1. Introduction
It is well known that the Banach contraction principle was published in 1922 by S. Banach as follows:
Theorem 1. Let be a complete metric space and a self mapping . If there exists such that, for all , , then T has a unique fixed point in
The Banach contraction principle has been extensively studied and different generalizations were obtained.
In 1968 [
1], Kannan established his famous extension of this contraction.
Theorem 2. Ref. [1] Let be a complete metric space and a self mapping . If T satisfies the following condition:then T has a fixed point in A similar contractive condition has been introduced by Chattergea in 1972 [
2] as follows:
Theorem 3. Ref. [2] Let , where is a complete metric space. If there exists such thatthen T has a fixed point in We can also find another extension of the Banach contraction principle obtained by S. Reich, Kannan in 1971 [
3].
Theorem 4. Ref. [3] Let , where is a complete metric space. If there exists such thatthen T has a fixed point in In addition, in the same year, Cirić gave the following extension [
4].
Theorem 5. Ref. [4] Let , where a complete metric space. If there exists such thatthen T has a fixed point in Many authors have investigated these situations and many results were proved (see [
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10,
11,
12,
13]).
In this article, we prove the uniqueness and existence of the fixed points in different types contractions for a self mapping T defined on the union of tree closed subsets of a complete metric space with k in different intervals.
2. Preliminaries
In best approximation theory, the concept of tricyclic mappings extends that of ordinary cyclic mappings. Moreover, in the case where two of the sets, say A and C, coincide, we find a cyclic mapping which is also a self-map, and, hence, a best proximity point result for a tricyclic mappings means also a fixed point and a best proximity point result for a self-map and a cyclic mapping.
Definition 1. Let A, B be nonempty subsets of a metric space . A mapping is said to be cyclic if: In 2003, Kirk et al. [
14] proved that, if
is cyclic and, for some
,
for all
, then
, and
T has a unique fixed point in
.
In 2017, Sabar et al. [
15] proved a similar result for tricyclic mappings and introduced the concept of tricyclic contractions.
Theorem 6. Ref. [15] Let and C be nonempty closed subsets of a complete metric space , and let a mapping . If and and there exists such that for all , then is nonempty and T has a unique fixed point in where
Definition 2. Ref. [15] Let and C be nonempty subsets of a metric space . A mapping is said to be tricyclic contracton if there exists such that: - 1.
and
- 2.
for all
where
Very Recently, Sabiri et al. introduced an extension of the aforementioned mappings and called them p-cyclic contractions [
16].
3. Main Results
Definition 3. Let and C be nonempty subsets of a metric space . A mapping is said to be a Kannan-S-type tricyclic contraction, if there exists such that
- 1.
- 2.
for all
We give an example to show that a map can be a tricyclic contraction but not a Kannan-S-type tricyclic contraction.
Example 1. Let X be normed by the norm and then Put such that We have and , andfor all On the other hand,andwhich implies that Then, T is tricyclic contraction but not a Kannan-S-type tricyclic contraction.
Now, we give an example for which T is a Kannan-S-type tricyclic contraction but not a tricyclic contraction.
Example 2. Let with the usual metric. Let then Put such that For and we haveand Then, T is not tricyclic contraction.
However T is a Kannan-S-type tricyclic contraction. Indeed:
If , we havefor all , then for 0 If , and , we havefor all , then for 0 If and , we haveandthen, for , we have If and we haveand Then, for , we have Consequently, for , we have:
Theorem 7. Let and C be nonempty closed subsets of a complete metric space and let be a Kannan-S-type tricyclic contraction. Then, T has a unique fixed point in
Proof. Consequently,
implies that
is a Cauchy sequence in
Hence, there exists
such that
Notice that
is a sequence in
is a sequence in
C and
is a sequence in
B and that both sequences tend to the same limit
z. Regarding the fact that
and
C are closed, we conclude
, hence
To show that
z is a fixed point, we must show that
. Observe that
which is equivalent to
Since , , which implies .
To prove the uniqueness of
assume that there exists
such that
and
. Taking into account that
T is tricyclic, we get
We have
which implies
. We get that
and hence
z is the unique fixed point of
□
Example 3. Let X be normed by the norm let , and let be defined by In addition, for all , we have Then, T is a Kannan-S-type tricyclic contraction, and T has a unique fixed point in
Corollary 1. Let be a complete metric space and a self mapping . If there exists such thatfor all , then T has a unique fixed point. Now, we shall define another type of a tricyclic contraction.
Definition 4. Let and C be nonempty subsets of a metric space . A mapping is said to be a Chattergea-S-type tricyclic contraction if , and there exist such that for all
Theorem 8. Let and C be nonempty closed subsets of a complete metric space , and let be a Chattergea-S-type tricyclic contraction. Then, T has a unique fixed point in
Proof. Fix
. We have
which implies
so
and
Then,
which implies
for all
. Consequently,
implies that
is a Cauchy sequence in
. Hence, there exists
such that
Notice that
is a sequence in
is a sequence in
C, and
is a sequence in
B and that both sequences tend to the same limit
z. Regarding that
and
C are closed, we conclude
hence
To show that
z is a fixed point, we must show that
Observe that
which is equivalent to
Since
then
, which implies
To prove the uniqueness of assume that there exists such that and Taking into account that T is tricyclic, we get
Then, We conclude that and hence z is the unique fixed point of □
Corollary 2. Let be a complete metric space and a self mapping . If there exists such thatfor all , then T has a unique fixed point. In this step, we define a Reich-S-type tricyclic contraction.
Definition 5. Let and C be nonempty subsets of a metric space .
A mapping is said to be a Reich-S-type tricyclic contraction if there exists such that:
- 1.
- 2.
for all
Theorem 9. Let and C be nonempty closed subsets of a complete metric space and let be a Reich-S-type tricyclic contraction. Then, T has a unique fixed point in
Proof. Then,
which implies
consequently
This implies that is a Cauchy sequence in . Hence, there exists such that Notice that is a sequence in is a sequence in C and is a sequence in B and that both sequences tend to the same limit z. Regarding the fact that and C are closed, we conclude that hence
To show that
z is a fixed point, we must show that
. Observe that
which is equivalent to
.
Since then , which implies
To prove the uniqueness of
assume that there exists
such that
and
Taking into account that
T is tricyclic, we get
implies
We conclude that
and hence
z is the unique fixed point of
□
Example 4. We take the same example 3.
Let X be normed by the norm ,and let be defined by We have T is tricyclic and for all , This implies that T is a Reich-S-type tricyclic contraction, and T has a unique fixed point in
Corollary 3. Let a complete metric space and a self mapping . If there exists such thatfor all , then T has a unique fixed point in X. The next tricyclic contraction considered in this section is the Cirić-S-type tricyclic contraction defined below.
Definition 6. Let and C be nonempty subsets of a metric space be a Cirié-S-type tricyclic contraction, if there exists such that
- 1.
- 2.
for all
where
The fixed point theorem of the Cirić-S-type tricyclic contraction reads as follows.
Theorem 10. Let and C be nonempty closed subsets of a complete metric space and let be a Cirić-S- type tricyclic contraction, then T has a unique fixed point in
Proof. Taking we have for all . If , Theorem 7 implies the desired result.
Consider the case
We have:
Consequently,
which implies that
is a Cauchy sequence in
. Hence, there exists
such that
Notice that
is a sequence in
is a sequence in
C, and
is a sequence in
B and that both sequences tend to the same limit
z; regarding the fact that
and
C are closed, we conclude
hence
To show that
z is a fixed point, we must show that
Observe that
which is equivalent to
. Since
then
, which implies
To prove the uniqueness of assume that there exists such that and .
Taking into account that T is tricyclic, we get
implies We conclude that and hence z is the unique fixed point of
Consider the case
. We have:
which is impossible since
Consider the case
. We have:
which is impossible since
□
Corollary 4. Let and C be a nonempty subset of a complete metric space and let a mapping . If there exists such that
- 1.
- 2.
.
Then, T has a unique fixed point in