A Priority in Land Supply for Sustainable Transportation of Chinese Cities: An Empirical Study from Perception, Discrimination, Linkage to Decision
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Data Source
2.2. Design of Decision Support System for Transportation Land Supply
2.3. Methodology
2.3.1. Quantify the Dependence of Urban Development on Transportation
2.3.2. Determine the Preference of Transportation Mode in Chinese Cities
2.3.3. Response of Socio-Economic Development and Ecological Protection to Transportation Construction
2.3.4. Grey Prediction of Land Demand for Transportation
2.3.5. Evaluation of Transportation Accessibility in Chinese Cities
3. Results
3.1. The Dominant Mode of Transportation in Chinese Cities
3.2. Analysis on the Dependence of Transportation in Chinese Cities
3.3. The Response of Social and Eco-Economic to the Land Demand for Transportation
3.4. Analysis of the Accessibility of the Transportation Network in Chinese Cities
3.5. Land Demand Forecast for Chinese Cities in 2025
3.6. Decision Making of Transportation Land Supply in Chinese cities
4. Discussion
4.1. Reliability Validation of Transportation Land Supply Strategy in Chinese Cities
4.2. Implications and Applications
4.3. Limitations and Prospects
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Pérez-Soba, M.; Petit, S.; Jones, L.; Bertrand, N.; Briquel, V.; Omodei-Zorini, L.; Contini, C.; Helming, K.; Farrington, J.H.; Mossello, M.T.; et al. Land use functions—A multifunctionality approach to assess the impact of land use changes on land use sustainability. In Sustainability Impact Assessment of Land Use Changes; Helming, K., Pérez-Soba, M., Tabbush, P., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; pp. 375–404. [Google Scholar]
- Koczberski, G.; Curry, G.N. Making a living: Land pressures and changing livelihood strategies among oil palm settlers in Papua New Guinea. Agric. Syst. 2005, 85, 324–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Li, B.; Cao, X.; Xu, J.; Wang, W.; Ouyang, S.; Liu, D. Spatial–Temporal Pattern and Influence Factors of Land Used for Transportation at the County Level since the Implementation of the Reform and Opening-Up Policy in China. Land 2021, 10, 833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loveland, T.R.; Reed, B.C.; Brown, J.F.; Ohlen, D.O.; Zhu, Z.; Yang, L.; Merchant, J.W. Development of a global land cover characteristics database and IGBP DISCover from 1 km AVHRR data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2000, 21, 1303–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderson, J.R. A Land Use and Land Cover Classification System for Use with Remote Sensor Data; US Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, USA, 1976; Volume 964. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, P.; Lü, B.; de Roo, G. Urban Expansion and Transportation: The Impact of Urban form on Commuting Patterns on the City Fringe of Beijing. Environ. Plan. A Econ. Space 2010, 42, 2467–2486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vande Walle, S.; Steenberghen, T.; Paulley, N.; Pedler, A.; Martens, M. The role of indicators in the assessment of integrated land-use and transport policies in European cities. Int. Plan. Stud. 2004, 9, 173–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okraszewska, R.; Romanowska, A.; Wołek, M.; Oskarbski, J.; Birr, K.; Jamroz, K. Integration of a Multilevel Transport System Model into Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning. Sustainability 2018, 10, 479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mendez, V.M.; Monje, C.A.; White, V. Beyond Traffic: Trends and Choices 2045—A National Dialogue About Future Transportation Opportunities and Challenges; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Keong, C.K.; Grace, O. Smart Mobility 2030–ITS Strategic Plan for Singapore. Land Transport Authority of Singapore. 2015. Available online: https://esci-ksp.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/J15Nov_p04Chin_SmartMobility2030.pdf (accessed on 26 December 2021).
- Jin, F.; Ding, J.; Wang, J.e.; Liu, D.; Wang, C. Transportation development transition in China. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 2012, 22, 319–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, J.D.; Shen, L.F.; Peng, W. Regional Evaluation of the Transportation Infrastructure Construction Level in China. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2013, 275–277, 2777–2783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, L.; Du, L.; Yang, X.; Du, X.; Wang, J.; Hao, J. Sustainable Strategies for Transportation Development in Emerging Cities in China: A Simulation Approach. Sustainability 2018, 10, 844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Banerjee, A.; Duflo, E.; Qian, N. On the road: Access to transportation infrastructure and economic growth in China. J. Dev. Econ. 2020, 145, 102442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Canning, D.; Pedroni, P. The effect of infrastructure on long run economic growth. Harv. Univ. 2004, 99, 1–30. [Google Scholar]
- Gillen, D.W. Transportation infrastructure and economic development: A review of recent literature. Logist. Transp. Rev. 1996, 32, 39. [Google Scholar]
- Herrendorf, B.; Schmitz, J.J.A.; Teixeira, A. The role of transportation in US economic development: 1840–1860. Int. Econ. Rev. 2012, 53, 693–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Magazzino, C.; Mele, M. On the relationship between transportation infrastructure and economic development in China. Res. Transp. Econ. 2020, 100947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Craven, J.; Horan, E.; Goulding, R. Population growth and infrastructure development in Melbourne. WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ. 2014, 191, 509–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Li, Y.; DaCosta, M.N. Transportation and income inequality in China: 1978–2007. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2013, 55, 56–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gramlich, E.M. Infrastructure investment: A review essay. J. Econ. Lit. 1994, 32, 1176–1196. [Google Scholar]
- Song, M.; Wang, S.; Fisher, R. Transportation, iceberg costs and the adjustment of industrial structure in China. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2014, 32, 278–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teye, V.B. Land transportation and tourism in Bermuda. Tour. Manag. 1992, 13, 395–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sobieralski, J.B. Transportation infrastructure and employment: Are all investments created equal? Res. Transp. Econ. 2020, 100927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, T.-Y.; Su, C.-W. Is transportation improving urbanization in China? Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 2021, 77, 101034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pradhan, R.P.; Arvin, M.B.; Nair, M. Urbanization, transportation infrastructure, ICT, and economic growth: A temporal causal analysis. Cities 2021, 115, 103213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kasraian, D.; Maat, K.; Stead, D.; van Wee, B. Long-term impacts of transport infrastructure networks on land-use change: An international review of empirical studies. Transp. Rev. 2016, 36, 772–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paulley, N.; Balcombe, R.; Mackett, R.; Titheridge, H.; Preston, J.; Wardman, M.; Shires, J.; White, P. The demand for public transport: The effects of fares, quality of service, income and car ownership. Transp. Policy 2006, 13, 295–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jiang, X.; Zhang, L.; Xiong, C.; Wang, R. Transportation and Regional Economic Development: Analysis of Spatial Spillovers in China Provincial Regions. Netw. Spat. Econ. 2016, 16, 769–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steinhäußer, R.; Siebert, R.; Steinführer, A.; Hellmich, M. National and regional land-use conflicts in Germany from the perspective of stakeholders. Land Use Policy 2015, 49, 183–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shaw, S.-L.; Xin, X. Integrated land use and transportation interaction: A temporal GIS exploratory data analysis approach. J. Transp. Geogr. 2003, 11, 103–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Z.; Li, C.; Zhang, J. Transportation and Land Use Change: Comparison of Intracity Transport Routes in Changchun, China. J. Urban Plan. Dev. 2018, 144, 05018015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waddell, P.; Ulfarsson, G.F.; Franklin, J.P.; Lobb, J. Incorporating land use in metropolitan transportation planning. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2007, 41, 382–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ewing, R.; Meakins, G.; Bjarnson, G.; Hilton, H. Transportation and Land Use. In Making Healthy Places: Designing and Building for Health, Well-being, and Sustainability; Dannenberg, A.L., Frumkin, H., Jackson, R.J., Eds.; Island Press/Center for Resource Economics: Washington, DC, USA, 2011; pp. 149–169. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, D. An Efficient Transportation and Land Use System; US Department of Transportation: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
- Levine, J.; Frank, L.D. Transportation and land-use preferences and residents’ neighborhood choices: The sufficiency of compact development in the Atlanta region. Transportation 2007, 34, 255–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demirel, H.; Sertel, E.; Kaya, S.; Zafer Seker, D. Exploring impacts of road transportation on environment: A spatial approach. Desalination 2008, 226, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, H.; Wang, J.; Yuan, H. Study of Optimal Urban Land-use Pattern Based on Transportation Efficiency. China J. Highw. Transp. 2005, 18, 109–113. [Google Scholar]
- Atash, F. Reorienting metropolitan land use and transportation policies in the USA. Land Use Policy 1996, 13, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Litman, T. Evaluating transportation land use impacts. World Transp. Policy Pract. 1995, 1, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yaliniz, P.; Bilgic, S.; Vitosoglu, Y.; Turan, C. Evaluation of urban public transportation efficiency in Kutahya, Turkey. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2011, 20, 885–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhou, Y. Efficiency of construction land allocation in China: An econometric analysis of panel data. Land Use Policy 2018, 74, 261–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shibusawa, H. Agglomeration of the Firms and the Allocation of Land to the Transportation in the Information-oriented City. Stud. Reg. Sci. 1993, 23, 37–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sevcikova, H.; Nichols, B. Land use uncertainty in transportation forecast. J. Transp. Land Use 2021, 14, 805–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harahap, F.; Silveira, S.; Khatiwada, D. Land allocation to meet sectoral goals in Indonesia—An analysis of policy coherence. Land Use Policy 2017, 61, 451–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williamson, I.; Enemark, S.; Rajabifard, A. Land Administration for Sustainable Development; ESRI Press Academic: Redlands, CA, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Eastman, J.R.; Jiang, H.; Toledano, J. Multi-criteria and multi-objective decision making for land allocation using GIS. In Multicriteria Analysis for Land-Use Management; Beinat, E., Nijkamp, P., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1998; pp. 227–251. [Google Scholar]
- Strauch, M.; Cord, A.F.; Pätzold, C.; Lautenbach, S.; Kaim, A.; Schweitzer, C.; Seppelt, R.; Volk, M. Constraints in multi-objective optimization of land use allocation—Repair or penalize? Environ. Model. Softw. 2019, 118, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Yu, S.; Huang, G.H. Land allocation based on integrated GIS-optimization modeling at a watershed level. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2004, 66, 61–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, X.; Fang, C.; Wang, Z.; Bao, C. Spatial relationship of high-speed transportation construction and land-use efficiency and its mechanism: Case study of Shandong Peninsula urban agglomeration. J. Geogr. Sci. 2019, 29, 549–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bartholomew, K. Land use-transportation scenario planning: Promise and reality. Transportation 2007, 34, 397–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, H.; Wu, J.H.; Tan, Y.; Bao, Y.; Song, B.; He, X. A land use and transportation integration method for land use allocation and transportation strategies in China. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2014, 69, 329–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lopes, S.B.; Brondino, N.C.; Rodrigues da Silva, A.N. GIS-Based Analytical Tools for Transport Planning: Spatial Regression Models for Transportation Demand Forecast. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2014, 3, 565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Koomen, E.; Borsboom-van Beurden, J. Land-Use Modelling in Planning Practicenull; Springer Nature: Basingstoke, UK, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Iacono, M.; Levinson, D.; El-Geneidy, A.; Wasfi, R. A Markov chain model of land use change. TeMA J. Land Use Mobil. Environ. 2015, 8, 263–276. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Z.; Tong, Q.; Wang, R. An Optimized Combination Model for Construction Land Increasing Trend Forecasting; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2007; Volume 6753. [Google Scholar]
- Shepherd, S.P. A review of system dynamics models applied in transportation. Transp. B Transp. Dyn. 2014, 2, 83–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pijanowski, B.C.; Brown, D.G.; Shellito, B.A.; Manik, G.A. Using neural networks and GIS to forecast land use changes: A Land Transformation Model. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2002, 26, 553–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geng, B.; Zheng, X.; Fu, M. Scenario analysis of sustainable intensive land use based on SD model. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2017, 29, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Fang, F.; Li, Y. Key issues of land use in China and implications for policy making. Land Use Policy 2014, 40, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, W.; Yang, L. Evaluating the urban land use plan with transit accessibility. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2019, 45, 474–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, M.-K.; Yoo, S.-H. The role of transportation sectors in the Korean national economy: An input-output analysis. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2016, 93, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Y.; Mohabir, N.; Ma, R.; Zhu, P. Sorting through Neoliberal Variations of Ghost Cities in China. Land Use Policy 2017, 69, 445–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, Y.; Wu, Y.; Liu, J.; Xu, M.; Zuo, T. Ecological civilization and government administrative system reform in China. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 155, 104654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Button, K.J.; Leitham, S.; McQuaid, R.W.; Nelson, J.D. Transport and industrial and commercial location. Ann. Reg. Sci. 1995, 29, 189–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leontief, W. Input-Output Economics; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1986. [Google Scholar]
- Chiu, R.-H.; Lin, Y.-C. Applying input-output model to investigate the inter-industrial linkage of transportation industry in Taiwan. J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 2012, 20, 173–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oswald Beiler Michelle, R.; Treat, C. Integrating GIS and AHP to Prioritize Transportation Infrastructure Using Sustainability Metrics. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 2015, 21, 04014053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ju-Long, D. Control problems of grey systems. Syst. Control Lett. 1982, 1, 288–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Javanmardi, E.; Liu, S. Exploring Grey Systems Theory-Based Methods and Applications in Analyzing Socio-Economic Systems. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhang, Z.; Hu, B.; Shi, K.; Su, K.; Yang, Q. Exploring the dynamic, forecast and decoupling effect of land natural capital utilization in the hinterland of the Three Gorges Reservoir area, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 718, 134832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, Y.; Zheng, X.; Song, Q.; Bai, S. Analysis on the evolution of traffic network accessibility in Chinese Mainland. Geogr. Res. 2017, 36, 2321–2331. [Google Scholar]
- Hillier, B.; Iida, S. Network and Psychological Effects in Urban Movement. In Spatial Information Theory; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2005; pp. 475–490. [Google Scholar]
- Turner, A.; Penn, A.; Hillier, B. An Algorithmic Definition of the Axial Map. Environ. Plan. B Plan. Des. 2005, 32, 425–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Ren, A.; Chen, L.; Zheng, X. Measurement and Spatial Difference Analysis on the Accessibility of Road Networks in Major Cities of China. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kim, H.-K.; Sohn, D.W. An analysis of the relationship between land use density of office buildings and urban street configuration: Case studies of two areas in Seoul by space syntax analysis. Cities 2002, 19, 409–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dettlaff, W. Space syntax analysis–methodology of understanding the space. PhD Interdiscip. J. 2014, 1, 283–291. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, L.; Chen, L. The impact of new transportation modes on population distribution in Jing-Jin-Ji region of China. Sci. Data 2018, 5, 170204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kenderdine, T. China’s Industrial Policy, Strategic Emerging Industries and Space Law. Asia Pac. Policy Stud. 2017, 4, 325–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Li, C.; Gao, X.; Wu, J.; Wu, K. Demand prediction and regulation zoning of urban-industrial land: Evidence from Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration, China. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2019, 191, 412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tian, L.; Ma, W. Government intervention in city development of China: A tool of land supply. Land Use Policy 2009, 26, 599–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rao, Y.; Zhang, J.; Xu, Q.; Wang, S. Sustainability assessment of road networks: A new perspective based on service ability and landscape connectivity. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 40, 471–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asher, S.; Garg, T.; Novosad, P. The Ecological Impact of Transportation Infrastructure. Econ. J. 2020, 130, 1173–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, P.; Gao, J.; Zhang, W.; Rao, S.; Zou, C.; Du, J.; Liu, W. China integrating conservation areas into red lines for stricter and unified management. Land Use Policy 2018, 71, 245–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Type | Data | Format | Description |
---|---|---|---|
Spatial data | Map of administrative divisions in China | Vector | Ministry of Natural Resources of the People’s Republic of China (http://bzdt.ch.mnr.gov.cn/ (accessed on 5 June 2021)) |
China integrated transportation network map | Vector | http://www.gov.cn/ (accessed on 5 June 2021) | |
National key ecological functional zones map | Vector | National Development and Reform Commission (http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2017-02/09/content_5166513.htm (accessed on 12 June 2021)) | |
Statistical data | Area of land used for transportation (2009–2016) | Text | Application service platform for the sharing of land survey results (http://tddc.mnr.gov.cn/to_Login (accessed on 2 March 2021)) |
Leading industry gross output value | Text | Provincial Statistical Yearbook | |
Population (2009–2016) | Text | China City Statistical Yearbook (2010–2017) | |
GDP (2009–2016) | Text | China City Statistical Yearbook (2010–2017) | |
Airport throughput (2016) | Text | Civil Aviation Administration of China (http://www.caac.gov.cn/index.html (accessed on 8 June 2021)) | |
Other data | Urban development planning | Text | 13th five-year plan for economic and social development (2016–2020) |
Transportation system development strategy | Text | 13th five-year plan for modern integrated transportation system development (2016–2020) | |
Industrial development strategy | Text | 13th five-year plan for strategic emerging industry development (2016–2020) | |
National layout plan for highway hub (2006–2020) | Text | Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China | |
Harbor Law of the People’s Republic of China (2004) | Text | Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China | |
Medium and long-term railway network planning (2016–2025) | Text | National Development and Reform Commission | |
National layout plan for civil airports (2006–2020) | Text | National Development and Reform Commission |
Index | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Connectivity | Measures the number of neighbor axes directly connected to a space. It specifies the number of immediate neighbors of an axis. | |
Control value | It is the sum of the inverse values of the parameter connectivity of all neighbors from the selected axial line. It measures the degree to which a given space controls access to all immediate neighbors of the axis line. It considers all alternative connections which these neighbors have. | |
Depth | It is defined as the smallest number of syntactic steps (in topological meaning) that are needed to reach one space from another. Including global depth, mean depth and local depth. | |
Integration | Integration is a variable that refers to how a space is connected with other spaces in its surroundings. This is the key parameter to understand the relationships that exist between users and the urban space and it is a global measure. Including global integration and local integration. |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wang, K.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, D.; Wu, X. A Priority in Land Supply for Sustainable Transportation of Chinese Cities: An Empirical Study from Perception, Discrimination, Linkage to Decision. Land 2022, 11, 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010078
Wang K, Zhang J, Zhang D, Wu X. A Priority in Land Supply for Sustainable Transportation of Chinese Cities: An Empirical Study from Perception, Discrimination, Linkage to Decision. Land. 2022; 11(1):78. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010078
Chicago/Turabian StyleWang, Ke, Jianjun Zhang, Di Zhang, and Xia Wu. 2022. "A Priority in Land Supply for Sustainable Transportation of Chinese Cities: An Empirical Study from Perception, Discrimination, Linkage to Decision" Land 11, no. 1: 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010078
APA StyleWang, K., Zhang, J., Zhang, D., & Wu, X. (2022). A Priority in Land Supply for Sustainable Transportation of Chinese Cities: An Empirical Study from Perception, Discrimination, Linkage to Decision. Land, 11(1), 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010078