Next Article in Journal
Assessment of Metallurgical Slags as Solar Heat Absorber Particles
Next Article in Special Issue
Natural Radionuclide Concentrations by γ-Ray Spectrometry in Granitic Rocks of the Sol Hamed Area, Southeastern Desert of Egypt, and Their Radiological Implications
Previous Article in Journal
Detailed Microparticle Analyses Providing Process Relevant Chemical and Microtextural Insights into the Black Mass
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessment of Radioactive Materials in Albite Granites from Abu Rusheid and Um Naggat, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt

by
Ibrahim Gaafar
1,†,
Mona Elbarbary
1,
M. I. Sayyed
2,3,
Abdelmoneim Sulieman
4,
Nissren Tamam
5,
Mayeen Uddin Khandaker
6,
David A. Bradley
6,7 and
Mohamed. Y. Hanfi
1,8,*,†
1
Nuclear Materials Authority, P.O. Box 530, El Maadi, Cairo 11936, Egypt
2
Department of Nuclear Medicine Research, Institute for Research and Medical Consultations, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia
3
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Isra University, Amman 11622, Jordan
4
Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, P.O.Box 422, Alkharj 11942, Saudi Arabia
5
Department of Physics, College of Science, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia
6
Centre for Applied Physics and Radiation Technologies, School of Engineering and Technology, Sunway University, Bandar Sunway 47500, Selangor, Malaysia
7
Centre for Nuclear and Radiation Physics, Department of Physics, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK
8
Institute of Physics and Technology, Ural Federal University, Mira Street 19, 620002 Ekaterinburg, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Minerals 2022, 12(2), 120; https://doi.org/10.3390/min12020120
Submission received: 27 December 2021 / Revised: 15 January 2022 / Accepted: 17 January 2022 / Published: 21 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Radionuclides and Radiation Exposure in Mine Sites)

Abstract

:
The present study aims to assess Abu Rusheid and Um Naggat albite granite’s natural radioactivity in the Central Eastern Desert, Egypt, using an HPGe laboratory spectrometer. A total of 17 albite granite samples were detected for this study. The activity concentrations were estimated for 238U (range from 204 to 1127 Bq/kg), 226Ra (range from 215 to 1300 Bq/kg), 232Th (from 130 to 1424 Bq/kg) and 40K (from 1108 to 2167 Bq/kg) for Abu Rusheid area. Furthermore 238U (range from 80 to 800 Bq/kg), 226Ra (range from 118 to 1017 Bq/kg), 232Th (from 58 to 674 Bq/kg) and 40K (from 567 to 2329 Bq/kg) for the Um Naggat area. The absorbed dose rates in the outdoor air were measured with average values of 740 nGy/h for Abu Rusheid albite granite and 429 nGy/h for Um Naggat albite granite. The activity concentration and gamma-ray exposure dose rates of the radioactive elements 238U, 226Ra, 232Th and 40K at Abu Rusheid and Um Naggat exceeded the worldwide average values that recommend the necessity of radiation protection regulation. Moreover, the corresponding outdoor annual effective dose (AEDout) was calculated to be 0.9 and 0.5 mSv y−1 for Abu Rusheid and Um Naggat albite granite, respectively, which are lower than the permissible level (1 mSv y−1). By contrast, the indoor annual effective dose (AEDin) exceeded the recommended limit (3.6 and 2.1 for Abu Rusheid and Um Naggat, respectively). Therefore, the two areas are slightly saving for development projects concerning the use of the studied rocks. The statistical analysis displays that the effects of the radiological hazard are associated with the uranium and thorium activity concentrations in Abu Rusheid and Um Naggat albite granites.

1. Introduction

Natural radioactivity in the environment is due to the presence of natural radionuclides, namely 238U, 232Th and 40K, in various geological formations [1,2]. Terrestrial radiation comprises radiation emitted from these radionuclides and their progeny. 40K is a singly occurring natural radionuclide, which also emits gamma radiation. In total, 98.5% of the gamma dose received from 238U series is emitted from 226Ra and its daughter products [3,4,5]. Because the ornamental and construction materials used in buildings are derived from natural rocks, such as granitic rocks, it is critical to assess the radiological dangers that humans face by measuring the concentration levels of radionuclides in these rocks. Furthermore, radionuclide concentration data will aid in the creation of guidelines and standards for the use and management of these rocks [6]. Geological materials utilized in industry, such as granitic rocks and their industrial derivatives, as well as concrete, cement, brick, sand, aggregate, marble, granite, limestone gypsum, etc. typically include a small quantity of terrestrial radioisotopes in varying quantities, depending on the origin of the rocks. As a result, a thorough study of the concentrations and distributions of terrestrial isotopes in rocks is required to avoid using geological materials with high levels of terrestrial radioisotopes, which could result in natural radioactivity contaminating the environment [7,8,9,10].
According to the ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry), long-term radioactive exposure causes significant ailments that include chronic lung disease, oral necrosis, leukopenia, and anemia [11,12]. In recent years, multiple investigations on high natural background areas around the world have created more awareness of risk appraisal due to whole-body exposures to long-term low-level radiation among inhabitants [13]. High radiation levels are caused by the presence of radionuclides in high concentrations in granite rocks, soils, sediments, and other materials. Granites are igneous rocks that were formed by slowly cooling magma. Distinct types of granite feature different geologic origins and mineralogic compositions. Granitic rocks contain different amounts of naturally occurring radionuclides of terrestrial origin, 238U and 232Th series and 40K [14,15]. Granites from Abu Rusheid and Um Naggat include specific mineralogical and geochemical features. These granites are acidic, slightly per-aluminous-to-meta-aluminous, Li–F–Na-rich, and Sn–Nb–Ta-mineralized. Snowball textures, homogenous distribution of rock-forming accessory minerals, disseminated mineralization and melt inclusions in quartz phenocrystals are typical features indicative of their petrographic specialization [16,17]. The late magmatic to the early hydrothermal stage is represented by small crystallized silicic melt in greisen and the outer margins of the mineralized veins. These inclusions are associated with beryl, topaz, and cassiterite mineralization.
The present study aimed to detect the radionuclides levels in the examined albite granites in particular, since they may be used in building materials and infrastructural applications. The studied areas were selected for the investigation owing to the economic importance of the heavy minerals accumulated in the albite granites. Furthermore, the public exposure to radiation was evaluated by assessing radiological hazards with various radioactive parameters. Among the radiological hazards, the parameters included: radium equivalent activity (Raeq); the absorbed dose rate (DR); the annual effective dose (AED), both outdoor and indoor; and external (Hex) and internal (Hin) hazard indices. Moreover, the excess lifetime cancer risk (ELCR) and the annual gonadal dose equivalent (AGDE) were also estimated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Geologic Setting

2.1.1. Um Naggat Area

Um Naggat albite granites (Figure 1) are concentrically zoned, elliptically shaped granitic bodies composed of a central biotite monzogranite and an outer alkaline-to-peralkaline granite rim with hypersolvus textures, with biotite, allanite, cassiterite and fluorite. The northern rim of the granite is albitized. Alterations are developed along with a NW-trending structure, and kaolinzation, greisenization alterations and yellow-to-violet fluorite veins are recorded [18]. Pegmatite lenses are characterized by garnet, fluorite and Nb-Ta mineralization occurring at the northern margin. The high Nb (104 to 672 ppm), Zr (223 to 2022 ppm), and Y (35 to 180 ppm) contents of the two granites indicate that they both possess alkaline-to-peralkaline features [18,19].

2.1.2. Abu Rusheid Area

The Abu Rusheid area is a part of the Arabian-Nubian Shield that lies in the Wadi Al Gemal basin and can be considered a key domain in that shield, besides its very complex structures. The main rock units encountered in the Abu Rusheid area are represented by albite granites, quartz amphibole schist, amphibolites, and gneisses (Figure 2). This area is located between two major thrusts in the NE. The Abu Rusheid area features abundant zircon, fluorite, and columbite [20]. Columbite features an intermediate composition between Fe- and Mn-columbite end-members and variable U contents (0.03 to 1.41 wt% UO2) [21]. Thorite has also been observed. Sulphides may also be locally abundant (pyrite, chalcopyrite, and arsenopyrite). This granite’s Nb/Ta ratio is close to the average crustal ratio. Previously interpreted as metasomatized psammitic gneisses, these rocks feature all the characteristics of rare-metal granite [21] as highly fractionated to alkaline magma.

2.2. Analytical Techniques

The collected samples were transferred to the laboratory to evaluate their radiological hazards. Next, they were stored within the plastic containers for 28 days to achieve secular equilibrium between radon and its daughters. The activity of a radioactive source is defined as the rate at which the isotope decays. Radioactivity may be thought of as the quantity of radiation produced in a given amount of time. The radioactivity concentration of the different identified radionuclides was calculated by gamma-ray spectrometry HPGe with the following simple regression [22]. The calibration energy of the gamma spectrometer system HPGe used in the investigation was accomplished with a mixed source with the same shape as the samples. At the same time, an empty container was used to identify the background counting. The radionuclide activity concentrations were computed utilizing the following equation:
A = Net area (cps)/Iγ. ζ. M Bq/kg
where
  • A = The activity concentration of the gamma-ray spectral line in Bq/kg
  • Net area (cps) = The net detected counts corresponding to the energy per second.
  • ζ = The counting system efficiency of the energy.
  • M = The mass of the sample in kg.
  • Iγ = The intensity of the gamma-ray spectrum.
In this study, 17 albite granite samples were collected from Abu Rusheid and Um Naggat. Natural radionuclides relevant to this work were mainly gamma-ray emitting nuclei in the decay series of 238U, 235U and 232Th, and singly occurring 40K. While 40K can be measured directly by its own gamma-rays, 238U, 235U, and 232Th are not directly gamma-ray emitters, but it is possible to measure the gamma-rays of their decay products. Decay products for 238U (234Th: 63.3; 234Pa: 1001; 214Pb: 295 and 352 keV; and 214Bi: 609, 1120, 1238, 1377 and 1764 keV), 235U (235U: 143,163,185 and 205 Kev) and 232Th (228Ac: 209, 338, 911 and 968 keV; 212 Bi: 727 keV; and 208Tl: 583 keV) were used by assuming the decay series to be in secular equilibrium [23]. 40K was determined as (1460 keV) photopeak. For the actinium series, 235U γ- energies of (143.8 keV, 163.4 keV) were taken to represent the 235U activity [24]. Weighted averages of several decay products were used.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Radiometric Evaluation of the Studied Areas

Gamma-ray spectrometry directly measures the surface distribution of naturally occurring radioelement K, U, and Th. Potassium is a major constituent of most rocks, while uranium and thorium are present in trace amounts as mobile and immobile elements, respectively. As the concentrations of these radioelements vary between different rock types, the measured radioelement distribution can be reliably used to map and distinguish different lithologies [25].

3.1.1. Abu Rusheid Area

Albite granite features medium thorium, potassium and uranium contents, which are radioactive elements. A small part of the amphibole rock in the northeast region of the studied area contains high concentrations of uranium and thorium with low potassium content. Some small parts of amazonitized granite contain high concentrations of uranium, up to 200 ppm, while their potassium and thorium contents are medium. Most of the amazonitized granites are characterized by very high concentrations of thorium, up to 500 ppm, and normal potassium contents. It is noted that the uranium and thorium anomaly trends are often affected by the north-east and north-west tectonic trends in the studied area. From Table 1, it is clear that the albite granite features slightly higher eU contents (20.3 to 263 ppm, average 118.2 ppm). At the same time, the albite granite contains higher concentrations of both thorium (56–552 ppm, average 305 ppm) and potassium (3.6–7.6%, average 5.2%).
The potassium–thorium cross plot is widely used to recognize clay mineral associations and to discriminate micas and feldspars [26]. As both thorium (by adsorption) and potassium (chemical composition) are associated with clay minerals, the ratio eTh/K expresses relative potassium enrichment as an indicator of clay-mineral species and might be diagnostic of other radioactive minerals [27,28]. Therefore, if eTh/K ≥ 2 × 10−4, the rock is thorium-rich, and if eTh/K ≤ 1 × 10−4, the rock is potassium-rich [29,30]. Table 1 presents the results for the Abu Rusheid area, in which the eTh/K ratio ranged from 8.4 to 48.3, with an average value of 62.6. These values are much higher than 2 × 10−4, which indicates that this area’s albite granite is fresh.

3.1.2. Um Naggat Area

Considering the surface distribution of radioactive elements (K, eU, eTh) in Table 2, it is clear that Um Naggat albite granite features eU contents (13 to 105 ppm, average 54 ppm) slightly, while the albite granite contains concentrations of both thorium (35 to 280 ppm, average 97 ppm) and potassium (1.7 to 8%, average 4.5%). The eTh/K ratio ranges from 4.5 to 137.8, with an average value of 31.3. These values are much higher than 2 × 10−4, which indicates that this area’s albite granite is fresh.
Figure 3 and Figure 4 exhibit the geological map of radioactive contents (eU, eTh and K%) in the albite granite samples. As can be seen in Figure 3, the highest uranium and thorium contents observed in the studied stations are assembled in the south-west of the investigated area. By contrast, Figure 4 shows that uranium and thorium contents are predicted in the south and south-east of the studied stations in the Um Naggat area. This is due to the alteration the radioactive minerals deposited inside the cracks of the granites. Furthermore, the highest thorium activity concentrations were found in some parts of the studied area. This was due to the presence of different minerals, such as zircon, thorianite, and monazite in the granite samples. The ratio 238U/232Th demonstrates that the granite enriched with the uranium due to the leaching process from rainwater helped in the migration of uranium minerals (uranophane, uraninite, betauranophane) and precipitated at joints and faults [31].

3.2. Radiometric Evaluation of the Studied Areas

Table 3 shows that the activity concentration of the 238U series included 234mPa that varied from 217.9 to 1135 Bq/kg and 234Th that varied from 189.8 to 1119.7 Bq/kg. Meanwhile, in Table 4, the 232Th series presents values of 228Ac ranges from 124.8 to 1324.7 Bq/kg, 208Ti ranges from 132.1 to 1389.1 Bq/kg, and 212Bi ranges from 133.3 to 1559 Bq/kg.
As demonstrated in Table 5, the concentrations of all the samples were very high compared to the worldwide average, except 235U, which is lower than the worldwide average. The average worldwide radioelement values are 32 Bq/kg for 226Ra, 45 Bq/kg for 232Th, and 412 Bq/kg for 40K [2]. The 226Ra/238U for the samples were around the unity, which suggested that Abu Rusheid granites are characterized by secular uranium equilibrium. The 238U/235U activity ratio for all the samples varied between 21.1 and 21.8 in the Abu Rusheid albite granite, which agrees with the worldwide crustal average.
Figure 5 represents the correlation curves of the activity concentrations between 226Ra and 232Th, 226Ra and 40K, and 232Th and 40K for the Abu Rusheid area. Figure 5a shows a weak correlation between 226Ra and 232Th (R2 = 0.21), which could be explained by the high U-enrichment. Furthermore, there is a weak correlation between 226Ra and 40K (R2 = 0.35) (Figure 5b). Moreover, there is a negative correlation between 232Th and 40K (R2 =0.51) due to the high enrichment of 232Th compared to the low 40K-content, as shown in Figure 5c. Moreover, the 232Th/238U ratio for the Rsh (3,4,7,8,9) samples is higher than Clark’s value (3.5), which indicates Th enrichment. By contrast, the samples Rsh 1, Rsh 2, Rsh 5, and Rsh 6 are less than Clark’s value, indicating U-enrichment.
The concentrations and distribution of radionuclides in the eight studied samples from the um Naggat area were determined using an HPGe spectrometer to evaluate the environmental radioactivity. Table 6 shows the activity concentration of the 238U series of the Um Naggat albite granite samples. The activity concentrations of the 238U series included 234mPa that varied from 79.3 to 753.7 Bq/kg,234Th that varied from 80.9 to 847.2 Bq/kg. Meanwhile, the 232Th series features values of 228Ac ranges from 54.7 to 632.1 Bq/kg, 208Tl ranges from 56.9 to 668.8 Bq/kg and 212Bi ranges from 63.2 to 720.9 Bq/kg, as shown in Table 7.
In Table 8, the concentrations of the radioelements in all the samples from the Um Naggat area are higher than the worldwide average, except 235U, which is lower than the worldwide average, while samples UNg 1 and UNg 5 are higher than the worldwide average.
The activity ratio 226Ra/238U was calculated for all the samples. It showed a disequilibrium between 226Ra and 238U, except in samples UNg 1, UNg 4, and UNg 7. The 238U/235U activity ratio for all the samples varied between 21.1 and 21.7, with an average of 21.5, which is close to the worldwide average. The correlation curves of the activity concentrations between 226Ra and 232Th, 226Ra and 40K, and 232Th and 40K from the Um Naggat area are shown in Figure 6. The correlation between 226Ra and 232Th (R2 = 0.42) is considered a positive relationship, as shown in Figure 6a, whereas the relationship between 40K and both 226Ra and 232Th is a negative correlation, with values of R2 = 0.60 and R2 = 0.31, respectively, as shown in Figure 6b,c. This also demonstrates the geological characteristics of the granite rocks in the investigated location, where an alteration resulted in the appearance of heavy minerals such as uranothorite, uranophane autunite, and thorite. Rutile, samarskite, columbite, xenotime, monazitezircon, fluorite, and fergusonite are examples of uncommon metals. Meanwhile, the 232Th/238U ratio for most samples was less than Clark’s value (3.5), indicating and confirming the U-enrichment of the albite granite in the Um Naggat area.

3.3. Radiation Health Hazards

The assessment of the radiation doses received by humans from natural sources is of special importance because the absorbed dose by γ-ray exposure depends not only on the γ-ray energy but also on the material, owing to changes in its physical properties [32,33]. There is concern that some rocks transmit excessive radiation doses to the body due to the γ-rays emitted by the 232Th decay chain; the 214Pb and 214Bi progeny of 226Ra and 40K also contribute to the total body radiation dose. The absorbed dose rates one meter from the studied rocks due to their terrestrial radioactivity are calculated using the following equation;
Dair (nGy/h) = KRa ARa + KTh ATh + KK AK
where Dair is the absorbed dose rate (nGy/h) 1 m from the surface of the albite granite and ARa, ATh, and AK represent the activity concentrations of Ra, Th, and K, respectively. Furthermore, KK, KTh, and KRa are the conversion factors (or dose rate coefficients) expressed in (nGy/h per Bq/kg) for potassium (0.043), thorium (0.662), and radium (0.427), respectively [34].
However, direct measurements of absorbed dose rates in the air have been carried out in many countries around the world. The values of the absorbed dose rates 1 m from the surface of the albite granitic rocks at nine and eight locations distributed over Abu Rusheid and Um Naggat areas, respectively, are presented in Table 9 and Table 10. The population weighted average is 59 nGy/h [3].
The absorbed dose rate Dair (nGy/h) for the Abu Rusheid samples was higher than the worldwide average 59 (nGy/h), as shown in Table 9. The minimum and maximum values were 200 and 1200 nGy/h, respectively, with an average of 740 nGy/h. This reveals that the average absorbed dose rate in the air 1 m from the surface of the studied albite granite was much higher than the worldwide average. The absorbed dose rate Dair for all the Um Naggat samples (Table 10) was lower than that of the Abu Rusheid samples, but the average value of Dair (429 nGy/h) was lower than the worldwide average. The Dair values varied from 195 to 820 nGy/h.
The annual effective dose (AED) was calculated from the absorbed dose (D) by applying the dose conversion factor of 0.7 Sv/Gy and the occupancy factor (OC) of 0.2 and 0.8 for outdoor and indoor exposures, respectively, through the exposure time 8760 h per year [35].
AED (mSv y−1) = 𝐷(nGy/h) × 8760(h) × OC × 0.7 (Sv/Gy) × 10−6
Table 9 and Table 10 illustrate that all the total average values of AED obtained from the examined samples were higher than the worldwide annual effective dose 1 mSvy−1 [35]. The mean values of AEDout were 0.9 and 0.5 mSv y−1 for Abu Rusheid and Um Naggat albite granite, respectively, while the AEDs were 3.6 and 2.1 for Abu Rusheid and Um Naggat, respectively. Thus, indoor exposure can cause dangerous health effects.
The activity levels of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K in the examined granitic samples can be determined using the radium equivalent activity (Raeq) index. This index can be calculated using the following equation [36]:
Raeq (Bq/kg) = ARa + 1.43ATh + 0.077AK
The average obtained values were 1672 and 944 Bq·kg−1 from the samples from Abu Rusheid and Um Naggat, respectively. The average was five and three times higher than the recommended limit (370 Bq·kg−1) (see Table 9 and Table 10), which keeps the external dose below 1.5 mSv·y−1 [37]. This illustrates that the studied samples are not safe to apply in the building materials and the infrastructure fields.
External and internal hazard indices (Hex and Hin) were utilized to compute the rate of radiation dose released by natural terrestrial radionuclides in the investigated samples [38]. Furthermore, a group of experts suggested another index that could be used to estimate the level of γ-radiation hazard associated with the natural radionuclides in the samples due to the different combinations of specific natural activities in the sample [38].
Hex = ARa/370 + ATh/259 + AK/4810
Hin = ARa/185 +ATh/259 + AK/4810
I γ = A Ra 150 + A Th 100 + + A K 1500
Table 9 and Table 10 demonstrate that the average values of Hex and Hin in all the measured stations of albite granite samples at Abu Rusheid (six and five, respectively) and Um Naggat (four and three, respectively) are observed to be higher than unity (Figure 7). The Hex and Hin values reveal that the albite granites would exert adverse health effects linked to external gamma radiation and radon gas and its decay products [6]. The data average varied from 3 to 6 at Um Naggat and Abu Rusheid, respectively. The Iγ index is higher than the permissible limit compared with unity (Figure 7).
The annual gonadal dose equivalent (AGDE) is the radiological factor used to detect the associated dose of organs per year for people, especially the gonads. The date of AGDE is computed based on the gamma radiation released from the natural radionuclides and is computed from the Equation (8) [39]:
AGDE (mSv·y−1) = 3.09ARa + 4.18ATh + 0.314AK
Table 9 and Table 10 reveal the statistical results of AGDE calculated for all the albite granites in the examined areas. The AGDE values exceeded the permissible limit of 0.3 mSv·y−1 [40]. At Abu Rusheid, the range of AGDE values was 2 mSv·y−1 to 8 mSv·y−1 with an average value of 5 mSv·y−1 (Table 9), while the minimum and maximum values were 1 mSv·y−1 and 6 mSv· y−1, with the average an value of 3 mSv·y−1 in the Um Naggat area (Table 10). Thus, the application of albite granites in building materials would entail significant health risks.
The excess lifetime cancer risk (ELCR) is the radioactive parameter is applied to predict the cancer risk associated with long exposure to albite granites. The following equation can be utilized to compute ELCR [41]:
ELCR   ( mSv · y 1 ) =   AED out ×   DL   ×   RF  
The computation depends on the outdoor annual effective dose (AEDout), the duration of life (DL, 70 years), and the risk factor for cancer (RF, 0.05 Sv−1), as recommended by ICRP (International Commission of Radiation Protection).
Table 9 and Table 10 display the ELCR date for the albite granite samples detected at Abu Rusheid and Um Naggat. The ELCR values ranged from 1 × 10−3 to 5 × 10−3, with a mean value of 3 × 10−3 (Table 9), in Abu Rusheid, while the values ranged from 1 × 10−3 to 4 × 10−3, with an average value 2 × 10−3 in Um Naggat (Table 10). This value is higher than the limit of 0.00029 of the worldwide average [42]. The ELCR values are more significant than the international mean value and suggest that long exposure to these albite granites may cause cancers and other serious diseases.

4. Statistical Analysis

Cluster Analysis

Because of the large number of parameters in the correlation analysis data, the analysis appears to be complicated. However, the correlations between the radioactive characteristics can be recognized and exposed qualitatively using hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA). HCA is a data classification system that uses multivariate algorithms to determine real data groups. Objects are grouped in such a way that they all belong to the same category. The results with the highest degree of nearness are categorized first in hierarchical clustering, followed by the next most similar data. The process is continued until all of the information has been classified. The degrees of similarity at which the data mix are used to create a dendrogram. A similarity of 100% indicates that the clusters are divided from comparable sample measures by zero distance, whereas a similarity of 0% indicates that the clustering regions are as unlike as the least similar region. In this work, Ward’s strategy of cluster analysis was applied. Ward’s method is a connection procedure for estimating the Euclidean distance between the activity concentrations of radionuclides and radiological parameters [43] (Figure 8a,b). Three clusters were plotted in the dendrogram of the examined results of the two studied areas. At Abu Rusheid, cluster I consisted of 226Ra, while cluster II included 232Th and the corresponding radiological hazard parameters. At the same time, Cluster III included the 40K activity concentration. Moreover, at Um Naggat, cluster I contained 226Ra and the corresponding radiological parameters, while cluster II included the 232Th and 40K activity concentration observed in cluster III. Thus, it can be concluded that the radioactivity and radiation exposure of albite granites was linked mainly to the radium and thorium activity concentrations.

5. Conclusions

This study aimed to assess the radioactivity released from albite granite rocks, which may be used in different infrastructure applications. A statistical analysis was performed to show the geological processes that are thought to increase the radioactive contents in the albite granite. The activity concentrations estimated for 238U (range from 204 to 1127 Bq/kg), 226Ra (range from 215 to 1300 Bq/kg), 232Th (from 130 to 1424 Bq/kg), and 40K (from 1108 to 2167 Bq/kg) in the Abu Rusheid area, as well as 238U (range from 80 to 800 Bq/kg), 226Ra (range from 118 to 1017 Bq/kg), 232Th (from 58 to 674 Bq/kg), and 40K (from 567 to 2329 Bq/kg) in the Um Naggat area, were significantly higher than the worldwide average values. Furthermore, the radiological hazard factors were estimated in the albite granite samples and found to be higher than the approved levels. This is linked to the alteration in the radioactive minerals and rare metals in the studied albite granites. Therefore, the albite granites in the investigated areas exert adverse health effects and cannot be utilized in building materials and numerous infrastructure fields.

Author Contributions

I.G. and M.Y.H. contributed equally to this work. Conceptualization, I.G., M.E. and M.Y.H.; methodology, I.G. and M.E.; software, M.E. and M.Y.H.; validation, M.U.K. and D.A.B.; formal analysis, I.G., M.E. and M.Y.H.; investigation, M.U.K. and M.I.S.; resources, I.G. and M.E.; data curation, M.E. and M.Y.H.; writing—original draft preparation, I.G., M.E. and M.Y.H.; writing—review and editing, I.G., M.U.K. and M.Y.H.; visualization, M.I.S. and D.A.B.; supervision, I.G., M.U.K. and M.I.S.; project administration, I.G. and M.E.; funding acquisition, A.S., N.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors express their gratitude to Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project (Grant No. PNURSP2022R12), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their graduate to the Nuclear Materials Authority. The authors express their gratitude to Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project (Grant No. PNURSP2022R12), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. UNSCEAR. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation—Exposures of the Public and Workers from Various Sources of Radiation—UNSCEAR 2008 Report; United Nations Publication: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hanfi, M.Y.M.; Masoud, M.S.; Sayyed, M.I.; Khandaker, M.U.; Faruque, M.R.I.; Bradley, D.A.; Mostafa, M.Y.A. The presence of radioactive heavy minerals in prospecting trenches and concomitant occupational exposure. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0249329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ng, K.H.; Abdullah, B.J.; Sivalingam, S. Medical radiation exposures for diagnostic radiology in Malaysia. Health Phys. 1999, 77, 33–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Kölbel, L.; Kölbel, T.; Maier, U.; Sauter, M.; Schäfer, T.; Wiegand, B. Water–Rock interactions in the Bruchsal geothermal system by U–Th series radionuclides. Geotherm. Energy 2020, 8, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Otwoma, D.; Patel, J.P.; Bartilol, S.; Mustapha, A.O. Estimation ofannual effective dose and radiation hazards due to natural radionuclides in mount homa, southwestern kenya. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2013, 155, 497–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yasmin, S.; Barua, B.S.; Khandaker, M.U.; Kamal, M.; Rashid, A.; Sani, S.A.; Ahmed, H.; Nikouravan, B.; Bradley, D. The presence of radioactive materials in soil, sand and sediment samples of Potenga sea beach area, Chittagong, Bangladesh: Geological characteristics and environmental implication. Results Phys. 2018, 8, 1268–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gaafar, I.M.; Abdrabboh, A.; Alshami, A.S. Gamma-ray spectrometric investigation of north El-Tor area, southwestern. NRIAG J. Astron. Geophys. 2018, 7, 390–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rashwan, M.A.; Lasheen, E.S.R.; Shalaby, B.N. Incorporation of metagabbro as cement replacement in cement-based materials: A role of mafic minerals on the physico-mechanical and durability properties. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 210, 256–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Stern, R.J.; Ali, K.A.; Liegeois, J.P.; Johnson, P.R.; Kozdroj, W.; Kattan, F.H. Distribution and significance of pre-Neoproterozoic zircons in juvenile Neoproterozoic igneous rocks of the Arabian-Nubian Shield. Am. J. Sci. 2010, 310, 791–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mashaly, A.O.; El-Kaliouby, B.A.; Shalaby, B.N.; El-Gohary, A.M.; Rashwan, M.A. Effects of marble sludge incorporation on the properties of cement composites and concrete paving blocks. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 731–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. ATSDR. Toxicological Profile for Uranium; U.S. Department of Health & Human Services: Washington, WA, USA, 1999; pp. 1–145.
  12. ATSDR. Draft Toxicological Profile for Radon: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry; U.S. Department of Health & Human Services: Washington, WA, USA, 2012; Volume 9–11, pp. 161–167.
  13. ATSDR. Case Studies in Environmental Medicine; U.S. Department of Health & Human Services: Washington, WA, USA, 1992; pp. 1–28.
  14. Cumberland, S.A.; Douglas, G.; Grice, K.; Moreau, J.W. Uranium mobility in organic matter-rich sediments: A review of geological and geochemical processes. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2016, 159, 160–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Tzortzis, M.; Tsertos, H.; Christoÿdes, S.; Christodoulides, G. Gamma-Ray measurements of naturally occurring radioactive samples from Cyprus characteristic geological rocks. Radiat. Meas. 2003, 37, 221–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Turhan, Ş. Estimation of possible radiological hazards from natural radioactivity in commercially-utilized ornamental and countertops granite tiles. Ann. Nucl. Energy 2012, 44, 34–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Moussa, H.E.; Asimow, P.D.; Azer, M.K.; Abou El Maaty, M.A.; Akarish, A.I.M.; Yanni, N.N.; Mubarak, H.S.; Wilner, M.J.; Elsagheer, M.A. Magmatic and hydrothermal evolution of highly-fractionated rare-metal granites at Gabal Nuweibi, Eastern Desert, Egypt. Lithos 2021, 400–401, 106405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gaafar, I.; Ali, K. Geophysical and Geochemical Signature of Rare Metal Granites, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt: Implications for Tectonic Environment. Al-Azhar Bull. Sci. 2015, 4, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hernández-Filiberto, L.; Roda-Robles, E.; Simmons, W.B.; Webber, K.L. Garnet as Indicator of Pegmatite Evolution: The Case Study of Pegmatites from the Oxford Pegmatite Field (Maine, USA). Minerals 2021, 11, 802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. EL-Mezayen, A.M.; Falham, O.; Abu Zeid, E.; Mahmoud, M.A.M.; Shalan, A.S. Petrology and Uranium Potentiality of Abu-Rusheid Subsurface Gneisses, Southeastern Desert, Egypt. Al-Azhar Bull. Sci. 2015, 26, 51–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Siachoque, A.; Garcia, R.; Vlach, S.R.F. Occurrence and composition of columbite-(Fe) in the reduced a-type desemborque pluton, graciosa province (s-se Brazil). Minerals 2020, 10, 411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Al-Zahrani, J.H. Estimation of natural radioactivity in local and imported polished granite used as building materials in Saudi Arabia. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 2017, 10, 241–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Arunima, S.; Lekshmi, R.; Jojo, P.J.; Khandaker, M.U. A study on leaching of primordial radionuclides 232Th and 40K to water bodies. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2021, 188, 109658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. De Oliveira, T.B.; Pedrosa, R.C.; Filho, D.W. Oxidative stress in chronic cardiopathy associated with Chagas disease. Int. J. Cardiol. 2007, 116, 357–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. IAEA. Radioelement Mapping; International Atomic Energy Agency: Vienna, Austria, 2010; p. 123. [Google Scholar]
  26. Gaafar, I.; Hanfi, M.; El-Ahll, L.S.; Zeidan, I. Assessment of radiation hazards from phosphate rocks, Sibaiya area, central eastern desert, Egypt. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2021, 173, 109734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ibrahim, W.E.; Salim, A.M.A.; Sum, C.W. Mineralogical investigation of fine clastic rocks from Central Sarawak, Malaysia. J. Pet. Explor. Prod. Technol. 2020, 10, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Anjos, R.M.; Veiga, R.; Soares, T.; Santos, A.M.A.; Aguiar, J.G.; Frascá, M.H.B.O.; Brage, J.A.P.; Uzêda, D.; Mangia, L.; Facure, A.; et al. Natural radionuclide distribution in Brazilian commercial granites. Radiat. Meas. 2005, 39, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Heikal, M.T.S.; Abd, M.; Monsef, E.; Goma, S.R.; Mansi, E.; Top, G. Natural Radionuclides Levels and their Geochemical Characteristics of Abu Dabbab Albite Granite Mining Area, Central Nubian Shield of Egypt. J. Environ. Hazard 2019, 1, 2. [Google Scholar]
  30. Ahmed, A.; Abo-alnaja, H.; Hasanain, H. Distribution of Radioelements and its Relation to Uranium Migration, El-Erediya Exploratory Tunnels, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt. J. King Abdulaziz Univ. Sci. 2001, 13, 19–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nagar, M.S.; Bayoumi, B.M.; Morsy, W.M. Characteristics and Evaluation of Leaching Behavior of Uranium Mineralization in Qash Amir Granite, South Eastern Desert, Egypt. Am. J. Appl. Ind. Chem. 2021, 5, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Iqbal, M.; Tufail, M.; Mirza, S.M. Measurement of natural radioactivity in marble found in Pakistan using a NaI(Tl) gamma-ray spectrometer. J. Environ. Radioact. 2000, 51, 255–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hasan, M.; Hossain Chaity, A.; Haydar, A.; Ali, I.; Uddin Khandaker, M. Elevated concentrations of terrestrial radionuclides in sand: An essential raw material used in Bangladeshi dwellings. Indoor Built Environ. 2021, 30, 1051–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Abdel Karim, M.; Gafaar, I.; Abd El-Halim, E.; Hanfi, M.; Walley El-Dine, N. Natural radioactivity and radiological implications of granite rocks, El-Sela area, Southeastern Desert, Egypt. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2021, 330, 707–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Amin, R.M. Gamma radiation measurements of naturally occurring radioactive samples from commercial Egyptian granites. Environ. Earth Sci. 2012, 67, 771–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. AlZahrani, J.H.; Alharbi, W.R.; Abbady, A.G.E. Radiological impacts of natural radioactivity and heat generation by radioactive decay of phosphorite deposits from Northwestern Saudi Arabia. Aust. J. Basic Appl. 2011, 5, 683–690. [Google Scholar]
  37. El Mezayen, A.M.; Heikal, M.A.; Omar, S.A.; El Feky, M.G.; Lasheen, E.S. Petrology, Geochemistry and fractional modelling of El Gidami Neoproterozoic granitic rocks, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt. Nat. Sci. 2015, 13, 102–114. [Google Scholar]
  38. Al-Trabulsy, H.A.; Khater, A.E.M.; Habbani, F.I. Radioactivity levels and radiological hazard indices at the Saudi coastline of the Gulf of Aqaba. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2011, 80, 343–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sivakumar, S.; Chandrasekaran, A.; Senthilkumar, G.; Gandhi, M.S.; Ravisankar, R. Determination of radioactivity levels and associated hazards of coastal sediment from south east coast of Tamil Nadu with statistical approach. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. A Sci. 2017, 42, 601–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hanfi, M.Y.; Masoud, M.S.; Ambrosino, F.; Mostafa, M.Y.A. Natural radiological characterization at the Gabal El Seila region (Egypt). Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2021, 173, 109705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Qureshi, A.A.; Tariq, S.; Din, K.U.; Manzoor, S.; Calligaris, C.; Waheed, A. Evaluation of excessive lifetime cancer risk due to natural radioactivity in the rivers sediments of Northern Pakistan. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 2014, 7, 438–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Abdel Gawad, A.E.A.; Ali, K.; Eliwa, H.; Sayyed, M.I.; Khandaker, M.U.; Bradley, D.A.; Osman, H.; Elesawy, B.H.; Hanfi, M.Y. Radiological Investigation on Sediments: A Case Study of Wadi Rod Elsayalla the Southeastern Desert of Egypt. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 11884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Adam, A.M.A.; Eltayeb, M.A.H. Multivariate statistical analysis of radioactive variables in two phosphate ores from Sudan. J. Environ. Radioact. 2012, 107, 23–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Geologic map of Um Naggat area, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt.
Figure 1. Geologic map of Um Naggat area, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt.
Minerals 12 00120 g001
Figure 2. Geologic map of Abu Rusheid area, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt.
Figure 2. Geologic map of Abu Rusheid area, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt.
Minerals 12 00120 g002
Figure 3. The geological map described the accumulation of high concentrations of: (a) potassium, K%, (b) uranium, eU, and (c) thorium, eTh of the albite granites in the Abu Rusheid area.
Figure 3. The geological map described the accumulation of high concentrations of: (a) potassium, K%, (b) uranium, eU, and (c) thorium, eTh of the albite granites in the Abu Rusheid area.
Minerals 12 00120 g003
Figure 4. The geological map describing the accumulation of high concentrations of (a) potassium, K%, (b) uranium, eU, and (c) thorium, eTh of the albite granites in the Um Naggat area.
Figure 4. The geological map describing the accumulation of high concentrations of (a) potassium, K%, (b) uranium, eU, and (c) thorium, eTh of the albite granites in the Um Naggat area.
Minerals 12 00120 g004
Figure 5. Correlation of the activity concentrations between: (a) 226Ra and 232Th (b) 226Ra and 40K, and (c) 232Th and 40K of albite granites in Abu Rusheid area, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt.
Figure 5. Correlation of the activity concentrations between: (a) 226Ra and 232Th (b) 226Ra and 40K, and (c) 232Th and 40K of albite granites in Abu Rusheid area, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt.
Minerals 12 00120 g005
Figure 6. Correlation of the activity concentrations between: (a) 226Ra and 232Th, (b) 226Ra and 40K and (c) 232Th and 40K of albite granites at Um Naggat, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt.
Figure 6. Correlation of the activity concentrations between: (a) 226Ra and 232Th, (b) 226Ra and 40K and (c) 232Th and 40K of albite granites at Um Naggat, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt.
Minerals 12 00120 g006
Figure 7. Mean values of the external (Hex) and internal (Hin) hazard indices and representative gamma index (Iγ) of the albite granites in the Abu Rusheid and Um Naggat areas.
Figure 7. Mean values of the external (Hex) and internal (Hin) hazard indices and representative gamma index (Iγ) of the albite granites in the Abu Rusheid and Um Naggat areas.
Minerals 12 00120 g007
Figure 8. The clustering analysis of the radiological parameters of the albite granites in (a) Abu Rusheid and (b) Um Naggat.
Figure 8. The clustering analysis of the radiological parameters of the albite granites in (a) Abu Rusheid and (b) Um Naggat.
Minerals 12 00120 g008aMinerals 12 00120 g008b
Table 1. Local content of the radioactive elements for albite granites at Abu Rusheid area, South Eastern Desert, Egypt.
Table 1. Local content of the radioactive elements for albite granites at Abu Rusheid area, South Eastern Desert, Egypt.
StationLocationK, %eU, ppmeTh, ppmeTh/K
Rsh124°39.475′ N6.521.1578.8
34°47.602′ E
Rsh 224°39.817′ N6.336.368.310.8
34°46.878′ E
Rsh 324°37.864′ N4.7219.7542114.5
34°46.027′ E
Rsh 424° 37.908′ N4.977.325652.6
34°46.198′ E
Rsh 524°37.977′ N4.8191.348199.5
34°46.220′ E
Rsh 624°38.057′ N4.8120277.757.4
34°46.290′ E
Rsh 724°38.095′ N4.9191.3392.380.1
34°46.091′ E
Rsh 824°38.074′ N5.375.3346.765.8
34°46.065′ E
Rsh 924°38.167′ N4.6131.332469.9
34°45.940′ E
Ave 5.2118.230562.6
Table 2. Local content of the radioactive elements for albite granites at Um Naggat area, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt.
Table 2. Local content of the radioactive elements for albite granites at Um Naggat area, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt.
StationLocationKeUeTheTh/K
%ppmppm
Ung 125°31.146′ N277246125.1
34°12.974′ E
Ung 225°31.009′ N4.686.3121.326.4
34°13.054′ E
Ung 325°31.018′ N4.7101.3126.727
34°13.096′ E
Ung 425°31.043′ N2.745.373.326.8
34°13.155′ E
Ung 525°31.015′ N4.169.380.319.4
34°13.185′ E
Ung 625°30.960′ N5.119.744.38.7
34°13.309′ E
Ung 725°30.794′ N516.337.37.5
34°13.330′ E
Ung 825°31.008′ N7.516.3476.3
34°13.286′ E
Ave. 4.5549731.3
Table 3. Activity concentration of 238U (Bq/kg) isotopes for Abu Rusheid samples, South Eastern Desert, Egypt.
Table 3. Activity concentration of 238U (Bq/kg) isotopes for Abu Rusheid samples, South Eastern Desert, Egypt.
Sample234Th234Pa226Ra214Pb214Bi230Th210Pb
Rsh 1189.8217.9214.8186.5169.3121.7142.5
Rsh 2241.2230.3262.7220200.7365.4210.4
Rsh 3476.7476.2521.7476.8428449.5329.6
Rsh 4307.3330.1341301.1291.8475.5210.4
Rsh 51119.711351300.11173.311121410.5894.6
Rsh 6728.4661.4872.9763.7722825.8558.5
Rsh 7472.8431.5555.2465.7424.7458.8396.7
Rsh 8472.7381.8497.2398.9372.7559.4261.7
Rsh 9644.3515.7634.5554.4503.8700.5363.9
Table 4. Activity concentration of 232Th (Bq/kg) isotopes of albite granites samples at Abu Rusheid, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt.
Table 4. Activity concentration of 232Th (Bq/kg) isotopes of albite granites samples at Abu Rusheid, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt.
Samples228Ac208Tl212Bi
Rsh 1124.8132.1133.3
Rsh 2143154.9167.4
Rsh 3992.81061.71144.8
Rsh 4437475.3506.7
Rsh 5842900.3964.2
Rsh 6460490.4559.3
Rsh 7765.8803.7875.2
Rsh 8716754.1808.4
Rsh 91324.71389.11559
Table 5. Activity concentration of 238U, 226Ra, 235U, 232Th, and 40K in (Bq/kg) of albite granites for Abu Rusheid samples, South Eastern Desert, Egypt.
Table 5. Activity concentration of 238U, 226Ra, 235U, 232Th, and 40K in (Bq/kg) of albite granites for Abu Rusheid samples, South Eastern Desert, Egypt.
Sample238U226Ra235U232Th40K238U/235U226Ra/238U232Th/238U
Rsh 1203.9214.89.6130.11751.521.21.10.64
Rsh 2235.7262.711.1155.12166.721.31.10.66
Rsh 3476.4521.722.61066.41254.321.11.12.24
Rsh 4318.7341154731277.421.31.11.48
Rsh 51127.3130053.2902.21139.121.21.10.80
Rsh 6694.9872.932.8503.11152.921.21.30.72
Rsh 7452.1555.220.8814.91107.921.81.21.80
Rsh 8427.3497.219.9759.51176.221.51.11.78
Rsh 9580634.526.61424.3114721.81.12.46
Min203.9214.89.6130.11107.921.11.10.64
Max1127.3130053.21424.32166.721.81.32.46
Ave.501.8577.823.56921352.621.41.131.40
W. A3332334550021.713.5
Table 6. Activity concentration of 238U isotopes of albite granite samples from Um Naggat Central Eastern Desert, Egypt.
Table 6. Activity concentration of 238U isotopes of albite granite samples from Um Naggat Central Eastern Desert, Egypt.
Samples234Th234Pa226Ra214Pb214Bi230Th210Pb
UNg 1834.7735.5844.5738.7726.8641.7575.8
UNg 2575.7580.5725.7512.2510.9762.9434.7
UNg 3442.1415.1514.9437.9428.1633.4340
UNg 4369.8350.2345.3338.7328.1301.3257.5
UNg 5847.2753.71016.6730.6708.6963.9600.3
UNg 6125.5129.9150.7133.9133.4119.7113.5
UNg 7389.4449.9447405.9404.1474.9314.3
UNg 880.979.3118.298.486.915266.1
Table 7. Activity concentration of 232Th (Bq/kg) isotopes of albite granite samples from Um Naggat, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt.
Table 7. Activity concentration of 232Th (Bq/kg) isotopes of albite granite samples from Um Naggat, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt.
Samples228Ac208Tl212Bi
UNg 1632.1668.8720.9
UNg 2251.5269.2288.6
UNg 3178190.2208.3
UNg 4188.9194.4213.7
UNg 5252262.1298
UNg 6114.5118.9131.8
UNg 754.756.963.2
UNg 884.694.5100.7
Table 8. Activity concentration of 238U, 235U, 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K (Bq/kg) of albite granite samples from Um Naggat, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt.
Table 8. Activity concentration of 238U, 235U, 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K (Bq/kg) of albite granite samples from Um Naggat, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt.
Sample238U226Ra235U232Th40K238U/235U226Ra /238U232Th/238U
UNg 1785.1844.536.3673.9567.121.61.10.86
UNg 2578.1725.726.9269.81218.721.41.30.47
UNg 3428.6514.920192.2845.121.41.20.45
UNg 4359.9345.316.61991222.821.710.55
UNg 5800.41016.637.1270.7578.321.61.30.34
UNg 6127.7150.76121.71264.621.11.20.95
UNg 7419.744719.358.31051.121.71.10.14
UNg 880.1118.23.893.32329.421.31.51.16
Min80.1118.23.858.3567.121.110.14
Max800.41016.637.1673.92329.421.71.51.16
Ave.447.5520.420.8234.91134.621.51.20.62
W. A3332334550021.713.5
Table 9. The statistical analysis of the activity concentration of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K, radium equivalent Raeq (Bq/kg), external hazard index (Hex), internal hazard index (Hin), representative gamma index (Iγ), absorbed dose rate, Dair (nGy h−1), outdoor annual effective dose, AEDout (mSv), indoor effective dose, AEDin (mSv), annual gonadal dose equivalent, AGDE (mSv), and excess lifetime cancer (ELCR) at Abu Rusheid, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt.
Table 9. The statistical analysis of the activity concentration of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K, radium equivalent Raeq (Bq/kg), external hazard index (Hex), internal hazard index (Hin), representative gamma index (Iγ), absorbed dose rate, Dair (nGy h−1), outdoor annual effective dose, AEDout (mSv), indoor effective dose, AEDin (mSv), annual gonadal dose equivalent, AGDE (mSv), and excess lifetime cancer (ELCR) at Abu Rusheid, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt.
Parameters NAverageSDMinMax
Raeq916727975362760
Hin963211
Hex95217
Iγ963210
Dair97403442501200
AEDout90.9001
AEDin93.6216
AGDE95228
ELCR × 10−393115
Table 10. The statistical analysis of the activity concentration of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K, radium equivalent Raeq (Bq/kg), external hazard index (Hex), internal hazard index (Hin), representative gamma index (Iγ), absorbed dose rate, Dair (nGy h−1), outdoor annual effective dose, AEDout (mSv), indoor effective dose, AEDin (mSv), annual gonadal dose equivalent, AGDE (mSv), and excess lifetime cancer (ELCR) at Um Naggat, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt.
Table 10. The statistical analysis of the activity concentration of 226Ra, 232Th, and 40K, radium equivalent Raeq (Bq/kg), external hazard index (Hex), internal hazard index (Hin), representative gamma index (Iγ), absorbed dose rate, Dair (nGy h−1), outdoor annual effective dose, AEDout (mSv), indoor effective dose, AEDin (mSv), annual gonadal dose equivalent, AGDE (mSv), and excess lifetime cancer (ELCR) at Um Naggat, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt.
ParametersNMeanSDMinMax
Raeq89445144221852
Hin84217
Hex83115
Iγ83226
Dair8429225195820
AEDout80.5001
AEDin82.1114
AGDE83216
ELCR × 10−382114
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gaafar, I.; Elbarbary, M.; Sayyed, M.I.; Sulieman, A.; Tamam, N.; Khandaker, M.U.; Bradley, D.A.; Hanfi, M.Y. Assessment of Radioactive Materials in Albite Granites from Abu Rusheid and Um Naggat, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt. Minerals 2022, 12, 120. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12020120

AMA Style

Gaafar I, Elbarbary M, Sayyed MI, Sulieman A, Tamam N, Khandaker MU, Bradley DA, Hanfi MY. Assessment of Radioactive Materials in Albite Granites from Abu Rusheid and Um Naggat, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt. Minerals. 2022; 12(2):120. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12020120

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gaafar, Ibrahim, Mona Elbarbary, M. I. Sayyed, Abdelmoneim Sulieman, Nissren Tamam, Mayeen Uddin Khandaker, David A. Bradley, and Mohamed. Y. Hanfi. 2022. "Assessment of Radioactive Materials in Albite Granites from Abu Rusheid and Um Naggat, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt" Minerals 12, no. 2: 120. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12020120

APA Style

Gaafar, I., Elbarbary, M., Sayyed, M. I., Sulieman, A., Tamam, N., Khandaker, M. U., Bradley, D. A., & Hanfi, M. Y. (2022). Assessment of Radioactive Materials in Albite Granites from Abu Rusheid and Um Naggat, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt. Minerals, 12(2), 120. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12020120

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop