Next Article in Journal
Laboratory and Field Trials to Identify Sustainable Chemical Control Strategies for Trioza erytreae in European Citrus Orchards
Next Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Nitrogen Fertilization on Yield and Macronutrient Concentrations in Three Cultivars of Jerusalem Artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.)
Previous Article in Journal
Development of an Optimal Algorithm for Detecting Damaged and Diseased Potato Tubers Moving along a Conveyor Belt Using Computer Vision Systems
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ammonium-Based Compound Fertilisers Mitigate Nitrous Oxide Emissions in Temperate Grassland
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Agronomy
Volume 11
Issue 10
10.3390/agronomy11101981
agronomy-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Release of Nitrogen from Granulate Mineral and Organic Fertilizers and Its Effect on Selected Chemical Parameters of Soil

by
Tomasz Niedziński
1,*,
María José Sierra
2,
Jan Łabętowicz
1,
Kinga Noras
1,
Cristina Cabrales
2 and
Rocio Millán
2
1
Independent Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Institute of Agriculture, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Nowoursynowska 166, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland
2
CIEMAT—Environment Department, Avda. Complutense, 40, 28040 Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2021, 11(10), 1981; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11101981
Submission received: 4 August 2021 / Revised: 18 September 2021 / Accepted: 25 September 2021 / Published: 30 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Improving Nitrogen Fertilizer Use Efficiency for Sustainable Agriculture)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The objective of this work was the evaluation of the release patterns of nitrogen from various types of fertilizers and their impact on selected chemical parameters of calcareous soil. Three mineral fertilizers and two organic fertilizers were tested in the laboratory for 35 days. This study showed the rapid release of nitrogen from mineral types. More than 70% of the nitrogen was released from the ammonium granules and 98% from the urea granules. The rate of nitrogen release from pellets of organic origin was much slower than from mineral pellets, the released N was 15–28% of the original amount. Soil pH was altered by incubation. The content of soil N changed significantly due to the incubation of N mineral fertilizers; no changes were observed for organic fertilizers. The EC value of the soil solution was significantly modified under the influence of mineral granules, it reached a maximum of 1147 µS cm−1 on the 10th day, and for organic fertilizers of 944 µS cm−1 on the 35th day. The results of this study characterize each N release pattern, providing data to support a more efficient nutrient management strategy in calcareous soils and the effect of incubated fertilizers on soil chemical parameters.

1. Introduction

In the contemporary fertilization system, solutions are sought that are characterized by high precision in the application of nutrients enabling more effective management of nutrients, one of them may be application directly to the root development zone. N-urea fertilizers in calcareous soil are characterized by a low fertilization efficiency index of 30–40% [1]. Factors affected by N losses in calcareous soils are ammonia volatilization, nitrate leaching, and denitrification processes [2]. The gaseous losses of ammonium are related to soil moisture [3,4], soil pH [5], granular size and shape [6], the salinity of the soil environment [7], and fertilizer placement [8]. NO3− is highly susceptible to nitrate leaching as it moves through the soil with diffusion [9] and mass flow of water [10]. The increase in soil pH to the value of 7-8 has an impact on nitrogen transformation, stimulating the formation of nitrates, which form nitrous oxide [11,12], this process is strongly inhibited at pH 8.5 [13]. The conversion rate of organic compounds into mineral compounds underlies processes responding to N efficiency and losses. Calcareous soil (pH 8.2 or higher) has been proven to increase urea hydrolysis, which reaches completion within two days of application [5]. Intensive agricultural systems that are quite fertilizer based demand high inputs with increased chances of N losses resulting in huge economic loss [14]. Some practices, such as deep–band placement application [15], high doses of ammonium nitrogen localized in special depots, time of application [16], and slow-release fertilizers [17,18], work to minimize nutrient risk pollution and maximize economic aspects [19]. The toxic effect of ammonium ion on the root system when the fertilizer is placed deeply is mitigated by the minimal contact between the source of N in the deposit and the surface of the root system [20,21], the use of SRF (slow-release fertilizer) is also a safe solution, causing minimal damage to germination [22]. Furthermore, new local conditions created within the nitrogen source zone slow down nitrobacteria activity [23], and less NO3− loss occurs [21,24]. If the release rate is more compatible with the metabolic needs of plants, high productivity of fertilization can be achieved [25]. Plant nutrient availability is controlled by soil properties and microbe interactions [26,27]. High soil pH accelerates nitrification, with an optimum pH of 8.3 to 9.3 for Nitrobacter and 8.5 to 8.8 for Nitrosomonas [28]. Beyond that, the availability of nutrients differs substantially in the root zone and as a medium of plant growth in bulk soil [29]. Inorganic nitrogen forms N-NH4+ and N-NO3−, and can trigger pH changes in soil of up to 1.2 pH units under field conditions [30,31]. A surface application of urea increases the pH until the nitrification process accelerates [8]. If the relative concentration of NH3 in soil increases from 0.1 to 1%, 10%, or 50%, the soil pH value increases from 6 to 7, 8, or 9, respectively [32,33]. Organic biomass i.e., manure, increases total organic carbon and total nitrogen in soil [34]. This improvement can be accomplished faster with higher soil temperature and soil humidity [35,36]. The individual physical and chemical properties of granules influence the soil characteristics, changing the soil parameters until a new balance is reached. Analyzing release rate patterns enables a better understanding of how each N fertilizer works in calcareous soils. Optimal nutrient management can then be achieved by supplying crops according to the nutrient uptake requirements of each stage.
To achieve the objective of this study, a laboratory experiment was carried out using a soil incubation method which is common practice for slow-release rate pattern measurement [37,38]. The 35-day incubation of fertilizers in calcareous soil allows the nitrogen release pattern to be analyzed throughout the incubation period and at different soil moisture levels. Additionally, the soil chemical parameters, soil N, soil pH, and EC (electric conductivity) were monitored in parallel.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Fertilizers

