The Influence of the Growth of the Number of Microbreweries on the Use of Farmland and on the Cultivation of Hops in the Czech Republic: A Case Study
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Research Hypothesis and Data Sources
- The indicator of the extent of the hop field area in Czechia in the years 2004–2020 was chosen as the subject of the research. For our purpose, it is a significant indicator of the economic performance of hop growing in Czechia. Indicators of the size of hop production and hop yield per hectare are significantly affected by year-on-year weather changes. The Hop Growers Union of Czechia has become a source of data for the analysis of the development of the hop field area indicator in Czechia (for more details see Section 3.2).
- The development of the number of microbreweries in Czechia in the years 2010–2019, when there was a boom in the microbrewery sector due to significant changes in the consumer behavior of beer drinkers, was chosen as the main indicator for comparison. The Czech-Moravian Association of Microbreweries became a source of data for the analysis of the development of the number of microbreweries in Czechia (for more details see Section 3.2).
- This boom has manifested itself in research in the hop growing sector through the breeding of new hop varieties suitable for the production of special beers, which are the main commodity offered by microbreweries. The data source was statistics from the Central Agricultural Inspection and Testing Institute [3].
- Due to the fact that this is a transnational phenomenon, this article also monitors the development of the microbrewing sector in the USA. The data source was statistics from the Brewers Association [33]. The reason is the interest in buying hop varieties suitable for the production of special beers from Czechia.
- The development of the extent of the hop field area in Czechia is then statistically evaluated in the form of testing with the development of the indicator of growth in the number of microbreweries in Czechia in a given time horizon (for more details see Section 4.7).
- The results of this research were subsequently confronted in this article with similar research conducted by the Ipsos agency for the Czech-Moravian Association of Microbreweries [34] and match was searched for in the results.
3.2. Methodology of Time Series Evaluation
4. Results
4.1. Area of Hop Fields in Czechia and Its Sustainable Development
4.2. Increase in Demand for Czech Hop from US Microbreweries
4.3. Increase in the Number of Hop Varieties Suitable for Czech Microbreweries
4.4. Development of the Number of Microbreweries in Czechia
4.5. Survey Conducted among Consumers of Beer from Microbreweries in Czechia
4.6. Survey Conducted among Brewers from Microbreweries
4.7. Verification of the Validity of the Proposed Hypothesis
5. Discussion
5.1. Possible Changes in the Hop Growing Sector in Czechia
- New varieties of hops expanding diversity
- Beer tourism
- New sales opportunities for hop growers (in the USA)
- Possibilities for the creation of new microbreweries
5.2. Resulting Recommendations for Consumers
5.3. Resulting Recommendations for the State
5.4. Limitations of the Research
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Czech Association of Breweries and Malt-Houses. Available online: http://ceske-pivo.cz/fakta-a-zajimavosti (accessed on 16 January 2021).
- Czech Statistical Office (CZSO). Available online: https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/320198-14-r_2014-1300 (accessed on 6 January 2021).
- Central Agricultural Inspection and Testing Institute. Available online: http://eagri.cz/public/web/ukzuz/portal/chmelu-se-darilo-letosni-sklizen-je.html (accessed on 6 January 2021).
- Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic. Available online: http://eagri.cz/public/web/ukzuz/portal/trvale-kultury/plochy-chmelnic-04-2020.html (accessed on 4 July 2021).
- Magazín EGO! Experiment roku 2020. Uvař si vlastní pivo. Hospodářské Nov. 2020, 3, 17–21. [Google Scholar]
- Hop Growers Union of Czechia. Available online: http://www.czhops.cz/index.php?option=com_content&view=section&layout=blog&id=1&Itemid=28&lang=cs (accessed on 18 December 2020).
- Rybáček, V. Hops Production and Science on a New Path. Rostl. Výroba 1991, 37, 625–626. [Google Scholar]
- Sbardella, M.; Racanicci, A.M.C.; Gois, F.D.; de Lima, C.B.; Migotto, D.L.; Costa, L.B.; Miyada, V.S. Effects of dietary hop (Humulus lupulus L.) β-acids on quality attributes, composition and oxidative stability of pork meat. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018, 98, 2385–2392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Oladokun, O.; Tarrega, A.; James, S.; Smart, K.; Hort, J.; Cook, D. The impact of hop bitter acid and polyphenol profiles on the perceived bitterness of beer. Food Chem. 2016, 205, 212–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hough, J.S.; Briggs, D.E.; Stevens, R.; Young, T.W. Beer 17ah ra and Beer Quality Malting and Brewing Science: Volume II Hopped Wort and Beer; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1982. [Google Scholar]
- De Keukeleire, D. Fundamentals of beer and hop chemistry. Quim. Nova 2000, 23, 108–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schönberger, C.; Kostelecky, T. 125th Anniversary Review: The role of hops in brewing. J. Inst. Brew. 2011, 117, 259–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hieronymus, S. For the Love of Hops: The Practical Guide to Aroma, Bitterness and the Culture of Hops; Brewers Publications: Boulder, CO, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Oladokun, O.; Tarrega, A.; James, S.; Cowley, T.; Dehrmann, F.; Smart, K.; Cook, D.; Hort, J. Modification of perceived beer bitterness intensity, character and temporal profile by hop aroma extract. Food Res. Int. 2016, 86, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keast, R.S.; Breslin, P.A. An overview of binary taste–taste interactions. Food Qual. Prefer. 2003, 14, 111–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Henning, J.A.; Gent, D.H.; Townsend, M.S.; Woods, J.L.; Hill, S.T.; Hendrix, D. QTL analysis of resistance to powdery mildew in hop (Humulus lupulus L.). Euphytica 2017, 213, 411–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nesvadba, V.; Krofta, K. New hop variety Agnus as the result of breeding process innovation in Czechia. Rostl. Výroba 2002, 48, 513–517. [Google Scholar]
- Patzak, J. Characterization of Czech hop (Humulus lupulus L.) genotypes by molecular methods. Rostl. Výroba 2002, 48, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chen, L.L.; Chen, H.S.; Zou, C.; Liu, Y. The Impact of Farmland Transfer on Rural Households’ Income Structure in the Context of Household Differentiation: A Case Study of Heilongjiang Province, China. Land 2021, 10, 362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ranjan, P.; Wardropper, C.B.; Eanes, F.R.; Reddy, S.M.; Harden, S.C.; Masuda, Y.J.; Prokopy, L.S. Understanding barriers and opportunities for adoption of conservation practices on rented farmland in the US. Land Use Policy 2019, 80, 214–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, S.; Jayne, T.S. Land Rental Markets in Kenya: Implications for Efficiency, Equity, Household Income, and Poverty. Land Econ. 2013, 89, 246–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kijima, Y.; Tabetando, R. Efficiency and equity of rural land markets and the impact on income: Evidence in Kenya and Ugandafrom 2003 to 2015. Land Use Policy 2020, 91, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Azadi, H.; Vanhaute, E.; Janeckova, K.; Sklenicka, P.; Teklemariam, D.; Feng, L.; Witlox, F. Evolution of land distribution in the context of development theories. Land Use Policy 2020, 97, 104730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huettel, S.; Wildermann, L.; Croonenbroeck, C. How do institutional market players matter in farmland pricing? Land Use Policy 2016, 59, 154–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ustaoglu, E.; Collier, M.J. Farmland abandonment in Europe: An overview of drivers, consequences, and assessment of the sustainability implications. Environ. Rev. 2018, 26, 396–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, H.; Wang, P.; Yao, G. Exploring the Dynamic Mechanisms of Farmland Abandonment Based on a Spatially Explicit Economic Model for Environmental Sustainability: A Case Study in Jiangxi Province, China. Sustainability 2014, 6, 1260–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Prus, P. Sustainable farming production and its impact on the natural environment—Case study based on a selected group of farmers. In Proceedings of the 8th International Scientific Conference on Rural Development—Bioeconomy Challenges, Akademija, Lithuania, 23–24 November 2017; Raupeliene, A., Ed.; Aleksandras Stulginskis University: Akademija, Lithuania, 2017; pp. 1280–1285. [Google Scholar]
- Veselá, K. Impact of Czech Republic Accession to European Union on Sugar Imports. Listy Cukrov. A Reparske 2020, 136, 422–425. [Google Scholar]
- Kosiciarova, I.; Kadekova, Z.; Dzupina, M.; Kubicova, L.; Dvorak, M. Comparative Analysis of Private Labels-Private Labels from the Point of View of a Millennial Customer in Slovakia, Czech Republic and Hungary. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beranova, M.; Navratilova, M. Organic Agriculture in the Context of Sustainable Development of Czechia and Norway. In Mezinarodni Konference Udrzitelny Rozvoj 2019: Vybrane Problemy Environmentalni a Regionalni Politiky. Selected Issues On Environmental And Regional Policy, Ceske Budejovice, Czechia, 14–15 March 2019; Riha, R., Ed.; Vysoka Skola Evropskych A Regionalnich Studii: Ceske Budejovice, Czechia, 2019; pp. 17–23. [Google Scholar]
- Slavík, L.; Zavadil, J. The need of supplemental irrigation in the Czech Republic. Rostl. Výroba 2001, 47, 507–512. [Google Scholar]
- Slavík, L. Utilization of trickle irrigation and microsprinkling of hop irrigation. Rostl. Výroba 2000, 46, 457–463. [Google Scholar]
- Brewers Association. Available online: https://www.brewersassociation.org/statistics/number-of-breweries/ (accessed on 23 January 2021).
- IPSOS Agency for Association of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises and Crafts of the Czech Republic. Available online: https://www.ipsos.com/cs-cz (accessed on 5 January 2021).
- Czech-Moravian Association of Microbreweries. Available online: http://www.minipivo.cz/ (accessed on 23 January 2021).
- Hindls, R.; Hronová, S.; Novák, I. Metody Statistické Analýzy pro Economy; Management Press: Praha, Czech Republic, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Chmelarstvi, Druzstvo Zatec. Available online: http://www.chmelarstvi.cz/profil-spolecnosti/chmelarstvi-druzstvo-zatec (accessed on 16 January 2021).
- Kütner, D. Český Chmel Zná Svět už Stovky Let. E15, 16 September 2016. [Google Scholar]
- National Beer Sales & Production Data. Available online: https://www.brewersassociation.org/statistics-and-data/national-beer-stats/ (accessed on 16 January 2021).
- Kütner, D. Počet minipivovarů loni stoupl o čtvrtinu. E15, 24 April 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Sůra, J.; Černý, A. Každý Týden Nový Pivovar. MF Dnes 2016, 23, 5. [Google Scholar]
- ČTK. Minipivovarů Jsou už Čtyři Stovky. E15 2018, 21, 6. [Google Scholar]
- Maier, T. Sources of Microbrewery Competitiveness in Czechia. AGRIS Line Pap. Econ. Inform. 2016, 8, 97–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Petříček, M. Místo na hrad do pivovaru. MF Dnes 2017, 17, 5. [Google Scholar]
- Dobis, E.; Reid, N.; Schmidt, C.; Goetz, S.J. The role of craft breweries in expanding (local) hops production. J. Wine Econ. 2019, 14, 374–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Association of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises and Crafts of the Czech Republic. Available online: https://www.spcr.cz/en/news (accessed on 5 January 2021).
- Kütner, D. Američany láká český chmel. E15, 30 June 2016. [Google Scholar]
- The International Hop Growers’ Convention (IHGC). Available online: http://www.hmelj-giz.si/ihgc/ (accessed on 28 April 2021).
2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2018 to 2019 % Change | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Regional Craft Breweries | 178 | 186 | 202 | 230 | 240 | 4.3% |
Microbreweries | 2684 | 3319 | 3956 | 4558 | 2058 | Not comparable |
Taprooms | - | - | - | 2966 | Not comparable | |
Brewpubs | 1941 | 2208 | 2503 | 2806 | 3011 | 7.3% |
Total U.S. Craft Breweries | 4803 | 5713 | 6661 | 7594 | 8275 | 9.1% |
Variable | Area of Hop Fields | Number of Microbreweries |
---|---|---|
Area of hop fields | 1.00 | +0.31 |
Number of microbreweries | +0.31 | 1.00 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Severová, L.; Šrédl, K.; Prášilová, M.; Štěbeták, M.; Svoboda, R.; Hommerová, D.; Kopecká, L. The Influence of the Growth of the Number of Microbreweries on the Use of Farmland and on the Cultivation of Hops in the Czech Republic: A Case Study. Land 2021, 10, 784. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10080784
Severová L, Šrédl K, Prášilová M, Štěbeták M, Svoboda R, Hommerová D, Kopecká L. The Influence of the Growth of the Number of Microbreweries on the Use of Farmland and on the Cultivation of Hops in the Czech Republic: A Case Study. Land. 2021; 10(8):784. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10080784
Chicago/Turabian StyleSeverová, Lucie, Karel Šrédl, Marie Prášilová, Michal Štěbeták, Roman Svoboda, Dita Hommerová, and Lenka Kopecká. 2021. "The Influence of the Growth of the Number of Microbreweries on the Use of Farmland and on the Cultivation of Hops in the Czech Republic: A Case Study" Land 10, no. 8: 784. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10080784
APA StyleSeverová, L., Šrédl, K., Prášilová, M., Štěbeták, M., Svoboda, R., Hommerová, D., & Kopecká, L. (2021). The Influence of the Growth of the Number of Microbreweries on the Use of Farmland and on the Cultivation of Hops in the Czech Republic: A Case Study. Land, 10(8), 784. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10080784