Next Article in Journal
Synthesis and Characterization of Methyl Cellulose/Keratin Hydrolysate Composite Membranes
Previous Article in Journal
Shape Memory Investigation of α-Keratin Fibers as Multi-Coupled Stimuli of Responsive Smart Materials
Previous Article in Special Issue
Novel Melt-Spun Polymer-Optical Poly(methyl methacrylate) Fibers Studied by Small-Angle X-ray Scattering
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Optical Characterization of Doped Thermoplastic and Thermosetting Polymer-Optical-Fibers

1
Department of Applied Mathematics, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Engineering School of Bilbao, Plaza Ingeniero Torres Quevedo, 1, E-48013 Bilbao, Spain
2
Department of Applied Physics I, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Engineering School of Bilbao, Plaza Ingeniero Torres Quevedo, 1, E-48013 Bilbao, Spain
3
Department of Communications Engineering, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Engineering School of Bilbao, Plaza Ingeniero Torres Quevedo, 1, E-48013 Bilbao, Spain
4
Faculty of Science and Technology, Keio University, 3-14-1 Hiyoshi, Kohoku-ku, Yokohama 223-0061, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2017, 9(3), 90; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9030090
Submission received: 25 November 2016 / Revised: 22 February 2017 / Accepted: 1 March 2017 / Published: 4 March 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polymeric Fibers)

Abstract

:
The emission properties of a graded-index thermoplastic polymer optical fiber and a step-index thermosetting one, both doped with rhodamine 6G, have been studied. The work includes a detailed analysis of the amplified spontaneous emission together with a study of the optical gains and losses of the fibers. The photostability of the emission of both types of fibers has also been investigated. Comparisons between the results of both doped polymer optical fibers are presented and discussed.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The last few years have seen a remarkable interest in the field of research dealing with the embedding of functional materials in adequate hosts, such as polymer optical fibers (POFs), in order to fabricate solid-state organic amplifiers and lasers [1,2]. In this respect, there exist several well-known advantages of POFs over glass fibers. The manufacturing technology of POFs is cheaper and simpler than that of glass fibers, and their mechanical strength is also higher. Their lower manufacturing temperatures make it possible to dope the fiber core with an ample variety of active materials like organic dyes, conjugated polymers, rare-earth ions, noble-metal nanoparticles, or quantum dots [3,4,5]. High optical gains can be achieved in remarkably short fiber lengths by doping POFs with organic dyes having high absorption and emission cross sections. Furthermore, as compared with the bulk material, the waveguide geometry of optical fibers make them advantageous in that they provide optical confinement in the fiber core, long interaction distances between light and active material, and high volume-to-surface-area ratios. This makes heat dissipation more efficient and, hence, minimizes thermal degradation. As compared with the bulk material, the fiber structure also provides a symmetric output beam profile and straightforward connectivity with the presently existing fiber-optic communications systems. All these advantages make doped POFs a very interesting option to realize efficient amplifiers, lasers, illuminators, sensors, and all-optical switches in the visible region [6,7,8,9].
Since the discoveries of the fiber laser based on a dye-doped POF in 1987 [6] and of the first amplifier based on POFs in 1993 [7], POFs doped with organic dyes have been extensively studied [8,10,11]. Light amplification along the fibers can be achieved just by pumping the doped fibers either longitudinally or transversely. In this type of configuration, the gain is due to amplified spontaneous emission (ASE). ASE presents some laser-emission properties, such as a narrowed emission spectrum, the existence of a threshold-like energy, and directionality, but its output bandwidth is broader than that obtained from a typical laser. These properties make doped POFs suitable for their use as broadband fiber sources. More specifically, these fiber sources, either glass or polymer ones, are nowadays candidates for a large variety of applications, e.g., for spectroscopy, for low-coherence interferometry, for fiber gyroscopes, and for applications that need a broad spectral gain, such as the amplification of all the channels in a wavelength-division-multiplexing system [12,13,14]. One of the most recent research lines regarding broadband POF sources has been the incorporation of multiple laser dyes in the POF so that a single fiber can cover a broad wavelength range [15]. This broad spectrum has been employed in combination with sensing techniques, such as the use of Bragg gratings inscribed in the same fiber, in order to manufacture all-polymer-fiber sensors. This technique makes it possible to interrogate multiple Bragg gratings by using the light generated in the same fiber [16].
As far as we know, the host matrix used in the reported works on dye-doped POFs has always been a thermoplastic polymer, such as polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). Thermoplastic polymers present a plastic-elastic behavior and they can be melted and reshaped when they are heated. In contrast, thermosetting polymers do not melt upon heating, and therefore they cannot be reshaped to any extent. Thermosetting polymers are made of polymer chains that cross-link with each other irreversibly, thus forming a three-dimensional interconnected polymer structure. The thermal stability of cross-linked polymers is considerably higher than that of non-crossed-linked ones, which could be an important feature if these materials are to be employed for POFs in high-temperature environments [17].
Taking the aforementioned applications of doped POFs into account, we present a thorough experimental study of the fluorescence and ASE properties of a graded-index (GI) thermoplastic POF and of a step-index thermosetting POF doped with rhodamine 6G (R6G) with different dopant concentrations and distributions. R6G is one the most efficient fluorescent dyes, it has been extensively and successfully employed in dye lasers, and it is still being studied nowadays. We analyze the influence of dye distribution, dye concentration, and host matrix on the light emission, which may be useful in improving the performance of broadband light sources based on these types of doped POFs. POFs of identical dye distributions and concentrations would facilitate the analysis of the effect of the host matrix alone. A theoretical study of the influence of the dye distribution on the emission properties of thermoplastic fibers was carried out by the authors in [18]. Regarding thermosetting fibers, there are no previous studies of dye-doped thermosetting POFs in the literature, in spite of their interesting thermal properties. Specifically, we show the absorption and emission bands, the amplified spontaneous emission and the optical gains for both types of fibers using the variable-stripe-length (VSL) method [19]. We also calculate the optical losses for both fibers by using the side-illumination technique [20,21]. Besides, since the potential applications of the studied doped POFs depend on the photodegradation of the dye, we will present the evolution of the emitted fluorescence characteristics when the POFs are excited for prolonged exposure times.
This paper is organized as follows. The employed experimental techniques and the characteristics of the analyzed fibers are described in Section 2. The light amplification properties, the attenuation and the photostability of the two types of POFs are analyzed and discussed in Section 3. The conclusions are summarized in Section 4.

2. Experiment

The samples analyzed are a thermoplastic POF and a thermosetting one, both of them doped with R6G in their cores but not in their claddings. Figure 1 shows the refractive-index profile and non-uniform dopant concentration of the thermoplastic fiber. In order to obtain a graded-index distribution in this fiber, the interfacial gel polymerization technique was employed [22,23]. In this process, a mixed solution of molecules of MMA monomer, polymerization initiator, chain transfer reagent, grading-index reagent (such as triphenyl phosphate), and also rhodamine 6G was prepared. Then, the solution was poured into a PMMA tube and subjected to a polymerization process. During this process, the polymerization took place inward from the wall of the tube. As the molecular volume of the MMA monomer is smaller than that of the grading-index reagent, MMA molecules can diffuse into the polymer phase more easily than the grading-index reagent, so this is gradually concentrated in the center region as the thickness of the polymer phase increases. Since the refractive index of the reagent molecules is higher than that of MMA, a rod with a graded-index distribution is obtained. The refractive-index distribution of the rod was measured by means of the longitudinal interferometric technique [23]. The resulting distribution of the dopant, shown in Figure 1a, was obtained by measuring the absorption from points along the diameter of a disc-shaped sample that was cut out and polished from the preformed rod, using the light from a He-Ne laser at 632.8 nm. From the value of the absorption cross section at this wavelength, the concentration of dopant could be estimated. The radial dye distribution in the POF is almost the same as that of the preform rod [24]. On the other hand, the thermosetting POF is a step-index fiber made of acrylic monomers whose dopant concentration is uniform (see Figure 1). POFs that are graded-index, as is the case of our thermoplastic sample, usually have higher dopant concentrations near the fiber symmetry axis, where the majority of the propagating light is concentrated. Therefore, the interaction between light and dopant molecules in that area is stronger than in the case of step-index fibers, such as our thermosetting sample. A parameter that measures the amount of interaction between dye molecules and light is the so-called overlapping factor γ, which is 1 in the case of step-index fibers and larger than 1 in the case of graded-index fibers (γ ≈ 1.4 in our thermoplastic sample) [18]. The thermoplastic POF was produced by the Keio Photonics Research Institute of Keio University [22,23,24,25], while the thermosetting POF was manufactured by the company Intellisiv Ltd. (Gadera, Israel) [26,27]. None of the fibers are commercially available. Their main manufacturing characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The average concentration of the thermoplastic fiber (16 ppm) is close to the maximum that can be dissolved satisfactorily in the PMMA host, in the sense that higher concentrations would produce detrimental dye aggregates in the fiber [28].
Figure 2 sketches the experimental set-up employed to measure the emission from the fiber upon transverse excitation. For the study of the ASE, the samples were pumped optically with the output signal of a frequency doubler coupled to a Nd:YAG nanosecond laser (EKSPLA NL301HT) (10 Hz, λ = 532 nm). The measurements of the attenuation and of the photostability were carried out by pumping the fibers with a tunable visible femtosecond laser at 80 MHz (Spectra-Physics Mai Tai HP, Newport, Santa Clara, CA, USA) combined with a frequency doubler (Inspire Blue, Radiantis, Barcelona, Spain). A cylindrical lens (L3) was used to convert the circular beam spot into a narrow stripe, which was focused onto the fiber side. The illuminated area was 1 mm in height and ze mm in width. For the measuring of the optical gains of the fibers, the VSL method was employed in the range of ze between 0 and a certain maximum length, ze,max [29]. In all our measurements, the emitted light propagates through a non-excited length zne before reaching the detector. A fiber-optic spectrometer (Ocean Optics USB4000, with an optical resolution of 1.5 nm of full width at half maximum) was used for the spectral measurement of the emission from one of the fiber ends. The absorption spectra of the doped fibers were obtained with a Cary 50UV–VIS spectrophotometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with a fiber-optic coupler accessory.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Absorption, Fluorescence, and ASE Spectra

The absorption spectra of our two types of R6G-doped POFs are shown in Figure 3a. In both cases, there is a strong wide absorption band that extends in the green region of the spectrum, corresponding to the transition from the ground singlet state S0 to the excited singlet state S1. As also happens in some other R6G-doped PMMA systems, the absorption bands present a flattened shape due to the contributions of dye monomers and aggregates [30]. A much weaker absorption band is detected around 350 nm, which is only noticeable in the thermoplastic POF, since, in the thermosetting fiber, it is hidden by the ultraviolet tail of the absorption curve of the host material. This weaker band corresponds to the transition from S0 to the excited singlet state S2. Notice that the absorption spectrum of the thermosetting fiber is located at slightly longer wavelengths than that of the thermoplastic fiber. The values of the attenuation coefficients at wavelengths outside the absorption band of the dye most probably stem from the contribution of light scattering in the fiber core. Since the lengths of our measured fibers are very short (about 1 cm), the power mode distributions of the fibers have not yet reached the equilibrium condition, so the attenuation coefficients at those wavelengths may be higher than those obtained by using long fibers, as demanded by the standard cut-back method. Figure 3b shows the fluorescence and ASE spectra when the fibers are excited transversely at 532 nm, which correspond to the transition from the excited state S1 to the ground singlet state S0. The ASE spectra, obtained by pumping the fibers above the threshold value, are the narrowed bands in the figure. It can be observed that both the fluorescence and the ASE curves of the thermosetting POF, with a higher dopant concentration, are located at longer wavelengths (about 30 nm) than the corresponding curves of the thermoplastic POF, with a lower dopant concentration (see Table 2). Additionally, it can be observed that the fluorescence spectrum of the thermosetting POF is broader than that of the thermoplastic POF. This spectral location at longer wavelengths and the broader spectrum in the case of the thermosetting POF could be explained by its higher dye concentration. It is known that dopant molecules tend to link to one another when the dye concentration is higher than a certain maximum level, thus creating dopant aggregates and, consequently, making the emission bands shift toward longer wavelengths [31]. In this respect, the crosslinked chains of the thermosetting polymer favor the appearance of dye aggregates when the dopant concentration is high enough [32].
Figure 4 illustrates the spectral narrowing and the abrupt increase in the output irradiance that occurs when the pump energy becomes higher than the ASE threshold. Due to gain-saturation effects, the spectral widths never become narrower than a certain value, and the curves of the full width at half maximum (FWHM) tend to become rather horizontal when the pump energy is high enough. The ASE threshold has been estimated as the pump energy at which the spectral FWHM of the emission spectrum decays to half of its maximum value [33]. As can be observed in the figure, the threshold is higher in the case of the thermosetting fiber (see Table 2 for the exact values). This fact could be due, in part, to the lower pump energy that is absorbed by the thermosetting fiber, as shown in Figure 5, where it is also noticeable that there is a greater tendency for absorption saturation at high pump energy to occur in this fiber, possibly due to phenomena such as excited-state absorption, energy transfer to triplet states, and so on. On the other hand, the aggregation of dye molecules at high concentration—such as that of the thermosetting POF—reduces the effective surface area of the dopant and hence its absorption cross section. This reduction has been attributed to the mutual interaction of neighboring molecules [34]. Besides, the fact that the overlapping factor γ is smaller and the core diameter is greater in our thermosetting POF could also contribute to its higher threshold energy [18].

3.2. Optical Gain

The gain coefficient of each fiber is calculated by measuring the output irradiance at the desired wavelength λ as a function of the excitation length ze (VSL method). In Figure 6a,b the output ASE intensities from the two types of POFs have been plotted as functions of ze for two different wavelengths in each case. As can be seen, the irradiance curves grow in an approximately exponential way with the excitation length. In each case, the gain coefficient at the desired emission wavelength can be estimated by fitting the irradiance, for a range of values ze, to the following equation:
I ( λ , z e ) = C ( λ ) g ( λ ) [ exp ( g ( λ ) z e ) 1 ] ,
where C(λ) is a constant related to the spontaneous emission and g(λ) is the gain coefficient at the emission wavelength considered [30]. The disagreement between the fitted curves and the experimental points for the largest values of ze may be due to saturation effects. The gains have been calculated in a range of wavelengths, and the corresponding curves obtained for both fibers are represented in Figure 7. In spite of the greater pump irradiances employed with the thermosetting fiber, the gains are quite similar in both fibers, or even slightly greater in the thermoplastic one. This gain reduction in our thermosetting POF could be explained, again, by taking the greater presence of dye aggregates in its strongly doped fiber core into account. These aggregates cause a negative effect by reducing the fluorescence efficiency and by decreasing the stimulated emission cross section of the dye [28,35]. On the other hand, the lower value of the overlapping factor γ in the step-index thermosetting POF also tends to reduce the gain coefficients [18]. The gains shown in Figure 7 are on the same order of magnitude as those reported for electrospun R6G-doped PMMA nanofibers [36].

3.3. Optical Loss

The attenuation in both fibers has been calculated by measuring the decrease of the irradiance of the fluorescence spectra as the light propagation distance (zne) is increased with a constant excitation length (ze = 1.2 mm). In Figure 8, we can see how this irradiance decreases for three different emission wavelengths. Assuming that the illuminated fiber portion behaves as a plane-wave source, the light output measured at the fiber end at the emission wavelength decays exponentially [20]:
I ( λ , z n e ) = I 0 ( λ ) exp ( α ( λ ) z n e ) ,
In Equation (2), I0(λ) is the light irradiance measured at zne = 0 at a certain wavelength λ, and α(λ) is the linear attenuation coefficient at that wavelength. Figure 9 shows the linear-attenuation coefficients obtained for the two fibers by fitting experimental curves I(λ,zne) for several wavelengths to Equation (2) [20,37]. In agreement with Figure 3a, the highest values of the attenuation curve in the range of wavelengths considered correspond to the thermosetting POF. In the region where the dye absorption tends to be negligible, i.e., above 650 nm, the attenuation of the thermosetting fiber is slightly higher. This result could be due to the light-scattering effect of the dye aggregates, and also to the fact that host materials with higher melting temperatures, as is the case of the thermosetting host, tend to present higher propagation losses [17,38]. Also in the case of non-doped fibers, the attenuation coefficient of undoped thermosetting POFs is typically higher than that of undoped PMMA POFs (on the order of 1500 and 400 dB/km, respectively, at 700 nm) [2,39]. In both types of fibers, the attenuation coefficients are always much smaller than the gain coefficients (see Figure 7).
The average emission wavelengths of the fluorescence curves in Figure 10 are shifted linearly toward longer wavelengths as zne is increased, which is due to reabsorption and reemission effects [37]. Figure 10 shows this shift for both types of fibers. The curves in Figure 10 present a linear behavior, but with different slopes: 0.054 nm/mm for the thermoplastic POF and 0.16 nm/mm for the thermosetting one. This linear spectral shift with length enables the manufacture of tunable light sources, and it could also be useful for the design of displacement sensors using doped fibers. For this purpose, the greater slope of the thermosetting POF would be advantageous.

3.4. Photostability

The photostability of the fluorescence spectra has been studied for both fibers with ze = 0.12 cm and zne = 4.4 cm by pumping them at 520 nm with the femtosecond laser. In a first step, both fibers were exposed to the same excitation conditions for 60 min The irradiance, average wavelength, and FWHM of the fluorescence spectra obtained during this period of time are shown in Figure 11a,c,e. In a second step, the same magnitudes were measured under the same conditions for another 60 min after a rest of 24 h in darkness, and the corresponding results have been plotted in Figure 11b,d,f. In the first step, the fibers had never been exposed to laser light, so there was no previous degradation that could affect the results. For the sake of comparison, we have normalized the fluorescence intensities to 100% at the start of the first set of measurements.
As can be noted in Figure 11a, the rhodamine-6G-doped thermoplastic fiber is more stable than the thermosetting one. Specifically, after 60 min of exposure, which, in this case, is equivalent to 2.88 × 1011 laser shots, the fluorescence capacities of both fibers were reduced by 39% and by 50%, respectively. According to the definition of lifetime given in [40], which is the time elapsed before the fluorescence irradiance is reduced by half, the thermoplastic fiber does not reach its lifetime value in the first set of measurements, whereas the thermosetting fiber reaches it just at the end of the same excitation period. The decays of the emitted fluorescence shown in Figure 11a can be well fitted to a double-exponential expression, where a, b, τ1, and τ2 are constants:
f ( t ) = a exp ( t / τ 1 ) + b exp ( t / τ 2 ) ,
The values of these constants were obtained from the fittings, and the corresponding coefficients of determination R2 are shown in Table 3. The values of τ1 and τ2 shown in Table 3 corroborate that the thermoplastic fiber undergoes the fastest degradation at the beginning of the excitation period, but the steady state is achieved relatively fast. Specifically, the thermoplastic fiber achieves an approximately steady state after 5 min of exposure, as can be seen in Figure 11a. In the case of the thermosetting fiber, the fluorescence irradiance is not much affected during the first 3 min, maintaining its emission capacity almost at 100%. However, after this short excitation period, the emission irradiance diminishes steadily during the rest of the excitation time without reaching any steady state.
The observed photodegradation that these fibers undergo could be due to different mechanisms, whose influence is different depending on the fiber. The most common source of degradation in dye-doped polymers is the thermally-induced bleach of organic dyes. In this respect, in our thermoplastic fiber, the dopant molecules are mainly surrounded by the host matrix, due to the lower dye concentration. Consequently, the molecules are partially protected from the thermally-induced degradation effects, and the fiber conserves its emission capacity for a longer time [40]. There are also other factors in our thermoplastic fiber that contribute to a better photostability, such as the lower presence of dye aggregates in the host matrix. The presence of aggregates would tend to increase the number of non-radiative relaxations and, therefore, would tend to contribute to the optical bleaching of the dye, as probably happens in our thermosetting POF [10,28]. Another disadvantage of our thermosetting POF, which has a step-index profile, is that step-index fibers tend to be less photostable than, for example, hollow fibers or graded-index fibers [41]. This fact probably contributes to the lower degradation of our graded-index thermoplastic fiber.
The emission spectra change slightly with excitation time, as shown in Figure 11c,e. We can see that, in both types of fibers, there is only a nearly negligible red shift in the average wavelength and a slight spectral broadening in the range of exposure times considered. Similarly, spectral changes with exposure time were also observed in active POFs doped with other dopants [42].
As already commented, we have also analyzed the effects of excitation after a rest period of 24 h in darkness. As Figure 11b shows, there is a partial recovery in the fluorescence capacity during the rest time both in the thermoplastic POF and in the thermosetting one: the emission intensities are, respectively, 16% and 22.3% higher right after the rest. This partial recovery has also been reported for other types of doped fibers and thin films, which suggests that there exist some reversible photodegradation processes [43]. Despite the partial recovery in the emission intensities during the rest time in both types of fibers, the changes in the emission average wavelength and in the spectral width are insignificant with respect to the values obtained just before the rest (see Figure 11d,f).

4. Conclusions

We have compared the emission properties of a graded-index thermoplastic POF and of a step-index thermosetting POF, both doped with rhodamine 6G, but with different distributions and concentrations: low concentration and non-uniform distribution in the thermoplastic POF, and high concentration and uniform distribution in the thermosetting POF. The properties of the amplified spontaneous emission, the optical losses, and the photostability of the emission have been analyzed for each type of fiber by using transverse excitation. We have found that the ASE characteristics, such as the threshold value and the spectral optical gains, are slightly better in the thermoplastic fiber. Besides, the attenuation of the generated emission is lower in the thermoplastic fiber. An analysis of the photostability carried out for both fibers shows that the thermoplastic fiber is more stable than the thermosetting one. The most influential factors in the emission properties presented in this work are the concentration and the distribution of the dye, the influence of the host matrix being much smaller. The much higher concentration in the thermosetting POF causes some negative effects on its emission properties due to the presence of aggregates. On the other hand, we have observed spectral shifts of the emission with propagation distance in both types of fiber, which are greater in the case of the thermosetting fiber. These spectral shifts may be employed to manufacture tunable light sources based on doped POFs. In this sense, we have also shown that wavelength tunability is also possible by increasing the dye concentration in the fiber.

Acknowledgments

This work has been funded in part by the Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER); by the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad under project TEC2015-638263-C03-1-R; by the Gobierno Vasco/Eusko Jaurlaritza under projects IT933-16 and ELKARTEK (KK-2016/0030 and KK-2016/0059); by the University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU under program UFI11/16; and by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science through the Funding Program for World-Leading Innovative R&D on Science and Technology (FIRST Program), initiated by the Council for Science and Technology. The work carried out by I. Parola has been funded by a research grant given by the Departamento de Educación, Política Lingüística y Cultura del Gobierno Vasco/Eusko Jaurlaritza for her PhD thesis. We also thank Stela Diamant and Oleg Palchik, from the company Intellisiv Ltd, for providing the thermosetting samples.

Author Contributions

María Asunción Illarramendi and Joseba Zubia conceived and designed the experiments; Akihiro Tagaya and Yasuhiro Koike prepared the thermoplastic samples; Igor Ayesta, María Asunción Illarramendi, and Itxaso Parola performed the experiments; Igor Ayesta, María Asunción Illarramendi, Itxaso Parola, Jon Arrue, and Felipe Jiménez analyzed the data; all authors contributed to the scientific discussion; all authors wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Clark, J.; Lanzani, G. Organic photonics for communications. Nat. Photonics 2010, 7, 438–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zubia, J.; Arrue, J. Plastic optical fibers: An introduction to their technological processes and applications. Opt. Fiber Technol. 2001, 7, 101–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liang, H.; Zheng, Z.; Li, Z.; Xu, J.; Chen, B.; Zhao, H.; Zhang, Q.; Ming, H. Fabrication and amplified spontaneous emission of Eu(DBM)3Phen doped step-index polymer optical fiber. Opt. Quant. Electron. 2004, 36, 1313–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yu, H.C.Y.; Argyros, A.; Barton, G.; Van Eijkelenborg, M.A.; Barbe, C.; Finnie, K.; Kong, L.; Ladouceur, F.; McNiven, S. Quantum dot and silica nanoparticle doped polymer optical fibers. Opt. Express 2007, 15, 9989–9994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Sebastian, S.; Ajina, C.; Vallabhan, C.P.G.; Nampoori, V.P.N.; Radhakrishnan, P.; Kailasnath, M. Fabrication and photostability of rhodamine-6G gold nanoparticle doped polymer optical fiber. Chin. Phys. Lett. 2013, 30, 118101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Muto, S.; Ando, A.; Yoda, O.; Hanawa, T.; Ito, H. Dye laser by sheet of plastic fibers with wide tunning range. Trans. IEICE Jpn. 1987, E70, 317–318. [Google Scholar]
  7. Tagaya, A.; Koike, Y.; Kinoshita, T.; Nihei, E.; Yamamoto, T.; Sasaki, K. Polymer optical-fiber amplifier. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1993, 63, 883–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Arrue, J.; Jiménez, F.; Ayesta, I.; Illarramendi, M.A.; Zubia, J. Polymer-optical-fiber lasers and amplifiers doped with organic dyes. Polymers 2011, 3, 1162–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Aiestaran, P.; Dominguez, V.; Arrue, J.; Zubia, J. A fluorescent linear optical fiber position sensor. Opt. Mat. 2009, 31, 1101–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Peng, G.D.; Xiong, Z.; Chu, P.L. Fluorescence decay and recovery in organic dye-doped polymer optical fibers. J. Lightwave Technol. 1998, 16, 2365–2369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Maier, G.V.; Kopylova, T.N.; Svetlichnyi, V.A.; Podgaetskii, V.M.; Dolotov, S.M.; Ponomareva, O.V.; Monich, A.E.; Monich, E.A. Active polymer fibres doped with organic dyes: Generation and amplification of coherent radiation. Quantum Electron. 2007, 37, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Redding, B.; Ahmadi, P.; Mokan, V.; Seifert, M.; Choma, M.A.; Cao, H. Low-spatial-coherence high-radiance broadband fiber source for speckle free imaging. Opt. Lett. 2015, 40, 4607–4610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Digonnet, M.J.F. Rare Earth Doped Fiber Lasers and Amplifiers; Marcel Dekker, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  14. Calzado, E.M.; Boj, P.G.; Díaz-García, M.A. Amplified spontaneous emission properties of semiconducting organic materials. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2010, 11, 2546–2565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tam, H.Y.; Pun, C.-F.J.; Zhou, G.; Cheng, X.; Tse, M.L.V. Special structured polymer fibers for sensing applications. Opt. Fiber Technol. 2010, 16, 357–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bonefacino, J.; Cheng, X.; Vincent Tse, M.-L.; Tam, H.-Y. Recent progress in polymer optical fiber light sources and fiber bragg gratings. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2017, 23, 5600911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cowie, J.M.G. Polymers: Chemistry and Physics of Modern Materials; Intertext Books: Aylesbury, UK, 1973. [Google Scholar]
  18. Illarramendi, M.A.; Arrue, J.; Ayesta, I.; Jiménez, F.; Zubia, J.; Bikandi, I.; Tagaya, A.; Koike, Y. Amplified spontaneous emission in graded-index polymer optical fibers: Theory and experiment. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 24254–24266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Shaklee, K.L.; Leheny, R.F. Direct determination of optical gain in semiconductor crystals. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1971, 18, 475–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kruhlak, R.; Kuzyk, M. Side-illumination fluorescence spectroscopy. I. Principles. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1999, 16, 1749–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kruhlak, R.; Kuzyk, M. Side-illumination fluorescence spectroscopy. II. Applications to squaraine-dye-doped polymer optical fibers. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 1999, 16, 1756–1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kuriki, K.; Kobayashi, T.; Imai, N.; Tamura, T.; Nishihara, S.; Nishizawa, Y.; Tagaya, A.; Koike, Y. High-efficiency organic dye-doped polymer optical fiber lasers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2000, 77, 331–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Koike, Y.; Ishigure, I.; Nihei, E. High-bandwidth graded-index polymer optical fiber. IEEE J. Lightwave Technol. 1995, 13, 1475–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tagaya, A.; Kobayashi, T.; Nakatsuka, S.; Nihei, E.; Sasaki, K.; Koike, Y. High Gain and high power organic dye-doped polymer optical fiber amplifiers: Absorption and Emission Cross Sections and Gain Characteristics. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1997, 36, 204–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yamamoto, T.; Fujii, K.; Tagaya, A.; Nihei, E.; Koike, Y.; Sasaki, K. High-power optical source using dye-doped polymer optical fiber. J. Nonlinear Opt. Phys. Mater. 1996, 5, 73–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Palchik, O.; Jaber, N.; Amram, I.; Roitfeld, A.; Vaistikh, L. UV Curing process applied for POFs and their doping using fluorescent materials. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Plastic Optical Fibers, Nuremberg, Germany, 22–24 September 2015; pp. 26–29.
  27. Palchik, O.; Palchik, V. Thermoset and Thermoplastic Fibers and Preparation Thereof by UV Curing. Patent WO 2012156896A1, 22 November 2012. [Google Scholar]
  28. De la Rosa-Cruz, E.; Dirk, C.W.; Rodríguez, A.; Castaño, V.M. Characterization of fluorescence induced by side illumination of rhodamine B doped plastic optical fibers. Fiber Integr. Opt. 2001, 20, 457–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Arrue, J.; Illarramendi, M.A.; Ayesta, I.; Jiménez, F.; Zubia, J.; Tagaya, A.; Koike, Y. Laser-like performance of side-pumped dye-doped polymer optical fibers. IEEE Photonics J. 2015, 7, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Parola, I.; Illarramendi, M.A.; Arrue, J.; Ayesta, I.; Jiménez, F.; Zubia, J.; Tagaya, A.; Koike, Y. Characterization of the optical gain in doped polymer optical fibers. J. Lumin. 2016, 177, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cyprych, K.; Kopczynska, Z.; Kajzar, F.; Rau, I.; Mysliewic, J. Tunable wavelength light emission and amplification in rhodamine 6G aggregates. Adv. Device Mater. 2015, 1, 69–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Costela, A.; García-Moreno, I.; Sastre, R. Polymeric solid-state dye lasers: Recent developments. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2003, 5, 4745–4763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Xia, R.; Heliotis, G.; Hou, Y.; Bradley, D.D.C. Fluorene-based conjugated polymer optical gain media. Org. Electron. 2003, 4, 165–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lu, Y.; Penzkofer, A. Absorption behaviour of methanolic rhodamine 6G solutions at high concentration. Chem. Phys. 1986, 107, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Penzkofer, A.; Leupacher, W. Fluorescence behaviour of highly concentrated rhodamine 6G solutions. J. Lumin. 1987, 37, 61–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Persano, L.; Camposeo, A.; Del Carro, P.; Fasano, V.; Moffa, M.; Manco, R.; D’Agostino, S.; Pisignano, D. Distrubuted feedback inprinted electrospun fiber lasers. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 6542–6547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Illarramendi, M.A.; Zubia, J.; Bazzana, L.; Durana, G.; Aldabaldetreku, G.; Sarasua, J.-R. Spectroscopic characterization of plastic optical fibers doped with fluorine oligomers. J. Lightwave Technol. 2009, 27, 3220–3226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Goudket, H.; Nhung, T.H.; Ea-Kim, B.; Roger, G.; Canva, M. Importance of dye host on absorption, propagation losses, and amplified spontaneous emission for dye-doped polymer thin films. Appl. Opt. 2006, 10, 7736–7741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Flipsen, T.A.C.; Steendam, R.; Pennings, A.J.; Hadziioannou, G. A novel thermoset polymer optical fiber. Adv. Mater. 1996, 8, 45–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Faloss, M.; Canva, M.; Georges, P.; Brun, A.; Chaput, F.; Boilot, J.P. Toward millions of laser pulses with pyrromethene-and perylene-doped xerogels. Appl. Opt. 1997, 36, 6760–6763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Jaison, P.; Vallabhan, C.P.G.; Radhakrishnan, P.; Nampoori, V.P.N. ASE and photostability measurements in dye doped step index, graded index and hollow polymer optical fiber. Opt. Laser Technol. 2014, 63, 34–38. [Google Scholar]
  42. Ayesta, I.; Illarramendi, M.A.; Arrue, J.; Jiménez, F.; Zubia, J.; Bikandi, I.; Ugartemendia, J.M.; Sarasua, J.-R. Luminescence study of polymer optical fibers doped with conjugated polymers. J. Lightwave Technol. 2012, 30, 3367–3375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hung, S.-T.; Bhuyan, A.; Schademan, K.; Steverlynck, J.; McCluskey, M.D.; Koeckelberghs, G.; Clays, K.; Kuzyk, M.G. Spectroscopic studies of the mechanism of reversible photodegradation of 1-substituted aminoanthraquinone-doped polymers. J. Chem. Phys. 2016, 144, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Refractive-index profiles (blue solid lines) and dye radial distributions (red dashed lines) in the fiber core obtained for the thermoplastic POF (a) and for the thermosetting POF (b).
Figure 1. Refractive-index profiles (blue solid lines) and dye radial distributions (red dashed lines) in the fiber core obtained for the thermoplastic POF (a) and for the thermosetting POF (b).
Polymers 09 00090 g001
Figure 2. Experimental set-up for the measurement of the ASE and the fiber gain using the VSL method. Legend: SH: second harmonic generator; I: iris; VF: variable filters; L1: divergent lens; L2: convergent lens; L3: cylindrical lens of f´ = +15 cm; SL: sliding blade; POSxy: micro positioner; FH: filter holder; FOS: fiber-optic spectrometer. Top inset: photograph of a fiber in the experimental set-up. Bottom inset: photograph of the thermoplastic fiber (left) and of the thermosetting one (right).
Figure 2. Experimental set-up for the measurement of the ASE and the fiber gain using the VSL method. Legend: SH: second harmonic generator; I: iris; VF: variable filters; L1: divergent lens; L2: convergent lens; L3: cylindrical lens of f´ = +15 cm; SL: sliding blade; POSxy: micro positioner; FH: filter holder; FOS: fiber-optic spectrometer. Top inset: photograph of a fiber in the experimental set-up. Bottom inset: photograph of the thermoplastic fiber (left) and of the thermosetting one (right).
Polymers 09 00090 g002
Figure 3. (a) Absorption coefficients corresponding to the thermoplastic POF and to the thermosetting POF; (b) Fluorescence spectra (solid lines) and ASE spectra (dotted lines) corresponding to both types of POFs. The fluorescence excitation irradiances are 0.1 mJ·cm−2 (0.01 mJ of pump energy with ze = 0.92 cm) for the thermoplastic POF and 2.88 mJ·cm−2 (0.265 mJ with ze = 0.92 cm) for the thermosetting POF. The ASE excitation irradiances are 41.3 mJ·cm−2 (3.8 mJ with ze = 0.92 cm) and 72 mJ·cm−2 (6.6 mJ with ze = 0.92 cm), respectively.
Figure 3. (a) Absorption coefficients corresponding to the thermoplastic POF and to the thermosetting POF; (b) Fluorescence spectra (solid lines) and ASE spectra (dotted lines) corresponding to both types of POFs. The fluorescence excitation irradiances are 0.1 mJ·cm−2 (0.01 mJ of pump energy with ze = 0.92 cm) for the thermoplastic POF and 2.88 mJ·cm−2 (0.265 mJ with ze = 0.92 cm) for the thermosetting POF. The ASE excitation irradiances are 41.3 mJ·cm−2 (3.8 mJ with ze = 0.92 cm) and 72 mJ·cm−2 (6.6 mJ with ze = 0.92 cm), respectively.
Polymers 09 00090 g003
Figure 4. Spectral full width at half maximum and irradiance of the light emitted from the thermoplastic POF (a) and from the thermosetting POF (b). In both fibers, ze and zne were maintained constant (ze = 0.92 cm and zne = 3.3 cm).
Figure 4. Spectral full width at half maximum and irradiance of the light emitted from the thermoplastic POF (a) and from the thermosetting POF (b). In both fibers, ze and zne were maintained constant (ze = 0.92 cm and zne = 3.3 cm).
Polymers 09 00090 g004
Figure 5. Experimentally-obtained values of the energy absorbed in each fiber as a function of the incident pump energy when ze = 0.92 cm. The dashed lines serve to guide the eye.
Figure 5. Experimentally-obtained values of the energy absorbed in each fiber as a function of the incident pump energy when ze = 0.92 cm. The dashed lines serve to guide the eye.
Polymers 09 00090 g005
Figure 6. Output irradiance from the thermoplastic POF (a) and from the thermosetting POF (b) measured at two different emission wavelengths in each case: 570 and 590 nm in the case of the thermoplastic fiber, and 605 and 620 nm in the case of the thermosetting fiber one. The pump irradiances are 6 and 30 mJ·cm−2, respectively. ze,max = 0.92 cm in both cases. The dashed lines are the fittings using Equation (1).
Figure 6. Output irradiance from the thermoplastic POF (a) and from the thermosetting POF (b) measured at two different emission wavelengths in each case: 570 and 590 nm in the case of the thermoplastic fiber, and 605 and 620 nm in the case of the thermosetting fiber one. The pump irradiances are 6 and 30 mJ·cm−2, respectively. ze,max = 0.92 cm in both cases. The dashed lines are the fittings using Equation (1).
Polymers 09 00090 g006
Figure 7. Spectral gains of the thermoplastic fiber and the thermosetting one. The pump irradiances are 6 and 30 mJ·cm−2, respectively.
Figure 7. Spectral gains of the thermoplastic fiber and the thermosetting one. The pump irradiances are 6 and 30 mJ·cm−2, respectively.
Polymers 09 00090 g007
Figure 8. Output irradiance as a function of the propagation distance for the thermoplastic POF (a) and for the thermosetting POF (b) at three different emission wavelengths: 580, 600, and 650 nm for the thermoplastic fiber, and 610 , 630, and 680 nm for the thermosetting fiber. The dashed lines are the fittings to Equation (2). The excitation wavelength in both cases is 520 nm with 22 nJ·cm−2 of irradiance.
Figure 8. Output irradiance as a function of the propagation distance for the thermoplastic POF (a) and for the thermosetting POF (b) at three different emission wavelengths: 580, 600, and 650 nm for the thermoplastic fiber, and 610 , 630, and 680 nm for the thermosetting fiber. The dashed lines are the fittings to Equation (2). The excitation wavelength in both cases is 520 nm with 22 nJ·cm−2 of irradiance.
Polymers 09 00090 g008
Figure 9. Linear-attenuation coefficient for both the thermoplastic fiber and the thermosetting one. At 700 nm, this coefficient is 0.018 cm−1 in the thermoplastic fiber and 0.027 cm−1 in the thermosetting one. The excitation irradiance at 520 nm is 22 nJ·cm−2.
Figure 9. Linear-attenuation coefficient for both the thermoplastic fiber and the thermosetting one. At 700 nm, this coefficient is 0.018 cm−1 in the thermoplastic fiber and 0.027 cm−1 in the thermosetting one. The excitation irradiance at 520 nm is 22 nJ·cm−2.
Polymers 09 00090 g009
Figure 10. Evolutions of the average wavelengths of the emission spectra of the thermosetting fiber (o) and the thermoplastic fiber (Δ) as functions of the propagation distance. The pump irradiance was 22 nJ·cm−2 at 520 nm. The equations correspond to the linear fittings (solid lines).
Figure 10. Evolutions of the average wavelengths of the emission spectra of the thermosetting fiber (o) and the thermoplastic fiber (Δ) as functions of the propagation distance. The pump irradiance was 22 nJ·cm−2 at 520 nm. The equations correspond to the linear fittings (solid lines).
Polymers 09 00090 g010
Figure 11. Fluorescence intensities, (a) and (b); average wavelengths, (c) and (d); and FWHMs (e) and (f), as functions of the excitation time. The excitation wavelength was 520 nm, the excitation irradiance was 22 nJ·cm−2, and the light propagation distance was 4.4 cm. The fibers were excited for 60 min in (a), (c), and (e). The fibers were re-excited for another 60 min after a 24 h rest in (b), (d), and (f).
Figure 11. Fluorescence intensities, (a) and (b); average wavelengths, (c) and (d); and FWHMs (e) and (f), as functions of the excitation time. The excitation wavelength was 520 nm, the excitation irradiance was 22 nJ·cm−2, and the light propagation distance was 4.4 cm. The fibers were excited for 60 min in (a), (c), and (e). The fibers were re-excited for another 60 min after a 24 h rest in (b), (d), and (f).
Polymers 09 00090 g011
Table 1. Manufacturing fiber characteristics.
Table 1. Manufacturing fiber characteristics.
POFType of fiberRefractive indexCore diameterCladding thicknessDopant concentrationOverlapping factor
ThermoplasticGI1.501 *0.6 mm0.4 mm16 ppm **1.4
ThermosettingSI1.540.7 mm0.05 mm300 ppm1
* maximum value. ** average value.
Table 2. Fluorescence and ASE characteristics of the thermoplastic POF and of the thermosetting one.
Table 2. Fluorescence and ASE characteristics of the thermoplastic POF and of the thermosetting one.
POFFluorescenceASEThreshold energy
λpeakFWHMλpeakFWHM
Thermoplastic586 nm40 nm579 nm18 nm0.14 ± 0.02 mJ
Thermosetting616 nm47 nm612 nm18 nm0.63 ± 0.02 mJ
Table 3. Values of the fittings to the experimental curves of Figure 11a with Equation (3).
Table 3. Values of the fittings to the experimental curves of Figure 11a with Equation (3).
POFaτ1 (s)bτ2 (s)R2
Thermoplastic37.4511365.81477100.993
Thermosetting61.51156743.671634000.999

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ayesta, I.; Illarramendi, M.A.; Arrue, J.; Parola, I.; Jiménez, F.; Zubia, J.; Tagaya, A.; Koike, Y. Optical Characterization of Doped Thermoplastic and Thermosetting Polymer-Optical-Fibers. Polymers 2017, 9, 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9030090

AMA Style

Ayesta I, Illarramendi MA, Arrue J, Parola I, Jiménez F, Zubia J, Tagaya A, Koike Y. Optical Characterization of Doped Thermoplastic and Thermosetting Polymer-Optical-Fibers. Polymers. 2017; 9(3):90. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9030090

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ayesta, Igor, María Asunción Illarramendi, Jon Arrue, Itxaso Parola, Felipe Jiménez, Joseba Zubia, Akihiro Tagaya, and Yasuhiro Koike. 2017. "Optical Characterization of Doped Thermoplastic and Thermosetting Polymer-Optical-Fibers" Polymers 9, no. 3: 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9030090

APA Style

Ayesta, I., Illarramendi, M. A., Arrue, J., Parola, I., Jiménez, F., Zubia, J., Tagaya, A., & Koike, Y. (2017). Optical Characterization of Doped Thermoplastic and Thermosetting Polymer-Optical-Fibers. Polymers, 9(3), 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9030090

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop