1. Introduction
RSs are of vital importance with respect to the functionality of components during operation. The surfaces exposed to the cyclic load require compressive RSs not only in the near-surface layer but in the deeper layers as well since the maximum Hertz pressure can be found at a certain distance beneath the free surface [
1]. The final state of RSs is very often produced during the finishing cycles, such as grinding, turning, superfinishing, etc. The development of machine tools, as well as process technology, has increased the industrial relevance of finishing turning [
2], which can be used as a substitute for the grinding cycles. Hard turning can produce a very good surface state that can be expressed in terms of surface roughness [
3,
4,
5] and the depth extent of microstructure transformations as well as RSs. However, progressively developed tool wear (especially the flank wear
VB (Verhandlungs basis)) should be considered as a risk factor [
6]. RSd initiated by turning cycles are due to the following:
- -
The non-homogenous plastic deformation of the neighbouring layers (compressive RS);
- -
The non-homogenous thermal expansion of the neighbouring layers (tensile RS);
- -
Phase transformation (compressive or tensile RS);
- -
A combination of the aforementioned aspects.
The turning cycles of high-tempered steels can produce a WL of variable thickness depending on the cutting conditions and, mainly, the development of flank wear
VB [
6,
7,
8]. For this reason, all of the aforementioned aspects initiating RSs should be considered. Therefore, the final RSs are e driven by their superimposing contribution. The amplitude and the direction of RSs in the different layers beneath the free surface depend on the prevailing effects listed above. Moreover, the RS state cannot be considered uniaxial, but instead, due to the remarkable differences in RSs, the cutting and feed directions should be taken into account as a result of unbalanced cutting and feed speeds. The strong imbalance with respect to process kinematics results in the preferential orientation of the matrix in the near-surface layer [
6,
8].
The term hard machining (hard turning) is usually associated with steels with a hardness above 50 HRC [
2,
6,
7]. On the other hand, some aspects predominant in hard turning cycles can be found during the machining of hardened steels below this threshold as well. The formation of a surface WL (as a re-hardened matrix) [
7,
9] is frequently linked with the hard turning process. The WL is a product of high temperatures (exceeding the austenitising ones) followed by rapid self-cooling when
VB exceeds the critical threshold [
7,
10,
11]. RS produced by hard turning is a function of
VB, cutting edge geometry, component hardness, etc. [
7,
12,
13]. Insert flank wear
VB can remarkably alter the amplitude of RSs as well as their penetration beneath the free surface [
12,
13].
High-tempered steel is a progressive material with an outstanding combination of mixed hardness and toughness. However, the functionality of components made of these steels especially depends on the surface state [
14] expressed in terms such as RS profile, phase transformation in the near-surface layer, its phase composition, microhardness, etc. [
2,
12,
15]. Turning operations are usually performed under constant cutting conditions. However, flank wear
VB (associated with mechanical and thermal loads), as well as the corresponding stress and microstructure of the machined surface state, can vary remarkably [
10,
16].
This study investigates the specific character of the residual stress state with respect to the presence of shear stress. Apart from stress states, microstructure alterations in the near-surface region were also studied in terms of WL thickness or/and WL hardness. The above-listed components of surface integrity were investigated as a function of cutting speed as well as flank wear area. Their depth gradients are discussed with respect to phase transformation and non-uniform mechanical and thermal loads during hard cycles.
2. Materials and Methods
The experimental study was carried out on heat-treated bearing steel 100Cr6 with a hardness of 40 ± 1 HRC. The heat treatment of the samples was carried out under industrial conditions. Samples in the form of a disk with an external diameter of 145 mm, an internal diameter of 25 mm and a width of 25 mm were quenched in oil at a temperature of 60 °C after reaching an austenitising temperature of 840 °C and tempered for 2 h afterwards at a temperature of 530 °C. Hard face turning was carried out through the use of cutting insert DNGA 150408 made of PCBN (CBN particles, 3 ÷ 5 μm; CBN content, 70%; TiN coating) with a 0.8 mm nose radius and a chamfer angle of −35° (chamfer width: 250 μm). Inserts of variable flank wear VB (in the range from 0.05 to 0.8 mm) were prepared prior to the experiment during hard turning.
Hard turning operations are not usually performed with insert flank wear
VB above 0.4 mm in order to avoid excessive cutting forces and corresponding instability in the machining. On the other hand,
VB is a major factor affecting the thickness of WL as well as the penetration of RSs beneath the free surface. For this reason, quite large
VB were employed. A cutting depth of
ap = 0.25 mm and a feed of
f = 0.09 mm (the feed direction corresponds with the axial direction on the turned surface) were kept constant. The rotational speed of the spindle was also kept constant, resulting in a variable cutting speed through the disk diameter during face turning, as shown in
Figure 1. The cutting speed
vc varied from 70 m.min
−1 at a distance of approx. 8 mm from the inner diameter up to 230 m.min
−1 at a distance of approx. 8 mm from the outer diameter.
The RSs were measured in the tangential direction (direction of
vc, which is referred to as RS
T) as well as in the perpendicular axial direction (direction of
f, which is referred to as RS
A), as shown in
Figure 1. Apart from the normal component of the RSs, shear was analysed as well. The RS shear components are referred to as RSS
T in the tangential direction and RSS
A in the axial direction. The determination of RSs was performed using the XRD technique carried out on a Proto iXRD Combo diffractometer using CrKα radiation. The average effective penetration depth of the XRD measurements was ~5 μm, with a scanning angle of ±39° and a Bragg angle of 156.4°. The residual stress was calculated by examining the shifts in <211> reflection. The Winholtz and Cohen method and X-ray elastic constants
½S2 = 5.75 TPa
−1,
S1 = −1.25 TPa
−1 were used for residual stress determination. In order to analyse the stress gradients beneath the free surface, layers of the material were gradually removed via electro-chemical polishing. The thickness of the layer removed during electro-chemical polishing was measured using the MarCator 1086R digital indicator with a precision of 0.0005 mm.
To reveal the microstructural transformations induced by hard milling, 10 mm long pieces were prepared for metallographic observations (etched using 5% Nital for 8 s). The microstructure was observed in the direction of the cutting speed. Microhardness measurements of HV0.05 in the WL were carried out in the case of samples turned by the insert of VB = 0.8 mm since the thickness of the WL was sufficient enough for such measurements. Microhardness measurements for other samples turned by the inserts of lower VB were not carried out due to the insufficient thickness of WL. Microhardness measurements HV0.05 were carried out using Innova Test 400TM (50 g load; dwell time, 10 s).
Cutting force components
Fc and
Fp were measured through the use of the Kistler 9441 dynamometer (Kistler, Winterthur, Switzerland). The measured components were decomposed in order to extract the shear
Fαt and normal components
Fαtn of
Fα as the net energy consumed in the
VB region separated from the energy consumed for chip formation and associated with
Fγ. Further details and the methodology of this decomposition can be found in the previous reports [
10,
17].
3. Results of Experiments and Their Discussion
Figure 2 demonstrates that
VB remarkably affects the amplitude of RSs as well as their extent in terms of depth. More developed
VB tends to shift the surface RS
T from the tensile region towards the compressive RS
T. On the other hand, the evolution of surface RSs is not monotonous and straightforward due to the contribution of the non-linear evolution of cutting edge geometry with
VB and the corresponding mechanical and thermal load of the surface. RS profiles for
VB = 0.6 mm are positioned near those of
VB = 0.2 mm since the evolution of the normal components
Fαtn of
Fα exhibits a local minimum beyond
VB = 0.4 mm [
17] (see
Table 1) due to the abrupt change in the evolution of the cutting edge geometry in this region (see the previous study in which the cutting edge geometry evolution, expressed in terms of rake angle
γn, cutting edge radius
rn, and evolution of
Fαtn, is reported [
10,
17]). It was found that the initial negative rake angle of
γn = −35° for the new insert turns to a nearly zero geometry for the insert of
VB = 0.4 mm, followed by a certain drop to a more negative geometry afterwards. However, this drop is compensated by the steep increase in cutting edge radius
rn, as shown in
Figure 3.
Progressively developed
VB initiates phase transformation in the near-surface region when the matrix is heated above the austenitising temperature, followed by rapid self-cooling [
18,
19,
20]. Such a thermal cycle produces a re-hardened WL, see
Figure 4. The thickness of WL increases with
VB; however, WL thickness exhibits a local minimum at
VB = 0.6 mm (see
Figure 5), and the evolution of the WL correlates with the evolution of normal and shear components of
Fα and the associated alterations in cutting edge geometry, as shown in
Figure 3. It should also be mentioned that the surface RS for
VB = 0.8 mm is less compared to that of
VB = 0.4 mm (see
Figure 2a,b). The main reason can be viewed as the stress release due to the phase transformation when a certain energy associated with the non-homogeneity in the near-surface heating and stressing is consumed due to matrix dynamic recovery during rapid self-cooling. It is also worth mentioning that a WL can be found on the surfaces for all
VB. However, the thickness of the WL is usually far below the sensing depth of the XRD technique apart from that of
VB = 0.4 mm, which is quite close to the sensing depth (see
Figure 5). Therefore, it is considered that the degree of surface stress relaxation grows with WL thickness.
Figure 2 also depicts the region in which RS is changed with respect to the bulk stress widening with
VB, and the amplitude of compressive RS in the deeper layers increases with
VB as well. On the other hand, the amplitude of compressive RS
A is greater compared with RS
T due to the contribution of the kinematics of the turning process (the cutting speed
vc is one order higher compared with the feed speed), preferential matrix orientation in the tangential direction [
6,
8] which, in turn, corresponds with the remarkable stress anisotropy [
8].
Figure 6 demonstrates that the contribution of the variable cutting speed
vc is only minor, and the influence of
VB remarkably prevails. Nearly the same RS profiles for the different
vc can be found for all inserts of variable
VB.
Figure 7a shows that
FWHMT progressively decreases with respect to the increasing depth below the free surface for all
VB. It can also be noted that the
FWHMT measured directly on the free surface is strongly dependent on WL thickness when the high WL thickness can be linked with the thick WL and vice versa. Moreover, the depth at which the valuable increase in
FWHMT above the untouched bulk can be found increases with WL thickness. However, this parameter is mainly a function of dislocation density, and no valuable directional anisotropy for
FWHM measured in the direction of the cutting and feed speeds can be found.
The evolution of RSS
T is quite interesting, as shown in
Figure 7b. The surface RSS
T are indirectly proportional to WL thickness. RSS
T profiles for the thin WL (for
VB = 0.05 and
VB 0.1 mm) exhibit the highest surface negative RSS
T and rapid decrease toward the bulk. RSS
T profiles for the WL of medium thickness (for
VB = 0.2 and
VB = 0.6 mm) exhibit medium surface negative RSS
T and a certain increase in the amplitude in the subsurface layers followed by a progressive decrease in the deeper region. Finally, RSS
T seem to be relaxed when the thickness of the WL is comparable to or higher than the XRD sensing depth, followed by a moderate increase in negative RSS
T in the deeper layers. On the other hand, RSS
A exhibit no valuable evolution, and RSS
A values more or less randomly fluctuate with respect to
VB,
vc, and depth. Deeper insight into RSSs and the physical interpretation of this parameter with respect to the turning process and the matrix produced is unclear in the current state of the art.
The XRD technique can be used in a destructive manner when depth profiles are analysed. On the other hand, XRD patterns can also be employed in a non-destructive manner when the information from the near-surface region only (which thickness corresponds to its sensing depths) is carried out.
Figure 8 and
Figure 9 and
Table 2 demonstrate the potential of the different XRD parameters for non-destructive monitoring of WL thickness.
Figure 8a shows that the surface RS
T shifts from the tensile region towards the compressive region with increasing WL thickness (nearly the same evolution can be found for the axial direction). However, this evolution saturates when the XRD sensing depth attains the WL thickness as a result of the more developed stress relaxation in the case of a thick WL. A similar evolution expressed in terms of the correlation coefficient
ρp can be found for RSS
T (see
Figure 9a) and zero correlation for RSS
A due to the random fluctuation of this parameter with respect to
VB,
vc, and depth (see
Figure 9b). The best correlation can be found between
FWHM and WL thickness, as shown in
Figure 8b.
FWHM is the XRD parameter usually associated with matrix hardness, which is less dependent on the stress state and more correlated with dislocation density [
21,
22,
23]. The WL thickness for
VB = 0.8 mm is thick enough to carry out the microhardness measurements inside the WL layer, and the
HV0.05 profiles are illustrated in
Figure 10. This figure demonstrates that the microhardness of the WL increases with decreasing depth due to the lower thermal load and, therefore, the higher rate of rapid self-cooling [
24,
25]. The influence of
vc is only minor, and the microhardness falls quite steeply toward depth. This figure also depicts that the remarkably altered RS and
FWHM values penetrate much deeper compared to the
HV0.05 depth profiles (see also
Figure 2). Therefore, correlation analysis between
FWHM and
HV0.05 (as shown in
Figure 11) should be executed at a limited depth (about 55 μm). On the other hand,
Figure 7 clearly demonstrates that the steep fall of
FWHMT can be found just in this region. The further drop of
FWHMT for
VB = 0.8 mm beyond this threshold in
Figure 7 is moderate only.
Figure 11 demonstrates quite good correlation between
HV0.05 and
FWHMT (a similar evolution can be found for the axial direction as well), and the correlation coefficient
ρp is close to that indicated in
Figure 8b. Comparing
Figure 7 and
Figure 11, it can be noticed that
FWHM exhibits a lack of sensitivity against WL thickness for
VB = 0.8 mm with respect to variable
vc, but this parameter is sensitive to its hardness expressed in the term
HV0.05.
Figure 2 shows that the non-homogenous heating of different layers beneath the free surface prevails over the mechanical one since the surface RS
T are tensile when WL thickness is low. However, these RS
T are quite rapidly transformed into compressive ones. The contribution of phase transformation is limited due to the low WL thickness. Thermal load is driven by the specific heat
Qα’, as reported in the previous study [
17]. This parameter takes into account the generated heat
Qα =
Fαt.
vc, as well as the duration of surface heating
τ (for further detail, check [
14]). On the one hand, increasing
VB makes the time within the surface exposed to heat longer. On the other hand,
vc increases the produced heat but shortens
τ. The shift of the surface RS
T for a thicker WL (
VB = 0.4 and 0.8 mm) is due to the higher rate of normal component
Fαtn growth along with
VB compared to that of
Fαt [
10,
17], as shown in
Table 2. For this reason, non-homogenous plastic deformation dominates over thermal heating in the case of
VB = 0.4 mm and
VB = 0.8 mm, and the compressive surface of RS
T can be found. Although the phase transformation associated with WL formation consumes certain stress (as mentioned above), the
Fαtn component still dominates over
Fαt, which is attributed to the thermal load via
Qα.
RS
T in the deeper layers are compressive, which indicates that the contribution of surface heating is vanishing and that the amplitude of the compressive RS
T, as well as their penetration depth, is driven mainly in the case of
Fαtn. In order to carry out the exact correlation analysis between the
Fαtn and RS
T profiles, the parameters indicated in
Figure 12 were proposed and analysed (taking into account the bulk stress of −20 ± 8 MPa).
Figure 13, as well as the correlation coefficients of
ρp in
Table 3, indicate that the thermal effect and the associated phase transformation have a more important role in the near-surface layer. For this reason, the
ρp for
SS is lower than that of
MCS. Moreover, it seems that
Fαtn mainly affects
DMSC as well as
DB. A similar analysis of RS
A profiles as a function of
Fαt and
Fαtn is not possible since the shear component of
Fα is not known in the axial direction. On the other hand, it is considered that this component should be remarkably lower due to the prevailing compressive RS
A.