Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Salicylic Acid on the Performances of Salt Stressed Strawberry Plants, Enzymes Activity, and Salt Tolerance Index
Previous Article in Journal
The Reaction of Cellulolytic and Potentially Cellulolytic Spore-Forming Bacteria to Various Types of Crop Management and Farmyard Manure Fertilization in Bulk Soil
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Agronomy
Volume 11
Issue 4
10.3390/agronomy11040773
agronomy-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Crithmum maritimum L.: First Results on Phenological Development and Biomass Production in Mediterranean Areas

by
Stefano Zenobi
,
Marco Fiorentini
,
Silvia Zitti
,
Lucia Aquilanti
,
Roberta Foligni
,
Cinzia Mannozzi
,
Massimo Mozzon
and
Roberto Orsini
*
Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences (D3A), Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2021, 11(4), 773; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11040773
Submission received: 24 March 2021 / Revised: 7 April 2021 / Accepted: 13 April 2021 / Published: 15 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Innovative Cropping Systems)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In Mediterranean cropping systems, it is important to utilise marginal lands for the cultivation of native food crops. Previous research on Crithmum maritimum L., a species native to southern Europe, has focused on its alimentary and chemical parameters. The aim of the present study was to identify the effects of irrigation and fertigation systems on C. maritimum in Mediterranean cropping systems. We planted C. maritimum seeds in an organic farm in Italy, and we carried out three experiments (fertigation, irrigation, and control) with three replications each. We evaluated plant phenological development and biomass production. We found that these treatments significantly influenced plant phenology and biomass parameters. Even with low irrigation and fertigation, this species showed a significant difference in the Bundesanstalt, Bundessortenamt, CHemischeIndustrie (BBCH) phase at harvest: in fact, there were 39 and 35 leaves on the main stem in the irrigation and fertigation treatments, respectively, while there were 29 leaves on the main stem in the rainfed unfertilised control. Biomass production also showed the same significant difference: 1.8 and 2.0 t ha−1 of total dry biomass in the irrigation and fertigation treatments, respectively, and 1.2 t ha−1 of total dry biomass in the rainfed unfertilised control. In conclusion, we recommend the use of C. maritimum for food production in Mediterranean organic cropping systems.

1. Introduction

The purpose of agriculture is to provide enough food to meet the nutritional demand of the current human population. Until the year 2050, the population is predicted to grow by 2.6 billion people [1]; agriculture will need to meet the increasing demand for food [2] while reducing production costs and pollution. The European Union has committed to complying with the Kyoto Protocol on Climate Change by adopting a series of directives to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 2020 [3]. These directives aim to establish a common framework to limit greenhouse gas emissions and promote cleaner transport [4].
In Mediterranean areas, to increase food productivity, it is important to utilise some marginal lands for the cultivation of non-food crops, thus reducing competition with food crops for land [5]. It is also important to use surplus and marginal lands to promote regional economic structures, provide alternative sources of employment in rural areas, reduce CO2 emissions, and decrease vulnerability to short-term weather changes [6]. In the Mediterranean region, soil water content is one of the most limiting factors for plant growth under rainfed conditions. Water availability strongly affects the choice of crops in Mediterranean environments [7] where only few options are suitable for growing. In addition, the choice and introduction of crops should take into account the existing cropping systems and plant needs at the local level [8]. In marginal areas, it is necessary to identify the most promising species in terms of adaptation capacity, required inputs, and yields [8].
In recent decades, the aim of production-focused agriculture is the preservation of agrobiodiversity [9] by seeking possibilities to use and revalue germplasms of local varieties, including wild ones, which are well adapted to environmental conditions, in order to ensure agroecosystem resilience and adaptability to new global challenges [10].
In Mediterranean coastal cultivation systems, sea fennel (Crithmum maritimum L.), also known as samphire, crest marine, marine fennel, and rock samphire, is an example of a native plant. It is a perennial halophyte which inhabits sandy beaches, maritime rocks, breakwaters, and piers of the world’s coastlines, being particularly abundant along the coasts of Mediterranean countries [11,12].
Among halophytes, which are plants tolerant to saline environments, sea fennel has been proposed as a potential crop in biosaline agriculture [11,12,13,14]; it can be used for the development of sustainable agroecosystems that require fewer inputs than conventional ecosystems, and that provide multiple services that can address climate change problems and tackle problems related to certain poor agricultural practices, such as the preference for cultivation of annuals over multiannuals, use of weak drainage systems, and inefficient water use management [15,16,17].
Urban Mediterranean environments can be improved using plants such as C. maritimum; in fact, implementation of green infrastructures can limit some negative impacts of urban environments on their inhabitants [18], providing the environment as well as the inhabitants with a wide range of services and advantages [18], such as rainwater retention [19], energy saving [20], thermal regulation [21], increased carbon sequestration capacity [22], and increased albedo values [23], which can lead to a significant reduction in the urban heat island effect [24]. Other benefits of these infrastructures include the reduction in atmospheric and sound pollution [25], improvement of biodiversity in urban areas [26], and certain improvements on aesthetic, psychological, and social levels [27]. C. maritimum is considered a species potentially suitable for growth in the conditions of extensive green roofs, as it already naturally grows in habitats characterised by shallow soils with low organic matter content, high solar radiation, and high temperatures, as well as its high tolerance to water stress [28].
C. maritimum could be used in marginal or degraded areas to promote soil desalination, enable agricultural production, and recycle nutrients from aquaculture effluents [29], as well as to act as a phytoremediator in areas polluted by heavy metals [30]. To date, many methods have been developed to desalinate soils, such as leaching, phytodepuration using halophytic plants, and subsurface drainage [30], to counteract the reduction in soil fertility [31].
Although halophytic species represent only 1% of all plants, they are particularly interesting because they inhabit salty environments, and are adapted to living under extreme conditions [32]. They have a wide range of uses, including as food and feed sources, for the production of oil, and for the pharmaceutical industry [30]. In particular, most food [33,34,35,36] and industrial products [29,37,38,39] obtained by processing C. maritimum and available in national and international markets are preserved in oil, and are produced by family-run or artisanal enterprises using wild plants harvested manually from coastal areas.
The current crisis involving the scarcity of water resources and increase in agricultural land salinisation has awoken a particular interest in C. maritimum and other halophytes, especially those that can achieve high and economically convenient yield [13].
Indeed, there were some promising initial attempts to grow glycophytic plants in saline regimes using conventional breeding programs, but the results were disappointing [40]. Other attempts [41] involved the implementation of strategies for adapting conventional agricultural crops to improve their salt tolerance through genetic screening, selection, and backcross breeding with salt-tolerant germplasms. However, these studies also revealed poor results [42].
Despite the scientific community’s understanding of the importance of selecting and breeding viable halophytes for agricultural purposes, most experiments carried out on wild halophytic plant germplasms have typically focused on the mere detection of salt stress response or types of salt resistance mechanisms, and not on the evaluation of biomass yields and commercial potential of the studied crops [43].
The yield of halophytes can be as high as that of conventional crops, even when irrigated with seawater [43,44]. Their potential yield depends on the species and the salt concentration to which the plant is subjected [45]. Unfortunately, these findings were obtained in short-term (14–60 days), small-scale trials [46] or laboratory trials, and the recorded yields refer to fresh or dry biomass per pot or per plant, without taking into account the actual planting density [47,48].
Field trials simulating agronomic growth conditions are rarely reported in scientific literature [44]. Considering the lack of agronomic data in scientific literature and the growing interest in the food, environmental, and industrial sectors, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the productive and phenological response of C. maritimum to different levels of agronomic intensification in the context of Mediterranean organic farming.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Site

The experimental site was located at an organic farm called “Paccasassi del Conero”, located in Camerano, Italy (43°53′ N,13°55′ E), at an altitude of 100 m above sea level and a slope gradient of 10% on silty-clay soil classified as Calcaric Gleyic Cambisol [49].
The weather data were provided by ASSAM (Agenzia Servizi al Settore Agroalimentare delle Marche, Osimo Stazione, Ancona, Italy). The climate of the site is Mediterranean corresponding to the type Csfa with no dry season and hot summer (Koppen-Geiger Map classification (1980–2016), https://people.eng.unimelb.edu.au/mpeel/koppen.html, accessed on 4 April 2021) (Figure 1).
Between transplanting and harvesting, we observed that the total rainfall during the 2020 growing season (from March to September; 337.4 mm), which coincided with the period of C. maritimum vegetative development and flowering, was approximately 27% lower than the total rainfall during the same period in the historical series of 1998–2019 (463.3 mm) less (Figure 1). In particular, Figure 1 shows that precipitation in 2020 was particularly low compared with the historical average in the months of May (37.26 mm in 2020 compared with 60 mm in 1998–2019) and July 2020 (27.20 mm in 2020 compared with 52 mm in 1998–2019). The only month in which there were no major differences in rainfall was June. The reduction in precipitation coincides with the trend of increase in average monthly temperature in 2020, starting in May and ending in September, compared with the temperature data from 1998 to 2019. In July, compared with the average temperature in the period of 1998–2019 (22 °C), a 2.2 °C higher average temperature was recorded in 2020, which corresponded with the decrease in monthly rainfall; a higher average temperature was also recorded in August 2020 (3 °C higher temperature and 20 mm less precipitation than those in the period of 1998–2019).
Soil characterisation was performed immediately before transplanting (Table 1) using a total of three soil samples that were taken from the depth of 0–30 cm.

2.2. Experimental Design and Crop Management

The experimental site covered about 400 m2 and was laid out in a randomised block design with three replicates. Three treatments were compared: fertigation with liquid fertiliser and water (FR), irrigation with water (IR), and control rainfed treatment without fertilisation (CT) (Figure 2).
Each of the three treatments was carried out in an area of 120 m2, divided into three replication plots of 40 m2. In each replication plot, 200 plants were planted in four rows of which the two central rows were sampled in three test areas. C. maritimum is a heliophile and therefore requires a planting pattern that ensures adequate inter- and intra-row spacing to maximise the leaf area exposed to the sun [11]. Its tendency to branch and its laterally and deeply expanded root system provide the plants with enough space to develop. Thus, the planting distance we used was 0.45 m × 0.45 m: considering this plant density, on the longitudinal distance of 10 metres, the number of plants on the inter-row was calculated as 44 plants on an area of 4.5 m−2 corresponding to a density of 9.8 plants m−2 and 98,000 plants ha−1. The plants that failed to grow were recovered by transplanting additional seedlings in order for the value of observed density to be equal to that of expected density, so that the recorded yields (Mg ha−1) can be compared among different treatments.
The dates of all agronomic practices are shown in Table 2.

2.2.1. Seed Bed Preparation and Mulching

In autumn, the soil in the experimental site was ploughed to a depth of 40 cm along the maximum slope using a mouldboard (with two ploughs). After the main tillage, soil refinement was performed with a spike harrow to establish the best conditions for transplanting. It was necessary to include a zinc-plated net fence in the experimental site to protect the crops, especially in the early stages of development, from possible attacks by certain animals, such as hares, which seemed to particularly enjoy the aromatic quality of young C. maritimum leaves. A heavy mulch sheet made of coconut jute with a density of 0.8 kg m−2, which also protects and limits evaporation from the surface soil layers, was placed along each plot. Natural fibre mulch was chosen because of our intention to create a cultivation system that not only follows biological principles and protects biodiversity, but can also be aesthetically well integrated into the natural landscape.

2.2.2. Seedling Collection and Transplantation

C. maritimum seeds were collected on the Adriatic coast, in Conero Regional Natural Park located within the Marche region.
The seeds were sown between May and June 2020 in a greenhouse with an average temperature of 20 °C. They were sown in biodegradable pots (Ø 16) in a substratum consisting of a mix of topsoil and peat (50:50 ratio). In the last ten days of July, the cotyledons started to emerge through the surface of the substratum, and by 15–20 January, three or four leaves were already visible. In this phase, field transplantation was performed as soon as the pedo-climatic conditions were favourable. After the rooting phase in March, a check of the actual plant density in the open field was carried out.

2.2.3. Irrigation and Fertigation

A drip irrigation system was installed with the tubes positioned on the ground, below the mulching sheet, so that the water is diffused by means of low-pressure sprays directly next to the plants and their root systems, so that it can be easily absorbed, thus avoiding irrigation with large volumes of water and maintaining low pressure use. The system was connected to a central programming unit, from which watering operations could be automated. The controller was in turn connected to a sensor in the field that detected the humidity at a given depth. The primary line of the tubes reached the connection point, from which the secondary supply lines led off via the valve unit. The system consisted of two lines of tubes, each with a total length of 250 m, distributed in two lines (irrigated and fertigated) in the three blocks. Irrigation planning was carried out considering the rainfall regime and the soil moisture level, which was continuously monitored by a probe: at 65% of total available water (TAW), the water supply started. Along these tubes there were 5 nozzles m−1 (a total of 1250 nozzles), with a flow rate of 2 L h−1. Fertigation was carried out with “Solabiol” liquid fertiliser permitted for use in organic farming systems (N = 1.5%, C = 10%, pH = 6.4) as follows: a dose of 1.20 L was diluted in 20 L of water at each fertigation, and this solution passed from a bucket to the fertigation lines via a “Venturi” pumped system. During the growing season, the water amount provided for both fertigation and irrigation treatments was 25,000 L corresponding to 210 mm. For the fertigation treatment, 25 kg ha−1 units of N were added to the water.

2.3. Measurements

2.3.1. Phenological Development

To characterise crop phenological development in the treatments, for the main stem, we adopted the Bundesanstalt, Bundessortenamt, CHemischeIndustrie (BBCH) scale [50] during the full crop biological cycle: phenological characterisation started between phase BBCH 13 at the time of transplantation (February) and continued until phase BBCH 50 (initial inflorescence emergence) at harvesting date (July).

2.3.2. Biomass Production Evaluation

Biomass production was evaluated at different phenological stages and at single plant level in three test areas for each replication.
In the last week of July, close to the harvesting date (BBCH scale phases between 40 and 50 (initial inflorescence emergence), before the flowering, which corresponded to the total inflorescence emergence 60 BBCH scale phase), the epigeal biomass was cut at 5 cm from the ground level and its fresh weight was determined. Then, the biomass was placed in an oven at 105 °C for 48 h, after which its dry weight was determined. Within the three replications in each plot, the average biomass production of 30 samples was determined, for a total of 270 plants.
The values obtained from all replications within the same treatment were averaged, and the standard deviation was determined. Production per hectare for each treatment was calculated from the average fresh unit production, taking into account the actual plant density. Yield per hectare was then calculated using the following formula:
Total yield (tha−1) = (Biomass sampled plant weight (g) × plant density (n. plants ha−1)) × 10−6
where Biomass sampled plant weight is the average production per plant for each treatment type [g plant−1], plant density is the number of plants per ha, and 10−6 is the conversion factor from g to t. The means and standard deviations of the total production in the plots within the same treatment were then calculated and compared with the results of other treatments.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed in R statistical software [51,52]. The analysis of the production and phenological variables was performed using a generalised linear model (GLM) procedure. Before ANOVA, we tested if the complete factorial model satisfied the three criteria of ANOVA: normality distribution of the residual model was verified both graphically (QQ-plot) and by performing the Shapiro–Wilk normality test, and homoscedasticity was checked using Levene’s test. The last ANOVA hypothesis was satisfied by the experimental design and random sampling. As all three criteria were met, we analysed our data using ANOVA.

3. Results

3.1. Phenology

Phenological measurements carried out between February and July 2020 (Table 3) showed that in the period between the first measurement (15 February 2020) and three subsequent measurements (10 April, 5 May, and 16 June 2020), vegetative development, in terms of total number of leaves present on the main stem, was reduced compared with that in the time interval between the fifth (14 July 2020) and sixth measurement (29 July 2020), the latter two being performed during pre-harvest when the plants reached their maximum leaf development. This reduced growth in the period between February and June may have been due to the acclimatisation phase of new plants to the new growth conditions in the post-transplant period. In fact, the seedlings had already developed their root systems in the pot cultivation substrates in the months before transplanting.
Regarding the four observations between BBCH 13 and BBCH 40 phases, no significant differences were found among the three treatments, as all the plants were probably in the initial phase of leaf development. Specifically, in the transplant phase, the three treatments had the same number of leaves on the main stem; in the second and third phenological phases, the control and fertigated plants had the same number of leaves, but this number was not significantly different from that of irrigated plants. In the BBCH 40 phase, the control and the irrigated plants had the same number of leaves, but this number not statistically different from the number of leaves in fertigated plants. In the BBCH 45 phase, significantly higher leaf growth was observed in the irrigated and fertigated plants than in the control, and this difference was also observed in the last phase (BBCH50).

3.2. Biomass Production

Biomass of C. maritimum L. was analysed per plant and per surface unit. Fertigation and irrigation treatments did not differ in terms of fresh biomass production (g plant−1), which varied between 112.1 (±18.6) g plant−1 and 120.0 (±17.5) g plant−1 (Table 4).
The fresh biomass unit production of the control was significantly lower than that of the two treatments. The total production of fresh biomass was significantly lower in the control treatment than in the irrigation and fertigation treatments. A significant difference between the control and the two treatments was also observed in the amount of dry biomass produced; it was significantly higher in the irrigation and fertigation treatments than in the control.

4. Discussion

In the present study, plant production in the three treatments was evaluated in terms of phenology (determined by the number of expanded leaves per plant) and biomass, as the studies on C. maritimum to date referred only to the chemical-organoleptic aspects [14,53,54] or its responses to different salinity concentrations in the soil [55,56].
Regarding plant phenology, the presence of clay soil, which is not a very hospitable substrate compared with the pot cultivation substrate, as well as the temperatures in the first few months after transplanting may have conditioned the exploration by the roots of the portions of the soil close to the part of topsoil with which the plants were transplanted, and consequently also slowed down leaf growth. More differences in phenology were visible in the BBCH 45 phase and especially in the BBCH 50 phase, in which certain morphological differences were observed, as the plants began to take a more expanded and elongated shape, due to the approaching of the flowering phase and the elongation of the flowering shoot. In some cases, a reduction in the size and number of leaves was observed along the stems that had begun to elongate. From the observation of these characteristics, the attainment of the ideal harvesting period was defined, i.e., the period in which the plant reached maximum leaf development in relation to the flowering phase.
The non-significant difference observed between irrigated and fertigated plants was probably related to the fact that the amount of nitrogen fertiliser applied was low (25 kg ha−1), in accordance with the aim of the financial project (Project “BioVeg Conserve: Nuove conserve vegetali biologiche da varietà autoctone di finocchio marino coltivato in biologico”, PSR Marche 2014–2020, Misura 16.1 Azione 2 (Project ID 28913)). Another factor that influenced the small difference between the three treatments in terms of phenology, and which consequently influenced the production variables measured, was the plants’ young age. In fact, the data were collected in the phase immediately after their acclimatisation in the field. This meant that the plants did not have sufficient time to fully manifest the influence of the different intensification levels used in the present study, as they used their resources for root system development in the first post-transplant phase. Although there was a significant difference in terms of production between the control and the other two treatments, this may be more evident at the end of the second growing season. Having already adapted to the environmental conditions during the first year, the plants may have used their energy resources for aerial development in a timely manner, thus increasing the overall time interval from vegetative regrowth to full development. Research activities will continue in the coming years with the aim of evaluating the production dynamics of C. maritimum in full vegetative development as well.

5. Conclusions

The investigated C. maritimum plants adapted well to the rainy season 2020, which was markedly dryer in some months than in those months in the historical series 1998–2019. Despite growing in a very clayey soil, the treated plants managed to grow more than the control plants, even with minimal water and nitrogen inputs; furthermore, weeds were controlled in the two months following transplantation and did not prove to be a limiting factor for production. C. maritimum is an interesting species whose spread and increasing use may represent a valid strategy for mitigating the effects of climate change and whose production may be useful for the growing caloric demand associated with the population increase. In light of the FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) 2019 projection [10], which foresees a population increase of +26% within the next 30 years, and in light of the desertification risk induced by climate change and increasing salinisation caused by the excessive use of potable water which has resulted in saline intrusions into groundwater, the use of C. maritimum in agricultural practices is an interesting possibility. For these reasons, C. maritimum has the potential to be grown in areas where the growth of other species is limited; thus, it could guarantee forage in areas with high desertification risk. In Conero Regional Natural Park in the Marche region (central Italy), the use of C. maritimum, better known in this context as “Paccasassi”, in the food and gastronomy sectors is increasing, and the present study is the first to evaluate different agronomic protocols that have previously not been investigated for the cultivation of this species.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.O.; Data curation, S.Z. (Stefano Zenobi); Investigation, S.Z. (Stefano Zenobi), S.Z. (Silvia Zitti), L.A. and M.M.; Resources, S.Z. (Silvia Zitti); Software, M.F.; Supervision, L.A. and R.O.; Writing—original draft, S.Z. (Stefano Zenobi) and R.O.; Writing—review & editing, R.F. and C.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

Project “BioVeg Conserve: Nuove conserve vegetali biologiche da varietà autoctone di finocchio marino coltivato in biologico”, PSR Marche 2014–2020, Misura 16.1 Azione 2 (Project ID 28913). We would like to dedicate this work to our dear colleague Silvia Zitti, who provided a considerable contribution to the above-mentioned research activities. We would also like to thank Ettore Drenaggi, Luca Galeazzi, Roberto and Francesco Velieri of the Rinci company (www.rinci.it, accessed on 4 April 2021), and Stefano Orlandini for technical and logistic support. Our appreciation is also extended to Alice Paccamiccio and Sonia Casagrande Conti for their contribution to field activities and bibliographic research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. United Nations Reports. World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision; Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP.250; Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division: New York, NY, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bodirsky, B.L.; Popp, A.; Lotze-Campen, H.; Dietrich, J.P.; Rolinski, S.; Weindl, I.; Schmitz, C.; Müller, C.; Bonsch, M.; Humpenöder, F.; et al. Reactive nitrogen requirements to feed the world in 2050 and potential to mitigate nitrogen pollution. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 38–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. PE-CONS 3736/08, 2008, Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources Amending and Subsequently Repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC; European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 26 March 2009. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zegada-Lizarazu, W.; Monti, A. Energy crops in rotation. A review. Biomass Bioenergy 2011, 35, 12–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fagnano, M.; Impagliazzo, A.; Mori, M.; Fiorentino, N. Agronomic and environmental impacts of giant reed (Arundo donax L.): Results from a long-term field experiment in hilly areas subject to soil erosion. Biol. Res. 2015, 8, 415–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zegada-Lizarazu, W.; Elbersen, H.W.; Cosentino, S.L.; Zatta, A.; Alexopoulou, E.; Monti, A. Agronomic aspects of future energy crops in Europe. Biofuels Bioprod. Biofin. 2010, 4, 674–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Fernández, J.; Curt, M.D.; Aguado, P.L. Industrial applications of Cynara cardunculus L. for energy and other uses. Ind. Crops Prod. 2006, 24, 222–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ledda, L.; Deligios, P.A.; Farci, R.; Sulas, L. Biomass supply for energetic purposes from some Cardueae species grown in Mediterranean farming systems. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 47, 218–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Montesano, F.F.; Gattullo, C.E.; Parente, A.; Terzano, R.; Renna, M. Cultivation of potted sea fennel, an emerging mediterranean halophyte, using a renewable seaweed-based material as a peat substitute. Agriculture 2018, 8, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. The State of the World’s Biodiversity for Food and Agriculture; Bélanger, J., Pilling, D., Eds.; FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture Assessments: Rome, Italy, 2009; p. 572. [Google Scholar]
  11. Atia, A.; Barhoumi, Z.; Mokded, R.; Abdelly, C.; Smaoui, A. Enviromental eco-physiology and economical potential of the halophyte Crithmum maritimum L. (Apiaceae). J. Med. Plants Res. 2011, 5, 3564–3571. [Google Scholar]
  12. Renna, M.; Gonnella, M. The use of the sea fennel as a new spice-colorant in culinary preparations. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2012, 1, 111–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Ventura, Y.; Sagi, M. Halophyte crop cultivation: The case for Salicornia and Sarcocornia. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2013, 92, 144–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Renna, M.; Gonnella, M.; Caretto, S.; Mita, G.; Serio, F. Sea fennel (Crithmum maritimum L.): From underutilized crop to new dried product for food use. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2017, 64, 205–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Biswas, A.; Biswas, A. Comprehensive approaches in rehabilitating salt affected soils: A review on Indian perspective. Open Trans. Geosci. 2014, 1, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hanay, A.; Büyüksönmez, F.; Kiziloglu, F.M.; Canbolat, M.Y. Reclamation of saline-sodic soils with gypsum and MSW compost. Compost. Sci. Util. 2013, 12, 175–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. The Future of Food and Agriculture. Trends and Challenges; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  18. Wong, N.H.; Chen, Y.; Ong, C.L.; Sia, A. Investigation of thermal benefits of rooftop garden in the tropical environment. Build Environ. 2003, 38, 261–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fioretti, R.; Palla, A.; Lanza, L.G.; Principi, P. Green roof energy and water related performance in the Mediterranean climate. Build Environ. 2010, 45, 1890–1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. MacIvor, J.S.; Lundholm, J. Performance evaluation of native plants suited to extensive green roof conditions in a maritime climate. Ecol. Eng. 2011, 37, 407–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sharma, A.; Conry, P.; Fernando, H.J.S.; Hamlet, A.F.; Hellmann, J.J.; Chen, F.; Akbari, H. Green and cool roofs to mitigate urban heat island effects in the Chicago metropolitan area: Evaluation with a regional climate model. Environ. Res. Lett. 2016, 11, 64004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Whittinghill, L.J.; Rowe, D.B.; Schutzki, R.; Cregg, B.M. Quantifying carbon sequestration of various green roof and ornamental landscape systems. Landsc Urban Plann. 2014, 123, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lundholm, J.T.; Macivor, J.S.; Macdougall, Z.; Ranalli, M. Plant species and functional group combinations affect green roof ecosystem functions. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e9677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Peng, L.L.H.; Jim, C.Y. Green-roof effects on neighborhood microclimate and human thermal sensation. Energies 2013, 6, 598–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Veisten, K.; Smyrnova, Y.; Klæboe, R.; Hornikx, M.; Mosslemi, M.; Kang, J. Valuation of green walls and green roofs as soundscape measures: Including mone-tised amenity values together with noise-attenuation values in a cost-benefit analysis of a green wall affecting courtyards. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2012, 9, 3770–3788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Dvorak, B.D.; Volder, A. Plant establishment on unirrigated green roof modules in a subtropical climate. AoB Plants 2013, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fernandez-Cañero, R.; Emilsson, T.; Fernandez-Barba, C.; Herrera Machuca, M. Green roof systems: A study of public attitudes and preferences in southern Spain. J. Environ. Manag. 2013, 128, 106–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Azeñas, V.; Janner, I.; Medrano, H.; Gulías, J. Evaluating the establishment performance of six native perennial Mediterranean species for use in extensive green roofs under water-limiting conditions. Urban Urban Green. 2019, 41, 158–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Buhmann, A.; Papenbrock, J. Biofiltering of aquaculture effluents by halophytic plants: Basic principles, current uses and future perspectives. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2013, 92, 122–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shankar, V.; Evelin, H. Strategies for reclamation of saline soils. In Soil Biology; Metzler, J.B., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; Volume 56, pp. 439–449. [Google Scholar]
  31. Laudicina, V.; Hurtado, M.; Badalucco, L.; Delgado, A.; Palazzolo, E.; Panno, M. Soil chemical and biochemical properties of a salt-marsh alluvial Spanish area after long-term reclamation. Biol. Fertil Soils 2009, 45, 691–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rozema, J.; Flowers, T. Ecology: Crops for a salinized world. Science 2009, 322, 1478–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Franke, W. Vitamin C in sea fennel (Crithmum maritimum), an edible wild plant. Econ. Bot. 1982, 36, 163–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pereira, C.G.; Barreira, L.; da Rosa Neng, N.; Nogueira, J.M.F.; Marques, C.; Santos, T.F.; Varela, J.; Custodio, L. Searching for new sources of innovative products for the food industry within halophyte aromatic plants: In vitro antioxidant activity and phenolic and mineral contents of infusions and decoctions of Crithmum maritimum L. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2017, 107, 581–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Barreira, L.; Resek, E.; Rodrigues, M.J.; Rocha, M.I.; Pereira, H.; Bandarra, N.; da Silva, M.M.; Varela, J.; Custódio, L. Halophytes: Gourmet food with nutritional health benefits? J. Food Comp. Anal. 2017, 59, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Petropoulos, S.A.; Karkanis, A.; Martins, N.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Edible halophytes of Mediterranean basin: Potential candidates for novel food products. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 74, 69–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Generalić Mekinić, I.; Blažević, I.; Mudnić, I.; Burčul, F.; Grga, M.; Skroza, D.; Jerčić, I.; Ljubenkov, I.; Boban, M.; Miloš, M. Sea fennel (Crithmum maritimum L.): Phytochemical profile, antioxidative, cholinesterase inhibitory and vasodilatory activity. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 53, 3104–3112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Maoloni, A.; Milanović, V.; Osimani, A.; Cardinali, F.; Garofalo, C.; Belleggia, L.; Foligni, R.; Mannozzi, C.; Mozzon, M.; Cirlini, M. Exploitation of sea fennel (Crithmum maritimum L.) for manufacturing of novel high-value fermented preserves. Food Bioprod. Process. 2021, 127, 174–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Glenn, E.; Anday, T.; Chaturvedi, R.; Martinez, G.R.; Pearlstein, S.; Soliz, D.; Nelson, S.; Felger, R. Three halophytes for saline-water agriculture: An oilseed, a forage and a grain crop. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2013, 92, 110–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Flowers, T.J.; Galal, H.K.; Bromham, L. Evolution of halophytes: Multiple origins of salt tolerance in land plant. Funct. Plant Biol. 2010, 37, 604–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Epstein, E.; Norlyn, J.D.; Rush, D.W.; Kingsbury, R.W.; Kelley, D.B.; Cunningham, G.A.; Wrona, A.F. Saline culture of crops—A genetic approach. Science 1980, 210, 399–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Flowers, T.J.; Yeo, A.R. Breeding for salinity resistance in crop plants: Where next? Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 1995, 22, 875–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ventura, Y.; Wuddineh, W.A.; Shpigel, M.; Samocha, T.M.; Klim, B.C.; Cohen, S.; Shemer, Z.; Santos, R.; Sagi, M. Effects of day length on flowering and yield production of Salicornia and Sarcocornia species. Sci. Hortic. 2011, 130, 510–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Glenn, E.; Brown, J.; Blumwald, E. Salt Tolerance and Crop Potential of Halophytes. Plant. Sci. 1999, 18, 227–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lieth, H. Cashcrop Halophytes for Future Halophyte Growers. EU Concerted Action Project IC 18CT96-0055; Institute of Environmental Systems Research, University of Osnabrück: Osnabrück, Germany, 2000; ISSN 09336-3114. [Google Scholar]
  46. Flowers, T.J.; Colmer, T.D. Salinity tolerance in halophytes. New Phytol. 2008, 179, 945–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Koyro, H.W.; Khan, M.A.; Lieth, H. Halophytic crops: A resource for the future to reduce the water crisis? Emir. J. Food Agric. 2011, 23, 1–16. Available online: http://ejfa.info (accessed on 4 April 2021). [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Zerai, B.; Glenn, E.; Chatervedi, R.; Lu, Z.; Mamood, A.N.; Nelson, S.G.; Ray, D.T. Potential for the improvement of Salicornia bigelovii through selective breeding. Ecol. Eng. 2010, 36, 730–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. World Soil Resources Report 103; ISRIC: Rome, Italy, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  50. Bleiholder, H.; van den Boom, T.; Langelüddecke, P.; Stauss, R. Uniform coding for the phenological stages of cultivated plants and weeds. Phytoma 1991, 28, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  51. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  52. Onofri, A.; Seddaiu, G.; Piepho, H.P. Long-term experiments with cropping systems: Case studies on data analysis. Eur. J. Agron. 2016, 77, 223–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ben Amor, N.; Ben Hamed, K.; Debez, A.; Grignon, C.; Abdelly, C. Physiological and antioxidant responses of the perennial halophyte Crithmum maritimum to salinity. Plant. Sci. 2005, 168, 889–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Male, Z.; Zuntar, I.; Nigovic, B.; Plazibat, M.; Bilusic Vundac, V. Quantitative analysis of the polyphenols of the aerial parts of rock samphire—Crithmum maritimum L. Acta Pharm. 2003, 53, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  55. Renna, M. Reviewing the prospects of sea fennel (Crithmum maritimum L.) as emerging vegetable crop. Plants 2018, 7, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Ben Hamed, K.; Debez, A.; Chibani, F.; Abdelly, C. Salt response of Crithmum maritimum, an oleagineous halophyte. Trop. Ecol. 2004, 45, 151–159. [Google Scholar]
Agronomy 11 00773 g001 550
Figure 1. Temperature and precipitation trends in the 2020 growing season compared with the 1998–2019 thermo-pluviometric series.
Figure 1. Temperature and precipitation trends in the 2020 growing season compared with the 1998–2019 thermo-pluviometric series.
Agronomy 11 00773 g001
Agronomy 11 00773 g002 550
Figure 2. Experiment location (a) and planting design (b).
Figure 2. Experiment location (a) and planting design (b).
Agronomy 11 00773 g002
Table
Table 1. Soil properties in the 0–30 cm layer in the experimental plots in 2020.
Table 1. Soil properties in the 0–30 cm layer in the experimental plots in 2020.
Soil PropertiesValues 1
Sand (g kg−1)129 ± 18
Silt (g kg−1)449 ± 17
Clay (g kg−1)422 ± 20
Soil organic matter (g kg−1)11.0 ± 2.1
Total nitrogen (g kg−1)0.8 ± 0.1
pH8.1 ± 0.9
Bulk density (Mg m−3)1.40 ± 0.4
Soil electrical conductivity (mS cm−1)0.55 ± 0.0
Exchangeable Na (mg kg −1)62 ± 4.0
Volumetric soil water content (%):
Field capacity44.0 ± 1.2
Permanent wilting point18.0 ± 2.4
Total available water 26.0 ± 1.8
1 Values are shown as mean ± standard deviation.
Table
Table 2. Agronomic management practices used during the experimental period (dd/mm/yyyy).
Table 2. Agronomic management practices used during the experimental period (dd/mm/yyyy).
AgrotechniqueDate
Ploughing (40 cm)13/10/2019
Harrowing and seed bed preparation25/10/2019
Mulching with sheeting03/02/2020
Transplantation17/02/2020
Fertigation and irrigation15/03/2020; 10/04/2020; 05/05/2020; 18/05/2020; 26/05/2020
Harvesting29–31/07/2020
Table
Table 3. Average number of leaves (±standard deviation) in six phenological measurements performed during different phenological phases (Bundesanstalt, Bundessortenamt, CHemischeIndustrie, BBCH) from transplanting to harvesting in the three treatments.
Table 3. Average number of leaves (±standard deviation) in six phenological measurements performed during different phenological phases (Bundesanstalt, Bundessortenamt, CHemischeIndustrie, BBCH) from transplanting to harvesting in the three treatments.
TreatmentPhenological Stages
Leaf
Development		Side Shoot FormationStem
Elongation		Vegetative Plant Parts GrowthInitial Inflorescence Emergence
(BBCH 13)(BBCH 25)(BBCH 35)(BBCH 40–45)(BBCH 50)
CT3 ± 1 a6 ± 2 a10 ± 1 a12 ± 1 a16 ± 3 b29 ± 4 b
IR3 ± 1 a7 ± 1 a9 ± 1 a12 ± 2 a22 ± 4 a35 ± 2 a
FR3 ± 1 a6 ± 2 a10 ± 2 a14 ± 2 a20 ± 2 a39 ± 2 a
CT = control treatment, IR = irrigation treatment with 210 mm ha−1, FR = fertigation treatment with 25 kg N ha−1 in 210 mm ha−1 of water. Among the treatments, means with different letters indicate significant differences (ANOVA, p < 0.05).
Table
Table 4. Quantification of Crithmum maritimum L. biomass per plant and per unit area in the three treatments. Values are shown as mean ± standard deviation.
Table 4. Quantification of Crithmum maritimum L. biomass per plant and per unit area in the three treatments. Values are shown as mean ± standard deviation.
TreatmentUFB
(g Plant−1)		TFB
(t ha−1)		UDB
(g Plant−1)		TDB
(t ha−1)
CT82. 9 (±26.5)1 b8.0 (±2.6) b12.7 (±1.6) b1.2 (±0.1) b
IR112.1 (±18.6) a11.1 (±1.8) a18.2 (±2.9) a1.8 (±0.3) a
FR120.0 (±17.5) a11.8 (±1.7) a20.1 (±3.1) a2.0 (±0.3) a
CT = control treatment (without irrigation and fertilisation), IR = irrigation treatment with 210 mm ha−1, FR = fertigation treatment with 25 kg N ha−1 in 210 mm ha−1 of water, UFB = unit fresh biomass, TFB = total fresh biomass, UDB = unit dry biomass, TDB = total dry biomass. Among the treatments, means with different letters indicate significant differences (ANOVA, p < 0.05).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zenobi, S.; Fiorentini, M.; Zitti, S.; Aquilanti, L.; Foligni, R.; Mannozzi, C.; Mozzon, M.; Orsini, R. Crithmum maritimum L.: First Results on Phenological Development and Biomass Production in Mediterranean Areas. Agronomy 2021, 11, 773. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11040773

AMA Style

Zenobi S, Fiorentini M, Zitti S, Aquilanti L, Foligni R, Mannozzi C, Mozzon M, Orsini R. Crithmum maritimum L.: First Results on Phenological Development and Biomass Production in Mediterranean Areas. Agronomy. 2021; 11(4):773. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11040773

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zenobi, Stefano, Marco Fiorentini, Silvia Zitti, Lucia Aquilanti, Roberta Foligni, Cinzia Mannozzi, Massimo Mozzon, and Roberto Orsini. 2021. "Crithmum maritimum L.: First Results on Phenological Development and Biomass Production in Mediterranean Areas" Agronomy 11, no. 4: 773. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11040773

APA Style

Zenobi, S., Fiorentini, M., Zitti, S., Aquilanti, L., Foligni, R., Mannozzi, C., Mozzon, M., & Orsini, R. (2021). Crithmum maritimum L.: First Results on Phenological Development and Biomass Production in Mediterranean Areas. Agronomy, 11(4), 773. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11040773

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop