Next Article in Journal
Astrocyte Signature in Alzheimer’s Disease Continuum through a Multi-PET Tracer Imaging Perspective
Next Article in Special Issue
Human Stem Cells for Cardiac Disease Modeling and Preclinical and Clinical Applications—Are We on the Road to Success?
Previous Article in Journal
Response of Prolyl 4 Hydroxylases, Arabinogalactan Proteins and Homogalacturonans in Four Olive Cultivars under Long-Term Salinity Stress in Relation to Physiological and Morphological Changes
Previous Article in Special Issue
ZnT8 Loss of Function Mutation Increases Resistance of Human Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Beta Cells to Apoptosis in Low Zinc Condition
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia Patient-Specific hiPSC-Derived Airway Epithelium in Air-Liquid Interface Culture Recapitulates Disease Specific Phenotypes In Vitro

1
Leibniz Research Laboratories for Biotechnology and Artificial Organs (LEBAO), Department of Cardiothoracic, Transplantation and Vascular Surgery (HTTG), Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
2
Biomedical Research in Endstage and Obstructive Lung Disease (BREATH), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
3
REBIRTH-Research Center for Translational and Regenerative Medicine, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
4
Helmholtz Pioneer Campus and Institute of Biological and Medical Imaging, Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
5
Department of Respiratory Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
6
Research Core Unit Electron Microscopy, Institute of Functional and Applied Anatomy, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
7
European Reference Network on Rare and Complex Respiratory Diseases (ERN-LUNG), 60590 Frankfurt, Germany
8
Chair of Biological Imaging at the Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research (TranslaTUM), School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Cells 2023, 12(11), 1467; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12111467
Submission received: 24 April 2023 / Accepted: 22 May 2023 / Published: 24 May 2023

Abstract

:
Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is a rare heterogenic genetic disorder associated with perturbed biogenesis or function of motile cilia. Motile cilia dysfunction results in diminished mucociliary clearance (MCC) of pathogens in the respiratory tract and chronic airway inflammation and infections successively causing progressive lung damage. Current approaches to treat PCD are symptomatic, only, indicating an urgent need for curative therapeutic options. Here, we developed an in vitro model for PCD based on human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived airway epithelium in Air-Liquid-Interface cultures. Applying transmission electron microscopy, immunofluorescence staining, ciliary beat frequency, and mucociliary transport measurements, we could demonstrate that ciliated respiratory epithelia cells derived from two PCD patient-specific hiPSC lines carrying mutations in DNAH5 and NME5, respectively, recapitulate the respective diseased phenotype on a molecular, structural and functional level.

1. Introduction

Motile cilia, membrane-bound organelles, are involved in the developmental processes and function of different organs. They are present on various cells, e.g., in the ventricular system of the brain, on nodal cells during development that are responsible for left-right asymmetry, in the fallopian tubes, and in the epithelium of the respiratory tract [1]. Mutations in genes involved in the assembly and function of motile cilia can lead therefore to complex disorders summarized as motile ciliopathies [1]. Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is a rare genetic disorder belonging to the group of motile ciliopathies, with current rates estimated at 1:10,000 inhabitants depending on the degree of consanguinity within a particular population [2,3]. PCD is a mainly autosomal recessive and very rarely X- chromosomal recessive or autosomal dominant condition and up-to-date PCD-causative mutations in more than 50 genes are known, leading to different functional defects ranging from abnormal beat pattern through impairment of dynein arms to a complete absence of motile cilia [3,4]. Patients with PCD suffer from dysfunction of the cilia in the respiratory epithelium of the upper and lower respiratory tract, leading to impaired mucociliary clearance (MCC), chronic inflammation, and infection of the airways and the lung. In addition, depending on the underlying mutation, laterality defects, congenital heart disease, and infertility or subfertility are further symptoms of PCD [4]. So far, PCD research is mainly focusing on the identification of disease-causing mutations and affected genes by utilizing primary airway or nasal epithelial cells from patients with PCD [5]. While in particular nasal epithelial cells are generally accessible from PCD patients, these cells have important disadvantages, e.g., the small number of cells within obtained samples, the difficulties to obtain samples in regular intervals, bad sample quality due to pre-damaged tissue, and the missing expandability under cell culture conditions. Evidently, other cell sources are required to develop advanced organotypic culture models. Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) can be generated from patients’ somatic cells [6,7,8,9,10], for instance, hair or small blood samples are generally considered excellent tools for modeling genetic diseases in vitro and have already been used for drug screening [11,12]. Established protocols for mass expansion of undifferentiated hiPSCs as well as upscaling of differentiation cultures allow for the generation of clinically relevant cell numbers [13,14,15,16,17]. In contrast to primary airway cells, hiPSCs allow for clonal genetic engineering by innovative gene editing techniques such as TALENs or CRISPR/Cas9, and therefore seamless correction of, for example, disease underlying point mutations [18] or introduction of disease-relevant mutations [19]. Genetic diseases have already been modeled using patient-specific hiPSCs, e.g., pulmonary arterial hypertension [20] or cystic fibrosis (CF). In the case of CF, we and others have previously shown the generation of patient-specific hiPSCs [18,21], their genetic correction in vitro, and the application of CF-hiPSC-derived epithelial cells for High-Throughput (HT) screening to identify new modulators or drug testing of Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) function [11,12,22]. In the case of PCD, two reports applied hiPSCs to further explore the disease [23,24]. While analyses of Hawkins et al. [23] just showed that similar to mutated primary airway epithelia DNAH5-mutated hiPSC-derived epithelial cells do not express the DNAH5 protein and consequently carry non-motile cilia with a reduced number of outer dynein arms, Sone et al. recently described the modeling of ciliary function using hiPSC-derived epithelial cells in more detail [24]. Since it has been difficult to recapitulate unidirectional mucociliary flow using hiPSC-derived airway epithelium in vitro, Sone et al. utilized a complex airway on a chip technology to demonstrate that abnormal mucociliary transport and altered ciliary ultrastructure, both hallmarks of PCD that are detectable in primary material, are also detectable in PCD patient-derived hiPSC with different underlying mutations (HEATR2, DNAH11, and PIH1D3) [24]. Here we show, that also a conventional Air-Liquid-Interface (ALI) culture system, which is readily available in many laboratories, facilitates the investigation of cilia structure and function in hiPSC-derived ciliated airway epithelial cells. Absence of ciliary movement or altered ciliary beating, respectively, and reduced particle transport as surrogate for MCC, as well as altered cilia ultrastructure compared to hiPSC-derived WT airway cells could be confirmed in PCD patient hiPSC-derivatives carrying mutations in DNAH5 [9], encoding for a protein of the outer dynein arm, and NME5 [7], encoding for a protein of the radial spoke.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. hiPSC Cultivation

All hiPSC lines ((non-PCD diseased (MHHi001-A) [25], DNAH5mut (MHHi017-A (Clone 22), MHHi017-B (Clone 24)) [10], and NME5mut (MHHi019-B) [10]) were generated from CD34pos cells using the CytoTune®-iPS 2.0 Sendai Reprogramming Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. hiPSC were cultivated on GeltrexTM (Gibco, Billings, MT, USA) in an E8 cell culture medium (in house-made). The medium was exchanged daily. Cells were passaged every 3 to 4 days using AccutaseTM (Gibco, Billings, MT, USA) for up to 10 passages.

