Next Article in Journal
Thrombus Density in Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion Depends on Slice Thickness and the Method of Manual Thrombus Delineation
Next Article in Special Issue
Dissecting the Relationship between Root Morphological Traits and Yield Attributes in Diverse Rice Cultivars under Subtropical Condition
Previous Article in Journal
Circadian Rhythm Regulates Reactive Oxygen Species Production and Inhibits Al-Induced Programmed Cell Death in Peanut
Previous Article in Special Issue
Unearthing the Alleviatory Mechanisms of Brassinolide in Cold Stress in Rice
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Multiple Facets of Nitrogen: From Atmospheric Gas to Indispensable Agricultural Input

1
Department of Southern Area Crop Science, National Institute of Crop Science, RDA, Miryang 50424, Korea
2
National Crops Resources Research Institute (NaCRRI), NARO, Entebbe 7084, Uganda
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Life 2022, 12(8), 1272; https://doi.org/10.3390/life12081272
Submission received: 15 July 2022 / Revised: 8 August 2022 / Accepted: 16 August 2022 / Published: 19 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rice Growth, Photosynthesis and Nitrogen Utilization)

Abstract

:
Nitrogen (N) is a gas and the fifth most abundant element naturally found in the atmosphere. N’s role in agriculture and plant metabolism has been widely investigated for decades, and extensive information regarding this subject is available. However, the advent of sequencing technology and the advances in plant biotechnology, coupled with the growing interest in functional genomics-related studies and the various environmental challenges, have paved novel paths to rediscovering the fundamentals of N and its dynamics in physiological and biological processes, as well as biochemical reactions under both normal and stress conditions. This work provides a comprehensive review on multiple facets of N and N-containing compounds in plants disseminated in the literature to better appreciate N in its multiple dimensions. Here, some of the ancient but fundamental aspects of N are revived and the advances in our understanding of N in the metabolism of plants is portrayed. It is established that N is indispensable for achieving high plant productivity and fitness. However, the use of N-rich fertilizers in relatively higher amounts negatively affects the environment. Therefore, a paradigm shift is important to shape to the future use of N-rich fertilizers in crop production and their contribution to the current global greenhouse gases (GHGs) budget would help tackle current global environmental challenges toward a sustainable agriculture.

1. Introduction

Agriculture is one of the major components of many development programs aiming at transforming economies, and it is perceived as a core economic sector with great potential to induce sustainable economic growth in several countries [1]. Agriculture is also central to achieving essential development goals, including ensuring food security and improving human and animal nutrition, as well as achieving employment stability and social growth [2].
To sustain their growth and productivity, plants require nutrients, which are essential for successful growth and achieving optimum yields. Among them, nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K), known as primary macronutrients, and sulfur (S), calcium (Ca), and magnesium, identified as secondary macronutrients, have been reported to play a preponderant role. Of all these nutrients, N has proven indispensable in several ways, and N deficiency in the soil has been shown to result in impaired growth and development that culminates in compromised productivity and quality of crops [3,4]. To date, dosages of primary macronutrient applications for various crop species have been optimized, and evidence of increased crop productivity has been recorded. One should note that the dosage of a particular fertilizer is a function of many factors, including plant nutrient requirement and growth stage, the variety of a crop species under cultivation, the type and the concentration of the fertilizer, and soil type and density. In the same way, the availability of nutrients to the plant is affected by the soil type, the pH, and the cationic exchange capacity (CEC) of the soil [5]. Likewise, abiotic factors, such as salinity, drought stress, or heavy-metal toxicity can impair the availability of nutrients to the plant, thus resulting in poor growth and productivity.
In recent years, many reports highlighted a growing interest in the use of an optimized plant nutrition, as well as the promotion of fertilizer use efficiency, which have emerged over the concerns that excessive application of mineral fertilizers, especially those rich in N, has proven to be one of the major causes of greenhouse gases (GHGs) emissions in agriculture [6,7,8]. Some voices emphasized the necessity to transition to sustainable agricultural production systems, while others sustained that the use of N-rich fertilizers is necessary for more food production to feed the growing global population. The paradigm of plant nutrition lies in the necessity to tackle the issue of soil fertility for efficient and successful crop cultivation and increased productivity, associated with an enhanced nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) by plants, while considering the sustainability and the resilience of food production systems. Recent alarming global warming records have set an imperative to reduce the emission of GHGs in all sectors. In agriculture (crop production), reducing the excessive application of N-rich fertilizers is a major target.
This review aims to provide an expanded view of the roles of N and N-containing compounds in plants, and it presents multiple facets of N under various conditions in a single location. We equally discuss the dynamics of N availability, use, remobilization, deficiency, and toxicity in soil and how these events affect the plant. This work also assesses and highlights the progress made in our understanding of N metabolism in plants, diving from the empirical background to the future use of N, from the perspective of global environmental challenges.

2. Basic Properties of Nitrogen and N-Containing Compounds

Nitrogen is a gas present in the air with an atomic mass of 14.007, a boiling and melting points of 77.36 K and 63.15 K, respectively, and a density of 0.0012506 g·cm–3. N was first discovered in 1772 by the Scottish physician and chemist Daniel Rutherford [9]. N is the fifth most abundant element in the universe after hydrogen (H, first), helium (He, second), oxygen (O, third), and neon (Ne, fourth), and it makes up approximately 78.1% of the earth’s atmosphere. Reports indicate that an estimate of 4000 trillion tons of N can be found in the atmosphere in the form of N2 (https://pubchem.ncbi.gov/element/Nitrogen, accessed on 31 May 2022). The most popular use of N is for the production of ammonia (NH3) when combined with hydrogen (H), in a process called the “Haber process” [10]. Then, large amounts of NH3 are used to produce mineral fertilizers in a process known as the “Ostwald process”, among other uses [11]. N is found in all living systems as part of the makeup of biological compounds. During the decomposition of organic matter (OM), sodium nitrate (NaNO3) and potassium nitrate (KNO3) are formed. Other inorganic N compounds include HNO3, NH3, the oxides (nitric oxide (NO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), N2O4, and nitrous oxide (N2O)), and cyanides (CN). NO2, NO, nitrous acid (HONO), and nitric acid (HNO3) belong to a group of highly reactive gases known as oxides of nitrogen or nitrogen oxides (NOx) [12].
NO2 is formed during nitrification and denitrification processes, in which N2O and NO are released, with N2O reported to be formed from NO3-dependent NO formation [13]. N2O is a potent greenhouse gas (GHG), with a global warming potential (GWP) 300 times greater than the mass of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere, right before methane (CH4) and CO2 [14,15]. As for NO, reports indicate that this molecule is versatile and bioactive, with the potential to diffuse through biological membranes owing to its physiological properties. NO can act as a signaling molecule, which may involve a very wide web with reactive oxygen species (ROS). However, excessive accumulation of NO induces stressful conditions in plants [16,17]. NO and its derived molecules are reported to be involved in abiotic and biotic stress response mechanisms.

3. Historical Use of Nitrogen and N-Rich Fertilizers in Agriculture

The history of agriculture revealed that a number of plant species were domesticated from wild ancestors [18,19,20,21,22,23] during the Early Pre-Pottery Neolithic period, at various locations and different times between 10,500 and 10,100 years before common era, BCE [24,25,26]. During this period, crops exhibited a low productivity, poor yields, and poor quality, mainly attributed to their genetic makeup [25,27,28,29,30,31,32]. Since then, significant progress has been made using plant breeding and the establishment of plant nutrition schemes. According to Pennazio [33], the development of mineral nutrition of plants began between the 17th and 18th centuries. The patterns of mineral fertilizer applications in different cropping systems, as well as their impact on the environment, continue to nourish the debate globally [34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47]. However, the increase in food demands due to the rapid increase in the global population has shown the necessity to enhance the productivity of food crops. To achieve that, the common strategies used are crop improvement and the use of mineral fertilizers during crop cultivation, which have increased over the years [48,49]. Despite the recorded progress in plant breeding, N remains an indispensable macronutrient, among the 14 mineral elements (macro- and micronutrients) required by plants for optimum growth and development, high productivity, quality, fitness, and resistance toward environmental and biotic stresses [50,51].
Data indicate that the application of N-rich fertilizers increased over the years concomitant with the expansion of crop cultivation areas and the use of improved or high-yielding crop varieties that are demanding of nutrients, particularly observed in large-scale farming systems. This trend could be partially attributed to the increase in food demands subsequent to the increase in the world’s population. An estimate of the global population growth shows that the number of people on Earth increased by 219.1% in 72 years, from about 2,499,322,157 in 1950 to nearly 7,975,105,156 in 2022 (https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/WLD/world/population, accessed on 15 July 2022), in contrast to the decreasing pattern of the annual population growth rate during the same period (nearly 1.75% in 1951 down to 0.83% in 2022, a decrease by 47.4%). Available data on land coverage, as reported by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) statistics (https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/LC/visualize, accessed on 15 July 2022), suggest that herbaceous crops occupied about 1,877,418.8 ha of cultivated lands in 1992 compared to 1,904,136.4 ha in 2020 globally. In addition, the report on the use of nutrients for agricultural production during the last six decades indicates that nearly 4,155,951,874 metric tons of N was used between 1961 and 2020 (11,455,804.3 mt in 1961 and 113,291,696.7 mt in 2020) (https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#compare, accessed on 15 July 2022). When compared with other macronutrients (phosphorus (P) and potassium (K)), N is by far the most abundantly used plant nutrient element in agriculture (nearly 4.15 billion tons (BT) within 59 years). For instance, a report by FAO showed that during 1961–2020, more than 1.9 BT of phosphate (P2O5) and 1.4 BT of potash (K2O) were used for agricultural production globally (Figure 1).

4. Essentiality of Nitrogen, Sources, and Availability

Arnon and Stout [52] proposed three criteria for the essentiality of a plant nutrient as follows: (1) a deficiency of the element makes it impossible for a plant to complete its lifecycle; (2) the deficiency is specific to the element in question; (3) the element is directly involved in the nutrition of the plant, such as a constituent of an essential metabolite or required for the action of an enzyme system. Other reports suggested that a more inclusive definition of the essentiality of a plant nutrient should be considered, which is not limited to those elements when they are deficient in the soil or unavailable, when they may cause symptoms of deficiency, and when their correction may involve an external supply through fertilization [53,54,55]. Therefore, on the basis of the abovementioned criteria, N and 15 other elements, namely, carbon (C), hydrogen (H), oxygen (O), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), sulfur (S), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), molybdenum (Mo), boron (B), and chlorine (Cl), are considered essential for the growth of higher plants. Of this list, C, H, and O are acquired by the plant directly from the air and soil water, while the remaining 13 are supplied by the soil [56,57]. On the basis of the amounts in which the essential nutrients are acquired by the plant (except C, H, and O), they are categorized as primary (N, P, and K) and secondary macronutrients (Ca, Mg, and S), and micronutrients (Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu, B, Mo, and Cl).
Plants are sessile living organisms, which do not have the ability to move from one environment to another looking for food in the case of nutrient deficiency in their immediate environment [58,59]. Soil is the principal source of nutrients (including N) necessary for plants to complete their life cycle [60,61]. The availability of N is affected by various factors that may be extrinsic or intrinsic to the plant [62,63,64,65,66,67]. Crop productivity relies heavily on N fertilization [68,69,70]. N is found abundantly in the air but in a form that plants cannot absorb. The major sources of N are atmospheric nitrogen gas N2, exogenous N supply, and OM through fertilization. Atmospheric N2 gas (plentiful in the air but cannot be absorbed by plants in this form) is acquired through the nitrogen fixation cycle mediated by plant species belonging to Fabaceae (leguminous, along with a few non-leguminous plants containing nodules in their roots) in a symbiotic association with soil microorganisms known as nitrogen-fixing bacteria belonging to the genus Rhizobium. The latter mediate the conversion of atmospheric N2 to ammonium (NH4) in the soil, which in turn is converted to nitrate (NO3) during the nitrification process. According to Maier [71], the growth of many bacteria, either free-living in the environment or in symbiosis with plants, is promoted during N fixation in areas where fixed N is deficient in the soil. The root nodule bacteria have many O2-binding terminal oxidases, with a high O2 affinity, which are associated with N2 fixation and help maintain a steady O2 supply, coupled with ATP supply for high energy-demanding N2 fixation. The fertility of soil depends on several factors, including the quantity and quality of nutrients present in the soil, soil physical, biological, and chemical properties [72].
NO3 and NH4 are the major forms of N taken up by the plant, with NO3 being the most abundant [70]. However, roughly half of N (all N sources and forms considered) is used by the plant, while the remainder is either lost to groundwater (percolation or leaching), consumed by soil microorganisms (bacteria) involved in the decomposition of OM to humus, or converted back to atmospheric N2 via the denitrification process.

5. Nitrogen-Based Fertilizers

Nitrogen is commonly applied using commercial N-containing fertilizers or OM (composts, liquid organic fertilizers, and animal feces) [73,74,75,76,77]. One of the most abundant forms of N commercially available is urea 46% N ((CO(NH2)2) or CH4N2O) also known as carbamide, or it can be found together with P in the form of diammonium phosphate (DAP, (NH4)2HPO4). The latter is also referred to as ammonium monohydrogen phosphate, ammonium hydrogen phosphate, or ammonium phosphate dibasic, with the typical formulation of 18% N, 46% P2O5, 0% K2O) or triple superphosphate (TSP) referred to as calcium dihydrogen phosphate or monocalcium phosphate ((Ca(H2PO4)2·H2O), containing 45% phosphate (P2O5) (0–45–0), 15% Ca), whereas, K is supplied as potash (K2O) [67]. Together, they make up the trio widely known as NPK. In the soil, N is available to the plant and transported in the form of NO3 and NH4, with NO3 transport being predominant over NH4 and the major source N [78,79]. DAP is known as the world’s most widely used phosphorus fertilizer and one of the known water-soluble ammonium phosphate salts that can be produced when ammonia (NH3) reacts with phosphoric acid (H3PO4) ((NH4)2HPO4 (s) ⇌ NH3 (g) + (NH4)H2PO4 (s)) [80]. Reports indicate that, when applied as a source of N and P, DAP temporarily increases the soil pH but becomes more acidic over the long term upon nitrification of the NH4, and it is said to be incompatible with alkaline chemicals due to the high potential for the NH4 ion to convert to NH3 in a high-pH environment (pH 7.5–8.0).

6. Multiple Roles of Nitrogen and N-Containing Compounds

Successful plant growth and development, reproduction, and productivity are the result of complex processes, including the use of solar energy, CO2, water (H2O), and nutrients from the soil and the atmosphere, herein referred to as environmental factors, which in fact are highly variable in natural and agricultural ecosystems [81,82]. The availability of plant nutrients in a usable form and in sufficient amounts and appropriate ratios or balance is critical for plants to complete their life cycle [82].
Each of the essential nutrients has a definite and specific function to perform in the growth and development of plants, and a deficiency of any of them causes abnormal or restricted growth. Table 1 summarizes the main functions of N, as well as the effects caused by its deficiency and toxicity or excess versus those of other macronutrients (adapted from [83]). Table S1 contains similar details for secondary macronutrients and micronutrients.

6.1. Nitrogen Is a Major Constituent of Living Organisms

Nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) are crucial components of the DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) and RNA (ribonucleic acid). DNA and RNA, molecules that carry genetic information for the development and functioning of an organism, are made of nucleotides including a five-carbon sugar backbone and phosphate groups (together forming the 5′–3′ phosphodiester linkage) [84] and nitrogenous bases (organic molecules containing N that act as a base in chemical reactions: adenine (A: C5H5N5), guanine (G: C5H5N5O) (purines), cytosine (C: C4H5N3O), and thymine (T: C5H6N2O2) or uracil (U: C4H4N2O2) in RNA (pyrimidine). The nucleobases are recognized as building blocks of DNA and RNA. The pyrimidine and purine biosynthesis pathways have been widely investigated [85,86,87], and a few genes encoding proteins controlling these pathways have been functionally characterized [16,88,89,90]. A recent study by Rolly and Yun [91] reported that an interplay exists between the de novo pyrimidine biosynthesis pathway and N metabolism in plants. In addition, N interacts with other elements, such as carbon [92,93,94] and potassium [95], to maintain a nutrient balance in plants under various conditions.

6.2. Nitrogen Is a Key Element in Plant Physiology and Biology

It is widely accepted that N is indispensable for plants in many ways (Figure 2, [96]). Stein and Klotz [97] indicated that N is the fourth most abundant element in cellular biomass. The authors also indicated that the interchange between inert N2 in the extant atmosphere and reactive nitrogen compounds that support or are products of cellular metabolism and growth is controlled by microbial activities. Nitrogen also plays an important role in various physiological, biological, molecular, and biochemical processes in plants under various environmental conditions. Bassi et al. [98] supported that N is a major component of the photosynthesis apparatus. The authors observed that the application of N during sugarcane cultivation influenced photosynthesis establishment. Similarly, Evans [99] indicated that there is an established relationship between photosynthesis and N in leaves of C3 plants, and that the photosynthetic capacity of leaves is related to the N content, whereby the proteins of the Calvin cycle and thylakoids represent the majority of leaf N. Similar studies reported the role of N in photosynthesis [100,101,102,103,104], while a balanced cell-cycle control is required to ensure the balance with adaptation to dynamic environmental conditions [105].
A study conducted by MacAdam et al. [106] involving the application of N to tall fescue plants increased leaf elongation rate (LER), as a result of epidermal cell elongation and mesophyll cell division. On the other hand, N starvation was shown to alter cell division but not initiation of rice tiller buds in rice [107]. Lin and Tsay [108] demonstrated that different levels of NO3 and N supply differentially influenced the control of flowering in Arabidopsis. From the same perspective, Moreno et al. [109] suggested that NO3 defines shoot size via compensatory roles for endoreplication and cell division in Arabidopsis.
Recent studies have shown that N is involved in plant signaling and gene expression both under normal conditions and in response to abiotic and biotic stress conditions [110,111,112,113,114,115]. Moreover, Fritz et al. [116] reported the carbon-nitrate status in tobacco regulate secondary metabolism, with NO3 inhibiting phenylpropanoid metabolism. In a converse approach, Ibrahim et al. [117] reported that the application of N-rich fertilizer affected the synthesis of primary and secondary metabolites in Labisia pumilia Blume (Kacip Fatimah). Oksman-Caldentey et al. [118] recorded a change in primary and secondary metabolism in roots of Hyoscyamus muticus caused by N and sucrose supplementation.

6.3. Nitrogen Is Required for Hormonal-Mediated Signaling in Plants

The multiple roles of phytohormones in physiological processes and signaling during abiotic or biotic stress events have been established, and progress continues to be made regarding their crosstalk, as well as their interactions with other molecules or cellular compounds [119,120,121,122,123,124]. A study conducted by Kiba et al. [125] highlighted that plants consist of multiple organs with various functions and different nutritional requirements, and they strongly rely on local and long-distance signaling pathways. In this regard, phytohormones, such as auxin (indole-3-acetic acid, IAA), abscisic acid (ABA), or cytokinin (CK) have been shown to interact with N signaling to coordinate the responses to fluctuations in N supply at the whole plant level. Similarly, Xu et al. [126] reported an interaction between auxin, CK, and strigolactone (SL) and N availability in the regulation of shoot branching in rice.
In addition, Vega et al. [127] revealed the role of NO3 in the modulation of hormonal pathways, while suggesting that plant hormones participate in local and systemic N signaling to regulate root and shoot growth, and that hormone crosstalk influences NO3 uptake. Likewise, Wen et al. [128] revealed that phytohormones interact with NO3 to regulate plant senescence. In the same way, Wang et al. [129] found that gibberellins (GAs) are involved in the regulation of N uptake and other physiological traits in maize in response to N availability. It was also shown that brassinosteroids modulate N physiological response and promote N uptake in maize [130].

6.4. Genes Involved in the Regulation of Nitrogen Uptake, Transport, and Assimilation in Plants

Genes involved in the N metabolism have been widely investigated and characterized under various environmental conditions [131,132,133]. Their interplay helps plants to maintain a balanced N availability and use efficiency. To date, five families of NO3 transporters have been reported, grouped into low- and high-affinity [134,135], including NO3 transporter 1 (NRT1), NO3 transporter 2 (NRT2), chloride channel (CLC), and slow anion channel-associated/slow anion channel-associated homologs (SLAC/SLAH) [136,137,138,139], with the NRT1 protein family harboring the biggest number [91]. Their activity is induced when plants experience low or high N availability in the soil. Among the well-characterized NO3 transporters, in various plant species, the Arabidopsis NRT2.1, a pure high-affinity NO3 transporter, was reported to be suppressed by high NO3 levels, but activated under low NO3 conditions [140]. In contrast, the NRT1.1 family acts exceptionally as dual-affinity NO3 transporter, which switches from low-affinity under regular NO3 availability to high-affinity under low NO3 availability. The fluctuation from low to high affinity of NRT1.1 is said to be facilitated by phosphorylation at the Thr101 residue of NRT1.1 that enhances its affinity to NO3 [141,142]. As illustrated in Figure 3, most of the NO3 or NH4 taken up by the plant is transported and translocated to the shoots where it is reduced to nitrite (NO2) via the activity of nicotine amide dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH)-dependent cytosolic NR. A certain amount of NO2 is then translocated to the chloroplasts where it is reduced to NH4 for further assimilation into organic compounds, such as amino acids. This event occurs through the action of the glutamine/glutamate synthase and glutamine-2oxoglutarate aminotransferase system [143,144].
The advances in plant molecular research and the advent of sequencing technologies and bioinformatics have allowed the discovery of several members of the low- and high-affinity NO3 and NH4 uptake, transport, translocation, assimilation, and remobilization molecular functions in several plant species in response to various environmental stimuli such as drought stress [138,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154], salinity [155,156,157,158,159], heat stress [160,161], heavy-metal stress [162,163], flooding stress [164,165,166], and biotic stress [167,168,169,170,171].

7. Multiple-Nutrient Deficiency and Toxicity

Plants absorb N in specific chemical forms, and some of these forms are naturally present in soils (Table S2). Plants need the most N during their vegetative and development stages. A balanced N supply can result in optimum growth and development. Although total nutrient content in the soil might be abundant, many nutrients are poorly available for plant uptake, in part due to a series of physical and chemical reactions, as well as biological processes, which exert an influence on the form on which they exist in the soil [68,82,95,172,173]. Nitrogen is available to the plant in the form of NO3 and NH4, with NO3 being the major form. Nitrate is negatively charged and, therefore, cannot bind to soil particles that are also negatively charged. In addition, plants usually take up about half of the N available in the soil. The other fraction of N is lost through either evaporation, runoff, or leaching in the depths of the soil to the aquifer (groundwater).
In addition, nutrient availability may be hindered by several external factors to the plant, such as the potential of hydrogen (pH, alkaline, neutral, or basic) [174,175]. The pH, a measure of the acidity or alkalinity, is a major component of nutrient acquisition by plants from the soil [176]. Soil pH level has an influence on the availability of nutrients to plants, which may occur through the modification of the basic form of a particular nutrient element in the soil. A soil pH of 6.0–7.5 is acceptable for most nutrient elements, but the optimum varies among plant or crop species [177]. Soil pH also determines microbial diversity and composition, including those mediating the decomposition of OM and the conversion of chemical elements from non-available forms to available forms for plants [178,179,180].
Likewise, the abundance of salts in the soil [181,182] may affect the mobility of key chemical components in the soil. Other reasons include the structure and texture of the soil (porosity of soil, cationic exchange capacity (CEC), etc.) [183], the OM in the soil, the activity of microorganisms in the soil that may be competing with the plant for their own food for survival, the availability of water in the growing environment (soil), which may be compromised by the water retention capacity of the soil (porosity and texture), and the heavy-metal contamination of soils. This implies that nutrients may be present in the soil but still unavailable to the plants.
Nitrogen deficiency also occurs when carbon-rich OM such as sawdust is supplemented to the soil. N and carbon metabolisms are functionally linked, and a balanced carbon/nitrogen (C/N) ratio is of great importance in ensuring N availability to the plant [92]. C/N also determines the level of the activity of telluric microorganisms and their multiplication. During the initial stage of fresh OM decomposition, soil microorganisms rely on the N contained in the OM to decompose the high carbon content in the OM. These microorganisms can also use any N available in the soil to break down carbon sources, thus making N unavailable to plants. This phenomenon is known as “robbing” the soil of N.
Moreover, soil erosions and runoff are also known to lead to N loss from agricultural lands [184]. It has been well established that N-deficient soil initially affects plant growth and development, causing the plant to be thin, pale, and subject to chlorosis, with low protein levels in grains, low biomass, and eventual crop failure [185,186,187,188]. Therefore, early detection of N deficiency may help to make decisions quickly so as to prevent crop failure and economic losses [189,190,191]. In addition to these factors, abiotic stress such as drought, salinity, and heavy-metal toxicity can be the cause of nutrient (including N) unavailability to the plant. As a result, the leaves take on a burnt look from dehydration and nutrient deficiency. Under these conditions, water availability to the plant may be hindered, and nutrient uptake may be impaired.
In contrast, excessive N supply is detrimental to the plant [192]. Although different plant species require different levels of N for peak health, with various thresholds for N toxicity, the symptoms of excessive N application favors foliage growth (overly or dark green) or vegetation growth and elongation of the plant (reduced stem strength), which may destabilize the plant’s stability in its soil position (sensitive to lodging during flowering and grain filling). Likewise, excessive N supply may stress the roots, causing root growth stunting, as well as delayed flowing and grain formation, consequently affecting grain yield and eventually death of the plant due to the stress. The use of excessive N concentrations in soils may result in N toxicity (commonly observed through the discoloration of leaves (from edges of the leaf and spread inward). Too much N in the soil also increases soil mineral salts and luxuriant growth, resulting in the plant being attractive to insects and/or diseases/pathogens (increased susceptibility to bacterial and fungal diseases). Additionally, excessive N levels in soils have negative implications for the environment, such as groundwater pollution due to the leaching of excessive N that the plant cannot absorb through water runoff or percolation (which may contaminate drinking water and groundwater). Other effects of excessive N on the environment include an enhanced production of GHGs, such as CH4 and N2O, which are later released to the atmosphere through gas exchange (90% mediated by plants) or diffusion from soil (10%). Nevertheless, knowing that different plant species require different levels of N for peak health, the thresholds for N toxicity also differ from one plant species or crop to another.

8. Tracking Nitrogen Uptake and Assimilation in Plants

Fertilizers labeled with radioactive isotopes, such as phosphorus and nitrogen-15 have been used to investigate fertilizer uptake, retention, and utilization [193,194,195]. The N-15 (15N) isotopic technique, which may help identify the source of N2O generation and reduce the emission of this potent GHG during nitrification and denitrification processes, offers comparative advantages over conventional techniques for measuring the impact of climate change [195]. Stable isotope enrichment approaches have long been established to trace the source of N2O following the application of 15N-labeled fertilizers, such as 15N-labeled NH4 and NO3 [196]. This technique enables the determination of the source of fertilizer-derived 15N-N2O.
In general, nitrification derived N2O is quantified upon the supply of 15NH4, while that mediated by denitrification is measured following the supply of 15NO3. In the same way, considering that multiple pathways mediating N2O formation and consumption occur simultaneously in various microenvironments in soils, nitrification inhibitors and isotope signature techniques are commonly utilized to separate N2O-producing and -reducing pathways [197]. Stevens and Laughlin [198] suggested that the reduction of N2O to N2 could be quantified by determining 15N in N2 following the supply of 15NO3. Similarly, Baggs et al. [199] demonstrated that application of 14NH4/15NO3 and 15NH4/14NO3 helped determine the relative contributions of nitrification and denitrification to N2O production. Furthermore, He et al. [200] proposed the use of the stable 15N isotope as a means for quantifying N transfer between mycorrhizal plants, considering that plants acquire nutrients from soil, and mycorrhizae play vital roles in plant nutrient acquisition, performance, and productivity. In the same way, the use of the carbon-13 (13C) stable isotopic technique helps evaluate the source of carbon sequestered in the soil.
Isotopic fractionation [201,202,203,204] can cause the isotope amount ratio n(15N)/n(14N) to increase systematically through food chains via assimilation of N compounds in biomolecules such as proteins. Isotopic fractionation occurs because of assimilation, storage, and excretion of proteins and other N compounds. Isotope amount ratio n(15N)/n(14N) measurements have been widely used to test hypotheses about predator–prey relations and detect disruptions to the trophic structure of ecosystems that might be caused by toxic contaminants, invasive species, harvesting, or organisms. Similar principles are used to detect differences in diets among animals, including humans [205,206,207].
Artificially enriched 15N tracers are used to study movement and transformation of N in biological and environmental systems, such as the uptake and loss of N fertilizers by crops. A common experiment involves introducing an isotopically labeled compound into the environment and then analyzing various samples taken from the environment for the presence of the enriched isotope to determine where the labeled compound moved and whether it transformed into another compound. Artificially enriched 15N has also been employed to study uptake and dispersal of N in feed supplies used in food production industries such as aquaculture [208].
The stable isotopes of N are subject to isotopic fractionation via physical, chemical, and biological processes. Variations in the isotope amount ratio n(15N)/n(14N) are commonly used to study Earth system processes, especially those related to biology, because N is a major nutrient for growth [209]. To illustrate this, isotope fractionation occurs when dissolved solutes, such as nitrate (NO3), are transformed to more reduced compounds (i.e., N2) because NO3 with higher 14N abundance tends to be more readily broken down. This leaves the residual unreacted NO3 with a higher n(15N)/n(14N) ratio than the initial ratio prior to reaction. Changes in the isotopic composition of biologically reactive compounds can be used to detect such reactions in aquatic environments, which are important mechanisms for removing reactive contaminants such as NO3 [210].
Variation in N stable isotopes has been used to track fertilizer N accumulation into plants, soils, and infiltrating groundwater to improve efficiency and reduce impact on the environment, such as experimental agricultural fields where various amounts of excess N from fertilizers and plant residues can be found in groundwater.

9. Paradigm Shift to a Sustainable Agricultural Production System

Agriculture is a major source of food. Food production is required to double within the next 8–10 decades or so from the perspective of the rapid population growth. Agriculture has been identified as a sink and source of GHGs, as well as the economic sector that suffers the most from climate change. As a source, reports support that the application of N-rich fertilizers is regarded as one of the factors contributing significantly to enhancing GHGs formation during crops cultivation. Rodale [211] proposed paths to transition to a sustainable agricultural production system on the basis of the following observations: (i) because renewable resources are the basis of operation and productivity of modern agriculture, in the event of depletion of nonrenewable resources, either food will become extremely expensive or productivity will decline; (ii) the current food production system contributes to the environmental degradation (soil erosion, soil degradation, and deforestation); (iii) lines of evidence indicate that a number of agricultural practices, including the pattern of N-rich fertilizer application, contribute to the escalation of pollution problems; (iv) there is a strong agreement that the natural resources are limited and should be used in a sustainable manner; (v) conventional technologies and secular agricultural production systems are likely to be unsustainable in the future in the event that agricultural production becomes the major source of energy and feed stocks; (vi) a major concern exists over whether the good life in rural areas can be maintained if family farms are replaced by large-scale industrialized farms, which produce all the food.
Owing to the above, sustainable agriculture, as proposed by diverse sources and condensed by the International Food and Agriculture Development (IFAD) task force report [212], could be portrayed as follows: (i) the successful management of resources to satisfy changing human needs, while maintaining or enhancing the natural resources base and avoiding environmental degradation; (ii) the ability of an agricultural system to maintain production over time in the face of social and economic pressures; (iii) one that should conserve and protect natural resources and allow for long-term economic growth by managing all exploited resources for sustainable yields. Other sources argue that stainability can only be achieved when resources, inputs, and technologies are within the capabilities of the farmers to own, hire, and manage with increasing efficiency to achieve desirable levels of productivity with minimal effects on the resources base, human life, and environmental quality. In this regard, sustainable agricultural production system is referred to as “one that maintains an acceptable and increasing level of productivity that satisfies prevailing needs and is continuously adapted to meet the future needs for increasing the carrying of the resource base and other worthwhile human needs” [213,214,215,216].
Nevertheless, the major challenge remains the reduction in GHG emissions from agriculture during crop cultivation. The last two decades have been marked by a hunt for sustainable and effective strategies toward achieving a sustainable agriculture, here referring to agricultural practices that help reduce, in a sustainable manner, the emission of GHGs. Among them, improving N use efficiency (NUE, from uptake to assimilation and remobilization) is considered the most promising and effective approach, because it allows significantly reducing the application of N-rich fertilizers, which helps cut down the production cost, with a low impact on the environment. Reports have demonstrated that NUE is controlled genetically, and this complex trait allows optimizing the use of N available to the plant. NUE is equally important when plants experience nutrients shortage or unavailability caused by environmental stresses, such as drought [153,217,218], salinity [219], heat stress [220], or heavy-metal toxicity, whereby the acquisition of N is either restricted or impaired. In addition to the well-characterized NO3 or NH4 transport- and assimilation-related genes [221], N remobilization (one of the components of NUE) from NO3 stored in the vacuole regulated through a process known as autophagy carries the potential to salvage poor N supply or transport within the plant, and it offers an alternative for balanced plant productivity and reduced GHG emissions [220,222,223,224]. Likewise, NO, an ancient molecule with multiple roles in the plant, previously suggested to play an important role in N acquisition and assimilation events through NR activity [225,226], could serve as a potential target for improving NUE in plants.
Other alternative approaches may include intermittent drainage, especially in flooded or irrigated cultivation systems, the use of nitrification inhibitors, and the application of biochar. Unlike in the industrial sector, it is important to indicate that net zero GHG emission may not be a realistic target from agriculture with regard to the biological nature of CH4 and N2O production, involving soil microorganisms such as methanotrophs and methanogens, and the requirement of CO2 in plant metabolic processes.

10. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

Nitrogen (N) may be to the plant, to some extent, what the seed is to agriculture. Efficient plant growth, development, and productivity are conditioned by the quality of nutrients available, coupled with the ability of the plant to take up and use them. On the one hand, N is one of the most important macronutrients, and by far the most abundantly used in agricultural production. Today, conceiving agriculture without N is nearly utopic, considering that N is vital for the plant and is involved in almost all physiological and biological processes. It is believed that, in order to reduce the impact of current agricultural practices on the environment, optimizing applications of N-rich fertilizers, enhancing the N use efficiency, and implementing better crop management practices are key factors to alleviate the impact of climate change, while maintaining a balanced productivity and quality.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/life12081272/s1, Table S1: Benefits and advert effects of essential nutrient deficiency and excess for plants, Table S2: Nutrient element forms taken up by plants.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, and formal analysis, N.R.K. and J.-H.L.; data curation and writing—original draft preparation, N.R.K., S.-M.L., Y.K., J.-K.C., H.P. and S.A.; writing—review and editing, J.-H.L., D.S., J.-Y.L. and J.-W.K.; visualization, validation and supervision, N.R.K. and J.-H.L.; project administration and funding acquisition, J.-H.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the project PJ01700801 of the Rural Development Administration (RDA), Korea.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not Applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not Applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not Applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mellor, J.W. Agricultural Development and Economic Transformation: Promoting Growth with Poverty Reduction; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  2. Johnston, B.F.; Mellor, J.W. The role of agriculture in economic development. Am. Econ. Rev. 1961, 51, 566–593. [Google Scholar]
  3. Leghari, S.J.; Wahocho, N.A.; Laghari, G.M.; HafeezLaghari, A.; MustafaBhabhan, G.; HussainTalpur, K.; Bhutto, T.A.; Wahocho, S.A.; Lashari, A.A.J.A.i.E.B. Role of nitrogen for plant growth and development: A review. Adv. Environ. Biol. 2016, 10, 209–219. [Google Scholar]
  4. Lawlor, D.W.; Lemaire, G.; Gastal, F. Nitrogen, plant growth and crop yield. In Plant Nitrogen; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2001; pp. 343–367. [Google Scholar]
  5. Lebrun, M.; Nandillon, R.; Miard, F.; Bourgerie, S.; Morabito, D. Biochar assisted phytoremediation for metal (loid) contaminated soils. In Assisted Phytoremediation; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 101–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cicerone, R.J.; Oremland, R.S. Biogeochemical aspects of atmospheric methane. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 1988, 2, 299–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Crutzen, P.J. Methane’s sinks and sources. Nature 1991, 350, 380–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Reay, D. Greenhouse Gas Sinks; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  9. Weeks, M.E. Daniel rutherford and the discovery of nitrogen. J. Chem. Educ. 1934, 11, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Clark, J.J. The Haber Process for the Manufacture of Ammonia. 2017. Available online: https://www.chemguide.co.uk (accessed on 10 July 2022).
  11. Wang, Y.; Yu, Y.; Jia, R.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, B. Electrochemical synthesis of nitric acid from air and ammonia through waste utilization. Nat. Sci. Rev. 2019, 6, 730–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. World Health Organization. Who Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality: Selected Pollutants; World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe: Geneva, Switzerland, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  13. Timilsina, A.; Zhang, C.; Pandey, B.; Bizimana, F.; Dong, W.; Hu, C. Potential pathway of nitrous oxide formation in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Davidson, E.A. The contribution of manure and fertilizer nitrogen to atmospheric nitrous oxide since 1860. Nat. Geosci. 2009, 2, 659–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Syakila, A.; Kroeze, C. The global nitrous oxide budget revisited. Greenh. Gas Meas. Manag. 2011, 1, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Corpas, F.J.; Barroso, J.B. Nitro-oxidative stress vs oxidative or nitrosative stress in higher plants. New Phytol. 2013, 199, 633–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Oz, M.T.; Eyidogan, F.; Yucel, M.; Öktem, H.A. Functional role of nitric oxide under abiotic stress conditions. In Nitric Oxide Action in Abiotic Stress Responses in Plants; Springer: Basel, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 21–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Purugganan, M.D. Evolutionary insights into the nature of plant domestication. Curr. Biol. 2019, 29, R705–R714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Sang, T.; Ge, S. Genetics and phylogenetics of rice domestication. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2007, 17, 533–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Heslop-Harrison, J.S.; Schwarzacher, T. Domestication, genomics and the future for banana. Ann. Bot. 2007, 100, 1073–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Schaal, B. Plants and people: Our shared history and future. New Phytol. 2019, 1, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Larson, G.; Piperno, D.R.; Allaby, R.G.; Purugganan, M.D.; Andersson, L.; Arroyo-Kalin, M.; Barton, L.; Vigueira, C.C.; Denham, T.; Dobney, K. Current perspectives and the future of domestication studies. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 6139–6146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zeder, M.A.; Bradley, D.G.; Smith, B.D.; Emshwiller, E. Documenting Domestication: New Genetic and Archaeological Paradigms; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zohary, D.; Hopf, M.; Weiss, E. Domestication of Plants in the Old World: The Origin and Spread of Domesticated Plants in Southwest Asia, Europe, and the Mediterranean Basin; Oxford University Press: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hancock, J.F. Plant Evolution and the Origin of Crop Species; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  26. Stetter, M.G.; Gates, D.J.; Mei, W.; Ross-Ibarra, J. How to make a domesticate. Curr. Biol. 2017, 27, R896–R900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Doebley, J.; Stec, A.; Wendel, J.; Edwards, M. Genetic and morphological analysis of a maize-teosinte F2 population: Implications for the origin of maize. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 1990, 87, 9888–9892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Harlan, J.R.; Zohary, D. Distribution of wild wheats and barley: The present distribution of wild forms may provide clues to the regions of early cereal domestication. Science 1966, 153, 1074–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Baker, H.G. Plants and Civilization; Macmillan International Higher Education: London, UK, 1970. [Google Scholar]
  30. Zohary, M. Flora Palaestina: Platanaceae to Umbelliferae, 2nd ed.; Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities: Jerusalem, Israel, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  31. Langer, R.H.M.; Langer, R.; Hill, G. Agricultural Plants; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  32. Martin, G.B.; Adams, M.W. Landraces of Phaseolus vulgaris (fabaceae) in northern malawi. I. Regional variation. Econ. Bot. 1987, 41, 190–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pennazio, S. Mineral nutrition of plants: A short history of plant physiology. Biol. Forum/Riv. Biol. 2005, 98, 215–236. [Google Scholar]
  34. Garcia-Oliveira, A.L.; Chander, S.; Ortiz, R.; Menkir, A.; Gedil, M. Genetic basis and breeding perspectives of grain iron and zinc enrichment in cereals. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Abdullah, M.; Hossain, K.L. Effects of urea-n fertilizer dosage supplemented with ipil-ipil tree litter on yield of rice and insect prevalence. J. For. Res. 2006, 17, 335–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Paungfoo-Lonhienne, C.; Yeoh, Y.K.; Kasinadhuni, N.R.P.; Lonhienne, T.G.; Robinson, N.; Hugenholtz, P.; Ragan, M.A.; Schmidt, S. Nitrogen fertilizer dose alters fungal communities in sugarcane soil and rhizosphere. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Sari, Y.; Alkaff, M. Classification of rice leaf using fuzzy logic and hue saturation value (hsv) to determine fertilizer dosage. In Proceedings of the 2020 Fifth International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC), Gorontalo, Indonesia, 3–4 November 2020; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Rasaq, S.; Shittu, T.; Fadimu, G.; Abass, A.; Omoniyi, O. Effect of cassava variety, fertilizer type and dosage on the physicochemical, functional and pasting properties of high quality cassava flour (hqcf). Qual. Assur. Saf. Crop. Food. 2020, 12, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ayoub, A.T. Fertilizers and the environment. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 1999, 55, 117–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kim, S.; Dale, B.E. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer application on greenhouse gas emissions and economics of corn production. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 6028–6033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xie, Z.; Xu, Y.; Liu, G.; Liu, Q.; Zhu, J.; Tu, C.; Amonette, J.E.; Cadisch, G.; Yong, J.W.; Hu, S.; et al. Impact of biochar application on nitrogen nutrition of rice, greenhouse-gas emissions and soil organic carbon dynamics in two paddy soils of china. Plant Soil 2013, 370, 527–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhong, Y.; Wang, X.; Yang, J.; Zhao, X.; Ye, X. Exploring a suitable nitrogen fertilizer rate to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and ensure rice yields in paddy fields. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 565, 420–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Paterson, A.H. What has QTL mapping taught us about plant domestication? New Phytol. 2002, 154, 591–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Purugganan, M.D.; Fuller, D.Q.J.N. The nature of selection during plant domestication. Nature 2009, 457, 843–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chaudhary, B. Plant domestication and resistance to herbivory. Int. J. Plant Genom. 2013, 2013, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Vaughan, D.A.; Lu, B.-R.; Tomooka, N. The evolving story of rice evolution. Plant Sci. 2008, 174, 394–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tan, L.; Li, X.; Liu, F.; Sun, X.; Li, C.; Zhu, Z.; Fu, Y.; Cai, H.; Wang, X.; Xie, D. Control of a key transition from prostrate to erect growth in rice domestication. Nat. Genet. 2008, 40, 1360–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. van Dijk, M.; Morley, T.; Rau, M.L.; Saghai, Y. A meta-analysis of projected global food demand and population at risk of hunger for the period 2010–2050. Nat. Food 2021, 2, 494–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sadik, N. Population growth and the food crisis. Food Nutr. Agric. 1991, 1, 3–6. [Google Scholar]
  50. Six, J. Plant nutrition for sustainable development and global health. Plant Soil 2011, 339, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. White, P.J.; Brown, P. Plant nutrition for sustainable development and global health. Ann. Biol. 2010, 105, 1073–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Arnon, D.I.; Stout, P. The essentiality of certain elements in minute quantity for plants with special reference to copper. Plant Physiol. 1939, 14, 371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Mengel, K.; Kirkby, E. Principles of Plant Nutrition; International Potash Institute: Worblaufen-Bern, Switzerland, 1987; pp. 687–695. [Google Scholar]
  54. Tisdale, S.L.; Nelson, W.L.; Beaton, J.D. Soil Fertility and Fertilizers; Collier Macmillan Publishers: Springfield, OH, USA, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  55. Nicholas, D. Minor mineral nutrients. Ann. Rev. 1961, 12, 63–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Epstein, E. Mineral Nutrition of Plants: Principles and Perspectives; John Wiley Sons, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Grundon, N.J.; Edwards, D.; Takkar, P.; Asher, C.J.; Clark, R. Nutritional Disorders of Grain Sorghum; Australian Center for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR): Canberra, Australia, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  58. Atkinson, N.J.; Urwin, P.E. The interaction of plant biotic and abiotic stresses: From genes to the field. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 3523–3543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Verma, S.; Nizam, S.; Verma, P.K. Biotic and abiotic stress signaling in plants. In Stress Signaling in Plants: Genomics and Proteomics Perspective, Volume 1; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 25–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Fageria, N.; Filho, M.B.; Moreira, A.; Guimarães, C.J. Foliar fertilization of crop plants. J. Plant Nutr. 2009, 32, 1044–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lambers, H.; Raven, J.A.; Shaver, G.R.; Smith, S.E. Plant nutrient-acquisition strategies change with soil age. Trend. Ecol. Evol. 2008, 23, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Miransari, M. Soil microbes and the availability of soil nutrients. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2013, 35, 3075–3084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Binkley, D.; Vitousek, P. Soil nutrient availability. In Plant Physiological Ecology; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1989; pp. 75–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Nemeth, K. The availability of nutrients in the soil as determined by electro-ultrafiltration (EUF). Adv. Agron. 1980, 31, 155–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Nair, K.P. The buffering power of plant nutrients and effects on availability. Adv. Agron. 1996, 57, 237–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Greger, M.; Landberg, T.; Vaculík, M. Silicon influences soil availability and accumulation of mineral nutrients in various plant species. Plants 2018, 7, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. López-Arredondo, D.L.; Sánchez-Calderón, L.; Yong-Villalobos, L. Molecular and genetic basis of plant macronutrient use efficiency: Concepts, opportunities, and challenges. In Plant Macronutrient Use Efficiency; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Xu, G.; Fan, X.; Miller, A.J. Plant nitrogen assimilation and use efficiency. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 2012, 63, 153–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Masclaux-Daubresse, C.; Daniel-Vedele, F.; Dechorgnat, J.; Chardon, F.; Gaufichon, L.; Suzuki, A. Nitrogen uptake, assimilation and remobilization in plants: Challenges for sustainable and productive agriculture. Ann. Bot. 2010, 105, 1141–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Krapp, A. Plant nitrogen assimilation and its regulation: A complex puzzle with missing pieces. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2015, 25, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Maier, R.J. Nitrogen fixation and respiration: Two processes linked by the energetic demands of nitrogenase. In Respiration in Archaea and Bacteria; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2004; pp. 101–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ellis, B.; Foth, H. Soil Fertility; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  73. Burns, R.C.; Hardy, R.W. Nitrogen Fixation in Bacteria and Higher Plants; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  74. Postgate, J. Nitrogen Fixation; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  75. Boddey, R.; Urquiaga, S.; Reis, V.; Döbereiner, J. Biological nitrogen fixation associated with sugar cane. In Nitrogen Fixation; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1991; pp. 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Schubert, K.R. Products of biological nitrogen fixation in higher plants: Synthesis, transport, and metabolism. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1986, 37, 539–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Bothe, H.; Ferguson, S.; Newton, W.E. Biology of the Nitrogen Cycle; Elsevier: London, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  78. Mustapha, S.; Voncir, N.; Umar, S. Content and distribution of nitrogen forms in some black cotton soils in akko lga, gombe state, nigeria. Int. J. Soil Sci. 2011, 6, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Harmsen, G.; Van Schreven, D. Mineralization of organic nitrogen in soil. Adv. Agron. 1955, 7, 299–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Lewu, F.; Volova, T.; Thomas, S.; Rakhimol, K. Controlled Release Fertilizers for Sustainable Agriculture; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  81. Hossain, M.A.; Kamiya, T.; Burritt, D.J.; Tran, L.-S.P.; Fujiwara, T. Plant Macronutrient Use Efficiency: Molecular and Genomic Perspectives in Crop Plants; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  82. López-Arredondo, D.L.; Leyva-González, M.A.; Alatorre-Cobos, F.; Herrera-Estrella, L. Biotechnology of nutrient uptake and assimilation in plants. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2013, 57, 595–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. FAO. Fertilizer and Plant Nutrition Guide; Food and Agriculture Organization: Rome, Italy, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  84. Roberts, K.; Alberts, B.; Johnson, A.; Walter, P.; Hunt, T. Molecular Biology of the Cell; Garland Science: New York, NY, USA, 2002; Volume 32. [Google Scholar]
  85. Stasolla, C.; Katahira, R.; Thorpe, T.A.; Ashihara, H. Purine and pyrimidine nucleotide metabolism in higher plants. J. Plant Physiol. 2003, 160, 1271–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Wasternack, C. Metabolism of pyrimidines and purines. In Nucleic Acids and Proteins in Plants II; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1982; pp. 263–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Witte, C.-P.; Herde, M. Nucleotide metabolism in plants. Plant Physiol. 2020, 182, 63–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Rolly, N.K.; Lee, S.-U.; Imran, Q.M.; Hussain, A.; Mun, B.-G.; Kim, K.-M.; Yun, B.-W. Nitrosative stress-mediated inhibition of OsDHODH1 gene expression suggests roots growth reduction in rice (Oryza sativa L.). 3 Biotech 2019, 9, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Dong, Q.; Zhang, Y.-X.; Zhou, Q.; Liu, Q.-E.; Chen, D.-B.; Wang, H.; Cheng, S.-H.; Cao, L.-Y.; Shen, X.-H. Ump kinase regulates chloroplast development and cold response in rice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Pedroza-García, J.A.; Nájera-Martínez, M.; Mazubert, C.; Aguilera-Alvarado, P.; Drouin-Wahbi, J.; Sánchez-Nieto, S.; Gualberto, J.M.; Raynaud, C.; Plasencia, J. Role of pyrimidine salvage pathway in the maintenance of organellar and nuclear genome integrity. Plant J. 2019, 97, 430–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Rolly, N.K.; Yun, B.-W. Regulation of nitrate (NO3) transporters and glutamate synthase-encoding genes under drought stress in arabidopsis: The regulatory role of AtbZIP62 transcription factor. Plants 2021, 10, 2149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Zheng, Z.-L. Carbon and nitrogen nutrient balance signaling in plants. Plant Sign. Behav. 2009, 4, 584–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Nunes-Nesi, A.; Fernie, A.R.; Stitt, M. Metabolic and signaling aspects underpinning the regulation of plant carbon nitrogen interactions. Mol. Plant 2010, 3, 973–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Coruzzi, G.M.; Zhou, L. Carbon and nitrogen sensing and signaling in plants: Emerging ‘matrix effects’. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2001, 4, 247–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Tsay, Y.-F.; Ho, C.-H.; Chen, H.-Y.; Lin, S.-H. Integration of nitrogen and potassium signaling. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 2011, 62, 207–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Luo, L.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, G. How does nitrogen shape plant architecture? J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 4415–4427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Stein, L.Y.; Klotz, M.G. The nitrogen cycle. Curr. Biol. 2016, 26, R94–R98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Bassi, D.; Menossi, M.; Mattiello, L. Nitrogen supply influences photosynthesis establishment along the sugarcane leaf. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Evans, J.R. Photosynthesis and nitrogen relationships in leaves of C3 plants. Oecologia 1989, 78, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Mu, X.; Chen, Y. The physiological response of photosynthesis to nitrogen deficiency. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 158, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Dejun, L.; Jiangming, M.; Yunting, F.; Shaolin, P.; Gundersen, P. Impact of nitrogen deposition on forest plants. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2003, 23, 1891–1900. [Google Scholar]
  102. Gao, J.; Wang, F.; Hu, H.; Jiang, S.; Muhammad, A.; Shao, Y.; Sun, C.; Tian, Z.; Jiang, D.; Dai, T. Improved leaf nitrogen reutilisation and rubisco activation under short-term nitrogen-deficient conditions promotes photosynthesis in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) at the seedling stage. Funct. Plant Biol. 2018, 45, 840–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Qu, F.; Peng, T.; Jia, Y.; Yang, M.; Meng, X.; Mao, S.; Zhou, D.; Hu, X.J.E.; Botany, E. Adjusting leaf nitrogen allocation could promote photosynthetic capacity, and nitrogen accumulation in Cucumis sativus L. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2022, 198, 104855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Nazar, R.; Iqbal, N.; Syeed, S.; Khan, N.A. Salicylic acid alleviates decreases in photosynthesis under salt stress by enhancing nitrogen and sulfur assimilation and antioxidant metabolism differentially in two mungbean cultivars. J. Plant Physiol. 2011, 168, 807–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Qi, F.; Zhang, F. Cell cycle regulation in the plant response to stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 10, 1765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. MacAdam, J.W.; Volenec, J.J.; Nelson, C.J. Effects of nitrogen on mesophyll cell division and epidermal cell elongation in tall fescue leaf blades. Plant Physiol. 1989, 89, 549–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Luo, L.; Pan, S.; Liu, X.; Wang, H.; Xu, G. Nitrogen deficiency inhibits cell division-determined elongation, but not initiation, of rice tiller buds. Isr. J. Plant Sci. 2017, 64, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Lin, Y.-L.; Tsay, Y.-F. Influence of differing nitrate and nitrogen availability on flowering control in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 2603–2609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Moreno, S.; Canales, J.; Hong, L.; Robinson, D.; Roeder, A.H.; Gutiérrez, R.A. Nitrate defines shoot size through compensatory roles for endoreplication and cell division in arabidopsis thaliana. Curr. Biol. 2020, 30, 1988–2000.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Palenchar, P.M.; Kouranov, A.; Lejay, L.V.; Coruzzi, G.M. Genome-wide patterns of carbon and nitrogen regulation of gene expression validate the combined carbon and nitrogen (CN)-signaling hypothesis in plants. Genome Biol. 2004, 5, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Osanai, T.; Imamura, S.; Asayama, M.; Shirai, M.; Suzuki, I.; Murata, N.; Tanaka, K. Nitrogen induction of sugar catabolic gene expression in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. DNA Res. 2006, 13, 185–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Snoeijers, S.S.; Pérez-García, A.; Joosten, M.H.; De Wit, P. The effect of nitrogen on disease development and gene expression in bacterial and fungal plant pathogens. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2000, 106, 493–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Bolton, M.D.; Thomma, B.P.J.P.; Pathology, M.P. The complexity of nitrogen metabolism and nitrogen-regulated gene expression in plant pathogenic fungi. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2008, 72, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Singh, P.; Kumar, K.; Jha, A.K.; Yadava, P.; Pal, M.; Rakshit, S.; Singh, I. Global gene expression profiling under nitrogen stress identifies key genes involved in nitrogen stress adaptation in maize (Zea mays L.). Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 4211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Kumar, R.; Taware, R.; Gaur, V.S.; Guru, S.; Kumar, A. Influence of nitrogen on the expression of tadof1 transcription factor in wheat and its relationship with photo synthetic and ammonium assimilating efficiency. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2009, 36, 2209–2220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Fritz, C.; Palacios-Rojas, N.; Feil, R.; Stitt, M. Regulation of secondary metabolism by the carbon–nitrogen status in tobacco: Nitrate inhibits large sectors of phenylpropanoid metabolism. Plant J. 2006, 46, 533–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Ibrahim, M.H.; Jaafar, H.Z.; Rahmat, A.; Rahman, Z.A. Effects of nitrogen fertilization on synthesis of primary and secondary metabolites in three varieties of kacip fatimah (labisia pumila blume). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12, 5238–5254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Oksman-Caldentey, K.-M.; Sevón, N.; Vanhala, L.; Hiltunen, R. Effect of nitrogen and sucrose on the primary and secondary metabolism of transformed root cultures of hyoscyamus muticus. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 1994, 38, 263–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Zha, M.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Chen, B.; Tan, Z. Strigolactones and cytokinin interaction in buds in the control of rice tillering. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 837136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Khuvung, K.; Silva Gutierrez, F.A.; Reinhardt, D. How strigolactone shapes shoot architecture. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 2275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Wu, F.; Gao, Y.; Yang, W.; Sui, N.; Zhu, J. Biological functions of strigolactones and their crosstalk with other phytohormones. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 821563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Confraria, A.; Muñoz-Gasca, A.; Ferreira, L.; Baena-González, E.; Cubas, P. Shoot branching phenotyping in Arabidopsis and tomato. In Environmental Responses in Plants; Humana: Uniondale, NY, USA, 2022; pp. 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Ryu, H.; Cho, H.; Choi, D.; Hwang, I. Plant hormonal regulation of nitrogen-fixing nodule organogenesis. Mol. Cell. 2012, 34, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Chen, G.; Liang, B.; Bawa, G.; Chen, H.; Shi, K.; Hu, Y.; Chen, P.; Fan, Y.; Pu, T.; Sun, X. Gravity reduced nitrogen uptake via the regulation of brace unilateral root growth in maize intercropping. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 724909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Kiba, T.; Kudo, T.; Kojima, M.; Sakakibara, H. Hormonal control of nitrogen acquisition: Roles of auxin, abscisic acid, and cytokinin. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 1399–1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Xu, J.; Zha, M.; Li, Y.; Ding, Y.; Chen, L.; Ding, C.; Wang, S. The interaction between nitrogen availability and auxin, cytokinin, and strigolactone in the control of shoot branching in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Cell Rep. 2015, 34, 1647–1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Vega, A.; O’Brien, J.A.; Gutiérrez, R.A. Nitrate and hormonal signaling crosstalk for plant growth and development. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2019, 52, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Wen, B.; Xiao, W.; Mu, Q.; Li, D.; Chen, X.; Wu, H.; Li, L.; Peng, F. How does nitrate regulate plant senescence? Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 157, 60–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Wang, Y.; Yao, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Xing, J.; Yang, B.; Mi, G.; Li, Z.; Zhang, M. The role of gibberellins in regulation of nitrogen uptake and physiological traits in maize responding to nitrogen availability. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Xing, J.; Wang, Y.; Yao, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, M.; Li, Z. Brassinosteroids modulate nitrogen physiological response and promote nitrogen uptake in maize (Zea mays L.). Crop J. 2022, 10, 166–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Wang, Y.-Y.; Cheng, Y.-H.; Chen, K.-E.; Tsay, Y.-F. Nitrate transport, signaling, and use efficiency. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 2018, 69, 85–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Lea, P.; Azevedo, R. Nitrogen use efficiency. 2. Amino acid metabolism. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2007, 151, 269–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Fan, X.; Jia, L.; Li, Y.; Smith, S.J.; Miller, A.J.; Shen, Q. Comparing nitrate storage and remobilization in two rice cultivars that differ in their nitrogen use efficiency. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 1729–1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Lea, P. Primary nitrogen metabolism. Plant Biochem. 1997, 273, 313. [Google Scholar]
  135. Forde, B.G. Nitrate transporters in plants: Structure, function and regulation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 2000, 1465, 219–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Fan, X.; Naz, M.; Fan, X.; Xuan, W.; Miller, A.J.; Xu, G. Plant nitrate transporters: From gene function to application. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 2463–2475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Krapp, A.; David, L.C.; Chardin, C.; Girin, T.; Marmagne, A.; Leprince, A.-S.; Chaillou, S.; Ferrario-Méry, S.; Meyer, C.; Daniel-Vedele, F. Nitrate transport and signalling in arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 789–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Han, M.-L.; Lv, Q.-Y.; Zhang, J.; Wang, T.; Zhang, C.-X.; Tan, R.-J.; Wang, Y.-L.; Zhong, L.-Y.; Gao, Y.-Q.; Chao, Z.-F. Decreasing nitrogen assimilation under drought stress by suppressing dst-mediated activation of nitrate reductase 1.2 in rice. Mol. Plant 2022, 15, 167–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Gao, Z.; Wang, Y.; Chen, G.; Zhang, A.; Yang, S.; Shang, L.; Wang, D.; Ruan, B.; Liu, C.; Jiang, H. The indica nitrate reductase gene OsNR2 allele enhances rice yield potential and nitrogen use efficiency. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 5207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Li, W.; Wang, Y.; Okamoto, M.; Crawford, N.M.; Siddiqi, M.Y.; Glass, A.D. Dissection of the AtNRT2.1: AtNRT2.2 inducible high-affinity nitrate transporter gene cluster. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143, 425–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Sun, J.; Bankston, J.R.; Payandeh, J.; Hinds, T.R.; Zagotta, W.N.; Zheng, N. Crystal structure of the plant dual-affinity nitrate transporter NRT1. 1. Nature 2014, 507, 73–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Parker, J.L.; Newstead, S. Molecular basis of nitrate uptake by the plant nitrate transporter NRT1. 1. Nature 2014, 507, 68–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Crawford, N.M. Nitrate: Nutrient and signal for plant growth. Plant Cell 1995, 7, 859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Zheng, H.; Wisedchaisri, G.; Gonen, T. Crystal structure of a nitrate/nitrite exchanger. Nature 2013, 497, 647–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Ali, A. Nitrate assimilation pathway in higher plants: Critical role in nitrogen signalling and utilization. Plant Sci. Today 2020, 7, 182–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Ruiz-Lozano, J.; Azcón, R. Mycorrhizal colonization and drought stress as factors affecting nitrate reductase activity in lettuce plants. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 1996, 60, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Ferrario-Méry, S.; Valadier, M.-H.; Foyer, C.H. Overexpression of nitrate reductase in tobacco delays drought-induced decreases in nitrate reductase activity and mRNA. Plant Physiol. 1998, 117, 293–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Zhou, H.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, F.; Guan, W.; Su, Y.; Yuan, X.; Xie, Y. Persulfidation of nitrate reductase 2 is involved in l-cysteine desulfhydrase-regulated rice drought tolerance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 12119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Guo, F.-Q.; Young, J.; Crawford, N.M. The nitrate transporter AtNRT1.1 (CHL1) functions in stomatal opening and contributes to drought susceptibility in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2003, 15, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Kuromori, T.; Seo, M.; Shinozaki, K. ABA transport and plant water stress responses. Trend. Plant Sci. 2018, 23, 513–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Rouphael, Y.; Cardarelli, M.; Schwarz, D.; Franken, P.; Colla, G. Effects of drought on nutrient uptake and assimilation in vegetable crops. In Plant Responses to Drought Stress; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 171–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Sreenivasulu, N.; Harshavardhan, V.T.; Govind, G.; Seiler, C.; Kohli, A. Contrapuntal role of aba: Does it mediate stress tolerance or plant growth retardation under long-term drought stress? Gene 2012, 506, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Ding, L.; Lu, Z.; Gao, L.; Guo, S.; Shen, Q. Is nitrogen a key determinant of water transport and photosynthesis in higher plants upon drought stress? Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Filiz, E.; Akbudak, M.A. Ammonium transporter 1 (AMT1) gene family in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.): Bioinformatics, physiological and expression analyses under drought and salt stresses. Genomics 2020, 112, 3773–3782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Popova, O.V.; Dietz, K.-J.; Golldack, D. Salt-dependent expression of a nitrate transporter and two amino acid transporter genes in Mesembryanthemum crystallinum. Plant Mol. Biol. 2003, 52, 569–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Liu, R.; Cui, B.; Lu, X.; Song, J. The positive effect of salinity on nitrate uptake in Suaeda salsa. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 166, 958–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Liu, R.; Jia, T.; Cui, B.; Song, J. The expression patterns and putative function of nitrate transporter 2.5 in plants. Plant Signal. Behav. 2020, 15, 1815980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Akbudak, M.A.; Filiz, E.; Çetin, D. Genome-wide identification and characterization of high-affinity nitrate transporter 2 (NRT2) gene family in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) and their transcriptional responses to drought and salinity stresses. J. Plant Physiol. 2022, 272, 153684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Taochy, C.; Gaillard, I.; Ipotesi, E.; Oomen, R.; Leonhardt, N.; Zimmermann, S.; Peltier, J.B.; Szponarski, W.; Simonneau, T.; Sentenac, H. The arabidopsis root stele transporter NPF2.3 contributes to nitrate translocation to shoots under salt stress. Plant J. 2015, 83, 466–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Tiwari, M.; Kumar, R.; Min, D.; Jagadish, S.K. Genetic and molecular mechanisms underlying root architecture and function under heat stress—A hidden story. Plant Cell Environ. 2022, 45, 771–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Kanstrup, C.; Nour-Eldin, H.H. The emerging role of the nitrate and peptide transporter family: Npf in plant specialized metabolism. Curr. Opin. Plant 2022, 68, 102243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Hussain, S.; Khaliq, A.; Noor, M.A.; Tanveer, M.; Hussain, H.A.; Hussain, S.; Shah, T.; Mehmood, T. Metal Toxicity and Nitrogen Metabolism in Plants: An Overview. In Carbon and Nitrogen Cycling in Soil; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 221–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Xiong, Z.T.; Zhao, F.; Li, M. Lead toxicity in Brassica pekinensis rupr.: Effect on nitrate assimilation and growth. Envri. Toxicol. Int. J. 2006, 21, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Antonacci, S.; Maggiore, T.; Ferrante, A. Nitrate metabolism in plants under hypoxic and anoxic conditions. Plant Stress 2007, 1, 136–141. [Google Scholar]
  165. Gupta, K.J.; Mur, L.A.; Wany, A.; Kumari, A.; Fernie, A.R.; Ratcliffe, R.G. The role of nitrite and nitric oxide under low oxygen conditions in plants. New Phytol. 2020, 225, 1143–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Da-Silva, C.J.; do Amarante, L. Nitric oxide signaling in plants during flooding stress. In Nitric Oxide in Plant Biology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 241–260. [Google Scholar]
  167. Nishida, H.; Suzaki, T. Nitrate-mediated control of root nodule symbiosis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2018, 44, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Lundberg, J.O.; Weitzberg, E.; Cole, J.A.; Benjamin, N. Nitrate, bacteria and human health. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2004, 2, 593–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Yu, C.; Chen, Y.; Cao, Y.; Chen, H.; Wang, J.; Bi, Y.-M.; Tian, F.; Yang, F.; Rothstein, S.J.; Zhou, X.; et al. Overexpression of mir169o, an overlapping microrna in response to both nitrogen limitation and bacterial infection, promotes nitrogen use efficiency and susceptibility to bacterial blight in rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2018, 59, 1234–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Jian, W.; Zhang, D.-W.; Zhu, F.; Wang, S.-X.; Zhu, T.; Pu, X.-J.; Zheng, T.; Feng, H.; Lin, H.-H. Nitrate reductase-dependent nitric oxide production is required for regulation alternative oxidase pathway involved in the resistance to cucumber mosaic virus infection in Arabidopsis. Plant Growth Regul. 2015, 77, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Oliveira, H.C.; Justino, G.C.; Sodek, L.; Salgado, I. Amino acid recovery does not prevent susceptibility to Pseudomonas syringae in nitrate reductase double-deficient arabidopsis thaliana plants. Plant Sci. 2009, 176, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Sanchez, P.A. Soil fertility and hunger in Africa. Science 2002, 295, 2019–2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Kirkby, E.A.; Johnston, A.E. Soil and fertilizer phosphorus in relation to crop nutrition. In The Ecophysiology of Plant-Phosphorus Interactions; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; pp. 177–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Alam, S.M.; Naqvi, S.S.M.; Ansari, R. Impact of soil ph on nutrient uptake by crop plants. Handb. Plant Crop Stress 1999, 2, 51–60. [Google Scholar]
  175. Neina, D. The role of soil ph in plant nutrition and soil remediation. Appl. Environ. Soil Sci. 2019, 2019, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Rorison, I. The effects of soil acidity on nutrient availability and plant response. In Effects of Acid Precipitation on Terrestrial Ecosystems; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1980; pp. 283–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Vessey, J.K.; Henry, L.T.; Chaillou, S.; Raper, C.D., Jr. Root-zone acidity affects relative uptake of nitrate and ammonium from mixed nitrogen sources. J. Plant Nutr. 1990, 13, 95–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Oshunsanya, S.O. Introductory chapter: Relevance of soil pH to agriculture. In Soil pH for Nutrient Availability and Crop Performance; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  179. Slattery, J.; Coventry, D.; Slattery, W. Rhizobial ecology as affected by the soil environment. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 2001, 41, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Brockwell, J.; Pilka, A.; Holliday, R.A. Soil ph is a major determinant of the numbers of naturally occurring rhizobium meliloti in non-cultivated soils in central new south wales. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 1991, 31, 211–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Hinsinger, P. Bioavailability of soil inorganic p in the rhizosphere as affected by root-induced chemical changes: A review. Plant Soil 2001, 237, 173–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Osman, K.T. Saline and sodic soils. In Management of Soil Problems; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 255–298. [Google Scholar]
  183. Kumar, A.; Schreiter, I.; Wefer-Roehl, A.; Tsechansky, L.; Schüth, C.; Graber, E. Production and utilization of biochar from organic wastes for pollutant control on contaminated sites. In Environmental Materials and Waste; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 91–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Osman, K.T. Sandy soils. In Management of Soil Problems; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 37–65. [Google Scholar]
  185. Xiong, Q.; Tang, G.; Zhong, L.; He, H.; Chen, X. Response to nitrogen deficiency and compensation on physiological characteristics, yield formation, and nitrogen utilization of rice. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Sun, X.; Chen, F.; Yuan, L.; Mi, G. The physiological mechanism underlying root elongation in response to nitrogen deficiency in crop plants. Planta 2020, 251, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Cartelat, A.; Cerovic, Z.; Goulas, Y.; Meyer, S.; Lelarge, C.; Prioul, J.-L.; Barbottin, A.; Jeuffroy, M.-H.; Gate, P.; Agati, G. Optically assessed contents of leaf polyphenolics and chlorophyll as indicators of nitrogen deficiency in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Field Crop. Res. 2005, 91, 35–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Uhart, S.A.; Andrade, F.H. Nitrogen deficiency in maize: Ii. Carbon-nitrogen interaction effects on kernel number and grain yield. Crop Sci. 1995, 35, 1384–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Rodriguez, D.; Fitzgerald, G.; Belford, R.; Christensen, L. Detection of nitrogen deficiency in wheat from spectral reflectance indices and basic crop eco-physiological concepts. Austrlian J. Agric. Res. 2006, 57, 781–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Tucker, T. Diagnosis of nitrogen deficiency in plants. Nitrogen Crop Prod. 1984, 247–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Qin, L.; Walk, T.C.; Han, P.; Chen, L.; Zhang, S.; Li, Y.; Hu, X.; Xie, L.; Yang, Y.; Liu, J. Adaption of roots to nitrogen deficiency revealed by 3d quantification and proteomic analysis. Plant Physiol. 2019, 179, 329–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Goyal, S.S.; Huffaker, R.C. Nitrogen Toxicity in Plants. In Nitrogen in Crop Production; American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI, USA, 1984; pp. 97–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Singh, B.; Singh, J.; Kaur, A. Applications of radioisotopes in agriculture. Int. J. Biotchnol. Bioeng. 2013, 4, 167–174. [Google Scholar]
  194. Gaspar, M. Stable nitrogen isotope helps scientists optimize water, fertilizer use. IAEA Bull. 2017, 58, 18–19. [Google Scholar]
  195. Liu, R.; Hu, H.; Suter, H.; Hayden, H.L.; He, J.; Mele, P.; Chen, D. Nitrification is a primary driver of nitrous oxide production in laboratory microcosms from different land-use soils. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Baggs, E. A review of stable isotope techniques for N2O source partitioning in soils: Recent progress, remaining challenges and future considerations. Rap. Comm. Mass Spectrom. 2008, 22, 1664–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Zhang, J.; Cai, Z.; Cheng, Y.; Zhu, T. Denitrification and total nitrogen gas production from forest soils of eastern China. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2009, 41, 2551–2557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Stevens, R.; Laughlin, R. Measurement of nitrous oxide and di-nitrogen emissions from agricultural soils. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 1998, 52, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Baggs, E.; Blum, H. CH4 oxidation and emissions of CH4 and N2O from lolium perenne swards under elevated atmospheric CO2. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2004, 36, 713–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. He, X.; Xu, M.; Qiu, G.Y.; Zhou, J. Use of 15N stable isotope to quantify nitrogen transfer between mycorrhizal plants. J. Plant Ecol. 2009, 2, 107–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Kotajima, S.; Koba, K.; Ikeda, D.; Terada, A.; Isaka, K.; Nishina, K.; Kimura, Y.; Makabe, A.; Yano, M.; Fujitani, H.; et al. Nitrogen and oxygen isotope signatures of nitrogen compounds during anammox in the laboratory and a wastewater treatment plant. Microb. Environ. 2020, 35, ME20031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Sánchez-Carrillo, S.; Álvarez-Cobelas, M. Stable isotopes as tracers in aquatic ecosystems. Environ. Rev. 2018, 26, 69–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Trimmer, M.; Grey, J.; Heppell, C.M.; Hildrew, A.G.; Lansdown, K.; Stahl, H.; Yvon-Durocher, G. River bed carbon and nitrogen cycling: State of play and some new directions. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 434, 143–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Dabundo, R. Nitrogen Isotopes in the Measurement of N2-Fixation and the Estimation of Denitrification in the Global Ocean; UCONN Library: Storrs, CT, USA, 2014; Available online: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/ (accessed on 10 July 2022).
  205. Hopkins, J.B., III; Ferguson, J.M. Estimating the diets of animals using stable isotopes and a comprehensive Bayesian mixing model. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e28478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Montoya, J.P. Nitrogen isotope fractionation in the modern ocean: Implications for the sedimentary record. In Carbon Cycling in the Glacial Ocean: Constraints on the Ocean’s Role in Global Change; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1994; pp. 259–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Hedges, R.E.; Reynard, L.M. Nitrogen isotopes and the trophic level of humans in archaeology. J. Archeol. Sci. 2007, 34, 1240–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Burford, M.; Preston, N.; Glibert, P.; Dennison, W. Tracing the fate of 15n-enriched feed in an intensive shrimp system. Aquaculture 2002, 206, 199–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Michener, R.; Lajtha, K. Stable Isotopes in Ecology and Environmental Science; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  210. Granger, J.; Sigman, D.M.; Lehmann, M.F.; Tortell, P.D. Nitrogen and oxygen isotope fractionation during dissimilatory nitrate reduction by denitrifying bacteria. Limnol. Ocean. 2008, 53, 2533–2545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Rodale, R. Agricultural Systems: The Importance of Sustainability, National Forum; Honor Society of Phi Kappa Phi: Baton Rouge, LA, USA, 1988; p. 2. [Google Scholar]
  212. BIFAD. Environment and Natural Resources: Strategies for Sustainable Agriculture Task Force Report; US Agency for International Development: Washington, DC, USA, 1988.
  213. Okigbo, B. Development of Sustainable Agricultural Production Systems in Africa: Roles of International Agricultural Research Centers and National Agricultural Research Systems; Institute of Tropical Agriculture: Ibadan, Nigeria, 1991; Available online: https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/index.do (accessed on 24 June 2022).
  214. Dover, M.J.; Talbot, L.M. To Feed the Earth: Agro-Ecology for Sustainable Development; World Resources Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  215. Knezek, B.D.; Hesterman, O.B.; Wink, L. Exploring a New Vision of Agriculture, National Forum; Honor Society of Phi Kappa Phi: Baton Rouge, LA, USA, 1988; p. 10. [Google Scholar]
  216. Lynam, J.K.; Herdt, R.W. Sense and sustainability: Sustainability as an objective in international agricultural research. Agric. Econom. 1989, 3, 381–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Ramamoorthy, P.; Bheemanahalli, R.; Meyers, S.L.; Shankle, M.W.; Reddy, K.R. Drought, low nitrogen stress, and ultraviolet-b radiation effects on growth, development, and physiology of sweetpotato cultivars during early season. Genes 2022, 13, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Araus, V.; Swift, J.; Alvarez, J.M.; Henry, A.; Coruzzi, G.M. A balancing act: How plants integrate nitrogen and water signals. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 4442–4451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Tian, J.; Pang, Y.; Zhao, Z. Drought, salinity, and low nitrogen differentially affect the growth and nitrogen metabolism of sophora japonica (L.) in a semi-hydroponic phenotyping platform. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 715456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Zhen, F.; Liu, Y.; Ali, I.; Liu, B.; Liu, L.; Cao, W.; Tang, L.; Zhu, Y. Short-term heat stress at booting stage inhibited nitrogen remobilization to grain in rice. J. Agric. Food Res. 2020, 2, 100066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Ye, J.Y.; Tian, W.H.; Jin, C.W. Nitrogen in plants: From nutrition to the modulation of abiotic stress adaptation. Stress Biol. 2022, 2, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Fan, T.; Yang, W.; Zeng, X.; Xu, X.; Xu, Y.; Fan, X.; Luo, M.; Tian, C.; Xia, K.; Zhang, M. A rice autophagy gene OsATG8B is involved in nitrogen remobilization and control of grain quality. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  223. Zhen, X.; Zheng, N.; Yu, J.; Bi, C.; Xu, F. Autophagy mediates grain yield and nitrogen stress resistance by modulating nitrogen remobilization in rice. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0244996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. Yu, J.; Zhen, X.; Li, X.; Li, N.; Xu, F. Increased autophagy of rice can increase yield and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE). Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  225. Berger, A.; Boscari, A.; Horta Araujo, N.; Maucourt, M.; Hanchi, M.; Bernillon, S.; Rolin, D.; Puppo, A.; Brouquisse, R. Plant nitrate reductases regulate nitric oxide production and nitrogen-fixing metabolism during the medicago truncatula–sinorhizobium meliloti symbiosis. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  226. Pan, Q.-N.; Geng, C.-C.; Li, D.-D.; Xu, S.-W.; Mao, D.-D.; Umbreen, S.; Loake, G.J.; Cui, B.-M. Nitrate reductase-mediated nitric oxide regulates the leaf shape in Arabidopsis by mediating the homeostasis of reactive oxygen species. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Pattern of global macronutrients use in agriculture from 1961 to 2020.
Figure 1. Pattern of global macronutrients use in agriculture from 1961 to 2020.
Life 12 01272 g001
Figure 2. Illustration of the multiple roles or involvement of nitrogen in plant growth, development, and cellular metabolism. Nitrogen is contained in various biological components and takes part in diverse physiological processes, biochemical reactions, and molecular response toward stress in plants. This illustration was created using the gallery proposed by Biorender (https://app.biorender.com/, accessed on 23 March 2022). The circular shapes and the description were added using Microsoft Office PowerPoint 2016.
Figure 2. Illustration of the multiple roles or involvement of nitrogen in plant growth, development, and cellular metabolism. Nitrogen is contained in various biological components and takes part in diverse physiological processes, biochemical reactions, and molecular response toward stress in plants. This illustration was created using the gallery proposed by Biorender (https://app.biorender.com/, accessed on 23 March 2022). The circular shapes and the description were added using Microsoft Office PowerPoint 2016.
Life 12 01272 g002
Figure 3. Illustration of N metabolism in plants. N is acquired by plants from the soil, which is the major source. Soil microorganisms are responsible for mediating the conversion of the atmospheric N gas (N2) to a form available to the plant (NO3 or NH4). N is also supplied exogenously through fertilizer application. NO3 and NH4 are taken up by the roots and transported to the shoot via the action of several transporter-encoding genes, which translocate to the cells. NO3 and NH4 undergo series of conversions and are assimilated in the form of amino acids, becoming part of several macromolecules. The NO3 stored in the vacuole is remobilized in the event of reduced fluxes from soil to the plant. This model was created from available information on the nitrogen metabolism proposed in the literature, including Wang et al. [131], Ali [145], and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways database (https://www.genome.jp/pathway/ko00910, accessed on 10 June 2022) using the BioRender design platform (https://app.biorender.com/, accessed on 10 June 2022). Continuous lines with an arrow indicate a positive process or induction. Dotted and dashed lines denote the nitrification and denitrification processes, respectively.
Figure 3. Illustration of N metabolism in plants. N is acquired by plants from the soil, which is the major source. Soil microorganisms are responsible for mediating the conversion of the atmospheric N gas (N2) to a form available to the plant (NO3 or NH4). N is also supplied exogenously through fertilizer application. NO3 and NH4 are taken up by the roots and transported to the shoot via the action of several transporter-encoding genes, which translocate to the cells. NO3 and NH4 undergo series of conversions and are assimilated in the form of amino acids, becoming part of several macromolecules. The NO3 stored in the vacuole is remobilized in the event of reduced fluxes from soil to the plant. This model was created from available information on the nitrogen metabolism proposed in the literature, including Wang et al. [131], Ali [145], and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways database (https://www.genome.jp/pathway/ko00910, accessed on 10 June 2022) using the BioRender design platform (https://app.biorender.com/, accessed on 10 June 2022). Continuous lines with an arrow indicate a positive process or induction. Dotted and dashed lines denote the nitrification and denitrification processes, respectively.
Life 12 01272 g003
Table 1. Beneficial outcomes and advert effects of nitrogen versus phosphorus and potassium.
Table 1. Beneficial outcomes and advert effects of nitrogen versus phosphorus and potassium.
Plant NutrientsFunctionDeficiency SymptomsExcess/Toxicity
Primary nutrients (NH4+/NO3, H2PO4/HPO4, and K+)
Nitrogen (N)
-
An important constituent (or involved in the synthesis) of chlorophyll, protoplasm, proteins, coenzymes, and nucleic acids.
-
Increases growth and development of all living tissues.
-
Improves the quality of leafy vegetables and fodders and the protein content of food grains.
-
Stunted growth.
-
Appearance of a light-green to pale-yellow color on older leaves, starting from the tips. Lower leaves turn yellow. This is followed by death and/or dropping of the older leaves depending upon the degree of deficiency.
-
In acute deficiency, flowering is greatly reduced.
-
Lower protein content.
-
Deep-green vegetation and poor secondary shoot growth development.
-
Greater bud formation instead of reproductive bud formation.
-
Roots turn brown, with necrotic root tips.
-
Reduced plant growth.
-
Necrotic lesions occur on stem and leaves.
-
Vascular browning occurs in stems and roots.
-
Increases soil mineral salts.
-
Promotes luxuriant growth, resulting in the plant being attractive to insects and/or diseases/pathogens (increases susceptibility to bacterial and fungal diseases).
-
Enhances production of methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O).
Phosphorus (P)
-
A constituent of phosphatides, nucleic acids, proteins, phospholipids, and coenzymes, metabolic transfer processes, NAD, NADP, and ATP, photosynthesis, and respiration.
-
Constituent of certain amino acids.
-
Necessary for cell division, a constituent of chromosomes, and stimulates root development.
-
Necessary for meristematic growth, seed and fruit development, and stimulates flowering.
-
Overall stunted appearance, where the mature leaves have characteristic dark to blue-green coloration, and restricted root development.
-
In acute deficiency, occasional purpling of leaves, especially the margins, and the stem shows spindly growth.
-
Delayed maturity and lack of or poor seed and fruit development.
-
Reduced tillering in cereals.
-
Yield loss ranging 10–15% of maximal yield.
-
Excess P in the plant can result in iron (Fe) and Zinc deficiencies.
Potassium (K)
-
Involved in sugar and starch formation, lipid metabolism, and nitrogen fixation, and neutralizes organic acids.
-
An activator of enzymes involved in photosynthesis and protein and carbohydrate metabolism.
-
Assists carbohydrate translocation, synthesis of protein and maintenance of its stability, membrane permeability and pH control, and water utilization by stomatal regulation.
-
Improves utilization of light during cool and cloudy weather, thereby enhancing plant ability to resist cold and other adverse conditions.
-
Enhances the plant’s ability to resist diseases.
-
Increases the size of grains or seeds and improves the quality of fruits and vegetables.
-
Plays a role in osmoregulation of water use (opening and closing of stomata).
-
Chlorosis along the leaf margins (or marginal burning of leaves and curling of leaves) followed by scorching and browning of tips of older leaves; these symptoms then gradually progress inward.
-
Slow and stunted growth of plants.
-
Stalks weak, and plants lodge easily.
-
Shriveled seeds or fruits.
-
High amounts of K can cause calcium, magnesium, and nitrogen deficiencies.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kabange, N.R.; Lee, S.-M.; Shin, D.; Lee, J.-Y.; Kwon, Y.; Kang, J.-W.; Cha, J.-K.; Park, H.; Alibu, S.; Lee, J.-H. Multiple Facets of Nitrogen: From Atmospheric Gas to Indispensable Agricultural Input. Life 2022, 12, 1272. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12081272

AMA Style

Kabange NR, Lee S-M, Shin D, Lee J-Y, Kwon Y, Kang J-W, Cha J-K, Park H, Alibu S, Lee J-H. Multiple Facets of Nitrogen: From Atmospheric Gas to Indispensable Agricultural Input. Life. 2022; 12(8):1272. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12081272

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kabange, Nkulu Rolly, So-Myeong Lee, Dongjin Shin, Ji-Yoon Lee, Youngho Kwon, Ju-Won Kang, Jin-Kyung Cha, Hyeonjin Park, Simon Alibu, and Jong-Hee Lee. 2022. "Multiple Facets of Nitrogen: From Atmospheric Gas to Indispensable Agricultural Input" Life 12, no. 8: 1272. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12081272

APA Style

Kabange, N. R., Lee, S. -M., Shin, D., Lee, J. -Y., Kwon, Y., Kang, J. -W., Cha, J. -K., Park, H., Alibu, S., & Lee, J. -H. (2022). Multiple Facets of Nitrogen: From Atmospheric Gas to Indispensable Agricultural Input. Life, 12(8), 1272. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12081272

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop