Next Article in Journal
Acidic and Hypoxic Microenvironment in Melanoma: Impact of Tumour Exosomes on Disease Progression
Next Article in Special Issue
Nucleofection of Adipose Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells: Improved Transfection Efficiency for GMP Grade Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Potential of E3 Ubiquitin Ligases in Cancer Immunity: Opportunities and Challenges
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pulsed Electrical Stimulation Enhances Consistency of Directional Migration of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ascorbic Acid/Retinol and/or Inflammatory Stimuli’s Effect on Proliferation/Differentiation Properties and Transcriptomics of Gingival Stem/Progenitor Cells

by
Karim M. Fawzy El-Sayed
1,2,3,*,†,
Amira Bittner
1,†,
Kristina Schlicht
4,5,†,
Mohamed Mekhemar
1,†,
Kim Enthammer
4,5,
Marc Höppner
6,
Martha Es-Souni
7,
Juliane Schulz
4,5,8,
Matthias Laudes
4,5,8,
Christian Graetz
1,
Christof E. Dörfer
1 and
Dominik M. Schulte
4,5,8
1
Clinic for Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany
2
Oral Medicine and Periodontology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo 11553, Egypt
3
Stem cells and Tissue Engineering Unit, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo 11553, Egypt
4
Institute of Diabetes and Clinical Metabolic Research, School of Medicine, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, 24104 Kiel, Germany
5
Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition, Department of Medicine I, School of Medicine, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, 24105 Kiel, Germany
6
Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, School of Medicine, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany
7
Department of Orthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University Clinic Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Christian-Albrechts University of Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany
8
Cluster of Excellence, Precision Medicine in Chronic Inflammation, School of Medicine, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this project.
Cells 2021, 10(12), 3310; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10123310
Submission received: 10 October 2021 / Revised: 16 November 2021 / Accepted: 18 November 2021 / Published: 25 November 2021

Abstract

:
The present study explored the effects of ascorbic-acid (AA)/retinol and timed inflammation on the stemness, the regenerative potential, and the transcriptomics profile of gingival mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells’ (G-MSCs). STRO-1 (mesenchymal stem cell marker) immuno-magnetically sorted G-MSCs were cultured in basic medium (control group), in basic medium with IL-1β (1 ng/mL), TNF-α (10 ng/mL) and IFN-γ (100 ng/mL, inflammatory-medium), in basic medium with AA (250 µmol/L) and retinol (20 µmol/L) (AA/retinol group) or in inflammatory medium with AA/retinol (inflammatory/AA/retinol group; n = 5/group). The intracellular levels of phosphorylated and total β-Catenin at 1 h, the expression of stemness genes over 7 days, the number of colony-forming units (CFUs) as well as the cellular proliferation aptitude over 14 days, and the G-MSCs’ multilineage differentiation potential were assessed. Next-generation sequencing was undertaken to elaborate on up-/downregulated genes and altered intracellular pathways. G-MSCs demonstrated all mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells characteristics. Controlled inflammation with AA/retinol significantly elevated NANOG (p < 0.05). The AA/retinol-mediated reduction in intracellular phosphorylated β-Catenin was restored through the effect of controlled inflammation (p < 0.05). Cellular proliferation was highest in the AA/retinol group (p < 0.05). AA/retinol counteracted the inflammation-mediated reduction in G-MSCs’ clonogenic ability and CFUs. Amplified chondrogenic differentiation was observed in the inflammatory/AA/retinol group. At 1 and 3 days, the differentially expressed genes were associated with development, proliferation, and migration (FOS, EGR1, SGK1, CXCL5, SIPA1L2, TFPI2, KRATP1-5), survival (EGR1, SGK1, TMEM132A), differentiation and mineral absorption (FOS, EGR1, MT1E, KRTAP1-5, ASNS, PSAT1), inflammation and MHC-II antigen processing (PER1, CTSS, CD74) and intracellular pathway activation (FKBP5, ZNF404). Less as well as more genes were activated the longer the G-MSCs remained in the inflammatory medium or AA/retinol, respectively. Combined, current results point at possibly interesting interactions between controlled inflammation or AA/retinol affecting stemness, proliferation, and differentiation attributes of G-MSCs.

1. Introduction

Initiation of periodontitis generally necessitates the stimulation of the periodontal immune system through a bacterial dysbiosis, consequently setting complex inflammatory cascades in motion, characterized by the liberation of a variety of pro-inflammatory cytokines, mainly tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-1 beta (IL-1β), IL-4, IL-6, IL-17 as well as interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) [1,2]. Although such pro-inflammatory response is pivotal in combating the invading pathogens and in boosting subsequent periodontal stem/progenitor cells-mediated reparative/regenerative endeavors, a long-lasting not adequately self-limiting pro-inflammatory insult could detrimentally affect the tooth-supporting and investing cellular components of the periodontium [3]. Clinically, gingival mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells (G-MSCs) are in constant immuno-regenerative crosstalk with their surrounding micro-environment [4,5,6], with controlled and precisely timed pro-inflammatory stimuli exerting positive effects on their stemness and reparative/regenerative attributes [7,8].
Ascorbic acid (AA) and retinol are antioxidants, with a multitude of significant host inflammation-modulatory effects [9,10,11,12] on periodontal disease and the outcome of reparative/regenerative periodontal therapies [13,14]. While AA promotes wound healing and collagen synthesis [12], AA and retinol boost cellular metabolism, proliferation, and differentiation, while impeding apoptosis [15,16,17,18,19]. Chronic periodontitis was found to be associated with a lower retinol intake in young Korean women [9] and low serum levels of a variety of carotenoids, in particular beta-cryptoxanthin and beta-carotene, were demonstrated to be connected with an elevated periodontitis prevalence in a sample of 1258, 60–70-year-old Western European men [10]. Every other day oral administration of all-trans retinoic acid in a Porphyromonas gingivalis-induced mice periodontitis model reduced the inflammatory cellular infiltrate, enhanced the T-regulatory cell activation, and arrested further periodontal inflammation-mediated tissue destruction [11].
Most strikingly, recent reports demonstrated the ability of AA and retinol, at specific concentrations, to impact cellular epigenetics, through nuclear bases demethylation, with a resultant de-differentiation of adult cells into pluripotent ones [20,21], a perspective with great potential for periodontal reparative/regenerative endeavors. The current study’s aim was to explore for the first time the effects of AA/retinol in isolation and combined with controlled and timed pro-inflammatory stimulation on stemness, proliferation, Wnt/β-catenin pathway activation, differentiation, and mRNA transcriptomics of G-MSCs in vitro and to elaborate on the associated intracellular pathways.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. G-MSCs’ Isolation, Characterization and Multilineage Differentiation

The study’s protocol was reviewed by the Ethical Committee of the Christian-Albrechts University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany (IRB:513/17). Gingival connective tissue cells were isolated from free gingival collars from five healthy patients (Table 1 shows the donors’ age and gender), and STRO-1 immuno-magnetically sorted to obtain G-MSCs as previously described [22]. Colony-forming units (CFUs), multilineage differentiation potential and CD14, CD34, CD45, CD73, CD90, and CD105 stemness marker expression were examined on second passage G-MSCs (FACS-Calibur-E6370 and FACS-Comp5.1.1 software, Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), as previously described [22].

2.2. Experimental Groups

Second passage G-MSCs were cultured in basic medium, consisting of Eagle’s minimum essential medium alpha modification (Sigma-Aldrich GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) supplemented with antibiotics (100 U mL−1 penicillin, 100 µg mL−1 streptomycin) and 1% amphotericin (all from Biochrom, Berlin, Germany) (control group), in basic medium, with 1 ng/mL IL-1β, 10 ng/mL TNF-α and 100 ng/mL IFN-γ (Pepro Tech Inc., Rocky Hill, NJ, USA) [5,6,8,23,24,25] (inflammatory group), in basic medium with 250 µg/mL AA [21] and 20 µmol/L retinol [26] (AA/retinol group), or in inflammatory medium with 250 µg/mL AA and 20 µmol/L retinol (inflammatory/AA/retinol group). Media were exchanged three times per week.

2.3. G-MSCs’ mRNA Expression

NANOG, octamer-binding-transcription-factor-4A (OCT4A) and sex-determining-region-Y-box-2 (SOX2) stemness markers were assessed on mRNA level in the four groups (n = 5). mRNA isolation was carried out at 1, 3, 5, and 7 days (RNeasy kit, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). cDNA was produced from RNA (1 μg/μL) by reverse transcription (QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) in 20 μL reaction mixture (4 pmol of each primer, 10 μL of LightCycler Probes Master mixture (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA) and 5 μL specimen cDNA). Real-time polymerase chain reaction (rt-PCR; LightCycler 96 Real-Time PCR System, Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, IN, USA) was performed. Nineteen potential reference genes (18S, ACTB, ALAS, β-2M, β-Globin, G6PDH, GAPDH, GUSB, HPRT1, IPO8, PBGD, PGK1, PPIA, RPL13A, RPLP0, SDHA, TBP, TFRC, and YWHAZ) were pre-examined for the most suitable reference gene, which would not be altered by the experiment (NormFinder). Apart from PGK1, all tested genes were altered. Thus, PGK1 (a housekeeping gene) was deemed suitable to be utilized (Table 2). Relative quantification of all genes under examination was performed using the 2^-ΔΔCt method in triplicate and averaged.

2.4. ELISA

SOX2, OCT4, and NANOG were measured using simple step ELISA Kits (ABCAM, Cambridge, UK). G-MSCs (n = 5) were cultivated on six-well plates and stimulated according to the defined groups, followed by PBS washing, 600 μL lysis buffer addition, and aliquoting. ELISA measurements were carried out following the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantitation of bound analyte was achieved photometrically through detection of the colored oxidized TMB product at 450 nm (µQuant-spectrophotometer, BioTek; Mikrowin-software, Mikrotek Laborsysteme, Overath, Germany).
For evaluation of phosphorylated (pβ-catenin, pS45 ELISA Kit, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and total (tβ-catenin, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) intracellular β-catenin levels, 8 × 104 G-MSCs were cultivated per well in six-well plates until reaching 85% confluence. Subsequently, G-MSCs were stimulated for one hour in the different groups and washed with 3 × 350 µL 1× wash buffer PT followed by the addition of 350 μL chilled 1× cell extraction Buffer. Fifty microliters standard or sample was mixed with 100 μL pβ-catenin or tβ-catenin detection antibody and incubated in the dark on a plate shaker (400 rpm, 37 °C, 5% CO2, 15 min), followed by Stop Solution (100 μL) and 450 nm optical density (OD) measurements (MultiskanGO Microplate Spectrophotometer, Thermo Fisher, Langenselbold, Germany). Intracellular %pβ-catenin and %tβ-catenin were determined employing standard curves. All experiments were performed in duplicates and averaged.

2.5. mRNA Next-Generation Sequencing

mRNA from three different probands grown in control or inflammatory medium and subjected to either treatment with AA/retinol or not were extracted. Differential expression analysis (DEA) was conducted on days 1 and 3 of exposure (n = 24). Sequencing of samples was performed at the next-generation sequencing (NGS) lab at the Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology (IKMB) in Kiel on an Illumina MiSeq. Raw FastQ files were aligned, quality controlled, and transformed into read counts, using Nextflow nfcore/RNAseq pipeline https://nf-co.re/rnaseq (accessed on 22 February 2021) [27]. Read counts were analyzed in Rv3.6.2 using edgeR [28] and DeSEQ2 Packages [29]. Gene counts were rlog transformed and visualized in heatmaps in DeSEQ2. Differential expression analysis (DEA) was carried out in edgeR, using the Quasi-likelihood F-test (QLF) function, which gives stricter error rate control by accounting for the uncertainty in dispersion estimation and allows for multi-factor contrast, while controlling the individual subjects, thus correcting for inter-individual variation in the samples [30]. Contrasts were modeled separately for effects of medium (control or inflammatory medium) and treatment (AA/retinol or not) on days 1 and 3, as well as grouped (medium with treatment) together leading to three different contrasts in each experiment day. To control the false discovery rate (FDR), the Benjamini–Hochberg method was employed to correct for multiple testing. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis [31] was carried out for each day of the experiment and visualized for differently expressed genes, using R-package “clusterprofiler” [32].

2.6. CFUs and Cellular Proliferation

G-MSCs passage (1 × 104) were cultivated per well per group in 24-well culture plates (n = 5). Cellular counts were established daily by two independent examiners for 14 consecutive days and cellular proliferation curves were plotted for the different groups.
Second passage 1.63/cm2 G-MSCs of the different groups were seeded in 10 cm diameter dishes (n = 5). On the 14th day, cell cultures were fixed using chilled 100% methanol and stained with 0.1% crystal violet for 10 min. Two independent examiners counted the CFUs under a phase-contrast inverted microscope, where aggregations of ≥50 cells were considered as a colony.

2.7. Multilineage Potential of Stimulated G-MSCs

For five days, G-MSCs were pre-stimulated in the experimental groups (n = 5). Subsequently, they underwent osteogenic (14 days), adipogenic (21 days), or chondrogenic (35 days) differentiation in an inflammation-free environment with their respective inductive media as described above. Runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) mRNA expression as well as qualitative and quantitative Alizarin-Red staining was conducted [33]. Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-ɣ) mRNA expression as well as quantitative and qualitative Oil-Red-O evaluation were examined to confirm adipogenic differentiation [34]. Aggrecan (ACAN) mRNA expression and Alcian-Blue/nuclear-fast-red staining quantification were evaluated as evidence for chondrogenic differentiation [35]. All PCR primers were supplied by Roche and the real-time PCR was conducted as described above in triplicate and averaged (Table 2).

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Normality of the data was examined, employing the Shapiro–Wilk Test. Data proved to be not normally distributed. Hence, differences in %tβ-catenin, %pβ-catenin, CFUs, mRNA expressions, and quantitative adipogenic, osteogenic, and chondrogenic differentiation between the experimental groups were examined, using the Friedman test (SPSS 23, IBM, Chicago, IL, USA). The significance level was set at p ≤ 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Characterization of G-MSCs

Fibroblast-like cell clusters grew out of adherent gingival connective tissue masses (Figure 1A). G-MSCs exhibited classical CFUs (Figure 1B), and were CD14, CD34, CD45, CD73+, CD90+, and CD105+ (Figure 1C). Through osteogenic induction, G-MSCs deposited Alizarin-Red-positive calcified deposits, in distinction to their controls (Figure 1D,E). Adipogenic induction of G-MSCs formed Oil-Red-O-positive intracellular inclusion bodies, in distinction to their controls (Figure 1F,G). Chondrogenic induction of G-MSCs deposited Alcian-Blue/acid-fast-red-positive glycosaminoglycans, in distinction to their controls (Figure 1H,I).

3.2. Stemness Markers’ Expression

Regarding the expression of stemness genes, significant differences between the groups were notable at day 1 for SOX2 expression, at day 5 for OCT4A expression and at days 5 and 7 for NANOG expression (p < 0.05). On the protein level, at day 1, significant differences were further evident for NANOG expression between groups (p < 0.05), with a synergistic effect of AA/retinol and inflammation evident only at day 3 (p < 0.05, Friedman). No expressions were detected for SOX2 or OCT4 on the protein level (Figure 2).

3.3. mRNA Next Generation Sequencing

Rlog-transformed gene counts showed a clear cluster pattern depending on probands (Figure 3A,B and Figure S1), appearing to be the main source of variation in the gene expression profiles. Further analysis was performed in edgeR, allowing for complex multi-factor designs and adjustment for the individual effect of different probands. Table 3 provides an overview of the top three differentially expressed (DE) genes on days 1 and 3 (A full list of DE genes for each effect is provided in Supplementary Table S1).
For the combined effect of inflammatory medium and AA/retinol treatment, adjusted for the effect of proband, DEA resulted in 803 DE genes on day 1 and 729 DE genes on day 3. On day 1, the top three genes for this effect were the tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI1), Folistatin (FST), and FKBP proryl isomerase (FKBP5). On day 3, the top DE genes were FKBP5 and two genes involved in the transfer and synthesis of amino acids serine (phosphoserine aminotransferase—PSAT1) and asparagine (asparagine synthetase—ASNS). When looking at the effect of inflammatory medium solely on day 1, adjusted for proband and treatment, a total of 161 genes were significantly downregulated and 182 genes were significantly upregulated. On day 3, this changed to 99 genes being significantly downregulated and 90 genes significantly upregulated (Figure 3C,D). The top three DE genes on day 1 were, again TFPI1, followed by the C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 5 (CXCL5) and cathepsin S (CTTS). On day 3, the top upregulated genes were CD74, followed by CTTS and the keratin-associated protein (KRATP1-5), a gene that is associated with developmental biology. Finally, when considering the effect of treatment solely on day 1, adjusted for proband and medium, a total of 182 genes were significantly downregulated and 91 genes were significantly upregulated. On day 3, this changed to 245 genes, being significantly downregulated and 104 genes significantly upregulated. The top 3 DE genes on day 1 were FKPB5, FST, and metallothionein 1E (MT1E). On day 3, the top three genes were again FKBP5, FST, and SIPA1L2).
To validate this observation and to further explore the involvement of our entire DE gene list in cellular pathways, an overrepresentation analysis based on KEGG pathways was performed. Results of the pathway analysis for effects of medium, treatment, and their combined effect are shown in Figure 3E (figure shows top five overrepresented pathways only). Supplementary Table S2 provides the full list of overrepresented KEGG pathways for each effect. To validate the results, we additionally performed functional pathway analyses, using Reactome and Wikipathway databases (Supplementary Table S3, for the combined effect of treatment and medium). For obvious reasons, curation and annotation of pathways differ between the platforms. Yet, interesting commonalities with regard to the activation of interleukin signaling and chemokine binding pathways (KEGG, Reactome, and Wikipathways) and mineral absorption (KEGG and Wikipathways) were observed.

3.4. Intracellular β-Catenin

Significantly lower intracellular pβ-catenin was evident in the AA/retinol—compared to the inflammatory/AA/retinol– and the inflammatory group (p < 0.05, Figure 4A). Intracellular tβ-catenin was similar between all groups (p > 0.05, Friedman, Figure 4B).

3.5. CFUs and Cellular Proliferation

Significant inter-group differences in cellular counts were evident from days 4 to 11, with the AA/retinol group demonstrating the highest cellular counts, followed by the control-, the inflammatory/AA/retinol—and finally the inflammatory group (p < 0.05). At 14 days, the numbers of CFUs were significantly higher in the AA/retinol—followed by the inflammatory/AA/retinol group (p < 0.05, Friedman, Figure 4C–E).

3.6. Stimulated G-MCSs’ Multilineage Differentiation

G-MSCs in all experimental groups exhibited a remarkable multilineage differentiation aptitude, with a heightened differentiation potential irrespective of the treatment group. However, the chondrogenic differentiation appeared to be significantly enhanced by the synergistic effect of inflammation and AA/retinol application in the inflammatory/AA/retinol group, compared to AA/retinol alone, with significantly higher ACAN expression and glycosaminoglycans deposition observed (p < 0.05, Friedman, Figure 5).

4. Discussion

Periodontal reparative/regenerative approaches rely chiefly on the reiteration of developmental procedures, involving stem/progenitor cells’ proliferation, differentiation, and maturation [36]. Clinically, these primary events occur under inflamed periodontal micro-environmental conditions, with inflammatory cytokines stage-managing the path of events [2,37,38]. Apart from their important roles in periodontal repair/regeneration [13,14,39,40], AA and retinol exert anti-oxidative effects against periodontitis-induced tissue damages [41,42], demonstrate immunomodulatory capabilities on stem/progenitor cells, dendritic cells, macrophages, T- and B-cells, and markedly downregulate IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-β, and nitric oxide release [43,44,45,46]. Most importantly, AA and retinol at specific concentrations, which were employed in the current investigation, could drive cellular reprogramming/de-differentiation and pluripotency [19,20,47].
In accordance with earlier investigations [22,48,49,50,51], G-MSCs exhibited all characteristic mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells’ traits [52]. In line with a multitude of studies, revealing the positive stimulatory effects of local, controlled, and well-timed micro-environmental pro-inflammatory conditions on G-MSCs’ reparative/regenerative attributes [3,8,53], G-MSCs were challenged by periodontal pro-inflammatory cytokines; explicitly IL-1β, TNF-α, and IFN-γ, by AA/retinol or their combination and their stemness, proliferation, differentiation potentials, mRNA transcriptomics, and associated gene pathways examined.
Although differences in NANOG, OCT4A, and SOX2 mRNA expressions were detectable between the groups at different time points, only NANOG was detectable on protein level, in line with earlier reports on dissimilar NANOG, OCT4A, and SOX2 protein and mRNA expression dynamics within mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells [54,55,56]. This AA/retinol-induced increase in the NANOG, especially in the presence of controlled inflammatory stimuli at 3 days, could be ascribed primarily to the capability of AA and retinol to activate the ten-eleven translocation (TET) DNA demethylases, initiating intracellular epigenetic reprogramming with pluripotency amplification [20,57]. The observed synergistic effect suggests that controlled inflammation could have augmented this AA/retinol-mediated effect. Pro-inflammatory stimuli further appeared to increase the AA/retinol-mediated decrease in phosphorylated β-catenin levels intracellularly, restoring the G-MSCs’ stemness [58] and differentiation capacity [59].
According to the mRNA NGS results, it was noticeable that the top three differentially expressed genes for all effects could be grouped under five categories, namely genes associated with developmental biology, cell proliferation, mitosis, and migration (FOS, EGR1, SGK1, CXCL5, SIPA1L2, TFPI2, KRATP1-5), with cell survival (EGR1, SGK1, TMEM132A), with cell differentiation and mineral absorption (FOS, EGR1, MT1E, KRTAP1-5, ASNS, PSAT1), with inflammation and MHC-class-II antigen processing (PER1, CTSS, CD74) and intracellular pathway activation (FKBP5, ZNF404). On day 1, the KEGG pathways of the combined effect of treatment (AA/retinol or not) and medium (inflammation) were mainly characterized by an overexpression of genes in the C-motif chemokine ligand family (CCL and CXCL). The top five activated KEGG pathways affected the IL-17 and TNF signaling pathway, and cytokine/cytokine receptor interaction. On day 3, the overexpression of C-Motif pathways remained. However, a downregulation of genes in the cardiomyopathy pathways, primarily characterized by genes from the alpha integrin family (ITGA10, ITGA11, ITGAB), which bind collagen and are involved in the degradation of the extracellular matrix [60,61], was observed. Examining exclusively the effect of inflammatory medium, on day 1 the top five KEGG pathways were identical to those of the combined effect on day 1, although fold changes differed slightly. For the AA/retinol effect, on day 1 an under-expression of genes in the integrin-alpha family was notable, with activation of genes in the mineral absorption pathway and overexpression of genes in the Metallothionein family (MT1X, MT1E, etc.) [62]. On day 3, activation of the focal adhesion and ECM receptor interaction pathways was observed, both of which regulate important biological processes on the cellular level including cellular differentiation, proliferation, motility, and adhesion [61,63]. Broadly speaking, the effect of inflammation seemed to lead to fewer activated genes the longer the cells remained in the inflammatory medium, while the effect of treatment induced activation of more genes the longer the cells were stimulated via AA/retinol, thus endorsing a positive impact of short-termed inflammatory stimuli with a longer AA/retinol stimulation.
Similar to earlier investigations [53,64,65], AA/retinol augmented G-MSCs’ cellular proliferation, especially between the 4th and 11th day, an effect that was clearly attenuated by a combination with pro-inflammatory stimuli. The observed proliferation-inducing effect could be ascribed to AA/retinol-induced upregulated gene expression of SIPA1L2 and TFPI2 as well as AA’s ability to suppress cellular growth arrest encoding genes, namely growth arrest/DNA damage-inducible 45α (Gadd45a) and apoptosis inducing genes, namely caspase-1 [44] with an upregulation of the proliferation-related Fos-transcriptional factor [66]. Although, inflammatory stimuli, especially longer-term TNF-α challenges, could induce self-senescence of stem/progenitor cells, especially in the presence of IFN-γ, through changing the IFN-γ-activated, non-apoptotic form of TNF receptor superfamily member 6 (Fas) signaling into a caspase 3- and caspase 8-associated pro-apoptotic cascade [67], significantly higher CFUs were observed over 14 days in the AA/retinol as well as the inflammation/AA/retinol group, demonstrating that AA/retinol could counteract the long-term detrimental effects of inflammation, maintaining the G-MSCs’ colonogenic self-renewal and CFUs production at low cellular densities.
AA and retinol are generally characterized by their ability to modulate cell growth, metabolism, and morphogenesis during osteogenesis [26,68,69] and extracellular matrix production [16]. Similar to earlier studies, inflammatory cytokines or AA/retinol short-term pre-stimuli did not attenuate the subsequent G-MSCs’ characteristic multilineage differentiation potentials [53,65]. Yet, the results regarding the osteogenic differentiation should still be interpreted with caution, taking into consideration that osteogenic media normally contain a specific concentration of AA, which could have possibly masked any effect between the groups. Particularly their conjoint presence appeared beneficial regarding the G-MSCs’ chondrogenic differentiation capacity. In this context, the activation of genes of the mineral absorption pathway (MT1X, MT1E, KRTAP1-5, PSAT1) and the downregulation of genes of the alpha integrin family (ITGA10, ITGA11, ITGAB) described above could have significantly contributed to this synergistic effect.

5. Conclusions

Combined, current results point at altered G-MSCs’ characteristics in the presence of controlled inflammation or AA/retinol. Apart from the isolated modulatory effects of inflammation or AA/retinol on G-MSCs, a synergistic effect of their conjoint presence on the expression of the NANOG stemness marker was observed. The presence of AA/retinol could counteract the inflammation-induced cellular senescence and maintain the G-MSCs’ clonogenic abilities. On the other hand, controlled inflammation could restore the AA/retinol-mediated reduction in intracellular phosphorylated β-catenin as well as enhance the AA/retinol-mediated G-MSC’s chondrogenic differentiation potential. The observed effects were associated with the activation of a multitude of differentially expressed genes associated with development, proliferation and migration, survival, differentiation and mineral absorption, inflammation, and MHC-II antigen processing as well as intracellular pathway activation, with less as well as more genes activated the longer the cells remained in the inflammatory medium or AA/retinol, respectively.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cells10123310/s1, Table S1: A full list of differentially expressed genes for each effect. Table S2: A full list of overrepresented KEGG pathways for each effect. Table S3: A side by side comparison of overrepresented KEGG, WIKIPATHWAYS and REACTOME pathways for each effect. Figure S1: PCA plot of gene expression data. Colors denote treatment with AA/retinol or no treatment. Shapes denote control or inflammation medium.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.M.F.E.-S., C.G., C.E.D. and D.M.S.; methodology, K.M.F.E.-S., K.S. and D.M.S.; formal analysis, K.M.F.E.-S., A.B., K.S., M.M., J.S. and M.E.-S.; investigation, A.B., K.S., M.M., K.E., M.H. and M.E.-S.; writing—original draft preparation, K.M.F.E.-S. and K.S.; writing—review and editing, K.M.F.E.-S., C.G., M.L., C.E.D. and D.M.S.; supervision, K.M.F.E.-S., M.L., C.E.D. and D.M.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Christian Albrechts University of Kiel, Germany.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Christian Albrechts University of Kiel, Germany (IRB:513/17).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Paymard-Stolz, Marx, Marquardt, Hartmann, Jemlich and Kruse for their excellent scientific support.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, S.; Yu, N.; Arce, R.M. Periodontal inflammation: Integrating genes and dysbiosis. Periodontology 2020, 82, 129–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Papapanou, P.N.; Susin, C. Periodontitis epidemiology: Is periodontitis under-recognized, over-diagnosed, or both? Periodontology 2017, 75, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. El-Sayed, K.M.F.; Elahmady, M.; Adawi, Z.; Aboushadi, N.; Elnaggar, A.; Eid, M.; Hamdy, N.; Sanaa, D.; Dörfer, C.E. The periodontal stem/progenitor cell inflammatory-regenerative cross talk: A new perspective. J. Periodontal Res. 2019, 54, 81–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhang, Q.; Shi, S.; Liu, Y.; Uyanne, J.; Shi, Y.; Shi, S.; Le, A.D. Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived from Human Gingiva Are Capable of Immunomodulatory Functions and Ameliorate Inflammation-Related Tissue Destruction in Experimental Colitis. J. Immunol. 2009, 183, 7787–7798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Fawzy-El-Sayed, K.; Mekhemar, M.; Adam-Klages, S.; Kabelitz, D.; Dorfer, C. TlR expression profile of human gingival margin-derived stem progenitor cells. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal. 2016, 21, e30–e38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mekhemar, M.K.; Adam-Klages, S.; Kabelitz, D.; Dörfer, C.E.; El-Sayed, K.F. TLR-induced immunomodulatory cytokine expression by human gingival stem/progenitor cells. Cell. Immunol. 2018, 326, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhou, L.; Dörfer, C.E.; Chen, L.; El-Sayed, K.M.F. Porphyromonas gingivalislipopolysaccharides affect gingival stem/progenitor cells attributes through NF-κB, but not Wnt/β-catenin, pathway. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2017, 44, 1112–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Zhang, F.; Si, M.; Wang, H.; Mekhemar, M.K.; Dörfer, C.E.; El-Sayed, K.M.F. IL-1/TNF-αInflammatory and Anti-Inflammatory Synchronization Affects Gingival Stem/Progenitor Cells’ Regenerative Attributes. Stem Cells Int. 2017, 2017, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Park, J.-A.; Lee, J.-H.; Jin, B.-H.; Bae, K.-H. Association of Some Vitamins and Minerals with Periodontitis in a Nationally Representative Sample of Korean Young Adults. Biol. Trace Element Res. 2017, 178, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Linden, G.J.; McClean, K.M.; Woodside, J.V.; Patterson, C.C.; Evans, A.; Young, I.S.; Kee, F. Antioxidants and periodontitis in 60-70-year-old men. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2009, 36, 843–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, L.; Wang, J.; Jin, Y.; Gao, H.; Lin, X. Oral Administration of All-TransRetinoic Acid Suppresses Experimental Periodontitis by Modulating the Th17/Treg Imbalance. J. Periodontol. 2014, 85, 740–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Nishida, M.; Grossi, S.G.; Dunford, R.G.; Ho, A.W.; Trevisan, M.; Genco, R.J. Dietary Vitamin C and the Risk for Periodontal Disease. J. Periodontol. 2000, 71, 1215–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chitsazi, M.; Faramarzie, M.; Sadighi, M.; Shirmohammadi, A.; Hashemzadeh, A. Effects of adjective use of melatonin and vitamin C in the treatment of chronic periodontitis: A randomized clinical trial. J. Dent. Res. Dent. Clin. Dent. Prospect. 2017, 11, 236–240. [Google Scholar]
  14. Sulaiman, A.E.A.; Shehadeh, R.M. Assessment of Total Antioxidant Capacity and the Use of Vitamin C in the Treatment of Non-Smokers with Chronic Periodontitis. J. Periodontol. 2010, 81, 1547–1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bi, Y.; Gong, M.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, X.; Jiang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, J.; Liu, Y.; He, T.-C.; Li, T. Pre-activation of retinoid signaling facilitates neuronal differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Dev. Growth Differ. 2010, 52, 419–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yu, J.; Tu, Y.-K.; Tang, Y.-B.; Cheng, N.-C. Stemness and transdifferentiation of adipose-derived stem cells using l-ascorbic acid 2-phosphate-induced cell sheet formation. Biomaterials 2014, 35, 3516–3526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Li, C.-J.; Sun, L.-Y.; Pang, C.-Y. Synergistic Protection of N-Acetylcysteine and Ascorbic Acid 2-Phosphate on Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Against Mitoptosis, Necroptosis and Apoptosis. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 9819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Gao, Y.; Han, Z.; Li, Q.; Wu, Y.; Shi, X.; Ai, Z.; Du, J.; Li, W.; Guo, Z.; Zhang, Y. Vitamin C induces a pluripotent state in mouse embryonic stem cells by modulating microRNA expression. FEBS J. 2015, 282, 685–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Esteban, M.A.; Pei, D. Vitamin C improves the quality of somatic cell reprogramming. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44, 366–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hore, T.A. Modulating epigenetic memory through vitamins and TET: Implications for regenerative medicine and cancer treatment. Epigenomics 2017, 9, 863–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Van Pham, P.; Tran, N.Y.; Phan, N.L.-C.; Vu, N.B.; Phan, N.K. Vitamin C stimulates human gingival stem cell proliferation and expression of pluripotent markers. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 2015, 52, 218–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. El-Sayed, K.M.F.; Paris, S.; Graetz, C.; Kassem, N.; Mekhemar, M.; Ungefroren, H.; Fändrich, F.; E Dorfer, C. Isolation and characterisation of human gingival margin-derived STRO-1/MACS+ and MACS− cell populations. Int. J. Oral Sci. 2015, 7, 80–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Sidney, L.E.; Kirkham, G.R.; Buttery, L.D. Comparison of Osteogenic Differentiation of Embryonic Stem Cells and Primary Osteoblasts Revealed by Responses to IL-1β, TNF-α, and IFN-γ. Stem Cells Dev. 2014, 23, 605–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Fawzy-El-Sayed, K.M.; Klingebiel, P.; Dörfer, C.E. Toll-like Receptor Expression Profile of Human Dental Pulp Stem/Progenitor Cells. J. Endod. 2016, 42, 413–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fehrmann, C.; Dörfer, C.E.; El-Sayed, K.M.F. Toll-like Receptor Expression Profile of Human Stem/Progenitor Cells Form the Apical Papilla. J. Endod. 2020, 46, 1623–1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhang, S.; Chen, X.; Hu, Y.; Wu, J.; Cao, Q.; Chen, S.; Gao, Y. All-trans retinoic acid modulates Wnt3A-induced osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells via activating the PI3K/AKT/GSK3β signalling pathway. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2016, 422, 243–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ewels, P.A.; Peltzer, A.; Fillinger, S.; Patel, H.; Alneberg, J.; Wilm, A.; Garcia, M.U.; Di Tommaso, P.; Nahnsen, S. The nf-core framework for community-curated bioinformatics pipelines. Nat. Biotechnol. 2020, 38, 276–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Robinson, M.D.; McCarthy, D.J.; Smyth, G.K. edgeR: A Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 139–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Love, M.I.; Huber, W.; Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. McCarthy, D.J.; Chen, Y.; Smyth, G.K. Differential expression analysis of multifactor RNA-Seq experiments with respect to biological variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, 4288–4297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Kanehisa, M.; Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yu, G.; Wang, L.-G.; Han, Y.; He, Q.-Y. clusterProfiler: An R Package for Comparing Biological Themes Among Gene Clusters. OMICS J. Integr. Biol. 2012, 16, 284–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mahmood, M.; Li, Z.; Casciano, D.; Khodakovskaya, M.V.; Chen, T.; Karmakar, A.; Dervishi, E.; Xu, Y.; Mustafa, T.; Watanabe, F.; et al. Nanostructural materials increase mineralization in bone cells and affect gene expression through miRNA regulation. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2011, 15, 2297–2306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Sun, J.; Ye, X.; Xie, M.; Ye, J. Induction of triglyceride accumulation and mitochondrial maintenance in muscle cells by lactate. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 33732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Mekhemar, M.; Tölle, J.; Dörfer, C.; El-Sayed, K.F. TLR3 ligation affects differentiation and stemness properties of gingival mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2020, 47, 991–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. El-Sayed, K.M.F.; Dörfer, C.E. Animal Models for Periodontal Tissue Engineering: A Knowledge-Generating Process. Tissue Eng. Part C: Methods 2017, 23, 900–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Silva, T.; Garlet, G.; Fukada, S.; Silva, J.S.; Cunha, F.Q. Chemokines in Oral Inflammatory Diseases: Apical Periodontitis and Periodontal Disease. J. Dent. Res. 2007, 86, 306–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Lee, J.; Bin Lee, J.; Cha, J.; Choi, E.; Park, S.; Cho, K.S.; Kim, C. Chemokine in inflamed periodontal tissues activates healthy periodontal-ligament stem cell migration. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2017, 44, 530–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rubin, M.B. Vitamins Wound Healing. Plast. Surg. Nurs. 1984, 4, 16–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Elbehwashy, M.T.; Hosny, M.M.; Elfana, A.; Nawar, A.; El-Sayed, K.F. Clinical and radiographic effects of ascorbic acid-augmented platelet-rich fibrin versus platelet-rich fibrin alone in intra-osseous defects of stage-III periodontitis patients: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin. Oral Investig. 2021, 25, 6309–6319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chapple, I.L.C. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidants in inflammatory diseases. J. Clin. Periodontol. 1997, 24, 287–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Alagl, A.; Bhat, S.G. Ascorbic acid: New role of an age-old micronutrient in the management of periodontal disease in older adults. Geriatr. Gerontol. Int. 2014, 15, 241–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Majewicz, J.; Rimbach, G.; Proteggente, A.R.; Lodge, J.K.; Kraemer, K.; Minihane, A.M. Dietary vitamin C down-regulates inflammatory gene expression in apoE4 smokers. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005, 338, 951–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tomofuji, T.; Ekuni, D.; Sanbe, T.; Irie, K.; Azuma, T.; Maruyama, T.; Tamaki, N.; Murakami, J.; Kokeguchi, S.; Yamamoto, T. Effects of vitamin C intake on gingival oxidative stress in rat periodontitis. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2009, 46, 163–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Erkelens, M.N.; Mebius, R.E. Retinoic Acid and Immune Homeostasis: A Balancing Act. Trends Immunol. 2017, 38, 168–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Abdelhamid, L.; Hussein, H.; Ghanem, M.; Eissa, N. Retinoic acid-mediated anti-inflammatory responses in equine immune cells stimulated by LPS and allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells. Res. Veter. Sci. 2017, 114, 225–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Gao, Y.; Yang, L.; Chen, L.; Wang, X.; Wu, H.; Ai, Z.; Du, J.; Liu, Y.; Shi, X.; Wu, Y.; et al. Vitamin C facilitates pluripotent stem cell maintenance by promoting pluripotency gene transcription. Biochimie 2013, 95, 2107–2113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Tomar, G.B.; Srivastava, R.K.; Gupta, N.; Barhanpurkar, A.P.; Pote, S.T.; Jhaveri, H.M.; Mishra, G.C.; Wani, M.R. Human gingiva-derived mesenchymal stem cells are superior to bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells for cell therapy in regenerative medicine. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010, 393, 377–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fournier, B.P.; Ferre, F.C.; Couty, L.; Lataillade, J.-J.; Gourven, M.; Naveau, A.; Coulomb, B.; Lafont, A.; Gogly, B. Multipotent Progenitor Cells in Gingival Connective Tissue. Tissue Eng. Part A 2010, 16, 2891–2899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jin, S.-H.; Lee, J.E.; Yun, J.-H.; Kim, I.; Ko, Y.; Park, J.B. Isolation and characterization of human mesenchymal stem cells from gingival connective tissue. J. Periodontal Res. 2014, 50, 461–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gao, Y.; Zhao, G.; Jianliang, P.; Chen, X.; Pang, J.; Ke, J. Isolation and Multiple Differentiation Potential Assessment of Human Gingival Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 20982–20996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Dominici, M.; Le Blanc, K.; Mueller, I.; Slaper-Cortenbach, I.; Marini, F.; Krause, D.; Deans, R.; Keating, A.; Prockop, D.; Horwitz, E. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy 2006, 8, 315–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. El-Sayed, K.M.F.; Hein, D.; Dörfer, C.E. Retinol/inflammation affect stemness and differentiation potential of gingival stem/progenitor cells via Wnt/β-catenin. J. Periodontal Res. 2019, 54, 413–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Liu, Y.; Beyer, A.; Aebersold, R. On the Dependency of Cellular Protein Levels on mRNA Abundance. Cell 2016, 165, 535–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Van den Berg, P.R.; Budnik, B.; Slavov, N.; Semrau, S. Dynamic post-transcriptional regulation during embryonic stem cell differentiation. bioRxiv 2017, 123497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Reimegård, J.; Tarbier, M.; Danielsson, M.; Schuster, J.; Baskaran, S.; Panagiotou, S.; Dahl, N.; Friedländer, M.R.; Gallant, C.J. A combined approach for single-cell mRNA and intracellular protein expression analysis. Commun. Biol. 2021, 4, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Hore, T.A.; von Meyenn, F.; Ravichandran, M.; Bachman, M.; Ficz, G.; Oxley, D.; Santos, F.; Balasubramanian, S.; Jurkowski, T.P.; Reik, W. Retinol and ascorbate drive erasure of epigenetic memory and enhance reprogramming to naïve pluripotency by complementary mechanisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 12202–12207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Rasmussen, M.; Ortolano, N.A.; Romero-Morales, A.I.; Gama, V. Wnt Signaling and Its Impact on Mitochondrial and Cell Cycle Dynamics in Pluripotent Stem Cells. Genes 2018, 9, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Kong, X.; Liu, Y.; Ye, R.; Zhu, B.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, X.; Hu, C.-H.; Luo, H.; Zhang, Y.; Ding, Y.; et al. GSK3β is a checkpoint for TNF-α-mediated impaired osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in inflammatory microenvironments. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Gen. Subj. 2013, 1830, 5119–5129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lehnert, K.; Ni, J.; Leung, E.; Gough, S.; Morris, C.; Liu, D.; Wang, S.-X.; Langley, R.; Krissansen, G. The integrin α10 subunit: Expression pattern, partial gene structure, and chromosomal localization. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 1999, 87, 238–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Bosman, F.T.; Stamenkovic, I. Functional structure and composition of the extracellular matrix. J. Pathol. 2003, 200, 423–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Stennard, F.; Holloway, A.F.; Hamilton, J.; West, A.K. Characterisation of six additional human metallothionein genes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Gene Struct. Expr. 1994, 1218, 357–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Petit, V.; Thiery, J.-P. Focal adhesions: Structure and dynamics. Biol. Cell 2000, 92, 477–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Yoo, H.G.; Chang, I.-Y.; Pyo, H.K.; Kang, Y.J.; Lee, S.H.; Kwon, O.; Cho, K.H.; Eun, H.C.; Kim, K.H. The Additive Effects of Minoxidil and Retinol on Human Hair Growth in Vitro. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2007, 30, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. El-Sayed, K.M.F.; Nguyen, N.; Dörfer, C.E. Ascorbic Acid, Inflammatory Cytokines (IL-1β/TNF-α/IFN-γ), or Their Combination’s Effect on Stemness, Proliferation, and Differentiation of Gingival Mesenchymal Stem/Progenitor Cells. Stem Cells Int. 2020, 2020, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kim, J.H.; Kim, W.-K.; Sung, Y.K.; Kwack, M.H.; Song, S.Y.; Choi, J.-S.; Park, S.G.; Yi, T.; Lee, H.-J.; Kim, D.-D.; et al. The Molecular Mechanism Underlying the Proliferating and Preconditioning Effect of Vitamin C on Adipose-Derived Stem Cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2014, 23, 1364–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Liu, Y.; Wang, L.; Kikuiri, T.; Akiyama, K.; Chen, C.; Xu, X.; Yang, R.; Chen, W.; Wang, S.; Shi, S. Mesenchymal stem cell–based tissue regeneration is governed by recipient T lymphocytes via IFN-γ and TNF-α. Nat. Med. 2011, 17, 1594–1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Carinci, F.; Pezzetti, F.; Spina, A.M.; Palmieri, A.; Laino, G.; De Rosa, A.; Farina, E.; Illiano, F.; Stabellini, G.; Perrotti, V.; et al. Effect of Vitamin C on pre-osteoblast gene expression. Arch. Oral Biol. 2005, 50, 481–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Ishikawa, S.; Iwasaki, K.; Komaki, M.; Ishikawa, I. Role of Ascorbic Acid in Periodontal Ligament Cell Differentiation. J. Periodontol. 2004, 75, 709–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Phase contrast inverted microscopic picture of gingival cells growing out from a gingival connective tissue specimen (A). G-MSCs’ colony-forming units (CFUs) (B). G-MSCs surface markers’ expression flowcytometrically (C). Osteogenic induction of G-MSCs (Alizarin-Red stained; (D)) and respective controls (E) Adipogenic induction of G-MSCs (Oil-Red-O stained; (F)) and respective controls (G). Chondrogenic induction of G-MSCs (Alcian Blue/acid-fast-red staining; (H)) and respective controls (I).
Figure 1. Phase contrast inverted microscopic picture of gingival cells growing out from a gingival connective tissue specimen (A). G-MSCs’ colony-forming units (CFUs) (B). G-MSCs surface markers’ expression flowcytometrically (C). Osteogenic induction of G-MSCs (Alizarin-Red stained; (D)) and respective controls (E) Adipogenic induction of G-MSCs (Oil-Red-O stained; (F)) and respective controls (G). Chondrogenic induction of G-MSCs (Alcian Blue/acid-fast-red staining; (H)) and respective controls (I).
Cells 10 03310 g001
Figure 2. mRNA and protein expressions of stemness markers (NANOG, OCT4A, SOX2) in G-MSCs challenged by AA/retinol and inflammation at 1, 3, 5, and 7 days (box and whisker plots with medians/quartiles). Significant differences denoted with asterisks (n = 5; * p < 0.05, Friedman test). Abbreviations: SOX2: sex-determining region Y-box 2; OCT4A: octamer-binding transcription factor 4A.
Figure 2. mRNA and protein expressions of stemness markers (NANOG, OCT4A, SOX2) in G-MSCs challenged by AA/retinol and inflammation at 1, 3, 5, and 7 days (box and whisker plots with medians/quartiles). Significant differences denoted with asterisks (n = 5; * p < 0.05, Friedman test). Abbreviations: SOX2: sex-determining region Y-box 2; OCT4A: octamer-binding transcription factor 4A.
Cells 10 03310 g002
Figure 3. Visualization of gene counts and differentially expressed genes: (A) Heatmap of rlog-transformed gene counts for all samples on day 1 of the experiment. Labels refer to type of medium, type of treatment and proband number. (B) Heatmap of rlog transformed gene counts for all samples on day 3 of the experiment. Labels refer to type of medium, type of treatment and proband number. (C) MD plot of differentially expressed genes for the overall effect of growth medium on day 1 of the experiment, type of treatment and proband id. (D) MD plot of differentially expressed genes for the effect of AA/retinol treatment on day 1 of the experiment, type of growth medium and proband id. (E) Top five significantly represented pathways for the effects of AA/retinol treatment (lower section), medium (middle section) and the combined effect of both (upper section). Three patients were tested (n = 3) per day (days 1 and 3). Four replicates were carried out for each measurement.
Figure 3. Visualization of gene counts and differentially expressed genes: (A) Heatmap of rlog-transformed gene counts for all samples on day 1 of the experiment. Labels refer to type of medium, type of treatment and proband number. (B) Heatmap of rlog transformed gene counts for all samples on day 3 of the experiment. Labels refer to type of medium, type of treatment and proband number. (C) MD plot of differentially expressed genes for the overall effect of growth medium on day 1 of the experiment, type of treatment and proband id. (D) MD plot of differentially expressed genes for the effect of AA/retinol treatment on day 1 of the experiment, type of growth medium and proband id. (E) Top five significantly represented pathways for the effects of AA/retinol treatment (lower section), medium (middle section) and the combined effect of both (upper section). Three patients were tested (n = 3) per day (days 1 and 3). Four replicates were carried out for each measurement.
Cells 10 03310 g003aCells 10 03310 g003b
Figure 4. β-catenin expression, cellular proliferation and CFUs following AA/retinol and inflammatory stimulation of G-MSCs: ELISA examination of the phosphorylated (pβ-catenin) and total (tβ-catenin) intracellular β-catenin, following G-MSCs’ challenging by AA/retinol and inflammation ((A,B); box and whisker plots with medians/quartiles). GMSCs’ cell proliferatory graph of the AA/retinol and inflammation stimulated groups over 14 days ((C); box and whisker plots with medians/quartiles). CFUs assay/CFUs’ numbers following G-MSCs’ stimulation via ascorbic acid and inflammation ((D); box and whisker plots with medians/quartiles). Significant differences denoted with asterisks (n = 5, * p < 0.05; Friedman test). Representative CFUs of the four experimental groups (E). CFUs; colony-forming units, pβ-catenin; phosphorylated β-catenin, tβ-catenin; total (tβ-catenin) intracellular β-catenin.
Figure 4. β-catenin expression, cellular proliferation and CFUs following AA/retinol and inflammatory stimulation of G-MSCs: ELISA examination of the phosphorylated (pβ-catenin) and total (tβ-catenin) intracellular β-catenin, following G-MSCs’ challenging by AA/retinol and inflammation ((A,B); box and whisker plots with medians/quartiles). GMSCs’ cell proliferatory graph of the AA/retinol and inflammation stimulated groups over 14 days ((C); box and whisker plots with medians/quartiles). CFUs assay/CFUs’ numbers following G-MSCs’ stimulation via ascorbic acid and inflammation ((D); box and whisker plots with medians/quartiles). Significant differences denoted with asterisks (n = 5, * p < 0.05; Friedman test). Representative CFUs of the four experimental groups (E). CFUs; colony-forming units, pβ-catenin; phosphorylated β-catenin, tβ-catenin; total (tβ-catenin) intracellular β-catenin.
Cells 10 03310 g004
Figure 5. G-MSCs multilineage differentiation following stimulation by AA/retinol and inflammation: Gene expressions of ALP and RUNX2 following a 14-day osteogenic stimulation ((A); box and whisker plots with medians/quartiles). Ca2+ quantification and Alizarin-Red staining following a 14-day osteogenic induction of ascorbic acid and inflammation stimulated G-MSCs ((B); box and whisker plots with medians/quartiles). LPL and PPARɣ gene expression after 21 days of adipogenic stimulation of ascorbic acid and inflammation challenged G-MSCs ((C); box and whisker plots with medians/quartiles). Oil-Red-O staining and lipid amount quantification of ascorbic acid and inflammation stimulated G-MSCs after 21 days of adipogenic stimulation ((D); box and whisker plots with medians/quartiles). ACAN gene expression following a 35-day chondrogenic induction of ascorbic acid and inflammation stimulated G-MSCs ((E); box and whisker plots with medians/quartiles). Alcian-blue/nuclear-fast-red staining of ascorbic acid and inflammation stimulated G-MSCs following a 35-day chondrogenic induction (F) (n = 5, a circle represents an outlier, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; Friedman test).
Figure 5. G-MSCs multilineage differentiation following stimulation by AA/retinol and inflammation: Gene expressions of ALP and RUNX2 following a 14-day osteogenic stimulation ((A); box and whisker plots with medians/quartiles). Ca2+ quantification and Alizarin-Red staining following a 14-day osteogenic induction of ascorbic acid and inflammation stimulated G-MSCs ((B); box and whisker plots with medians/quartiles). LPL and PPARɣ gene expression after 21 days of adipogenic stimulation of ascorbic acid and inflammation challenged G-MSCs ((C); box and whisker plots with medians/quartiles). Oil-Red-O staining and lipid amount quantification of ascorbic acid and inflammation stimulated G-MSCs after 21 days of adipogenic stimulation ((D); box and whisker plots with medians/quartiles). ACAN gene expression following a 35-day chondrogenic induction of ascorbic acid and inflammation stimulated G-MSCs ((E); box and whisker plots with medians/quartiles). Alcian-blue/nuclear-fast-red staining of ascorbic acid and inflammation stimulated G-MSCs following a 35-day chondrogenic induction (F) (n = 5, a circle represents an outlier, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; Friedman test).
Cells 10 03310 g005
Table 1. Donors’ gender and age.
Table 1. Donors’ gender and age.
Donor’s NumberGenderAge
1Male18
2Female20
3Female19
4Male22
5Male20
Table 2. Real-time PCR primers (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA).
Table 2. Real-time PCR primers (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA).
GeneGene SymbolAccession IDAssay ID
RUNX2RUNX2 H. sapiensENST00000359524113380
ACANACAN H. sapiensENST00000439576138057
ALPALP H. sapiensENST00000374840103448
LPLLPL H. sapiensENST00000311322113230
NANOGNANOG H. sapiensENST00000229307148147
OCT4AOCT4 H. sapiensENST00000259915113034
PGK1PGK1 H. sapiensENST00000373316102083
PPARɣPPARɣ H. sapiensENST00000287820110607
SOX2SOX2 H. sapiensENST00000325404111867
Abbreviations: ACAN: Aggrecan; ALP: alkaline phosphatase; LPL: lipoprotein lipase; OCT4A: octamer-binding transcription factor 4A; PGK1: Phosphoglycerate kinase-1; PPARɣ: proliferator-activated receptor gamma; RUNX2: Runt-related transcription factor 2; SOX2: sex-determining region Y-box 2.
Table 3. Top three differentially expressed genes for the effect of growth medium, AA/retinol treatment, as well as the combined effect of inflammatory medium and AA/retinol treatment. Effects have been adjusted for the influence of different probands. LogFC = log Fold Change, LogCPM = log counts per million. Correction for multiple testing was performed with the Benjamini–Hochberg method, significance level was set to FDR < 0.05.
Table 3. Top three differentially expressed genes for the effect of growth medium, AA/retinol treatment, as well as the combined effect of inflammatory medium and AA/retinol treatment. Effects have been adjusted for the influence of different probands. LogFC = log Fold Change, LogCPM = log counts per million. Correction for multiple testing was performed with the Benjamini–Hochberg method, significance level was set to FDR < 0.05.
EnsembleEntrez IDGene NameLogFCp-ValueFDR
MediumTreatment
Day 1Treatment + mediumGen 1ENSG000001058257980TFPI11.461.82 × 10−131.41 × 10−9
Gen 2ENSG0000013436310468FST−0.435.48 × 10−132.0 4× 10−9
Gen 3ENSG000000960602289FKBP51.546.66 × 10−132.04 × 10−9
MediumGen 1ENSG000001058257980TFPI21.98 5.85 × 10−149.06 × 10−10
Gen 2ENSG000001637356374CXCL53.86 5.63 × 10−124.36 × 10−8
Gen 3ENSG000001631311520CTSS2.27 8.82 × 10−124.56 × 10−8
TreatmentGen 1ENSG000000960602289FKBP5 2.001.29 × 10−132.00 × 10−9
Gen 2ENSG0000013436310468FST −1.521.74 × 10−121.25 × 10−8
Gen 3ENSG000001697154493MT1E 1.332.42 × 10−121.25 × 10−8
Day 3Treatment + mediumGen 1ENSG000000960602289FKBP52.001.67 × 10−121.21 × 10−8
Gen 2ENSG0000013506929968PSAT11.171.18 × 10−121.22 × 10−8
Gen 3ENSG0000013436310468ASNS0.382.39 × 10−111.22 × 10−8
MediumGen 1ENSG00000019582972CD741.89 3.20 × 10−124.88 × 10−8
Gen 2ENSG000001631311520CTSS1.53 9.24 × 10−117.05 × 10−7
Gen 3ENSG0000022185283895KRTAP1-51.12 4.27 × 10−91.83 × 10−5
TreatmentGen 1ENSG000000960602289FKBP5 2.523.32 × 10−145.05 × 10−10
Gen 2ENSG0000013436310468FST −1.832.04 × 10−111.55 × 10−7
Gen 3ENSG0000011699157568SIPA1L2 −1.404.48 × 10−112.28 × 10−7
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fawzy El-Sayed, K.M.; Bittner, A.; Schlicht, K.; Mekhemar, M.; Enthammer, K.; Höppner, M.; Es-Souni, M.; Schulz, J.; Laudes, M.; Graetz, C.; et al. Ascorbic Acid/Retinol and/or Inflammatory Stimuli’s Effect on Proliferation/Differentiation Properties and Transcriptomics of Gingival Stem/Progenitor Cells. Cells 2021, 10, 3310. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10123310

AMA Style

Fawzy El-Sayed KM, Bittner A, Schlicht K, Mekhemar M, Enthammer K, Höppner M, Es-Souni M, Schulz J, Laudes M, Graetz C, et al. Ascorbic Acid/Retinol and/or Inflammatory Stimuli’s Effect on Proliferation/Differentiation Properties and Transcriptomics of Gingival Stem/Progenitor Cells. Cells. 2021; 10(12):3310. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10123310

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fawzy El-Sayed, Karim M., Amira Bittner, Kristina Schlicht, Mohamed Mekhemar, Kim Enthammer, Marc Höppner, Martha Es-Souni, Juliane Schulz, Matthias Laudes, Christian Graetz, and et al. 2021. "Ascorbic Acid/Retinol and/or Inflammatory Stimuli’s Effect on Proliferation/Differentiation Properties and Transcriptomics of Gingival Stem/Progenitor Cells" Cells 10, no. 12: 3310. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10123310

APA Style

Fawzy El-Sayed, K. M., Bittner, A., Schlicht, K., Mekhemar, M., Enthammer, K., Höppner, M., Es-Souni, M., Schulz, J., Laudes, M., Graetz, C., Dörfer, C. E., & Schulte, D. M. (2021). Ascorbic Acid/Retinol and/or Inflammatory Stimuli’s Effect on Proliferation/Differentiation Properties and Transcriptomics of Gingival Stem/Progenitor Cells. Cells, 10(12), 3310. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10123310

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop