4.1. Flow and Rainfall Effects on Phosphorus Fluxes
This study found that the Vermilion River, draining agriculture intensive land, had an increased total phosphorus export from the 1990–2009 period to the 2010–2017 period. However, the increase should not be attributed to land use effects because the river discharge increased during the past eight years while the TP concentration in the river was relatively unchanged (
Table 5). The Vermilion River receives partial flow from the Atchafalaya River through river diversion [
16] and it is not clear whether the discharge increase was caused by an increased diversion from the Atchafalaya River or an increased rainfall within the drainage area. In any case, the findings indicate the important role of river discharge in TP export.
From 1990–2009 period to 2010–2017 period, the variation of river discharge in the Calcasieu River was mainly caused by precipitation change. For instance, daily precipitation from a NOAA weather station (station number: USC00166938 Oberlin fire tower, LA, USA) which is about 16 km upstream of Kinder can explain 71% variance of the river discharge at Kinder during 1990–2017 (
Appendix A Figure A5). Other studies have shown that climate condition such as precipitation has a critical impact on riverine phosphorus export. Chen et al. [
34] showed that in the six catchments of the Yongan River watershed in eastern China will have an 8–18% increase from 2000–2010 in riverine TP flux by 2030 due to a 4% increase in precipitation with no changes in anthropogenic phosphorus inputs and land use condition. As future climate change drives an increase in hydrologic variability, the predictability of the response of nutrient flux such as TP flux to discharge may be important in understanding ecosystem responses to climatic change.
River discharge impacts TP flux not only because TP flux is the product of the river’s discharge and TP concentration in river water, but also because discharge influences TP concentration. In the Calcasieu and Mermentau Rivers, low discharges were not always accompanied by high TP concentrations, but high TP concentrations were usually accompanied by low discharges, suggesting the dilution effect of river discharge. For example, in the Calcasieu River, all samples with TP concentrations >0.18 mg L
−1 were collected when discharges were below 50 m
3 s
−1 (
Appendix A Figure A6). In the Mermentau River, all samples with TP concentrations >0.30 mg L
−1 were collected when discharges were below 105 m
3 s
−1. The Vermilion River did not exhibit such trend, and we believe this is caused by the high nutrient availability in the Vermilion drainage basin due to the agricultural intensive land use conditions. In this river, discharge could have a dilution effect as well as have the ability to bring in more nutrients into the river surface water due to soil erosion.
River discharge could also affect phosphorus flux by changing the water depth of the river, potentially causing vertical profile differences in phosphorus concentration. Therefore, even though surface water sampling is a very common practice, profiled water sampling might be a more appropriate way to determine phosphorus flux. However, since we only collected surface water samples, discussion on this subject is beyond the scope of this study.
4.2. Land Use Effects on Phosphorus Fluxes
The TP and DIP fluxes and yields from the Mermentau and Vermilion Rivers were clearly higher than those from the Calcasieu River, further confirming the strong effect of land uses on phosphorus input to estuaries in coastal river basins. Phosphorus in surface waters arises from various sources, including drainage from agricultural soils, domestic, farm, and industrial effluents, groundwater discharge, and atmospheric deposition [
19,
35,
36]. Numerous studies have demonstrated the strong effect of agricultural practices in coastal river basins on the quantity and quality of nutrient input to estuaries [
7,
37]. The concentration of phosphorus in drainage water from agricultural land is a complex function of soil characteristics, land use, and management practices [
19,
38]. Due to the non-existence of gaseous phase and phosphorus adsorption on oxides and clay mineral, phosphorus is less mobile in the soil-plant-atmosphere system than nitrogen [
37]. One consequence of this lower phosphorus mobility throughout the soil profile is that when phosphorus fertilizers are applied, they tend to increase soil phosphorus concentration on the surface, which makes phosphorus more available by loss through soil erosion and surface runoff [
37,
39]. The high availability of phosphorus by loss explains the strong impact of agriculture on river water TP and DIP concentrations and fluxes.
Land uses not only change the quantity of phosphorus loadings to estuarine rivers, but also change the forms and availability of phosphorus. The higher DIP contribution in rivers draining agricultural-intensive watersheds may be due to the soluble phosphorus fertilizer used in these river basins. The Mermentau and Vermilion Rivers also had lower DOC:TP, DOC:DIP, Si:TP, and Si:DIP ratios than the Calcasieu River. The differences in those ratios can influence primary production and the composition of plankton communities in these rivers, individually or in combination, as such influence was found by other researchers [
40,
41].
4.3. Phosphorus in Fresh-Saltwater Mixing
In this study, we found no clear mixing dynamics of total phosphorus (
Figure 5). The average TP concentrations at the six sites from upstream to downstream were fairly consistent. The mixing dynamics of DIP concentration versus salinity plots suggest a source was present throughout the Calcasieu Estuary since measured DIP concentration was usually higher than those predicted by conservative mixing (
Figure 6), and this source is not related to seasonal change. The ultimate source of biologically available DIP is the weathering of continental rocks. However, only about 5% to 10% of the phosphorus eroded from continental rocks is thought to be carried to the oceans in dissolved form, and the rest is presumably carried as inert phosphorus in fluvial detrital grains [
42,
43]. Therefore, the forms of phosphorus have important impact on phosphorus transport and transformation dynamics in a river system.
The interaction between water and sediment has important impacts on phosphorus concentration in water. In solution, DIP reacts quickly with a wide variety of surfaces, being taken up by and released from particles through a complex series of sorption reactions [
42,
44]. For instance, desorption of DIP from aluminum and iron oxides is an important source for DIP in estuarine waters, while adsorption of DIP on sediments is an important sink for some estuaries. Hobbie et al. [
45] reported that 60% of the DIP entering the Pamlico River estuary (USA) was scavenged by particulates and stored in sediments, while Evans et al. [
46] showed that sediment plays an important role in supplying phosphorus to the river channel. In both freshwater and estuarine systems, concentrations of DIP have been strongly linked with the suspended sediment load. In fact, a stable or “equilibrium” concentration range of DIP, between 0.5 µM (0.015 mg L
−1) and 2 µM (0.062 mg L
−1), has been reported for several estuarine systems [
42,
47], including the Calcasieu Estuary in this study. These stable DIP concentrations are believed to be controlled by a “buffering” of DIP through the adsorption and desorption onto metal oxide surfaces [
48,
49].
The release of phosphorus from estuarine sediment is a common and important process that varies spatially and temporally [
17]. Metal oxyhydroxide adsorption of phosphorus in sediment is an important control upon phosphorus mobility, while the re-suspension of phosphorus-rich particles from the river bed, combined with high pH and low oxygen concentrations, can cause desorption of particulate phosphorus into the water column via hydroxyl group exchange mechanisms [
50]. Concentration of DIP in bottom water in the Baltic Sea was correlated with an area of the bottom covered by hypoxic water, and also shown to be negatively correlated with oxygen concentration, indicating the release of DIP from sediments [
51]. Increases in pH can enhance the release of adsorbed P that is hydrated to Fe and Al oxides, through ligand exchange mechanisms involving competition between OH
− and PO
43− [
17,
48]. In the Calcasieu River, desorption from suspended solids and sediments may be one of the sources of DIP in the estuary. The negative relationship between DO and DIP as well as the positive relationship between pH and DIP (
Table 3 and
Table 6) can partially explain this. Further, correlation analysis showed significant relationships between TP and total Mn (
Table 1;
n = 25,
R2 = 0.50,
p < 0.01), and total zinc (
n = 25,
R2 = 0.92;
p < 0.01) in sediment samples (data available at
Appendix A Table A1) collected from the Calcasieu River. With that, however, release of P from estuarine sediment may not the only source of DIP in the Calcasieu River.
There may be other anthropogenic DIP point sources around the study area that could contribute to the riverine DIP level, especially the lower Calcasieu as a heavy industry area, such as wastewater treatment plants, paper plants, and chemical refineries. Unfortunately, in this study, we did not design to trace the different sources of riverine phosphorus, which has limited us to quantify point source of P from the study watershed. Therefore, discussing potential point sources of Pinputs to the Calcasieu Estuary is beyond our data as well as the scope of this study. On the other hand, it is reasonable to consider this as many studies have shown that anthropogenic DIP sources could be important factors controlling the phosphorus dynamics in an estuary [
20,
52]. If this is the case for the Calcasieu Estuary, then the dynamics of phosphorus might have been modified due to anthropogenic phosphorus input. Further studies are needed to accurately distinguish the riverine DIP from anthropogenic sources.
Calcium carbonate and phosphorus co-precipitation, as reported in other river systems [
46,
50], could be another mechanism controlling the phosphorus dynamics in the Calcasieu River. Concentrations of TP and calcium in sediment samples collected from the Calcasieu River were statistically correlated (sample size
n = 23,
R2 = 0.68,
p < 0.01). Furthermore, sites 5 and 6 had higher correlations (
n = 8,
R2 = 0.89,
p < 0.01) than sites 1 to 4 did (
n = 15,
R2 = 0.73,
p < 0.01), suggesting that calcium carbonate and phosphorus co-precipitation was a more significant mechanism that could decrease phosphorus concentration at sites 5 and 6 when compared with the four upstream sites. Therefore, the observed mixing dynamics for DIP could be caused by using site 6 as the marine endmember.
As discussed above, riverine transport of phosphorus is controlled by a number of physical, chemical, and biotic mechanisms which are in turn dependent upon interactions between the water column and riverbed. The release and uptake of phosphorus by both suspended and bed sediments provide a critical control on in-stream phosphorus transport. Phosphorus transport and transformation dynamics in rivers can only be fully understood when considering both the water and sediment phases [
50]. While we are confident that the discussions here are well supported by our results, a more detailed sampling design focusing on suspended sediment, river bed sediment, and water column interactions will provide us with a deeper understanding on the dynamics of phosphorus in our studied river systems.