Next Article in Journal
Wearable Pressure Sensor Using Porous Natural Polymer Hydrogel Elastomers with High Sensitivity over a Wide Sensing Range
Previous Article in Journal
Tribo-Mechanical Investigation of Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites under Dry Conditions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Characterization of the Mechanical and Morphological Properties of Cow Dung Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites: A Comparative Study with Corn Stalk Fiber Composites and Sisal Fiber Composites
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study of Heat Treatment Effect on Mechanical Properties of Epoxy Resin Reinforced with Fiber Glass

1
Wuhan Nari Limited Liability Company of State Grid Electric Power Research Institute, Wuhan 430000, China
2
State Grid Electric Power Research Institute, Nanjing 210000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2023, 15(12), 2734; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15122734
Submission received: 29 April 2023 / Revised: 12 June 2023 / Accepted: 14 June 2023 / Published: 19 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fiber-Reinforced Composite)

Abstract

:
In this paper, mechanical properties of the diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A epoxy resin (EP) reinforced with a 20% fiber glass (GF) with layered structure after high temperature aging are studied. Tensile and flexural stress–strain curves of the GF/EP composite after aging tests in the temperature range of 85–145 °C in air were measured. Tensile and flexural strength demonstrate gradual decrease with the increase in the aging temperature. The failure mechanism at the micro scale is studied by the scanning electron microscopy. A separation of the GFs and EP matrix and evident pullout of the GFs are observed. Degradation of the mechanical properties is explained by a cross-linking and chain scission of the initial molecular structure of the composite and decrease in the interfacial adhesion force between GFs and EP matrix caused by oxidation of the EP matrix and difference of the GF and EP coefficients of thermal expansion.

1. Introduction

High-molecular-weight epoxy resin (EP) has a few epoxy groups which react with a curing agent forming a 3D thermosetting network [1]. During the aging processes, EP mechanical properties and appearance (yellowing and cracking) are deteriorated, shortening its service life [2,3]. Aging factors which influence the service life can be sorted into two groups of external and internal effects. The parameters of the material itself influencing the service life are the internal factors, including structure and composition of the material; impurities in the material can also play a considerable role [4,5]. The parameters of the external conditions are temperature, humidity, atmosphere composition, electric field, electromagnetic and high-energy particle irradiation. These parameters have strong effect influencing the internal characteristics of the material and result in its aging [6,7,8]. During aging, internal and external factors result in change in the molecular chain structure (branching, breaking) of the EP, which leads to deterioration of mechanical and other properties.
If the EP is in a high-temperature oxygen atmosphere, its molecular chains can absorb the external oxygen and form hydroperoxide [7]. Due to the fact that peroxides are unstable, restructuring of the polymer occurs, including cross-linking and breaking of the chains. Such restructuring leads to deterioration of the EP properties due to thermal oxygen aging. During use, storage, and processing, the EP is often subjected to high-temperature stresses. When the temperature increases, at a certain value, thermal oxygen aging starts [9]. Thermal oxidation features of EP at different temperatures were studied by Lin X. et al. [10]. At the beginning of aging treatment, the shear strength of the EP is increased. This effect can be explained by increasing curing degree of the resin due to post-curing process. Further, after the curing is completed, the shear strength starts to decrease due to oxidative aging of the EP. Tang et al. used the Kissinger method to study the thermal decomposition characteristics of the EP cured with different curing systems at different heating rates [11]. The results showed that under nitrogen atmosphere, the EP cured with diethylenetriamine and m-phenyldimethylamine as curing agents was subjected to a two-stage pyrolysis process. The cured EP using low-molecular-weight polyamide (PA10) as the curing agent is least affected by the heating rate, but as the heating rate increases, the two-stage pyrolysis gradually transforms to the tertiary pyrolysis. In a humid environment, the EP is subjected to the damp heat aging process [12], which also deteriorates the performance of the EP. The damp heat aging results in microcraking, spallation at the interface in the EP composites, and post-heating curing of the EP [8,13,14]. Webster et al. synthesized a novel vinyl ether monomer from eugenol, a 2-eugenoloxyvinyl ether, which was copolymerized with cyclohexyl vinyl ether (CHVE). The epoxidized co-polymers showed an increase in thermal stability from 213 to 241 °C depending on content of the CHVE [15].
Therefore, a long-term treatment at high temperature inevitably results in EP aging, which is manifested as degradation of mechanical properties and loss of adhesion. One of the ways to solve the problem of high-temperature degradation is adding fiber fillers during the EP curing. Widely used synthetic fiber fillers are carbon fibers, glass wool, aramid, mineral wool, and glass fibers. After reinforcement with a relatively low fraction of fiber fillers, polymers with crosslinked structures demonstrate improvement in their mechanical (tensile stress and elastic modulus), high-temperature, and corrosive performance [16,17]. The EPs reinforced with fiber fillers are often used in many industrial fields such as electronic and aerospace equipment, coatings and adhesives [18,19,20,21].
High-temperature aging in oxygen environment of the fiber-reinforced bisphenol EP cured by anhydride was studied by Yang et al. [22]. During thermal aging in an oxygen environment, infra-red (IR) spectrometry revealed molecular structure reconstruction and oxidation in the EP surface layer. It was shown by dynamic thermal analysis that the structure reconstruction during oxidation takes place in the thin (about 100 um) surface layer. Zheng et al. prepared modified EP-based composites with different levels of carbon fiber doping [23]. The study showed that 6 wt% of carbon fiber doping is beneficial for improving the mechanical properties, thermal stability, and thermal conductivity of the EP-based composites. Hu et al. studied the thermal stability of polyaryletherketone (PAEK)-modified EP-based composites [24]. The results showed that as the mass fraction of thermoplastic PAEK increased, the diameter of rich spherical epoxy particles gradually decreased. The spherical structure helped to absorb energy, hindered crack propagation, and thus improved the fracture energy and toughness of the composite material. The heat resistance of PAEK/EP showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing with the increase in the PAEK content. Li et al. studied the preparation method and mechanical properties of GF three-dimensional fabric-reinforced epoxy foam composite in order to reveal the reinforcing mechanism of the GF fabric [25]. It was shown that the introduction of three-dimensional fabric can significantly improve the strength of the composite under different load-bearing conditions.
Survey of the recent studies shows that a lot of work has been conducted on the high-temperature stability of the EP itself and the use of fiber fillers to enhance its mechanical properties. However, the number of studies on the effect of high-temperature aging on the mechanical properties of fiber-reinforced EP is limited to some extent. Therefore, the aim of this study is modification of a commercial EP by reinforcing it with 20% of GF to increase its heat aging resistance and mechanical properties. Heat aging effects on morphology, adhesion between GF and the EP matrix and mechanical properties at different temperatures are studied.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

In this study, diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A (170–192 EEW) EP matrix and 3,3-diaminodiphenyl sulfone as a curing agent (Honghe Limited Corporation, Zigong, China) reinforced with 20% of GF with the average diameter of 10 μm (FR5301B-2000, Chongqing Polymer Composite International, Chongqing, China) were used. To prepare GF/EP composites, first, the EP was mixed with the curing agent. Then, a layer of GF was immersed into the still liquid epoxy resin, taken out, placed in the mold and maintained for curing. These operations were repeated for several layers stacked together to obtain a composite material with a laminar structure. Next, dog-bone-shaped and plate samples made of the GF/EP composite were prepared for mechanical tests. The samples were used to study heat aging effects on tensile and flexural properties. The dimensions of samples made for tensile measurements are shown in Figure 1a. The samples used for flexural tests had dimensions of 80 × 10 × 4 mm3 with a support span of 64 mm, as shown in Figure 1b.

2.2. Thermal Aging Treatment

Heat aging of the reinforced GF/EP samples was carried out in air atmosphere in the HZ-2004 furnace (Lyxyan, Dongguan, China) at different temperatures of 85, 100, 115, 130, and 145 °C for 180 h at each temperature. The samples were placed in the furnace after reaching the required temperature. Reference samples, i.e., not heat treated, were also prepared. In this study, we denote samples before the heat treatment as GF/EP-0 and samples after the heat treatment at a certain temperature as, for example, GF/EP-145, where 145 is the aging temperature of 145 °C.

2.3. Measurement Methods

2.3.1. Mechanical Properties

To study damage effects of the GF/EP internal structure on the mechanical properties, tensile and flexural tests were carried out after different heat treatments. The dog bone samples were used to evaluate tensile properties using the ASTM D3039 standard. A mechanical tester MTS E45 (MTS, Eden Prairie, MN, USA) was used to conduct the tensile tests. The measurements were conducted at room temperature and at a cross-head speed of 50 mm/min. The gauge length region displacement was measured by a 50 mm length extensometer. After each heat treatment, five samples were measured to calculate averaged values of the tensile characteristics. In the experiment, tensile strain, tensile strength and elastic modulus were measured. Mechanical tester MTS E45 was also used to measure flexural properties of the composite. For these measurements, plate samples were used. The three-point-mode ASTM D7264 standard was employed. The cross-head speed was 1 mm/min. Five tests were performed to obtain averaged values of the flexural strength.

2.3.2. Surface Morphology

To analyze the failure mechanism, morphology of the fractured surface of the sample was studied using scanning electron microscope (SEM) TESCAN MIRA III (TESCAN, Brno, Czech Republic) operated at 5 kV. The SEM samples were prepared from fractured samples after tensile measurements. Before the study, due to poor electrical conductivity of the GF/EP composite, the samples were coated with conductive carbon film using vapor deposition technique.

3. Experimental Results and Discussion

3.1. Tensile Properties

One of the most important mechanical properties is tensile strength, which indicates the ability of material to resist forces that pull it apart. Figure 2 shows the effect of the heat treatment at different temperatures on the tensile characteristics of the GF/EP composites. The tensile stress as a function of the tensile strain measured after heat treatment of the GF/EP composite samples is shown in Figure 2a. All samples demonstrate nearly linear stress–strain curves according to Hook’s law of elastic deformation. The sample before thermal aging (GF/EP-0) shows a sharp decrease in tensile stress at the strain of 6.7%, indicating the failure of the sample. After heat treatment at 85 °C, the GF/EP-85 sample demonstrates a similar tensile stress–strain curve; however, both the strength and strain of the sample are smaller. At higher aging temperatures in the range of 100 and 145 °C, the samples demonstrate similar linear stress–strain curves, followed by failure of the sample and further decrease in the strength and strain. The tensile strength, tensile strain, and elastic modulus as functions of the aging temperature are shown in Figure 2b–d. In Figure 2b, the tensile strength of the samples after heat treatment shows a decrease along with increasing aging temperature. The values of the tensile strength of the samples GF/EP-0, GF/EP-85, GF/EP-100, GF/EP-115, GF/EP-130, and GF/EP-145 are 364.4, 343.6, 338.1, 313.5, 283.8, and 216.4 MPa, respectively. Faster decrease in tensile strength at higher temperatures indicates accelerated structural degradation of the GF/EP composite. Figure 2c shows tensile strain as a function of the aging temperature. The values of tensile strain of the samples GF/EP-0, GF/EP-85, GF/EP-100, GF/EP-115, GF/EP-130, and GF/EP-145 are 6.7%, 6.0%, 5.9%, 4.5%, 4.0% and 3.5%, respectively. Figure 2d shows that within the experimental uncertainty, the elastic modulus is independent of the aging temperature. Therefore, one can conclude that heat treatment results in degradation of the GF/EP composite ductility. This effect can occur due to destruction of the internal structure of the GF/EP composite such as cross-linking and chain scission of the initial linear molecular structures of the EP matrix during thermal aging. Moreover, a simultaneous increase in crystallinity of the material takes place, which also increases the brittleness of the composite. Degradation of the internal structure of the EP due to increase in crystallinity and cross-linking depends on the aging temperature and treatment time. It is also known that interaction between GF and EP controls the mechanical properties of the GF/EP composites. Therefore, it can be concluded that another reason of degradation of mechanical properties can be a decrease in the interfacial adhesion force between GF and the EP matrix. Such degradation can occur due to oxidation of the EP matrix during the heat treatment or due to difference in coefficients of thermal expansion (CTEs) of the GF and EP. The oxidation of the EP itself can also have an effect on its crystallinity.

3.2. Failure Analysis

The cross-section SEM images of the GF/EP composites before and after heat treatment at different temperatures are shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4. Figure 3 shows the overall cross-section of the fractured surface of the composites at a low magnification. A laminar morphology of the structure is well observed. Each layer is composed of GF embedded in the EP matrix. There is no evident crack initiation or propagation, which means that the GF/EP composite sample has high toughness. Moreover, no obvious difference in overall fracture morphology between the composite samples aged at different temperatures is observed. Therefore, to study the failure behavior of the aged composite samples, it is necessary to analyze SEM images at a higher magnification. These SEM images of the GF/EP composites after fracture in tensile test are shown in Figure 4. GF wires embedded in the EP matrix now are very well visible. In Figure 4a, fracture morphology of the sample GF/EP-0 before heat treatment is shown. It can be seen that each GF is coated well with the EP matrix, which proves highest tensile strength and explains good adhesion between GF and the EP matrix. After heat treatment at 85 and 100 °C, the GFs are still observed as embedded in the EP matrix, as shown in Figure 4b,c, respectively. The GFs are visible as pulled out of the EP matrix. Therefore, a good adhesion of the EP matrix with GFs up to aging temperature up to 100 °C is observed. However, after heat treatment at 115 °C, as shown in Figure 4d, numerous slits between GFs and the EP matrix can be observed, which suggests degradation of the adhesion force due to heat treatment. Figure 4e shows that at higher temperatures of 130 and 145 °C, there is more evident detachment of the EP matrix from the GF surface, suggesting further degradation of the adhesion between components. To explain this heat treatment effect, we propose that the main reason for detachment of the GF from the EP matrix is the difference in their CTEs. The EP CTE is in the range of 7–9·10−5 K−1 [26], and for the GF, we can use the CTE of the α-quartz, which is in the range of 7.1–13.1·10−6 K−1 and depends on the crystal orientation [27]. It can be seen that there is an order-of-magnitude difference in the CTEs of EP and GF. Thus, at a relatively low aging temperature, thermal stress appears between these two materials due to the difference in CTEs, whereas at a higher aging temperature, the thermal stress damages the GF/EP interface, which eventually results in degradation of mechanical properties.

3.3. Flexural Properties

Flexural stress–strain curves are shown in Figure 5a. All curves have two parts. First, a linear part demonstrates the elastic deformation. The second sublinear part represents the elastic–plastic deformation followed by sample fracture. The non-heat-treated GF/EP-0 sample has the highest flexural strength and strain. After heat treatment, the samples GF/EP-115 and GF/EP-130 show faster increase in the stress as a function of strain. Influence of the temperature of the aging on flexural strength is shown in Figure 5b. The flexural strength decreases along with the increase in aging temperature from 408.4 to 255.7 MPa. The minimal flexural strength is demonstrated by the sample heat treated at the highest temperature. Degradation of the flexural strength can also be explained by the increase in brittleness of the GF/EP composites after heat treatment due to cross-linking and chain scission of the initial molecular structure of the composite and decrease in the interfacial adhesion force between GF and EP caused by oxidation of the EP matrix or difference in the GF and EP CTEs. The general temperature trend of the flexural strength is in agreement with that of the tensile strength, shown in Figure 2.

4. Conclusions

Layered composites of diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A EP reinforced with a 20% GF were prepared. Tensile and flexural stress–strain curves of the GF/EP composite after aging tests in the temperature range of 85–145 °C in air wrre measured. As the aging temperature increases from 85 to 145 °C, the tensile and flexural strength demonstrate decrease from 364.4 to 216.4 MPa and from 408.4 to 255.7 MPa, respectively. However, the elastic modulus of the samples (~8.5 GPa) is almost independent of the aging temperature. The SEM images of the fracture morphology indicate that samples are degraded by thermal aging from the brittle manner. This effect can occur due to destruction of the internal structure of the GF/EP composite such as cross-linking and chain scission of the initial linear molecular structures of the EP during thermal aging. SEM images also reveal a separation of the GF and the EP matrix, which is caused by a decrease in the adhesion force between GF and EP and results in the observed deterioration of mechanical properties. We explain the decrease in the interfacial adhesion between GF and EP by the fact of oxidation of the EP matrix and the difference in the GF and EP coefficients of thermal expansion, which is one order of magnitude. This work can be useful to understand the effect of thermal aging on the stability of the mechanical properties of the GF/EP composites.

Author Contributions

Z.L. conducted the original draft preparation of the manuscript and performed experiments and measurements, J.D. performed experiments and measurements, Z.X. coordinated the scientific group and reviewed and edited the draft manuscript, Z.Y. and Y.N. were involved in the development of the investigation concept, Y.N. performed sample preparation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Key R&D project of Hubei province: Research on key technologies of UHV power transformer resin-covered film busing (Project Number: 2021BAA182).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Z.X. was employed by the Wuhan Nari Limited Liability Company of State Grid Electric Power Research Institute and State Grid Electric Power Research Institute. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jin, F.L.; Li, X.; Park, S.J. Synthesis and application of epoxy resins: A review. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2015, 29, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Babu, M.S.; Sarathi, R.; Imai, T.; Tanaka, T. Influence of gamma irradiation and water aging on the space charge characteristics of epoxy micro-nano composites. Polymers 2021, 13, 964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. McGrath, L.M.; Parnas, R.S.; King, S.H.; Schroeder, J.L.; Fischer, D.A.; Lenhart, J.L. Investigation of the thermal, mechanical, and fracture properties of alumina–epoxy composites. Polymer 2008, 49, 999–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wei, J.; Ma, S.; Yue, H.; Wang, S.; Zhu, J. Comparison of hydrogenated bisphenol A and bisphenol A epoxies: Curing10 behavior, thermal and mechanical properties, shape memory properties. Macromol. Res. 2018, 26, 529–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. George, G.A.; Sacher, R.E.; Sprouse, J.F. Photo–oxidation and photoprotection of the surface resin of a glass fiber–epoxy composite. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1977, 21, 2241–2251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Odegard, G.M.; Bandyopadhyay, A. Physical aging of epoxy polymers and their composites. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 2011, 49, 1695–1716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rivaton, A. Photochemical and thermal oxidation of poly (2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide). Polym. Degrad. Stab. 1995, 49, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Stocchi, A.; Pellicano, A.; Rossi, J.P.; Bernal, C.; Montemartini, P. Physical and water aging of glass fiber–reinforced plastic pipes. Compos. Interfaces 2006, 13, 685–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gao, Y.; Cui, W.; Mu, W. Study on thermal oxidative aging behavior of epoxy resin adhesive. New Chem. Mater. 2011, 39, 72–74. [Google Scholar]
  10. Lin, X. Mechanism analysis of thermal oxygen aging of epoxy resin binder. Chem. Enterp. Manag. 2017, 8, 106–108. [Google Scholar]
  11. Tang, B.; Xv, Y.; Wang, J.; Wang, Z. Pyrolysis Characteristics of Cured Epoxy Resin With Different Curing Systems. Liaoning Chem. Ind. 2022, 51, 1674–1681. [Google Scholar]
  12. Yu, B.; Jiang, Z.; Yang, J. Long–Term Moisture Effects on the Interfacial Shear Strength Between Surface Treated Carbon Fiber and Epoxy Matrix. Compos. Part A 2015, 78, 311–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Man, W.; Xu, X.; Ji, J.; Yang, Y.; Shen, J. The hygrothermal aging process and mechanism of the novolac epoxy resin. Compos. Part B Eng. 2016, 107, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  14. Niu, Y.; Yan, Y.; Yao, J. Hygrothermal aging mechanism of carbon fiber/epoxy resin composites based on quantitative characterization of interface structure. Polym. Test. 2021, 94, 107019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kalita, D.J.; Tarnavchyk, I.; Kalita, H.; Chisholm, B.J.; Webster, D.C. Novel bio–based epoxy resins from eugenol derived copolymers as an alternative to DGEBA resin. Prog. Org. Coat. 2023, 178, 107471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Novais, R.M.; Carvalheiras, J.; Capela, M.N.; Seabra, M.P.; Pullar, R.C.; Labrincha, J.A. Incorporation of glass fibre fabrics waste into geopolymer matrices: An eco–friendly solution for off–cuts coming from wind turbine blade production. Constr. Build Mater 2018, 187, 876–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rahman, A.S. Design of cost–effective and efficient fiber–reinforced composite blades for wind turbines. Reinf. Plast 2019, 63, 21–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Toldy, A.; Szolnoki, B.; Marosi, G. Flame retardancy of fibre–reinforced epoxy resin composites for aerospace applications. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2011, 96, 371–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, X.; Cheng, L. Influence of plasma treatment on properties of ramie fiber and the reinforced composites. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2017, 31, 1723–1734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jung, J.; Sodano, H.A. Cellulose nanocrystal functionalized aramid nanofiber reinforced epoxy nanocomposites with high strength and toughness. Nanotechnology 2023, 34, 245703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kalauni, K.; Pawar, S.J. Physicochemical, mechanical, morphological, and thermal characterization of Grewia Optiva fiber reinforced epoxy and hybrid (epoxy-Lannea Coromandelica gum) resins composite. J. Polym. Res. 2023, 30, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yang, Y.; Xian, G.; Li, H.; Sui, L. Thermal aging of an anhydride–cured epoxy resin. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2015, 118, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zheng, T. Preparation and properties of carbon fiber modified epoxy resin matrix composites. Funct. Mater. 2022, 53, 12147–12151. [Google Scholar]
  24. Hu, H.; Wang, J.; Feng, X.; Qin, H.; Deng, Y.; Liu, W. Thermal Stability of Polyaryl Ether Ketone Modified Epoxy Composite. Plastics 2022, 51, 30–34. [Google Scholar]
  25. Li, H.; Ding, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Xiang, J.; Wang, J.; Li, J. Preparation and mechanical properties of glass fiber reinforced 3D fabric reinforced epoxy foam sandwich composites. Acta Mater. Compos. Sin. 2023, 40, 601–612. [Google Scholar]
  26. Wong, C.P.; Wang, L.; Shi, S.-H. Novel high performance no flow and reworkable underfills for flip–chip applications. Mater. Res. Innov. 1999, 2, 232–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kosinski, J.A.; Gualtieri, J.G.; Ballato, A. Thermoelastic Coefficients of Alpha Quartz. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 1992, 39, 502–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The dimensions of the dog bone sample used for tensile test (a) and the plate sample used for flexural test (b).
Figure 1. The dimensions of the dog bone sample used for tensile test (a) and the plate sample used for flexural test (b).
Polymers 15 02734 g001
Figure 2. Tensile stress as a function of the strain measured after different heat treatments (a), tensile strength (b), strain (c) and elastic modulus (d) as functions of annealing temperatures measured for GF/EP composites after heat treatment.
Figure 2. Tensile stress as a function of the strain measured after different heat treatments (a), tensile strength (b), strain (c) and elastic modulus (d) as functions of annealing temperatures measured for GF/EP composites after heat treatment.
Polymers 15 02734 g002
Figure 3. The SEM images of the fracture morphology taken at a low magnification after heat treatment at different temperatures of the composites: (a) GF/EP-0, (b) GF/EP-85, (c) GF/EP-100, (d) GF/EP-115, (e) GF/EP-130, and (f) GF/EP-145.
Figure 3. The SEM images of the fracture morphology taken at a low magnification after heat treatment at different temperatures of the composites: (a) GF/EP-0, (b) GF/EP-85, (c) GF/EP-100, (d) GF/EP-115, (e) GF/EP-130, and (f) GF/EP-145.
Polymers 15 02734 g003
Figure 4. The same as in Figure 3 at higher magnification. Samples: (a) GF/EP-0, (b) GF/EP-85, (c) GF/EP-100, (d) GF/EP-115, (e) GF/EP-130, (f) GF/EP-145.
Figure 4. The same as in Figure 3 at higher magnification. Samples: (a) GF/EP-0, (b) GF/EP-85, (c) GF/EP-100, (d) GF/EP-115, (e) GF/EP-130, (f) GF/EP-145.
Polymers 15 02734 g004
Figure 5. The flexural stress as a function of the strain (a) and the flexural strength of the GF/EP samples heat treated at different temperatures (b).
Figure 5. The flexural stress as a function of the strain (a) and the flexural strength of the GF/EP samples heat treated at different temperatures (b).
Polymers 15 02734 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lan, Z.; Deng, J.; Xu, Z.; Ye, Z.; Nie, Y. Study of Heat Treatment Effect on Mechanical Properties of Epoxy Resin Reinforced with Fiber Glass. Polymers 2023, 15, 2734. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15122734

AMA Style

Lan Z, Deng J, Xu Z, Ye Z, Nie Y. Study of Heat Treatment Effect on Mechanical Properties of Epoxy Resin Reinforced with Fiber Glass. Polymers. 2023; 15(12):2734. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15122734

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lan, Zhenbo, Jiangang Deng, Zhuolin Xu, Zhu Ye, and Yu Nie. 2023. "Study of Heat Treatment Effect on Mechanical Properties of Epoxy Resin Reinforced with Fiber Glass" Polymers 15, no. 12: 2734. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15122734

APA Style

Lan, Z., Deng, J., Xu, Z., Ye, Z., & Nie, Y. (2023). Study of Heat Treatment Effect on Mechanical Properties of Epoxy Resin Reinforced with Fiber Glass. Polymers, 15(12), 2734. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15122734

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop