Next Article in Journal
Targeted Mutations Produce Divergent Characteristics in Pedigreed Sake Yeast Strains
Next Article in Special Issue
Multi-Approach Characterization of Novel Pyrene-Degrading Mycolicibacterium austroafricanum Isolates Lacking nid Genes
Previous Article in Journal
Safety and Efficacy of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the Pediatric Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Characterization and Genomic Analysis of the Naphthalene-Degrading Delftia tsuruhatensis ULwDis3 Isolated from Seawater
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Investigating Bio-Inspired Degradation of Toxic Dyes Using Potential Multi-Enzyme Producing Extremophiles

1
Department of Environmental Energy Engineering, College of Creative Engineering of Kyonggi University, Suwon 16227, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Life Science, College of Natural Science of Kyonggi University, Suwon 16227, Republic of Korea
3
Department of Environmental Energy Engineering, Graduate School of Kyonggi University, Suwon 16227, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2023, 11(5), 1273; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11051273
Submission received: 27 March 2023 / Revised: 3 May 2023 / Accepted: 11 May 2023 / Published: 12 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microbial Biodegradation of Toxic Pollutants)

Abstract

:
Biological treatment methods overcome many of the drawbacks of physicochemical strategies and play a significant role in removing dye contamination for environmental sustainability. Numerous microorganisms have been investigated as promising dye-degrading candidates because of their high metabolic potential. However, few can be applied on a large scale because of the extremely harsh conditions in effluents polluted with multiple dyes, such as alkaline pH, high salinity/heavy metals/dye concentration, high temperature, and oxidative stress. Therefore, extremophilic microorganisms offer enormous opportunities for practical biodegradation processes as they are naturally adapted to multi-stress conditions due to the special structure of their cell wall, capsule, S-layer proteins, extracellular polymer substances (EPS), and siderophores structural and functional properties such as poly-enzymes produced. This review provides scientific information for a broader understanding of general dyes, their toxicity, and their harmful effects. The advantages and disadvantages of physicochemical methods are also highlighted and compared to those of microbial strategies. New techniques and methodologies used in recent studies are briefly summarized and discussed. In particular, this study addresses the key adaptation mechanisms, whole-cell, enzymatic degradation, and non-enzymatic pathways in aerobic, anaerobic, and combination conditions of extremophiles in dye degradation and decolorization. Furthermore, they have special metabolic pathways and protein frameworks that contribute significantly to the complete mineralization and decolorization of the dye when all functions are turned on. The high potential efficiency of microbial degradation by unculturable and multi-enzyme-producing extremophiles remains a question that needs to be answered in practical research.

1. Introduction

Comprising two-thirds of the more than 1000 available dyes, textile dyes are pollutants with harmful impacts on the environment, including air and water ecosystems which are already heavily loaded with inorganic/organic matter, pathogenic microorganisms, and toxic chemicals, including recalcitrant dyes, heavy metals, sulfides, and detergents. These factors negatively impact soil productivity, soil microbial communities, seed germination, and plant growth, ultimately affecting global carbon cycling [1,2]. Dyes cause aesthetic damage to water bodies and reduce the rate of photosynthesis in aquatic plants by inhibiting the penetration of light into water. Therefore, clean-up strategies are required for physicochemical treatments, bioremediation, and their combinations. However, dyes are difficult to remove from water using conventional methods due to their high solubility and the presence of multiple complex pollutants [3,4]. Additionally, these treatments result in incomplete mineralization and conversion to CO2 production from intensive sludge as a consequence of disposal. Further, the high cost of these treatments limits their application, leading to increased ecotoxicity in the long term [5,6]. Hence, biodegradation has been evaluated as an efficient alternative approach that has attracted research attention because it overcomes the drawbacks of traditional techniques and is economical, eco-friendly, and sustainable.
Recently, potential bacterial candidates were reported to play a crucial role in the biological degradation of dyes through the action of either extra/intracellular enzymes or the whole bacterial cell [7,8,9]. In particular, extremophilic and multi-enzyme-producing bacteria have received much attention, focusing on their metabolic pathways, with extraordinary properties being applied to bioremediation strategies, including dye decolorization. They can survive under stress and degrade synthetic dyes into non-colored compounds or mineralize them partially or completely under certain environmental conditions. Dye effluents with extremely variable compositions and intermediate products generated during dye degradation may induce oxidative stress in microorganisms. Therefore, only bacterial strains have shown the ability to withstand harsh conditions and produce multiple enzymes to protect themselves from toxic environments which may enhance the efficiency of dye degradation compared to non-specific microorganisms.
Moreover, industrially-produced azo dyes are xenobiotic compounds that are considered recalcitrant to biological degradation processes [10]. Le Borgne et al. suggested mechanisms of xenobiotic degradation by halophilic bacteria involving the production of microbial enzymes and catabolic genes responsible for toxicant degradation [11]
Additives used in the textile industry lead to the formation of refractory intermediates which are toxic pollutants such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and aromatic amines [12,13]. Under highly saline conditions in dye effluents, the degradation of PAH occurs slowly. Thus, halophilic bacteria have been proposed to have high potential because of the valuable amount of biosurfactants that can enhance the degradation of PAH [14].
In another study, Pham et al. introduced a facultative bacterial strain that can grow and degrade Methylene Blue at an acidic pH of 5 through fundamental mechanisms of bioabsorption using both dead and living bacterial cells and accumulation [9]. The biodegradation of dyes occurs effectively under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions, or in combination. Thus, aerobes, anaerobes, and facultative bacteria play significant roles in degradation efficiency.
Some dye particles exhibit a high chemical structural class and are exclusively degraded by a few enzymes such as ligninolytic enzymes, which are recognized as efficient tools for dye degradation because of their extracellular and nonspecific nature [15,16]. In addition, azoreductases and laccases have shown great potential for decolorizing a wide range of industrial dyes [7,17]. However, bacterial dye degradation has proven to be a major challenge in wastewater under the diverse stresses of high salt concentrations, various contaminated metals, and the complex nature of waste [18]. Recently, halophilic bacteria have been investigated as potential dye degraders [18,19,20]. Surprisingly, these candidates can survive harsh temperatures, pH, and heavy metal conditions [9,21]. Other thermophilic microorganisms also exhibit adaptive responses to oxidative stress during dye degradation [22,23]. Nevertheless, these studies provide insights into the enzyme-producing potential of these extremophilic bacteria are limited so far. Thus, this review put an effort to mainly focus on analyzing the potential of extremophilic bacteria, the mechanisms of their adaptation to the harsh conditions of polluted environments, and their metabolism involved in the decolorization of dyes via whole-cell and secreted multi-enzyme pathways as well as the importance of developing methods for isolating these promising bacteria to be used as green materials for dye biodegradation in the future.

2. Toxicity and the Negative Impact of Dyes on Human and Environmental Ecosystems

The long-term release of untreated dye-containing wastewater can cause serious ecotoxicological threats to multiple environmental ecosystems, especially aquatic life, soil fertility, and crop germination rates in the life cycle [24,25].
The presence of color associated with dyes increases the chemical oxygen demand (COD), biological oxygen demand (BOD), total organic carbon (TOC), and suspended solids which reduce photosynthesis, promote toxicity of several intermediate amino acids, inhibit plant growth, and create recalcitrance and bioaccumulation [26,27,28]. Furthermore, the residuals of chemicals used during dye manufacture can evaporate and pollute the air. Long-term or accidental exposure to these residuals may cause respiratory problems after inhalation or trigger allergic reactions causing skin irritation and itching after absorption through the skin. Water-soluble azo dyes are extremely toxic when metabolized by live enzymes.
Moreover, dyes ingested and accumulated in fish can become toxic intermediates for both fish and their predators including humans [29]. Traditional techniques and limited biodegradability lead to recalcitrance and bioaccumulation and may promote toxicity, mutagenicity, and carcinogenicity [6,30].
Dyes contain heavy metals, such as Lead (Pb), Arsenic (As), Chromium (Cr), Nickel (Ni), Copper (Cu), Cadmium (Cd), Mercury (Hg), and Zinc (Zn) which act as catalysts, oxidizing agents, fixing agents, and cross-linking agents in the dyeing process. They may accumulate in the food chain causing harmful effects on human health and considerably damage the growth and development of plants [31]. Oxidative stress caused by Cr in textile dyes is another problem associated with the recalcitrant characteristics that affect photosynthesis and CO2 assimilation [32].
Some of the negative effects of dyes on humans and environmental ecosystems are shown in Figure 1.

3. The Role of Polyextremophilic Bacteria in Dye Degradation

Extremophiles are classified into different categories based on the harsh environments to which they have adapted. However, many extremophilic bacteria belong to two or more categories and are known as polyextremophiles [33]. Some studies have highlighted the benefits of extremophilic and polyextremophilic microorganisms in biotechnology and bioremediation. Synthetic dyes often exist as complex mixtures of structurally different types, in addition to other contaminants such as detergents, surfactants, heavy metals, and high concentrations of salts caused by sodium hydroxide in dye baths under diverse pH and temperature stresses [34]. Additionally, high concentrations of lead salts may inhibit decolorization because survival and activity decrease under extreme conditions. Thus, there are obstacles to the biological treatment of dye-containing effluents, particularly for large-scale applications. Biological approaches using polyenzyme-producing extremophiles have shown great efficiency in the degradation of aerobic and anaerobic dyes [35]. Therefore, investigating well-adapted bacterial candidates under multiple stress conditions is a promising strategy for research and application for removing dyes from wastewater.
The general mechanism of dye removal by bacteria involves the binding of dye molecules to specific groups on the surface of bacterial cells, such as alcohol, aldehydes, carboxylic, ether, and phenolic groups (biosorption) and their gradual accumulation inside the cell (bioaccumulation) [36]. Biosorption is carried out in living or dead cells, whereas bioaccumulation involves the active uptake and accumulation of dye molecules inside living cells. However, in the case of dead cells as an effective biosorbent, the negative effects of its disposal need further study.
During the process of microbial removal of dyes, reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as superoxide anion radicals (O2) and hydroxyl radicals (OH), are generated during the dye degradation process due to the contribution of high oxygen pressure, lack of water, high temperature, high metal ion concentrations, radiation, high salinity, and other chemicals that cause cells to face oxidative stress (OS). Therefore, protective mechanisms of extremophiles against damage by enzyme systems, including superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), and catalase (CAT), play a role in protecting the cell from OS generated during the dye degradation process [37]. Moreover, extremophiles have special protein adaptations to each environmental stress condition, including genetic changes resulting from changes in protein sequences and structures. For example, thermophilic bacteria are exposed to oxidative stress, which directly or indirectly damages various metalloproteins. They are active in effective DNA repair systems, antioxidant defense systems, selective protection against oxidative protein damage, and removal of damaged macromolecules. On the other hand, thermophiles have different amino acid contents than ordinary proteins to increase thermal stability with the number of large hydrophobic residues or cores, a greater number of disulfide bonds/bridges, and increased interactions of ions. In addition, thermostable thermophilic proteins contain high amounts of arginine which leads to an increase in salt bridge formation to stabilize thermophilic proteins [38].
Different physicochemical methods have been used for dye removal from textile industry wastewater; however, they are costly, non-environmentally friendly, and cause immediate secondary toxicity. To overcome several physicochemical and environmental constraints, such as high water viscosity, osmotic stress, and high gas solubility, psychrophiles modify the fatty acid composition of the cell membrane by notably increasing the proportion of unsaturated fatty acids and modulating the activity of enzymes involved in lipid biosynthesis [39]. With high glycine content in the proteome, psychrophiles have greater conformational mobility and stability at low temperatures because of the large number of disulfide bridges in their proteins. Additionally, psychrophiles have developed various adaptive mechanisms at the molecular level. Psychrophilic enzymes have large cavities that improve their flexibility and produce anti-ice-binding proteins that prevent the formation of ice crystals inside the cell [38,40].
Faced with the other detrimental effects of low water activity and salt interference, low hydrophobicity is considered an adaptation mechanism of halophiles at the protein level that allows them to exhibit an affinity toward toxicants. Moreover, increasing the negative surface charge on proteins helps them become more soluble and flexible at high salt concentrations in dye effluents. Dinucleotides are abundant in the genomes of halophiles and have specific genomic signatures for hypersaline adaptation that are significantly different from those of non-halophiles [41]. Azoreduction by halophilic bacteria has been effectively performed as a nonspecific reductive process mediated by an enzyme system [19].
Under highly acidic conditions, acidophiles have adaptive mechanisms, such as building a waterproof cell membrane and cytoplasmic buffering to secrete acid and maintain natural pH conditions by transporting protons across the cell membrane [42,43]. Further reactions to dye breakdown involve a specific mechanism involving different metabolic enzymes.
In an alkaline environment, alkaliphiles have the most significant effects on cell-free protein synthesis systems to adapt. To maintain a neutral intracellular pH, the internal pHi of alkaliphiles can be estimated from the optimal pH of the intracellular enzymes. For example, α-galactosidase from alkaliphilic Micrococcus sp. strain 31-2 and β-galactosidase from Bacillus circulans sp. alkalophilus have an optimal catalytic pH of 7.5, and pH 6 to 7.5, respectively [44,45]. Moreover, multi-cation/proton antiporters (CPAs) such as Na+, K+, Ca 2+, and H+ in the environment enhance the electrical membrane potential to provide the energy for ATP synthesis that is adequate to support cell growth under extreme pH conditions. The structure of cell wall polymers, which mainly consists of teichuronic acids and teichuronopeptides, also greatly contributes to maintaining pH homeostasis in the cytoplasm via a negatively charged matrix and reduces the pH value at the cell surface of alkaliphilic bacteria [46]. Alkaliphilic bacteria in pure cultures or consortia, such as Bacteroides spp., Eubacterium spp., Clostridium spp., Proteus vulgaris, Streptococcus faecalis, Bacillus spp., and Sphingomonas are effective azo dye-degrading candidates [38].
The adaptation mechanisms and dye degradation of dye of the main functional extremophiles under severe conditions was summarized in Figure 2.
In recent studies, some thermophiles have been investigated as highly adaptive response candidates for redox stress during the dye degradation process of textile wastewater [36]. A halophilic and alkalophilic bacterial strain of Bacillus albus DD1 was identified as an azo dye RB5 degrader with 98% efficiency [47]. Another member of the genus Bacillus isolated from an alkaline lake showed complete dye degradation efficiency under anoxic and anaerobic conditions at pH 10 [48]. Acinetobacter baumannii strain was investigated as a degrader of Reactive Red 198, with a removal efficiency of 96.2% under hypersaline conditions [49]. A previous study illustrated that thermophilic anaerobic treatment is an interesting approach for enhancing the decolorization of azo dyes with a significant contribution from thermophiles [50]. In another study, the dye Remazol Brilliant Blue R (RBBR) was determined to have a 90% removal efficiency by immobilized cells of the thermophilic bacterial strain Geobacillus stearothermophilus ATCC 10,149 [51]. However, there are few reports published on azo dye removal by psychrotolerant bacteria so far [52]. Interestingly, the psychrophilic bacterial strain Psychrobacter almentarius, isolated from seawater sediment, was able to decolorize three reactive dyes: Reactive Black 5, Reactive Golden Ovifix, and Reactive Blue BRS [53]. Recently, a psychrotolerant, halophilic, alkalophilic, and xenobiotic degrader, Actinobacterium Zhihengliuella sp. ISTPL4 has been explored for its potential to degrade the azo dye methyl red [54,55].
In another study, the four bacterial strains, namely Shewanella indica strain ST2, Oceanimonassmirnovii strain ST3, Enterococcus faecalis strain ST5, and Clostridiumbufermentans strain ST12 demonstrated high tolerance to salinity (>20 g L−1), temperature (35–50 °C), and pH (<4 and >8), as well as the presence of metals except for Cd, Cu, and Pb [56]. Halotolerant, alkali-thermo-tolerant bacterial mixed cultures have been investigated as cost-effective biodegraders of Direct Red 81 (DR81) with ≥70% decolorization within 24 h of dye up to 600 mg/L at 60 °C, pH 10, and 5% salinity [57]. Many thermophilic bacteria have shown the potential for treating textile industry effluents with high salinity [58]. Typical dye-degrading bacterial strains are listed in Table 1:

4. Enzyme-Linked Bioremediation of Dyes

In recent decades, the enzymatic processes carried out by “biocatalysts” for the treatment of dye-contaminated wastewater have been considered because they overcome the drawbacks of physicochemical methods. The currently used dye removal methods are summarized in Figure 3. Several enzymes, such as hydrolases, laccases, azoreductases, and lignin peroxidases, are effective in cleaving the aromatic rings and amines of dye molecules [9,48,81,82]. Specifically, the azoreductase activity of a mixed extremophilic bacteria was found to be optimal at 70 °C and stable at temperatures above 50 °C and in a wide pH range of 4–9 [57]. Bacterial degradation of dyes can be carried out in the presence of various substrates. For example, Navitan Fast Blue S5R is aerobically degraded by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the presence of glucose as a carbon source for bacterial growth and metabolism [83]. In another study, Aeromonas hydrophila was shown to degrade Crystal Violet dye using laccase enzymes and lignin peroxidase with sucrose and yeast extract as substrates [84]. Pham et al. found that Bacillus sp. React3 is capable of degrading up to 97% of Methylene Blue using lignin peroxidase in the presence of tryptone and yeast extract [9].
The common mechanisms of biological degradation of dye effluents using bacterial enzymes usually involve two steps. First, NADH or NADPH produced by azoreductases from bacteria serve as electron donors for the cleavage of the azo linkage (N=N) and form toxic metabolites or aromatic amines. Second, the toxic metabolites further transform into non- or less toxic compounds [57]. Azoreductases are enzymes that are more active under anaerobic conditions than during aerobic processes or respiration [85]. However, some previous studies have illustrated that these azoreductases behave differently with no clear degradation patterns [86,87]. The real physiological role of azoreductases needs to be studied more to answer correctly the still questionable activity of azo dye consumption [87].
Laccases are multicopper oxidase enzymes that are important biocatalysts for various industrial applications. These enzymes lack cofactors but use molecular oxygen as an electron acceptor to carry out their oxidation reactions, making them more versatile and able to use various substrates by adding redox mediators to the reactions. They can degrade dyes through non-specific free radical-mediated mechanisms without yielding hazardous products. Moreover, they are active over a wide pH range, stable at high temperatures, and tolerant to detergents [88]. Therefore, microbial laccases have potential opportunities for commercial applications. A recent study investigated laccases produced from Bacillus cereus (B. Cereus) and Pseudomonas parafulva (P. parafulva) and the enzyme activity was optimal at 50 °C [17]. In another study, laccases produced by Bacillus sp. NU2 showed a high catalytic potential with optimal activity at 60 °C, and pH 8 for the detoxification of various dyes such as Congo Red, Methyl Orange, Remazol Brilliant Blue R, Reactive Blue 4, and Malachite Green [89]. Laccases that served as good dye decolorizing agents have been produced from the thermophilic bacterial species Streptomyces psammoticus and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia [90,91].
Catalase was determined to the role of protecting bacteria against oxidative damages caused by dye [37,92]. Further research has identified a catalase and a laccase isolated from the extremophile Geobacillus thermo pakistaniensis which can bleach colors [93].
Hydrolase enzymes containing protease, amylase, and cellulase are responsible for breaking bonds of C-N; C-C; and C-O in dye degradation. Previous studies have investigated the contribution of amylases produced by Bacillus megaterium and Anoxybacillus rupiensis and a serine protease produced from Bacillus sp. were investigated in the previous studies that exposed capacity in the degradation of dyes [93,94,95]. The glucose oxidase enzyme can remove natural pigments through bio-bleaching by glucose oxidation mechanisms [96]. In the dye textile industry, stain and color preservatives can be removed from fabrics using the cellulase Puradax HA produced by Bacillus sp. [97]. Alkali-thermophilic thermozymes have been evaluated in bioscouring processes at alkaline pH and high temperatures [98]. Alkaline pectinases generated by Bacillus sp. and Pseudomonas sp. can be used to protect cellulose and fiber from damage [94,99]. Recently, cold-adapted amylases and proteases that can eliminate stain-containing starch were successfully commercialized [100]. In another study, alkaline protease produced from bacterial consortia has been shown the decolorization capacity of Direct Red-81 (68.8%) and Direct Organge-34 (70.78%) [101].
Peroxidases, including manganese peroxidases and lignin peroxidases, are being discovered as they are directly involved in the degradation of dyes and xenobiotics. In particular, bacterial peroxidases are preferred to fungal peroxidases because bacteria are more flexible during protein engineering to enhance catalyst activity [102]. Thermosediminibacter spp. have been investigated as promising candidates for the production of peroxidases (DyP), laccases, and azoreductases involved in dye decolorization [103]. Lignocellulosic biomass is currently considered not only an abundant renewable source for the production of biofuels and valuable bioproducts, but also a significant substrate or biosorbent for dye removal because of its eco-friendly nature and natural availability [9]. Lignin is one of three different polymers decomposed from lignocellulose and may be a suitable substrate for extremophilic lignin peroxidase-producing bacteria to enhance LiP production which contributes to the dye degradation process. The promising halotolerant and alkalophilic Bacillus ligniniphilus L1 has illustrated high-value utilization of lignin at pH 9 [27].
Compared to other extremozymes, psychrophilic enzymes have lower thermal stability, higher structural flexibility, and greater specific activity [104]. On the other hand, superoxide dismutases (SODs) are antioxidant enzymes that play important roles in the cellular defense against harmful environmental factors. Both SODs and catalase (CAT) enzymes are found in the thermophilic bacterium Exiguobacterium profundum [36].
Although extremozymes have been investigated for several decades, their characteristics, structures, and functions have changed over time. Therefore, further studies on the potential activities of these extremophiles and their enzymes in certain conditions to obtain maximum efficiency in biological applications are needed, and would be an exciting venture for researchers.

