Next Article in Journal
A Comparative Dataset of Annotated Broccoli Heads Recorded with Depth Cameras from a Moving Vehicle
Previous Article in Journal
Genetic Diversity and Genome-Wide Association in Cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparative Study of the Convertibility of Pretreated Miscanthus Straw Using Enzyme Preparations Produced by Different Recombinant Strains of Penicillium verruculosum
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Special Issue “Pretreatment and Bioconversion of Crop Residues II”—Introduction to the Collection

1
Department of Biotechnology, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, N-2317 Hamar, Norway
2
Department of Chemistry, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden
3
Department of Chemical, Environmental and Materials Engineering, Centre for Advanced Studies in Earth Sciences, Energy and Environment (CEACTEMA), Universidad de Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2024, 14(5), 962; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14050962
Submission received: 26 April 2024 / Accepted: 30 April 2024 / Published: 3 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pretreatment and Bioconversion of Crop Residues II)

Abstract

:
Bioconversion in biorefineries is a way to valorize residues from agriculture and food processing. Pretreatment is an important step in the bioconversion of lignocellulosic materials, including crop residues. This Special Issue includes nine articles on several pretreatment and bioconversion approaches applied to different agricultural residues and food-processing by-products. The materials addressed in this collection cover straw from wheat, rye, and miscanthus, olive tree pruning residue, almond shells and husks, avocado waste, sweet sorghum bagasse, soybean meal, and residues of non-edible oilseeds.

1. Introduction

The expansion of the agricultural sector as a consequence of the population increase leads to an increased generation of crop wastes and agro-industrial residues. Management of the large amounts of residues generated by harvesting cereals [1] and other Gramineae, legumes, tubers and root crops [2], edible tree fruits and nuts [3], and non-food agricultural products [4] poses significant challenges [5]. A common management strategy is to use crop residues for energy generation or to burn them directly in the field. However, large-scale burning causes air pollution [6] and contributes to the deterioration of soil health [7].
As an alternative to disposal by direct burning, the bioconversion of crop residues to advanced biofuels, platform chemicals, and other products represents the possibility of technical development, reduction of import dependence, and job creation. Waste materials from agriculture and residual streams from crop processing are renewable and cost-effective feedstocks for biorefineries [8]. Bioconversion of agriculture-related residues can help cope with their accumulation and thus contribute to a sustainable economy [9].
As typical examples of lignocellulosic biomass [10], crop residues are composed of cellulose, hemicelluloses, and lignin. The general process of lignocellulosic biomass bioconversion into products of interest consists of three fundamental stages: pretreatment, enzymatic saccharification, and fermentation [11]. Pretreatment is directed at partially decomposing the lignocellulosic matrix to facilitate access to enzymes, which deconstruct cellulose and hemicelluloses by saccharification [12]. The resulting sugars are then converted into the desired products via fermentation. Pretreatment is a key stage in the overall process, and its effectiveness is feedstock-dependent [13]. Therefore, investigating pretreatment approaches that efficiently address materials of different natures is crucial for developing methods suited for the commercial bioprocessing of crop residues.

2. This Issue

This Special Issue is a continuation of a previously started series on different pretreatment and bioconversion approaches applied to crop residues [8]. The current collection features a review article and eight original research papers that present crucial aspects of pretreatment for various crop residues, as well as other key elements of the conversion process, such as economic and environmental factors and the production of enzymes.
In a review article, Castro et al. [14] provide an outlook on the pretreatment of non-edible oilseed residues to enhance their bioconversion. The study is pertinent considering that non-edible oils are a sustainable feedstock for biodiesel production [15], in contrast to the first-generation biodiesel from edible oilseeds, such as palm, sunflower, and rapeseed. Most of these residues are disposed of by burning or are used in a suboptimal way. Bioconversion via the sugar platform route, anaerobic digestion, or enzyme production enables the transformation of these residues into advanced biofuels and high-added value products.
Barley straw, as a feedstock for ethanol production, is the focus of the work presented by Díaz et al. [16]. Based on steam explosion pretreatment, the authors revealed that up to 194 kg of ethanol can be produced from 1 ton of dilute phosphoric acid-soaked barley straw. Operational conditions include moderate temperature (160 °C for 30 min), enzymatic hydrolysis, and co-fermentation by ethanologenic Escherichia coli.
Wheat straw is an abundant crop residue with limited uses, and its valorization is desirable [17]. The work authored by Steffen et al. [18] proposes using wheat straw as a fiber source alternative for use in several paper applications. This could provide sufficient quantities of alternative products with acceptable quality for green applications. As a main conclusion, sodium carbonate-based pulping is perfectly suited for non-wood materials such as wheat straw. A broad range of pulp qualities can be produced from unbleached pulp for packaging to bleached pulps for graphical applications.
Olive tree pruning residues are another abundant and renewable lignocellulosic by-product, which is generally burned in the fields, but it has potential as a source of energy and chemicals [19]. Based on the high content of potentially fermentable carbohydrates in olive tree pruning biomass, Díaz et al. [20] propose using it as feedstock for producing a wide range of byproducts in a biorefinery context. The study assesses a sequential pretreatment with sulfuric acid and sodium hydroxide to maximize the release of sugars to be fermented into bioethanol.
López-Sandín et al. [21] report the production of second-generation ethanol from sweet sorghum bagasse using hydrothermal pretreatment. The pretreated material was further processed by pre-saccharification and simultaneous fermentation (PSSF). The study has a strong focus on the energy balance of the process. The results show that pretreatment severity played a key role in sugar release and energy consumption.
The residues from avocados are the object of an article co-authored by García-Vallejo et al. [22]. The potential introduction of small-scale biorefineries in rural areas as a sustainable alternative is presented. Four scenarios, based on experimental and simulation data, were evaluated according to technical, economic, environmental, and social aspects. A process producing animal feed, bioactive compounds, biogas, and fertilizer was selected as the best option for implementation in an avocado waste-based biorefinery in Caldas, Colombia.
In a different processing approach, following the thermochemical pathway, Carmo-Calado et al. [23] present a technical study of the gasification of almond shells and husks. The study includes a detailed technical-economic analysis of the in situ installation of a decentralized unit to produce electricity through a syngas generator, which would overcome the use of fossil fuels in the almond-processing industry. It was concluded that thermal gasification is a suitable technology for the recovery of lignocellulosic materials, with good economic viability for fixed-bed gasification systems.
Two articles cover studies on enzymes required for the bioconversion of crop residues. Osipov et al. [24] report the investigation of in-house enzyme preparations produced by recombinant strains of Penicillium verruculosum. The effects of different pretreatment methods on the enzymatic conversion of miscanthus straw by P. verruculosum preparations were investigated. Pretreatment with dilute sodium hydroxide was found to be the most effective method. Finally, Anderson et al. [25] report the immobilization of enzymes produced by Aspergillus niger for producing mannooligosaccharides from soybean meal. As a main conclusion, the authors state that the prebiotic potential of soybean meal-produced sugars on the growth and viability of probiotic bacteria is better than that of glucose. The study demonstrated the potential of immobilized mannanase for sustainable prebiotic production from mannan-containing agricultural feedstocks.

3. Conclusions

The set of studies compiled in this Special Issue, with their wide variety of techniques and raw materials, and a multi-perspective analytical approach, represent an advance in the knowledge on valorization of crop residues through bioconversion. However, we recognize the significant challenges that remain ahead. Continuing the current efforts is necessary for the worldwide development of the biorefinery business based on crop residues. The Guest Editors thank the authors who contributed to this Special Issue and hope that this collection will interest a wide range of readers.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.M. and E.C.; methodology, C.M. and E.C.; writing—original draft preparation, E.C. and C.M.; writing—review and editing, C.M. and E.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Sparebankstiftelsen Hedmark (through project number 362001-10) and Bio4Energy strategic research environment (through project number 550080300) funded C.M. salary.

Acknowledgments

The Department of Biotechnology, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, and the Department of Chemical, Environmental and Materials Engineering, Universidad de Jaén, are thanked for their institutional support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Vogel, A.M.; Below, F.E. Residue and Agronomic Management to Reduce the Continuous Corn Yield Penalty. Agronomy 2019, 9, 567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Smerilli, M. Valorization of Potato-Processing Residues for the Production of Lactic Acid. Chem. Biochem. Eng. Q. 2016, 30, 255–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Libutti, A.; Cammerino, A.R.B.; Monteleone, M. Management of Residues from Fruit Tree Pruning: A Trade-Off between Soil Quality and Energy Use. Agronomy 2021, 11, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Martín, C.; Fernández, T.; García, R.; Carrillo, E.; Marcet, M.; Galbe, M.; Jönsson, L.J. Preparation of Hydrolysates from Tobacco Stalks and Ethanolic Fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2002, 18, 857–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kornecki, T.S.; Price, A.J. Management of High-Residue Cover Crops in a Conservation Tillage Organic Vegetable On-Farm Setting. Agronomy 2019, 9, 640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bhuvaneshwari, S.; Hettiarachchi, H.; Meegoda, J.N. Crop Residue Burning in India: Policy Challenges and Potential Solutions. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sharma, S.; Singh, S.; Singh, M.; Singh, A.; Ali, H.M.; Siddiqui, M.H.; Bhattarai, D. Changes in Wheat Rhizosphere Carbon Pools in Response to Nitrogen and Straw Incorporation. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Martín, C. Pretreatment of Crop Residues for Bioconversion. Agronomy 2021, 11, 924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zheng, Y.; Doll, C.A.; Qiu, F.; Anderson, J.A.; Hauer, G.; Luckert, M.K. Potential Ethanol Biorefinery Sites Based on Agricultural Residues in Alberta, Canada: A GIS Approach with Feedstock Variability. Biosyst. Eng. 2021, 204, 223–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rodríguez, A.; Espinosa, E.; Martín, C. Special Issue “Lignocellulosic Biomass II”. Molecules 2023, 28, 6230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Capolupo, L.; Faraco, V. Green Methods of Lignocellulose Pretreatment for Biorefinery Development. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 9451–9467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Martín, C.; Dixit, P.; Momayez, F.; Jönsson, L.J. Hydrothermal Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Feedstocks to Facilitate Biochemical Conversion. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 846592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jönsson, L.J.; Martín, C. Pretreatment of Lignocellulose: Formation of Inhibitory by-Products and Strategies for Minimizing Their Effects. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 199, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Castro, E.; Strætkvern, K.O.; Romero-García, J.M.; Martín, C. Pretreatment and Bioconversion for Valorization of Residues of Non-Edible Oilseeds. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Martín, C.; Moure, A.; Martín, G.; Carrillo, E.; Domínguez, H.; Parajó, J.C. Fractional Characterisation of Jatropha, Neem, Moringa, Trisperma, Castor and Candlenut Seeds as Potential Feedstocks for Biodiesel Production in Cuba. Biomass Bioenergy 2010, 34, 533–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Díaz, M.J.; Moya, M.; Castro, E. Bioethanol Production from Steam-Exploded Barley Straw by Co-Fermentation with Escherichia coli SL100. Agronomy 2022, 12, 874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ilanidis, D.; Stagge, S.; Jönsson, L.J.; Martín, C. Hydrothermal Pretreatment of Wheat Straw: Effects of Temperature and Acidity on Byproduct Formation and Inhibition of Enzymatic Hydrolysis and Ethanolic Fermentation. Agronomy 2021, 11, 487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Steffen, F.; Kordsachia, T.; Heizmann, T.; Eckardt, M.P.; Chen, Y.; Saake, B. Sodium Carbonate Pulping of Wheat Straw—An Alternative Fiber Source for Various Paper Applications. Agronomy 2024, 14, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ruiz, E.; Romero-García, J.M.; Romero, I.; Manzanares, P.; Negro, M.J.; Castro, E. Olive-Derived Biomass as a Source of Energy and Chemicals. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefin. 2017, 11, 1077–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Díaz, M.J.; Ferrero, P.M.; Moya, M. Sequential Acid/Alkali Pretreatment for an Olive Tree Pruning Biorefinery. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. López-Sandin, I.; Rodríguez-Jasso, R.M.; Gutiérrez-Soto, G.; Rosero-Chasoy, G.; Shiva; González-Gloria, K.D.; Ruiz, H.A. Energy Assessment of Second-Generation (2G) Bioethanol Production from Sweet Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) Bagasse. Agronomy 2022, 12, 3106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Garcia-Vallejo, M.C.; Agudelo Patiño, T.; Poveda-Giraldo, J.A.; Piedrahita-Rodríguez, S.; Cardona Alzate, C.A. Alternatives for the Valorization of Avocado Waste Generated in the Different Links of the Value Chain Based on a Life-Cycle Analysis Approach. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Carmo-Calado, L.; Hermoso-Orzáez, M.J.; La Cal-Herrera, J.; Brito, P.; Terrados-Cepeda, J. Techno-Economic Evaluation of Downdraft Fixed Bed Gasification of Almond Shell and Husk as a Process Step in Energy Production for Decentralized Solutions Applied in Biorefinery Systems. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Osipov, D.O.; Dotsenko, A.S.; Semenova, M.V.; Rozhkova, A.M.; Sinitsyn, A.P. Comparative Study of the Convertibility of Pretreated Miscanthus Straw Using Enzyme Preparations Produced by Different Recombinant Strains of Penicillium verruculosum. Agronomy 2024, 14, 499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Anderson, A.S.; Mkabayi, L.; Malgas, S.; Kango, N.; Pletschke, B.I. Covalent Immobilisation of an Aspergillus Niger Derived Endo-1,4-β-Mannanase, Man26A, on Glutaraldehyde-Activated Chitosan Nanoparticles for the Effective Production of Prebiotic MOS from Soybean Meal. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Martín, C.; Castro, E. Special Issue “Pretreatment and Bioconversion of Crop Residues II”—Introduction to the Collection. Agronomy 2024, 14, 962. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14050962

AMA Style

Martín C, Castro E. Special Issue “Pretreatment and Bioconversion of Crop Residues II”—Introduction to the Collection. Agronomy. 2024; 14(5):962. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14050962

Chicago/Turabian Style

Martín, Carlos, and Eulogio Castro. 2024. "Special Issue “Pretreatment and Bioconversion of Crop Residues II”—Introduction to the Collection" Agronomy 14, no. 5: 962. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14050962

APA Style

Martín, C., & Castro, E. (2024). Special Issue “Pretreatment and Bioconversion of Crop Residues II”—Introduction to the Collection. Agronomy, 14(5), 962. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14050962

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop