Next Article in Journal
Promotion of Lymphangiogenesis by Targeted Delivery of VEGF-C Improves Diabetic Wound Healing
Next Article in Special Issue
Opportunities and Challenges for the Development of MRCK Kinases Inhibitors as Potential Cancer Chemotherapeutics
Previous Article in Journal
An Inverse Agonist of Estrogen-Related Receptor Gamma, GSK5182, Enhances Na+/I Symporter Function in Radioiodine-Refractory Papillary Thyroid Cancer Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Voltage-Gated T-Type Calcium Channel Modulation by Kinases and Phosphatases: The Old Ones, the New Ones, and the Missing Ones
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Cellular Factors That Shape the Activity or Function of Nitric Oxide-Stimulated Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase

Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiology Division, The University of Texas—McGovern Medical School, 1941 East Road, Houston, TX 77054, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2023, 12(3), 471; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12030471
Submission received: 5 January 2023 / Revised: 29 January 2023 / Accepted: 31 January 2023 / Published: 1 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Exclusive Review Papers in "Cell Signaling")

Abstract

:
NO-stimulated guanylyl cyclase (SGC) is a hemoprotein that plays key roles in various physiological functions. SGC is a typical enzyme-linked receptor that combines the functions of a sensor for NO gas and cGMP generator. SGC possesses exclusive selectivity for NO and exhibits a very fast binding of NO, which allows it to function as a sensitive NO receptor. This review describes the effect of various cellular factors, such as additional NO, cell thiols, cell-derived small molecules and proteins on the function of SGC as cellular NO receptor. Due to its vital physiological function SGC is an important drug target. An increasing number of synthetic compounds that affect SGC activity via different mechanisms are discovered and brought to clinical trials and clinics. Cellular factors modifying the activity of SGC constitute an opportunity for improving the effectiveness of existing SGC-directed drugs and/or the creation of new therapeutic strategies.

1. Introduction

1.1. Cytosolic Guanylyl Cyclase Mediates Diverse Physiological Functions of NO

Nitric oxide (NO) is a gaseous diatomic molecule that acts as an intra- and extracellular messenger mediating diverse physiological and pathophysiological processes in various cells and tissues. NO exerts its function through two independent but overlapping pathways. One pathway relies on cGMP-dependent effector proteins, while another is cGMP-independent [1,2]. NO-stimulated guanylyl cyclase is an essential player in the NO/cGMP-signaling. This enzyme is often referred to as soluble guanylyl cyclase (SGC), due to its primarily cytosolic localization. Although multiple studies revealed that on many occasions, SGC is also found in membrane fractions of cell lysates and tissue homogenates [3,4], the term “SGC” remains most widely used. Soluble GC functions as a typical enzyme-linked receptor. Under resting conditions, SGC possesses weak cGMP-forming activity. However, following the binding of NO molecule to the SGC enzyme, cGMP-forming activity is activated several hundred-fold [5,6]. Elevated cellular cGMP level resulting from SGC activation engages cGMP-dependent kinases, phosphodiesterases, and cyclic nucleotide gated channels that affect a variety of cellular and physiological processes. These include calcium sequestration and cytoskeletal changes, relaxation of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC), improved oxygenation of tissues and organs [7], inhibition of adhesion and subsequent migration of leukocytes [8], reduction of platelet aggregation [9,10], facilitation of the repair of injured endothelium [11,12], inhibition of proliferation and migration of VSMCs [13], regulation of gastrointestinal motility [14], modulation of cancer development [15], and many others.

1.2. SGC Is a Highly Sensitive NO Receptor

SGC is a heterodimer which consists of one α and one β subunit. Humans and mice have two functional isoforms of the α subunit (α1 and α2) and one functional β1 isoform. The heterodimer α1β1 is ubiquitously expressed and has a higher level of expression. It has been recently classified as GC-1 [16]. The α2β1 heterodimer is classified as GC-2. GC-2 isoform is less abundant and is primarily expressed in the brain at the same level as the GC-1 counterpart. GC-2 is also detected in kidney and placenta. GC-1 and GC-2 are very similar in their structure and exhibit very similar responses to NO and other activating or inhibiting small molecules [17]. Nevertheless, there are some substantial differences in subcellular localization of GC-1 and GC-2. Ubiquitous GC-1 is mainly found in the cytosolic compartment of the cell, although a small fraction is membrane-associated [3]. In contrast, brain-expressed GC-2 isoform is primarily associated with the synaptic membrane [18], a property believed to be essential for neurotransmission [4,19].
The α and β subunits of SGC share a lot of sequence similarity and have similar domain organization. Each SGC subunit contains a heme nitric oxide/oxygen binding domain (H-NOX), a Per-Arnt-Sim domain (PAS), a coiled-coil domain (CC), and a catalytic domain (CAT). The β1 H-NOX domain harbors a heme prosthetic group [20], essential for binding the NO molecules. The structure of the α1β1 heterodimer established by cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) shows a two-lobe structure with the H-NOX/PAS domains on one connected by the CC domains end to the CAT domains on the other (Figure 1). Despite some differences between α1 and α2 sequences, the structure of the α2β1 isoform of SGC most likely follows the same fold.
Functional SGC is a hemoprotein containing a heme with ferrous iron. The heme moiety plays a key role in sensing the signal of elevated cellular NO levels. The heme is stabilized within the β1 H–NOX domain via coordination of the heme iron with His105 residue [6,21] and by interaction of the heme propionate groups with the Y135, Ser 137 and Arg 139 residues residing in the same domain [22,23]. The interaction of NO and SGC is a two-step process [24,25]. Initial binding of NO to the distal side of SGC heme results in the formation of a six-coordinate complex. However, unlike the stable complex between NO and heme in hemoglobin, the six-coordinate NO-heme complex of SGC is unstable. In a fraction of a second, the heme-His105 coordinate bond is disrupted (Figure 1A), maintaining only the NO-heme coordinate bond. The disruption of the His105-heme bond seems to release a conformational strain that triggers the relative rotation among α1 and β1 CC helices and straightening of the CC domains, while preserving some interactions between the β1 CC helix and the heme-containing β1 H-NOX domain (Figure 1B). The rotation of the CC helices causes a rotation of the catalytic CAT domains, resulting in changes in the GTP binding pocket [23,26]. These conformational changes only modestly lower the KM for the GTP substrate [27], but significantly increase the Vmax of the cGMP synthesis. Vmax of the high-cGMP output state induced by NO is several hundred times higher than of the resting non-stimulated state [28,29].
Many hemeproteins with histidine as a proximal ligand for heme evolved to sense gaseous diatomic ligands. Although the major physiological function of different globins, such as hemoglobin, myoglobin, or cytoglobins, is to serve as sensors and carriers of molecular oxygen (O2), these proteins are also capable of binding carbon monoxide (CO) and NO with high affinity. Unlike these gaseous sensors, SGC evolved to have a unique ligand selectivity. Studies performed with purified SGC demonstrated that it cannot bind O2 even under high pressure of pure O2 [30]. It has been reported that exposure of purified SGC to saturating amounts of CO results in a modest 2–4-fold elevation of cGMP-forming activity [6,31]. However, careful examinations of the reaction between purified GC1 and CO revealed that GC-1 isoform exhibit a low affinity for CO, with an estimated KD of 240–260 µM [30,32]. This value is more than four orders of magnitude higher than the estimated low nM level of physiological CO [33,34,35]. It seems unlikely that physiologically relevant CO-dependent activation of SGC takes place. The affinity of SGC for the NO ligand is much higher. Studies of interaction between purified GC-1 and NO solutions revealed a nanomolar affinity for NO (KD 54 nM) [30,36,37]. Since both SGC isoforms exhibit similar dose-dependent increase of cGMP-forming activity in response to NO donors [38], it is highly probable that the affinity for NO is very similar. Thus, SGC has a strong selectivity towards NO as the main physiological activating agent, as it is expected from a NO receptor. While the gaseous ligand selectivity of GC-1 and GC-2 was not compared, it is reasonable to assume that both SGC isoforms have similar affinities for signaling gasses.
However, if the affinity for NO is regarded as the main parameter determining the role of a protein as a highly sensitive NO receptor, SGC does not seem to fit the role. A number of intracellular histidine ligated hemoproteins have higher affinities for NO than SGC [39]. Thus, it is important to consider physiological levels of NO and SGC. Direct measurements of NO produced in different cells [40,41] and the assessment of bioavailable NO suggest that physiological levels of NO reach subnanomolar concentrations [40,42]. The EC50 values for various NO donors sufficient to elicit a desired physiological response is often in the range of 100 pM to 5 nM [40]. These are much lower values than the ~50 nM KD for NO determined in vitro with purified SGC. Thus, under normal physiological conditions, SGC encounters concentrations of NO much lower than its calculated KD value. Yet, these NO concentrations are sufficient to generate a physiological response. Therefore, the KD value determined at equilibrium and reflecting the affinity for NO is not an appropriate parameter to determine if SGC is an efficient NO receptor. Considering that the waves of NO generated by activated eNOS and nNOS are transient, these levels of NO are not sustained long to establish an equilibrium condition. Therefore, the NO binding constant is a parameter better suited to judge the effectiveness of SGC as NO receptor. While SGC’s affinity for NO is not the highest among known hemoproteins, the kinetics of NO binding to SGC heme is very fast. A number of studies directly measured the kinetics of NO interaction with SGC heme and determined the association constant kon to be in the 1.4–4.5 × 108 M−1s−1 range [24,29,30,43]. This is a diffusion-limited binding and the fastest NO binding among proteins known to interact with NO. Therefore, in a cellular environment containing many proteins competing for NO binding, the binding kinetics of NO to the ferrous SGC heme favors the formation of NO:SGC adduct and subsequent activation of cGMP-forming activity.
Once formed, the NO:SGC complex should be quite labile to be appropriate for various rapid signaling processes that depends on NO/cGMP signling. NO dissociation measured spectroscopically resulted in a half-life of the NO:SGC complex of approximately 2 min [44]. A similar half-life of approximately 3 min was reported in a different study [45]. These values obtained in vitro with purified SGC are not compatible with fast deactivation required for efficient NO signaling and observed experimentally. For example, studies performed on aortic rings demonstrated that relaxation of aortic rings can be re-elicited 1–2 min after previous exposure to NO [46]. This discrepancy most likely reflects the contribution of different cellular factors. In vitro spectroscopic studies demonstrated that some cellular factors may accelerate the process of NO:SGC decomposition. For example, in the presence of different thiols (DTT, GSH, cysteine) the half-life of the complex is much shorter than without thiols [45], while the addition of Mg2+-GTP yielded a half-life of 5 s [47]. Deactivation of NO:SGC determined by monitoring the decline in cGMP-forming activity yielded a similar ~5 s value for purified protein [48] and cytosolic fraction of bovine retina [49]. Even faster deactivation was reported in case of intact cerebellar cells, where the estimated half-life was 0.2 s [50].
Equally important for SGC function as an efficient NO receptor is the abundance of SGC protein in physiological systems responsive to NO. It has been estimated that intracellular concentrations of SGC, at least in platelets and cerebellar astrocytes, reaches micromolar range [51]. In mouse aorta, the amount of SGC far exceeds the amount needed to mediate the relaxation of aortic smooth muscles. The loss of functional GC-1 in mice lacking α1 SGC subunits was functionally compensated by GC-2 [52], which constitutes only 6% of the total SGC activity in aorta. The large excess of SGC over the bioavailable NO coupled with the fast-binding kinetics ensures that a sufficient number of SGC molecules is activated to achieve the desired physiological outcome.
In vitro studies with purified SGC heterodimer clearly demonstrate that the presence of Mg2+-GTP and NO is sufficient to promote NO-dependent activation of cGMP-forming activity. However, multiple data indicate that there is a number of cellular factors affecting either positively or negatively this process. For example, SGC has a higher sensitivity for NO [51,53] in intact cells than in vitro. The rate of NO dissociation from SGC heme in cerebellar cells is 25 times higher than the one observed in vitro with purified protein [50]. There is multiple evidence of SGC desensitization in vivo, but no desensitization is observed with the purified enzyme in vitro [54]. A number of studies reported that some cells contain factors affecting SGC activity. For example, the lysates of endothelial cells contain a heat-labile activator of SGC [55], while COS-7 cells contain factor(s) that strongly enhance the activity of resting and NO-activated purified SGC [56]. Studies of the last two and half decades demonstrated that SGC activity may be upregulated via allosteric modulation by synthetic small molecules. Two types of such allosteric regulators have been identified [57], namely SGC stimulators and SGC activators. Allosteric stimulators of SGC strongly potentiate NO signaling by sensitizing the enzyme to low doses of NO [57]. Many of these stimulators are undergoing clinical trials at different stages. At least two stimulators, riociguat and vericiguat, were approved as SGC-targeting therapeutics for the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension [58,59], and heart failure conditions [60,61]. Allosteric activators seem to target the β1 H-NOX domain and activate NO-independently the enzyme that lacks heme or contains oxidized ferric heme [62]. They are also promising drug candidates [63]. The existence of such synthetic allosteric regulators suggests the potential existence of a cellular factor(s) that affect(s) the activity of SGC in a similar fashion. This manuscript reviews the effect of cellular factors known to directly modulate the function of SGC as a cellular NO receptor. Factors affecting the expression of SGC subunits or influencing SGC function indirectly are not discussed.

2. Modulation of SGC Activity by Cell- and Tissue-Derived Small Molecules

2.1. Role of Additional NO as Regulating Cellular Factor

In a 2004 study, Russwurm and Koelsing investigated the relationship between the extent of SGC activation and the amount of NO donors present in reaction mixture. They reported that exposing SGC to an equimolar amount of NO is sufficient to generate the NO:SGC adduct, according to the spectral evidence. However, such NO:SGC adduct does not exhibit maximal cGMP-forming activity [64]. They observed that only by providing additional NO the maximal activity can be achieved, suggesting that more than one NO molecule is required for full activation. Later studies by other groups confirmed these observations [36,65]. In the context of these findings, NO may be regarded not only as an activating heme ligand, but also as an allosteric cellular factor. It should be noted that the study by Russwurm and Koesling and several later studies established that when the NO:SGC adduct is formed in the presence of GTP, stoichiometric amount of NO is sufficient to achieve maximal stimulation of SGC without the need for additional NO [36,64,65].
By applying carefully timed sequential addition of 14NO and 15NO ligands with subsequent rapid freezing at different time points and EPR analysis, it was demonstrated that the second NO molecule binds to the proximal side of SGC heme (Figure 2, state C) [66]. Similar NO-heme adduct with NO on the proximal side was observed in the X-ray structure of the NO-bound state of cytochrome c’ of the bacterium Alcaligenes xylosoxidans [67]. Later studies of the NO-bound H-NOX protein from Shewanella oneidensis (So H-NOX) [68] also reported a similar location of the NO ligand. It has been proposed that the formation of such NO-heme adduct with NO on the proximal side may stabilize the activated state of SGC and explains how maximal cGMP activity is achieved [36,37,66,69].
Studies by another group proposed an alternative mechanism that explains the stimulatory effect of the additional NO molecule. The authors demonstrated that SGC pretreated with methyl methanethiosulfonate (MMTS), a thiol reactive compound, does not exhibit full activation, even when excess NO donor was applied. Thus, a putative protein modification of SGC in the form of nitrosothiol or thionitroxide has been postulated [70] (Figure 2, state D), but the specific cysteine residues involved remains to be determined.
Regardless of the mechanism by which additional NO exerts its stimulatory action on purified SGC, it is not clear if this effect is reproduced in the cellular environment. As already mentioned above, the stimulatory effect of additional NO is not needed to achieve maximal activity when the reaction happens in the presence of GTP [36,65]. Considering that intracellular concentrations of GTP is estimated to be around 100–200 µM [71,72] and the lower KM(GTP) value (~70 µM ) for purified SGC [73], most of the intracellular SGC should be in the GTP bound form. Another important factor to be considered is the physiological ratio of produced NO to available SGC enzyme. As already mentioned, the physiological level of NO in different cells reaches subnanomolar concentrations [40,41,42], while SGC level may reach micromolar levels. Thus, under normal physiological conditions, the cells exhibiting a robust NO/cGMP-dependent signaling have a substantial excess of the NO receptor over the bioavailable NO, making it unlikely for NO to have an allosteric function. Therefore, the allosteric role of NO most likely may exhibit itself only in inflammatory conditions, when there is a sustained production of NO due to the activity of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS).
The synthesis of NO under conditions of oxidative stress results in byprodact formation of nitrosylated thiols of various nature [74], including free-thiol cysteines in proteins. Early studies by Ignarro and colleagues implicated nitrosothiols in activation of SGC in different cell models [75,76,77]. These observations reflect the instability of different nitrosothiols, which are susceptible to reduction and release of captured NO. Several decades later, the studies by Beuve and colleagues demonstrated that the results are quite different if the decomposition of nitrosothiols is being carefully controlled. They demonstrated that following the pretreatment with S-nitrosating agent S-nitrosocysteine (CSNO) SGC exhibits a significant decrease in responsiveness to NO donors [78], essentially demonstrating desensitization of SGC. In a series of studies, Beuve and colleagues demonstrated S-nitrosylation of SGC in various systems and conditions. They reported S-nitrosylation of SGC in human umbilical vein endothelial cells treated with vascular endothelial growth factor; in isolated aorta after prolonged exposure to acetylcholine [78]; in aortic smooth muscle cells exposed to nitrovasodilator nitroglycerin [79]; in aldosterone-treated bovine vascular smooth muscle cells [80]; in a hypertensive model of angiotensin II-treated rats [81]. Nitrosative desensitization of SGC was also confirmed with different S-nitrosating agents [82] or in mice overexpressing endothelial NOS [83]. Initial studies revealed that two cysteine residues in the α1 and β1 H-NOX domain, αC243 and βC122, are responsible for SGC desensitization via nitrosylation [78]. However, subsequent thorough proteomic examination revealed additional SGC cysteine residues that may be susceptible to S-nitrosylation and contribute to desensitization [78,79,81,83,84,85]. In summary, many studies clearly demonstrate that NO plays not only the role of heme ligand that activates cGMP-forming activity of SGC, but also may act as a modulator of SGC activity and function in specific conditions.

2.2. Role of Free Cellular Thiols in SGC Function

A simple analysis of the amino acid composition of human SGC reveals a high content of Cys residues. Using a large protein data set as reference, Marino and Gladyshev estimated that the frequency of cysteine residues in an average cytosolic protein is ~1.59% [86]. However, the frequency of cysteine residues in the α1 and β1 subunits is 3.3% and 2.3%, respectively. As described above, many of these Cys residues may be nitrosylated, affecting the extent of SGC activation by NO. However, other processes involving Cys residues, such as disulfide bond formation, oxidation to sulfenic acid, or sulfonation may take place. Early studies of SGC demonstrated the susceptibility of the enzyme to different thiol-targeting agents. For example, SGC activity in hepatic cells was inhibited by arsenite, which interacts with cysteines, but reversed by the thiol reducing agent dimercaprol [87]. Purified enzyme was inhibited by agents inducing disulfide bonds, but the inhibition was restored by thiol-reducing dithiothreitol (DTT) [88,89]. One study demonstrated that 35S-labeled cystin was incorporated into the purified SGC and this label was released by DTT [88]. Collectively, these studies indicate that a number of Cys residues of SGC may be susceptible to disulfide bond formation or other type of cysteine oxidation/modification, which may affect the NO receptor function of SGC. In recent years, a series of reports using proteomic and bioinformatic tools identified a number of SGC cysteine residues that may be involved in these processes [85,90,91].
Since most of the inhibitory effects of cysteine-targeting agents were reversed by different thiols, the early studies uncovered the importance of cellular thiols in maintaining SGC function. Early studies on biochemical purification of SGC noticed a loss of NO responsiveness of SGC during purification, which can be abolished by the addition of DTT [92]. More recently, it has been demonstrated that cellular thiols, such as GSH, play an important role in modulating the effect of SGC cysteine nitrosylation. It has been shown that incubation with GSH reverses the desensitization of SGC caused by cysteine nitrosylation and at certain doses prevents the nitrosylation from taking place [82].
Thiols were also shown to play an important role in maintaining the proper redox state of the heme moiety in SGC. For NO signal recognition, it is important that SGC heme iron is in the reduced ferrous state. Oxidation of SGC heme prevents the binding of NO and activation of SGC. Moreover, SGC with oxidized heme has the tendency to lose heme [93] and is more susceptible to degradation [94,95,96]. The discovery of NO-independent activators of SGC allowed a better understanding of the widespread occurrence of SGC with oxidized heme or even lacking heme. As mentioned above, allosteric activators of SGC activate SGC more efficiently when the heme moiety is lacking or it is in the oxidized state [62]. Using these agents as probing tools, multiple studies demonstrated that even under normal physiological conditions, these activators cause a substantial increase in cellular and tissue cGMP [94,97,98,99,100]. These studies support the notion that there is a substantial portion of cellular and tissue SGC with oxidized heme. The biochemical properties of a rare mutant variant of human SGC associated with hypertension, achalasia, and moyamoya conditions [101] was recently reported. The Cys517→Tyr substitution in the α1 subunit rendered the mutant SGC heme more susceptible to oxidation, causing a higher rate of degradation of the mutant SGC under oxidative condition [27]. Previous studies demonstrated that some thiols, such as DTT, are effective reducing agents that cause the reduction of oxidized SGC heme [102]. After exposure to DTT, SGC with oxidized heme fully restored its ability to bind NO and activate cGMP-forming activity. In the case of mutant variant α1C517Yβ1, such protective effect of cellular thiols is impaired, underlying the observed pathological phenotype [27]. While the mechanism of such thiol-mediated reduction of SGC heme remains to be understood, it underscores the importance of cellular thiols as cellular factors modulating and supporting the function of SGC.
Hydrogen sulfide is another cellular factor affecting the redox state of SGC heme. Three enzymes are recognized as endogenous sources of H2S in various cells and tissues: cystathionine γ-lyase (CSE), cystathionine β-synthase (CBS), and 3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase [103]. When SGC with ferric heme was exposed to hydrogen sulfide, the heme was reduced to ferrous form, coinciding with restored ability to bind NO and stimulate cGMP-forming activity [104]. Studies in cultured rat aortic smooth muscle cells and mouse aortic rings provide supportive evidence that H2S-mediated reduction of ferric SGC heme is a physiological process that facilitates NO-mediated cellular signaling [104].

2.3. Role of Ca2+ Ion in the Activity of SGC

Increased intracellular Ca2+ is essential for activation of endothelial and neuronal nitric oxide synthases [105]. A number of studies also demonstrate that changes in intracellular Ca2+ directly affect the activity and function of SGC. Initial studies performed on purified SGC revealed that Ca2+ inhibits SGC [106,107]. Calcium treatment dramatically decreased Vmax and KM(GTP) for purified SGC or SGC expressed in different cell lines [107,108]. Mechanistic studies unmasked the negative allosteric sites with high (Ki~10 µM) and low (Ki~100 µM) affinities for Ca2+ mediating noncompetitive and uncompetitive inhibition, respectively [109]. The same study reported that purified SGC binds 45Ca2+ even in the presence of a large excess of Mg2+ ion, demonstrating that SGC is a constitutive Ca2+-binding protein. The nature of this Ca2+-binding site remains to be determined. Studies in different cell lines demonstrated that carbachol-, thrombospondin-1-, or angiotensin II-induced increase of cellular Ca2+ lowers SGC activity [107,108]. Depolarization of pituitary cells by high K+ and L-type Ca2+-channel agonists increased intracellular Ca2+ and blunted the elevation of cellular cGMP in response to NO [110]. Similar effect to elevated cellular Ca2+ was also reported in pancreatic acinar cells [111]. On the other hand, studies in cytosolic fraction of bovine retina revealed that Ca2+ slows down the deactivation of SGC [49].
Elevated Ca2+ not only affects the activity of SGC, but also influences its subcellular localization. It was reported that increased Ca2+ promotes translocation of SGC to the membrane fraction of human platelets and to the caveolar fraction of lung endothelial cell [3]. Interestingly, the membrane-associated SGC was more sensitive to lower doses of NO donor than cytosolic SGC. It remains to be determined if Ca2+-induced translocation of SGC to the membrane is dependent on the direct binding of Ca2+ to one of the Ca2+-binding sites on SGC or if this is a PKC-dependent process.

2.4. Cell- and Tissue-Derived Allosteric Factors

The discovery of synthetic allosteric regulators of SGC activity points to the possibility that various small molecules of cellular origin may possess identical or similar function and affect the cGMP-forming activity of SGC. Synthetic allosteric stimulators on their own activate SGC relatively weakly. However, in the presence of these stimulators, SGC exhibits a robust activation by low concentration of NO, which usually do not elicit any substantial effects [112]. The cryoEM studies demonstrated that the synthetic allosteric stimulator YC-1 binds directly between the beta H-NOX domain and the two CC domains [113]. Other studies revealed that cobinamide, a naturally occurring precursor of vitamin B12, shares some functional similarities with synthetic stimulators. Cobinamide weakly activates sGC, but significantly enhances the effect of YC-1, reaching levels of activation observed with moderate concentrations of NO donors [114]. No stimulation of NO-dependent activation was observed with cobinamide. The binding of cobinamide was also mapped to the fragment of SGC protein containing the CC and the catalytic region. Although relaxation of isolated aortic rings in response to cobinamide was demonstrated in organ baths, the physiological role of cobinamide-dependent activation of SGC remains to be demonstrated. Since symbiotic microbiome and diet are the main source of vitamin B12 in humans [115], it is possible that cobinamide-dependent regulation of SGC is restricted to the GI tract, where SGC plays an important role in motility [14].
As discussed above, the discovery of SGC allosteric activators that act by occupying the empty heme pocket [116] allowed the discovery that a substantial portion of SGC lacks heme. Long before the discovery of synthetic allosteric SGC activators, Ignarro’s research team reported that SGC is highly activated by protoporphyrin IX [117], a precursor in heme synthesis. Later studies demonstrated that protoporphyrin IX is an effective activator only of SGC lacking heme [118]. Therefore, protoporphyrin IX may be regarded as a potential cell-derived allosteric activator on SGC. Interestingly, the product of heme breakdown by heme oxygenase has an opposite effect. It has been demonstrated that biliverdin IX significantly decreases both basal and NO-stimulated activities of SGC [119], presumably by binding to the heme pocket and displacing the heme. Another potential SGC inhibiting small molecule synthesized by cells is carnosine. Carnosine, a dipeptide beta-alanyl-L-histidine synthesized in the liver [120], is known for its anti-oxidant properties [121]. Several studies reported that carnosine inhibits NO-dependent activation of SGC [122,123]. It has been speculated that carnosine may chelate the heme iron, thus interfering with the binding of NO [124].

3. Modulation of SGC Activity by Cellular Proteins

In addition to cell-derived small molecules that directly affect SGC, a growing list of proteins has been reported to shape SGC activity and function.

3.1. Proteins Affecting the Redox Status of SGC Thiols

The high frequency of cysteine residues in SGC provides ample opportunities for misfolding in a thiol oxidation environment. Oxidoreductase protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) is an enzyme in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) that catalyzes the formation and breakage of disulfide bonds between cysteine residues within proteins during the maturation process [125]. PDI was reported to interact with purified SGC and inhibit its activity [126]. This interaction appears to be via the formation of a mixed thiol-disulfide bond between SGC and PDI. The biological relevance of such interaction remains to be determined, considering that PDI is primarily in ER, while SGC is exclusively outside of ER. The cytosolic oxidoreductase thioredoxin-1 also associates with SGC via a similar mixed disulfide [127]. Thioredoxin-1 was shown to reverse the S-nitrosylation of SGC and protect the enzyme from desensitization. Considering the importance of cysteine residues of SGC, it is highly plausible that other cellular proteins affecting cellular thiol redox status may indirectly modulate the function of SGC.

3.2. Proteins Affecting the Redox Status of SGC Heme

Maintaining the heme moiety in a reduced state is essential for the binding of NO and the function of SGC as NO receptor. In 1999, Gupte and colleagues reported that a flavoprotein-containing NADPH oxidoreductase is important in restoring the sensitivity to NO for SGC with oxidized heme [128]. NADPH was essential for this restoration. In later studies, it was reported that Cytochrome B5 reductase (Cyb5R3) is important for maintaining the reduced state of SGC heme [98]. Cyb5R3 is also known as methemoglobin reductase and requires NADPH for its function. Mice lacking Cyb5R3 in vascular smooth muscle cells exhibit higher levels of SGC containing oxidized heme [100].

3.3. Proteins Affecting the Assembly of SGC Heterodimer

The assembly of functional heme-containing SGC heterodimer is a stepwise process requiring the involvement of additional interacting proteins. Careful studies by the Stuehr group discovered that upon translation the heme-deficient β1 subunit (apo-β1) associates with the major cytosolic chaperone Hsp90 [129,130], which promotes its maturation. The heme moiety is then provided by GAPDH, which binds mitochondrially derived heme and delivers it to the β1 subunit [131,132]. The association of the β1 subunit with Hsp90 and the ATP-ase activity of HSP90 are essential for the translocation of heme from GAPDH to the apo-β1 [133]. Only after the insertion of heme Hsp90 dissociates from the β1 subunit and allows the binding of the α1 subunit and formation of the functional heterodimer [134]. It should be noted that substitution of the heme-coordinating His105 residue of the β1 subunit by phenylalanine or cysteine completely abolishes the binding of heme to SGC [21,118,135]. Nevertheless, mutant α1β1 heterodimers lacking the heme moiety fully retain the cGMP-forming activity and the ability to form a high-cGMP output state induced by protoporphyrin IX [21,118]. These studies strongly indicate that the insertion of heme is not an obligatory step in the assembly of a functional SGC heterodimer. Interestingly, NO also has a role in the maturation of SGC heterodimer. It is reported that physiological levels of NO promote the deployment of cellular heme and GAPDH-mediated heme insertion [136], demonstrating another role of NO in the function of SGC unrelated to the activation of cGMP-forming activity.

3.4. Proteins Affecting Sub-Cellular Localization of SGC

Although SGC is predominantly found in cytosolic fraction, a significant portion of the enzyme is membrane associated. Interaction of SGC with different proteins promotes this localization. For example, in the brain, 90% of the GC-2 isoform is found in the synaptic membrane. The interaction between the C-terminal region of the α2 subunits of GC-2 with the third PDZ domain of PSD-95 recruits GC-2 to the membrane fraction of synaptosomes [4]. In cardiomyocytes, the interaction of SGC with Hsp90 directs SGC to the plasma membrane of cardiomyocytes within the caveolae [137], where Caveolin 3 may also protect SGC heme from oxidation [138]. The translocation of SGC may also be facilitated by its interaction with AGAP1 and resulting phosphorylation [139]. In cardiomyocytes, the β1 subunit was shown to co-localize and co-precipitate with Connexin 43 at the intercalating discs [140]. The interaction of SGC and Connexin 43 was shown to be important in cardiac electrical function.

3.5. Interacting Proteins Altering the Response to NO

Application of different biochemical and genetic techniques identified a number of SGC interacting proteins that directly affect the activity SGC. The lysate of COS-7 cells, which do not express SGC, was reported to boost several fold the activity of resting and NO-activated SGC. Using a SGC affinity matrix Hsp70 was identified as a protein directly interacting with SGC [56]. The Hsp70/SGC complex was confirmed by immunoprecipitation and was shown to promote membrane localization of SGC. The immunodepletion of Hsp70 from the COS-7 cell lysate blocked the boosting of SGC activity by the lysate. The biological significance of this interaction remains to be unraveled.
By applying a yeast two-hybrid screening approach, the η subunit of the chaperonin containing t-complex polypeptide (CCTη) was identified as a protein interacting with the β1 subunit of SGC [141]. The N-terminal portion of the β1 subunit is crucial for this interaction. The complex between CCTη and SGC was confirmed by co-precipitation and cellular co-localization. The addition of purified CCTη to SGC preparation resulted in diminished activity of SGC stimulated by NO donors, but not by allosteric stimulator BAY41-2272 [141]. The functional role of such interaction is yet to be determined. However, considering the importance of CCT complex in the process of protein folding [142], it can be reasonably assumed that this interaction is involved in the maturation of SGC. As already mentioned, a similar inhibitory effect was described for the complex between oxidoreductase PDI and SGC [126]. In the same yeast two-hybrid screening, the G-protein-signaling modulator 2, also known as LGN for its 10 Leucine-Glycine-Asparagine repeats, was identified as a protein interacting with both α1 and β1 subunits of SGC [143]. The LGN/SGC complex was co-immunoprecipitated from cells expressing both proteins and from native tissues. This interaction required the N-terminal domain of LGN, but did not require the N-terminal portions of alpha1 or beta1 subunits. When overexpressed, LGN decreased the activity of cellular SGC, while the repression of LGN expression correlated with increased sGC activity. Interestingly, the inhibitory effect of LGN was observed only in the presence of cell lysates, indicating that additional cell components are needed. Additional studies are needed to determine the biological significance of this interaction.

3.6. Role of Protein Kinases in SGC Activity

It has been reported that cGMP generated by activated SGC modulates SGC activity via the engagement of cGMP-dependent phosphorylation. Activation of PKG in gastric smooth muscle cells in response to sodium nitroprusside-elicited elevation of cGMP results in phosphorylation and inhibition of SGC [144,145]. The results imply a feedback inhibition of soluble GC activity by PKG-dependent phosphorylation which impedes further synthesis of cGMP. Later studies performed with purified proteins confirmed partial inhibition of SGC by PKG. Mechanistic studies revealed that PKG directly phosphorylates the Ser64 residue of the α1 subunit, resulting in lower Vmax and a blunted improvement of KM(GTP) in response to NO [146]. A different study reported that PKG-dependent inhibition of SGC is caused by the phosphorylation of the β1 subunit [147].
In vitro studies performed with purified SGC and cAMP-dependent kinase (PKA) demonstrated that phosphorylation of the α1 subunit increased SGC activity [148]. Later studies in GH(3) immortalized pituitary cells demonstrated that activation of PKA also enhanced the activity of cellular SGC [149]. Moreover, the expression of a constitutively active PKA in these cells resulted in enhanced SGC-dependent cGMP synthesis and phosphorylation of the α1 subunit. Modulation of SGC activity by PKG and PKA suggest that cAMP and cGMP nucleotides should also be regarded as important small molecule regulators of SGC.
Studies with SGC isolated from rat brains revealed that protein kinase C directly phosphorylates SGC, while Ca2+ and phorbol ester enhanced the level of SGC phosphorylation. cGMP-forming activity of SGC was potentiated by this PKC-dependent phosphorylation [150]. Considering that elevated cellular Ca2+ stimulated the translocation of SGC to cellular membrane [3], where SGC exhibited higher sensitivity to NO, it is possible that this process is mediated by Ca2+-dependent PKC.

4. Conclusions

The proper function of NO/SGC signaling is essential in the maintenance of multiple physiological functions. It is now clear that a plethora of cell- and tissue-derived small molecules and proteins modulates the activity of SGC (Table 1). Although most of these effects are well characterized in vitro on purified homogeneous systems or in specifically designed cellular models, it is important to further evaluate the contribution of these modulating cell factors on physiological function of SGC in vivo. SGC is an important therapeutic target. A growing number of SGC-targeting synthetic small molecules are being identified and introduced in clinics or tested in clinical trials. Cellular factors modulating the activity of SGC constitute an opportunity for improving the effectiveness of existing SGC-directed drugs and/or the creation of new therapeutic strategies.

Author Contributions

Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: I.S. and E.M. Contributed to figure preparation: E.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health grants HL139838 to E.M. and RAG071999A to I.S.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Martin, E.; Sharina, I.; Seminara, A.R.; Krumenacker, J.; Murad, F. Nitric Oxide cell signalling mediated by cGMP. In Nitric Oxide, Cell Signalling and Gene Expression; Cadenas, E., Lamas, S., Eds.; Taylor & Francis Group, LLC: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  2. Foster, M.W.; McMahon, T.J.; Stamler, J.S. S-nitrosylation in health and disease. Trends Mol. Med. 2003, 9, 160–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zabel, U.; Kleinschnitz, C.; Oh, P.; Nedvetsky, P.; Smolenski, A.; Müller, H.; Kronich, P.; Kugler, P.; Walter, U.; Schnitzer, J.E.; et al. Calcium-dependent membrane association sensitizes soluble guanylyl cyclase to nitric oxide. Nature 2002, 4, 307–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Russwurm, M.; Wittau, N.; Koesling, D. Guanylyl cyclase/PSD-95 interaction: Targeting of the nitric oxide-sensitive alpha2beta1 guanylyl cyclase to synaptic membranes. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 44647–44652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gerzer, R.; Böhme, E.; Hofmann, F.; Schultz, G. Soluble guanylate cyclase purified from bovine lung contains heme and copper. FEBS Lett. 1981, 132, 71–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Stone, J.R.; Marletta, M.A. Soluble Guanylate Cyclase from Bovine Lung: Activation with Nitric Oxide and Carbon Monoxide and Spectral Characterization of the Ferrous and Ferric States. Biochemistry 1994, 33, 5636–5640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Stasch, J.-P.; Becker, E.M.; Alonso-Alija, C.; Apeler, H.; Dembowsky, K.; Feurer, A.; Gerzer, R.; Minuth, T.; Perzborn, E.; Pleiß, U.; et al. NO-independent regulatory site on soluble guanylate cyclase. Nature 2001, 410, 212–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kubes, P.; Suzuki, M.; Granger, D.N. Nitric oxide: An endogenous modulator of leukocyte adhesion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1991, 88, 4651–4655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Radomski, M.W.; Palmer, R.M.J.; Moncada, S. Endogenous nitric oxide inhibits human platelet adhesion to vascular endothelium. Lancet 1987, 330, 1057–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Makhoul, S.; Walter, E.; Pagel, O.; Walter, U.; Sickmann, A.; Gambaryan, S.; Smolenski, A.; Zahedi, R.P.; Jurk, K. Effects of the NO/soluble guanylate cyclase/cGMP system on the functions of human platelets. Nitric Oxide 2018, 76, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Noiri, E.; Hu, Y.; Bahou, W.F.; Keese, C.R.; Giaever, I.; Goligorsky, M.S. Permissive Role of Nitric Oxide in Endothelin-induced Migration of Endothelial Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 1747–1752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Noiri, E.; Lee, E.; Testa, J.; Quigley, J.; Colflesh, D.; Keese, C.R.; Giaever, I.; Goligorsky, M.S. Podokinesis in endothelial cell migration: Role of nitric oxide. Am. J. Physiol. Physiol. 1998, 274, C236–C244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Seki, J.; Nishio, M.; Kato, Y.; Motoyama, Y.; Yoshida, K. FK409, a new nitric-oxide donor, suppresses smooth muscle proliferation in the rat model of balloon angioplasty. Atherosclerosis 1995, 117, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Friebe, A.; Mergia, E.; Dangel, O.; Lange, A.; Koesling, D. Fatal gastrointestinal obstruction and hypertension in mice lacking nitric oxide-sensitive guanylyl cyclase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 7699–7704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhu, H.; Li, J.T.; Zheng, F.; Martin, E.; Kots, A.Y.; Krumenacker, J.S.; Choi, B.-K.; McCutcheon, I.E.; Weisbrodt, N.; Bögler, O.; et al. Restoring Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase Expression and Function Blocks the Aggressive Course of Glioma. Mol. Pharmacol. 2011, 80, 1076–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Alexander, S.P.; Fabbro, D.; Kelly, E.; Mathie, A.; Peters, J.A.; Veale, E.L.; Armstrong, J.F.; Faccenda, E.; Harding, S.D.; Pawson, A.J.; et al. The concise guide to pharmacology 2021/22: Catalytic receptors. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2021, 178 (Suppl. 1), S264–S312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Russwurm, M.; Behrends, S.; Harteneck, C.; Koesling, D. Functional properties of a naturally occurring isoform of soluble guanylyl cyclase. Biochem. J. 1998, 335, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mergia, E.; Russwurm, M.; Zoidl, G.; Koesling, D. Major occurrence of the new alpha2beta1 isoform of NO-sensitive guanylyl cyclase in brain. Cell. Signal. 2003, 15, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mergia, E.; Koesling, D.; Friebe, A. Genetic mouse models of the NO receptor ‘soluble’ guanylyl cyclases. In Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009; Volume 191, pp. 33–46. [Google Scholar]
  20. Derbyshire, E.R.; Marletta, M.A.; Hogg, N.; Fukuto, J.M.; Switzer, C.H.; Miranda, K.M.; Wink, D.A.; Griffith, O.W.; Stuehr, D.J.; Masters, B.S.S.; et al. Structure and Regulation of Soluble Guanylate Cyclase. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2012, 81, 533–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wedel, B.; Humbert, P.; Harteneck, C.; Foerster, J.; Malkewitz, J.; Böhme, E.; Schultz, G.; Koesling, D. Mutation of His-105 in the beta 1 subunit yields a nitric oxide-insensitive form of soluble guanylyl cyclase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 2592–2596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Schmidt, P.M.; Schramm, M.; Schröder, H.; Wunder, F.; Stasch, J.-P. Identification of Residues Crucially Involved in the Binding of the Heme Moiety of Soluble Guanylate Cyclase. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 3025–3032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Kang, Y.; Liu, R.; Wu, J.-X.; Chen, L. Structural insights into the mechanism of human soluble guanylate cyclase. Nature 2019, 574, 206–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhao, Y.; Brandish, P.E.; Ballou, D.P.; Marletta, M.A. A molecular basis for nitric oxide sensing by soluble guanylate cyclase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 14753–14758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Makino, R.; Matsuda, H.; Obayashi, E.; Shiro, Y.; Iizuka, T.; Hori, H. EPR Characterization of Axial Bond in Metal Center of Native and Cobalt-substituted Guanylate Cyclase. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 7714–7723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Horst, B.; Marletta, M.A. Physiological activation and deactivation of soluble guanylate cyclase. Nitric Oxide 2018, 77, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Sharina, I.; Lezgyieva, K.; Krutsenko, Y.; Martin, E. Higher susceptibility to heme oxidation and lower protein stability of the rare alpha1C517Ybeta1 sGC variant associated with moyamoya syndrome. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2021, 186, 114459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lee, Y.-C.; Martin, E.; Murad, F. Human recombinant soluble guanylyl cyclase: Expression, purification, and regulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 10763–10768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Martin, E.; Berka, V.; Tsai, A.; Murad, F. Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase: The Nitric Oxide Receptor. Methods Enzymol. 2005, 396, 478–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Martin, E.; Berka, V.; Bogatenkova, E.; Murad, F.; Tsai, A.L. Ligand selectivity of soluble guanylyl cyclase: Effect of the hydrogen-bonding tyrosine in the distal heme pocket on binding of oxygen, nitric oxide, and carbon monoxide. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 27836–27845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Friebe, A.; Schultz, G.; Koesling, D. Sensitizing soluble guanylyl cyclase to become a highly CO-sensitive enzyme. EMBO J. 1996, 15, 6863–6868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kharitonov, V.G.; Sharma, V.S.; Magde, D.; Koesling, D. Kinetics and Equilibria of Soluble Guanylate Cyclase Ligation by CO: Effect of YC-1. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 10699–10706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Coburn, R.F. Endogenous Carbon Monoxide Metabolism. Annu. Rev. Med. 1973, 24, 241–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Coburn, R.F.; Blakemore, W.S.; Forster, R.E. Endogenous carbon monoxide production in man. J. Clin. Investig. 1963, 42, 1172–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Marks, G.S.; Vreman, H.J.; McLaughlin, B.E.; Brien, J.F.; Nakatsu, K. Measurement of Endogenous Carbon Monoxide Formation in Biological Systems. Antioxidants Redox Signal. 2002, 4, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tsai, A.L.; Berka, V.; Sharina, I.; Martin, E. Dynamic Ligand Exchange in Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase (sGC): Implications for sGC regulation and desensitization. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 43182–43192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Wu, G.; Sharina, I.; Martin, E. Soluble guanylyl cyclase: Molecular basis for ligand selectivity and action in vitro and in vivo. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2022, 9, 1007768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Russwurm, M.; Koesling, D. Isoforms of NO-sensitive guanylyl cyclase. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2002, 230, 159–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Tsai, A.L.; Martin, E.; Berka, V.; Olson, J.S. How do heme-protein sensors exclude oxygen? Lessons learned from cytochrome c’, Nostoc puntiforme heme nitric oxide/oxygen-binding domain, and soluble guanylyl cyclase. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2012, 17, 1246–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Hall, C.N.; Garthwaite, J. What is the real physiological NO concentration in vivo? Nitric Oxide 2009, 21, 92–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sato, M.; Nakajima, T.; Goto, M.; Umezawa, Y. Cell-Based Indicator to Visualize Picomolar Dynamics of Nitric Oxide Release from Living Cells. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 8175–8182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chen, K.; Popel, A. Theoretical analysis of biochemical pathways of nitric oxide release from vascular endothelial cells. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2006, 41, 668–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tsai, A.L.; Berka, V.; Martin, E.; Olson, J.S. A "Sliding Scale Rule" for Selectivity among NO, CO, and O2 by Heme Protein Sensors. Biochemistry 2012, 51, 172–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kharitonov, V.G.; Sharma, V.S.; Magde, D.; Koesling, D. Kinetics of Nitric Oxide Dissociation from Five- and Six-Coordinate Nitrosyl Hemes and Heme Proteins, Including Soluble Guanylate Cyclase. Biochemistry 1997, 36, 6814–6818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Brandish, P.E.; Buechler, W.; Marletta, M.A. Regeneration of the Ferrous Heme of Soluble Guanylate Cyclase from the Nitric Oxide Complex: Acceleration by Thiols and Oxyhemoglobin. Biochemistry 1998, 37, 16898–16907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Palmer, R.M.J.; Ferrige, A.G.; Moncada, S. Nitric oxide release accounts for the biological activity of endothelium-derived relaxing factor. Nature 1987, 327, 524–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Kharitonov, V.G.; Russwurm, M.; Magde, D.; Sharma, V.S.; Koesling, D. Dissociation of Nitric Oxide from Soluble Guanylate Cyclase. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1997, 239, 284–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Russwurm, M.; Mergia, E.; Mullershausen, F.; Koesling, D. Inhibition of Deactivation of NO-sensitive Guanylyl Cyclase Accounts for the Sensitizing Effect of YC-1. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 24883–24888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Margulis, A.; Sitaramayya, A. Rate of Deactivation of Nitric Oxide-Stimulated Soluble Guanylate Cyclase: Influence of Nitric Oxide Scavengers and Calcium. Biochemistry 2000, 39, 1034–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bellamy, T.C.; Garthwaite, J. Sub-second Kinetics of the Nitric Oxide Receptor, Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase, in Intact Cerebellar Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 4287–4292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Batchelor, A.M.; Bartus, K.; Reynell, C.; Constantinou, S.; Halvey, E.J.; Held, K.F.; Dostmann, W.R.; Vernon, J.; Garthwaite, J. Exquisite sensitivity to subsecond, picomolar nitric oxide transients conferred on cells by guanylyl cyclase-coupled receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 22060–22065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mergia, E.; Friebe, A.; Dangel, O.; Russwurm, M.; Koesling, D. Spare guanylyl cyclase NO receptors ensure high NO sensitivity in the vascular system. J. Clin. Investig. 2006, 116, 1731–1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bellamy, T.C.; Wood, J.; Goodwin, D.A.; Garthwaite, J. Rapid desensitization of the nitric oxide receptor, soluble guanylyl cyclase, underlies diversity of cellular cGMP responses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 2928–2933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sharma, V.S.; Magde, D. Activation of Soluble Guanylate Cyclase by Carbon Monoxide and Nitric Oxide: A Mechanistic Model. Methods 1999, 19, 494–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Schmidt, K.; Schrammel, A.; Koesling, R.; Mayer, B. Molecular Mechanisms Involved in the Synergistic Activation of Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase by YC-1 and Nitric Oxide in Endothelial Cells. Mol. Pharmacol. 2001, 59, 220–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Balashova, N.; Chang, F.-J.; Lamothe, M.; Sun, Q.; Beuve, A. Characterization of a Novel Type of Endogenous Activator of Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 2186–2196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Sandner, P.; Zimmer, D.P.; Milne, G.T.; Follmann, M.; Hobbs, A.; Stasch, J.-P. Soluble Guanylate Cyclase Stimulators and Activators. In Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2019; Volume 264, pp. 355–391. [Google Scholar]
  58. Ghofrani, H.A.; D’Armini, A.M.; Grimminger, F.; Hoeper, M.M.; Jansa, P.; Kim, N.H.; Mayer, E.; Simonneau, G.; Wilkins, M.R.; Fritsch, A.; et al. Riociguat for the treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 369, 319–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Ghofrani, H.A.; Galiè, N.; Grimminger, F.; Grünig, E.; Humbert, M.; Jing, Z.C.; Keogh, A.M.; Langleben, D.; Kilama, M.O.; Fritsch, A.; et al. Riociguat for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 369, 330–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Armstrong, P.W.; Pieske, B.; Anstrom, K.J.; Ezekowitz, J.; Hernandez, A.F.; Butler, J.; Lam, C.S.; Ponikowski, P.; Voors, A.A.; Jia, G.; et al. Vericiguat in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1883–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Lam, C.S.; Giczewska, A.; Sliwa, K.; Edelmann, F.; Refsgaard, J.; Bocchi, E.; Ezekowitz, J.A.; Hernandez, A.F.; O’Connor, C.M.; Roessig, L.; et al. Clinical Outcomes and Response to Vericiguat According to Index Heart Failure Event: Insights From the VICTORIA Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2020, 6, 706–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Sandner, P.; Follmann, M.; Becker-Pelster, E.; Hahn, M.G.; Meier, C.; Freitas, C.; Roessig, L.; Stasch, J. Soluble GC stimulators and activators: Past, present and future. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2021, 178, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hahn, M.G.; Lampe, T.; El Sheikh, S.; Griebenow, N.; Woltering, E.; Schlemmer, K.-H.; Dietz, L.; Gerisch, M.; Wunder, F.; Becker-Pelster, E.-M.; et al. Discovery of the Soluble Guanylate Cyclase Activator Runcaciguat (BAY 1101042). J. Med. Chem. 2021, 64, 5323–5344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Russwurm, M.; Koesling, D. NO activation of guanylyl cyclase. Embo. J. 2004, 23, 4443–4450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Cary, S.P.L.; Winger, J.A.; Marletta, M.A. Tonic and acute nitric oxide signaling through soluble guanylate cyclase is mediated by nonheme nitric oxide, ATP, and GTP. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 13064–13069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Martin, E.; Berka, V.; Sharina, I.; Tsai, A.-L. Mechanism of Binding of NO to Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase: Implication for the Second NO Binding to the Heme Proximal Site. Biochemistry 2012, 51, 2737–2746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Lawson, D.M.; Stevenson, C.E.; Andrew, C.R.; Eady, R.R. Unprecedented proximal binding of nitric oxide to heme: Implications for guanylate cyclase. EMBO J. 2000, 19, 5661–5671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Herzik, M.A.; Jonnalagadda, R.; Kuriyan, J.; Marletta, M.A. Structural insights into the role of iron–histidine bond cleavage in nitric oxide-induced activation of H-NOX gas sensor proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, E4156–E4164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wu, G.; Martin, E.; Berka, V.; Liu, W.; Garcin, E.D.; Tsai, A.-L. A new paradigm for gaseous ligand selectivity of hemoproteins highlighted by soluble guanylate cyclase. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2020, 214, 111267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Fernhoff, N.B.; Derbyshire, E.R.; Marletta, M.A. A nitric oxide/cysteine interaction mediates the activation of soluble guanylate cyclase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 21602–21607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Otero, A.D.S. Transphosphorylation and G protein activation. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1990, 39, 1399–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hatakeyama, K.; Harada, T.; Kagamiyama, H. IMP dehydrogenase inhibitors reduce intracellular tetrahydrobiopterin levels through reduction of intracellular GTP levels. Indications of the regulation of GTP cyclohydrolase I activity by restriction of GTP availability in the cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 20734–20739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Schmidt, P.; Schramm, M.; Schröder, H.; Stasch, J.-P. Mechanisms of nitric oxide independent activation of soluble guanylyl cyclase. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2003, 468, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Stomberski, C.; Hess, D.T.; Stamler, J.S. Protein S-Nitrosylation: Determinants of Specificity and Enzymatic Regulation of S-Nitrosothiol-Based Signaling. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2019, 30, 1331–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ignarro, L.J.; Edwards, J.C.; Gruetter, D.Y.; Barry, B.K.; Gruetter, C.A. Possible involvement of S -nitrosothiols in the activation of guanylate cyclase by nitroso compounds. FEBS Lett. 1980, 110, 275–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ignarro, L.J.; Gruetter, C.S. Requirement of thiols for activation of coronary arterial guanylate cyclase by glyceryl trinitrate and sodium nitrite possible involvement of S-nitrosothiols. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Gen. Subj. 1980, 631, 221–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Mellion, B.T.; Ignarro, L.J.; Myers, C.B.; Ohlstein, E.H.; Ballot, B.A.; Hyman, A.L.; Kadowitz, P.J. Inhibition of human platelet aggregation by S-nitrosothiols. Heme-dependent activation of soluble guanylate cyclase and stimulation of cyclic GMP accumulation. Mol. Pharmacol. 1983, 23, 653–664. [Google Scholar]
  78. Sayed, N.; Baskaran, P.; Ma, X.; van den Akker, F.; Beuve, A. Desensitization of soluble guanylyl cyclase, the NO receptor, by S-nitrosylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 12312–12317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Sayed, N.; Kim, D.D.; Fioramonti, X.; Iwahashi, T.; Durán, W.N.; Beuve, A. Nitroglycerin-Induced S-nitrosylation and Desensitization of Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase Contribute to Nitrate Tolerance. Circ. Res. 2008, 103, 606–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Maron, B.A.; Zhang, Y.-Y.; Handy, D.E.; Beuve, A.; Tang, S.-S.; Loscalzo, J.; Leopold, J.A. Aldosterone Increases Oxidant Stress to Impair Guanylyl Cyclase Activity by Cysteinyl Thiol Oxidation in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 7665–7672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Crassous, P.-A.; Couloubaly, S.; Huang, C.; Zhou, Z.; Baskaran, P.; Kim, D.D.; Papapetropoulos, A.; Fioramonti, X.; Durán, W.N.; Beuve, A. Soluble guanylyl cyclase is a target of angiotensin II-induced nitrosative stress in a hypertensive rat model. Am. J. Physiol. Circ. Physiol. 2012, 303, H597–H604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Mayer, B.; Kleschyov, A.L.; Stessel, H.; Russwurm, M.; Münzel, T.; Koesling, D.; Schmidt, K. Inactivation of Soluble Guanylate Cyclase by Stoichiometric S-Nitrosation. Mol. Pharmacol. 2008, 75, 886–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Oppermann, M.; Suvorava, T.; Freudenberger, T.; Dao, V.T.-V.; Fischer, J.W.; Weber, M.; Kojda, G. Regulation of vascular guanylyl cyclase by endothelial nitric oxide-dependent posttranslational modification. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2011, 106, 539–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Fernhoff, N.B.; Derbyshire, E.R.; Underbakke, E.S.; Marletta, M.A. Heme-assisted S-Nitrosation Desensitizes Ferric Soluble Guanylate Cyclase to Nitric Oxide. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 43053–43062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Beuve, A.; Wu, C.; Cui, C.; Liu, T.; Jain, M.R.; Huang, C.; Yan, L.; Kholodovych, V.; Li, H. Identification of novel S-nitrosation sites in soluble guanylyl cyclase, the nitric oxide receptor. J. Proteom. 2016, 138, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Marino, S.M.; Gladyshev, V.N. Cysteine Function Governs Its Conservation and Degeneration and Restricts Its Utilization on Protein Surfaces. J. Mol. Biol. 2010, 404, 902–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Craven, P.A.; DeRubertis, F. Effects of thiol inhibitors on hepatic guanylate cylase activity. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1978, 524, 231–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Brandwein, H.J.; Lewicki, J.A.; Murad, F. Reversible inactivation of guanylate cyclase by mixed disulfide formation. J. Biol. Chem. 1981, 256, 2958–2962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Braughler, J. Soluble guanylate cyclase activation by nitric oxide and its reversal: Involvement of sulfhydryl group oxidation and reduction. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1983, 32, 811–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Alapa, M.; Cui, C.; Shu, P.; Li, H.; Kholodovych, V.; Beuve, A. Selective cysteines oxidation in soluble guanylyl cyclase catalytic domain is involved in NO activation. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2021, 162, 450–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Beuve, A.; Alruwaili, N.; Kandhi, S.; Sun, D.; Wolin, M.S. Thiol-Based Redox Modulation of Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase, the Nitric Oxide Receptor. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2017, 26, 137–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Braughler, J.M.; Mittal, C.K.; Murad, F. Effects of thiols, sugars, and proteins on nitric oxide activation of guanylate cyclase. J. Biol. Chem. 1979, 254, 12450–12454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Fritz, B.G.; Hu, X.; Brailey, J.L.; Berry, R.E.; Walker, F.A.; Montfort, W.R. Oxidation and Loss of Heme in Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase from Manduca sexta. Biochemistry 2011, 50, 5813–5815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Stasch, J.-P.; Schmidt, P.M.; Nedvetsky, P.I.; Nedvetskaya, T.Y.; Kumar, A.H.S.; Meurer, S.; Deile, M.; Taye, A.; Knorr, A.; Lapp, H.; et al. Targeting the heme-oxidized nitric oxide receptor for selective vasodilatation of diseased blood vessels. J. Clin. Investig. 2006, 116, 2552–2561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Hoffmann, L.; Schmidt, P.; Keim, Y.; Schaefer, S.; Schmidt, H.; Stasch, J. Distinct molecular requirements for activation or stabilization of soluble guanylyl cyclase upon haem oxidation-induced degradation. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2009, 157, 781–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Sharina, I.G.; Jelen, F.; Bogatenkova, E.P.; Thomas, A.; Martin, E.; Murad, F. Alpha1 soluble guanylyl cyclase (sGC) splice forms as potential regulators of human sGC activity. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 15104–15113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Shah, R.C.; Sanker, S.; Wood, K.C.; Durgin, B.G.; Straub, A.C. Redox regulation of soluble guanylyl cyclase. Nitric Oxide 2018, 76, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Rahaman, M.M.; Nguyen, A.T.; Miller, M.P.; Hahn, S.A.; Sparacino-Watkins, C.; Jobbagy, S.; Carew, N.; Cantu-Medellin, N.; Wood, K.C.; Baty, C.J.; et al. Cytochrome b5 Reductase 3 Modulates Soluble Guanylate Cyclase Redox State and cGMP Signaling. Circ. Res. 2017, 121, 137–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Stasch, J.P.; Pacher, P.; Evgenov, O.V. Soluble guanylate cyclase as an emerging therapeutic target in cardiopulmonary diseas. Circulation 2011, 123, 2263–2273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Durgin, B.G.; Hahn, S.A.; Schmidt, H.M.; Miller, M.P.; Hafeez, N.; Mathar, I.; Freitag, D.; Sandner, P.; Straub, A.C. Loss of smooth muscle CYB5R3 amplifies angiotensin II–induced hypertension by increasing sGC heme oxidation. J. Clin. Investig. 2019, 4, e129183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Wallace, S.; Guo, D.C.; Regalado, E.; Mellor-Crummey, L.; Bamshad, M.; Nickerson, D.A.; Dauser, R.; Hanchard, N.; Marom, R.; Martin, E.; et al. Disrupted nitric oxide signaling due to GUCY1A3 mutations increases risk for moyamoya disease, achalasia and hypertension. Clin. Genet. 2016, 90, 351–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Martin, E.; Lee, Y.-C.; Murad, F. YC-1 activation of human soluble guanylyl cyclase has both heme-dependent and heme-independent components. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 12938–12942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Cirino, G.; Szabo, C.; Papapetropoulos, A. Physiological roles of hydrogen sulfide in mammalian cells, tissues, and organs. Physiol. Rev. 2023, 103, 31–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Zhou, Z.; Martin, E.; Sharina, I.; Esposito, I.; Szabo, C.; Bucci, M.; Cirino, G.; Papapetropoulos, A. Regulation of soluble guanylyl cyclase redox state by hydrogen sulfide. Pharmacol. Res. 2016, 111, 556–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Nathan, C. Nitric oxide as a secretory product of mammalian cells. FASEB J. 1992, 6, 3051–3064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Serfass, L.; Carr, H.S.; Aschenbrenner, L.M.; Burstyn, J.N. Calcium Ion Downregulates Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase Activity: Evidence for a Two-metal Ion Catalytic Mechanism. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2001, 387, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Parkinson, S.J.; Jovanovic, A.; Jovanovic, S.; Wagner, F.; Terzic, A.; Waldman, S. Regulation of Nitric Oxide-Responsive Recombinant Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase by Calcium. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 6441–6448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Ramanathan, S.; Mazzalupo, S.; Boitano, S.; Montfort, W.R. Thrombospondin-1 and Angiotensin II Inhibit Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase through an Increase in Intracellular Calcium Concentration. Biochemistry 2011, 50, 7787–7799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Kazerounian, S.; Pitari, G.M.; Ruiz-Stewart, I.; Schulz, S.; Waldman, S.A. Nitric Oxide Activation of Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase Reveals High and Low Affinity Sites That Mediate Allosteric Inhibition by Calcium. Biochemistry 2002, 41, 3396–3404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Andric, S.; Kostic, T.; Tomić, M.; Koshimizu, T.-A.; Stojilkovic, S.S. Dependence of Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase Activity on Calcium Signaling in Pituitary Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 844–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Gukovskaya, A.S.; Pandol, S.J. Dual regulation of cGMP formation by calcium in pancreatic acinar cells. Am. J. Physiol. Content 1995, 268, G900–G907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Friebe, A.; Koesling, D. Mechanism of YC-1-Induced Activation of Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase. Mol. Pharmacol. 1998, 53, 123–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Horst, B.G.; Yokom, A.L.; Rosenberg, D.J.; Morris, K.L.; Hammel, M.; Hurley, J.H.; A Marletta, M. Allosteric activation of the nitric oxide receptor soluble guanylate cyclase mapped by cryo-electron microscopy. Elife 2019, 8, e50634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Sharina, I.; Sobolevsky, M.; Doursout, M.-F.; Gryko, D.; Martin, E. Cobinamides Are Novel Coactivators of Nitric Oxide Receptor That Target Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase Catalytic Domain. Experiment 2011, 340, 723–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Guetterman, H.M.; Huey, S.L.; Knight, R.; Fox, A.M.; Mehta, S.; Finkelstein, J.L. Vitamin B-12 and the Gastrointestinal Microbiome: A Systematic Review. Adv. Nutr. Int. Rev. J. 2021, 13, 530–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Martin, F.; Baskaran, P.; Ma, X.; Dunten, P.W.; Schaefer, M.; Stasch, J.-P.; Beuve, A.; Akker, F.V.D. Structure of Cinaciguat (BAY 58–2667) Bound to Nostoc H-NOX Domain Reveals Insights into Heme-mimetic Activation of the Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 22651–22657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Ignarro, L.J.; Wood, K.S.; Wolin, M.S. Activation of purified soluble guanylate cyclase by protoporphyrin IX. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1982, 79, 2870–2873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Martin, E.; Sharina, I.; Kots, A.; Murad, F. A constitutively activated mutant of human soluble guanylyl cyclase (sGC): Implication for the mechanism of sGC activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 9208–9213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Koglin, M.; Behrends, S. Biliverdin IX is an endogenous inhibitor of soluble guanylyl cyclase. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2002, 64, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Crush, K. Carnosine and related substances in animal tissues. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 1970, 34, 3–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Solana-Manrique, C.; Sanz, F.J.; Martínez-Carrión, G.; Paricio, N. Antioxidant and Neuroprotective Effects of Carnosine: Therapeutic Implications in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Severina, I. Soluble guanylate cyclase of platelets: Function and regulation in normal and pathological states. Adv. Enzym. Regul. 1992, 32, 35–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Severina, I.S.; Busygina, O.G. Effect of carnosine on the activation of human platelet soluble guanylate cyclase by sodium nitroprusside and protoporphyrin IX. Biochem. Int. 1990, 22, 455–465. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  124. Severina, I.S.; Bussygina, O.G.; Pyatakova, N.V. Carnosine as a regulator of soluble guanylate cyclase. Biochemistry 2000, 65, 783–788. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  125. Wilkinson, B.; Gilbert, H.F. Protein disulfide isomerase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2004, 1699, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Heckler, E.J.; Crassous, P.-A.; Baskaran, P.; Beuve, A. Protein disulfide-isomerase interacts with soluble guanylyl cyclase via a redox-based mechanism and modulates its activity. Biochem. J. 2013, 452, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Huang, C.; Alapa, M.; Shu, P.; Nagarajan, N.; Wu, C.; Sadoshima, J.; Kholodovych, V.; Li, H.; Beuve, A. Guanylyl cyclase sensitivity to nitric oxide is protected by a thiol oxidation-driven interaction with thioredoxin-1. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 14362–14370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Gupte, S.A.; Rupawalla, T.; Phillibert, D., Jr.; Wolin, M.S. NADPH and heme redox modulate pulmonary artery relaxation and guanylate cyclase activation by NO. Am. J. Physiol. Cell. Mol. Physiol. 1999, 277, L1124–L1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Ghosh, A.; Stasch, J.-P.; Papapetropoulos, A.; Stuehr, D.J. Nitric Oxide and Heat Shock Protein 90 Activate Soluble Guanylate Cyclase by Driving Rapid Change in Its Subunit Interactions and Heme Content. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 15259–15271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Ghosh, A.; Stuehr, D.J. Soluble guanylyl cyclase requires heat shock protein 90 for heme insertion during maturation of the NO-active enzyme. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 12998–13003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Sweeny, E.A.; Singh, A.B.; Chakravarti, R.; Martinez-Guzman, O.; Saini, A.; Haque, M.M.; Garee, G.; Dans, P.D.; Hannibal, L.; Reddi, A.R.; et al. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase is a chaperone that allocates labile heme in cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 14557–14568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Dai, Y.; Sweeny, E.A.; Schlanger, S.; Ghosh, A.; Stuehr, D.J. GAPDH delivers heme to soluble guanylyl cyclase. J. Biol. Chem. 2020, 295, 8145–8154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Dai, Y.; Schlanger, S.; Haque, M.M.; Misra, S.; Stuehr, D.J. Heat shock protein 90 regulates soluble guanylyl cyclase maturation by a dual mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 12880–12891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Stuehr, D.J.; Misra, S.; Dai, Y.; Ghosh, A. Maturation, inactivation, and recovery mechanisms of soluble guanylyl cyclase. J. Biol. Chem. 2021, 296, 100336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Zhao, Y.; Schelvis, J.P.; Babcock, G.T.; Marletta, M.A. Identification of histidine 105 in the beta1 subunit of soluble guanylate cyclase as the heme proximal ligand. Biochemistry 1998, 37, 4502–4509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Dai, Y.; Faul, E.M.; Ghosh, A.; Stuehr, D.J. NO rapidly mobilizes cellular heme to trigger assembly of its own receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2115774119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Venema, R.C.; Venema, V.J.; Ju, H.; Harris, M.B.; Snead, C.; Jilling, T.; Dimitropoulou, C.; Maragoudakis, M.E.; Catravas, J.D. Novel complexes of guanylate cyclase with heat shock protein 90 and nitric oxide synthase. Am. J. Physiol. Circ. Physiol. 2003, 285, H669–H678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Tsai, E.J.; Liu, Y.; Koitabashi, N.; Bedja, D.; Danner, T.; Jasmin, J.-F.; Lisanti, M.; Friebe, A.; Takimoto, E.; Kass, D.A. Pressure-Overload–Induced Subcellular Relocalization/Oxidation of Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase in the Heart Modulates Enzyme Stimulation. Circ. Res. 2012, 110, 295–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Meurer, S.; Pioch, S.; Wagner, K.; Müller-Esterl, W.; Gross, S. AGAP1, a Novel Binding Partner of Nitric Oxide-sensitive Guanylyl Cyclase. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 49346–49354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Crassous, P.; Shu, P.; Huang, C.; Gordan, R.; Brouckaert, P.; Lampe, P.D.; Xie, L.; Beuve, A. Newly Identified NO-Sensor Guanylyl Cyclase/Connexin 43 Association Is Involved in Cardiac Electrical Function. J. Am. Hear. Assoc. 2017, 6, e006397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Hanafy, K.A.; Martin, E.; Murad, F. CCTη, a Novel Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase-interacting Protein. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 46946–46953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Smith, T.M.; Willardson, B.M. Mechanistic insights into protein folding by the eukaryotic chaperonin complex CCT. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2022, 50, 1403–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Chauhan, S.; Jelen, F.; Sharina, I.; Martin, E. The G-protein regulator LGN modulates the activity of the NO receptor soluble guanylate cyclase. Biochem. J. 2012, 446, 445–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Murthy, K.S. Activation of phosphodiesterase 5 and inhibition of guanylate cyclase by cGMP-dependent protein kinase in smooth muscle. Biochem. J. 2001, 360 Pt 1, 199–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Murthy, K.S. Modulation of soluble guanylate cyclase activity by phosphorylation. Neurochem. Int. 2004, 45, 845–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Zhou, Z.; Sayed, N.; Pyriochou, A.; Roussos, C.; Fulton, D.; Beuve, A.; Papapetropoulos, A. Protein Kinase G Phosphorylates Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase on Serine 64 and Inhibits Its Activity. Arter. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2008, 28, 1803–1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Ferrero, R.; Rodríguez-Pascual, F.; Miras-Portugal, M.T.; Torres, M. Nitric oxide-sensitive guanylyl cyclase activity inhibition through cyclic GMP-dependent dephosphorylation. J. Neurochem. 2000, 75, 2029–2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Zwiller, J.; Revel, M.-O.; Basset, P. Evidence for phosphorylation of rat brain guanylate cyclase by cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1981, 101, 1381–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Kostic, T.S.; Andric, S.A.; Stojilkovic, S.S. Receptor-Controlled Phosphorylation of α1Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase Enhances Nitric Oxide-Dependent Cyclic Guanosine 5′-Monophosphate Production in Pituitary Cells. Mol. Endocrinol. 2004, 18, 458–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Zwiller, J.; Revel, M.O.; Malviya, A.N. Protein kinase C catalyzes phosphorylation of guanylate cyclase in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 1985, 260, 1350–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Structural changes of SGC in response to NO-dependent activation. (A): Schematic representation of the process of NO:-SGC adduct formation. The five-coordinate heme moiety of SGC (state a) binds NO to form a six-coordinate complex (state b). The six-coordinate complex subsequently converts irreversibly into a five-coordinate complex (state c) due to the rupture of Fe-His105 bond. Corresponding reaction rates are indicated. (B): Structural rearrangement of different SGC domains that occurs following NO binding causes significant activation of cGMP-forming activity.
Figure 1. Structural changes of SGC in response to NO-dependent activation. (A): Schematic representation of the process of NO:-SGC adduct formation. The five-coordinate heme moiety of SGC (state a) binds NO to form a six-coordinate complex (state b). The six-coordinate complex subsequently converts irreversibly into a five-coordinate complex (state c) due to the rupture of Fe-His105 bond. Corresponding reaction rates are indicated. (B): Structural rearrangement of different SGC domains that occurs following NO binding causes significant activation of cGMP-forming activity.
Cells 12 00471 g001
Figure 2. Alternative hypothesis of the allosteric effect of additional NO. In the presence of NO excess, the five-coordinate NO-heme adduct (state A) may bind a second NO to form a transient ternary complex (state B), which rapidly loses the distal NO and converts into a five-coordinate NO-heme adduct with NO bound on the proximal side of heme (state C). Alternatively, the allosteric effect of additional NO is explained by S-nitrosylation of an unspecified cysteine residue (state D), resulting in a full stimulation cGMP-forming activity.
Figure 2. Alternative hypothesis of the allosteric effect of additional NO. In the presence of NO excess, the five-coordinate NO-heme adduct (state A) may bind a second NO to form a transient ternary complex (state B), which rapidly loses the distal NO and converts into a five-coordinate NO-heme adduct with NO bound on the proximal side of heme (state C). Alternatively, the allosteric effect of additional NO is explained by S-nitrosylation of an unspecified cysteine residue (state D), resulting in a full stimulation cGMP-forming activity.
Cells 12 00471 g002
Table 1. Cellular factors modulating the activity and function of SGC.
Table 1. Cellular factors modulating the activity and function of SGC.
Cellular FactorEffectReferences
Role of additional NO as an allosteric factor
Binding of additional NO to the proximal site of heme;
Formation nitrosothiol or thionitroxide by additional NO
Nitrosylation of sGC cysteines
Stabilizes of NO:SGC adduct; enhances SGC activity;
Enhances SGC activity

Desensitizes of SGC towards NO
[66]

[70]

[78,79,81,83,84,85]
Cell- and tissue-derived small molecules
Free cellular thiolsReduction of oxidized SGC heme;
Protects and reverses desensitization by nitrosothiols;
Protects from inhibitory SGC thiol oxidation;
[27,102]
[82]

[87,88,89]
Hydrogen sulfideReduces oxidized SGC heme;[104]
Ca2+ ionInhibits SGC via binding to two Ca2+-binding sites; Promotes translocation of SGC to membrane fraction. [106,107,108]

[3]
Protoporphyrin IXActivates heme-deficient SGC[117,118]
Biliverdin IXInhibits SGC activity[119]
CarnosineInhibits SGC activation by NO[122,123]
CobinamideStimulates SGC activity[114]
Cellular proteins
Protein targeting SGC thiols
-protein disulfide isomerase (PDI)
-thioredoxin-1

Inhibits SGC activity
Reverses S-nitrosylation of SGC

[126]
[127]
Protein affecting SGC heme
-CytB5R3
-Caveolin 3

Maintains SGC heme in ferrous state
Possibly protects SGC heme in cardiomyocytes


[138]
Proteins affecting SGC maturation
-Hsp90

-GAPDH

Promotes maturation of the β1 subunit; prevents premature binding of α1
Delivers heme to the β1 subunit

[129,130]

[131,132,133]
Protein affecting cellular localization
-PSD95
-Hsp90
-Connexin 43

-AGAP1

Localizes GC-2 to synaptosomes
Directs SGC to caveolae in cardiomyocytes
Binds SGC at the intercalating discs, affects cardiac electrical function
Promotes SGC phosphorylation

[4]
[137]
[140]

[139]
Proteins affecting SGC activity
-CCTη
-Hsp70

-LGN

Inhibits SGC activity upon binding
Enhances SGC activity; promotes membrane localization
Inhibits SGC in concert with unknown cellular factors

[141]
[56]

[143]
Protein kinases affecting SGC
-PKG
-PKA
-PKC

Inhibition of SGC activity
Stimulation of SGC activity
Stimulation of SGC activity

[144,145,146,147]
[148,149]
[150]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sharina, I.; Martin, E. Cellular Factors That Shape the Activity or Function of Nitric Oxide-Stimulated Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase. Cells 2023, 12, 471. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12030471

AMA Style

Sharina I, Martin E. Cellular Factors That Shape the Activity or Function of Nitric Oxide-Stimulated Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase. Cells. 2023; 12(3):471. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12030471

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sharina, Iraida, and Emil Martin. 2023. "Cellular Factors That Shape the Activity or Function of Nitric Oxide-Stimulated Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase" Cells 12, no. 3: 471. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12030471

APA Style

Sharina, I., & Martin, E. (2023). Cellular Factors That Shape the Activity or Function of Nitric Oxide-Stimulated Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase. Cells, 12(3), 471. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12030471

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop