Next Article in Journal
Genetic Diversity in Schizophrenia: Developmental Implications of Ultra-Rare, Protein-Truncating Mutations
Previous Article in Journal
Unambiguous Interpretation of the Pathogenicity of the GLA c.547+3A>G Variant Causing Fabry Disease
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Co-Occurrence of Two Plasmids Encoding Transferable blaNDM-1 and tet(Y) Genes in Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter bereziniae

by
Andrés Opazo-Capurro
1,2,
Kyriaki Xanthopoulou
3,4,
Rocío Arazo del Pino
3,
Paulina González-Muñoz
1,2,5,
Maximiliano Matus-Köhler
1,2,
Luis Amsteins-Romero
1,2,
Christian Jerez-Olate
1,2,6,
Juan Carlos Hormazábal
7,
Rodrigo Vera
8,
Felipe Aguilera
9,10,
Sebastián Fuller
9,
Paul G. Higgins
3,4,11,* and
Gerardo González-Rocha
1,2,*
1
Laboratorio de Investigación en Agentes Antibacterianos (LIAA), Universidad de Concepción, Concepción 4070386, Chile
2
Grupo de Estudio en Resistencia Antimicrobiana (GRAM), Universidad de Concepción, Concepción 4070386, Chile
3
Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, D-50937 Cologne, Germany
4
German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Bonn-Cologne, D-50937 Cologne, Germany
5
Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas y Químicas, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencia, Universidad San Sebastián, Concepción 4070386, Chile
6
Facultad de Odontología y Ciencias de la Rehabilitación, Universidad San Sebastián, Concepción 4070386, Chile
7
Instituto de Salud Pública (ISP), Santiago 8320000, Chile
8
Hospital de Urgencia Asistencia Pública, Santiago 8320000, Chile
9
Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción 4070386, Chile
10
Centro de Biotecnología, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción 4070386, Chile
11
Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, D-50937 Cologne, Germany
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2024, 15(9), 1213; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15091213
Submission received: 22 August 2024 / Revised: 11 September 2024 / Accepted: 13 September 2024 / Published: 17 September 2024

Abstract

:
Acinetobacter bereziniae has emerged as a significant human pathogen, acquiring multiple antibiotic resistance genes, including carbapenemases. This study focuses on characterizing the plasmids harboring the blaNDM-1 and tet(Y) genes in two carbapenem-resistant A. bereziniae isolates (UCO-553 and UCO-554) obtained in Chile during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Antibiotic susceptibility testing was conducted on UCO-553 and UCO-554. Both isolates underwent whole-genome sequencing to ascertain their sequence type (ST), core genome multilocus sequence-typing (cgMLST) profile, antibiotic resistance genes, plasmids, and mobile genetic elements. Conjugation experiments were performed for both isolates. Results: Both isolates exhibited broad resistance, including resistance to carbapenems, third-generation cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, tetracycline, cotrimoxazole, and aminoglycosides. Both isolates belong to sequence type STPAS1761, with a difference of 17 out of 2984 alleles. Each isolate carried a 47,274 bp plasmid with blaNDM-1 and aph(3′)-VI genes and two highly similar plasmids: a 35,184 bp plasmid with tet(Y), sul2, aph(6)-Id, and aph(3″)-Ib genes, and a 6078 bp plasmid containing the ant(2″)-Ia gene. Quinolone-resistance mutations were identified in the gyrA and parC genes of both isolates. Importantly, blaNDM-1 was located within a Tn125 transposon, and tet(Y) was embedded in a Tn5393 transposon. Conjugation experiments successfully transferred blaNDM-1 and tet(Y) into the A. baumannii ATCC 19606 strain, indicating the potential for horizontal gene transfer. Conclusions: This study highlights the critical role of plasmids in disseminating resistance genes in A. bereziniae and underscores the need for the continued genomic surveillance of this emerging pathogen. The findings emphasize the importance of monitoring A. bereziniae for its potential to cause difficult-to-treat infections and its capacity to spread resistance determinants against clinically significant antibiotics.

1. Introduction

Non-baumannii Acinetobacter species are increasingly prevalent in nosocomial infections and have been associated with antibiotic resistance genes that confer resistance to last-line antibiotics, such as carbapenems [1]. Among these, A. bereziniae (formerly designated as genomospecies 10), is considered as an emerging nosocomial pathogen involved in multiple infections, including urinary tract infections, pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, sepsis, and bacteraemia [2,3].
Carbapenems (i.e., imipenem and meropenem) are β-lactams antibiotics, considered the first line of treatment for infections against highly resistant Gram-negative isolates, including Acinetobacter species. These bactericidal antibiotics inhibit the bacterial cell-wall biosynthesis, producing the lysis of the bacterial cell [4].
Despite the important activity of these drugs, carbapenem resistance is becoming more frequent worldwide. In this sense, the World Health Organization (WHO) has deemed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria as ‘critical priority’ pathogens for which the development of novel drugs is urgently needed [5].
The main mechanism of carbapenem resistance among Gram-negative organisms is mediated through enzymatic hydrolysis, i.e., carbapenemases [6]. In this regard, there are reports of carbapenem-resistant A. bereziniae strains associated with the production of diverse carbapenemases, including the metallo-β-lactamases (MBL) IMP-1, SIM-1, VIM-2, and NDM-1; and the overexpression of class D OXA-type carbapenemases including their intrinsic OXA-228-like [2,3,7,8].
Due to the above, polymyxins (i.e., colistin) and tetracyclines (including tetracycline, minocycline and tigecycline) are significant options to treat serious infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative species, including A. baumannii [9,10]. Class B carbapenemases are metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) and are clinically defined as one of the most relevant classes of carbapenemases [6].
The genes encoding these enzymes are frequently encoded in mobile genetic elements (MGEs) such as plasmids and/or transposons, facilitating their spread between different bacteria [6]. Among these enzymes, it has been documented that NDM-carbapenemases are associated with elevated mortality rates, posing a significant challenge to clinical management and a substantial risk to public health [11]. In Chile, NDM-enzymes have been emerging in hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) produced by Gram-negative species [12], denoting a significant challenge in the clinical setting.
On the other hand, tetracyclines are bacteriostatic broad-spectrum antibiotics that bind to the bacterial 30S ribosomal subunit and inhibit protein synthesis [13]. At present, there are three generations of tetracyclines available in clinical practice. The first generation is represented by tetracycline itself, whereas the second generation includes doxycycline and minocycline, and the third generation is represented by the glycylcycline tigecycline [14]. Significantly, an important role of tetracycline in the treatment of serious infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter spp. is its combined use with ampicillin/sulbactam [15].
Alarmingly, there are diverse reports of tetracycline resistance among Gram-negative pathogens, in which the main mechanism of resistance in A. baumannii corresponds to the activity of resistance/nodulation/cell division (RND) family-type efflux pumps, such as the Ade ATP-binding cassette (ABC) system [16]. AdeABC is also associated with elevated minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for minocycline and tigecycline [17].
Furthermore, acquired efflux pumps that mediate resistance specifically to tetracyclines have been identified in Acinetobacter species, such as TetA and TetB, which belong to the major facilitator superfamily (MFS) [17]. Moreover, various tet(X) genes have been emerging, which encode for monooxygenases that can inactive all tetracyclines, including tigecycline [17]. Recently, a novel plasmid-encoded tetracycline resistance gene, tet(Y), that encodes for a tetracycline-specific MFS efflux pump [18], was identified in a clinical tigecycline-resistant A. baumannii isolate in China [19].
Ongoing evidence suggests that antibiotic resistance increased during the COVID-19 pandemic because of the over-use of antibiotics to treat seriously ill patients as a prophylaxis measure [20,21]. In 2021, the Instituto de Salud Publica of Chile (ISPCh) detected two isolates of NDM-producing Acinetobacter species from infections in hospitalized patients during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. This constituted the first detection of New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM)-positive Acinetobacter species in Chile. Alarmingly, these carbapenem-resistant isolates also exhibited resistance to multiple drugs, including tetracycline and aminoglycosides.
Consequently, the objective of this study was to characterize the genomic features and molecular epidemiology of these two carbapenem-resistant NDM-producing Acinetobacter spp. isolates recovered during the COVID-19 pandemic in Chile.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Isolates

The Acinetobacter spp. isolates UCO-553 and UCO-554 were recovered from bronchial aspirate and blood samples, respectively. These samples were collected from two separate patients in a tertiary hospital in Santiago, Chile, during October 2020 (UCO-553) and February 2021 (UCO-554). Initially, both isolates were identified as members of the Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex. NDM production was confirmed using immunochromatographic tests (CORIS®, Gembloux, Belgium). The isolates were cultured in nutrient media and subsequently cryo-preserved in a mixture of culture broth and glycerol (50% v/v) at -80 °C for further analysis. For both isolates, we conducted a multiplex PCR for Acinetobacter species identification [22] and an additional multiplex PCR to detect various carbapenemase groups [23].

2.2. Antibiotic Susceptibility Tests (AST)

AST were carried out by disk diffusion according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [24]. The antibiotics tested were imipenem (10 µg), meropenem (10 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), cefepime (30 µg), ampicillin/sulbactam (10/10 µg), piperacillin/tazobactam (100/10 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), amikacin (30 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), levofloxacin (5 µg), tetracycline (30 µg), and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (1.25/2375 µg). Furthermore, the colistin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined by broth microdilution using the ComASP colistin kit (Liofilchem®, Teramo, Italy), and the tetracycline, minocycline and tigecycline MICs were determined utilizing the SensiTitre MIC system (ThermoFisher®, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). The tigecycline and colistin MIC values were interpreted according to Seifert et al. [25] and CLSI [24], respectively.

2.3. Whole-Genome Sequencing (WGS) and In Silico Analyses

Genomic DNA (gDNA) from both isolates was extracted using the InstaGene matrix (Bio-Rad®, Hercules, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was conducted using both short- and long-read sequencing techniques. Initially, libraries were prepared with the Illumina® DNA Prep kit and sequenced on an Illumina NextSeq 2000, generating 2 × 150 bp reads. Demultiplexing, quality control, and adapter trimming were performed using bcl-convert (v3.9.3). For long-read sequencing, gDNA was extracted using the Wizard® HMW DNA Extraction Kit (Promega, Madison, USA) and sequenced with Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT). Library preparation, MinION sequencing, and bioinformatic processing were conducted as previously described [26]. The combined long- and short-reads were assembled using the Unicycler assembly pipeline [27].
Species determination was conducted by comparing the genomes against the GenomesDB database hosted on the JSpeciesWS server [28]. In silico detection of antibiotic-resistance genes (ARGs) and sequence typing (ST) was performed using ABRIcate with ResFinder v4.4.2 and MLST v2.22.0, respectively, integrated into the Galaxy platform [29]. Plasmid typing was carried out by the MOB-typer tool [30]. Plasmids were annotated using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP), and gene cluster comparisons were built using Clinker (v0.0.23) [31] after the manual curation of the sequences using the Artemis software v18.2.0. The Proksee tool (https://proksee.ca, accessed on January 2024) was utilized for analyzing and visualizing the sequenced genomes of both isolates [32].

2.4. Core-Genome MLST (cgMLST)

To investigate the molecular epidemiology of the isolates, an ad hoc core genome multi-locus sequence typing (cgMLST) scheme was developed using the cgMLST target definer function of the Ridom SeqSphere+ software (Ridom GmbH, Münster, Germany) with default parameters. The A. bereziniae strain XH901 (NZ_CP018259.1) served as the reference genome, and the cgMLST scheme comprised a core genome of 2984 alleles.

2.5. Conjugation Experiments

Mating experiments were performed to evaluate the transmissibility of the blaNDM-1 and tet(Y) genes from A. bereziniae UCO-553 and UCO-554 strains (imipenem-resistant, tetracycline-resistant, and chloramphenicol-susceptible) to A. baumannii ATCC 19,606 (imipenem-susceptible, tetracycline-susceptible, and chloramphenicol-susceptible). Isolates were incubated overnight at 37 °C in lysogeny broth (LB) and subsequently mixed at a 1:10 donor/recipient ratio. The mixtures were incubated for 36 h at 37 °C without shaking, and transconjugant cells were selected on LB plates supplemented with 16 µg/mL of tetracycline and 128 µg/mL of chloramphenicol. Conjugation was verified by PCR, which assessed species identification and the presence of blaNDM-1 and tet(Y) genes in the transconjugant bacteria.

3. Results

The initial multiplex PCR analyses confirmed that both isolates were NDM-producing Acinetobacter species, distinct from A. baumannii. Additionally, disk diffusion assay results (Table 1) indicated that both isolates exhibited resistance to carbapenems (imipenem and meropenem), cephalosporins (cefepime, ceftazidime, and cefotaxime), β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (ampicillin/sulbactam and piperacillin/tazobactam), fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin), aminoglycosides (gentamicin and amikacin), tetracycline, and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim. They demonstrated intermediate resistance to colistin (MIC ≤ 0.25 µg/mL). Conversely, both isolates were susceptible to minocycline and tigecycline (MIC ≤ 1 µg/mL). Consequently, UCO-553 and UCO-554 were classified as extensively drug-resistant (XDR) [33].
The genome sizes of UCO-553 and UCO-554 are highly similar, comprising 4,557,265 bp, and 4,557,136 bp, respectively. Both strains have a GC content of 38.07%. Moreover, each isolate possesses four plasmids of the same size, ranging from 5594 bp to 47,274 bp. The species identification was confirmed using the genome sequences in the tetra-correlation comparison from the JSpeciesWS server. Likewise, they belonged to the STPAS1761, and cgMLST revealed that they differ in 17/2984 alleles, which is interpreted as not originating from the same source. We determined this by using the cut-off for transmissions for A. baumannii, which was determined to be up to eight alleles different using cgMLST [34].
Regarding antibiotic-resistance gene content, UCO-553 and UCO-554 harbor the chromosomally encoded blaOXA-931 that belongs to the intrinsic bla229-like group [35]. There was no insertion sequence (IS) either upstream or downstream of blaOXA-931. In addition to the intrinsic OXA-type β-lactamase, the acquired resistome of both isolates was the same, constituted by the aminoglycoside resistance genes aph(3′)-VI, aph(6′)-Id (strB), aph(3″)-Ib (strA), and ant(2″)-Ia, the sulphonamide resistance gene sul2, the carbapenemase gene blaNDM-1, and tet(Y) that mediates resistance to tetracycline [36]. Moreover, isolates UCO-553 and UCO-554 exhibit mutations at different positions, specifically Met125Ile in GyrA and Phe84Tyr in ParC, with the A. bereziniae strain GD03185 genome (GenBank accession number CP066119.1) serving as the reference.
Furthermore, we identified the presence of identical 47,274 bp plasmids harboring the blaNDM-1 gene in both isolates (pNDM_UCO553 and pNDM_UCO554, accession numbers CP133667.1 and CP123919, respectively), exhibiting 100% coverage and 100% identity (Supplementary Materials), and belonging to the MOBq-type (Figure 1). A BLAST analysis revealed that these plasmids are highly similar to a plasmid previously reported in A. baumannii from Colombia in 2016, with 100% coverage and 99.99% identity (accession number CP010399), which also carries the blaNDM-1 and aph(3′)-VI resistance genes. Furthermore, the blaNDM-1 gene in both UCO-553 and UCO-554 is located within a Tn125 transposon (Figure 1), a feature also present in the Colombian A. baumannii strain. As shown in Figure 1, this plasmid also contains genes encoding for a type IV secretion system (T4SS) proteins, which are protein involved in the translocation of proteins and/or DNA [37].
Commonly, Tn125 encodes for the blaNDM-1 in Gram-negative species [38]. Specifically, this element is delimited by two ISAba125 copies, forming a composite transposon that is able to be mobilized, facilitating the spread of NDM-1 [39].
Additionally, both isolates contained highly similar MOBp-type plasmids of 35,184 kb (100% coverage and 99.99% identity) that harbor the tet(Y) gene in addition with sul2, aph(3″)-Ib (strA) and aph(6′)-Id (strB) and were classified as conjugative [40] (Figure 2). According to the MOB-typing results, the closest sequence (39% coverage) corresponds to a plasmid identified in A. pittii in Taiwan (accession number CP033537), which does not harbor the tet(Y) gene. Interestingly, the tet(Y), aph(6)-Id and aph(3″)-Ib genes were located in a Tn5393-like transposon (Figure 2). Although both plasmids are similar, the tnpA gene of Tn5393 was intact in UCO-553, whereas this gene was incomplete in UCO-554 (Figure 2). Furthermore, blaNDM-1- and tet(Y)-containing plasmids were mobilized by conjugation, resulting in the increase in the MIC for imipenem (x > 340) and tetracycline (x 256), whereas the MIC for tigecycline did not change (Table 2). These results demonstrate that both plasmids are mobilizable.

4. Discussion

A. bereziniae has been emerging as a relevant human pathogen due to its ability to develop resistance to several antibiotics, including carbapenems [41]. Here, we described the genomic features of two A. bereziniae isolates recovered from human infections during the COVID-19 pandemic in Chile.
These isolates displayed a broad resistance phenotype, including resistance to β-lactams, such as carbapenems, tetracycline, aminoglycosides, and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim. In this context, minocycline, tigecycline and colistin were active against the isolates; thus, the therapeutic options were limited.
We determined that both isolates were resistant to fluoroquinolones. Interestingly, it has been demonstrated that fluoroquinolone resistance is commonly mediated by the Ser83Leu substitution in GyrA and the Ser80Leu substitution in ParC within the A. baumannii-calcoaceticus complex [42].
However, the isolates UCO-553 and UCO-554 exhibit mutations at different positions, specifically Met125Ile in GyrA and Phe84Tyr in ParC, with the A. bereziniae strain GD03185 genome (GenBank accession number CP066119.1) serving as the reference. These substitutions differ from those typically associated with fluoroquinolone resistance in A. baumannii. Therefore, further investigation is required to understand the role of these novel substitutions in fluoroquinolone resistance in A. bereziniae [42].
Furthermore, both isolates contained two main plasmids harboring genes that mediate resistance to relevant antibiotics, such as blaNDM-1 and tet(Y). Relevantly, these genes were transferred by conjugation, highlighting their potential to be successfully disseminated among clinically relevant bacteria. Significantly, these genes were contained in transposons, which may help in their dissemination.
We found the Tn125 transposon carrying the blaNDM-1 gene in identical plasmids of 47,274 bp in both isolates. This transposon is frequently associated with the blaNDM-1 gene and is significant in its dissemination [11], playing an important role in the dissemination of blaNDM.
Previously, Mo et al., have detected the blaNDM-1 gene in three A. bereziniae isolates collected in two major tertiary hospitals in China, in which this carbapenemase gene was also located in a Tn125 transposon [43]. Furthermore, since the first detection of A. bereziniae carrying the blaNDM-1 in Brazil in 2014 [44], other cases in Argentina [45,46], Japan [47], Australia [48], and China [7,43] have been documented.
The impact of NDM-carbapenemase carriage on patient outcomes has been previously established. For instance, Pudpong et al. found that mortality rates for infections caused by Enterobacterales harboring NDM-1 or NDM-1/OXA-48 were higher than those associated with OXA-48 carbapenemase alone [49]. Consequently, the spread of plasmids encoding NDM-1 carbapenemase may contribute to increased mortality in these infections, highlighting the significant influence of these mobile genetic elements on patient outcomes. Furthermore, we identified the aph(3′)-VI gene in both plasmids conferring resistance to gentamicin and amikacin, similar to the findings in the A. baumannii isolate from Colombia.
Moreover, we determined that these plasmids also contain genes encoding a type IV secretion system (T4SS) [37]. In this sense, the virB proteins that conforms the T4SS have been associated with the plasmid mobilization [49]. Interestingly, the virB genes detected in the 47,274 bp plasmids (Figure 1) have been associated with conjugative type IV secretion systems, in which diverse components, such as channel formation and pore structure (virB8 and virB6), pore structure/substrate transfer (virB9 and virB10), ATP-hydrolysis (VirB11), ATPase (VirB4), adhesion (virB5), major pilus subunit (VirB2), and DNA binding (VirD4), are involved in the conjugation process, facilitating the dissemination of these plasmids.
On the other hand, both isolates contained plasmids of 35,184 bp containing the tet(Y) gene embedded in a Tn9353 transposon. To the author’s knowledge, this is the first description of the tetracycline resistance gene tet(Y) in A. bereziniae isolates. This gene was originally identified in a clinical A. baumannii strain in China recovered from a bronchoalveolar lavage sample in 2016 [19]. In that report, tet(Y) was also located in a Tn5393 transposon embedded in a 72,126 bp plasmid that was not typeable [19].
As illustrated in Figure 2, both 35,184 bp plasmids possess a variety of toxin–antitoxin (TA) systems. Specifically, they harbored the abiEii/abiGii toxin–antitoxin system, which is part of the abortive infection (Abi) mechanism [50]. Moreover, these plasmids contain an additional TA system, Xre/Mbca/ParS (Figure 2), which facilitates the stabilization of these plasmids. Moreover, the presence of genes involved in plasmid stabilization (TA systems), conjugation (T4SS), and a myriad of IS (i.e., ISAba215) and transposons (i.e., Tn125 and Tn5393), could explain their success at dissemination of relevant ARGs, such as blaNDM-1 and tet(Y).
Although we determined that tet(Y) was inserted in the same transposon compared with the report of Wang et al., the plasmids are different. Interestingly, the Tn5393 transposon was first identified on a plasmid from Klebsiella pneumoniae, demonstrating its ability to be transferred at the interspecies level, thus contributing to its mobilization and dissemination [51].
Remarkably, Kyselková et al. [36] identified the tet(Y) gene in plasmids recovered from soil and manure samples, in which tet(Y)-tet(R), in addition to the aph(6′)-Id and aph(3′′)-Ib genes, was located in a structure similar to Tn5393, highlighting the importance of this transposon in the mobilization of these genes. In this sense, fragments of Tn5393 appear to be more common than the intact transposon in plasmids [51], which is concordant with our findings.
Recently, Stehling et al. described an A. bereziniae isolate collected from an infected semiaquatic turtle that contains the novel Tn9393m that is associated with the qnrB19 gene that confers resistance to fluoroquinolones [41]. This finding underscores the relevance of this transposon in the carriage and dissemination of ARGs, which is concordant with our findings. However, this study included a comparative genomic analysis of the A. bereziniae genomes available in public databases, from which the authors concluded that most of the isolates did not carry any ARGs [41]. Moreover, the authors determined that some strains from Asia and Brazil harbored six or more antibiotic resistance genes [41]; therefore, our results contribute to the knowledge of A. bereziniae as an important resistant pathogen, as we identified eight antibiotic resistance genes in each isolate, demonstrating that this species could accumulate and disseminate ARGs.
Furthermore, while the ARG content of both isolates aligns with their observed resistance phenotypes, there is a discrepancy concerning their susceptibility to minocycline and tigecycline.
Despite the above, our study demonstrated that both isolates were susceptible to these drugs despite the presence of the tet(Y) gene, which encodes for an MFS efflux-pump that has been previously associated with minocycline- and tigecycline resistance in A. baumannii [18,19]. In this sense, in the same publication, the authors demonstrated that the mobilization of tet(Y) into a susceptible strain resulted in a 4-fold increase in tigecycline MIC [19], and when this gene was co-transferred with tet(A), the tigecycline MIC showed a 128-fold increase.
However, our results showed that UCO-553 and UCO-554 were susceptible to minocycline and tigecycline (MIC ≤ 1 µg/mL), indicating that the sole presence of Tet(Y) does not confer resistance to second- and third-generation tetracyclines in A. bereziniae. These results highlight the relevance of highly resistant emerging species causing infections in the clinical setting. Specifically, as both A. bereziniae strains included in this study were resistant to last-line antibiotics, including carbapenems, the remaining therapeutic options are colistin and tigecycline; hence, it is important to be aware of the presence of these types of strains in order to adopt a effective therapy.
In conclusion, our study characterized the first two NDM- and Tet(Y)-producing A. bereziniae isolates collected in Chile that are resistant to multiple antibiotics, including carbapenems and tetracycline. As most of the resistance genes are plasmid-encoded, this underscores the importance of mobile genetic elements in the dissemination of resistance genes among clinical isolates of emerging species that could act as a reservoir of these genes. Finally, our findings emphasize the significance of conducting genomic surveillance to detect highly resistant strains that pose a serious threat to public health.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes15091213/s1. Figure S1: coverage and identity of blaNDM-1 gene.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.O.-C., K.X., P.G.H. and G.G.-R.; methodology, A.O.-C., K.X., R.A.d.P., P.G.-M., M.M.-K., L.A.-R., C.J.-O., R.V., F.A. and S.F.; software, F.A. and S.F.; validation, J.C.H., P.G.H. and G.G.-R.; resources, A.O.-C. and P.G.H., data curation, A.O.-C., K.X. and P.G.H.; writing—review and editing, A.O.-C., K.X., P.G.H. and G.G.-R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the FONDECYT-Iniciación Grant N°11190602, FONDECYT-Regular N°1220708 and FONDEQUIP EQM200056.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

This Whole Genome Shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession numbers CP133666.1 (UCO-553 chromosome), CP133667 to CP133670 (UCO-553 plasmids), and CP123918 (UCO-554 chromosome), CP123919 to CP123922 (UCO-554 plasmids).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Tavares, L.; Cunha, M.; de Vasconcellos, F.; Bertani, A.; de Barcellos, T.; Bueno, M.; Santos, C.; Sant’Ana, D.; Ferreira, A.; Mondelli, A.; et al. Genomic and Clinical Characterization of IMP-1-Producing Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter Bereziniae Isolates from Bloodstream Infections in a Brazilian Tertiary Hospital. Microb. Drug Resist. 2020, 26, 1399–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Reyes, S.M.; Bolettieri, E.; Allen, D.; Hay, A.G. Genome Sequences of Four Strains of Acinetobacter Bereziniae Isolated from Human Milk Pumped with a Personal Breast Pump and Hand-Washed Milk Collection Supplies. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 2020, 9, e00770-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Grosso, F.; Silva, L.; Sousa, C.; Ramos, H.; Quinteira, S.; Peixe, L. Extending the Reservoir of Bla IMP-5: The Emerging Pathogen Acinetobacter Bereziniae. Future Microbiol. 2015, 10, 1609–1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Armstrong, T.; Fenn, S.J.; Hardie, K.R. JMM Profile: Carbapenems: A Broad-Spectrum Antibiotic. J. Med. Microbiol. 2021, 70, 1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Bacterial Priority Pathogens List, 2024: Bacterial Pathogens of Public Health Importance to Guide Research, Development and Strategies to Prevent and Control Antimicrobial Resistance; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2024.
  6. Aurilio, C.; Sansone, P.; Barbarisi, M.; Pota, V.; Giaccari, L.G.; Coppolino, F.; Barbarisi, A.; Passavanti, M.B.; Pace, M.C. Mechanisms of Action of Carbapenem Resistance. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Guo, H.; Li, L.; Chen, Y.; He, F. Genomic Insights into a Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter Bereziniae Strain Co-Carrying BlaOXA-301 and BlaNDM-1 from China. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2023, 35, 56–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zander, E.; Seifert, H.; Higgins, P.G. Insertion Sequence IS18 Mediates Overexpression of BlaOXA-257 in a Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter Bereziniae Isolate. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2014, 69, 270–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bassetti, M.; Peghin, M.; Vena, A.; Giacobbe, D.R. Treatment of Infections Due to MDR Gram-Negative Bacteria. Front. Med. 2019, 6, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cheng, Y.; Li, Y.; Yang, M.; He, Y.; Shi, X.; Zhang, Z.; Zhong, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Si, H. Emergence of Novel Tigecycline Resistance Gene Tet(X5) Variant in Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter Indicus of Swine Farming Environments. Vet. Microbiol. 2023, 284, 109837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wu, W.; Feng, Y.; Tang, G.; Qiao, F.; Mcnally, A.; Zong, Z. NDM Metallo-Lactamases and Their Bacterial Producers in Health Care Settings. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2019, 32, e00115-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Instituto de Salud Pública (ISP) de Chile. Bulletin Vigilancia de Carbapenemasas En Bacterias Que Pueden Producir Infecciones Asociadas a La Atención En Salud (IAAS), Chile 2014–2017; Instituto de Salud Pública (ISP) de Chile: Ñuñoa, Santiago de Chile, 2014; p. 8. [Google Scholar]
  13. Shutter, M.C.; Akhondi, H. Tetracycline; StatPearls Publishing: St. Petersburg, FL, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  14. Nguyen, F.; Starosta, A.; Arenz, S.; Sohmen, D.; Dönhöfer, A.; Wilson, D. Tetracycline Antibiotics and Resistance Mechanisms. Biol. Chem. 2014, 395, 559–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bouza, E.; Muñoz, P.; Burillo, A. How to Treat Severe Acinetobacter Baumannii Infections. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2023, 36, 596–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Gauba, A.; Rahman, K.M. Evaluation of Antibiotic Resistance Mechanisms in Gram-Negative Bacteria. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kyriakidis, I.; Vasileiou, E.; Pana, Z.D.; Tragiannidis, A. Acinetobacter Baumannii Antibiotic Resistance Mechanisms. Pathogens 2021, 10, 373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sun, C.; Yu, Y.; Hua, X. Resistance Mechanisms of Tigecycline in Acinetobacter Baumannii. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2023, 13, 1141490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, Z.; Li, H.; Zhang, J.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, H. Identification of a Novel Plasmid-Mediated Tigecycline Resistance-Related Gene, Tet(Y), in Acinetobacter Baumannii. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2021, 77, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Langford, B.J.; So, M.; Simeonova, M.; Leung, V.; Lo, J.; Kan, T.; Raybardhan, S.; Sapin, M.E.; Mponponsuo, K.; Farrell, A.; et al. Antimicrobial Resistance in Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Lancet Microbe 2023, 4, e179–e191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Getahun, H.; Smith, I.; Trivedi, K.; Paulin, S.; Balkhy, H.H. Tackling Antimicrobial Resistance in the COVID-19 Pandemic. Bull. World Health Organ. WHO 2020, 98, 442–442A. [Google Scholar]
  22. Chen, T.L.; Siu, L.K.; Wu, R.C.C.; Shaio, M.F.; Huang, L.Y.; Fung, C.P.; Lee, C.M.; Cho, W.L. Comparison of One-Tube Multiplex PCR, Automated Ribotyping and Intergenic Spacer (ITS) Sequencing for Rapid Identification of Acinetobacter Baumannii. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2007, 13, 801–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Poirel, L.; Walsh, T.R.; Cuvillier, V.; Nordmann, P. Multiplex PCR for Detection of Acquired Carbapenemase Genes. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2011, 70, 119–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. M100, 32nd ed.; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI): Berwyn, PA, USA, 2022; ISBN 9781684401345. [Google Scholar]
  25. Seifert, H.; Blondeau, J.; Lucaßen, K.; Utt, E.A. Global Update on the in Vitro Activity of Tigecycline and Comparators against Isolates of Acinetobacter Baumannii and Rates of Resistant Phenotypes (2016–2018). J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2022, 31, 82–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Xanthopoulou, K.; Carattoli, A.; Wille, J.; Biehl, L.M.; Rohde, H.; Farowski, F.; Krut, O.; Villa, L.; Feudi, C.; Seifert, H.; et al. Antibiotic Resistance and Mobile Genetic Elements in Extensively Drug-Resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae Sequence Type 147 Recovered from Germany. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wick, R.R.; Judd, L.M.; Gorrie, C.L.; Holt, K.E. Unicycler: Resolving Bacterial Genome Assemblies from Short and Long Sequencing Reads. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2017, 13, e1005595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Richter, M.; Rosselló-Móra, R.; Oliver Glöckner, F.O.; Peplies, J. JSpeciesWS: A Web Server for Prokaryotic Species Circumscription Based on Pairwise Genome Comparison. Bioinformatics 2016, 32, 929–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Afgan, E.; Nekrutenko, A.; Grüning, B.A.; Blankenberg, D.; Goecks, J.; Schatz, M.C.; Ostrovsky, A.E.; Mahmoud, A.; Lonie, A.J.; Syme, A.; et al. The Galaxy Platform for Accessible, Reproducible and Collaborative Biomedical Analyses: 2022 Update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022, 50, W345–W351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Robertson, J.; Nash, J. MOB-Suite: Software Tools for Clustering, Reconstruction and Typing of Plasmids from Draft Assemblies. Microb. Genom. 2018, 4, e000206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gilchrist, C.; Chooi, Y. Clinker & Clustermap.Js: Automatic Generation of Gene Cluster Comparison Figures. Bioinformatics 2021, 37, 2473–2475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Grant, J.R.; Enns, E.; Marinier, E.; Mandal, A.; Herman, E.K.; Chen, C.Y.; Graham, M.; Van Domselaar, G.; Stothard, P. Proksee: In-Depth Characterization and Visualization of Bacterial Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, W484–W492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Magiorakos, A.P.; Srinivasan, A.; Carey, R.B.; Carmeli, Y.; Falagas, M.E.; Giske, C.G.; Harbarth, S.; Hindler, J.F.; Kahlmeter, G.; Olsson-Liljequist, B.; et al. Multidrug-Resistant, Extensively Drug-Resistant and Pandrug-Resistant Bacteria: An International Expert Proposal for Interim Standard Definitions for Acquired Resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012, 18, 268–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Higgins, P.G.; Prior, K.; Harmsen, D.; Seifert, H. Development and Evaluation of a Core Genome Multilocus Typing Scheme for Whole-Genome Sequence-Based Typing of Acinetobacter baumannii. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0179228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bonnin, R.; Ocampo-Sosa, A.; Poirel, L.; Guet-Revillet, H.; Nordmann, P. Biochemical and Genetic Characterization of Carbapenem-Hydrolyzing β-Lactamase OXA-229 from Acinetobacter Bereziniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 3923–3927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kyselková, M.; Chrudimský, T.; Husník, F.; Chroňáková, A.; Heuer, H.; Smalla, K.; Elhottová, D. Characterization of Tet(Y)-Carrying LowGC Plasmids Exogenously Captured from Cow Manure at a Conventional Dairy Farm. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2016, 92, fiw075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wallden, K.; Rivera-Calzada, A.; Waksman, G. Type IV Secretion Systems: Versatility and Diversity in Function. Cell. Microbiol. 2010, 12, 1203–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Bontron, S.; Nordmann, P.; Poirel, L. Transposition of Tn125 Encoding the NDM-1 Carbapenemase in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016, 60, 7245–7251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Acman, M.; Wang, R.; van Dorp, L.; Shaw, L.P.; Wang, Q.; Luhmann, N.; Yin, Y.; Sun, S.; Chen, H.; Wang, H.; et al. Role of Mobile Genetic Elements in the Global Dissemination of the Carbapenem Resistance Gene BlaNDM. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Coluzzi, C.; Guédon, G.; Devignes, M.; Ambroset, C.; Loux, V.; Lacroix, T.; Payot, S.; Leblond-Bourget, N. A Glimpse into the World of Integrative and Mobilizable Elements in Streptococci Reveals an Unexpected Diversity and Novel Families of Mobilization Proteins. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Guedes Stehling, E.; Sellera, F.P.; Guilherme Gonçalves de Almeida, O.; Hany Lima Gonzalez, I.; Locosque Ramos, P.; Gonsales da Rosa-Garzon, N.; Regina von Zeska Kress, M.; Cabral, H.; Pedro Rueda Furlan, J. Genomic Features and Comparative Analysis of a Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter Bereziniae Strain Infecting an Animal: A Novel Emerging One Health Pathogen? World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024, 40, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Castanheira, M.; Mendes, R.E.; Gales, A.C. Global Epidemiology and Mechanisms of Resistance of Acinetobacter Baumannii-Calcoaceticus Complex. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2023, 76, S166–S178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mo, X.-M.; Pan, Q.; Seifert, H.; Xing, X.-W.; Yuan, J.; Zhou, Z.-Y.; Luo, X.-Y.; Liu, H.-M.; Xie, Y.-L.; Yang, L.-Q.; et al. First Identification of Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter Bereziniae Isolates Harboring Bla NDM-1 from Hospitals in South China. Heliyon 2023, 9, e12365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chagas, T.; Carvalho-Assef, A.; Martins Aires, C.; Bertocini, R.; Asensi, M. Detection of an NDM-1-Producing Acinetobacter Bereziniae Strain in Brazil. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2015, 3, 147–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Brovedan, M.; Marchiaro, P.M.; Morán-Barrio, J.; Cameranesi, M.; Cera, G.; Rinaudo, M.; Viale, A.M.; Limansky, A.S. Complete Sequence of a Bla(NDM-1)-Harboring Plasmid in an Acinetobacter Bereziniae Clinical Strain Isolated in Argentina. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 6667–6669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Brovedan, M.; Repizo, G.D.; Marchiaro, P.; Viale, A.M.; Limansky, A. Characterization of the Diverse Plasmid Pool Harbored by the BlaNDM-1-Containing Acinetobacter Bereziniae HPC229 Clinical Strain. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0220584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yamamoto, M.; Nagao, M.; Matsumura, Y.; Hotta, G.; Matsushima, A.; Ito, Y.; Takakura, S.; Ichiyama, S. Regional Dissemination of Acinetobacter Species Harbouring Metallo-β-Lactamase Genes in Japan. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2013, 19, 729–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Merlino, J.; Rizzo, S.; Beresford, R.; Gray, T. Isolation of Acinetobacter Bereziniae Harbouring Plasmid BlaNDM-1 in Central Sydney, Australia. Pathology 2023, 55, 867–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Pudpong, K.; Pattharachayakul, S.; Santimaleeworagun, W.; Nwabor, O.F.; Laohaprertthisan, V.; Hortiwakul, T.; Charernmak, B.; Chusri, S. Association Between Types of Carbapenemase and Clinical Outcomes of Infection Due to Carbapenem Resistance Enterobacterales. Infect. Drug. Resist. 2022, 15, 3025–3037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Dy, R.L.; Przybilski, R.; Semeijn, K.; Salmond, G.P.C.; Fineran, P.C. A Widespread Bacteriophage Abortive Infection System Functions through a Type IV Toxin–Antitoxin Mechanism. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, 4590–4605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Partridge, S.R.; Kwong, S.M.; Firth, N.; Jensen, S.O. Mobile Genetic Elements Associated with Antimicrobial Resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2018, 31, e00088-1. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Graphical representation of 47,274 bp plasmids harbored by A. bereziniae UCO-553 and UCO-554 strains. Arrows indicate the length and directions of genes and ORFs. Tn125 is indicated in the red line. Genes annotations were performed by the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP), whereas the plasmid was visualized using Proksee and edited using Inkscape v1.2.
Figure 1. Graphical representation of 47,274 bp plasmids harbored by A. bereziniae UCO-553 and UCO-554 strains. Arrows indicate the length and directions of genes and ORFs. Tn125 is indicated in the red line. Genes annotations were performed by the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP), whereas the plasmid was visualized using Proksee and edited using Inkscape v1.2.
Genes 15 01213 g001
Figure 2. Comparative linear maps of the tet(Y)-encoding plasmids harbored by UCO-553 and UCO-554 strains. Arrows indicate the length and directions of genes and ORFs. Antibiotics-resistant genes (ARGs) are marked in red, insertions sequences (IS) and transposases are in green, plasmid mobilization proteins genes in yellow, other genes are in blue and hypothetical proteins in white. Tn5393 is denoted in the red rectangle. Gene annotations were performed by the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP), whereas genomic alignment was facilitated by clinker v0.0.23 [31] and the figure was processed using Inkscape v1.2.
Figure 2. Comparative linear maps of the tet(Y)-encoding plasmids harbored by UCO-553 and UCO-554 strains. Arrows indicate the length and directions of genes and ORFs. Antibiotics-resistant genes (ARGs) are marked in red, insertions sequences (IS) and transposases are in green, plasmid mobilization proteins genes in yellow, other genes are in blue and hypothetical proteins in white. Tn5393 is denoted in the red rectangle. Gene annotations were performed by the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP), whereas genomic alignment was facilitated by clinker v0.0.23 [31] and the figure was processed using Inkscape v1.2.
Genes 15 01213 g002
Table 1. Susceptibility profiles of A. bereziniae UCO-553 and A. bereziniae UCO-554 strains included in this study.
Table 1. Susceptibility profiles of A. bereziniae UCO-553 and A. bereziniae UCO-554 strains included in this study.
StrainsDisk Diffusion TestMIC (µg/mL)
IMPMEMFEPCAZCTXSAMTZPCIPLEVGENAMKTETSXTCSTMINTGC
UCO-553RRRRRRRRRRRRR≤0.25 (I)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)
UCO-554RRRRRRRRRRRRR≤0.25 (I)≤1 (S)≤1 (S)
IMP: imipenem; MEM: meropenem; CAZ: ceftazidime; CTX: cefotaxime; TZP: piperacillin/tazobactam; CIP: ciprofloxacin; LEV: levofloxacin; GEN: gentamicin; AMK: amikacin; TET: tetracycline; SXT: sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim; CST: colistin; MIN: minocycline; TGC: tigecycline. MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration. R: resistant; I: intermediate; S: susceptible.
Table 2. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the antibiotics used in the conjugation assay.
Table 2. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the antibiotics used in the conjugation assay.
StrainsCHL (µg/mL)IMP (µg/mL)TET (µg/mL)MIN (µg/mL)TGC (µg/mL)
A. bereziniae UCO-5538>32256≤1≤1
A. bereziniae UCO-5544>32256≤1≤1
A. baumannii ATCC 196061280.0941≤1≤1
A. baumannii
Tc-553
128>32256≤1≤1
A. baumannii
Tc-554
128>32256≤1≤1
CHL: chloramphenicol; IMP: imipenem; TET: tetracycline; MIN: minocycline; TGC: tigecycline; Tc: transconjugant.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Opazo-Capurro, A.; Xanthopoulou, K.; Arazo del Pino, R.; González-Muñoz, P.; Matus-Köhler, M.; Amsteins-Romero, L.; Jerez-Olate, C.; Hormazábal, J.C.; Vera, R.; Aguilera, F.; et al. Co-Occurrence of Two Plasmids Encoding Transferable blaNDM-1 and tet(Y) Genes in Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter bereziniae. Genes 2024, 15, 1213. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15091213

AMA Style

Opazo-Capurro A, Xanthopoulou K, Arazo del Pino R, González-Muñoz P, Matus-Köhler M, Amsteins-Romero L, Jerez-Olate C, Hormazábal JC, Vera R, Aguilera F, et al. Co-Occurrence of Two Plasmids Encoding Transferable blaNDM-1 and tet(Y) Genes in Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter bereziniae. Genes. 2024; 15(9):1213. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15091213

Chicago/Turabian Style

Opazo-Capurro, Andrés, Kyriaki Xanthopoulou, Rocío Arazo del Pino, Paulina González-Muñoz, Maximiliano Matus-Köhler, Luis Amsteins-Romero, Christian Jerez-Olate, Juan Carlos Hormazábal, Rodrigo Vera, Felipe Aguilera, and et al. 2024. "Co-Occurrence of Two Plasmids Encoding Transferable blaNDM-1 and tet(Y) Genes in Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter bereziniae" Genes 15, no. 9: 1213. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15091213

APA Style

Opazo-Capurro, A., Xanthopoulou, K., Arazo del Pino, R., González-Muñoz, P., Matus-Köhler, M., Amsteins-Romero, L., Jerez-Olate, C., Hormazábal, J. C., Vera, R., Aguilera, F., Fuller, S., Higgins, P. G., & González-Rocha, G. (2024). Co-Occurrence of Two Plasmids Encoding Transferable blaNDM-1 and tet(Y) Genes in Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter bereziniae. Genes, 15(9), 1213. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15091213

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop