Next Article in Journal
Cost-Effective PCR-Based Identification of Tunga penetrans (Siphonaptera) Larvae Extracted from Soil Samples Containing PCR Inhibitor-Rich Material
Previous Article in Journal
Evidence for Reconsidering the Taxonomic Status of Closely Related Oligonychus Species in punicae Complex (Acari: Prostigmata: Tetranychidae)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Leaf Color and Trichome Density Influence the Whitefly Infestation in Different Cassava Cultivars

by
Marcelo A. Pastório
1,
Adriano T. Hoshino
2,
Cíntia S. G. Kitzberger
3,
Orcial C. Bortolotto
4,
Luciano M. de Oliveira
2,
Adevanir Martins dos Santos
3,
Wilmar F. Lima
3,
Ayres de O. Menezes Junior
2 and
Humberto G. Androcioli
3,*
1
Department of Entomology, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Marechal Cândido Rondon, Cascavel 85819-110, Brazil
2
Department of Agronomy, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina 86057-970, Brazil
3
Instituto de Desenvolvimento Rural do Paraná IAPAR-EMATER, Curitiba 86047-902, Brazil
4
Department of Agronomy, Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste, Guarapuava 85040-080, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2023, 14(1), 4; https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14010004
Submission received: 19 October 2022 / Revised: 12 December 2022 / Accepted: 14 December 2022 / Published: 21 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Integrated Pest Management of Crops)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The cassava is an important food crop in many regions of the world, mainly in the African continent and Brazilian regions. Pest occurrence has been the main limiting factor towards high productivity. The objective of this study was to identify the relationship between two whitefly species’ occurrences and leaf characteristics in different cassava cultivars. Fewer whitefly nymphs were observed in cultivars with the lowest trichome density, highest light reflection and chroma in leaves. These cultivars could be recommended in areas where whiteflies have an infestation history. The morphological characteristics of cassava leaves such as trichome density, light reflection and chroma, should all be considered in future resistance breeding programs.

Abstract

The whitefly species Bemisia tuberculata and Aleurotrixus aepim (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) are considered important cassava (Manihot esculenta) pests. Leaf color and other morphological characteristics can influence the pest’s interactions with the host plants. Thus, this study aimed to identify the relationship between whitefly occurrence and trichome density and leaf color in different cassava cultivars. The study was conducted in the field during the 2014/2015 and 2016/2017 crop seasons. The whitefly occurrence was surveyed in the cultivars, IAPAR 19, IPR Upira, IPR União, IAC 576-70, IAC 14, IAC 90, Catarina Branca, Santa Helena and Baianinha. The whitefly nymph quantification was correlated with non-glandular trichome density, luminosity (L*) and chroma (a* and b*) of the cassava leaves. IAPAR 19 and IAC 14 were less infested by whitefly nymphs when contrasted with IPR União, IPR Upira and Baianinha, which were the most infested. The lowest B. tuberculata infestations were correlated with lesser trichome density, highest light reflection and highest chroma in the sprout and the plant’s superior third portion leaves. Low A. aepim infestation in both crop seasons made it impossible to verify its correlation with the studied cassava plant characteristics. The cultivars IAPAR 19 and IAC 14 could contribute towards B. tuberculata management in regions with a history of whitefly infestation.

1. Introduction

The cassava plant (Manihot esculenta Crantz) has great importance in human nutrition [1,2]. The world’s largest producers of cassava in decreasing order are Nigeria, Thailand, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ghana and Brazil [3]. Pest occurrence can restrain the cassava cultivation, especially in favorable environmental conditions [4,5,6].
Whitefly species are major pests of agricultural crops around the world, from the Americas to Asia and Africa [7,8,9,10]. In cassava cultivations, especially in the Neo tropical regions, whiteflies are serious pests and are responsible for significant economic losses annually [11]. Different species of whiteflies dominate divergent cassava cultivation regions. For instance, in Brazil, Bemisia tuberculata (Bondar, 1923) and Aleurothrixus aepim (Goeldi, 1886), (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), are important pests with occurrences in different cassava-cultivating regions [12,13].
Under favorable development conditions, the whiteflies can cause severe damage, debilitating the cassava plants through sap suction [14]. As a consequence, the plants exhibit chlorosis symptoms and premature leaf fall, and in addition, the honeydew secreted by the insect favors the development of sooty mold (Capnodium sp.) which impairs the plant’s photosynthetic capability and gas exchange [15]. Whiteflies are the main pests in cassava-cultivating countries where the transmission of the African Cassava Mosaic Virus (ACMV) greatly impairs productivity, being reduced from 20 to 95% [16,17].
The use of synthetic insecticides is still the main whitefly control strategy [18], however, its indiscriminate use can cause human intoxication risks, environmental imbalance and the selection of insecticide-resistant populations [19,20]. Thus, the development of environmentally sound, resilient and complementary management strategies, such as host plant resistance and biological control agents, should be fostered [20,21,22,23]. The use of resistant cultivars can reduce infestation with pests causing low environmental imbalance, and in addition, in most instances, host plant resistance acts synergistically with biological control in integrated pest management programs [23,24,25].
However, in Brazil, there are a lack of studies to better understand the resistance mechanisms of cassava cultivars against whiteflies. However, previously, multiple studies have indicated the existence of chemical, morphological and/or physical mechanisms in cassava that act against pests [25,26,27,28].
Within the morphological resistance factors, the presence of trichomes and the leaf coloration can influence many insects, attracting or repelling their actions towards the host plants [28,29]. Cultivars with physical characteristics which tarnish the establishment of the whitefly could be recommended for areas with a history of infestation of this pest. However, in field conditions, trichome effects against B. tuberculata and A. aepim have not been well studied, impairing the development and recommendation of cultivars less susceptible to the whitefly.
Therefore, the objectives of this study were to identify the relationship between whitefly occurrence, and the trichome density and leaf color in different cassava cultivars.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area and Climate

The study was conducted in the city of Londrina (23°21′ S; 51°10′ W; 610 m.a.s.l.), from November 2014 to October 2015 and July 2016 to May 2017, in the experimental station of Instituto de Desenvolvimento Rural do Paraná IAPAR-EMATER (IDR-Paraná).
According to the Köppen classification, the experiment site has a humid subtropical climate (Cfa). The median temperature and accumulated rain during the first and second year were 22.7 °C and 1928.9 mm, and 21.8 °C and 1307.6 mm, respectively (data obtained from the meteorological station of IDR-Paraná, located at 600 m away from the experimental site).

2.2. Experimental Design and Stem-Seed Plantation

The experiment was conducted in a randomized block design, with nine treatments (IAPAR 19, IPR Upira, IPR União, IAC 576-70, IAC 14, IAC 90, Catarina Branca, Santa Helena and Baianinha) and five repetitions (parcels). Each repetitions had an area of 36 m2 (6 m × 6 m), with six lines, each line containing six cassava plants. The spacing between lines and between plants was 0.90 m and 0.80 m, respectively. The cultivars were manually planted in two crop seasons, in the early November in 2014 and early July for 2016. No fertilization was performed in both crop seasons.

2.3. Evaluation of B. tuberculata and A. aepim Infestation on Cassava Leaves

The B. tuberculata and A. aepim nymph population was quantified through the visual inspections of four plants in the middle region of each parcel. The nymphs were differentiated through distinct behavior characteristics, whereas A. aepim specimens have gregarious behaviors and wax secretion; the opposite is true for B. tabaci. The cassava plants were divided into three regions—lower, middle and superior—and four abaxial leaves’ surfaces, on the superior third of each plant, were inspected, following the North, South, East and West positions. The inspections were performed on the plant’s superior third region due to the whitefly’s oviposition preference in this region [30]. Eleven surveys were conducted from February to October in the first year, in intervals of approximately 20 days, and twenty surveys were performed from November 2016 to May 2017 in the second year, in intervals of approximately 10 days.

2.4. Material Preparation and Microscopic Reading for Leaf Trichomes Quantification

Non-expanded leaf (sprout) and the first expanded leaf in the plant’s superior third were gathered 210 days after planting (before flowering), in accordance with Schoonhoven’s observation [31].
The material preparation for scanning electron microscope (SEM) followed the methodological proceedings proposed by Zinsou et al. [32]. An area of 4 mm2 (2 × 2 mm) from the median section of the central leaf lobe of each cassava cultivar was extracted using a scalpel. The samples were washed in a phosphate-buffered saline solution (0.1 M, pH 7.2). Afterwards, the samples were dehydrated using an ascending concentration of ethanol (30, 50, 70, 90 and 100%) in 10 min intervals. The samples were then critical point-dried in a CO2 atmosphere at 40 °C, gold coted and photographed under an SEM (Phillips FEI, model Quanta 200) with a 400× magnification lens.
After producing the micrographs, the number of trichomes was counted in three randomly allocated areas (0.032 µm2). The trichome density per cm2 was estimated using these areas’ mean (File S1, File S2, File S3, File S4).

2.5. Determination of the Colorimetric Parameters

The colorimetric parameters were performed in field conditions from the same superior third of planta utilized to quantify whitefly nymphs. Five sprouts and the adaxial surface of five leaves per parcel were measured, and the leaves were placed on a black background clipboard to avoid the interference of reflected solar light.
The colorimetric parameters were obtained through the portable colorimetric device Konica Minolta® (model Chroma Meter CR-400), following the color system of Commision Internationale de L’Éclairage (CIE), which uses the colorimetric parameters luminosity (L*) and chroma (a* and b*), set in standard coordinates within a tridimensional space of color.
The value of L* ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 is black and 100 is white. The value of a* indicates red when it is represented by positive numbers and green when represented by negative numbers. The value of b* is positive when the object is yellow and negative when it is blue [33]. These parameters correlate consistently the color values with the visual perception [34].

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The normality and homogeneity were verified for the whitefly nymph density per leaf, non-glandular trichome density per cm2 and colorimetric parameters. When necessary, the data were transformed using the square root (x + 0.5), where x is the original value. The variance analysis (ANOVA) was performed, and the means compared by the Scott–Knott test (α = 5%).
The variables of trichome density and colorimetric parameters were correlated with the whitefly nymph infestation utilizing the Pearson correlation test (r).

3. Results

For the 2014/2015 crop season, the lowest B. tuberculata infestations were observed on the IAC 14 and IAPAR 19 cultivars, with 5.41 and 3.52 nymphs per leaf, respectively, while the highest B. tuberculata infestations occurred on the IPR União, IPR Upira and Baianinha cultivars, with 15.17, 11.85 and 10.72 nymphs per leaf, respectively (Table 1).
Although there was a difference among the cultivars in the 2016/2017 crop season, with highest infestation of B. tuberculata in IPR Upira (0.12) and IAC 90 (0.08), these differences should be analyzed with caution, since its value represents less than one nymph every five leaves. The lowest whitefly infestation in the 2016/2017 crop season was probably due to some unfavorable meteorological conditions.
The A. aepim infestation was inferior in both crop seasons when compared to the B. tuberculata. In the 2014/2015 crop season, the lowest densities of A. aepim was observed in IPR União, Baianinha, Catarina Branca, Santa Helena, IAC 576-70, IAC 14, IAPAR 19 with number of nymphs per leaf ranging from 0.66 to 1.99. Due to low infestations, differences between the cassava cultivars for A. aepim infestation could not be quantified in the crop season of 2016/2017 (Table 1).
There is a great variation among studied cultivars in the number of non-glandular trichomes on the sprout leaves (Δ = 13055.6) and on the plant’s apical leaves (Δ = 5833.3). The highest non-glandular trichome densities were observed in IPR União, IAC 90 and IPR Upira cultivars, with trichomes density per cm2 ranging from 4861.1 to 13055.6 for sprout leaves and ranging from 3472.2 to 5833.3 for the plant’s apical leaves. The IAC 14 genotype had the less trichome density, with 277.8 and 416.7 trichomes/cm2 for sprout leaves and plant’s apical leaves, respectively. No presence of non-glandular trichomes were observed on the IAPAR 19 genotype (Table 2).
The association of non-glandular trichome density with the presence of whitefly nymphs was verified in the 2014/2015 crop season. The B. tuberculata nymphs were more abundant in cassava cultivars with more trichomes density on the sprout leaves (r = 0.85 and p < 0.01), and in plant’s apical leaves (r = 0.81 and p = 0.01). The correlation between A. aepim nymphs and non-glandular trichome density was not performed, due to the low infestation of whiteflies during both studied years.
Differences among the cultivars to the luminosity (L*) and chroma (b*) parameters were verified in sprout leaves and plant’s apical leaves, while the differences in the chroma a* parameter occcurred only for the sprout leaves. The cultivars IPR Upira, IPR União, Baianinha and IAC 90 presented the lowest values of luminosity and lowest positive values of chroma b* (tendency towards yellow) for the sprouts and plant’s apical leaves (Table 3).
Weak and proportionally-inversed correlations (r = −0.44 to −0.30; p < 0.05) were verified between B. tuberculata infestation and luminosity, as well as B. tuberculata and chroma b* parameters (Table 4), indicating that cassava cultivars with the lowest values of luminosity and lowest positive values of chroma b* (tendency towards yellow) have higher B. tuberculata infestations. The correlation between nymph presence and the colorimetric parameters for the A. aepim species was not possible to verify, due to its low infestation.

4. Discussion

The higher infestation of B. tuberculata in the sprout leaves and plant’s apical leaves, is probably a result of the insect’s oviposition preference towards cultivars that are more pubescent. The high density of trichomes might favor the increase of humidity, offering better conditions to the development of nymphs [35]. Many studies have indicated positive correlations between Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius, 1889) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) oviposition, and the highly pubescent leaves of the cotton [36,37], butter collard [38], soybean [39], potato [40] and eggplant cultivars [41].
The lowest presence of whiteflies in less pubescent cultivars probably relates to a higher exposition and vulnerability of the nymphs to predation and parasitism. Leaves with high trichomes density impair predator mites [42] and whitefly parasitoids [43] action. Thus, it is probable that non-glandular trichomes on the cassava leaves act as physical barriers to B. tuberculata predators and parasitoids.
The relation between pest development and leaf pubescence density is variable. The negative effect of leaves that were more pubescent was verified for B. tabaci in cotton [37], as well as for Aleurotrachelus socialis Bondar, 1923 (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) and the green-mite Mononychellus tanajoa (Bondar, 1938) (Acari: Tetranychidae) in cassava [25,27]. However, no relation between trichome density and B. tabaci biotype B development was found in cotton and soybean [44,45,46], neither for the mealybug Phenacoccus manihoti (Matile-Ferrero) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) nor A. aepim in cassava plants [47].
The variation of results observed in the literature indicates that it is necessary to consider which studied pest and host plant (species and variety) is involved, and that the results can vary depending on the studies object. Beyond the trichome density, other factors such as leaf coloration could be involved in the manifestation of pest resistance to certain cultivars.
Insect’s host plant selection is initially related to visual stimuli based on colors [46]. Generally, whitefly species are attracted to the yellow color [48,49,50,51]. Our study corroborates previous studies, which indicate more whitefly attractiveness from surfaces with a reflectance between green and yellow (wavelength 520–600 nm) [52], while the violet light (wavelength 400 nm) influenced their migration habits [53].
A study conducted with Trialeurodes vaporariorum Westwood, 1856 (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), demonstrated that these insects were very attracted to the “pure yellow” color. However, the spectral transition between green and yellow can also attract or repel them, depending on the luminosity [54]. Indicating that not just the color, but also the luminosity interferes in the attraction or repellence of whiteflies.
Our results for luminosity and chroma b* corroborate with those observed with B. tabaci on cotton, in which the adult insects had a lesser preference towards permanency and oviposition on leaves with a high light intensity (L*) and tendency towards a yellow color (positive b* values) [37]. Similar results were found with B. tabaci in eggplant, in which, a higher brightness in the evaluated colors (red, green and blue), resulted in a shorter permanency and oviposition of adult insects [40].
A study conducted with cassava cultivars verified that the whitefly A. aepim had less preference for leaves with low reflected light intensity, with no difference found for the chroma b* [47], differing from the present study. However, the obtained results in the mentioned study were observed in other cassava cultivars, grown in a greenhouse, while the results of the present study were obtained in field conditions, with different lighting conditions, that may have contributed to the observed difference between the results.
The colors blue, green and red were reported as less attractive to T. vaporariorum adults [54]. Our results were similar since there was no correlation between chroma a* (tendency towards green) and the B. tuberculata nymph presence was verified.
The plant’s resistance to whitefly is not defined by one single factor, but from an intrinsic and extrinsic interaction with the plant [43]. There are other factors besides trichome density and leaf color that influence whitefly occurrence. Thus, the evaluation of plant-derived volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which play pivotal roles in interactions between host plant and insect herbivores, should also be considered in further studies, aiming towards the development of whitefly-resistant cassava cultivars.

5. Conclusions

The lesser trichome density, higher light reflectance (L*) and higher chroma value (b*) could contribute to lesser B. tuberculata infestation in cassava cultivars.
The cultivars IAPAR 19 and IAC 14 could contribute to the B. tuberculata management in areas with this pest’s infestation history, as well as serving as a resistance genetic source for the development of new cultivars.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/insects14010004/s1, File S1, File S2, File S3, File S4.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.G.A., W.F.L. and A.d.O.M.J.; methodology, M.A.P., C.S.G.K. and O.C.B.; investigation, M.A.P., A.M.d.S., H.G.A. and A.T.H.; writing—review and editing, M.A.P., A.T.H. and L.M.d.O.; supervision, A.d.O.M.J. and H.G.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Instituto de Desenvolvimento Rural do Paraná (IDR-Paraná) and Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to the Instituto de Desenvolvimento Rural do Paraná IAPAR-EMATER’s policies.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the olericulture, roots and tubers program of IDR-Paraná to support this study, and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES). Also, to the reviewers for their valuable contribution to the improvement this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Salvador, E.M.; Steenkamp, V.; McCrindle, C.M.E. Production, consumption and nutritional value of cassava (Manihot esculenta, Crantz) in Mozambique: An overview. J. Agric. Biotechnol. Sustain. Dev. 2014, 6, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. de Menezes, E.W.; Grande, F.; Giuntini, E.B.; Lopes, T.D.V.C.; Dan, M.C.T.; Prado, S.B.R.; Melo Franco, B.D.G.; Charrondière, U.R.; Lajolo, F.M. Impact of dietary fiber energy on the calculation of food total energy value in the Brazilian Food Composition Database. Food Chem. 2016, 193, 128–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. FAO. Food and Agriculture Organization of The United Nations—FAOSTAT—Crops—Cassava Production Quantity. 2019. Available online: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC (accessed on 14 March 2019).
  4. Espinel, C.; Torres, L.T.; Cotes, A.M. Efecto de hongos entomopatógenos sobre estados de desarrollo de Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Rev. Colomb. Entomol. 2009, 35, 18–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bellon, P.P.; Wengrat, A.P.G.S.; Kassab, S.O.; Pietrowski, V.; Loureiro, E.D.S. Occurrence of lace bug Vatiga illudens and Vatiga manihotae (Hemiptera: Tingidae) in Mato Grosso do Sul, midwestern Brazil. An. Acad. Bras. Cienc. 2012, 84, 703–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Bellotti, A.; Campo, B.V.H.; Hyman, G. Cassava Production and Pest Management: Present and Potential Threats in a Changing Environment. Trop. Plant Biol. 2012, 5, 39–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Marchant, W.G.; Gautam, S.; Dutta, B.; Srinivasan, R. Whitefly-Mediated Transmission and Subsequent Acquisition of Highly Similar and Naturally Occurring Tomato Yellow Leaf Curl Virus Variants. Phytopathology 2022, 112, 720–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Guo, C.-L.; Zhu, Y.-Z.; Zhang, Y.-J.; Keller, M.A.; Liu, T.-X.; Chu, D. Invasion Biology and Management of Sweetpotato Whitefly (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in China. J. Integr. Pest Manag. 2021, 12, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kalyebi, A.; Macfadyen, S.; Parry, H.; Tay, W.T.; De Barro, P.; Colvin, J. African cassava whitefly, Bemisia tabaci, cassava colonization preferences and control implications. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0204862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Krause-Sakate, R.; Watanabe, L.F.M.; Gorayeb, E.S.; Da Silva, F.B.; Alvarez, D.D.L.; Bello, V.H.; Nogueira, A.M.; De Marchi, B.R.; Vicentin, E.; Ribeiro-Junior, M.R.; et al. Population Dynamics of Whiteflies and Associated Viruses in South America: Research Progress and Perspectives. Insects 2020, 11, 847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bellotti, A.C.; Smith, L.; Lapointe, S.L. Recent advances in cassava pest management. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1999, 44, 343–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. da Silva Alonso, R.; Racca-Filho, F.; De Lima, A.F. Occurrences of whiteflies (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) on cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) crops under field conditions in the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. EntomoBrasilis 2010, 5, 78–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Silva, A.S.; Mota, T.A.; Fernandes, M.G.; Kassab, S.M. Spatial distribution of Bemisia tuberculata (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) on cassa-va crop in Brazil. Rev. Colomb. Entomol. 2013, 39, 193–196. Available online: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S012004882013000200002&lng=en&nrm=iso (accessed on 19 March 2019). [CrossRef]
  14. Pietrowski, V.; Ringenberg, R.; Rheinheimer, A.R.; Bellon, P.P.; Gazola, D.; Monsani, A.M. Insetos-Praga da Cultura da Mandioca na Região Centro-sul do Brasil; Edunioeste: Marechal Cândido Rondon, Brazil, 2010; pp. 15–40. [Google Scholar]
  15. Bellotti, A.C.; Arias, B. Host plant resistance to whiteflies with emphasis on cassava as a case study. Crop Prot. 2001, 20, 813–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Fauquet, C.; Fargette, D. African Cassava Mosaic Virus: Etiology, Epidemiology, and Control. Plant Dis. 1990, 74, 404–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fargette, D.; Fauquet, C.; Grenier, E.; Thresh, J.M. The Spread of African Cassava Mosaic Virus into and within Cassava Fields. J. Phytopathol. 1990, 130, 289–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. de Souza Silva, A.; Kassab, S.O.; Gaona, J.C. Insetos-pragas produtos e métodos de controle utilizados na cultura de mandioca em Ivinhema Mato Grosso do Sul. Rev. Verde Agroecol. Desenvolv. Sustentável 2012, 7, 19–23. Available online: https://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/article/view/1091 (accessed on 14 March 2019).
  19. Nauen, R.; Denholm, I. Resistance of insect pests to neonicotinoid insecticides: Current status and future prospects. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 2005, 58, 200–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Aktar, W.; Sengupta, D.; Chowdhury, A. Impact of pesticides use in agriculture: Their benefits and hazards. Interdiscip. Toxicol. 2009, 2, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Andrade Filho, N.N.; Roel, A.R.; Porto, K.R.D.A.; Souza, R.O.; Coelho, R.M.; Portela, A. Toxicidade do extrato aquoso das folhas de Anacardium humile para Bemisia tuberculata. Cienc. Rural 2010, 40, 1689–1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Rheinheimer, A.R.; Alves, L.F.A.; Pietrowski, V.; Bellon, P.P.; Miranda, A.M.; Gazola, D. Produtos fitossanitários alternativos no controle da mosca-branca (Bemisia tuberculata) (Matile-Ferrero), na mandioca. Semin. Cienc. Agrar. 2012, 33, 1419–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Legg, J.P.; Shirima, R.; Tajebe, L.S.; Guastella, D.; Boniface, S.; Jeremiah, S.; Nsami, E.; Chikoti, P.; Rapisarda, C. Biology and management of Bemisia whitefly vectors of cassava virus pandemics in Africa. Pest Manag. Sci. 2014, 70, 1446–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Carabalí, A.; Bellotti, A.C.; Montoya-Lerma, J.; Fregene, M. Resistance to the Whitefly, Aleurotrachelus socialis, in Wild Populations of Cassava, Manihot Tristis. J. Insect Sci. 2010, 10, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Parsa, S.; Medina, C.; Rodríguez, V. Sources of pest resistance in cassava. Crop Prot. 2015, 68, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Prokopy, R.J.; Owens, E.D. Visual Detection of Plants by Herbivorous Insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1983, 28, 337–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Plett, J.M.; Wilkins, O.; Campbell, M.M.; Ralph, S.G.; Regan, S. Endogenous overexpression of Populus MYB186 increases trichome density, improves insect pest resistance, and impacts plant growth. Plant J. 2010, 64, 419–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chalwe, A.; Melis, R.; Shanahan, P.; Chiona, M. Inheritance of resistance to cassava green mite and other useful agronomic traits in cassava grown in Zambia. Euphytica 2015, 205, 103–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kasu, T.; Odebiyi, J.; Lema, K. Effects of cassava pubescence on the behaviour, post-embryonic development and reproduction of the cassava mealybug, Phenacoccus manihoti Matile-Ferrero (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 1989, 10, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tonhasca, A.; Palumbo, J.C.; Byrne, D.N. Distribution Patterns of Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) in Cantaloupe Fields in Arizona. Environ. Entomol. 1994, 23, 949–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Van Schoonhoven, A. Resistance to Thrips Damage in Cassava1. J. Econ. Entomol. 1974, 67, 728–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zinsou, V.; Wydra, K.; Ahohuendo, B.; Schreiber, L. Leaf Waxes of Cassava (Manihot Esculenta Crantz) in Relation to Ecozone and Resistance to Xanthomonas Blight. Euphytica 2006, 149, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Minolta. Precise color communication: Color control from perception to instrumentation; Minolta: Osaka, Japan, 2017; 59p. [Google Scholar]
  34. Ohta, E.N.; Robertson, A.R. Colorimetry: Fundamentals and Applications; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK, 2006; 334p. [Google Scholar]
  35. Berlinger, M. Host plant resistance to Bemisia tabaci. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 1986, 17, 69–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Butler, G.D., Jr.; Henneberry, T.J.; Wilson, F.D. Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) on Cotton: Adult Activity and Cultivar Oviposition Preference. J. Econ. Entomol. 1986, 79, 350–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Prado, J.C.D.; Peñaflor, M.F.G.V.; Cia, E.; Vieira, S.S.; Silva, K.I.; Carlini-Garcia, L.A.; Lourenção, A.L. Resistance of cotton genotypes with different leaf colour and trichome density to Bemisia tabaci biotype B. J. Appl. Entomol. 2016, 140, 405–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Coelho, S.A.M.P.; Lourenção, A.L.; De Melo, A.M.T.; Schammass, E.A. Resistência de meloeiro a Bemisia Tabaci biótipo B. Bragantia 2009, 68, 1025–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Lima, A.C.S.; Lara, F.M. Resistência de genótipos de soja à mosca branca Bemisia tabaci (Genn.) biótipo B (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Neotrop. Entomol. 2004, 33, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Silva, M.S.; Lourenção, A.L.; De Souza-Dias, J.A.C.; Miranda Filho, H.S.; Ramos, V.J.; Schammass, E.A. Resistance of potato genotypes (Solanum spp.) to Bemisia tabaci biotype B. Hortic. Bras. 2008, 26, 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hasanuzzaman, A.T.M.; Islam, N.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, C.-Y.; Liu, T.-X. Leaf Morphological Characters Can Be a Factor for Intra-Varietal Preference of Whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) among Eggplant Varieties. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0153880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Krips, O.E.; Kleijn, P.W.; Willems, P.E.L.; Gols, G.J.Z.; Dicke, M. Leaf hairs influence searching efficiency and predation rate of the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 1999, 23, 119–131. Available online: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1023/A:1006098410165.pdf (accessed on 17 March 2019). [CrossRef]
  43. Inbar, M.; Gerling, D. Plant-Mediated Interactions Between Whiteflies, Herbivores, and Natural Enemies. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2008, 53, 431–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Boiça, A.L., Jr.; Campos, Z.R.; Lourenção, A.L.; Campos, A.R. Adult attractiveness and oviposition preference of Bemisia tabaci (Genn.) (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) B-biotype in cotton genotypes. Sci. Agric. 2007, 64, 147–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Torres, L.C.; Souza, B.; Amaral, B.B.; Tanque, R.L. Biologia e não-preferência para oviposição por Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) biótipo B (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) em cultivares de algodoeiro. Neotropical Entomol. 2007, 36, 445–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. do Valle, G.E.; Lourenção, A.L.; Pinheiro, J.B. Adult attractiveness and oviposition preference of Bemisia tabaci biotype B in soybean genotypes with different trichome density. J. Pest. Sci. 2012, 85, 431–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lima, W.H.; Ringenberg, R.; Fancelli, M.; Ledo, C.A.D.S. Resistance of Manihot esculenta and its intraspecific hybrids to the whitefly Aleurothrixus aepim (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 2018, 53, 885–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Shimoda, M.; Honda, K.-I. Insect reactions to light and its applications to pest management. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 2013, 48, 413–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Riley, D.; Wolfenbarger, D. Cultivated hosts and population dynamics of sweetpotato whitefly in the Lower Rio Grande Val-ley of Texas. In Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference, National Cotton Council of America, New Orleans, LA, USA, 10–14 January 1993; Dugger, C.P., Richter, D.A., Eds.; National Cotton Council: Memphis, TN, USA, 1993; pp. 667–670. [Google Scholar]
  50. Riley, D.G.; Ciomperlik, M.A. Regional Population Dynamics of Whitefly (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) and Associated Parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). Environ. Entomol. 1997, 26, 1049–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Park, J.-J.; Lee, J.-H.; Shin, K.-I.; Lee, S.E.; Cho, K. Geostatistical analysis of the attractive distance of two different sizes of yellow sticky traps for greenhouse whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood) (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae), in cherry tomato greenhouses. Aust. J. Entomol. 2011, 50, 144–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Macdowall, F.D.H. Phototactic action spectrum for whitefly and the question of colour vision. Can. Entomol. 1972, 104, 299–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Coombe, P.E. Visual behaviour of the greenhouse whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum. Physiol. Entomol. 1982, 7, 243–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Vaishampayan, S.M.; Kogan, M.; Waldbauer, G.P.; Woolley, J.T. Spectral specific responses in the visual behavior of the greenhouse whitefly, trialeurodes vaporariorum (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). Entomol. Exp. Appl. 1975, 18, 344–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Nymph density (median ± standard deviation) of Bemisia tuberculata and Aleurothrixus aepim per leaf on the plant’s superior third portion, from nine cassava cultivars, Londrina, Paraná, crop season 2014/15 and 2016/17.
Table 1. Nymph density (median ± standard deviation) of Bemisia tuberculata and Aleurothrixus aepim per leaf on the plant’s superior third portion, from nine cassava cultivars, Londrina, Paraná, crop season 2014/15 and 2016/17.
CultivarsBemisia tuberculataAleurothrixus aepim
2014/20152016/20172014/20152016/2017
IPR União15.17 ± 0.53a 10.03 ± 0.01c1.99 ± 0.77b0.021 ns
IPR Upira11.85 ± 0.82b0.12 ± 0.02a3.47 ± 0.90a0.014
Baianinha10.72 ± 0.73b0.04 ± 0.01c1.38 ± 0.79b0.025
IAC 908.43 ± 1.21c0.08 ± 0.02b4.04 ± 1.28a0.003
Catarina Branca8.43 ± 1.27c0.04 ± 0.01c1.76 ± 0.72b0.004
Santa Helena7.42 ± 0.94c0.03 ± 0.01c0.76 ± 0.25b0.011
IAC 576-706.82 ± 0.73c0.06 ± 0.01c1.10 ± 0.35b0.001
IAC 145.41 ± 0.54d0.04 ± 0.01c0.66 ± 0.14b0.004
IAPAR 193.52 ± 0.59d0.02 ± 0.01c0.72 ± 0.39b0.006
DF Error32 3232-
CV (%)20.23 40.8378.27-
p-value<0.01 <0.01<0.01-
1 Medians followed by the same letters in the columns do not differ from each other by statistical test Scott–Knott (α = 5%). ns = no significance.
Table 2. Estimated non-glandular trichome density (median ± standard deviation) on sprout leaves and leaves from the plant’s superior third portion, in an area of 1 cm², from nine cassava cultivars. Londrina, Paraná.
Table 2. Estimated non-glandular trichome density (median ± standard deviation) on sprout leaves and leaves from the plant’s superior third portion, in an area of 1 cm², from nine cassava cultivars. Londrina, Paraná.
CultivarsEstimated Trichomes/cm2
Sprout LeavesPlant’s Apical Leaves 2
IPR União13055.6 ±636.5a 15833.3 ±1666.7a
IAC 906250.0 ±416.7b5138.9 ±1683.9a
IPR Upira4861.1 ±636.5b3472.2 ±1048.6a
Santa Helena3888.9 ±1969.1c1805.6 ±636.5b
Catarina Branca3194.4 ±636.5c1388.9 ±962.3b
IAC 576-703055.6 ±636.5c1111.1 ±636.5b
Baianinha2638.9 ±240.6c2083.3 ±721.7b
IAC 14277.8 ±481.1d416.7 ±0.0c
IAPAR 190.0 ±0.0d0.0 ±0.0d
DF Error1818
CV (%)19.6820.81
p-value<0.01<0.01
1 Medians followed by the same letters in the columns do not differ from each other by statistical test Scott–Knott (α = 5%). 2 Transformed values by square root (x + 0.5), where x is the original value.
Table 3. Median values (±standard deviation) from the Luminosity (L*) and Chroma (a* and b*) parameters in sprout leaves and plant’s apical leaves, from nine cassava cultivars. Londrina. Paraná.
Table 3. Median values (±standard deviation) from the Luminosity (L*) and Chroma (a* and b*) parameters in sprout leaves and plant’s apical leaves, from nine cassava cultivars. Londrina. Paraná.
CultivarsSprout LeavesPlant’s Apical Leaves
L*a*b*L*a*b*
IAC 576-7036.2 ± 1.3 a 1−12.1 ± 1.5 c21.0 ± 2.1 a38.5 ± 1.2 a−16.3 ± 0.623.3 ± 1.1 a
Catarina Branca34.9 ± 1.8 b−10.0 ± 2.8 c18.8 ± 4.1 a37.8 ± 0.5 a−14.8 ± 2.822.7 ± 0.9 a
Santa Helena34.5 ± 1.6 b−7.9 ± 3.0 b19.5 ± 2.9 a37.1 ± 0.9 a−15.4 ± 0.721.8 ± 1.2 a
IAPAR 1934.1 ± 1.2 b−5.9 ± 1.6 b16.3 ± 2.1 b37.5 ± 0.4 a−15.4 ± 0.722.2 ± 0.5 a
Baianinha33.3 ± 1.4 c−7.3 ± 1.6 b14.5 ± 2.1 b35.3 ± 0.9 b−14.3 ± 1.218.0 ± 1.3 b
IPR União33.1 ± 0.7 c−6.9 ± 2.0 b13.5 ± 2.0 b35.8 ± 0.7 b−14.7 ± 0.819.6 ± 0.7 b
IAC 1432.3 ± 0.8 d−4.8 ± 1.7 a12.0 ± 1.8 c37.2 ± 0.9 a−14.5 ± 0.418.9 ± 1.2 b
IAC 9031.8 ± 1.7 d−6.9 ± 2.8 b14.9 ± 2.9 b35.0 ± 0.8 b−12.8 ± 2.618.4 ± 1.0 b
IPR Upira30.1 ± 1.3 e−2.7 ± 2.1 a11.2 ± 2.3 c35.1 ± 0.7 b−14.1 ± 0.619.3 ± 1.0 b
DF Error323232323232
CV (%)2.78 29.5113.972.31 9.54 5.09
p-value<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01ns<0.01
1 Medians followed by the same letters in the columns do not differ as shown by the statistical test Scott–Knott (α = 5%). ns. = no significance.
Table 4. Pearson correlation test (r) values between the colorimetric parameters (L*, a* and b*) and the B. tuberculata nymph density present in sprout leaves and superior third portion leaves, from nine cassava cultivars. Londrina. Paraná.
Table 4. Pearson correlation test (r) values between the colorimetric parameters (L*, a* and b*) and the B. tuberculata nymph density present in sprout leaves and superior third portion leaves, from nine cassava cultivars. Londrina. Paraná.
Sprout LeavesPlant’s Apical Leaves
L*a*b*L*a*b*
r (Pearson)−0.310.10−0.31−0.440.04−0.30
p-value0.040.530.04<0.010.810.04
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pastório, M.A.; Hoshino, A.T.; Kitzberger, C.S.G.; Bortolotto, O.C.; de Oliveira, L.M.; dos Santos, A.M.; Lima, W.F.; Menezes Junior, A.d.O.; Androcioli, H.G. The Leaf Color and Trichome Density Influence the Whitefly Infestation in Different Cassava Cultivars. Insects 2023, 14, 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14010004

AMA Style

Pastório MA, Hoshino AT, Kitzberger CSG, Bortolotto OC, de Oliveira LM, dos Santos AM, Lima WF, Menezes Junior AdO, Androcioli HG. The Leaf Color and Trichome Density Influence the Whitefly Infestation in Different Cassava Cultivars. Insects. 2023; 14(1):4. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14010004

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pastório, Marcelo A., Adriano T. Hoshino, Cíntia S. G. Kitzberger, Orcial C. Bortolotto, Luciano M. de Oliveira, Adevanir Martins dos Santos, Wilmar F. Lima, Ayres de O. Menezes Junior, and Humberto G. Androcioli. 2023. "The Leaf Color and Trichome Density Influence the Whitefly Infestation in Different Cassava Cultivars" Insects 14, no. 1: 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14010004

APA Style

Pastório, M. A., Hoshino, A. T., Kitzberger, C. S. G., Bortolotto, O. C., de Oliveira, L. M., dos Santos, A. M., Lima, W. F., Menezes Junior, A. d. O., & Androcioli, H. G. (2023). The Leaf Color and Trichome Density Influence the Whitefly Infestation in Different Cassava Cultivars. Insects, 14(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14010004

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop