Next Article in Journal
Comparative Analysis of Examination Methods for Periapical Lesion Diagnostics: Assessing Cone-Beam Computer Tomography, Ultrasound, and Periapical Radiography
Previous Article in Journal
Non-Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Assessment: Focus on Optical Coherence Tomography Biomarkers
 
 
Interesting Images
Peer-Review Record

Occult Breast Cancer Presenting as Sternum Pain

Diagnostics 2024, 14(7), 765; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14070765
by Dang Wu 1,2, Siyu Guo 1,2, Bicheng Zhang 1,2, Fengbo Huang 2,3, Wei Qian 4, Fuming Qiu 2,5, Qichun Wei 1,2 and Ting Zhang 1,2,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Diagnostics 2024, 14(7), 765; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14070765
Submission received: 18 February 2024 / Revised: 24 March 2024 / Accepted: 25 March 2024 / Published: 4 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Medical Imaging and Theranostics)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This case report describes the diagnosis of breast cancer made through sternal and left internal mammary lymph node metastases without a definite breast primary lesion. The case report is very complete, with all of the information and images one needs to understand the case. It does not, however, add significantly to our understanding of the disease process nor suggest a different approach in workup/management.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

One minor comment is to change "no positive signs" to "no visualized lesions" or "no positive findings" in several places.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The introduction does not provide sufficient background nor relevant references. The research design was not appropriately elaborated. Used methods should be described. Results need to be presented in line with figures but instead the figures are described without text of the Results. The conclusions need to be highlighted.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors corrected the manuscript according to suggestions and properly explained the issues that can not be added.

Back to TopTop