This research was carried out in laboratory conditions in Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Technológicas (CIEMAT), Madrid.
Two mineral fertilizers called UreaPhoS (U-PSc and U-PSf) were used in this study, containing the same quantity and types of chemical components, but with different size granules with a diameter of 10 mm and 3–5 mm, respectively.
Urea as a nitrogen source in this study was in the form of an adduct with calcium, being chemically bonded to N–Ca hydrogen and classified as a slow-release fertilizer (SRF). The granulate contained nitrogen (N), sulfur (S) in CaSO4·4CO(NH2)2, and phosphorus (P) in Ca(H2PO4)2 chemical form. Granules were formulated using a plate granulator [39,40], and the compressive strength of the granules was 36 and 222 N, respectively [39].
The third mineral fertilizer, DAP–diammonium phosphate, contained 18% nitrogen in ammonium form, and 46% P—P2O5 in the form of (NH4H2PO4) and (NH4)2(HPO4). This fertilizer consisted of granules 3–5 mm in diameter. The compressive strength of the granules was 71.1 N.
Two organic fertilizers were prepared in an experimental station in a pilot installation of pellet production in Skierniewice, Poland. One was made from turkey manure (TM) and the other was from post-mushroom substrate (MS). Nitrogen in these pellets occurs as ammonium (mineral) and as organic compounds.
The determination of ammonium N and Kjeldahl nitrogen [41] was carried out in an automated way using KjelFlex K-360 equipment (distillation and titration units, Buchi, Basel, Switzerland) coupled to a digestion module (Digestion K-435 and a Scrubber B-414, Buchi). The modular setup allowed the adaptation of the KjelFlex K-360 to the other mentioned modules for ease of operation. With this set of modules, it was possible to carry out a distillation and a titration of samples, allowing the ammonia N to be directly measured, or for N Kjeldahl to be measured following the digestion process.
The total, organic, and ammonium nitrogen was determined in the dry mass of 0.3 g randomly chosen samples (Table 1). The ammonium N was determined with equipment without a mineralization section, only carrying out the distillation process. The organic N was calculated as the difference between the total and ammonium N.

2.2. Study Soil

The soil was taken from the top 0–20 cm layer of cultivated soil, from a plot located in Buendia (Castilla-La Mancha region), in the central part of Spain which is under the influence of a Continental Mediterranean climate. The soil was extremely calcareous according to the classification for these types of soil [42] based on carbonate content [43], which limits crop production due to the low nutrient availability, available moisture, or organic matter [27,44]. Oxidizable organic carbon (OC) in soil was determined by wet acid oxidation [45,46]. The soil pH was determined by the potentiometric method in water with a proportion of soil to water (m/m) equal 1 to 2.5. The soil chemical characteristics were measured in dry soil sieved through 2.0 mm mesh (Table 2).
The water content capacity was measured using the cylinder method by placing an absorbent membrane until the excess water is drawn away by gravity. Once equilibrium is reached, the water holding capacity is calculated based on the weight of the water held in the sample vs. the sample dry weight at 105 °C.

2.3. Experimental Design

Every fertilizer granule or pellet was covered by the soil. A proportion of 1 to 50 (10 g of fertilizer and 500 g of soil) were arranged in rectangular boxes with dimensions: 25 cm × 15 cm × 4 cm (Figure 1).
The experiment was designed as follows: 4 times × 2 soil moisture levels × 5 fertilizers × 3 replication = 120 treatments. The granules/pellets in all boxes were covered by the soil so that no granules were visible above the soil surface. For each incubation time, the boxes were then dried at room temperature, before the fertilizer granules/pellets were separated from the soil by hand. The crumbled and ground samples of separated granules/pellets and soil were taken into the chemical analysis. This sampling was done at a termination time of 5, 10, 20, and 35 days. Throughout the incubation, two levels of humidity, 30% and 60% of maximum water holding capacity, were maintained. Appropriate soil humidity was maintained day-to-day by weighing samples, and water was added to soil where water declined. Determination of ammonium, organic and total nitrogen in granules, and total nitrogen in soil were detected according to the Kjeldahl procedure [41]. Additionally, pH and EC in water for each soil sample were measured using the potentiometric method.
The experiment was set up in a random system with three replications for each treatment. Statistical differences were evaluated by an analysis of variance (ANOVA), using the Tukey procedure for homogeneous groups. The statistical elaboration was conducted using the software STATISTICA 13.1. The significance level of analysis was α = 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Total Nitrogen

The release rate of total nitrogen was characterized specifically for mineral and organic forms of nitrogen N. The two mineral fertilizers called UreaPhoS (U-PSc and U-PSf) released a similar amount of nitrogen by the end of the experiment (Table 3). The most rapid changes were observed during the first five days, and over 98% of the N was released throughout the 35 days.
The ammonium N, the only N form in DAP, was characterized with high dynamic changes, with the most rapid occurring in the first five days. In the subsequent periods, in addition to the significant influence of incubation time, the release slowed. In the final incubation period, more than 70% of the ammonium was released. The urea and ammonium granules reacted with a more dynamic release when the soil was kept at a higher moisture level, with the exception of U-PSf. In the case of small U-PSf granules (3–5 mm), the higher soil moisture level had no significant influence on the N release rate.
The release rate of total N from organic pellets turned out to be slow in dynamics. The total percentage of N released by TM and MS was only 20–32% and 15–20%, respectively for 35 days. As there was a significant decrease in N over time with TM, higher soil moisture corresponded to much higher N release. However, a different pattern of N release from MS showed no statistical difference between the 5 to 35 day incubation periods, and there was no effect from higher soil moisture (Table 4).

3.2. Ammonium Nitrogen in Organic Pellets

The incubation time and soil moisture levels significantly affected the release of N from TM and MS (Table 5). A significant steady decrease in N ammonium in the pellets occurred up to 20 days of incubation. A large amount of ammonium was released from the pellets in the first 20 days, accounting for about 40 to 60% of the total initial amount in TM and MS, respectively. Higher soil moisture resulted in greater ammonium release. It must be noted that ammonium DAP and TM, MS are the same chemical forms. However, the results show an approximately 25–30% faster release from DAP (Table 3) compared to ammonium from organic pellets. The final release varied from 45 to 70% and 65 to 70% ammonium for the TM and MS pellets, respectively.

3.3. Organic Nitrogen

Data obtained from organic N incubation showed slow-release characteristics. Regarding the incubation time, only a small amount of organic N was released. During 35 days of soil incubation, 12–16% and 3–8% of N were decomposed by TM and MS, respectively (Table 6, Figure 2).
Organic nitrogen release indicates the need to extend the range of incubation time, and long-term studies should be carried out to comprehensively evaluate the organic N release pattern. Statistically, it has been demonstrated that higher amounts of N are released with higher soil moisture content for TM fertilizer. The curve of ammoniacal, organic, and total nitrogen release as a function of time for TM and MS pellets is presented below (Figure 2).

3.4. Soil Nitrogen

The study of soil nitrogen content showed that there were significant changes in its concentration. After the second (10 days) and third (20 days) sampling dates, there was a significant increase in % N in the soil with incubation of the mineral granules. In the initial period (10 days), the maximum concentration of Kjeldahl nitrogen ranged from 0.32 to 0.35% and then decreased until the end of incubation (Figure 3). Moreover, a significant influence of soil moisture on the measured amount of N in the soil was found. Higher N concentration after 20 days of U-PSc and DAP incubation was maintained at higher soil moisture levels. In the final sampling (35 days), different soil moisture levels had no effect on the N status of the soil. In contrast to organic pellets, incubation had no significant effect on the growth of Kjeldahl N in soil, both as a function of time and of soil moisture.
Detailed analysis of nitrogen distribution in the soil–fertilizer system shows significant differences, characterizing each N source separately from the beginning to the end of the incubation period, as depicted below (Figure 4).
The total (soil, fertilizer) amount of N expressed as 100% was represented as the sum of the N of the soil and fertilizer before incubation (zero days). Incubation periods after zero days showed differences in the distribution of N and the share of nitrogen between the fertilizer and the soil. Kjeldahl nitrogen was the sum of ammoniacal and organic nitrogen from both sources, soil and fertilizer, which decreased over time in all facilities, and some nitrogen was not measured by the Kjeldahl procedure. Throughout the experiment, the most intense processes were assigned to urea, the medium ones to DAP, and the slowest to organic sources. Statistically significant differences in the distribution of N occurred in all analyzed mineral fertilizers. In the case of organic pellets incubation, there were no statistical differences in nitrogen distribution between the pellets and the soil. Throughout the incubation period, the share of measured nitrogen in pellets and soil was not statistically different. As in the case of mineral granules, part of the nitrogen in the soil fertilizer system was not detected by the Kjeldahl procedure. This phenomenon may be the result of the high pH of the soil and, as a consequence, the influence of the alkaline reaction on the loss of some nitrogen. The portion of nitrogen that was not measured by the Kjeldahl procedure is described in Figure 4 as N left. Nitrogen that has not been measured against the starting amount of zero days as a reference amount could possibly be converted to other forms of nitrogen, such as ammonia and nitrates. Calcareous soil conditions with alkaline pH may generate ammonia losses if the soil pH exceeds 7.0, the course of losses is described by the following reaction:
CO(NH2)2 + 2H2O → (NH4)2CO3 → ↑2NH3 + H2O + CO2

3.5. Soil pH

Data presented in Figure 5 clearly show the influence of each treatment on soil pH. Incubated mineral granules were characterized by an increase in soil pH at initial sampling, with a peak between 5 and 10 days. It is likely that the hydrolysis products, as evidenced by Equation (1), triggered an alkaline reaction. Moreover, this growth was significantly stimulated by higher soil moisture only for U-PSc and U-PSf, but only after 10 days of incubation. In contrast to the mineral granulates, the changes in TM and MS showed a significant decrease at 20 days of incubation below the soil pH before the start of incubation. Moreover, a significant effect of higher soil moisture on the decrease in pH was shown, resulting in a greater decrease under the influence of higher humidity.

3.6. Electric Conductivity (EC) of Soil Solution

The data presented in Table 7 revealed the effect of the test conditions on the EC value (µS cm−1). The obtained results showed a significant influence of time on the EC value. The first incubation periods between 10 and 20 days resulted in a significant increase in EC due to the incubation of mineral fertilizers, followed by a significant decrease in the value by the end of the experiment. Table 7 shows that treatments with higher soil moisture significantly increased the EC for all incubated mineral fertilizers.
The study of the influence of incubation time and soil moisture shows the opposite trend than for mineral fertilizers. During incubation, there was a steady increase in EC values, reaching a maximum on day 35, and ranging from 698 to 944 and from 424 and 797 µS cm−1 for TM and MS, respectively (Table 8). These data also indicate that higher soil moisture had a significant effect on the EC value.

4. Discussion

The results of this research demonstrate the effect of different N forms, granulation or pellet preparation properties, incubation time, and different humidity on the N release model from incubated fertilizers in calcareous soil. The second aim was to evaluate their influence on the chemical properties of the soil as a function of time and humidity.
The urea nitrogen and ammonium reactions have revealed themselves as very fast sources of nitrogen, which were quickly released from the granules into the soil within a few days. N released at the end of the experiment by U-PSc and U-PSf accounted for more than 98%, and by DAP about 70–80% of the initial amount. After the first 5 days, the percentage of N released was still high, with 85–90% N released from urea and 65–75% N released from DAP. Following Trenkel 2010 [47], U-PSc granules can be classified as a slow-release fertilizer. The 10 mm size classifies them as super granules, with retarded nutrient release materials due to their low surface area to volume ratio. The analysis of data for the U-PSc fertilizer showed that this fertilizer, granulated to a large granule diameter, did not meet the criteria for slow-release fertilizers. Taking into account the calcareous soils and the very high risk of nitrogen loss in gaseous form, this fertilizer should be applied to soil and covered before sowing. Placing the granulate in calcareous soils causes a greater or lesser loss of nitrogen, due to the conditions in which the fertilizer is located. Various studies show that losses from ammonia volatilization vary from 11 to 60% depending on the applied method of fertilization, with the greatest losses occurring during surface application to soil with a high pH of around 9.0 [48].
The study reveals the effects of the granulation process on the release patterns. Two mineral fertilizers, U-PSc and U-PSf, granulated from chemically identical components, were tested for the effect of different granulation diameters on the release rate. Based on the research, a significantly higher rate of N released during incubation in soil with higher humidity was found for super-granules (U-PSc). Incubation of small diameter granules of 3–5 mm (U-PSf) showed no reaction in the rate of nitrogen release from the granule to the higher level of soil moisture. An equal amount of N was released at both soil moisture levels. U-PSf fertilizer with small granule diameters should be recommended for initial fertilization, as this fertilizer more dynamically modulates the environment in which it dissolves, quickly creating new conditions for plant growth [49]. This fertilizer can be used for crops grown in wide inter-row spaces, such as maize, beetroot, potatoes, vegetables.
Analysis of the DAP data indicated that nitrogen N was released systematically throughout the 35 days of incubation. The rate of nitrogen release was significantly affected by soil moisture, releasing more N in conditions of increased humidity. Conventional fertilizer can be used to pre-fertilize crops such as potato, corn, beet, as described above.
The implementation of practices such as split application and sowing fertilization can increase the efficiency of nitrogen use by up to 16–17% in calcareous soils [50]. A higher level of available nitrogen in calcareous soil results in a higher yield of plants, even in semi-dry soil conditions [51]. The small granules of U-PSf can be recommended for these conditions with a high dissolving capacity. In calcareous conditions, it is recommended to apply fertilizers 5.0 to 7.5 cm below the soil surface [8], even at a fertilization depth of 3–5 cm below the soil surface, as this allows to minimize ammonia volatilization by 85–95% [52].
Incubation of the organic pellets showed that the release rate was very slow. This type of fertilizer can be used as an additive to mineral nitrogen sources, as a background for mineral fertilization. This type of nitrogen source should be recommended for crops with long growing periods, e.g., corn, potato, beetroot.
All mineral fertilizers tested in this study can be recommended for fertilizing plants with a fast growth rate, such as vegetables and crops, but due to the form of urea or ammonia, it is necessary to mix with the soil before sowing or during planting. Most of the N transformation in calcareous soil occurs during the first few days of fertilizer incubation in the soil [5]. The fate of the applied fertilization depends on the amount of available nitrogen in the soil, as in poor soils it can be immobilized, and in rich soils, it can undergo mineralization as a source of available nitrogen [53]. When urea is applied in concentrated amounts in narrow bands, the formation of NH4+ ions leads to the consumption of protons and localized alkalization in the band [54]. This effect has been demonstrated in various studies, in which the local pH increased up to approximately 9.3 in response to the hydrolyzing urea band [55]. These conditions promote nitrogen losses via volatilization [56,57].
It was confirmed in the present study that the incubation of urea and ammonium brought the soil pH peak from 8.39 to 8.9–9.17. A higher concentration of ammonia in the soil is responsible for an increase in soil pH [32]. Moreover, high concentrations of NH4+ and an increase in pH increase the potential formation of phytotoxic concentrations of NH3, which may also have an inhibitory effect on nitrifying microorganisms [58].
The data clearly shows that all treatments significantly influenced the EC value. Incubation of mineral N resulted in a rapid increase in EC values, reaching a maximum of 1323 µS cm−1 for U-PSf. Incubation of organic pellets showed a steady gradual increase in soil EC from 194 to 394 µS cm−1. The significance of the influence of higher soil moisture on a significantly higher EC value was confirmed [59]. The maximum value measured in our research could have an impact on microbiological processes such as the nitrification process (10–37%), due to exceeding the threshold value of 0.7 dS m−1 [60,61]. A further increase in nitrification inhibition can reach up to 98%, with an increase in EC to 3–6 dS m–1 [62]. EC values from all treatments do not exceed the safe threshold causing damage to seedlings of cultivated plants. The EC from the analyzed treatments was below the threshold tolerated by maize (7.0 dS·m−1) or potato (1.7 dS·m−1) [63].
The results of studies on the pattern of nitrogen release from granules to soil showed statistical differences in release rates from different fertilizers. Incubation of these fertilizers showed a clear effect of the influence of various forms of granules on the chemical properties of carbonate soil.

5. Conclusions

Calcareous soil makes up more than 30% of the world’s soil, and their CaCO3 content ranges from a few percent to 95% [9] which influences their physico-chemical characteristics. Management practices in calcareous soils differ from those in non-calcareous soils due to the effect of soil pH and CaCO3 content on plant growth properties and due to chemical reactions that affect the loss or fixation of almost all nutrients [9,64]. Thus, the results of the experiments can be used to expand knowledge to improve fertilizer utilization in these soils, especially in highly calcareous soils.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: T.N., R.M., J.Ł.; methodology: T.N., R.M., J.Ł.; software: K.N.; validation: T.N., M.J.S.; formal analysis: T.N., J.Ł., K.N., C.C.; investigation: T.N.; resources: T.N., J.Ł.; data curation: T.N.; writing—original draft preparation: T.N.; writing—review, and editing: R.M., M.J.S., J.Ł.; visualization: T.N., M.J.S., K.N.; supervision: R.M., M.J.S., J.Ł., C.C.; project administration: R.M.; funding acquisition: J.Ł. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data are available by contacting the authors.

Acknowledgments

Thanks for the participation of people from the CIEMAT group at this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Khan, M.J.; Malik, A.; Zaman, M.; Khan, Q.; Ur Rehman, H.; Kalimullah. Nitrogen use efficiency and yield of maize crop as affected by Agrotain coated urea in arid calcareous soils. Soil Environ. 2014, 33, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  2. Rochette, P.; Angers, D.A.; Chantigny, M.H.; MacDonald, J.D.; Gasser, M.O.; Bertrand, N. Reducing ammonia volatilization in a no-till soil by incorporating urea and pig slurry in shallow bands. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 2009, 84, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rochette, P.; MacDonald, J.D.; Angers, D.A.; Chantigny, M.H.; Gasser, M.O.; Bertrand, N. Banding of urea increased ammonia volatilization in a dry acidic soil. J. Environ. Qual. 2009, 38, 1383–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Borowik, A.; Wyszkowska, J. Soil moisture as a factor affecting the microbiological and biochemical activity of soil. Plant Soil Environ. 2016, 62, 250–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Christianson, C.B.; Baethgen, W.E.; Carmona, G.; Howard, R.G. Microsite reactions of urea-nbtpt fertilizer on the soil surface. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1993, 25, 1107–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Allaire, S.E.; Parent, L.E. Physical Properties of Granular Organic-based Fertilisers, Part 1: Static Properties. Biosyst. Eng. 2004, 87, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Akhtar, M.; Hussain, F.; Ashraf, M.Y.; Qureshi, T.M.; Akhter, J.; Awan, A.R. Influence of Salinity on Nitrogen Transformations in Soil. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2012, 43, 1674–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sommer, S.G.; Schjoerring, J.K.; Denmead, O.T. Ammonia Emission from Mineral Fertilizers and Fertilized Crops. Adv. Agron. 2001, 82, 557–622. [Google Scholar]
  9. Marschner, P.; Rengel, Z. Nutrient Availability in Soils. In Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2012; pp. 315–330. [Google Scholar]
  10. Herrmann, M.; Pust, J.; Pott, R. Leaching of nitrate and ammonium in heathland and forest ecosystems in Northwest Germany under the influence of enhanced nitrogen deposition. Plant Soil 2005, 273, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cheng, W.; Sudo, S.; Tsuruta, H.; Yagi, K.; Hartley, A. Temporal and spatial variations in N2O emissions from a Chinese cabbage field as a function of type of fertilizer and application. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 2006, 74, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jiang, J.; Hu, Z.; Sun, W.; Huang, Y. Nitrous oxide emissions from Chinese cropland fertilized with a range of slow-release nitrogen compounds. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2010, 135, 216–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Weier, K.L.; Gilliam, J.W. Effect of acidity on denitrification and nitrous oxide evolution from Atlantic Coastal Plain soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1986, 50, 1202–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Boyer, E.W.; Goodale, C.L.; Jaworski, N.A.; Howarth, R.W. Anthropogenic nitrogen sources and relationships to riverine nitrogen export in the northeastern U.S.A. Biogeochemistry 2002, 57–58, 137–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wu, P.; Liu, F.; Li, H.; Cai, T.; Zhang, P.; Jia, Z. Suitable fertilizer application depth can increase nitrogen use efficiency and maize yield by reducing gaseous nitrogen losses. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 781, 146787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sommer, K. CULTAN cropping system: Fundamentals, state of development and perspectives. Nitrogen A Sustain. Ecosyst. Cell Plant 2000, 361–375. [Google Scholar]
  17. Stagnari, F.; Pisante, M. Slow release and conventional N fertilizers for nutrition of bell pepper. Plant Soil Environ. 2012, 58, 268–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Alemi, H.; Kianmehr, M.H.; Borghaee, A.M. Effect of pellet processing of fertilizer on slow-release nitrogen in soil. Asian J. Plant Sci. 2010, 9, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Geng, J.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, M.; Li, C.; Yang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Li, S. Long-term effects of controlled release urea application on crop yields and soil fertility under rice-oilseed rape rotation system. Field Crops Res. 2015, 184, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Marschner, H. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  21. Sommer, K. CULTAN-Düngung. In Physiologisch, Ökologisch, Ökonomisch Optimiertes Düngungsverfahren für Ackerkulturen, Grünland, Gemüse, Zierpflanzen und Obstgehölze; AgroConcept GmbH: Bonn, Germany, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  22. Azeem, B.; Kushaari, K.; Man, Z.B.; Basit, A.; Thanh, T.H. Review on materials & methods to produce controlled release coated urea fertilizer. J. Control. Release 2014, 181, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Petersen, J.; Hansen, B.; Sørensen, P. Nitrification of 15N-ammonium sulphate and crop recovery of 15N-labelled ammonium nitrates injected in bands. Eur. J. Agron. 2004, 21, 81–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Naeem, M.; Idrees, M.; Khan, M.M.A.; Moinuddin; Ansari, A.A. Task of mineral nutrients in eutrophication. In Eutrophication: Causes, Consequences and Control; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin, Germany, 2014; Volume 2, pp. 223–237. [Google Scholar]
  25. Lubkowski, K. Coating fertilizer granules with biodegradable materials for controlled fertilizer release. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 2014, 13, 2573–2581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jones, D.L.; Hodge, A.; Kuzyakov, Y. Plant and mycorrhizal regulation of rhizodeposition. New Phytol. 2004, 163, 459–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Motior Rahman, M.; Soaud, A.A.; Al Darwish, F.H.; Sofian-Azirun, M. Effects of sulfur and nitrogen on nutrients uptake of corn using acidified water. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 10, 8275–8283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Shammas, K.N. Interactions of temperature, pH, and biomass on the nitrification process. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 1986, 58, 52–59. [Google Scholar]
  29. Marschner, P.; Fu, Q.; Rengel, Z. Manganese availability and microbial populations in the rhizosphere of wheat genotypes differing in tolerance to Mn deficiency. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2003, 166, 712–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Smiley, R.W. Rhizosphere pH as influenced by plants, soils and nitrogen fertilizers. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 1974, 38, 795–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kanabo, I.A.K.; Gilkes, R.J. The role of soil pH in the dissolution of phosphate rock fertilizers. Fertil. Res. 1987, 12, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Freney, J.R.; Keerthisinghe, D.G.; Phongpan, S.; Chaiwanakupt, P.; Harrington, K.J. Effect of urease, nitrification and algal inhibitors on ammonia loss and grain yield of flooded rice in Thailand. Fertil. Res. 1994, 40, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Smith, J.L.; Doran, J.W. Measurement and use of pH and electrical conductivity for soil quality analysis. Methods Assess. Soil Qual. 2015, 49, 169–185. [Google Scholar]
  34. Giacometti, C.; Demyan, M.S.; Cavani, L.; Marzadori, C.; Ciavatta, C.; Kandeler, E. Chemical and microbiological soil quality indicators and their potential to differentiate fertilization regimes in temperate agroecosystems. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2013, 64, 32–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hood, R.C. The effect of soil temperature and moisture on organic matter decomposition and plant growth. Isot. Environ. Health Stud. 2001, 37, 25–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Agehara, S.; Warncke, D.D. Soil moisture and temperature effects on nitrogen release from organic nitrogen sources. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2005, 69, 1844–1855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Medina, L.C.; Sartain, J.B.; Obreza, T.A. Estimation of release properties of slow-release fertilizer materials. HortTechnology 2009, 19, 13–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Broschat, T.K.; Moore, K.K. Release rates of ammonium-nitrogen, nitrate-nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, magnesium, iron, and manganese from seven controlled-release fertilizers. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2007, 38, 843–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rusek, P.; Rutkowska, B.; Szulc, W.; Schab, S.; Łabętowicz, J.; Stępień, W.; Biskupski, A.; Niedziński, T. The urea superphosphate-based nps(M) fertilizer production technology. part 1. the evaluation of fertilizer effect on development of maize root system after sub-soil application of the fertilizer. Przem. Chem. 2016, 95, 1020–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Schab, S.; Biskupski, A.; Rusek, P. Process for production of a urea superphosphate fertilizer under continuous feeding of raw materials. Przem. Chem. 2016, 95, 1000–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. ISO 11261:1995. Soil Quality—Determination of Total Nitrogen—Modified Kjeldahl Method. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/19239.html (accessed on 18 June 2021).
  42. Krasilnikov, P.; Martí, J.J.I.; Arnold, R.; Shoba, S. A Handbook of Soil Terminology, Correlation and Classification. Stylus Pub. Llc.: London, UK, 2009; pp. 328–335. [Google Scholar]
  43. ISO 10693:1995. Soil Quality—Determination of Carbonate Content—Volumetric Method. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/18781.html (accessed on 18 June 2021).
  44. ISO 10694:1995(en)ISO 10694:1995. Soil Quality—Determination of Organic and Total Carbon after Dry Combustion. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/18782.html (accessed on 18 June 2021).
  45. Walkley, A.; Black, I.A. An examination of the degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 1934, 37, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Walkley, A. A critical examination of a rapid method for determining organic carbon in soils—effect of variations in digestion conditions and of inorganic soil constituents. Soil Sci. 1947, 63, 251–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Trenkel, M.E. Slow- and Controlled-Release and Stabilized Fertilizers: An Option for Enhancing Nutrient Use Efficiency in Agriculture, 2nd ed.; International Fertilizer Industry Association: Paris, France, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  48. Fillery, I.; Simpson, J.R.; De Datta, S.K. Contribution of ammonia volatilization to total nitrogen loss after applications of urea to wetland rice fields. Fertil. Res. 1986, 8, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hasnain, M.; Chen, J.; Ahmed, N.; Memon, S.; Wang, L.; Wang, Y.; Wang, P. The effects of fertilizer type and application time on soil properties, plant traits, yield and quality of tomato. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ju, X.T.; Liu, X.J.; Pan, J.R.; Zhang, F.S. Fate of 15N-Labeled Urea Under a Winter Wheat-Summer Maize Rotation on the North China Plain1 1 Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 40571071, 30390080 and 30370287) and the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (No. IRT0511). Pedosphere 2007, 17, 52–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zangani, E.; Afsahi, K.; Shekari, F.; Sweeney, E.M.; Mastinu, A. Nitrogen and phosphorus addition to soil improves seed yield, foliar stomatal conductance, and the photosynthetic response of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Agriculture 2021, 11, 483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Prasertsak, P.; Freney, J.R.; Denmead, O.T.; Saffigna, P.G.; Prove, B.G.; Reghenzani, J.R. Effect of fertilizer placement on nitrogen loss from sugarcane in tropical Queensland. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 2002, 62, 229–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Di, H.J.; Cameron, K.C. Nitrate leaching in temperate agroecosystems: Sources, factors and mitigating strategies. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 2002, 64, 237–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Andrews, R.K.; Blakeley, R.L.; Zerner, B. Urea and urease. Adv. Inorg. Biochem. 1984, 6, 245–283. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  55. Rochette, P.; Angers, D.A.; Chantigny, M.H.; Gasser, M.O.; MacDonald, J.D.; Pelster, D.E.; Bertrand, N. NH3 volatilization, soil NH4+concentration and soil pH following subsurface banding of urea at increasing rates. Can. J. Soil Sci. 2013, 93, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Zhu, Z.L.; Chen, D.L. Nitrogen fertilizer use in China—Contributions to food production, impacts on the environment and best management strategies. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 2002, 63, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Soaud, A.A.; Saleh, M.E.; El-Tarabily, K.A.; Rahman, M.M. Effect of elemental sulfur application on ammonia volatilization from surface applied urea fertilizer to calcareous sandy soils. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2011, 5, 571–579. [Google Scholar]
  58. Passioura, J.B.; Wetselaar, R. Consequences of banding nitrogen fertilizers in soil—II. Effects on the growth of wheat roots. Plant Soil 1972, 36, 461–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ekwue, E.I.; Bartholomew, J. Electrical conductivity of some soils in Trinidad as affected by density, water and peat content. Biosyst. Eng. 2011, 108, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yan, N.; Marschner, P.; Cao, W.; Zuo, C.; Qin, W. Influence of salinity and water content on soil microorganisms. Int. Soil Water Conserv. Res. 2015, 3, 316–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. McCormick, R.W.; Wolf, D.C. Effect of sodium chloride on CO2 evolution, ammonification, and nitrification in a Sassafras sandy loam. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1980, 12, 153–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. McClung, G.; Frankenberger, W.T., Jr. Soil nitrogen transformations as affected by salinity. Soil Sci. 1985, 139, 405–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Peralta, N.R.; Costa, J.L. Delineation of management zones with soil apparent electrical conductivity to improve nutrient management. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2013, 99, 218–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. FAO. Calcareous Soils; FAO Soils Bulletin: Rome, Italy, 1973; Volume 21. [Google Scholar]
Agronomy 11 01981 g001 550
Figure 1. The scheme of incubation boxes with fertilizers (without soil).
Figure 1. The scheme of incubation boxes with fertilizers (without soil).
Agronomy 11 01981 g001
Agronomy 11 01981 g002 550
Figure 2. Effect of incubation time on cumulative released nitrogen under incubation of two organic pellets TM (a) and MS (b); values are mean ± standard error; * small letters indicate a significant difference (separate analyses were made for each form of nitrogen) from one another based on Tukey’s test at p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Effect of incubation time on cumulative released nitrogen under incubation of two organic pellets TM (a) and MS (b); values are mean ± standard error; * small letters indicate a significant difference (separate analyses were made for each form of nitrogen) from one another based on Tukey’s test at p < 0.05.
Agronomy 11 01981 g002
Agronomy 11 01981 g003 550
Figure 3. Effect of incubation time and soil moisture on soil nitrogen content under incubation of mineral (a–ca; b; c;) and organic fertilizers (d,e); values are mean ± standard error; * small letters indicate significant difference from one another based on Tukey’s test at p < 0.05.
Figure 3. Effect of incubation time and soil moisture on soil nitrogen content under incubation of mineral (a–ca; b; c;) and organic fertilizers (d,e); values are mean ± standard error; * small letters indicate significant difference from one another based on Tukey’s test at p < 0.05.
Agronomy 11 01981 g003
Agronomy 11 01981 g004 550
Figure 4. Nitrogen distribution in soil–fertilizer system throughout incubation time and soil moisture under incubation of mineral (a–ca; b; c; a; b; c;) and organic fertilizers (d,e); * N left—the nitrogen participation was not detected by Kjeldahl procedure; values are mean ± standard error; ** small (N in soil) and *** capital (N in granules) letters indicate significant difference from one another based on Tukey’s test at p < 0.05.
Figure 4. Nitrogen distribution in soil–fertilizer system throughout incubation time and soil moisture under incubation of mineral (a–ca; b; c; a; b; c;) and organic fertilizers (d,e); * N left—the nitrogen participation was not detected by Kjeldahl procedure; values are mean ± standard error; ** small (N in soil) and *** capital (N in granules) letters indicate significant difference from one another based on Tukey’s test at p < 0.05.
Agronomy 11 01981 g004
Agronomy 11 01981 g005 550
Figure 5. Effect of incubation time and soil moisture on soil pH under incubation of mineral (a–ca; b; c; a; b; c; a; b; c;) and organic (d,e) fertilizers; values are mean ± standard error; small letters indicate significant difference from one another based on Tukey’s test at p < 0.05 (the pH value was converted into the concentration of hydrogen ions, then statistical analysis was performed).
Figure 5. Effect of incubation time and soil moisture on soil pH under incubation of mineral (a–ca; b; c; a; b; c; a; b; c;) and organic (d,e) fertilizers; values are mean ± standard error; small letters indicate significant difference from one another based on Tukey’s test at p < 0.05 (the pH value was converted into the concentration of hydrogen ions, then statistical analysis was performed).
Agronomy 11 01981 g005
Table
Table 1. Fertilizer characteristics—nitrogen content in dry mass (%).
Table 1. Fertilizer characteristics—nitrogen content in dry mass (%).
FertilizerMass Percentage—N (%)
NH4-NNorg-NNtot-N
U-PSc-20.8120.81
U-PSf-20.8920.89
DAP18.67-18.67
MT1.092.773.86
Ms0.551.972.52
Table
Table 2. The chemical properties of calcareous soil.
Table 2. The chemical properties of calcareous soil.
pH(H2O)CaCO3 (%)µS·cm−1Ntot (%)NH4+-N (%)Corg (%)Ctot (%)
8.3952.0113.850.170.010.661.14
Table
Table 3. Effect of incubation time and soil moisture on the release rate of total nitrogen from mineral fertilizers (%N in dry mass).
Table 3. Effect of incubation time and soil moisture on the release rate of total nitrogen from mineral fertilizers (%N in dry mass).
Time
(Days)		U-PScU-PSfDAP
30% MWHC% Relative Content60% MWHC% Relative Content30% MWHC% Relative Content60% MWHC% Relative Content30% MWHC% Relative Content60% MWHC% Relative Content
020.8a *10020.8a10020.9a10020.9a10018.7a10018.7a100
53.4b16.11.9c9.31.7b8.01.9b9.06.5b34.85.2de27.7
101.7c7.90.5d2.20.7c3.40.3cd1.45.8c31.24.8ef25.6
200.5d2.40.3d1.50.4cd2.10.3cd1.35.6cd30.04.5f24.2
350.4d2.00.3d1.40.3cd1.20.2d1.15.3d28.24.0g21.3
Average5.3A **25.74.8B22.94.8A22.94.7A22.58.4A44.87.5B40.0
* small letters (incubation time), ** capital letters (soil moisture) indicate significant difference from one another based on Tukey’s test at p < 0.05.
Table
Table 4. Effect of incubation time and soil moisture on a release rate of total nitrogen from organic fertilizers (%N in dry mass).
Table 4. Effect of incubation time and soil moisture on a release rate of total nitrogen from organic fertilizers (%N in dry mass).
TimeTMMS
30% MWHC% Relative Content60% MWHC% Relative Content30% MWHC% Relative Content60% MWHC% Relative Content
03.9a *1003.9a1002.5a1002.5a100
53.5b.091.23.0de77.52.4ab94.02.3abc90.9
103.4bc88.12.9def75.92.3abc89.32.2bc86.5
203.2cd83.42.8ef73.12.2bc86.12.0bc81.0
353.1de79.82.6f68.12.2bc85.72.0c80.2
Average3.4A **88.33.0B79.02.3A90.92.2A88.5
* small letters (incubation time), ** capital letters (soil moisture) indicate significant differences from one another based on Tukey’s test at p < 0.05.
Table
Table 5. Effect of incubation time and soil moisture on the release rate of ammonium from organic fertilizers (%N in dry mass).
Table 5. Effect of incubation time and soil moisture on the release rate of ammonium from organic fertilizers (%N in dry mass).
Time
(Days)		TMMS
30% MWHC% Relative Content60% MWHC% Relative Content30% MWHC% Relative Content60% MWHC% Relative Content
01.09a *1001.09a1000.55a1000.55a100
50.89b81.70.65c59.60.41b74.50.33c60.0
100.86b78.90.60c55.00.29c52.70.23d41.8
200.66c60.60.48d44.00.22de40.00.22de40.0
350.59c54.10.33e30.30.20de36.40.17e30.9
Average0.82A **75.20.63B57.80.33A60.00.30B54.5
* small letters (incubation time), ** capital letters (soil moisture) indicate significant differences from one another based on Tukey’s test at p < 0.05.
Table
Table 6. Effect of incubation time and soil moisture on the release rate of organic nitrogen from organic fertilizers.
Table 6. Effect of incubation time and soil moisture on the release rate of organic nitrogen from organic fertilizers.
Time
(Days)		TMMS
30% MWHC% Relative Content60% MWHC% Relative Content30% MWHC% Relative Content60% MWHC% Relative Content
02.75a *1002.74a1001.97a1001.97a100
52.61abc94.92.39de87.21.96a99.51.95a99.0
102.65bcd96.42.34e85.41.96a99.51.93ab98.0
202.55cd92.72.32e84.71.94ab98.51.90b96.4
352.44cde88.72.29e83.61.92ab97.51.82c92.4
Average2.58A **93.82.41B88.01.95A99.01.91B97.0
* small letters (incubation time), ** capital letters (soil moisture) indicate significant difference from one another based on Tukey’s test at p < 0.05.
Table
Table 7. Effect of incubation time and soil moisture on EC value (µS cm−1) of soil solution under incubation of mineral fertilizers.
Table 7. Effect of incubation time and soil moisture on EC value (µS cm−1) of soil solution under incubation of mineral fertilizers.
Time
(Days)		U-PScU-PSfDAP
30% MWHC% Relative Content60% MWHC% Relative Content30% MWHC% Relative Content60% MWHC% Relative Content30% MWHC% Relative Content60% MWHC% Relative Content
0129a *100120a100129a100120a100129a100120a100
5772b598798b665905b7021042e868833e646929fg774
10940e7291107g923996de7721376g1147872ef676946g788
20893d6921037f864967cd7501323fg1103679c526849e708
35816b6331001f834931bc7221312f1093610b473766d638
Average710A **550813B678786A6091034B862625A484722B602
* small letters (incubation time), ** capital letters (soil moisture) indicate significant differences from one another based on Tukey’s test at p < 0.05.
Table
Table 8. Effect of incubation time and soil moisture on EC value (µS cm−1) of soil solution under incubation of organic fertilizers.
Table 8. Effect of incubation time and soil moisture on EC value (µS cm−1) of soil solution under incubation of organic fertilizers.
Time
(Days)		TMMS
30% MWHC% Relative Content60% MWHC% Relative Content30% MWHC% Relative Content60% MWHC% Relative Content
0129a *100120a100129a100120a100
5371b288576c480293b227357c298
10403b312697d581325bc252511e426
20523c405764d637337c261540e450
35698d541944e787424d329797f664
Average425A **329618B515301A233465B388
* small letters (incubation time), ** capital letters (soil moisture) indicate significant differences from one another based on Tukey’s test at p < 0.05.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Niedziński, T.; Sierra, M.J.; Łabętowicz, J.; Noras, K.; Cabrales, C.; Millán, R. Release of Nitrogen from Granulate Mineral and Organic Fertilizers and Its Effect on Selected Chemical Parameters of Soil. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1981. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11101981

AMA Style

Niedziński T, Sierra MJ, Łabętowicz J, Noras K, Cabrales C, Millán R. Release of Nitrogen from Granulate Mineral and Organic Fertilizers and Its Effect on Selected Chemical Parameters of Soil. Agronomy. 2021; 11(10):1981. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11101981

Chicago/Turabian Style

Niedziński, Tomasz, María José Sierra, Jan Łabętowicz, Kinga Noras, Cristina Cabrales, and Rocio Millán. 2021. "Release of Nitrogen from Granulate Mineral and Organic Fertilizers and Its Effect on Selected Chemical Parameters of Soil" Agronomy 11, no. 10: 1981. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11101981

APA Style

Niedziński, T., Sierra, M. J., Łabętowicz, J., Noras, K., Cabrales, C., & Millán, R. (2021). Release of Nitrogen from Granulate Mineral and Organic Fertilizers and Its Effect on Selected Chemical Parameters of Soil. Agronomy, 11(10), 1981. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11101981

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop