Condition Monitoring with Prediction Based on Diesel Engine Oil Analysis: A Case Study for Urban Buses
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- First, the mathematical model to help predicting the next intervention based on Exponential Smoothing, the variable Fe is summarily presented as example;
- Due to the variation of the variable Fe, a t-Student distribution with bilateral test of hypotheses is used;
- Then an example using several values for smoothing parameter and some levels of significance is presented;
- Finally, the influence of the maintenance policy, namely the predictive in the reserve fleet is discussed.
2. Condition Monitoring with Prediction through Oil Analysis
2.1. Oil Analysis
- In the first phase, the vehicles targeted for analysis and monitoring in the evolution of the degradation of the oils will be selected—this monitoring will be done through the periodic collection of oil samples of the selected vehicles and they will be sent to a proper place for their analysis;
- In the second phase, an in-depth study of the results obtained in the analyses, as well as of the prediction algorithms to be used, will be carried out;
- In the third and final phase, an analysis of planned maintenance aiming its improvement will be made. This shall take into account the results obtained in monitoring the evolution of oil degradation—this phase will also serve to present proposals for the improvement of planned maintenance schedules and the reduction of costs that come from it.
- Number of the vehicle;
- Brand;
- Model;
- Type of car;
- Organ—Motor;
- Equipment km;
- km of the oil;
- Sample date;
- Date of submission of the sample.
- Soot (Carbon Matter);
- Viscosity;
- TBN;
- Wear and Contamination Metals;
- Particles.
2.2. Oil Analysis Changes through Prediction
- µ Is a fixed value used for comparison with the sample mean;
- Is the average sample;
- tα Corresponds to the critical T;
- S Is the sample standard deviation;
- n Is the sample size.
- A one-tailed test uses one threshold value (associated with the chosen significance level) and rejects the hypothesis H0—where T > T critical—when the value of the modulus calculated for the t statistic exceeds the critical value.
3. Discussion
- Individually, to all vehicles (all parameters);
- Homogeneous groups of different vehicles (all parameters);
- To the groups of vehicles that use biodiesel as fuel (all parameters).
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
Symbols and Acronyms
β | Is the smoothing parameter |
Is the real value recorded in the present time | |
µ | Is a fixed value used for comparison with the sample mean |
Is the average sample | |
tα | Corresponds to the critical T |
n | Is the sample size |
µo | Population Average |
Al | Aluminium |
ARIMA | Auto Regressive Integrated Moving Average |
ARMA | Auto Regressive Moving Average |
Cr | Chromium |
Cu | Cobalt |
Fe | Iron |
H0 | Hypothesis 0 |
H1 | Hypothesis 1 |
ICE | Internal Combustion Engines |
LVO | Low Viscosity Oils |
Mo | Molybdenum |
Na | Sodium |
Ni | Nickel |
PAO | Polyolefin, Polyester, polyglycol |
Pb | Lead |
S | Is the sample standard deviation |
Si | Silicon |
Sn | Tin |
St | Is the forecasted value for the present time |
St+1 | Is the forecast for the next time |
TAN | Total Acid Number |
TBN | Total Base Number |
V | Vanadium |
σ | standard deviation of the population |
References
- Cabral, J.S. Organização e Gestão da Manutenção, 6th ed.; Lidel—Edições Técnicas Lda: Lisbon, Portugal, 2006; ISBN 9789727574407. [Google Scholar]
- Assis, R. Manutenção Centrada na Fiabilidade; Lidel—Edições Técnicas Lda: Lisbon, Portugal, 1997; ISBN 9789727570379. [Google Scholar]
- Pinto, C.V. Organização e Gestão da Manutenção, 2nd ed.; Monitor—Projecto e Edições, Lda: Lisbon, Portugal, 2002; ISBN 9789729413391. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, W. A Model to Determine the Optimal Critical Leveland the Monitoring in Condition Based Maintenance. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2000, 38, 1425–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simões, A.S. Manutenção Condicionada às Emissões Poluentes em Autocarros Urbanos, Utilizando Modelos de Previsão de Degradação Baseados nas Tecnologias dos Veículos e nas Condições de Exploração. Ph.D. Thesis, Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisboa, Portugal, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Ferreira, L.A. Uma Introdução à Manutenção; Publindústria: Porto, Portugal, 1998; ISBN 9789729579448. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmad, R.; Kamaruddin, S. An overview of time-based and condition-based maintenance in industrial application. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2012, 63, 135–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farinha, J.T. Asset Maintenance Engineering Methodologies, 1st ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2018. ISBN-10 1138035890, ISBN-13 978-1138035898. (In English) [Google Scholar]
- Newell, G.E. Oil analysis cost-effective machine condition monitoring technique. In Industrial Lubrication and Tribology; MCB University Press: Bingley, UK, 1999; Volume 51, pp. 119–124. [Google Scholar]
- Macián, V.; Tormos, B.; Olmeda, P.; Montoro, L. Analytical approach to wear rate determination for internal combustion engine condition monitoring based on oil analysis. Tribol. Int. 2003, 36, 771–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vališ, D.; Zák, L.; Pokora, O. Failure prediction of Diesel engine based on occurrence of selected wear particles in oil. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2015, 56, 501–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Changsong, Z.; Liu, P.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Z. Oil-based maintenance interval optimization for power-shift steering Transmission. Adv. Mech. Eng. 2018, 10, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Macián, V.; Tormos, B.; Ruíz, S.; Miró, G. Low viscosity engine oils: Study of wear effects and oil key parameters in a heavy duty engine fleet test. Tribol. Int. 2016, 94, 240–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Macián, V.; Tormos, B.; Miró, G.; Pérez, T. Assessment of low-viscosity oil performance and degradation in a heavy duty engine real-world fleet test. Proc. IMechE Part J J. Eng. Tribol. 2016, 230, 729–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Macián, V.; Tormos, B.; Ruíz, S.; Ramírez, L. Potential of low viscosity oils to reduce CO2 emissions and fuel consumption of urban buses fleets. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2015, 39, 76–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tormos, B.; Martín, J.; Carreño, R.; Ramírez, L. A general model to evaluate mechanical losses and auxiliary energy consumption in reciprocating internal combustion engines. Tribol. Int. 2018, 123, 161–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fraer, R.; Dinh, H.; Proc, K.; McCormick, R. Operating Experience and Teardown Analysis for Engines Operated on Biodiesel Blends (B20). In Proceedings of the 2005 SAE Commercial Vehicle Engineering Conference, Rosemont, IL, USA, 1–3 November 2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Proc, K.; Barnitt, R.; Hayes, R.R.; Ratcliff, M.; McCormick, R.L. 100,000-Mile Evaluation of Transit Buses Operated on Biodiesel Blends (B20). In Proceedings of the Powertrain and Fluid Systems Conference and Exhibition, Toronto, ON, Canada, 16–19 October 2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tica, S.; Filipovic, S.; Zivanovic, P.; Milovanovic, B. Test Run of Biodiesel in Public Transport System in Belgrade. Energy Policy 2010, 38, 7014–7020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shrake, S.O.; Landis, A.E.; Bilec, M.M.; Collinge, W.O.; Xue, X. A comparative analysis of performance and cost metrics associated with a diesel to biodiesel fleet transition. Energy Policy 2010, 38, 7451–7456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tormos, B.; Macián, V.; Gargar, K.; Redon, P. Results of an Operating Experience for Urban Buses Fuelled with Biodiesel Blends (B50). In Proceedings of the SAE 2009 International Powertrains, Fuels and Lubricants Meeting, Florence, Italy, 15–17 June 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valis, D.; Zak, L.; Pokora, O. Engine residual technical life estimation based on tribo data. Eksploatacja Niezawodnosc—Maint. Reliab. 2014, 16, 203–210. [Google Scholar]
- Valis, D.; Zak, L.; Pokora, O. Contribution to system failure occurrence prediction and to system remaining useful life estimation based on oil field data. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part O 2015, 229, 36–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valis, D.; Žák, L.; Pokora, O.; Lansky, P. Perspective analysis outcomes of selected tribodiagnostic data used as input for condition based maintenance. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2016, 145, 231–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, X.; Zhong, C.; Zhe, J. Lubricating oil conditioning sensors for online machine health monitoring—A review. Tribol. Int. 2017, 109, 473–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Motamen, S.F.; Morina, A.; Neville, A. The effect of soot and diesel contamination on wear and friction of engine oil pump. Tribol. Int. 2017, 115, 285–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sen, P.K. Review: Contemporary Textbooks on Multivariate Statistical Analysis: A Panoramic Appraisal and Critique. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1986, 81, 560–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schervish, M.J. A Review of Multivariate Analysis. Stat. Sci. 1987, 2, 396–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jun, H.B.; Kiritsis, D.; Gambera, M.; Xirouchakis, P. Predictive Algorithm to Determine the Suitable Time to Change Automotive Engine Oil. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2006, 51, 671–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seabra, J.; Graça, B. Análise de óleos e massas lubrificantes em serviço. In Proceedings of the 5th National Conference of Industrial Maintenance, Figueira da Foz, Portugal, 23–25 October 1996; APMI: Figueira da Foz, Portugal. [Google Scholar]
- Gresham, R.M.; Totten, G.E. Lubrication and Maintenance of Industrial Machinery; Best Practices and Reliability; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2008; ISBN-10 1420089358, ISBN-13 978-1420089356. [Google Scholar]
- Makridakis, S.G.; Wheelwright, S.C. Forecasting Methods for Management; John Wiley & Sons Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1989; ISBN-10 0471600636, ISBN-13 978-0471600633. [Google Scholar]
Characteristics of the Oil | Limits (X > Danger) | |
Antifreeze (%) | (PE-TA.071) | 0.08 |
Appearance (dimensionless) | (PE-TA.096) | |
Fuel (%) | (PE-TA.071) | 4.0 |
Water content (%) | (PE-TA.071) | 0.2 |
Water content (FinachecK) (%) | (PE-5022-Al) | 0.2 |
Soot (%) | (DIN 51452) | 1.5 |
Nitration (ABS/cm) | (PE-TA.071) | 15 |
Oxidation (ABS/cm) | (PE-TA.071) | 15 |
Sulfation (ABS/cm) | (PE-TA.071) | 20 |
TBN (mgr KOH/g) | (ASTM D-2896-07a) | 30 |
Viscosity at 100 °C (cst) | (ASTM D-445-11) | 15 |
Wear and Contamination Metals | Limits | |
Content in Al (ppm) | (ASTM D-5185-05 mod.) | 20 |
Content in Cr (ppm) | (ASTM D-5185-05 mod.) | 10 |
Content in Cu (ppm) | (ASTM D-5185-05 mod.) | 35 |
Content in Fe (ppm) | (ASTM D-5185-05 mod.) | 90 |
Content in Mo (ppm) | (ASTM D-5185-05 mod.) | 20 |
Content in Na (ppm) | (ASTM D-5185-05 mod.) | 40 |
Content in Ni (ppm) | (ASTM D-5185-05 mod.) | 20 |
Content in Pb (ppm) | (ASTM D-5185-05 mod.) | 40 |
Content in Si (ppm) | (ASTM D-5185-05 mod.) | 20 |
Content in Sn (ppm) | (ASTM D-5185-05 mod.) | 15 |
Content in V (ppm) | (ASTM D-5185-05 mod.) | 00 |
Particles | Limits | |
PQ Index (Dimensionless) | (PE-5024-Al) | 110 |
Fe Content (ppm) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Period km | Observed Value | Prediction with β = 0.1 | Prediction with β = 0.5 | Prediction with β = 0.9 |
2451 | 19 | |||
5214 | 53 | 19.00 | 19.00 | 19.00 |
10,115 | 22 | 22.40 | 36.00 | 49.60 |
12,403 | 14 | 22.36 | 29.00 | 24.76 |
17,212 | 54 | 21.52 | 21.50 | 15.08 |
22,183 | 141 | 24.77 | 37.75 | 50.11 |
27,682 | 28 | 36.39 | 89.38 | 131.91 |
30,965 | 77 | 35.55 | 58.69 | 38.39 |
35,965 | 39.70 | 67.84 | 73.14 |
Content Fe (ppm) t-Student | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
α = 0.001 | α = 0.01 | α = 0.05 | α = 0.1 | α=0.2 | |
Average (sample) | 51.00 | 51.00 | 51.00 | 51.00 | 51.00 |
Standard deviation (sample) S | 42.35 | 42.35 | 42.35 | 42.35 | 42.35 |
Critical t | 4.79 | 3.00 | 1.89 | 1.41 | 0.90 |
Standard deviation (population) σ | 46.27 | 34.83 | 24.63 | 19.19 | 12.60 |
Population Average (µ0) | 51 + 46.2 | 51 + 34.8 | 51 + 24.6 | 51 + 19.1 | 51 + 12.6 |
Upper limit | 97.27 | 85.83 | 75.63 | 70.19 | 63.60 |
Hypothesis Test | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
µ0 (Population Average) | Calculated t | Table t α = 0.001 | Table t α = 0.05 | Table t α = 0.1 | Table t α = 0.2 |
25.00 | 1.23 | 4.79 | 1.89 | 1.41 | 0.90 |
35.00 | 0.76 | 4.79 | 1.89 | 1.41 | 0.90 |
45.00 | 0.28 | 4.79 | 1.89 | 1.41 | 0.90 |
50.00 | 0.05 | 4.79 | 1.89 | 1.41 | 0.90 |
65.00 | −0.66 | 4.79 | 1.89 | 1.41 | 0.90 |
75.00 | −1.13 | 4.79 | 1.89 | 1.41 | 0.90 |
80.00 | −1.59 | 4.79 | 1.89 | 1.41 | 0.90 |
µ0 | 20.64 | 22.64 | 29.82 | 37.59 |
Months | Bus Fleet | Availability | Need | Maintenance | Reserve Fleet |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
January | 115 | 107 | 90 | 18 | 7 |
February | 115 | 104 | 90 | 21 | 4 |
March | 115 | 105 | 90 | 19 | 6 |
April | 115 | 106 | 90 | 18 | 7 |
May | 115 | 107 | 90 | 18 | 7 |
June | 115 | 106 | 90 | 19 | 6 |
July | 115 | 102 | 90 | 22 | 3 |
August | 115 | 103 | 90 | 22 | 3 |
September | 115 | 106 | 90 | 19 | 6 |
October | 115 | 107 | 90 | 18 | 7 |
November | 115 | 109 | 90 | 16 | 9 |
December | 115 | 106 | 90 | 18 | 7 |
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Raposo, H.; Farinha, J.T.; Fonseca, I.; Ferreira, L.A. Condition Monitoring with Prediction Based on Diesel Engine Oil Analysis: A Case Study for Urban Buses. Actuators 2019, 8, 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/act8010014
Raposo H, Farinha JT, Fonseca I, Ferreira LA. Condition Monitoring with Prediction Based on Diesel Engine Oil Analysis: A Case Study for Urban Buses. Actuators. 2019; 8(1):14. https://doi.org/10.3390/act8010014
Chicago/Turabian StyleRaposo, Hugo, José Torres Farinha, Inácio Fonseca, and L. Andrade Ferreira. 2019. "Condition Monitoring with Prediction Based on Diesel Engine Oil Analysis: A Case Study for Urban Buses" Actuators 8, no. 1: 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/act8010014
APA StyleRaposo, H., Farinha, J. T., Fonseca, I., & Ferreira, L. A. (2019). Condition Monitoring with Prediction Based on Diesel Engine Oil Analysis: A Case Study for Urban Buses. Actuators, 8(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/act8010014