Next Article in Journal
Modeling of FAN1-Deficient Kidney Disease Using a Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Kidney Organoid System
Next Article in Special Issue
Targeting Striatal Glutamate and Phosphodiesterases to Control L-DOPA-Induced Dyskinesia
Previous Article in Journal
Differential Effects of Regulatory T Cells in the Meninges and Spinal Cord of Male and Female Mice with Neuropathic Pain
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exploring New Mechanism of Depression from the Effects of Virus on Nerve Cells
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Biochemical and Molecular Pathways in Neurodegenerative Diseases: An Integrated View

by
Nitesh Sanghai
1,* and
Geoffrey K. Tranmer
1,2
1
College of Pharmacy, Rady Faculty of Health Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0T5, Canada
2
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2023, 12(18), 2318; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12182318
Submission received: 21 July 2023 / Revised: 5 September 2023 / Accepted: 18 September 2023 / Published: 20 September 2023

Abstract

:
Neurodegenerative diseases (NDDs) like Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) are defined by a myriad of complex aetiologies. Understanding the common biochemical molecular pathologies among NDDs gives an opportunity to decipher the overlapping and numerous cross-talk mechanisms of neurodegeneration. Numerous interrelated pathways lead to the progression of neurodegeneration. We present evidence from the past pieces of literature for the most usual global convergent hallmarks like ageing, oxidative stress, excitotoxicity-induced calcium butterfly effect, defective proteostasis including chaperones, autophagy, mitophagy, and proteosome networks, and neuroinflammation. Herein, we applied a holistic approach to identify and represent the shared mechanism across NDDs. Further, we believe that this approach could be helpful in identifying key modulators across NDDs, with a particular focus on AD, PD, and ALS. Moreover, these concepts could be applied to the development and diagnosis of novel strategies for diverse NDDs.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Neurodegeneration causes progressive loss of non-regenerative neurons in the brain and spinal cord [1]. Various biochemical pathways are implicated in the progression of neurodegenerative diseases (NDDs) like Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) [2,3]. Several complex pathologies have been reported over the years with converging biochemical cascades in neuronal death [4]. The most important biochemical perils include firstly the perturbed redox pathway in neuronal cells due to hypermetallation [5,6,7,8], leading to redox dyshomeostasis (Figure 1) [9,10,11]. Secondly, the butterfly effect of calcium-related dysfunctions in neurons leads to the propagation of excitotoxicity and hence, incites multiple pathologies in the progression of neurodegeneration (Figure 2) [12,13,14,15]. Thirdly, the defective protein quality control pathways in neurodegeneration lead to the aggregation of misfolded proteins in NDDs (Figure 3) [16,17,18,19,20]. Lastly, recent evidence from various scientific communities suggests that neuroinflammation plays a crucial role in the onset and progression of several NDDs [21,22,23].
Above all, ageing [8,24,25,26], which is a physiological process of human life, is one of the determinants of neuronal vulnerability and in many cases leads to the probability of increasing NDDs. Herein, we will explore the various common or overlapping biochemical molecular mechanisms and indispensable cross-talks implicated in NDDs.

2. Biochemical Pathways Perturbed by Different Metal Ions and the Pathological Role of Free Radicals in NDDs

The human brain weighs merely ~1400 g; however, it consumes ~20% of the total basal oxygen (O2) budget to power its ~86 billion neurons and their highly complex synapses, fueled by adenosine triphosphate (ATP) formed in mitochondria. The O2 we breathe is a mutagenic gas, due to its diradical and triplet spin state, and is implicated in the formation of the precursors of all free radicals via superoxide anion radical (O2•−) [27]. The (O2•−) undergoes a chemical redox reaction to produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) or reactive nitrogen species (RNS) including non-radicals, free radicals, and anions, such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), hydroxyl radical (HO), and peroxynitrite (ONOO-), causing an imbalance in cellular homeostasis called oxidative stress (OS) (Figure 1). OS is largely implicated in the biochemical pathophysiology of NDDs like AD, PD, and ALS [9]. The most important factors leading to oxidative damage in neurodegeneration are inevitable ageing, the presence of redox transition metals, and excitotoxicity. Redox-active transition metals (RATM) in their reduced state (i.e., ferrous ion (Fe2+) and cuprous ion (Cu+) are enriched in the brain, and they take part in various chemical reactions, mainly with oxygen (O) and nitrogen (N) group of bio-molecules) [28]. Fe2+ is an essential RATM for myelin synthesis [29,30] and acts as a co-factor for essential de novo lipid synthesis enzymes [8]. Fe2+ regulates ferroptosis—a novel iron-dependent, non-apoptotic, and non-necrotic form of cell death due to (OS) caused by lipid peroxidation pathway, and is regarded as one of the potential causes for pathogenesis of various NDDs [31,32,33]. Like Fe2+, neurons contain a “labile” Cu+ pool [34]. Cu+ helps in neuronal excitability, due to the re-distribution of Cu+ from soma to dendrites. In addition, Cu+ is an essential co-factor for many enzymes like mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase (CcO) [35], which acts as an electron acceptor in the electron transport chain (ETC), thus producing energy, ATP [36]. Cu+ has a catalytic role in the function of the ubiquitous antioxidant copper-zinc superoxide dismutase 1 (CuZnSOD, or SOD1) enzyme. Further, the Cu+ chaperone for SOD1 (CCS), is crucial for Cu+ insertion and disulfide (-S-S-) bond formation [37]. CCS prevents the accumulation of misfolded mutant SOD1 and promotes zinc (Zn) binding, which has a structural role to play in the SOD1 function [38]. Recently, evidence has shown that Cu+ could block glutamate receptors [39,40].
Ageing is inevitable and is regarded as one of the primary risk factors for the degeneration of post-mitotic neuronal cells in the CNS [25,41]. One of the most important causes of selective neuronal vulnerability (SNV) during ageing is due to the increase in metals, like Cu+ and Fe2+. These RATM are known to cause neuronal death due to an increase in ROS and hypermetallation in misfolded toxic aggregates of proteins (Aβ in AD and α-synuclein in PD) during the process of ageing [42,43,44]. However, SOD1 aggregation in the case of familial ALS (fALS) is due to aberrant post-translational modifications (PTMs) [45] instigated by demetallation leading to loss of Cu+, whereas Fe2+ was shown to be increased in ALS pathology [46]. These abnormal toxic proteins (Aβ) in AD [44], α-synuclein in PD [47,48], and SOD1 in ALS [46], abnormally present Fe2+ and Cu+ ligands for inappropriate chemical reactions with H2O2 called Fenton and Haber–Weiss reactions, respectively (Figure 1) [9]. Both these chemical redox reactions produce nature’s most vulnerable hydroxyl radical (HO), which accelerates the process of misfolding and hence, the formation of toxic aggregates leading to neuronal death. Several studies over the past three decades have decoded the toxic role of H2O2 in the pathogenesis of NDDs [49]. H2O2 can display both Jekyll and Hyde behavior as a stable ‘diffusible’ non-ionized oxidant in living cells. It acts as a double-edged sword molecule, depending upon the physiological concentration. Lower concentration, called physiological concentration in the range of (1–10 nM), acts as a redox cell signaling molecule in various biochemical cellular processes, creating oxidative eustress. Higher (or pathological) concentration of H2O2 of around (>100 nM) is known to cause damaging effects on cellular biomolecules; this effect is called oxidative distress and acts as a bio-precursor for generating toxic oxidant (HO) radicals. These radicals can act as a determinant to trigger the biochemical conformational trajectories via changing the cellular redox thiol (SH) status of several proteins leading to misfolding and toxic proteinopathies in NDDs like amyloid β in AD [50,51], α-synuclein in PD [52,53] and SOD1 [54,55,56], and TDP-43 in case of ALS [54,57,58].
Mounting evidence has shown the presence of OS biomarkers [59,60,61] in NDDs [62,63,64,65] due to the damaging effect of (HO) radicals. Elevated 4-hydroxynonenal (HNE) levels have been observed in AD [66] and PD [67] brain tissue, whereas increased HNE has been observed in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of ALS patients [68]. Thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARs) have been observed in AD [69], PD [70], and ALS [71]. The oxidative lipids acrolein and HNE induce toxicity by crosslinking to cystine, lysine, and histidine residues via a Michael addition [9]. Recent evidence has shown the generation of (HO) by a Fenton-like reaction involving Fe+2 with histidine complex in the case of AD [72]. Further, oxidation of selected histidine residues, such as 2-oxohistidine, binds metals in the active site and can mediate SOD1 aggregation in ALS [73]. In the case of PD, the dopaminergic neurons containing dopamine neurotransmitters undergo Fenton-like reactions to produce oxidative metabolites, like dopamine quinones and (HO), and cause neurotoxicity [74]. 8-hydroxyguanosine (8-OHG) and 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) are observed as biomarkers for nucleic acid deoxyribonucleic acid/ribonucleic acid (DNA/RNA) oxidation in the brains of AD [75], PD [76], and ALS [77] patients. Further, protein carbonylation as a result of protein oxidation is found in AD [78], PD [79], and ALS [80], (Figure 1). On the other hand, the brain uses neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate NAD(P)H oxidase (NOX) biochemistry, forming peroxynitrite anion (ONOO) for cell signaling. However, during redox dyshomeostasis of neurological disorders like AD [81], PD [82], and ALS [83], high levels of ONOO forms 3-nitrotyrosine (3-NO2Tyr), which act as a versatile biomarker of nitrosative stress (Figure 1) [84,85].
Another metal, Zinc ion (Zn+2), is a well-known redox-inert metal and helps in neurogenesis, neuromodulation, and axonal and synaptic transmission [86]. Zn+2 is found in the ubiquitous antioxidant enzyme SOD1, where it maintains the structural integrity of the enzyme and inhibits Fenton’s chemistry via inhibition of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase (NADPH-Oxidase) [87,88]. The expression levels of the Zn+2 transporter are altered abnormally during AD; more importantly, ZnT3 levels were further decreased in the AD cortex. Thus, synaptic zinc release may be decreased in AD [89]. Further, Zn deficiency leads to the accumulation of α-synuclein, leading to toxicity in PD [90,91]. Recent studies have shown that Zn loss due to demetallation during abnormal PTMs leads to misfolding and gain of toxic function in the pathology of ALS [57,92,93,94].
These reports from the various scientific literature over the years have shown the critical importance of redox balance in the CNS. Further, various metal ions and bio-reactive free radicals mentioned above act as a common determinant in changing the redox signaling, thus initiating pathological processes in the degeneration of neurons in the case of AD, PD, and ALS. Moreover, these metals and OS biomarkers serve as a common hallmark of neurodegeneration across all NDDs.
Figure 1. Schematic presentation of various biochemical cross-talks and their detrimental manifestations (AI) in the brain provoked by oxidative stress and their implications in the progress of neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Brain is highly vulnerable to oxidative stress due to low regenerative capacity, enrichment of polyunsaturated fatty acids, high dependency on mitochondria for adenosine triphosphate (ATP) generation, elevated glucose demand, high concentration of metals like ferrous ion (Fe+2), cuprous ion (Cu+), zinc ion (Zn+2) and calcium ion (Ca+2), glutamate-induced excitotoxicity, high oxygen (O2) consumption, and relatively low antioxidant system. These multiple factors initiate various reaction pathways to create redox disbalance called oxidative and nitrosative stress in the brain, implicated in various NDDs. (A). The triplet unstable O2 undergoes reduction to produce the precursor of all radicals called superoxide anion radical (O2•−) via NAD(P)H oxidases (NOXs) pathway, i.e., one-electron trans-membrane transfer to (O2) [95]. (B). Antioxidant superoxide dismutase (SOD1) undergoes dismutation to scavenge (O2•−) to produce hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). (C). The weakly liganded (Fe+2) and (Cu+) undergo reduction to produce nature’s most vulnerable oxidant hydroxyl radical (HO) through Fenton’s reaction and Haber-Weiss reaction. (D). The final 4th electron reduction of H2O2 in the presence of antioxidants, like glutathione peroxidase (Gpx), catalase (cat), and peroxiredoxin system (Prx), forms water (H2O). (E). Overactivation of neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) produces nitric oxide (NO) radicals from L-arginine, which create nitrosative stress by modification of thiol group (SH) containing proteins. (F). Excessive superoxide anion radicals lead to inactivation of nitric oxide production and switch the biology to production of highly potent oxidant peroxynitrite anion (ONOO), which leads to the nitrosative stress by (SH) modification of free tyrosine (Tyr) residues to form 3-nitrotyrosine (3-NO2Tyr) (G), which act as a versatile biomarker of nitrosative stress and NDDs. (H). Highly reactive and mutagenic oxidant (HO) damages the nucleic acid deoxyribonucleic acid/ribonucleic acid (DNA/RNA) to form oxidative products 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine(8-OHdG) and (8-OxoG), and acts as a universal biomarker for oxidative stress and NDDs (important to note that guanine is the most oxidation prone nucleobase because of low reduction potential [96]). Further, HO radical causes lipid peroxidation of lipid-rich neuronal membranes, resulting in the death of neurons. Lipid peroxides (ROO.) act as a biomarker of oxidative stress and NDDs. Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 19 September 2023).
Figure 1. Schematic presentation of various biochemical cross-talks and their detrimental manifestations (AI) in the brain provoked by oxidative stress and their implications in the progress of neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Brain is highly vulnerable to oxidative stress due to low regenerative capacity, enrichment of polyunsaturated fatty acids, high dependency on mitochondria for adenosine triphosphate (ATP) generation, elevated glucose demand, high concentration of metals like ferrous ion (Fe+2), cuprous ion (Cu+), zinc ion (Zn+2) and calcium ion (Ca+2), glutamate-induced excitotoxicity, high oxygen (O2) consumption, and relatively low antioxidant system. These multiple factors initiate various reaction pathways to create redox disbalance called oxidative and nitrosative stress in the brain, implicated in various NDDs. (A). The triplet unstable O2 undergoes reduction to produce the precursor of all radicals called superoxide anion radical (O2•−) via NAD(P)H oxidases (NOXs) pathway, i.e., one-electron trans-membrane transfer to (O2) [95]. (B). Antioxidant superoxide dismutase (SOD1) undergoes dismutation to scavenge (O2•−) to produce hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). (C). The weakly liganded (Fe+2) and (Cu+) undergo reduction to produce nature’s most vulnerable oxidant hydroxyl radical (HO) through Fenton’s reaction and Haber-Weiss reaction. (D). The final 4th electron reduction of H2O2 in the presence of antioxidants, like glutathione peroxidase (Gpx), catalase (cat), and peroxiredoxin system (Prx), forms water (H2O). (E). Overactivation of neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) produces nitric oxide (NO) radicals from L-arginine, which create nitrosative stress by modification of thiol group (SH) containing proteins. (F). Excessive superoxide anion radicals lead to inactivation of nitric oxide production and switch the biology to production of highly potent oxidant peroxynitrite anion (ONOO), which leads to the nitrosative stress by (SH) modification of free tyrosine (Tyr) residues to form 3-nitrotyrosine (3-NO2Tyr) (G), which act as a versatile biomarker of nitrosative stress and NDDs. (H). Highly reactive and mutagenic oxidant (HO) damages the nucleic acid deoxyribonucleic acid/ribonucleic acid (DNA/RNA) to form oxidative products 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine(8-OHdG) and (8-OxoG), and acts as a universal biomarker for oxidative stress and NDDs (important to note that guanine is the most oxidation prone nucleobase because of low reduction potential [96]). Further, HO radical causes lipid peroxidation of lipid-rich neuronal membranes, resulting in the death of neurons. Lipid peroxides (ROO.) act as a biomarker of oxidative stress and NDDs. Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 19 September 2023).
Cells 12 02318 g001

3. Biochemical Pathways and Cross-Talk between Excitotoxicity, Calcium ion (Ca+2), Fe+2, and Zn+2 in NDDs

The glutamatergic system is essential for brain functioning, with 40% of glutamatergic synapses located in the central nervous system [97,98]. Seminal work by John Olney provided the first evidence of the neurotoxic properties of the excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate. Since then, glutamate-driven neuronal death has been linked to several NDDs, like AD [99], PD [100], and ALS [101]. The biochemical mechanism that incites excitotoxicity involves alterations of glutamate receptors, mainly N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptors (NMDAR), highly permeable to (Ca+2) and sodium ion (Na+) [12]. The exacerbated or prolonged activation of glutamate receptors starts a cascade of biochemical molecular pathways, which includes cationic influx, mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and overproduction of ROS [102]. Mounting evidence has shown the role of calcium ions (Ca2+) to be critical in the biochemical pathways of NDDs, involving excitotoxic neurotransmitter glutamate, Zn+2 [103] and Fe+2 [104], and the cascade called neurotoxic excitotoxicity cascade (Figure 2) [103,105]. Glutamate homeostasis in the synaptic cleft is maintained by astrocytes and further, they are involved in 90% of glutamate clearance; during an acute insult, astrocytes can impede excitotoxicity by eliminating extracellular glutamate with high-affinity sodium-dependent glutamate transporters, also known as excitatory amino acid transporters (EAAT) [106,107,108]. Glutamate-induced excitotoxicity may be encouraged through an astrocyte-mediated downregulation of excitatory amino acid transporter 2 (EAAT2). In addition, astrocytes can also modulate the susceptibility of motor neurons to excitotoxic insults by regulating the influx of calcium through alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid (AMPA) receptors [109]. Astrocytes act as gatekeepers for the maintenance of glutamate homeostasis by supporting its biosynthesis, uptake, and release via the glutamate-glutamine cycle [110,111]. Furthermore, astrocytes are responsible for the synthesis of lactate, which is taken by neurons for energy production via the citric acid cycle because of the absence of the essential enzyme pyruvate carboxylase [112,113,114]. Moreover, astrocytes are the main source of D-serine, essential for NMDAR function [115]. Therefore, growing evidence has demonstrated the biochemical role of excitotoxicity induced by astrocytic dysregulation in AD [99,116,117], PD [100,118,119], and ALS [109,120,121] (Figure 2). Further, the vicious cycle induced by glutamate-induced excitotoxicity and its disruption of (Ca+2) homeostasis thus accelerates oxidative and nitrosative stress in mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and hence, forms a quartet to initiate degeneration of neurons in NDDs [122,123]. This quartet leads to proteinopathies like SOD1 [124,125,126] and TDP-43 [127,128] in the case of ALS, β-amyloid protein in the case of AD [129,130,131,132], and α-synuclein in the case of PD [133,134].
The above-mentioned scientific evidence from various works of literature has concluded the cross-link between excitotoxicity, Ca+2, Fe+2, and Zn+2 across NDDs. The increased glutamate acts as a first pathological signaling in instigating a myriad of overlapped pathological cascades in various NDDs. Further, the excitotoxic degeneration of neurons is due to the Ca+2, which acts as an indisputable signaling metal exerting the butterfly effect. Hence, it serves as an impetus for initiating a cascade of pathological neurodegenerative processes in association with Fe+2 and Zn+2 in case of AD, PD, and ALS. In addition, these biochemical signatures could act as a therapeutic target in halting the progression of NDDs.
Figure 2. Schematic presentation of various biochemical cross-talks, involving calcium ion (Ca+2), ferrous ion (Fe+2), and Zinc ion (Zn+2) implicated in the progress of neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). (A). Excitotoxicity (neuronal death) is triggered by the excessive release of excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate (neurotoxic) from the presynaptic neuron and leads to activation of various biochemical cascades leading to neurotoxicity and hence, neuronal death. This process is initiated by the activation of the N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptors (NMDAR) by excessive glutamate at postsynaptic neurons and thereby the release and accumulation of toxic intraneuronal Ca2+. (B). Glutamate-mediated excitotoxicity is increased because of the astrocyte-mediated downregulation of excitatory amino acid transporters 2 (EAAT2), which slows down the uptake of glutamate from the synaptic cleft and incites the excitotoxicity cascade. (C). Ca2+ overload initiates most of the deleterious downstream mechanisms of the cascade, through increasing Ca2+ overload in mitochondria, induction of proteases (calpains and caspases), decreasing the proton gradient (ΔpH), mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm) and adenosine triphosphate (ATP), activation of phospholipase A2 (PLA2) pathway initiating downstream activation of arachidonic acid and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), aggravation of mitochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum stress leading to superoxide dismutase (SOD1) and TAR DNA-binding protein (TDP-43) aggregation. (D). Surge of reactive oxygen species (ROS) like hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and hydroxyl radical (HO) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) like nitric oxide (NO) radical, formation of peroxynitrite anion (ONOO) increases the intraneuronal Zn2+ mobilization, which targets mitochondria and further exacerbates Ca2+ dysregulation and ROS production. (E). Ca+2 and Fe+2 dysregulation participates in the ferroptosis death of neurons. Iron dysregulation leads to Ca2+ dysregulation and vice versa. Excessive glutamate increases the Fe+2 intake inside the neurons, thereby leading to excitotoxicity and lipid peroxidation via Fenton’s reaction called Ferroptosis. Created with BioRender.com.
Figure 2. Schematic presentation of various biochemical cross-talks, involving calcium ion (Ca+2), ferrous ion (Fe+2), and Zinc ion (Zn+2) implicated in the progress of neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). (A). Excitotoxicity (neuronal death) is triggered by the excessive release of excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate (neurotoxic) from the presynaptic neuron and leads to activation of various biochemical cascades leading to neurotoxicity and hence, neuronal death. This process is initiated by the activation of the N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptors (NMDAR) by excessive glutamate at postsynaptic neurons and thereby the release and accumulation of toxic intraneuronal Ca2+. (B). Glutamate-mediated excitotoxicity is increased because of the astrocyte-mediated downregulation of excitatory amino acid transporters 2 (EAAT2), which slows down the uptake of glutamate from the synaptic cleft and incites the excitotoxicity cascade. (C). Ca2+ overload initiates most of the deleterious downstream mechanisms of the cascade, through increasing Ca2+ overload in mitochondria, induction of proteases (calpains and caspases), decreasing the proton gradient (ΔpH), mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm) and adenosine triphosphate (ATP), activation of phospholipase A2 (PLA2) pathway initiating downstream activation of arachidonic acid and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), aggravation of mitochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum stress leading to superoxide dismutase (SOD1) and TAR DNA-binding protein (TDP-43) aggregation. (D). Surge of reactive oxygen species (ROS) like hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and hydroxyl radical (HO) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) like nitric oxide (NO) radical, formation of peroxynitrite anion (ONOO) increases the intraneuronal Zn2+ mobilization, which targets mitochondria and further exacerbates Ca2+ dysregulation and ROS production. (E). Ca+2 and Fe+2 dysregulation participates in the ferroptosis death of neurons. Iron dysregulation leads to Ca2+ dysregulation and vice versa. Excessive glutamate increases the Fe+2 intake inside the neurons, thereby leading to excitotoxicity and lipid peroxidation via Fenton’s reaction called Ferroptosis. Created with BioRender.com.
Cells 12 02318 g002

4. Biochemical Pathways Involving Protein Homeostasis, Autophagy, Mitochondrial Homeostasis, Axonal Transport, Protein Seeding, and Propagation and Their Implication in the Pathophysiology of NDDs

Recent evidence from a large number of groups has shown that there are common cellular and pathological mechanisms among numerous NDDs, which include converging biochemical mechanisms, such as defective protein quality-control and degradation pathways, dysfunctional mitochondrial homeostasis, stress granules, and abnormal innate immune responses. Despite their common biochemical pathways, they show loss of specific neurons and synapses in distinct brain regions [4]. One of the most common hallmarks is the aggregation of cytosolic and nuclear proteins due to dysfunction in protein homeostasis (called proteostasis), which causes neurodegeneration [16,135,136,137,138]. During the course of these proteinopathies, beta-amyloid (Aβ) aggregates in AD, inclusions of hyperphosphorylated microtubule-binding tau in AD and other tauopathies, aggregates of α-synuclein in PD and other synucleinopathies, and inclusions of TAR DNA-binding protein (TDP)-43 in case of ALS occur. Moreover, some toxic aggregates seed and spread from one region to another, consistent with the progressive nature of NDDs [4,139]. However, not all aspects of NDDs are the same because of the uniqueness in the genetic mutations in gene loci. Unlike other cells, neurons are post-mitotic cells, and they cannot divide and face several challenges in terms of continuous demand for energy production, maintenance of protein and organelle quality control, rapid delivery of molecules within and out of cells, and trafficking of organelles and other factors over considerable distances within the cell. Compromised pathways responsible for these functions can lead to NDDs.
Proteins must fold into well-defined 3D structures and need to remain folded and undergo quality control throughout their lifetimes to perform their biological functions. The state of balanced proteome homeostasis is called proteostasis and is governed by an extensive network of molecular chaperones, proteolytic systems, and their regulators, comprising ~2000 proteins in human cells [138]. One of the most essential parts of proteostasis is the presence of chaperones, which, with the help of ATPs, maintains proper protein folding and conformational maintenance without being part of its final structure and cooperate with the degradation machinery [16]. They are classified into small heat shock proteins (sHSPs). In mammals, Hsp90 helps in folding and conformational regulations. The Hsp70 major chaperone family is required for aggregation prevention, folding, and conformational maintenance, and it also cooperates with Hsp40 in the protein disaggregation or protein turnover of NDD proteins through the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) (Figure 3) [4]. Autophagy (macroautophagy) is a catabolic process and is the cellular way of cleaning out damaged cells to regenerate newer and healthier cells. It is one of the most pivotal systems, and without it, the nervous system cannot function well [140]. Also, the activation of this self-destruction pathway is controlled by complex signaling mechanisms, which could be globally classified as mammalian targets of rapamycin (mTOR)-dependent or -independent pathways. mTOR modulates autophagy by suppressing the autophagic induction pathways [141], mainly via modulating the ULK1 ubiquitylation [142]. Autophagy is the regulator of misfolded aggregate-prone defective and toxic proteins that cause NDDs; for instance, mutant α-synuclein in PD [143], mutant TDP-43 in ALS [144], and Aβ in AD [145]. Abnormal degradation pathways due to defective autophagy could also lead to cell-to-cell propagation of toxic aggregates in the adjacent neurons in the central nervous system (CNS), causing the progression of AD [145,146], PD [147,148,149], and ALS [150,151,152] (Figure 3). The clearance of such substrates is retarded when autophagy is compromised, and clearance is induced when autophagy is stimulated. An autophagic receptor/adaptor like p62 is involved in the aggregation of Aβ, tau in the case of AD [153], α-synuclein in the case of PD [154], TDP-43 [155], and SOD1 in the case of ALS [156]; whereas optineurin (OPTN) is involved in the aggregation of tau in the case of AD and SOD1 and TDP-43 in the case of ALS. The autophagy gene BECN1, encoding the mammalian orthologue of the yeast Atg6 (Beclin-1), has reduced messenger RNA (mRNA) levels in AD brain tissue [157]. Further, mutations in the ALS-causing gene DCTN1 lead to impaired dynein/dynactin motor protein function, causing defects in the transport of autophagosomes, inducing axonopathy [158], and hence, motor neuron degeneration [159,160,161]. Moreover, the depletion of dynein/dynactin motor protein leads to neuromuscular synapse instability and functional abnormalities in both sporadic (sALS) and fALS [160,162,163] (Figure 3).
A significant topic implicated in the pathogenesis of NDDs is defective mitophagy [164,165,166,167,168]. It is defined as the selective autophagy or turnover of mitochondria. It is important for cells to maintain mitochondrial quality control through mitophagy and mitochondrial dynamics (fission and fusion). A progressive reduction in Parkin expression was observed in both AD patient brains as well as mutant human amyloid precursor protein transgenic mice (hAPP Tg) mouse models, suggesting an impairment in the effective activation of Parkin-mediated mitophagy during disease progression [79]. Further, levels of mitophagy-related proteins such as BCL2-like 13 (apoptosis facilitator) (Bcl2L13) and PTEN-induced kinase 1 (PINK1) downregulated in the hippocampal area of AD patient brains, in induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) derived cortical neuronal cultures generated from AD patients, indicative of a defective mitophagy pathway [169]. In the case of PD, mutations in PINK1 and Parkin, which are the predominant proteins involved in mitophagy, were shown to contribute to the early onset of autosomal recessive PD [170,171]. Moreover, in the case of ALS levels of mitophagy, proteins like Parkin, PINK1, Bcl-2 interacting protein 3 (BNIP3), and p62 were also found to be reduced in SOD1G93A mice [172]. In addition, studies in TDP-43Q331K transgenic mice revealed dysregulations of Parkin and PINK1 mitophagic pathways in TDP-43 proteinopathy [173].
Together, these findings highlight the impairment of the mitophagy pathway contributing to the pathophysiology of NDDs (Figure 3). Further, rising evidence has shown the dysfunction of axonal transport (anterograde and retrograde) in the case of NDDs, such as in AD [174,175,176,177], PD [177,178,179], and ALS [180,181,182,183] (Figure 3). The cytoskeleton of large projection neurons might be particularly prone to dysfunction, as suggested by the biochemical pathways of aggregation and displacement of axonal neurofilaments (Nf) proteins and the microtubule-associated protein tau, observed in motor neurons in ALS and pyramidal neurons in AD [184]. Moreover, axonopathy in cases of neurodegeneration, like AD [185,186], PD [187,188], and ALS [189,190], causes the release of phosphorylated neurofilament (pNf) into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and subsequently into the blood. Thus, increased neurofilament light chain (NfL) in biofluids acts as a potential biomarker in NDDs like AD, PD, and ALS. Specifically, in the case of AD levels of NfL [186,191,192], NfL during the progression of PD [193,194], and in the case of ALS, NfL and phosphorylated neurofilament heavy chain (pNFH) [190,195,196] reflect global neuronal axonal injury and, therefore, act as a prognostic biomarker for diagnosis of AD, PD, and ALS (Figure 3).
As described here, abnormal proteostasis, including (chaperones, autophagy, mitophagy, and proteosome) networks, acts as a decisive characteristic feature of neuronal death in the case of AD, PD, and ALS. Further, the increase in the propensity of progression of these NDDs is directly proportional to the defective PQC, leading to neurotoxic aggregation of proteins in NDDs. Moreover, specific genome instability leads to proteinopathies in a concerted fashion across various neurodegenerations. Thus, understanding and driving deep into the protein homeostasis pathways could give us an understanding of deciphering the therapeutic target across NDDs. The new approach could be identifying the defective protein signatures across various NDDs by utilizing global proteomics technique.
Figure 3. Schematic presentation of various common neuronal biochemical pathways perturbed or compromised in multiple neurodegenerative diseases, such as AD, PD, and ALS. The key points in the pathway and the selected disease-associated proteins are demonstrated in this picture. 1. Protein Quality Control (PQC) proteostasis network: molecular chaperones, including heat shock proteins (Hsp90, Hsp70, and Hsp40), regulate protein folding and maturation. Ubiquitin-proteosome system (UPS) is a crucial protein degradation pathway and is important for PQC and homeostasis. Any defect in the PQC leads to neurodegeneration (AD, PD, ALS). Decline of proteostasis is the hallmark of ageing and it decreases with age, leading to the accumulation of toxic and non-functional aggregates. 2. Autophagy-Lysosome Pathway (a,b,c,d,e.): Perturbations throughout the pathway, from initiation of autophagosome formation to degradation in the autolysosomes, have been suggested to be involved in neurodegenerative diseases like AD, PD, and ALS and further, could build an accumulation of pathogenic and toxic protein aggregates and defective mitochondria. a. Autophagy initiation defects due to decreased expression of protein Beclin1 in case of AD. b. Loss of sequestration into autophagosomes due to mutations in the gene-encoding p62/optineurin in the case of ALS, and mitophagy defects due to mutations in the gene-encoding protein PINK1/Parkin in the case of PD c. Defects in the maturation of autophagosome are due to decreasing expression of PICLAM protein in the case of AD, whereas mutation in SIGMAR1 gene in the case of ALS. c. Defects in vesicle trafficking (lysosome to membrane) are due to the mutations in the gene-encoding protein dynactin/profilin in case of ALS. 3. Dysregulation of mitochondrial quality control (MQC): including a (mitochondrial damage), b (mitochondrial fusion and fission dynamics), c (selective autophagy of mitochondria called mitophagy) results in decreased ATP production and dysfunctional proteostasis network. 4. Axonal transport defects in AD, PD, and ALS and underlying mechanisms: Defective axonal transport is due to perturbed anterograde and retrograde transport mechanisms involving mitochondrial kinesin and endosomal transport protein dynein. Further, disrupted neurofilament (NF) in forms of phosphorylated NF in the case of AD, PD, and ALS and microtubules (including α-Tubulin and β-Tubulin) are involved in the impairment of transport across neurons. 5. Protein Seeding and Propagation: Dysfunction of Intracellular propagation and seeding of toxic protein aggregates involved in the disease progression in case of AD, PD, and ALS. Created with BioRender.com.
Figure 3. Schematic presentation of various common neuronal biochemical pathways perturbed or compromised in multiple neurodegenerative diseases, such as AD, PD, and ALS. The key points in the pathway and the selected disease-associated proteins are demonstrated in this picture. 1. Protein Quality Control (PQC) proteostasis network: molecular chaperones, including heat shock proteins (Hsp90, Hsp70, and Hsp40), regulate protein folding and maturation. Ubiquitin-proteosome system (UPS) is a crucial protein degradation pathway and is important for PQC and homeostasis. Any defect in the PQC leads to neurodegeneration (AD, PD, ALS). Decline of proteostasis is the hallmark of ageing and it decreases with age, leading to the accumulation of toxic and non-functional aggregates. 2. Autophagy-Lysosome Pathway (a,b,c,d,e.): Perturbations throughout the pathway, from initiation of autophagosome formation to degradation in the autolysosomes, have been suggested to be involved in neurodegenerative diseases like AD, PD, and ALS and further, could build an accumulation of pathogenic and toxic protein aggregates and defective mitochondria. a. Autophagy initiation defects due to decreased expression of protein Beclin1 in case of AD. b. Loss of sequestration into autophagosomes due to mutations in the gene-encoding p62/optineurin in the case of ALS, and mitophagy defects due to mutations in the gene-encoding protein PINK1/Parkin in the case of PD c. Defects in the maturation of autophagosome are due to decreasing expression of PICLAM protein in the case of AD, whereas mutation in SIGMAR1 gene in the case of ALS. c. Defects in vesicle trafficking (lysosome to membrane) are due to the mutations in the gene-encoding protein dynactin/profilin in case of ALS. 3. Dysregulation of mitochondrial quality control (MQC): including a (mitochondrial damage), b (mitochondrial fusion and fission dynamics), c (selective autophagy of mitochondria called mitophagy) results in decreased ATP production and dysfunctional proteostasis network. 4. Axonal transport defects in AD, PD, and ALS and underlying mechanisms: Defective axonal transport is due to perturbed anterograde and retrograde transport mechanisms involving mitochondrial kinesin and endosomal transport protein dynein. Further, disrupted neurofilament (NF) in forms of phosphorylated NF in the case of AD, PD, and ALS and microtubules (including α-Tubulin and β-Tubulin) are involved in the impairment of transport across neurons. 5. Protein Seeding and Propagation: Dysfunction of Intracellular propagation and seeding of toxic protein aggregates involved in the disease progression in case of AD, PD, and ALS. Created with BioRender.com.
Cells 12 02318 g003

5. Biochemical Pathways Altered in NDDs Due to Neuroinflammation

Neuroinflammation is a protective mechanism that initially protects the CNS from various pathogens and helps remove cellular waste and repair mechanisms [197]. However, extended periods of inflammation, which persist mainly due to changes in genetic makeup, neurotoxic protein aggregation, environmental pollution, infection, and exposure to drugs [198], could be detrimental and impair the regeneration of neuronal tissue in the CNS [199]. Microglia and astrocytes are the two main bio-inflammatory mediators associated with persistent neuroinflammation in the CNS [200]. Microglia are ubiquitously expressed immune cells in the CNS and are activated first in case of infections due to pathogens [201]. Microglia act as a mixed blessing depending upon the status of their stimulus. They could be pro-inflammatory or neuroprotective [202]. On the other hand, astrocytes are the indispensable glial cells in the brain and play an important role in maintaining CNS homeostasis [203]. Like that of microglia, astrocytes could be both pro-inflammatory and neuroprotective. The aggregation of neurotoxic proteins in NDDs, like amyloid-β (in case of AD) [204], tau (in case of AD) [204], α-synuclein (in case of PD), mSOD1 (in case of ALS), and TDP-43 (in case of ALS), initiates changes to induce both microglia and astrocytes to produce harmful pro-inflammatory pathological phenotypic biomarkers. The major pro-inflammatory biomarkers induced by both the glial cells implicated in the NDDs are interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), tumour necrosis factor (TNF-α), interleukin 6 (IL-6), and nitric oxide (NO) [202,205]. Eventually, the production of these pro-inflammatory mediators leads to the progression of NDDs. Recent studies have shown that bivalent (Ca) plays an indispensable role in maintaining CNS homeostasis and aberrant Ca+2 signaling in the CNS leads to NDDs. This is largely evidenced by the abnormal Ca+2 dysregulation in the microglial and astrocytic cells of CNS, thus initiating a cascade of neuroinflammatory progression of the disease, like in AD [206,207], PD [208,209], and ALS [210,211].
Recent studies and perspectives have shown that nuclear factor κB (NFκB) in the case of AD [212], PD [213], and ALS [214] induces both microglia [215,216] and astrocytes [217,218] to produce several pro-inflammatory mediators implicated in various NDDs [200,219]. Further, free radical-generating enzymes such as cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), NADPH oxidase, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), and lipoxygenase are also implicated in NF-κβ activation in the case of AD [212]. Survival of motor neurons with the decrease in misfolded SOD1 protein has been reported recently, with neuronal inhibition of NF-κB activity in the SOD1G93A ALS mice model [220]. Together, enormous studies have portrayed the new modulatory role of NF-κB in instigating inflammation in the brain tissues [212,221,222,223,224,225].
To recapitulate, neuroinflammation contributes to both the onset and progression of disease in various NDDs. Glial cells and various other pro-inflammatory mediators mentioned above mediate neuroinflammation and thus neurodegeneration. With recent evidence, neuroinflammation in CNS is a common emerging factor in the case of AD, PD, and ALS. Further, studies are needed to understand and explore the biochemical factors that induce neuroinflammation. One such mediator of inflammation in neurons is NF-κB, which is now known to have profound effects in encouraging the neuroinflammation pathways. Further, suppression of neuroinflammation could ameliorate the symptom onset and progression of NDDs. One therapeutic target could be the modulation of neuroinflammation through modulating the deleterious effects of NF-κB in the CNS.

6. Conclusions

The brain is an organ that harbors post-mitotic neuronal cells which have no capacity to regenerate. Scientific evidence suggests that the brain is vulnerable to numerous insults due to ageing, oxidative stress, high metal content, poor quality control of organelles, dysfunctional proteostasis, excitotoxicity, defective axonal transport, and neuroinflammation. These complex cascades of biochemical pathways provoke the degeneration of neurons in the case of AD, PD, and ALS, together called NDDs. The pathophysiology of each NDD shares a common pathway with convergent cross-talks among various molecular mechanisms, because of common genotype-phenotype relationships among various NDDs.
A better understanding of these crucial biochemical pathological hallmarks across various NDDs like AD, PD, and ALS is crucial to finding therapeutic agents that could create hope in patients by slowing down the progression of NDDs. Various approaches could be used to slow down the progression of NDDs. Firstly, targeting a single etiological factor; however, due to multifactorial pathologies underlying NDDs, it would be difficult to alleviate the progression, targeting only one risk factor. Secondly, a comprehensive approach to target multiple etiological factors through a multitarget approach. We believe that targeting multiple aetiologies responsible for the disease could help slow and tackle the devastating and complex biochemical neurodegenerative cascade in the case of AD, PD, and ALS. Therefore, it is essential to understand various pivotal and common potential biochemical perils of cross-talks among various NDDs, which could be helpful in finding effective cocktail treatments for NDDs. Considering the complex and multifactorial nature of the NDDs, we further advocate designing novel molecules, with multi-targeted directed ligands having different pharmacophores, which could interact with different biomolecular targets or pathologies.

Author Contributions

N.S. and G.K.T. were involved in developing the notion for this manuscript. N.S. was involved in the literature survey, writing, and original draft preparation of the manuscript. G.K.T. supervised the writing, reviewing, and editing of the manuscript. N.S. was involved in referencing and making all the figures in the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Research Manitoba 2017 Health Research New Investigator Operating Grant, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant, and Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Bridge grant to G.K.T.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

NDDs: Neurodegenerative diseases; ALS: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; AD: Alzeimer’s disease; PD: Parkinson’s disease; ATP: Adenosine triphosphate; Cu/Zn SOD, SOD1: Copper/zinc superoxide dismutase; OS: Oxidative stress; RATM: Redox active transition metals; Fe+2: Ferrous ion; Cu+: Cuprous ion; (O): Oxygen; (N): Nitrogen; CCS: Chaperone for SOD1; CcO: Cytochrome c oxidase; (-S-S-): Disulphide bond; Zn: Zinc; TBARS: Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances; HNE: 4-Hydroxynonenal; 8-OHG: 8-hydroxyguanosine; 8-OHdG: 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine; DNA/RNA: Deoxyribonucleic acid/Ribonucleic acid; NOXs: NAD(P)H oxidases; (ONOO): Peroxynitrite; 3-NO2Tyr: 3-nitrotyrosine; (-OOH): Hydroperoxide; (ROO.): Lipid peroxides; (NO): Nitric oxide radical (Zn+2): Zinc ion; (Ca2+): Calcium ions; EAAT: Excitatory amino acid transporters;EAAT2: Excitatory amino acid transporter 2; AMPA: Alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid; ER: Endoplasmic reticulum;(NMDAR): N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptors; ΔpH: Proton gradient; PLA2: Phospholipase A2; PGE2: Prostaglandin E2; SOD1: Superoxide dismutase; TDP-43: TAR DNA-binding protein; sHSPs: Small heat shock proteins; mTOR: Mammalian target of rapamycin; CNS: Central nervous system; PINK1: PTEN-induced kinase 1; (Nf): Neurofilaments; pNf: Phosphorylated neurofilament; CSF: Cerebrospinal fluid; NfL: Neurofilament light chain; pNFH: Phosphorylated neurofilament heavy chain; MQC: Mitochondrial quality control; Na+: Sodium ion; NFκB: Nuclear factor κB; iNOS: Inducible nitric oxide synthase; TNF-α: Tumour necrosis factor; IL-1β: Interleukin-1 beta; IL-6: Interleukin 6; iPSC: Induced pluripotent stem cells.

References

  1. Kovacs, G.G. Molecular pathology of neurodegenerative diseases: Principles and practice. J. Clin. Pathol. 2019, 72, 725–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wilson, D.M., 3rd; Cookson, M.R.; Van Den Bosch, L.; Zetterberg, H.; Holtzman, D.M.; Dewachter, I. Hallmarks of neurodegenerative diseases. Cell 2023, 186, 693–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gitler, A.D.; Dhillon, P.; Shorter, J. Neurodegenerative disease: Models, mechanisms, and a new hope. Dis. Model. Mech. 2017, 10, 499–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gan, L.; Cookson, M.R.; Petrucelli, L.; La Spada, A.R. Converging pathways in neurodegeneration, from genetics to mechanisms. Nat. Neurosci. 2018, 21, 1300–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Cicero, C.E.; Mostile, G.; Vasta, R.; Rapisarda, V.; Signorelli, S.S.; Ferrante, M.; Zappia, M.; Nicoletti, A. Metals and neurodegenerative diseases. A systematic review. Environ. Res. 2017, 159, 82–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Brown, D.R. Metals in neurodegenerative disease. Metallomics 2011, 3, 226–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Hayflick, S.J.; Kurian, M.A.; Hogarth, P. Neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2018, 147, 293–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ward, R.J.; Zucca, F.A.; Duyn, J.H.; Crichton, R.R.; Zecca, L. The role of iron in brain ageing and neurodegenerative disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2014, 13, 1045–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Barnham, K.J.; Masters, C.L.; Bush, A.I. Neurodegenerative diseases and oxidative stress. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2004, 3, 205–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sbodio, J.I.; Snyder, S.H.; Paul, B.D. Redox Mechanisms in Neurodegeneration: From Disease Outcomes to Therapeutic Opportunities. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2019, 30, 1450–1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Iskusnykh, I.Y.; Zakharova, A.A.; Pathak, D. Glutathione in Brain Disorders and Aging. Molecules 2022, 27, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Armada-Moreira, A.; Gomes, J.I.; Pina, C.C.; Savchak, O.K.; Gonçalves-Ribeiro, J.; Rei, N.; Pinto, S.; Morais, T.P.; Martins, R.S.; Ribeiro, F.F.; et al. Going the Extra (Synaptic) Mile: Excitotoxicity as the Road Toward Neurodegenerative Diseases. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Schrank, S.; Barrington, N.; Stutzmann, G.E. Calcium-Handling Defects and Neurodegenerative Disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2020, 12, a035212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Jung, H.; Kim, S.Y.; Canbakis Cecen, F.S.; Cho, Y.; Kwon, S.K. Dysfunction of Mitochondrial Ca(2+) Regulatory Machineries in Brain Aging and Neurodegenerative Diseases. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 599792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pchitskaya, E.; Popugaeva, E.; Bezprozvanny, I. Calcium signaling and molecular mechanisms underlying neurodegenerative diseases. Cell Calcium 2018, 70, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hipp, M.S.; Kasturi, P.; Hartl, F.U. The proteostasis network and its decline in ageing. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2019, 20, 421–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Sontag, E.M.; Samant, R.S.; Frydman, J. Mechanisms and Functions of Spatial Protein Quality Control. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2017, 86, 97–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Soto, C.; Pritzkow, S. Protein misfolding, aggregation, and conformational strains in neurodegenerative diseases. Nat. Neurosci. 2018, 21, 1332–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Koopman, M.B.; Ferrari, L.; Rüdiger, S.G.D. How do protein aggregates escape quality control in neurodegeneration? Trends Neurosci. 2022, 45, 257–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ciechanover, A.; Kwon, Y.T. Protein Quality Control by Molecular Chaperones in Neurodegeneration. Front. Neurosci. 2017, 11, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, Q.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, J. Neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease and its potential as therapeutic target. Transl. Neurodegener. 2015, 4, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Leng, F.; Edison, P. Neuroinflammation and microglial activation in Alzheimer disease: Where do we go from here? Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2021, 17, 157–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Philips, T.; Robberecht, W. Neuroinflammation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Role of glial activation in motor neuron disease. Lancet Neurol. 2011, 10, 253–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Mattson, M.P.; Magnus, T. Ageing and neuronal vulnerability. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2006, 7, 278–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hou, Y.; Dan, X.; Babbar, M.; Wei, Y.; Hasselbalch, S.G.; Croteau, D.L.; Bohr, V.A. Ageing as a risk factor for neurodegenerative disease. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2019, 15, 565–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wyss-Coray, T. Ageing, neurodegeneration and brain rejuvenation. Nature 2016, 539, 180–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cobley, J.N.; Fiorello, M.L.; Bailey, D.M. 13 reasons why the brain is susceptible to oxidative stress. Redox Biol. 2018, 15, 490–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Imlay, J.A. Iron-sulphur clusters and the problem with oxygen. Mol. Microbiol. 2006, 59, 1073–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Connor, J.R.; Menzies, S.L. Relationship of iron to oligodendrocytes and myelination. Glia 1996, 17, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Todorich, B.; Pasquini, J.M.; Garcia, C.I.; Paez, P.M.; Connor, J.R. Oligodendrocytes and myelination: The role of iron. Glia 2009, 57, 467–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dixon, S.J.; Lemberg, K.M.; Lamprecht, M.R.; Skouta, R.; Zaitsev, E.M.; Gleason, C.E.; Patel, D.N.; Bauer, A.J.; Cantley, A.M.; Yang, W.S.; et al. Ferroptosis: An iron-dependent form of nonapoptotic cell death. Cell 2012, 149, 1060–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Weiland, A.; Wang, Y.; Wu, W.; Lan, X.; Han, X.; Li, Q.; Wang, J. Ferroptosis and Its Role in Diverse Brain Diseases. Mol. Neurobiol. 2019, 56, 4880–4893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Yan, H.F.; Zou, T.; Tuo, Q.Z.; Xu, S.; Li, H.; Belaidi, A.A.; Lei, P. Ferroptosis: Mechanisms and links with diseases. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021, 6, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Banci, L.; Bertini, I.; Ciofi-Baffoni, S.; Kozyreva, T.; Zovo, K.; Palumaa, P. Affinity gradients drive copper to cellular destinations. Nature 2010, 465, 645–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Swaminathan, A.B.; Gohil, V.M. The Role of COA6 in the Mitochondrial Copper Delivery Pathway to Cytochrome c Oxidase. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Garcia, L.; Mansilla, N.; Ocampos, N.; Pagani, M.A.; Welchen, E.; Gonzalez, D.H. The mitochondrial copper chaperone COX19 influences copper and iron homeostasis in arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2019, 99, 621–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kawamata, H.; Manfredi, G. Import, maturation, and function of SOD1 and its copper chaperone CCS in the mitochondrial intermembrane space. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2010, 13, 1375–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Luchinat, E.; Barbieri, L.; Banci, L. A molecular chaperone activity of CCS restores the maturation of SOD1 fALS mutants. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 17433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tokuda, E.; Furukawa, Y. Copper Homeostasis as a Therapeutic Target in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis with SOD1 Mutations. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Opazo, C.M.; Greenough, M.A.; Bush, A.I. Copper: From neurotransmission to neuroproteostasis. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2014, 6, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kesidou, E.; Theotokis, P.; Damianidou, O.; Boziki, M.; Konstantinidou, N.; Taloumtzis, C.; Sintila, S.-A.; Grigoriadis, P.; Evangelopoulos, M.E.; Bakirtzis, C. CNS Ageing in Health and Neurodegenerative Disorders. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 2255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Liguori, I.; Russo, G.; Curcio, F.; Bulli, G.; Aran, L.; Della-Morte, D.; Gargiulo, G.; Testa, G.; Cacciatore, F.; Bonaduce, D.; et al. Oxidative stress, aging, and diseases. Clin. Interv. Aging 2018, 13, 757–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Tan, B.L.; Norhaizan, M.E.; Liew, W.P.; Sulaiman Rahman, H. Antioxidant and Oxidative Stress: A Mutual Interplay in Age-Related Diseases. Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 9, 1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Olanow, C.W.; Arendash, G.W. Metals and free radicals in neurodegeneration. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 1994, 7, 548–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Shafiq, K.; Sanghai, N.; Guo, Y.; Kong, J. Implication of post-translationally modified SOD1 in pathological aging. Geroscience 2021, 43, 507–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Petillon, C.; Hergesheimer, R.; Puy, H.; Corcia, P.; Vourc’h, P.; Andres, C.; Karim, Z.; Blasco, H. The Relevancy of Data Regarding the Metabolism of Iron to Our Understanding of Deregulated Mechanisms in ALS; Hypotheses and Pitfalls. Front. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Mezzaroba, L.; Alfieri, D.F.; Colado Simão, A.N.; Vissoci Reiche, E.M. The role of zinc, copper, manganese and iron in neurodegenerative diseases. Neurotoxicology 2019, 74, 230–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Gangania, M.K.; Batra, J.; Kushwaha, S.; Agarwal, R. Role of Iron and Copper in the Pathogenesis of Parkinson’s Disease. Indian. J. Clin. Biochem. 2017, 32, 353–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Konno, T.; Melo, E.P.; Chambers, J.E.; Avezov, E. Intracellular Sources of ROS/H(2)O(2) in Health and Neurodegeneration: Spotlight on Endoplasmic Reticulum. Cells 2021, 10, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Behl, C.; Davis, J.B.; Lesley, R.; Schubert, D. Hydrogen peroxide mediates amyloid beta protein toxicity. Cell 1994, 77, 817–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sebastià, J.; Pertusa, M.; Vílchez, D.; Planas, A.M.; Verbeek, R.; Rodríguez-Farré, E.; Cristòfol, R.; Sanfeliu, C. Carboxyl-terminal fragment of amyloid precursor protein and hydrogen peroxide induce neuronal cell death through different pathways. J. Neural. Transm. 2006, 113, 1837–1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Xu, Y.; Li, K.; Qin, W.; Zhu, B.; Zhou, Z.; Shi, J.; Wang, K.; Hu, J.; Fan, C.; Li, D. Unraveling the role of hydrogen peroxide in α-synuclein aggregation using an ultrasensitive nanoplasmonic probe. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 1968–1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Turnbull, S.; Tabner, B.J.; El-Agnaf, O.M.; Moore, S.; Davies, Y.; Allsop, D. alpha-Synuclein implicated in Parkinson’s disease catalyses the formation of hydrogen peroxide in vitro. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2001, 30, 1163–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Xu, W.C.; Liang, J.Z.; Li, C.; He, Z.X.; Yuan, H.Y.; Huang, B.Y.; Liu, X.L.; Tang, B.; Pang, D.W.; Du, H.N.; et al. Pathological hydrogen peroxide triggers the fibrillization of wild-type SOD1 via sulfenic acid modification of Cys-111. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Koo, B.K.; Munroe, W.; Gralla, E.B.; Valentine, J.S.; Whitelegge, J.P. A Novel SOD1 Intermediate Oligomer, Role of Free Thiols and Disulfide Exchange. Front. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 619279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Chen, X.; Shang, H.; Qiu, X.; Fujiwara, N.; Cui, L.; Li, X.M.; Gao, T.M.; Kong, J. Oxidative modification of cysteine 111 promotes disulfide bond-independent aggregation of SOD1. Neurochem. Res. 2012, 37, 835–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sanghai, N.; Tranmer, G.K. Hydrogen Peroxide and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: From Biochemistry to Pathophysiology. Antioxidants 2021, 11, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Cohen, T.J.; Hwang, A.W.; Unger, T.; Trojanowski, J.Q.; Lee, V.M. Redox signalling directly regulates TDP-43 via cysteine oxidation and disulphide cross-linking. EMBO J. 2012, 31, 1241–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sidorova, Y.; Domanskyi, A. Detecting Oxidative Stress Biomarkers in Neurodegenerative Disease Models and Patients. Methods Protoc. 2020, 3, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Frijhoff, J.; Winyard, P.G.; Zarkovic, N.; Davies, S.S.; Stocker, R.; Cheng, D.; Knight, A.R.; Taylor, E.L.; Oettrich, J.; Ruskovska, T.; et al. Clinical Relevance of Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2015, 23, 1144–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Marrocco, I.; Altieri, F.; Peluso, I. Measurement and Clinical Significance of Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress in Humans. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2017, 2017, 6501046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Obata, T. Role of hydroxyl radical formation in neurotoxicity as revealed by in vivo free radical trapping. Toxicol. Lett. 2002, 132, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Gutteridge, J.M. Hydroxyl radicals, iron, oxidative stress, and neurodegeneration. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1994, 738, 201–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Jomova, K.; Valko, M. Advances in metal-induced oxidative stress and human disease. Toxicology 2011, 283, 65–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Halliwell, B.; Adhikary, A.; Dingfelder, M.; Dizdaroglu, M. Hydroxyl radical is a significant player in oxidative DNA damage in vivo. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 8355–8360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Selley, M.L.; Close, D.R.; Stern, S.E. The effect of increased concentrations of homocysteine on the concentration of (E)-4-hydroxy-2-nonenal in the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 2002, 23, 383–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Dexter, D.T.; Carter, C.J.; Wells, F.R.; Javoy-Agid, F.; Agid, Y.; Lees, A.; Jenner, P.; Marsden, C.D. Basal lipid peroxidation in substantia nigra is increased in Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurochem. 1989, 52, 381–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Pedersen, W.A.; Fu, W.; Keller, J.N.; Markesbery, W.R.; Appel, S.; Smith, R.G.; Kasarskis, E.; Mattson, M.P. Protein modification by the lipid peroxidation product 4-hydroxynonenal in the spinal cords of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients. Ann. Neurol. 1998, 44, 819–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lovell, M.A.; Ehmann, W.D.; Butler, S.M.; Markesbery, W.R. Elevated thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances and antioxidant enzyme activity in the brain in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 1995, 45, 1594–1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Younes-Mhenni, S.; Frih-Ayed, M.; Kerkeni, A.; Bost, M.; Chazot, G. Peripheral blood markers of oxidative stress in Parkinson’s disease. Eur. Neurol. 2007, 58, 78–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bonnefont-Rousselot, D.; Lacomblez, L.; Jaudon, M.; Lepage, S.; Salachas, F.; Bensimon, G.; Bizard, C.; Doppler, V.; Delattre, J.; Meininger, V. Blood oxidative stress in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J. Neurol. Sci. 2000, 178, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Wang, C.; Wang, Z.; Zeng, B.; Zheng, M.; Xiao, N.; Zhao, Z. Fenton-like reaction of the iron(II)-histidine complex generates hydroxyl radicals: Implications for oxidative stress and Alzheimer’s disease. Chem. Commun. 2021, 57, 12293–12296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Rakhit, R.; Cunningham, P.; Furtos-Matei, A.; Dahan, S.; Qi, X.F.; Crow, J.P.; Cashman, N.R.; Kondejewski, L.H.; Chakrabartty, A. Oxidation-induced misfolding and aggregation of superoxide dismutase and its implications for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 47551–47556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Herrera, A.; Muñoz, P.; Steinbusch, H.W.M.; Segura-Aguilar, J. Are Dopamine Oxidation Metabolites Involved in the Loss of Dopaminergic Neurons in the Nigrostriatal System in Parkinson’s Disease? ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2017, 8, 702–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Nunomura, A.; Moreira, P.I.; Castellani, R.J.; Lee, H.G.; Zhu, X.; Smith, M.A.; Perry, G. Oxidative damage to RNA in aging and neurodegenerative disorders. Neurotox. Res. 2012, 22, 231–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Nakabeppu, Y.; Tsuchimoto, D.; Yamaguchi, H.; Sakumi, K. Oxidative damage in nucleic acids and Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurosci. Res. 2007, 85, 919–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Konopka, A.; Atkin, J.D. DNA Damage, Defective DNA Repair, and Neurodegeneration in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2022, 14, 786420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Dalle-Donne, I.; Rossi, R.; Giustarini, D.; Milzani, A.; Colombo, R. Protein carbonyl groups as biomarkers of oxidative stress. Clin. Chim. Acta 2003, 329, 23–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Alam, Z.I.; Daniel, S.E.; Lees, A.J.; Marsden, D.C.; Jenner, P.; Halliwell, B. A generalised increase in protein carbonyls in the brain in Parkinson’s but not incidental Lewy body disease. J. Neurochem. 1997, 69, 1326–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Mitsumoto, H.; Santella, R.M.; Liu, X.; Bogdanov, M.; Zipprich, J.; Wu, H.C.; Mahata, J.; Kilty, M.; Bednarz, K.; Bell, D.; et al. Oxidative stress biomarkers in sporadic ALS. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. 2008, 9, 177–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Butterfield, D.A.; Reed, T.T.; Perluigi, M.; De Marco, C.; Coccia, R.; Keller, J.N.; Markesbery, W.R.; Sultana, R. Elevated levels of 3-nitrotyrosine in brain from subjects with amnestic mild cognitive impairment: Implications for the role of nitration in the progression of Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Res. 2007, 1148, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Fernández-Espejo, E.; Rodríguez de Fonseca, F.; Suárez, J.; Tolosa, E.; Vilas, D.; Aldecoa, I.; Berenguer, J.; Damas-Hermoso, F. Native α-Synuclein, 3-Nitrotyrosine Proteins, and Patterns of Nitro-α-Synuclein-Immunoreactive Inclusions in Saliva and Submandibulary Gland in Parkinson’s Disease. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Beal, M.F.; Ferrante, R.J.; Browne, S.E.; Matthews, R.T.; Kowall, N.W.; Brown, R.H., Jr. Increased 3-nitrotyrosine in both sporadic and familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 1997, 42, 644–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Bandookwala, M.; Sengupta, P. 3-Nitrotyrosine: A versatile oxidative stress biomarker for major neurodegenerative diseases. Int. J. Neurosci. 2020, 130, 1047–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ahsan, H. 3-Nitrotyrosine: A biomarker of nitrogen free radical species modified proteins in systemic autoimmunogenic conditions. Hum. Immunol. 2013, 74, 1392–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Pfeiffer, C.C.; Braverman, E.R. Zinc, the brain and behavior. Biol. Psychiatry 1982, 17, 513–532. [Google Scholar]
  87. Marreiro, D.D.; Cruz, K.J.; Morais, J.B.; Beserra, J.B.; Severo, J.S.; de Oliveira, A.R. Zinc and Oxidative Stress: Current Mechanisms. Antioxidants 2017, 6, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Choi, S.; Hong, D.K.; Choi, B.Y.; Suh, S.W. Zinc in the Brain: Friend or Foe? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Lee, J.Y.; Cole, T.B.; Palmiter, R.D.; Suh, S.W.; Koh, J.Y. Contribution by synaptic zinc to the gender-disparate plaque formation in human Swedish mutant APP transgenic mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 7705–7710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Forsleff, L.; Schauss, A.G.; Bier, I.D.; Stuart, S. Evidence of functional zinc deficiency in Parkinson’s disease. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 1999, 5, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Du, K.; Liu, M.Y.; Zhong, X.; Wei, M.J. Decreased circulating Zinc levels in Parkinson’s disease: A meta-analysis study. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 3902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Smith, A.P.; Lee, N.M. Role of zinc in ALS. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. 2007, 8, 131–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Hilton, J.B.; White, A.R.; Crouch, P.J. Metal-deficient SOD1 in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J. Mol. Med. 2015, 93, 481–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Trist, B.G.; Genoud, S.; Roudeau, S.; Rookyard, A.; Abdeen, A.; Cottam, V.; Hare, D.J.; White, M.; Altvater, J.; Fifita, J.A.; et al. Altered SOD1 maturation and post-translational modification in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis spinal cord. Brain 2022, 145, 3108–3130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Vermot, A.; Petit-Härtlein, I.; Smith, S.M.E.; Fieschi, F. NADPH Oxidases (NOX): An Overview from Discovery, Molecular Mechanisms to Physiology and Pathology. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Singh, A.; Kukreti, R.; Saso, L.; Kukreti, S. Oxidative Stress: Role and Response of Short Guanine Tracts at Genomic Locations. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Fairman, W.A.; Amara, S.G. Functional diversity of excitatory amino acid transporters: Ion channel and transport modes. Am. J. Physiol. 1999, 277, F481–F486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Bano, D.; Young, K.W.; Guerin, C.J.; Lefeuvre, R.; Rothwell, N.J.; Naldini, L.; Rizzuto, R.; Carafoli, E.; Nicotera, P. Cleavage of the plasma membrane Na+/Ca2+ exchanger in excitotoxicity. Cell 2005, 120, 275–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Wang, R.; Reddy, P.H. Role of Glutamate and NMDA Receptors in Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2017, 57, 1041–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Iovino, L.; Tremblay, M.E.; Civiero, L. Glutamate-induced excitotoxicity in Parkinson’s disease: The role of glial cells. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2020, 144, 151–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Foran, E.; Trotti, D. Glutamate transporters and the excitotoxic path to motor neuron degeneration in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2009, 11, 1587–1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Connolly, N.M.; Prehn, J.H. The metabolic response to excitotoxicity—Lessons from single-cell imaging. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 2015, 47, 75–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Granzotto, A.; Canzoniero, L.M.T.; Sensi, S.L. A Neurotoxic Ménage-à-trois: Glutamate, Calcium, and Zinc in the Excitotoxic Cascade. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2020, 13, 600089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Gleitze, S.; Paula-Lima, A.; Núñez, M.T.; Hidalgo, C. The calcium-iron connection in ferroptosis-mediated neuronal death. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2021, 175, 28–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Doble, A. The role of excitotoxicity in neurodegenerative disease: Implications for therapy. Pharmacol. Ther. 1999, 81, 163–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Danbolt, N.C. Glutamate uptake. Prog. Neurobiol. 2001, 65, 1–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Mahmoud, S.; Gharagozloo, M.; Simard, C.; Gris, D. Astrocytes Maintain Glutamate Homeostasis in the CNS by Controlling the Balance between Glutamate Uptake and Release. Cells 2019, 8, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Armbruster, M.; Hanson, E.; Dulla, C.G. Glutamate Clearance Is Locally Modulated by Presynaptic Neuronal Activity in the Cerebral Cortex. J. Neurosci. 2016, 36, 10404–10415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Pehar, M.; Harlan, B.A.; Killoy, K.M.; Vargas, M.R. Role and Therapeutic Potential of Astrocytes in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2017, 23, 5010–5021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. van den Berg, C.J.; Garfinkel, D. A simulation study of brain compartments. Metabolism of glutamate and related substances in mouse brain. Biochem. J. 1971, 123, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Ottersen, O.P.; Zhang, N.; Walberg, F. Metabolic compartmentation of glutamate and glutamine: Morphological evidence obtained by quantitative immunocytochemistry in rat cerebellum. Neuroscience 1992, 46, 519–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Magistretti, P.J.; Allaman, I. A cellular perspective on brain energy metabolism and functional imaging. Neuron 2015, 86, 883–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Schousboe, A.; Westergaard, N.; Waagepetersen, H.S.; Larsson, O.M.; Bakken, I.J.; Sonnewald, U. Trafficking between glia and neurons of TCA cycle intermediates and related metabolites. Glia 1997, 21, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Jiang, L.L.; Zhu, B.; Zhao, Y.; Li, X.; Liu, T.; Pina-Crespo, J.; Zhou, L.; Xu, W.; Rodriguez, M.J.; Yu, H.; et al. Membralin deficiency dysregulates astrocytic glutamate homeostasis leading to ALS-like impairment. J. Clin. Investig. 2019, 129, 3103–3120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Sultan, S.; Li, L.; Moss, J.; Petrelli, F.; Cassé, F.; Gebara, E.; Lopatar, J.; Pfrieger, F.W.; Bezzi, P.; Bischofberger, J.; et al. Synaptic Integration of Adult-Born Hippocampal Neurons Is Locally Controlled by Astrocytes. Neuron 2015, 88, 957–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. González-Reyes, R.E.; Nava-Mesa, M.O.; Vargas-Sánchez, K.; Ariza-Salamanca, D.; Mora-Muñoz, L. Involvement of Astrocytes in Alzheimer’s Disease from a Neuroinflammatory and Oxidative Stress Perspective. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2017, 10, 427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Rodríguez-Giraldo, M.; González-Reyes, R.E.; Ramírez-Guerrero, S.; Bonilla-Trilleras, C.E.; Guardo-Maya, S.; Nava-Mesa, M.O. Astrocytes as a Therapeutic Target in Alzheimer’s Disease-Comprehensive Review and Recent Developments. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 13630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Miyazaki, I.; Asanuma, M. Neuron-Astrocyte Interactions in Parkinson’s Disease. Cells 2020, 9, 2623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Bancroft, E.A.; Srinivasan, R. Emerging Roles for Aberrant Astrocytic Calcium Signals in Parkinson’s Disease. Front. Physiol. 2021, 12, 812212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Bruijn, L.I.; Becher, M.W.; Lee, M.K.; Anderson, K.L.; Jenkins, N.A.; Copeland, N.G.; Sisodia, S.S.; Rothstein, J.D.; Borchelt, D.R.; Price, D.L.; et al. ALS-linked SOD1 mutant G85R mediates damage to astrocytes and promotes rapidly progressive disease with SOD1-containing inclusions. Neuron 1997, 18, 327–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Yamanaka, K.; Komine, O. The multi-dimensional roles of astrocytes in ALS. Neurosci. Res. 2018, 126, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Verma, M.; Lizama, B.N.; Chu, C.T. Excitotoxicity, calcium and mitochondria: A triad in synaptic neurodegeneration. Transl. Neurodegener. 2022, 11, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Nguyen, D.; Alavi, M.V.; Kim, K.Y.; Kang, T.; Scott, R.T.; Noh, Y.H.; Lindsey, J.D.; Wissinger, B.; Ellisman, M.H.; Weinreb, R.N.; et al. A new vicious cycle involving glutamate excitotoxicity, oxidative stress and mitochondrial dynamics. Cell Death Dis. 2011, 2, e240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Yin, H.Z.; Weiss, J.H. Marked synergism between mutant SOD1 and glutamate transport inhibition in the induction of motor neuronal degeneration in spinal cord slice cultures. Brain Res. 2012, 1448, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Musarò, A. State of the art and the dark side of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. World J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 1, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Van Den Bosch, L.; Van Damme, P.; Bogaert, E.; Robberecht, W. The role of excitotoxicity in the pathogenesis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2006, 1762, 1068–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Jiang, T.; Handley, E.; Brizuela, M.; Dawkins, E.; Lewis, K.E.A.; Clark, R.M.; Dickson, T.C.; Blizzard, C.A. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis mutant TDP-43 may cause synaptic dysfunction through altered dendritic spine function. Dis. Model. Mech. 2019, 12, dmm038109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Pirie, E.; Oh, C.K.; Zhang, X.; Han, X.; Cieplak, P.; Scott, H.R.; Deal, A.K.; Ghatak, S.; Martinez, F.J.; Yeo, G.W.; et al. S-nitrosylated TDP-43 triggers aggregation, cell-to-cell spread, and neurotoxicity in hiPSCs and in vivo models of ALS/FTD. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2021368118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Olney, J.W.; Wozniak, D.F.; Farber, N.B. Excitotoxic neurodegeneration in Alzheimer disease. New hypothesis and new therapeutic strategies. Arch. Neurol. 1997, 54, 1234–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Reddy, P.H.; Beal, M.F. Amyloid beta, mitochondrial dysfunction and synaptic damage: Implications for cognitive decline in aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Trends Mol. Med. 2008, 14, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Liu, B.; Zhu, Y.; Zhou, J.; Wei, Y.; Long, C.; Chen, M.; Ling, Y.; Ge, J.; Zhuo, Y. Endoplasmic reticulum stress promotes amyloid-beta peptides production in RGC-5 cells. Cell Stress. Chaperones 2014, 19, 827–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Ghemrawi, R.; Khair, M. Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Unfolded Protein Response in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Puspita, L.; Chung, S.Y.; Shim, J.W. Oxidative stress and cellular pathologies in Parkinson’s disease. Mol. Brain 2017, 10, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Gómez-Suaga, P.; Bravo-San Pedro, J.M.; González-Polo, R.A.; Fuentes, J.M.; Niso-Santano, M. ER-mitochondria signaling in Parkinson’s disease. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Höhn, A.; Tramutola, A.; Cascella, R. Proteostasis Failure in Neurodegenerative Diseases: Focus on Oxidative Stress. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2020, 2020, 5497046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Yerbury, J.J.; Ooi, L.; Dillin, A.; Saunders, D.N.; Hatters, D.M.; Beart, P.M.; Cashman, N.R.; Wilson, M.R.; Ecroyd, H. Walking the tightrope: Proteostasis and neurodegenerative disease. J. Neurochem. 2016, 137, 489–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Hetz, C. Adapting the proteostasis capacity to sustain brain healthspan. Cell 2021, 184, 1545–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Klaips, C.L.; Jayaraj, G.G.; Hartl, F.U. Pathways of cellular proteostasis in aging and disease. J. Cell Biol. 2018, 217, 51–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Goedert, M.; Eisenberg, D.S.; Crowther, R.A. Propagation of Tau Aggregates and Neurodegeneration. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2017, 40, 189–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Xilouri, M.; Stefanis, L. Autophagy in the central nervous system: Implications for neurodegenerative disorders. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets 2010, 9, 701–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Kim, Y.C.; Guan, K.L. mTOR: A pharmacologic target for autophagy regulation. J. Clin. Investig. 2015, 125, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Nazio, F.; Strappazzon, F.; Antonioli, M.; Bielli, P.; Cianfanelli, V.; Bordi, M.; Gretzmeier, C.; Dengjel, J.; Piacentini, M.; Fimia, G.M.; et al. mTOR inhibits autophagy by controlling ULK1 ubiquitylation, self-association and function through AMBRA1 and TRAF6. Nat. Cell Biol. 2013, 15, 406–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Webb, J.L.; Ravikumar, B.; Atkins, J.; Skepper, J.N.; Rubinsztein, D.C. Alpha-Synuclein is degraded by both autophagy and the proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 25009–25013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Barmada, S.J.; Serio, A.; Arjun, A.; Bilican, B.; Daub, A.; Ando, D.M.; Tsvetkov, A.; Pleiss, M.; Li, X.; Peisach, D.; et al. Autophagy induction enhances TDP43 turnover and survival in neuronal ALS models. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2014, 10, 677–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Liu, J.; Li, L. Targeting Autophagy for the Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease: Challenges and Opportunities. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2019, 12, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Nixon, R.A.; Yang, D.S. Autophagy failure in Alzheimer’s disease--locating the primary defect. Neurobiol. Dis. 2011, 43, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Hou, X.; Watzlawik, J.O.; Fiesel, F.C.; Springer, W. Autophagy in Parkinson’s Disease. J. Mol. Biol. 2020, 432, 2651–2672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Arotcarena, M.L.; Teil, M.; Dehay, B. Autophagy in Synucleinopathy: The Overwhelmed and Defective Machinery. Cells 2019, 8, 565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Lee, H.J.; Cho, E.D.; Lee, K.W.; Kim, J.H.; Cho, S.G.; Lee, S.J. Autophagic failure promotes the exocytosis and intercellular transfer of α-synuclein. Exp. Mol. Med. 2013, 45, e22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Chen, S.; Zhang, X.; Song, L.; Le, W. Autophagy dysregulation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain Pathol. 2012, 22, 110–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Ramesh, N.; Pandey, U.B. Autophagy Dysregulation in ALS: When Protein Aggregates Get Out of Hand. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2017, 10, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Vicencio, E.; Beltrán, S.; Labrador, L.; Manque, P.; Nassif, M.; Woehlbier, U. Implications of Selective Autophagy Dysfunction for ALS Pathology. Cells 2020, 9, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Ramesh Babu, J.; Lamar Seibenhener, M.; Peng, J.; Strom, A.L.; Kemppainen, R.; Cox, N.; Zhu, H.; Wooten, M.C.; Diaz-Meco, M.T.; Moscat, J.; et al. Genetic inactivation of p62 leads to accumulation of hyperphosphorylated tau and neurodegeneration. J. Neurochem. 2008, 106, 107–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Tanji, K.; Odagiri, S.; Miki, Y.; Maruyama, A.; Nikaido, Y.; Mimura, J.; Mori, F.; Warabi, E.; Yanagawa, T.; Ueno, S.; et al. p62 Deficiency Enhances α-Synuclein Pathology in Mice. Brain Pathol. 2015, 25, 552–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Hiji, M.; Takahashi, T.; Fukuba, H.; Yamashita, H.; Kohriyama, T.; Matsumoto, M. White matter lesions in the brain with frontotemporal lobar degeneration with motor neuron disease: TDP-43-immunopositive inclusions co-localize with p62, but not ubiquitin. Acta Neuropathol. 2008, 116, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Gal, J.; Ström, A.L.; Kwinter, D.M.; Kilty, R.; Zhang, J.; Shi, P.; Fu, W.; Wooten, M.W.; Zhu, H. Sequestosome 1/p62 links familial ALS mutant SOD1 to LC3 via an ubiquitin-independent mechanism. J. Neurochem. 2009, 111, 1062–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Pickford, F.; Masliah, E.; Britschgi, M.; Lucin, K.; Narasimhan, R.; Jaeger, P.A.; Small, S.; Spencer, B.; Rockenstein, E.; Levine, B.; et al. The autophagy-related protein beclin 1 shows reduced expression in early Alzheimer disease and regulates amyloid beta accumulation in mice. J. Clin. Investig. 2008, 118, 2190–2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Shi, P.; Ström, A.L.; Gal, J.; Zhu, H. Effects of ALS-related SOD1 mutants on dynein- and KIF5-mediated retrograde and anterograde axonal transport. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010, 1802, 707–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Puls, I.; Jonnakuty, C.; LaMonte, B.H.; Holzbaur, E.L.; Tokito, M.; Mann, E.; Floeter, M.K.; Bidus, K.; Drayna, D.; Oh, S.J.; et al. Mutant dynactin in motor neuron disease. Nat. Genet. 2003, 33, 455–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Bercier, V.; Hubbard, J.M.; Fidelin, K.; Duroure, K.; Auer, T.O.; Revenu, C.; Wyart, C.; Del Bene, F. Dynactin1 depletion leads to neuromuscular synapse instability and functional abnormalities. Mol. Neurodegener. 2019, 14, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Cozzi, M.; Ferrari, V. Autophagy Dysfunction in ALS: From Transport to Protein Degradation. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2022, 72, 1456–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. LaMonte, B.H.; Wallace, K.E.; Holloway, B.A.; Shelly, S.S.; Ascaño, J.; Tokito, M.; Van Winkle, T.; Howland, D.S.; Holzbaur, E.L. Disruption of dynein/dynactin inhibits axonal transport in motor neurons causing late-onset progressive degeneration. Neuron 2002, 34, 715–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Kuźma-Kozakiewicz, M.; Chudy, A.; Kaźmierczak, B.; Dziewulska, D.; Usarek, E.; Barańczyk-Kuźma, A. Dynactin Deficiency in the CNS of Humans with Sporadic ALS and Mice with Genetically Determined Motor Neuron Degeneration. Neurochem. Res. 2013, 38, 2463–2473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Wang, Q.; Xue, H.; Yue, Y.; Hao, S.; Huang, S.H.; Zhang, Z. Role of mitophagy in the neurodegenerative diseases and its pharmacological advances: A review. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2022, 15, 1014251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Fivenson, E.M.; Lautrup, S.; Sun, N.; Scheibye-Knudsen, M.; Stevnsner, T.; Nilsen, H.; Bohr, V.A.; Fang, E.F. Mitophagy in neurodegeneration and aging. Neurochem. Int. 2017, 109, 202–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Chen, H.; Chan, D.C. Mitochondrial dynamics—Fusion, fission, movement, and mitophagy—In neurodegenerative diseases. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2009, 18, R169–R176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Magalhães, J.D.; Fão, L.; Vilaça, R.; Cardoso, S.M.; Rego, A.C. Macroautophagy and Mitophagy in Neurodegenerative Disorders: Focus on Therapeutic Interventions. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Lionaki, E.; Markaki, M.; Palikaras, K.; Tavernarakis, N. Mitochondria, autophagy and age-associated neurodegenerative diseases: New insights into a complex interplay. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2015, 1847, 1412–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Fang, E.F.; Hou, Y.; Palikaras, K.; Adriaanse, B.A.; Kerr, J.S.; Yang, B.; Lautrup, S.; Hasan-Olive, M.M.; Caponio, D.; Dan, X.; et al. Mitophagy inhibits amyloid-β and tau pathology and reverses cognitive deficits in models of Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Neurosci. 2019, 22, 401–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Valente, E.M.; Abou-Sleiman, P.M.; Caputo, V.; Muqit, M.M.; Harvey, K.; Gispert, S.; Ali, Z.; Del Turco, D.; Bentivoglio, A.R.; Healy, D.G.; et al. Hereditary early-onset Parkinson’s disease caused by mutations in PINK1. Science 2004, 304, 1158–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Goiran, T.; Eldeeb, M.A.; Zorca, C.E.; Fon, E.A. Hallmarks and Molecular Tools for the Study of Mitophagy in Parkinson’s Disease. Cells 2022, 11, 2097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Rogers, R.S.; Tungtur, S.; Tanaka, T.; Nadeau, L.L.; Badawi, Y.; Wang, H.; Ni, H.M.; Ding, W.X.; Nishimune, H. Impaired Mitophagy Plays a Role in Denervation of Neuromuscular Junctions in ALS Mice. Front. Neurosci. 2017, 11, 473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Sun, X.; Duan, Y.; Qin, C.; Li, J.C.; Duan, G.; Deng, X.; Ni, J.; Cao, X.; Xiang, K.; Tian, K.; et al. Distinct multilevel misregulations of Parkin and PINK1 revealed in cell and animal models of TDP-43 proteinopathy. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Salvadores, N.; Gerónimo-Olvera, C.; Court, F.A. Axonal Degeneration in AD: The Contribution of Aβ and Tau. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2020, 12, 581767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Stokin, G.B.; Goldstein, L.S. Axonal transport and Alzheimer’s disease. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2006, 75, 607–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Kanaan, N.M.; Pigino, G.F.; Brady, S.T.; Lazarov, O.; Binder, L.I.; Morfini, G.A. Axonal degeneration in Alzheimer’s disease: When signaling abnormalities meet the axonal transport system. Exp. Neurol. 2013, 246, 44–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Chu, Y.; Morfini, G.A.; Langhamer, L.B.; He, Y.; Brady, S.T.; Kordower, J.H. Alterations in axonal transport motor proteins in sporadic and experimental Parkinson’s disease. Brain 2012, 135, 2058–2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Prots, I.; Grosch, J.; Brazdis, R.M.; Simmnacher, K.; Veber, V.; Havlicek, S.; Hannappel, C.; Krach, F.; Krumbiegel, M.; Schütz, O.; et al. α-Synuclein oligomers induce early axonal dysfunction in human iPSC-based models of synucleinopathies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 7813–7818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Roy, S.; Zhang, B.; Lee, V.M.; Trojanowski, J.Q. Axonal transport defects: A common theme in neurodegenerative diseases. Acta Neuropathol. 2005, 109, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Morfini, G.A.; Burns, M.; Binder, L.I.; Kanaan, N.M.; LaPointe, N.; Bosco, D.A.; Brown, R.H., Jr.; Brown, H.; Tiwari, A.; Hayward, L.; et al. Axonal transport defects in neurodegenerative diseases. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29, 12776–12786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. De Vos, K.J.; Hafezparast, M. Neurobiology of axonal transport defects in motor neuron diseases: Opportunities for translational research? Neurobiol. Dis. 2017, 105, 283–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Ikenaka, K.; Katsuno, M.; Kawai, K.; Ishigaki, S.; Tanaka, F.; Sobue, G. Disruption of axonal transport in motor neuron diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 1225–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Sleigh, J.N.; Tosolini, A.P.; Gordon, D.; Devoy, A.; Fratta, P.; Fisher, E.M.C.; Talbot, K.; Schiavo, G. Mice Carrying ALS Mutant TDP-43, but Not Mutant FUS, Display In Vivo Defects in Axonal Transport of Signaling Endosomes. Cell Rep. 2020, 30, 3655–3662.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Mandelkow, E.M.; Stamer, K.; Vogel, R.; Thies, E.; Mandelkow, E. Clogging of axons by tau, inhibition of axonal traffic and starvation of synapses. Neurobiol. Aging 2003, 24, 1079–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Clark, C.; Lewczuk, P.; Kornhuber, J.; Richiardi, J.; Maréchal, B.; Karikari, T.K.; Blennow, K.; Zetterberg, H.; Popp, J. Plasma neurofilament light and phosphorylated tau 181 as biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease pathology and clinical disease progression. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 2021, 13, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Jin, M.; Cao, L.; Dai, Y.P. Role of Neurofilament Light Chain as a Potential Biomarker for Alzheimer’s Disease: A Correlative Meta-Analysis. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2019, 11, 254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Wang, L.; Zhang, W.; Liu, F.; Mao, C.; Liu, C.F.; Cheng, W.; Feng, J. Association of Cerebrospinal Fluid Neurofilament Heavy Protein Levels With Clinical Progression in Patients With Parkinson Disease. JAMA Netw. Open 2022, 5, e2223821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Frigerio, I.; Laansma, M.A.; Lin, C.P.; Hermans, E.J.M.; Bouwman, M.M.A.; Bol, J.; Galis-de Graaf, Y.; Hepp, D.H.; Rozemuller, A.J.M.; Barkhof, F.; et al. Neurofilament light chain is increased in the parahippocampal cortex and associates with pathological hallmarks in Parkinson’s disease dementia. Transl. Neurodegener. 2023, 12, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Heckler, I.; Venkataraman, I. Phosphorylated neurofilament heavy chain: A potential diagnostic biomarker in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J. Neurophysiol. 2022, 127, 737–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Behzadi, A.; Pujol-Calderón, F.; Tjust, A.E.; Wuolikainen, A.; Höglund, K.; Forsberg, K.; Portelius, E.; Blennow, K.; Zetterberg, H.; Andersen, P.M. Neurofilaments can differentiate ALS subgroups and ALS from common diagnostic mimics. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 22128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Zhou, W.; Zhang, J.; Ye, F.; Xu, G.; Su, H.; Su, Y.; Zhang, X. Plasma neurofilament light chain levels in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci. Lett. 2017, 650, 60–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Heshmatollah, A.; Fani, L.; Koudstaal, P.J.; Ghanbari, M.; Ikram, M.A.; Ikram, M.K. Plasma β-Amyloid, Total-Tau, and Neurofilament Light Chain Levels and the Risk of Stroke: A Prospective Population-Based Study. Neurology 2022, 98, e1729–e1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Mollenhauer, B.; Dakna, M.; Kruse, N.; Galasko, D.; Foroud, T.; Zetterberg, H.; Schade, S.; Gera, R.G.; Wang, W.; Gao, F.; et al. Validation of Serum Neurofilament Light Chain as a Biomarker of Parkinson’s Disease Progression. Mov. Disord. 2020, 35, 1999–2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Batzu, L.; Rota, S.; Hye, A.; Heslegrave, A.; Trivedi, D.; Gibson, L.L.; Farrell, C.; Zinzalias, P.; Rizos, A.; Zetterberg, H.; et al. Plasma p-tau181, neurofilament light chain and association with cognition in Parkinson’s disease. NPJ Park. Dis. 2022, 8, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Yang, X.; Ji, Y.; Wang, W.; Zhang, L.; Chen, Z.; Yu, M.; Shen, Y.; Ding, F.; Gu, X.; Sun, H. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Molecular Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Therapeutic Strategies. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Poesen, K.; Van Damme, P. Diagnostic and Prognostic Performance of Neurofilaments in ALS. Front. Neurol. 2018, 9, 1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Wyss-Coray, T.; Mucke, L. Inflammation in neurodegenerative disease—A double-edged sword. Neuron 2002, 35, 419–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Stephenson, J.; Nutma, E.; van der Valk, P.; Amor, S. Inflammation in CNS neurodegenerative diseases. Immunology 2018, 154, 204–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Russo, M.V.; McGavern, D.B. Inflammatory neuroprotection following traumatic brain injury. Science 2016, 353, 783–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Kwon, H.S.; Koh, S.-H. Neuroinflammation in neurodegenerative disorders: The roles of microglia and astrocytes. Transl. Neurodegener. 2020, 9, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Baufeld, C.; O’Loughlin, E.; Calcagno, N.; Madore, C.; Butovsky, O. Differential contribution of microglia and monocytes in neurodegenerative diseases. J. Neural Transm. 2018, 125, 809–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Glass, C.K.; Saijo, K.; Winner, B.; Marchetto, M.C.; Gage, F.H. Mechanisms underlying inflammation in neurodegeneration. Cell 2010, 140, 918–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Colombo, E.; Farina, C. Astrocytes: Key regulators of neuroinflammation. Trends Immunol. 2016, 37, 608–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Heneka, M.T.; Carson, M.J.; El Khoury, J.; Landreth, G.E.; Brosseron, F.; Feinstein, D.L.; Jacobs, A.H.; Wyss-Coray, T.; Vitorica, J.; Ransohoff, R.M. Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2015, 14, 388–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Liddelow, S.A.; Barres, B.A. Reactive astrocytes: Production, function, and therapeutic potential. Immunity 2017, 46, 957–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Di Benedetto, G.; Burgaletto, C.; Bellanca, C.M.; Munafò, A.; Bernardini, R.; Cantarella, G. Role of Microglia and astrocytes in Alzheimer’s disease: From neuroinflammation to Ca2+ homeostasis dysregulation. Cells 2022, 11, 2728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Nagele, R.G.; Wegiel, J.; Venkataraman, V.; Imaki, H.; Wang, K.-C.; Wegiel, J. Contribution of glial cells to the development of amyloid plaques in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 2004, 25, 663–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Ferreira, S.A.; Romero-Ramos, M. Microglia response during Parkinson’s disease: Alpha-synuclein intervention. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Vila, M.; Jackson-Lewis, V.; Guégan, C.; Teismann, P.; Choi, D.-K.; Tieu, K.; Przedborski, S. The role of glial cells in Parkinson’s disease. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2001, 14, 483–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Grosskreutz, J.; Van Den Bosch, L.; Keller, B.U. Calcium dysregulation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Cell Calcium 2010, 47, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Philips, T.; Rothstein, J.D. Glial cells in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Exp. Neurol. 2014, 262, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Jha, N.K.; Jha, S.K.; Kar, R.; Nand, P.; Swati, K.; Goswami, V.K. Nuclear factor-kappa β as a therapeutic target for Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurochem. 2019, 150, 113–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Bellucci, A.; Bubacco, L.; Longhena, F.; Parrella, E.; Faustini, G.; Porrini, V.; Bono, F.; Missale, C.; Pizzi, M. Nuclear factor-κB dysregulation and α-synuclein pathology: Critical interplay in the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2020, 12, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  214. Källstig, E.; McCabe, B.D.; Schneider, B.L. The Links between ALS and NF-κB. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Mattson, M.P.; Camandola, S. NF-κB in neuronal plasticity and neurodegenerative disorders. J. Clin. Investig. 2001, 107, 247–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Singh, A.; Ansari, V.A.; Mahmood, T.; Ahsan, F.; Wasim, R. Neurodegeneration: Microglia: Nf-Kappab Signaling Pathways. Drug Res. 2022, 72, 496–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Kempuraj, D.; Thangavel, R.; Natteru, P.; Selvakumar, G.; Saeed, D.; Zahoor, H.; Zaheer, S.; Iyer, S.; Zaheer, A. Neuroinflammation induces neurodegeneration. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Spine 2016, 1, 1003. [Google Scholar]
  218. Choi, S.S.; Lee, H.J.; Lim, I.; Satoh, J.-i.; Kim, S.U. Human astrocytes: Secretome profiles of cytokines and chemokines. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e92325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Ma³ek, R.; Borowicz, K.K.; Jargie³³o, M.g.; Czuczwar, S.A.J. Role of nuclear factor kB in the central nervous system. Pharmacol. Rep. 2007, 59, 25–33. [Google Scholar]
  220. Dutta, K.; Thammisetty, S.S.; Boutej, H.; Bareil, C.; Julien, J.-P. Mitigation of ALS pathology by neuron-specific inhibition of nuclear factor kappa B signaling. J. Neurosci. 2020, 40, 5137–5154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Jover-Mengual, T.; Hwang, J.-Y.; Byun, H.-R.; Court-Vazquez, B.L.; Centeno, J.M.; Burguete, M.C.; Zukin, R.S. The role of NF-κB triggered inflammation in cerebral ischemia. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2021, 15, 633610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  222. Shih, R.-H.; Wang, C.-Y.; Yang, C.-M. NF-kappaB signaling pathways in neurological inflammation: A mini review. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2015, 8, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  223. Kaltschmidt, B.; Uherek, M.; Volk, B.; Baeuerle, P.A.; Kaltschmidt, C. Transcription factor NF-κB is activated in primary neurons by amyloid β peptides and in neurons surrounding early plaques from patients with Alzheimer disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 2642–2647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. Martorana, F.; Foti, M.; Virtuoso, A.; Gaglio, D.; Aprea, F.; Latronico, T.; Rossano, R.; Riccio, P.; Papa, M.; Alberghina, L. Differential modulation of NF-κB in neurons and astrocytes underlies neuroprotection and antigliosis activity of natural antioxidant molecules. Oxidative Med. Cell Longev. 2019, 2019, 8056904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  225. Mattson, M.; Meffert, M. Roles for NF-κB in nerve cell survival, plasticity, and disease. Cell Death Differ. 2006, 13, 852–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sanghai, N.; Tranmer, G.K. Biochemical and Molecular Pathways in Neurodegenerative Diseases: An Integrated View. Cells 2023, 12, 2318. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12182318

AMA Style

Sanghai N, Tranmer GK. Biochemical and Molecular Pathways in Neurodegenerative Diseases: An Integrated View. Cells. 2023; 12(18):2318. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12182318

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sanghai, Nitesh, and Geoffrey K. Tranmer. 2023. "Biochemical and Molecular Pathways in Neurodegenerative Diseases: An Integrated View" Cells 12, no. 18: 2318. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12182318

APA Style

Sanghai, N., & Tranmer, G. K. (2023). Biochemical and Molecular Pathways in Neurodegenerative Diseases: An Integrated View. Cells, 12(18), 2318. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12182318

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop