Intelligent Analysis Cloud Platform for Soil Moisture-Nutrients-Salinity Content Based on Quantitative Remote Sensing
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- Selecting data sources to obtain SMNS. There are usually two methods. The more common is using fixed monitoring stations or mobile monitoring stations to obtain data and using the spatial interpolation method to achieve regional soil quality information monitoring. For example, Wu et al. designed and developed an online evaluation system to remediate heavy metal pollution of soil by collecting the index information of heavy metals in soil samples and using the kriging spatial interpolation analysis method [21]. However, this method is costly, fixed stations can be easily damaged and require complex maintenance, and mobile monitoring stations require many human and material resources [22]. It is therefore not easy to complete the analysis of regional soil quality information. Another method is to obtain soil quality information through quantitative remote sensing inversion, which involves establishing the quantitative relationship and model between spectral reflectance and soil quality information. For example, Wang et al., based on MODIS/HJ1A remote sensing image data, used the temperature–vegetation dryness index (TVDI) method to invert soil moisture and then designed a soil moisture monitoring system [23]. The method has now become an essential tool for regional soil quality monitoring. The remote sensing data source is low in cost and easy to access, and the quantitative model can achieve rapid and non-destructive monitoring of regional SMNS [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. Therefore, it has become a general trend in analysis systems for soil quality information to obtain soil quality data based on the quantitative remote sensing model.
- Designing the system application platform and function, i.e., the platform environment and functions, on the basis of user requirements. For example, Zhang et al. designed and developed a water–salt dynamic monitoring Web system for saline land for agricultural managers, which realized the functions of information query of plot, statistical analysis of water and salt data, spatial analysis of water and salt, dynamic trend analysis of water and salt, and early warning [24]. Guo developed a modular desktop system for remote sensing inversion and monitoring of soil salinity using the ArcGIS Engine. It also combines remote sensing and spatial statistic principles to mine and analyze data on soil salinization spatial and temporal variation characteristics [25]. Long et al. developed a farmland drought remote sensing dynamic monitoring system based on the Android platform [26]. The research shows that regional soil quality information can be rapidly monitored and analyzed by developing the system, but the above research only designed the system application platform and functions for the needs of a single user. Different users have different needs in agricultural production: Farmers need to acquire field soil information remotely, agricultural managers need to understand the characteristics of regional soil change, and agricultural researchers need to study precision fertilization and smart agricultural production. Therefore, we must design the system application platform level and functions of the analysis systems for soil quality information in a targeted way to accomplish a rapid and intelligent analysis of regional soil quality indicators.
- Selecting analysis index of the system, that is, which soil quality indicators are acquired, processed, analyzed, and managed by the system. The indicators in the existing studies include soil moisture, nutrients (organic matter, nitrogen, etc.), and salinity. For example, Lan et al. designed and developed a soil nitrogen spatial distribution mapping system based on ArcGIS Engine [27]. Wang et al. performed a kriging analysis of soil nutrient data and realized precise fertilization for family farms using the smartphone App combined with the Web management system [28]. It can be seen that most of the existing soil quality analysis systems only focus on a single index. Crop growth is affected by the interaction of soil water, nutrients, salt, and other factors requires in-depth analysis of soil quality information from the perspectives of multiple indicators. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a multi-index analysis system of soil quality information to provide general data for comprehensive analysis, management, mining, and application of soil quality information.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Platform Design Methodology
2.1.1. Object-Oriented Programming Methods
2.1.2. System Requirement Analysis
2.2. Platform Environment
2.2.1. GIS Software
2.2.2. Development Environment
2.2.3. Database Software
2.3. Data Acquisition and Pre-Processing
2.3.1. Spatial Data
- Remote sensing image data are downloaded through Copernicus Open Access Hub (URL: https://scihub.copernicus.eu/, accessed on 15 November 2022) and Geospatial Data Cloud (URL: https://www.gscloud.cn/, accessed on 15 November 2022); processed by the Sentinel Application Platform (SNAP), ENVI, and other image processing software for atmospheric correction, radiometric calibration, and other pre-processing, and released to the spatial database.
- The administrative area vector data are obtained through the Earth Big Data Science Project Data Sharing Service System (https://data.casearth.cn/sdo/list, accessed on 15 November 2022), processed using Geoscene Pro, and then released to the spatial database.
2.3.2. Attribute Data
- Soil knowledge includes the classification, formation factors, types, and other related information related to the soil. It is collected from papers, books, and other materials; organized into tables according to the needs; and then stored in the database for users.
- Decision-making advice is based on soil moisture–nutrient–salinity indicators, and the classification standards of soil indicators, advice decisions, and others are sorted into tables and stored in the database.
- News information includes news on agricultural policies, crop planting, pest control, natural disaster warning, etc. It is organized and edited using open source KindEditor [36] and then released by the administrator from the background. Users can view it on the front-end client.
2.3.3. Quantitative Inversion Model for SMNS
2.4. Functions Design and Implementation
2.4.1. Intelligent Inversion of SMNS
- The Web client and the mobile app: The existing remote sensing inversion model was created as geographic processing using the Python programing language in Geoscene Pro and published as the GP service. The client can fetch raster image files from local or cloud databases and display them. The Web client and the mobile app sides access and call the GP service to process the raster image using ArcGIS Runtime API. Images are processed at the back end and returned to the front display in the form of raster files for users to view the inversion results.
- The PC client: This uses C# language to directly call the script file (py) written in Python language to complete the remote sensing image inversion function.
2.4.2. Data Analysis Mining
- Spatial distribution analysis
- 2.
- Analysis of spatial and temporal changes
2.4.3. Management of Quantitative Inversion Models
2.5. Application of Case
3. Results
3.1. Platform Architecture
3.1.1. The Data Layer
3.1.2. The Service Layer
3.1.3. The User Layer
3.2. Platform Functions
3.2.1. Map Function Module
3.2.2. Intelligent Inversion of SMNS Module
3.2.3. Data Analysis and Mining Module
3.2.4. Soil Knowledge Base Module
3.2.5. Platform Management Module
3.3. Application Cases
3.3.1. Intelligent Inversion and Spatial Distribution Analysis of Soil Organic Matter in Southwestern Shandong Province, China
3.3.2. Inversion and Temporal-Spatial Change Analysis of Soil Salinity in Kenli District, Yellow River Delta
4. Discussion
- The technology of analyzing soil quality information based on quantitative remote sensing inversion is mature and can objectively present accurate regional soil quality index information quickly and in real time [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. Many quantitative remote sensing models for soil quality information have been developed worldwide. For example, Guo et al. constructed a quantitative remote sensing prognostic model for storing information on organic carbon and its associated soil properties (organic carbon and soil bulk density) and a collaborative validation strategy evaluated the spatial distribution of the soil map. The results are consistent with the facts [15]. Wang et al. used machine learning to construct a quantitative remote sensing inversion model of soil salinity using gray correlation analysis based on Sentinel-2A MSI data [16]. The group also carried out related research and constructed many quantitative remote sensing inversion models for soil. Wei et al. studied the remote sensing inversion model for organic matter in the southwestern part of Shandong Province based on Sentinel-2A MSI images and obtained good inversion results [12]. To construct the inversion model of soil salinity in the Kenli district, Ma et al. used a numerical regression method for spectral index fusion based on UAV and Sentinel-2A [13]. It can be seen that, with the development of remote sensing technology, inversion using remote sensing data has become the primary way to obtain regional soil quality information quickly and will be a research hotspot in the future. Therefore, in this paper, quantitative remote sensing inversion technology is selected as the SMNS content analysis method that can meet the requirements of a cloud platform for intelligent analysis of SMNS by rapidly acquiring accurate regional soil quality information. Compared with monitoring based on the combination of monitoring points and geostatistical analysis, this method is far less in terms of cost and effectively avoids the impacts of easy destruction of monitoring points.
- In system application platform and function design.
- 3.
- From the aspect of analysis index of the system, remote sensing has been the main tool for soil quantitative analysis till now, and scientists all over the world have established many quantitative soil remote sensing inversion models. Because SMNS is an important part of soil quality information, the system is developed and tested based on SMNS. In practical application, different soil indexes use different models and there are some differences in the models across regions. Therefore, the platform supports model modification, which is not limited to the SMNS quantitative remote sensing provided by us but can also use other quantitative remote sensing inversion models in the platform according to user requirements, which will expand the platform’s application area infinitely.
5. Conclusions
- Based on the quantitative remote sensing inversion model, the SMNC cloud platform enables fast collection and analysis of regional soil quality information. Taking the spatial distribution analysis of soil organic matter in southwest Shandong province as an example, the results of cloud platform inversion are basically consistent with the measured sample points and interpolation analysis, and the results in the range of 10–20 g/kg are significantly higher than the interpolation analysis.
- The three-layer client design can simultaneously meet the needs of farmers, agricultural managers, and agricultural researchers for soil quality analysis.
- The cloud platform with the function of model customization, which can modify or add models according to user requirements to expand the application domain and value.
- The cases show that the platform has a friendly interface and runs smoothly. In the case of organic matter inversion in southwest Shandong Province, this platform can accurately obtain organic matter content in southwest Shandong Province by using remote sensing inversion model. The regional analysis function can effectively feedback the distribution of regional soil organic matter to users, and effectively improve the efficiency of regional soil quality acquisition. In the case of analysis of temporal and spatial changes of soil salinity in Kenli area, this platform can compare soil salinity data at different times through spatial analysis function on the basis of obtaining soil salinity by inversion, which can provide important data support for the treatment of soil salinization.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Passinato, J.H.; Amado, T.J.C.; Kassam, A.; Acosta, J.A.A.; Amaral, L.D.P. Soil Health Check-Up of Conservation Agriculture Farming Systems in Brazil. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Webb, N.P.; Marshall, N.A.; Stringer, L.C.; Reed, M.S.; Chappell, A.; Herrick, J.E. Land degradation and climate change: Building climate resilience in agriculture. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2017, 15, 450–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Guo, Y.; Fu, Y.; Hao, F.; Zhang, X.; Wen, W.; Jin, X.; Bryant, C.; Senthilnath, K. Integrated phenology and climate in rice yields prediction using machine learning methods. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 120, 106935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, Y.; Fu, Y.; Chen, S.; Bryant, C.; Li, X.; Senthilnath, j.; Sun, H.; Wang, S.; Wu, Z.; Beurs, K. Integrating spectral and textural information for identifying the tasseling date of summer maize using UAV based RGB images. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2021, 102, 102435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fróna, D.; Szenderák, J.; Harangi-Rákos, M. Economic effects of climate change on global agricultural production. Nat. Conserv. 2021, 44, 117–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sofo, A.; Zanella, A.; Ponge, J. Soil quality and fertility in sustainable agriculture, with a contribution to the biological classification of agricultural soils. Soil Use Manag. 2021, 38, 1085–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tahat, M.M.; Alananbeh, K.M.; Othman, Y.A.; Leskovar, D.I. Soil Health and Sustainable Agriculture. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lichtfouse, E.; Navarrete, M.; Debaeke, P.; Souchère, V.; Alberola, C.; Ménassieu, J. Agronomy for sustainable agriculture. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2009, 29, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ainiwaer, M.; Ding, J.; Kasim, N.; Wang, J.; Wang, J. Regional scale soil moisture content estimation based on multi-source remote sensing parameters. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2020, 41, 3346–3367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Zhang, M.; Yang, H.; Zhang, X.; Meng, X.; Li, H.; Tang, H. Invertion of cultivated soil organic matter content combining multi-spectral remote sensing and random forest algorithm. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2020, 36, 134–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Ma, Y.; Zhu, A.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, G.; Wei, Y. Soil salinity inversion based on differentiated fusion of satellite image and ground spectra. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2020, 101, 102360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, Y.; Ping, Z.; Zhao, G.; Chen, H.; Wang, L. Comparison of Sentinel 2A MSI and Landsat 8 OLI for Soil Organic Matter Inversion in Southwestern Shandong Province, China; Geocarto International: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Y.; Chen, H.; Zhao, G.; Wang, Z.; Wang, D. Spectral Index Fusion for Salinized Soil Salinity Inversion Using Sentinel-2A and UAV Images in a Coastal Area. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 159595–159608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, E.; Wang, C.; Dow, K. Comparing Sentinel-2 MSI and Landsat 8 OLI in soil salinity detection: A case study of agricultural lands in coastal North Carolina. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2019, 40, 6134–6153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, L.; Fu, P.; Shi, T.; Chen, Y.; Wang, S. Exploring influence factors in mapping soil organic carbon on low-relief agricultural lands using time series of remote sensing data. Soil Tillage Res. 2021, 210, 104982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, X.; Chan, N.W.; Kung, H.; Ariken, M.; Zhou, X.; Wang, Y. Regional suitability prediction of soil salinization based on remote-sensing derivatives and optimal spectral index. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 775, 145807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pei, T.; Xu, J.; Liu, Y.; Huang, X.; Gong, J. Current and future roles of GIScience and remote sensing in natural resource and environmental research. Geogr. Sustain. 2021, 38, 207–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ban, Y.; Marullo, S.; Eklundh, L. European Remote Sensing: Progress, challenges, and opportunities. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2017, 38, 1759–1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mutanga, O.; Dube, T.; Ahmed, F. Progress in remote sensing: Vegetation monitoring in South Africa. South Afr. Geogr. J. 2016, 98, 461–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lü, G.; Batty, M.; Strobl, J.; Lin, H.; Chen, M. Reflections and speculations on the progress in Geographic Information Systems (GIS): A geographic perspective. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2018, 33, 346–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, B.; Zhao, X.; Zhou, X.; Feng, K.; Luan, J. Design and Implementation of Soil Heavy Metal Pollution Remediation Evaluation System Based on WebGIS. Surv. Mapp. Spat. Geogr. Inf. 2021, 44, 131–135, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liao, C.; Zeng, W.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Lin, C.; Liu, Q. Contrastive Analysis of Multi-scale PM2.5 Concentration Spatial Distribution Simulation of Spatial Interpolation and Remote Sensing Inversion. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 40, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, D.; Wang, J.; Zhu, Y.; Luo, K.; Hou, Z.; Sun, K. Design and Implementation of Soil Moisture Monitor System of Yunnan Province. J. Irrig. Drain. 2016, 35, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Gao, M.; Zhu, C. Dynamic monitoring system of water and salt in saline alkali land based on WebGIS. Soils 2019, 51, 413–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, P. Remote Sensing Inversion and Monitoring System of Soil Salinization; Shandong Agricultural University: Taian, China, 2019; pp. 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Long, Z.; Zhang, T.; Xu, W.; Qin, Q. Development of farmland drought remote sensing dynamic monitoring system based on Android. Remote Sens. Land Resour. 2021, 33, 256–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lan, H.; Yang, W.; Li, M.; Zhou, P. Soil Nitrogen Spatial Distribution Mapping System Based on ArcGIS Engine. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2019, 50, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Yang, Z.; Yang, X.; Yang, X. Design of precision fertilization system for family farm based on Mobile GIS. China Agric. Inform. 2019, 31, 62–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jamie, S.; Murray, W. Recognising object-oriented software design quality: A practitioner-based questionnaire survey. Softw. Qual. J. 2017, 26, 321–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Parr, M.; Schmidt, A. Life Cycle Management of Analytical Methods. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2017, 147, 506–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alexander, F.; Brett, C.; Trent, P. Quantifying merging fire behaviour phenomena using unmanned aerial vehicle technology. Int. J. 2017, 54, 284–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, D.; Cho, H.; Onof, C.; Choi, M. Let-It-Rain: A web application for stochastic point rainfall generation at ngagged basins and its applicability in runoff and flood modeling. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 2017, 31, 1023–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhu, J.; Tan, Y.; Wang, X.; Wu, P. BIM/GIS integration for web GIS-based bridge management. Ann. GIS 2021, 27, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kuper, P. Design of a Generic Mobile GIS for Professional Users. Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2018, 7, 422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Li, S.; Pu, G.; Cheng, C.; Chen, B. Method for managing and querying geo-spatial data using a grid-code-array spatial index. Earth Sci. Inform. 2019, 12, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, R. Usage analysis of HTML online text editor in Java Web Development - Taking kindeditor as an example. J. Hubei Univ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 33, 21–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alan, T. Spatial Analysis and Modeling: Advances and Evolution. Geogr. Anal. 2020, 53, 647–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, Z.; Qian, B. Field investigation on effects of wheat-straw/corn-stalk mulch on ecological environment of upland crop farmland. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A 2002, 2, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, Y.L.; Yu, S. The Effects of different agricultural management measures on CH4 emission from paddy fields in southwest Shandong Province. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 792, 012051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoffland, E.; Kuyper, W.T.; Comans, R.N.J.; Creamer, R.E. Eco-functionality of organic matter in soils. Plant Soil 2020, 455, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prudnikova, E.; Savin, I. Some Peculiarities of Arable Soil Organic Matter Detection Using Optical Remote Sensing Data. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 2313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, J.; Zhao, G.; Xi, X.; Cui, K.; Gao, P. Extraction of soil salinization information by combining spectral and texture data in the Yellow River Delta: A case study in Kenli District. Shandong Province. J. Agric. Resour. Environ. 2022, 39, 594–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, W.; Yang, Z.; Di, L. Cropscape: A Web service based application for exploring and disseminating US conterminous geospatial cropland data products for decision support. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2012, 84, 111–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xing, H.; Chen, J.; Wu, H.; Hou, D. A web service-oriented geoprocessing system for supporting intelligent land cover change detection. Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2019, 8, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Grade | Soil Organic Range (g/kg) | Number of Pixels | Proportion Rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|
First grade | >30 | 1,031,507 | 3.6 |
Second grade | 25~30 | 2,843,615 | 10.2 |
Third Grade | 20~25 | 6,189,046 | 22.2 |
Fourth Grade | 15~20 | 5,631,474 | 20.2 |
Fifth Grade | 10~15 | 12,071,428 | 43.3 |
Sixth Grade | ≤10 | 139,392 | 0.5 |
Grade | Sampling Point (%) | Inversion Map (%) | Interpolation Map (%) |
---|---|---|---|
≥30 | 2.8 | 3.6 | 1.5 |
25–30 | 13.5 | 10.2 | 9.3 |
20–25 | 24.8 | 22.2 | 27.8 |
15–20 | 26.3 | 20.2 | 45.1 |
10–15 | 30.5 | 43.3 | 15.5 |
<10 | 2.1 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
Grade | Soil Salinization Range (g/kg) | Number of Pixels | Proportion Rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Non-saline soil | <2.0 | 228,551 | 6.26 |
Mild saline soil | 2.0~4.0 | 301,080 | 8.25 |
Moderate saline soil | 4.0~6.0 | 808,347 | 22.14 |
Severe saline soil | 6.0~10.0 | 1,116,931 | 30.60 |
Solonchak | ≥10.0 | 1,195,639 | 32.75 |
Grade | 2018-04 | 2018-10 | Change |
---|---|---|---|
Non-saline soil | 6.26% | 22.27% | 16.01% |
Mild saline soil | 8.25% | 19.93% | 11.68% |
Moderate saline soil | 22.14% | 20.13% | −2.01% |
Severe saline soil | 30.60% | 29.80% | −0.80% |
Solonchak | 32.75% | 7.87% | −24.88% |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zhang, T.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, A.; Wang, R.; Chen, H.; Liu, P. Intelligent Analysis Cloud Platform for Soil Moisture-Nutrients-Salinity Content Based on Quantitative Remote Sensing. Atmosphere 2023, 14, 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14010023
Zhang T, Zhang Y, Wang A, Wang R, Chen H, Liu P. Intelligent Analysis Cloud Platform for Soil Moisture-Nutrients-Salinity Content Based on Quantitative Remote Sensing. Atmosphere. 2023; 14(1):23. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14010023
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhang, Teng, Yong Zhang, Ao Wang, Ruilin Wang, Hongyan Chen, and Peng Liu. 2023. "Intelligent Analysis Cloud Platform for Soil Moisture-Nutrients-Salinity Content Based on Quantitative Remote Sensing" Atmosphere 14, no. 1: 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14010023
APA StyleZhang, T., Zhang, Y., Wang, A., Wang, R., Chen, H., & Liu, P. (2023). Intelligent Analysis Cloud Platform for Soil Moisture-Nutrients-Salinity Content Based on Quantitative Remote Sensing. Atmosphere, 14(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14010023