2.2. Differentiation of hiPSCs towards Lung Progenitor Cells

Seven days prior to the start of differentiation, hiPSCs were seeded at a low cell density (non-PCD: 1.2 × 104 cells/cm2; NME5mut and DNAH5mut: 2.0 × 104 cells/cm2) in a GeltrexTM coated flask using E8 medium. The medium was supplemented with 10 µM Y-27632 (Tocris, Bristol, UK) for 24 h (h) after seeding. The medium was exchanged daily. On day 4, preculture was initiated by supplementing E8 with Supplement 1, provided in the STEMdiffTM Definitive Endoderm Kit (STEMCELL Tech., Vancouver, BC, Canada). At day −1, cells were passaged using AccutaseTM and seeded onto a new culture vessel (non-PCD: 0.33 × 104 cells/cm2; DNAH5mut Clone 22 (Cl. 22): 0.44 × 104 cells/cm2; DNAH5mut Cl. 24: 0.44 × 104 cells/cm2, NME5mut: 0.44 × 104 cells/cm2) in E8 supplemented with 10 µM Y-27632 and Supplement 1. After 24 h, definitive endoderm differentiation was initiated by exchanging the medium to STEMDiffTM Basal Medium with Supplement CJ and MR. After 24 h and 48 h, the medium was exchanged to STEMDiffTM Basal Medium with Supplement CJ. At day 3, cells were detached using AccutaseTM, analyzed for DE markers using flow cytometric analysis, and plated for subsequent lung progenitor specification.
For anterior foregut specification, endodermal cells were plated at 12.5 × 104 cells/cm2 for non-PCD; 21.9 × 104 cells/cm2 for DNAH5mut Cl. 22; 18.8 × 104 cells/cm2 for DNAH5mut Cl. 24 and 31.3 × 104 cells/cm2 for NME5mut in basal media (Knockout DMEM (Gibco, Billings, MT, USA), 5% Knockout serum replacement (Gibco, Billings, MT, USA), 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco, Billings, MT, USA), L-glutamine (Gibco, Billings, MT, USA), non-essential amino acids (Gibco, Billings, MT, USA) and 0.46 mM monothioglycerol (Sigma Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with 3 µM Dorsomorphin (Sigma Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA), 10 µM SB431542 (provided by the Institute of Organic Chemistry, Leibniz University, Hannover, Germany) and 10 µM Y-27632 (anterior foregut media 1; AFE1). After 24 h or 48 h, media was exchanged to basal media supplemented with 2 µM IWP2 (Tocris, Bristol, UK), 10 µM SB431542, and 3 µM Dorsomorphin (only for WT and NME5mut) for 24 or 48 h (anterior foregut media 2; AFE2). Conditions for optimal anterior foregut specification were determined in advance for each cell line individually and are listed in Supplementary Table S1. For induction of lung progenitor fate, the medium was switched to basal medium with 10 ng/mL BMP4 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), 10 ng/mL FGF10 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), and 3 µM Chir99021 (provided by the Institute of Organic Chemistry, Leibniz University, Hannover, Germany) until day 14 of differentiation. The medium was exchanged daily. At day 14, lung progenitor cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline without Mg2+/Ca2+ (PBS w/o) and dissociated using AccutaseTM for 10–20 min (min) at 37 °C. After purification using magnetic-activated cell sorting, cells were plated onto transwells (Greiner Bio-One, Frickenhausen, Germany) for airway epithelial specification.

2.3. Magnetic Activated Cell Sorting (MACS) of Lung Progenitors

On day 14 of differentiation, cells were detached from culture vessels as described above. Cells were harvested in basal media with 10 µM Y-27632 and spun at 216× g for 3 min at 4 °C. After straining and counting, up to 15 × 106 cells were first incubated in MACS buffer (PBS w/o (Gibco, Billings, MT, USA), 1.0% BSA (Sigma Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA), 2 mM EDTA (Sigma Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) with FcR blocking (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) for 10 min at 4 °C and mouse anti-human CPM antibody (FUJIFILM Wako; 1:200 dilution) for additional 20 min at 4 °C. Unbound antibody was removed by washing once with MACS buffer before cells were incubated in anti-mouse IgG 2a+b microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) for 20 min at 4 °C. After washing once with MACS buffer, cells were separated using the QuadroMACS Separator (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). NKX2.1 flow cytometry analysis was used to determine the proportion of lung progenitor cells before and after sorting.

2.4. Flow Cytometry Analysis

For assessment of successful DE induction, flow cytometry analysis was performed on day 3 of differentiation according to our previously published protocol [26,27]. Shortly, cells were detached with AccutaseTM and stained with anti-CXCR4, anti-cKIT, and anti-EpCAM in FACS Buffer (PBS w/o, 1.0% FCS (Pan Biotech, Aidenbach, Germany), 1 mM EDTA) for 30 min on ice. After washing twice with FACS buffer, cells were resuspended in FACS buffer containing 1.7 µg/mL DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) for dead cell exclusion for flow cytometry measurement. Lung progenitor cultures at day 14 of differentiation were detached as described above and fixed and permeabilized using the transcription factor staining buffer kit (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). After washing with flow buffer (PBS w/o containing 1.0% BSA), cells were stained with anti- NKX2.1 for 30 min on ice. Cells were washed three times with FACS buffer and resuspended in FACS buffer for flow cytometry measurement.
Antibodies and respective dilutions are listed in Supplementary Table S3. All flow cytometry measurements were performed using the MACSQuant Analyzer 10 (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) and data were analyzed with FlowJo software (Ashland, OR, USA).

2.5. Differentiation of Lung Progenitor Cells towards Pseudostratified Airway Epithelium on Air-Liquid Interface Culture

After MACS sorting, purified lung progenitor cells were resuspended in a small airway epithelial cell growth medium (SAECGM; PromoCell, Heidelberg, Germany) supplemented with 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco, Billings, MT, USA), 1 µM A83-01 (Tocris, Bristol, UK), 0.2 µM DMH-1 (Tocris, Bristol, UK) and 5 µM Y-27632 [28]. For initiation of air-liquid interface (ALI) culture, 2.65 × 105 cells/cm2 were seeded per transwell (Greiner Bio-One, Frickenhausen, Germany), coated with 804 G conditioned medium [28]. During the expansion phase, the medium was renewed every other day in the apical and basal chambers. Once cells have formed a confluent cell layer (usually after 4 days), the medium in the apical and basal chamber was switched to PneumaCultTM-ALI medium (STEMCELL Tech., Vancouver, BC, Canada) containing 1% penicillin/streptomycin. After 48h, the medium in the apical chamber was removed to conduct the airlift and the medium in the basal chamber was renewed. Cells were differentiated on ALI cultures for 28 days for molecular characterization and >35 days for functionality assessment with medium exchanges every two to three days.

2.6. Quantitative RT-PCR

ALI cultures were lysed at day 28 after airlift using TRIzol (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). RNA isolation was performed using the Nucleospin RNA II Kit (Macherey-Nagel, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany), and reverse transcription of 500 ng RNA was conducted using the RevertAid H Minus First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). cDNA was diluted 1:5 and RT-qPCR was conducted using SsoAdvancedTM Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) with PrimePCR Assays (CCDC40, CK5) or self-designed primers (FOXJ1, P63, NGFR, NKX2.1, MUC5AC, CCSP, betaActin, GAPDH). Primer sequences and assay IDs are listed in Supplementary Table S2. Samples were pipetted as duplicates and run on the CFX ConnectTM Real-Time System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Ct values were averaged and normalized to the housekeeping genes GAPDH and betaActin.

2.7. Cytospin

Prior to staining for ciliary protein markers, airway epithelium was dissociated into single cells or small clumps. For this purpose, the membrane of day 28 ALI cultures was removed from the transwell using a scalpel and incubated in AccutaseTM supplemented with 200 µg/mL DNase I (Roche) for 15–20 min in a shaking 37 °C water bath. Dissociation was stopped with RPMI medium (Gibco, Billings, MT, USA) and cells were spun at 138× g for 3 min. After resuspending in RPMI medium, cells were centrifuged onto a Superfrost® microscope slide at 650 rpm for 5 min using Cytospin2 (Shandon, Cambridge, UK). Slides were dried at room temperature and stored at −20 °C until used.

2.8. Paraffin Embedding and Sectioning

For fixation, the medium was aspirated from the apical and basal side and replaced with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA), and was incubated for 15 min at room temperature. In order to remove mucus from the airway epithelium, the apical side of ALI cultures was washed repeatedly with PBS (Gibco, Billings, MT, USA) before fixation. After fixation, transwells were washed with and stored in PBS at 4 °C. For embedding, the membrane was cut out of the transwell using a scalpel, dehydrated (Leica Biosystems, Nußloch, Germany), and embedded in paraffin (Leica Biosystems, Nußloch, Germany). Using a microtome (Leica Biosystems, Nußloch, Germany), cross-sections of 3 µm thickness were generated.

2.9. Immunofluorescence Staining

Before staining paraffin-embedded samples, paraffin was removed from cross-sections by first heating the sections to 60 °C for 30 min, followed by incubation in xylol for 2 × 15 min. Rehydration of the sections was conducted by stepwise incubation in ethanol (100%, 90%, 80%, and 70%) for 2 min each and finally, incubation in water. For antigen retrieval, slides were incubated in 10 mM citrate buffer, pH6 (Sigma Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) for 60 min at 133 °C.
Prior to staining of cytospin samples, slides were taken from the −20 °C storage and fixed immediately with 4% PFA for 2 min at room temperature.
For immunofluorescence staining of cytospin samples and cross-sections, samples were washed twice with Tris-buffered saline (TBS) and were blocked with blocking buffer (TBS containing 5% donkey serum (Biozol, Munich, Germany) and 0.25% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA)) for 1 h at room temperature. Primary antibody incubation was performed in a staining buffer (TBS with 1% BSA) at 4 °C overnight. Primary antibodies and respective dilutions are listed in Supplementary Table S3. Slides were washed three times with TBS and secondary antibody incubation was performed in staining buffer for 30 min at room temperature. Secondary antibodies are listed in Supplementary Table S4. Samples were washed three times with TBS and nuclei were stained with TBS containing 1.7 µg/mL DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) for 5 min. After washing three more times with TBS, sections were mounted with mounting medium (Dako, Nowy Sącz, Poland) and dried overnight at room temperature. Images were taken with the Axio Observer A7 (Zeiss, Baden-Württemberg, Germany) by optical sectioning using the Apotome. Pictures were processed using ZenBlue 3.0 software (Zeiss, Baden-Württemberg, Germany).

2.10. Transepithelial Electrical Resistance (TEER) Analysis

Prior to measurement, ALI cultures were supplied with fresh PneumaCultTM-ALI medium on the basal side and covered with 750 µL of PBS supplemented with 100 µg/mL Primocin (InvivoGen, San Diego, CA, USA) on the apical side of the transwell. Electrical resistance between the apical and basal chamber is measured with an EVOM3 electrical volt-ohm meter (World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL, USA) using the STX4 electrode (RTotal). Measurements were carried out in technical duplicates. A transwell without cells was used for blanking (RBlank). TEER values were calculated as follows:
(1)
RTissue [Ω] = RTotal − RBlank
(2)
TEER [Ω × cm2] = RTissue [Ω] × surface area [cm2]

2.11. Transmission Electron Microscopy

ALI cultures were washed with PBS as described above and subsequently fixed and stored in 150 mM HEPES buffer containing 1.5% PFA and 1.5% glutaraldehyde. Membranes were cut off the ALI inserts and fixation and embedding were carried out as described in [29]

2.12. PCD Detect Software Analysis

For the assessment of ultrastructural dynein arm defects, PCD Detect Software was used, following the developers’ workflow and using the same alignment settings [30]. From each cilia cross-section, 9 cut-outs, each including a microtubule doublet with outer and inner dynein arms, were manually selected. At least 5 cilia cross-sections (equivalent to 45 cut-outs) from different cells were analyzed in each sample. In this study, we present the averaging of all features as color contour maps of electron density (blue: high density; yellow: low density).

2.13. Mucociliary Clearance (MCC) Measurement

Only cultures at day 35 of ALI or older were used for MCC measurements to ensure substantial maturity of MCC. To remove accumulated mucus and debris, ALI cultures were submerged with PBS for 10 min, then the PBS was carefully suctioned off. To visualize MCC, fluorescent microspheres (1-micron diameter, Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) were diluted 1:1000 in PBS, and 20 µL of this suspension was added to the surface of each ALI culture. Particle movement was recorded using a Zeiss Axioscope fluorescence microscope equipped with an Orca Flash 4.0 camera (Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan) and a temperature-controlled chamber that was preheated to 37 °C. Apart from a few initial test recordings, standardized acquisition settings using a 10× objective were 1024 × 1024 pixels with 1.3 µm/pixel resolution at a framerate of 20 frames per second for a total duration of 10 s. For each condition, at least 3 experiments (different differentiations or clones (hiPSCs), or different isolations (pALI)) were performed. In each experiment, 5 fields of view (FOVs) with visible particle movement (sometimes only Brownian motion) were recorded from 2 insert cultures each. The particle trajectories were extracted from the raw movies using ImageJ/Fiji [31] with the Trackmate plugin [32]. Movies that did not contain analyzable bead signals due to debris or overgrowth were excluded. Trajectories were further analyzed to compute the average trajectory speed Uk and MCC coverage Ck (the fraction of the FOV containing MCC) of each FOV k using customized code in Matlab (Mathworks), as reported previously [33]. For statistical analysis, the pooled FOV-averaged trajectory speed and MCC coverage values (the Uk and Ck for all k = 1…n FOVs, respectively) per condition were compared with the non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by Tukey-Kramer multi-comparison test, to test for different median values.

2.14. Ciliary Beat Frequency (CBF) Measurement

Only cultures at day 35 of ALI or older were used for CBF measurements. CBF was recorded using a Zeiss Axioscope microscope, allowing for oblique phase contrast recordings, equipped with an Orca Flash 4.0 camera (Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan) and a temperature-controlled chamber that was preheated to 37 °C. Koehler illumination was set up for all recordings. Two different procedures were performed to measure CBF. In non-PCD pALI and non-PCD iALI cultures, CBF was measured at the tissue level, and single-cell CBF was measured in DNAH5mut and NME5mut cultures, as the movement of cilia could not be resolved at the tissue level. For tissue-level CBF measurements, ALI cultures were washed as above. High-speed movies of CBF (ca. 140 frames per second for a duration of at least 1.5 s) were recorded using a 40× long-distance phase contrast objective at a spatial resolution of 0.3 µm/pixel in a 512 × 512 pixel frame. For each condition, at least 3 experiments (different differentiations (hiPSCs) or different isolations (pALI)) were performed. From the cultures of each experiment, 6 FOVs with visible CBF were recorded. We measured cilia beat frequencies by applying Fourier spectral analysis, as previously described [34]. The mean CBF was calculated for each window of 32 × 32 pixels, resulting in a maximum of 16 mean CBF values per FOV if all windows contained ciliary beat, and from these values, the median CBF of the entire FOV was determined.
For single-cell CBF measurements, the cell layer was dissociated by incubating the ALI cultures for 20 min in prewarmed AccutaseTM in a conical tube. DNase I at a concentration of 200 µg/mL was added to remove any free DNA resulting from the dissociation process. After 20 min warm culture medium was added at a ratio of 3:1 and the cells were centrifuged at 170 to 240× g for 5 min. The resulting pellet was resuspended in 1 mL culture medium to obtain a high cell density and 10 µL of this suspension was placed onto a glass bottom imaging dish (Ibidi, Munich, Germany). To confirm the viability of the cells, the same amount of life-dead stain (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) was added to the cell suspension droplet, and the solution was covered with a round glass coverslip in order to prevent evaporation. The measurements were performed using a 40× oil phase contrast objective (NA 1.4) under standardized acquisition settings, which were 800 frames per second for a duration of 2 s (NME5mut) and up to 10 s (DNAH5mut) of recording time and a spatial resolution of 0.16 µm/pixel in a 265 × 265 pixel frame. For each condition, at least 3 experiments (different differentiation (hiPSCs) or different isolations (pALI)) were performed, and in each experiment, at least 9 FOVs, i.e., 9 ciliated cells, were recorded. After each CBF movie recording a brightfield image and fluorescent images of the life-dead staining were recorded to confirm viability. The recordings were analyzed using the kymograph function in ImageJ. Kymographs of individual or groups of cilia were generated and the frequency was calculated by counting the amount of pixel intensity changes over time in the kymograph. Whenever a wave pattern was observed, the number of peaks were counted, else the dark lines were counted and divided by two to obtain a full beat cycle count. In the case of non-harmonic oscillation observed in DNAH5mut-derived ciliated cells, stationary vibrations were not included in the count. A median was calculated from all counted frequencies per ciliated cell. For statistical analysis, the pooled tissue-level medians and single-cell medians per condition were compared with the non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by Tukey-Kramer multi-comparison test, to test for different median values.

3. Results

3.1. PCD Specific hiPSC Lines can Be Efficiently Differentiated towards Respiratory Epithelial Cells

For the establishment of a PCD in vitro disease model, two hiPSC lines from patients carrying homozygous mutations in DNAH5 (c.7915C > T [p.Arg2639*]; hereafter DNAH5mut Clone 22 and Clone 24) and NME5 (c.415delA [p.Ile139Tyrfs*8]; hereafter NME5mut), respectively, were previously generated [10]. A non-PCD diseased hiPSC line (non-PCD) was used as a control [25].
In order to direct the hiPSCs towards respiratory airway epithelial cell fate, a stepwise differentiation protocol was used that induced definitive endoderm (DE), anterior foregut endoderm (AFE), and lung progenitor cells (Figure 1A). The protocol was slightly adapted individually for all cell lines regarding seeding densities and duration of AFE induction.
By applying these cell-line-specific optimized conditions, more than 91% of the cells expressed the definitive endoderm-specific markers CXCR4, cKIT, and EpCAM at day 3 of differentiation in all hiPSC lines (Figure 1B). Further differentiation to the respiratory lineage resulted in the expression of the lung progenitor cell-specific transcription factor NKX2.1 in 11–33 % (non-PCD: 33.7 ± 13.1%; DNAH5mut Cl. 22: 13.1 ± 4.1%; DNAH5mut Cl. 24: 14.0 ± 7.3% and NME5mut: 11.6 ± 3.1%) of the cells at day 14 of differentiation. In order to enrich lung progenitor cultures, magnetically activated cell sorting (MACS) using the cell surface maker carboxypeptidase M (CPM) was performed [35]. Sorting allowed significant enrichment of lung progenitor cells to 50–78% NKX2.1 expressing cells (non-PCD: 78.5 ± 16.5%; DNAH5mut Cl. 22: 50.2 ± 22.4%; DNAH5mut Cl. 24: 50.8 ± 14.7%; NME5mut: 57.4 ± 6.4%) (Figure 1C).
For maturation towards respiratory airway epithelium, sorted lung progenitor cells were seeded onto transwells and cultivated under ALI conditions for at least 28 days before analysis. Immunofluorescence staining of ALI cross-sections shows the presence of airway epithelium-specific cell types (ciliated cells (AcTub), goblet cells (MUC5AC), club cells (CCSP) and basal cells (P63 and CK5)) in all cell lines (Figure 1D). Remarkably, NME5mut-derived cultures generated thicker cell layers and fewer AcTub, MUC5AC, and CCSP positive cells as compared to DNAH5mut and non-PCD diseased counterparts. Primary bronchial epithelial cell (PBEC)-derived ALI cultures served as control (non-PCD pALI). Additionally, airway epithelial cell-specific marker expression was confirmed by RT-qPCR (Figure 1E). Expression levels of all tested genes in DNAH5mut ALI cultures were comparable to those of non-PCD disease cultures. Although all markers were detectable, NME5mut cultures showed lower expression for most tested markers. To assess epithelial integrity, transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) measurements were performed after 28 days of ALI culture and showed TEER values of 302–476 Ω × cm2, indicating intact and comparable barrier function in cultures derived from all cell lines (Figure 1F).

3.2. PCD Specific hiPSC-Derived Epithelial Cells show Impaired Expression of Cilia Proteins

In order to visualize ciliary protein expression, ALI cultures at day 28 post airlift were dissociated into single cells and stained for DNAH5 and NME5 protein, respectively. Immunofluorescence staining against AcTub was used to identify cilia and confirmed the presence of cilia with a normal appearance in all cell lines. In ciliated cells generated from non-PCD diseased primary cell-derived ALI cultures (non-PCD pALIs; Figure 2A,B) as well as non-PCD hiPSC-derived ALIs (non-PCD iALIs; Figure 2C,D), expression of DNAH5 and NME5 was observed that was associated with the cilia. In contrast, DNAH5-mutant ciliated cells (DNAH5mut Cl. 22 and Cl. 24) showed the absence of DNAH5 protein in the cilia. NME5 protein expression remains unchanged in these cells (Figure 2E–H). In ciliated cells derived from NME5-mutant hiPSCs, cilia show a lack of NME5 protein expression and unchanged DNAH5 expression (Figure 2I,J).

3.3. Transmission Electron Microscopy Analysis Shows Impact of DNAH5 and NME5 Mutations on Ciliary Ultrastructure

To further investigate the impact of each specific mutation on the cilia axoneme ultra-structure, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of generated iALI cultures was performed. Analysis of cilia of non-PCD diseased hiPSC-derived cells showed a normal 9 + 2 ultrastructure pattern in more than 95% of analyzed cilia axonemes (Figure 3A,B) as expected. In contrast, NME5-mutants show a 9 + 2 structure only in 56.6% of cilia axonemes and frequent numerical abnormalities or disorganization of cilia ultrastructure (Figure 3A,B). 5.1% of axonemes exhibited a 9 + 0 ultrastructure pattern, which is consistent with previous findings of Cho and colleagues [36]. Furthermore, we detected additional abnormal ultrastructural patterns. Most abundantly, 23.4% of axonemes exhibited an 8 + 1 pattern. A smaller subset of axonemes showed additional configurations of microtubule transpositions (e.g., 7 + 4, 8 + 4), additional microtubules (9 + 4 pattern), and/or microtubular disorganization. These findings resemble phenotypes associated with mutations in other radial spoke proteins (RSPH1, RSPH3) [37,38].
For investigating outer dynein arm (ODA) defects in DNAH5-mutated cilia, TEM cross-sections were analyzed using the PCD Detect software [30]. This software allows overlapping and averaging of microtubule features to generate enhanced signals and improved structural resolution. By averaging the electron density of multiple outer microtubule doublets, the shortening of outer dynein arms in DNAH5-mutated cilia compared to non-PCD controls was detected and visualized in color-coded density plots (Figure 3C).

3.4. PCD Specific hiPSC-Derived ALI Cultures show Altered Ciliary Beat Frequencies

To evaluate the maturation and functional consequences of the DNAH5 and NME5 mutations in PCD, we measured ciliary beat frequencies (CBF) using high-speed microscopy on day 35 after airlift or later. In non-PCD cells (pALI and iALI) ciliary beat was visible directly in ALI cultures, enabling us to use tissue-level recordings and automated analysis of CBF (Figure 4A). In PCD cells (DNAH5mut and NME5mut), the ciliary beat was too sparse or abnormal for direct analysis of ALI cultures, and we, therefore, conducted a manual analysis of CBF in single-cell suspensions (Figure 4B). Non-PCD iALI cultures showed a relatively low variation of CBFs and a median value of 8 Hz (IQR = 1.3), which compared well to the similarly distributed CBF values in non-PCD pALI with a median value of 11.4 Hz (IQR = 3.0). Compared to non-PCD iALIs, DNAH5mut cultures showed significantly lower values of CBF, with a median of 2 Hz (IQR = 1.2), whereas NME5 cultures exhibited significantly higher and highly variable values of CBF, ranging from 5 to 19 Hz with a median of 15 Hz (IQR = 4.5) (Figure 4C).

3.5. PCD Specific hiPSC-Derived ALI Cultures Show Impaired Mucociliary Clearance (MCC)

Since functional MCC depends on many factors, including ciliary beat coordination and orientation [39,40], CBF alone is not a good predictor of MCC [33]. Indeed, visually comparing the ciliary beat in suspended cells of all conditions revealed metachronal and coordinated beats in non-PCD pALI and iALI cultures (Supplementary Videos S1 and S2), whereas we observed sparse strokes and occasional vibrations in DNAH5-mutant cells (Supplementary Video S3), which is consistent with the literature [23,41,42]. NME5-mutant cells showed an asymmetrical beating pattern (Supplementary Video S4) and sporadically exhibited circular instead of whipping cilia movements (data not shown). This has not been described for NME5 defects, yet, but resembles findings in other radial spoke defects [24,43,44,45]. Altogether these defects suggest that the cilia beat in the PCD mutants might be ineffective at transporting fluids. We, therefore, proceeded to measure a direct proxy of MCC by recording the transport of suspended fluorescent microspheres on the intact tissue surface at day 35 post-airlift or later (Figure 5A). As expected, the non-PCD pALI cultures generated the fastest flow that covered most of the tissue surface. Non-PCD iALI cultures created significantly faster and more expansive MCC than DNAH5 and NME5-mutated cultures (Figure 5B), demonstrating that the functionally healthy versus the diseased phenotype of mutated airway epithelia from PCD patients is exhibited by the hiPSC-derived cultures.

4. Discussion

To date, mainly primary cells or non-airway immortalized cell lines (e.g., HEK293 cell line) have been used for PCD in vitro modeling or drug screening [46,47,48]. However, both cell sources harbor severe limitations for such applications. Non-airway immortalized cell lines do not allow assessment of the therapeutic effect on a functional level, and primary airway cells, while they represent the PCD phenotype well, are limited in their accessibility and expandability. Even though it has been demonstrated that primary cells can be expanded over 35 passages and maintained their differentiation potential [49], this requires laborious matrix-embedded cultures, which limits the cell yield. Furthermore, targeted gene editing is not possible on a clonal level. hiPSCs exhibit infinite self-renewal and can be differentiated into the cell type of interest, thereby overcoming the limitations of primary cells. Moreover, PCD-patient-specific hiPSCs can be used to study the disease on different disease-implicated tissues (airway cilia, sperm cells, nodal cilia) and can be genetically modified on a clonal level, e.g., for introducing reporter systems for screening readout. Hence, hiPSCs represent a valuable tool for PCD disease modeling and screening applications.
Current differentiation protocols for the generation of airway epithelium from hiPSCs often include an intermediate 3D culture step, in which lung progenitor cells are embedded in Matrigel droplets, prior to differentiation to airway epithelium [25,26]. Hence, these protocols are lengthy (28–46 days until initiation of ciliation by airlift or supplementation with DAPT [25,26]), and scale-up of cell production is severely limited due to the small scale and laborious 3D culture. Here, were describe an efficient airway differentiation protocol that takes only 20 days until initiation of ciliation. Moreover, our protocol is not dependent on complex Matrigel-dependent organoid culture steps, hence more defined and scalable for future high throughput drug screening applications.
Sone et al. previously reported a hiPSC-based disease model of PCD-causing mutations in DNAH11, HEATR2, and PIH1D3 using a complex airway-on-a-chip technology [24]. By applying fluid shear stress via defined cell culture medium flow rates on the apical side of the forming epithelium, planar cell polarity can be effectively induced in ciliated cells. Hence, compared to simple transwell ALI cultures, the chip technology allows the application and investigation of mechanical effects on the cells. However, such culture-on-a-chip is technically complex, expensive, and also harbors several limitations. The microfluidic design of the system hampers the establishment of chip cultures in unexperienced labs, the access to the cultured epithelium, the application of standard characterization methods (e.g., TEM, staining of cross-sections), and functional high throughput readouts using plate reader technology. In particular, electrophysiological assessments such as TEER and Ussing chamber measurements, which are valuable techniques to determine epithelial quality and functionality [36,50], are not feasible in commercially available airway chips. Integration of electrodes is possible in custom-made chip systems but this approach is very laborious and requires microfabrication infrastructure and expertise [51,52]. Moreover, the submerged culture system utilized by Sone and colleagues [24] does not allow for investigation of the implication of mucus properties in PCD disease development and infection processes. Additionally, for future compound screening applications, downscaling of culture size to high or medium throughput formats is indispensable and not yet possible for chip cultures.
In contrast, transwell ALI cultures are compatible with standard readouts, easier to establish due to the commercial availability and handling simplicity, and available in various formats including 96-well plates (Corning, Corning, NY, USA #100-0419), allowing higher throughput screening of pharmacological compounds. Altogether, the airway-on-a-chip system is a valuable tool to investigate specific research questions under dynamic flow conditions; however, the transwell ALI culture system remains indispensable to be used as a complementary system, in particular for screening purposes.
In the present study, we describe the establishment of a hiPSC-based PCD in vitro disease model using patient lines containing mutations in the most frequently mutated and well-described PCD-associated gene DNAH5 [41,42], and in the recently PCD-associated described gene NME5 [36], respectively. Our data show that mutated DNAH5 results in loss of DNAH5 protein, altered ODA ultrastructure, and reduced CBF, consistent with previously published iPSC-based models [23]. Additionally, we investigated bead transport on the tissue level that displayed significantly reduced MCC capacity in DNAH5-mutated cultures. Moreover, we demonstrate the application of the newly developed PCD Detect software [30] that allows the identification of ODA defects. Previous disease models mainly focused on describing a severe DNAH5 ultrastructural phenotype that exhibits a total absence of ODA [23], but mutated DNAH5 can also result in less prominent ODA defects such as dynein arm truncation [4]. Reliable analysis of the whole range of ODA phenotypes is necessary for diagnostics and experimental readouts; however, analyzing ultrastructure with only subtle defects can be challenging and strongly rely on the investigators’ expertise [30]. Hence, we used the PCD Detect software as an investigator-independent and time-efficient diagnostic method [30] to identify subtle ODA shortening in our hiPSC DNAH5-mutated cultures. Altogether, the detailed characterization of our DNAH5-mutated iALI cultures serves as a proof-of-concept to demonstrate that our in vitro model recapitulates the DNAH5mut-specific phenotype and can be captured in detail by utilizing improved readout methods.
Next, we aimed at modeling the impact of mutations in the gene NME5, which was recently identified as PCD-associated. NME5 is part of the radial spoke neck; however, so far, only little is known about the function of NME5 and the pathomechanism of its mutation [36,53]. Solely Cho and colleagues studied the effect of mutant NME5 in humans and have described an abnormal axonemal ultrastructure in mutant ciliated cells (loss of the central pair; 9 + 0 pattern) [36]. Here, we investigated the effects of mutated NME5 in more detail. Our TEM results are consistent with the previously reported loss of central pair (9 + 0) in NME5-mutated cilia, and moreover, show additional ultrastructural abnormalities, such as outer doublet transposition (8 + 1, 7 + 4, 8 + 4) and presence of additional microtubules (9 + 4), which have not been described for this mutation before. Importantly, similar ultrastructural abnormalities were reported in other radial spoke protein defects [22,45,54,55,56]. These findings suggest that NME5 is indispensable for proper radial spoke assembly and stabilization of the central pair complex.
To further investigate the effect of mutated NME5 on single-cell and tissue levels, we performed high-speed video microscopy (HSVM). Single-cell functional analysis revealed that NME5-mutant ciliated cells beat in an uncoordinated way and exhibited partially circular cilia movements that resembled 9 + 0 nodal cilia beating. These nodal-like beat kinematics have been previously reported to be a consequence of central pair and transposition defects [24,43,44,45]. Additionally, NME5-mutated ciliated cells showed an increased variance of CBFs, compared to controls. By assessing the mucociliary transport capacity, we could additionally demonstrate that these alterations lead to a significantly diminished mucociliary clearance capacity (coverage and speed) compared to non-PCD controls (iALI and pALI). Altogether, these findings indicate that mutated NME5 not only impairs the beating synchrony and pattern of a given cell but also potentially prevents tissue-level metachronal wave formation due to divergent beat frequencies, which breaks down mucus clearance [57].
Notably, also non-PCD iALIs showed reduced MCC compared to primary cell controls (non-PCD pALI), despite comparable CBF parameters (median and variance) and synchronous cilia beating. This heterogeneity may have been neglected in other studies that used smaller fields of view for measuring bead transport; e.g., Sone et al. used a 100 µm × 100 µm fields of view (FOV) [24] compared to our 600 µm × 600 FOV. Our larger FOV allows us to obtain a more representative picture of the tissue, which might be particularly necessary to detect phenotypes on a tissue level (as in the case of NME5mut cells). Further underlying causes for the observed differences between pALI and iALI cultures may include an insufficient maturation of the iALIs. Despite analyzing the cultures earliest at day 35 after the airlift, maturation of ciliary beating (synchrony, force generation, and cilia length) might be not fully completed. So far, the maturation of cilia beating during differentiation is not well understood, and investigation of bead transport over the course of differentiation and analysis of cilia length remains to be carried out for further understanding. In addition, the higher heterogeneity of hiPSC-derived cultures (ciliated cells appearing in clusters and/or uneven epithelium surface) compared to pALIs might reduce MCC coverage and average trajectory speed, since bead transport slows down in non-ciliated areas.

5. Conclusions

Taking together, here we present a hiPSC-based PCD model platform utilizing a simple air-liquid interface culture system that recapitulates mutation-specific phenotypes by detailed characterization on a molecular (mRNA, protein, ultrastructure) and functional (CBF, HSVM, bead transport) level. In addition, our system allows down-scaling of the culture format and up-scaling of cell yield, which are essential prerequisites for upcoming higher throughput screening applications.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cells12111467/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization R.O., F.C.R. and U.M.; software, D.R., J.N. and B.O.S.; formal analysis, D.R., J.N., L.v.S. and J.H.; investigation, L.v.S., D.P.M., N.C. and J.Z.; data curation, L.v.S. and J.H.; writing—original draft preparation, L.v.S., J.N., D.R., F.C.R., R.O. and U.M.; visualization, B.O.S., J.H., L.v.S., D.R. and J.N.; supervision, U.M. and R.O.; project administration, U.M. and R.O.; funding acquisition, U.M., R.O. and F.C.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by German Center for Lung research (DZL; 82DZL002A1).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of Hannover Medical School (8457_BO_K_2019).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mitchison, H.M.; Valente, E.M. Motile and non-motile cilia in human pathology: From function to phenotypes. J. Pathol. 2017, 241, 294–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Contarini, M.; Shoemark, A.; Rademacher, J.; Finch, S.; Gramegna, A.; Gaffuri, M.; Roncoroni, L.; Seia, M.; Ringshausen, F.C.; Welte, T.; et al. Why, when and how to investigate primary ciliary dyskinesia in adult patients with bronchiectasis. Multidiscip. Respir. Med. 2018, 13, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wallmeier, J.; Nielsen, K.G.; Kuehni, C.E.; Lucas, J.S.; Leigh, M.W.; Zariwala, M.A.; Omran, H. Motile ciliopathies. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2020, 6, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Leigh, M.W.; Horani, A.; Kinghorn, B.; O’Connor, M.G.; Zariwala, M.A.; Knowles, M.R. Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia (PCD): A genetic disorder of motile cilia. Transl. Sci. Rare Dis. 2019, 4, 51–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Loges, N.T.; Antony, D.; Maver, A.; Deardorff, M.A.; Gulec, E.Y.; Gezdirici, A.; Nothe-Menchen, T.; Hoben, I.M.; Jelten, L.; Frank, D.; et al. Recessive DNAH9 Loss-of-Function Mutations Cause Laterality Defects and Subtle Respiratory Ciliary-Beating Defects. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2018, 103, 995–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Usman, A.; Haase, A.; Merkert, S.; Gohring, G.; Hansmann, G.; Gall, H.; Schermuly, R.; Martin, U.; Olmer, R. Generation of pulmonary arterial hypertension patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cell lines from three unrelated patients with a heterozygous missense mutation in exon 12, a heterozygous in-frame deletion in exon 3 and a missense mutation in exon 11 of the BMPR2 gene. Stem Cell Res. 2021, 55, 102488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sahabian, A.; von Schlehdorn, L.; Drick, N.; Pink, I.; Dahlmann, J.; Haase, A.; Gohring, G.; Welte, T.; Martin, U.; Ringshausen, F.C.; et al. Generation of two hiPSC clones (MHHi019-A, MHHi019-B) from a primary ciliary dyskinesia patient carrying a homozygous deletion in the NME5 gene (c.415delA (p.Ile139Tyrfs*8)). Stem Cell Res. 2020, 48, 101988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pongpamorn, P.; Dahlmann, J.; Haase, A.; Ebeling, C.T.; Merkert, S.; Gohring, G.; Lachmann, N.; Martens, A.; Haverich, A.; Martin, U.; et al. Generation of three induced pluripotent stem cell lines (MHHi012-A, MHHi013-A, MHHi014-A) from a family with Loeys-Dietz syndrome carrying a heterozygous p.M253I (c.759G>A) mutation in the TGFBR1 gene. Stem Cell Res. 2020, 43, 101707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Drick, N.; Dahlmann, J.; Sahabian, A.; Haase, A.; Gohring, G.; Lachmann, N.; Ringshausen, F.C.; Welte, T.; Martin, U.; Olmer, R. Generation of two human induced pluripotent stem cell lines (MHHi017-A, MHHi017-B) from a patient with primary ciliary dyskinesia carrying a homozygous mutation (c.7915C > T [p.Arg2639*]) in the DNAH5 gene. Stem Cell Res. 2020, 46, 101848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dahlmann, J.; Sahabian, A.; Drick, N.; Haase, A.; Gohring, G.; Lachmann, N.; Ringshausen, F.C.; Welte, T.; Martin, U.; Olmer, R. Generation of two hiPSC lines (MHHi016-A, MHHi016-B) from a primary ciliary dyskinesia patient carrying a homozygous 5 bp duplication (c.248_252dup (p.Gly85Cysfs*11)) in exon 1 of the CCNO gene. Stem Cell Res. 2020, 46, 101850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Berical, A.; Lee, R.E.; Lu, J.; Beermann, M.L.; Le Suer, J.A.; Mithal, A.; Thomas, D.; Ranallo, N.; Peasley, M.; Stuffer, A.; et al. A multimodal iPSC platform for cystic fibrosis drug testing. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 4270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Merkert, S.; Schubert, M.; Olmer, R.; Engels, L.; Radetzki, S.; Veltman, M.; Scholte, B.J.; Zöllner, J.; Pedemonte, N.; Galietta, L.J.V.; et al. High-Throughput Screening for Modulators of CFTR Activity Based on Genetically Engineered Cystic Fibrosis Disease-Specific iPSCs. Stem Cell Rep. 2019, 12, 1389–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kempf, H.; Olmer, R.; Kropp, C.; Ruckert, M.; Jara-Avaca, M.; Robles-Diaz, D.; Franke, A.; Elliott, D.A.; Wojciechowski, D.; Fischer, M.; et al. Controlling expansion and cardiomyogenic differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells in scalable suspension culture. Stem Cell Rep. 2014, 3, 1132–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kropp, C.; Kempf, H.; Halloin, C.; Robles-Diaz, D.; Franke, A.; Scheper, T.; Kinast, K.; Knorpp, T.; Joos, T.O.; Haverich, A.; et al. Impact of Feeding Strategies on the Scalable Expansion of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells in Single-Use Stirred Tank Bioreactors. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2016, 5, 1289–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Olmer, R.; Engels, L.; Usman, A.; Menke, S.; Malik, M.N.H.; Pessler, F.; Gohring, G.; Bornhorst, D.; Bolten, S.; Abdelilah-Seyfried, S.; et al. Differentiation of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells into Functional Endothelial Cells in Scalable Suspension Culture. Stem Cell Rep. 2018, 10, 1657–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sahabian, A.; Dahlmann, J.; Martin, U.; Olmer, R. Production and cryopreservation of definitive endoderm from human pluripotent stem cells under defined and scalable culture conditions. Nat. Protoc. 2021, 16, 1581–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zweigerdt, R.; Olmer, R.; Singh, H.; Haverich, A.; Martin, U. Scalable expansion of human pluripotent stem cells in suspension culture. Nat. Protoc. 2011, 6, 689–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Merkert, S.; Bednarski, C.; Gohring, G.; Cathomen, T.; Martin, U. Generation of a gene-corrected isogenic control iPSC line from cystic fibrosis patient-specific iPSCs homozygous for p.Phe508del mutation mediated by TALENs and ssODN. Stem Cell Res. 2017, 23, 95–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Merkert, S.; Jaboreck, M.C.; Engels, L.; Malik, M.N.H.; Gohring, G.; Pessler, F.; Martin, U.; Olmer, R. Generation of two human ISG15 knockout iPSC clones using CRISPR/Cas9 editing. Stem Cell Res. 2020, 50, 102135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sa, S.; Gu, M.; Chappell, J.; Shao, N.Y.; Ameen, M.; Elliott, K.A.; Li, D.; Grubert, F.; Li, C.G.; Taylor, S.; et al. Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Model of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Reveals Novel Gene Expression and Patient Specificity. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care. Med. 2017, 195, 930–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Merkert, S.; Schubert, M.; Haase, A.; Janssens, H.M.; Scholte, B.; Lachmann, N.; Gohring, G.; Martin, U. Generation of an induced pluripotent stem cell line (MHHi018-A) from a patient with Cystic Fibrosis carrying p.Asn1303Lys (N1303K) mutation. Stem. Cell. Res. 2020, 44, 101744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Jiang, J.X.; Wellhauser, L.; Laselva, O.; Utkina, I.; Bozoky, Z.; Gunawardena, T.; Ngan, Z.; Xia, S.; Di Paola, M.; Eckford, P.D.W.; et al. A new platform for high-throughput therapy testing on iPSC-derived lung progenitor cells from cystic fibrosis patients. Stem Cell Rep. 2021, 16, 2825–2837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hawkins, F.J.; Suzuki, S.; Beermann, M.L.; Barillà, C.; Wang, R.; Villacorta-Martin, C.; Berical, A.; Jean, J.C.; Le Suer, J.; Matte, T.; et al. Derivation of Airway Basal Stem Cells from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2021, 28, 79–95.e78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sone, N.; Konishi, S.; Igura, K.; Tamai, K.; Ikeo, S.; Korogi, Y.; Kanagaki, S.; Namba, T.; Yamamoto, Y.; Xu, Y.; et al. Multicellular modeling of ciliopathy by combining iPS cells and microfluidic airway-on-a-chip technology. Sci. Transl. Med. 2021, 13, eabb1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Haase, A.; Göhring, G.; Martin, U. Generation of non-transgenic iPS cells from human cord blood CD34+ cells under animal component-free conditions. Stem Cell Res. 2017, 21, 71–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sahabian, A.; Sgodda, M.; Naujok, O.; Dettmer, R.; Dahlmann, J.; Manstein, F.; Cantz, T.; Zweigerdt, R.; Martin, U.; Olmer, R. Chemically-Defined, Xeno-Free, Scalable Production of hPSC-Derived Definitive Endoderm Aggregates with Multi-Lineage Differentiation Potential. Cells 2019, 8, 1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Manstein, F.; Ullmann, K.; Kropp, C.; Halloin, C.; Triebert, W.; Franke, A.; Farr, C.M.; Sahabian, A.; Haase, A.; Breitkreuz, Y.; et al. High density bioprocessing of human pluripotent stem cells by metabolic control and in silico modeling. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2021, 10, 1063–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Levardon, H.; Yonker, L.M.; Hurley, B.P.; Mou, H. Expansion of Airway Basal Cells and Generation of Polarized Epithelium. Bio-Protocol 2018, 8, e2877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Grund, A.; Szaroszyk, M.; Korf-Klingebiel, M.; Malek Mohammadi, M.; Trogisch, F.A.; Schrameck, U.; Gigina, A.; Tiedje, C.; Gaestel, M.; Kraft, T.; et al. TIP30 counteracts cardiac hypertrophy and failure by inhibiting translational elongation. EMBO Mol. Med. 2019, 11, e10018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shoemark, A.; Pinto, A.L.; Patel, M.P.; Daudvohra, F.; Hogg, C.; Mitchison, H.M.; Burgoyne, T. PCD Detect: Enhancing ciliary features through image averaging and classification. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2020, 319, L1048–L1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Schindelin, J.; Arganda-Carreras, I.; Frise, E.; Kaynig, V.; Longair, M.; Pietzsch, T.; Preibisch, S.; Rueden, C.; Saalfeld, S.; Schmid, B.; et al. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 676–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ershov, D.; Phan, M.S.; Pylvanainen, J.W.; Rigaud, S.U.; Le Blanc, L.; Charles-Orszag, A.; Conway, J.R.W.; Laine, R.F.; Roy, N.H.; Bonazzi, D.; et al. TrackMate 7: Integrating state-of-the-art segmentation algorithms into tracking pipelines. Nat. Methods 2022, 19, 829–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Nawroth, J.C.; Roth, D.; van Schadewijk, A.; Ravi, A.; Maulana, T.I.; Senger, C.N.; van Riet, S.; Ninaber, D.K.; de Waal, A.M.; Kraft, D.; et al. Breathing on Chip: Dynamic flow and stretch tune cellular composition and accelerate mucociliary maturation of airway epithelium in vitro. bioRxiv 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Benam, K.H.; Novak, R.; Nawroth, J.; Hirano-Kobayashi, M.; Ferrante, T.C.; Choe, Y.; Prantil-Baun, R.; Weaver, J.C.; Bahinski, A.; Parker, K.K.; et al. Matched-Comparative Modeling of Normal and Diseased Human Airway Responses Using a Microengineered Breathing Lung Chip. Cell Syst. 2016, 3, 456–466.e454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gotoh, S.; Ito, I.; Nagasaki, T.; Yamamoto, Y.; Konishi, S.; Korogi, Y.; Matsumoto, H.; Muro, S.; Hirai, T.; Funato, M.; et al. Generation of alveolar epithelial spheroids via isolated progenitor cells from human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Rep. 2014, 3, 394–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cho, E.H.; Huh, H.J.; Jeong, I.; Lee, N.Y.; Koh, W.J.; Park, H.C.; Ki, C.S. A nonsense variant in NME5 causes human primary ciliary dyskinesia with radial spoke defects. Clin. Genet. 2020, 98, 64–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jeanson, L.; Copin, B.; Papon, J.F.; Dastot-Le Moal, F.; Duquesnoy, P.; Montantin, G.; Cadranel, J.; Corvol, H.; Coste, A.; Desir, J.; et al. RSPH3 Mutations Cause Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia with Central-Complex Defects and a Near Absence of Radial Spokes. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2015, 97, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chong, J.J.; Yang, X.; Don, C.W.; Minami, E.; Liu, Y.W.; Weyers, J.J.; Mahoney, W.M.; Van Biber, B.; Cook, S.M.; Palpant, N.J.; et al. Human embryonic-stem-cell-derived cardiomyocytes regenerate non-human primate hearts. Nature 2014, 510, 273–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ramirez-San Juan, G.R.; Mathijssen, A.J.T.M.; He, M.; Jan, L.; Marshall, W.; Prakash, M. Multi-scale spatial heterogeneity enhances particle clearance in airway ciliary arrays. Nat. Phys. 2020, 16, 958–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Smith, D.J.; Gaffney, E.A.; Blake, J.R. Modelling mucociliary clearance. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 2008, 163, 178–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hornef, N.; Olbrich, H.; Horvath, J.; Zariwala, M.A.; Fliegauf, M.; Loges, N.T.; Wildhaber, J.; Noone, P.G.; Kennedy, M.; Antonarakis, S.E.; et al. DNAH5 mutations are a common cause of primary ciliary dyskinesia with outer dynein arm defects. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2006, 174, 120–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Raidt, J.; Wallmeier, J.; Hjeij, R.; Onnebrink, J.G.; Pennekamp, P.; Loges, N.T.; Olbrich, H.; Haffner, K.; Dougherty, G.W.; Omran, H.; et al. Ciliary beat pattern and frequency in genetic variants of primary ciliary dyskinesia. Eur. Respir. J. 2014, 44, 1579–1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Castleman, V.H.; Romio, L.; Chodhari, R.; Hirst, R.A.; de Castro, S.C.; Parker, K.A.; Ybot-Gonzalez, P.; Emes, R.D.; Wilson, S.W.; Wallis, C.; et al. Mutations in radial spoke head protein genes RSPH9 and RSPH4A cause primary ciliary dyskinesia with central-microtubular-pair abnormalities. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2009, 84, 197–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Chilvers, M.A.; Rutman, A.; O’Callaghan, C. Ciliary beat pattern is associated with specific ultrastructural defects in primary ciliary dyskinesia. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2003, 112, 518–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Knowles, M.R.; Ostrowski, L.E.; Leigh, M.W.; Sears, P.R.; Davis, S.D.; Wolf, W.E.; Hazucha, M.J.; Carson, J.L.; Olivier, K.N.; Sagel, S.D.; et al. Mutations in RSPH1 cause primary ciliary dyskinesia with a unique clinical and ciliary phenotype. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2014, 189, 707–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Bukowy-Bieryllo, Z.; Dabrowski, M.; Witt, M.; Zietkiewicz, E. Aminoglycoside-stimulated readthrough of premature termination codons in selected genes involved in primary ciliary dyskinesia. RNA Biol. 2016, 13, 1041–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Dabrowski, M.; Bukowy-Bieryllo, Z.; Jackson, C.L.; Zietkiewicz, E. Properties of Non-Aminoglycoside Compounds Used to Stimulate Translational Readthrough of PTC Mutations in Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lee, D.D.H.; Cardinale, D.; Nigro, E.; Butler, C.R.; Rutman, A.; Fassad, M.R.; Hirst, R.A.; Moulding, D.; Agrotis, A.; Forsythe, E.; et al. Higher throughput drug screening for rare respiratory diseases: Readthrough therapy in primary ciliary dyskinesia. Eur. Respir. J. 2021, 58, 2000455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. van der Vaart, J.; Böttinger, L.; Geurts, M.H.; van de Wetering, W.J.; Knoops, K.; Sachs, N.; Begthel, H.; Korving, J.; Lopez-Iglesias, C.; Peters, P.J.; et al. Modelling of primary ciliary dyskinesia using patient-derived airway organoids. EMBO Rep. 2021, 22, e52058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Srinivasan, B.; Kolli, A.R.; Esch, M.B.; Abaci, H.E.; Shuler, M.L.; Hickman, J.J. TEER measurement techniques for in vitro barrier model systems. J. Lab. Autom. 2015, 20, 107–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bossink, E.G.B.M.; Zakharova, M.; de Bruijn, D.S.; Odijk, M.; Segerink, L.I. Measuring barrier function in organ-on-chips with cleanroom-free integration of multiplexable electrodes. Lab Chip 2021, 21, 2040–2049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Henry, O.Y.F.; Villenave, R.; Cronce, M.J.; Leineweber, W.D.; Benz, M.A.; Ingber, D.E. Organs-on-chips with integrated electrodes for trans-epithelial electrical resistance (TEER) measurements of human epithelial barrier function. Lab Chip 2017, 17, 2264–2271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Grossman-Haham, I.; Coudray, N.; Yu, Z.; Wang, F.; Zhang, N.; Bhabha, G.; Vale, R.D. Structure of the radial spoke head and insights into its role in mechanoregulation of ciliary beating. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2021, 28, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Daniels, M.L.A.; Leigh, M.W.; Davis, S.D.; Armstrong, M.C.; Carson, J.L.; Hazucha, M.; Dell, S.D.; Eriksson, M.; Collins, F.S.; Knowles, M.R.; et al. Founder Mutation in RSPH4A Identified in Patients of Hispanic Descent with Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia. Hum. Mutat. 2013, 34, 1352–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lin, J.; Yin, W.; Smith, M.C.; Song, K.; Leigh, M.W.; Zariwala, M.A.; Knowles, M.R.; Ostrowski, L.E.; Nicastro, D. Cryo-electron tomography reveals ciliary defects underlying human RSPH1 primary ciliary dyskinesia. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ziętkiewicz, E.; Bukowy-Bieryłło, Z.; Voelkel, K.; Klimek, B.; Dmeńska, H.; Pogorzelski, A.; Sulikowska-Rowińska, A.; Rutkiewicz, E.; Witt, M. Mutations in radial spoke head genes and ultrastructural cilia defects in East-European cohort of primary ciliary dyskinesia patients. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e33667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Loiseau, E.; Gsell, S.; Nommick, A.; Jomard, C.; Gras, D.; Chanez, P.; D’Ortona, U.; Kodjabachian, L.; Favier, J.; Viallat, A. Active mucus–cilia hydrodynamic coupling drives self-organization of human bronchial epithelium. Nat. Phys. 2020, 16, 1158–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. PCD-specific hiPSC lines can be efficiently differentiated towards ciliated respiratory epithelium. Schematic depiction of the stepwise differentiation protocol for generating respiratory airway epithelium from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs). The scheme was generated with Biorender.com (A). Differentiation efficiencies of definitive endoderm (DE) induction measured by flow cytometry staining of CXCR4, cKIT, and EpCAM (means ± SD, n = 3–23 independent experiments) (B). The proportion of NKX2.1 positive cells at day 14 of differentiation before (unsorted) and immediately after MACS (CPMpos sorted) (means ± SD, n = 3–19 independent experiments), **** p < 0.0001, ns, significance (C). Immunofluorescence staining of paraffin-embedded ALI culture cross-sections of indicated cell lines at day 28 after airlift. Immunolabeling with acetylated tubulin (AcTub) and MUC5AC (left panel), AcTub and CCSP (middle panel), and p63 and CK5 (right panel). Nuclei stained with DAPI (blue). All scale bars represent 20 µm (D). mRNA expression of airway epithelial markers (ciliated cells: FOXJ1, CCDC40; goblet cells: MUC5AC; club cells: CCSP; basal cells: P63, CK5, NGFR; lung progenitor cells: NKX2.1) in hiPSC-derived ALI cultures at day 26–32 after airlift (means ± SD, n = 3–7 independent experiments) (E). Transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) measurements of different hiPSC-derived ALI cultures at day 26–29 after airlift. Each point represents an individual insert (means ± SD, n = 3–4 independent differentiations) (F).
Figure 1. PCD-specific hiPSC lines can be efficiently differentiated towards ciliated respiratory epithelium. Schematic depiction of the stepwise differentiation protocol for generating respiratory airway epithelium from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs). The scheme was generated with Biorender.com (A). Differentiation efficiencies of definitive endoderm (DE) induction measured by flow cytometry staining of CXCR4, cKIT, and EpCAM (means ± SD, n = 3–23 independent experiments) (B). The proportion of NKX2.1 positive cells at day 14 of differentiation before (unsorted) and immediately after MACS (CPMpos sorted) (means ± SD, n = 3–19 independent experiments), **** p < 0.0001, ns, significance (C). Immunofluorescence staining of paraffin-embedded ALI culture cross-sections of indicated cell lines at day 28 after airlift. Immunolabeling with acetylated tubulin (AcTub) and MUC5AC (left panel), AcTub and CCSP (middle panel), and p63 and CK5 (right panel). Nuclei stained with DAPI (blue). All scale bars represent 20 µm (D). mRNA expression of airway epithelial markers (ciliated cells: FOXJ1, CCDC40; goblet cells: MUC5AC; club cells: CCSP; basal cells: P63, CK5, NGFR; lung progenitor cells: NKX2.1) in hiPSC-derived ALI cultures at day 26–32 after airlift (means ± SD, n = 3–7 independent experiments) (E). Transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) measurements of different hiPSC-derived ALI cultures at day 26–29 after airlift. Each point represents an individual insert (means ± SD, n = 3–4 independent differentiations) (F).
Cells 12 01467 g001
Figure 2. PCD-specific hiPSC-derived epithelial cells show a lack of ciliary protein expression of DNAH5 and NME5. Immunofluorescence staining of DNAH5, NME5 (magenta) and AcTub (green) of dissociated primary cell-derived (pALI) and hiPSC-derived ALI cultures (iALI) (day 26–31 after airlift) from different cell lines as indicated. Nuclei stained with DAPI (blue); scale bars represent 20 µm (AJ).
Figure 2. PCD-specific hiPSC-derived epithelial cells show a lack of ciliary protein expression of DNAH5 and NME5. Immunofluorescence staining of DNAH5, NME5 (magenta) and AcTub (green) of dissociated primary cell-derived (pALI) and hiPSC-derived ALI cultures (iALI) (day 26–31 after airlift) from different cell lines as indicated. Nuclei stained with DAPI (blue); scale bars represent 20 µm (AJ).
Cells 12 01467 g002
Figure 3. Ultrastructural defects in PCD hiPSC-derived ciliated epithelial cells can be detected by TEM. Representative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of cilia cross-sections from non-PCD and NME5mut iALI-derived ciliated cells (A). Quantitative analysis of the distribution of the most apparent axoneme patterns in non-PCD iALI and NME5mut iALI axonemes (B). TEM image of non-PCD and DNAH5mut Cl. 24 iALI cilia axoneme. Averaging of outer microtubule doublets (middle image) and generation of a color contour map of electron density (right image) was performed with PCD Detect software. Red dotted line presence (non-PCD) or absence (DNAH5mut) of outer dynein arms (C).
Figure 3. Ultrastructural defects in PCD hiPSC-derived ciliated epithelial cells can be detected by TEM. Representative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of cilia cross-sections from non-PCD and NME5mut iALI-derived ciliated cells (A). Quantitative analysis of the distribution of the most apparent axoneme patterns in non-PCD iALI and NME5mut iALI axonemes (B). TEM image of non-PCD and DNAH5mut Cl. 24 iALI cilia axoneme. Averaging of outer microtubule doublets (middle image) and generation of a color contour map of electron density (right image) was performed with PCD Detect software. Red dotted line presence (non-PCD) or absence (DNAH5mut) of outer dynein arms (C).
Cells 12 01467 g003
Figure 4. Ciliary beating frequencies are altered in PCD hiPSC-derived epithelial cells. Representative top-view heatmaps of ciliary beat frequencies in non-PCD pALI and non-PCD iALI cultures, color-coded by ciliary beat frequency and overlaid onto a maximal projection of all movie frames. Scale bar: 50 µm. Associated kymographs for comparison. Scale bars kymographs: 1 µm in space, 0.25 s in time (A). Representative image of DNAH5mut and NME5mut suspension movies and corresponding kymographs. The yellow line indicates the position at which a kymograph was taken for CBF counting. Scale bar phase contrast images: 10 μm; Scale bars kymographs: 1 µm in space, 0.25 s in time (B). The median of ciliary beat frequencies in all 4 cultures. Black dots: median value per box (non-PCD pALI and iALI), median value per FOV (DNAH5mut, NME5mut); red dots: median value across FOVs for each experiment (different isolation, differentiation or clone); red bar: median of all experiments. **** p < 0.0001 (C).
Figure 4. Ciliary beating frequencies are altered in PCD hiPSC-derived epithelial cells. Representative top-view heatmaps of ciliary beat frequencies in non-PCD pALI and non-PCD iALI cultures, color-coded by ciliary beat frequency and overlaid onto a maximal projection of all movie frames. Scale bar: 50 µm. Associated kymographs for comparison. Scale bars kymographs: 1 µm in space, 0.25 s in time (A). Representative image of DNAH5mut and NME5mut suspension movies and corresponding kymographs. The yellow line indicates the position at which a kymograph was taken for CBF counting. Scale bar phase contrast images: 10 μm; Scale bars kymographs: 1 µm in space, 0.25 s in time (B). The median of ciliary beat frequencies in all 4 cultures. Black dots: median value per box (non-PCD pALI and iALI), median value per FOV (DNAH5mut, NME5mut); red dots: median value across FOVs for each experiment (different isolation, differentiation or clone); red bar: median of all experiments. **** p < 0.0001 (C).
Cells 12 01467 g004
Figure 5. PCD-specific hiPSC-derived ALI cultures show impaired mucociliary clearance. Representative plots of bead trajectories color-coded by instantaneous flow speed and overlaid onto the maximal projection of all movie frames. Scale bar: 200 µm (A). The relative fraction of the field of view (FOV) with detected MCC (B). The average speed of flow trajectories (C). Black dots: average value per FOV; red dots: median value across FOVs for each experiment (different isolation, differentiation, or clone); red bar: median of all experiments. ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001 (C).
Figure 5. PCD-specific hiPSC-derived ALI cultures show impaired mucociliary clearance. Representative plots of bead trajectories color-coded by instantaneous flow speed and overlaid onto the maximal projection of all movie frames. Scale bar: 200 µm (A). The relative fraction of the field of view (FOV) with detected MCC (B). The average speed of flow trajectories (C). Black dots: average value per FOV; red dots: median value across FOVs for each experiment (different isolation, differentiation, or clone); red bar: median of all experiments. ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001 (C).
Cells 12 01467 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

von Schledorn, L.; Puertollano Martín, D.; Cleve, N.; Zöllner, J.; Roth, D.; Staar, B.O.; Hegermann, J.; Ringshausen, F.C.; Nawroth, J.; Martin, U.; et al. Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia Patient-Specific hiPSC-Derived Airway Epithelium in Air-Liquid Interface Culture Recapitulates Disease Specific Phenotypes In Vitro. Cells 2023, 12, 1467. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12111467

AMA Style

von Schledorn L, Puertollano Martín D, Cleve N, Zöllner J, Roth D, Staar BO, Hegermann J, Ringshausen FC, Nawroth J, Martin U, et al. Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia Patient-Specific hiPSC-Derived Airway Epithelium in Air-Liquid Interface Culture Recapitulates Disease Specific Phenotypes In Vitro. Cells. 2023; 12(11):1467. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12111467

Chicago/Turabian Style

von Schledorn, Laura, David Puertollano Martín, Nicole Cleve, Janina Zöllner, Doris Roth, Ben Ole Staar, Jan Hegermann, Felix C. Ringshausen, Janna Nawroth, Ulrich Martin, and et al. 2023. "Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia Patient-Specific hiPSC-Derived Airway Epithelium in Air-Liquid Interface Culture Recapitulates Disease Specific Phenotypes In Vitro" Cells 12, no. 11: 1467. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12111467

APA Style

von Schledorn, L., Puertollano Martín, D., Cleve, N., Zöllner, J., Roth, D., Staar, B. O., Hegermann, J., Ringshausen, F. C., Nawroth, J., Martin, U., & Olmer, R. (2023). Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia Patient-Specific hiPSC-Derived Airway Epithelium in Air-Liquid Interface Culture Recapitulates Disease Specific Phenotypes In Vitro. Cells, 12(11), 1467. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12111467

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop