Next Article in Journal
New Model Systems and the Development of Targeted Therapies for the Treatment of Neurofibromatosis Type 1-Associated Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors
Previous Article in Journal
Telomere and Centromere Staining Followed by M-FISH Improves Diagnosis of Chromosomal Instability and Its Clinical Utility
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study of the Relationship between Polymorphisms in the IL-8 Gene Promoter Region and Coccidiosis Resistance Index in Jinghai Yellow Chickens

1
College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225009, China
2
Joint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-Product Safety, the Ministry of Education of China, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225009, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2020, 11(5), 476; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11050476
Submission received: 26 March 2020 / Revised: 23 April 2020 / Accepted: 24 April 2020 / Published: 27 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Genetics and Genomics)

Abstract

:
Interleukin 8 (IL-8) participates in the immune response and has the function of inducing neutrophils to release lysosomal enzymes and eliminate pathogens. This study was to investigate the effect of single nucleotide mutations in the IL-8 gene promoter region on the coccidiosis resistance index. In this study, 180 infected Eimeria tenella (E. tenella) Jinghai yellow chickens were used as experimental samples. DNA sequencing technology was used to detect single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the IL-8 gene promoter region. The association between these SNPs and coccidiosis resistance indexes (including superoxide dismutase (SOD), malondialdehyde (MDA), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-PX), catalase (CAT), nitric oxide (NO), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-2 (IL-2), interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-8, and interferon-γ (IFN-γ)) were analyzed. Three SNPs (T-550C, G-398T, and T-360C) were detected. Significant associations were found between each genotype at the T-550C site with NO (p-value = 0.006) and IL-8 (p-value = 0.034) indexes. Significant associations were found between each genotype at the G-398T site with SOD (p-value = 0.042), CAT (p-value = 0.049), NO (p-value = 0.008), and IL-2 (p-value = 0.044) indexes. Significant associations were found between each genotype at the T-360C site with SOD (p-value = 0.007), NO (p-value = 0.046), IL-2 (p-value = 0.041), IL-8 (p-value = 0.039), and IFN-γ (p-value = 0.042) indexes. Haplotype analysis showed that multiple indexes of the H1H3 haplotype combination were significantly higher than other haplotype combinations. Therefore, mutation of the IL-8 gene promoter region has a significant regulatory effect on the coccidiosis resistance index, with a change in transcription factor binding potentially altering IL-8 gene expression, thereby further affecting the IL-8 level in plasma. However, the specific mechanism needs further study.

1. Introduction

Coccidiosis is a very serious intestinal disease caused by protozoan parasites, which can lead to significant weight loss, malnutrition, blood loss, increased susceptibility to other disease factors, reduced animal production performance, and massive economic losses to the poultry industry [1,2]. Chickens are susceptible to Eimeria, with Eimeria tenella, which is parasitic in the cecum, being one of the most pathogenic species. Pathological manifestations include intestinal mucosal injury, cecal swelling, bleeding, and discharge of bloody stools [3,4]. So far, control by drugs and live vaccines are the two major coccidiosis control strategies [5,6]. However, anticoccidial drugs and vaccination can cause risks, such as drug residues, drug resistance, and strain variation [7,8]. Therefore, studying the genes and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with coccidia at the molecular level and applying the results to breeding new strains resistant to coccidiosis are effective ways to solve this problem. Interleukin 8 (IL-8) is a chemotactic cytokine that induces neutrophils to release lysosomal enzymes, clears pathogens, and also participates in immune responses, stimulating immune cell resistance [9,10,11]. Cornelissen et al. [12] showed that IL-8 can effectively recruit Th1 CD4+ cells, macrophages, and monocytes and then induce the production of interferon-γ (IFN-γ). Yu et al. [1] showed that glutathione peroxidase (GSH-PX), superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and IL-2 play vital roles in the inflammatory response of chicken E. tenella infection. Swaggerty et al. [13] selected and bred broiler individuals with high levels of the leukocyte proinflammatory cytokines interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-8, and chemokine chemokine c–c motif ligand 2 (CCLi2) for 3 consecutive generations and found that the ability of their offspring to resist E. tenella was significantly higher than that of a group with low expression levels. Lin [14] used RNA-seq technology to analyze the transcriptome of cecal tissues of E. tenella-infected chickens and non-infected control chickens and identified many significantly enriched pathways and differentially expressed genes, including IL-6, IL-8, interleukin-12β (IL-12β), interleukin-15 (IL-15), and transforming growth factor beta-2 (TGFB2). Min et al. [15] inoculated experimental chickens with pcDNA3-1E vaccine containing IL-8 and IL-15 genes, and found that the CD3+ lymphocytes increased significantly, and the number of fecal oocysts shed decreased significantly, which could be used as an adjuvant in the chicken emedia DNA vaccine. Ding et al. [16] injected recombinant protein (3-1e) in combination with cytokines such as IL-2, IL-8, and IFN-γ into chickens, and found that chickens could enhance their ability to resist coccidiosis infection. In this study, the aim was to examine the effect of mutations in the promoter region of the IL-8 gene on coccidiosis resistance indicators and to use this information as a reference for breeding new coccidiosis-resistant chickens.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Animals

A total of 184 (92♂, 92♀) 1-day-old healthy Jinghai yellow chickens were selected from Jinghai Yellow Chicken Resource Farm (Haimen, China), housed in coccidiosis-free conditions and fed with antibiotic-free feed. All the chickens were free from parasitic infection, as tested by fecal detection, during the pre-test period. Each chicken was given an oral infection with 1.5 × 104 E. tenella sporulated oocysts at the age of 30 days, and parasite oocysts were acquired from the Department of Parasitology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University. All animal protocols were approved by the Animal Welfare Committee of Yangzhou University (permit number: SYXK (Su) IACUC 2012-0029), and all efforts were made to minimize the suffering of the chickens.
The method for counting the number of oocysts per gram of feces was as in [14]: 2 g of feces were mixed with 10 mL water and ground up. Saturated salt solution (50 mL) was added and mixed well. A small amount of fecal fluid was drained with a straw and added to the two counting rooms of the McMaster counter plate and counted under a microscope, the average was multiplied by 200 and repeated 3 times to give the number of oocysts per gram of feces.

2.2. Sample Collection

Blood samples were collected from the wing vein of each bird on the 7th day post-infection, anticoagulated by heparin sodium, and centrifuged immediately at 4000 r/min for 5 min. After centrifugation, blood cells, and plasma were stored at −20 °C.

2.3. DNA Extraction

The whole-blood genomic DNA of all chickens was extracted using the conventional phenol:chloroform extraction method. An Eppendorf BioPhotometer (Eppendorf Scientific, Hamburg, Germany) was employed to assess the DNA concentration and quality based on UV light absorbance at 260 and 280 nm. DNA samples of suitable quality were diluted to 100 ng/μL and stored at −20 °C.

2.4. Primer Design and PCR Amplification

According to the published chicken IL-8 gene sequence (Gene ID: 396495) in GenBank, four pairs of primers were designed using Primer Premier 5 software for nucleotide sequence determination, ranging from −2000 bp to −1 bp upstream of the IL-8 gene. The primers were synthesized by Sangon Biotech Co. (Shanghai, China). Primer sequences are shown in Table 1. The amplicon layout in the promoter region of the IL-8 gene is shown in Figure 1.
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out as follows: 10 μL of 2 × Taq Master Mix, 1 μL each of the upstream and downstream primers, 1 μL of DNA template, and ddH2O to 20 μL were mixed. The PCR amplification procedures were: preliminary denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min; 35 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing for 30 s at the optimum primer annealing temperature, and elongation for 1 min at 72 °C; and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The samples were stored at 4 °C.

2.5. SNP Identification

The purified PCR products were sequenced using a 3730XL DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) at Sangon Biotech Co. We compared the sequencing results with DNAMAN 5.2 (Lynnon Corporation, San Ramon, CA, USA) and MEGA 6.06 to determine the SNPs of the IL-8 gene in Jinghai yellow chickens.

2.6. Transcription Factor Binding Site Prediction

AliBaba2.1 software [1] was employed to predict possible transcription factor binding sites (TFBS) in the promoter region of the chicken IL-8 gene. During the prediction, the original sequence and the sequence containing the SNPs in the promoter region of IL-8 gene were analyzed and changes to TFBS determined.

2.7. Linkage Disequilibrium and Haplotype Analysis

SHEsis analysis software [1] was used for linkage disequilibrium and haplotype analysis of the identified SNPs in the promoter region.

2.8. Resistance Index Detection

Plasma antioxidant indexes were determined by biotin double antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Institute of Bioengineering, Nanjing) [14,17]. These indexes included superoxide dismutase (SOD), malondialdehyde (MDA), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-PX), catalase (CAT), nitric oxide (NO), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-2 (IL-2), interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-8, and interferon-γ (IFN-γ).

2.9. Statistical Analysis

The associations of the SNPs and haplotype with the E. tenella resistance index in Jinghai yellow chickens were analyzed by the least square model:
Y=μ + Sex + Genotype + (Sex × Genotype) + e
where Y is the value of the resistance index for each bird; μ is the overall mean; Sex is the effect of sex; Genotype is the effect of genotype or haplotype combination; Sex × Genotype is the interaction effect between sex and genotypes; and e is the random error effect.
The F test of each factor and interaction between factors were performed by using SPSS18.0 software (IBM, NK, USA) [18].
The LSD multiple comparison method was used to compare the difference among groups [18]. The method of multiple testing correction was the Bonferroni adjustment. Statistical significance occurred at p-values < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Clinical Observation

On days 1–3 post-infection, the infected chickens had no noticeable symptoms. On the fourth day post-infection, the infected chickens began to excrete bloody diarrheas, and particularly on the fifth day after infection, bloody diarrheal excretion was the highest. On days 6–7 post-infection, bloody diarrheal excretion began to decrease. The infected chickens appeared listless, wasted food, and presented anal filth along with paralytic and symptoms of spasm. No chicken deaths occurred during the trial period.

3.2. SNP Identification in IL-8 Promoter

Three SNP sites were detected by sequencing and sequence alignment. Mutation site 1 was a T mutated to C at –550 bp (T–550C), the chromosome location was 51282560 and the chromosome (rs) number was rs740065165. Site 2 was mutated from G to T at –398 bp (G–398T). It was located at 51282712 in the chromosome, and the rs number was rs731947764. Site 3 was mutated from T to C at –360 bp (T–360C), which was located at 51282750 in the chromosome, and the rs number was rs16409254. The sequencing results of the 3 SNPs are shown in Figure 2.

3.3. Prediction Results for Transcription Factor Changes Caused by Mutations in SNPs in the Promoter Region of the IL-8 Gene

As shown in Table 2, a mutation from T to C occurred at −550 bp in the promoter region of the IL-8 gene, where the mutation caused the original Oct-1 transcription factor binding site to disappear. A mutation from G to T occurred at −398 bp, resulting in a positional change in the binding site of the original C/EBPalp transcription factor, and a binding site for a Pit-1a transcription factor was added.
A mutation from T to C at −360 bp resulted in the disappearance of the original NF-1 transcription factor binding site.

3.4. Association Analysis of SNPs in the IL-8 Gene Promoter Region and Plasma Resistance Indexes

3.4.1. Association Analysis between Each Genotype of the T–550C Mutation and Coccidiosis

Resistance Indexes of Chickens

In all the figures, different uppercase letters in the same indexes indicate significant differences (p < 0.01); different lowercase letters in the same indexes indicate significant differences (p < 0.05); the same or no letters indicate no significant differences (p > 0.05). The number of individuals of each genotype is shown in brackets. As shown in Figure 3, except for the SOD, MDA, NO, and IL-1β indexes, the other indexes of TC genotype individuals were higher than those of chickens with the other two genotypes, but the difference was not significant (p > 0.05). The IL-8 index of TC genotype individuals was significantly higher than that of TT genotypes (p < 0.05); the NO index of TT genotype individuals was significantly higher than that of CC genotype chickens (p < 0.01)

3.4.2. Association Analysis between Each Genotype of the G–398T Mutation and Resistance Indexes of Chicken Coccidiosis

As shown in Figure 4, the SOD index of TT genotype individuals and the CAT index of GT genotype individuals were significantly higher than those of GG genotype chickens (p < 0.05). The NO index of TT genotype individuals was significantly higher than that of GG genotype chickens (p < 0.01) and significantly higher than that of GT genotype chickens (p < 0.05). The IL-2 index of TT genotype individuals was significantly higher than GT genotype chickens (p < 0.05). The IL-1β and IL-8 indexes of TT genotype individuals were higher than those of GG genotype chickens, but the differences were not significant (p > 0.05).

3.4.3. Association Analysis between Each Genotype of the T–360C Mutation and Coccidiosis

Resistance Indexes of Chickens

As shown in Figure 5, except for the MDA, CAT, IL-1β, and IFN-γ indexes, other indexes of TT genotype individuals were higher than those of chickens with the other two genotypes. For the SOD index, the difference between TT genotypes and CC genotypes was significant (p < 0.01), and TC and CC genotypes were significantly different (p < 0.05). Both TT and TC genotype individuals had significantly higher NO indexes than CC genotype chickens (p < 0.05). TT genotype individuals had significantly higher IL-2 and IL-8 indexes than CC genotype chickens (p < 0.05). CC genotype individuals had significantly higher IFN-γ indexes than the chickens with the other two genotypes (p < 0.05). The GSH-PX and IL-6 indexes of TT genotype individuals were higher than those of the chickens with the other two genotypes, but the differences were not significant (p > 0.05).

3.5. Linkage Disequilibrium Analysis of Each Mutation Site in the IL-8 Gene Promoter Region

D’ and r2 are two commonly used parameters to measure linkage disequilibrium. The probability of the occurrence of recombination events in the linkage disequilibrium region can be directly reflected by the size of D’, while the effectiveness of correlation analysis is directly related to r2. Because D’ is insensitive to changes in gene frequency, r2 is more reliable than D’ when one gene at one site is less frequent [19]. The result is shown in Figure 6. The graphical representation, generated by SHEsis, of the r2 linkage disequilibrium relationship between each SNP is expressed in different colors, where deep red represents high linkage disequilibrium (r2 > 0.80) and light red represents low linkage disequilibrium (r2 < 0.80). The r2 value for each pair-wise comparison is shown (%), indicating a strong linkage disequilibrium between the T–550C and T–360C mutations.

3.6. Haplotype Analysis and Association Analysis between Haplotype Combinations and Resistance Indexes of the IL-8 Gene Promoter Region Mutation Sites

The haplotype analysis produced three haplotypes, H1 (CGC), H2 (TGT), and H3 (TTT), with frequencies of 30.4%, 5.4%, and 61.4%, respectively. Six haplotype combinations (H1H1, H1H2, H1H3, H2H2, H2H3, and H3H3) were produced. The haplotype combination effect on coccidiosis resistance indexes is shown in Figure 7 (haplotype combinations with less than 3 individuals were not used in multiple comparisons). The results showed that the SOD content of H1H3 was significantly higher than that of the other three haplotype combinations (p < 0.05). The GSH-PX content of H3H3 was significantly higher than that of the H1H1 haplotype combination (p < 0.05), and there were no significant differences between H3H3 and H1H3 or H2H3 (p > 0.05). The IL-1β and IFN-γ contents of the H1H3 haplotype combination were significantly higher than those of the H1H1 haplotype combination (p < 0.05), and there were no significant differences between H1H3 and H2H3 or H3H3 (p > 0.05). The IL-8 content of the H1H3 haplotype combination was significantly higher than that of the H2H3 haplotype combination (p < 0.05), and there were no significant differences between H1H3 and H1H1 or H3H3 (p > 0.05).

4. Discussion

4.1. Prediction of Transcription Factor Binding Sites in the IL-8 Gene Promoter Region

The promoter region is the core region of gene transcription regulation, and the SNPs formed by mutation in this region can change the original transcription factor binding sites and associated transcription factors, thereby affecting the expression of traits related to the gene [20]. A transcription factor binding site is a DNA sequence recognized and bound by a transcription factor, with the transcription process being regulated by the interaction between the two. If the binding site changes, it will have an important influence on the binding of transcription factors to regulatory sequences and the expression products of the genes. Therefore, the study of SNPs in gene promoter regions and their association with related traits is also an important way to discover new molecular genetic markers [21,22]. Korkaya et al. [23] found that activated nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) has a positive regulatory effect on the expression of IL-6 and IL-8 in epithelial cells. Wu et al. [24] showed that inhibition of activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3) significantly increased the expression of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-6 and IL-8 in human bronchial epithelial cells. Octamer transcription factor (Oct-1) is a member of the Pit-Oct-Unc (POU) homeodomain family. Oct-1 binds to a diverse range of cis-regulatory DNA sequences through its DNA-binding POU domain and can carry on the negative regulation to the gene [25]. CCAAT enhancer binding protein (C/EBPalp) and nuclear factor-1 (NF-1) play important roles innumerous cellular responses by regulating the transcription of genes from target cells, including the cell proliferation and differentiation, tumorgenesis and apoptosis, and cell cycle regulation [25,26]. Pituitary specific transcription factor (Pit-1a) can bind to and transactivate promoters of growth hormone- and prolactin-encoding genes, and has an important regulatory effect on animal growth and immunity [27]. The transcription factor prediction results of the IL-8 gene promoter region in this experiment indicated that the mutation of T to C at −550 bp caused the original Oct-1 transcription factor binding site to disappear. The mutation of G to T at −398 bp resulted in a positional change in the binding site of the original C/EBPalp transcription factor, and a binding site for the Pit-1a transcription factor was added. The mutation of T to C at −360 bp resulted in the disappearance of the original NF-1 transcription factor binding site. These three mutations have changed the original transcription factor interaction, thereby potentially regulating promoter activity. Changes in transcription factors may change the expression of the IL-8 gene, which in turn affects the content of IL-8 in plasma. IL-8 is involved in the immune response and plays an important role in inflammation and the immune response. Studies have shown that the higher the expression of IL-8 in the body is when chickens are infected with coccidia, the stronger the resistance to coccidiosis [13]. Therefore, it is speculated that the change in transcription factors may affect the chicken’s ability to resist coccidioides, but the specific mechanism remains to be further studied.

4.2. Relationship between SNPs in the IL-8 Gene Promoter Region and Resistance Indexes of Chicken Coccidiosis

Under normal circumstances, the body’s antioxidant enzymes are in a dynamic equilibrium. When the body’s steady state is destroyed, these enzymes will change to maintain the balance of the body’s antioxidant system [28,29]. Cytokines are proteins secreted by immune cells that regulate immune responses through intercellular interactions [30]. Therefore, improving the resistance index of chickens can be an important way to resist coccidiosis infection. In this study, the F test showed that there were no significant effects between sex, and interactions between sex and genotype. SOD, CAT, GSH-PX, and MDA constitute the body’s antioxidant system. CAT is an oxidoreductase capable of decomposing hydrogen peroxide, GSH-PX can work with SOD to remove active oxidative free radicals, and MDA can degrade lipid peroxidationproducts [1,14]. For the T-550C mutation, GSH-PX, CAT, IL-2, IL-6, and IL-8 indexes of TC genotype individuals were significantly different from those of chickens with the other two genotypes. NO can inhibit or kill parasites. Il-2 and other cytokines in the chicken body can induce the secretion of IgA antibodies in immune cells and enhance the immune ability to diseases [14]. For the G-398T mutation, the SOD, CAT, NO, and IL-2 indexes of TT genotype individuals were significantly different from those of chickens with the other two genotypes. IFN-γ can improve the level of the chicken’s protective cellular immunity against coccidiola [14]. For the T-360C mutation, the SOD, NO, IL-2, IL-8, and IFN-γ indexes of TT genotype individuals were significantly different from those of chickens with the other two genotypes. After cocciditis infection, cell metabolism and dysfunction will be caused with the aggravation of organ and tissue damage, and the changes of these indexes may be a manifestation of the body playing a defense role to reduce the damage of the body. The results of Lin and Yu et al. demonstrate this [1,14]. In this study, compared with other genotypes, individuals with certain genotypes formed by mutation have higher anticoccidial ability, and the selection of such individuals may be beneficial to the improvement the population’s anticoccidial abilities.

4.3. Linkage Disequilibrium and Haplotype Analysis

Linkage disequilibrium usually occurs in natural populations, and sites that are in linkage disequilibrium tend to be inherited as a whole in haplotypes [31,32]. Studies have shown that multiple-site combined haplotype analysis considers the interaction of linkage disequilibrium and non-allelic inheritance between SNPs, which has enhanced statistical power [33]. The results showed that the H1H3 haplotype combinations were higher than other haplotype combinations in the resistance indexes for CAT, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IFN-γ, and the SOD content of the H1H3 haplotype combination was significantly higher than the other three haplotype combinations. Thus, the H1H3 haplotype combination is a dominant haplotype combination, which can provide a reference for the breeding of new coccidium-resistant strains. In this study, we detected 14 SNPs in the promoter region of the IL-8 gene. Among the 14 SNPs detected, only three SNPs were significantly correlated with the selected resistance indexes. These associations need to be further tested for their correlation with larger populations. Because these SNPs have the potential to change gene expression, this study can be classed as a preliminary study paving the way for future in-depth studies.
Three mutation sites were detected in the promoter region of the IL-8 gene in Jinghai yellow chickens, which changed their original transcription factor interactions. Correlation analysis with coccidioides resistance indexes revealed that the genotypes of the SNPs and dominant haplotypes in the promoter region of the IL-8 gene have significant effects on resistance indexes. This result indicated that mutation of the IL-8 gene promoter region related to the coccidioides resistance index may affect IL-8 gene expression, but the specific mechanism needs further study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: G.-J.D.; Data curation: X.-H.W., G.-J.D., and H.-L.Y.; Formal analysis: X.-H.W., G.-J.D., W.-B.Z., and H.-L.Y.; Funding acquisition: G.-J.D.; Investigation: X.-H.W., H.-L.Y., W.-B.Z., and C.-H.M.; Methodology: X.-H.W., G.-J.D., and H.-L.Y.; Project administration: G.-J.D.; Supervision: G.-J.D., T.Z., G.-X.Z., K.-Z.X., and J.-Y.W.; Writing—original draft: X.-H.W.; Writing—review and editing: X.-H.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the earmarked fund for Jiangsu Agricultural Industry Technology System (JATS [2019]449), the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD), and the China Agriculture Research System (CARS-41-G23).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all members of this work for their advice and technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yu, H.; Zou, W.; Xin, S.; Wang, X.; Mi, C.; Dai, G.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, G.; Xie, K.; Wang, J.; et al. Association analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms in the 5’ regulatory region of the IL-6 gene with Eimeria tenella resistance in Jinghai yellow chickens. Genes 2019, 10, 890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Blake, D.P.; Tomley, F.M. Securing poultry production from the ever-present Eimeria challenge. Trends Parasitol. 2014, 30, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Wang, X.; Zou, W.; Yu, H.; Lin, Y.; Dai, G.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, G.; Xie, K.; Wang, J.; Shi, H. RNA sequencing analysis of chicken cecum tissues following Eimeria tenella infection In Vivo. Genes 2019, 10, 420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Guo, A.; Cai, J.; Gong, W.; Yan, H.; Luo, X.; Tian, G.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, H.; Zhu, G.; Cai, X. Transcriptome analysis in chicken cecal epithelia upon infection by Eimeria tenella In Vivo. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e64236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Jang, S.I.; Lillehoj, H.S.; Lee, S.H.; Lee, K.W.; Park, M.S.; Bauchan, G.R.; Lillehoj, E.P.; Bertrand, F.; Dupuis, L.; Deville, S. Immunoenhancing effects of Montanide™ ISA oil-based adjuvants on recombinant coccidia antigen vaccination against Eimeria acervulina infection. Vet. Parasitol. 2010, 172, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Abdelrahman, W.; Mohnl, M.; Teichmann, K.; Doupovec, B.; Schatzmayr, G.; Lumpkins, B.; Mathis, G. Comparative evaluation of probiotic and salinomycin effects on performance and coccidiosis control in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2014, 93, 3002–3008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Abbas, R.Z.; Iqbal, Z.; Blake, D.; Khan, M.N.; Saleemi, M.K. Anticoccidial drug resistance in fowl coccidia: The state of play revisited. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 2011, 67, 337–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wallach, M. Role of antibody in immunity and control of chicken coccidiosis. Trends Parasitol. 2010, 26, 382–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Coussens, L.M.; Werb, Z. Inflammation and cancer. Nature 2002, 420, 860–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Neuschäfer-Rube, F.; Pathe-Neuschafer-Rube, A.; Hippenstiel, S.; Puschel, G.P. PGE2 enhanced TNFalphamediated IL-8 induction in monocytic cell lines and PBMC. Cytokine 2019, 113, 105–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Papadopoulou, C.; Corrigall, V.; Taylor, P.R.; Poston, R.N. The role of the chemokines MCP-1, GRO-alpha, IL-8 and their receptors in the adhesion of monocytic cells to human atherosclerotic plaques. Cytokine 2008, 43, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Cornelissen, J.B.; Swinkels, W.J.; Boersma, W.A.; Rebel, J.M. Host response to simultaneous infections with Eimeria acervulina, maxima and tenella: A cumulation of single responses. Vet. Parasitol. 2009, 162, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Swaggerty, C.L.; Pevzner, I.Y.; Kogut, M.H. Selection for pro-inflammatory mediators produces chickens more resistant to Eimeria tenella. Poult. Sci. 2015, 94, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lin, Y. RNA Sequencing Analysis of Chicken Cecum Tissues Following E. tenella Infection and Coccidiosis Evaluation of Jinghai Yellow Chicken Cross-Breeding System Parents. Master’s Thesis, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  15. Min, W.; Lillehoj, H.S.; Burnside, J.; Weining, K.C.; Staeheli, P.; Zhu, J.J. Adjuvant effects of IL-1β, IL-2, IL8, IL-15, IFN-α, IFN-γ, TNF-β4 and lymphotactin, on DNA vaccination against Eimeria acervulina. Vaccine 2001, 20, 267–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ding, X.; Lillehoj, H.S.; Quiroz, M.A.; Bevensee, E.; Lillehoj, E.P. Protective immunity against Eimeria acervulina following in OVO immunization with a recombinant subunit vaccine and cytokine genes. Infect. Immun. 2004, 72, 6939–6944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Zhang, Y.X.; Yang, M.X.; Wang, Z.B.; Geng, Z.X.; Cao, G.; Li, W.H. Effects of ZHIGANTAI(ZHGT) capsule on the SOD & CAT activity and the MDA contents in the blood serum and hepatic tissue of fatty liver rat with hyperlipidemia. Chin. J. Basic Med. Tradit. Chin. Med. 2002, 8, 35–38. [Google Scholar]
  18. Chapman, S.J. Review of discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics, 4th editor. J. Pol. Sci. Educ. 2017, 14, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Guryev, V.; Smits, B.M.; van de Belt, J.; Verheul, M.; Hubner, N.; Cuppen, E. Haplotype block structure is conserved across mammals. PLoS Genet. 2006, 2, e121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cui, J.X.; Du, H.L.; Liang, Y.; Deng, X.M.; Li, N.; Zhang, X.Q. Association of polymorphisms in the promoter region of chicken prolactin with egg production. Poult. Sci. 2006, 85, 26–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Qiu, X.; Li, N.; Deng, X.; Zhao, X.; Meng, Q.; Wang, X. The single nucleotide polymorphisms of chicken melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) gene and their association analysis with carcass traits. Sci. China C Life Sci. 2006, 49, 560–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xin, S.; Wang, X.; Dai, G.; Zhang, J.; An, T.; Zou, W.; Zhang, G.; Xie, K.; Wang, J. Bioinformatics analysis of SNPs in IL-6 gene promoter of Jinghai yellow chickens. Genes 2018, 9, 446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Korkaya, H.; Liu, S.; Wicha, M.S. Regulation of cancer stem cells by cytokine networks: Attacking cancer’s inflammatory roots. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011, 17, 6125–6129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Wu, Y.P.; Cao, C.; Wu, Y.F.; Li, M.; Lai, T.W.; Zhu, C.; Wang, Y.; Ying, S.M.; Chen, Z.H.; Shen, H.H.; et al. Activating transcription factor 3 represses cigarette smoke-induced IL6 and IL8 expression via suppressing NF-kappaB activation. Toxicol. Lett. 2017, 270, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Jin, S.; Fan, F.; Fan, W.; Zhao, H.; Tong, T.; Blanck, P.; Alomo, I.; Rajasekaran, B.; Zhan, Q. Transcription factors Oct-1 and NF-YA regulate the p53-independent induction of the GADD45 following DNA damage. Oncogene 2001, 20, 2683–2690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Pabst, T.; Mueller, B.U.; Zhang, P.; Radomska, H.S.; Narravula, S.; Schnittger, S.; Behre, G.; Hiddemann, W.; Tenen, D.G. Dominant-negative mutations of CEBPA, encoding CCAAT/enhancer binding protein-alpha (C/EBPalpha), in acute myeloid leukemia. Nat. Genet. 2001, 27, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ohta, K.; Nobukuni, Y.; Mitsubuchi, H.; Ohtab, T.; Tohmab, T.; Jinno, Y.; Endo, F.; Matsuda, I. Characterization of the gene encoding human pituitary-specific transcription factor, Pit-1. Gene 1992, 122, 387–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Georgieva, N.V.; Koinarski, V.; Gadjeva, V. Antioxidant status during the course of Eimeria tenella infection in broiler chickens. Vet. J. 2006, 172, 488–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lillehoj, H.S.; Ding, X.; Quiroz, M.A.; Bevensee, E.; Lillehoj, E.P. Resistance to intestinal coccidiosis following DNA immunization with the cloned 3-1E Eimeria gene plus IL-2, IL-15, and IFN-gamma. Avian. Dis. 2005, 49, 112–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Boyman, O.; Kovar, M.; Rubinstein, M.P.; Surh, C.D.; Sprent, J. Selective stimulation of T cell subsets with antibody-cytokine immune complexes. Science 2006, 311, 1924–1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Johnson, G.C.; Esposito, L.; Barratt, B.J.; Smith, A.N.; Heward, J.; Di Genova, G.; Ueda, H.; Cordell, H.J.; Eaves, I.A.; Dudbridge, F.; et al. Haplotype tagging for the identification of common disease genes. Nat. Genet. 2001, 29, 233–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, S.; He, S.; Yuan, F.; Zhu, X. Tagging SNP-set selection with maximum information based on linkage disequilibrium structure in genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics 2017, 33, 2078–2081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Horne, B.D.; Camp, N.J. Principal component analysis for selection of optimal SNP-sets that capture intragenic genetic variation. Genet. Epidemiol. 2004, 26, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Amplicon layout in the promoter region of the interleukin 8 (IL-8 ) gene.
Figure 1. Amplicon layout in the promoter region of the interleukin 8 (IL-8 ) gene.
Genes 11 00476 g001
Figure 2. Analysis result chart of 3 SNPs site. (A): T−550c peak alignment; (B): G−398T peak alignment; (C): T−360C peak alignment.
Figure 2. Analysis result chart of 3 SNPs site. (A): T−550c peak alignment; (B): G−398T peak alignment; (C): T−360C peak alignment.
Genes 11 00476 g002
Figure 3. Correlation analysis between each genotype of the IL-8 gene T–550C mutation and coccidiosis resistance indexes. Note: Different uppercase letters in the same indexes indicate significant differences (p < 0.01); different lowercase letters in the same indexes indicate significant differences (p < 0.05); the same or no letters indicate no significant differences (p > 0.05). The number of individuals of each genotype is shown in brackets. The same representation is used in Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7.
Figure 3. Correlation analysis between each genotype of the IL-8 gene T–550C mutation and coccidiosis resistance indexes. Note: Different uppercase letters in the same indexes indicate significant differences (p < 0.01); different lowercase letters in the same indexes indicate significant differences (p < 0.05); the same or no letters indicate no significant differences (p > 0.05). The number of individuals of each genotype is shown in brackets. The same representation is used in Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7.
Genes 11 00476 g003
Figure 4. Correlation analysis between each genotype of the IL-8 gene G–398T mutation and coccidiosis resistance indexes.
Figure 4. Correlation analysis between each genotype of the IL-8 gene G–398T mutation and coccidiosis resistance indexes.
Genes 11 00476 g004
Figure 5. Correlation analysis between each genotype of the IL-8 gene T–360C mutation and coccidiosis resistance indexes.
Figure 5. Correlation analysis between each genotype of the IL-8 gene T–360C mutation and coccidiosis resistance indexes.
Genes 11 00476 g005
Figure 6. D’ values (left) and r2 values (right) of pairwise linkage disequilibrium analysis of the IL-8 gene promoter region.
Figure 6. D’ values (left) and r2 values (right) of pairwise linkage disequilibrium analysis of the IL-8 gene promoter region.
Genes 11 00476 g006
Figure 7. Effect of different haplotype combinations of the IL-8 gene on resistance indexes.
Figure 7. Effect of different haplotype combinations of the IL-8 gene on resistance indexes.
Genes 11 00476 g007
Table 1. Primer sequence information.
Table 1. Primer sequence information.
PrimerPrimers Sequence (5′→3′) Annealing Temperature Length (bp)
P1F: TTCCATTCGCATAAGTCATC
R: AAAGTTGATTTGGGGATACC
51 °C 638
P2F: TGTAATTGGGAATTCAAGGGGGA
R: CCCATTTGGTGTGTGATAAGATGA
58 °C 708
P3F: AGTCCACAGACCACAAAGCA
R: TCGCAATATAAGTTTCTGATGGCTT
58 °C 693
P4F: AAACCAGCAACACAAAGTC
R: CATCTCAGCAAGTGCCAAG
60 °C 574
Table 2. Prediction results for transcription factor changes before and after single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) mutations in the 5’ regulation region of the IL-8 gene.
Table 2. Prediction results for transcription factor changes before and after single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) mutations in the 5’ regulation region of the IL-8 gene.
Mutation Site Base Transcription Factor Transcription Factor Binding Site Base Sequence Transcription Factor Position
−550 T C Oct-1 gttgcatttg −551~−542
−398 G C/EBPalp gaaataaata −398~−389
T Pit-1a taaataaata −398~−389
C/EBPalp acataaataa −401~−392
−360 T C NF-1 agccagttat −362~−353
Note: The underlined letters in the table indicate mutated bases.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, X.-H.; Yu, H.-L.; Zou, W.-B.; Mi, C.-H.; Dai, G.-J.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, G.-X.; Xie, K.-Z.; Wang, J.-Y. Study of the Relationship between Polymorphisms in the IL-8 Gene Promoter Region and Coccidiosis Resistance Index in Jinghai Yellow Chickens. Genes 2020, 11, 476. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11050476

AMA Style

Wang X-H, Yu H-L, Zou W-B, Mi C-H, Dai G-J, Zhang T, Zhang G-X, Xie K-Z, Wang J-Y. Study of the Relationship between Polymorphisms in the IL-8 Gene Promoter Region and Coccidiosis Resistance Index in Jinghai Yellow Chickens. Genes. 2020; 11(5):476. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11050476

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Xiao-Hui, Hai-Liang Yu, Wen-Bin Zou, Chang-Hao Mi, Guo-Jun Dai, Tao Zhang, Gen-Xi Zhang, Kai-Zhou Xie, and Jin-Yu Wang. 2020. "Study of the Relationship between Polymorphisms in the IL-8 Gene Promoter Region and Coccidiosis Resistance Index in Jinghai Yellow Chickens" Genes 11, no. 5: 476. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11050476

APA Style

Wang, X. -H., Yu, H. -L., Zou, W. -B., Mi, C. -H., Dai, G. -J., Zhang, T., Zhang, G. -X., Xie, K. -Z., & Wang, J. -Y. (2020). Study of the Relationship between Polymorphisms in the IL-8 Gene Promoter Region and Coccidiosis Resistance Index in Jinghai Yellow Chickens. Genes, 11(5), 476. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11050476

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop