Next Article in Journal
Flotation of Copper Ores with High Cu/Zn Ratio: Effects of Pyrite on Cu/Zn Separation and an Efficient Method to Enhance Sphalerite Depression
Next Article in Special Issue
Trace Elements and Pb-O Isotopes of Scheelite: Metallogenic Implications for the Shimensi W-Polymetallic Deposit in South China
Previous Article in Journal
Early Triassic Monzonite–Granite Series in Eastern Kazakhstan as a Reflection of Siberian Large Igneous Province Activity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genesis of the Wuzhutang Granite and Associated W–Sn–Be Mineralization in the Xuebaoding Mining Area, Sichuan Province, China
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Minerals
Volume 12
Issue 9
10.3390/min12091102
minerals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genetic Relationship between Granite and Fluorite Mineralization in the Shuanghuajiang Fluorite Deposit, Northern Guangxi, South China: Evidence from Geochronology, REE, and Fluid Geochemistry

by
Gen Li
1,2,
Guicong Fang
1,*,
Zuohai Feng
1,
Cheng Xu
1,3,
Zhennan Huang
1 and
Chunzeng Wang
4
1
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Hidden Metallic Ore Deposits Exploration, College of Earth Sciences, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China
2
College of Petroleum and Chemical Engineering, Beibu Gulf University, Qinzhou 535011, China
3
School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
4
College of Arts and Sciences, University of Maine at Presque Isle, Presque Isle, ME 04769, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2022, 12(9), 1102; https://doi.org/10.3390/min12091102
Submission received: 21 July 2022 / Revised: 20 August 2022 / Accepted: 23 August 2022 / Published: 30 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rare Metal Ore Formations and Rare Metal Metallogeny)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Hydrothermal vein-type fluorite deposits are the most important metallogenic type of fluorite deposits in South China, most of which are closely related to granitoid in space; however, the genetic relationship between granitoid and fluorite mineralization remains controversial. The Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit in northern Guangxi of South China is a typical vein-type fluorite deposit hosted in a granite pluton, with the orebodies occurring within brittle faults. Zircon U-Pb dating of the hosting Xiangcaoping granite yields an emplacement age of 228.04 ± 0.76 Ma (MSWD = 0.072). Fluorite Sm-Nd dating yields an isochron age of 185 ± 18 Ma. The new age data indicate that the fluorite deposit was precipitated significantly later than the emplacement of the hosting Xiangcaoping granite pluton. The fluorite and granite exhibit similar rare earth element (REE) patterns with negative Eu anomalies, suggesting that fluorine (F) was derived from the granite. The fluorite fluid inclusions show a homogeneous temperature mainly ranging between 165 °C and 180 °C. Salinity is typically less than 1% NaCl eqv, while the δ18OV-SMOW and δDV-SMOW values are between −5.2‰–−6.1‰ and −17.35‰–−23.9‰, respectively. These indicate that the ore-forming fluids were a NaCl-H2O system with medium-low temperature and low salinity, which is typical for meteoric water. Given the combined evidence of geochronology, REE, and fluid geochemistry, the mineralization of the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit is unrelated to magmatic-hydrothermal activity but achieved via hydrothermal circulation and leaching mechanisms. Our study presents a genetic relationship between the fluorite deposit and granitoids based on an example of northern Guangxi, providing a better understanding of the genesis of hydrothermal vein-type fluorite deposits in granitoids outcropping areas.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

As an important mineral raw material for modern industry, fluorite is widely used in aerospace engineering, chemical engineering, and metallurgy [1,2,3]. Much attention has been paid to fluorite in recent years, and countries and organizations such as China, the United States, Australia, and the European Union, classify it as a strategic and critical mineral [4,5,6]. South China is tectonically formed by the amalgamation of the Yangtze Block and Cathaysia Block [7,8] (Figure 1a) and is rich in fluorite resources, accounting for more than 80% of the total known fluorite reserve in China [9]. Fluorite deposits in South China can be classified into three major types: (1) hydrothermal fluid filling type; (2) sedimentary-reformation type; (3) accompanying type [10]. The first two types are the most economically valuable types of fluorite deposits. The orebodies of the former are largely present as veins and lenses within faults, and the scales of the deposits are predominately large and medium-sized. The orebodies of the latter are often present as layers, and the size of the deposit is normally medium-sized [11]. Fluorite deposits occur as hydrothermal vein-type deposits and are mainly distributed in Zhejiang, Jiangxi, Fujian, Guangdong, and Guangxi provinces of South China [12,13]. Most of these fluorite deposits occur either within granitic batholith or within its contact zones, showing a close spatial relation between granitic batholith and the fluorite deposits [14] (Figure 1b), such as the Longping fluorite deposit [15], the Gaowushan–Jiaokengwu fluorite deposit [16], and the Nanshanxia fluorite deposit [17]; however, the genetic relationship between granitoids and fluorite deposits remains controversial and unsolved. For example, regarding the source of ore-forming materials, some researchers propose that F and Ca are derived from granitoids [18,19], while others suggest that Ca-rich sedimentary rocks next to the contact zone may also serve as source rocks for F and Ca in addition to granitoids [20,21]. Others even believe that F and Ca may all be derived from sedimentary rocks and that late magmatism only helped enrich the orebodies [22,23]. Arguments also abound regarding whether the source of ore-forming fluids is magmatic water or meteoric water [17,24,25]. In view of these contradictory findings, more study is needed to reveal the sources and processes of fluorite mineralization in South China.
The Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit is located in the Miaoershan batholith, which is one of the largest granitoid pluton in the western Nanling metallogenic belt (Figure 1c). In recent years, a series of metallic deposits have been discovered within the Miaoershan batholith or its contact zones, which are considered to be closely related to magmatic-hydrothermal activity [26,27,28,29]. With an increasing number of geologic surveys being carried out, a number of fluorite deposits have been discovered. They have a close spatial relation with the Miaoershan batholith, and present as veins and lenses within faults in the granite. These fluorite deposits are concentrated and have good prospecting potential; however, some key questions remain unresolved: Is the mineralization of these fluorite deposits also related to magmatic-hydrothermal activity? What role does granite play in fluorite mineralization? What is the mineralizing process of these fluorite deposits?
Based on a systematic analysis of geochronology, REE geochemistry, hydrogen-oxygen isotopes, and fluid inclusion, this study investigates the geochronological sequence of diagenesis and mineralization, characteristics of ore-forming fluids, and the source of the ore-forming material. We aim here to reveal the genetic relationship between granitoids and fluorite mineralization of the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit to permit a better understanding of the formation of vein-like and granite-related fluorite mineral systems in South China.

2. Regional Geologic Setting

The Miaoershan region of northern Guangxi, where the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit is located, is tectonically a part of the southeastern margin of the Yangtze block [31]. Stratified rocks mainly include the Neoproterozoic Gongdong Formation of low-grade metamorphic sandstone and slate with a small amount of tuff, the Nanhua System of conglomerate-bearing argillaceous sandstones, shales, and siliceous rocks, the Sinian System of carbonaceous slate interbedded with microcrystalline dolomites, Cambrian quartz sandstones, Ordovician argillaceous siltstone and limestones, and Cretaceous pebbly sandstone (Figure 2a).
The NNE- and NE-striking brittle faults are widespread in the Miaoershan region. These faults provide favorable pathways for the circulation and enrichment of ore-forming hydrothermal fluids. An important part of the Ziyuan–Xinning fault zone, the Ziyuan fault, located on the east side of the Miaoershan batholith, is the main fault in the region, striking at 25° and extending 20 km in length. Many NE-striking (25°–40°) secondary faults developed in the region are associated with the Ziyuan–Xinning fault zone, with strike lengths ranging from 5 to 10 km. These faults are characterized by multi-stage activity. The early fractured fault zone was filled and replaced by SiO2-rich hydrothermal fluid and appeared as silicified crushing dikes, in which fluorite ore bodies hosted. The late faults developed along the sides of the silicified crushing dikes formed earlier, and partially destroyed it.
The Miaoershan region has experienced several significant tectonic-magmatic events [28,32,33]. The NNE-trending Miaoershan batholith is the largest granitoid pluton in the region. The batholith was initially emplaced in the Caledonian time and expanded with additional granitoid intrusions during the Indosinian and Yanshanian orogenies [34,35,36]. The Caledonian granitoids are the main phase of the batholith and consist mainly of medium-grained porphyritic biotite granite, fine- to medium-grained, and coarse- to medium-grained biotite monzogranite [37]. The Indosinian granitoids occur as stocks within the Caledonian granitoids, represented by the Xiangcaoping granite [38,39]. The Indosinian granitoids are mainly medium- to coarse-grained porphyritic biotite granites and locally medium- to coarse-grained two-mica granite.

3. Deposit Geology

The stratified rocks in the Shuanghuajiang deposit include the Neoproterozoic Gongdong Formation and the Nanhua System. The Nanhua System has a parallel unconformity above the Gongdong Formation. The Gongdong Formation can be separated into three parts: (1) the upper part is composed of low-grade meta-sandstone and shale with calcareous bands; (2) the middle part is composed of low-grade metamorphic shale and feldspathic quartz sandstone; (3) the lower part consists of low-grade metamorphic carbonaceous shale and locally calcareous dolomite. The Nanhua System can be separated into two parts: (1) the upper part consists of sandstone, dolomitic limestone, and argillaceous limestone; (2) the lower part is composed of argillaceous sandstone and feldspathic quartz sandstone (Figure 2b).
Major faults in the Shuanghuajiang area are the NE-striking faults, with F1, F2, F3, and F4 faults the largest examples. These faults also include ore-bearing faults F1, F3, and F4 (Figure 2b). F1 fault is 5–15 m wide and dips toward 329°–355° at a dip angle of 57°–75° and hosts orebody I (Figure 2c). F2 fault is 6–20 m wide and dips toward 290°–330° at a dip angle of 65°–83°. F3 fault dips toward 295°–310° at a dip angle of 54°–87° and hosts orebody III. F4 fault is located east of the F1 and F2 faults. It dips toward 270°–333° at a dip angle of 52°–88° and hosts orebody II.
Two granitic plutons, the Miaoershan and Xiangcaoping plutons, are exposed in the deposit and vicinity (Figure 2b). The Shuanghuajiang fluorite orebodies are hosted by the Xiangcaoping pluton (Figure 2a,b). The Xiangcaoping pluton is mainly pale gray, medium- to coarse-grained biotite granite. It is composed of quartz (35%–40%), plagioclase (30%–35%), K-feldspar (20%–25%), and biotite (5%) (Figure 3a). The accessory minerals include zircon, apatite, tourmaline, and pyrite. Quartz shows a xenomorphic granular texture. Plagioclase and K-feldspar usually occur as subidiomorphic plate strips, showing polysynthetic twin and grid twin under microscope, respectively. Biotite is fine-grained and flaky, partly replaced with chlorite and muscovite (Figure 3b).
The orebodies are mainly present as veins and lenses within faults in the granite (Figure 3c). The orebodies show clearly defined boundaries with their hosting rocks. The fault zone and the orebodies contain some fragments of granite that are cemented by silica (Figure 3d), indicating that the orebodies were formed after the granite. The orebodies are up to 720 m long along the strike, with thicknesses ranging between 1.5–3.5 m. The ore grade is 49.5%–74.5% fluorite. The thickness and ore grade of the orebodies vary considerably along the strike and dip, and include mainly fluorite, chalcedony, and quartz. Fluorite is mainly purple and green in color (Figure 3e,f), showing coarse-grained euhedral to subeuhedral textures or fine-grained subeuhedral to anhedral textures. Ore structures include massive, banded, brecciated, and stockwork structures. In places, the fluorite crystal fragments are cemented by chalcedony (Figure 3g), or chalcedony fragments are cemented by fluorite (Figure 3h). Wallrock alteration is dominated by silicification, followed by chloritization and sericitization. Generally, silicification is most closely related to fluorite mineralization, and as a matter of fact, all orebodies occur in the silicification zones.

4. Sampling and Analytical Methods

All the samples used for geochronological and geochemical analyses in this study were collected from the 520 m gallery (mean sea level) of orebody II in the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit. A total of six samples from the Xiangcaoping granite were selected for zircon U-Pb geochronological and REE geochemical analysis. Nine fluorite samples were selected for REE geochemical, Sm-Nd isopotic, fluid inclusion, and H-O isotopic analyses.
Zircon U–Pb dating was performed at Guangxi Key Laboratory of Hidden Metallic Ore Exploration, Guilin University of Technology, using an NWR-193 laser ablation system, and coupled with an Agilent 7500cx ICP-MS. High purity helium was used as the carrier gas for exfoliated material during the analysis. Laser beam spot diameter, pulse frequency, and energy density were 32 μm, 8 Hz, and 15 J/cm2, respectively. Zircon SRM610 and GJ-1 were used as standards. ICPMSDataCal software was used to process the data, and age calculation and Concordia diagrams were prepared using the ISOPLOT program [40].
Fluorite Sm-Nd analysis was carried out at the Beijing Institute of Uranium Geology, Beijing, using an ISOPROBE-T thermal ionization mass spectrometer (TIMS) following the procedure given by [41]. Sm and Nd contents have an analytical error within 0.5%, and 147Sm/144Nd (2σ) has an error of ±0.5%. The analytical result of the standard sample BCR-l is Sm = 6.571 μg/g, Nd = 28.753 μg/g, and 143Nd/144Nd = 0.512644 ± 0.000005 (2σ), consistent with the reported values of 6.58 ppm for Sm and 28.8 ppm for Nd [42]. The Sm-Nd isochron ages were calculated using the ISOPLOT program [40].
The REE geochemical analysis of granite and fluorite samples was performed at Qingdao Sparta Analysis and Test Co. Ltd., Qingdao, China. Following removal of the weathered rims, fresh biotite granite samples were crushed and grounded to ~200 mesh in an agate ring mill. The fluorite mineral separates were handpicked under a microscope, with a purity of above 99%, washed with distilled water, dried at a low temperature, and powered to 200 mesh in an agate mortar. The REE analyses were performed by an Agilent 7500a ICP-MS after acid digestion of the sample powders in high-pressure Teflon bombs, with the detailed procedure described by [43].
Fluid inclusion micro-thermometry and in-situ Raman spectroscopic analysis were performed at Guangxi Key Laboratory of Hidden Metallic Ore Exploration, Guilin University of Technology. The Linkam THMSG-600 Cooling-Heating Stage coupled to a polarizing microscope was used for inclusion observation and the heating–cooling process. The temperature range was −196 °C to 600 °C and the freezing and heating rate was 0.1–130 °C/min with a precision of 0.1 °C. The heating rate near the phase transformation point was controlled between 0.5–1 °C/min. The precision is estimated as ±0.1 °C when it comes to the temperature measurement during the observation of the phase transformation. In situ Raman spectroscopic analysis of fluorite inclusions was performed using a Renishaw inVia microscopic confocal laser Raman spectrometer. The light source used in the instrument is the SpectraPhysics argon ion laser. The laser excitation wavelength was 514.5 nm, the laser power was 20 mW, the scanning range was 100–4500 cm−1, the minimum diameter of the laser beam was 1 μm, and the spectral resolution was 1–2 cm−1. Double polished wafers were used for the analyses.
Hydrogen and oxygen isotopic measurements of pure fluorites were performed at the Beijing Institute of Uranium Geology, Beijing. Hydrogen was measured for vapors re-leased from fluid inclusions in fluorite grains by thermal decrepitation and reaction with zinc powder. Oxygen isotope compositions from fluid inclusions in fluorite samples were analyzed based on the BrF5 extraction technique [44]. Hydrogen and oxygen isotopic were analyzed on a Finnigan MAT-253 isotope ratio mass spectrometer, with analytical precisions of ±3‰ for hydrogen isotope and ±0.2‰ for oxygen isotope. The Vienna standard mean ocean water (V-SMOW) was used as the standard.

5. Results

5.1. Zircon U-Pb Dating

Cathodoluminescence (CL) images (Figure 4) show that the zircon grains are 80–120 µm in diameter, with a smooth and flat surface; some of them have fractures. The zircon grains are mostly long prismatic or short stubby, with some equidimensional in shape. Their length/width ratios range from 1:1 to 2:1. They show clear oscillatory zones. A few zircon grains show a core-edge structure. Every effort was made to avoid ablating the inherited cores during the analytical process.
Table 1 shows the isotopic data obtained from the LA-ICP-MS U-Pb zircon analysis. A total of 27 zircon grains were analyzed. Their Th and U contents fall in the range of 337.4–1710.3 ppm and 1502.4–7678.5 ppm, respectively, with Th/U ratios in the range of 0.11–0.59, indicating a magmatic origin [45,46]. Twenty-seven spots yielded a coherent cluster with the 206Pb/238U weighted age of 228.04 ± 0.76 Ma (MSWD = 0.072) (Figure 5).

5.2. Fluorite Sm and Nd Isotopic Analysis

A total of four samples were used for Sm-Nd radiometric dating; all of the samples were collected from orebody II of the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit. The analytical data of Sm-Nd isotopes are given in Table 2, and the isochron plot is shown in Figure 6; Sm and Nd concentrations of fluorite range from 0.556 to 2.28 ppm and from 4.1 to 9.02 ppm, respectively. The 147Sm/144Nd and 143Nd/144Nd ratios vary from 0.0813 to 0.1526 and from 0.511887 to 0.511976, respectively. The 143Nd/144Nd initial ratio is 0.511787 ± 0.000015. Isoplot was utilized here for age calculation. The Sm-Nd isotopic data of the four samples define an isochron age of 185 ± 18 Ma (MSWD = 1.6).

5.3. Rare Earth Elements (REE)

The classification of REE in this paper adopts the dichotomous method. Light rare earth elements (LREE) include La~Eu, and heavy rare earth elements (HREE) include Gd~Lu. REE analytical results of the Xiangcaoping granite samples are provided in Table 3. Their chondrite normalized REE patterns are shown in Figure 7a. The REE distribution patterns are consistent. Further, all show a right-leaning feature and an obvious Eu negative anomaly. The total REE content in the granite samples ranges from 110.57 to 159.43 ppm (exclude Y), the LREE/HREE ratio is 8.17–11.89, and the (La/Yb)N ranges from 9.14 to 18.73, indicating a high degree of LREE and HREE fractionation and a relative enrichment of LREE. The (La/Sm)N ranges from 3.0 to 3.53, indicating fractionation of the LREE. The (Gd/Yb)N ranges from 1.83 to 3.09, indicating fractionation of the HREE. The δEu value ranges from 0.20 to 0.42, showing a strong negative Eu anomaly.
The REE analytical results of fluorite samples are given in Table 3. Their chondrite normalized REE patterns are shown in Figure 7b. The distribution patterns of the REE and Eu negative anomalies are similar to that of the biotite granite samples. In comparison with the Xiangcaoping granite samples, the total REE content in the fluorite samples is substantially lower, ranging from 27.55 to 123.48 ppm (exclude Y). The LREE/HREE ratio is 4.50–11.75. The (La/Yb)N ranges from 4.74 to 16.31, indicating a high degree of LREE and HREE fractionation and a relative enrichment of LREE. The (La/Sm)N value ranges from 2.15 to 4.49, indicating fractionation of the LREE. The (Gd/Yb)N value ranges from 1.77 to 2.52, indicating fractionation of the HREE. The δEu value ranges from 0.42 to 0.53, showing a strong negative Eu anomaly.

5.4. Fluid Inclusions

Primary fluid inclusions contained within the fluorite samples (samples SHJ01–SHJ04) were analyzed in this study. Microscopic observation reveals that the fluid inclusions are all bi-phase types, containing liquid and vapor (L + V type) with a general size of 5–10 μm and a vapor-liquid ratio of 20%–35% (Table 4). Morphologically, the fluid inclusions are subcircular, elongated, square, or irregular. They are randomly distributed within the fluorite crystals or occur in groups or zones, typical for primary fluid inclusions (Figure 8). During the heating process, the fluid inclusions were homogenized to the liquid phase. The homogenization temperature ranges widely from 126 °C to 281 °C with a peak at around 165 °C to 180 °C (Figure 9). According to the revised equation of the H2O-NaCl system [47], the calculated salinities range from 0.18% to 7.86% NaCl eqv, with an average of 1.99% NaCl eqv, and a peak in the range of less than 1% NaCl eqv. Laser Raman spectroscopic analysis indicates that the vapor and liquid compositions of the inclusions are dominated by H2O, along with minor amounts of CO2 present (Figure 10).

5.5. H-O Isotopic Compositions of the Fluid Inclusions

The oxygen and hydrogen isotopic compositions of the liquids from the primary fluid inclusions (for samples SHJ01, SHJ03, SHJ04, and SHJ07) are presented in Table 5. The δDV-SMOW values range between −17.35‰ and −23.9‰. The δ18OV-SMOW value ranges between −5.2‰ and −6.1‰. Since fluorite itself does not contain hydrogen and oxygen, no O and H isotopic exchange exists between fluorite and the fluids. Thus, the isotopic composition of water in various geological environments can be measured directly in the water of fluid inclusions in minerals such as fluorite [48,49].

6. Discussion

6.1. Timing of Granitic Emplacement and Fluorite Mineralisation

The emplacement age of the Xiangcaoping granite pluton, which hosts the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit, has been previously dated. For example, Xie et al. [50] obtained a zircon SHRIMP U-Pb age of 228 ± 11 Ma. Hu et al. [31] performed U-Pb isotope analysis for accessory minerals monazite and xenotime contained in the Xiangcaoping granite and obtained ages of 220 ± 6 Ma and 211 ± 7 Ma. Wang [39] reported a U-Pb age of 223.9 ± 1.3 Ma. The new zircon U-Pb age obtained in this study is 228.04 ± 0.76 Ma, which is consistent with the reported ages within the acceptable error range, confirming that the Xiangcaoping granite was emplaced in the Indosinian time.
The fluorite deposits in northern Guangxi lack direct geochronological data. Using the fluorite Sm-Nd isotope dating method, for the first time, this study reports a mineralization age of 185 ± 18 Ma (MSWD = 1.6) for the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit, which is significantly later than the emplacement of the Xiangcaoping granite (228.04 ± 0.76 Ma). This significant time lag is consistent with the geological fact that the orebodies are mainly present as veins in the granite (Figure 3c) and fragments of granite are cemented by silica or fluorite (Figure 3d). The time lag between fluorite mineralization and granite emplacement exists objectively in South China [51,52]. For example, at the Xiefang fluorite deposit of southern Jiangxi Province and the Daoji fluorite deposit of Guangdong Province, the Cretaceous Formation has a parallel unconformity above the early Yanshanian biotite granite and contains many fragments of granite, and the fluorite veins cut across the biotite granite and extend into the Cretaceous Formation [14,51,53]. At the Beishi large-scale fluorite deposit, the largest fluorite deposit in Guangxi Province, the fluorite veins were found to cut across the early Indosinian granite and extend into the Cretaceous Formation, which represents unconformable contact with the granite [30]. The above geological findings further indicate that such vein-like and granite-related fluorite deposits were formed significantly later than the solidification of the intrusive granite magma.
In addition, the Miaoershan and Yuechengling batholith contains a number of polymetallic deposits (W, Sn, Mo, Pb, Zn, etc.), which are closely related to Caledonian and Indosinian magma intrusion (Figure 2b) [54,55,56]. For instance, Li et al. [54] obtained molybdenite Re-Os ages of 226.2 ± 4.1 Ma and 219.3 ± 4.0 Ma, and zircon U-Pb age of ore-related granites of 216.8 ± 4.9 Ma at the Yuntoujie W-Mo deposit. Yang et al. [35] reported two zircon U-Pb ages of 215.0 ± 1.5 Ma and 212.3 ± 1.2 Ma from the Youmaling W deposit. Zhang et al. [57] reported scheelite Sm-Nd isochron age of 212 ± 20 Ma and ore-related granites zircon U-Pb ages of 224.9 ± 1.4 Ma and 220.2 ± 1.6 Ma from the Gaoling W deposit. In Yuechengling batholith, Chen et al. [58] obtained scheelite Sm-Nd isochron age of 417 ± 35 Ma, and zircon U-Pb age of ore-related granites of 423~421 Ma at the Dushiling W-Cu deposit. Based on the published data, the mineralization of these metallic deposits and related magmatic activities are significantly earlier than the mineralization of the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposits, which may also prove that the mineralization of the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposits is different from the nearby metal deposits and is unrelated to magmatic activities. The reason can be that the magmatic activity and subsequent magma solidification have a higher surrounding temperature, while the chemical properties of the F are active and volatile. F is easy to migrate and disperse towards lower temperature and pressure; therefore, it is difficult to enrich and mineralize independently in magmatic-hydrothermal systems [51,59].
Based on the mineralization ages and regional tectonic setting, it has been shown that South China experienced the early Yanshanian continental extension and crustal thinning process [60,61,62,63]. The Miaoershan region in northern Guangxi was transformed into a post-orogenic extensional tectonic environment in the early Jurassic time after experiencing a post-collision environment with weakened compression and stress relaxation [64,65]. With the extension and thinning of the lithosphere, a series of faults were formed in the region, and the faults facilitated fluorite mineralization.

6.2. Ore-Forming Fluids

The fluid inclusion data of fluorite collected from the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit show that the ore-forming fluids have low homogenization temperatures and low salinities, which can only be formed due to the introduction of a large amount of atmospheric meteoric water. Another possibility is that the fluids were heated meteoric water [66,67]. The results of laser Raman spectroscopy show that the chemical composition of the fluid inclusions is mainly H2O with small amounts of CO2 (Figure 11), implying a single source of mineralizing fluids.
The geochemical behaviors of Eu and Ce in fluorite are closely related to pH, Eh, material composition, temperature, and other characteristics of the ore-forming fluids, which are often used to indicate the redox conditions and temperature of the mineralizing fluids [68,69,70]. Under the same redox conditions, Eu and Ce show different valence states. For example, under reducing conditions, Eu exists in a divalent state, whereas Ce exists in a trivalent state. Since the ion radius of Eu2+ (1.33 Å) is larger than that of Ca2+ (1.2 Å), it is difficult to replace Ca2+ in fluorite, which increases the loss of Eu in fluorite and makes fluorite a strong negative Eu anomaly. The negative anomaly of Ce can only occur under oxidation conditions, due to the presence of Ce in the tetravalent form under oxidizing conditions; however, Ce4+ has little solubility in the fluid and is easily adsorbed out of the fluid by hydroxide, thus forming a Ce-deficient fluid and causing the material crystallized from it to exhibit a Ce negative anomaly [12,71]. The fluorite samples of the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit show strong negative Eu anomalies and no or only slightly positive Ce anomalies (Figure 7b), indicating that the fluorite was formed under relatively reducing conditions.
The Tb/Ca vs. Tb/La bivariate diagram can be used to effectively discriminate the genetic type of fluorite [72,73]. Based on the atomic ratios of Tb/Ca and Tb/La, the diagram is divided into three genetic fields: pegmatitic, hydrothermal, and sedimentary. The fluorite samples are all plotted in the hydrothermal field (Figure 11), indicating that the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit is a hydrothermal deposit, consistent with many granite-related fluorite deposits found in South China.
The δ18OV−SMOW and δDV−SMOW values can be projected onto a δD-δ18O diagram to further understand the source characteristics of ore-forming fluids [75]. The δ18OV-SMOW value of the fluorite samples from the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit ranges from −5.2‰ to −6.1‰, and the δDV-SMOW value ranges from −17.35‰ to −23.9‰, with a narrow variation range, indicating a relatively singular source for the ore-forming fluids [76]. All the δ18OV-SMOW and δDV-SMOW values fall near the meteoric water line (Figure 12), implying that the ore-forming fluids were mainly meteoric water and not derived from the crystallizing granite, even though the hosting rock is granite. From published H-O isotope data, meteoric water was the source of ore-forming fluids for many granite-related fluorite deposits in South China [52,77,78,79].

6.3. Source of the Ore-Forming Materials

Among large-scale fluorite deposits around the world, F has two common sources: magmatic-hydrothermal fluid and basinal brine. For example, fluorite deposits are widespread in northern Mexico, and two different types of fluorites have been found: MVT type and skarns type fluorite deposits. The F of the MVT type fluorite deposits is related to the brines from Jurassic petroleum basins, whereas that of skarn type fluorite deposit is derived from Tertiary magmatic activity [81,82]. The F of the world-class Vergenoeg fluorite deposit in South Africa was derived from the granitic fluids of the Bushveld complex [83]. The mineralization age of the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit is significantly later than the emplacement of the hosting Xiangcaoping granite, which indicates that magmatic-hydrothermal fluid cannot provide F for fluorite mineralization. The Shuanghuajiang deposits and their vicinity do not develop marine sedimentary carbonate rocks, indicating that F is not derived from the basin brine; therefore, the source of F in the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit is different from the above fluorite deposits.
Different minerals have different REE abundance and geochemical behaviors. REE characterization is an important tool for tracing the origin of ore-forming materials and mineralization processes [2,84,85]. REE patterns of both the fluorite and the hosting Xiangcaoping granite are similar and show a right-leaning trend with a strong negative Eu anomaly. This feature suggests an ore-forming material exchange between ore-forming fluid and the hosting Xiangcaoping granite [86], indicating that the fluorite inherited the REE characteristics of the Xiangcaoping granite, and the F originated from the Xiangcaoping granite. This is because F and REE mainly exist in the form of the F-REE complex in the fluid [87,88]. When the ore-forming fluid leaches the ore-hosting granite and destroys minerals such as biotite, F and REE in the biotite are picked up by the ore-forming fluid in the form of F-REE complexes, resulting in the crystallized fluorite exhibiting the same distribution pattern of REE as the ore-hosting granite [12,14]. In addition, the F content of the Xiangcaoping granite is 0.12%–0.30% (Table 3), which is higher than the average F content of granites in the Nanling area (0.11%) [89]. It is suggested that the Xiangcaoping granite can provide sufficient F for fluorite mineralization. The stratified rocks in the fluorite deposit and vicinity were exposed incompletely and have been weathered; therefore, samples were not collected to measure the F content; however, the stratified rocks are mainly feldspathic quartz sandstone and shales, which generally do not contain F.
Ca may be sourced from sedimentary rocks and Xiangcaoping granite in the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit. As a matter of fact, Ca-bearing sedimentary rocks, such as limestone, tuffs, or Ca-bearing clastic rocks, always exist around most large-sized fluorite deposits in South China. Calcareous interlayers occur as part of the sedimentary rocks in some small and medium-sized fluorite deposits in South China. For example, at the Longping large-scale fluorite deposit of southern Jiangxi Province, Sinian calcareous sandstones, tuffaceous sandstone, and calcareous siltstone are widespread in the ore district [19]. Ca-bearing sedimentary rocks such as tuff and limestone exist in large-scale fluorite deposits, including the Xinqiao, Yucun, and Gaowushan–Jiaokengwu deposits in northwestern Zhejiang Province. The 87Sr/86Sr ratios of these fluorite deposits also indicate that the Ca-bearing strata are an important source of Ca [24]. Fluorite deposits may be formed where a granite pluton was emplaced in Ca-rich sedimentary rocks; however, for the same granite pluton, fluorite deposits failed to develop where it intruded in Ca-poor sedimentary rocks. For example, the Shizhuyuan giant fluorite deposit of south Hunan Province occurs in the southern part of the Qianlishan granite, where the granite was emplaced in the Middle-Upper Devonian Ca-rich tuff; however, no fluorite deposits have ever been discovered in the northern part of the Qianlishan granite pluton that was emplaced in the Middle Devonian Ca-poor sandstone [52]. In short, Ca-rich stratigraphy is crucial for the formation of fluorite deposits. The Neoproterozoic Gongdong Formation and Nanhua System exist in the southwest of the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit. The Gongdong Formation locally contains calcareous dolomite and the Nanhua System contains dolomitic limestone and argillaceous limestone, both of which can provide a large amount of Ca for the formation of fluorite deposits. In addition, the CaO content of the Xiangcaoping granite is 0.87%–1.22%, with an average of 0.99% [39]. The CaO content of the granite near the orebodies measured in this study is only 0.30%–0.87%, with an average of 0.60% (Table 3). It is suggested that the decrease in Ca content found in granite near the orebodies may be caused by meteoric water leaching, and that the leached Ca is also involved in the formation of fluorite. The sericitization of granite commonly developed in fluorite deposits provides evidence to support this suggestion; therefore, both the Ca-bearing sedimentary rocks and the Xiangcaoping granite in the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit served as sources of Ca for the formation of fluorite, with the Ca-bearing sedimentary rocks may playing a more dominant role.

6.4. Model of Fluorite Mineralization

Based on previous discussions, the granite, Ca-bearing sedimentary rocks, and faults are the controlling factors in the formation of the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit. The Ca-bearing sedimentary rocks and the Xiangcaoping granite provide a source for ore-forming materials. The post-orogenic extensional tectonic setting is favorable for the formation of fluorite deposits [90,91,92]. In the Shuanghuajing deposit, the NNE-NE striking faults provided pathways and room, and facilitated migration and precipitation of the ore-forming fluids. The mineralization of the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit was achieved via hydrothermal circulation and leaching mechanisms. Besides the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit, there are some other fluorite deposits formed by this mechanism distributed in the Nanling metallogenic belt. The mineralization age of these fluorite deposits is not concentrated, which is the reason for the large age span of fluorite deposits in the Nanling metallogenic belt.
Based on the data obtained in this study and the discussions set out above, a comprehensive mineralization model for hydrothermal vein-type fluorite deposits is proposed and described as follows. (1) A granite pluton was emplaced in Ca-rich sedimentary rocks, followed by brittle faulting of the pluton (Figure 13a). (2) The deep-cutting faults provided pathways for meteoric water to reach deep into the crust (Figure 13b). Low-temperature meteoric water has a limited dissolution ability and could leach and pick up only a small number of ore-forming materials [93]. (3) However, the meteoric water that reached deep into the crust was heated to become hydrothermal fluids with enhanced leaching and dissolution capabilities. Due to the large time lag between diagenesis and mineralization in the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit, the heat source that heats up the meteoric water may be unrelated to magma. Granite is more concentrated with radioactive elements (U, Th, K) than other types of rocks, and the radioactive heat from it can be diffused outward through heat conduction or groundwater [94,95,96]; therefore, the heat source may be the granite batholith. (4) Driven by temperature and pressure gradients, the meteoric hydrothermal fluids circulated upward through the granite plutons and sedimentary rocks with enhanced dissolution and leaching. The contents of ore-forming ingredients such as Ca and F became enriched in the hydrothermal fluids (Figure 13b). (5) The temperature and pH value of the ore-forming fluids decreased following mixing with meteoric water containing CO2 at higher levels of the crust [93]. For example, a pH value < 4 means that the solubility of CaF2 increases as the pH value decreases [97]. With a pH value = 4–7, the solubility of CaF2 becomes lower and more stable, while the solubility of SiO2 increases as the pH value increases [67,98]. (6) Therefore, during the upward migration of the hydrothermal ore-forming fluids, SiO2 of the acidic component reached its saturation point, which caused silicification. Subsequently, the ore-forming fluid temperature was further lowered, and the pH value of the fluids gradually increased due to SiO2 precipitation, changing from acidic to weak acidic. At this time, CaF2 precipitation began, and the fluorite veins were formed (Figure 13c). (7) Starting from the late Yanshanian period, a number of transient tectonic compression events occurred in parts of South China [99,100]. Under this tectonic setting, the Miaoershan region experienced compression, rapid uplift, and denudation, resulting in the exposure of some orebodies in the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit and eventually in the present-day topography (Figure 13d).

7. Conclusions

(1) A new zircon U–Pb age (228.04 ± 0.76 Ma) for the Xiangcaoping granite pluton that hosts the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit is reported in this study. The fluorite Sm-Nd dating yielded an isochron age of 185 ± 18 Ma (MSWD = 1.6) for the fluorite mineralization. The new age data indicate that the fluorite deposit was precipitated significantly later than the emplacement of the hosting Xiangcaoping granite pluton.
(2) Primary fluid inclusions in the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit are liquid-rich H2O inclusions. The ore-forming fluids belong to a NaCl-H2O system with low temperature and low salinity, typical for meteoric water and not derived from the magmatic-hydrothermal activity.
(3) The fluorite and the hosting Xiangcaoping granite show similarities in REE distribution patterns and characteristics, indicating that the F is derived from the Xiangcaoping granite. The Ca is most likely derived from the Ca-rich sedimentary rocks of the Neoproterozoic Gongdong Formation, the Nanhua System, and the Ca-bearing Xiangcaoping granite. The Xiangcaoping granite plays a role in providing ore-forming materials.
(4) The mineralization of the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit was achieved via hydrothermal circulation and leaching mechanisms. This may reveal the genetic relationship between granite and fluorite mineralization in northern Guangxi. A metallogenic model is proposed here that faults developed in the granite pluton provided pathways for meteoric water to reach deep into the crust, where it evolved into hydrothermal fluids that circled back with enhanced dissolution and leaching capacities. Ore-forming ingredients Ca and F were leached out from the Xiangcaoping granite and Ca-bearing strata, picked up by the hydrothermal fluids, and later migrated and precipitated in the faults at shallower levels due to changes in temperature, pressure, and pH conditions.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed in a substantial way to the manuscript. G.F. conceived and designed the work. G.L. contributed significantly to acquired data, analysis, manuscript preparation, and submission. Z.F. and C.X. helped perform the analysis with constructive discussions. Z.H. contributed to field sampling work and performed the experiments. C.W. revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFC2900100), Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province (No. 2020GXNSFGA297003 and 2020GXNSFAA159154), Research Project of the Guangxi Prospecting Breakthrough Strategic Action (No. [2020]1639), the Scientific Research Ability Improvement Project for Young and Middle-aged Faculty of Guangxi Universities (2021KY0430) and Collabora-tive Innovation Center for Exploration of Nonferrous Metal Deposits and Efficient Utilization of Resources By the Province and Ministry, Guilin University of Technology.

Data Availability Statement

All data derived from this research are presented in the figures and tables of this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chen, J.Y.; Liu, Y.F.; Yan, L.Y.; Gao, S.X.; OuYang, Y.H.; Long, T. Research on development trend of strategic nonmetallic minerals such as graphite and fluorite. Acta Geosci. Sin. 2021, 42, 287–296, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  2. Zou, H.; Li, M.; Santosh, M.; Zheng, D.; Cao, H.W.; Jiang, X.W.; Chen, H.F.; Li, Z.Q. Fault-controlled carbonate-hosted barite-fluorite mineral systems: The Shuanghe deposit, Yangtze Block, South China. Gondwana Res. 2022, 101, 26–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, C.L.; Wang, J.Y.; You, C.; Yu, X.C.; Liu, D.H.; Yan, K.; Liu, S.H.; Xue, Y.; Liu, Y.T.; Liu, X.; et al. A study on strategic non-metallic mineral definition, key applications, and supply and demand situation. Acta Geosci. Sin. 2022, 43, 267–278, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  4. Blengini, G.A.; Nuss, P.; Dewulf, J.; Nita, V.; Peiro, L.T.; Legaz, B.V.; Latunussa, C.; Mancini, L.; Blagoeva, D.; Pennington, D.; et al. EU methodology for critical raw materials assessment: Policy needs and proposed solutions for incremental improvements. Resour. Policy 2017, 53, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Galos, K.; Lewicka, E.; Burkowicz, A.; Guzik, K.; Niewiadomska, A.K.; Kamyk, J.; Szlugaj, J. Approach to identification and classification of the key, strategic and critical minerals important for the mineral security of Poland. Resour. Policy 2021, 70, 101900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yi, J.H.; Dai, S.; Cheng, J.H.; Wu, Q.S.; Liu, K.L. Production quota policy in China: Implications for sustainable supply capacity of critical minerals. Resour. Policy 2021, 72, 102246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, H.; Zhu, D.P.; Shen, L.W.; Algeo, T.J.; Elatikpo, S.M. A general ore formation model for metasediment-hosted Sb-(Au-W) mineralization of the Woxi and Banxi deposits in South China. Chem. Geol. 2022, 607, 121020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gao, B.; Chen, J.T.; Huang, X.; Xin, H.; Zheng, Q.F. Resolving the Tectonic Setting of South China in the Late Paleozoic. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2022, 15, 26–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ministry of Natural Resources of the People’s Republic of China. China Mineral Resources; Geological Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2021; (In Chinese with English Abstract).
  10. Wang, J.P.; Shang, P.Q.; Xiong, X.X.; Yang, H.Y.; Tang, Y. The classification of fluorite deposits in China. Geol. China 2014, 41, 21–325. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang, J.P.; Shang, P.Q.; Niu, G.Z. Discussion on China fluorite-concentrating area and the resource potentialhina. Geol. Chem. Miner. 2010, 32, 87–94. [Google Scholar]
  12. Cao, J.C. REE geochemical characteristics of epithermal vein fluorite deposits in South China. Geochimica 1995, 24, 225–234, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  13. Han, B.B.; Shang, P.Q.; Gao, Y.Z.; Jiao, S.; Yao, C.M.; Zou, H.; Li, M.; Wang, L.; Zheng, H.Y. Fluorite deposits in China: Geological features, metallogenic regularity, and research progress. China Geol. 2020, 3, 473–489. [Google Scholar]
  14. Cao, J.C. Geological feature and mineralization of fluorite deposit related to granite in China. Geol. Prospect. 1994, 30, 1–6, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  15. Yang, S.W. Genesis of Fluorite Deposits in Xingguo–Ningdu Metallogenic Belt Southern Jiangxi. Ph.D. Thesis, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing, China, 2019. (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  16. Liu, D.R. Geological Characteristics and Metallogenic Regularity of the Gaowushan–Jiaokengwu Fluorite Deposit in the Bamianshan Orefield, Chanshan County, Zhejiang Province. Master’s Thesis, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China, 2013. (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  17. Li, K.K.; Wang, C.L.; Chen, L.X.; Wang, G.X.; Shang, P.Q.; Zhang, Q.S.; Liu, Z.Z.; Han, Z.K.; Yan, X.B.; Jiang, J.Y. Characteristics of trace and rare earth elements and direction for ore-forming materials in Shaowu area, Fujian Province. Geol. China 2020. Available online: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1167.P.20200616.1107.010.html (accessed on 16 June 2020). (In Chinese with English Abstract).
  18. Wen, H.C.; Hou, G.Y. The geological characteristics controlled geological conditions and geneses of Nankeng fluorite deposit in Yongfeng Jiangxi province. J. Southwest Inst. Technol. 1993, 8, 55–63, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  19. Yang, S.W.; Feng, C.Y.; Lou, S.F.; Zhang, F.R.; He, B.; Cao, Y.B. A preliminary study on metallogenic age and genesis of Longping fluorite deposit in southern Jiangxi Province: Evidence from Sm-Nd isochron dating of fluorite and electron probe of biotite. Geol. J. China Univ. 2019, 25, 341–351, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  20. Chang, S.M. Study on Geological Characteristics and Metallogenic Regularity of Fluorite Ore Deposits in the Huaiyuand Northern Wuyi Mountains, Jiangxi Province. Master’s Thesis, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China, 2017. (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhang, Z.Z.; Gong, Y.J.; Chen, L.B.; Huang, C.J.; Gan, J.M. Geochemical evidence of the source of ore-forming materials from Dazhuyuan fluorite deposit in northeastern Guizhou. Geochimica 2018, 47, 295–305, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  22. Xia, X.H.; Han, Y.C.; Lian, W.; Yuan, C.J.; Xu, S.K.; Yan, F.; Liang, Z.P. Sedimentary Genesis Feature of Bamianshan Unusual Large Fluorite Deposit in Zhejiang Province. Acta Sedimentol. Sin. 2010, 28, 1175–1181, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  23. Han, Y.C.; Xia, X.H.; Pang, S.Y.; Xu, S.K. Hydrothermal sedimentary mineralization of the super-large Bamianshan fluorite deposit in Zhejiang Province, China. Acta Geol. Sin. 2012, 86, 762–768. [Google Scholar]
  24. Liu, D.R. Genesis of Fluorite Deposits and Prospecting Direction in Northwestern Zhejiang Province. Geol. Explor. 2017, 53, 947–959, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  25. Wang, X.L.; Wang, S.; Yuan, Y.W.; Li, Y.Q. Characteristics of geological and metallogenic fluids on Bancang fluorite mine in Dawu, Hubei. Miner. Explor. 2019, 10, 2256–2260, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  26. Huang, W.T.; Wu, J.; Zhang, J.; Liang, H.Y.; Qiu, X.L. Geochemistry and Hf–Nd isotope characteristics and forming processes of the Yuntoujie granites associated with W–Mo deposit, Guangxi, South China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2017, 81, 953–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wei, G.H.; Nong, S.H.; Wu, J.; Liang, H.Y.; Chen, X.L.; Che, J.; Liu, X. Study on the characteristics of ore-forming fluid and formation of the Niutangjie tungsten deposit in northern Guangxi, China. Geochimica 2018, 47, 675–684, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhu, Y.T.; Li, X.F.; Xiao, R.; Yu, Y.; Wang, C.Z. Multistage magmatic-hydrothermal activity and W-Cu mineralization at Jiepai, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, South China: Constraints from geochronology and Nd-Sr-Hf-O isotopes. Ore Geol. Rev. 2020, 121, 103492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Du, Y.; Tian, L.; Zheng, Z.F.; Chen, J.F.; Zhang, X.Q.; Wang, J.Y.; Zhou, L.T.; Fan, H.; Li, C. Sm-Nd dating of scheelite in Luojiachong W-Sn deposit, Miaoershan area, southwestern Hunan Province: Implications for polycyclic tectonic-magmatic activities and metallogenesis in South China. Geol. Bull. China 2022, 41, 886–902, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  30. Wang, J.P.; Shang, P.Q.; Xiong, X.X.; Yang, H.Y.; Tang, T. Metallogenic regularities of fluorite deposits in China. Geol. China 2015, 42, 18–32, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hu, H.; Wang, R.C.; Chen, W.F.; Chen, P.R.; Ling, H.F.; Liu, G.N. Timing of hydrothermal activity associated with the Douzhashan uranium-bearing granite and its significance for uranium mineralization in northeastern Guangxi, China. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2013, 58, 4319–4328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Wu, J.; Liang, H.Y.; Huang, W.T.; Wang, C.L.; Sun, W.D.; Sun, Y.L.; Li, J.; Mo, J.H.; Wang, X.Z. Indosinian isotope ages of plutons and deposits in southwestern Miaoershan–Yuechengling, northeastern Guangxi and implications on Indosinian mineralization in South China. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2012, 57, 1126–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Huang, W.T.; Wu, J.; Liang, H.Y.; Zhang, J.; Ren, L.; Chen, X.L. Ages and genesis of W-Sn and Ta-Nb-Sn-W mineralization associated with the Limu granite complex, Guangxi, China. Lithos 2020, 352–353, 105321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, F.S.; Zhou, H.X. The characteristics and its fixed position mechanism of granite unit and super-unit of Miaoer Mountain. Hunan Geol. 2002, 21, 20–25, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  35. Yang, Z.; Zhang, W.L.; Wang, R.C.; Lu, J.J.; Xie, L.; Che, X.D. Geochronology and geochemical characteristics of metallogenetic pluton in the Youmaling tungsten mining area, northern Guangxi province, and its geological significance. Geol. J. China Univ. 2013, 19, 159–172, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  36. Hu, H.; Wang, R.C.; Chen, W.F.; Ding, H.H.; Ling, H.F.; Chen, P.R.; Liu, G.R. Characteristics of Biotite in Uranium-and Non-uranium-bearing Granites from Northeastern Guangxi Province, China: Implications on Uranium Mineralization. Acta Mineral. Sin. 2014, 34, 321–327, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  37. Bai, D.Y.; Zhong, X.; Jia, P.Y.; Xiong, X.; Huang, W.Y. Zircon SHRIMP U-Pb dating and geochemistry of Caledonian Miaoershan pluton in the western part of the Nanling Mountains and their tectonic significance. Acta Petrol. Mineral. 2014, 33, 407–423, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  38. Li, W.W.; Wang, G.; Chen, W.F.; Zhao, K.D. Geochemical characteristics and geological implications of Xiangcaoping granite pluton in Miaoershan area. Uranium Geol. 2010, 26, 215–221, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  39. Wang, Z.Q. Study on Metallogenic Mechanism of Miaoershan Granite-Type Uranium Deposit in Guangxi. Ph.D. Thesis, Beijing Research Institute of Uranium Geology, Beijing, China, 2018. (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  40. Ludwig, K.R. Isoplot/Ex, a geochronological toolkit for Microsoft Excel, Version 3.00. Berkeley Geochronology Center. Berkeley Geochronol. Cent. Spec. Publ. 2003, 4, 1–70. [Google Scholar]
  41. Peng, J.T.; Hu, R.Z.; Burnard, P.G. Samarium–neodymium isotope systematics of hydrothermal calcites from the Xikuangshan antimony deposit (Hunan, China): The potential of calcite as a geochronometer. Chem. Geology. 2003, 200, 120–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bell, K.; Anglin, C.D.; Franklin, J.M. Sm-Nd and Rb-Sr isotope systematics of scheelites: Possible implications for the age and genesis of vein-hosted gold deposits. Geology 1989, 17, 500–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gao, S.; Liu, X.M.; Yuan, H.L.; Hattendorf, B.; Gunther, D.; Chen, L.; Hu, S.H. Determination of forty-two major and trace elements in USGS and NIST SRM glasses by laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. Geostand. Geoanal. Res. 2007, 26, 181–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Clayton, R.N.; Mayeda, T.K. The use of bromine pentafluoride in the extraction of oxygen from oxides and silicates for isotopic analysis. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 1963, 27, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Belousova, E.; Griffin, W.; O’reilly, S.Y.; Fisher, N. Igneous zircon: Trace element composition as an indicator of source rock type. Contrib. Miner. Petrol. 2002, 143, 602–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hoskin, P.; Black, L.P. Metamorphic zircon formation by solid-state recrystallization of protolith Igneous Zircon. J. Metamorph. Geol. 2010, 18, 423–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hall, D.L.; Sterner, S.M.; Bodnar, R.J. Freezing point depression of NaCl-KCl-H2O solutions. Econ. Geol. 1988, 83, 197–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ohmoto, H.; Rye, R.O. Hydrogen and oxygen isotopic compositions of fluid inclusions in the Kuroko deposits, Japan. Econ. Geol. 1974, 69, 947–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Richardson, C.K.; Rye, R.O.; Wasserman, M.D. The chemical and thermal evolution of the fluids in the Cave-In-Rock fluorspar district, Illinois: Stable isotope systematics at the Deardorff mine. Econ. Geol. 1988, 83, 765–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Xie, X.H.; Chen, W.F.; Zhao, K.D.; Sun, T.; Chen, P.R.; Jiang, S.Y.; Zhu, K.R.; Li, W.W. Geochemical characteristics and geochronology of the Douzhashan granite, northeastern Guangxi Province, China. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2008, 24, 1302–1312, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  51. Li, C.J.; Xu, B.T.; Jiang, X.L.; Hu, Y.H. Time interval between the formation of host rock and the mineralization in some hydrothermal deposits of Southeast China with a discussion on some related problems. Miner. Depos. 1992, 11, 106–112+105, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  52. Fang, G.C.; Wang, D.H.; Chen, Y.C.; Huang, F.; Wang, Y.; Wu, J.X.; Hu, S.F. Metallogenic regularities and genesis of the fluorite deposits in Nanling region. Acta Geol. Sin. 2020, 97, 161–178, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  53. Xu, Y.H. Research on the Fluorite Metallogenic Geological Conditions and Prognosis in Gannan Area. Ph.D. Thesis, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China, 2008. (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  54. Li, X.F.; Feng, Z.H.; Xiao, R.; Song, C.A.; Yang, F.; Wang, C.Y.; Kang, Z.Q.; Mao, W. Spatial and Temporal Distributions and the Geological Setting of the W-Sn-Mo-Nb-Ta Deposits at the Northeast Guangxi, Southe China. Acta Geol. Sin. 2012, 86, 1713–1725, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  55. Zhang, D.X.; Pan, J.Q.; Gao, J.F.; Dai, T.G.; Bayless, R.C. In situ LA ICP-MS analysis of trace elements in scheelite from the Xuefeng Uplift Belt, South China and its metallogenic implications. Ore Geol. Rev. 2021, 133, 104097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Li, J.D.; Li, X.F.; Xiao, R. Multiple-stage tungsten mineralization in the Silurian Jiepai W skarn deposit, South China: Insights from cathodoluminescence images, trace elements, and fluid inclusions of scheelite. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2019, 181, 103898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhang, D.; Zhang, W.L.; Wang, R.C.; Chu, Z.Y.; Gong, M.W.; Jiang, G.X. Quartz-vein Type Tungsten Mineralization Associated with the Indosinian (Triassic) Gaoling Granite, Miao’ershan Area, Northern Guangxi. Geol. Rev. 2015, 61, 817–834, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  58. Chen, W.D.; Zhang, W.L.; Wang, R.C.; Chu, Z.Y.; Xiao, R.; Zhang, D.; Che, X.D. A study on the Dushiling tungsten-copper deposit in the Miao’ershan-Yuechengling area, Northern Guangxi, China: Implications for variations in the mineralization of multi-aged composite granite plutons. Sci. Sin. 2016, 46, 1602–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ye, X.F. Mineralization and Metallogenic Model of Fluorite Deposits in the Zhejiang Area. Northwestern Geol. 2014, 47, 208–220, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  60. Hua, R.M.; Chen, P.R.; Zhang, W.L.; Yao, J.M.; Lin, J.F.; Zhang, S.Z.; Gu, S.Y. Metallogeneses and Their Geodynamic Settings Related to Mesozoic Granitoids in the Nanling Range. Geol. J. China Univ. 2005, 11, 291–304, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  61. Li, X.H.; Li, W.X.; Li, Z.X. Discussing the origin of the early Yanshanian granite and its tectonic significanceagain, in Nanling region. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2007, 52, 981–991, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  62. Cheng, S.B.; Fu, J.M.; Ma, Y.L.; Lu, Y.Y.; Wang, X.D.; Xia, J.L. Early Jurassic Iron-Tin Mineralization Event in the Nanling Range: Evidence from LA-ICP-MS Zircon U-Pb and Phlogopite 39 Ar-40 Ar Dating of the Dading Deposit in Lianping, Northern Guangdong. Acta Geol. Sin. 2016, 90, 163–176, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  63. Zhou, Z.M.; Ma, C.Q.; Wang, L.X.; Chen, S.G.; Xie, C.F.; Li, Y.; Liu, W. A source-depleted Early Jurassic granitic pluton from South China: Implication to the Mesozoic juvenile accretion of the South China crust. Lithos 2018, 300, 278–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Jia, X.H.; Wang, X.D.; Yang, W.Q.; Niu, Z.J. The early Jurassic A-type granites in North Guangxi, China: Petrogenesis and implications. Earth Sci.-J. China Univ. Geosci. 2014, 39, 21–36, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  65. Bai, D.Y.; Zhong, X.; Jia, P.Y.; Xiong, X. Geochemistry and tectonic setting of the early Yanshanian granites in the Miaoershan area, southwest Hunan Province. Resour. Surv. Environ. 2015, 36, 235–243, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  66. Ma, C.A. Study on mineral inclusions of fluorite deposits in Wuyi, Zhejiang Prov. J. Nanjing Inst. Geol. Miner. Resour. 1990, 11, 13–24, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  67. Zhang, S.T.; Cao, H.W.; Zheng, G.; Ma, Y.; Fang, Y.; Zou, H. Characteristics of ore-forming fluids and mineralization processes of the Shuitou fluorite deposit in Linxi, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region. Earth Sci. Front. 2014, 21, 31–40, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  68. Bau, M. Rare-earth element mobility during hydrothermal and metamorphic fluid-rock interaction and the significance of the oxidation state of europium. Chem. Geol. 1991, 93, 219–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Schwinn, G.; Markl, G. REE systematics in hydrothermal fluorite. Chem. Geol. 2005, 216, 225–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Mahdy, N.M.; Shalaby, M.H.; Helmy, H.M.; Osman, A.F.; EI Sawey, E.S.H.; Zeib, E.K.A. Trace and REE element geochemistry of fluorite and its relation to uranium mineralization, Gabal Gattar Area, Northern Eastern Desert, Egypt. Arab. J. Geosci. 2014, 7, 2573–2589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Dong, W.C.; Pang, X.C.; Si, Y.Y.; Liang, Z.; Li, W.M. REE Geological Characteristics of Checun Fluorite Deposit in Song County, Henan Province. J. Chin. Soc. Rare Earths 2020, 38, 706–714, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  72. Möller, P.; Parekh, P.P.; Schneider, H.J. The application of Tb/Ca-Tb/La abundance ratios to problems of fluorspar genesis. Miner. Depos. 1976, 11, 111–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Graupner, T.; Mühlbach, C.; Schwarz-Schampera, U.; Henjes-Kunst, F.; Melcher, F.; Terblanche, H. Mineralogy of high-field-strength elements (Y, Nb, REE) in the world-class Vergenoeg fluorite deposit, South Africa. Ore Geol. Rev. 2015, 64, 583–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zhu, L.G.; Jin, S.; Wang, C.L.; Shang, P.Q.; Gao, L.Y.; Wang, Z.B. Geochemistry characteristic and genesis of surrounding rock and ore in Pucheng fluorite deposits district, Fujian Province. Acta Petrol. Mineral. 2021, 40, 923–938, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  75. Taylor, H.P. The application of oxygen and hydrogen isotope studies to problems of hydrothermal alteration and ore deposition. Econ. Geol. 1974, 69, 843–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Xu, Z.G.; Tao, Y.K.; Xie, J.Y. Volcanic Geology and Mineral Resources of Southeast China Continent; Geological Publishing House: Beijing, China, 1997; (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  77. Cao, J.C. Hydrogen and oxygen isotopic elements of fluorite gas-liquid inclusions in hydrothermal vein type fluorite deposits. Geol. Prospect. 1994, 30, 28–29, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  78. Fang, Y.; Zou, H.; Bagas, L.; Said, N.; Li, Y.; Liu, H. Fluorite deposits in the Zhejiang Province, Southeast China: The possible role of extension during the late stages in the subduction of the Paleo-Pacific oceanic plate, as indicate by the Gudongkeng fluorite deposit. Ore Geol. Rev. 2020, 117, 122–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zhu, J.B.; Wang, J.P.; Shang, P.Q.; Shi, Q.Y. Geochemical characteristics of strontium and hydrogen and oxygen isotopes in fluorite deposits in China. Geol. Chem. Miner. 2021, 43, 7–16, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  80. Sheppard, S.M. Characterization and Isotopic Variations in Natural Waters. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 1986, 16, 165–183. [Google Scholar]
  81. González-Partida, E.; Carrillo-Chávez, A.; Grimmer, J.O.W.; Pironon, J.; Mutterer, J.; Levresse, G. Fluorite deposits at Encantada–Buenavista, Mexico: Products of Mississippi Valley type processes. Ore Geol. Rev. 2003, 23, 107–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Levresse, G.; Tritlla, J.; Villareal, J.; Gonzalez-Partida, E. The “El Pilote” fluorite skarn: A crucial deposit in the understanding and interpretation of the origin and mobilization of F from northern Mexico deposits. J. Geochem. Explor. 2006, 89, 205–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Borrok, D.M.; Kelser, S.E.; Boer, R.H.; Essene, E.J. The Vergenoeg magnetite-fluorite deposit, South Africa; support for a hydrothermal model for massive iron oxide deposits. Econ. Geol. 1998, 93, 564–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Bau, M.; Romer, R.L.; Lüders, V.; Dulski, P. Tracing element sources of hydrothermal mineral deposits: REE and Y distribution and Sr-Nd-Pb isotopes in fluorite from MVT deposits in the Pennine orefield, England. Miner. Depos. 2003, 38, 992–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Brugger, J.; Etschmann, B.; Pownceby, M.; Liu, W.H.; Grundler, P.; Brewe, D. Oxidation state of europium in scheelite: Tracking fluid-rock interaction in gold deposits. Chem. Geol. 2008, 257, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Li, H.; Kong, H.; Guo, B.Y.; Tamehe, L.S.; Zhang, Q.; Wu, Q.H.; Xi, X.S. Fluid inclusion, H–O–S isotope and rare earth element constraints on the mineralization of the Dong’an Sb deposit, South China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2020, 126, 103759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Wood, S.A. The aqueous geochemistry of the rare earth elements and yttrium: 1. Review of available low-temperature data for inorganic complexes and the inorganic REE speciation of natural waters. Chem. Geol. 1990, 82, 159–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Wood, S.A. The aqueous geochemistry of the rare-earth elements and yttrium: 2. Theoretical predictions of speciation in hydrothermal solutions to 350 °C at saturation water vapor pressure. Chem. Geol. 1990, 88, 99–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Granitoid Research Group of Nanling Project. Geology of Granitoids of Nanling Region and Their Petrogenesis and Mineralization; Geological Publishing House: Beijing, China, 1989; (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  90. Rubinstein, N.A.; Zappettini, E.O. Origin and age of rift related fluorite and manganese deposits from the San Rafael Massif, Argentina. Ore Geol. Rev. 2015, 66, 334–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Pei, Q.M.; Zhang, S.T.; Santosh, M.; Cao, H.W.; Zhang, W.; Hu, X.K.; Wang, L. Geochronology, geochemistry, fluid inclusion and C, O and Hf isotope compositions of the Shuitou fluorite deposit, Inner Mongolia, China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2017, 83, 174–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Sami, M.; Ntaflos, T.; Farahat, E.S.; Mohamed, H.A.; Ahmed, A.F.; Hauzenberger, C. Mineralogical, geochemical and Sr-Nd isotopes characteristics of fluorite-bearing granites in the Northern Arabian-Nubian Shield, Egypt: Constraints on petrogenesis and evolution of their associated rare metal mineralization. Ore Geol. Rev. 2017, 88, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Han, W.B. Geology and Geochemical Characteristics of Fluorite Deposits-with Wuyi Orefield in Zhejiang Province as an Example; Geological Publishing House: Beijing, China, 1991; (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  94. Zhang, B.D.; Xie, B.R.; Dai, Y.S. The analysis and calculation of metallogenic heat source for granite-type uranium deposits in South China. Miner. Depos. 1990, 9, 270–278, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  95. Zhou, Z.M. Late Mesozoic Polycyclic Tectono-Magmatic Evolution and Forming Mechanism of the Geothermal Systems in South China-New Constraints from Typical Plutons in Guangdong Provine. Ph.D. Thesis, China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China, 2015. (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  96. Lu, X.Q. Discussion on metallogenic heat source of fluorite deposit in Hushan, Zhejiang Province. Zhejiang Land Resour. 2006, 2, 42–45. [Google Scholar]
  97. Deloule, E. The genesis of fluorspar hydrothermal deposits at Montroc and Le Burc, the Tarn, as deduced from fluid inclusion analysis. Econ. Geol. 1982, 77, 1867–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Duan, Z.P.; Jiang, S.Y.; Su, H.M.; Zhu, X.H.; Jiang, B.B. Textural features and in situ trace element analysis of fluorite from the Wujianfang fluorite deposit, Inner Mongolia (NE China): Insights into fluid metasomatism and ore-forming process. Ore Geol. Rev. 2021, 147, 104982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Chen, F.; Yan, D.P.; Qiu, L.; Yang, W.X.; Tang, S.L.; Guo, Q.Y.; Zhang, Y.X. The brittle-ductile shearing and uranium metallogenesis of the Motinaling dome in the southwestern Jiangnan Orogenic Belt. Acta Petrol. Sinica 2019, 35, 2637–2659, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
  100. Chu, Y.; Lin, W.; Faure, M.; Xue, Z.H.; Ji, W.B.; Feng, Z.T. Cretaceous episodic extension in the South China Block, East Asia: Evidence from the Yuechengling Massif of Central South China. Tectonics 2019, 38, 3675–3702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Minerals 12 01102 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Inset map showing location of map (b); (b) Distribution of granites and associated fluorite deposits in South China (modified after [28,30]); (c) Geological map of Miaoershan-Yuechengling district (modified after [28]).
Figure 1. (a) Inset map showing location of map (b); (b) Distribution of granites and associated fluorite deposits in South China (modified after [28,30]); (c) Geological map of Miaoershan-Yuechengling district (modified after [28]).
Minerals 12 01102 g001
Minerals 12 01102 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) Geologic map of the Miaoershan region; (b) geologic map of the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit; (c) cross-section of No. 10 exploration line.
Figure 2. (a) Geologic map of the Miaoershan region; (b) geologic map of the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit; (c) cross-section of No. 10 exploration line.
Minerals 12 01102 g002
Minerals 12 01102 g003 550
Figure 3. Photographs of orebodies and hand specimens: (a) hand specimen of the Xiangcaoping granite; (b) photomicrograph of the Xiangcaoping granite (cross polarizing light); (c) a fluorite orebody; (d) granite and fluorite fragments in fluorite orebody; (e) massive purple fluorite; (f) massive green fluorite; (g) photomicrograph of chalcedony veins containing fluorite crystal fragments (cross polarizing light); (h) photomicrograph of chalcedony fragments are cemented by fluorite (cross polarizing light). Qtz—quartz, Pl—plagioclase, Kfs—K-feldspar, Bt—biotite, Cln—chalcedony.
Figure 3. Photographs of orebodies and hand specimens: (a) hand specimen of the Xiangcaoping granite; (b) photomicrograph of the Xiangcaoping granite (cross polarizing light); (c) a fluorite orebody; (d) granite and fluorite fragments in fluorite orebody; (e) massive purple fluorite; (f) massive green fluorite; (g) photomicrograph of chalcedony veins containing fluorite crystal fragments (cross polarizing light); (h) photomicrograph of chalcedony fragments are cemented by fluorite (cross polarizing light). Qtz—quartz, Pl—plagioclase, Kfs—K-feldspar, Bt—biotite, Cln—chalcedony.
Minerals 12 01102 g003
Minerals 12 01102 g004 550
Figure 4. CL images of zircon grains from the Xiangcaoping granite.
Figure 4. CL images of zircon grains from the Xiangcaoping granite.
Minerals 12 01102 g004
Minerals 12 01102 g005 550
Figure 5. Zircon U-Pb Concordia and weighted mean ages of the Xiangcaoping granite.
Figure 5. Zircon U-Pb Concordia and weighted mean ages of the Xiangcaoping granite.
Minerals 12 01102 g005
Minerals 12 01102 g006 550
Figure 6. Fluorite Sm-Nd isochrons of the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit.
Figure 6. Fluorite Sm-Nd isochrons of the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit.
Minerals 12 01102 g006
Minerals 12 01102 g007 550
Figure 7. (a) Chondrite-normalized REE patterns of the Xiangcaoping granite; (b) fluorite of the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit.
Figure 7. (a) Chondrite-normalized REE patterns of the Xiangcaoping granite; (b) fluorite of the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit.
Minerals 12 01102 g007
Minerals 12 01102 g008 550
Figure 8. Photomicrographs of primary fluid inclusions in fluorite of the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit. L for liquid phase and V for vapor phase.
Figure 8. Photomicrographs of primary fluid inclusions in fluorite of the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit. L for liquid phase and V for vapor phase.
Minerals 12 01102 g008
Minerals 12 01102 g009 550
Figure 9. Histograms of (a) homogenization temperatures and (b) salinities of fluid inclusions in fluorite from the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit.
Figure 9. Histograms of (a) homogenization temperatures and (b) salinities of fluid inclusions in fluorite from the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit.
Minerals 12 01102 g009
Minerals 12 01102 g010 550
Figure 10. Laser Raman spectra of fluid inclusions in the fluorite from the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit.
Figure 10. Laser Raman spectra of fluid inclusions in the fluorite from the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit.
Minerals 12 01102 g010
Minerals 12 01102 g011 550
Figure 11. Tb/Ca vs. Tb/La (after [72]) diagrams of fluorites from the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit. Data source: The Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit is from this study; other deposits are after [15,52,74].
Figure 11. Tb/Ca vs. Tb/La (after [72]) diagrams of fluorites from the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit. Data source: The Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit is from this study; other deposits are after [15,52,74].
Minerals 12 01102 g011
Minerals 12 01102 g012 550
Figure 12. δD-δ18O diagram of fluorite from the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit (modified after [75,80]. Data source: the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit is from this study; other deposits are from [77,78].
Figure 12. δD-δ18O diagram of fluorite from the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit (modified after [75,80]. Data source: the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit is from this study; other deposits are from [77,78].
Minerals 12 01102 g012
Minerals 12 01102 g013 550
Figure 13. Schematic illustration depicting ore-forming processes of the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit. (a) the hosting Xiangcaoping granite was emplaced in Ca-rich sedimentary rocks, followed by brittle faulting of the pluton; (b) meteoric water percolated into the crust, which are heated by the radioactive heat from the hosting granite and ascended along the pathways provided by brittle faults, resulting in the fluids with low-T and low-salinity leaching the ore-forming materials (F and Ca) from the hosting granite and Ca-bearing sedimentary, and evolved into ore-forming fluids. (c) due to the changes in temperature, pressure, and pH conditions during the upward migration of the ore-forming fluids, the CaF2 begins to precipitate and the fluorite veins were formed. (d) under transient tectonic compression setting, the Miaoershan region experienced compression, rapid uplift, and denudation, resulting in the exposure of some fluorite orebodies in the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit.
Figure 13. Schematic illustration depicting ore-forming processes of the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit. (a) the hosting Xiangcaoping granite was emplaced in Ca-rich sedimentary rocks, followed by brittle faulting of the pluton; (b) meteoric water percolated into the crust, which are heated by the radioactive heat from the hosting granite and ascended along the pathways provided by brittle faults, resulting in the fluids with low-T and low-salinity leaching the ore-forming materials (F and Ca) from the hosting granite and Ca-bearing sedimentary, and evolved into ore-forming fluids. (c) due to the changes in temperature, pressure, and pH conditions during the upward migration of the ore-forming fluids, the CaF2 begins to precipitate and the fluorite veins were formed. (d) under transient tectonic compression setting, the Miaoershan region experienced compression, rapid uplift, and denudation, resulting in the exposure of some fluorite orebodies in the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit.
Minerals 12 01102 g013
Table
Table 1. Analytical data of zircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb dating for the Xiangcaoping granite.
Table 1. Analytical data of zircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb dating for the Xiangcaoping granite.
Sample No.PbThUTh/UIsotopic RatioAge (Ma)
ppmppmppm207Pb/
206Pb		1σ207Pb/
235U		1σ206Pb/
238U		1σ207Pb/
206Pb		1σ207Pb/
235U		1σ206Pb/
238U		1σ
SHJ02-01133.2589579.77732801.53300.210.04900.00080.24150.00450.03580.0003146.438.9219.63.7226.61.7
SHJ02-0290.1386406.41381899.84890.210.05180.00080.25570.00470.03580.0003279.739.8231.23.8226.81.8
SHJ02-03168.3155515.46193773.92100.140.04900.00060.24180.00380.03570.0003150.134.3219.93.2226.41.7
SHJ02-04116.5695647.05722412.63690.270.04910.00070.24270.00450.03590.0004153.835.2220.73.7227.22.4
SHJ02-05157.6004694.42513417.26070.200.05030.00130.24460.00640.03510.0003205.693.5222.15.2222.12.1
SHJ02-06131.5342486.65732941.51130.170.05150.00270.24990.01410.03520.0005261.288.0226.511.5223.23.1
SHJ02-07130.0629542.37952669.19360.200.05250.00140.25980.00760.03600.0004309.356.5234.56.2227.92.3
SHJ02-08194.9586507.75414476.42000.110.05260.00280.24930.00940.03520.0004322.3120.4226.07.7222.72.7
SHJ02-09123.03231129.85881905.49860.590.05120.00100.24620.00550.03490.0003255.644.4223.54.5221.31.9
SHJ02-1079.6681494.88441675.74500.300.04980.00120.24200.00710.03570.0005183.455.5220.05.8226.33.2
SHJ02-11119.2085540.40422477.11820.220.04810.00090.23350.00560.03570.0003105.644.4213.14.6226.21.9
SHJ02-12204.6999936.17524278.25410.220.04920.00100.23560.00610.03540.0003166.850.9214.85.1223.91.7
SHJ02-13167.6420840.17913399.22450.250.04810.00110.23280.00690.03590.0003105.651.8212.55.7227.21.8
SHJ02-14129.4213678.58302529.75200.270.04910.00120.23630.00790.03590.0003153.859.3215.46.5227.12.0
SHJ02-1573.7076337.40631502.45650.220.05490.00160.26360.01030.03580.0004405.666.7237.68.3227.02.3
SHJ02-16196.5075682.67294395.87310.160.04880.00140.23590.00880.03590.0003139.069.4215.17.3227.22.0
SHJ02-17179.46401073.95553461.47150.310.05160.00110.24800.00710.03540.0003333.448.1224.95.7224.51.9
SHJ02-18131.05491095.91312270.81620.480.05010.00210.24480.01150.03600.0004211.2100.0222.49.4227.92.2
SHJ02-19369.48321710.34247678.55640.220.05220.00090.25610.00580.03580.0003294.537.0231.54.7227.11.8
SHJ02-20116.8691596.41342397.41830.250.04850.00090.23780.00520.03590.0003120.544.4216.64.2227.71.9
SHJ02-21176.5587847.33813695.47540.230.04830.00090.23460.00470.03540.0003122.347.2214.03.9224.31.7
SHJ02-22153.2807710.86123166.14460.220.04830.00080.23860.00450.03590.0003122.340.7217.33.7227.21.8
SHJ02-23196.6776701.13504246.85100.170.04910.00080.24080.00450.03580.0006150.140.7219.03.7227.03.5
SHJ02-24179.92751071.49673487.98230.310.04960.00070.24560.00420.03590.0003176.035.2223.03.4227.21.7
SHJ02-25296.8654767.38966829.84070.110.04960.00050.24570.00350.03590.0003176.030.6223.02.8227.21.7
SHJ02-2694.7876852.03941539.33100.550.04870.00100.23710.00500.03540.0003200.150.9216.04.1224.21.8
SHJ02-27133.8424471.90022911.69280.160.05050.00140.24860.00630.03580.0003216.764.8225.55.1226.81.9
Table
Table 2. Fluorite Sm and Nd isotopic compositions of the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit.
Table 2. Fluorite Sm and Nd isotopic compositions of the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit.
Sample No.Sm (ppm)Nd (ppm)147Sm/144Nd143Nd/144NdError (2σ)
SHJ02-A0.5564.140.08130.5118870.000017
SHJ03-A2.218.750.15260.5119660.000009
SHJ03-C2.289.020.15250.5119760.000007
SHJ04-A0.5994.10.08820.5118940.000006
Table
Table 3. Analytical data of REE (ppm) and CaO (wt%) for the Xiangcaoping granite and fluorite from the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit.
Table 3. Analytical data of REE (ppm) and CaO (wt%) for the Xiangcaoping granite and fluorite from the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit.
SamplesSHJ01
Fluorite		SHJ02
Fluorite		SHJ03
Fluorite		SHJ04
Fluorite		SHJ11
Granite		SHJ12-1
Granite		SHJ12-2
Granite		SHJ12-3
Granite		SHJ12-4
Granite
La10.556.007.0622.6421.1626.9734.0233.0526.29
Ce22.4512.4714.7252.646.6756.9068.9766.8755.38
Pr2.891.371.846.635.486.347.547.496.52
Nd12.254.547.6224.620.2425.8928.4331.3822.36
Sm3.170.861.984.954.565.206.226.404.95
Eu0.450.140.280.740.400.370.370.440.61
Gd3.410.751.944.143.663.824.884.733.74
Tb0.580.120.320.630.650.600.770.710.61
Dy3.130.581.692.93.232.723.593.142.81
Ho0.650.110.340.530.660.500.680.550.53
Er1.650.260.821.341.691.331.811.441.39
Tm0.260.040.130.210.270.190.270.210.21
Yb1.600.260.761.361.661.241.641.271.23
Lu0.240.040.110.210.240.180.230.180.18
Y39.864.9919.2130.1319.1714.8118.9216.0014.54
ΣREE63.2627.5539.62123.48110.57132.26159.43157.88126.82
LREE51.7625.3933.5112.1798.51121.68145.56145.64116.12
HREE11.512.166.1211.3212.0610.5813.8712.2410.70
LREE/
HREE		4.511.755.479.918.1711.5010.4911.8910.85
(La/Yb)N4.7416.316.6511.969.1415.6314.8518.7315.36
(La/Sm)N2.154.492.302.953.003.353.533.333.43
(Gd/Yb)N1.772.352.112.521.832.552.463.092.52
δEu0.420.530.430.500.290.250.200.230.42
δCe1.001.061.001.051.041.031.011.001.01
F----0.300.140.120.130.13
CaO----0.300.530.780.870.51
Table
Table 4. Results of fluid inclusion analysis of fluorite of the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit.
Table 4. Results of fluid inclusion analysis of fluorite of the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit.
SampleMineralTypeCountsVapor/Liquid (%)Freezing Point (°C)Homogenization
Temperature
(°C)		Salinity
(%)
SHJ01FluoriteL + V920~25−0.1~−1.3140~1850.18~2.23
SHJ02FluoriteL + V2120~30−0.1~−5.0155~2810.16~7.86
SHJ03FluoriteL + V925~35−0.1~−1.4153~2100.18~2.40
SHJ04FluoriteL + V1120~30−0.2~−2.7126~2640.35~4.48
Table
Table 5. Oxygen and hydrogen isotopic compositions of fluid inclusions from the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit.
Table 5. Oxygen and hydrogen isotopic compositions of fluid inclusions from the Shuanghuajiang fluorite deposit.
Sample NoMineralδDV-SMOW/‰δ18OV-SMOW/‰
SHJ01fluorite−23.9−5.7
SHJ03fluorite−23.5−6.1
SHJ0fluorite−17.35−5.2
SHJ07fluorite−21.3−5.2
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, G.; Fang, G.; Feng, Z.; Xu, C.; Huang, Z.; Wang, C. Genetic Relationship between Granite and Fluorite Mineralization in the Shuanghuajiang Fluorite Deposit, Northern Guangxi, South China: Evidence from Geochronology, REE, and Fluid Geochemistry. Minerals 2022, 12, 1102. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12091102

AMA Style

Li G, Fang G, Feng Z, Xu C, Huang Z, Wang C. Genetic Relationship between Granite and Fluorite Mineralization in the Shuanghuajiang Fluorite Deposit, Northern Guangxi, South China: Evidence from Geochronology, REE, and Fluid Geochemistry. Minerals. 2022; 12(9):1102. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12091102

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Gen, Guicong Fang, Zuohai Feng, Cheng Xu, Zhennan Huang, and Chunzeng Wang. 2022. "Genetic Relationship between Granite and Fluorite Mineralization in the Shuanghuajiang Fluorite Deposit, Northern Guangxi, South China: Evidence from Geochronology, REE, and Fluid Geochemistry" Minerals 12, no. 9: 1102. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12091102

APA Style

Li, G., Fang, G., Feng, Z., Xu, C., Huang, Z., & Wang, C. (2022). Genetic Relationship between Granite and Fluorite Mineralization in the Shuanghuajiang Fluorite Deposit, Northern Guangxi, South China: Evidence from Geochronology, REE, and Fluid Geochemistry. Minerals, 12(9), 1102. https://doi.org/10.3390/min12091102

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop