3.2. The Tribological Properties of the Laminated Composites
Figure 4 shows the friction coefficient curves of different surfaces of the Al
2O
3/graphite-Al
2O
3 laminated composites under dry sliding friction, the water condition, and water with 5 wt% SiO
2 particles. Under the dry sliding condition shown in
Figure 4a, the friction coefficient of the Al
2O
3/graphite-Al
2O
3 laminated composites parallel to the layer direction is between 0.30 and 0.40, and the values show a certain fluctuation, while the composites perpendicular to the layer direction are more stable, with values between 0.28 and 0.32. Remarkably, the friction coefficients of the laminated composites decreased evidently when friction pairs were placed in the water conditions, as shown in
Figure 4b. The friction coefficients of the surface parallel to the layer direction decreased to 0.10~0.20 but fluctuated apparently during the friction process, while they decreased to 0.15~0.16 for the surface perpendicular to the layer direction and became pretty stable after the running-in period. After adding 5 wt% SiO
2 particles into the water (in
Figure 4c), the friction coefficients of the Al
2O
3/graphite-Al
2O
3 laminated composites increased and showed no evident fluctuation compared to the water condition without particles. The friction coefficients of the surface parallel to the layer direction increased to 0.21~0.22, while the friction coefficients of the surface perpendicular to the layer direction increased to 0.19 and became stable after the running-in period.
Figure 5 shows the wear rates of different surfaces of the Al
2O
3/graphite-Al
2O
3 laminated composites under the different conditions. The wear rates of the laminated composites under the water conditions are lower compared to the dry sliding friction condition. The solid particles in the water increased the wear rates of the laminated composites severely. In addition, compared to the surfaces parallel to the layer direction, the wear rate perpendicular to the layer direction decreases by orders of magnitude. Especially under water conditions, the wear rate perpendicular to the layer direction can be as low as 1.76 × 10
−6 mm
3/Nm, which is two orders of magnitude lower than that parallel to the layer direction under the same condition.
Briefly, the friction coefficients of the Al2O3/graphite-Al2O3 laminated composites under the water conditions with or without suspended particles were lower than those under dry sliding friction, and the friction coefficients of the surfaces perpendicular to the layer direction were lower and more stable than those parallel to the layer direction. This demonstrates that the test conditions and the configuration of the laminated composites had a great influence on the friction and wear properties.
From our previous research results [
16], a comparison of the tribological performance of different alumina-based ceramics under dry sliding and water lubrication conditions is presented in
Figure 6. The friction coefficient of the monolithic Al
2O
3 ceramic under dry sliding is 0.72, as shown in
Figure 6a, and it approximately decreases by 50% after introducing graphite as a lubricant. The friction coefficients of the Al
2O
3/graphite-Al
2O
3 laminated composites are the lowest under both conditions.
Figure 6b shows the wear rate of the alumina-based ceramics; the graphite-Al
2O
3 composite has the highest wear rate among all the ceramics under the dry sliding and water conditions. The Al
2O
3/graphite-Al
2O
3 laminated composites almost have the lowest wear rate among the four ceramics. Therefore, the Al
2O
3/graphite-Al
2O
3 laminated composites show preferable tribological properties under the dry friction and water conditions. In the preparation and application of seals, the Al
2O
3/graphite-Al
2O
3 laminated composites can tolerate a certain load and high temperatures. The surface perpendicular to the layer direction, as the main working surface, can exhibit better friction and wear performance under dry sliding friction, water, and suspended particle conditions, and it can also reduce the energy loss during work and improve the service life of components.
3.3. Mechanism of Friction and Wear
The above results indicate that the surfaces of the Al
2O
3/graphite-Al
2O
3 laminated composites perpendicular to the layer direction show better wear resistance than those parallel to the layer direction under the three different working conditions. This can be attributed to the laminated composites with strong/weak layers that effectively improve the bearing capacity and wear resistance of composites by virtue of the high strength and anti-wear ceramic matrix layer. Typically, the layered structure reduces the low reliability caused by the high friction and inherent brittleness of Al
2O
3 under dry friction conditions and overcomes the weaknesses of the low bearing capacity, insufficient heat resistance, and wear resistance of graphite. In this way, the vulnerability from inadequate mechanical and tribological properties of conventional ceramic materials can be reduced, and the unification of mechanical properties and lubricating functions of ceramic materials can be realized. For graphite-Al
2O
3 composite ceramics (the B layer), the friction coefficient can be significantly reduced, but the wear rate will increase, unfortunately. The introduction of the graphite phase will form an interphase and destroy the continuity of the Al
2O
3 matrix, so that the mechanical properties of the composite ceramics, such as strength and hardness, will decline, reducing the crack resistance and the reliability of graphite-Al
2O
3 composite ceramics, as shown in
Figure 6b.
Moreover, the Al
2O
3/graphite-Al
2O
3 laminated composite is apt to form lubricating films and transfer films compared with the graphite-Al
2O
3 composite ceramic. In the process of friction and sliding, the soft layers of graphite were subjected to extrusion of friction and thermal expansion, which was continuously transported to the laminated composite surface perpendicular to the layer direction and formed a relatively stable lubricating film [
23]. And it continuously supplemented and provided a lubricating medium to form a “self-healing” effect, repairing the torn lubrication film during the friction process, inhibiting the laminated composite’s directly contacting the friction pair. As a result, the surface of the Al
2O
3/graphite-Al
2O
3 laminated composite perpendicular to the layer direction under the three different working conditions showed better self-lubricating performance than that parallel to the layer direction, and the friction coefficient curves were more stable. For graphite-Al
2O
3 composite ceramics, a friction lubrication film was formed through wear and self-consumption. The hard Al
2O
3 phase underwent abrasive wear, aggravating the self-consumption of the graphite-Al
2O
3 composite ceramics.
In water working conditions, the bearing capacity of water is low owing to the low viscosity of the liquid. In an ab initio molecular dynamics study, Hass et al. revealed that the dissociative adsorption of water was energetically favored on an Al-terminated (0001) α-Al
2O
3 surface compared to molecular physisorption [
24]. The surface of Al
2O
3 can form an electric double layer between the solid–liquid interface, which is composed of several dissociative adsorptions of water molecules about several nanometers in thickness away from the solid surface. This makes the electric viscosity of water increase exponentially, increasing the bearing capacity of water [
25,
26]. Furthermore, the water molecules on the solid surface are layered and directionally arranged; the molecules in the same layer maintain an independent integrity, and it is easy for sliding to occur between the layers. When a slip occurs, a shear plane with a certain potential is generated in the electric double layer, which provides a low shear resistance interface. In addition, the two friction surfaces were separated by the adsorption film; the layer adsorbed at the surface promoted the easy removal of the alumina debris [
27], causing the friction coefficient to decrease and avoiding surface adhesion.
On the other hand, if graphite is exposed to air for a long time, its surface adsorbs hydrocarbon pollutants in the environment and becomes hydrophobic, while the newly formed surface is hydrophilic [
28]. The water molecules will be arranged regularly near the graphite surface, and the rank density is high to form an obvious stable adsorption layer; the arrangement of water molecules is gradually disordered away from the graphite surface, and the density gradually decreases, forming a diffusion adsorption layer. Unfortunately, simulations show that the interaction between water and graphite is weak compared to that among water molecules [
29]. The adsorbed layer on the graphite surface can be easily destroyed by friction. This leads to expansion between graphite layers and decreases the shear resistance of graphite layers, resulting in better self-lubrication for graphite. In short, in water working conditions, the alumina plays an important part in boundary lubrication, the graphite is indispensable for self-lubrication, and the different lubrication mechanisms lead to different friction and wear behaviors compared to dry sliding conditions.
For the graphite-Al
2O
3 composite ceramic, the boundary lubrication of alumina is destroyed and presents discontinuity caused by the introduction of graphite; it exhibits an unstable friction coefficient parallel to the layer direction during sliding (
Figure 4b). For the Al
2O
3/graphite-Al
2O
3 laminated composites perpendicular to the layer direction, the reduction in the friction coefficient is affected by the layered structure between the alumina and the graphite–alumina. Besides the lubrication film formed by graphite during sliding friction, water can form a certain fluid lubrication film on the friction surface (
Figure 7c) during friction and sliding processes [
30]. Moreover, the layer distance of the graphite is higher by one order of magnitude than the size of the water molecules, and the water molecules can diffuse into the graphite layer easily. Then, the distance between graphite layers increases by swelling from water molecule adsorption, which decreases the shear resistance of graphite layers and provides graphite with a better self-lubricating performance [
31]. Thus, the friction coefficients of the alumina-based composite are low under the water lubrication conditions in
Figure 6a. In addition, due to the periodic arrangement of the Al
2O
3 layer (the A layer) and the graphite-Al
2O
3 composite layer (the B layer), the B layer also contains 78.5 vol% of alumina; the high content of Al
2O
3 means that boundary lubrication plays a relatively stable role, and the friction coefficient is relatively stable accordingly. Furthermore, water can wash away the debris generated on the friction surface with the movement of the sample (
Figure 7b), decreasing the hard particles and preventing abrasive wear from the friction pairs. Therefore, the Al
2O
3/graphite-Al
2O
3 composites perpendicular to the layer direction have lower friction coefficients in water working conditions than the graphite-Al
2O
3 composite ceramic.
During the tests in the suspended particle conditions, the adsorptive water layer on the surface of the alumina was easily destroyed by SiO
2 particles in the water, and the shear lubrication of water decreased. Additionally, the SiO
2 particles increased abrasive wear in the sliding process and tore the lubricating film on the graphite surface (
Figure 7d) and also aggravated the friction and wear of the Al
2O
3/graphite-Al
2O
3 laminated composites. Thus, the friction coefficient and wear rates of the Al
2O
3/graphite-Al
2O
3 laminated composites in water containing SiO
2 particles were higher than those in pure water.
3.4. Friction and Wear Surface Analysis
The surface morphologies for the wear surfaces of the Al
2O
3/graphite-Al
2O
3 laminated composites under water working conditions are shown in
Figure 8. The width of the worn surfaces is approximately 800 μm. Obviously, the addition of SiO
2 suspended particles makes the worn surface of Al
2O
3 (the A layer) become clearer and smoother and that of graphite-Al
2O
3 composites (the B layer) become rougher, as shown in
Figure 8a. Without SiO
2 particles, a continuous graphite lubricating film forms on the surface of the Al
2O
3/graphite-Al
2O
3 composites, as shown in
Figure 8c. Additionally, it can be seen that abrasive particles are generated and that steps appear at the interface between the A layer and the B layer of the Al
2O
3/graphite-Al
2O
3 laminated composites in the water working conditions with suspended SiO
2 particles (seen in
Figure 8b); spallation occurs on the wear surface of the Al
2O
3 (the A layer), and the wear of the graphite-Al
2O
3 composites (the B layer) is serious. For the water condition without SiO
2 particles, the worn interface between the A layer and the B layer is relatively smooth, and the B layer has some large pores on the surface (
Figure 8d).
The micro-morphologies of the wear surfaces of the Al
2O
3/graphite-Al
2O
3 laminated composites perpendicular to the layer direction are shown in
Figure 9.
Figure 9a shows the micro-morphology of Al
2O
3 (the A layer), where the surface is relatively smooth with some pores, and the relative density is high.
Figure 9d shows the morphology of the graphite-Al
2O
3 composites (the B layer), where the surface has some holes and graphite flakes are mixed with alumina grains, forming a relatively loose structure. Comparing the layers of the Al
2O
3/graphite-Al
2O
3 laminated composites under water working conditions with SiO
2 particles, numerous alumina abrasive particles were attached to the worn surface (
Figure 9b) and the graphite was full of pores, and the worn surface of the B layer (
Figure 9e) was full of graphite debris and pores after the graphite was peeled off. Furthermore, there were some finer pores in the A layer, which were caused by shearing and peeling of Al
2O
3 particles that were not strongly bound during friction.
Figure 9f shows the pores left after the peeling of graphite.
Table 1 shows the atomic percentages of the elements in the lines of the images in
Figure 8. Line 1 and line 2 are on the worn surface under the water working condition with SiO
2 particles (
Figure 8a), and line 3 and line 4 are on the worn surface under the water condition without SiO
2 particles (
Figure 8c). Compared with line 3 on the A layer (the Al
2O
3 phase), the carbon content of line 1 is lower than that in line 3; the main reason is that the graphite lubrication film was worn off. The silicon and oxygen contents of line 1 are higher than those of line 3, which is mainly due to the SiO
2 particles embedded into the friction surface under the working condition with suspended SiO
2 particles. Meanwhile, compared with line 4, the silicon content of line 2 is increased because of the B layer (the graphite-Al
2O
3 composite phase) containing the softer graphite phase that makes SiO
2 abrasive particles embed in the worn surface easily. This is caused by the hardness of the B layer (HV374 ± 20), which is lower than that of the A layer (HV1408 ± 85). The embedded SiO
2 particles in the wear surface can also be observed during the friction process in
Figure 10; the atomic distribution of Si is higher in the B layer than that in the A layer.
The interface steps between the A layer and the B layer of the Al
2O
3/graphite-Al
2O
3 laminated composites were observed, and the depths of the wear track of the laminated composites perpendicular to the layer direction were studied. In
Figure 11a, it can be seen that the worn surface of the laminated composites is not continuous and has obvious furrows and peeling under the water working condition with SiO
2 particles. The wear and tear of the graphite-Al
2O
3 composites (the B layer) are higher than those of the Al
2O
3 ceramic (the A layer), especially in the middle of the sliding distance. The maximum depth of the wear track for the graphite-Al
2O
3 composites (the B layer) is 18.48 ± 6.77 μm, and the maximum depth of the wear track for the Al
2O
3 ceramic (the A layer) is 6.28 ± 0.87 μm. This indicates that the friction surface is uneven and that the graphite falls off unevenly. For the worn track of the laminated composites under the water working condition without SiO
2 particles, the wear and tear of the A layer and the B layer are different. The frictional behavior under the water working conditions is similar to polishing with water; the specimen surface becomes smoother, the roughness decreases, and the friction coefficient decreases as well. The maximum depth of the wear track of the graphite-Al
2O
3 composite layer (the B layer) is 6.06 ± 1.56 μm, and the maximum depth of the wear track of the Al
2O
3 ceramic layer (the A layer) is 4.27 ± 0.18 μm. The wear of the A layer is not severe because the Al
2O
3 has a high hardness. The wear mode of the B layer (the graphite-Al
2O
3 composites) under the water working condition without SiO
2 particles is mainly dominated by water lubrication and spalling accompanied by slight abrasive wear, while it is mainly dominated by abrasive wear and evident furrowing presents itself under the water working condition with SiO
2 particles.
In short, under water working conditions, the formation of water-lubricating film, the water absorption and expansion of graphite, and the erosion of wear debris from water improve the anti-wear properties of layered materials. However, under conditions with SiO2 suspended particles, the solid particles will destroy the lubricating film during friction, which is unfavorable for the reduction in friction and wear. Finally, the addition of graphite can decrease the frictional resistance of laminated Al2O3/graphite-Al2O3 composites, but its wear rate strongly depends on the working conditions.