Sulfidizing Behavior of Complex Lead-Silver Ore: A Flotation Study

Abstract

In this study, we investigate a low-grade oxidized lead ore containing noble metal silver, with complex mineralogy. The sulfurization behaviors of different types of lead-silver minerals at different pH values were analyzed using the chemical phase analysis method. The interactions between different types of lead-silver minerals and different types of collectors were investigated. An effective laboratory process was developed, and closed-circuit tests were carried out at industrial sites. We found that the order of difficulty for sulfidizing various lead minerals and silver minerals was (PbFe₆(OH)₁₂SO₄)₄ < PbCO₃ < PbSO₄ < Pb₅(P/As/VO₄)₃Cl; Ag₂AsS₂ < AgCl < natural-Ag. Aerophine 3418A had the best selectivity and capture capacity of the silver minerals. In the laboratory, the total recovery of lead and silver was 65.16% and 87.81%, respectively. In industrial closed-circuit testing, flotation alone was used, which produced a total lead recovery yield of 67.71%, and a total silver recovery yield of 87.64%.

1. Introduction

The Three Rivers (Sanjiang) region, which is one of the sixteen most famous regions in China, is an important source of Chinese nonferrous metals, where hundreds of deposits such as copper, lead, zinc, and silver are found. The so-called Three Rivers refers to China’s Jinsha River, Nu River, and the Lancang River. Mixed sulfide-oxide ores with extremely complex mineralogy are often found near this area. A low-grade complex oxidized lead ore taken from this area is tested in this study. This type of ore is very difficult to deal with from a mineral-processing point of view due to its complex mineralogy. Nevertheless, because of its large reserves, this type of low-grade complex oxidized lead ore is still of great significance [1,2].

It is generally known that sulfide minerals can be effectively recovered by conventional collectors such as xanthate or dithiophosphate. However, the separation between minerals is difficult. In contrast, oxidized minerals are difficult to float directly because of their higher solubilities, as well as the extensive hydration of their surfaces. Under normal conditions, the surfaces of oxidized minerals can be sulfurized by the addition of sulfide salts such as sodium sulfide, thereby reducing their solubility and hydration to facilitate the adsorption of conventional reagents on the surface [3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. The reactions are given as follows:

$${\mathrm{Na}}_2{\mathrm{S}}_{\left(\mathrm{S}\right)}\to 2{\mathrm{Na}}^{+}{}_{\left(\mathrm{aq}\right)}+{\mathrm{S}}^{2-}{}_{\left(\mathrm{aq}\right)}$$

(1)

$${\mathrm{PbCO}}_{3\left(\mathrm{s}\right)}+{\mathrm{S}}^{2-}{}_{\left(\mathrm{aq}\right)}\to {\mathrm{PbS}}_{\left(\mathrm{s}\right)}+{\mathrm{CO}}_3{{}^{2-}}_{\left(\mathrm{aq}\right)}$$

(2)

It has been found that the surfaces of oxidized lead minerals could be converted to a more insoluble lead sulfide by adding sulfide salts. Therefore, oxidized lead minerals could be collected by xanthate, and the consumption of the collectors could be reduced [10]. It is evident that pH, reaction time, and the method of conditioning have a significant impact on the solubility behavior of lead oxide minerals [11,12,13,14,15]. Lead ions in the solution can be reabsorbed as hydroxy complexes on the surface, activating or depressing the mineral As, depending on the pH of the solution [16]. A sulfidization flotation method has been used to investigate the recovery of lead and silver. Moreover, xanthate and dithiophosphate were used as collectors in the studies [17,18,19]. The flotation results indicated that Aerophine 3418A had excellent selectivity, which could dramatically reduce the total consumption of the collectors [19]. The effect of the addition of sodium sulfide on the pulp potential and amyl xanthate flotation of cerussite and galena was reported. It was found that the optimal flotation conditions occurred when the dose of sodium sulfide set the pulp potential in the range from −100 mv to 150 mv [20,21].

Due to the complex mineralogy of the minerals, different separation methods were used at different stages [13,15]. Research on minerals with extremely complex mineralogy is relatively rare, and therefore this study is an attempt to fill this gap.

The paper is organized as follows: In Section 3.1, we describe the sulfurization flotation behavior of lead oxide minerals in lead-silver ore and that of various silver minerals. Sodium sulfide (Na₂S) is a typical depressant of sulfide minerals and its depression behavior has been clearly investigated [11,12], therefore, the sulfide minerals that can be easily depressed by Na₂S are not analyzed in this part; in Section 3.2, we test the effect of several collectors on the flotation recovery of silver minerals; in Section 3.3, we design a complete flotation process, and then an industrial closed-circuit test is carried out.

2. Materials

2.1. Samples

The complex Pb-Ag ore sample investigated in this study was provided by the Huachangshan Mining Company, which is located in the Three Rivers (Sanjiang) region in LanPing county, Yunnan province, China. The ore of the Huachangshan deposit has laminar structure, banded structure, primary breccia structure, allomorphic granular structure, sulfide mold structure, and characteristics of the development of barite and siliceous rocks with hydrothermal characteristics. The characteristics of trace elements, rare earth elements, mineralogy and petrology of siliceous rocks in the Sanhedong formation of the Upper Triassic show the characteristics of submarine sedimentary hydrothermal (SEDEX) deposits. The wall rock alteration related to lead-silver mineralization is mainly silicification, carbonation, dolomitization, and fluoritization [22,23,24].

An X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometry and chemical phase analysis were used to determine the compositions of the samples, and the results are shown in

Table 1. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometry results of complex oxidized Pb-Ag ore sample (mass fraction, %).

Species	Content	Species	Content
CaO	36.1	Fe	1.77
MgO	5.03	Mn	0.12
SiO2	4.1	V	0.18
Al2O3	0.6	Cd a	112
K2O	0.14	Mo a	24
Pb	2.96	Sb a	800
Zn	0.43	As	0.66
Ag a	177	S	0.28
Cu	0.02

^a Units in g/t (g/t is short for gram per ton).

and

Table 2. Chemical phase analysis results of complex sulfide-oxidized mixed Pb-Ag ore sample (mass fraction, g/t, %).

Species	Natural-Ag	Ag2AsS2	AgCl	CuFeS2	PbS	SiO2 and Silicate	Total Ag
Ag (g/t)	21	42.5	63	1.3	15	34.2	177
Species	Pb5(P/As/VO4)3Cl	PbCO3	PbS	PbSO4	(PbFe6(OH)12SO4)4		Total Pb
Pb (%)	1.24	1.01	0.16	0.09	0.46		2.96

(Pb₅(P/As/VO₄)₃Cl is shorthand for Pb₅(PO₄)₃Cl, Pb₅(AsO₄)₃Cl and Pb₅(VO₄)₃Cl).

, respectively.

X-ray fluorescence (XRF) spectrometry used the original X-ray photons or other microscopic particles to excite the atoms in the substances to be detected, and therefore produced secondary characteristic X-rays (X photofluorescence) for chemical composition analysis and chemical research [25].

Chemical phase analysis was based on the differences of solubility and dissolution rate of various minerals (or compounds) in chemical solvents. Chemical methods were used to determine the percentages of different compounds composed of the same elements in the sample. Different solvents were selected for selective separation of each phase, and then the composition or structure of each phase was determined by chemical or physical methods. We used this analysis method to determine mineral species and found that the chemical phase analysis method was more accurate than XRD spectrometry for determining mineral species [26].

According to the results of XRF spectrometry in Table 1, in general, the sample contained 2.96% Pb, and 177 g/t Ag, from which it could be seen that the main precious metals in this sample were all at a relatively low level. Table 2 shows that the Ag mineral was found mainly in AgCl (63 g/t), Ag₂AsS₂ (42.5 g/t), SiO₂, and silicate (34.2 g/t), natural-Ag (21 g/t), PbS (15 g/t), and CuFeS₂ (1.3 g/t). These different Ag minerals accounted for 35.6%, 24%, 19.3%, 11.9%, 8.5%, and 0.7% of the total Ag, respectively. Pb was found mainly in Pb₅(P/As/VO₄)₃Cl (1.24% in content), PbCO₃ (1.01% in content), (PbFe₆(OH)₁₂SO₄)₄ (0.46% in content), PbS (0.16% in content) and PbSO₄ (0.09% in content). They accounted for 41.9%, 34.2%, 15.5%, 5.4%, and 3% of the total Pb, respectively.

The sample was also analyzed using X-ray diffraction (XRD), and the results revealed that there were 42 types of minerals in this sample. Principal among them were teallite-(Pb,Sn)S, cerussite-syn-PbCO₃, vanadinite-Pb₅(VO₄)₃Cl, mimetite-syn-Pb₅(AsO₄)₃Cl, clinomimetite-Pb₅(AsO₄)₃Cl, crocoite-syn-PbCrO₄, uchucchacuaite-AgMnPb₃Sb₅S₁₂, dervillite-Ag₂AsS₂, chalcopyrite-CuFeS₂, calcite-CaCO₃, dolomite-CaMg(CO₃)₂, tachyhydrite-syn-CaMg₂C_l6·12H₂O, and hemimorphite-Zn₄Si₂O₇(OH)₂·H₂O.

The above results suggest that the composition of this ore sample is very complex. It is a sulfide-oxidized mixed ore with high oxidation rate.

2.2. Experiments

The sample was wet ground to 88% (w/w) below 0.074 mm in a ball mill. A 300 g ground sample was added to an XFG single-trough flotation machine at a volume of 1.0 dm³, with the impeller speed set at 2000 rpm. All the experiments were conducted under standard atmospheric pressure and an average temperature of 32 °C (the average temperature of the laboratory environment during the test period).

In all flotation tests, Na₂SiO₃·9H₂O (glass water) and Na₂CO₃ were used as depressants. Sodium sulfide (Na₂S) was used as an activator for the oxidized Pb minerals. N-butyl xanthate (NBX) and Aerophine 3418A were used as collectors, and Methyl Isobutyl Carbinol (MIBC) was chosen as frother. All the reagents used or tested (except 3418A) in this study were provided by the Zhuzhou Flotation Reagents Factory in Hunan Province, and 3418A was provided by the Solvay Company, Shanghai, China. All these reagents were analytical grade.

Each group of experiments was repeated twice to ensure the accuracy of the experimental results.

3. Results and Discussion

Ores that have undergone partial or strong oxidation during formation of the orebody usually have the character of containing both sulfide ores and oxidized ores [27]. Dealing with these types of oxidized ores requires a combination of collectors, excessive amounts of reagents, the use of sodium sulfide (Na₂S), and also a staged preferential flotation. In industry, the most stable oxidized lead flotation procedure is to sulfurize the ore in advance, and then collect by xanthate, which is called the sulfurization-xanthate method in China [28]. As for the silver mineral, pulp pH and collector types are critical to its recovery. Although some silver ores exist in an elemental state or a combined state, most of them can be found in either lead or both lead and zinc concentrates, or even distributed in gangue.

In this study, the grades of different types of lead and silver minerals are tested by chemical phase analysis, and therefore the recovery rates of different types of minerals can subsequently be calculated.

3.1. Sulfidizing Flotation Behavior

To test the sulfurization behaviors of different types of lead oxide minerals and various silver minerals at different pH values, in these experiments, the dosage of Na₂S was gradually increased from 1 to 10 kg/t, and the recovery rates of lead and silver minerals were used to measure the effectiveness of the sulfidizing flotation behavior. Each group of experiments used 300 g of wet-ground sample in a 1.0 dm³ flotation cell, and the same amount of reagent was used in each group. Regular reagents used were 500 g/t Na₂SiO₃·9H₂O and 500 g/t Na₂CO₃, Na₂S was used as an activator, and 500 g/t NBX was used as the collector. The flowchart for the Na₂S dosage test is shown in Figure 1. Pulp pH at different dosages of Na₂S is displayed in

Table A1. Pulp pH at different dosages of Na₂S.

Na2S Dosage (g/t)	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10
pH	6.0	6.5	7.0	7.5	8.0	8.5	9.0	9.5	10.0	11.0	12.0

, Appendix A.

The flotation recovery of lead oxide minerals at different dosages of Na₂S are shown in Figure 2a. From Figure 2a, the following can be concluded: (I) The overall trend of the recovery of (PbFe₆(OH)₁₂SO₄)₄ is upward, which suggests that a high dosage of Na₂S is beneficial for recovering (PbFe₆(OH)₁₂SO₄)₄; (II) The recovery of PbSO₄, PbCO₃, and Pb₅(P/As/VO₄)₃Cl are relatively stable. The PbCO₃ is on the rise, reaching its peak at 10 kg/t at a recovery rate of 59.86%, while the PbSO₄ shows slow growth from 32.21% at 1 kg/t to 41.07% at 10 kg/t, which suggests that the recovery rates of PbSO₄ and PbCO₃ increase with an increasing Na₂S dosage, and PbCO₃ is affected more than PbSO₄; (III) The recovery rate of Pb₅(P/As/VO₄)₃Cl is the lowest, leveling off below 20%. As for the barely changed curve, the Pb₅(P/As/VO₄)₃Cl recovery has nothing to do with the variance in the Na₂S dosage. In summary, the order of difficulty for sulfidizing all types of lead oxide minerals was (PbFe₆(OH)₁₂SO₄)₄ < PbCO₃ < PbSO₄ < Pb₅(P/As/VO₄)₃Cl.

The flotation recovery of Ag minerals at different dosages of Na₂S is shown in Figure 2b. The following is illustrated in Figure 2b: (I) The mineral Ag₂AsS₂ is relatively easy to recover with a recovery rate that is around 90% below 5 kg/t of Na₂S. The overall trend of this curve is a decline, that is to say, a high level of Na₂S usage acts as one type of depressant in Ag₂AsS₂ flotation. (II) Considering AgCl, the recovery rate gradually decreases with an increase in Na₂S from a peak of 17% at 1 kg/t, down to 8.55% at 10 kg/t. During this process, it clearly becomes further depressed. (III) In terms of natural-Ag, in spite of an increase in Na₂S usage, the recovery rate is constant at about 6%, which suggests that the dosage of Na₂S used for the recovery of natural-Ag does not have any impact. Thus, the the order of difficulty for sulfidizing these types of silver minerals was Ag₂AsS₂ < AgCl < natural-Ag.

Figure 2 illustrates the recovery rate of different types of Pb minerals and Ag minerals, which change according to the dosage of Na₂S. Figure 3 shows the recovery of total Ag and Pb at different dosages of Na₂S. The recovery rate of total Pb presents an upward trend overall, from the lowest value of 11.49% to the highest value of 30.79%. On the contrary, it is found that the recovery rate of total Ag overall exhibits a downward trend, from the highest value of 33.73% to a minimum of 22.85%.

The trends of the two curves show that an increase in the dosage of Na₂S is beneficial to the recovery of Pb, and detrimental to the recovery of Ag. Whatever reagent dosage is used, these two metals cannot be optimally recovered at the same time. Therefore, the flotation process should be performed in two stages, one each for the recycling of Pb and Ag. The first stage should focus on the recovery of Ag, while the second stage focuses on the recovery of Pb with the sulfurization-xanthate method. In addition, because the two curves intersect at around 9 kg/t, the optimum Na₂S dosage for the second stage is 9 kg/t.

3.2. Selection of Ag Flotation Collectors

In Section 3.1, it was concluded that the first stage of the flotation process should give priority to silver recovery, thus, nullifying the effect of Na₂S on silver recovery in the second stage. After a series of flotation reagents tests, 70 g/t dithiophosphate BA(DBA), 300 g/t dithiophosphate BA(DBA), 20 g/t 3418A, 100 g/t alkyl hydroximic acid (AHDA), and 100 g/t dodecyl mercaptan (DDM) were selected to estimate their collecting capacity and selectivity. The flowchart is shown in Figure 4 and the comparison results are shown in Figure 5. Under the conditions of using these five reagents separately, from Figure 5a,b the following can be observed:

I

Ag recovery increased in the order 100 g/t DDM < 100 g/t AHDA < 70 g/t DBA < 300 g/t DBA < 20 g/t 3418A;

II

Pb recovery increased in the order 100 g/t DDM < 20 g/t 3418A < 70 g/t DBA < 300 g/t DBA < 100 g/t AHDA;

III

The yield of the product increased in the order 100 g/t DDM ≈ 20 g/t 3418A < 70 g/t DBA < 300 g/t DBA < 100 g/t AHDA;

IV

The Pb grade showed small difference in these five products, but the Ag grade is the highest when 20 g/t 3418A was used.

When 20 g/t 3418A is used, firstly, the product yield is only half of that using 70 g/t DBA, but the recovery rate of Ag is the highest among the five collectors, and the recovery rate Pb is relatively low; secondly, for these five products, the contents of Pb are similar, while the product of 3418A has an obvious higher grade of Ag than the others. These two points together suggest that 3418A has the best selectivity for Ag, and less selectivity for Pb. The purpose of the first stage of flotation is to strengthen the Ag recovery, as well as weaken the recovery of Pb, which enables the first stage to produce a higher grade of silver concentrate and ensures that the second stage gets a higher grade of lead concentrate at the same time. From the above observations, 3418A is determined to be the primary collector for Ag flotation in the first stage.

3.3. Laboratory Test and Industrial Closed-Circuit Test

3.3.1. Laboratory Test Results

The laboratory flotation flowchart is shown in Figure 6. After three stages of flotation, four types of products are obtained (rougher Ag concentrate, rougher Pb concentrate, scavenger Pb concentrate, and tailing). NBX at 50 g/t is added to strengthen the recovery of Ag in the Ag flotation stage.

The yield, content, and recovery rate of total Pb and Ag in the obtained products are shown in

Table 3. The yield, grade, and recovery of total Pb and Ag.

		Rougher Ag Conc.	Rougher Pb Conc.	Scavenger Pb Conc.	Tailing	Total
Ag	Yield (%)	7.57	8.76	7.8	75.87	100
	Content of total Ag a (g/t)	1289.28	475.47	208.38	27.1	177
	Recovery of total Ag (%)	54.98	23.5	9.33	12.19	100
Pb	Yield (%)	7.57	8.76	7.8	75.87	100
	Content of total Pb (%)	4.35	13.64	4.87	1.33	2.96
	Recovery of total Pb (%)	11.25	40.7	13.21	34.84	100

^a Units in g/t.

. It was found that rougher Ag concentrate contains 1289.28 g/t Ag with 54.98% recovery, and 4.35% Pb with 11.25% recovery. Rougher Pb concentrate contains 475.47 g/t Ag with 23.5% recovery. For the entire process, the recovery rate of total Ag and total Pb are 87.81% and 65.16%, respectively. The grade of Ag and Pb are displayed in

Table A2. The grade of Ag (g/t).

	Rougher Ag Conc.	Rougher Pb Conc.	Scavenger Pb Conc.	Tailing
Natural-Ag	234.3	12.54	5.62	2.2
Ag2AsS2	94	273.4	100.8	2.99
AgCl	685.06	65.56	29.14	3.8
PbS	176	3.36	1.85	1.65
SiO2 & Silicate	91.5	116	69.8	6.4

and

Table A3. The grade of Pb (%).

	Rougher Ag Conc.	Rougher Pb Conc.	Scavenger Pb Conc.	Tailing
PbSO4	0.17	0.42	0.16	0.03
PbS	1.91	0.03	0.02	0.01
PbCO3	0.32	7.14	2.19	0.16
Pb5(P/As/VO4)3Cl	1.64	2.07	2.28	0.86
(PbFe6(OH)12SO4)4	0.31	3.98	0.22	0.02

, which can be found in Appendix A.

In practical terms, Table 3 and

Table 4. The recovery rate of Ag (%).

	Rougher Ag Conc.	Rougher Pb Conc.	Scavenger Pb Conc.	Tailing	Total
Natural-Ag	84.36	5.15	2.01	8.48	100
Ag2AsS2	16.71	56.31	18.49	8.49	100
AgCl	82.14	8.77	3.51	5.58	100
PbS	88.78	1.92	0.92	8.38	100
SiO2 & Silicate	21.35	31.46	16.71	30.48	100

Conc. is short for Concentration.

show the following: (I) Ag within natural-Ag, AgCl, and PbS is recovered mainly from the rougher Ag selection. The recovery rates are 91.52%, 94.42%, and 91.62%, respectively. These three types of Ag are relatively easy to recover; (II) Ag within Ag₂AsS₂ is mainly recovered from the rougher Pb selection with a recovery rate of 56.31%. Moreover, in the products, rougher Ag and scavenger Pb, the recovery rates of Ag within Ag₂AsS₂ are 16.71% and 18.49%. Its total recovery rate is 91.51%; (III) Ag within SiO₂ and Silicate is distributed across the products.

Correspondingly, in

Table 5. The recovery rate of Pb (%).

	Rougher Ag Conc.	Rougher Pb Conc.	Scavenger Pb Conc.	Tailing	Total
PbSO4	14.65	40.81	13.49	31.05	100
PbS	90.39	1.87	1.00	6.74	100
PbCO3	2.36	61.87	16.86	18.91	100
Pb5(P/As/VO4)3Cl	9.92	14.51	14.25	61.32	100
(PbFe6(OH)12SO4)4	5.69	85.03	4.13	5.15	100

, most of the PbS is collected from the rougher Ag selection with a recovery of 90.39%. On the contrary, PbSO₄, PbCO₃, and (PbFe₆(OH)₁₂SO₄)₄ are collected from the rougher Pb selection, with recovery rates of 40.81%, 61.87%, and 85.03%, respectively, and their total recovery rates are 68.95%, 81.09%, and 94.85%, respectively. Unlike the above minerals, Pb₅(P/As/VO₄)₃Cl is too hard to be sulfurized, or to be recovered by 3418A or NBX.

3.3.2. Industrial Closed-Circuit Test

An industrial closed-circuit test was carried out by the ore sample provider, Huachangshan Mountain Mining Company, Lanping Bai and Pumi Autonomous County, China. The main flowchart is shown in Figure 7, and the kind of reagent as well as their dosage are the same as in the laboratory flotation test. The grade and recovery rate of Ag concentrate and Pb concentrate are displayed in

Table 6. Results of the industrial closed-circuit test.

		Ag		Pb
	Yield (%)	Content (g/t)	Recovery (%)	Content (%)	Recovery (%)
Ag conc.	5.97	1988	57.89	4.8	9.25
Pb conc.	7.76	786	29.75	23.4	58.46
Tailing	86.27	29	12.36	1.2	32.29

. The raw ore contains 3.11% Pb and 205 g/t Ag. Obviously, there are some slight differences between industrial and laboratory samples. This is a normal phenomenon in industrial production.

In Table 6, the Ag concentrate contains 1988 g/t Ag with 57.89% recovery, and the Pb concentrate contains 23.4% Pb with 58.46% recovery.

4. Conclusions

In this study, we investigated a low-grade, mixed sulfide-oxide ore, containing lead and silver minerals, with complex mineralogy. The flotation findings demonstrated the sulfidizing flotation behaviors of these four different types of Pb minerals and three different types of Ag minerals, which provides valuable references for the separation of such minerals in the future. The selectivity of the commonly used silver flotation reagents was compared and a high-efficiency silver collector was found. An effective flotation process was successfully explored for this typical ore and an industrial closed-circuit test verified its feasibility and efficiency.

The main conclusions were as follows:

• For the sulfidizing flotation behaviors of lead minerals, (PbFe₆(OH)₁₂SO₄)₄ and PbCO₃ were quite easy to be sulfurized, PbSO₄ could not be completely sulfurized, and only a small part of Pb₅(P/As/VO₄)₃Cl could be sulfurized. Therefore, the order of difficulty for sulfidizing all types of lead minerals was (PbFe₆(OH)₁₂SO₄)₄ < PbCO₃ < PbSO₄ < Pb₅(P/As/VO₄)₃Cl.
  For silver minerals, Ag₂AsS₂ could be easily recovered at a lower dosage of Na₂S, but with an increase in Na₂S dosage, the recovery rate of Ag₂AsS₂ gradually decreased. In contrast, natural-Ag and AgCl were basically depressed by sodium sulfide. Nevertheless, they were easily collected by xanthate and 3418A. Thus, the order of difficulty for sulfidizing all types of silver minerals was Ag₂AsS₂ < AgCl < natural-Ag.
• Ag minerals existed in the elemental form, and also in sulfide minerals and oxidized minerals. This made it impossible to effectively recover the silver which was partially present in the sulfide minerals by using only the sulfurization-xanthate method. Therefore, it was necessary to implement two flotation stages, the first stage for the sulfide minerals, and the second stage for the oxidized minerals, with the sulfurization-xanthate method. Most of the lead which existed in the oxidized minerals, could be effectively recovered by the sulfurization-xanthate method.
• In the sulfide ore flotation stage, 3418A had the best selectivity for Ag and the least selectivity for Pb, which was conducive to a higher grade of silver and a lower grade of lead. The yield of the product obtained by 3418A was low, which was favorable for industrial production.
• The results of the laboratory tests showed that the silver found in natural-Ag, AgCl, and PbS were recovered mainly in rougher Ag, and the recovery rates were 84.36%, and 82.14%, and 88.78%, respectively. Ag₂AsS₂ was mainly recovered in the rougher Pb, and the recovery rate was 56.31%. At the same time, PbSO₄, PbCO₃, and (PbFe₆(OH)₁₂SO₄)₄ were recovered in the rougher Pb, with recovery rates of 40.81%, 61.87%, and 85.03%, respectively. For lead minerals, the recovery efficiency of Pb₅(P/As/VO₄)₃Cl was quite low, and its recovery in rougher Pb and rougher Ag were 14.51% and 9.92%, respectively, while the total recovery rate was only 38.68%.
  The final results of the laboratory tests showed that the recovery rate of total Ag was 87.81% and the recovery rate of total Pb was 65.16%. The results of the industrial closed-circuit test showed that the recovery rate of total Ag was 87.64% and the recovery rate of total Pb was 67.71% in lead concentrate.