Next Article in Journal
Genetic Analysis of Avian Gyrovirus 2 Variant-Related Gyrovirus Detected in Farmed King Ratsnake (Elaphe carinata): The First Report from China
Next Article in Special Issue
Dual Transcriptional Profile of Aspergillus flavus during Co-Culture with Listeria monocytogenes and Aflatoxin B1 Production: A Pathogen–Pathogen Interaction
Previous Article in Journal
Whole Transcriptome Analyses Reveal Differential mRNA and microRNA Expression Profiles in Primary Human Dermal Fibroblasts Infected with Clinical or Vaccine Strains of Varicella Zoster Virus
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pathogens
Volume 8
Issue 4
10.3390/pathogens8040184
pathogens-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Retrospective Study of Listeria monocytogenes Isolated in the Territory of Inner Eurasia from 1947 to 1999

by
Ekaterina K. Psareva
1,*,
Irina Yu. Egorova
2,
Elena A. Liskova
1,
Irina V. Razheva
1,
Nadezda A. Gladkova
1,
Elena V. Sokolova
1,
Eugene A. Potemkin
1,
Pavel A. Zhurilov
1,
Tatyana V. Mikhaleva
3,
Andrei A. Blokhin
1,
Yaroslava M. Chalenko
1,4,
Denis V. Kolbasov
2 and
Svetlana A. Ermolaeva
1,4
1
Federal Research Center for Virology and Microbiology, Nizhny Novgorod Research Veterinary Institute Branch, Nizhny Novgorod 603950, Russia
2
Federal Research Center for Virology and Microbiology, Volginsky 601125, Russia
3
Federal Research Center for Virology and Microbiology, Samara Research Veterinary Institute Branch, Samara 443013, Russia
4
Gamaleya Research Centre of Epidemiology and Microbiology, Moscow 123098, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pathogens 2019, 8(4), 184; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens8040184
Submission received: 8 August 2019 / Revised: 22 September 2019 / Accepted: 10 October 2019 / Published: 11 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Microbiology of Foodborne Pathogens)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Listeriosis is one of the most significant humans and animals foodborne infectious diseases. Here, we characterized 48 Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated in the territory of inner Eurasia during the second half of the 20th century. A total of 23 strains (52.3%) were susceptible to the nine antibiotics tested, 30.43%, 15.22%, and 8.7% were resistant penicillin G, ampicillin, and enrofloxacin, respectively. We applied the multilocus sequence typing (MLST) scheme to determine the phylogenetic positions of the strains. All but one strain belonged to the II phylogenetic lineage, and the majority of the strains belonged to one of the previously described clonal complexes (CCs). More than 60% of the strains belonged to the clonal complex CC7 that prevailed among all sources, including cattle (58%), small ruminants (64%), rodents (71%), and humans (50%). Further, CC7, CC101, and CC124 were found among human isolates. The MLST scheme was supplemented with virulence gene analysis. In total, eight inlA, six inlB, and six inlC allelic variants were found, and all but one strain carried one of the two inlE alleles. Most strains (62.5%) belonged to the same multivirulence locus sequence typing (MvLST) type, which includes CC7, inlA allele 4, inlB allele 14, inlC allele 6, and inlE allele 8.

1. Introduction

Listeriosis is an infectious disease of humans and animals that results in high hospitalization and fatality rates [1,2]. The annual incidence of listeriosis ranges from 0.2 to 0.5 cases per 100,000 population, while average fatality rates are estimated to be 20%–30% of hospitalized patients and can reach 40% in outbreaks, including elderly persons or immunosuppressed patients [3,4].
Listeriosis is currently considered to be one of the most significant food infections [5,6]. The worldwide epidemic situation continues to deteriorate for a number of reasons, including specific biological features of the causative agent of listeriosis, the Gram-positive bacterium Listeria monocytogenes [7]. L. monocytogenes is widely spread in the environment [8,9,10,11]. It is able to survive in saprophytic conditions, to effectively withstand bacterivorous organisms inhabiting terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, and to cause disease in a wide range of domestic and wild animals [7,9,12,13,14,15,16,17]. The wide distribution of L. monocytogenes in the soil contributes to animal reinfection and pathogen conservation in nature [15,18]. Ruminants fed on silage are at a higher risk of contracting L. monocytogenes infection. In small ruminants, L. monocytogenes often causes neurological disease and abortion [19,20]. Adult swine and cows can be infected by L. monocytogenes but rarely develop neurological disease [2,21,22]. Meanwhile, L. monocytogenes is a common contaminant of raw milk, and its occurrence in the bulk tank milk of the dairy cow ranges from 2% to 7% [23,24,25]. In general, wild animals are asymptomatic carriers that shed the bacterium in their feces, although invasive infection has been described in wild small rodents and both invasive infection and fatal cases have been described in wild deer [9,17,26,27,28].
The species L. monocytogenes has a clonal structure and is divided into four evolutionary lineages (I, II, III, and IV) occupying different, but overlapping, ecological niches [29,30,31]. Most L. monocytogenes isolates belong to lineages I and II. The majority of human listeriosis outbreaks and many sporadic cases are associated with lineage I isolates [32]. In bovine, lineage I is predominantly isolated from cases of encephalitis [19,20]. Lineage II strains, which are common in foods, seem to be widespread in natural and farm environments and are also commonly isolated from sporadic human clinical cases and animal listeriosis cases, which are equally represented by isolates from cases of encephalitis versus septicemia and fetal infection [31,32,33]. Lineage III and IV strains are rare and are predominantly isolated from animal sources [34].
The phylogenetic structure of the L. monocytogenes species was investigated using multiple molecular methods, such as multilocus enzyme electrophoresis and whole genome sequencing [35,36,37]. The method of multilocus sequence typing (MLST), based on sequencing of seven housekeeping genes, is a powerful technique that provides high resolution and specificity in addition to unambiguous results and rigor in analysis [28,33,38]. Introduction of the concept of clonal complexes (CCs) as a group of one-marker deviations provided the means for large-scale analysis of clonal distribution worldwide [17,34,38,39].
In this work, we used the MLST scheme [28] to typify L. monocytogenes strains that were isolated from humans and domestic animals in the territory of inner Eurasia—a huge geographic region covering Eastern Europe, Central Asia, and Russia [39]—during the second half of the 20th century. The strains are kept in the National Collection of the Federal Research Center for Virology and Microbiology (Volginsky, Russia). The MLST scheme was supplemented with analysis of the virulence genes encoding proteins of the internalin family. Such a multivirulence locus sequence typing (MvLST) scheme has been used to characterize current L. monocytogenes isolates obtained in the territory of Russia from natural and anthropogenic environments [16,40]. This retrospective MvLST analysis allowed for characterization of the strains isolated in this territory when the area was isolated from other parts of the world, and allowing for comparison with modern data.

2. Results

2.1. Antibiotic Resistance

All 48 strains tested in this study were sensitive to kanamycin, streptomycin, and neomycin. Natural resistance to polymyxin B was observed in 44 strains. Total of 23 strains (52.3%) were susceptible to all nine tested antibiotics besides polymyxin B. Among strains with resistance, 20 strains (45.5%) were resistant to one antibiotic and five strains (11.4%) were resistant to two antibiotics. The highest percentage of observed resistance was to penicillin G (30.43%), followed by ampicillin (15.22%), and enrofloxacin (8.7%) (Table 1).

2.2. L. monocytogenes Virulence

When tested in guinea pigs, 40 L. monocytogenes strains (83%) caused progressive conjunctivitis and keratitis with generalized infection. In one (2%) case, the generalized infection ended in death (strain 211). Seven strains (15%) were incapable of causing conjunctivitis and keratitis.
A total of 17 strains were additionally tested in mice. Strains were selected by random sampling from various sources. Fourteen strains (82%) were virulent for mice, for which the LD50 ranged from 104 to 107 CFU per mouse (Table 2). Two strains (11.8%), including strain 2598 isolated from rabbit and strain 39 isolated from guinea pig, were moderately virulent for mice, although they caused purulent keratoconjunctivitis in guinea pigs. Strain “A,” isolated from ticks, was avirulent for mice and unable to cause keratoconjunctivitis in guinea pigs.

2.3. MLST Typing of L. monocytogenes Strains

More than half (60.4%) of all strains (29 of 48) belonged to the clonal complex CC7. Twelve of them (41.4%) belonged to the parental CC7 sequence type ST7. Other CC7 strains belonged to six established and nine new described sequence types (Table 3). Sequence types ST12, ST177, and ST23 were each identified in two strains. Eleven other sequence types (ST85, ST98, ST106, ST519, ST124, ST481, ST757, ST101, ST21, ST252, ST308, and ST2) were represented by a single strain. All but one L. monocytogenes strain (98%) belonged to the II phylogenetic lineage, and only strain K-23 (ST252; CC1) belonged to the I phylogenetic lineage. Nine previously described CCs [32] were found among the L. monocytogenes strains (Table 3).
Besides CC7, four more clonal complexes were represented by more than one sequence type. The clonal complex CC18 was represented by three sequence types, and CC124, CC101, and CC177 were represented by two sequence types. At least one sequence type found in strain 45 from sheep detected in Kazakhstan did belong to new ST1549 and clonal complex CC307. In total, eight new sequence types were described. The studied strains information is presented at the L. monocytogenes MLST database at https://bigsdb.pasteur.fr/.

2.4. Characterization of CC Distribution among Sources of Isolation

The 48 tested L. monocytogenes strains included isolates from small ruminants (25%), cattle (23%), humans (12.5%), pigs (16.7%), rodents (14.6%), arthropods (6.25%), and a horse (2%) (Figure 1 and Table 1). Strains belonging to the clonal complex CC7 prevailed among all sources, including cattle (7 of 12; 58%), small ruminants (7 of 11; 64%), rodents (5 of 7; 71%), humans (3 of 6; 50%), arthropods (2 of 3; 66.7%), and horse (1 of 1; 100%).
With the exception of CC7 strains, strains isolated from small ruminants, cattle, and humans were quite heterogeneous, although all but one belonged to the II phylogenetic lineage. Five isolates from small ruminants belonged to CC124, CC18, CC101, CC21, and a new ST which has not been previously described. CC177 (n = 3), CC124 (n = 2), CC18 (n = 1), and CC21 (n = 1) were found in strains isolated from cattle. Besides isolates from cattle and small ruminants, CC124 was also found in strains isolated from a rabbit and ticks. New STs profiles belonging to CC18 and CC19 were found in strains isolated from pig and rabbit, respectively (Figure 1). Strains isolated from humans belonged to CC7 (n = 3), CC89 (n = 1), CC177 (n = 1), and CC1 (n = 1, I phylogenetic lineage).

2.5. Distribution of the L. monocytogenes Clonal Complexes on the Territory of Inner Eurasia

All L. monocytogenes strains were obtained from inner Eurasia territories. To simplify analysis, the regions were divided into (1) the European region, which unites the territories of current eastern European countries (Ukraine and Belarus) and central regions of Russia (Moscow, Voronezh, Kursk, Ryazan, Yaroslavl, Tula, and Novgorod regions); (2) the Asia region, which includes territories of Central Asian countries (Tajikistan, Kazakhstan, and Uzbekistan) and territories of the Russian Federation (North Caucasus, Dagestan, Ural, Volga, and Altai regions); and (3) the far eastern and Siberia region of the Russian Federation (Irkutsk, Sakhalin, Khabarovsk, and Chita regions) (Figure 2).
All but one L. monocytogenes strain isolated in the European region belonged to the II phylogenetic lineage and included the main clonal complexes CC7 (n = 15), CC124 (n = 4), CC177 (n = 1), CC18 (n = 4), CC89 (n = 1), and CC19 (n = 1). Only one strain, isolated in Moscow in 1988, belonged to the I phylogenetic lineage. Strains isolated in the Asia region belonged to CC7 (n = 11), CC177 (n = 2), CC124 (n = 1) CC21 (n = 1), and CC101 (n = 1), and one strain belonged to a new sequence type that was not associated with any described clonal complex. In the far eastern and Siberia region, strains of CC7 (n = 3), CC177 (n = 1), and CC101 (n = 1) were found. Therefore, CC7 was the most frequent in the whole territory in inner Eurasia.

2.6. Internalin Gene Diversity in L. monocytogenes Isolates

In this study, previously described internal fragments of the internalin genes inlA, inlB, inlC, and inlE [39] were sequenced to supplement the MLST analysis with virulence gene analysis.
In total, 8 inlA allelic variants were found. Alleles 1, 4, 6, 8, 9, and 12 have been described in previous studies while alleles 14 and 15 were detected for the first time. The inlA gene was not detected in strain 45 isolated from sheep in Kazakhstan, which belongs to a newly described ST. It is noteworthy that each allele of the inlA gene correlated with a specific CC (Table 4).
All studied L. monocytogenes strains contained one of six alleles of the inlB gene, and the dominant allele 14 was detected in 35 (73%) strains belonging to CC7, CC177, CC21, and CC19. Strains belonging to CC1, CC124, CC101, and CC89 carried alleles 1, 12, 15, and 17, respectively (Table 4). Strain 45, which belongs to a new sequence type, did not correlate with any clonal complex carrying inlB allele 16 (data not shown).
The variability of inlC, and especially inlE, was low. In total, 6 inlC alleles were found, among which allele 6 was predominant and found in 40 of 48 (83%) strains belonging to CC7, CC21, CC19, CC124, CC177, and CC18. Other inlC alleles were distributed in a CC-specific manner and were represented in single strains. As for inlE, all but one strain carried one of two alleles, either 6 or 8. The only exception was the phylogenetic lineage I strain K-23, which carried alleles distinct from the other studied genes. Interestingly, all strains carrying inlE allele 8 were isolated in the Asian part of inner Eurasia, and all but one strain carrying allele 6 of inlE was isolated in the European territory. The exception was the strains of CC7 that carried allele 8 and were widely spread over the whole inner Eurasia territory.
Polymorphism among housekeeping genes included in the MLST scheme and virulence genes included in the internalin profile (IP) was compared only for strains of lineage II, to avoid the introduction of false variability which would have been caused by the addition of a single lineage I strain into the analysis because of a high percentage of conservative substitutions between lineages [16,38]. It was shown that for the studied collection, the polymorphism of virulence genes was lower or comparable with the polymorphism of housekeeping genes. Particularly, the virulence gene inlE had the lowest number of alleles relative to all studied genes, and the housekeeping gene ldh had the highest number of alleles (2 vs. 18) (Table 5).
A phylogenetic tree was constructed on the basis of concatenated sequences of the MLST and internalin gene alleles (Table 4 and Figure 3). The major cluster, Cluster I, was identified from phylogenetic analysis, and included strains containing CC7, inlA allele 4, inlB allele 14, inlC allele 6, and inlE allele 8. Other clusters (II–IX) were observed and clustered according to clonal complexes of L. monocytogenes strains and internalin gene alleles profiles (IP). Cluster II included two strains from sheep and cow belonging to CC101 with the internalin profile (IP) 14, 20, 15, 8 for inlA, inlB, inlC, and inlE, respectively. Cluster III was represented by five strains isolated from different sources in Europe and belonged to CC124 and IP 6, 12, 6, 6. Clusters IV–VI were represented by one strain each belonging to distinct clonal complexes (CC21, CC19, CC89, respectively), and carrying distinct inlA alleles (alleles 12, 9, and 15, respectively). These three clusters had the same alleles of inlB and inlE (14 and 8, respectively). Clusters IV and V shared the inlC allele (6) while Cluster VI carried the inlC allele 17. Four strains from the cattle had Cluster VII profile and belonged to CC177 with IP 8, 14, 6, 8 that differed from IP of Clusters IV and V only by the inlA allele. Cluster VIII was represented by three strains obtained from different sources in Europe and belonged to CC18 with IP 12, 13, 6, 6. The only one strain isolated from the human case belonged to the 1 phylogenetic lineage, Cluster IX, CC1 and IP 1,9,1,3.

3. Discussion

Here, we performed a retrospective study of L. monocytogenes strains isolated in the territory of inner Eurasia in the second part of the 20th century, when countries of the former Soviet Union were to certain extent isolated from the rest of the world. Animal isolates prevailed in the studied collection while only six human isolates were included that is in line with the rare occurrence of human listeriosis until the 1980s [41,42,43]. Food isolates were not included into the study as food products began to be considered as a source of listeriosis in the 80s, and a mandatory check of products for listeriosis was introduced in Russia in 2002, so food isolates dated before 1990 are absent from the National Collection of the Federal Center for Virology and Microbiology (Volginsky, Russia), which was the strain source.
The analysis of antibiotic resistance showed that about half of the strains were sensitive to all antibiotics tested. This is consistent with the rarer use of antibiotics during that period, and is in stark contrast with the modern prevalence of antibiotic-resistant strains among animal and environmental L. monocytogenes isolates [44,45,46].
The obtained results suggested the prevalence of lineage II strains among animal isolates obtained in the territory of inner Eurasia from 1947 to 1999. These data are in line with previously obtained results which demonstrated the prevalence of lineage II L. monocytogenes strains among wild animals inhabiting natural foci of infection in the European part of Russia [16]. In general, the comprehensive analysis of isolates obtained in European countries showed the prevalence of lineage I among clinical isolates, and lineage II among food and environmental isolates [20,44,47]. Both lineage I and II strains were isolated from wild animals that inhabited different regions of Germany and Austria [48]. Prevailing of Lineage II was described in some studies performed in Sweden [49,50], although comparison with these studies was restricted by inconsistence of isolation sources. A more consistent study from the point of view of the isolation source study showed longitude prevalence of Lineage II strains at three Finnish dairy farms during 2013 to 2016 [15].
The current study included only five strains isolated in the far eastern part of Eurasia, all of which belong to lineage II. The phylogenetic lineage I prevailed among isolates obtained from invasive diseases in humans and wild animals in the far eastern region of Russia at the beginning of the 21st century [9]. Other studies demonstrated similar representations of the I and II phylogenetic lineages among L. monocytogenes strains isolated from the intestinal contents and feces of wild animals in Japan and China in this century [25,51]. Taken together, the available data suggest that the distribution of the I and II lineages might be different for the European and Central Asian parts of Eurasia and its far eastern part. More representative studies are required to clarify the phylogenetic pattern of L. monocytogenes circulating in this region.
Further, recent as well as earlier studies have demonstrated the prevalence of the clonal complex CC7 among isolates obtained from the European and Central Asian parts of inner Eurasia (see Table 4 and Figure 1, [16,38]). CC7 is one of the largest-spreading clonal complexes worldwide. It includes the epidemic clone VII (ECVII), which is associated with the foodborne outbreak of listeriosis that was associated with the consumption of cantaloupe during 2011 in the United States [52]. The distribution of L. monocytogenes clones varies across countries around the world. Clonal complexes CC1 and CC2 of phylogenetic lineage I have prevailed in all regions of the world, with the exception of North Africa for CC1. CC2 clones have been found in 30 countries. CC3 is one of the most common clones in all regions, while CC9 of the lineage II was shown to be the third largest in Europe and the Western Hemisphere [31]. The predominant clonal complexes in China are CC9 and CC8 in food and ST87 in clinics [53,54]. In the last decade, CC6 noticeably increased in significance as a causative agent of human listeriosis in Africa, Europe, and North America [31,33,55,56,57]. In Russia, current human listeriosis is associated with the CC1, CC2, and CC20 strains [38].
Analysis of virulence gene variability revealed a difference between the distribution of inlA and inlB respectively encoding two major invasion factors, InlA and InlB. While inlA is distributed according to a phylogenetic position and is well correlated with clonal complexes, the inlB allele 14 was found in strains belonging to four of the nine revealed clonal complexes. This prevalence might be due to some selective advantage of this allele. Recently, we demonstrated that inlB allele 14 provided the highest level of L. monocytogenes dissemination to the internal organs of mice when infection was performed via intragastric inoculation, which is the best model of the natural infection process [58]. All lineage II strains isolated from internal mouse organs in this and previous studies carried the inlB allele 14, and mice might be an important host for L. monocytogenes in the natural focus of infection [38]. Variability analysis of two other IP genes, inlC and especially inlE, showed that their sequences were as conserved as the most conservative housekeeping genes.
Taken together, the obtained results demonstrate that L. monocytogenes strains belonging to CC7 prevailed among isolates obtained in the territory of inner Eurasia in the second half of the 20th century. Resistance to antibiotics occurred among these strains, but about 50% of the isolates were sensitive to all tested antibiotics with the exception of polymyxin B. Analysis of virulence gene variability demonstrated different patterns of distribution for genes encoding proteins of the internalin family among these strains.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Bacterial Strains and Culturing Conditions

A total of 48 L. monocytogenes strains were obtained from the National Collection of the Federal Research Center for Virology and Microbiology (Volginsky, Russia) for further analysis (Table 6). Independent isolates were chosen on the basis of having been isolated from humans and animals in different regions of inner Eurasia from 1947 to 1999. Strains isolated from animal insect and human parasites were included. All strains from biological sources (with the exception of rodents and insects) were isolated from postmortal material taken from animals who died from listeriosis, daveric (sectional) material. Isolates were obtained from animals which died from listeriosis. Serotypes were characterized with antisera. Strains were kept lyophilized at −18 °C with bovine serum or gelatin agar medium as a stabilizer.
Lyophilized L. monocytogenes cultures were restored using 1 mL of tryptone soya yeast extract broth (TSB-YE, HiMedia, India). The strain suspension was immediately plated on tryptone soya yeast extract agar (TSA-YE, HiMedia, India). Plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h; then, colonies were counted and up to 10 typical colonies were replated for further identification and characterization. The remainder of the initial suspension was supplemented with sterile TSA-YE and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h without shaking to guarantee culture viability in the absence of colony growth on agar plates.
All cultures were confirmed as L. monocytogenes using Microgen Listeria ID (Microgen Bioproducts, U.K.). Additionally, the colonies from TSA-YE were verified by Gram staining, catalase reactions, oxidase tests, and motility at 20–25 °C (Listeria Motility Medium, HiMedia, India).

4.2. Antibiotic Resistance Test

L. monocytogenes strains were tested for their resistance to antibiotics using the disc diffusion method on Mueller–Hinton agar (HiMedia, India), as described by the performance standards for antimicrobial disk and dilution susceptibility test for bacteria isolated from animals (CLSI) [59]. Penicillin G (10 µg/disc), enrofloxacin (5 µg/disc), ampicillin (10 µg/disc), tetracycline (30 µg/disc), levomycetin (chloramphenicol) (30 µg/disc), kanamycin (30 µg/disc), tylosin (15 µg/disc), streptomycin (30 µg/disc), polymyxin B (30 µg/disc), and neomycin (30 µg/disc) were used (NICF, LLC; St. Petersburg, Russia). These antibiotics were chosen for use or preference in veterinary medicine for the treatment of infectious diseases in animals in Russia. After 24 h of incubation, the zones of inhibition were measured (mm), and the strains were categorized as susceptible, intermediate, or resistant to specific antibiotics as per the criteria of CLSI [59]. The breakpoints of Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, and Enterococcus species resistance were considered since no resistance criteria exist in the CLSI guidelines for Listeria susceptibility testing [25].

4.3. Anton’s Eye Test

Anton’s eye test was performed on guinea pigs [60]. Strains were recognized as pathogenic of purulent keratoconjunctivitis when it developed in guinea pigs within 3–5 days.

4.4. L. monocytogenes Virulence in Mice

Virulence was estimated by the 50% lethal dose (LD50), determined by the probit method, using white laboratory outbred Swiss mice weighing 14–16 g strains were randomly selected among isolates obtained from a particular source. Bacteria were grown on TSA-YE slopes (HiMedia, India) for 18 h at 37 °C. The culture was standardized turbidimetrically and diluted appropriately in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.3). For each strain, five out of six mice were injected intraperitoneally with 0.5 mL of dilution. Dilutions were 1.0 × 109, 2.0 × 108, 4.0 × 107, 8.0 × 106, and 1.6 × 106 CFU per animal. Each inoculum was checked by determining the viable counts on TSA-YE plates.
The LD50 was calculated using the following formula:
lg LD50 = DN − lgδ(∑ Li − 0.5)
where lgDN is the logarithm of the maximum infecting dose, lgδ is the logarithm of the multiplicity of dilution (the ratio of each subsequent dose to the previous one), Li is the ratio of the number of animals who died from a given dose of the inoculation to the total number of animals inoculated in this dose, and ∑ Li is the sum of the Li values calculated for all doses tested.
All strains with LD50s from 1.0 × 104 to 1.6 × 107 CFU per mouse were considered as virulent. A strain was nonvirulent if it did not cause death in the injected group of mice 7 days after injection with 1.0 × 109 CFU [44]. Animal experiments were performed according to the European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental and Other Scientific Purposes (Strasbourg, 1986). All procedures involving animals were approved by the Ethic Committee of the Federal Research Center for Virology and Microbiology (Volginsky, Russia) (ref. no. 5 on February 28, 2019). After infection, the surviving mice were euthanized by CO2 asphyxiation.

4.5. PCR

Lysates of overnight L. monocytogenes cultures were obtained as previously described [38]. The Encyclo Plus PCR kit (Evrogen, Russia) and primers (Syntol, Russia) were used for DNA amplification. The MLST scheme based on the sequences of seven housekeeping genes that was developed by Ragon et al. was used [28]. The housekeeping gene fragments were amplified as previously described, with modifications [16]. The following temperature conditions were used: 94 °C, 2 min; (92 °C, 30 s; 55 °C, 30 s; 72 °C, 2 min) × 30; 72 °C, 10 min; melting temperatures (Tm) were 60 °C for bglA and ldh. PCR products were evaluated by electrophoresis in 1% agarose gel. Amplified DNA was eluted from the reaction mixture using Cleanup Standard (Evrogen, Russia).
PCR amplification of the internal fragments of four internalin genes (inlA, inlB, inlC, and inlE) was performed as previously described [16,38].

4.6. PCR Product Sequencing

PCR products were sequenced on both strands according to the BigDye Terminator 3.1 Cycle Sequencing protocol for the Genetic Analyzer 3130 of Applied Biosystems/Hitachi. Electrophoretic DNA separation was performed in 50-cm capillaries with POP7 polymer.

4.7. Sequence Analysis

Sequences were proofread and assembled in Chromas Lite MFC Application version 2.1.1.0. DNA alignment was performed using ClustalX2. Dendrograms were constructed with Mega X version 10.1 (https://www.megasoftware.net/) [61]. Allelic numbers and profiles (genotypes, sequence types (STs)) were determined using the L. monocytogenes MLST database (https://bigsdb.pasteur.fr/listeria/listeria.html). Nucleotide diversity was analyzed with DnaSP version 6 [62].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.K.P. and S.A.E.; methodology, E.K.P., I.Y.E., Y.M.C.; software, E.K.P. and S.A.E.; validation, Y.M.C., I.V.R., N.A.G., E.V.S., E.A.P., P.A.Z., and T.V.M.; formal analysis, E.A.L. and T.V.M.; resources, E.A.L.; data curation, I.Y.E. and S.A.E.; writing—original draft preparation, E.K.P.; writing—review and editing, S.A.E., I.Y.E. and D.V.K.; visualization, E.K.P. and A.A.B.; supervision, E.K.P., S.A.E. and D.V.K.; project administration, D.V.K.; funding acquisition, D.V.K.

Funding

The work was supported by the Federal Research Center for Virology and Microbiology for government assignment.

Acknowledgments

We thank the team of curators of the Institute Pasteur MLST system (Paris, France) for importing newly described alleles, profiles, and/or isolates at https://bigsdb.pasteur.fr. Also, thanks to Olga L. Voronina from N.F. Gamaleya Federal Research Center for Epidemiology and Microbiology for information on alleles of internalin genes.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Swaminathan, B.; Gerner-Smidt, P. The epidemiology of human listeriosis. Microbes Infect. 2007, 9, 1236–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Walland, J.; Lauper, J.; Frey, J.; Imhof, R.; Stephan, R.; Seuberlich, T.; Oevermann, A. Listeria monocytogenes infection in ruminants: Is there a link to the environment, food and human health? A review. Schweiz. Arch. Tierheilkd. 2015, 157, 319–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Desai, A.N.; Anyoha, A.; Madoff, L.C.; Lassmann, B. Changing epidemiology of Listeria monocytogenes outbreaks, sporadic cases, and recalls globally: A review of ProMED reports from 1996 to 2018. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2019, 84, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). EU summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2015. EFSA J. 2016, 14, 4634. [Google Scholar]
  5. Allerberger, F.; Wagner, M. Listeriosis: A resurgent foodborne infection. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2010, 16, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. De Noordhout, C.M.; Devleesschauwer, B.; Angulo, F.J.; Verbeke, G.; Haagsma, J.; Kirk, M.; Havelaar, A.; Speybroeck, N. The global burden of listeriosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2014, 14, 1073–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ferreira, V.; Wiedmann, M.; Teixeira, P.; Stasiewicz, M.J. Listeria monocytogenes Persistence in Food-Associated Environments: Epidemiology, Strain Characteristics, and Implications for Public Health. J. Food Prot. 2014, 77, 150–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nightingale, K.K.; Schukken, Y.H.; Nightingale, C.R.; Fortes, E.D.; Ho, A.J.; Her, Z.; Grohn, Y.T.; Mcdonough, P.L.; Wiedmann, M. Ecology and Transmission of Listeria monocytogenes Infecting Ruminants and in the Farm Environment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 4458–4467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zaytseva, E.; Ermolaeva, S.; Somov, G.P. Low genetic diversity and epidemiological significance of Listeria monocytogenes isolated from wild animals in the far east of Russia. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2007, 7, 736–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Weis, J.; Seeliger, H.P. Incidence of Listeria monocytogenes in nature. Appl. Microbiol. 1975, 30, 29–32. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ahlstrom, C.A.; Manuel, C.S.; Den Bakker, H.C.; Wiedmann, M.; Nightingale, K.K. Molecular ecology of Listeria spp., Salmonella, Escherichia coli O157:H7 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli in pristine natural environments in Northern Colorado. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 124, 511–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Pushkareva, V.I.; Ermolaeva, S.A. Listeria monocytogenes virulence factor Listeriolysin O favors bacterial growth in co-culture with the ciliate Tetrahymena pyriformis, causes protozoan encystment and promotes bacterial survival inside cysts. BMC Microbiol. 2010, 10, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wacheck, S.; Fredriksson-Ahomaa, M.; König, M.; Stolle, A.; Stephan, R. Wild boars as an important reservoir for foodborne pathogens. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2010, 7, 307–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sasaki, Y.; Goshima, T.; Mori, T.; Murakami, M.; Haruna, M.; Ito, K.; Yamada, Y. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of foodborne bacteria in wild boars (Sus scrofa) and wild deer (Cervus nippon) in Japan. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2013, 10, 985–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Castro, H.; Jaakkonen, A.; Hakkinen, M.; Korkeala, H.; Lindström, M. Occurrence, Persistence, and Contamination Routes of Listeria monocytogenes Genotypes on Three Finnish Dairy Cattle Farms: A Longitudinal Study. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 84, e02000–e02017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Voronina, O.L.; Ryzhova, N.N.; Kunda, M.S.; Kurnaeva, M.A.; Semenov, A.N.; Aksenova, E.I.; Egorova, I.Y.; Kolbasov, D.V.; Ermolaeva, S.A.; Gintsburg, A.L. Diversity and Pathogenic Potential of Listeria monocytogenes Isolated from Environmental Sources in the Russian Federation. IJMER 2015, 5, 5–15. [Google Scholar]
  17. Locatelli, A.; Spor, A.; Jolivet, C.; Piveteau, P.; Hartmann, A. Biotic and Abiotic Soil Properties Influence Survival of Listeria monocytogenes in Soil. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e75969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dreyer, M.; Aguilar-Bultet, L.; Rupp, S.; Guldimann, C.; Stephan, R.; Schock, A.; Otter, A.; Schüpbach, G.; Brisse, S.; Lecuit, M.; et al. Listeria monocytogenes sequence type 1 is predominant in ruminant rhombencephalitis. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 36419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Dell’Armelina Rocha, P.R.; Lomonaco, S.; Bottero, M.T.; Dalmasso, A.; Dondo, A.; Grattarola, C.; Zuccon, F.; Iulini, B.; Knabel, S.J.; Capucchio, M.T.; et al. Ruminant rhombencephalitis-associated Listeria monocytogenes strains constitute a genetically homogeneous group related to human outbreak strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79, 3059–3066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chlebicz, A.; Śliżewska, K. Campylobacteriosis, Salmonellosis, Yersiniosis, and Listeriosis as Zoonotic Foodborne Diseases: A Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Esteban, J.I.; Oporto, B.; Aduriz, G.; Juste, R.A.; Hurtado, A. Faecal shedding and strain diversity of Listeria monocytogenes in healthy ruminants and swine in Northern Spain. BMC Vet. Res. 2009, 5, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Schoder, D.; Melzner, D.; Schmalwieser, A.; Zangana, A.; Winter, P.; Wagner, M. Important Vectors for Listeria monocytogenes Transmission at Farm Dairies Manufacturing Fresh Sheep and Goat Cheese from Raw Milk. J. Food Prot. 2011, 74, 919–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Reu, K.; Grijspeerdt, K.; Herman, L. A Belgian Survey of hygiene indicator bacteria and pathogenic bacteria in raw milk and direct marketing of raw milk farm products. J. Food Saf. 2004, 24, 17–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jayarao, B.M.; Donaldson, S.C.; Straley, B.A.; Sawant, A.A.; Hegde, N.V.; Brown, J.L. A Survey of Foodborne Pathogens in Bulk Tank Milk and Raw Milk Consumption among Farm Families in Pennsylvania. J. Dairy Sci. 2006, 89, 2451–2458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, Y.; Lu, L.; Lan, R.; Salazar, J.K.; Liu, J.; Xu, J.; Ye, C. Isolation and characterization of Listeria species from rodents in natural environments in China. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2017, 6, e44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Eriksen, L.; Larsen, H.E.; Christiansen, T.; Jensen, M.M.; Eriksen, E. An outbreak of meningo-encephalitis in fallow deer caused by Listeria monocytogenes. Vet. Rec. 1988, 122, 274–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Pewsner, M.; Origgi, F.C.; Frey, J.; Ryser-Degiorgis, M.P. Assessing fifty years of general health surveillance of roe deer in Switzerland: A retrospective analysis of necropsy reports. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0170338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ragon, M.; Wirth, T.; Hollandt, F.; Lavenir, R.; Lecuit, M.; Le Monnier, A.; Brisse, S. A new perspective on Listeria monocytogenes evolution. PLoS Pathog. 2008, 4, e1000146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Doumith, M.; Buchrieser, C.; Glaser, P.; Jacquet, C.; Martin, P. Differentiation of the major Listeria monocytogenes serovars by multiplex PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004, 42, 3819–3822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Orsi, R.H.; den Bakker, H.C.; Wiedmann, M. Listeria monocytogenes lineages: Genomics, evolution, ecology, and phenotypic characteristics. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2011, 301, 79–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chenal-Francisque, V.; Lopez, J.; Cantinelli, T.; Caro, V.; Tran, C.; Leclercq, A.; Lecuit, M.; Brisse, S. World wide distribution of major clones of listeria monocytogenes. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2011, 17, 1110–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Nightingale, K.K.; Windham, K.; Wiedmann, M. Evolution and molecular phylogeny of Listeria monocytogenes isolated from human and animal listeriosis cases and foods. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187, 5537–5551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Cantinelli, T.; Chenal-Francisque, V.; Diancourt, L.; Frezal, L.; Leclercq, A.; Wirth, T.; Lecuit, M.; Brisse, S. “Epidemic clones” of listeria monocytogenes are widespread and ancient clonal groups. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2013, 51, 3770–3779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Piffaretti, J.C.; Kressebuch, H.; Aeschbacher, M.; Bille, J.; Bannerman, E.; Musser, J.M.; Selander, R.K.; Rocourt, J. Genetic characterization of clones of the bacterium Listeria monocytogenes causing epidemic disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1989, 86, 3818–3822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Moura, A.; Tourdjman, M.; Leclercq, A.; Hamelin, E.; Laurent, E.; Fredriksen, N.; van Cauteren, D.; Bracq-Dieye, H.; Thouvenot, P.; Vales, G.; et al. Real-time whole-genome sequencing for surveillance of Listeria monocytogenes, France. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2017, 23, 1462–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, Z.; Pérez-Osorio, A.; Wang, Y.; Eckmann, K.; Glover, W.A.; Allard, M.W.; Brown, E.W.; Chen, Y. Whole genome sequencing analyses of Listeria monocytogenes that persisted in a milkshake machine for a year and caused illnesses in Washington State. BMC Microbiol. 2017, 17, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Belén, A.; Pavón, I.; Maiden, M.C.J. Multilocus Sequence Typing. Mol. Epidemiol. Microorg. 2009, 551, 129–140. [Google Scholar] [Green Version]
  38. Aanensen, D.M.; Spratt, B.G. The multilocus sequence typing network: Mlst.net. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, 728–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jeong, C.; Balanovsky, O.; Lukianova, E.; Kahbatkyzy, N.; Flegontov, P.; Zaporozhchenko, V.; Immel, A.; Wang, C.C.; Ixan, O.; Khussainova, E.; et al. The genetic history of admixture across inner Eurasia. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 3, 966–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Adgamov, R.; Zaytseva, E.; Thiberge, J.-M.; Brisse, S.; Ermolaev, S. Genetically Related Listeria Monocytogenes Strains Isolated from Lethal Human Cases and Wild Animals. Genet. Divers. Microorg. 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Takeuchi, K.; Smith, M.A.; Doyle, M.P. Pathogenicity of Food and Clinical Listeria monocytogenes Isolates in a Mouse Bioassay. J. Food Prot. 2016, 66, 2362–2366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Soni, D.K.; Singh, D.V.; Dubey, S.K. Pregnancy—Associated human listeriosis: Virulence and genotypic analysis of Listeria monocytogenes from clinical samples. J. Microbiol. 2015, 53, 653–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Doumith, M.; Jacquet, C.; Gerner-Smidt, P.; Graves, L.M.; Loncarevic, S.; Mathisen, T.; Morvan, A.; Salcedo, C.; Torpdahl, M.; Vazquez, J.A.; et al. Multicenter Validation of a Multiplex PCR Assay for Differentiating the Major Listeria monocytogenes Serovars 1/2a, 1/2b, 1/2c, and 4b: Toward an International Standard. J. Food Prot. 2016, 68, 2648–2650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Soni, D.; Singh, M.; Singh, D.; Dubey, S. Virulence and genotypic characterization of Listeria monocytogenes isolated from vegetable and soil samples. BMC Microbiol. 2014, 14, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lyautey, E.; Topp, E.; Hartmann, A.; Piveteau, P.; Rieu, A.; Pagotto, F.; Tyler, K.; Lapen, D.R.; Wilkes, G.; Robertson, W.J.; et al. Characteristics and frequency of detection of fecal Listeria monocytogenes shed by livestock, wildlife, and humans. Can. J. Microbiol. 2007, 53, 1158–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jamali, H.; Paydar, M.; Ismail, S.; Looi, C.Y.; Wong, W.F.; Radmehr, B.; Abedini, A. Prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility and virulotyping of Listeria species and Listeria monocytogenes isolated from open-air fish markets. BMC Microbiol. 2015, 15, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tamburro, M.; Ripabelli, G.; Fanelli, I.; Grasso, G.M.; Sammarco, M.L. Typing of Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated in Italy by inlA gene characterization and evaluation of a new cost-effective approach to antisera selection for serotyping. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 108, 1602–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Weindl, L.; Frank, E.; Ullrich, U.; Heurich, M.; Kleta, S.; Ellerbroek, L.; Gareis, M. Listeria monocytogenes in Different Specimens from Healthy Red Deer and Wild Boars. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2016, 13, 391–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Parihar, V.S.; Lopez-Valladares, G.; Danielsson-Tham, M.-L.; Peiris, I.; Helmersson, S.; Unemo, M.; Andersson, B.; Arneborn, M.; Bannerman, E.; Barbuddhe, S.; et al. Characterization of Human Invasive Isolates of Listeria monocytogenes in Sweden 1986–2007. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2008, 5, 755–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lopez-Valladares, G.; Danielsson-Tham, M.-L.; Goering, R.V.; Tham, W. Lineage II (Serovar 1/2a and 1/2c) Human Listeria monocytogenes Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis Types Divided into PFGE Groups Using the Band Patterns Below 145.5 kb. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2016, 14, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yoshida, T.; Sugimoto, T.; Sato, M.; Hirai, K. Incidence of Listeria monocytogenes in Wild Animals in Japan. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2000, 62, 673–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Lomonaco, S.; Verghese, B.; Gerner-Smidt, P.; Tarr, C.; Gladney, L.; Joseph, L.; Katz, L.; Turnsek, M.; Frace, M.; Chen, Y.; et al. Novel Epidemic Clones of Listeria United States, 2011. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2013, 19, 147–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Li, W.; Bai, L.; Fu, P.; Han, H.; Liu, J.; Guo, Y. The Epidemiology of Listeria monocytogenes in China. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2018, 15, 459–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Fan, Z.; Xie, J.; Li, Y.; Wang, H. Listeriosis in mainland China: A systematic review. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2019, 81, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Maury, M.M.; Tsai, Y.; Charlier, C.; Touchon, M.; Europe PMC funders group. Uncovering Listeria monocytogenes hypervirulence by harnessing its biodiversity. Nat. Genet. 2016, 48, 308–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Koopmans, M.M.; Engelen-Lee, J.Y.; Brouwer, M.C.; Jaspers, V.; Man, W.K.; Vall Seron, M.; van de Beek, D. Characterization of a Listeria monocytogenes meningitis mouse model. J. Neuroinflamm. 2018, 15, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Smith, A.M.; Tau, N.P.; Smouse, S.L.; Allam, M.; Ismail, A.; Ramalwa, N.R.; Disenyeng, B.; Ngomane, M.; Thomas, J. Outbreak of Listeria monocytogenes in South Africa, 2017–2018: Laboratory Activities and Experiences Associated with Whole-Genome Sequencing Analysis of Isolates. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2019, 16, 524–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sobyanin, K.A.; Sysolyatina, E.V.; Chalenko, Y.M.; Kalinin, E.V.; Ermolaeva, S.A. Route of Injection Affects the Impact of InlB Internalin Domain Variants on Severity of Listeria monocytogenes Infection in Mice. BioMed Res. Int. 2017, 2017, 2101575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Test for Bacteria Isolated from Animals, 4th ed.; CLSI supplement VET08; CLSI: Wayne, PA, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  60. Bakulov, I.A.; Vasylyev, D.A.; Kolbasov, D.B.; Kovaleva, E.N.; Egorova, I.Y.; Selyaniniov, Y.O. Listeria and Listeriosis. Monograph, 2nd ed.; Revised and Enlarged; RDICMB: Ulyanovsk, Russia, 2016; p. 334. [Google Scholar]
  61. Kumar, S.; Dudley, J.; Nei, M.; Tamura, K. MEGA: A biologist-centric software for evolutionary analysis of DNA and protein sequences. Brief. Bioinform. 2008, 9, 299–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Rozas, J.; Ferrer-Mata, A.; Sánchez-DelBarrio, J.C.; Guirao-Rico, S.; Librado, P.; Ramos-Onsins, S.E.; Sánchez-Gracia, A. DnaSP 6: DNA Sequence Polymorphism Analysis of Large Datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017, 34, 3299–3302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pathogens 08 00184 g001 550
Figure 1. The clonal complexes (CCs) and sources of L. monocytogenes isolates, including isolates from small ruminants (n = 12; 25%), cattle (n = 11; 23%), humans (n = 6; 12.5%), pigs (n = 8; 16.7%), rodents (n = 7; 14.6%), arthropods (n = 3; 6.25%), and a horse (n = 1; 2%).
Figure 1. The clonal complexes (CCs) and sources of L. monocytogenes isolates, including isolates from small ruminants (n = 12; 25%), cattle (n = 11; 23%), humans (n = 6; 12.5%), pigs (n = 8; 16.7%), rodents (n = 7; 14.6%), arthropods (n = 3; 6.25%), and a horse (n = 1; 2%).
Pathogens 08 00184 g001
Pathogens 08 00184 g002 550
Figure 2. Map showing locations in inner Eurasia where L. monocytogenes strains were isolated.
Figure 2. Map showing locations in inner Eurasia where L. monocytogenes strains were isolated.
Pathogens 08 00184 g002
Pathogens 08 00184 g003 550
Figure 3. The dendrogram was constructed based on the MLST sequence types and internalin gene alleles.
Figure 3. The dendrogram was constructed based on the MLST sequence types and internalin gene alleles.
Pathogens 08 00184 g003
Table
Table 1. Antibiotic resistance of L. monocytogenes strains.
Table 1. Antibiotic resistance of L. monocytogenes strains.
AntibioticNumber of Resistant Strains
Penicillin G14
Enrofloxacin4
Ampicillin7
Tetracycline1
Chloramphenicol1
Kanamycin0
Tylosin2
Streptomycin0
Polymyxin B44
Neomycin0
Table
Table 2. Virulence of L. monocytogenes strains for Swiss mice.
Table 2. Virulence of L. monocytogenes strains for Swiss mice.
LD50Number of Strains in a Particular Source
HumansCattleGoatPigMouseRatSheepRabbitTick
104–107131221220
107–109010000010
≥109000000001
Table
Table 3. Phylogenetic characterization of the L. monocytogenes strains included in the study.
Table 3. Phylogenetic characterization of the L. monocytogenes strains included in the study.
Phylogenetic LineageClonal Complex (CC)Sequence Type (ST)Number of Strains in a Particular Source
HumansCattleSmall RuminantsPigsRodentsHorseArthropods
IICC7ST71033500
ST121100000
ST230101000
ST850010000
ST980000001
ST1060000010
ST5190001000
ST15340000001
ST15350001000
ST15360100000
ST15370010000
ST15380100000
ST15391000000
ST15400010000
ST15410001000
IICC124ST1240100001
ST15500000100
ST15510100000
ST15520010000
IICC177ST1770200000
ST15420100000
ST15431000000
IICC18ST4810010000
ST15440001000
ST15450100000
IICC89ST15471000000
IICC101ST1010010000
ST15480100000
IICC19ST15460000100
IICC21ST210010000
IICC307ST15490010000
ICC1ST2521000000
Table
Table 4. Clonal complexes and internalin gene alleles of L. monocytogenes strains.
Table 4. Clonal complexes and internalin gene alleles of L. monocytogenes strains.
Clonal Complexes (Number of Strains)Gene Allele
inlAinlBinlCinlE
ICC7 (29)41468
IICC101 (2)1420158
IIICC124 (5)61266
IVCC21 (1)121468
VCC19 (1)91466
VICC89 (1)1515176
VIICC177 (4)81468
VIIICC18 (3)121366
IXCC1 (1)1913
Table
Table 5. Polymorphism of gene fragments included in the multivirulence locus sequence typing (MvLST) (multilocus sequence typing (MLST) + internalin profile (IP)) scheme for the strains of the II phylogenetic lineage.
Table 5. Polymorphism of gene fragments included in the multivirulence locus sequence typing (MvLST) (multilocus sequence typing (MLST) + internalin profile (IP)) scheme for the strains of the II phylogenetic lineage.
GeneLengthN Alleles Mutations π aInDel bRm c
SynonNonsynon
MLST
abcZ5374810.0083800
bglA39971100.0097901
cat4868830.0084501
dapE46292760.0185203
dat4714400.0042500
lhkA4803110.0027800
ldh45918560.0076864
IP d
inlA64871350.0119003
inlB6185560.0090602
inlC58751050.0112600
inlE5582110.0035800
a π—nucleotide diversity; b InDel—the number of inserted/deleted nuleotides; c Rm—minimum number of recombination events; d IP—internalin profile.
Table
Table 6. Listeria monocytogenes strains used in the study.
Table 6. Listeria monocytogenes strains used in the study.
No.StrainYearSourceLocationSerovarSTCC
14-401947horseMoscow1/2aST106CC7
21341952vole mouseMoscow region1/2aST7CC7
3151952pigBelarus1/2aST519CC7
461952pigRyazan oblast1/2aST1544CC18
5A1952ticksKazakhstan1/2aST124CC124
63821954cowYaroslav region1/2aST1545CC18
71971955ticksUkraine1/2aST98CC7
8391956guinea pigIrkutsk region1/2aST7CC7
9К-171956rabbitUkraine1/2aST1546CC19
101691957louseUkraine1/2aST1534CC7
119441958house mouseMoscow region1/2aST7CC7
1225981960rabbitNorth Caucasus region1/2aST7CC7
13971960rabbitVoronezh region1/2aST1550CC124
14351962sheepKazakhstan1/2aST101CC101
154061964pigKazan1/2aST7CC7
16Chistopol1964pigVolga region1/2aST1541CC7
171211964bovineMoscow region1/2aST124CC124
1835011965goatMoscow1/2aST85CC7
1934531965pigMoscow1/2aST7CC7
203241965pigMoscow1/2aST23CC7
2127-T1966ratTajikistan1/2aST7CC7
223-P/21966sheepSouth Ural region1/2aST7CC7
232-P1967bovineSouth Ural region1/2aST177CC177
241191967cowUral region1/2aST1542CC177
25178-P1967pigUzbekistan1/2aST1535CC7
2614P1969sheepAltai region1/2aST1534CC7
2738801970pigUral region1/2aST7CC7
284-G1970sheepKazakhstan1/2aST7CC7
2914261970cowIrkutsk region1/2aST1548CC101
301-CAX1971cowSakhalin region1/2aST1536CC7
31451971sheepKazakhstan1/2aST1459CC307
321401971cowBelarus1/2aST23CC7
332571971cowNovgorod region1/2aST1551CC124
34246181971humanMoscow1/2aST7CC7
35571971humanMoscow1/2aST1539CC7
361741971sheepBelarus1/2aST1552CC124
37501971sheepBelarus1/2aST7CC7
381-671972sheepAltai region1/2aST1537CC7
397-B1972sheepBelarus1/2aST481CC18
401701974cowKhabarovsk region1/2aST177CC177
41331975sheepChita region1/2aST1540CC7
423051975cowKazakhstan1/2aST12CC7
43816-D1975goatDagestan region1/2aST21CC21
445 ch1975humanTula region1/2aST12CC7
45К-231988humanMoscow4bST252CC1
462111992cowKursk region1/2aST1538CC7
47761997humanTula1/2aST1547CC89
4829 ch1999humanTula region1/2aST1543CC177

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Psareva, E.K.; Egorova, I.Y.; Liskova, E.A.; Razheva, I.V.; Gladkova, N.A.; Sokolova, E.V.; Potemkin, E.A.; Zhurilov, P.A.; Mikhaleva, T.V.; Blokhin, A.A.; et al. Retrospective Study of Listeria monocytogenes Isolated in the Territory of Inner Eurasia from 1947 to 1999. Pathogens 2019, 8, 184. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens8040184

AMA Style

Psareva EK, Egorova IY, Liskova EA, Razheva IV, Gladkova NA, Sokolova EV, Potemkin EA, Zhurilov PA, Mikhaleva TV, Blokhin AA, et al. Retrospective Study of Listeria monocytogenes Isolated in the Territory of Inner Eurasia from 1947 to 1999. Pathogens. 2019; 8(4):184. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens8040184

Chicago/Turabian Style

Psareva, Ekaterina K., Irina Yu. Egorova, Elena A. Liskova, Irina V. Razheva, Nadezda A. Gladkova, Elena V. Sokolova, Eugene A. Potemkin, Pavel A. Zhurilov, Tatyana V. Mikhaleva, Andrei A. Blokhin, and et al. 2019. "Retrospective Study of Listeria monocytogenes Isolated in the Territory of Inner Eurasia from 1947 to 1999" Pathogens 8, no. 4: 184. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens8040184

APA Style

Psareva, E. K., Egorova, I. Y., Liskova, E. A., Razheva, I. V., Gladkova, N. A., Sokolova, E. V., Potemkin, E. A., Zhurilov, P. A., Mikhaleva, T. V., Blokhin, A. A., Chalenko, Y. M., Kolbasov, D. V., & Ermolaeva, S. A. (2019). Retrospective Study of Listeria monocytogenes Isolated in the Territory of Inner Eurasia from 1947 to 1999. Pathogens, 8(4), 184. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens8040184

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop