Next Article in Journal
Applied Investigation of Methyl, Ethyl, Propyl, and Butyl Mercaptan as Potential Poisons in the Gas Phase Polymerization Reaction of Propylene
Previous Article in Journal
Performance of Bamboo Bark Fiber Asphalt Mortar Modified with Surface-Grafted Nano-SiO2
Previous Article in Special Issue
Size Effects in Climatic Aging of Epoxy Basalt Fiber Reinforcement Bar
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mechanical Performance of Cellulose Nanocrystal and Bioceramic-Based Composites for Surgical Training

1
Quantum Functional Semiconductor Research Center, Dongguk University, Jung-gu, Seoul 04620, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Mechanical, Robotics and Energy Engineering, Dongguk University, Jung-gu, Seoul 04620, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2024, 16(19), 2849; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16192849
Submission received: 9 September 2024 / Revised: 5 October 2024 / Accepted: 8 October 2024 / Published: 9 October 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Epoxy-Based Materials, 5th Edition)

Abstract

:
This study evaluated the mechanical performance of a cellulose nanocrystal (CNC)-based composite, consisting of hydroxyapatite and natural fibers, mimicking the mechanical properties of real bone. The effect of natural nanofibers on the cutting force of the composite was evaluated for suitability in surgical training. Although hydroxyapatite has been extensively studied in bone-related applications, the exploration of epoxy-based composites incorporating both hydroxyapatite and CNC represents a novel approach. The evaluation involved a load cell with an oscillating saw. The uniform distribution of CNCs within the composite was assessed using 3D X-ray imaging. The cutting force was found to be 4.005 ± 0.5469 N at a feed rate of 0.5 mm/s, comparable to that required when cutting real bone with the osteon at 90°. The 90-degree orientation of the osteon aligns with the cutting direction of the oscillating saw when performing knee replacements on the tibia and femur bones. The addition of CNCs resulted in changes in fracture toughness, leading to increased material fragmentation and surface irregularities. Furthermore, the change in the cutting force with depth was similar to that of real bone. The developed composite material enables bone-cutting surgeries using bioceramics and natural fibers without the risks associated with cadavers or synthetic fibers. Mold-based computed tomography data allows for the creation of various bone forms, enhancing skill development for surgeons.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Surgeries involving bone cutting or drilling can exhibit significant individual variability. Studies have shown that practice can improve the surgical skills required for these procedures [1]. Surgeons face difficulties in precise control owing to the cutting force and blade bending, which subsequently affect the feed rate [2]. Moreover, the postoperative condition of the implant surface is often suboptimal [3].
Research on bone-cutting force began in 1974, with a focus on the factors influencing the cutting force through orthogonal cutting [4]. Studies have examined the tool rake angle and depth of the cut, exploring chip and crack formation in bones, which has led to the development of new tools to reduce the cutting force; however, most of these previous studies utilized rotational cutting tools [5]. An oscillating saw has been developed to reduce the cutting force [6], and the saw blades currently used in orthopedic surgery have been redesigned with teeth. The tooth shape of the blade is crucial during the oscillation process, prompting various research directions to minimize the cutting force, leading to the study of cutting force models based on oscillating saws [7].
Surgical oscillating saws are widely used in orthopedic surgery to cut various hard tissues, particularly in total knee arthroplasty [8]. These hard tissues, including the cortical bone, cancellous bone, dentin, and enamel, have complex anisotropic structures, resembling composites, and exhibit significant individual variability [9]. Understanding the cutting mechanism of hard tissue is essential for surgeons to improve the machining process [10,11]; enhance various surgical cutting, milling, and drilling procedures; and use appropriate tools [12,13]. Cadaver bones are typically used for surgical education and training; however, they pose challenges such as cost, limitations in practice, and preservation issues. Furthermore, the aerosols generated during the machining of cadaver bones can act as pathogen carriers, posing health risks when inhaled [14].
Regarding research materials for bone-cutting training, epoxy-based composites have been explored as alternative materials, offering mechanical properties similar to human bone. Research efforts are underway to develop composites with bone-like mechanical properties for medical applications. However, despite their excellent biocompatibility and bone repair properties, they have significantly lower mechanical strength compared to epoxy-based composites and are challenging to fabricate into femur shapes [15,16]. Poly lactic acid (PLA)/hydroxyapatite composites have been studied for bone modeling, with the material fabricated into filaments and used to create bone shapes via 3D printing. Additionally, PLA-based alginate–hydroxyapatite composites have been investigated for application to femur bones. However, these materials face limitations in producing full-scale femur models, and their compressive strength and elastic modulus are significantly lower than natural bone [17,18]. Epoxy resin can replicate various cortical bone shapes using molds and maintains its post-curing form, making it suitable for producing identical bone models. Therefore, there is growing interest in creating safe, cost-effective, and mechanically and geometrically similar bone models for traditional surgical education [19]. However, there are some limitations to these bone models; the synthetic fibers (such as carbon and glass) used for cutting can generate dust that may cause dermatitis in practitioners, and prolonged exposure to synthetic fiber dust has been shown to negatively affect respiratory health [20,21,22,23]. In contrast, nanocellulose is a safe material used in the field of biomedicine and possesses biocompatibility characteristics [24]. Additionally, nanocellulose is widely used in polymer-based composites, similar to hydroxyapatite (HAP) [25].
This study is the first to analyze the oscillating force on composite materials and investigate the cutting-force characteristics of a novel nanocellulose-based epoxy composite with fracture toughness. Previous studies have shown that increased stiffness due to nanocellulose results in higher cutting-force load. Furthermore, for the first time, the distribution of nanocellulose within the composite was analyzed using three-dimensional (3D) X-ray imaging.

2. Materials and Methods

The epoxy and hardener used were 105 epoxy resins and 207 hardeners (West System Co., Bay City, MI, USA). HAP was obtained from Sigma–Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The nanocellulose used in this study consisted of cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) provided by the Process Development Center at the University of Maine. Silicone molds were created using Mold Max 30 (Smooth-On, Inc., Macungie, PA, USA) for specimen preparation. The oscillating saw used was a DPS model from Sungwon Medical (Chungbuk, Republic of Korea) with saw blade dimensions of 90 × 25.4 × 1.27 mm3. The angle of the tooth was measured to be 51.8 ± 1.2°.

2.1. Preparation of Nanocellulose

A CNC slurry with a concentration of 10.4 wt% was freeze-dried at −86 °C using a freeze dryer (ilShinBioBase Co., Ltd., Dongducheon-si, Republic of Korea, FD8508) for 3 days to obtain a powder.

2.2. Preparation of Composite Materials

First, the HAP was vacuum dried at 100 °C for 30 min. The HAP was measured according to its weight percentages and dried accordingly. After drying, the hardener was added, and the mixture was ultrasonicated for 30 min to ensure thorough mixing of the hardener and HAP powder. CNCs were added to the hardener and HAP mixture and subjected to ultrasonic treatment together. Following ultrasonication, the resin was poured into the mixture and stirred with a wooden stick. To remove bubbles, the mixture was subjected to vacuum treatment at room temperature. The prepared mixture was then poured into silicone molds of the desired specimen shape and cured. The curing process was completed by heating at 80 °C for 3 h, followed by physical property testing. The hardener and resin were mixed at a weight ratio of 1:3. This method and the mixing ratio follow the same manufacturing process as described in the previous study [26] (Table 1).
Single-edge-notch bending (SENB) method specimens were fabricated according to the ASTM D5045 standard [27], with dimensions of B (Thickness) = 5 mm, W (Width) = 10 mm, L (Length) = 44 mm, and a (Length of the notch) = 0.45 mm.

2.3. Material Characterization

A Universal Testing Machine (UTM; Oriental TM Co., Ltd., Siheung-si, Republic of Korea, OTU-2) was used for mechanical testing. A load cell and a vice were installed on the upper part of the machine. The cuboidal composite material blocks were fixed in the vice to keep them steady. A custom-made oscillating saw was installed and secured to the lower part of the UTM. The cutting force was measured by adjusting the feed rate of the UTM at a temperature of 24 °C. All tests were conducted with three measurements of the cutting force.
Fracture toughness was measured using the SENB method following the ASTM D5045 standard. The experiment was conducted with a feed rate of 0.05 mm/min.
For the internal structural analysis of the nanocellulose-reinforced composite, X-ray microscopy (XRM) was performed using the Xradia 620 Versa (ZEISS, Baden-Württemberg, Germany) installed at the National Center for Inter-university Research Facilities (NCIRF) at Seoul National University. Dragonfly software (version 2024.1 for Windows, Comet Technologies Canada Inc., Montreal, QC, Canada) was used to analyze the nanocellulose volume fraction and particle distribution within the composite material as well as the XRM data.

2.4. Finite Element Method

Crack growth was simulated using the eXtended finite element method (XFEM) based on the 3D model of SENB specimens, with the experimental material properties of each specimen implemented. The simulation was performed using the Abaqus/CAE 2020 software.

2.5. Bone Model Fabrication

To create the bone model, a 3D printer (DP201, Sindoh, Seoul, Republic of Korea) was used to print the shape of a femur bone using polylactic acid material. The printing speed was set at 40 mm/s, with a nozzle temperature of 200 °C and a bed temperature of 25 °C (room temperature). A 15 mm raft was used to secure the print to the bed. The printed 3D model was coated with XTC-3D epoxy resin (Smooth-On, Inc.). The acrylic and bone model was then set up, and Mold Max 30 silicone (Smooth-On, Inc.) was poured to create the mold. Using a process identical to composite material manufacturing, the material was poured into the mold and cured to produce the composite bone model.

3. Results and Discussion

Based on the existing literature on bone cutting, silicone molds were used to fabricate rectangular block specimens with dimensions of 25 × 25 × 30 mm3 (Figure 1a). The specimens were prepared with and without nanocellulose (Figure 1b).
Standardized specimens, such as those used in tensile or compression tests, are not available for measuring the cutting force. Therefore, similar to previous bone-cutting tests [28], rectangular block specimens were used. The cutting tests were performed at a depth of 6 mm.
In the present study, the epoxy resin was reinforced with bioceramic HAP and CNCs to enhance its strength and stiffness, respectively [26]. Samples were prepared to compare differences in cutting forces resulting from these reinforcements. In addition to mechanical enhancements, potential applications of HAP and CNCs for bone regeneration were considered [29].
The setup for measuring the sawing force consisted of a load cell and a sample holder positioned at the top, with an oscillating saw fixed at the bottom. The feed direction was configured such that the sample holder moved downward during the experiment. The saw tooth was triangular, with an angle of 51.8 ± 1.2°. During the operation, the saw blade moved within the range of the oscillation angle (Figure 2).
For the composite material containing only HAP, the cutting forces at the initial cutting distance of 2 mm were 2.344 ± 0.4507 N at 0.5 mm/s, 3.6513 ± 1.0321 N at 1 mm/s, and 8.4301 ± 0.8674 N at 2 mm/s (Figure 3a). In contrast, the composite material containing both HAP and CNCs exhibited cutting forces of 4.005 ± 0.5469 N at 0.5 mm/s (Figure 3b). For HAP, cutting forces increased with speed. For samples with CNC addition, a slightly higher cutting force was observed at the same cutting speed. This suggests that the initial cutting force for the composite material with CNCs was higher. Furthermore, the cutting speed used in this study matches that of previous research on actual animal bone cutting, demonstrating similar cutting force behavior [28,30]. For this reason, the addition of CNCs makes the composite material more brittle and prone to fragmentation, resulting in increased production of bone chip-like fragments and surface irregularities during cutting. This behavior aligns with the fracture toughness and SEM surface analysis presented later in this study. Figure 3c shows an image of the composite material after cutting, where the cut surface appears smooth, which is similar to real bone.
The results of the cutting-force measurement using an oscillating saw showed that the vertical cutting force was significantly lower, as stated in previous studies. Additionally, as the feed rate increased, the cutting force also increased, which is consistent with the behavior observed when cutting real bone [28].
The inclusion of CNCs led to a decrease in the cutting force as the feed rate increased and the saw cut deeper into the material. This is because uniformly distributed CNCs aid in cutting by promoting the propagation of microcracks, thereby continuously reducing the required force [31]. This phenomenon enables surgeons to practice more precisely on materials that mimic the varying thickness of real bone, thereby enhancing surgical training accuracy [32].
The cutting force was also found to align with the angle of the osteon in real knee bones perpendicular to the saw blade [33]. When the osteon is oriented at a 90° angle to the blade, the vertical cutting force at a cutting speed of 0.5 mm/s is approximately 4 N, which is similar to the force observed when CNCs are added to the composite material (Figure 3b). At a 0° angle to the blade, the vertical cutting force is approximately 0.5 N, and, at both 60° and 120° angles, the force is approximately 2 N [30].
In previous research, the stiffness of the epoxy was approximately 2 GPa, and, for HAP 5 wt%, it was approximately 2.6 GPa. However, when CNCs were added, the stiffness increased to approximately 4 GPa, approaching the reported elastic modulus of proximal femur bone, which is approximately 6–7.5 GPa [26,34]. This enhancement in stiffness is consistent with prior findings that adding CNCs increases stiffness while decreasing toughness in tensile tests, a trend also observed in the mechanical properties reflected due to differences in cutting force. Therefore, higher cutting forces are generated owing to increased stiffness and brittleness, causing greater plastic deformation during cutting. In summary, a mixture of 5% HAP and 1% CNCs in the composite material allows for conditions that closely mimic various bone-cutting scenarios [30,35].
Figure 4 shows the measurement locations where high-resolution measurements were taken in the cuboid specimen. The XRM results are shown in three dimensions, with positions indicated on the XY, YZ, and XZ planes. The bright gray areas indicate the measurement positions, as shown in Figure 5.
Recent studies on cortical bone thickness have found that the thickness of the proximal part near the cutting area during knee replacement surgery is 1.28 ± 0.4 mm for women and 1.74 ± 0.3 mm for men [36]. Therefore, the range for measuring CNCs with high resolution in the composite block was selected as 1.5–2 mm (Figure 4). Additionally, the 1.5–2 mm region shows the most significant differences in the cutting force (Figure 3b).
Using XRM, the cuboid specimen was positioned through preliminary measurements. High-resolution X-ray measurements were conducted using a cylindrical volume with a diameter of 1.5 mm and a height of 1.5 mm. The analyzed images confirmed the surface area distribution as 0.95 mm2 for 1 wt% of CNCs within the composite material across each plane, revealing a highly uniform dispersion.
The volume fraction of the CNCs was found to be 1.19%, which is consistent with the 1% weight percentage synthesized in the sample. Thus, it was confirmed that the composite material had a uniform distribution and the correct proportion of CNCs.
Additionally, during the synthesis, the distribution of CNCs was analyzed by calculating the area of CNCs at different depths. The numerical area values confirmed that the CNCs were uniformly distributed throughout the composite material. Therefore, the consistent distribution observed in the 3D X-ray images was corroborated by the numerical data, validating that the CNCs were evenly dispersed at various depths within the composite material.
Fracture toughness was measured using the three-point bending method (Figure 6a). Load-displacement curves for both composite materials were measured using three-point bending on SENB samples. Both materials exhibited brittle characteristics, with the samples fracturing as crack propagation occurred. Fracture toughness was calculated using the following equation [37]:
K I C = P I B W f x
f x = 6 x 1 / 2   [ 1.99 x 1 x 2.15 3.93 x + 2.7 x 2 ] 1 + 2 x 1 x 3 / 2
The results showed that, unlike differences in toughness reported in previous studies, there is no significant difference in fracture toughness between the materials. However, adding CNCs leads to a decrease in fracture toughness due to the material’s more brittle nature (Figure 6b,c) [26]. This difference is attributed to the characteristics of the oscillating saw, which causes irregular small cracks, resulting in greater cutting force in the vertical direction as the vibrating saw blade impacts the material [38]. Additionally, the reduced fracture toughness leads to easier fragmentation of the material, creating greater resistance and cutting force between the oscillating saw and the composite, similar to the generation of bone chips [30].
Scanning electron microscopy analysis revealed that the surface of the HAP sample is smooth, with a clean fracture path following crack propagation (Figure 7a,c). However, in the HAP + CNC composite, irregular fracture surfaces and numerous fragmented particles can be observed (Figure 7b,d). These findings reflect the material characteristics identified earlier, wherein the oscillating saw generated high cutting force and the composite exhibited reduced fracture toughness. This behavior closely resembles the uneven surface observed in human bone fractures due to crack propagation [39].
These characteristics can also be observed in the finite element analysis. When simulating the SENB specimen using the three-point bending method, crack propagation in the 5% HAP sample was found to be shorter due to its higher fracture toughness (Figure 8a,b). In contrast, the crack rapidly propagates in materials with lower fracture toughness and more brittle characteristics (Figure 8c,d). Additionally, as seen in the SEM images (Figure 7), the surface of the crack becomes more irregular and rougher when CNC is added, compared with when it is not (Figure 8e,f).
As a result, femur bone-shaped specimens were created, and surgical guides were fixed. Cutting tests were performed using an oscillating saw, which confirmed that the composite material could be used for surgical training (Figure 9). This composite material, utilizing bioceramics and natural fibers, reduces the risks associated with debris during cadaver-based training while also providing bone-like mechanical properties [14]. It enhances the realism of surgical training by simulating the power and conditions of cutting real bones in a safe environment. This research aimed to provide a material that allows surgeons to safely and repeatedly practice bone cutting under realistic forces with consistent strength and tactile feedback, ultimately enhancing skill development.
Additionally, complex shapes can be fabricated in desired forms, allowing surgeons to practice using actual patient computed tomography data.

4. Conclusions

This study aimed to overcome the limitations of current training composites made from real bone and synthetic fibers by measuring the cutting force using an oscillating saw on a composite material. An experimental environment was created that was similar to that of bone, and it was confirmed that the addition of CNCs resulted in an increase in the initial cutting force, which was greater than that of the composite material with HAP. Additionally, the cutting force with nanocellulose closely matches the 4 N cutting force observed in real bone, where the osteon orientation was perpendicular to the cutting direction. This is because the uniformly distributed CNCs facilitated the cutting by influencing both fracture toughness and surface roughness. This study provides foundational data for measuring the cutting force on composite materials using an oscillating saw. Future research will focus on double casting with trabecular bone material to study changes in the cutting force with depth, with the aim of synthesizing materials that more closely mimic the cutting force of real bone. In addition, future research efforts will be directed to studying the impact of variations in saw blade size and shape on the cutting force.

Author Contributions

H.-C.J. conceptualization, investigation, formal analysis, fund acquisition, writing—original draft, writing—review & editing; Y.-S.K. conceptualization, methodology, investigation, data curation, formal analysis, visualization, supervision, project administration, fund acquisition, writing—original draft, writing—review & editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT, Education) (Nos. 2018R1A5A7023490, 2016R1A6A1A03012877), the Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy (MOTIE), and the Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT) through the International Cooperative R&D Program (Project No. P0016173).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the insert article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Sabri, H.; Cowan, B.; Kapralos, B.; Porte, M.; Backstein, D.; Dubrowskie, A. Serious games for knee replacement surgery procedure education and training. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2010, 2, 3483–3488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Plaskos, C.; Hodgson, A.J.; Inkpen, K.; McGraw, R.W. Bone cutting errors in total knee arthroplasty. J. Arthroplast. 2002, 17, 698–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kluess, D.; Bergschmidt, P.; Mueller, I.; Mittelmeier, W.; Bader, R. Influence of the distal femoral resection angle on the principal stresses in ceramic total knee components. Knee 2012, 19, 846–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jacobs, C.H.; Pope, M.H.; Berry, J.T.; Hoaglund, F. A study of the bone machining process—Orthogonal cutting. J. Biomech. 1974, 7, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shu, L.; Sugita, N. Analysis of fracture, force, and temperature in orthogonal elliptical vibration-assisted bone cutting. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2020, 103, 103599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Roberts, M.J. Electro Osteotome. US Patent 436804, 23 September 1890. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang, H.; Satake, U.; Enomoto, T. Modeling of oscillating bone sawing forces with instantaneous cutting speed and depth of cut. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2024, 324, 118225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, Y.; Robles-Linares, J.A.; Chen, L.; Liao, Z.; Shih, A.J.; Wang, C. Advances in machining of hard tissues–From material removal mechanisms to tooling solutions. Int. J. Mach. Tool. Manuf. 2022, 172, 103838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kersh, M.E.; Zysset, P.K.; Pahr, D.H.; Wolfram, U.; Larsson, D.; Pandy, M.G. Measurement of structural anisotropy in femoral trabecular bone using clinical-resolution CT images. J. Biomech. 2013, 46, 2659–2666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sugita, N.; Osa, T.; Aoki, R.; Mitsuishi, M. A new cutting method for bone based on its crack propagation characteristics. CIRP Ann. 2009, 58, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chengyong, W.; Chen, Z.; Chen, H.; Song, Q.; Ren, Y.; Sui, J.; Shu, L.; Chen, B.; Zheng, L. A review on cutting mechanism for bone material. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 2021, 57, 2–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liao, Z.; Axinte, D.A.; Gao, D. A novel cutting tool design to avoid surface damage in bone machining. Int. J. Mach. Tool. Manuf. 2017, 116, 52–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shu, L.; Li, S.; Terashima, M.; Bai, W.; Hanami, T.; Hasegawa, R.; Sugita, N. A novel self-centring drill bit design for low-trauma bone drilling. Int. J. Mach. Tool. Manuf. 2020, 154, 103568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pluim, J.M.E.; Jimenez-Bou, L.; Gerretsen, R.R.R.; Loeve, A.J. Aerosol production during autopsies: The risk of sawing in bone. Forensic Sci. Int. 2018, 289, 260–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Cuneo, A.; Timossi, F.; Musenich, L.; Stagni, A.; Wilhelm, F.; Libonati, F. Design and manufacturing of bone-like composites. Procedia CIRP 2022, 110, 287–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Huang, Q.-W.; Wang, L.-P.; Wang, J.-Y. Mechanical properties of artificial materials for bone repair. J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. 2014, 19, 675–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, X.; Saeed, S.-S.; Beni, M.H.; Morovvati, M.R.; Angili, S.N.; Toghraie, D.; Khandan, A.; Khan, A. Experimental measurement and simulation of mechanical strength and biological behavior of porous bony scaffold coated with alginate-hydroxyapatite for femoral applications. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2021, 214, 108973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wu, D.; Spanou, A.; Diez-Escudero, A.; Persson, C. 3D-printed PLA/HA composite structures as synthetic trabecular bone: A feasibility study using fused deposition modeling. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2020, 103, 103608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Atesok, K.; Mabrey, J.D.; Jazrawi, L.M.; Egol, K.A. Surgical simulation in orthopaedic skills training. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2012, 20, 410–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ramulu, M.; Kramlich, J. Machining of fiber reinforced composites: Review of environmental and health effects. Int. J. Environ. Cons. 2004, 11, 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zustra, M.A. Evaluation of the Potential Health Hazards Associated with the Machining of Carbon Fiber Composites. Master’s Thesis, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  22. Minamoto, K.; Nagano, M.; Inaoka, T.; Kitano, T.; Ushijima, K.; Fukuda, Y.; Futatsuka, M. Skin problems among fiber-glass reinforced plastics factory workers in Japan. Ind. Health 2002, 40, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gu, Y.; He, W.; Wang, Y.; Chen, J.; Wang, H.; Gao, P.; Yang, S.; Zhu, X.; Ma, W.; Li, T. Respiratory effects induced by occupational exposure to refractory ceramic fibers. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2021, 41, 421–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lin, N.; Dufresne, A. Nanocellulose in biomedicine: Current status and future prospect. Eur. Polym. J. 2014, 59, 302–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lu, J.; Sun, C.; Yang, K.; Wang, K.; Jiang, Y.; Tusiime, R.; Yang, Y.; Fan, F.; Sun, Z.; Liu, Y.; et al. Properties of polylactic acid reinforced by hydroxyapatite modified nanocellulose. Polymers 2019, 11, 1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kim, Y.-S.; Baek, J.W.; Jin, Z.; Jeon, H.C.; Han, M.W.; Lim, J.Y. Mechanical properties of a bone-like bioceramic–epoxy-based composite material with nanocellulose fibers. Materials 2023, 16, 739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. ASTM D5045-99; Standard Test Methods for Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness and Strain Energy Release Rate of Plastic Materials. ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2007.
  28. Wang, H.; Satake, U.; Enomoto, T. Surgical oscillating saw blade to suppress forces in bone cutting. CIRP Ann. 2022, 71, 73–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ingole, V.H.; Vuherer, T.; Maver, U.; Vinchurkar, A.; Ghule, A.V.; Kokol, V. Mechanical properties and cytotoxicity of differently structured nanocellulose-hydroxyapatite based composites for bone regeneration application. Nanomaterials 2019, 10, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Luo, Y.; Ren, Y.; Shu, Y.; Mao, C.; Zhou, Z.; Bi, Z.M. Cutting behavior of cortical bone in different bone osteon cutting angles and depths of cut. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 2022, 35, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kamada, Y.; Yan, J. Machinability investigation for cellulose nanofiber-reinforced polymer composite by ultraprecision diamond turning. Int. J. Autom. Technol. 2021, 15, 475–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yanping, L.; Dedong, Y.; Xiaojun, C.; Xudong, W.; Guofang, S.; Chengtao, W. Simulation and evaluation of a bone sawing procedure for orthognathic surgery based on an experimental force model. J. Biomech. Eng. 2014, 136, 034501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Heřt, J.; Fiala, P.; Petrtýl, M. Osteon orientation of the diaphysis of the long bones in man. Bone 1994, 15, 269–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wirtz, D.C.; Schiffers, N.; Pandorf, T.; Radermacher, K.; Weichert, D.; Forst, R. Critical evaluation of known bone material properties to realize anisotropic FE-simulation of the proximal femur. J. Biomech. 2000, 33, 1325–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Li, S.; Abdel-Wahab, A.; Demirci, E.; Silberschmidt, V.V. Penetration of cutting tool into cortical bone: Experimental and numerical investigation of anisotropic mechanical behaviour. J. Biomech. 2014, 47, 1117–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Huppke, C.M.; Fahlbusch, H.; Frosch, K.-H.; Krause, M.; von Rehlingen-Prinz, F. Cortical bone thickness on preoperative CT scans as predictor of bone quality in distal femur fractures: A retrospective study in Caucasians. Arch. Orthop. Trauma. Surg. 2024, 144, 731–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Vilutis, A.; Jankauskas, V. Experimental and numerical investigation of the fracture behavior of extruded wood–plastic composites under bending. Polymers 2024, 16, 1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Wang, H.; Satake, U.; Enomoto, T. Reduction of sawing forces in bone cutting: Innovative oscillating saw mechanism based on trajectory analysis. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2024, 332, 118563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Koester, K.J.; Ager, J.W., III; Ritchie, R.O. The true toughness of human cortical bone measured with realistically short cracks. Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 672–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Preparation of specimens for measuring the cutting force. (a) The shape of the specimen fabricated in a cuboid form, with dimensions 25 × 25 × 30 mm. (b) Cuboid specimens made using hydroxyapatite and cellulose nanocrystals.
Figure 1. Preparation of specimens for measuring the cutting force. (a) The shape of the specimen fabricated in a cuboid form, with dimensions 25 × 25 × 30 mm. (b) Cuboid specimens made using hydroxyapatite and cellulose nanocrystals.
Polymers 16 02849 g001
Figure 2. Setup for measuring the cutting force of composite materials with an oscillating saw.
Figure 2. Setup for measuring the cutting force of composite materials with an oscillating saw.
Polymers 16 02849 g002
Figure 3. Measurement of the cutting force using an oscillating saw. (a) Cutting force results for the 5% hydroxyapatite (HAP) composite material based on the feed rate, including the average and standard deviation. (b) Comparison of cutting force results for the 5% HAP composite material and 5% HAP + 1% cellulose nanocrystal composite material based on the 0.5 mm/s feed rate, including the average cutting force and its standard deviation. (c) Appearance of the composite material after completion of cutting.
Figure 3. Measurement of the cutting force using an oscillating saw. (a) Cutting force results for the 5% hydroxyapatite (HAP) composite material based on the feed rate, including the average and standard deviation. (b) Comparison of cutting force results for the 5% HAP composite material and 5% HAP + 1% cellulose nanocrystal composite material based on the 0.5 mm/s feed rate, including the average cutting force and its standard deviation. (c) Appearance of the composite material after completion of cutting.
Polymers 16 02849 g003
Figure 4. Results from XRM measurements. The brightly marked area indicates the high-resolution measurement region.
Figure 4. Results from XRM measurements. The brightly marked area indicates the high-resolution measurement region.
Polymers 16 02849 g004
Figure 5. High-resolution results from XRM measurements. (a) A three-dimensional (3D) image illustrating the dispersion of nanocellulose within the epoxy matrix, along with views from various 3D planes. (b) An image depicting only the nanocellulose after the removal of the epoxy matrix.
Figure 5. High-resolution results from XRM measurements. (a) A three-dimensional (3D) image illustrating the dispersion of nanocellulose within the epoxy matrix, along with views from various 3D planes. (b) An image depicting only the nanocellulose after the removal of the epoxy matrix.
Polymers 16 02849 g005
Figure 6. The three-point bending tests of the single-edge-notch bending specimens of HAP and HAP + cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) (a) and fracture toughness experimental setup. (b) Load-displacement curve. (c) Fracture toughness.
Figure 6. The three-point bending tests of the single-edge-notch bending specimens of HAP and HAP + cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) (a) and fracture toughness experimental setup. (b) Load-displacement curve. (c) Fracture toughness.
Polymers 16 02849 g006
Figure 7. Scanning electron microscopy images of the fracture surface highlighting representative critical flaws, marked by yellow arrows. (a) HAP5%, (b) HAP5% + CNC1%. Magnified image (highlighted by the red square) of (c) HAP5%, (d) HAP5% + CNC1%.
Figure 7. Scanning electron microscopy images of the fracture surface highlighting representative critical flaws, marked by yellow arrows. (a) HAP5%, (b) HAP5% + CNC1%. Magnified image (highlighted by the red square) of (c) HAP5%, (d) HAP5% + CNC1%.
Polymers 16 02849 g007
Figure 8. Finite element analysis of crack growth, (a,b) HAP5%, (c,d) HAP5% + CNC1%. Magnified image of crack propagation of (e) HAP5% and (f) HAP5% + CNC1%.
Figure 8. Finite element analysis of crack growth, (a,b) HAP5%, (c,d) HAP5% + CNC1%. Magnified image of crack propagation of (e) HAP5% and (f) HAP5% + CNC1%.
Polymers 16 02849 g008
Figure 9. Application: fabrication and cutting test of the femur bone model.
Figure 9. Application: fabrication and cutting test of the femur bone model.
Polymers 16 02849 g009
Table 1. Composite materials weight ratio.
Table 1. Composite materials weight ratio.
Composite MaterialsResinHardenerHAPCNC
HAP 5 wt%71.2523.755-
HAP 5 wt% with CNC 1 wt%70.523.551
HAP: hydroxyapatite; CNC: cellulose nanocrystals.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jeon, H.-C.; Kim, Y.-S. Mechanical Performance of Cellulose Nanocrystal and Bioceramic-Based Composites for Surgical Training. Polymers 2024, 16, 2849. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16192849

AMA Style

Jeon H-C, Kim Y-S. Mechanical Performance of Cellulose Nanocrystal and Bioceramic-Based Composites for Surgical Training. Polymers. 2024; 16(19):2849. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16192849

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jeon, Hee-Chang, and Young-Seong Kim. 2024. "Mechanical Performance of Cellulose Nanocrystal and Bioceramic-Based Composites for Surgical Training" Polymers 16, no. 19: 2849. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16192849

APA Style

Jeon, H. -C., & Kim, Y. -S. (2024). Mechanical Performance of Cellulose Nanocrystal and Bioceramic-Based Composites for Surgical Training. Polymers, 16(19), 2849. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16192849

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop