Next Article in Journal
Karst Hydrological Connections of Lakes and Neoproterozoic Hydrogeological System between the Years 1985–2020, Lagoa Santa—Minas Gerais, Brazil
Previous Article in Journal
Sponge City Drainage System Prediction Based on Artificial Neural Networks: Taking SCRC System as Example
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of the Fe2O3/SBA-15 Surface on Inducing Ozone Decomposition and Mass Transfer in Water

1
National and Provincial Joint Engineering Laboratory of Wetland Ecological Conservation, Heilongjiang Academy of Science, Harbin 150040, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, School of Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2024, 16(18), 2590; https://doi.org/10.3390/w16182590
Submission received: 1 August 2024 / Revised: 3 September 2024 / Accepted: 11 September 2024 / Published: 12 September 2024

Abstract

:
Catalytic ozonation with metal oxides is of interest for advanced water treatment technology. The amount of active oxygen-containing radicals produced is a primary objective of this process. Fe2O3 is a widely used catalyst because of its high performance. In this study, Fe2O3/SBA-15 was synthesized and characterized. The results revealed that Fe2O3/SBA-15 was a nano-/mesoporous material with high-order hexagonal array structures and exhibited greater catalytic performance than Fe2O3 in ozonation processes. To investigate the role of the Fe2O3/SBA-15 surface in O3 decomposition, the kinetic constant was measured, and the interfacial reactions were discussed. Compared with Fe2O3, Fe2O3/SBA-15 significantly increased the formation of hydroxyl radicals (•OH) and the efficient utilization of O3 in the catalytic O3 decomposition process. The SBA-15 support decreased the O3 self-decomposition rate during catalytic ozonation with Fe2O3/SBA-15, which resulted in increased formation of •OH via the reaction between O3 and Fe2O3. From a practical point of view, Fe2O3/SBA-15 is an efficient green ozonation catalyst for water treatment.

1. Introduction

The increasing discharge of organic wastewater from industry and agriculture poses potential risks to human health and ecosystems. A variety of contaminants in wastewater require advanced treatment processes. Oxidation is an efficient water treatment technology for contaminant removal. Many contaminants (double bonds and molecules incorporating activated aromatic structures) can be removed easily by typical oxidants [1]. O3 has received widespread attention in water treatment because of its oxidizing ability and potential as a disinfectant. However, its low stability and solubility result in the low efficiency of using O3 alone in decomposing refractory contaminants. Advanced oxidation processes have been confirmed to be efficient for the removal of contaminants, especially in treating dissolved trace refractory contaminants [2]. Many advanced oxidation processes, such as heterogeneous catalytic ozonation (metal oxides, activated carbon and minerals), homogeneous catalytic ozonation (metal ions), O3/UV, O3/H2O2, and O3/H2O2/UV, have been studied as potential water treatment methods to overcome the disadvantage of using O3 alone [3].
Owing to its low negative effect and high oxidation capacity, heterogeneous catalytic ozonation has been the subject of increasing interest from the water treatment industry [4,5]. In this system, the active oxygen-containing radicals (•O2−, 1O2, and •OH) are important oxidant species resulting from O3 decomposition in water [6,7]. The production of active oxygen-containing radicals predominantly depends on the decomposition behavior of dissolved O3 on the catalyst surface.
Metal oxides, including MnO2, Al2O3, TiO2, CuO, and Fe2O3, are widely used as catalysts in catalytic ozonation [8,9,10,11]. However, the difficulty of reuse limits the use of these metal oxides. To improve the catalytic performance and ease of use, metal oxides on supports (Al2O3, SiO2, and activated carbon) are often synthesized via wet impregnation methods [12]. The use of Al2O3 and activated carbon supports is limited by the specific surface area, mechanical strength, and easy oxidation. However, SiO2 shows promise because of its high chemical stability and safety. SBA-15 is a pure SiO2 molecular sieve with a large surface area, an ordered mesoporous structure, a narrow pore size distribution and thick pore walls [13]. It is often selected as a support for industrial catalysis [14]. In the past decade, SBA-15 has attracted much attention as a promising nanomaterial in environmental technology [15,16]. However, many previous studies have investigated gas adsorption on SBA-15 and modified SBA-15, and the catalytic ozonation of contaminants in water by SBA-15 and modified SBA-15 has rarely been investigated [17].
Nitrobenzene is a typical man-made compound that is abundantly used in many fields (solvents, metal polishes, perfume, plastics, explosives, and pesticides) and is found in surface water and soil, causing great environmental concern because of its toxicity and difficult biological treatment, even at low concentrations [18,19]. Nitrobenzene rarely reacts with O3 (0.09 M−1s−1) but reacts rapidly with •OH (2.2 × 108 M−1s−1) [20]. Therefore, nitrobenzene, a special •OH indicator, was selected as a model contaminant in catalytic ozonation.
Compared with other metal oxides, Fe2O3 is ubiquitous in natural systems and poses a low risk to human health. In the present study, the Fe2O3/SBA-15 material was synthesized as a catalyst to investigate its catalytic performance, active oxygen-containing radicals and O3 decomposition pathway on the catalyst surface.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The SBA-15 molecular sieve was obtained from XFNANO Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China). FeCl3·6H2O was obtained from Hengxing Chemical Preparation Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China). The nitrobenzene (NB) reagent was obtained from Nanjing Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China). The 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide (DMPO) reagent was obtained from Sigma Aldrich, Inc. (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). The tert-butanol reagent was obtained from Xilong Chemical Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). The experimental water was obtained with a Milli-Q ultrapure system. The water pH was adjusted with HCl solution (Xiongda Chemical Co., Ltd., Maoming, China) and NaOH solution (Shuangshuang Chemical Co., Ltd., Yantai, China). All chemical reagents used in the tests were of analytical grade. The glass vessel was washed with H2CrO4 (Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Beijing Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) and then rinsed with ultrapure water.

2.2. Catalyst Preparation

Fe2O3/SBA-15 was synthesized via the wet impregnation method [21]. For example, 25 mg of FeCl3·6H2O was dissolved completely in 200 mL of ultrapure water in a conical glass flask, and 45 mg of SBA-15 was dispersed into this mixture. A stirrer was used to mix the suspension for 10 min to maintain a dispersion of Fe and SBA-15 in water. The pH of the reaction mixture was adjusted to 1.0 with HCl. After ultrasonication for 20 min, the suspension was slowly dried and finally calcined at 350 °C for 2 h (loading percentage of Fe2O3 wt.%, 10%). The solid was washed repeatedly with ultrapure water until the pH values of the filtrates did not vary. The samples were oven dried at 100 °C for 6 h. These dry samples were crushed and sieved into powder for the experiments. For comparison, Fe2O3 was synthesized through the same process without the introduction of SBA-15.

2.3. Experimental Procedure

The catalytic ozonation test was conducted in batch oxidation mode (Figure 1). The glass reactor was a modified round bottom flask (1 L), and gaseous O3 was added once to the aqueous solution via an ozone generator (COM-AD-01, ANSEROS Company, Tübingen, Germany) from dried oxygen gas. The catalysts and nitrobenzene were then rapidly added to this reactor. The reaction temperature was maintained via a thermostatic bath (HH-2, Jintan Shuangjie Experimental Instrument Factory, Changzhou, China). A magnetic stirrer (84-1, Shanghai Meiyingpu Instrument Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) was used to mix the reaction mixture continuously. The solution collected with a syringe at different times was quenched with 0.1 mol/L Na2S2O3 (Beijing Omiget Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). The water sample was filtered through a 0.45 µm glass membrane before analysis. The adsorption–decomposition of O3 on the catalyst surface was investigated through the same process without nitrobenzene.

2.4. Analytical Methods

X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were obtained with a D8 ADVANCE diffractometer (Bruker, Ettlingen, Germany) to analyze crystallinity and phases of the catalysts. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) was performed with a Spectrum One instrument (PerkinElmer, Shelton, CT, USA) to analyze the structure and functional groups. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed with a Quanta 200 instrument (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) to analyze the morphology of the catalyst. The Brunauer–Emmet–Teller (BET) method was performed with an ASAP 2020 (Micromeritics, Norcross, GA, USA) analyzer to study the structure of the catalyst. The concentration of nitrobenzene was analyzed via an HPLC-1200 system (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with a Venusil Mp C18 column via UV detection at 262 nm. The mobile phase was a mixture of 4/5 CH3OH and 1/5 ultrapure water introduced at a 0.8 mL/min flow rate. An EMX-8/2.7 spectrometer (Bruker, Germany) was used to analyze the amount of active radicals formed. A T6 spectrophotometer (Persee, Taoyuan City, Taiwan) was used to analyze dissolved O3 at a wavelength of 258 nm. An Optima 5300DV spectrometer (PerkinElmer, Shelton, CT, USA) was used to analyze the concentrations of ions leached from the catalyst surface.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization

Fe2O3/SBA-15 was characterized to determine the relationship between its ozonation activity and its structure.
The crystal structure of Fe2O3/SBA-15 was analyzed via X-ray diffraction. Figure 2A shows wide-angle XRD patterns of Fe2O3/SBA-15. Analysis of the patterns revealed that the major phase of SBA-15 was amorphous SiO2 (broad peaks in the 2θ range from 20° to 30°). The XRD patterns of Fe2O3/SBA-15 differ from those of SBA-15. Seven intense peaks appeared in the wide-angle patterns of Fe2O3/SBA-15, which were assigned to hematite (No. 33-0664). In the low-angle range, Fe2O3/SBA-15 showed a strong peak near 1°, indicating that the hexagonal structure belonged to the {100} lattice family (Figure 2B). The two weaker peaks were attributed to the {110} and {200} lattice planes [22]. Therefore, Fe2O3/SBA-15 has a highly ordered hexagonal array structure.
The physisorption isotherms and pore structures of Fe2O3/SBA-15 were measured via the BET method. The nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms of the samples are shown in Figure 2C. A type IV H1 isotherm with a hysteresis loop from 0.6 to 0.8 relative pressure was observed for Fe2O3/SBA-15 after N2 adsorption–desorption, and the data suggested the presence of a mesoporous structure. SBET decreased from 721.5 m2/g (SBA-15) to 382.3 m2/g (Fe2O3/SBA-15). Moreover, the pore diameter distribution of Fe2O3/SBA-15 is shown in Figure 2D. Fe2O3/SBA-15 is a mesoporous material with pore sizes ranging from 6.2 to 11 nm.
The surface functional groups of Fe2O3/SBA-15 were characterized via FT-IR spectroscopy. The FT-IR spectrum of Fe2O3/SBA-15 is shown in Figure 2E. The –O–H peaks at 3450 cm−1 and 1634 cm−1 suggested the presence of surface –OH and water on Fe2O3/SBA-15 [23]. The peaks at 1052 cm−1 and 685 cm−1 represent characteristic bands of Si–O–Si bonds [24]. The peaks at 532 cm−1 and 451 cm−1 represent the Fe–O bonds of Fe2O3 [25].
The morphology of Fe2O3/SBA-15 was characterized via SEM. The patterns shown in Figure 2F clearly indicate that the presence of Fe2O3 in the Fe2O3/SBA-15 structure remarkably changed the morphology of SBA-15. The inset of Figure 2F shows that the morphologies of SBA-15 formed wheat ears. However, introducing Fe2O3 affected the morphologies, and the morphologies of Fe2O3/SBA-15 formed numerous dispersed irregular short rods.

3.2. Catalytic Performance and O3 Utilization Efficiency

The catalytic performance of Fe2O3/SBA-15 was studied through nitrobenzene removal in different systems, involving adsorption on the catalyst, O3 alone, and catalytic ozonation. In this experiment, Fe2O3 was selected as a reference.
The results shown in Figure 3 indicate that the removal rate of nitrobenzene was only 38.5% after 10 min in O3 alone. Nitrobenzene removal during this process was difficult to achieve in a short period of time. The introduction of Fe2O3 and Fe2O3/SBA-15 led to a synergistic reaction with O3 in the removal of nitrobenzene. Compared with that of O3 alone, the amount of nitrobenzene removed was greater with Fe2O3 and Fe2O3/SBA-15 during catalytic ozonation, and the amount of nitrobenzene removed was greater with Fe2O3/SBA-15. The nitrobenzene removal rate achieved with Fe2O3/SBA-15 after 10 min was 61.5%, which was 1.16 times greater than that achieved with Fe2O3. SBA-15 inhibited nitrobenzene removal in the ozonation system. In addition, nitrobenzene showed weak adsorption onto Fe2O3 and Fe2O3/SBA-15 at less than 3% under these test conditions. Adsorption had a weak effect on removal via catalytic ozonation with Fe2O3 and Fe2O3/SBA-15. Therefore, the removal of nitrobenzene mainly depends on the behavior of O3 decomposition on the catalyst surface.
In this work, SBA-15 was used to support Fe2O3. After the synthesis of modified SBA-15, the chemical composition and physical structure of SBA-15 were altered, leading to improved catalytic performance. Catalytic ozonation is a complex reaction process that includes the following three routes [26]: (1) O3 adsorption onto the catalyst results in the production of active oxygen-containing radicals that decompose contaminants, (2) contaminants adsorb onto the catalyst and react with O3, and (3) O3 and contaminants adsorb onto the catalyst surface before interaction.
Tert-butanol (TBA) is a stronger hydroxyl radical (•OH) scavenger, as indicated by its high reaction rate constants with •OH (5 × 108 M−1s−1) and with O3 (3 × 10−3 M−1s−1) [27]. TBA reacts with •OH in aqueous solution, generating inert intermediates, which induce the end of the radical chain reaction. As shown in Figure 3, the presence of TBA had a very strong negative effect on nitrobenzene removal during both the O3-alone and catalytic ozonation processes, causing a primary reduction in the removal rate, even at a low concentration of TBA (2.0 mg/L). The removal rate of nitrobenzene via catalytic ozonation with Fe2O3 decreased from 53.2% to 21.2%, and the removal rate via Fe2O3/SBA-15-catalyzed ozonation decreased from 61.5% to 22.8%. The introduction of TBA effectively inhibited •OH formation in the solution. The above results indicated that TBA competitively traps and quickly consumes •OH in the reaction system. Moreover, the results also suggested that in both the O3-alone and catalytic ozonation processes, nitrobenzene is removed mainly by •OH in the ozonation process.
The O3 utilization efficiency was investigated during the O3-alone and catalytic ozonation processes (Figure 4). The O3 utilization efficiency was used as an indicator of catalyst performance. The O3 utilization efficiency was expressed as follows:
R U   % = NB ] 0 NB ] t O 3 ] 0 O 3 ] t × 100 %
where RU represents the O3 utilization efficiency (%), the subscript (0) represents the initial concentration, and the subscript (t) represents the terminal concentration.
The experimental results indicated that the minimal O3 utilization efficiency was 6.2% when O3 alone was used (Figure 4). The O3 utilization efficiency for Fe2O3-catalyzed ozonation was less than that for Fe2O3/SBA-15. The utilization efficiency of O3 in catalytic ozonation with Fe2O3/SBA-15 after 10 min was 10.6%, which was 1.2 times greater than that in catalytic ozonation with Fe2O3. The O3 in the solution can be consumed via the following two routes: (1) direct oxidation of O3 with nitrobenzene or (2) O3 decomposition into active free radicals. The oxidation rate constants of nitrobenzene with •OH and O3 are 2.2 × 108 M−1s−1 and 0.09 M−1s−1, respectively, indicating that nitrobenzene hardly reacts with O3 [20]. On the basis of the above results in Figure 4, the improvement in O3 utilization efficiency in catalytic ozonation was actually caused by the substantial formation of •OH, especially in catalytic ozonation with Fe2O3/SBA-15. Therefore, in subsequent experiments, we investigate the influence of variables and on O3 decomposition and mass transfer and the interface behaviors.

3.3. Water Temperature and Catalyst Dose

Water temperature was a key factor influencing the decomposition behavior of O3 in the ozonation reaction system. The influence of water temperature on nitrobenzene removal was investigated at different water temperatures during catalytic ozonation with Fe2O3/SBA-15.
As shown in Figure 5, the removal rates of nitrobenzene at 15 °C, 25 °C, 35 °C, and 45 °C were significantly different from those of catalytic ozonation with Fe2O3/SBA-15. The adsorption removal rates at different water temperatures did not significantly change. The removal rate of nitrobenzene increased from 52.5% to 61.5%, 63.2% and 55.7% as the water temperature increased from 15 °C to 45 °C. The removal of nitrobenzene via catalytic ozonation with Fe2O3/SBA-15 was obviously affected by the water temperature. Within a certain temperature range from 15 °C to 35 °C, increasing the water temperature can positively promote the activation of O3, increasing the decomposition of O3 into •OH. Moreover, O3 showed a lower solubility with increasing water temperature. When the water temperature was further increased from 35 °C to 45 °C, the removal rate of nitrobenzene decreased from 63.2% to 55.7% after 10 min, which had a negative effect on the amount of •OH formed.
Heterogeneous catalytic ozonation is an oxidation process of the following three phases: gas–liquid–solid. Therefore, it was necessary to investigate the influence of the catalyst content on the removal of nitrobenzene in water.
The removal of nitrobenzene was studied by catalytic ozonation in the presence of different catalyst contents. The results shown in Figure 6 indicate that the removal rate increased gradually by 51.1% and 65.2%, respectively, with increasing catalyst content (25–150 mg/L). At a low content of 25 mg/L, the removal rate of nitrobenzene obviously improved compared with that of O3 alone (38.5%). Only 4.2% of nitrobenzene can be removed by adsorption onto the Fe2O3/SBA-15 surface (150 mg/L); therefore, surface adsorption weakly contributes to the removal rate in the catalytic ozonation process. The increase in the catalyst content may also increase the solid catalytic surface area, resulting in the promotion of •OH formation, which increases the removal rate in the solution.

3.4. Ozone Decay

O3 gas–liquid mass transfer from water onto the catalyst surface plays an important role in catalytic ozonation. The dissolved O3 is unstable in water because of its resonance structure. The O3 half-life ranges from a few seconds to a few minutes and relies on several environmental conditions. Therefore, the decay behavior of O3 in solution was evaluated to determine the effect of the Fe2O3/SBA-15 surface in this process.
The results shown in Figure 7A indicate that the concentration of O3 continuously decreased in the solution due to O3 self-decomposition during the O3-alone process. Compared with using O3 alone, the use of Fe2O3 significantly improved O3 decay. After 15 min of reaction, O3 completely decomposed into Fe2O3. However, the presence of Fe2O3/SBA-15 strongly inhibited O3 decay relative to that obtained from O3 alone. The concentration of O3 slowly decreased with fluctuations due to the presence of Fe2O3/SBA-15.
O3 decomposition occurs via heterogeneous reactions or via homogeneous reactions [17]. The decomposition rate of O3 in a heterogeneous system can be written as follows:
d O 3 d t = k 1 O 3 + k 2 S O 3
where k1 and k2 are the apparent rate constants of O3 decomposition because of homogeneous and heterogeneous processes. [S] represents the number of active catalyst sites. The concentration of O3 in the solution changed over a narrow range, and [S] is the pseudoconcentration and is indicated the concentration of surface reactive centers on the catalyst. By defining kapp = k1 + k2 [S], Equation (2) may be expressed as Equation (3).
d O 3 d t = k a p p O 3
O3 decomposition followed first-order kinetics according to Equation (2), and kapp is the apparent rate constant.
The pseudo-first-order rate constant of O3 increased remarkably in the presence of Fe2O3, with the apparent rate constant increasing 2.312-fold (Figure 7B). This result was consistent with that of previous studies, and Fe2O3 was the active material for O3 decomposition in water [12]. Moreover, O3 decomposition did not follow first-order kinetics in the presence of Fe2O3/SBA-15. This phenomenon represented the dynamic equilibrium between adsorption and desorption.
The solution acidity and alkalinity significantly affected the decomposition of O3 in water because of O3 reactions with hydroxyl ions and were also important factors for evaluating the activity of the catalyst. Therefore, the effect of the initial pH of the solution on the O3 decay process was studied via catalytic ozonation with Fe2O3/SBA-15.
Figure 8A shows that the O3 concentration rapidly decreased at pH 9 during catalytic ozonation with Fe2O3/SBA-15. In contrast, the O3 concentration slowly decreased with increasing and decreasing fluctuations at pH 3 in the same process. O3 decay followed a pseudo-first-order kinetics model (pH 9). O3 decay exhibited a decay rate constant at pH 9, resulting in a rate constant of 0.308 min−1 after 30 min. At pH 3, O3 decay did not follow first-order kinetics at this reaction time. These results may be due to the following factors. First, the hydroxyl ions competitively decompose O3 under alkaline conditions. Second, the active species were difficult to produce from O3 decomposition under acidic conditions.

3.5. Active Species

The oxidation of contaminants in water by dissolved O3 involves mainly O3 or active oxygen-containing radicals. O3 decomposition often produces many active oxygen-containing radicals, such as HO4•, •O, •OH, HO2•, and O2•, in catalytic ozonation. Among the above free radicals, •OH is the principal active radical due to its high oxidative activity and unselective reaction with contaminants [28]. Thus, many studies have focused on accelerating the production of •OH in this process.
The current test detected •OH production via spin trapping/EPR technology, which may capture •OH according to the intensity of the DMPO-OH signal. The signal was composed of quartet lines (1:2:2:1 peak height ratio). Figure 9 indicates that the •OH signal exists in three processes. The intensity of the peak was minimal for O3 alone. The formation of •OH in O3 alone was difficult to achieve in a short time. The test data also indicated that the introduction of a catalyst promoted O3 decomposition. Relative to that observed with O3 alone, the adduct signal increased during catalytic ozonation with Fe2O3 and Fe2O3/SBA-15, and the strongest signal was observed during catalytic ozonation with Fe2O3/SBA-15. The reason for this finding was the presence of SBA-15, which can significantly affect O3 mass transfer at the solid/water interface for •OH generation.

3.6. Ion Effects

According to the XRD analysis of Fe2O3/SBA-15, there was some opportunity for the release of ions from Fe2O3/SBA-15. The release of ions could lead to two possible effects: (1) the leaching of ions, which could have a negative impact on human health and the environment, and (2) an effect on the performance of Fe2O3/SBA-15. Moreover, metal ions are often used as homogeneous catalysts for catalytic ozonation, which could further contribute to removal during the reaction process. Therefore, the ions released from Fe2O3/SBA-15 in this study are of particular concern.
After 30 min, ion leaching was detected in the treated water (Figure 10). The results indicated the presence of Fe and Si ions after the reaction. The concentration of Fe ions was minimal in the two processes, especially during catalytic ozonation with Fe2O3/SBA-15. This phenomenon indicated that the SBA-15 support can inhibit Fe ion leaching in catalytic ozonation with Fe2O3/SBA-15. In this experiment, the influence of the homogeneous reaction with Fe ions was insignificant compared with that of the heterogeneous reaction. Moreover, the residual Fe and Si ions are not harmful to human health because their concentrations are lower than the drinking water standards in China. On the basis of the above results, Fe2O3/SBA-15 has the potential to be used safely in catalytic ozonation.

3.7. Catalyst Reuse

Deactivation is a major issue with catalysts in water treatment technology. For catalytic ozonation reactions, it is essential to study the catalytic stability of spent/reused catalysts. The catalytic stability of Fe2O3/SBA-15 was evaluated by reusing the same Fe2O3/SBA-15 sample in three successive iterations of decomposing O3 into •OH. At the end of the tests, the solid samples were recovered and then rinsed with water. The samples were dried at 100 °C for subsequent use.
As shown in Figure 11, the variation in peak intensity of the DMPO-OH adduct signal was minimal after three reuses in catalytic ozonation with Fe2O3/SBA-15. •OH formation was not affected by the continuous use of Fe2O3/SBA-15 over a long reaction time. These results indicated that the performance of Fe2O3/SBA-15 was relatively stable during catalytic ozonation. Therefore, the application of ozonation catalyzed with Fe2O3/SBA-15 for water treatment was feasible.

4. Conclusions

Fe2O3/SBA-15 is a nano-/mesoporous material with high-order hexagonal array structures. Compared with Fe2O3, Fe2O3/SBA-15, a useful ozonation catalyst, obviously enhances the removal of nitrobenzene, O3 utilization efficiency, and O3 decomposition into •OH. The introduction of the SBA-15 support can affect the pathway of O3 decomposition in the ozonation system. Compared with O3/Fe2O3, Fe2O3/SBA-15 significantly increases the amount of •OH generated. This phenomenon can be illustrated by the difference in the surface properties of the catalysts. The experimental results indicate that the SBA-15 support decreased the O3 self-decomposition rate during catalytic ozonation with Fe2O3/SBA-15, which resulted in increased •OH production via the reaction between O3 and Fe2O3. Fe2O3/SBA-15 is an efficient catalyst because of its high activity, stability and safety in the catalytic ozonation process. Further studies should investigate whether metal oxides support ozone-loaded materials and further illuminate the enhancement mechanism, including the reaction behavior and key structure.

Author Contributions

L.Y., L.F., P.Y., J.Z. and Z.C. contributed to the conception and design of the study: data curation, J.Z.; writing—original draft, L.Y.; writing—review and editing, L.F., P.Y. and Z.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was jointly supported by Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Provincial Institute (No. CZKYF2023-1-B036), Heilongjiang Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (No. JQ2024ZR01), Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment (Harbin Institute of Technology) (No. HC202329), Natural Science Foundation Joint Guidance Project of Heilongjiang Province (No. LH2022C078) and Science Research Fund Project of Heilongjiang Academy of Sciences (No. KY2023ZR01).

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, T.; Hu, H.; Croue, J.P. Production of sulfate radical from peroxymonosulfate induced by a magnetically separable CuFe2O4 spinel in water: Efficiency, stability, and mechanism. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 2784–2791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tian, S.Q.; Qi, J.Y.; Wang, Y.P.; Liu, Y.L.; Wang, L.; Ma, J. Heterogeneous catalytic ozonation of atrazine with Mn-loaded and Fe-loaded biochar. Water Res. 2021, 193, 116860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Legube, B.; Karpel, V.L.N. Catalytic ozonation: A promising advanced oxidation technology for water treatment. Catal. Today 1999, 53, 61–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, H.H.; Xu, B.B.; Qi, F.; Sun, D.Z.; Chen, Z.L. Degradation of bezafibrate in wastewater by catalytic ozonation with cobalt doped red mud: Efficiency, intermediates and toxicity. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2014, 152, 342–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, Y.X.; Xie, Y.B.; Sun, H.Q.; Xiao, J.D.; Cao, H.B.; Wang, S.B. Efficient catalytic ozonation over reduced graphene oxide for p-hydroxylbenzoic acid (PHBA) destruction: Active site and mechanism. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 9710–9720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yuan, L.; Shen, J.M.; Chen, Z.L.; Guan, X.H. Role of Fe/pumice composition and structure in promoting ozonation reactions. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2016, 180, 707–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yan, P.; Shen, J.M.; Zhou, Y.; Yuan, L.; Kang, J.; Wang, S.Y.; Chen, Z.L. Interface mechanism of catalytic ozonation in an α-Fe0.9Mn0.1OOH aqueous suspension for the removal of iohexol. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2020, 277, 119055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yan, P.W.; Chen, Z.L.; Wang, S.Y.; Zhou, Y.C.; Li, L.; Yuan, L.; Shen, J.M.; Jin, Q.Q.; Zhang, X.X.; Kang, J. Catalytic ozonation of iohexol with α-Fe0.9Mn0.1OOH in water: Efficiency, degradation mechanism and toxicity evaluation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 402, 123574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, S.; Quan, X.; Wang, D. Catalytic ozonation in arrayed zinc oxide nanotubes as highly efficient mini-column catalyst reactors (MCRs): Augmentation of hydroxyl radical exposure. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 8701–8711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, J.K.; Fu, L.Y.; Chen, X.X.; Deng, L.Y.; Wu, C.Y. Catalytic ozonation promoted by Mn-doped sludge-based catalyst treating refractory industrial wastewater. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2025, 354, 128676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, L.; Wang, Y.W.; Gao, Y.; Huang, Y.X.; Liang, Y.F. Theoretical evidence of enhanced interaction between H2O and O3 leads to improved performance of catalytic ozonation with copper doping α-FeOOH. Surf. Interfaces 2024, 44, 103772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nawrocki, J.; Kasprzyk-Hordern, B. The efficiency and mechanisms of catalytic ozonation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2010, 99, 27–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhao, D.; Feng, J.; Huo, Q.; Melosh, N.; Fredrickson, G.H.; Chmelka, B.F.; Stucky, G.D. Tri block copolymer synthesis of mesoporous silica with periodic 50 to 300 angstrom pores. Science 1998, 279, 548–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wang, F.; Jiang, L.; Wang, J.M.; Zhang, Z.H. Catalytic conversion of fructose and 5-hydroxymethyl furfural into 2,5-diformylfuran over SBA-15 supported ruthenium catalysts. Energy Fuels 2016, 30, 5885–5892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chen, W.R.; Li, X.K.; Pan, Z.Q.; Ma, S.S.; Li, L.S. Synthesis of MnOx/SBA-15 for norfloxacin degradation by catalytic ozonation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2017, 173, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bing, J.H.; Hu, C.; Nie, Y.L.; Yang, M.; Qu, J.H. Mechanism of catalytic ozonation in Fe2O3/Al2O3@SBA-15 aqueous suspension for destruction of ibuprofen. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 1690–1697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rosal, R.; Gonzalo, M.S.; Rodríguez, A. Catalytic ozonation of atrazine and linuron on MnOx/Al2O3 and MnOx/SBA-15 in a fixed bed reactor. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 165, 806–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yang, M.; Qing, Y.H.; Chuan, Z.J.; Juan, Z.S.; Ping, S.G. Reductive degradation of nitrobenzene in aqueous solution by zero-valent iron. Chemosphere 2004, 54, 789–794. [Google Scholar]
  19. Mantha, R.; Taylor, K.E.; Biswas, N.; Bewtra, J.K. A continuous system for Fe0 re duction of nitrobenzene in synthetic wastewater. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 3231–3236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hoigné, J.; Bader, H. Rate constants of reactions of ozone with organic and inorganic compounds in water—I: Non-dissociating organic compounds. Water Res. 1983, 17, 173–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yuan, L.; Shen, J.M.; Chen, Z.L. Catalytic ozonation of p-chloronitrobenzene over pumice-supported zinc oxyhydroxide. Water Sci. Technol. 2013, 68, 1895–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Liu, C.H.; Lin, C.Y.; Chen, J.L.; Lu, K.T.; Lee, J.F.; Chen, J.M. SBA-15-supported Pd catalysts: The effect of pretreatment conditions on particle size and its application to benzyl alcohol oxidation. J. Catal. 2017, 350, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Richmond, G.L. Molecular bonding and interactions at aqueous surfaces as probed by vibrational sum frequency spectroscopy. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 2693–2724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wang, L.Z.; Shi, J.L.; Yu, J.; Yan, D.S. Synthesis of nanostructured mesoporous silica materials containing manganese. Nanostruct. Mater. 1998, 10, 1289–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Guo, S.; Liu, M.; You, L.; Cheng, G.; Li, J.; Zhou, K. Oxygen vacancy induced peroxymonosulfate activation by Mg-doped Fe2O3 composites for advanced oxidation of organic pollutants. Chemosphere 2021, 279, 130482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kasprzyk-Hordern, B.; Ziolek, M.; Nawrocki, J. Catalytic ozonation and methods of enhancing molecular ozone reactions in water treatment. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2003, 46, 639–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Guan, Y.H.; Ma, J.; Ren, Y.M.; Liu, Y.L.; Xiao, J.Y.; Lin, L.Q.; Zhang, C. Efficient de gradation of atrazine by magnetic porous copper ferrite catalyzed peroxymonosulfate, oxidation via the formation of hydroxyl and sulfate radicals. Water Res. 2013, 47, 5431–5438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gligorovski, S.; Strekowski, R.; Barbati, S.; Vione, D. Environmental implications of hydroxyl radicals (OH). Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 13051–13092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic of the experimental apparatus.
Figure 1. Schematic of the experimental apparatus.
Water 16 02590 g001
Figure 2. (A) Wide-angle XRD patterns, (B) low-angle XRD patterns, (C) physisorption isotherms, (D) pore size distributions, (E) FT-IR spectra, and (F) SEM image of Fe2O3/SBA-15.
Figure 2. (A) Wide-angle XRD patterns, (B) low-angle XRD patterns, (C) physisorption isotherms, (D) pore size distributions, (E) FT-IR spectra, and (F) SEM image of Fe2O3/SBA-15.
Water 16 02590 g002
Figure 3. Removal of nitrobenzene in different processes (test conditions: concentration of O3 in solution: 0.6 mg/L; concentration of nitrobenzene in solution: 50 μg/L; concentration of Fe2O3/SBA-15: 50 mg/L; concentration of Fe2O3: 5 mg/L; concentration of SBA-15: 45 mg/L; initial pH of solution: 6.0; reaction time: 10 min; reaction; temperature: 25 °C; and concentration of TBA: 2 mg/L).
Figure 3. Removal of nitrobenzene in different processes (test conditions: concentration of O3 in solution: 0.6 mg/L; concentration of nitrobenzene in solution: 50 μg/L; concentration of Fe2O3/SBA-15: 50 mg/L; concentration of Fe2O3: 5 mg/L; concentration of SBA-15: 45 mg/L; initial pH of solution: 6.0; reaction time: 10 min; reaction; temperature: 25 °C; and concentration of TBA: 2 mg/L).
Water 16 02590 g003
Figure 4. O3 utilization efficiency in different processes (test conditions: concentration of O3 in solution: 0.6 mg/L; concentration of nitrobenzene in solution: 50 μg/L; concentration of Fe2O3/SBA-15: 50 mg/L; concentration of Fe2O3: 5 mg/L; initial pH of the solution: 6.0; reaction time: 10 min; reaction; and temperature: 25 °C).
Figure 4. O3 utilization efficiency in different processes (test conditions: concentration of O3 in solution: 0.6 mg/L; concentration of nitrobenzene in solution: 50 μg/L; concentration of Fe2O3/SBA-15: 50 mg/L; concentration of Fe2O3: 5 mg/L; initial pH of the solution: 6.0; reaction time: 10 min; reaction; and temperature: 25 °C).
Water 16 02590 g004
Figure 5. Influence of water temperature on removal (test conditions: concentration of O3 in solution: 0.6 mg/L; concentration of nitrobenzene in solution: 50 μg/L; concentration of Fe2O3/SBA-15: 50 mg/L; initial pH of the solution: 6.0; and reaction time: 10 min).
Figure 5. Influence of water temperature on removal (test conditions: concentration of O3 in solution: 0.6 mg/L; concentration of nitrobenzene in solution: 50 μg/L; concentration of Fe2O3/SBA-15: 50 mg/L; initial pH of the solution: 6.0; and reaction time: 10 min).
Water 16 02590 g005
Figure 6. Influence of catalyst content on removal (test conditions: concentration of O3 in solution: 0.6 mg/L; concentration of nitrobenzene in solution: 50 μg/L; initial pH of the solution: 6.0; reaction time: 10 min; and reaction temperature: 25 °C).
Figure 6. Influence of catalyst content on removal (test conditions: concentration of O3 in solution: 0.6 mg/L; concentration of nitrobenzene in solution: 50 μg/L; initial pH of the solution: 6.0; reaction time: 10 min; and reaction temperature: 25 °C).
Water 16 02590 g006
Figure 7. (A) Ozone decay and (B) pseudo-first-order plot in water (test conditions: concentration of O3 in solution: 0.6 mg/L; concentration of Fe2O3/SBA-15: 50 mg/L; concentration of Fe2O3: 5 mg/L; initial pH of the solution: 6.0; and reaction temperature: 25 °C).
Figure 7. (A) Ozone decay and (B) pseudo-first-order plot in water (test conditions: concentration of O3 in solution: 0.6 mg/L; concentration of Fe2O3/SBA-15: 50 mg/L; concentration of Fe2O3: 5 mg/L; initial pH of the solution: 6.0; and reaction temperature: 25 °C).
Water 16 02590 g007
Figure 8. Influence of pH on (A) ozone decay and (B) pseudo-first-order plot (test conditions: concentration of O3 in solution: 0.6 mg/L; concentration of Fe2O3/SBA-15: 50 mg/L; and reaction temperature: 25 °C).
Figure 8. Influence of pH on (A) ozone decay and (B) pseudo-first-order plot (test conditions: concentration of O3 in solution: 0.6 mg/L; concentration of Fe2O3/SBA-15: 50 mg/L; and reaction temperature: 25 °C).
Water 16 02590 g008
Figure 9. •OH captured via ESR (test conditions: concentration of O3 in solution: 0.6 mg/L; concentration of Fe2O3/SBA-15: 50 mg/L; concentration of Fe2O3: 5 mg/L; initial pH of the solution: 6.0; reaction temperature: 25 °C; and concentration of DMPO: 100 mmol/L).
Figure 9. •OH captured via ESR (test conditions: concentration of O3 in solution: 0.6 mg/L; concentration of Fe2O3/SBA-15: 50 mg/L; concentration of Fe2O3: 5 mg/L; initial pH of the solution: 6.0; reaction temperature: 25 °C; and concentration of DMPO: 100 mmol/L).
Water 16 02590 g009
Figure 10. Ions released into water (test conditions: concentration of O3 in solution: 0.6 mg/L; concentration of Fe2O3/SBA-15: 50 mg/L; concentration of Fe2O3: 5 mg/L; initial pH of the solution: 6.0; reaction temperature: 25 °C; and reaction time: 30 min).
Figure 10. Ions released into water (test conditions: concentration of O3 in solution: 0.6 mg/L; concentration of Fe2O3/SBA-15: 50 mg/L; concentration of Fe2O3: 5 mg/L; initial pH of the solution: 6.0; reaction temperature: 25 °C; and reaction time: 30 min).
Water 16 02590 g010
Figure 11. •OH captured via ESR (test conditions: concentration of O3 in solution: 0.6 mg/L; concentration of Fe2O3/SBA-15: 50 mg/L; concentration of Fe2O3: 5 mg/L; initial pH of the solution: 6.0; reaction temperature: 25 °C; and concentration of DMPO: 100 mmol/L).
Figure 11. •OH captured via ESR (test conditions: concentration of O3 in solution: 0.6 mg/L; concentration of Fe2O3/SBA-15: 50 mg/L; concentration of Fe2O3: 5 mg/L; initial pH of the solution: 6.0; reaction temperature: 25 °C; and concentration of DMPO: 100 mmol/L).
Water 16 02590 g011
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yuan, L.; Fang, L.; Zhang, J.; Yan, P.; Chen, Z. Effect of the Fe2O3/SBA-15 Surface on Inducing Ozone Decomposition and Mass Transfer in Water. Water 2024, 16, 2590. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16182590

AMA Style

Yuan L, Fang L, Zhang J, Yan P, Chen Z. Effect of the Fe2O3/SBA-15 Surface on Inducing Ozone Decomposition and Mass Transfer in Water. Water. 2024; 16(18):2590. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16182590

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yuan, Lei, Lele Fang, Jizhou Zhang, Pengwei Yan, and Zhonglin Chen. 2024. "Effect of the Fe2O3/SBA-15 Surface on Inducing Ozone Decomposition and Mass Transfer in Water" Water 16, no. 18: 2590. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16182590

APA Style

Yuan, L., Fang, L., Zhang, J., Yan, P., & Chen, Z. (2024). Effect of the Fe2O3/SBA-15 Surface on Inducing Ozone Decomposition and Mass Transfer in Water. Water, 16(18), 2590. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16182590

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop