Next Article in Journal
Turbulence Characteristics before and after Scour Upstream of a Scaled-Down Bridge Pier Model
Next Article in Special Issue
Characterization of 1,4-Dioxane Biodegradation by a Microbial Community
Previous Article in Journal
Mining Rock Wastes for Water Treatment: Potential Reuse of Fe- and Mn-Rich Materials for Arsenic Removal
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Water
Volume 11
Issue 9
10.3390/w11091899
water-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Preparation of Activated Biochar-Supported Magnetite Composite for Adsorption of Polychlorinated Phenols from Aqueous Solutions

by
Byung-Moon Jun
1,†,
Yejin Kim
2,†,
Jonghun Han
3,
Yeomin Yoon
1,
Jeonggwan Kim
4,* and
Chang Min Park
2,*
1
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, 300 Main Street, SC 29208, USA
2
Department of Environmental Engineering, Kyungpook National University, 80 Daehak-ro, Buk-gu, Daegu 41566, Korea
3
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Korea Army Academy at Yeongcheon, 495 Hogook-ro, Gokyungmeon, Yeongcheon, Gyeongbuk 38900, Korea
4
Korea Environmental Industry & Technology Institute, 215 Jinheungno, Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul 03367, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
The first two authors contributed equally.
Water 2019, 11(9), 1899; https://doi.org/10.3390/w11091899
Submission received: 20 July 2019 / Revised: 5 September 2019 / Accepted: 9 September 2019 / Published: 11 September 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Removal of Emerging Contaminants from Waters Using Nanotechnology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
For this study, we applied activated biochar (AB) and its composition with magnetite (AB-Fe3O4) as adsorbents for the removal of polychlorophenols in model wastewater. We comprehensively characterized these adsorbents and performed adsorption tests under several experimental parameters. Using FTIR, we confirmed successful synthesis of AB-Fe3O4 composite through cetrimonium bromide surfactant. We conducted adsorption tests using AB and AB-Fe3O4 to treat model wastewater containing polychlorophenols, such as 2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol (TeCP), 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol (TCP), and 2,4-Dichlorophenol (DCP). Results of the isotherm and the kinetic experiments were well adapted to Freundlich’s isotherm model and the pseudo-second-order kinetic model, respectively. Main adsorption mechanisms in this study were attributed to non-covalent, π-electron acceptor–donor interactions and hydrophobic interactions judging from the number of chloride elements in each chlorophenol and its hydrophobic characteristics. We also considered the electrostatic repulsion effect between TeCP and AB, because adsorption performance of TeCP at basic condition was slightly worse than at weak acidic condition. Lastly, AB-Fe3O4 showed high adsorption selectivity of TeCP compared to other persistent organic pollutants (i.e., bisphenol A and sulfamethoxazole) due to hydrophobic interactions. We concluded that AB-Fe3O4 may be used as novel adsorbent for wastewater treatment including toxic and hydrophobic organic pollutants (e.g., TeCP).

1. Introduction

In the past decades, several efficient ways to treat wastewater containing organic and inorganic pollutants have been considered as one of the important topics in environmental science [1,2,3,4,5]. Chlorinated organic compounds (e.g., dioxins, polychlorophenols) are known as significant environmental pollutants, because these compounds have great resistance to biological degradation processes and affect serious health problems (e.g., nervous or respiratory systems) via the bioaccumulation of organisms in the ecosystem [6]. The emission of chlorinated organic compounds could be a result of combustion processes or several industries such as pulp, herbicides, petroleum refineries, dyes, pharmaceuticals, and pesticides [7,8]. Particularly, polychlorophenols have been regulated as toxic pollutants by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency due to its carcinogenic properties [7], thus it is crucial to investigate the effective way for removal of polychlorophenols from aqueous phase.
The various physico-chemical or biological methods that have previously been proposed to treat chlorophenols in wastewater are as follows: adsorption [9], incineration [7], photodegradation [10], electrochemical oxidation [11], catalytic degradation [12], biodegradation [13], and using a hybrid bioreactor [14]. However, secondary pollution could be generated by toxic byproducts in chemical treatments [15]. Furthermore, high operational costs and low efficiency have been described as weaknesses of biological treatments [7]. Thus, the adsorption process could be considered as an efficient method due to its simplicity, accessibility, cost-effectiveness, and high removal efficiency with reusability [16,17,18,19,20]. Novel adsorbents are essential for increasing removal efficiency of adsorbates in the adsorption process, and several adsorbents have been utilized to treat chlorophenols through carbon nanotubes, graphene oxides, activated carbon fibers, biochars, natural clays, and minerals [9,11,12].
Biochar is a kind of pyrogenic carbon material obtained from the combustion of biomass via pyrolysis [21]. This low-cost material has attracted attention since it can be used as an efficient adsorbent to remove organic pollutants with its outstanding adsorption physico-chemical properties. In other words, high adsorption efficiency of biochar can be attributed to its high porosity, large surface area, great ion-exchange capacity, and tunable surface chemistry [21,22]. For instance, biochar has been used as an effective adsorbent for treatment of wastewater that contains several toxic organic and inorganic pollutants such as phenol, dyes, chlorophenols, heavy metals, and pharmaceuticals [23]. Although raw biochar is applicable in many situations as an adsorbent, adsorption properties may be enhanced with further activation using various acids (e.g., HCl, HNO3, H2SO4, and H3PO4) [23]. In other words, physico-chemical properties can be modified by modifying parameters, thus the pore size or the chemical bonds of biochar can change with activation agents and exposure time [24]. For example, the physical properties of biochar were improved by HCl activation, as revealed by an increased surface area from 289 to 347 m2/g [23]. In addition, increased oxygenated functional groups after activation (e.g., carboxyl, hydroxyl, and carbonyl groups) could have positive or negative effects depending on the chemical structure of adsorbates [25].
Nanocomposite materials—iron-based magnetic nanoparticles, in particular (e.g., Fe2O3 and Fe3O4)—and their efficiency in removing toxic pollutants from wastewater have been widely studied [26]. Magnetite is generally produced by co-precipitation using Fe(II)/Fe(III) salts under anaerobic condition, and performances of synthesized magnetite are attributed to preparation parameters such as solution pH, temperature, and co-ions [27]. Magnetite has been used for composite materials to treat toxic pollutants in wastewater using its high surface area, reusability by external magnetic field, reproducibility, mechanical property, and adsorption ability [28]. Thus, there is synergetic effect if magnetite is synthesized with activated biochar (AB) as a novel adsorbent according to previous studies [9,27,28]. To the best of our knowledge, our study was the first attempt to treat 2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol (TeCP), 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol (TCP), and 2,4-Dichlorophenol (DCP) in model wastewater via AB-Fe3O4.
The main goal of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of AB-Fe3O4 as an adsorbent to remove selected polychlorophenols. We first conducted several characterizations in order to evaluate the physico-chemical properties of synthesized AB-Fe3O4. Subsequently, we carried out the adsorption process of polychlorophenols under the following experimental parameters: contact time for kinetics, initial concentration of polychlorophenols for isotherms, and solution pH. Lastly, we measured adsorption selectivity of TeCP by AB-Fe3O4 compared to other persistent organic pollutants [i.e., bisphenol A (BPA) and sulfamethoxazole (SMX)].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

We purchased commercially available nitric acid (HNO3), sulfuric acid (H2SO4), sodium hydroxide (NaOH), ferrous chloride (FeCl2·4H2O), ferric chloride (FeCl3·6H2O), BPA (C15H16O2), SMX (C10H11N3O3S), 2,3,4,6-TeCP (C6H2Cl4O), 2,4,6-TCP (C6H3Cl3O), 2,4-DCP (C6H4Cl2O), methanol (CH4O), and cetrimonium bromide (CTAB, C19H42BrN) from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Table 1 summarizes selected physicochemical properties of TeCP, TCP, DCP, BPA, and SMX. Stock and feed solutions were prepared using deionized (DI) water.

2.2. Fabrication of AB, Fe3O4, and AB-Fe3O4

Bamboo particles as biomass feedstock were carbonized by being heated in a tubular furnace for 1.5 h at 773 K under an argon atmosphere. The carbonized material (biochar) was then left to cool in argon until 298 K, ground, and sieved to −200 mesh. Subsequently, we activated 5 g of biochar via an acid treatment using H2SO4/HNO3 mixture [3:1 (v/v)] at 353 K for 3 h, as suggested in a previous study [29]. AB was then washed several times with DI to remove residual acids, and the clean AB was collected through centrifugation.
The magnetite (Fe3O4) particles were produced using a co-precipitation method based on a previous report [30]. We prepared a solution (50 mL) containing FeCl2·4H2O (2.0 g) and FeCl3·6H2O (5.2 g) dissolved in 1 M HCl (1 mL) under a nitrogen atmosphere. Then, 1 M NaOH was added dropwise into the mixture solution with vigorous stirring for 3 h. Then, fabricated Fe3O4 particles were collected by an external magnetic field, washed several times using DI water, and then dried in a vacuum oven.
The synthesis of AB-Fe3O4 was prepared as follows: 5 g of AB was dispersed into a beaker including 100 mL DI water through a magnetic stirrer. Then, 0.1% CTAB surfactant (w/w) was added to the beaker and stirred for 30 min to produce AB-CTAB complexation. The long chain cationic surfactant (CTAB) intercalated to AB-Fe3O4 converted the surface property to a more hydrophobic characteristic, which helped increase the adsorption of polychlrophenols [31,32]. Lastly, we mixed Fe3O4 (2.5 g) with AB-CTAB complexation and stirred vigorously for 60 min. The final AB-Fe3O4 products were washed several times with DI water and then separated by vacuum filtration. The cleaned products were kept in a vacuum oven until we conducted the adsorption experiments.

2.3. Characterization Methods

Physico-chemical properties of adsorbents were investigated by various characterization techniques. We analyzed the crystalline structure of biochar, AB, Fe3O4, and AB-Fe3O4 via powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD, D/max-2500; Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan). Analyses of PXRD peaks were carried out using well-known references (Jade software; Materials Data, Inc., Livermore, CA, USA). Chemical properties of biochar, AB, Fe3O4, and AB-Fe3O4 were analyzed via Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR; Thermo Nicolet; Madison, WI, USA) in order to identify each chemical bond [33]. The surface morphology of AB, Fe3O4, and AB-Fe3O4 was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX, S-4200; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The surface charge of 100 mg/L AB, Fe3O4, and AB-Fe3O4 was obtained via zeta potential analyzer (Nano ZS; Malvern Instruments Ltd., Malvern, UK) at pH 3.5, 7, and 10 adjusted by 0.1 M HNO3 and NaOH. The magnetic hysteresis loops of Fe3O4 and AB-Fe3O4 were evaluated via a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM, 7407-S; Lake Shore Cryotronics, OH, USA) at room temperature. Textural characteristics of AB, Fe3O4, and AB-Fe3O4 were confirmed by porosimeter (Quadrasorb SI; Quantachrome Instruments Ltd., FL, USA).

2.4. Adsorption Experiments

In this work, we aimed to measure the efficiency of polychlorophenols adsorption by a prepared adsorbent (AB-Fe3O4). Feed solutions including polychlorophenols (TeCP, TCP, and DCP) or pharmaceuticals (BPA and SMX) were diluted from 100 mg/L methanol-based stock solutions. Adsorption tests were conducted in a 60 mL polyethylene plastic bottle containing 30 mg of adsorbent mass and 30 mL of total liquid volume. Kinetic and isotherm adsorption studies were carried out at different exposure times (i.e., 15, 30, 45, 60, 120, and 240 min) and initial concentrations of adsorbates (i.e., 5, 10, 20, 60, 100, and 200 mg/L). Solution pH was adjusted by 0.1 M HNO3 and NaOH before adsorption tests. The concentration of filtered samples was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (1200 series; Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA).

2.5. Data Analysis

Adsorption performances of TeCP by AB and AB-Fe3O4 were evaluated through adsorption capacity at equilibrium state (qe, mg/g), as shown in Equation (1):
q e =   ( C 0 −   C e )   V m
where C0 (mg/L) is the initial concentration of TeCP, Ce (mg/L) is the concentration of TeCP at equilibrium state, V (L) is the volume of the total solution containing TeCP and each adsorbent, and m (g) is mass of each adsorbent.
We referenced another study to conduct kinetic and isotherm experiments on target compounds’ adsorption on adsorbents [15]. We used pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order kinetic models to investigate kinetic study of adsorption on adsorbents and applied Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models to verify the isotherm adsorption mechanism in this system.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterizations of Biochar, AB, Fe3O4, and AB-Fe3O4

The crystalline structures of biochar, AB, Fe3O4, and AB-Fe3O4 were analyzed by PXRD, which are summarized in Figure 1. The PXRD pattern of Fe3O4 was comparable to another study [34], and both Fe3O4 and AB patterns were overlapped in a PXRD pattern of AB-Fe3O4 composite, indicating successful synthesis of AB-Fe3O4 composite.
In terms of chemical bonds, we analyzed the FTIR spectra of biochar, AB, Fe3O4, and AB-Fe3O4 (Figure 2a). New peaks appeared after activation via acid treatments when AB (orange line in Figure 2a) was compared to biochar (green line in Figure 2a). We attributed these peaks to oxygenated functional groups [e.g., carboxyl (1720 cm−1) and hydroxyl (3500 and 1247 cm−1)] judging from the results of other studies [29,35]. The newly formed peaks of AB-Fe3O4 (black line in Figure 2a) at 2916 and 2849 cm−1 represented methyl (2916 cm−1) and methylene (2849 cm−1) functional groups of CTAB surfactant, which was used for synthesis of AB-Fe3O4 [31]. Thus, FTIR spectra of AB-Fe3O4 (black line in Figure 2a) showed successful synthesis as a composite material based on overlapping peaks of Fe3O4 (1035 cm−1 of blue line in Figure 2a) and AB (1605 cm−1 of orange line in Figure 2a), respectively. Furthermore, we conducted the further analyses of FTIR to clarify the change of chemical bonds before and after adsorption of TeCP, TCP, and DCP on AB-Fe3O4, as shown in Figure 2b. According to Figure 2b, FTIR spectra were evidently changed after TeCP, TCP, and DCP adsorption on AB-Fe3O4. First of all, new peaks at 3775, 3659, and 3524 cm−1 were detected after adsorption, and these peaks could have resulted from hydroxyl group of chlorophenols [36]. Secondly, the C=C stretching vibration of AB-Fe3O4 at 1480 cm−1 was slightly shifted to a lower wave number, which could be explained by π–π interaction between adsorbent and adsorbates [37]. Lastly, the C-Cl stretching vibration of chlorophenols in the range from 800 to 600 cm−1 (i.e., 775 cm−1 in this study) was detected after TeCP, TCP, and DCP adsorption [38]. These results indicated that those adsorbates were clearly adsorbed on AB-Fe3O4 in this system.
Figure 3a–c shows representative SEM images and EDX spectra of AB, Fe3O4, and AB-Fe3O4, respectively. SEM images revealed that both AB and Fe3O4 were spherical in shape, measuring 10–100 μm (Figure 3a,c) and ~20 nm (Figure 3b) in diameter, respectively. Using EDX (Figure 3a,b), we determined that the main elements of AB and Fe3O4 were C/O and O/Fe, respectively. The basis for our conclusion of the composite of AB-Fe3O4—as shown in Figure 3c—is as follows: (a) Fe3O4 nanoparticles uniformly covered AB surface through SEM image, and (b) elements of C (55 wt %), O (20 wt %), and Fe (25 wt %) were detected through EDX analysis.
We measured the surface charge of AB, Fe3O4, and AB-Fe3O4 at pH 3.5, 7, and 10, as shown in Figure 4. The isoelectric points of AB and AB-Fe3O4 were lower and higher than pH 3.5, respectively, meaning that AB-Fe3O4 had a much higher positive surface charge than AB due to the positive surface charge of Fe3O4 at pH 3.5. Thus, we concluded that AB-Fe3O4 was able to achieve better adsorption capacity than AB if adsorbates were at a negative surface charge and a weak acid condition. Increased isoelectric point after composition with Fe3O4 was consistent with other studies, because the pH of zero point charge of Fe3O4 was close to pH 5~6 [39].
We analyzed the paramagnetic property of Fe3O4 and AB-Fe3O4 using magnetic hysteresis loops, as shown in Figure 5. The magnetization curves of Fe3O4 and AB-Fe3O4 showed that the specific saturation magnetizations of Fe3O4 and AB-Fe3O4 were 85.6 and 13.3 emu/g, respectively. The lower saturation value of AB-Fe3O4 compared to that of Fe3O4 could have been the result of lower Fe3O4 content in the AB-Fe3O4 composite [40]. The specific saturation magnetization of Fe3O4 was comparable to a previous report (e.g., approximately 80 emu/g [39]). Thus, the used AB-Fe3O4 adsorbent could be easily separated and recycled via external magnetic fields based on specific saturation magnetization of AB-Fe3O4.
Physical properties of AB, Fe3O4, and AB-Fe3O4 were confirmed by porosimeter, and Table 2 summarizes specific surface area and total pore volume. Two physical properties of AB-Fe3O4 were improved from 2.06 m2/g and 6.13 × 10−3 cm3/g to 2.89 m2/g and 1.43 × 10−2 cm3/g in the case of specific surface area and total pore volume, respectively, after the introduction of Fe3O4. Hence, composition with Fe3O4 had merit for its higher adsorption sites if van der Waals force was a major mechanism between adsorbent and adsorbate [41]. After having evaluated all adsorption performances under several experimental parameters, we describe each adsorption mechanism in the following sections.

3.2. Effect of Contact Time on Polychlorophenols Adsorption and Investigation of its Mechanism

It was important to determine the contact time for equilibrium state in the adsorption process from an engineering perspective. We measured the effect of contact time on the uptake of TeCP, TCP, and DCP on AB and AB-Fe3O4, as shown in Figure 6a,b, respectively. Both adsorbents showed that adsorption performances of TeCP, TCP, and DCP reached an equilibrium state within 60 min. Two kinetic models were applied to investigate kinetic studies of AB and AB-Fe3O4 on adsorption of TeCP, TCP, and DCP. Table 3 summarizes kinetic parameters of TeCP, TCP, and DCP adsorption by AB and AB-Fe3O4. The pseudo-second-order kinetic model was better suited for explaining the kinetic adsorption efficiency of both adsorbents, thus chemisorption was the main kinetic mechanism of this system [15]. These results were consistent with other research [12,25], which reported carbon-based materials as the adsorbent for removal of DCP.
Furthermore, Figure 6a,b shows that performance in the removal of polychlorophenols from the aqueous solutions by using AB and AB-Fe3O4 was ranked in the following order: DCP < TCP < TeCP. This phenomenon could be explained by the following adsorption mechanisms, as concluded in previous studies [12]: (a) hydrogen bonding (H-bond), (b) electrostatic interactions, (c) hydrophobic interactions, and (d) non-covalent π-electron acceptor–donor interactions.
H-bond between adsorbent and adsorbate is a useful factor in determining adsorption mechanisms. In this system, all three adsorbates include one hydroxyl group, thus they can act as both a hydrogen acceptor and a donor, and the number of hydrogen acceptors or donors is a critical factor in controlling adsorption performances. Thus, if H-bond was a major adsorption mechanism, adsorption performances should have been similar, regardless of the role of adsorbates for H-bond, based on only one hydroxyl group. However, TeCP was removed much more efficiently by both adsorbents as compared to TCP and DCP, which suggested that H-bond may not have been the most significant. Other factors would have affected the sorption process.
Electrostatic interactions are good parameters for identifying adsorption mechanisms, because they are easily confirmed by the characteristics of surface charge between adsorbent and adsorbate. Based on pKa of TeCP (5.22), TCP (6.23), and DCP (7.89), as shown in Table 1, they existed in a neutral state at pH 3.5, which is the experimental condition depicted in Figure 6a,b. Hence, if electrostatic interactions were a critical adsorption mechanism, adsorption performances should have been consistent, irrespective of the surface charge of adsorbents, considering the neutral state of adsorbates at pH 3.5. Therefore, electrostatic interactions were not the most likely explanation for the adsorption mechanism in this system, considering TeCP’s removal rate was the highest compared to TCP and DCP.
Hydrophobic interactions are a significant factor when the target compounds have high hydrophobic characteristics. Table 1 shows the water solubility of TeCP, TCP, and DCP, which could be used as representative parameters for the degree of hydrophobicity of adsorbates. That is, hydrophobicity of adsorbates existed in the following order: TeCP > TCP > DCP. This order was the exact pattern of removal rate of the adsorbates shown in Figure 6a,b. The results of previous studies also concluded that hydrophobic organic pollutants were efficiently treated by biochar via hydrophobic interactions [23]; therefore, hydrophobic interaction was one of the important roles in the removal of the target contaminants.
According to another study [12], non-covalent π-electron acceptor–donor interactions were a major adsorption mechanism for removing DCP by biochar. Thus, we applied this adsorption mechanism to our system. A major difference in the chemical structure of TeCP, TCP, and DCP is the number of chlorides, which plays a role as the electron-withdrawn atom [12]. In other words, the electron density of a benzene ring of adsorbates continuously decreases as the number of attached chloride atoms increases. Meanwhile, biochar contains a lot of oxygenated functional groups after activation that act as electron-donors. Therefore, non-covalent π-electron acceptor–donor interactions could be a reasonable explanation for the adsorption mechanism in this system. This was particularly revealed by the deficient electron density atmosphere of TeCP, because the intrinsic molecular structure of TeCP contains the highest number of chloride atoms.
Subsequently, adsorption performances of AB-Fe3O4 were better than AB (Figure 6a,b), and these results could be explained by (a) stronger non-covalent π-electron acceptor–donor interactions attributed to higher oxygen content as an electron-donor group [12] and (b) larger surface area judging by the results from the porosimeter (Table 2). Considering TeCP’s high removal efficiency rate, we thoroughly investigate its use as an adsorbate in following sections.

3.3. Effect of Solution pH and Initial TeCP Concentration on TeCP Adsorption Performances

Surface charge of both adsorbents and adsorbates is attributed to solution pH; thus, we tested the effect of solution pH on the uptake of TeCP by AB and AB-Fe3O4 (Figure 7). Both adsorbents showed that adsorption performances were almost constant in the range of pH 3–9. In the case of AB, adsorption rates at neutral and basic conditions were lower than acidic conditions, thus electrostatic repulsion acted as a supplementary effect in this system considering its higher negative surface charge than AB-Fe3O4 (Figure 4) and pKa of TeCP (Table 1). Furthermore, we measured the initial and the final pH, as described in Figure 4, and both adsorbents showed that the initial pH was higher than the final pH at over pH 5. This phenomenon might have beem attributed to the reaction between ionized TeCP and hydroxyl ion in the solution [42].
The effect of the initial TeCP concentration with a different contact time on TeCP adsorption was evaluated by AB and AB-Fe3O4, as shown in Figure 8a,b, respectively. As mentioned above, the removal rate of TeCP by AB-Fe3O4 was higher than AB, regardless of the initial concentration of TeCP, due to stronger non-covalent π-electron acceptor–donor interactions and larger surface area. Furthermore, the removal rate of TeCP continuously decreased with the increasing initial concentration of TeCP in both AB and AB-Fe3O4 cases, and these results could be explained by the fact that limited active sites were available when the mass of the adsorbent was fixed for binding adsorbates [43].
Subsequently, we tried to evaluate equilibrium isotherms for adsorption of TeCP on AB and AB-Fe3O4 for further investigation. In this study, we employed the Langmuir and the Freundlich isotherm models to correlate the adsorption capacities and the residual concentrations of TeCP left in the aqueous solutions [15]. Figure 9 describes the effect of initial concentration of adsorbates (i.e., 5, 10, 20, 60, 100, and 200 mg/L) on adsorption capacity (qe), and two isotherm models were plotted using the qe results. Freundlich isotherm better explained the equilibrium of TeCP adsorption on both AB and AB-Fe3O4 cases based on the higher correlation coefficients (R2, R2 of AB and AB-Fe3O4 of Langmuir/Freundlich isotherm models were 0.9368/0.9653 and 0.8724/0.9974, respectively). This result was similar to previous studies [12,25], which reported biochar and activated charcoal as adsorbents for DCP treatment in aqueous phase.

3.4. Adsorption Selectivity for TeCP over BPA and SMX

From a practical perspective, adsorption selectivity for TeCP over other organic pollutants is important parameter, and BPA and SMX were chosen as representative organic pollutants because they have been commonly detected in a wastewater effluent [44]. Figure 10a,b describes the effect of contact time on the uptake of TeCP with the presence of BPA and SMX, respectively. The removal rate of TeCP was better compared to that of BPA and SMX, thus AB-Fe3O4 could be used as a novel adsorbent for the selective removal of TeCP in wastewater. To conduct further investigation, we referred to a previous method and calculated the mixture selectivity between two different adsorbates by each concentration ratio in the feed solution [45]. Mixture selectivities at 240 min in the case of TeCP/BPA (Figure 10a) and TeCP/SMX (Figure 10b) were 2.31 and 11.14, respectively. These results could be attributed to the hydrophobic interactions because TeCP has a higher number of hydrophobic characteristics than BPA and SMX considering log Kow of TeCP (4.45), BPA (3.32), and SMX (0.89), as shown in Table 1. Thus, these results also suggested that hydrophobic interactions played a role as the main adsorption mechanism in this study, and AB-Fe3O4 could be applied to the selective removal of TeCP in wastewater judging from its high adsorption selectivity (Figure 10a,b). Table 4 summarizes the comparison of polychlorinated compounds removal by reported adsorbents in the literature and this study. AB-Fe3O4 showed comparable or higher adsorption performances compared to the previously reported adsorbents.

4. Conclusions

In this study, we characterized biochar, AB, Fe3O4, and AB-Fe3O4 via PXRD, FTIR, SEM-EDX, zeta potential analyzer, VSM, and porosimeter. These characterizations revealed successful synthesis of AB-Fe3O4 composite, which was utilized as a novel adsorbent to remove polychlorophenols (TeCP, TCP, and DCP). Furthermore, the results of the kinetic and the isotherm experiments obtained in this study were well matched to the pseudo-second-order kinetic model and the Freundlich isotherm model, respectively. The chemisorption of polychlorophenols on AB-Fe3O4 in this system was verified by FTIR spectra analysis before and after adsorption. Major adsorption mechanisms of this system were attributed to both hydrophobic interactions and non-covalent π-electron acceptor–donor interactions judging by the intrinsic properties of polychlorophenols and adsorbents. Lastly, we measured adsorption selectivity for TeCP over other organic pollutants (i.e., BPA and SMX) because it is an important factor from a practical perspective. Removal rate of TeCP was outstanding compared to BPA and SMX due to hydrophobic interactions; thus, we conclude that AB-Fe3O4 can be applied in the selective removal of TeCP in wastewater based on its results of high selectivity.

Author Contributions

C.M.P. and Y.K. designed and carried out this research. J.H. and Y.Y. supervised and instructed this research. B.-M.J. wrote this paper. J.K. prepared and analyzed the data. C.M.P. provided advices and help in this paper revision. All authors have approved the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2018R1A6A1A03024962), and the Korea Ministry of Environment (The SEM projects; 2018002470005).

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their insightful and constructive comments, which greatly improved the quality of the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Demey, H.; Tria, S.A.; Soleri, R.; Guiseppi-Elie, A.; Bazin, I. Sorption of his-tagged Protein G and Protein G onto chitosan/divalent metal ion sorbent used for detection of microcystin-LR. Environ. Sci. Pollut. R. 2017, 24, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Han, S.-W.; Kim, W.; Lee, Y.; Jun, B.-M.; Kwon, Y.-N. Investigation of Hydrate-induced Ice Desalination (HIID) and its application to a pretreatment of reverse osmosis (RO) process. Desalination 2016, 395, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Attar, K.; Bouazza, D.; Miloudi, H.; Tayeb, A.; Boos, A.; Sastre, A.M.; Demey, H. Cadmium removal by a low-cost magadiite-based material: Characterization and sorption applications. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 5351–5360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jun, B.-M.; Nguyen, T.P.N.; Kim, Y.-K.; Lee, H.K.; Kwon, Y.-N. Surface modification of TFC FO membrane using N-isopropylacrylamide (NIPAM) to enhance fouling resistance and cleaning efficiency. Desalin. Water Treat. 2017, 65, 11–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Demey, H.; Melkior, T.; Chatroux, A.; Attar, K.; Thiery, S.; Miller, H.; Grateau, M.; Sastre, A.M.; Marchand, M. Evaluation of torrefied poplar-biomass as a low-cost sorbent for lead and terbium removal from aqueous solutions and energy co-generation. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 361, 839–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fernández-Castro, P.; San Román, M.F.; Ortiz, I. Theoretical and experimental formation of low chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans in the Fenton oxidation of chlorophenol solutions. Chemosphere 2016, 161, 136–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Choi, J.-H.; Kim, Y.-H. Reduction of 2,4,6-trichlorophenol with zero-valent zinc and catalyzed zinc. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 166, 984–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Schmid, P.; Bogdal, C.; Wang, Z.; Azara, V.; Haag, R.; von Arx, U. Releases of chlorobenzenes, chlorophenols and dioxins during fireworks. Chemosphere 2014, 114, 158–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Chen, M.-L.; Min, J.-Q.; Pan, S.-D.; Jin, M.-C. Surface core–shell magnetic polymer modified graphene oxide-based material for 2,4,6-trichlorophenol removal. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 63494–63501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xiong, Z.; Xu, Y.; Zhu, L.; Zhao, J. Enhanced photodegradation of 2,4,6-trichlorophenol over palladium phthalocyaninesulfonate modified organobentonite. Langmuir 2005, 21, 10602–10607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, Q.-S.; Zheng, T.; Wang, P.; Jiang, J.-P.; Li, N. Adsorption isotherm, kinetic and mechanism studies of some substituted phenols on activated carbon fibers. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 157, 348–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kalderis, D.; Kayan, B.; Akay, S.; Kulaksız, E.; Gözmen, B. Adsorption of 2,4-dichlorophenol on paper sludge/wheat husk biochar: Process optimization and comparison with biochars prepared from wood chips, sewage sludge and hog fuel/demolition waste. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 2222–2231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, C.C.; Lee, C.M.; Lu, C.J.; Chuang, M.S.; Huang, C.Z. Biodegradation of 2,4,6-trichlorophenol in the presence of primary substrate by immobilized pure culture bacteria. Chemosphere 2000, 41, 1873–1879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Eker, S.; Kargi, F. Biological treatment of 2,4,6-trichlorophenol (TCP) containing wastewater in a hybrid bioreactor system with effluent recycle. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90, 692–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jun, B.-M.; Kim, S.; Kim, Y.; Her, N.; Heo, J.; Han, J.; Jang, M.; Park, C.M.; Yoon, Y. Comprehensive evaluation on removal of lead by graphene oxide and metal organic framework. Chemosphere 2019, 231, 82–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Han, J.; Jun, B.-M.; Heo, J.; Lee, G.; Yoon, Y.; Park, C.M. Highly efficient organic dye removal from waters by magnetically recoverable La2O2CO3/ZnFe2O4-reduced graphene oxide nanohybrid. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 19247–19256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Park, C.M.; Kim, Y.M.; Kim, K.-H.; Wang, D.; Su, C.; Yoon, Y. Potential utility of graphene-based nano spinel ferrites as adsorbent and photocatalyst for removing organic/inorganic contaminants from aqueous solutions: A mini review. Chemosphere 2019, 221, 392–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Su, C. Environmental implications and applications of engineered nanoscale magnetite and its hybrid nanocomposites: A review of recent literature. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 322, 48–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Maziarz, P.; Matusik, J.; Leiviskä, T.; Strączek, T.; Kapusta, C.; Marek Woch, W.; Tokarz, W.; Górniak, K. Toward highly effective and easily separable halloysite-containing adsorbents: The effect of iron oxide particles impregnation and new insight into As(V) removal mechanisms. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2019, 210, 390–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Maziarz, P.; Matusik, J.; Strączek, T.; Kapusta, C.; Woch, W.M.; Tokarz, W.; Radziszewska, A.; Leiviskä, T. Highly effective magnet-responsive LDH-Fe oxide composite adsorbents for As(V) removal. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 362, 207–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhou, Y.; Gao, B.; Zimmerman, A.R.; Chen, H.; Zhang, M.; Cao, X. Biochar-supported zerovalent iron for removal of various contaminants from aqueous solutions. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 152, 538–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Devi, P.; Saroha, A.K. Simultaneous adsorption and dechlorination of pentachlorophenol from effluent by Ni–ZVI magnetic biochar composites synthesized from paper mill sludge. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 271, 195–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tan, X.-F.; Liu, S.-B.; Liu, Y.-G.; Gu, Y.-L.; Zeng, G.-M.; Hu, X.-J.; Wang, X.; Liu, S.-H.; Jiang, L.-H. Biochar as potential sustainable precursors for activated carbon production: Multiple applications in environmental protection and energy storage. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 227, 359–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, Z.; Wu, J.; He, T.; Wu, J. Corn stalks char from fast pyrolysis as precursor material for preparation of activated carbon in fluidized bed reactor. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 167, 551–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ma, J.-W.; Wang, H.; Wang, F.-Y.; Huang, Z.-H. Adsorption of 2,4-dichlorophenol from aqueous solution by a new low-cost adsorbent—Activated bamboo charcoal. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2010, 45, 2329–2336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Park, C.M.; Heo, J.; Wang, D.; Su, C.; Yoon, Y. Heterogeneous activation of persulfate by reduced graphene oxide–elemental silver/magnetite nanohybrids for the oxidative degradation of pharmaceuticals and endocrine disrupting compounds in water. Appl. Catal. B 2018, 225, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Janoš, P.; Kormunda, M.; Životský, O.; Pilařová, V. Composite Fe3O4/humic acid magnetic sorbent and its sorption ability for chlorophenols and some other aromatic compounds. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2013, 48, 2028–2035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jiang, W.; Cai, Q.; Xu, W.; Yang, M.; Cai, Y.; Dionysiou, D.D.; O’Shea, K.E. Cr(VI) adsorption and reduction by humic acid coated on magnetite. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 8078–8085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Qian, L.; Chen, B. Interactions of aluminum with biochars and oxidized biochars: Implications for the biochar aging process. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 373–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, Z.; Guo, H.; Yu, Y.; He, N. Synthesis and characterization of a novel magnetic carrier with its composition of Fe3O4/carbon using hydrothermal reaction. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2006, 302, 397–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, H.; Ruan, X.; Zhao, D.; Fan, X.; Feng, T. Enhanced adsorption of 2,4-dichlorophenol by nanoscale zero-valent iron loaded on bentonite and modified with a cationic surfactant. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2017, 56, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Khenifi, A.; Zohra, B.; Kahina, B.; Houari, H.; Zoubir, D. Removal of 2,4-DCP from wastewater by CTAB/bentonite using one-step and two-step methods: A comparative study. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 146, 345–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jun, B.-M.; Kim, S.H.; Kwak, S.K.; Kwon, Y.-N. Effect of acidic aqueous solution on chemical and physical properties of polyamide NF membranes. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 444, 387–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, L.; Gan, K.; Lu, D.; Zhang, J. Hydrophilic Fe3O4@C for high-capacity adsorption of 2,4-dichlorophenol. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 2016, 890–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hadjittofi, L.; Prodromou, M.; Pashalidis, I. Activated biochar derived from cactus fibres—Preparation, characterization and application on Cu(II) removal from aqueous solutions. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 159, 460–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Dik, P.P.; Klimov, O.V.; Danilova, I.G.; Leonova, K.A.; Pereyma, V.Y.; Budukva, S.V.; Uvarkina, D.D.; Kazakov, M.O.; Noskov, A.S. Hydroprocessing of hydrocracker bottom on Pd containing bifunctional catalysts. Catal. Today 2016, 271, 154–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pei, Z.; Li, L.; Sun, L.; Zhang, S.; Shan, X.-Q.; Yang, S.; Wen, B. Adsorption characteristics of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene, 2,4,6-trichlorophenol, 2-naphthol and naphthalene on graphene and graphene oxide. Carbon 2013, 51, 156–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fan, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, C.; Ren, L.; Shi, Q. Adsorption of 2,4,6-trichlorophenol from aqueous solution onto activated carbon derived from loosestrife. Desalination 2011, 267, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, J.-F.; Zhao, Z.-S.; Jiang, G.-B. Coating Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles with humic acid for high efficient removal of heavy metals in water. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 6949–6954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Huang, J.; Chang, Q.; Ding, Y.; Han, X.; Tang, H. Catalytic oxidative removal of 2,4-dichlorophenol by simultaneous use of horseradish peroxidase and graphene oxide/Fe3O4 as catalyst. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 254, 434–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hasan, Z.; Jhung, S.H. Removal of hazardous organics from water using metal-organic frameworks (MOFs): Plausible mechanisms for selective adsorptions. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 283, 329–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ren, L.; Zhang, J.; Li, Y.; Zhang, C. Preparation and evaluation of cattail fiber-based activated carbon for 2,4-dichlorophenol and 2,4,6-trichlorophenol removal. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 168, 553–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Joseph, L.; Jun, B.-M.; Jang, M.; Park, C.M.; Muñoz-Senmache, J.C.; Hernández-Maldonado, A.J.; Heyden, A.; Yu, M.; Yoon, Y. Removal of contaminants of emerging concern by metal-organic framework nanoadsorbents: A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 369, 928–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Heo, J.; Yoon, Y.; Lee, G.; Kim, Y.; Han, J.; Park, C.M. Enhanced adsorption of bisphenol A and sulfamethoxazole by a novel magnetic CuZnFe2O4–biochar composite. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 281, 179–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jun, B.-M.; Lee, H.K.; Kwon, Y.-N. Acid-catalyzed hydrolysis of semi-aromatic polyamide NF membrane and its application to water softening and antibiotics enrichment. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 332, 419–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Alam, Z.; Muyibi, S.A.; Toramae, J. Statistical optimization of adsorption processes for removal of 2,4-dichlorophenol by activated carbon derived from oil palm empty fruit bunches. J. Environ. Sci. 2007, 19, 674–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sathishkumar, M.; Binupriya, A.R.; Kavitha, D.; Yun, S.E. Kinetic and isothermal studies on liquid-phase adsorption of 2,4-dichlorophenol by palm pith carbon. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98, 866–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Radhika, M.; Palanivelu, K. Adsorptive removal of chlorophenols from aqueous solution by low cost adsorbent—Kinetics and isotherm analysis. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, 138, 116–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Water 11 01899 g001 550
Figure 1. Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns of biochar, activated biochar (AB), Fe3O4, and AB-Fe3O4.
Figure 1. Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns of biochar, activated biochar (AB), Fe3O4, and AB-Fe3O4.
Water 11 01899 g001
Water 11 01899 g002 550
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of (a) biochar, AB, Fe3O4, and AB-Fe3O4 and (b) AB-Fe3O4 before and after TeCP, TCP, and DCP adsorption.
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of (a) biochar, AB, Fe3O4, and AB-Fe3O4 and (b) AB-Fe3O4 before and after TeCP, TCP, and DCP adsorption.
Water 11 01899 g002
Water 11 01899 g003 550
Figure 3. Representative SEM images and energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDX) spectra of (a) AB, (b) Fe3O4, and (c) AB-Fe3O4.
Figure 3. Representative SEM images and energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDX) spectra of (a) AB, (b) Fe3O4, and (c) AB-Fe3O4.
Water 11 01899 g003
Water 11 01899 g004 550
Figure 4. Variations in the surface (zeta) potential of AB, Fe3O4, and AB-Fe3O4 with solution pH (pH 3.5, 7, and 10) at 298 K. Error bars indicate the standard deviations for at least triplicate measurements.
Figure 4. Variations in the surface (zeta) potential of AB, Fe3O4, and AB-Fe3O4 with solution pH (pH 3.5, 7, and 10) at 298 K. Error bars indicate the standard deviations for at least triplicate measurements.
Water 11 01899 g004
Water 11 01899 g005 550
Figure 5. Room temperature magnetic hysteresis loops of Fe3O4 and AB-Fe3O4.
Figure 5. Room temperature magnetic hysteresis loops of Fe3O4 and AB-Fe3O4.
Water 11 01899 g005
Water 11 01899 g006 550
Figure 6. Effect of contact time on the uptake of TeCP, TCP, and DCP on (a) AB and (b) AB-Fe3O4 at pH 3.5 (C0 = 5 mg/L, V = 30 mL, adsorbent mass 30 mg, and agitation speed = 300 rpm). C indicates the remaining concentration of TeCP, TCP, and DCP in the solution at time t.
Figure 6. Effect of contact time on the uptake of TeCP, TCP, and DCP on (a) AB and (b) AB-Fe3O4 at pH 3.5 (C0 = 5 mg/L, V = 30 mL, adsorbent mass 30 mg, and agitation speed = 300 rpm). C indicates the remaining concentration of TeCP, TCP, and DCP in the solution at time t.
Water 11 01899 g006
Water 11 01899 g007 550
Figure 7. (a) Effect of solution pH on the uptake of TeCP by AB and AB-Fe3O4 (C0 = 5 mg/L, V = 30 mL, adsorbent mass 30 mg, agitation speed = 300 rpm, temperature = 25 ± 1 °C, and reaction time = 120 min); and (b) the final pH of the solution.
Figure 7. (a) Effect of solution pH on the uptake of TeCP by AB and AB-Fe3O4 (C0 = 5 mg/L, V = 30 mL, adsorbent mass 30 mg, agitation speed = 300 rpm, temperature = 25 ± 1 °C, and reaction time = 120 min); and (b) the final pH of the solution.
Water 11 01899 g007
Water 11 01899 g008 550
Figure 8. Effect of initial TeCP concentration and contact time on adsorption of TeCP by (a) AB and (b) AB-Fe3O4 at pH 3.5 (V = 30 mL, adsorbent mass 30 mg, agitation speed = 300 rpm, temperature = 25 ± 1 °C, and reaction time = 120 min).
Figure 8. Effect of initial TeCP concentration and contact time on adsorption of TeCP by (a) AB and (b) AB-Fe3O4 at pH 3.5 (V = 30 mL, adsorbent mass 30 mg, agitation speed = 300 rpm, temperature = 25 ± 1 °C, and reaction time = 120 min).
Water 11 01899 g008
Water 11 01899 g009 550
Figure 9. Equilibrium isotherms for adsorption of TeCP on AB and AB-Fe3O4 at pH 3.5 (V = 30 mL, adsorbent mass 30 mg, agitation speed = 300 rpm, temperature = 25 ± 1 °C, and reaction time = 240 min).
Figure 9. Equilibrium isotherms for adsorption of TeCP on AB and AB-Fe3O4 at pH 3.5 (V = 30 mL, adsorbent mass 30 mg, agitation speed = 300 rpm, temperature = 25 ± 1 °C, and reaction time = 240 min).
Water 11 01899 g009
Water 11 01899 g010 550
Figure 10. Effect of contact time on the uptake of TeCP with the presence of (a) BPA and (b) SMX on AB-Fe3O4 at pH 3.5 (C0 = 5 mg/L, V = 30 mL, adsorbent mass 30 mg, temperature = 25 ± 1 °C, and agitation speed = 300 rpm).
Figure 10. Effect of contact time on the uptake of TeCP with the presence of (a) BPA and (b) SMX on AB-Fe3O4 at pH 3.5 (C0 = 5 mg/L, V = 30 mL, adsorbent mass 30 mg, temperature = 25 ± 1 °C, and agitation speed = 300 rpm).
Water 11 01899 g010
Table
Table 1. Selected physicochemical properties of 2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol (TeCP), 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol (TCP), 2,4-Dichlorophenol (DCP), bisphenol A (BPA), and sulfamethoxazole (SMX).
Table 1. Selected physicochemical properties of 2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol (TeCP), 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol (TCP), 2,4-Dichlorophenol (DCP), bisphenol A (BPA), and sulfamethoxazole (SMX).
Compound
[Full name]		FormulaMW
(g/mol)		pKaWater Solubility
(M)		log KowMolecular Structure
2,3,4,6-TetrachlorophenolC6H2Cl4O231.95.229.92 × 10−54.45 Water 11 01899 i001
2,4,6-TrichlorophenolC6H3Cl3O197.46.232.78 × 10−23.69 Water 11 01899 i002
2,4-DichlorophenolC6H4Cl2O162.97.893.01 × 10−23.06 Water 11 01899 i003
Bisphenol A
[2,2-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl) propane; 4,4′-dihydroxy-2,2-diphenylpropane]		C15H16O2228.39.65.26 × 10−43.32 Water 11 01899 i004
Sulfamethoxazole
[4-amino-N-(5-methyl-1,2-oxazol-3-yl) benzenesulfonamide]		C10H11N3O3S253.31.6, 5.73.21 × 10−2(37 °C)0.89 Water 11 01899 i005
Table
Table 2. Textural characteristics of AB, Fe3O4, and AB-Fe3O4.
Table 2. Textural characteristics of AB, Fe3O4, and AB-Fe3O4.
SampleABFe3O4AB-Fe3O4
Specific surface area (m2/g)2.069.292.89
Total pore volume (cm3/g)6.13 × 10−35.58 × 10−11.43 × 10−2
Table
Table 3. Kinetic parameters of TeCP, TCP, and DCP adsorption by AB and AB-Fe3O4.
Table 3. Kinetic parameters of TeCP, TCP, and DCP adsorption by AB and AB-Fe3O4.
Adsorbate/AdsorbentTeCP/ABTCP/ABDCP/ABTeCP/AB-Fe3O4TCP/AB-Fe3O4DCP/AB-Fe3O4
Pseudo-first-order
qe (mg/g)1.07431.07301.02781.06681.08571.6195
k1 (min−1)0.01740.02020.02210.02610.02600.0188
R20.94170.95860.98740.99680.98480.9676
Pseudo-second-order
qe (mg/g)2.48201.56491.12164.51263.06002.2242
k2 (g mg-min−1)0.03460.02500.02620.05350.04830.0769
R20.99980.99290.99510.99990.99880.9998
Table
Table 4. Comparison of polychlorinated compounds removal by reported adsorbents in the literature and this study.
Table 4. Comparison of polychlorinated compounds removal by reported adsorbents in the literature and this study.
AdsorbentPolychlorinated CompoundsExperimental Conditionsqmax (mg/g)Reference
Cattail fiber-based activated carbonDCP200 mg/L adsorbate using 100 mg/L adsorbent142.8[42]
Oil palm empty fruit bunch carbonDCP250 mg/L adsorbate using 5 mg/L adsorbent27.3[46]
Palm pith carbonDCP40 mg/L adsorbate using 2000 mg/L adsorbent19.2[47]
Coconut shell-based activated carbonTCP100 mg/L adsorbate using 5000 mg/L adsorbent122.3[48]
Activated carbon TCP100 mg/L adsorbate using 5000 mg/L adsorbent112.4[48]
ABTeCP200 mg/L adsorbate using 1000 mg/L adsorbent34.8This study
AB-Fe3O4TeCP200 mg/L adsorbate using 1000 mg/L adsorbent149.8This study

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jun, B.-M.; Kim, Y.; Han, J.; Yoon, Y.; Kim, J.; Park, C.M. Preparation of Activated Biochar-Supported Magnetite Composite for Adsorption of Polychlorinated Phenols from Aqueous Solutions. Water 2019, 11, 1899. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11091899

AMA Style

Jun B-M, Kim Y, Han J, Yoon Y, Kim J, Park CM. Preparation of Activated Biochar-Supported Magnetite Composite for Adsorption of Polychlorinated Phenols from Aqueous Solutions. Water. 2019; 11(9):1899. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11091899

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jun, Byung-Moon, Yejin Kim, Jonghun Han, Yeomin Yoon, Jeonggwan Kim, and Chang Min Park. 2019. "Preparation of Activated Biochar-Supported Magnetite Composite for Adsorption of Polychlorinated Phenols from Aqueous Solutions" Water 11, no. 9: 1899. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11091899

APA Style

Jun, B. -M., Kim, Y., Han, J., Yoon, Y., Kim, J., & Park, C. M. (2019). Preparation of Activated Biochar-Supported Magnetite Composite for Adsorption of Polychlorinated Phenols from Aqueous Solutions. Water, 11(9), 1899. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11091899

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop