Next Article in Journal
Pilot-Scale Production of Hemicellulose Ethers from Softwood Hemicelluloses Obtained from Compression Screw Pressate of a Thermo-Mechanical Pulping Plant
Next Article in Special Issue
Fabrication of CuO-NP-Doped PVDF Composites Based Electrospun Triboelectric Nanogenerators for Wearable and Biomedical Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Orientation and Dispersion on Electrical Conductivity and Mechanical Properties of Carbon Nanotube/Polypropylene Composite
Previous Article in Special Issue
In Vitro and In Vivo Protective Effects of Agaro-Oligosaccharides against Hydrogen Peroxide-Stimulated Oxidative Stress
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 15
Issue 10
10.3390/polym15102375
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Polyvinylidene Fluoride/Aromatic Hyperbranched Polyester of Third-Generation-Based Electrospun Nanofiber as a Self-Powered Triboelectric Nanogenerator for Wearable Energy Harvesting and Health Monitoring Applications

by
Ramadasu Gunasekhar
1,
Ponnan Sathiyanathan
2,†,
Mohammad Shamim Reza
2,
Gajula Prasad
3,
Arun Anand Prabu
1,* and
Hongdoo Kim
2,*
1
Department of Chemistry, School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India
2
Department of Advanced Materials Engineering for Information & Electronics, College of Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin-si 17104, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
3
School of Energy, Materials and Chemical Engineering, Korea University of Technology and Education, 1600, Cheonan-si 31253, Chungcheongnam-do, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Current address: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea.
Polymers 2023, 15(10), 2375; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15102375
Submission received: 28 February 2023 / Revised: 11 April 2023 / Accepted: 13 April 2023 / Published: 19 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polymer-Based Composites for Biomedical Applications)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Flexible pressure sensors have played an increasingly important role in the Internet of Things and human–machine interaction systems. For a sensor device to be commercially viable, it is essential to fabricate a sensor with higher sensitivity and lower power consumption. Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF)-based triboelectric nanogenerators (TENGs) prepared by electrospinning are widely used in self-powered electronics owing to their exceptional voltage generation performance and flexible nature. In the present study, aromatic hyperbranched polyester of the third generation (Ar.HBP-3) was added into PVDF as a filler (0, 10, 20, 30 and 40 wt.% w.r.t. PVDF content) to prepare nanofibers by electrospinning. The triboelectric performances (open-circuit voltage and short-circuit current) of PVDF-Ar.HBP-3/polyurethane (PU)-based TENG shows better performance than a PVDF/PU pair. Among the various wt.% of Ar.HBP-3, a 10 wt.% sample shows maximum output performances of 107 V which is almost 10 times that of neat PVDF (12 V); whereas, the current slightly increases from 0.5 μA to 1.3 μA. The self-powered TENG is also effective in measuring human motion. Overall, we have reported a simpler technique for producing high-performance TENG using morphological alteration of PVDF, which has the potential for use as mechanical energy harvesters and as effective power sources for wearable and portable electronic devices.

1. Introduction

Recently, the need for human interaction applications including synthetic e-skin and health management (temperature, blood pressure, pulse rate, respiration and heartbeat) robots has increased due to the development of self-powered adaptable wearables [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. Human-generated, low-frequency mechanical energy (body movements) can be transformed into electrical energy in wearable devices, which can effectively be used as energy harvesters [15,16]. Specifically, flexible pressure sensors have considerable potential for disease diagnostics, since they can transform external force stimuli into electrical impulses to track human biomedical parameters [17,18,19,20]. Most strain sensors are powered by backup batteries, which makes the sensor bulky. In addition, batteries must be recharged or replaced, which does not meet the needs of wearable electronics [7,21].
An example of such a technique is the nanogenerator, which transforms mechanical energy into electricity, and is the final outcome of a minor physical change [6]. They have several virtues, such as being compact, affordable, stable, etc. They are also most suitable for use in self-powered devices [6,18,22,23,24,25,26,27]. Electrostatic induction and contact electrification are the operating mechanisms of the nanogenerator [28]. Sensitive technologies such as those that are self-powered are desired in order to tackle the aforementioned challenges. Initiated by Wang’s group, and depending on the effects of contact electrification and electrostatic induction, triboelectric nanogenerators (TENGs) can transform an implied mechanical force into an electrical signal [29]. TENGs have already been explored extensively as well as being applied in self-powered sensors due to their flexible device structural system, maximum output energy, high energy-conversion efficiency, and wide range of available materials [11,30,31,32,33]. To examine human activity, the TENG strain sensor’s sensitivity should be further increased [6,34,35,36,37].
TENGs can operate in a variety of ways, but the majority of them have been observed to operate in contact separation, which occurs when two surfaces with two electron affinities encounter each other [6,38]. The quantity of the transferred charge resulting from contact electrification is determined by the number of electrons lost or gained on the frictional surface [11]. Thus, it can raise the charges just on triboelectric surfaces to enhance the polarity distinction between the two contacting layers, thereby improving output triboelectric efficiency [39]. Different materials have been tested during the past few years, and a triboelectric series has been suggested [40,41,42]. It has been proven successful to increase charge density in recent attempts to modify the chemical properties of polymer surfaces by adding moieties with various electron affinities [39,43]. Through adding suitable layers on top of the triboelectric layer to increase the polarity difference between the two contacting layers, it provides a distinct method for improving the performance of a self-powered triboelectric sensor [44].
In TENG, there is always a pair of triboelectric materials with different charge affinities that are employed to generate charges. To generate more charges or obtain a higher output from the TENG, a significant difference in the charge affinities of the two materials is preferred. However, in practice, the two materials with the highest difference in charge affinity are not selected. The reason is that the triboelectrification between two materials is based not only on their chemical compositions but also on other physical features such as their elasticity, friction and topographical structure. The triboelectric effect and level of contact electrification performance are based on materials that come into contact. In this case, contact electrification is caused by the surface transfer of electrons or ions between these two materials. Each material has its own ability to lose or gain electrons during the contact electrification process. This ability can be found in a list of materials (triboelectric series), where the polarity and amount of charge for each material are described as shown in Figure S1 (see in Supplementary Materials). For example, a material with fluorine functional groups can attract as many electrons as possible from its counterparts. Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) is a material that tends to gain electrons during electrification. On the other hand, PU is positively charged during electrification. Both materials lie far enough apart in the triboelectric series, and this distance indicates their high triboelectric potential on contact.
Additionally, the technique used for fabrication is crucial in developing high-performance nanogenerators. Due to its adaptability in applications including chemical and physical sensors, healthcare diagnostics, sensitive robotics and wearable technology, fiber-based electronic devices are becoming more and more popular these days [20,29]. In the case of PVDF, it is one of the most studied materials as a nanogenerator; its electrospinning combines mechanical stretching as well as electric poling into a single process for obtaining PVDF in the electroactive β-phase. It is claimed that, in comparison with its as-cast film, PVDF nanofibers produced by the electrospinning technique exhibit a greater coefficient of piezoelectricity and higher energy conversion efficiency [5,6,45,46,47,48,49,50,51]. Some of the positive outcomes of obtaining electrospun fibers are higher surface area-to-volume ratio, availability of diversified polymeric materials, combination of the materials’ flexibilities, comparatively lesser manufacturing expenses and ease in depositing fibers on various types of substrates [52,53,54,55,56,57,58].
Electrospun PVDF nanofibers offer a lot of prospects for applications such as energy harvesters [6,54,59,60,61] and sensor applications [17,62,63,64,65]. The selection of triboelectric material in nanogenerator fabrication is as important as the fabrication technique used [5,6,54,66]. To ensure excellent electrical output, several types of materials such as organic, inorganic, polymeric, piezoelectric, triboelectric and dielectric materials were investigated [6,54,67,68,69]. Amongst the most adaptable polymers, PVDF is applied in a wide range of applications including nanogenerators, lithium-ion batteries, semiconductors, medical and healthcare devices [47,48,50,62,70,71,72,73]. Furthermore, when mechanical force is applied, the pristine PVDF-based TENG provides relatively minimal electrical output. Because of the all-trans (TTTT) conformation, it shows five distinct crystal phases (α, β, γ, δ and ε) [74,75,76]. PVDF’s β-crystalline phase has the maximum dielectric and piezoelectric response compared to its other polymorphic phases [72,77]. As a result, PVDF with an improved β-phase fraction may provide the required electrical efficiency in nanogenerators. As a polymer with multiple functions, PVDF also has excellent ferroelectric, piezoelectric, pyroelectric, and dielectric characteristics [6,54,68,71]. To generate substantial electrical properties suitable for achieving a commercially viable nanogenerator, higher β-phase content in PVDF is required, and this is achieved by mechanical stretching, annealing, electrical polling, and by adding diverse additives such as ZnO, RGO: Fe, ALO/RGO, aromatic hyperbranched polyesters (Ar.HBP), etc. The main criteria are the rearrangements of C–F groups to achieve a favorable enhancement in PVDF’s β-phase, which in turn can boost the device conductivity of nanogenerators [70,73,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96]. Due to their extremely compatible and less expensive characteristics, electrospun fibers are preferentially used in many health-monitoring applications [6,54].
In this study, we fabricated a TENG using electrospun nanofiber based on PVDF-Ar.HBP of the third generation (P-Ar.HBP-3) blend mixture and non-woven PU film, and used it for harvesting energy under diverse conditions. Electrospun P-Ar.HBP-3 nanofiber and non-woven PU film operate as the corresponding negative and positive triboelectric layers. FTIR, XRD, FESEM and EDS techniques were used to analyze and correlate the structural and morphological characteristics of the blend with its triboelectric behavior. Triboelectric performance of the TENG device was assessed using open-circuit voltage (VOC) and short circuit current (ISC) parameters. We have demonstrated that the triboelectric property of PVDF can be significantly enhanced through the addition of Ar.HBP of the third generation (Ar.HBP-3) and aided by electrospinning. Hence, a high-performance P-Ar.HBP-3 (10 wt.%) TENG has been successfully developed based on this negative triboelectric material. Detailed investigation revealed that the modulation of PVDF composition using Ar.HBP-3 and nanofiber structure fabricated through electrospinning significantly contributed to the triboelectric performance enhancement of P-Ar.HBP-3 nanofiber. Draft comparison for the above-mentioned voltage obtained by P-Ar.HBP-3 (10 wt.%) in comparison with earlier reported materials is given in Table S1 (see in Supplementary Materials). Eventually, TENG was demonstrated to harvest mechanical energy suitable for LED lighting and wearable applications for monitoring healthcare.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

PVDF, dimethyl formamide (DMF) and acetone were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Synthesis and characterization of aromatic hyperbranched polyester of third generation (Ar.HBP-3) is reported in our earlier study [69]. All the chemicals and reagents were utilized without any additional purification or processing.

2.2. Preparation of P-Ar.HBP-3 Electrospun Nanofibers

P-Ar.HBP-3 with varying Ar.HBP-3 content (10 to 40 wt.%) was dispersed in DMF/acetone (3:2, v/v) solvent mixture (16 wt.%) under steady magnetic stirring at 350 rpm speed for 4 to 5 h at 50 °C, and the resultant homogenous solution is further used for the electrospinning process. Along with that, comparative studies were carried out using a neat PVDF solution. Custom-designed electrospinning equipment was used to conduct the electrospinning process. A 10 mL syringe was adapted for filling the prepared solution and transferred through a needle having a diameter of 23 G with a flow rate of 1.2 mL/h by a pumped syringe. The distance between the electrospinning needle tip and the film collector wrapped on a roller was 15 cm, and the electrospinning applied voltage was set at 20 kV. For about 6 h, collection of all the fibers was performed with 60 rpm roller speed. During the electrospinning process, fast evaporation of the solvents takes place. We also took additional care to remove the traces of residual solvents, if any, in the as-spun fibers by keeping the samples in vacuum oven for 5 h at 50 °C to remove any traces of residual solvent. Further, we preserved the samples in a desiccator under closed vacuum for a week before proceeding to electrical measurements.

2.3. Nanogenerator Fabrication

For the TENG fabrication, P-Ar.HBP-3 (10 to 40 wt.%) electrospun mat and non-woven polyurethane (PU) film were cut into the specified sizes (effective working area: 2 × 2 cm2). Across both sides of the mat, two Ni–Cu conductive electrodes were placed as the top and bottom electrodes. Electrodes were then soldered with Cu and finally, two flexible PET substrates of a larger size compared to the size of the fiber mat were fixed on both sides of the electrodes. To construct a compressed device and resolve the gap among materials, the layered structure was finally subjected to proper pressure. This was to prevent the triboelectric effect and to shield the nanogenerator from environmental damage. In addition, this will not allow direct contact of the sensor with the skin and is safe for the user performing the measurements. Figure S2 (see in Supplementary Materials) depicts the device’s optical view.

2.4. Characterization

Polymer structure was confirmed using Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR, Thermo Nicolet iS50, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) spectroscopy. Morphology of the fibers was examined using a field emission-scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, Thermo Fisher FEI QUANTA 250 FEG). The nanofiber’s X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were measured using an X-ray diffractometer (Bruker D8 Advance, Mannheim, Germany) with a Cu Kα radiation source. An external pushing force was generated by an electrical pushing machine. VOC and ISC electrical output parameters were evaluated using a digital phosphor oscilloscope (DPO4104, Tektronix, Beaverton, OR, USA) with an input impedance of 40 MΩ. Furthermore, an oscilloscope was coupled to a low-noise current preamplifier (SR570, Stanford Research Systems, Stanford, CA, USA) for ISC measurement. Sensitivity of the TENG was measured using a BIOPAC System, Inc., Goleta, CA, USA MP150 connected to a measurement expertise Piezo Film Lab Amplifier (conditions: Rin of 100 MΩ and gain of 0 dB). These measurements were carried out for healthcare monitoring applications.

3. Results and Discussion

The schematic representation for the production of electrospun nanofibers and TENG for applications in energy harvesting and health monitoring is shown in Figure 1a. Figure 1a(i,ii) demonstrate the preparation of a precursor polymeric solution. In the beginning, PVDF and Ar.HBP-3 (0 to 40 wt.%) were dissolved in DMF: acetone solvent mixture (3:2 v/v). Afterwards, the polymeric solution was electrospun onto the substrate (Figure 1a(iii)), peeled off, and further TENG fabrication was performed using the nanoweb. Figure 1a(iv) illustrates the FE-SEM imaging of the produced electrospun fibers. Furthermore, the fabricated triboelectric nanofibers based on P-Ar.HBP-3 and PU, as shown in Figure 1a(v), were cut to the desired size (2 × 2 cm2) and adhered along with the Ni–Cu electrode and PET substrate, respectively. These devices could be used in a variety of healthcare-monitoring applications.

3.1. Working Principle

Mechanical damage to the sensor setup is a big challenge, preventing TENGs’ practical applications. TENGs have four working modes, i.e., single-electrode, contact-separation, lateral-sliding. and free-standing triboelectric layer modes. For single-electrode and contact-separation modes, TENGs are subjected to constant external tapping, bending, and stretching, which will cause mechanical damage such as cracks, leading to rupture of the sensor structure. In the case of lateral-sliding and free-standing triboelectric modes, TENGs suffer from significant friction, wear, and adhesion of material during sliding. For example, the triboelectric surface of TENGs is prone to being worn out by frictional forces. The worn particles are transferred to the surface of the opposite material, resulting in output degradation and a loss in sensor longevity. Our main focus in this study is the enhancement of the PVDF β-phase by blending with Ar.HBP-3 so as to increase the output voltage of the sensor. Hence, we did not perform any mechanical studies for the sensor.
As shown in Figure 1b, we considered P-Ar.HBP-3/PU composition based on a contact-separation mechanism to describe the TENG device working mechanism for the developed sensor. In this case, the P-Ar.HBP-3 nanofiber mat serves as a tribo-negative film, whereas the PVDF nanofiber mat serves as a tribo-positive film. As demonstrated in step (i), both the layers are isolated from one another and show no charges prior to applying external pressure. When an external force is applied, the upper layer (P-Ar.HBP-3) contacts with the bottom PU layer. Depending on respective electron affinities, equal and opposite charges were formed on contact layers according to the triboelectric principle. PU has a greater tendency to shed electrons than P-Ar.HBP-3. As a result, it becomes positively charged while the adjacent P-Ar.HBP-3 film becomes negatively charged. Electrical balance prevents flow of current in step (ii) because the films gradually separate from one another as you begin to release the external load, which causes a potential difference to develop across the electrodes. In order to equalize the potential differences in step (iii), electrons will migrate from the top to the bottom electrode, and this is repeated until as indicated in step (iv). The electrodes and associated triboelectric films acquire the same amount of contrary charge due to electrostatic induction. As depicted in step (v), if there is an increase in external force, the electrostatic induction balancing becomes disrupted, causing the electrons to flow from bottom to top in the opposite direction. As depicted in Figure 1b(i–v), alternating current is consistently produced by this repetitive cyclical contact and separation mechanism.
Due to their higher triboelectric sensitivity, PVDF fibers with a significant proportion of β-phase are more desirable. Therefore, the effect of Ar.HBP-3 upon PVDF crystalline forms was investigated using XRD and FTIR measurements. XRD patterns of electrospun PVDF and P-Ar.HBP-3 (0 to 40 wt.%) fibers are shown in Figure 2a. XRD patterns of neat PVDF can be seen to have two distinct α-phase crystallization peaks at 18.3° and 19.8°, which correspond to (020) and (110) reflections, respectively. This outcome demonstrates that the α-phase predominates in neat PVDF samples. In the case of P-Ar.HBP-3 (10 wt.%) fiber, unique crystallization peaks corresponding to (020) and (110) reflections of β-phase is observed at 20.6°, thereby demonstrating the coexistence of both α- and β-phases in the blend case. Electrospinning’s simultaneous stretching and poling assists in the PVDF’s transformation from the α- to β-phase.
Additional analysis on the crystalline phase changes in P-Ar.HBP-3 (0 to 40 wt.%) was performed using FTIR analyses [91] as shown in Figure 2b. The non-polar α-phase is represented by the vibrational bands at 763 and 976 cm−1, whereas the electroactive β-phase is represented by the distinctive peaks at 841 cm−1 and 1276 cm−1. The minimal peak intensity of the γ-phase at 1234 cm−1 indicates the majority presence of β- and α-phases in their composition. The prominent PVDF fiber’s α-phase peaks sharply reduce when compared to the P-Ar.HBP-3 fiber, indicating that the electrospinning is an effective way to generate and/or improve the polar β-phase. This trend is also a confirmation of the effect of Ar.HBP-3 in improving the β-phase content in PVDF. Under the condition that the infrared transmittance corresponds with the Lambert–Beer law, the β-phase’s relative content in electrospun fibers is determined using the equation:
F ( β ) = A β 1.26 A α + A β × 100
where 841 cm−1 and 763 cm−1 absorbance are denoted as Aβ and Aα, respectively. Figure 2c depicts how the β-phase fractions in electrospun nanofiber have varied. β-phase % rises with an increase in Ar.HBP-3 content, reaching a peak value of 93.8 % for the nanofiber, i.e., electrospun PVDF with 10 wt.% Ar.HBP-3 exhibits higher β-crystalline phase content than neat PVDF fibers as shown in Figure 2c. The greater interaction between P-Ar.HBP-3 dipoles and the surrounding local electric field aided the significantly increased β-phase in PVDF. However, decreasing β-phase content with Ar.HBP-3 content beyond 10 wt.% may be attributed to increasing coagulation as observed during sample preparation.
The anticipated mechanism for β-phase formation on the P-Ar.HBP-3 surface is shown in Figure 2d. Ar.HBP-3 has a significant role to play towards improving the β-phase in PVDF. Similarly, the interfacial interactions of Ar.HBP-3 can pull PVDF link chains to form crystals on the surface in an all-trans form, thereby enabling the conversion of localized non-polar α-phase to polar β-phase. Ar.HBP-3 serves as a nucleating agent in this circumstance, offering basic units for the creation of PVDF crystalline polymerization and inciting the creation of PVDF’s β-phase fragment through potent interaction at the interface [28,56]. In contrast, the interfacial interactions and polarity of –CH2/–CF2 dipoles differ. As shown in Figure 2d, owing to the strong interaction of hydrogen bonds between F atoms of PVDF and H atoms in hydroxyl groups on the Ar.HBP-3 surface, dipoles of –CH2/–CF2 in PVDF tend to align their F atoms towards the Ar.HBP-3 at the P-Ar.HBP-3 interface [58]. The mobility and architecture of –CH2/–CF2 dipoles are affected by these cross-surface links and the dipolar interaction between PVDF and DMF (polar) solvent, thereby causing the formation of the β-phase [30,58]. Additionally, during localized poling operations, the conducting Ar.HBP-3 can reinforce the Coulombic force by generating inductive charges and increasing the local electric field. This attracts PVDF chain links to form the β-phase at the P-Ar.HBP-3 interface. As a result, when compared to pure PVDF nanofibers, the electrospun P-Ar.HBP-3 nanofiber contains more β-phase. Furthermore, it is also observed that when Ar.HBP-3 content is raised further, the β-phase proportion is lowered. Increasing the amount of Ar.HBP-3 over 10 wt.% induces agglomeration as well as inhibiting the mobility of PVDF chain links, which may help explain this phenomenon [57]. As a result of Ar.HBP-3 aggregation at the interface, induced charges migrate longitudinally and eventually neutralize the charges in the fiber, which lowers the polarizability of PVDF nanofibers.
Fiber orientation is one of the important factors when processing electrospun fibers, as they are collected on a rotating collector. The two main fiber orientations obtained during electrospinning are ‘aligned’ and ‘random’. While random fibers are randomly oriented at different angles throughout the collected sample, aligned fibers are typically oriented in the same direction. Flat plate and roll-to-roll collectors are the most commonly used collector tools for electrospun nanofibers. The most efficient, and increasingly common method of collecting aligned fibers is by using a rotating drum collector. The degree of fiber alignment is determined by the linear speed of the rotating collector. As linear speed increases, fibers become more aligned. Linear speed on a rotating collector is calculated by υ = r × ω, and is typically represented in revolutions per minute (rpm), where υ = linear velocity, r = radius of drum collector, and ω = angular velocity. In our study using the drum collector, we did not observe any oriented fibers, and instead saw aligned fibers.
SEM images of electrospun PVDF and P-Ar.HBP-3 (10 wt.%) nanofibers are shown in Figure 3a–d, respectively. Furthermore, they display the statistical distributions of the relevant fiber diameters. It is clear that the fibers of both neat PVDF and P-Ar.HBP-3 (10 wt.%) are properly aligned, and neither beads nor non-volatilized solvents can be observed. Ar.HBP-3 (10 wt.%) plays the role of an additive, and showed good structural stability after diffusing into the PVDF fiber. Due to the addition of Ar.HBP-3, the electrospun nanofibers exhibit a smaller diameter than that observed in pure PVDF fibers, which in turn, could improve the electrospinning solution’s electrical conductivity. Under high voltage, the conductive Ar.HBP-3 is easily charged, but as a consequence of the increased Coulombic and electrostatic forces on the Taylor cone, the fiber diameter decreases [71,92].
The elemental mapping images of P-Ar.HBP-3 (10 wt.%) film are shown in Figure 3c–e. Figure 3f–h shows energy-dispersive spectral images of carbon, fluorine, and oxygen elements, respectively. From the SEM data, we were able to study the influence of morphology on the triboelectric properties of the nanofibers.

3.2. Electrical Measurements

TENG devices were fabricated using the prepared P-Ar.HBP-3 nanofibers with various Ar.HBP-3 concentrations (0, 10, 20, 30, and 40 wt.%) along with readily available non-woven PU fabric. By applying a constant frequency and force of 1 Hz & 10 N, respectively, the output electrical efficiency of the fabricated TENGs were evaluated. Figure 4a–d depicts the output voltage and current of the PVDF/PU and P-Ar.HBP-3/PU based TENGs. P-Ar.HBP-3 (10 wt.%)/PU-based TENG showed a maximum output voltage and current of 107 V and 1.33 μA, respectively when compared to PVDF/PU which is 12 V and 0.50 μA, respectively. The enhanced β-phase and dielectric constant of 10 wt.% P-Ar.HBP-3/PU-based TENG was responsible for the enhanced electrical performance.
Defects surrounding Ar.HBP-3-filled PVDF were eliminated as observed from the cross-sectional FE-SEM images. This results in increasing the PVDF’s β-phase and dielectric properties along with a corresponding improvement in the TENG’s electrical output [93]. The electrical response of P-Ar.HBP-3/PU-based TENG under different external mechanical forces at constant frequency is important for its practical and commercial applications. Therefore, the TENG electrical response observed under various applied mechanical forces from 10 to 5 N when the frequency was maintained at 1 Hz exhibited voltages of 35, 49 and 107 V and current of 0.55, 1.14, and 1.33 μA, respectively. The electrical efficiency of the TENG is depicted in Figure 4e,f. It was observed that the TENG’s output voltage and current decreased when the applied force decreased from 10 N to 5 N. From the above observations, P-Ar.HBP-3 (10 wt.%)/PU based TENG was further considered as an optimized device.

3.3. Energy Harvesting Applications

To demonstrate the viability of P-Ar.HBP-3/PU-based TENG in real-time applications, the fabricated TENG is able to power 12 LEDs without using a capacitor or rectifier when operating under a load and frequency of 10 N at 1 Hz (Figure 4j,k and Video S1, see in Supplementary Materials). The circuit diagram for application studies is shown in Figure 4i. This device generated voltage in a peculiar waveform that could not be used to directly power portable electronics. Therefore, the equivalent voltage produced by the devices was transformed into direct voltage by the use of a full-bridge rectifier circuit while connected to an electronic device that is portable. Furthermore, the rectified voltage was held using a capacitor before connecting any portable electronics. At an operating load of 10 N and a frequency of 1 Hz, the P-Ar.HBP-3/PU-based TENG’s rectified voltage is 46 V, as shown in Figure 4g. For approximately 130 s, the rectified voltage was retained in a variety of capacitors with capacitance values of 2.2, 4.7, 10, and 22 μF storing maximum voltages of 1.4, 1.3, 0.9, and 0.6 V, respectively as shown in Figure 4h.

3.4. Wearable Applications

In the ambient environment, mechanical energy is abundant, and the majority is spent in our daily activities. This example illustrates how to use TENGs to collect human motion data. Initially, the sensor is attached to the piezo-amplifier during the measurement, and its output is attached to the Biopac 150 system. This can wirelessly communicate the data to the computer or mobile phone, which uses acknowledgment software during the measurement. The schematic representation of the general circuit used for human health monitoring measurements with Biopac MP150 is shown in Figure S3 (see in Supplementary Materials). P-Ar.HBP-3/PU-based TENG sensor can detect a variety of human body motions including those from wrist, elbow, finger, pocket, mouth and shoe insole. Prior to evaluating a real-time wearable application, the enhanced P-Ar.HBP-3/PU-based TENG (2 × 2 cm2) sensitivity is determined (Figure 5a). The sensor is capable of precisely detecting finger tapping, twisting, bending and folding. The sensor produces 3 V at most when it is tapped, 6 V when twisted, 3 V when it is bent, and 2 V when folded.
These results indicate that the TENG responds well enough to twisting compared to other activities as demonstrated in Video S2 (see in Supplementary Materials). When the sensor is employed as a finger ring with a bending inclination of 45°, it generated 13 V (Figure 5b). As shown in Figure 5c, once the sensor is punched, it exhibits a significant increase in voltage, i.e., 11.8 V. Similar results were seen for the elbow flexion sensed by the TENG’s detecting voltage of 2.5 V, as depicted in Figure 5d. Whenever the sensor is attached to the circular chair, and a person periodically sits on the chair, 16.5 V is displayed (Figure 5e). Additionally, if the sensor is affixed to the exterior of the mask to detect the pattern of coughing, this will vary its signal as depicted in Figure 5f which is 3.4 V and 4.9 V for slow and fast coughing, respectively. As illustrated in Figure 5g–i and in Supplementary Videos S3 and S4, the sensor can differentiate among various human activities including walking, leg movement, and jumping when it is positioned on the pocket, knee flexion and shoe sole. Video S3 (see in Supplementary Materials) shows the real-time measurement for the aforementioned pocket sensor.
As demonstrated in Video S3 (see in Supplementary Materials), a P-Ar.HBP-3/PU-based TENG sensor can operate as a smart pocket. When the sensor is attached to the pocket and the person in the video puts their hand inside their pocket, it produced voltages of 6.8 V and 5.4 V during walking and hand movements, respectively. In contrast, if the sensor was put on the knee, it produced a voltage of 8.8 V during walking. The sensor first responds well to twisting and folding instead of tapping, and the shoe insole case acts as a tapping mechanism, whereas the other two are bending or folding. Still, the shoe insole generates reduced voltages during walking (2.3 V) and jumping (5.8 V). This implies that the sensor can be used for continuously monitoring the behavior of vehicle drivers and people with paralysis. It is obvious from the results that the P-Ar.HBP-3-based TENG sensors have applications in continuously identifying and distinguishing various physical activities of humans. The above results demonstrate the prepared TENG’s potential for extracting biomechanical energy from the environment of daily living.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, by employing the synergistic enhancing impact of Ar.HBP-3 on the triboelectric efficiency of electrospun PVDF nanofibers, we were able to successfully fabricate flexible and high voltage output TENGs. The polar β-phase of PVDF is effectively enhanced using electrospinning technique, aided by the influence of dipole interaction between the functional groups present in PVDF and Ar.HBP-G3. Triboelectric performance of the TENGs is significantly improved in the P-Ar.HBP-3 case compared to neat PVDF. Under the mechanical strain of 10 N at 1 Hz for TENG with 10 wt.% Ar.HBP-3, we could achieve a maximum VOC of 107 V and ISC of 1.3 μW. Further, to power electronics and charge capacitors, the mechanical energy transformed from triboelectric energy was used. In healthcare monitoring applications, the fabricated TENG exhibited high voltage output stability. In addition, 12 LEDs were directly lit from the maximum VOC of 107 V. Additionally, the specified TENG was used to harvest mechanical energy and power portable electronics. In order to track and monitor the patient’s physical conditions, the TENG was also integrated with a variety of health monitoring systems. Due to their low cost, ease of fabrication, and excellent output, the flexible nanofiber TENGs developed in the present study are very promising for powering portable electronics and for healthcare monitoring applications.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/polym15102375/s1, Figure S1: Triboelectric materials in series following a tendency to easily lose electrons (+) and to easily gain electrons (−), Figure S2: Optical view of the TENG device, Figure S3: Schematic representation and general circuit for human health monitoring using TENG device, Table S1: Draft comparison of triboelectric voltage from the literature data, Video S1: Demonstration of lighting 12 LEDs by VOC of fabricated TENG, Video S2: Demonstration of the sensitivity efficiency under various physical deformations of the sensor (tapping, twisting, bending and folding), Video S3: real-time measurement for the TENG pocket sensor, Video S4: Demonstration of the TENG performance including walking and jumping when it is positioned on the shoe sole.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, investigation and writing—original draft, R.G.; methodology, P.S.; visualization, M.S.R.; visualization, editing, G.P.; resources, supervision, writing—review & editing, A.A.P.; resources, visualization, validation, H.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by MHRD-SPARC, India (No. 2018-2019/P399). The authors also thank VIT for providing ‘VIT SEED GRANT’ for carrying out this research work.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study as all the electrical measurements were carried out by placing the sensors externally on the human body by integrating them into clothes and accessories.

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived for all the physiological measurements reported in this work. The sensor is placed externally to the subject (R.G.) and integrated into clothes and accessories. This study is not harmful for the human body.

Data Availability Statement

The data will be made available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yao, G.; Xu, L.; Cheng, X.; Li, Y.; Huang, X.; Guo, W.; Liu, S.; Wang, Z.L.; Wu, H. Bioinspired triboelectric nanogenerators as self-powered electronic skin for robotic tactile sensing. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ding, W.; Wang, A.; Wu, C.; Guo, H.; Wang, Z.L. Human-machine interfacing enabled by triboelectric nanogenerators and tribotronics. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2019, 4, 1800487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Meng, K.; Zhao, S.; Zhou, Y.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, S.; He, Q.; Wang, X.; Zhou, Z.; Fan, W.; Tan, X.; et al. A wireless textile-based sensor system for self-powered personalized health care. Matter 2020, 2, 896–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lin, Z.; Chen, J.; Li, X.; Zhou, Z.; Meng, K.; Wei, W.; Yang, J.; Wang, Z.L. Triboelectric nanogenerator enabled body sensor network for self-powered human heart-rate monitoring. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 8830–8837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fahad, M.M.; Reza, M.S.; Prasad, G.; Jaisankar, S.N.; Kim, K.J.; Kim, H. Polysomnographic observation using triboelectric pressure sensor composed of polymer-pairs having coarse surface. Fibers Polym. 2022, 23, 1490–1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Prasad, G.; Graham, S.A.; Yu, J.S.; Kim, H.; Lee, D.-W. Investigated a PLL surface-modified Nylon 11 electrospun as a highly tribo-positive frictional layer to enhance output performance of triboelectric nanogenerators and self-powered wearable sensors. Nano Energy 2023, 108, 108178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhong, Y.; Wang, J.; Han, L.; Dai, S.; Zhu, H.; Hua, J.; Cheng, G.; Ding, J. High-performance flexible self-powered triboelectric pressure sensor based on chemically modified micropatterned PDMS film. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2023, 349, 114013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shi, K.; Sun, B.; Huang, X.; Jiang, P. Synergistic effect of graphene nanosheet and BaTiO3 nanoparticles on performance enhancement of electrospun PVDF nanofiber mat for flexible piezoelectric nanogenerators. Nano Energy 2018, 52, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, H.; Wang, H.; Hu, Z.; Xuan, W.; Dong, S.; Luo, J. A portable triboelectric nanogenerator for real-time respiration monitoring. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2019, 14, 354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Vu, D.L.; Le, C.D.; Ahn, K.K. Polyvinylidene fluoride surface polarization enhancement for liquid-solid triboelectric nanogenerator and its application. Polymers 2022, 14, 960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Peng, Y.; Wang, Z.; Shao, Y.; Xu, J.; Wang, X.; Hu, J.; Zhang, K.-Q. A review of recent development of wearable triboelectric nanogenerators aiming at human clothing for energy conversion. Polymers 2023, 15, 508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Van Tran, V.; Lee, S.; Lee, D.; Le, T.-H. Recent developments and implementations of conductive polymer-based flexible devices in sensing applications. Polymers 2022, 14, 3730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gajula, P.; Muhammad, F.M.; Reza, M.S.; Jaisankar, S.N.; Kim, K.J.; Kim, H. Fabrication of a silicon elastomer-based self-powered flexible triboelectric sensor for wearable energy harvesting and biomedical applications. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2023, 5, 1750–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gunasekhar, R.; Prabu, A.A. Polyvinylidene fluoride/aromatic hyperbranched polyester 2nd generation based triboelectric sensor for polysomnographic and health monitoring applications. Sensors Actuators A Phys. 2023, 355, 114311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ha, M.; Lim, S.; Cho, S.; Lee, Y.; Na, S.; Baig, C.; Ko, H. Skin-inspired hierarchical polymer architectures with gradient stiffness for spacer-free, ultrathin, and highly sensitive triboelectric sensors. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 3964–3974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bai, P.; Zhu, G.; Jing, Q.; Yang, J.; Chen, J.; Su, Y.; Ma, J.; Zhang, G.; Wang, Z.L. Membrane-based self-powered triboelectric sensors for pressure change detection and its uses in security surveillance and healthcare monitoring. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 5807–5813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yang, B.; Chen, W.; Zhou, X.; Meng, F.; Chen, C.; Liu, Q.; Li, Q.; Wang, X.; Xu, P.; Lei, Y.; et al. Strong and crack-resistant hydrogel derived from pomelo peel for highly sensitive wearable sensors. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 431, 134094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Claver, U.P.; Zhao, G. Recent progress in flexible pressure sensors based electronic skin. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2021, 23, 2001187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ho, D.H.; Han, J.; Huang, J.; Choi, Y.Y.; Cheon, S.; Sun, J.; Lei, Y.; Park, G.S.; Wang, Z.L.; Sun, Q.; et al. β-Phase-Preferential blow-spun fabrics for wearable triboelectric nanogenerators and textile interactive interface. Nano Energy 2020, 77, 105262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, J.; Zhong, Y.; Dai, S.; Zhu, H.; Wu, L.; Gu, F.; Cheng, G.; Ding, J. Ag Nanowire/CPDMS dual conductive layer dome-based flexible pressure sensor with high sensitivity and a wide linear range. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2022, 5, 13227–13235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Selleri, G.; Mongioì, F.; Maccaferri, E.; D’anniballe, R.; Mazzocchetti, L.; Carloni, R.; Fabiani, D.; Zucchelli, A.; Brugo, T.M. Self-sensing soft skin based on piezoelectric nanofibers. Polymers 2023, 15, 280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ma, C.; Zhao, G. Recent progress in electronic skin: Materials, functions and applications. J. Univ. Sci. Technol. China 2021, 51, 725–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mekbuntoon, P.; Kaeochana, W.; Prada, T.; Appamato, I.; Harnchana, V. Power Output enhancement of natural rubber based triboelectric nanogenerator with cellulose nanofibers and activated carbon. Polymers 2022, 14, 4495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ciobanu, R.C.; Schreiner, C.; Aradoaei, M.; Hitruc, G.E.; Rusu, B.-G.; Aflori, M. Characteristics of composite materials of the type: TPU/PP/BaTiO3 powder for 3D printing applications. Polymers 2023, 15, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zou, J.; Zhang, M.; Huang, J.; Bian, J.; Jie, Y.; Willander, M.; Cao, X.; Wang, N.; Wang, Z.L. Coupled supercapacitor and triboelectric nanogenerator boost biomimetic pressure sensor. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1702671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yamklang, W.; Prada, T.; Bunriw, W.; Kaeochana, W.; Harnchana, V. Fe3O4-Filled cellulose paper for triboelectric nanogenerator application. Polymers 2023, 15, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Lee, J.S.; Prabu, A.A.; Chang, Y.M.; Kim, K.J. Ultrathin ferroelectric P (VDF/TrFE) Copolymer film in low-cost non-volatile data storage applications. In Proceedings of the Macromolecular Symposia; Wiley Online Library: New York, NY, USA, 2007; Volume 249, pp. 13–20. [Google Scholar]
  28. Liu, Z.; Zhao, Z.; Zeng, X.; Fu, X.; Hu, Y. Expandable microsphere-based triboelectric nanogenerators as ultrasensitive pressure sensors for respiratory and pulse monitoring. Nano Energy 2019, 59, 295–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fan, F.-R.; Tian, Z.-Q.; Wang, Z.L. Flexible triboelectric generator. Nano Energy 2012, 1, 328–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zheng, Y.; Cheng, L.; Yuan, M.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Qin, Y.; Jing, T. An electrospun nanowire-based triboelectric nanogenerator and its application in a fully self-powered UV detector. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 7842–7846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lee, H.J.; Chun, K.-Y.; Oh, J.H.; Han, C.-S. Wearable triboelectric strain-insensitive pressure sensors based on hierarchical superposition patterns. ACS Sens. 2021, 6, 2411–2418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cheng, K.; Wallaert, S.; Ardebili, H.; Karim, A. Advanced triboelectric nanogenerators based on low-dimension carbon materials: A review. Carbon 2022, 194, 81–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mi, Y.; Lu, Y.; Shi, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, X.; Meng, J.; Cao, X.; Wang, N. Biodegradable polymers in triboelectric nanogenerators. Polymers 2023, 15, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Oh, H.S.; Lee, C.H.; Kim, N.K.; An, T.; Kim, G.H. Review: Sensors for bio signal/health monitoring in electronic Skin. Polymers 2021, 13, 2478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Toto, E.; Laurenzi, S.; Santonicola, M.G. Recent trends in Graphene/Polymer nanocomposites for sensing devices: Synthesis and applications in environmental and human health monitoring. Polymers 2022, 14, 1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Li, Z.; Xu, H.; Jia, N.; Li, Y.; Zhu, L.; Sun, Z. A Highly sensitive, ultra-durable, eco-friendly ionic skin for human motion monitoring. Polymers 2022, 14, 1902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Sun, S.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Y. Progress in microtopography optimization of polymers-based pressure/strain sensors. Polymers 2023, 15, 764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kim, W.-G.; Kim, D.-W.; Tcho, I.-W.; Kim, J.-K.; Kim, M.-S.; Choi, Y.-K. Triboelectric nanogenerator: Structure, mechanism, and applications. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 258–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nie, S.; Cai, C.; Lin, X.; Zhang, C.; Lu, Y.; Mo, J.; Wang, S. Chemically functionalized cellulose nanofibrils for improving triboelectric charge density of a triboelectric nanogenerator. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 18678–18685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yu, Y.; Wang, X. Chemical modification of polymer surfaces for advanced triboelectric nanogenerator development. Extreme Mech. Lett. 2016, 9, 514–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Diaz, A.; Felix-Navarro, R. A semi-quantitative tribo-electric series for polymeric materials: The influence of chemical structure and properties. J. Electrost. 2004, 62, 277–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, J.; Hu, S.; Shi, Z.; Wang, Y.; Lei, Y.; Han, J.; Xiong, Y.; Sun, J.; Zheng, L.; Sun, Q.; et al. Eco-friendly and recyclable all cellulose triboelectric nanogenerator and self-powered interactive interface. Nano Energy 2021, 89, 106354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lone, S.A.; Lim, K.C.; Kaswan, K.; Chatterjee, S.; Fan, K.-P.; Choi, D.; Lee, S.; Zhang, H.; Cheng, J.; Lin, Z.-H. Recent advancements for improving the performance of triboelectric nanogenerator devices. Nano Energy 2022, 99, 107318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, W.; Hu, Y.; Shi, L.; Zhang, X.; Xiong, L.; Zhang, W.; Ullah, I. Electrospinning of Polycaprolactone/Pluronic F127 dissolved in glacial acetic acid: Fibrous scaffolds fabrication, characterization and in vitro evaluation. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2018, 29, 1155–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Baji, A.; Mai, Y.-W.; Li, Q.; Liu, Y. Electrospinning induced ferroelectricity in poly (vinylidene fluoride) fibers. Nanoscale 2011, 3, 3068–3071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chang, C.; Tran, V.H.; Wang, J.; Fuh, Y.-K.; Lin, L. Direct-write piezoelectric polymeric nanogenerator with high energy conversion efficiency. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 726–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Sathiyanathan, P.; Prabu, A.A.; Kim, K.J. Electrospun polyvinylidene fluoride-polyoctafluoropentyl acrylate blend based piezocapacitive pressure sensors. Macromol. Res. 2016, 24, 670–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sathiyanathan, P.; Dhevi, D.M.; Prabu, A.A.; Kim, K.J. Electrospun polyvinylidene fluoride-polyoctafluoropentyl acrylate-hydroxyapatite blend based piezoelectric pressure sensors. Macromol. Res. 2019, 27, 743–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ponnan, S.; Schmidt, T.W.; Li, T.; Gunasekaran, H.B.; Ke, X.; Huang, Y.; Mubarak, S.; Prabu, A.A.; Weng, Z.; Wu, L. Electrospun polyvinylidene fluoride–magnesiochromite nanofiber-based piezoelectric nanogenerator for energy harvesting applications. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2021, 3, 4879–4888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Prasad, G.; Sathiyanathan, P.; Prabu, A.A.; Kim, K.J. Piezoelectric characteristics of electrospun PVDF as a function of phase-separation temperature and metal salt content. Macromol. Res. 2017, 25, 981–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Liu, R.; Hou, L.; Yue, G.; Li, H.; Zhang, J.; Liu, J.; Miao, B.; Wang, N.; Bai, J.; Cui, Z.; et al. Progress of fabrication and applications of electrospun hierarchically porous nanofibers. Adv. Fiber Mater. 2022, 4, 604–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Rana, S.M.S.; Rahman, M.T.; Salauddin, M.; Sharma, S.; Maharjan, P.; Bhatta, T.; Cho, H.; Park, C.; Park, J.Y. Electrospun PVDF-TrFE/MXene nanofiber mat-based triboelectric nanogenerator for smart home appliances. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 4955–4967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kim, Y.; Wu, X.; Oh, J.H. Fabrication of triboelectric nanogenerators based on electrospun polyimide nanofibers membrane. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 2742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Graham, S.A.; Patnam, H.; Manchi, P.; Paranjape, M.V.; Kurakula, A.; Yu, J.S. Biocompatible electrospun fibers-based triboelectric nanogenerators for energy harvesting and healthcare monitoring. Nano Energy 2022, 100, 107455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. He, Z.; Rault, F.; Lewandowski, M.; Mohsenzadeh, E.; Salaün, F. Electrospun PVDF nanofibers for piezoelectric applications: A Review of the influence of electrospinning parameters on the β phase and crystallinity enhancement. Polymers 2021, 13, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wang, F.; Dou, H.; You, C.; Yang, J.; Fan, W. Enhancement of piezoelectric properties of flexible nanofibrous membranes by hierarchical structures and nanoparticles. Polymers 2022, 14, 4268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Abutaleb, A.; Maafa, I.M.; Zouli, N.; Yousef, A.; El-Halwany, M.M. Electrospun Co nanoparticles@PVDF-HFP nanofibers as efficient catalyst for dehydrogenation of sodium borohydride. Polymers 2023, 15, 597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. dos Santos, G.G.; Malherbi, M.S.; de Souza, N.S.; César, G.B.; Tominaga, T.T.; Miyahara, R.Y.; Mendonça, P.D.S.B.D.; Faria, D.R.; Rosso, J.M.; Freitas, V.F.; et al. 4th Generation biomaterials based on PVDF-Hydroxyapatite composites produced by electrospinning: Processing and characterization. Polymers 2022, 14, 4190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Pu, X.; Guo, H.; Chen, J.; Wang, X.; Xi, Y.; Hu, C.; Wang, Z.L. Eye motion triggered self-powered mechnosensational communication system using triboelectric nanogenerator. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, e1700694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Paranjape, M.V.; Graham, S.A.; Patnam, H.; Manchi, P.; Yu, J.S. 3D printed bidirectional rotatory hybrid nanogenerator for mechanical energy harvesting. Nano Energy 2021, 88, 106250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Dallaev, R.; Pisarenko, T.; Sobola, D.; Orudzhev, F.; Ramazanov, S.; Trčka, T. Brief review of PVDF properties and applications potential. Polymers 2022, 14, 4793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Persano, L.; Dagdeviren, C.; Su, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Girardo, S.; Pisignano, D.; Huang, Y.; Rogers, J.A. High performance piezoelectric devices based on aligned arrays of nanofibers of poly(vinylidenefluoride-co-trifluoroethylene). Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1610–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Wang, Z.; Tan, L.; Pan, X.; Liu, G.; He, Y.; Jin, W.; Li, M.; Hu, Y.; Gu, H. Self-Powered viscosity and pressure sensing in microfluidic systems based on the piezoelectric energy harvesting of flowing droplets. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 28586–28595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Bai, Y.; Liu, Y.; Lv, H.; Shi, H.; Zhou, W.; Liu, Y.; Yu, D.-G. Processes of electrospun polyvinylidene fluoride-based nanofibers, their piezoelectric properties, and several fantastic applications. Polymers 2022, 14, 4311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Dhevi, D.M.; Ahn, Y.J.; Kim, K.J.; Prabu, A.A. Electrospun PVDF-TrFE-based piezoelectric sensors. In Advances in Polymer Materials and Technology; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2016; pp. 241–270. ISBN 1315371057. [Google Scholar]
  66. Prasad, G.; Prabu, A.A. Effect of stirring on hydrophobicity of PVDF/CNT nanocomposite coatings. Adv. Mater. Res. 2014, 938, 199–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Bae, J.H.; Oh, H.J.; Song, J.; Kim, D.K.; Yeang, B.J.; Ko, J.H.; Kim, S.H.; Lee, W.; Lim, S.J. Nano- and microfiber-based fully fabric triboelectric nanogenerator for wearable devices. Polymers 2020, 12, 658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Graham, S.A.; Dudem, B.; Mule, A.R.; Patnam, H.; Yu, J.S. Engineering squandered cotton into eco-benign microarchitectured triboelectric films for sustainable and highly efficient mechanical energy harvesting. Nano Energy 2019, 61, 505–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Magnani, A.; Capaccioli, S.; Azimi, B.; Danti, S.; Labardi, M. Local piezoelectric response of polymer/ceramic nanocomposite fibers. Polymers 2022, 14, 5379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Gunasekhar, R.; Sathiyanathan, P.; Dhevi, D.M.; Reza, M.S.; Prabu, A.A.; Kim, H. Studies on electrospun polyvinylidene fluoride/aromatic hyperbranched polyester (gen-1) blend nanoweb for energy harvesting applications. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 47, 885–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sathiyanathan, P.; Wu, L.; Schmidt, T.W.; Li, T.; Bhuvaneswari, G.H.; Kim, H.; Arun, A.P.; Kim, K.J. Piezoelectric-piezocapacitive hybrid sensor based on electrospun Poly(vinylidene fluoride)-Poly(octafluoropentyl acrylate)-sulphonated Poly(phenylene sulfide) blend nanofiber. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2021, 331, 112993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Martins, P.; Lopes, A.C.; Lanceros-Mendez, S. Electroactive phases of poly (vinylidene fluoride): Determination, processing and applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2014, 39, 683–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Liu, Y.; Feng, H.; Gui, Y.; Chen, T.; Xu, H.; Huang, X.; Ma, X. Flexible stretchable, dry-resistant MXene nanocomposite conductive hydrogel for human motion monitoring. Polymers 2023, 15, 250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Yoon, S.; Prabu, A.A.; Kim, K.J.; Park, C. Metal salt-induced ferroelectric crystalline phase in poly (vinylidene fluoride) films. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2008, 29, 1316–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Choi, C.W.; Prabu, A.A.; Kim, Y.M.; Yoon, S.; Kim, K.J.; Park, C. Comparative electrical bistable characteristics of ferroelectric poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene) copolymer based nonvolatile memory device architectures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 93, 182902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Lee, J.S.; Prabu, A.A.; Kim, K.J. UCST-Type phase separation and crystallization behavior in poly (vinylidene fluoride)/poly (methyl methacrylate) blends under an external electric field. Macromolecules 2009, 42, 5660–5669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Wolff, S.; Jirasek, F.; Beuermann, S.; Türk, M. Crystal phase transformation of α into β phase poly (vinylidene fluoride) via particle formation caused by rapid expansion of supercritical solutions. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 66644–66649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ye, H.-J.; Shao, W.-Z.; Zhen, L. Crystallization kinetics and phase transformation of poly (vinylidene fluoride) films incorporated with functionalized baTiO3nanoparticles. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2013, 129, 2940–2949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Bodkhe, S.; Turcot, G.; Gosselin, F.P.; Therriault, D. One-step solvent evaporation-assisted 3D printing of piezoelectric PVDF nanocomposite structures. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 20833–20842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Ahn, Y.; Lim, J.Y.; Hong, S.M.; Lee, J.; Ha, J.; Choi, H.J.; Seo, Y. Enhanced piezoelectric properties of electrospun poly (vinylidene fluoride)/multiwalled carbon nanotube composites due to high β-phase formation in poly (vinylidene fluoride). J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 11791–11799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Widakdo, J.; Lei, W.-C.; Anawati, A.; Manjunatha, S.T.; Austria, H.F.M.; Setiawan, O.; Huang, T.-H.; Chiao, Y.-H.; Hung, W.-S.; Ho, M.-H. Effects of Co-Solvent-induced self-assembled graphene-PVDF composite film on piezoelectric application. Polymers 2023, 15, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Orudzhev, F.; Sobola, D.; Ramazanov, S.; Částková, K.; Papež, N.; Selimov, D.A.; Abdurakhmanov, M.; Shuaibov, A.; Rabadanova, A.; Gulakhmedov, R.; et al. Piezo-enhanced photocatalytic activity of the electrospun fibrous magnetic PVDF/BiFeO3 membrane. Polymers 2023, 15, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Dhevi, D.M.; Prabu, A.A.; Pathak, M. Miscibility, crystallization and annealing studies of poly (vinylidene fluoride)/hyperbranched polyester blends. Polymer 2014, 55, 886–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Salauddin; Toyabur, R.; Maharjan, P.; Rasel, M.; Kim, J.; Cho, H.; Park, J.Y. Miniaturized springless hybrid nanogenerator for powering portable and wearable electronic devices from human-body-induced vibration. Nano Energy 2018, 51, 61–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Karan, S.K.; Mandal, D.; Khatua, B.B. Self-powered flexible Fe-doped RGO/PVDF nanocomposite: An excellent material for a piezoelectric energy harvester. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 10655–10666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Paul, T.; Maiti, S.; Mukherjee, U.; Mondal, S.; Sahoo, A.; Chattopadhyay, K.K. Cube shaped FAPbBr3 for piezoelectric energy harvesting devices. Mater. Lett. 2021, 301, 130264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Singh, H.H.; Khare, N. Improved performance of ferroelectric nanocomposite flexible film based triboelectric nanogenerator by controlling surface morphology, polarizability, and hydrophobicity. Energy 2019, 178, 765–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Chen, H.-J.; Han, S.; Liu, C.; Luo, Z.; Shieh, H.-P.D.; Hsiao, R.-S.; Yang, B.-R. Investigation of PVDF-TrFE composite with nanofillers for sensitivity improvement. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2016, 245, 135–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Tong, W.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Luan, X.; Lv, F.; Liu, L.; An, Q. Energy Storage: An all-solid-state flexible piezoelectric high-kFilm functioning as both a generator and in situ storage unit (Adv. Funct. Mater. 45/2015). Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 7028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Liu, Y.-L.; Li, Y.; Xu, J.-T.; Fan, Z.-Q. Cooperative Effect of electrospinning and Nano clay on formation of polar crystalline phases in poly (vinylidene fluoride). ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2010, 2, 1759–1768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Roy, K.; Ghosh, S.K.; Sultana, A.; Garain, S.; Xie, M.; Bowen, C.R.; Henkel, K.; Schreiber, D.; Mandal, D. A self-powered wearable pressure sensor and pyroelectric breathing sensor based on GO interfaced PVDF nanofibers. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2019, 2, 2013–2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Dhevi, D.M.; Prabu, A.A.; Kim, K.J. FTIR studies on polymorphic control of PVDF ultrathin films by heat-controlled spin coater. J. Mater. Sci. 2015, 51, 3619–3627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Tofel, P.; Částková, K.; Říha, D.; Sobola, D.; Papež, N.; Kaštyl, J.; Ţălu, Ş.; Hadaš, Z. Triboelectric response of electrospun stratified PVDF and PA structures. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Yu, A.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, W.; Zhai, J. Progress in triboelectric materials: Toward high performance and widespread applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1900098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Garain, S.; Jana, S.; Sinha, T.K.; Mandal, D. Design of In Situ poled Ce3+-doped electrospun PVDF/Graphene composite nanofibers for fabrication of Nano pressure sensor and ultrasensitive acoustic nanogenerator. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 4532–4540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Kil Yun, B.; Kim, J.W.; Kim, H.S.; Jung, K.W.; Yi, Y.; Jeong, M.-S.; Ko, J.-H.; Jung, J.H. Base-treated polydimethylsiloxane surfaces as enhanced triboelectric nanogenerators. Nano Energy 2015, 15, 523–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 15 02375 g001 550
Figure 1. (a). Schematic explanation of preparation and electrospinning of P-Ar.HBP-3 solution followed by TENG fabrication: (i). preparation of P-Ar.HBP-3 blend solution, (ii). solution blending by constant magnetic stirring, (iii). electrospinning process, (iv). SEM image of electrospun nanofiber and (v). fabricated TENG device. (b). Schematic illustration of triboelectric mechanism.
Figure 1. (a). Schematic explanation of preparation and electrospinning of P-Ar.HBP-3 solution followed by TENG fabrication: (i). preparation of P-Ar.HBP-3 blend solution, (ii). solution blending by constant magnetic stirring, (iii). electrospinning process, (iv). SEM image of electrospun nanofiber and (v). fabricated TENG device. (b). Schematic illustration of triboelectric mechanism.
Polymers 15 02375 g001
Polymers 15 02375 g002 550
Figure 2. (a). XRD pattern and (b). FTIR spectra of PVDF fibers as well as P-Ar.HBP-3 (0 to 40 wt.%) blended nanofibers. (c). Computed β-phase content variability in P-Ar.HBP-3 (0 to 40 wt.%) blended nanofibers, and (d). Mechanism of β-phase formation in P-Ar.HBP-3 nanofiber.
Figure 2. (a). XRD pattern and (b). FTIR spectra of PVDF fibers as well as P-Ar.HBP-3 (0 to 40 wt.%) blended nanofibers. (c). Computed β-phase content variability in P-Ar.HBP-3 (0 to 40 wt.%) blended nanofibers, and (d). Mechanism of β-phase formation in P-Ar.HBP-3 nanofiber.
Polymers 15 02375 g002
Polymers 15 02375 g003 550
Figure 3. (a,a′). Surface morphologies of neat PVDF (16 wt.%), (b,b′). Surface morphologies of P/HBP-3 (10 wt.%) nanofibers, respectively. (c,d). EDS and elemental mapping of P-Ar.HBP-3 (10 wt.%) nanofiber, respectively. (e). Map spectrum of elements in P-Ar.HBP-3 (10 wt.%) nanofiber and (f–h). Energy-dispersive spectral images of carbon, fluorine and oxygen elements, respectively.
Figure 3. (a,a′). Surface morphologies of neat PVDF (16 wt.%), (b,b′). Surface morphologies of P/HBP-3 (10 wt.%) nanofibers, respectively. (c,d). EDS and elemental mapping of P-Ar.HBP-3 (10 wt.%) nanofiber, respectively. (e). Map spectrum of elements in P-Ar.HBP-3 (10 wt.%) nanofiber and (f–h). Energy-dispersive spectral images of carbon, fluorine and oxygen elements, respectively.
Polymers 15 02375 g003
Polymers 15 02375 g004 550
Figure 4. (a–d). Time-dependent VOC and ISC graphs of PVDF and P-Ar.HBP-3/PU (10 wt.%)-based TENG under constant frequency of 1 Hz and load of 10 N, respectively. (e,f). Output performances (VOC and ISC) of P/PU and P-Ar.HBP-3/PU (10 wt.%)-based TENG device as a function of load 5–10 N). (g). Rectified voltage of P-Ar.HBP-3/PU (10 wt.%)-based TENG (h). P-Ar.HBP-3/PU (10 wt.%)-based TENG device energy storage with various capacitors (2.2–22 μF) with charging cycles. (i). Circuit diagram for LED application. (j,k). Images of 12 LEDs before and after connecting P-Ar.HBP-3/PU (10 wt.%)-based TENG.
Figure 4. (a–d). Time-dependent VOC and ISC graphs of PVDF and P-Ar.HBP-3/PU (10 wt.%)-based TENG under constant frequency of 1 Hz and load of 10 N, respectively. (e,f). Output performances (VOC and ISC) of P/PU and P-Ar.HBP-3/PU (10 wt.%)-based TENG device as a function of load 5–10 N). (g). Rectified voltage of P-Ar.HBP-3/PU (10 wt.%)-based TENG (h). P-Ar.HBP-3/PU (10 wt.%)-based TENG device energy storage with various capacitors (2.2–22 μF) with charging cycles. (i). Circuit diagram for LED application. (j,k). Images of 12 LEDs before and after connecting P-Ar.HBP-3/PU (10 wt.%)-based TENG.
Polymers 15 02375 g004
Polymers 15 02375 g005 550
Figure 5. Real-time monitoring of P-Ar.HBP-3/PU (10 wt.%)-based TENG: (a). Sensitivity efficiency under various physical deformations of the sensor (tapping, twisting, bending, and folding), (b). Sensor’s performance when used as a finger ring, (c). Detection of punching intensity, (d). Sensitivity of the joint-bending when the sensor is placed at elbow flexion, (e). Smart chair health care, (f). Detecting and differentiating the intensities of slow and fast coughing pattern while the sensor is used on mouth mask, (g–i). Motion detection and differentiation (hand moment, leg moment, walk and jump) when the sensor is placed on pocket, knee and shoe insole, respectively for human health motion applications.
Figure 5. Real-time monitoring of P-Ar.HBP-3/PU (10 wt.%)-based TENG: (a). Sensitivity efficiency under various physical deformations of the sensor (tapping, twisting, bending, and folding), (b). Sensor’s performance when used as a finger ring, (c). Detection of punching intensity, (d). Sensitivity of the joint-bending when the sensor is placed at elbow flexion, (e). Smart chair health care, (f). Detecting and differentiating the intensities of slow and fast coughing pattern while the sensor is used on mouth mask, (g–i). Motion detection and differentiation (hand moment, leg moment, walk and jump) when the sensor is placed on pocket, knee and shoe insole, respectively for human health motion applications.
Polymers 15 02375 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gunasekhar, R.; Sathiyanathan, P.; Reza, M.S.; Prasad, G.; Prabu, A.A.; Kim, H. Polyvinylidene Fluoride/Aromatic Hyperbranched Polyester of Third-Generation-Based Electrospun Nanofiber as a Self-Powered Triboelectric Nanogenerator for Wearable Energy Harvesting and Health Monitoring Applications. Polymers 2023, 15, 2375. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15102375

AMA Style

Gunasekhar R, Sathiyanathan P, Reza MS, Prasad G, Prabu AA, Kim H. Polyvinylidene Fluoride/Aromatic Hyperbranched Polyester of Third-Generation-Based Electrospun Nanofiber as a Self-Powered Triboelectric Nanogenerator for Wearable Energy Harvesting and Health Monitoring Applications. Polymers. 2023; 15(10):2375. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15102375

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gunasekhar, Ramadasu, Ponnan Sathiyanathan, Mohammad Shamim Reza, Gajula Prasad, Arun Anand Prabu, and Hongdoo Kim. 2023. "Polyvinylidene Fluoride/Aromatic Hyperbranched Polyester of Third-Generation-Based Electrospun Nanofiber as a Self-Powered Triboelectric Nanogenerator for Wearable Energy Harvesting and Health Monitoring Applications" Polymers 15, no. 10: 2375. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15102375

APA Style

Gunasekhar, R., Sathiyanathan, P., Reza, M. S., Prasad, G., Prabu, A. A., & Kim, H. (2023). Polyvinylidene Fluoride/Aromatic Hyperbranched Polyester of Third-Generation-Based Electrospun Nanofiber as a Self-Powered Triboelectric Nanogenerator for Wearable Energy Harvesting and Health Monitoring Applications. Polymers, 15(10), 2375. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15102375

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop