Next Article in Journal
Longitudinal Investigation of the Native Grass Hay from Storage to Market Reveals Mycotoxin-Associated Fungi
Next Article in Special Issue
An Isolated Arthrobacter sp. Enhances Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Plant Growth
Previous Article in Journal
Traditional Fermented Foods and Beverages from around the World and Their Health Benefits
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 10
Issue 6
10.3390/microorganisms10061152
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Rhizosphere Microbiome of Ginseng

by
Paul H. Goodwin
School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
Microorganisms 2022, 10(6), 1152; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061152
Submission received: 10 May 2022 / Revised: 30 May 2022 / Accepted: 1 June 2022 / Published: 2 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rhizosphere Microbial Community)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The rhizosphere of ginseng contains a wide range of microorganisms that can have beneficial or harmful effects on the plant. Root exudates of ginseng, particularly ginsenosides and phenolic acids, appear to select for particular microbial populations through their stimulatory and inhibitory activities, which may account for the similarities between the rhizosphere microbiomes of different cultivated species of Panax. Many practices of cultivation attempt to mimic the natural conditions of ginseng as an understory plant in hilly forested areas. However, these practices are often disruptive to soil, and thus the soil microbiome differs between wild and cultivated ginseng. Changes in the microbiome during cultivation can be harmful as they have been associated with negative changes of the soil physiochemistry as well as the promotion of plant diseases. However, isolation of a number of beneficial microbes from the ginseng rhizosphere indicates that many have the potential to improve ginseng production. The application of high-throughput sequencing to study the rhizosphere microbiome of ginseng grown under a variety of conditions continues to greatly expand our knowledge of the diversity and abundance of those organisms as well as their impacts of cultivation. While there is much more to be learnt, many aspects of the ginseng rhizosphere microbiome have already been revealed.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The main environments occupied by microorganisms associated with plants can be divided into the endosphere inside plant tissues, anthosphere inside flowers, spermosphere inside seeds, carposphere inside fruits, phyllosphere on the leaf surface, and rhizosphere in soil adjacent to roots [1]. This review will concentrate on the rhizosphere, which has the highest numbers of microorganisms among those environments and can have significant impacts on plant growth and health [2]. Although not covered in this review, endosphere microbes, particularly in roots, are often rhizosphere microbes that enter through wounds, such as those formed by lateral root formation, by natural openings such as root tips, or by directly penetrating the root epidermis using extracellular cell wall degrading enzymes [3].
The rhizosphere is distinguished from bulk soil by having a much greater level of microbial activity [3]. Traditionally, microbes in the rhizosphere were studied using cultivation-based methods, but the ability to grow on standard culture media favors only a fraction of the microbial community [4]. Thus, different DNA-based culture-independent methods have been developed [5]. An example would be the use of polymerase chain reaction denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE), where DNA is extracted and PCR products for sequences, such as 16S or 18S ribosomal RNA, which have similar lengths but different nucleotide sequences, can be separated on a gel with a gradient of DNA denaturing agents, allowing the partially melted DNA to have different electrophoretic mobilities. Microarrays are another approach, where extracted DNA is labeled with a fluorophore and hybridized to known microbial sequences on a surface that is detected by fluorescence microscopy. With fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), microbes are collected on membrane filters, then DNA is released and hybridization to fluorescent-labeled DNA probes is detected by image analysis. However, those techniques have limitations, such as the difficulty of PCR-DGGE to separate PCR products with highly similar sequences, reliance on using known microbial sequences and cross-hybridizations with microarrays, and a similar reliance on known microbial sequences and low sensitivity with FISH [6]. More often now, the DNA-based culture-independent method utilized is high-throughput sequencing, including rhizosphere soil [6]. Sequencing 16S ribosomal RNA is typically used for bacteria and archaea, whereas sequencing 18S ribosomal RNA and/or internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions are most often used for fungi. The sequences are then grouped, such as into Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs), using microbial sequence databases, typically based on >97% similarity [7,8]. High-throughput sequencing can detect much higher levels of diversity compared to culture-dependent techniques. For example, there were 60% more bacterial OTUs identified by high-throughput sequencing than bacterial species cultured from the maize rhizosphere [9]. However, isolation still has the advantage of producing pure cultures for laboratory studies, such as determining various biological activities.
Rhizosphere microbial diversity and abundance can be affected by many factors, but most studies examine the effects of the rhizosphere environment or plant genotype. An example of the impact of the soil is a study showing that the rhizosphere bacterial communities of lettuce were similar in diluvial sand and alluvial loam but different from those in loess loam, likely due to a stronger rhizosphere effect in diluvial sand and alluvial loam [10]. Another example is that high organic matter in soils of watermelon resulted in higher abundance of beneficial bacteria and higher bacterial diversity than without added organic matter [11]. An example of a study on the plant genotype effect is a higher rhizosphere microbial diversity and abundance found in Cardamine hirsuta compared to related Arabidopsis species believed to be due to differences in root exudates [12].
A major reason for studying rhizosphere microorganisms is that many can benefit plants, such as by enhancing soil aggregate formation, thus improving water retention, aeration, and movement of nutrients and water [13]. Other benefits from rhizosphere microorganisms are increasing plant nutrient availability, such as by solubilizing phosphate (P), fixing nitrogen (N2), decaying organic matter, and reducing plant diseases through direct antagonism against pathogens and/or induction of host PAMP-triggering immunity (PTI) [14,15]. Rhizosphere microorganisms can even directly promote plant growth by secreting plant hormone-like compounds or lowering inhibitory levels of plant hormones [14,16].
Compared to model plants or major annual field crops, the rhizosphere microbiology of many horticultural crops, like Panax species, are less well studied. However, as this review shows, the number of studies on the ginseng rhizosphere microbiome has greatly increased in recent years, particularly for Asian ginseng (Panax ginseng), American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius), and Himalayan ginseng (Panax notoginseng).

2. Ginseng Rhizosphere Environment

Panax ginseng is native to the hills and mountains of Korea, northern China, and western Siberia, found in mixed hardwood forests of well-drained sandy loam soils with a pH of 5–6.5 [17]. Panax quinquefolius prefers very similar conditions in the hills and mountains of eastern North America from Maine to Minnesota and Ontario to Georgia [17]. Panax notoginseng also prefers similar conditions but has a limited range, being native to the forests of the Wenshan mountains of Yunnan province [18]. Ginseng plants can grow 30 or more years in the wild [19]. This indicates that wild ginseng would have a relatively stable rhizosphere in soil with a neutral to acidic pH, good aeration, and annual inputs of nutrients from ginseng root exudates and relatively large amounts of leaf litter from the forest canopy. Typically, perennial plants accumulate root exudates in the rhizosphere at higher concentrations than annual plants due to several seasons of growth without disruption of the rhizosphere by harvesting, allowing for greater root tissue density and mass [20]. Compared to acidic or basic soils, near-neutral pH soils generally have a greater diversity and abundance of microorganisms in the rhizosphere [21]. Good soil aeration promotes water, oxygen, and nutrient diffusion, enhancing microbial activity [22]. Forest leaf litter adds organic carbon to the upper soil horizon, unlike annual crops, where limited amounts of organic matter are typically added or remain after harvest [23]. The significance of forest leaf litter to ginseng was observed when leaves from five tree species were added to soil of P. ginseng resulting in higher total nitrogen, available nitrogen–phosphate–potassium (NPK), carbon/nitrogen ratio (C/N), and soil microbial biomass, particularly, increased numbers of Proteobacteria [24]. Thus, the rhizosphere of wild ginseng in a forest understory should be relatively rich in organic matter with good oxygen and water exchange that should promote the growth of rhizosphere microorganisms.
Ginseng is also cultivated under relatively similar conditions in cool temperate regions of the world. Common production methods begin prior to transplanting with soil fumigation using broad spectrum pesticides to reduce populations of soil-borne pests, including pathogenic fungi [19]. This would also dramatically reduce the microbiome in the soil [25]. If required, soil pH is adjusted to 5.5–6.5, and fertilizers are applied where the major benefits come from NPK, as well as calcium and magnesium, that have been shown to significantly increase root yield and ginsenoside content [26]. After fumigation, the soil is tilled to form raised beds to increase water drainage [19]. Tillage typically reduces soil organic matter [27]. Seeds are planted in the fall or one-year old seedlings are transplanted in the spring and then covered with straw mulch acting like leaf litter in the wild, thus adding organic matter. However, there would not be inputs from forest leaf litter as shading occurs artificially by the use of polypropylene mesh shades [19]. Periodic pesticide applications to control insects, pathogens and weeds would have a negative impact on soil microbes. Harvesting of plants after 3–4 years involves tillage and root removal that would result in reduced organic matter negatively impacting the soil microbiome. Thus, compared to wild ginseng, cultivated ginseng would start with a highly disrupted soil with relatively little soil organic matter and reduced soil microbial populations. A rhizosphere would develop over the several years of growth from ginseng root exudates, mucilage, and root cap cells that might regularly be reduced by pesticide inputs but increased by organic inputs from decaying straw mulch and senescent ginseng stems and leaves that dieback each fall. Thus, the rhizosphere of cultivated ginseng would be expected to have significant differences from that of ginseng in the understory of a mixed hardwood forest, starting with less microbial diversity and abundant microbial population but possibly more affected by cultivation practices over the years of growth.
Part of the rhizosphere effect of ginseng would be ginsenosides released into the soil in the root exudates, estimated at 25 µg per day per plant of P. quinquefolius [28]. The specific ginsenoside compounds in the exudates were F11, Rb1, Rb2, Rc, Rd, Re, and Rg1, which were the same as those found in roots. For P. notoginseng, the specific ginsenoside compounds were Rg1, Rb1, and Rd in root exudates, which were released at 1.2, 1.0, and 2.6 µg per day per plant, respectively [29]. Another type of ginseng root exudate is phenolic compounds, such as benzoic acid, diisobutyl phthalate, diisobutyl succinate, palmitic acid, and 2,2-bis-(4-hydroxyphenyl) propane, that have been detected in rhizosphere soil of P. ginseng [30]. The phenolics, gallic acid, salicylic acid, 3-phenylpropionic acid, and cinnamic acid, were also detected in the rhizosphere of cultivated P. ginseng [31]. The exudates of P. ginseng roots are complex with over 30 compounds composed of 23% hydrocarbons, 64% organic acids/esters, 13% phenolic acids, and trace amounts of ginsenosides [32]. However, ginseng root exudates can be altered by different factors, such as N and K deficiency, which resulted in more types of organic acids and phenolics released compared to P deficiency, which resulted in less [33].

3. Ginseng Rhizobiome Diversity and Abundance

Several reports have described the diversity and abundance of bacteria and fungi in the rhizosphere of P. notoginseng [34,35,36,37,38]. All those studies examined P. notoginseng under cultivation using high-throughput sequencing, but Wu et al. [34] examined 2-to-4-year soil collected in winter, Fan et al. [35] examined 3-year-old soil collected in summer, Tan et al. [36] and Tan et al. [37] examined 1-to-3-year old soil collected in fall, and Miao et al. [38] examined 3-year-old soil collected in spring. Thus, samples were collected from different aged roots at different times of the year, and the soil microbiome is known to be affected by differences in temperature and moisture [39]. Despite such differences, there were a number of similarities between the studies. Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria were in the three most abundant bacterial phyla, whereas Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Acidobacteria were also mentioned among the most common phyla (Table 1). Among the Proteobacteria, Pseudomonas was listed as a common genus, and Arthrobacter and Streptomyces more often noted as abundant among the Actinobacteria. For fungi, the Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, and Zygomycota were the most abundant phyla, but ranked differently between the studies, although Basidiomycota was never the most abundant (Table 1). Commonly mentioned abundant genera were Fusarium in the Ascomycota, Cryptococcus in the Basidiomycota, and Mortierella in the Zygomycota.
There are also multiple reports about the diversity and abundance of bacteria and fungi in the rhizosphere of P. ginseng [40,41,42,43,44]. The methods in the studies were PCR-DGGE [40], RAPDs [42], and high-throughput sequencing [41,43,44]. All the studies collected samples in the spring, except Fang et al. [43], who collected in late summer. Plant ages in the soil differed with 1- to 4-year-old gardens [40], 1- to 6-year-old gardens [42], 2- to 6-year-old gardens [41], 1- to 5-year-old gardens [44], and 15-year-old gardens [43]. However, there were still many similarities in the results. For rhizospheric bacteria, the dominant phylum was typically the Proteobacteria, with Pseudomonas mentioned among the most abundant genera in that phylum (Table 2). The other abundant phyla varied between the studies, with Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Acidobacteria, and Chloroflexi in more than one study, whereas Fusobacteria was only noted in one study [40]. For rhizospheric fungi of P. ginseng, the most abundant phylum was the Ascomycota with Fusarium mentioned as the most abundant in that phylum in two studies (Table 2). This was followed by Basidiomycota or Zygomycota with Mortierella noted as abundant in the Zygomycota.
The other Panax species with multiple reports about the diversity and abundance of bacteria and fungi in the rhizosphere is P. quinquefolius [45,46,47,48]. In all these studies, the rhizobiome was examined with high-throughput sequencing using 3- and 4-year-old garden rhizosphere soils, but they differed in collection times, with Jiang et al. [45] sampling in spring, Dong et al. [47] sampling in summer, and both Samur [48] and Liu et al. [46] sampling in fall. For rhizosphere bacteria, most studies showed that Proteobacteria was the most abundant phylum followed by Actinobacteria or Acidobacteria, although the ranking differed between studies (Table 3). Only Dong et al. [47] did not find that Proteobacteria was the most abundant phylum. Rhodoplanes was most often noted as an abundant genus for the Proteobacteria, Arthrobacter for the Actinobacteria, and Candidatus solibacter for the Acidobacteria. For the rhizosphere fungi of P. quinquefolius, the dominant phylum was the Ascomycota in all studies, with Penicillium often noted as an abundant ascomycete genus (Table 3). The Zygomycota with Mortierella was noted in two studies, while the Basidiomycota, Rozellomycota, and Chytridiomycota were also abundant phyla in one study each.
Comparing between Panax species, it appears that they have similarities in their rhizosphere microbiomes (Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3). At the phylum level, the rhizosphere of P. notoginseng, P. ginseng, and P. quinquefolius most often had Proteobacteria being dominant followed by either Acidobacteria or Actinobacteria. There was more similarity between P. notoginseng and P. ginseng, with Pseudomonas and Burkholderia commonly being dominant compared to P. quinquefolius, with Rhodoplanes and Candidatus solibacter being most dominant. A Panax genotype affect could possibly be seen in Rhodoplanes being the most common for P. quinquefolius in both China and North America, while it was not common for either of the other two Panax species. Studies of rhizosphere fungi of P. notoginseng, P. ginseng, and P. quinquefolius almost always showed that the Ascomycota was the most common phylum, followed by Basidiomycota and then Zygomycota. For all three Panax species, Fusariums and Mortierella tend to be among the most common fungal genera in the rhizosphere.

4. Impact of Cultivation of the Rhizosphere Microbiome

Many ginseng cultivation practices can affect the rhizosphere microbiome. Chloropicrin is a potent broad-spectrum pesticide against microbes, weeds, insects, and nematodes, and fumigation of ginseng soil with it reduced levels of Pythium by 66% one year after fumigation [49]. Thus, it is likely that many other microbes were also killed by the fumigation. Repeated exposure to fungicides during cultivation was proposed to explain why fungal endophyte diversity was lower in 4-year-old roots than in 1-, 2-, and 3-year-old ginseng roots [50]. Thus, pesticides also likely reduced microbial diversity in the rhizosphere, considering that many root endophytes originate from the rhizosphere [51]. However, not using fungicides could result in higher amounts of disease that would also affect the microbiome. Panax ginseng plants with more disease were associated with increases in Acidobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, and Solibacteres in the rhizosphere [41]. While there are no reports of chemical fertilization affecting the microbiome of ginseng, studies in other crops like maize have shown that higher N due to urea application increased root exudates and thus, soil bacteria abundance [52]. Mulching clearly affects the rhizosphere microbiome of ginseng. The numbers of bacteria in the Bacteroidetes were more reduced in P. ginseng soil than were other bacteria when conifer leaf litter mulch was applied versus broad leaf litter mulch [24]. White and red pine bark mulch reduced root infections of P. quinquefolius by Rhizoctonia solani compared to oat straw mulch, possibly due to the bark leachates releasing an enteric bacterium and a yeast that were inhibitory to R. solani [49]. Soil additives, like vermicompost, a mixture of compost and worm castings, reduced the level of Fusarium root rot and increased the relative abundance of the beneficial bacteria Pseudomonas, Lysobacter, and Chryseolinea in the rhizosphere of P. quinquefolius [53]. Artificial shading used in ginseng gardens would likely have an effect as it not only reduces light intensity but also reduces air temperatures over ginseng beds up to 6 °C [54]. Even the type of shading appears to have an impact. Rhizosphere bacterial diversity of P. quinquefolius, notably for the Proteobacteria and Nitrospirae, was more abundant using 2.6 m high shades with an arched shape compared to 1.6 and 2.0 m high shades with a flat shape [55]. This may be related to different soil physicochemical properties associated with the different shade types, where the soil pH was significantly higher in the arched shades and increased soil pH was positively correlated with microbial diversity. Soil total organic matter, hydrolyzable nitrogen, and available phosphorus were also affected by shading. Disease incidence and severity were lower and the yield was higher with flat shades compared to the arched shades. Possibly the arched shades allowed for higher light levels, but as this was not measured, it is not clear why the type of shadings had different impacts. Evidence for an effect of harvesting comes from an examination of the bacterial and fungal microbiome of ginseng soil following harvesting where the soil was dug to 30 cm and the roots harvested by hand [48]. There were major shifts in diversity and abundance of the microbiome, such as increased abundance of Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria and decreased abundance of Actinobacteria by the following spring after harvest, compared to other phyla, which initially fluctuated in abundance but returned to comparable levels in the following year. Changes in the microbiomes due to harvesting were proposed to result from soil disruption by tillage and the addition of organic matter to the soil from ginseng crop debris decaying after harvest. Thus, it appears that ginseng cultivation practices can directly or indirectly impact the microbiome of the rhizosphere.
Changes in the soil microbiome as a crop develops are determined by both changes in the physiology of the plants as well as different management practices applied during the growing season. As ginseng is a perennial, the microbiome could be affected over the years of growth as root biomass increases with more exudates being released. This would likely be most obvious in cultivated ginseng gardens over the first several years, when growth is fastest and the rhizosphere is being established.
During 3 years of farmland cultivation of the first crop of P. ginseng, soil bacterial diversity and abundance decreased with the greatest decreases in the Proteobacteria and Bacteriodetes, possibly due to older roots excreting less organic material [41]. The second crop (i.e., replanted ginseng) had a higher abundance of Acidobacteria, Solibacteres, and Rhizomicrobium in the soil compared to the first crop soil and non-cultivated soil, which was correlated with decreased soil pH caused by long-term ginseng growth. For farmland cultivation of P. ginseng, cultivation age had a more pronounced effect on soil bacteria than on soil fungi with decreasing pH in older soils related to negative impacts on soil bacteria [56]. While overall abundance was higher in 6- than in 5-year-old cultivated soil, beneficial and neutral microbes decreased over time, while potentially harmful microbes, such as the pathogenic fungi, Cylindrocarpon and Fusarium, increased over time. The authors proposed that higher abundances of pathogens over time led to an imbalance in the microbial community. For farmland cultivation of P. ginseng, the greatest changes in rhizophere bacteria were in the first three years, gradually stabilizing in the fourth and fifth years [44]. Fungi were less affected over time than bacteria. However, non-pathogenic fungi decreased over time, whereas pathogenic fungi, such as Cylindrocarpon and Nectria, increased over time. Tong et al. [44] proposed that allelochemicals from ginseng roots may be increasingly disturbing the microbial community over time. Li et al. [57] found that P. ginseng growth over 6 years increased soil fungal abundance primarily for an unclassified_Nectriaceae, Fusarium, Gibberella, Cryptococcus, and Trichoderma, but decreased fungal diversity, mostly Mortierella and Humicola. It was believed that certain phenolic acids found in P. ginseng root exudates were responsible.
Farmland soil with continuous cropping would be altered by many factors, such as tillage, pesticides, and chemical fertilizers, compared to forest soils subjected to little or no crop cultural practices. Comparing wild P. ginseng in a forest understory to cultivated P. ginseng showed that they had different fungal soil communities, which became more different over time in both soil types with increasing abundance of fungal pathogens but decreasing fungal diversity [58]. Tong et al. [44] found that there was greater richness and diversity of rhizospheric bacteria but not fungi for planted P. ginseng in forest versus farmland soil. In addition, after five years of growth, the richness and diversity of soil bacteria increased in both forest and farmland gardens, but the richness and diversity of soil fungi decreased in farmland soil and was unchanged in forest soil. The amount of soil fungal pathogens changed over time in both soils but differed depending upon the fungus. For example, over the years with P. ginseng cultivation, I. mors-panacis increased in both farmland and forest soil, Ilyonectria robusta increased more in forest than farmland soil, and Fusarium solani increased more in farmland than forest soil.
Changes in bacterial abundance were observed in the soil of P. quinquefolius over 3 years’ growth in the first crop, with significant decreases in levels of Paralcligenes and Sphingomonas belonging to Proteobacteria, as well as Candidatus Saccharibacteria, but levels of other Proteobacteria, such as Pandoraea, as well as Chlamydiae, increased with plant age [47]. There was also increased fungal abundance over time with the greatest increases in the abundance of Fusarium and members of the Tremellomycetes, Chytridiomycota, and Sordariales, but decreasing abundance of the Zygomycota. Unlike many other studies of ginseng cultivation, significant soil pH changes over the years were not observed. Additionally, for P. quinquefolius, the abundance of soil bacteria with biodegradative functions, such as species of Methylibium, Sphingomonas, Variovorax, and Rubrivivax, was lowered over 4 years of growth compared to non-cropped soils, which was accompanied by a decrease in soil pH over time [59]. There was also an increased abundance of the soil-borne fungal pathogens, Fusarium and Ilyonectria, over years of cultivation relative to non-cropped soils. It was proposed that this change could result in toxic soil compounds accumulating due to reduced microbial degradation.
In general, these studies reveal that cultivation of P. ginseng and P. quinquefolius affects the rhizosphere microbiome over time. Although forest and farmland soils may begin differently, these changes occur both in forest and farmland soils as the crop develops. The effects appear to be related to changes in soil factors, such as decreased pH and increased toxic compounds. As a result, the impact is negative for the crop, typically with decreases in potentially beneficial microbes and increases in potentially pathogenic microbes over the years of cultivation. However, it is not clear whether increased abundance of pathogens is a cause or a result of changes in other microbes in the soil.

5. Impacts of Ginseng on Rhizosphere Microbiome

The genotype of ginseng appears to affect the rhizosphere microbiome. Wang et al. [60] reported that the fungal micobiome was more affected than the bacterial microbiome when comparing the P. ginseng genotypes, Gaoli, common ginseng, Shizhu, and Biantiao. Rhizosphere fungal diversity was negatively correlated with rhizosphere bacterial diversity with Gaoli, common ginseng, and Shizhu. Biantiao had the lowest rhizosphere microbial diversity, which could be related to seeds of common, Gaoli, and Shizhu being planted directly and grown for six years, while Biantiao are grown for three years before being transplanted as seedlings. For bacteria, Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, and Verrucomicrobia were abundant in the rhizosphere with all ginseng types, but Acidobacteria were more abundant with Gaoli. At the genus level, the abundance of Bacillus was higher with Shizhu and Biantiao than common ginseng and Gaoli rhizospheres. For rhizospheric fungi, Basidiomycota, Ascomycota, and Zygomycota were most abundant with all ginseng genotypes, but the Ascomycota were more abundant and Zygomycota less abundant with Shizhu. At the genus level, Mortierella was more abundant with Biantiao, and the potential pathogens, Alternaria alternata and Cladosporium, were less abundant in the rhizosphere of Biantiao. The authors speculated that differences in the amount and composition of root exudates in the different ginseng genotypes may have been responsible.
The type of ginseng root exudates, such as hydrocarbons, organic acids/esters, phenolic acids, and ginsenosides [32], can have major impacts on the microbiome of the rhizosphere. Various hydrocarbons and organic acids/esters act both as nutrients maintaining the rhizosphere effect and as signals attracting or repelling soil bacteria and fungi [61]. An example would be P. ginseng root exudates that were chemotactic to the soft-rot bacterium Pseudomonas qessardii in the culture medium [62]. Among the organic acids in ginseng root exudates is citric acid [32], which is known in cucumber root exudates to induce biofilm formation and/or chemotaxis for the beneficial rhizobacteria, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, and Bacillus subtilis [63]. A root ginsenoside, Rg1, of P. notoginseng that is found in the rhizosphere causes ginseng root cell death, releasing cellobiose and d-galacturonic acid into the soil, and the addition of those compounds with Rg1 to soil increased populations of pathogens like Ilyonectria and decreased beneficial microorganisms like Pseudomonas and Streptomyces [64]. Li et al. [42] concluded that the microbial rhizosphere community of ginseng was different from that of other plants due to the types of compounds in ginseng roots exudates.
Ginsenoside saponins are important element of ginseng root exudates, and many saponins have selective antimicrobial activity in the soil altering the rhizosphere microbiome [61,65]. Adding the ginsenosides Rg1, Rb1, and Rh1 or a ginsenoside mixture into ginseng soil decreased populations of beneficial fungi, such as Acremonium, Mucor, and Ochroconis, but increased populations of pathogenic fungi, such as Alternaria, Cylindrocarpon, Gibberella, Phoma, and Fusarium [66]. Growth of Pythium irregulare, a root rot pathogen of ginseng, was stimulated by total ginsenosides or Rb1 but inhibited by F2 added to culture media, and dipping ginseng roots into a ginsenoside solution prior to planting delayed infection by P. irregulare [67]. Pythium irregulare produces extracellular glycosidases able to partially deglycosylate ginsenosides, and the level of deglycosylation activity strongly correlated with the virulence of twelve P. irregulare isolates [68]. Ginsenosides in culture media also suppressed growth of the non-pathogenic rhizosphere fungus, Trichoderma [28]. Growth of a Trichoderma isolate exposed to protopanaxatriol type ginsenosides in culture was inhibited, perhaps related to the very limited ability of the fungus to deglycosylate ginsenosides compared to the root rot pathogens, I. robusta and I. leucospermi [69]. The growth of many plant pathogenic fungi that do not have ginseng in their host range, Aspergillus nidulans, Cladosporium fulvum, Fusarium oxysporum, Alternaria solani, and A. porri, were inhibited by both protopanaxadiol and protopanaxatriol type ginsenosides, but only the protopanaxadiol ginsenoside fraction inhibited growth of the ginseng pathogen, I. mors-panacis, which may be due to its limited ability to deglycosylate ginsenosides [70].
The adaptation of microbes to the ginseng rhizosphere is indicated by the many reports of ginseng soil bacteria and fungi that can deglycosylate ginsenosides, e.g., [71,72,73,74]. Park et al. [75] noted that there is a large variety of ginseng soil microbes with glycosidases that can remove sugars from ginsenosides, including the fungi Absidia coerulea, Acremonium strictum, Curvularia lunata, Fusarium sacchari, Rhizopus stolonifer, and Paecilomyces bainier, and the bacteria Bacillus megaterium, Burkholderia pyrrocinia, Caulobacter leidyia, Intrasporangium sp., Microbacterium sp., and Sphingomonas echinoides. In addition to deglycoslyation reducing the toxicity of ginsenosides, removal of the attached sugars may also benefit microbes by providing a food source. For example, Pseudomonas plecoglossicida isolated from P. quinquefolius soil appeared to use ginsenosides as a nutrient in culture, resulting in higher populations in minimal medium when root ginsenoside extract was included in the medium [76]. Yousef and Bernards [77] also reported that P. irregulare was able to use the sugars hydrolyzed from ginsenosides as carbon source. It was proposed that ginsenosides were the main substances in root exudates driving changes in the soil microbiome of P. notoginseng due to the ginsenosides in root exudates acting as a carbon source for some members of the soil microbiome stimulating their growth while inhibiting others [29]. These studies strongly suggest that the microbiome around ginseng roots have enhanced or reduced growth due to ginsenosides released by the roots that is related to their ability to deglycosylate them to detoxify them and/or assimilate sugars attached to them.
Another major class of ginseng root exudates that appear to impact the soil microbiome are phenolic root exudates. They are believed to have greater impacts on rhizosphere microbes than other exudate compounds, such as sugars and amino acids [78]. Applying the ginseng root phenols, gallic acid, salicylic acid, 3-phenylpropionic acid, and benzoic acid to soil increased fungal richness but decreased fungal diversity in soil continuously cropped with ginseng for 6 years [57]. The phenolic acid soil treatment also enhanced the abundance of plant pathogens, such as Fusarium, Gibberella, and Ilyonectria, which may explain why those compounds increased root rot disease. Another example is the phenols, benzoic acid, diisobutyl phthalate, diisobutyl succinate, palmitic acid, or 2,2-bis-(4-hydroxyphenyl) identified in the P. ginseng rhizosphere and root exudates, that were used to treat soil, which also resulted in reduced diversity of bacteria and fungi compared to a control [42]. Adding ferulic acid, syringic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, p-coumaric acid, or vanillic acid to culture medium decreased mycelium growth and spore production of the pathogen Fusarium oxysporum [79]. Adding a stem and leaf ginseng extract high in phenolics to the culture medium inhibited the growth of the bacteria, Bacillus cereus, Salmonella enteritidis, Escherichia coli, and Listeria monocytogenes [80]. Accumulation of diisobutyl phthalate in P. ginseng soil that likely came from root exudates and decaying roots correlated with declines in populations of Arthrobacter, Burkholderia, Rhodanobacter, and Sphingobacterium in soil [81]. Thus, many studies have shown that a variety of ginseng phenolic acid root exudates can have major impacts on both rhizosphere communities of fungi and bacteria, mostly by reducing their diversity and in some cases shifting towards greater pathogen abundance.

6. Impacts of Rhizosphere Microbiome on Ginseng

One way that microbes in the rhizosphere can benefit ginseng is to enhance the plant’s access to nutrients. Microbes can acquire iron through the secretion of siderophores, which are secondary metabolites that bind iron in the environment and deliver it to cells via specific receptors [82]. Hussein and Joo [83] identified 23 siderophore-producing fungal isolates in the ginseng rhizosphere with a Penicillium isolate showing the strongest activity, but isolates of Aspergillus versicolor, Mortierella turficola, F. oxysporum, Metarhizium anisopliae, Rhodosporidium toruloides, and Trichoderma harzianum also produced siderophores. Farh et al. [69] identified 7 bacterial isolates as strong producers and 1 isolate as a weak producer of siderophores out of 12 isolates from P. ginseng rhizosphere. Many other ginseng rhizosphere bacteria have been found to produce siderophores, such as the P. ginseng rhizosphere bacterium, Mesorhizobium panacihumi, whose siderophores bound excess iron to reduce its toxicity, thus providing ginseng with heavy metal resistance [84]. Siderophore production appears to be relatively common among ginseng rhizosphere microorganisms and may help both in scavenging iron when levels are too low or sequestering it when levels are too high.
Another nutrient whose solubility can be affected by microorganisms is phosphate [85]. Twenty-two strains of bacteria from the rhizosphere of P. ginseng had phosphate solubilizing activity in culture, with an isolate of Burkholderia vietnamiensis showing the highest activity whose phosphate solubilization ability was related to gluconic acid production [86]. Another P. ginseng rhizosphere bacterium, P. fluorescens RAF15, showed phosphate solubilizing activity that was also related to gluconic acid production [87]. Farh et al. [69] identified 5 bacterial isolates as strong and two isolates as weak phosphate solubilizers among 12 isolates from the P. ginseng rhizosphere. Hussein and Joo [83] obtained 60 bacterial and 14 fungal isolates from the rhizosphere of P. ginseng with phosphate solubilization activity. Bacteria were more effective than fungi in phosphate solubilization with the most effective bacteria being P. fluorescens and Azotobacter chroococcum and the most effective fungus being a Penicillium species. Thus, phosphate solubilisation appears to be a widespread trait among rhizosphere bacteria and fungi of ginseng, but the effectiveness of different microbes can vary considerably.
Another commonly reported benefit to ginseng provided by rhizosphere microorganisms is suppression of plant diseases. Rhizosphere bacteria and fungi can reduce plant diseases through direct antagonism of soil-borne pathogens, as well as by triggering resistance in the plant against pathogens, such as by induced systemic resistance (ISR) [88]. In ISR, priming of defenses typically occurs by a treatment prior to infection, resulting in faster and stronger triggered resistance when a pathogen infects [89]. One example of direct antagonism is a B. subtilis isolate from P. ginseng soil that significantly reduced lesion numbers caused by Colletotrichum panacicola, possibly due to direct inhibition of the fungus on ginseng leaves, as it inhibited the fungus in culture likely due to antibiotic production [90]. Out of 113 fungal isolates from rhizosphere soil of P. notoginseng, 13 showed possible antibiotic production with zones of inhibition against one or more of the ginseng pathogens, Alternaria panax, F. oxysporum, F. solani, and Phoma herbarum [39]. Guo et al. [91] examined 574 bacterial isolates from P. notoginseng rhizosphere and found 33 isolates showing inhibition of the fungal pathogens, Cylindrocarpon didynum, F. solani, Phytophthora cactorum, P. herbarum, and R. solani, in culture most likely related to antibiotic production, such as lipopeptides produced by B. subtilis, which was the most antagonistic. Another example is Sun et al. [92] who screened 169 bacterial strains from rhizospheric soil of P. ginseng and found that B. amyloliquefaciens showed antagonistic activity against Botrytis cinerea in culture due to antibiotic production, as well as the ability to reduce the severity of gray mold foliar lesions. However, induction of host resistance is also possible with ginseng rhizosphere microbes. A B. amyloliquefaciens strain from soil of wild P. ginseng induced resistance against P. cactorum, which causes foliar blight and root rot, when applied as soil drench that was related to a significant up-regulation of the ISR-related defense genes, PgPR10, PgPR5, and PgCAT [93]. Although the majority of the work in this area involves examining rhizosphere microbes that directly inhibit pathogens of ginseng in culture and then sometimes testing them on infected plants, there appears to be considerable scope for more studies on inducing resistance mechanisms in ginseng by non-pathogenic soil bacteria and fungi, considering how often this has been shown in other plant species [94].
Ginseng plants can benefit from rhizosphere microbes producing phytohormones, such as indole acetic acid (IAA), resulting in increased plant growth [95]. From P. ginseng soil, 50 of 105 rhizobacterial isolates and 11 of 17 rhizosphere fungal isolates exhibited IAA production in vitro with isolates of P. fluorescens, Rhodobacter, Burkholderia, Pseudomonas putida, and A. chroococcum producing the highest levels [83]. Twelve bacterial strains were isolated from the rhizosphere of diseased P. ginseng roots that were positive for IAA production in the presence of the IAA precursor, L-tryptophan, with the highest production by Arthrobacter nicotinovorans [69]. This trait appears to be relatively common among ginseng soil bacteria, with reports including IAA production by Rhizobium panacihumi, Paenibacillus panacihumi, M. panacihumi, Duganella ginsengisoli, and others [84,96,97,98]. Although common, IAA production appears to be less prevalent in the rhizosphere microbiome of ginseng than phosphate solubilization, at 65% versus 82% for fungal isolates and 48% versus 57% for bacterial isolates obtained from the ginseng rhizosphere [83].
While most research on the benefits of rhizospheric microbes has concentrated on iron and phosphate nutrition, disease control, and auxins, ginseng rhizosphere microbes can provide other benefits to the plant. An example would be B. amyloliquefaciens strain TB6 from the rhizosphere of P. ginseng, which promoted root growth and possessed 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase activity [99]. ACC deaminase can promote plant growth by cleaving the ethylene precursor ACC, thus lowering levels of stress-related ethylene that can inhibit growth [16]. There are also examples of ginseng rhizosphere microbes that promote ginseng growth where the mechanism has yet to be examined, such as Brevundimonas terrae, which promoted P. ginseng growth [100].

7. Conclusions

Like other plant microbiomes, the microbiome of the ginseng rhizosphere is greatly influenced by both plant genotype and environmental factors. Cultivation practices are a significant factor, as ginseng production involves fumigation, tillage, mulching, pesticides, shading, fertilizing, and harvesting. Many of those practices attempt to mimic the natural environment of ginseng as a cool weather hardwood forest understory plant. Compared to wild ginseng plants, cultivation involves a higher plant density, more chemical inputs, and greater soil disturbances. However, while forest and farmland soils may initially differ in their microbiomes, there are many similarities in the effect of ginseng growth on the rhizosphere microbiome over time. A decrease in soil pH negatively affecting rhizospheric bacteria and a shift in rhizospheric fungi with pathogens becoming more dominant over time appears to be common. Despite studies using different locations, collection times, and methods of assessment, there are many similarities between the types of rhizosphere microbes of P. notoginseng, P. ginseng, and P. quinquefolius, indicating that the complex assortment of compounds exuded by roots of Panax species have a unique impact on the microbes around them, selecting for a set of microbes more adapted to those compounds. While high-throughput sequencing has given a better idea about the diversity of the ginseng rhizosphere microbiome, more work is needed on studying microbes isolated from the ginseng rhizosphere. A quick survey of the literature by the author identified over 20 publications describing new bacterial species that were isolated from ginseng soil, mostly in the last 15 years, with little to no description of their effects on the plants. There are many reports of ginseng rhizosphere microbes providing benefits to the plant by a variety of mechanisms that can be exploited to reduce fertilizer and pesticide inputs, so continuing to isolate and screen ginseng soil microbes for their impacts on ginseng is important. It is likely that many more novel ginseng rhizosphere microorganisms, including many with beneficial traits and many new species, will be found. The study of the ginseng rhizosphere microbiome has only begun.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Compant, S.; Samad, A.; Faist, H.; Sessitsch, A. A review on the plant microbiome: Ecology, functions, and emerging trends in microbial application. J. Adv. Res. 2019, 19, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Solaiman, Z.M.; Anawar, H.M. Rhizosphere microbes interactions in medicinal plants. In Plant-Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) and Medicinal Plants; Egamberdieva, D., Shrivastava, S., Varma, A., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2015; Volume 42, pp. 19–41. [Google Scholar]
  3. Smalla, K.; Sessitsch, A.; Hartmann, A. The rhizosphere: Soil compartment influenced by the root. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2006, 56, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Al-Awadhi, H.; Dashti, N.; Khanafer, M.; Al-Mailem, D.; Ali, N.; Radwan, S. Bias problems in culture-independent analysis of environmental bacterial communities: A representative study on hydrocarbonoclastic bacteria. SpringerPlus 2013, 2, 369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Su, C.; Lei, L.; Duan, Y.; Zhang, K.Q.; Yang, J. Culture-independent methods for studying environmental microorganisms: Methods, application, and perspective. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 93, 993–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Rincon-Florez, V.A.; Carvalhais, L.C.; Schenk, P.M. Culture-independent molecular tools for soil and rhizosphere microbiology. Diversity 2013, 5, 581–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, S.; Zheng, X.; Xia, H.; Shi, D.; Fan, J.; Wang, P.; Yan, Z.; Hong, Y. Archaeal community variation in the Qinhuangdao coastal aquaculture zone revealed by high-throughput sequencing. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0218611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nilsson, R.H.; Anslan, S.; Bahram, M.; Wurzbacher, C.; Baldrian, P.; Tedersoo, L. Mycobiome diversity: High-throughput sequencing and identification of fungi. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 17, 95–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pereira, P.; Ibáñez, F.; Rosenblueth, M.; Etcheverry, M.; Martínez-Romero, E. Analysis of the bacterial diversity associated with the roots of maize (Zea mays L.) through culture-dependent and culture-independent methods. ISRN Ecol. 2011, 2011, 938546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Schreiter, S.; Ding, G.C.; Heuer, H.; Neumann, G.; Sandmann, M.; Grosch, R.; Kropf, S.; Smalla, K. Effect of the soil type on the microbiome in the rhizosphere of field-grown lettuce. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ling, N.; Deng, K.; Song, Y.; Wu, Y.; Zhao, J.; Raza, W.; Huang, Q.; Shen, Q. Variation of rhizosphere bacterial community in watermelon continuous mono-cropping soil by long-term application of a novel bioorganic fertilizer. Microbiol. Res. 2014, 169, 570–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Schlaeppi, K.; Dombrowski, N.; Oter, R.G.; Themaat, E.V.L.; Schulze-Lefert, P. Quantitative divergence of the bacterial root microbiota in Arabidopsis thaliana relatives. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 585–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Forster, S.M. The role of microorganisms in aggregate formation and soil stabilization: Types of aggregation. Arid Soil Res. Rehabil. 1990, 4, 85–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Morgan, J.A.W.; Bending, G.D.; White, P.J. Biological costs and benefits to plant–microbe interactions in the rhizosphere. J. Exp. Bot. 2005, 56, 1729–1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Van, D.E.S.; Hulten, M.V.; Pozo, M.J.; Czechowski, T.; Udvardi, M.K.; Pieterse, C.M.J.; Ton, J. Priming of plant innate immunity by rhizobacteria and β-aminobutyric acid: Differences and similarities in regulation. New Phytol. 2009, 183, 419–431. [Google Scholar]
  16. Glick, B.R.; Cheng, Z.; Czarny, J.; Duan, J. Promotion of plant growth by ACC deaminase-producing soil bacteria. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2007, 119, 329–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Persons, W.S. American Ginseng: Green Gold; Bright Mountain Books: Asheville, NC, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  18. Wang, T.; Guo, R.; Zhou, G.; Zhou, X.; Kou, Z.; Sui, F.; Li, C.; Tang, L.; Wang, Z. Traditional uses, botany, phytochemistry, pharmacology and toxicology of Panax notoginseng (Burk.) F.H. Chen: A review. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2016, 188, 234–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Westerveld, S. Ginseng Production in Ontario; Queen’s Printer for Ontario: Toronto, ON, Canada, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  20. Guyonnet, J.P.; Cantarelm, A.A.M.; Simon, L.; Haichar, F.Z. Root exudation rate as functional trait involved in plant nutrient-use strategy classification. Ecol. Evol. 2018, 8, 8573–8581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Fierer, N.; Jackson, R.B. The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 626–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Abuarab, M.E.; El-Mogy, M.M.; Hassan, A.M.; Abdeldaym, E.A.; Abdelkader, N.H.; El-Sawy, M.B.I. The effects of root aeration and different soil conditioners on the nutritional values, yield, and water productivity of potato in clay loam soil. Agronomy 2019, 9, 418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Veen, G.F.C.; Fry, E.L.; Hooven, T.F.; Kardol, P.; Morrien, E.; De Long, J.R. The role of plant litter in driving plant-soil feedbacks. Front. Environ. Sci. 2019, 7, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sun, H.; Wang, Q.-X.; Liu, N.; Li, L.; Zhang, C.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, Y. Effects of different leaf litters on the physicochemical properties and bacterial communities in Panax ginseng-growing soil. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2017, 111, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ibekwe, A.M.; Papiernik, S.K.; Gan, J.; Yates, S.R.; Yang, C.H.; Crowley, D.E. Impact of soil fumigants on soil microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67, 3245–3257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Xia, P.; Guo, H.; Zhao, H.; Jiao, J.; Deyholos, M.K.; Yan, X.; Liu, Y.; Liang, Z. Optimal fertilizer application for Panax notoginseng and effect of soil water on root rot disease and saponin contents. J. Ginseng Res. 2016, 40, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Blasdent, J.; Chenu, C.; Balabane, M. Relationship of soil organic matter dynamics to physical protection and tillage. Soil Tillage Res. 2000, 53, 215–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nicol, R.W.; Yousef, L.; Traquair, J.A.; Bernards, M.A. Ginsenosides stimulate the growth of soilborne pathogens of American ginseng. Phytochemistry 2003, 64, 257–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Luo, L.F.; Yang, L.; Yan, Z.X.; Jiang, B.B.; Li, S.; Huang, H.C.; Liu, Y.X.; Zhu, S.S.; Yang, M. Ginsenosides in root exudates of Panax notoginseng drive the change of soil microbiota through carbon source different utilization. Plant Soil 2020, 455, 139–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, Y.; Huang, X.F.; Ding, W.L. Autotoxicity of Panax ginseng rhizosphere and non-rhizosphere soil extracts on early seedlings growth and identification of chemicals. Allelopathy J. 2011, 28, 145–154. [Google Scholar]
  31. Li, Z.B.; Zhou, R.J.; Xie, Y.J.; Fu, J.F. Allelopathic effects of phenolic compounds of ginseng root rhizosphere on Cylindrocarpon destructans. J. Appl. Ecol. 2016, 27, 3616–3622. [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhang, A.H.; Peng, H.L.; Lei, F.J.; Zhang, L.X. Extraction and identification of ginseng root exudates. J. Northwest Univ. 2014, 42, 191–196. [Google Scholar]
  33. Li, Y.; Huang, X.F.; Ding, W.L. Effects of nutrient deficiency on principal components of ginseng root exudates. J. Appl. Ecol. 2008, 19, 1688–1693. [Google Scholar]
  34. Wu, Z.; Hao, Z.; Zeng, Y.; Guo, L.; Huang, L.; Chen, B. Molecular characterization of microbial communities in the rhizosphere soils and roots of diseased and healthy Panax notoginseng. Antonie. Leeuw. Int. J. 2015, 108, 1059–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Fan, Z.Y.; Miao, C.P.; Qiao, X.G.; Zheng, Y.K.; Chen, H.H.; Chen, Y.W.; Xu, L.H.; Zhao, L.X.; Guan, H.L. Diversity, distribution, and antagonistic activities of rhizobacteria of Panax notoginseng. J. Ginseng Res. 2016, 40, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Tan, Y.; Cui, Y.; Li, H.; Kuang, A.; Li, X.; Wei, Y.; Ji, X. Diversity and composition of rhizospheric soil and root endogenous bacteria in Panax notoginseng during continuous cropping practices. J. Basic Microbiol. 2017, 57, 337–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Tan, Y.; Cui, Y.; Li, H.; Kuang, A.; Li, X.; Wei, Y.; Ji, X. Rhizospheric soil and root endogenous fungal diversity and composition in response to continuous Panax notoginseng cropping practices. Microbiol. Res. 2017, 194, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Miao, C.P.; Mi, Q.L.; Qiao, X.G.; Xin, G.; Zheng, Y.K.; Chen, Y.W.; Xu, L.H.; Guan, H.L.; Zhao, L. Rhizospheric fungi of Panax notoginseng: Diversity and antagonism to host phytopathogens. J. Ginseng Res. 2016, 40, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Chernov, T.I.; Tkhakakhova, A.K.; Ivanova, E.A.; Kutovaya, O.V.; Turusov, V.I. Seasonal dynamics of the microbiome of chernozems of the long-term agrochemical experiment in Kamennaya steppe. Eurasian Soil Sci. 2015, 48, 1349–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xiao, C.; Yang, L.; Zhang, L.; Liu, C.; Han, M. Effects of cultivation ages and modes on microbial diversity in the rhizosphere soil of Panax ginseng. J. Ginseng Res. 2016, 40, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Nguyen, N.L.; Kim, Y.J.; Hoang, V.A.; Subramaniyam, S.; Kang, J.P.; Kang, C.H.; Yang, D.C. Bacterial diversity and community structure in Korean ginseng field soil are shifted by cultivation time. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0155055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Li, Y.; Ying, Y.; Ding, W. Dynamics of Panax ginseng rhizospheric soil microbial community and their metabolic function. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2014, 2014, 160373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Fang, X.; Wang, H.; Zhao, L.; Wang, M.; Sun, M. Diversity and structure of the rhizosphere microbial communities of wild and cultivated ginseng. BMC Microbiol. 2022, 22, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tong, A.Z.; Liu, W.; Liu, Q.; Xia, G.Q.; Zhu, J.Y. Diversity and composition of the Panax ginseng rhizosphere microbiome in various cultivation modes and ages. BMC Microbiol. 2021, 21, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Jiang, J.; Yu, M.; Hou, R.; Li, L.; Ren, X.; Jiao, C.; Yang, L.; Xu, H. Changes in the soil microbial community are associated with the occurrence of Panax quinquefolius L. root rot diseases. Plant Soil. 2019, 438, 143–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Liu, N.; Shao, C.; Sun, H.; Liu, Z.; Guan, Y.; Wu, L.; Zhang, L.; Pan, X.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi biofertilizer improves American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius L.) growth under the continuous cropping regime. Geoderma 2020, 363, 114155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Dong, L.; Xu, J.; Zhang, L.; Yang, J.; Liao, B.; Li, X.; Chen, S. High-throughput sequencing technology reveals that continuous cropping of American ginseng results in changes in the microbial community in arable soil. Chin. Med. 2017, 12, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Samur, I.D. Effects of Biostimulants on Creeping Bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera) and Post-Harvest Debris of American Ginseng (Panax quinquefolius) on Soil Microbiology and Chemistry. Master’s Thesis, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  49. Reeleder, R.D.; Capell, B.B.; Roy, R.C.; Grohs, R.; Zilkey, B. Suppressive effect of bark mulch on weeds and fungal diseases in ginseng (Panax quinquefolius L.). Allelopathy J. 2004, 13, 211–231. [Google Scholar]
  50. Park, Y.H.; Kim, Y.C.; Park, S.U.; Lim, H.S.; Kim, J.B.; Cho, B.K.; Bae, H. Age-dependent distribution of fungal endophytes in Panax ginseng roots cultivated in Korea. J. Ginseng Res. 2012, 36, 327–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Nannipieri, P.; Ascher, J.; Ceccherini, M.T.; Landi, L.; Pietramellara, G.; Renella, G. Microbial diversity and soil functions. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2003, 54, 655–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhu, S.; Vivanco, J.M.; Manter, D.K. Nitrogen fertilizer rate affects root exudation, the rhizosphere microbiome and nitrogen-use-efficiency of maize. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2016, 107, 324–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Tian, G.L.; Bi, Y.M.; Jiao, X.L.; Zhang, X.M.; Li, J.F.; Niu, F.B.; Gao, W.W. Application of vermicompost and biochar suppresses Fusarium root rot of replanted American ginseng. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 105, 6977–6991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Stathers, R.J.; Bailey, W.G. Energy receipt and partitioning in a ginseng shade canopy and mulch environment. Agric. For. Meteorol. 1986, 37, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wang, X.; Guo, X.; Hou, L.; Zhang, J.; Hu, J.; Zhang, F.; Mao, J.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, C.; Han, J.; et al. A comparative study of bacterial diversity based on effects of three different shade shed types in the rhizosphere of Panax quiquefolium L. Peer J. 2022, 10, e12807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. He, C.; Wang, R.; Ding, W.; Li, Y. Effects of cultivation soils and ages on microbiome in the rhizosphere soil of Panax ginseng. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2022, 174, 104397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Li, Z.; Fu, J.; Zhou, R.; Wang, D. Effects of phenolic acids from ginseng rhizosphere on soil fungi structure, richness and diversity in consecutive monoculturing of ginseng. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2018, 25, 1788–1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Bao, Y.; Qi, B.; Huang, W.; Liu, B.; Li, Y. The fungal community in non-rhizosphere soil of Panax ginseng are driven by different cultivation modes and increased cultivation periods. Peer J. 2020, 8, e9930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhang, J.; Fan, S.; Qin, J.; Dai, J.; Zhao, F.; Gao, L.; Lian, X.; Shang, W.; Xu, X.; Hu, X. Changes in the microbiome in the soil of an American ginseng continuous plantation. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 572199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, H.; Fang, X.; Wu, H.; Cai, X.; Xiao, H. Effects of plant cultivars on the structure of bacterial and fungal communities associated with ginseng. Plant Soil. 2021, 465, 143–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Bais, H.P.; Weir, T.L.; Perry, L.G.; Gilroy, S.; Vivanco, J.M. The role of root exudates in rhizosphere interactions with plants and other organisms. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2006, 57, 233–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Lei, F.; Fu, J.; Zhou, R.; Wang, D.; Zhang, A.; Ma, W.; Zhang, L. Chemotactic response of ginseng bacterial soft-rot to ginseng root exudates. Saudi J. Biol Sci. 2017, 24, 1620–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhang, N.; Wang, D.; Liu, Y.; Li, S.; Shen, Q.; Zhang, R. Effects of different plant root exudates and their organic acid components on chemotaxis, biofilm formation and colonization by beneficial rhizosphere-associated bacterial strains. Plant Soil. 2014, 374, 689–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Xu, Y.; Yang, M.; Yin, R.; Wang, L.; Luo, L.; Zi, B.; Liu, H.; Huang, H.; Liu, Y.; He, X.; et al. Autotoxin Rg1 induces degradation of root cell walls and aggravates root rot by modifying the rhizospheric microbiome. Microbiol. Spectr. 2021, 9, e01679-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Avato, P.; Bucci, R.; Tava, A.; Vitali, C.; Rosato, A.; Bialy, Z.; Jurzysta, M. Antimicrobial activity of saponins from Medicago sp.: Structure-activity relationship. Phytother. Res. 2006, 20, 454–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Li, Y.; Dai, S.; Wang, B.; Jiang, Y.; Ma, Y.; Pan, L.; Wu, K.; Huang, X.; Zhang, J.; Cai, Z.; et al. Autotoxic ginsenoside disrupts soil fungal microbiomes by stimulating potentially pathogenic microbes. Appl. Environ Microbiol. 2020, 86, e00130-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Ivanov, D.A.; Georgakopoulos, J.R.C.; Bernards, M.A. The chemoattractant potential of ginsenosides in the ginseng—Pythium irregulare pathosystem. Phytochemistry 2016, 122, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Ivanov, D.A.; Bernards, M.A. Ginsenosidases and the pathogenicity of Pythium irregulare. Phytochemistry 2012, 78, 44–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Farh, M.E.A.; Kim, Y.J.; Sukweenadhi, J.; Singh, P.; Yang, D.C. Aluminium resistant, plant growth promoting bacteria induce overexpression of aluminium stress related genes in Arabidopsis thaliana and increase the ginseng tolerance against aluminium stress. Microbiol. Res. 2017, 200, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zhao, X.; Gao, J.; Song, C.; Fang, Q.; Wang, N.; Zhao, T.; Liu, D.; Zhou, Y. Fungal sensitivity to and enzymatic deglycosylation of ginsenosides. Phytochemistry 2012, 78, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ko, S.R.; Suzuki, Y.; Suzuki, K.; Choi, K.J.; Cho, B.G. Marked production of ginsenosides Rd, F2, Rg3, and compound K by enzymatic method. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2007, 55, 1522–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Kim, E.M.; Kim, J.; Seo, J.H.; Park, J.S.; Kim, D.H.; Kim, B.G. Identification and characterization of the Rhizobium sp. strain GIN611 glycoside oxidoreductase resulting in the deglycosylation of ginsenosides. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 242–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Yu, S.; Zhou, X.; Li, F.; Xu, C.; Zheng, F.; Li, J.; Zhao, H.; Dai, Y.; Liu, S.; Feng, Y. Microbial transformation of ginsenoside Rb1, Re and Rg1 and its contribution to the improved anti-inflammatory activity of ginseng. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Siddiqi, M.Z.; Huq, M.A.; Im, W.T. Isolation, characterisation and genome analysis of a novel ginsenosides hydrolysing bacterium Ginsengibacter hankyongi gen. nov., sp. nov. isolated from soil. Antonie Leeuwenhoek Int. J. 2021, 114, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Park, C.S.; Yoo, M.H.; Noh, K.H.; Oh, D.K. Biotransformation of ginsenosides by hydrolyzing the sugar moieties of ginsenosides using microbial glycosidases. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 87, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Behdarvandi, B. The Relationship of Ilyonectria to Replant Disease of American Ginseng (Panax quinquefolius). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  77. Yousef, L.F.; Bernards, M.A. In vitro metabolism of ginsenosides by the ginseng root pathogen Pythium irregulare. Phytochemistry 2006, 67, 1740–1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Badri, D.V.; Chaparro, J.M.; Zhang, R.; Shen, Q.; Vivanco, J.M. Application of natural blends of phytochemicals derived from the root exudates of Arabidopsis to the soil reveal that phenolic-related compounds predominantly modulate the soil microbiome. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 4502–4512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Zhao, Y.M.; Cheng, Y.X.; Ma, Y.N.; Chen, C.J.; Xu, F.R.; Dong, X. Role of phenolic acids from the rhizosphere soils of Panax notoginseng as a double-edge sword in the occurrence of root-rot disease. Molecules 2018, 23, 819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Lee, K.A.; Kim, W.J.; Kim, H.J.; Kim, K.T.; Paik, H.D. Antibacterial activity of ginseng (Panax ginseng C. A. Meyer) stems-leaves extract produced by subcritical water extraction. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 48, 947–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Dong, L.; Xu, J.; Li, Y.; Fang, H.; Niu, W.; Li, X.; Zang, Y.; Ding, W.; Chen, S. Manipulation of microbial community in the rhizosphere alleviates the replanting issues in Panax ginseng. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2018, 125, 64–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kramer, J.; Özkaya, Ö.; Kümmerli, R. Bacterial siderophores in community and host interactions. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 18, 152–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Hussein, K.A.; Joo, J.H. Isolation and characterization of rhizomicrobial isolates for phosphate solubilization and indole acetic acid production. J. Korean Soc. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2015, 58, 847–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Huo, Y.; Kang, J.P.; Ahn, J.C.; Kim, Y.; Piao, C.H.; Yang, D.U.; Yang, D.C. Siderophore-producing rhizobacteria reduce heavy metal-induced oxidative stress in Panax ginseng Meyer. J. Ginseng Res. 2020, 45, 218–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ponmurugan, P.; Gopi, C. In vitro production of growth regulators and phosphatase activity by phosphate solubilizing bacteria. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2006, 5, 348–350. [Google Scholar]
  86. Park, K.H.; Lee, O.M.; Jung, H.I.; Jeong, J.H.; Jeong, Y.D.; Hwarg, D.Y.; Lee, C.Y.; Son, H.J. Rapid solubilization of insoluble phosphate by a novel environmental stress-tolerant Burkholderia vietnamiensis M6 isolated from ginseng rhizospheric soil. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 86, 947–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Park, K.H.; Lee, C.Y.; Son, H.J. Mechanism of insoluble phosphate solubilization by Pseudomonas fluorescens RAF15 isolated from ginseng rhizosphere and its plant growth-promoting activities. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2009, 49, 222–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Whipps, J.M. Microbial interactions and biocontrol in the rhizosphere. J. Exp. Bot. 2001, 52, 487–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Conrath, U.; Beckers, G.J.M.; Langenbach, C.J.G.; Jaskiewicz, M.R. Priming for enhanced defense. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2015, 53, 97–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ryu, H.; Park, H.; Suh, D.S.; Jung, G.H.; Park, K.; Lee, B.D. Biological control of Colletotrichum panacicola on Panax ginseng by Bacillus subtilis HK-CSM-1. J. Ginseng Res. 2014, 38, 215–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Guo, R.; Liu, X.; Li, S.; Miao, Z. In vitro inhibition of fungal root-rot pathogens of Panax notoginseng by rhizobacteria. Plant Pathol. J. 2009, 25, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Sun, Z.; Yang, L.; Han, M.; Han, Z.; Yang, L.; Cheng, L.; Yang, X.; Lv, Z. Biological control ginseng grey mold and plant colonization by antagonistic bacteria isolated from rhizospheric soil of Panax ginseng Meyer. Biocontrol 2019, 138, 104048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Lee, B.D.; Dutta, S.; Ryu, H.; Yoo, S.J.; Suh, D.S.; Park, K. Induction of systemic resistance in Panax ginseng against Phytophthora cactorum by native Bacillus amyloliquefaciens HK34. J. Ginseng Res. 2015, 39, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Choudhary, D.K.; Prakash, A.; Johri, B.N. Induced systemic resistance (ISR) in plants: Mechanism of action. Indian J. Microbiol. 2007, 47, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Ahmed, A.; Hasnain, S. Auxins as one of the factors of plant growth improvement by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Pol. J. Microbiol. 2014, 63, 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Zhang, J.; Kim, Y.J.; Hoang, V.A.; Nguyen, N.L.; Wang, C.; Kang, J.P.; Wang, D.; Yang, D.C. Duganella ginsengisoli sp. nov., isolated from ginseng soil. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2016, 66, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Kim, C.G.; Kang, J.P.; Huo, Y.; Chokkalingam, M.; Yeon-Ju, K.; Dong-Hyun, K.; Deok-Chun, Y. Paenibacillus panacihumi sp. nov., a potential plant growth-promoting bacterium isolated from ginseng-cultivated soil. Arch. Microbiol. 2018, 200, 1049–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Kang, J.P.; Huo, Y.; Kim, Y.J.; Ahn, J.C.; Hurh, J.; Yang, D.U.; Yang, D.C. Rhizobium panacihumi sp. nov., an isolate from ginseng-cultivated soil, as a potential plant growth promoting bacterium. Arch. Microbiol. 2019, 201, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Tian, L.; Shi, S.; Ji, L.; Nasir, F.; Ma, L.; Tian, C. Effect of the biocontrol bacterium Bacillus amyloliquefaciens on the rhizosphere in ginseng plantings. Int. Microbiol. 2018, 21, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Sun, Z.; Yang, L.; Zhang, L.; Han, M. An investigation of Panax ginseng Meyer growth promotion and the biocontrol potential of antagonistic bacteria against ginseng black spot. J. Ginseng Res. 2018, 42, 304–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table
Table 1. Examples of studies of bacterial and fungal rhizobiome diversity in P. notoginseng. The first most dominant phylum followed by the second and third most dominant phyla are listed with common genera within each phylum in parentheses when mentioned.
Table 1. Examples of studies of bacterial and fungal rhizobiome diversity in P. notoginseng. The first most dominant phylum followed by the second and third most dominant phyla are listed with common genera within each phylum in parentheses when mentioned.
FirstSecondThirdRef.
Actinobacteria
(Actinoallomurus, Arthrobacter)		Bacteroidetes
(Dyadobacter, Pedobacter)		Proteobacteria
(Aquicella, Pseudomonas, Methylophilus, Pseudolabrys)		[34]
Firmicutes
(Bacillus, Paenibacillus, Lysinibacillus)		Actinobacteria
(Arthrobacter, Streptomyces)		Proteobacteria
(Burkholderia, Cupriavidus, Pseudomonas, Dyella)		[35]
Proteobacteria
(Pseudomonas, Rhodoplanes)		Acidobacteria
(Candidatus solibacter)		Actinobacteria
(Streptomyces)		[36]
Ascomycota
(Fusarium, Dendryphion, Trichoderma)		Basidiomycota (Geminibasidium, Cryptococcus)Zygomycota
(Mortierella)		[34]
Ascomycota
(Emericella, Fusarium, Plectosphaerella, Mycocentrospora)		Zygomycota
(Mortierella)		Basidiomycota
(Amanita)		[37]
Zygomycota
(Mortierella)		Ascomycota
(Fusarium, Phoma)		Basidiomycota
(Cryptococcus)		[38]
Table
Table 2. Examples of studies of bacterial and fungal rhizobiome diversity in P. ginseng. The first most dominant phylum followed by the second and third most dominant phyla are listed with common genera within each phylum in parentheses when mentioned.
Table 2. Examples of studies of bacterial and fungal rhizobiome diversity in P. ginseng. The first most dominant phylum followed by the second and third most dominant phyla are listed with common genera within each phylum in parentheses when mentioned.
FirstSecondThirdRef.
Proteobacteria
(Sphingomonas, Paralcaligenes)		Actinobacteria
(Frigoribacterium)		Fusobacteria[40]
Proteobacteria
(Pseudomonas, Sphingomonas, Pseudolabrys)		AcidobacteriaActinobacteria[41]
Proteobacteria
(Pseudomonas, Burkholderia)		Firmicutes
(Bacillus)		-[42]
ActinobacteriaChloroflexiFirmicutes[43]
ProteobacteriaActinobacteriaAcidobacteria/Chloroflexi[44]
Ascomycota
(Fusarium, Tetrachaetum)		Basidiomycota
(Cryptococcus)		Zygomycota
(Mortierella)		[40]
Ascomycota
(Fusarium, Alternaria)		Basidiomycota-[43]
AscomycotaZygomycotaBasidiomycota[44]
Table
Table 3. Examples of studies of bacterial and fungal rhizobiome diversity in P. quinquefolius. The first most dominant phylum followed by the second and third most dominant phyla are listed with common genera within each phylum in parentheses when mentioned.
Table 3. Examples of studies of bacterial and fungal rhizobiome diversity in P. quinquefolius. The first most dominant phylum followed by the second and third most dominant phyla are listed with common genera within each phylum in parentheses when mentioned.
FirstSecondThirdRef.
Proteobacteria
(Kaistobacter, Rhodoplanes, Phenylobacterium)		Actinobacteria
(Arthrobacter, Blastococcus, Mycobacterium)		Acidobacteria
(Candidatus solibacter)		[45]
Proteobacteria
(Bradyrhizobium, Pseudolabrys)		Acidobacteria
(Candidatus solibacter, Bryobacter)		Actinobacteria
(Streptomyces, Pseudoarthrobacter)		[46]
AcidobacteriaProteobacteriaActinobacteria[47]
Proteobacteria
(Rhodoplanes, Sphingomonas, Hyphomicrobium)		Actinobacteria
(Pseudoclavibacter, Arthrobacter, Demequina)		Acidobacteria[48]
Ascomycota
(Penicillium, Didymella, Humicola)		Zygomycota
(Mortierella)		Basidiomycota (Cystofilobasidium)[46]
AscomycotaBasidiomycotaChytridiomycota[47]
Ascomycota
(Trichoderma, Penicillium, Acremonium)		Rozellomycota
(Rozella)		Zygomycota
(Mortierella)		[48]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Goodwin, P.H. The Rhizosphere Microbiome of Ginseng. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1152. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061152

AMA Style

Goodwin PH. The Rhizosphere Microbiome of Ginseng. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(6):1152. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061152

Chicago/Turabian Style

Goodwin, Paul H. 2022. "The Rhizosphere Microbiome of Ginseng" Microorganisms 10, no. 6: 1152. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061152

APA Style

Goodwin, P. H. (2022). The Rhizosphere Microbiome of Ginseng. Microorganisms, 10(6), 1152. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061152

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop