Next Article in Journal
Dendritic Cells: Neglected Modulators of Peripheral Immune Responses and Neuroinflammation in Mood Disorders?
Next Article in Special Issue
Lysophosphatidic Acid: Promoter of Cancer Progression and of Tumor Microenvironment Development. A Promising Target for Anticancer Therapies?
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of the Clenbuterol—β2-Adrenergic Receptor Agonist on the Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells Proliferation, Phenotype, Functions, and Reactive Oxygen Species Production in Race Horses In Vitro
Previous Article in Special Issue
LPA1 Receptor Promotes Progesterone Receptor Phosphorylation through PKCα in Human Glioblastoma Cells
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Expression Regulation and Biological Function of Autotaxin

The Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Regulation Biology, Ministry of Education, Institute of Cell Biology, College of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2021, 10(4), 939; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10040939
Submission received: 24 March 2021 / Revised: 15 April 2021 / Accepted: 15 April 2021 / Published: 19 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Role and Signaling Mechanisms of LPA in Cancer Development)

Abstract

:
Autotaxin (ATX) is a secreted glycoprotein and functions as a key enzyme to produce extracellular lysophosphatidic acid (LPA). LPA interacts with at least six G protein-coupled receptors, LPAR1-6, on the cell membrane to activate various signal transduction pathways through distinct G proteins, such as Gi/0, G12/13, Gq/11, and Gs. The ATX-LPA axis plays an important role in physiological and pathological processes, including embryogenesis, obesity, and inflammation. ATX is one of the top 40 most unregulated genes in metastatic cancer, and the ATX-LPA axis is involved in the development of different types of cancers, such as colorectal cancer, ovarian cancer, breast cancer, and glioblastoma. ATX expression is under multifaceted controls at the transcription, post-transcription, and secretion levels. ATX and LPA in the tumor microenvironment not only promote cell proliferation, migration, and survival, but also increase the expression of inflammation-related circuits, which results in poor outcomes for patients with cancer. Currently, ATX is regarded as a potential cancer therapeutic target, and an increasing number of ATX inhibitors have been developed. In this review, we focus on the mechanism of ATX expression regulation and the functions of ATX in cancer development.

1. ATX, a Lyso-PLD that Catalyzes Extracellular LPA Production

Autotaxin (ATX), a secreted glycoprotein, was first detected in conditioned medium of cultured human A2058 melanoma cells as an autocrine motility factor [1]. ATX belongs to the ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase (ENPP) family and is also known as ENPP2 [1,2,3]. It was found that ATX possesses lysophospholipase D (LysoPLD) activity and mainly hydrolyzes lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) to form lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) [4]. As a bioactive lipid molecule, LPA interacts with six different G protein-coupled receptors (LPAR1–6) on the cell membrane to activate the coupled G proteins (Gq, Gi and G12/13) and their downstream signaling molecules such as Rho, PLC, Ras, PI3K, and so on [5]. The ATX-LPA-LPA receptor axis participates in many physiological processes, including embryonic development, angiogenesis, and preadipocyte differentiation. When ATX or LPA receptor expression patterns are disrupted, various pathological processes can result, such as cancer [6,7], neuropathic pain [8], and fat mass expansion [9]. On the other hand, extracellular LPA is degraded to monoacylgycerol (MAG) by lipid phosphate phosphohydrolase LPPs (LPP1-3) localized on plasma membranes, which moderates the LPA effects on the activation of LPARs [10,11] (Figure 1).

2. ATX Structure and Isoforms

ATX protein is composed of two N-terminal somatomedin B (SMB)-like domains, a central phosphodiesterase (PDE) domain, and a C-terminal nuclease (NUC)-like domain. The PDE domain is located in the center of the peptide chain and interacts with the two SMB domains in the N-terminus and the NUC domain in the C-terminus. The PDE domain contains the active catalytic site and two zinc ions. Next to the active site, a hydrophobic lipid binding pocket can bind different LPC and LPA species. A disulfide bond joins the NUC domain and the PDE domain, and the NUC domain wrapped by a lasso maintains the rigidity of the PDE domain [12,13,14]. The N-terminal SMB domain is relatively small and enriched with cysteine, which is critical for ATX interacting with cell surface integrins [12]. The integrin binding localizes ATX activity to the cell surface, providing a mechanism to generate LPA in the vicinity of LPA receptors, achieving a highly efficient delivery of its product to the target receptors [14,15] (Figure 1).
Human ATX gene is located on chromosome 8 at position 8q24.1, which is a potential susceptibility genetic locus in cancer patients [16], containing 27 exons and 26 introns. According to different alternative splicing forms, there are five ATX isoforms distributed in different tissues (Figure 2). ATXβ is an isoform with the deletion of exons 12 and 21 enriched in human peripheral tissues. ATXγ, with the deletion of exon 12, is widely expressed in the central nervous system and brain. ATXα, in which exon 21 is deleted, is expressed at significantly lower levels than ATXβ and ATXγ in the nervous system and peripheral tissues [17,18,19,20]. In 2012, another two ATX isoforms (δ and ε) were identified. ATXδ and ATXε are novel alternative splice variants of ATX with four amino acid deletions in the L2 linker region of ATXβ and ATXα, respectively. It is found that, although all of the five ATX isoforms have the lysoPLD activity, ATXβ and ATXδ are the major and stable isoforms present in a wide range of organisms [21].

3. Mechanisms of ATX Expression Regulation

The regulation of ATX expression has a profound impact on the content of LPA in the cellular microenvironment and on the activation of the LPA receptor as well as its downstream signaling. The results of previous research indicate that ATX is regulated by complicated mechanisms at both transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels (Figure 3). It has been reported that HDAC inhibitor treatment can induce ATX expression in various cancer cells [22]. Recently, ATX promoter was characterized by H3K27me3 marks in HEK 293T cells. It was found that ATX expression levels were increased in response to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) treatment through the removal of the methyl groups of H3K27me3 by the demethylase UTX, suggesting that ATX expression is amenable to epigenetic regulation. Furthermore, a distant acting enhancer is identified as regulating ATX expression. The enhancer-mediated enrichment of interacting JMJD3-DDX21 to the ATX locus prevents R-loop formation and promotes transcript synthesis in response to LPS treatment [23].
There are several transcription factors involved in ATX expression. Reducing the expression of the transcription factor NFAT1 decreases ATX expression, leading to the suppression of melanoma cell growth and metastasis [24]. AP-1 and SP transcription factors act on the promoter of ATX by activating a CRE/AP-1-like element and a GA-box [25]. The transcription factor Stat3 increases the migration of breast cancer cells through the activation of ATX [26]. Michelle et al. reported that hypoxia increased hepatocellular ATX expression by HIF-1α in vitro and that hepatitis C virus infection increased ATX expression via HIF-1α to promote liver fibrosis and injury [27]. In addition, the transcription factors v-jun, c-jun, and HOXA13 all participate in the regulation of ATX at the transcriptional level [28,29,30].
In recent years, the post-transcriptional regulation of ATX expression has been identified. It is found that the RNA-binding proteins HuR and AUF1 directly bind to the ATX mRNA 3’-UTR and influence ATX mRNA stability in Colo320 human colon cancer cells and LPS-stimulated THP-1 human monocytic cells [31]. microRNA-101-3p (miR-101-3p), a well-known tumor suppressor, inhibits ATX regulation by directly targeting a conserved sequence in the ATX mRNA 3’-UTR [32]. Recently, we clarified that the RNA methyltransferase NSUN2 could methylate the 3’-UTR of ATX mRNA at cytosine 2756. Methylation by NSun2 promotes the export of ATX mRNA from the nucleus to the cytoplasm and enhances the translation of ATX [33].
Some inflammatory cytokines have been demonstrated to influence ATX expression. The proinflammatory cytokine TNFα selectively promotes ATX expression and secretion in Hep3B and Huh7 cells [34]. LPA induces the expression of IL-6, and then IL-6 stimulates the fibroblast expression of ATX, which connects the ATX/LPA and IL-6 pathways in an amplification loop in human dermal fibroblasts [35]. Our laboratory found that ATX expression in THP-1 cells was induced by treatment with TLR ligands such as LPS, CpG oligonucleotide, and poly(I:C). In response to TLR activation, ATX is induced by a type I interferon autocrine-paracrine loop through activating JAK-STAT and PI3K-AKT pathways, which is likely to enhance immune cell migration during the proinflammatory response by increasing LPA levels in the microenvironment [36].
ATX is a secreted glycoprotein initially synthesized as a pre-pro-enzyme with a 27-residue signal peptide at its N-terminal end. ATX secretion is dependent on the hydrophobic core sequence of the signal peptide [37]. The N-glycosylation at the amino-acids N53 and N410 of ATX is required for its secretion [38]. Our lab reported that a di-phenylalanine (Phe-838/Phe-839) motif in the human ATX C-terminal region was a transport signal essential for the ATX-p23 interaction and that ATX was selectively exported from the ER through a p23, Sec24C-dependent pathway, which could be regulated by the AKT-GSK-3β signaling [39].
Meanwhile, the accumulation of LPA in the circulation decreases ATX expression, which forms a negative feedback loop of ATX production [40,41]. In addition, it was found that ATX could be cleared from the circulation and degraded by liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs) through the scavenger receptor [42].

4. Physiological Functions of the ATX-LPA Axis

ATX distribution has been explored in the stages of embryonic development and in mature individuals. During the development of mouse embryos, the protein expression of ATX is temporal and spatial. At E8.5, ATX is mainly expressed in the anterior folds of the neural tube and the most posterior region of the midbrain. ATX expression significantly increases at the floor plate of the neural tube at E10.5. At E11.5–12.5, organs in the developing era, glands, and intestines show high ATX levels. Then, mesenchymal kidney and smooth muscle tissues exhibit high ATX levels at E13.5 and E16.5, respectively. However, ATX always shows high expression levels in choroid plexus epithelial cells from E13.5 to birth [43,44]. In healthy mature individuals, adipose tissue, the central nervous system, placenta, and lymph nodes have the highest expression levels of ATX [45,46]. In addition, in a variety of biological fluids, including blood, urine, seminal fluids, and cerebrospinal fluids, relatively high concentrations of ATX protein have been detected [47]. All these results suggest that the ATX-LPA axis may participate in the physiological and pathological processes of these organs.
To date, studies have shown that ATX plays crucial roles in embryonic development. Homozygous ATX-knockout mice show embryonic lethality with defects in the formation of blood vessels in the extraembryonic yolk sac and neural tube [48,49,50]. Heterozygous ATX-knockout mice appear to be healthy. However, the plasma LPA levels of heterozygous ATX-knockout mice are only half of those of wild-type mice [49]. This finding is consistent with a previous study showing that ATX is the main enzyme involved in LPA production in vivo.
Because of the abundant expression of ATX in adipose tissue, many researchers have focused on the relationship between ATX and lipid metabolism. Some studies have shown that ATX expression levels are significantly increased during differentiation in 3T3-L1, 3T3-F442A, and primary preadipocytes [51,52,53]. Dusaulcy et al. reported that plasma LPA levels were reduced by 38% in mice with an adipose-specific disruption of ATX. When fed a high-fat diet, the adipocyte-specific ATX knockout mice show less insulin resistance than control mice, suggesting that ATX from adipose tissue contribute to the impaired glucose homeostasis observed in diet-induced obesity [9,54]. We found that the interleukin 6 (IL-6) family cytokines, such as IL-6, leukemia inhibitory factor, cardiotrophin-1, and ciliary neurotrophic factor, upregulated ATX expression in adipocytes through gp130. Blocking gp130 signaling suppresses ATX expression in adipocytes and improves insulin sensitivity in diet-induced obesity [53]. Growing evidences indicate that ATX is stimulated by inflammation and acts as an enhancer of inflammation in obese individuals. The adipose-specific disruption of ATX mice shows a significant decrease in IL-6, TNFα, and MCP-1 in adipose tissue and circulating plasma [54]. Incubation of adipose tissue CD8+ T cells with recombinant ATX increases the expression of CD44 and interferon, which both play predominant proinflammatory roles [54].
The ATX-LPA axis is closely related to the development of atherosclerosis [55,56,57]. As the main cause of atherosclerosis, low-density lipoproteins (LDLs), which can transform into LPC after oxidative modification, are the main sources of LPA [58]. LPA can induce endothelial cells to secrete a variety of cytokines (IL-8, IL-1β), chemokines (MCP-1, cxcl-1), and adhesion molecules (E-selectin, VCAM-1, cam-1), which mediates the recognition and adhesion of lymphocytes to endothelial cells [58,59,60]. In addition to triggering aseptic inflammation, the ATX-LPA axis can promote and deteriorate atherosclerosis by increasing endothelial permeability [61], activating vascular smooth muscle cells [62], and promoting plaque instability [63].
ATX also shows high expression levels in the lymphoid node and participates in lymphocyte trafficking and immune regulation. ATX can bind to lymphocytes, and LPA or ATX/LPC strongly enhances the transendothelial migration of integrin-arrested T cells across an endothelial monolayer and promotes lymphocytes to enter lymphoid organs from blood [45,64].
ATX also plays an important role in maintaining pregnancy. The serum ATX levels of pregnancy women are likely from placental trophoblasts and increase in parallel with the gestational weeks [65]. The decrease of placental ATX mRNA levels is closely associated with abnormal pregnancies [66]. After delivery, the serum ATX levels soon decrease to the nonpregnant level [67].

5. Roles of the ATX-LPA Axis in Cancers

It has been reported that ATX is highly expressed in many kinds of cancers, such as melanoma [1], glioblastoma [68], renal cancer [69], liver cancer [70], and hepatocarcinoma [71]. The ATX-LPA axis plays crucial roles in tumorigenesis and cancer cell invasion.

5.1. Glioblastoma Multiforme

Glioblastoma multiforme (GMB) is the most highly malignant type of brain tumor in adults. Because GMB cells are highly mobile and infiltrate normal brain parenchyma diffusely, patients with GMB have a poor prognosis and a high recurrence rate. About 26–33% of GMB patients survive more than two years in clinical trials [72], and the 5-year survival rate is only 4–5% [73].
GBM possesses a high invasiveness due to the production of LPA by ATX [68]. Yasuhiro et al. reported that GBM tissues and most brain cancer cell lines, namely SNB-78, SNB-75, SF-268, SF-539, and SF-298 cells, displayed high ATX expression levels [74]. As verified with GBM patient samples, ATX is highly expressed in glioblastoma cells and is also clearly expressed in WHO grade I, II, and III gliomas. ATX displays predominant cytoplasmic staining not only in invading cells but also in tumor core cells [68]. Oxidative stress mediates the cross talk between APE1, PKM2, and ATX and increases ATX expression levels, which stimulates the invasive potential of C6 rat and U87 human MG glioblastoma cells [75]. GBM invasion into the oligodendrocyte layer is more powerful in U87 and U251 cells, which express high ATX levels [76]. Our laboratory found that NSun2-mediated ATX mRNA methylation elevated ATX expression levels and promoted the migration of U87 cells [33].
Treatment with the ATX-specific inhibitor PF-8380 decreases cell migration and invasion in vivo and abrogates radiation-induced cancer neovascularization, suggesting that the inhibition of ATX may ameliorate the GBM response to radiotherapy [77,78]. The use of α-bromomethylene phosphonate LPA (BrP-LPA), an inhibitor of ATX activity and a pan-antagonist of four LPA receptors [79,80], reduced Akt phosphorylation in irradiated endothelial cell lines and decreased the survival and migration of irradiated glioblastoma cells [81]. These findings suggest that the ATX-LPA axis has a potential therapeutic relevance for GMB as a drug target.

5.2. Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in females and constitutes 18% of all cancers in women. The estimated 5-year survival rate of breast cancer is 80% in developed countries and below 40% in developing countries [82]. A clinical study showed that serum ATX levels were significantly higher in breast cancer patients than in healthy individuals [83]. It has been reported that overexpression of ATX promotes the migration and invasion of MCF-7 and MDA-B02 cells [84,85].
In contrast to glioblastoma and melanoma cells, breast cancer cells directly produce low levels of ATX [86,87,88]. However, ATX is secreted by adjacent mammary adipose tissue and tumor-associated fibroblasts of breast cancer [89]. Breast cancer is a prototypical model of the relationship between the tumor microenvironment and ATX. Benesch et al. reported that the tumor stroma of breast cancer patients showed nearly threefold higher ATX protein levels than the normal breast stroma in healthy women [89]. Inflammatory mediators secreted by breast cancer cells, such as TNFα and IL-1β, increase ATX production in adipose tissue. Increased LPA signaling further promotes inflammatory mediator production in adipose tissue and tumors. Finally, breast cancer cells recruit ATX to bind integrin αIIbβ3 [14] and αvβ3 [90] on the cell surface to promote persistent directional cell migration [83,91,92].

5.3. Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the major histological type of liver cancer and the second leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide [93]. The serum ATX activity and plasma LPA levels are significantly increased in patients with liver cancer versus normal patients [94,95]. Wu et al. reported that the positive rate of ATX protein expression in HCC was 89% (34 of 38), while ATX in normal samples was 20% [34]. Hepatoma Hep3B and Huh7 cells display a higher ATX expression [34]. In mice, different hepatotoxic stimuli linked with the development of different forms of chronic liver disease are shown to stimulate hepatocyte ATX expression, leading to increased LPA levels, activation of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), and amplification of profibrotic signals, while the hepatocyte-specific deletion of ATX attenuates HCC development [70].

5.4. Ovarian Cancer

Ovarian cancer is the second most common malignancy after breast cancer in women over the age of 40 years, especially in developed countries [96]. Ovarian cancer is known as a silent killer that is usually not diagnosed until vague symptoms appear when the disease has progressed to stage III or IV [97]. In ovarian cancer tissue, ATX levels were found to be at least twofold higher than in normal ovarian tissue [98,99]. In women with ovarian cancer, the activity of ATX was found to be markedly elevated in malignant ovarian ascites compared with serum and plasma [98]. Tokumura et al. revealed higher ATX levels in the peritoneal fluid than in the sera of stage III ovarian cancers, dermoid cysts, and mucinous cystadenomas [100]. The increased levels of LPA found in ascites may also be due to the release of LPA in a PLA2-dependent manner from human mesothelial cells [101]. The peritoneal fluid of ovarian carcinoma patients promotes cancer cell invasion and metastatic spread with LPA as a potentially crucial mediator. The addition of ATX inhibitor S32826 or PF8380 abolished the generation of LPA in ovarian cancer stem cells (CSCs) and resulted in the reduction of CSC characteristics, suggesting that ATX regulates the maintenance of ovarian cancer stem cells through an LPA-mediated autocrine mechanism [102].

6. Development and Application of ATX Inhibitors

The ATX-LPA axis plays key roles in promoting tumor migration, metastasis, invasion, and angiogenesis. Blocking the LPA formation and ATX-LPA axis signaling pathway would be an effective and important method for the treatment of cancers. Meanwhile, ATX is also seen as a potential target for treating inflammatory diseases such as pulmonary fibrosis and chronic hepatitis [103]. To date, several ATX inhibitors have reached clinical and preclinical stages of drug development.
The ATX competitive inhibitor of GLPG1690 has been in phase III clinical trials for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) [104,105,106]. GLPG1690 is retained in the hydrophobic pocket and hydrophobic channel of ATX to prevent the formation of LPA [105]. Recently, the effect of GLPG1690 has been studied in breast cancer. The application of GLPG1690 significantly decreased cancer cell proliferation and enhanced radiotherapy-induced apoptosis in a mouse model of breast cancer [107].
PF-8380 is another potent inhibitor of ATX that can occupy the orthosteric site directly and mimic LPC substrate binding. Inhibition of ATX by PF-8380 leads to suppressed tumor invasion and enhances radio-sensitization in human and murine glioblastoma cell lines [77]. The application of PF-8380 not only decreases high fat diet-induced cardiac hypertrophy, dysfunction, and inflammatory responses by reducing circulating LPA levels in obese mice [108] but also attenuates bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis [109].
ONO-8430506, a new ATX inhibitor, decreases plasma ATX activity. ONO-8430506 decreases initial breast cancer cell growth and subsequent lung metastatic nodules by 60% compared with vehicle-treated mice [110]. The use of ONO-8430506 decreases the levels of 16 inflammatory mediators in thyroid cancer and is associated with a 50–60% decrease in tumor volume [111].
S32826 is a nanomolar inhibitor of ATX that lacks activity in vivo. However, it is widely used for in vitro studies [112]. Our laboratory found that TSA-induced ATX protected cancer cells against TSA-induced apoptosis by producing LPA through its lyso-PLD activity, which could be reversed by S32826 [22].
HA155 and HA130 are boronic acid-based compounds that inhibit ATX by selectively binding to its catalytic threonine and inhibiting ATX binding with LPC [12,113,114].
RB011 is a DNA aptamer that can specifically bind to the active site of ATX and inhibit LPC access to the hydrophobic binding pocket [115]. However, it has been indicated that RB011 can also inhibit ENPP1 activity [115].

7. Future Works

The expression of ATX is characteristic of spatiotemporal specificity and tissue specificity. ATX expression is regulated in many ways, including regulation at the transcription, post-transcription, and secretion levels. According to the existing results, ATX is highly expressed in various cancer cells, and the ATX-LPA axis is of great significance in oncogenesis and cancer progression. So far, the mechanism of ATX expression in cancer cells is still not fully clear and needs to be further clarified. The modulation of the activity and localization of extracellular ATX as well as the degradation of ATX are attractive subjects for future study. ATX is regarded as a cancer therapy target, and several ATX inhibitors have been developed and applied in preclinical trial. These ATX inhibitors may be used in the clinical treatment of cancer in the future.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 81972604 and 31500619) and grants from the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (Nos. 7192102 and 5172019). This work was also supported by the Open Fund from the Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Regulation Biology, Ministry of Education, China.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Stracke, M.L.; Krutzsch, H.C.; Unsworth, E.J.; Arestad, A.; Cioce, V.; Schiffmann, E.; Liotta, L.A. Identification, purification, and partial sequence analysis of autotaxin, a novel motility-stimulating protein. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 2524–2529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bollen, M.; Gijsbers, R.; Ceulemans, H.; Stalmans, W.; Stefan, C. Nucleotide pyrophosphatases/phosphodiesterases on the move. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2000, 35, 393–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Clair, T.; Lee, H.Y.; Liotta, L.A.; Stracke, M.L. Autotaxin is an exoenzyme possessing 5’-nucleotide phosphodiesterase/ATP pyrophosphatase and ATPase activities. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 996–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. van Meeteren, L.A.; Moolenaar, W.H. Regulation and biological activities of the autotaxin-LPA axis. Prog. Lipid Res. 2007, 46, 145–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Choi, J.W.; Herr, D.R.; Noguchi, K.; Yung, Y.C.; Lee, C.W.; Mutoh, T.; Lin, M.E.; Teo, S.T.; Park, K.E.; Mosley, A.N.; et al. LPA receptors: Subtypes and biological actions. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2010, 50, 157–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Houben, A.J.; Moolenaar, W.H. Autotaxin and LPA receptor signaling in cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2011, 30, 557–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Liu, S.; Umezu-Goto, M.; Murph, M.; Lu, Y.; Liu, W.; Zhang, F.; Yu, S.; Stephens, L.C.; Cui, X.; Murrow, G.; et al. Expression of autotaxin and lysophosphatidic acid receptors increases mammary tumorigenesis, invasion, and metastases. Cancer Cell 2009, 15, 539–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Inoue, M.; Rashid, M.H.; Fujita, R.; Contos, J.J.; Chun, J.; Ueda, H. Initiation of neuropathic pain requires lysophosphatidic acid receptor signaling. Nat. Med. 2004, 10, 712–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dusaulcy, R.; Rancoule, C.; Grès, S.; Wanecq, E.; Colom, A.; Guigné, C.; van Meeteren, L.A.; Moolenaar, W.H.; Valet, P.; Saulnier-Blache, J.S. Adipose-specific disruption of autotaxin enhances nutritional fattening and reduces plasma lysophosphatidic acid. J. Lipid Res. 2011, 52, 1247–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Tang, X.; Benesch, M.G.; Brindley, D.N. Lipid phosphate phosphatases and their roles in mammalian physiology and pathology. J. Lipid Res. 2015, 56, 2048–2060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Tomsig, J.L.; Snyder, A.H.; Berdyshev, E.V.; Skobeleva, A.; Mataya, C.; Natarajan, V.; Brindley, D.N.; Lynch, K.R. Lipid phosphate phosphohydrolase type 1 (LPP1) degrades extracellular lysophosphatidic acid in vivo. Biochem. J. 2009, 419, 611–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Hausmann, J.; Kamtekar, S.; Christodoulou, E.; Day, J.E.; Wu, T.; Fulkerson, Z.; Albers, H.M.; van Meeteren, L.A.; Houben, A.J.; van Zeijl, L.; et al. Structural basis of substrate discrimination and integrin binding by autotaxin. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2011, 18, 198–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Nishimasu, H.; Okudaira, S.; Hama, K.; Mihara, E.; Dohmae, N.; Inoue, A.; Ishitani, R.; Takagi, J.; Aoki, J.; Nureki, O. Crystal structure of autotaxin and insight into GPCR activation by lipid mediators. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2011, 18, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fulkerson, Z.; Wu, T.; Sunkara, M.; Kooi, C.V.; Morris, A.J.; Smyth, S.S. Binding of autotaxin to integrins localizes lysophosphatidic acid production to platelets and mammalian cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 34654–34663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Tabchy, A.; Tigyi, G.; Mills, G.B. Location, location, location: A crystal-clear view of autotaxin saturating LPA receptors. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2011, 18, 117–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Lee, H.Y.; Murata, J.; Clair, T.; Polymeropoulos, M.H.; Torres, R.; Manrow, R.E.; Liotta, L.A.; Stracke, M.L. Cloning, chromosomal localization, and tissue expression of autotaxin from human teratocarcinoma cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1996, 218, 714–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Murata, J.; Lee, H.Y.; Clair, T.; Krutzsch, H.C.; Arestad, A.A.; Sobel, M.E.; Liotta, L.A.; Stracke, M.L. cDNA cloning of the human tumor motility-stimulating protein, autotaxin, reveals a homology with phosphodiesterases. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 30479–30484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kawagoe, H.; Soma, O.; Goji, J.; Nishimura, N.; Narita, M.; Inazawa, J.; Nakamura, H.; Sano, K. Molecular cloning and chromosomal assignment of the human brain-type phosphodiesterase I/nucleotide pyrophosphatase gene (PDNP2). Genomics 1995, 30, 380–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Giganti, A.; Rodriguez, M.; Fould, B.; Moulharat, N.; Cogé, F.; Chomarat, P.; Galizzi, J.P.; Valet, P.; Saulnier-Blache, J.S.; Boutin, J.A.; et al. Murine and human autotaxin alpha, beta, and gamma isoforms: Gene organization, tissue distribution, and biochemical characterization. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 7776–7789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Hashimoto, T.; Okudaira, S.; Igarashi, K.; Hama, K.; Yatomi, Y.; Aoki, J. Identification and biochemical characterization of a novel autotaxin isoform, ATXδ, with a four-amino acid deletion. J. Biochem. 2012, 151, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Houben, A.J.; van Wijk, X.M.; van Meeteren, L.A.; van Zeijl, L.; van de Westerlo, E.M.; Hausmann, J.; Fish, A.; Perrakis, A.; van Kuppevelt, T.H.; Moolenaar, W.H. The polybasic insertion in autotaxin α confers specific binding to heparin and cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 510–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Li, S.; Wang, B.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, J. Autotaxin is induced by TSA through HDAC3 and HDAC7 inhibition and antagonizes the TSA-induced cell apoptosis. Mol. Cancer 2011, 10, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Argaud, D.; Boulanger, M.C.; Chignon, A.; Mkannez, G.; Mathieu, P. Enhancer-mediated enrichment of interacting JMJD3-DDX21 to ENPP2 locus prevents R-loop formation and promotes transcription. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, 8424–8438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Braeuer, R.R.; Zigler, M.; Kamiya, T.; Dobroff, A.S.; Huang, L.; Choi, W.; McConkey, D.J.; Shoshan, E.; Mobley, A.K.; Song, R.; et al. Galectin-3 contributes to melanoma growth and metastasis via regulation of NFAT1 and autotaxin. Cancer Res. 2012, 72, 5757–5766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Farina, A.R.; Cappabianca, L.; Ruggeri, P.; Di Ianni, N.; Ragone, M.; Merolle, S.; Sano, K.; Stracke, M.L.; Horowitz, J.M.; Gulino, A.; et al. Constitutive autotaxin transcription by Nmyc-amplified and non-amplified neuroblastoma cells is regulated by a novel AP-1 and SP-mediated mechanism and abrogated by curcumin. FEBS Lett. 2012, 586, 3681–3691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Azare, J.; Doane, A.; Leslie, K.; Chang, Q.; Berishaj, M.; Nnoli, J.; Mark, K.; Al-Ahmadie, H.; Gerald, W.; Hassimi, M.; et al. Stat3 mediates expression of autotaxin in breast cancer. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e27851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Farquhar, M.J.; Humphreys, I.S.; Rudge, S.A.; Wilson, G.K.; Bhattacharya, B.; Ciaccia, M.; Hu, K.; Zhang, Q.; Mailly, L.; Reynolds, G.M.; et al. Autotaxin-lysophosphatidic acid receptor signalling regulates hepatitis C virus replication. J. Hepatol. 2017, 66, 919–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Black, E.J.; Clair, T.; Delrow, J.; Neiman, P.; Gillespie, D.A. Microarray analysis identifies Autotaxin, a tumour cell motility and angiogenic factor with lysophospholipase D activity, as a specific target of cell transformation by v-Jun. Oncogene 2004, 23, 2357–2366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Sioletic, S.; Czaplinski, J.; Hu, L.; Fletcher, J.A.; Fletcher, C.D.; Wagner, A.J.; Loda, M.; Demetri, G.D.; Sicinska, E.T.; Snyder, E.L. c-Jun promotes cell migration and drives expression of the motility factor ENPP2 in soft tissue sarcomas. J. Pathol. 2014, 234, 190–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Williams, T.M.; Williams, M.E.; Innis, J.W. Range of HOX/TALE superclass associations and protein domain requirements for HOXA13:MEIS interaction. Dev. Biol. 2005, 277, 457–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Sun, S.; Zhang, X.; Lyu, L.; Li, X.; Yao, S.; Zhang, J. Autotaxin Expression Is Regulated at the Post-transcriptional Level by the RNA-binding Proteins HuR and AUF1. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 25823–25836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Wang, Y.; Lyu, L.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, J. Autotaxin is a novel target of microRNA-101-3p. FEBS Open Bio. 2019, 9, 707–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Xu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, X. NSun2 promotes cell migration through methylating autotaxin mRNA. J. Biol. Chem. 2020, 295, 18134–18147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wu, J.M.; Xu, Y.; Skill, N.J.; Sheng, H.; Zhao, Z.; Yu, M.; Saxena, R.; Maluccio, M.A. Autotaxin expression and its connection with the TNF-alpha-NF-kappaB axis in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol. Cancer 2010, 9, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Castelino, F.V.; Bain, G.; Pace, V.A.; Black, K.E.; George, L.; Probst, C.K.; Goulet, L.; Lafyatis, R.; Tager, A.M. An Autotaxin/Lysophosphatidic Acid/Interleukin-6 Amplification Loop Drives Scleroderma Fibrosis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016, 68, 2964–2974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Song, J.; Guan, M.; Zhao, Z.; Zhang, J. Type I Interferons Function as Autocrine and Paracrine Factors to Induce Autotaxin in Response to TLR Activation. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0136629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Jansen, S.; Stefan, C.; Creemers, J.W.; Waelkens, E.; Van Eynde, A.; Stalmans, W.; Bollen, M. Proteolytic maturation and activation of autotaxin (NPP2), a secreted metastasis-enhancing lysophospholipase D. J. Cell Sci. 2005, 118, 3081–3089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Pradère, J.P.; Tarnus, E.; Grès, S.; Valet, P.; Saulnier-Blache, J.S. Secretion and lysophospholipase D activity of autotaxin by adipocytes are controlled by N-glycosylation and signal peptidase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2007, 1771, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lyu, L.; Wang, B.; Xiong, C.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, J. Selective export of autotaxin from the endoplasmic reticulum. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 7011–7022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Benesch, M.G.; Zhao, Y.Y.; Curtis, J.M.; McMullen, T.P.; Brindley, D.N. Regulation of autotaxin expression and secretion by lysophosphatidate and sphingosine 1-phosphate. J. Lipid Res. 2015, 56, 1134–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. van Meeteren, L.A.; Ruurs, P.; Christodoulou, E.; Goding, J.W.; Takakusa, H.; Kikuchi, K.; Perrakis, A.; Nagano, T.; Moolenaar, W.H. Inhibition of autotaxin by lysophosphatidic acid and sphingosine 1-phosphate. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 21155–21161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Jansen, S.; Andries, M.; Derua, R.; Waelkens, E.; Bollen, M. Domain interplay mediated by an essential disulfide linkage is critical for the activity and secretion of the metastasis-promoting enzyme autotaxin. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 14296–14302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Ohuchi, H.; Hayashibara, Y.; Matsuda, H.; Onoi, M.; Mitsumori, M.; Tanaka, M.; Aoki, J.; Arai, H.; Noji, S. Diversified expression patterns of autotaxin, a gene for phospholipid-generating enzyme during mouse and chicken development. Dev. Dyn. Off. Publ. Am. Assoc. Anat. 2007, 236, 1134–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bächner, D.; Ahrens, M.; Betat, N.; Schröder, D.; Gross, G. Developmental expression analysis of murine autotaxin (ATX). Mech. Dev. 1999, 84, 121–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kanda, H.; Newton, R.; Klein, R.; Morita, Y.; Gunn, M.D.; Rosen, S.D. Autotaxin, an ectoenzyme that produces lysophosphatidic acid, promotes the entry of lymphocytes into secondary lymphoid organs. Nat. Immunol. 2008, 9, 415–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Katsifa, A.; Kaffe, E.; Nikolaidou-Katsaridou, N.; Economides, A.N.; Newbigging, S.; McKerlie, C.; Aidinis, V. The Bulk of Autotaxin Activity Is Dispensable for Adult Mouse Life. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0143083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Nakamura, K.; Igarashi, K.; Ide, K.; Ohkawa, R.; Okubo, S.; Yokota, H.; Masuda, A.; Oshima, N.; Takeuchi, T.; Nangaku, M.; et al. Validation of an autotaxin enzyme immunoassay in human serum samples and its application to hypoalbuminemia differentiation. Clin. Chim. Acta 2008, 388, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. van Meeteren, L.A.; Ruurs, P.; Stortelers, C.; Bouwman, P.; van Rooijen, M.A.; Pradère, J.P.; Pettit, T.R.; Wakelam, M.J.; Saulnier-Blache, J.S.; Mummery, C.L.; et al. Autotaxin, a secreted lysophospholipase D, is essential for blood vessel formation during development. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006, 26, 5015–5022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Tanaka, M.; Okudaira, S.; Kishi, Y.; Ohkawa, R.; Iseki, S.; Ota, M.; Noji, S.; Yatomi, Y.; Aoki, J.; Arai, H. Autotaxin stabilizes blood vessels and is required for embryonic vasculature by producing lysophosphatidic acid. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 25822–25830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Fotopoulou, S.; Oikonomou, N.; Grigorieva, E.; Nikitopoulou, I.; Paparountas, T.; Thanassopoulou, A.; Zhao, Z.; Xu, Y.; Kontoyiannis, D.L.; Remboutsika, E.; et al. ATX expression and LPA signalling are vital for the development of the nervous system. Dev. Biol. 2010, 339, 451–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Ferry, G.; Tellier, E.; Try, A.; Grés, S.; Naime, I.; Simon, M.F.; Rodriguez, M.; Boucher, J.; Tack, I.; Gesta, S.; et al. Autotaxin is released from adipocytes, catalyzes lysophosphatidic acid synthesis, and activates preadipocyte proliferation. Up-regulated expression with adipocyte differentiation and obesity. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 18162–18169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. D’Souza, K.; Kane, D.A.; Touaibia, M.; Kershaw, E.E.; Pulinilkunnil, T.; Kienesberger, P.C. Autotaxin Is Regulated by Glucose and Insulin in Adipocytes. Endocrinology 2017, 158, 791–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Sun, S.; Wang, R.; Song, J.; Guan, M.; Li, N.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, Z.; Zhang, J. Blocking gp130 signaling suppresses autotaxin expression in adipocytes and improves insulin sensitivity in diet-induced obesity. J. Lipid Res. 2017, 58, 2102–2113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Nishimura, S.; Nagasaki, M.; Okudaira, S.; Aoki, J.; Ohmori, T.; Ohkawa, R.; Nakamura, K.; Igarashi, K.; Yamashita, H.; Eto, K.; et al. ENPP2 contributes to adipose tissue expansion and insulin resistance in diet-induced obesity. Diabetes 2014, 63, 4154–4164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Nsaibia, M.J.; Mahmut, A.; Boulanger, M.C.; Arsenault, B.J.; Bouchareb, R.; Simard, S.; Witztum, J.L.; Clavel, M.A.; Pibarot, P.; Bossé, Y.; et al. Autotaxin interacts with lipoprotein(a) and oxidized phospholipids in predicting the risk of calcific aortic valve stenosis in patients with coronary artery disease. J. Intern. Med. 2016, 280, 509–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Dohi, T.; Miyauchi, K.; Ohkawa, R.; Nakamura, K.; Kurano, M.; Kishimoto, T.; Yanagisawa, N.; Ogita, M.; Miyazaki, T.; Nishino, A.; et al. Increased lysophosphatidic acid levels in culprit coronary arteries of patients with acute coronary syndrome. Atherosclerosis 2013, 229, 192–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Smyth, S.S.; Mueller, P.; Yang, F.; Brandon, J.A.; Morris, A.J. Arguing the case for the autotaxin-lysophosphatidic acid-lipid phosphate phosphatase 3-signaling nexus in the development and complications of atherosclerosis. Arterioscler. Thromb Vasc. Biol. 2014, 34, 479–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Zhou, Z.; Subramanian, P.; Sevilmis, G.; Globke, B.; Soehnlein, O.; Karshovska, E.; Megens, R.; Heyll, K.; Chun, J.; Saulnier-Blache, J.S.; et al. Lipoprotein-derived lysophosphatidic acid promotes atherosclerosis by releasing CXCL1 from the endothelium. Cell Metab. 2011, 13, 592–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Shimada, H.; Rajagopalan, L.E. Rho kinase-2 activation in human endothelial cells drives lysophosphatidic acid-mediated expression of cell adhesion molecules via NF-kappaB p65. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 12536–12542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Lin, C.I.; Chen, C.N.; Chen, J.H.; Lee, H. Lysophospholipids increase IL-8 and MCP-1 expressions in human umbilical cord vein endothelial cells through an IL-1-dependent mechanism. J. Cell Biochem. 2006, 99, 1216–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chen, C.; Ochoa, L.N.; Kagan, A.; Chai, H.; Liang, Z.; Lin, P.H.; Yao, Q. Lysophosphatidic acid causes endothelial dysfunction in porcine coronary arteries and human coronary artery endothelial cells. Atherosclerosis 2012, 222, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Zhou, Z.B.; Niu, J.P.; Zhang, Z.J. Receptor-mediated vascular smooth muscle migration induced by LPA involves p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway activation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2009, 10, 3194–3208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Bot, M.; de Jager, S.C.; MacAleese, L.; Lagraauw, H.M.; van Berkel, T.J.; Quax, P.H.; Kuiper, J.; Heeren, R.M.; Biessen, E.A.; Bot, I. Lysophosphatidic acid triggers mast cell-driven atherosclerotic plaque destabilization by increasing vascular inflammation. J. Lipid Res. 2013, 54, 1265–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Zhang, Y.; Chen, Y.C.; Krummel, M.F.; Rosen, S.D. Autotaxin through lysophosphatidic acid stimulates polarization, motility, and transendothelial migration of naive T cells. J. Immunol. 2012, 189, 3914–3924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Masuda, A.; Fujii, T.; Iwasawa, Y.; Nakamura, K.; Ohkawa, R.; Igarashi, K.; Okudaira, S.; Ikeda, H.; Kozuma, S.; Aoki, J.; et al. Serum autotaxin measurements in pregnant women: Application for the differentiation of normal pregnancy and pregnancy-induced hypertension. Clin. Chim. Acta 2011, 412, 1944–1950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ichikawa, M.; Nagamatsu, T.; Schust, D.J.; Kawai-Iwasawa, Y.; Kawana, K.; Yamashita, T.; Osuga, Y.; Aoki, J.; Yatomi, Y.; Fujii, T. Placental autotaxin expression is diminished in women with pre-eclampsia. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2015, 41, 1406–1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Tokumura, A.; Majima, E.; Kariya, Y.; Tominaga, K.; Kogure, K.; Yasuda, K.; Fukuzawa, K. Identification of human plasma lysophospholipase D, a lysophosphatidic acid-producing enzyme, as autotaxin, a multifunctional phosphodiesterase. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 39436–39442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Hoelzinger, D.B.; Mariani, L.; Weis, J.; Woyke, T.; Berens, T.J.; McDonough, W.S.; Sloan, A.; Coons, S.W.; Berens, M.E. Gene expression profile of glioblastoma multiforme invasive phenotype points to new therapeutic targets. Neoplasia 2005, 7, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Stassar, M.J.; Devitt, G.; Brosius, M.; Rinnab, L.; Prang, J.; Schradin, T.; Simon, J.; Petersen, S.; Kopp-Schneider, A.; Zöller, M. Identification of human renal cell carcinoma associated genes by suppression subtractive hybridization. Br. J. Cancer 2001, 85, 1372–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Kaffe, E.; Katsifa, A.; Xylourgidis, N.; Ninou, I.; Zannikou, M.; Harokopos, V.; Foka, P.; Dimitriadis, A.; Evangelou, K.; Moulas, A.N.; et al. Hepatocyte autotaxin expression promotes liver fibrosis and cancer. Hepatology 2017, 65, 1369–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Zhang, G.; Zhao, Z.; Xu, S.; Ni, L.; Wang, X. Expression of autotaxin mRNA in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Chin. Med. J. 1999, 112, 330–332. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  72. Batash, R.; Asna, N.; Schaffer, P.; Francis, N.; Schaffer, M. Glioblastoma Multiforme, Diagnosis and Treatment; Recent Literature Review. Curr. Med. Chem. 2017, 24, 3002–3009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. McLendon, R.E.; Halperin, E.C. Is the long-term survival of patients with intracranial glioblastoma multiforme overstated? Cancer 2003, 98, 1745–1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kishi, Y.; Okudaira, S.; Tanaka, M.; Hama, K.; Shida, D.; Kitayama, J.; Yamori, T.; Aoki, J.; Fujimaki, T.; Arai, H. Autotaxin is overexpressed in glioblastoma multiforme and contributes to cell motility of glioblastoma by converting lysophosphatidylcholine to lysophosphatidic acid. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 17492–17500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Cholia, R.P.; Dhiman, M.; Kumar, R.; Mantha, A.K. Oxidative stress stimulates invasive potential in rat C6 and human U-87 MG glioblastoma cells via activation and cross-talk between PKM2, ENPP2 and APE1 enzymes. Metab. Brain Dis. 2018, 33, 1307–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Hoelzinger, D.B.; Nakada, M.; Demuth, T.; Rosensteel, T.; Reavie, L.B.; Berens, M.E. Autotaxin: A secreted autocrine/paracrine factor that promotes glioma invasion. J. Neuro Oncol. 2008, 86, 297–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Bhave, S.R.; Dadey, D.Y.; Karvas, R.M.; Ferraro, D.J.; Kotipatruni, R.P.; Jaboin, J.J.; Hallahan, A.N.; Dewees, T.A.; Linkous, A.G.; Hallahan, D.E.; et al. Autotaxin Inhibition with PF-8380 Enhances the Radiosensitivity of Human and Murine Glioblastoma Cell Lines. Front. Oncol. 2013, 3, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. St-Cœur, P.D.; Ferguson, D.; Morin, P., Jr.; Touaibia, M. PF-8380 and closely related analogs: Synthesis and structure-activity relationship towards autotaxin inhibition and glioma cell viability. Arch. Pharm. 2013, 346, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Jiang, G.; Xu, Y.; Fujiwara, Y.; Tsukahara, T.; Tsukahara, R.; Gajewiak, J.; Tigyi, G.; Prestwich, G.D. Alpha-substituted phosphonate analogues of lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) selectively inhibit production and action of LPA. ChemMedChem 2007, 2, 679–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Prestwich, G.D.; Gajewiak, J.; Zhang, H.; Xu, X.; Yang, G.; Serban, M. Phosphatase-resistant analogues of lysophosphatidic acid: Agonists promote healing, antagonists and autotaxin inhibitors treat cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2008, 1781, 588–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Schleicher, S.M.; Thotala, D.K.; Linkous, A.G.; Hu, R.; Leahy, K.M.; Yazlovitskaya, E.M.; Hallahan, D.E. Autotaxin and LPA receptors represent potential molecular targets for the radiosensitization of murine glioma through effects on tumor vasculature. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e22182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Sun, Y.S.; Zhao, Z.; Yang, Z.N.; Xu, F.; Lu, H.J.; Zhu, Z.Y.; Shi, W.; Jiang, J.; Yao, P.P.; Zhu, H.P. Risk Factors and Preventions of Breast Cancer. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2017, 13, 1387–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Shao, Y.; Yu, Y.; He, Y.; Chen, Q.; Liu, H. Serum ATX as a novel biomarker for breast cancer. Medicine 2019, 98, e14973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. David, M.; Wannecq, E.; Descotes, F.; Jansen, S.; Deux, B.; Ribeiro, J.; Serre, C.M.; Grès, S.; Bendriss-Vermare, N.; Bollen, M.; et al. Cancer Cell expression of autotaxin controls bone metastasis formation in mouse through lysophosphatidic acid-dependent activation of osteoclasts. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e9741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Yang, S.Y.; Lee, J.; Park, C.G.; Kim, S.; Hong, S.; Chung, H.C.; Min, S.K.; Han, J.W.; Lee, H.W.; Lee, H.Y. Expression of autotaxin (NPP-2) is closely linked to invasiveness of breast cancer cells. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 2002, 19, 603–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Brindley, D.N.; Tang, X.; Meng, G.; Benesch, M.G.K. Role of Adipose Tissue-Derived Autotaxin, Lysophosphatidate Signaling, and Inflammation in the Progression and Treatment of Breast Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Cerami, E.; Gao, J.; Dogrusoz, U.; Gross, B.E.; Sumer, S.O.; Aksoy, B.A.; Jacobsen, A.; Byrne, C.J.; Heuer, M.L.; Larsson, E.; et al. The cBio cancer genomics portal: An open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov. 2012, 2, 401–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Gao, J.; Aksoy, B.A.; Dogrusoz, U.; Dresdner, G.; Gross, B.; Sumer, S.O.; Sun, Y.; Jacobsen, A.; Sinha, R.; Larsson, E.; et al. Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Sci. Signal. 2013, 6, pl1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Benesch, M.G.; Tang, X.; Dewald, J.; Dong, W.F.; Mackey, J.R.; Hemmings, D.G.; McMullen, T.P.; Brindley, D.N. Tumor-induced inflammation in mammary adipose tissue stimulates a vicious cycle of autotaxin expression and breast cancer progression. FASEB J. 2015, 29, 3990–4000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Leblanc, R.; Lee, S.C.; David, M.; Bordet, J.C.; Norman, D.D.; Patil, R.; Miller, D.; Sahay, D.; Ribeiro, J.; Clézardin, P.; et al. Interaction of platelet-derived autotaxin with tumor integrin αVβ3 controls metastasis of breast cancer cells to bone. Blood 2014, 124, 3141–3150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Wu, T.; Kooi, C.V.; Shah, P.; Charnigo, R.; Huang, C.; Smyth, S.S.; Morris, A.J. Integrin-mediated cell surface recruitment of autotaxin promotes persistent directional cell migration. FASEB J. 2014, 28, 861–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Tang, X.; Brindley, D.N. Lipid Phosphate Phosphatases and Cancer. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Hoshida, Y.; Fuchs, B.C.; Bardeesy, N.; Baumert, T.F.; Chung, R.T. Pathogenesis and prevention of hepatitis C virus-induced hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Hepatol. 2014, 61, S79–S90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Cooper, A.B.; Wu, J.; Lu, D.; Maluccio, M.A. Is autotaxin (ENPP2) the link between hepatitis C and hepatocellular cancer? J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2007, 11, 1628–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Watanabe, N.; Ikeda, H.; Nakamura, K.; Ohkawa, R.; Kume, Y.; Aoki, J.; Hama, K.; Okudaira, S.; Tanaka, M.; Tomiya, T.; et al. Both plasma lysophosphatidic acid and serum autotaxin levels are increased in chronic hepatitis C. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2007, 41, 616–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Vargas, A.N. Natural history of ovarian cancer. Ecancermedicalscience 2014, 8, 465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Jayson, G.C.; Kohn, E.C.; Kitchener, H.C.; Ledermann, J.A. Ovarian cancer. Lancet 2014, 384, 1376–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Umezu-Goto, M.; Tanyi, J.; Lahad, J.; Liu, S.; Yu, S.; Lapushin, R.; Hasegawa, Y.; Lu, Y.; Trost, R.; Bevers, T.; et al. Lysophosphatidic acid production and action: Validated targets in cancer? J. Cell Biochem. 2004, 92, 1115–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Schaner, M.E.; Ross, D.T.; Ciaravino, G.; Sorlie, T.; Troyanskaya, O.; Diehn, M.; Wang, Y.C.; Duran, G.E.; Sikic, T.L.; Caldeira, S.; et al. Gene expression patterns in ovarian carcinomas. Mol. Biol. Cell 2003, 14, 4376–4386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Tokumura, A.; Tominaga, K.; Yasuda, K.; Kanzaki, H.; Kogure, K.; Fukuzawa, K. Lack of significant differences in the corrected activity of lysophospholipase D, producer of phospholipid mediator lysophosphatidic acid, in incubated serum from women with and without ovarian tumors. Cancer 2002, 94, 141–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Ren, J.; Xiao, Y.J.; Singh, L.S.; Zhao, X.; Zhao, Z.; Feng, L.; Rose, T.M.; Prestwich, G.D.; Xu, Y. Lysophosphatidic acid is constitutively produced by human peritoneal mesothelial cells and enhances adhesion, migration, and invasion of ovarian cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 3006–3014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Seo, E.J.; Kwon, Y.W.; Jang, I.H.; Kim, D.K.; Lee, S.I.; Choi, E.J.; Kim, K.H.; Suh, D.S.; Lee, J.H.; Choi, K.U.; et al. Autotaxin Regulates Maintenance of Ovarian Cancer Stem Cells through Lysophosphatidic Acid-Mediated Autocrine Mechanism. Stem Cells 2016, 34, 551–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Nikolaou, A.; Kokotou, M.G.; Limnios, D.; Psarra, A.; Kokotos, G. Autotaxin inhibitors: A patent review (2012-2016). Expert Opin. Ther. Patients 2017, 27, 815–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Maher, T.M.; van der Aar, E.M.; Van de Steen, O.; Allamassey, L.; Desrivot, J.; Dupont, S.; Fagard, L.; Ford, P.; Fieuw, A.; Wuyts, W. Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of GLPG1690, a novel autotaxin inhibitor, to treat idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (FLORA): A phase 2a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Respir. Med. 2018, 6, 627–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Desroy, N.; Housseman, C.; Bock, X.; Joncour, A.; Bienvenu, N.; Cherel, L.; Labeguere, V.; Rondet, E.; Peixoto, C.; Grassot, J.-M.; et al. Discovery of 2-[[2-Ethyl-6-[4-[2-(3-hydroxyazetidin-1-yl)-2-oxoethyl]piperazin-1-yl]-8-methylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridin -3-yl]methylamino]-4-(4-fluorophenyl)thiazole-5-carbonitrile (GLPG1690), a first-in-class autotaxin inhibitor undergoing clinical evaluation for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 60, 3580–3590. [Google Scholar]
  106. Maher, T.M.; Kreuter, M.; Lederer, D.J.; Brown, K.K.; Wuyts, W.; Verbruggen, N.; Stutvoet, S.; Fieuw, A.; Ford, P.; Abi-Saab, W.; et al. Rationale, design and objectives of two phase III, randomised, placebo-controlled studies of GLPG1690, a novel autotaxin inhibitor, in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (ISABELA 1 and 2). BMJ Open Respir. Res. 2019, 6, e000422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Tang, X.; Wuest, M.; Benesch, M.G.K.; Dufour, J.; Zhao, Y.; Curtis, J.M.; Monjardet, A.; Heckmann, B.; Murray, D.; Wuest, F.; et al. Inhibition of Autotaxin with GLPG1690 Increases the Efficacy of Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy in a Mouse Model of Breast Cancer. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2020, 19, 63–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Weng, J.; Jiang, S.; Ding, L.; Xu, Y.; Zhu, X.; Jin, P. Autotaxin/lysophosphatidic acid signaling mediates obesity-related cardiomyopathy in mice and human subjects. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2019, 23, 1050–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Ninou, I.; Kaffe, E.; Müller, S.; Budd, D.C.; Stevenson, C.S.; Ullmer, C.; Aidinis, V. Pharmacologic targeting of the ATX/LPA axis attenuates bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther. 2018, 52, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Benesch, M.G.; Tang, X.; Maeda, T.; Ohhata, A.; Zhao, Y.Y.; Kok, B.P.; Dewald, J.; Hitt, M.; Curtis, J.M.; McMullen, T.P.; et al. Inhibition of autotaxin delays breast tumor growth and lung metastasis in mice. FASEB J. 2014, 28, 2655–2666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Benesch, M.G.; Ko, Y.M.; Tang, X.; Dewald, J.; Lopez-Campistrous, A.; Zhao, Y.Y.; Lai, R.; Curtis, J.M.; Brindley, D.N.; McMullen, T.P. Autotaxin is an inflammatory mediator and therapeutic target in thyroid cancer. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2015, 22, 593–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Ferry, G.; Moulharat, N.; Pradère, J.P.; Desos, P.; Try, A.; Genton, A.; Giganti, A.; Beucher-Gaudin, M.; Lonchampt, M.; Bertrand, M.; et al. S32826, a nanomolar inhibitor of autotaxin: Discovery, synthesis and applications as a pharmacological tool. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2008, 327, 809–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Albers, H.M.; Hendrickx, L.J.; van Tol, R.J.; Hausmann, J.; Perrakis, A.; Ovaa, H. Structure-based design of novel boronic acid-based inhibitors of autotaxin. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 4619–4626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Albers, H.M.; Dong, A.; van Meeteren, L.A.; Egan, D.A.; Sunkara, M.; van Tilburg, E.W.; Schuurman, K.; van Tellingen, O.; Morris, A.J.; Smyth, S.S.; et al. Boronic acid-based inhibitor of autotaxin reveals rapid turnover of LPA in the circulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 7257–7262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Kato, K.; Ikeda, H.; Miyakawa, S.; Futakawa, S.; Nonaka, Y.; Fujiwara, M.; Okudaira, S.; Kano, K.; Aoki, J.; Morita, J.; et al. Structural basis for specific inhibition of Autotaxin by a DNA aptamer. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2016, 23, 395–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. ATX-LPA-LPA receptor signaling axis and LPA delivery on the surface of target cell. LPA is mainly synthesized via the ATX-mediated hydrolysis of lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) and degraded to monoacylglycerol (MAG) through LPP1/3. ATX protein is composed of two N-terminal somatomedin B (SMB)-like domains, a central phosphodiesterase (PDE) domain, and a C-terminal nuclease (NUC)-like domain. The SMB2 domain enables ATX to bind with cell surface integrin, which achieves a highly efficient delivery of LPA to its receptors. When it binds to LPAR1-6, LPA induces different downstream signal cascades, including Rho, phospholipase C (PLC), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), phosphatidylinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), and adenylate cyclase (AC), through different G proteins.
Figure 1. ATX-LPA-LPA receptor signaling axis and LPA delivery on the surface of target cell. LPA is mainly synthesized via the ATX-mediated hydrolysis of lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) and degraded to monoacylglycerol (MAG) through LPP1/3. ATX protein is composed of two N-terminal somatomedin B (SMB)-like domains, a central phosphodiesterase (PDE) domain, and a C-terminal nuclease (NUC)-like domain. The SMB2 domain enables ATX to bind with cell surface integrin, which achieves a highly efficient delivery of LPA to its receptors. When it binds to LPAR1-6, LPA induces different downstream signal cascades, including Rho, phospholipase C (PLC), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), phosphatidylinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), and adenylate cyclase (AC), through different G proteins.
Cells 10 00939 g001
Figure 2. Domain structure of the major ATX isoforms. The five splice variants mainly differ by the presence or absence of sequences encoded by exons 12 and 21. Besides, ATXδ and ATXε have four amino acid deletions in exon 19.
Figure 2. Domain structure of the major ATX isoforms. The five splice variants mainly differ by the presence or absence of sequences encoded by exons 12 and 21. Besides, ATXδ and ATXε have four amino acid deletions in exon 19.
Cells 10 00939 g002
Figure 3. Mechanisms of ATX expression regulation. At the transcriptional level, the expression of ATX is influenced by chromatin modification and different transcriptional factors, like NFAT1, AP-1, SP, STAT3, NFκB et al. Some inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α, IL-6, and IFNα/β, can influence ATX expression by inducing different downstream signaling cascades. At the post-transcriptional level, RNA binding proteins (HuR and AUF1), RNA methyltransferase (NSUN2), and microRNA (miR-101-3p) bind to the 3’-UTR of ATX mRNA to influence ATX mRNA stability, nuclear export, and translation. ATX expression can be downregulated by a negative feedback loop by LPA. Moreover, the secretion of ATX is also a regulated process.
Figure 3. Mechanisms of ATX expression regulation. At the transcriptional level, the expression of ATX is influenced by chromatin modification and different transcriptional factors, like NFAT1, AP-1, SP, STAT3, NFκB et al. Some inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α, IL-6, and IFNα/β, can influence ATX expression by inducing different downstream signaling cascades. At the post-transcriptional level, RNA binding proteins (HuR and AUF1), RNA methyltransferase (NSUN2), and microRNA (miR-101-3p) bind to the 3’-UTR of ATX mRNA to influence ATX mRNA stability, nuclear export, and translation. ATX expression can be downregulated by a negative feedback loop by LPA. Moreover, the secretion of ATX is also a regulated process.
Cells 10 00939 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, X.; Li, M.; Yin, N.; Zhang, J. The Expression Regulation and Biological Function of Autotaxin. Cells 2021, 10, 939. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10040939

AMA Style

Zhang X, Li M, Yin N, Zhang J. The Expression Regulation and Biological Function of Autotaxin. Cells. 2021; 10(4):939. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10040939

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Xiaotian, Mengmiao Li, Nan Yin, and Junjie Zhang. 2021. "The Expression Regulation and Biological Function of Autotaxin" Cells 10, no. 4: 939. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10040939

APA Style

Zhang, X., Li, M., Yin, N., & Zhang, J. (2021). The Expression Regulation and Biological Function of Autotaxin. Cells, 10(4), 939. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10040939

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop