1. Introduction and Preliminaries
Recently a number of geometric constants, which play a significant role in the theory of Banach space geometry, have been widely investigated. One of the well-known geometric constants is the James constant
proposed by Gao and Lau [
1,
2], which is defined as follows:
The relationship between it and other geometric constants, and its significant geometric properties such as normal structure in the context of fixed point property have been extensively discussed in [
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6,
7].
It is noteworthy that a Banach space
X has the fixed point property for nonexpansive mappings if each nonexpansive self-mapping of each non-empty bounded closed convex subset of
X has a fixed point. When it comes to the non-empty weakly compact convex subset of
X with normal structure, it is found that
X has the weak fixed point property for nonexpansive mappings. It has been shown that further studies of uniform non-squareness are very useful in the description of a fixed point property. Particularly, García-Falset et al. obtained an important generalization of Browder–Göhde and Kirk theorems for the existence of fixed points of a nonexpansive mapping, i.e., every uniformly non-square Banach space has the fixed point property [
8]. For more details of applications of the fixed point property, we recommand the references [
9,
10,
11,
12].
Recall that a classical constant
of a Banach space
X, which is defined by
has been intensively investigated by Baronti et al. [
13]. By extension of the domain from
to
, Takahashi and Kato have discussed a new constant
in relation with
and other geometric constants such as the James constant
and von Neumann–Jordan constant
. From this germ of the idea emerged a sequence of the strengthened and improved relationships among the geometric constants. Furthermore, the characterization of uniform non-squareness has also been shown by means of the aforementioned discussion. For readers who are interested in pursuing more introduction and theoretical results of this constant, we recommend reference [
14].
Motivated by the characterizations of the James constant
with its prominent properties due to its symmetric structure, we will introduce four new James type constants
,
,
, and
, which are also endowed with symmetric structure. In
Section 2, we mainly focus on a new James type constant
, which is derived from the original James constant
combined with the notion of metric. We then bring out several relationships between it and some other well-known geometric constants such as the James constant
, which will be subsequently employed to explore the connection between it and its dual, together with the estimation of the upper and lower bounds of it. Moreover, a few connections between its value and some geometrical properties of the space, such as uniform non-squareness and uniformly normal structure, will be shown by inequalities. In
Section 3, we will introduce another new James type constant
combined with the notion of isosceles orthogonality, whereby the relationship between it and the James constant
and the connection between it and its dual will be different. By considering the extension of its domain from the unit sphere to the whole Banach space, we define a new constant
and therefore illustrate the difference between
and
by giving an example on an inner product space in terms of their values. Inspired by the characterizations of the constant
, we will discuss the last James type constant
in
Section 4, and obtain several results mainly by conducting a comparison between it and James constant
, which will show their similarities and differences on some specific Banach spaces.
Throughout the paper, we consider the real Banach space X with and the infinite-dimensional Banach space X, and use and to symbolize the unit sphere and closed unit ball of X, respectively.
We recall several geometric properties closely related to the geometric structure of Banach space as follows.
Definition 1. A Banach space X is called uniformly non-square if there exists such that for any , we have either or .
Definition 2 ([
15])
. We define to represent diameter of A and is called Chebyshev radius of A. A Banach space X has normal structure providedfor every bounded closed convex subset A of X with . A Banach space X is said to have uniform normal structure ifwith In order to study the property of James type constants that appear in the paper, we also recall the following modulus of smoothness of
X [
16].
Definition 3. Let X be a Banach space, then the modulus of smoothness is defined by The applications of aforementioned constants
,
,
, and
can be presented as simply and plainly as possible in the following terms [
5,
13,
14].
(i) For any Banach space,
(ii) For any Banach space,
and
(iii) If X is a Hilbert space, then , resp. , resp. , resp. .
(iv) X is uniformly non-square if and only if one of the following conditions is true: (a) , (b) , (c) , (d) .
(v) Let
X be a Banach space. Then
resp.
resp.
resp.
The following lemma will be employed in the proofs of this paper.
Lemma 1. is continuously increasing on .
2. James Type Constant Related to Metric
For the sake of revealing the origin of
, we first bring up the following notion of metric. It is easy to see
is a metric on
X, and then we can easily transform
into following term.
Let
. Then
is a metric on
X. Thus we consider the following symmetric James type constant:
Theorem 1. Let X be a Banach space. Then Proof. Similarly, we can deduce that
Therefore,
which implies that
On the other hand, since
and
therefore,
i.e.,
. □
Proposition 1. Let X be a Banach space. Then Proof. For any
, since
and
therefore,
which implies that
namely,
. □
Example 1. Let X be the space .
By utilizing Proposition 1 and results from [
17],
we can easily obtain
If
, let
. Then
If
, let
. Then
Proposition 2. Let X be a non-trivial Banach space. Then Proof. By utilizing result from James constant
[
1],
By employing Lemma 1 and Proposition 1, we obtain
On the other hand, by utilizing Theorem 10 in [
18], we can deduce that there exist
such that
which shows
This completes the proof. □
Theorem 2. Let X be Hilbert space. Then .
Proof. Assume that
X is Hilbert space, then
For any
, let
. By utilizing Lemma 1, we have
In addition, since , then , which implies that .
Thus
i.e.,
. □
In order to reveal the relationship between and the uniform smoothness, the aforementioned constant will be employed in the following theorems and corollaries.
Theorem 3. Let X be a Banach space. Then Proof. Let
. Then
and
Therefore,
i.e.,
.
This completes the proof. □
Corollary 1. Let X be a Banach space. Then Proof. For any
, we can deduce that
By utilizing Lemma 1 and Proposition 1, we obtain
This completes the proof. □
Corollary 2. Let X be a Banach space. Then Proof. Since
X is a Banach space, and by [
6], we have
By employing Theorem 1, we obtain
This completes the proof. □
Next, we will consider the dual space , and manage to bring out the relationship between and by utilizing the aforementioned theorem.
Theorem 4. Let X be a Banach space. Then Proof. By utilizing Theorem 1, we have
By employing Lemma 1, we have
and
This completes the proof. □
Theorem 5. Let X be a non-trivial Banach space. Then if and only if X is uniformly non-square.
Proof. According to the definition of uniformly non-square, there exists a
such that for any
, either
or
. We first consider the case
. Then we have
In the case
, by utilizing the same method above, we can obtain that
Furthermore, if , by applying Theorem 1, , then X is uniformly non-square. This completes the proof. □
Next, we consider the uniform normal structure of
. The concept of normal structure plays an important role in Banach space geometry and fixed point theory. It was proved by Kirk [
19] that every reflexive Banach space with normal structure has the fixed point property. We recall a lemma from Dhompongsa et al. [
3] as follows.
Lemma 2. Let X be a Banach space with . Then X has uniformly normal structure.
Theorem 6. Let X be a Banach space. If , then X has uniformly normal structure.
Proof. Since
, by employing Theorem 1, we have
hence
By utilizing Lemma 2, we obtain that X has uniformly normal structure. □
4. James Type Constant
In this section, we will discuss the last James type constant
by utilizing several heuristic ideas from the investigation of the constant
proposed by Takahashi and Kato [
14]. By considering the extension of the domain of the James constant from
to
, we can define the symmetric constant
as follows.
Obviously, for all Banach space
X,
Theorem 10. Let X be a Banach space. Then Proof. For any
satisfying
, we have
and
hence
Therefore,
which implies that
.
To prove the right-hand side of the inequalities, we use the following fact that
hence
which implies that
This completes the proof. □
Proposition 3. Let X be a Banach space. Then Proof. Let
and
,
. Then, since
, we have
with some
. Now let
and
. Then
and we have
and
Conversely, let and . Let and . Then , and then the opposite inequality holds. □
Proposition 4. Let X be a Banach space. Then Proof. This completes the proof. □
Theorem 11. Let X be a Banach space. Then Proof. For any satisfying , of course we have . Then we get for Banach space X.
However, it is well-known that
By employing Proposition 4, we have
for some
. Since
from [
6], then we have
This completes the proof. □
Corollary 3. Let X be a Banach space. Thenand the equality holds only if and . Proof. Let
. Then
is strictly increasing on
, and decreasing on
. Since
, it follows from the aforementioned inequality that
The latter assertion is easily deduced. □
Corollary 4. Let X be a Banach space. Then Proof. By [
7], we have
. Then
and
Therefore we complete the proof. □
Example 3. Let X be , . Then , where .
By [
14],
, along with Theorems 10 and 11, we get
which implies that
Example 4. Let X be endowed with normfor . By [
14], we know that
.
Furthermore, let
,
,
. Obviously,
. Then
Therefore,
which implies that
. We know that
from [
5]. Then
.
Theorem 12. Let X be a Banach space. Then X is a Hilbert space if and only if .
Proof. By [
14],
X is a Hilbert space if and only if
, and
by [
1]; we can easily obtain
by the inequality
. □
Theorem 13. Let X be a Banach space. Then if and only if X is uniformly non-square.
Proof. If
X is uniformly non-square, by [
14], we have
, then
. Conversely, if
, then
, which implies that
X is uniformly non-square. □