5. Discussion and Future Prospective

The utilization of microorganisms in the dye degradation process has increased due to their unique metabolic pathways and protein frameworks that help them mineralize and completely decolorize the dye under specific ecological conditions [105]. In-depth studies on the enzymes, genes, and metabolic mechanisms responsible for the decolorization by extremophiles are currently needed for application in wastewater treatment. The possibility of identifying, isolating, cloning, and transferring genes that encode the degrading enzymes should be explored to identify potential superdegrading microorganisms from extremophiles.
Several studies have demonstrated that bacterial biomass is a promising biosorbent material for textile dye bioremediation because it provides sources of carbon and nitrogen [9,106]. Therefore, hybrid adsorbent systems are highly efficient for dye removal at low operating costs. However, the mechanisms involved in the link between the living/dead cell biomass and dyes are complex. Moreover, the consequences of final biomass disposal and dye effluents after absorption are still uncontrolled and neglected.
Agrowaste is considered an excellent substrate source for polyenzyme production in the fermentation process, eliminating hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin [9,107]. Therefore, multi-enzyme-producing bacteria are potential candidates for various waste decompositions in the polypolluted form. Interestingly, most bacterial strains which have high adaptation under stress have been investigated as multiple enzyme-producing candidates in recent studies [9,108]. Therefore, more practical research regarding the ecology, taxonomy, and molecular properties of these special bacteria should be carried out to better understand the correlation between the high extreme tolerance and enzyme-producing capacity during the degradation process of toxicants.
The biological degradation of dyes can be performed in the presence or absence of oxygen. Although anaerobic conditions are mostly responsible for the degradation of azo dyes in the first step of azo-linkage cleavage, the aromatic amines formed in the second step can be degraded by bacteria almost exclusively under aerobic conditions. Thus, the combination of both anaerobic and aerobic phases in one treatment process may speed up the process and improve its efficiency [109].
Other important biocompounds that should also be considered are extremolytes. These are small organic molecules that accumulate inside cells and are either synthesized or taken up by extremophilic bacteria. They play a crucial role in protecting the macromolecules and cell structures of extremophiles by forming and stabilizing protective water layers [110]. In addition, the biosurfactants secreted by extremophiles during dye degradation should be further studied in terms of changes in their composition and function under certain operating conditions.
Because extremophiles have huge potential applications with superior performance in a wide range of areas, they need to be considered as a great replacement for many current conventional methods. Developing novel isolation methods to investigate unculturable or fastidious bacteria such as designing the nutrient components of culture media, equipment, and optimizing the growth conditions based on characteristics, adaptation mechanisms, and metabolic pathways should be continued as an independent further step. However, studying these polyenzyme-producing extremophiles is more challenging because of the lack of knowledge about particular physiological features and molecular properties due to the change in their complex metabolic pathways under extreme environments. However, the long-term effects of using extremophilic bacteria and their by-products should be verified with each original dye effluent input.

6. Conclusions

The specificity of special biological molecules, complex metabolic pathways, and robustness enables extremophiles to easily face multiple environmental stresses. Thus, they have attracted significant attention as powerful sources for biological applications and industrial purposes and the development of bioremediation techniques using biomass and enzymes as super catalysts. The demand for extremophilic bacteria and multi-extremozymes and their potential applications have increased tremendously. Therefore, it is expected that new methods, both dependent and independent, will be developed to provide a pool of extremely competitive cells and catalysts for waste treatment and other bio-based applications. It is necessary to figure out the link between the capacity of enzyme production and the removal rate of dye under each certain extreme conditions based on the components of the original dye effluent that may affect the efficiency of the dye degradation process. Additionally, understanding the changes in the metabolic pathways and physiological properties of polyenzyme-producing bacteria under harsh fluctuating environmental conditions may help in the discovery of novel enzymes and their potential functions. Moreover, insight into the genetic diversity, metabolic engineering, and extremolytes of these potential extremophiles is needed to further study their outstanding characteristics such as structure and biochemical properties and significant values to achieve sustainable development goals in environmental and industrial fields.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: V.H.T.P.; methodology: V.H.T.P.; validation: V.H.T.P.; formal analysis and investigation: V.H.T.P. and D.B.; resources: S.C.; writing—original draft preparation: V.H.T.P.; writing—review and editing: V.H.T.P., J.K. and S.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

MDPI Research Data Policies.

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bhatia, S.C. Pollution Control in Textile Industry; WPI Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  2. Patila, S.M.; Suryavanshib, M.V.; Chandanshivec, V.V.; Kuradea, M.B.; Govindwara, S.P.; Jeona, B.H. Regeneration of textile wastewater deteriorated microbial diversity of soil microcosm through bioaugmentation. J. Chem. Eng. 2020, 380, 122533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hassan, M.M.; Carr, C.M. A critical review on recent advancements of the removal of reactive dyes from dyehouse effluent by ion-exchange adsorbents. Chemosphere 2018, 209, 201–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Patel, V.R.; Khan, R.; Bhatt, N. Cost-effective in-situ remediation technologies for complete mineralization of dyes contaminated soils. Chemosphere 2020, 243, 125253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Singh, R.L.; Singh, P.K.; Singh, R.P. Enzymatic decolorization and degradation of azo dyes—A review. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2015, 104, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Vikrant, K.; Giri, B.S.; Raza, N.; Roy, K.; Kim, K.-H.; Rai, B.N.; Singh, R.S. Recent advancements in bioremediation of dye: Current status and challenges. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 253, 355–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Sarkar, S.; Banerjee, A.; Halder, U.; Biswas, R.; Bandopadhyay, R. Degradation of Synthetic Azo Dyes of Textile Industry: A Sustainable Approach Using Microbial Enzymes. Water. Conserv. Sci. Eng. 2017, 2, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Meerbergen, K.; Willems, K.A.; Dewil, R.; Van Impe, J.; Appels, L.; Lievens, B. Isolation and screening of bacterial isolates from wastewater treatment plants to decolorize azo dyes. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2018, 125, 448–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pham, V.H.T.; Kim, J.; Chang, S.; Chung, W. Biodegradation of Methylene Blue using a novel Lignin peroxidase enzyme producing bacteria, named Bacillus sp. React3, as a promising candidate for dye-contaminated wastewater treatment. Fermentation 2022, 8, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shaul, G.M.; Holdsworth, T.J.; Dempsey, C.R.; Dostal, K.A. Fate of water soluble azo dyes in the activated sludge process. Chemosphere 1991, 22, 107–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Le Borgne, S.; Paniagua, D.; Vazquez-Duhalt, R. Biodegradation of organic pollutants by halophilic bacteria and archaea. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 15, 74–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ning, X.-A.; Lin, M.-Q.; Shen, L.-Z.; Zhang, J.-H.; Wang, J.-Y.; Wang, Y.-J.; Yang, Z.-Y.; Liu, J.-Y. Levels, composition profiles and risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in sludge from ten textile dyeing plants. Environ. Res. 2014, 132, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ning, X.-A.; Liang, J.-Y.; Li, R.-J.; Hong, Z.; Wang, Y.-J.; Chang, K.-L.; Zhang, Y.-P.; Yang, Z.-Y. Aromatic amine contents, component distributions and risk assessment in sludge from 10 textile-dyeing plants. Chemosphere 2015, 134, 367–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kumar, M.; Leon, V.; De Sisto Materano, A.; Ilzins, O.A. A halotolerant and thermotolerant bacillus sp. degrades hydrocarbons and produces tensio-active emulsifying agent. World J. Microbiol. Biotech. 2007, 23, 211–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gahlout, M.; Gupte, S.; Gupte, A. Optimization of culture condition for enhanced decolorization and degradation of azo dye reactive violet 1 with concomitant production of ligninolytic enzymes by Ganoderma cupreum AG-1.3. Biotechnology 2013, 3, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ergun, S.O.; Urek, R.O. Production of ligninolytic enzymes by solid state fermentation using Pleurotus ostreatus. Ann. Agrar. Sci. 2017, 15, 273–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Khaled, J.M.; Alyahya, S.A.; Govindan, R.; Chelliah, C.K.; Maruthupandy, M.; Alharbi, N.S.; Kadaikunnan, S.; Issac, R.; Murugan, S.; Li, W.J. Laccase producing bacteria influenced the high decolorization of textile azo dyes with advanced study. Environ. Res. 2022, 207, 112211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jojy, J.; Ramadoss, D.; Raman, H.K.; Peter, D.M.; Dharani, G.; Amit, K. Bio-decolorization of synthetic dyes by a halophilic bacterium Salinivibrio sp. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 594011. [Google Scholar]
  19. Amoozegar, M.A.; Hajighasemi, M.; Hamedi, J.; Asad, S.; Ventosa, A. Azo dye decolorization by halophilic and halotolerant microorganisms. Ann. Microbiol. 2011, 61, 217–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tian, F.; Wang, Y.; Guo, G.; Ding, K.; Yang, F.; Wang, H.; Cao, Y.; Liu, C. Enhanced azo dye biodegradation at high salinity by a halophilic bacterial consortium. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 326, 124749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. John, J.; Siva, V.; Kumari, R.; Arya, A.; Kumar, A. Unveiling cultivable and uncultivable halophilic bacteria inhabiting Marakkanam saltpan, India and their potential for biotechnological applications. Geomicrobiology 2020, 37, 691–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nzila, A. Current status of the degradation of aliphatic and aromatic petroleum hydrocarbons by Thermophilic microbes and Future Perspectives. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 2782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Baker, B.A.; Tawabini, B.; Nazal, M.; AlThaqfi, J.; Khalil, A. Efficiency of thermophilic bacteria in wastewater treatment. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2021, 46, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dutta, S.; Bhattacharjee, J. A comparative study between physicochemical and biological methods for effective removal of textile dye from wastewater. In Development in Wastewater Treatment Research and Processes; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  25. Parmar, S.; Daki, S.; Bhattacharya, S.; Shrivastav, A. Microorganism: An ecofriendly tool for waste management and environmental safety. In Development in Wastewater Treatment Research and Processes; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 175–193. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ao, S.; Zayed, T. Impact of sewer overflow on public health: A comprehensive scientometric analysis and systematic review. Environ. Res. 2022, 203, 111609. [Google Scholar]
  27. Gallo, G.; Puopolo, R.; Carbonaro, M.; Maresca, E.; Fiorentino, G. Extremophiles, a nifty tool to face environmental pollution: From exploitation of metabolism to genome engineering. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 5228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Patil, R.; Zahid, M.; Govindwar, S.; Khandare, R.; Vyavahare, G.; Gurav, R.; Desai, N.; Pandit, S.; Jadhav, J. Constructed wetland: A promising technology for the treatment of hazardous textile dyes and effluent. In Development in Wastewater Treatment Research and Processes; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 173–198. [Google Scholar]
  29. Elgarahy, A.M.; Elwakeel, K.Z.; Mohammad, S.H.; Elshoubaky, G.A. A critical review of biosorption of dyes, heavy metals and metalloids from wastewater as an efficient and green process. Clean. Eng. Technol. 2021, 4, 100209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rawat, D.; Sharma, R.S.; Karmakar, S.; Arora, L.S.; Mishra, V. Ecotoxic potential of a presumably non-toxic azo dye. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 148, 528–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Khan, S.; Malik, A. Toxicity evaluation of textile effluents and role of native soil bacterium in biodegradation of a textile dye. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 4446–4458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Copaciu, F.; Opris¸, O.; Coman, V.; Ristoiu, D.; Niinemets, Ü.; Copolovici, L. Diffuse water pollution by anthraquinone and azo dyes in environment importantly alters foliage volatiles, carotenoids and physiology in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Water. Air. Soil. Pollut. 2013, 224, 1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rothschild, L.J.; Mancinelli, R.L. Life in extreme environments. Nature. 2001, 409, 1092–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ajaz, M.; Rehman, A.; Khan, Z.; Nisar, M.A.; Hussain, S. Degradation of azo dyes by Alcaligenes aquatilis 3c and its potential use in the wastewater treatment. AMB Express 2019, 9, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sridharan, R.; Krishnaswamy, V.; Archana, K.M.; Rajagopal, R.; Kumar Thirumal, D.; Priya Doss George, C. Integrated approach on azo dyes degradation using laccase enzyme and Cul nanoparticle. SN Appl. Sci. 2021, 3, 370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Aragaw, T.A.; Bogale, F.M.; Gessesse, A. Adaptive Response of thermophiles to redox stress and their role in the process of dye degradation from textile industry wastewater. Front. Physiol. 2022, 13, 1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bedekar, P.A.; Saratale, R.G.; Saratale, G.D.; Govindwar, S.P. Oxidative stress response in dye degrading bacterium Lysinibacillus sp. RGS exposed to Reactive Orange 16, degradation of RO16 and evaluation of toxicity. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014, 21, 11075–11085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tapadar, S.; Tripathi, D.; Pandey, S.; Goswami, K.; Bhattacharjee, A.; Das, K.; Palwan, E.; Rani, M.; Kumar, A. Role of extremophiles and extremophilic proteins in industrial waste treatment. In Removal of Emerging Contaminants through Microbial Processes; Shah, M.P., Ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 217–235. [Google Scholar]
  39. Russell, N.J. Membrane components and cold sensing. In Psychrophiles: From Biodiversity to Biotechnology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; pp. 177–190. [Google Scholar]
  40. Bar Dolev, M.; Braslavsky, I.; Davies, P.L. Ice-binding proteins and their function. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2016, 85, 515–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Paul, S.; Bag, S.K.; Das, S.; Harvill, E.T.; Dutta, C. Molecular signature of hypersaline adaptation: Insights from genome and proteome composition of halophilic prokaryotes. Genome Biol. 2008, 9, R70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Baker-Austin, C.; Dopson, M. Life in acid: pH homeostasis in acidophiles. Trends. Microbiol. 2007, 15, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sarma, J.; Sengupta, A.; Laskar, M.K.; Sengupta, S.; Tenguria, S.; Kumar, A. Chapter 13—Microbial adaptations in extreme environmental conditions. In Developments in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. Bacterial Survival in the Hostile Environment; Kumar, A., Tenguria, S., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2023; pp. 193–206. [Google Scholar]
  44. Horikoshi, K. Alkaliphiles. Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser. B Phys. Biol. Sci. 2004, 80, 166–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Maksimainen, M.; Paavilainen, S.; Hakulinen, N.; Rouvinen, J. Structural analysis, enzymatic characterization, and catalytic mechanisms of β-galactosidase from Bacillus circulans sp. alkalophilus. FEBS J. 2012, 279, 1788–1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Rao, A.S.; Nair, A.; Nivetha, K.; More, V.S.; Anantharaju, K.S.; More, S.S. Chapter 7—Molecular adaptations in proteins and enzymes produced by extremophilic microorganisms. In Extremozymes and Their Industrial Applications; Arora, N.K., Agnihotri, S., Mishra, J., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022; pp. 205–230. [Google Scholar]
  47. Srivastava, A.; Dangi, L.K.; Kumar, S.; Rani, R. Microbial decolorization of Reactive Black 5 dye by Bacillus albus DD1 isolated from textile water effluent: Kinetic, thermodynamics & decolorization mechanism. Heliyon 2022, 8, e08834. [Google Scholar]
  48. Guadie, A.; Tizazu, S.; Melese, M.; Guo, W.; Ngo, H.H.; Xia, S. Biodecolorization of textile azo dye using Bacillus sp. strain CH12 isolated from alkaline lake. Biotechnol. Rep. 2017, 15, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Unnikrishnan, S.; Khan, M.H.; Ramalingam, K. Dye-tolerant marine Acinetobacter baumannii-mediated biodegradation of reactive red. Water Sci. Eng. 2018, 11, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Dos Santos, A.B.; Traverse, J.; Cervantes, F.J.; Van Lier, B. Enhancing the electron transfer capacity and subsequent color removal in bioreactors by applying thermophilic anaerobic treatment and redox mediators. Biotechnol. Bioengineer. 2005, 89, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Giovanella, P.; Vieira, G.A.L.; Ramos Otero, I.V.; Pais Pellizzer, E.; de Jesus Fontes, B.; Sette, L.D. Metal and organic pollutants bioremediation by extremophile microorganisms. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 382, 121024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Aydin, M.; Ağaoğlu, A.; Baris, Ö. Azo dye decolorization by using four different psychrotolerant bacillus species. NE. Sci. 2021, 6, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Khalid, A.; Kausar, F.; Arshad, M.; Mahmood, T.; Ahmed, I. Accelerated decolorization of reactive azo dyes under saline conditions by bacteria isolated from Arabian seawater sediment. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 96, 1599–1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Mishra, S.; Nayak, J.K.; Maiti, A. Bacteria-mediated bio-degradation of reactive azo dyes coupled with bio-energy generation from model wastewater. Clean. Technol. Environ. Policy 2020, 22, 651–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Takkar, S.; Tyagi, B.; Kumar, N.; Kumari, T.; Iqbal, K.; Varma, A.; Thakur, I.S.; Mishra, A. Biodegradation of methyl red dye by a novel actinobacterium Zhihengliuella sp. ISTPL4: Kinetic studies, isotherm and biodegradation pathway. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2022, 26, 102348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhuang, M.; Sanganyado, E.; Zhang, X.; Xu, L.; Zhu, J.; Liu, W.; Song, H. Azodye degrading bacteria tolerant to extreme conditions inhabit nearshore ecosystems:Optimization and degradation pathways. J. Environ. Manage. 2020, 261, 110222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kamal, I.M.; Abdeltawab, N.F.; Ragab, Y.M.; Farag, M.A.; Ramadan, M.A. Biodegradation, decolorization, and detoxification of Di-azo dye direct Red 81 by Halotolerant, alkali-thermo-tolerant bacterial mixed cultures. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Mirbolooki, H.; Amirnezhad, R.; Pendashteh, A.R. Treatment of high saline textile wastewater by activated sludge microorganisms. J. Appl. Res. Technol. 2017, 15, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gianolini, J.E.; Britos, C.N.; Mulreedy, C.B.; Trelles, J.A. Hyperstabilization of a thermophile bacterial laccase and its applicationfor industrial dyes degradation. 3 Biotech 2020, 10, 288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chen, G.; An, X.; Li, H.; Lai, F.; Yuan, E.; Xia, X.; Zhang, Q. Detoxification of Azo Dye Direct Black G by Thermophilic Anoxybacillus Sp. PDR2 and its application potential in bioremediation. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 214, 112084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Tang, J.; Wang, Y.; Yang, G.; Luo, H.; Zhuang, L.; Yu, Z.; Zhou, S. Complete genome sequence of the dissimilatory azo reducing thermophilic bacterium Novibacillus Thermophiles SG-1. J. Biotechnol. 2018, 284, 6–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Zhang, F.; Guo, X.; Qian, D.K.; Sun, T.; Zhang, W.; Dai, K.; Zeng, R.J. Decolorization of Acid Orange 7 by extreme-thermophilic mixed culture. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 291, 121875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Yan, Y.; Geng, Z.Q.; Dai, K.; Guo, X.; Zeng, R.J.; Fang Zhang, F. Decoupling mechanism of Acid Orange 7 decolorization and sulfate reduction by a Caldanaerobacter dominated extreme-thermophilic consortium. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 419, 126498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Rajashekhar, K.K.; Neelagund, S.; Mahadevan, G.D. Novel Geobacillus thermoleovorans KNG 112 Thermophilic bacteria from Bandaru hot spring: A potential producer of thermostable enzymes. Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. 2020, 13, 134–141. [Google Scholar]
  65. Rajashekarappa, K.K.; Mahadevan, G.D.; Neelagund, S.E.; Sathynarayana, M.; Vijaya, D.; Mulla, S.I. Decolorization of amaranth RI and fast red E azo dyes by thermophilic Geobacillus thermoleovorans KNG 112. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2021, 97, 482–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Sharma, N.; Leung, I.K. Novel thermophilic bacterial laccase for the degradation of Aromatic organic pollutants. Front. Chem. 2021, 9, 711345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Navas, L.E.; Carballo, R.; Levin, L.; Berretta, M.F. Fast decolorization of azo dyes in alkaline solutions by a thermostable metal-tolerant bacterial laccase and proposed degradation pathways. Extremophiles 2020, 24, 705–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ibrahim, H.K.; Mahdi, M.S.; Ameen, R.S. Study the ability of the newly isolated thermophilic bacterium (Geobacillus Thermoleovorans) Strain Ir1 (Jq912239) in decolonization and degradation of Azo dyes (Methylene Blue and Acid Orange G). Int. J. Drug Deliv. Technol. 2021, 11, 429–433. [Google Scholar]
  69. Miao, L.-L.; Hou, Y.-J.; Fan, H.-X.; Qu, J.; Qi, C.; Liu, Y.; Li, D.L.; Liu, Z.P. Molecular structural basis for the cold adaptedness of the psychrophilic β-glucosidase BglU in Micrococcus antarcticus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 82, 2021–2030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Abd-Elnaby, H.M.; Abou-Elela, G.M.; Ghozlan, H.A.; Hussein, S.H.; Sabry, O.A. Characterization and bioremediation potential of marine Psychrobacter species. Egypt. J. Aquat. Res. 2016, 42, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lu, L.; Zhao, M.; Wang, T.-N.; Zhao, L.-Y.; Du, M.-H.; Li, T.-L.; Li, D.-B. Characterization and dye decolorization ability of an alkaline resistant and organic solvents tolerant laccase from Bacillus licheniformis LS04. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 115, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Neetha, J.; Sandesh, K.; Girish Kumar, K.; Chidananda, B.; Ujwal, P. Optimization of Direct Blue-14 dye degradation by Bacillus fermus (Kx898362) an alkaliphilic plant endophyte and assessment of degraded metabolite toxicity. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 364, 742–751. [Google Scholar]
  73. Bhattacharya, A.; Goyal, N.; Gupta, A. Degradation of azo dye methyl red by alkaliphilic, halotolerant Nesterenkonia lacusekhoensis EMLA3: Application in alkaline and salt-rich dyeing effluent treatment. Extremophiles 2017, 21, 479–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Krithika, A.; Gayathri, K.V.; Kumar, D.T.; Doss, C. Mixed azo dyes degradation by an intracellular azoreductase enzyme from alkaliphilic Bacillus subtilis: A molecular docking study. Arch. Microbiol. 2021, 203, 3033–3044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Chauhan, A.K.; Bijan Choudhury, B. Synthetic dyes degradation using lignolytic enzymes produced from Halopiger aswanensis strain ABC_IITR by Solid State Fermentation. Chemosphere 2021, 273, 129671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Tian, F.; Guo, G.; Zhang, C.; Yang, F.; Hu, Z.; Liu, C.; Wang, S.W. Isolation, cloning and characterization of an azoreductase and the effect of salinity on its expression in a halophilic bacterium. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 123, 1062–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Guadie, A.; Gessesse, A.; Xia, S. Halomonas sp. strain A55, a novel dye decolorizing bacterium from dye-uncontaminated Rift Valley Soda lake. Chemosphere 2018, 206, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Hulin, Q.; Fengfei, S.; Aiguo, Y.; Jiaxian, L.; Biyu, W.; Ying, L.; Yunyi, X.; Jinping, H.; Bo, X. Biodegradation and detoxification of Azo dyes by halophilic/halotolerant microflora isolated from the salt fields of tibet autonomous region China. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 877151. [Google Scholar]
  79. Liu, W.; Liu, C.; Liu, L.; You, Y.; Jiang, J.; Zhou, Z.; Dong, Z. Simultaneous decolorization of sulfonated azo dyes and reduction of hexavalent chromium under high salt condition by a newly isolated salt-tolerant strain Bacillus circulans BWL1061. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2017, 141, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Song, X.Y.; Liu, F.J.; Zhou, H.B.; Yang, H.L. Biodegradation of Acid Scarlet 3R by a new salt-tolerant strain Alcaligenes faecalis LJ-3: Character, Enzyme and Kinetics analysis. Chem. Biochem. Eng. Q. 2018, 32, 371–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Franciscon, E.; Grossman, M.; Paschoal, J.A.; Reyes, F.G.; Durrant, L. Decolorization and biodegradation of reactive sulfonated azo dyes by a newly isolated Brevibacterium sp. strain VN-15. Springerplus 2012, 1, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Masarbo, R.S.; Karegoudar, T. Decolourisation of toxic azo dye Fast Red E by three bacterial strains: Process optimisation and toxicity assessment. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2020, 102, 2686–2696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ameenudeen, S.; Unnikrishnan, S.; Ramalingam, K. Statistical optimization for the efficacious degradation of reactive azo dyes using acinetobacter baumannii JC359. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 279, 111512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Nachiyar, C.V.; Rajkumar, G.S. Degradation of a tannery and textile dye, Navitan Fast Blue S5R by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2003, 19, 609–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Bharagava, R.N.; Mani, S.; Mulla, S.I.; Saratale, G.D. Degradation and decolourization potential of an ligninolytic enzyme producing Aeromonas hydrophila for crystal violet dye and its phytotoxicity evaluation. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 156, 166–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Suzuki, H. Remarkable diversification of bacterial azoreductases: Primary sequences, structures, substrates, physiological roles, and biotechnological applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 3965–3978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ngo, A.C.R.; Tischler, D. Microbial Degradation of Azo Dyes: Approaches and Prospects for a Hazard-Free Conversion by Microorganisms. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 4740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Zahran, S.A.; Ali-Tammam, M.; Hashem, A.M.; Aziz, R.K.; Ali, A.E. Azoreductase activity of dye-decolorizing bacteria isolated from the human gut microbiota. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 5508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Sharma, V.; Upadhyay, L.S.B.; Vasanth, D. Extracellular thermostable Laccase-like enzymes from Bacillus licheniformis strains: Production, purification and characterization. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2020, 56, 420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Edoamodu, C.E.; Nwodo, U.U. Decolourization of synthetic dyes by laccase produced from Bacillus sp. NU2. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2022, 36, 95–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ashraf, F.; Irfan, M.; Shakir, H.A.; Ali, S.; Khan, M. An overview of production and industrial exploitation of bacterial laccases. Punjab Univ. J. Zool. 2020, 35, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Kadam, S.K.; Tamboli, A.S.; Sambhare, S.B.; Jeon, B.H.; Govindwar, S.P. Enzymatic analysis, structural study and molecular docking of laccase and catalase from B. subtilis SK1 after textile dye exposure. Ecol. Inform. 2018, 48, 269–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Panwar, A.; Sheikh, J.N.; Dutta, T. Sustainable denim bleaching by a novel thermostable bacterial laccase. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2020, 192, 1238–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Kakkar, P.; Wadhwa, N. Extremozymes used in textile industry. J. Text. Inst. 2021, 113, 2007–2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Sankareswaran, M.; Kaliselvi, K.; Anbalagan, S.; Suganya, M.; Abirami, K. Production, characterization and immobilised dye decolorization of amylase enzyme produced by Bacillus megaterium isolated from soil sample. Int. J. Adv. Res. 2015, 3, 295–305. [Google Scholar]
  96. Mahdi, M.S.; Ibrahim, H.K.; Nidal, S.; Zbarr, N.S.; Hadi, S.A. Microbiological degradation of food dyes and amylase production, immobilization by Iraqi isolate Anoxybacillus rupiensis strain Ir3 (JQ912241). Int. J. Sci. Res. 2022, 6, 257–262. [Google Scholar]
  97. Maiti, S.; Kulkarni, K.; Adivarekar, R.V. Biotechnology in textile wet processing. Glo. J. Biomed. Sci. 2018, 2, 7–13. [Google Scholar]
  98. Raddadi, N.; Cherif, A.; Daffonchio, D.; Neifar, M.; Fava, F. Biotechnological applications of extremophiles, extremozymes and extremolytes. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 7907–7913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Kavuthodi, B.; Sebastian, D. Review on bacterial production of alkaline pectinase with special emphasis on Bacillus species. Biosci. Biotechnol. Res. Commun. 2018, 11, 18–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Zhu, D.; Adebisi, W.A.; Ahmad, F.; Sethupathy, S.; Danso, B.; Sun, J. Recent Development of Extremophilic Bacteria and Their Application in Biorefinery. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 12, 483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Rathod, M.G.; Pathk, A.P. Efficient decolorization of textile dyes by alkaline protease producing bacterial consortia. Indian J. Mar.Sci. 2018, 47, 1468–1477. [Google Scholar]
  102. Babu, K.M. Studies on Bioscouring of Cotton. World J. Text. Eng. 2019, 5, 43–52. [Google Scholar]
  103. Bugg, T.D.H.; Ahmad, M.; Hardiman, E.M.; Singh, R. The emerging role for bacteria in lignin degradation and bio-product formation. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2011, 22, 394–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Zhu, D.; Zhang, P.; Xie, C.; Zhang, W.; Sun, J.; Qian, W.-J.; Yang, B. Biodegradation of alkaline lignin by Bacillus ligniniphilus L1. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2017, 10, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Dumorné, K.; Camacho Córdova, D.; Astorga-Eló, M.; Renganathan, P. Extremozymes: A potential source for industrial applications. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 27, 649–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Mishra, A.; Takkar, S.; Joshi, N.C.; Shukla, S.; Shukla, K.; Singh, A.; Manikonda, A.; Varma, A. An Integrative approach to study bacterial enzymatic degradation of toxic dyes. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 802544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Roy, U.; Manna, S.; Sengupta, S.; Das, P.; Datta, S.; Mukhopadhyay, A.; Bhowal, A. Dye removal using microbial biosorbents. In Green Adsorbents for Pollutant Removal; Crini, G., Lichtfouse, E., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 253–280. [Google Scholar]
  108. Pham, V.H.T.; Kim, J.; Shim, J.; Chang, S.; Chung, W. Purification and characterization of strong simultaneous Enzyme production of Protease and α-Amylase from an extremophile-Bacillus sp. FW2 and its possibility in food waste degradation. Fermentation 2022, 8, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Unuofin, J.O. Treasure from dross: Application of agroindustrial wastes-derived thermo-halotolerant laccases in the simultaneous bioscouring of denim fabric and decolorization of dye bath effluents. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 147, 112251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. van der Zee, F.P.; Villaverde, S. Combined anaerobic-aerobic treatment of azo dyes—A short review of bioreactor studies. Water Res. 2005, 39, 1425–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The hazardous effects of dyes on humans and the environment.
Figure 1. The hazardous effects of dyes on humans and the environment.
Microorganisms 11 01273 g001
Figure 2. Mechanisms of adaptations and dye degradation of extremophiles under environmental stresses.
Figure 2. Mechanisms of adaptations and dye degradation of extremophiles under environmental stresses.
Microorganisms 11 01273 g002
Figure 3. Current methods for dye removal.
Figure 3. Current methods for dye removal.
Microorganisms 11 01273 g003
Table 1. List of potential extremophiles and functional key enzymes/substrates in dye biodegradation.
Table 1. List of potential extremophiles and functional key enzymes/substrates in dye biodegradation.
GroupName of Bacterial Strainkey Enzymes/SubstratesType of DyesEfficiencyReferences
ThermophilesGeobacillus stearothermophilus ATCC 10149Extracellular laccaseRemazol Brilliant Blue R90%[59]
Anoxybacillus sp. PDR2Quinone oxidoreductaseDirect Black G90%[60]
Nivibacillus thermophiles SG-1Gene encoding riboflavin biosynthesis proteinAzo dye (Orange I)100%[61]
Consortium of Caldanaerobacter and Pseudomonasnot reportedAcid Orange 7 90%[62]
CaldanaerobacterXyloseAcid Orange 7 97%[63]
Geobacillus thermoleovorans KNG 112not reportedamaranth R.I and red E azo dyes~98%[64,65]
Geobacillus yumthangensisLaccaseOrganic dyes, including Alizarin, Acid red 27, Congo red, bromophenol blue, Coomassie brilliant blue R-250, Malachite green, and Indigo carmine~99%[66]
Thermus sp.Laccasexylidine98%[67]
Geobacillus thermoleovoransNot reportedMethylene Blue and Acid Orange G100%[68]
PsychrophilesMicrococcus antarcticusPsychrophilic β-glucosidaseStarch stainnot reported[69]
Psychrobacter almentariusNot reportedReactive Black 5, Reactive Golden Ovifix, and Reactive Blue BRS~100%[53]
Psychrobacter sp.Not reportedFast orange, Methanil yellow, and Acid fast red~85%[70]
Zhihengliuella sp.Lignin peroxidase and laccaseMethyl red98.87%[55]
Bacillus sp.Azo-reductaseAmido black 10B, Evans blue, Janus green, Methyl orange,
Methyl red, and orange G)
~98%[52]
AlkaliphilesBacillus licheniformis LS04LaccaseReactive black 5>80%[71]
Bacillus fermusNot reportedDirect Blue-14>92.76%[72]
Nesterenkonia lacusekhoensis EMLA3Not reportedMethyl red97%[73]
Pseudomonas mendocinaLaccaseMixture of reactive red (RR), Reactive brown (RB), and Reactive black (RBL)58.40%[35]
Bacillus subtilisIntracellular azoreductaseMixed azo dyes87.35%[74]
Halopiger aswanensisLignin Peroxidase (LiP), Manganese Peroxidase (MnP), and laccaseMalachite Green, Methyl orange~93%[75]
Halophiles Halomonas spAzoreductaseAcid Brilliant Scarlet GR [76]
Halomonas sp. strain A55Not reporteddifferent dyes~100%[77]
Nesterenkonia lacusekhoensis EMLA3Not reportedmethyl red97%[73]
Mixture of Enterococcus, unclassified Enterobacteriaceae, Staphylococcus, Bacillus, and Kosakonia.Laccase, lignin peroxidase, manganese peroxidase, azo reductase, and NADH–DCIP reductase Congo red, Direct Black G (DBG), Amaranth, Methyl red, and Methyl orange~100%[78]
Bacillus circulans BWL1061Azoreductase, NADH-DCIP reductase, and laccaseMethyl orange >90%[79]
Alcaligenes faecalisAzoreductase, laccase and NADH-DCIP (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide-dichlorophenol indophenols) reductaseAcid Scarlet 3R~100%[80]
Bacillus sp. strain CH12Not reportedReactive Red 239 ~100%[48]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pham, V.H.T.; Kim, J.; Chang, S.; Bang, D. Investigating Bio-Inspired Degradation of Toxic Dyes Using Potential Multi-Enzyme Producing Extremophiles. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1273. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11051273

AMA Style

Pham VHT, Kim J, Chang S, Bang D. Investigating Bio-Inspired Degradation of Toxic Dyes Using Potential Multi-Enzyme Producing Extremophiles. Microorganisms. 2023; 11(5):1273. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11051273

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pham, Van Hong Thi, Jaisoo Kim, Soonwoong Chang, and Donggyu Bang. 2023. "Investigating Bio-Inspired Degradation of Toxic Dyes Using Potential Multi-Enzyme Producing Extremophiles" Microorganisms 11, no. 5: 1273. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11051273

APA Style

Pham, V. H. T., Kim, J., Chang, S., & Bang, D. (2023). Investigating Bio-Inspired Degradation of Toxic Dyes Using Potential Multi-Enzyme Producing Extremophiles. Microorganisms, 11(5), 1273. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11051273

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop