1. Introduction
Recently, the fixed-circle problem has been considered for metric and some generalized metric spaces (see [
1,
2,
3,
4,
5,
6] for more details). For example, in [
1], some fixed-circle results were obtained using the Caristi type contraction on a metric space. Using Wardowski’s technique and some classical contractive conditions, new fixed-circle theorems were proved in [
5,
6]. In [
2,
3], the fixed-circle problem was studied on an
S-metric space. In [
7], a new fixed-circle theorem was proved using the modified Khan type contractive condition on an
S-metric space. Some generalized fixed-circle results with geometric viewpoint were obtained on
-metric spaces and parametric
-metric spaces (see [
8,
9] for more details, respectively). Also, it was proposed to investigate some fixed-circle theorems on extended
-metric spaces [
10]. On the other hand, an application of the obtained fixed-circle results was given to discontinuous activation functions on metric spaces (see [
1,
4,
11]). Hence it is important to study new fixed-circle results using different techniques.
Let
be a metric space and
be any circle on
X. In [
5], it was given the following open problem.
Open Problem : What is (are) the condition(s) to make any circle as the common fixed circle for two (or more than two) self-mappings?
In this paper, we give new results to the fixed-circle problem using Khan type contractions and to the above open problem using both of Khan and Ćirić type contractions on a metric space. In
Section 2, we introduce three types of
-Khan type contractions and obtain new fixed-circle results. In
Section 3, we investigate some solutions to the above Open Problem
. In addition, we construct some examples to support our theoretical results.
2. New Fixed-Circle Theorems
In this section, using Khan type contractions, we give new fixed-circle theorems (see [
12,
13,
14,
15] for some Khan type contractions used to obtain fixed-point theorems). At first, we recall the following definitions.
Definition 1 ([
16])
. Let be the family of all functions such that F is strictly increasing,
For each sequence of positive numbers, if and only if ,
There exists such that .
Definition 2 ([
16])
. Let be a metric space. A mapping is said to be an F-contraction on , if there exist and such thatfor all .
Definition 3 ([
15])
.Let be the family of all increasing functions , that is, for all , if then .
Definition 4 ([
15])
. Let be a metric space and be a self-mapping. T is said to be an F-Khan-contraction if there exist and such that for all if then andand if then .
Now we modify the definition of an
F-Khan-contractive condition, which is used to obtain a fixed point theorem in [
15], to get new fixed-circle results. Hence, we define the notion of an
-Khan type I contractive condition as follows.
Definition 5. Let be a metric space and be a self-mapping. T is said to be an -Khan type I contraction if there exist , and such that for all if the following condition holdsthenwhere and if then .
One of the consequences of this definition is the following proposition.
Proposition 1. Let be a metric space. If a self-mapping T on X is an -Khan type I contraction with then we get .
Proof. Let
. Then using the hypothesis, we find
and
This is a contradiction since and so it should be . □
Consequently, the condition (
1) can be replaced with
and so
. Considering this, now we give a new fixed-circle theorem.
Theorem 1. Let be a metric space, be a self-mapping and If T is an -Khan type I contraction with then is a fixed circle of T.
Proof. Let
. Assume that
. Then we have
and by the
-Khan type I contractive condition, we obtain
a contradiction since
. Therefore, we have
and so
T fixes the circle
. □
Corollary 1. Let be a metric space, be a self-mapping and r be defined as in (2). If T is an -Khan type I contraction with then T fixes the disc .
We recall the following theorem.
Theorem 2 ([
12])
. Let be a metric space and satisfywhere and . Then T has a unique fixed point . Moreover, for all , the sequence converges to .
We modify the inequality (
3) using Wardowski’s technique to obtain a new fixed-point theorem. We give the following definition.
Definition 6. Let be a metric space and be a self-mapping. T is said to be an -Khan type II contraction if there exist , and such that for all if then andwhere and if then .
An immediate consequence of this definition is the following result.
Proposition 2. Let be a metric space. If a self-mapping T on X is an -Khan type II contraction then we get .
Proof. Let
. Then using the hypothesis, we find
and
which is a contradiction since
. Hence it should be
. □
Theorem 3. Let be a metric space, be a self-mapping and r be defined as in (2). If T is an -Khan type II contraction with then is a fixed circle of T.
Proof. Let
. Assume that
. Then using Proposition 2, we get
By the
-Khan type II contractive condition, we obtain
a contradiction since
. Therefore, we have
and
T fixes the circle
. □
Corollary 2. Let be a metric space, be a self-mapping and r be defined as in (2). If T is an -Khan type II contraction with then T fixes the disc .
In the following theorem, we see that the -Khan type I and -Khan type II contractive conditions are equivalent.
Theorem 4. Let be a metric space and be a self-mapping. T satisfies the -Khan type I contractive condition if and only if T satisfies the -Khan type II contractive condition.
Proof. Let the
-Khan type I contractive condition be satisfied by
T. Using Proposition 1 and Proposition 2, we get
Using the similar arguments, the converse statement is clear. Consequently, the -Khan type I contractive and the -Khan type II contractive conditions are equivalent. □
Remark 1. By Theorem 4, we see that Theorem 1 and Theorem 3 are equivalent.
Now we give an example.
Example 1. Let be the metric space with the usual metric . Let us define the self-mapping asfor all . The self-mapping T is both of an -Khan type I and an -Khan type II contraction with , , and . Indeed, we getfor all such that . Then we haveand Consequently, T fixes the circle and the disc . Notice that the self-mapping T has other fixed circles. The above results give us only one of these circles. Also, T has infinitely many fixed circles.
Now we consider the case if
is a self-mapping, then for all
,
Definition 7. Let be a metric space and be a self-mapping. Then T is called a C-Khan type contraction if there exists such thatwhere for all .
We can give the following fixed-circle result.
Theorem 5. Let be a metric space, be a self-mapping and be a circle on X. If T satisfies the C-Khan type contractive condition (4) for all with then T fixes the circle .
Proof. Let
. Suppose that
. Using the
C-Khan type contractive condition with
, we find
which is a contradiction since
. Consequently,
T fixes the circle
. □
Theorem 6. Let be a metric space, and be a self-mapping. If T is a C-Khan type contraction for all with then T is the identity map on X.
Proof. Let
be any point. If
then using the
C-Khan type contractive condition (
4) with
, we find
which is a contradiction since
. Consequently, we have
and hence
T is the identity map
on
X. □
Example 2. Let be the usual metric space and consider the circle . Let us define the self-mapping asfor all . Then the self-mapping T satisfies the C-Khan type contractive condition for all and . Consequently, is a fixed circle of T.
3. Common Fixed-Circle Results
Recently, it was obtained some coincidence and common fixed-point theorems using Wardowski’s technique and the Ćirić type contractions (see [
17] for more details). In this section, we extend the notion of a Khan type
-contraction to a pair of maps to obtain a solution to the Open Problem
. At first, we give the following definition.
Definition 8. Let be a metric space and be two self-mappings. A pair of self-mappings is called a Khan type -contraction if there exist , and such that for all if the following condition holdsthenwhere and if then .
An immediate consequence of this definition is the following proposition.
Proposition 3. Let be a metric space and be two self-mappings. If the pair of self-mappings is a Khan type -contraction with then is a coincidence point of T and S, that is, .
Proof. We prove this proposition under the following cases:
Case 1: Let
and
. Then using the hypothesis, we get
and so
which is a contradiction since
and
.
Case 2: Let and . By the similar arguments used in the proof of Case 1, we get a contradiction.
Case 3: Let and . Then we get .
Case 4: Let
,
and
. Using the hypothesis, we obtain
and so
Assume that
. Using the inequality (
5), we get
which is a contradiction. Suppose that
. Using the inequality (
5), we find
which is a contradiction. Consequently,
is a coincidence point of
T and
S, that is,
. □
Now we use the following number given in [
17] (see Definition 3.1 on page 183):
We give the following definition.
Definition 9. Let be a metric space and be two self-mappings. A pair of self-mappings is called a Ćirić type -contraction if there exist , and such that for all We get the following proposition.
Proposition 4. Let be a metric space and be two self-mappings. If the pair of self-mappings is both a Khan type -contraction and a Ćirić type -contraction with then is a common fixed point of T and S, that is, .
Proof. By the Khan type
-contractive property and Proposition 3, we know that
is a coincidence point of
T and
S, that is,
. Now we prove that
is a common fixed point of
T and
S. Let
. Then using the Ćirić type
-contractive condition, we get
which is a contradiction because of the definition of
F. Therefore it should be
. Consequently,
is a common fixed point of
T and
S, that is,
. □
Notice that we get a coincidence point result for a pair of self-mappings using the Khan type -contractive condition by Proposition 3. We obtain a common fixed-point result for a pair of self-mappings using the both of Khan type -contractive condition and the Ćirić type -contractive condition by Proposition 4.
We prove the following common fixed-circle theorem as a solution to the Open Problem .
Theorem 7. Let be a metric space, be two self-mappings and r be defined as in (2). If for all and the pair of self-mappings is both a Khan type -contraction and a Ćirić type -contraction with then is a common fixed circle of T and S, that is, for all .
Proof. Let
. We show that
x is a coincidence point of
T and
S. Using Proposition 4, we get
and so by the definition of the Khan type
-contraction we obtain
Now we prove that
is a common fixed circle of
T and
S. Assume that
. Using Proposition 4 and the hypothesis Ćirić type
-contractive condition, we find
which contradicts with the definition of
r. Consequently, we have
and so
is a common fixed circle of
T and
S. □
Corollary 3. Let be a metric space, be two self-mappings and r be defined as in (2). If for all and the pair of self-mappings is both a Khan type -contraction and a Ćirić type -contraction with then T and S fix the disc , that is, for all .
We give an illustrative example.
Example 3. Let be the metric space with the usual metric. Let us define the self-mappings and asandfor all . The pair of the self-mappings is both a Khan type -contraction and a Ćirić type -contraction with , and . Indeed, we getand so . Therefore, the pair is a Khan type -contraction. Also we getfor andfor all . Then we haveandHence the pair is a Ćirić type -contraction. Also we obtainConsequently, T fixes the circle and the disc .
In closing, we want to bring to the reader attention the following question, under what conditions we can prove the results in [
18,
19,
20] in fixed circle?