Next Article in Journal
Does Presentation Duration Modulate the Effect of Task on Perceptual Organization?
Next Article in Special Issue
Bilateral Correlational Behavior of Pyroglutamate Aminopeptidase I Activity in Rat Photoneuroendocrine Locations During a Standard 12:12 h Light–Dark Cycle
Previous Article in Journal
Symmetrical Generalized Pareto Dominance and Adjusted Reference Vector Cooperative Evolutionary Algorithm for Many-Objective Optimization
Previous Article in Special Issue
Navicular Drop Height Asymmetry as an Intrinsic Risk Factor for Lower Limb Injury in Male Recreational Athletes
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Symmetry
Volume 16
Issue 11
10.3390/sym16111485
symmetry-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Motor Asymmetry in Football: Implications for Muscular Power, Balance, and Injury Prevention

by
Monoem Haddad
Coaching Sciences Department, College of Sport Sciences, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar
Symmetry 2024, 16(11), 1485; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16111485
Submission received: 12 September 2024 / Revised: 13 October 2024 / Accepted: 21 October 2024 / Published: 7 November 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Symmetry/Asymmetry in Life Sciences: Feature Papers 2024)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This review explores the prevalence and impacts of muscular power and dynamic balance motor asymmetry among football players, emphasizing its impact on performance and injury risk. Motor asymmetry frequently occurs in football, largely due to the sport’s specific demands, including the frequent use of one leg for kicking and passing. While some motor asymmetry may lead to functional specialization and does not always hinder performance, significant imbalances are often linked to an increased risk of injuries, particularly to the lower extremities. Dynamic balance motor asymmetry is also associated with a higher risk of non-contact injuries, underscoring the importance of joint stability in preventing such injuries. However, the direct impact of balance motor asymmetry on performance metrics like sprint speed and agility is less definitive, suggesting that compensatory mechanisms or training adaptations could mitigate potential negative effects. Technological advances in assessment, such as motion capture systems and wearable devices, have enhanced the precision of asymmetry evaluations, enabling more targeted interventions. In addition, personalized training interventions, informed by real-time data from these technologies, allow for tailored rehabilitation and performance optimization, addressing asymmetry-related risks early. Despite these technological advancements, there is a significant gap in understanding how motor asymmetry affects underrepresented groups, such as female football players and youth athletes. Further research is needed to investigate motor asymmetry in these populations, particularly to assess the long-term impact on injury risk and performance. Addressing these gaps will provide valuable insights into the development of gender- and age-specific training interventions. This review recommends a multidisciplinary approach, integrating biomechanics, sports medicine, and coaching insights, to develop comprehensive strategies for managing motor asymmetry in football. Such strategies, supported by real-time monitoring and tailored interventions, will be crucial for optimizing player performance, minimizing injury risk, and improving training and rehabilitation programs tailored to the diverse needs of football players.

1. Introduction

Motor asymmetry in muscular power and balance between the dominant and non-dominant legs is a critical area of research in football, a sport where bilateral coordination and strength are essential for optimal performance. Motor asymmetry refers to the differences in strength, balance, or coordination between the two sides of the body, which can significantly impact athletic performance and injury risk [1]. Technological advancements, such as motion capture systems, force plates, and wearable sensors, have become indispensable tools for detecting asymmetry, allowing coaches to design interventions that address these imbalances early [2]. These personalized interventions, based on real-time data, play a crucial role in preventing injuries and optimizing player performance by addressing asymmetry-related risks before they develop into chronic issues [3,4]. Early detection through these devices allows for more targeted rehabilitation protocols, improving recovery and performance outcomes [5].
This phenomenon is not limited to football; it is observed across various sports due to repetitive, sport-specific movements that favor one side of the body over the other. For example, in tennis, players often develop substantial strength differences between their dominant and non-dominant arms as a result of repeated serving and stroke mechanics [6]. Most research to date has focused on male football players, leaving gaps in understanding how motor asymmetry manifests in other populations, such as female football players and youth athletes. These groups may experience different injury risks or performance impacts due to physiological and biomechanical differences [5,7]. Addressing these gaps is crucial for developing tailored training interventions that mitigate injury risk and optimize performance across all populations [8]. Similarly, in basketball, asymmetries arise between the shooting and non-shooting arms, potentially affecting both performance and injury susceptibility [9]. In rugby, particularly among forwards, leg asymmetries are commonly observed due to the physical demands of scrummaging, where players push off one leg more frequently [10]. Additionally, studies have shown that runners often exhibit asymmetry in leg strength and coordination, which can increase the risk of overuse injuries, particularly in the lower limbs [11]. In baseball, pitchers demonstrate marked upper body asymmetries, as repeated throwing leads to significant differences in muscle mass and coordination between the throwing and non-throwing arms [12]. These examples from various sports highlight the widespread presence of motor asymmetry and underscore the importance of managing asymmetry to optimize performance and minimize injury risk.
Football players are often required to perform complex maneuvers, such as rapid changes in direction, high-intensity sprints, and precise ball control, which demand synchronized efforts from both legs [13]. However, due to the repetitive and specialized nature of football, where one leg is predominantly used for actions like kicking and passing, players often develop muscular power and balance asymmetries [5,14]. Research into leg motor asymmetry in football gained significant attention in the early 2000s as sports scientists and coaches sought to better understand the implications of these asymmetries for player performance and injury prevention [15]. Early studies highlighted the potential risks associated with strength imbalances between the legs, suggesting that players with significant asymmetries were more prone to injuries, particularly in the hamstrings [15,16]. These findings led to further investigation into the prevalence and effects of motor asymmetry in football players, resulting in the development of various assessment tools and methodologies, such as the Y-balance test and the countermovement jump, to quantify motor asymmetry and its impact on athletic performance [17,18]. Similar patterns of imbalance and performance impacts have been observed in other high-intensity sports, such as Taekwondo, where heart rate and training load fluctuations during non-specific and sport-specific aerobic training provided significant insights into injury prevention and management strategies [19]. These findings highlight the importance of monitoring both general and sport-specific loads to mitigate the risk of injury in football players.
The study by Haddad et al. [20] provided a foundational analysis of leg motor asymmetry in football players, showing no significant differences between the dominant and non-dominant legs in a cohort of sub-elite football players. This study challenged the prevailing notion that leg motor asymmetry was inherently detrimental to performance and opened new avenues for research exploring the nuanced relationship between motor asymmetry, performance, and injury risk in football. Along with this study, other literature has examined various aspects of motor asymmetry in football players, focusing on the role of muscular power motor asymmetry in influencing sprint speed, agility, and jumping performance, as well as the implications of dynamic balance motor asymmetry for injury prevention [5,21]. For instance, Bishop et al. [5] conducted a systematic review of the effects of motor asymmetry on sports performance, finding that while some degree of motor asymmetry is common among football players, its impact on performance and injury risk is not as straightforward as previously thought. This review highlighted the need for a more nuanced understanding of how motor asymmetry affects different aspects of athletic performance and emphasized the importance of considering individual player characteristics and training contexts [5].
Dynamic balance, a key component of athletic performance in football, has also been a focus of research in the context of motor asymmetry. Studies such as those by Plisky et al. [17] and Gonell et al. [22] have demonstrated that dynamic balance motor asymmetry can be indicative of injury risk, particularly in lower-extremity injuries. Additionally, external factors such as fatigue, stress, and muscle soreness, which influence perceived exertion, can exacerbate balance motor asymmetry and injury risk during submaximal effort tasks [23]. Monitoring these variables is crucial for developing effective training and rehabilitation programs tailored to individual players’ needs. However, the relationship between dynamic balance motor asymmetry and performance remains complex, with some studies suggesting that motor asymmetry is not always a predictor of poor performance. Meylan et al. [21], for example, found that dynamic balance motor asymmetry did not significantly impact sprint performance in elite football players, indicating that the effects of motor asymmetry may vary depending on the specific demands of the sport and the individual player’s biomechanical characteristics [21].
The debate over the significance of motor asymmetry in football players has led to diverse hypotheses and conflicting findings in the literature. While some researchers advocate for minimizing motor asymmetry to reduce injury risk and enhance performance [24,25], others argue that asymmetry is a natural consequence of sport-specific training and may even be advantageous in certain contexts. For example, Wong et al. [26] suggested that a certain level of asymmetry might allow players to specialize in specific tasks with each leg, such as using one leg predominantly for kicking while using the other for stabilizing during maneuvers. This perspective challenges the traditional view that symmetry is always beneficial and highlights the need for individualized assessments and training programs that consider each player’s unique needs and characteristics [27,28].
Methodological advancements in recent years have further enriched the study of motor asymmetry in football players. The development of high-precision motion capture systems, force plates, and wearable technology has revolutionized the assessment of motor asymmetry, providing more accurate and reliable data on how differences in leg strength and balance affect performance and injury risk [18,29]. These technologies, coupled with methods such as session RPE, have improved the monitoring of training loads and the ecological validity of motor asymmetry assessments, particularly in high-performance settings [30]. Such combined approaches offer coaches and practitioners real-time feedback to adjust training loads and reduce motor asymmetry-related risks. The integration of inertial measurement units (IMUs), for example, allows for continuous monitoring of motor asymmetry during training and matches, offering real-time feedback to coaches and athletes [31,32]. These technological innovations have enabled researchers to explore the nuances of motor asymmetry in greater detail and have contributed to a more comprehensive understanding of its implications for football performance [5,33].
Despite significant progress, there remain several gaps in the literature on motor asymmetry in football players. Most studies have focused on male athletes, with limited research on female players, youth athletes, and players in different positions [5,34]. Additionally, the long-term effects of motor asymmetry on performance and injury risk are not well understood, underscoring the need for longitudinal studies that track changes in motor asymmetry over time with different training regimens and playing styles [35,36]. Furthermore, there is a need for more research on the effects of specific training interventions designed to address or exploit motor asymmetry, which could provide valuable insights into optimizing performance and reducing injury risk [28,37].
In conclusion, the study of motor asymmetry in football players has evolved significantly over the past 20 years, driven by a growing recognition of its importance for performance optimization and injury prevention [38]. While some level of motor asymmetry is natural and may even be beneficial in certain contexts, understanding the balance between specialization and symmetry is crucial for developing effective training programs that enhance performance and minimize injury risk [39]. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of research on motor asymmetry in football players, highlighting key findings, controversies, and future directions for this dynamic and evolving field of sports science [15,40].

2. Methods

2.1. Literature Search Strategy

A narrative review was conducted to ensure a thorough and unbiased collection of relevant literature on motor asymmetry among football players, focusing on studies published over the last 20 years. A systematic search strategy was employed to identify all pertinent studies from multiple databases, covering the period from January 2004 to June 2024, ensuring coverage of both key seminal works and recent advancements in the field.

2.2. Databases Searched

The databases searched included PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar. To maximize the retrieval of relevant articles, a variety of search terms and keywords was used. The search strategy included both specific terms related to football and general terms associated with motor asymmetry and athletic performance. The following keywords and Boolean operators were used in the search: “Soccer asymmetry”, “Soccer motor asymmetry”, “Football asymmetry”, “Football motor asymmetry”, “Leg dominance”, “Muscular power”, “Dynamic balance”, “Injury prevention”, “Biomechanics”, “Performance in athletes”, “Asymmetry in sports”, “Motor asymmetry in sports”. The search terms were used in various combinations to ensure a comprehensive search. For example, searches were conducted using terms such as “football asymmetry AND leg dominance” and “muscular power AND dynamic balance AND injury prevention.” This approach helped identify studies that specifically addressed the review’s focus while capturing a wide range of related research.

2.3. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

To ensure the relevance and quality of the articles included in the review, specific inclusion and exclusion criteria were established (Table 1).

2.4. Data Extraction and Management

After completing a comprehensive literature search across multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, the identified articles were imported into reference management software (i.e., EndNote version 21.4) for efficient organization and management. Duplicate articles were removed, and the remaining articles were screened based on their titles and abstracts, using the established inclusion and exclusion criteria.
During the screening process, articles that were unrelated to football/soccer or did not specifically address motor asymmetry in athletic performance were excluded. Following this initial screening, a set of articles met the inclusion criteria and were subjected to full-text review.
For the articles that passed the full-text review, data extraction was performed systematically using a pre-designed data extraction form. This form captured essential information such as the study title and authors, year of publication, journal name and volume/issue number, study design and methodology, sample size and characteristics (e.g., age, gender, playing level), key findings related to motor asymmetry in football players, conclusions, and implications for practice and future research.
This structured approach to data extraction ensured both consistency and accuracy in capturing relevant information from each study, while avoiding redundancy. In response to reviewer feedback, additional references were incorporated during the revision process, further enriching the manuscript with up-to-date studies.

2.5. Quality Assessment

To evaluate the quality of the included studies, a standardized quality assessment tool was applied. The tool was selected based on its suitability for the types of studies (e.g., observational studies, randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews). Key criteria for quality assessment included:
  • Study design and methodology (e.g., sample size, control groups, blinding)
  • Data collection methods and tools (e.g., reliability and validity of measurement instruments)
  • Statistical analysis and reporting of results (e.g., appropriateness of statistical tests, clarity of data presentation)
  • Discussion and interpretation of findings (e.g., consideration of limitations, implications for practice)

2.6. Synthesis of Findings

The findings from the included studies were synthesized using a narrative approach. This method was chosen due to the heterogeneous nature of the studies, which varied in terms of design, sample characteristics, and measured outcomes. A narrative synthesis enabled a comprehensive exploration of the key themes and patterns that emerged from the literature, providing a detailed overview of the current state of research on motor asymmetry in football players.
The synthesis focused on several key areas, including:
  • The prevalence and impact of muscular power motor asymmetry on performance and injury risk.
  • The role of dynamic balance motor asymmetry in predicting injuries and its implications for training and rehabilitation.
  • Methodological advancements in assessing motor asymmetry and their contribution to a more nuanced understanding of the topic.
  • Gaps in the current literature and recommendations for future research.

3. Muscular Power Asymmetry

Muscular power asymmetry refers to the differences in strength and power output between the dominant and non-dominant legs of football players. This aspect of motor asymmetry has been extensively studied due to its potential implications for performance and injury risk. The existing literature suggests that while some degree of asymmetry is common among football players, its impact on performance varies depending on the level of motor asymmetry and the specific demands of the sport [24,25].
Several studies have investigated the prevalence of muscular power motor asymmetry in football players. For instance, Menzel et al. [25] found that lower limb asymmetries, as measured by isokinetic and vertical jump tests, were present in professional football players, with motor asymmetry levels ranging between 10% and 15% for most athletes. Similarly, Lockie et al. [24] reported that unilateral jumping ability and asymmetry significantly affected multidirectional speed, which is crucial for football performance.
However, the relationship between muscular power asymmetry and injury risk is complex, and not fully understood. While some research suggests that higher levels of asymmetry may increase the risk of injury, particularly to the lower extremities [15], other studies have found no significant correlation between motor asymmetry and injury rates [5]. For example, DeLang et al. [14] conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis and found that although the dominant leg was more likely to get injured, the extent of muscular power asymmetry was not a consistent predictor of injury across all studies.
Interestingly, some studies suggest that a certain level of motor asymmetry might be beneficial for performance. Wong et al. [26] demonstrated that football players often use their dominant leg for kicking and other precision tasks while relying on their non-dominant leg for balance and support. This specialization might explain why some degree of motor asymmetry does not necessarily impair performance and may, in some cases, enhance it. Moreover, Bishop et al. [5] suggested that the context in which motor asymmetry is present—such as the player’s position, style of play, and specific physical demands—could significantly influence whether motor asymmetry is advantageous or detrimental.

4. Dynamic Balance Asymmetry

Dynamic balance is another critical component of football performance, affecting a player’s ability to maintain stability while performing movements involving rapid changes in direction or speed [17,22]. The Y-balance test is a commonly used assessment tool to measure dynamic balance and has been widely employed in studies examining motor asymmetry in football players [17,18].
Research indicates that dynamic balance asymmetry can be an important predictor of injury, particularly in the lower extremities. Gonell et al. [22] found that football players with significant asymmetries in dynamic balance were at a higher risk of sustaining non-contact injuries, such as sprains and strains. This finding aligns with the broader literature, suggesting that balance impairments can compromise joint stability and increase the likelihood of injury during dynamic activities [18].
However, the impact of dynamic balance asymmetry on performance is less clear. Meylan et al. [21] investigated the relationship between dynamic balance asymmetry and sprint performance in elite football players and found no significant impact. This suggests that while dynamic balance asymmetry may contribute to injury risk, its effect on performance may be less pronounced. Factors such as compensatory strategies used by players, their overall athleticism, and specific training interventions may mitigate the negative effects of motor asymmetry on performance [20].
Furthermore, the degree of acceptable motor asymmetry in dynamic balance may vary depending on the player’s position and role within the team. For example, defenders and goalkeepers, who frequently engage in lateral movements and directional changes, may be more affected by balance asymmetries than midfielders or forwards, who rely more on speed and agility. This position-specific consideration is crucial for developing tailored training programs that address the unique needs of each player [34].

5. Impact on Performance and Injury Prevention

The impact of motor asymmetry on performance and injury prevention in football is a subject of ongoing debate. While some researchers argue that minimizing motor asymmetry is essential for optimizing performance and reducing injury risk, others contend that a certain level of motor asymmetry is natural and may even be beneficial [5,24].
Performance metrics in football, such as sprint speed, agility, and jump performance, have been studied extensively in the context of motor asymmetry. For example, Lockie et al. [24] found that players with lower motor asymmetry in jumping ability exhibited better multidirectional speed, a key performance indicator in football. Similarly, Menzel et al. [25] reported that asymmetries in isokinetic strength were associated with reduced performance in explosive activities, such as jumping and sprinting.
On the other hand, some studies suggest that motor asymmetry might not always negatively impact performance. For instance, Bini and Hume [27] examined pedal force motor asymmetry in cyclists and found that a moderate level of asymmetry did not impair time trial performance. While this study was conducted in a different sport, it highlights the possibility that some motor asymmetry may be acceptable, particularly if it aligns with the athlete’s specific movement patterns and biomechanical demands.
Regarding injury prevention, there is evidence to suggest that addressing motor asymmetry can reduce the risk of injury in football players. Croisier et al. [15] demonstrated that targeted training interventions to correct strength imbalances significantly reduced hamstring injury rates among professional football players. This finding underscores the importance of identifying and addressing asymmetries through individualized training programs to enhance performance and minimize injury risk.
However, the effectiveness of these interventions may depend on the nature and extent of the motor asymmetry. For example, Fousekis et al. [41] found that intrinsic risk factors, such as flexibility and strength imbalances, were significant predictors of non-contact muscle injuries in professional football players. These findings suggest that a comprehensive approach to injury prevention, which considers multiple factors beyond just motor asymmetry, is essential for optimizing player health and performance.
Coaching strategies aimed at addressing leg asymmetry in football typically involve a combination of strength training, neuromuscular coordination drills, and dynamic balance exercises [5,42,43,44,45,46]. These interventions are designed to reduce the risks associated with significant muscular imbalances between the dominant and non-dominant legs. A common approach involves single-leg training exercises (e.g., single-leg squats, lunges, and unilateral plyometric drills) that specifically target strength deficiencies and improve balance in the weaker leg, thereby promoting more symmetrical muscular development [5,47,48].
Additionally, sport-specific drills that require players to use their non-dominant leg for ball control and passing can help improve leg coordination and reduce functional asymmetry during gameplay [7]. This approach allows for more biomechanical efficiency and lowers the risk of non-contact injuries, especially hamstring strains and ligament injuries, which are often associated with leg asymmetry [14].
Electronic devices, such as motion capture systems, force plates, and inertial measurement units (IMUs), play a critical role in the objective assessment of motor asymmetry during both training and matches [49,50]. These technologies allow coaches to track real-time asymmetry metrics, providing instant feedback on how well players are maintaining balance and coordination under varying conditions [2,50]. For example, wearable sensors can continuously monitor force output and movement patterns, enabling coaches to adjust training loads based on individual player data [51,52]. This precise monitoring helps to personalize rehabilitation protocols and optimize performance by identifying asymmetry-related risks early, ensuring that interventions are tailored to each player’s needs [42,53,54].

6. Controversies and Divergent Hypotheses

Motor asymmetry in football players has generated ongoing debate among researchers, particularly regarding its impact on performance and injury risk. The primary point of contention revolves around whether motor asymmetry inherently leads to increased injury risk, or if a certain level of asymmetry can be functional and beneficial for performance, especially in tasks that require unilateral actions, such as kicking, dribbling, or changing direction.
Many studies have emphasized the negative impact of asymmetry on injury risk, particularly in the lower extremities. Research has shown that significant discrepancies in strength, flexibility, or balance between limbs can predispose athletes to non-contact injuries such as anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears, hamstring strains, and ankle sprains [5,42,55]. For instance, Exell et al. [56] found that soccer players with greater lower-limb asymmetry were more prone to muscle injuries over a competitive season. This supports earlier findings by Hart et al. [57], which linked asymmetry in hamstring strength to a higher risk of hamstring strain injuries. These studies suggest that asymmetry disrupts neuromuscular coordination and joint stability, leading to inefficient movement patterns that increase injury susceptibility.
However, injury risk may also depend on the severity of the asymmetry. While severe imbalances can lead to acute or overuse injuries, moderate levels of asymmetry might not always have such detrimental effects. Bishop et al. [5] concluded that small degrees of asymmetry in balance and strength might not necessarily increase injury risk and could even enhance specific task performance by allowing functional specialization of the limbs.
In contrast, some researchers argue that moderate levels of asymmetry may be functional and beneficial for athletic performance. For example, in football, the dominant leg is often tasked with precision movements like kicking and passing, while the non-dominant leg is used for stability and support [58,59,60]. This specialization may naturally lead to asymmetry but without negative consequences if the player’s training compensates for potential weaknesses. The review by Fox et al. [61] revealed that lower-limb strength asymmetry did not consistently impair performance in elite athletes, with some studies showing no significant effects on jump or sprint performance. However, the review also noted variability across studies, suggesting that the impact of asymmetry may be task-specific and that further research is required to fully understand its implications for performance.
The existing research is largely cross-sectional, limiting our understanding of the long-term effects of motor asymmetry on performance and injury risk. Cross-sectional studies provide valuable snapshots of asymmetry at a single point in time, but they fail to capture its dynamic nature across different training phases, competition periods, and recovery stages. Bishop et al. [5] note the complexity in assessing the fluctuating nature of asymmetry during various training loads and its inconsistent impact on performance. To better understand how asymmetry evolves over time, longitudinal studies are necessary. These would help to determine whether motor asymmetry can be managed through targeted training interventions or if it naturally resolves with consistent training and rehabilitation. Such studies would also enable researchers to distinguish between harmful asymmetry that increases injury risk and functional adaptations that may optimize performance in specific tasks [55,56].

7. Gender and Age-Related Differences in Motor Asymmetry

Motor asymmetry research has traditionally focused on male football players, leaving gaps in understanding how these asymmetries manifest in female athletes and youth players. The literature on motor asymmetry in female football players is scarce, with most studies concentrating on elite male players. However, the physiological and biomechanical differences between genders suggest that motor asymmetry might affect female players differently [14,62].
For instance, female athletes tend to have different muscle recruitment patterns and are more prone to certain types of injuries, such as ACL injuries [63]. These differences may be linked to motor asymmetry, as asymmetry in lower-limb strength and dynamic balance could contribute to a higher risk of ACL injury. Further research is needed to determine whether reducing motor asymmetry could help mitigate these injury risks in female football players [5,7].
Additionally, youth athletes are another underrepresented group in motor asymmetry research. During adolescence, when young athletes are still developing coordination and strength, they may exhibit different asymmetry patterns compared to adults [8]. Longitudinal studies tracking the evolution of motor asymmetry from youth to adulthood could provide valuable insights into injury prevention and performance optimization for young football players [64,65,66,67,68,69].

8. Methodological Advances and Future Directions

Methodological advancements in recent years have significantly enriched the study of motor asymmetry in football players. The development of high-precision motion capture systems, force plates, and wearable technology has revolutionized the assessment of motor asymmetry, providing more accurate and reliable data on how differences in leg strength and balance affect performance and injury risk [18,29].
For example, the integration of inertial measurement units (IMUs) has enabled continuous monitoring of motor asymmetry during training and matches, offering real-time feedback to coaches and athletes [31,32]. These tools allow for more proactive intervention strategies by detecting asymmetry early and providing real-time data to coaches, enabling personalized training and rehabilitation programs aimed at reducing injury risk and optimizing performance [3,4]. This precise monitoring has also shown promise in long-term asymmetry management, particularly by adjusting training loads based on real-time insights [5]. These technological innovations have allowed researchers to explore the nuances of motor asymmetry in greater detail, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of its implications for football performance.
Despite significant progress, several gaps remain in the literature on motor asymmetry in football players. Most studies have focused on male athletes, with limited research on female players, youth athletes, and players in different positions [5,34]. Expanding research to these underrepresented groups is essential to develop interventions that cater to the unique physiological and biomechanical characteristics of these populations [14]. Additionally, the long-term effects of motor asymmetry on performance and injury risk are not well understood, underscoring the need for longitudinal studies that track changes in asymmetry over time with different training regimens and playing styles [35,41].
Furthermore, more research is needed on the effects of specific training interventions designed to address or exploit motor asymmetry, which could provide valuable insights into optimizing performance and reducing injury risk [28,37]. Single-leg strength training, plyometric drills, and neuromuscular coordination exercises have shown promise in correcting asymmetry, but more longitudinal studies are required to validate their effectiveness across different populations and age groups [57,70]. Developing a deeper understanding of the role of motor asymmetry in football will require a multidisciplinary approach, incorporating insights from biomechanics, sports medicine, and coaching to create tailored training programs that address the unique needs of each player.

9. Conclusions

The present review of motor asymmetry in football players underscores the complexity of its impact on performance and injury risk. Muscular power asymmetry, often resulting from the sport’s specific demands, is prevalent among football players. While some degree of motor asymmetry may allow for functional specialization, significant imbalances are frequently associated with an increased risk of injuries, particularly to the lower extremities. This relationship highlights the necessity of individualized assessments and interventions tailored to each player’s unique physical characteristics and playing roles.
Dynamic balance asymmetry is similarly linked to a higher risk of non-contact injuries due to compromised joint stability, although its direct effect on performance metrics such as sprint speed and agility is less definitive. This suggests that while balance asymmetry may contribute to injury risk, its impact on performance could be mitigated through compensatory strategies or training adaptations.
Advancements in assessment technologies have significantly enhanced our understanding of motor asymmetry in football, allowing for more precise and targeted interventions. Technological tools, such as motion capture systems, force plates, and wearable sensors, offer real-time data on motor asymmetry, enabling early detection and more personalized interventions. These devices allow for continuous monitoring of asymmetry throughout the season, helping coaches adjust training loads and prevent overuse injuries. By using real-time data, coaches can design tailored training and rehabilitation programs that address each player’s specific needs, reducing injury risk and enhancing performance. Despite these advancements, further research is needed to explore the long-term effects of motor asymmetry across different player demographics. In particular, there is a notable lack of research on female football players and youth athletes, who may experience different injury risks and performance impacts due to their physiological and biomechanical characteristics. Addressing these gaps is essential for developing more targeted training interventions that can help mitigate injury risk and optimize performance across all football populations.
Future research should focus on expanding our knowledge of motor asymmetry in these underrepresented groups, as well as evaluating the effectiveness of specific training and rehabilitation programs designed to reduce asymmetry-related risks. A multidisciplinary approach, integrating insights from biomechanics, sports medicine, and coaching, is crucial for developing comprehensive strategies that are adaptable to the diverse needs of football players. Such strategies will not only optimize player performance but also contribute to more effective injury prevention and rehabilitation programs, ensuring that all athletes, regardless of gender or age, can perform at their best while minimizing their risk of injury.

Funding

The publication is supported by Qatar University Internal Grant (QUCG-CED-24/25-495).

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Zifchock, R.A.; Davis, I.; Hamill, J. Kinetic asymmetry in female runners with and without retrospective tibial stress fractures. J. Biomech. 2006, 39, 2792–2797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Marques, J.B.; Mc Auliffe, S.; Thomson, A.; Sideris, V.; Santiago, P.; Read, P.J. The use of wearable technology as an assessment tool to identify between-limb differences during functional tasks following ACL reconstruction. A scoping review. Phys. Ther. Sport 2022, 55, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bell, D.R.; Sanfilippo, J.L.; Binkley, N.; Heiderscheit, B.C. Lean mass asymmetry influences force and power asymmetry during jumping in collegiate athletes. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2014, 28, 884–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gabbett, T.J.; Kennelly, S.; Sheehan, J.; Hawkins, R.; Milsom, J.; King, E.; Whiteley, R.; Ekstrand, J. If overuse injury is a ‘training load error’, should undertraining be viewed the same way? Br. J. Sports Med. 2016, 50, 1017–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bishop, C.; Turner, A.; Read, P. Effects of inter-limb asymmetries on physical and sports performance: A systematic review. J. Sports Sci. 2018, 36, 1135–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kovacs, M.S. Tennis physiology: Training the competitive athlete. Sports Med. 2007, 37, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Loturco, I.; Pereira, L.A.; Kobal, R.; Abad, C.C.; Rosseti, M.; Carpes, F.P.; Bishop, C. Do asymmetry scores influence speed and power performance in elite female soccer players? Biol. Sport 2019, 36, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Myer, G.D.; Ford, K.R.; Paterno, M.V.; Nick, T.G.; Hewett, T.E. The effects of generalized joint laxity on risk of anterior cruciate ligament injury in young female athletes. Am. J. Sports Med. 2008, 36, 1073–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. McGill, S.M.; Andersen, J.T.; Horne, A.D. Predicting performance and injury resilience from movement quality and fitness scores in a basketball team over 2 years. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2012, 26, 1731–1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Quarrie, K.L.; Wilson, B. Force production in the rugby union scrum. J. Sports Sci. 2000, 18, 237–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Schmitz, A.; Russo, K.; Edwards, L.; Noehren, B. Do novice runners have weak hips and bad running form? Gait Posture 2014, 40, 82–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Dines, J.S.; Frank, J.B.; Akerman, M.; Yocum, L.A. Glenohumeral internal rotation deficits in baseball players with ulnar collateral ligament insufficiency. Am. J. Sports Med. 2009, 37, 566–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Barnes, C.; Archer, D.T.; Hogg, B.; Bush, M.; Bradley, P.S. The evolution of physical and technical performance parameters in the English Premier League. Int. J. Sports Med. 2014, 35, 1095–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. DeLang, M.D.; Salamh, P.A.; Farooq, A.; Tabben, M.; Whiteley, R.; van Dyk, N.; Chamari, K. The dominant leg is more likely to get injured in soccer players: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Biol. Sport 2021, 38, 397–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Croisier, J.L.; Ganteaume, S.; Binet, J.; Genty, M.; Ferret, J.M. Strength imbalances and prevention of hamstring injury in professional soccer players: A prospective study. Am. J. Sports Med. 2008, 36, 1469–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Impellizzeri, F.M.; Marcora, S.M.; Coutts, A.J. Internal and external training load: 15 years on. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 2019, 14, 270–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Plisky, P.J.; Gorman, P.P.; Butler, R.J.; Kiesel, K.B.; Underwood, F.B.; Elkins, B. The reliability of an instrumented device for measuring components of the star excursion balance test. N. Am. J. Sports Phys. Ther. 2009, 4, 92–99. [Google Scholar]
  18. Gribble, P.A.; Kelly, S.E.; Refshauge, K.M.; Hiller, C.E. Interrater reliability of the star excursion balance test. J. Athl. Train. 2013, 48, 621–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Haddad, M.; Chaouachi, A.; Wong, D.P.; Castagna, C.; Chamari, K. Heart rate responses and training load during nonspecific and specific aerobic training in adolescent taekwondo athletes. J. Hum. Kinet. 2011, 29, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Haddad, M.; Abbes, Z.; Zarrouk, N.; Aganovic, Z.; Hulweh, A.; Moussa-Chamari, I.; Behm, D.G. Difference asymmetry between preferred dominant and non-dominant legs in muscular power and balance among sub-elite soccer players in Qatar. Symmetry 2023, 15, 625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Meylan, C.M.; Nosaka, K.; Green, J.; Cronin, J.B. Temporal and kinetic analysis of unilateral jumping in the vertical, horizontal, and lateral directions. J. Sports Sci. 2010, 28, 545–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Gonell, A.C.; Romero, J.A.; Soler, L.M. Relationship between the Y Balance Test Scores and Soft Tissue Injury Incidence in a Soccer Team. Int. J. Sports Phys. Ther. 2015, 10, 955–966. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Haddad, M.; Chaouachi, A.; Wong, D.P.; Castagna, C.; Hambli, M.; Hue, O.; Chamari, K. Influence of fatigue, stress, muscle soreness and sleep on perceived exertion during submaximal effort. Physiol. Behav. 2013, 119, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lockie, R.G.; Callaghan, S.J.; Berry, S.P.; Cooke, E.R.; Jordan, C.A.; Luczo, T.M.; Jeffriess, M.D. Relationship between unilateral jumping ability and asymmetry on multidirectional speed in team-sport athletes. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2014, 28, 3557–3566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Menzel, H.J.; Chagas, M.H.; Szmuchrowski, L.A.; Araujo, S.R.; de Andrade, A.G.; de Jesus-Moraleida, F.R. Analysis of lower limb asymmetries by isokinetic and vertical jump tests in soccer players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2013, 27, 1370–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wong, P.-l.; Chamari, K.; Chaouachi, A.; Wisløff, U.; Hong, Y. Difference in plantar pressure between the preferred and non-preferred feet in four soccer-related movements. Br. J. Sports Med. 2007, 41, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bini, R.R.; Hume, P.A. Relationship between pedal force asymmetry and performance in cycling time trial. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fit. 2015, 55, 892–898. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hoffman, J.R.; Ratamess, N.A.; Klatt, M.; Faigenbaum, A.D.; Kang, J. Do bilateral power deficits influence direction-specific movement patterns? Res. Sports Med. 2007, 15, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Linek, P.; Sikora, D.; Wolny, T.; Saulicz, E. Reliability and number of trials of Y Balance Test in adolescent athletes. Musculoskelet. Sci. Pract. 2017, 31, 72–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Haddad, M.; Stylianides, G.; Djaoui, L.; Dellal, A.; Chamari, K. Session-RPE Method for Training Load Monitoring: Validity, Ecological Usefulness, and Influencing Factors. Front. Neurosci. 2017, 11, 612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chamari, K.; Hachana, Y.; Ahmed, Y.B.; Galy, O.; Sghaier, F.; Chatard, J.C.; Hue, O.; Wisloff, U. Field and laboratory testing in young elite soccer players. Br. J. Sports Med. 2004, 38, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Stiffler, M.R.; Sanfilippo, J.L.; Brooks, M.A.; Heiderscheit, B.C. Star Excursion Balance Test Performance Varies by Sport in Healthy Division I Collegiate Athletes. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 2015, 45, 772–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Mujika, I.; Padilla, S. Scientific bases for precompetition tapering strategies. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2003, 35, 1182–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Castagna, C.; Castellini, E. Vertical jump performance in Italian male and female national team soccer players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2013, 27, 1156–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Reilly, T.; Atkinson, G.; Edwards, B.; Waterhouse, J.; Farrelly, K.; Fairhurst, E. Diurnal variation in temperature, mental and physical performance, and tasks specifically related to football (soccer). Chronobiol. Int. 2007, 24, 507–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Fousekis, K.; Tsepis, E.; Poulmedis, P.; Athanasopoulos, S.; Vagenas, G. Intrinsic risk factors of non-contact quadriceps and hamstring strains in soccer: A prospective study of 100 professional players. Br. J. Sports Med. 2011, 45, 709–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Teixeira, L.A. Categories of manual asymmetry and their variation with advancing age. Cortex 2008, 44, 707–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, P.; Ensink, E.; Lang, S.; Marshall, L.; Schilthuis, M.; Lamp, J.; Vega, I.; Labrie, V. Hemispheric asymmetry in the human brain and in Parkinson’s disease is linked to divergent epigenetic patterns in neurons. Genome Biol. 2020, 21, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Augustsson, J.; Thomeé, R.; Karlsson, J. Ability of a new hop test to determine functional deficits after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2004, 12, 350–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sawyer, D.T.; Ostarello, J.Z.; Suess, E.A.; Dempsey, M. Relationship between football playing ability and selected performance measures. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2002, 16, 611–616. [Google Scholar]
  41. Fousekis, K.; Tsepis, E.; Vagenas, G. Multivariate isokinetic strength asymmetries of the knee and ankle in professional soccer players. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fit. 2010, 50, 465–474. [Google Scholar]
  42. Read, P.J.; Oliver, J.L.; De Ste Croix, M.B.; Myer, G.D.; Lloyd, R.S. Neuromuscular risk factors for knee and ankle ligament injuries in male youth soccer players. Sports Med. 2016, 46, 1059–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Read, P.J.; Oliver, J.L.; De Ste Croix, M.; Myer, G.D.; Lloyd, R.S. A prospective investigation to evaluate risk factors for lower extremity injury risk in male youth soccer players. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2018, 28, 1244–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kolodziej, M.; Nolte, K.; Schmidt, M.; Alt, T.; Jaitner, T. Identification of neuromuscular performance parameters as risk factors of non-contact injuries in male elite youth soccer players: A preliminary study on 62 players with 25 non-contact injuries. Front. Sports Act. Living 2021, 3, 615330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hietamo, J.; Rantala, A.; Parkkari, J.; Leppänen, M.; Rossi, M.; Heinonen, A.; Steffen, K.; Kannus, P.; Mattila, V.; Pasanen, K. Injury History and Perceived Knee Function as Risk Factors for Knee Injury in Youth Team-Sports Athletes. Sports Health 2023, 15, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Makuch, R.; Kucharski, A.; Pilarski, K.; Chrościcka, A.; Gała, K.; Czajka, A.; Lenard, P.; Michalska, S.; Dewicka, M.; Wawrzyniak, A.M. Knee joint injuries in football players: Types of injuries, etiology, diagnostics and prevention. Qual. Sport 2024, 15, 51945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. McCurdy, K.; O’Kelley, E.; Kutz, M.; Langford, G.; Ernest, J.; Torres, M. Comparison of lower extremity EMG between the 2-leg squat and modified single-leg squat in female athletes. J. Sport Rehabil. 2010, 19, 57–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bishop, C. Inter-limb asymmetry: Longitudinal monitoring and associations with speed and change of direction speed in elite academy soccer players. Doctoral Dissertation, Middlesex University, London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  49. Alenezi, F.; Herrington, L.; Jones, P.; Jones, R. The reliability of biomechanical variables collected during single leg squat and landing tasks. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 2014, 24, 718–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Alanen, A.; Räisänen, A.; Benson, L.; Pasanen, K. The use of inertial measurement units for analyzing change of direction movement in sports: A scoping review. Int. J. Sports Sci. Coach. 2021, 16, 1332–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Abazov, V.M.; Abbott, B.; Abolins, M.; Acharya, B.S.; Adams, D.L.; Adams, M.; Adams, T.; Agelou, M.; Agram, J.L.; Ahmed, S.N.; et al. Observation and properties of the X(3872) decaying to J/psipi(+)pi(−) in pp collisions at sqrt[s] = 1.96 TeV. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93, 162002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Haddad, M.; Hermassi, S.; Aganovic, Z.; Dalansi, F.; Kharbach, M.; Mohamed, A.O.; Bibi, K.W. Ecological Validation and Reliability of Hexoskin Wearable Body Metrics Tool in Measuring Pre-exercise and Peak Heart Rate During Shuttle Run Test in Professional Handball Players. Front. Physiol. 2020, 11, 957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Santos, F.J.; Valido, A.J.; Malcata, I.S.; Ferreira, C.C.; Pessôa Filho, D.M.; Verardi, C.E.; Espada, M.C. The relationship between preseason common screening tests to identify inter-limb asymmetries in high-level senior and professional soccer players. Symmetry 2021, 13, 1805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Beato, M.; Young, D.; Stiff, A.; Coratella, G. Lower-limb muscle strength, anterior-posterior and inter-limb asymmetry in professional, elite academy and amateur soccer players. J. Hum. Kinet. 2021, 77, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Fort-Vanmeerhaeghe, A.; Romero-Rodriguez, D.; Montalvo, A.M.; Kiefer, A.W.; Lloyd, R.S.; Myer, G.D. Integrative neuromuscular training and injury prevention in youth athletes. Part I: Identifying risk factors. Strength Cond. J. 2016, 38, 36–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Exell, T.; Irwin, G.; Gittoes, M.; Kerwin, D. Strength and performance asymmetry during maximal velocity sprint running. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2017, 27, 1273–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hart, N.H.; Nimphius, S.; Spiteri, T.; Newton, R.U. Leg strength and lean mass symmetry influences kicking performance in Australian football. J. Sports Sci. Med. 2014, 13, 157. [Google Scholar]
  58. Bittencourt, N.F.; Meeuwisse, W.; Mendonça, L.; Nettel-Aguirre, A.; Ocarino, J.; Fonseca, S. Complex systems approach for sports injuries: Moving from risk factor identification to injury pattern recognition—Narrative review and new concept. Br. J. Sports Med. 2016, 50, 1309–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Dijkstra, H.P.; Pollock, N.; Chakraverty, R.; Ardern, C.L. Return to play in elite sport: A shared decision-making process. Br. J. Sports Med. 2017, 51, 419–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Vasileiou, S.S.; Asimakidis, N.D.; Dalamitros, A.A.; Manou, V. Effects of an 8-Week In-Season Explosive Power Training Program on Neuromuscular Performance and Lower-Limb Asymmetries in Young Male Soccer Players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2024, 10–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Fox, K.T.; Pearson, L.T.; Hicks, K.M. The effect of lower inter-limb asymmetries on athletic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0286942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Leetun, D.T.; Ireland, M.L.; Willson, J.D.; Ballantyne, B.T.; Davis, I.M. Core stability measures as risk factors for lower extremity injury in athletes. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2004, 36, 926–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Hewett, T.E.; Myer, G.D.; Ford, K.R. Anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female athletes: Part 1, mechanisms and risk factors. Am. J. Sports Med. 2006, 34, 299–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Owen, A.; Dunlop, G.; Rouissi, M.; Chtara, M.; Paul, D.; Zouhal, H.; Wong, D.P. The relationship between lower-limb strength and match-related muscle damage in elite level professional European soccer players. J. Sports Sci. 2015, 33, 2100–2105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Raya-González, J.; Bishop, C.; Gómez-Piqueras, P.; Veiga, S.; Viejo-Romero, D.; Navandar, A. Strength, jumping, and change of direction speed asymmetries are not associated with athletic performance in elite academy soccer players. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 175. [Google Scholar]
  66. Torreblanca-Martínez, V.; Torreblanca-Martínez, S.; Salazar-Martínez, E. Effects of inter-limb vertical jump asymmetries on physical performance in elite soccer players under 19 years old. J. Phys. Educ. Sport 2020, 20, 2607–2613. [Google Scholar]
  67. Ascenzi, G.; Ruscello, B.; Filetti, C.; Bonanno, D.; Di Salvo, V.; Nuñez, F.J.; Mendez-Villanueva, A.; Suarez-Arrones, L. Bilateral deficit and bilateral performance: Relationship with sprinting and change of direction in elite youth soccer players. Sports 2020, 8, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Bishop, C.; Read, P.; McCubbine, J.; Turner, A. Vertical and horizontal asymmetries are related to slower sprinting and jump performance in elite youth female soccer players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2021, 35, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bishop, C.; Read, P.; Bromley, T.; Brazier, J.; Jarvis, P.; Chavda, S.; Turner, A. The association between interlimb asymmetry and athletic performance tasks: A season-long study in elite academy soccer players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2022, 36, 787–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Chaouachi, A.; Othman, A.B.; Hammami, R.; Drinkwater, E.J.; Behm, D.G. The combination of plyometric and balance training improves sprint and shuttle run performances more often than plyometric-only training with children. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2014, 28, 401–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria for the Review of Motor asymmetry in Football Players.
Table 1. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria for the Review of Motor asymmetry in Football Players.
Criteria TypeDescription
Inclusion Criteria
-
Studies published between 2004 and 2024 to focus on the most recent 20 years of research.
-
Peer-reviewed journal articles, review papers, and meta-analyses to ensure high-quality research.
-
Articles addressing motor asymmetry in football (soccer) players, including those focusing on muscular power, dynamic balance, injury prevention, and performance, with a preference for those offering unique findings or insights.
-
Studies employing quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods approaches to provide a comprehensive view of the research landscape.
Exclusion Criteria
-
Studies not related to football (soccer) or not specifically addressing motor asymmetry in athletic performance.
-
Non-peer-reviewed articles, opinion pieces, editorials, or letters to the editor to maintain a focus on empirical research.
-
Articles published in languages other than English due to resource constraints and to ensure consistency in the review process.
-
Redundant studies with similar findings to those already included, to maintain a focus on distinct contributions.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Haddad, M. Motor Asymmetry in Football: Implications for Muscular Power, Balance, and Injury Prevention. Symmetry 2024, 16, 1485. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16111485

AMA Style

Haddad M. Motor Asymmetry in Football: Implications for Muscular Power, Balance, and Injury Prevention. Symmetry. 2024; 16(11):1485. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16111485

Chicago/Turabian Style

Haddad, Monoem. 2024. "Motor Asymmetry in Football: Implications for Muscular Power, Balance, and Injury Prevention" Symmetry 16, no. 11: 1485. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16111485

APA Style

Haddad, M. (2024). Motor Asymmetry in Football: Implications for Muscular Power, Balance, and Injury Prevention. Symmetry, 16(11), 1485. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16111485

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop