Next Article in Journal
Biodegradation of Gossypol by Aspergillus terreus-YJ01
Next Article in Special Issue
Bivariate One Strain Many Compounds Designs Expand the Secondary Metabolite Production Space in Corallococcus coralloides
Previous Article in Journal
Coxiella burnetii Femoro-Popliteal Bypass Infection: A Case Report
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Optimization of Rhodococcus erythropolis JCM3201T Nutrient Media to Improve Biomass, Lipid, and Carotenoid Yield Using Response Surface Methodology

Werner Siemens-Chair of Synthetic Biotechnology, Department of Chemistry, TUM School of Natural Sciences, Technical University of Munich, 85748 Garching, Germany
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2023, 11(9), 2147; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11092147
Submission received: 3 August 2023 / Revised: 17 August 2023 / Accepted: 21 August 2023 / Published: 24 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Microbial Cell Factories, 2nd Edition)

Abstract

:
The oleaginous bacterium Rhodococcus erythropolis JCM3201T offers various unique enzyme capabilities, and it is a potential producer of industrially relevant compounds, such as triacylglycerol and carotenoids. To develop this strain into an efficient production platform, the characterization of the strain’s nutritional requirement is necessary. In this work, we investigate its substrate adaptability. Therefore, the strain was cultivated using nine nitrogen and eight carbon sources at a carbon (16 g L−1) and nitrogen (0.16 g L−1) weight ratio of 100:1. The highest biomass accumulation (3.1 ± 0.14 g L−1) was achieved using glucose and ammonium acetate. The highest lipid yield (156.7 ± 23.0 mg g−1DCW) was achieved using glucose and yeast extract after 192 h. In order to enhance the dependent variables: biomass, lipid and carotenoid accumulation after 192 h, for the first time, a central composite design was employed to determine optimal nitrogen and carbon concentrations. Nine different concentrations were tested. The center point was tested in five biological replicates, while all other concentrations were tested in duplicates. While the highest biomass (8.00 ± 0.27 g L−1) was reached at C:N of 18.87 (11 g L−1 carbon, 0.583 g L−1 nitrogen), the highest lipid yield (100.5 ± 4.3 mg g−1DCW) was determined using a medium with 11 g L−1 of carbon and only 0.017 g L−1 of nitrogen. The highest carotenoid yield (0.021 ± 0.001 Abs454nm mg−1DCW) was achieved at a C:N of 12 (6 g L−1 carbon, 0.5 g L−1 nitrogen). The presented results provide new insights into the physiology of R. erythropolis under variable nutritional states, enabling the selection of an optimized media composition for the production of valuable oleochemicals or pigments, such as rare odd-chain fatty acids and monocyclic carotenoids.

1. Introduction

A number of bacteria, some of which belong to the actinomycetes group, such as Streptomyces, Rhodococcus, and Mycobacterium, can accumulate lipids and triacylglycerols (TAG) when grown under nitrogen limitation [1]. These single-cell oils (SCOs) have the potential to serve as sustainable alternatives to fossil fuels [2]. Some bacteria can also inherently produce carotenoids. These isoprenoids range in color from yellow to red. Due to their antioxidant nature, carotenoids, which are stored in the cell membrane, play a crucial role in photo quenching and protection of the cell from photodamage. Photo-oxidative damage is dangerous for vital cellular machinery, such as DNA, lipids, and proteins. Therefore, biotic and abiotic stress triggers many organisms to accumulate carotenoids [3,4]. Carotenoids are utilized in a wide range of commercial industries, including the pharmaceutical, food, feed, and cosmetics industries [5]. The Gram-positive and aerobic bacteria of the diverse genus Rhodococcus offer a wide range of catabolic diversity and unique enzymatic capabilities [6,7]. Furthermore, the members of this genus can typically withstand various stress conditions, including metal toxicity and desiccation [8]. Due to this adaptability, Rhodococcus is a potential producer of various products, such as biosurfactants, bioflocculants, carotenoids, triacylglycerols, and antimicrobial compounds [8]. A range of micro-organisms, including microalgae, yeast and fungi, are able to produce lipids and carotenoids in higher quantities [9,10], with each species having specific advantages and disadvantages as producers. Microalgae or cyanobacteria can use carbon dioxide as their carbon source and produce photoautotrophic lipids and carotenoids, but they also have disadvantages, such as low lipid productivity and long fermentation duration for microalgae [11], as well as low carotenoid content for cyanobacteria [12]. Rhodococcus strains are of high interest as robust producers, as they can be genetically modified and harbor a large set of enzyme genes. As one of the few bacterial genera, Rhodococcus is only able to produce monocyclic carotenoids [8]. Further, the fatty acid profile revealed the production of rare odd-chain fatty acids [13]. The heterogeneous taxon Rhodococcus can be grouped into seven distantly related species-groups, i.e., A–G. All R. erythropolis strains belong to the species group D, which further includes R. qingshengii and several unclassified strains [14]. To enable the industrial application of R. erythropolis, an efficient genome-reduction tool was recently developed to produce a genome-structure-stabilized host strain. This strain allows the removal of unfavorable genes/functions [15]. Interestingly, R. erythropolis was initially classified as a non-oleaginous species due to its low lipid content when grown on glucose. However, recent studies have reported that this strain can exhibit an oleaginous and robust phenotype when grown on glycerol [16,17]. The carotenoids 4-keto-γ-carotene and γ-carotene were produced by R. erythropolis AN12, and in other R. erythropolis strains additional carotenoids, such as β-carotene, lycopene, and phytoene, have been identified [18,19]. The scarce research demonstrating lipid accumulation in this bacterium, as well as the limited studies investigating its carotenoid production under different nutrient sources, underscore the pressing need for further characterization to comprehensively elucidate its biology and explore its potential for the production of vital compounds. In this work, a wide range of nitrogen and carbon sources are tested in parallel to derive direct conclusions on their influence on yield of biomass, lipids, and carotenoids. Further, changes in the fatty acid profile are analyzed, thereby allowing the identification of the most promising application.
Identifying the optimal fermentation conditions is crucial to developing cost-efficient processes, as the medium composition directly correlates to product yield and productivity. The carbon source is considered to be the most essential medium component. It serves as an energy source and, therefore, plays a vital role in regulating the growth and production of primary and secondary metabolites. However, the selection and concentration of the nitrogen source cannot be neglected [20]. Nitrogen is an essential nutrient used in the synthesis of many cell components and metabolites. In yeast, inorganic nitrogen sources are better suited to biomass accumulation, while organic nitrogen sources have been shown to improve lipid production [21,22]. The precise ratio of carbon to nitrogen in the cultivation medium is crucial to improve lipid accumulation, as it typically occurs when micro-organisms are grown in excess of carbon, while other nutrients, particularly nitrogen, are limited [23]. Since growth is restricted under limited conditions, TAG accumulation mainly occurs in the stationary phase, as TAG are efficient storage compounds [1]. The one-factor-at-a-time (OFAT) optimization approach, which is commonly used in microbial systems, is very time consuming, consisting of iterative removal, supplementation, and replacement experiments. It is also unable to consider interactions between variables [20,24]. Statistics-based response surface methodology (RSM), on the other hand, allows rapid parameter screening at a reduced cost. RSM, which is a mathematical modeling algorithm developed by Box and Wilson [25], can be used as an experimental strategy to identify optimum conditions in a multivariable system. It is an efficient optimization technique, as it reduces the cost and time required to identify optimal cultivation conditions by reducing the number of examined conditions in an experimental design. Furthermore, this method enables defining the standalone effects of independent variables on the process, as well as their interactions [26,27]. Central composite design (CCD) has previously been utilized for the media optimization of Rhodococcus in various contexts, such as diesel oil [28] and aflatoxin B1 degradation [26] by R. erythropolis, the production of biosurfactant by Rhodococcus spp. MTCC2574 [29], and odd-chain fatty acid (FA) production by Rhodococcus sp. YHY01 [13]. CCD has not previously been used to optimize the production of lipids and carotenoids in R. erythropolis.
In the presented data, media optimization to increase biomass, lipid, and carotenoid accumulation of R. erythropolis JCM3201T was performed via a threefold method: sequential investigation of nine distinct nitrogen sources and eight selected carbon sources was followed by the optimization of the carbon-to-nitrogen ratio via a circumscribed and rotatable CCD. The results shed light on the growth characteristics and FA profile of R. erythropolis, with the aim being to facilitate future studies of its use as a secondary metabolite producer.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strain and Inoculum Preparation

R. erythropolis JCM3201T (DSM No. 43066, German Collection of Micro-Organisms and Cell Cultures GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany) was maintained using Luria–Bertani (LB) agar plates (10 g L−1 of peptone, 5 g L−1 of yeast extract, 10 g L−1 of sodium chloride, and 14 g L−1 of agar). For inoculum, single colonies were cultured in 500-milliliter baffled shake flasks holding 100 mL of LB medium at 120 rpm (New Brunswick InnovaTM 44, Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) for 48 h. Afterward, the inoculum was transferred to prospective optimization media.

2.2. Cultivation Medium

All cultures were cultivated in 500-milliliter baffled shake flasks holding 100 mL of ‘457. Mineral Medium’ (Brunner, DSMZ, Braunschweig, Germany). As a cultivation medium, ‘457. Mineral Medium’ (Brunner, DSMZ)) [30] (pH 6.9) was used, which contained 2.44 g L−1 of Na2HPO4, 1.52 g L−1 of KH2PO4, 0.20 g L−1 of MgSO4 × 7 H2O, 0.05 g L−1 of CaCl2 × 2 H2O, and 10 mL of trace element solution SL-4. Trace element solution SL-4 contained 0.50 g L−1 of EDTA, 0.20 g L−1 of FeSO4 × 7 H2O, and 100 mL of trace element solution SL-6. Trace element solution SL-6 contained 0.10 g L−1 of ZnSO4 × 7 H2O, 0.03 g L−1 of MnCl2 × 4 H2O, 0.30 g L−1 of H3BO3, 0.20 g L−1 of CoCl2 × 6 H2O, 0.01 g L−1 of CuCl2 × 2 H2O, 0.02 g L−1 of NiCl2 × 6 H2O, and 0.03 g L−1 of Na2MoO4 × 2 H2O. Carbon and nitrogen sources were individually selected for each experiment.

2.3. Experimental Design

Media optimization was divided into three stages, with the first and second stages investigating various nitrogen and carbon sources using an OFAT strategy. Nitrogen sources encompassed ammonium chloride, diammonium hydrogen phosphate, ammonium sulfate, potassium nitrate, ammonium nitrate, yeast extract, tryptone/peptone, urea and ammonium acetate (Table 1). Based on the supplier’s information (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany), yeast extract and tryptone/peptone contained 10.8% (w/w) and 12.3% (w/w) nitrogen, respectively. To examine the effect of the nitrogen source on growth, a medium, which contained 40 g L−1 of glucose (16 g L−1 carbon) and 0.16 g L−1 of nitrogen, was used. Carbon sources encompassed glucose, galactose, fructose, lactose, sucrose, maltose, sorbitol, and glycerol (Table 1). For the screening of carbon sources, cultivation was carried out in media using the optimal nitrogen source, as observed in the previous stage of optimization, which was ammonium acetate. For each nitrogen and carbon source, biological triplicates were prepared. Each culture was inoculated to OD600nm 0.2 and cultivated at 28 °C and 120 rpm for 192 h.
Following the RSM strategy, different carbon-to-nitrogen concentrations and ratios were assessed. Subsequently, the effect of varying carbon-to-nitrogen sources on the growth, as well as lipid and carotenoid production of R. erythropolis, was compared. A total of 9 different carbon-to-nitrogen ratios were tested using a CCD. Concentrations ranged from 3.93 to 18.07 g L−1 elemental carbon and 0.02 to 0.58 g L−1 elemental nitrogen, with glucose and ammonium acetate used the as carbon and nitrogen sources, respectively. Carbon-to nitrogen ratios ranged from 12:1 to 647:1. For the center point (11 g L−1 of carbon and 0.3 g L−1 of nitrogen), five biological replicates were prepared; all other ratios were prepared in biological duplicates. Each culture was analyzed in two technical replicates. Cultures were inoculated to OD600 0.2 and then cultivated for 192 h (28 °C, 120 rpm).

2.4. Growth Analysis

Optical density was measured at 600 nm using a photometer (Nano Photometer NP80, IMPLEN, Munich, Germany). Standard semi-micro cuvettes made of polystyrene were used, and each cuvette had a path length of 10 mm.
For dry cell weight (DCW) analysis, 30 mL of culture was sampled after 140 and 192 h. For the CCD, 30 mL of culture was divided into two pre-weighed falcon tubes. Cultures were centrifuged (3500× g, 5 min), and the cells were washed using bidistilled water and lyophilized (−80 °C, ≥72 h). After gravimetric measurements, the weight of the empty vessels was subtracted from that of vessels containing lyophilized biomass.

2.5. Carotenoid Extraction

Carotenoid extraction from dry biomass was carried out as previously shown [31]. Depending on availability, between 2 and 10 mg biomass was weighed into 1.5-milliliter Eppendorf tubes. In brief, pigments were extracted using acetone after cell disruption via glass beads (2 mm). The absorbance at 454 nm was measured using a Nano Photometer NP80 (IMPLEN, Munich, Germany), and the titer calculated according to Formula (1).
Carotenoid titer (Abs454nm mg−1DCW) = Absorbance (Abs454nm)/Dry Biomass (mg)

2.6. Fatty Acid Profile

FA analysis was carried out according to the method described by Engelhart-Straub et al. [31]. In brief, lipids extracted from biomass were converted into fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) via MultiPurposeSampler MPS robotic (Gerstel, Linthicum Heights, MD, USA). FAMEs were measured via gas chromatography (GC-2025 coupled to an AOC-20i auto-injector and an AOC-20s auto-sampler, Shimadzu, Duisburg, Germany) and equipped with a flame ionization detector. For separation, a Zebron ZB-wax column (30 m × 0.32 mm, film thickness 0.25 μm, Phenomenex, Aschaffenburg, Germany) was used. The external standards, namely Marine Oil FAME mix (20 components from C14:0 to C24:1; Restek GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany) and FAME #12 mix (C13:0, C15:0, C17:0, C19:0, and C21:0; Restek GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany), were utilized for the identification and quantification of FAMEs. Normalization was based on the internal methyl laurate standard (C12; Restek GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany).
For the identification of branched FA, GC–MS was performed using a Thermo Scientific™ TRACE™ Ultra Gas Chromatograph instrument coupled with a Thermo DSQ™ II mass spectrometer and a Triplus™ Autosampler injector. For this analysis, a BPX5 column (30 m × 0.25 mm, film thickness of 0.25 μm) acquired from von Trajan Scientific Australia Pty Ltd. (Ringwood, Victoria, Australia) was used. The separation was performed at an initial column temperature of 50 °C, which increased at a rate of 4 °C min−1 up to a final temperature of 250 °C. The used carrier gas was hydrogen at a constant flow rate of 0.8 mL min−1.

2.7. Response Surface Methodology and Further Statistical Analysis

Design-Expert Software, Version 22.0.2 (Stat-Ease, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) was adopted for the design and analysis of the media optimization. A full central composite design with eight non-center points in duplicates and five center points, as well as an alpha value of 1.41421, was performed. The range of values is listed in Table 2. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to estimate the appropriate statistical parameter and evaluate the suitability of the design. The effects of carbon and nitrogen levels on the level of the dependent variables—biomass (g L−1), lipid content (mg g−1DCW) and carotenoid titers (Abs454nm mg−1DCW)—were analyzed. Non-significant terms not needed for hierarchy were excluded from the model.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of Different Nitrogen Sources on Biomass, Lipid, and Carotenoid Formation of R. erythropolis

To determine the appropriate carbon and nitrogen concentrations and assess the effects of different carbon and nitrogen sources on R. erythropolis, a full central composite design-based DOE (design of experiment) analysis was performed. Glucose was selected as the carbon source, and ammonium sulfate was used as the nitrogen source. While increasing the carbon and nitrogen concentrations resulted in increased biomass formation, a low nitrogen concentration induced increased lipid production. To produce a significant amount of biomass while retaining nitrogen limitation at a later point in the cultivation, a C:N of 100:1, with 16 g L−1 of carbon and 0.16 g L−1 of nitrogen, was used for the following experiments, in which the effects of different nitrogen and carbon sources on R. erythropolis were examined.
This study examined nine distinct nitrogen sources, including ammonium chloride, diammonium hydrogen phosphate, ammonium sulfate, potassium nitrate, and ammonium nitrate, as defined inorganic sources. Yeast extract and tryptone/peptone were used as complex organic sources, in addition to urea and ammonium acetate, which were used as defined organic sources (Figure 1).
The cultivation proceeded for eight days under identical conditions, which allowed direct comparison. Yields of biomass, lipids, and carotenoids were determined after 140 and 192 h, as two timepoints enable a more detailed assessment of the differences between the cultures. Cultures containing any of the five defined inorganic sources exhibited slow growth at the beginning (Figure 1a). When inorganic nitrogen was used as nitrogen source, compared to complex sources, the micro-organism needed additional energy to perform amino acid synthesis [27]. The lowest biomass accumulation was achieved for potassium nitrate as the nitrogen source, with a DCW of 0.36 ± 0.08 g L−1 after 192 h. In contrast, a strain identified as Rhodococcus sp. BCH2 showed the highest growth on potassium nitrate, which was comparable to that of ammonium acetate [32]. The complex nitrogen sources’ yeast extract and tryptone/peptone showed the fasted growth from the start of the cultivation with no detectable lag phase. Complex nitrogen sources provide additional nutrients, including amino acids, polypeptides, vitamins, and trace elements. Increased yield of biomass with complex nitrogen sources was achieved for a variety of micro-organisms, including C. oleaginosus and A. oryzae [27,33]. When cultivating the R. erythropolis strains MTCC1548, 2794, and 3951 using different nitrogen sources, inorganic nitrogen sources (ammonium sulfate and ammonium phosphate), as well as urea, resulted in very low biomass compared to complex organic nitrogen sources (yeast extract and meat peptone) [29]. In this study, R. erythropolis cultures, which contained the two aforementioned complex nitrogen sources, entered the stationary phase after approximately 115 h (Table S5). After 140 h, a DCW of 2.13 ± 0.07 g L−1 for yeast extract and 1.88 ± 0.03 g L−1 for tryptone/peptone was determined, with a decreased DCW after 192 h. The higher yield of the biomass when using yeast extract could be related to its high vitamin content relative to tryptone/peptone [34]. The final group of assessed nitrogen sources comprised defined organic sources in the form of urea and ammonium acetate. While urea induced an extended lag phase within the first 120 h, cultures with ammonium acetate exhibited a steady growth over 192 h and no lag phase. The highest biomass was achieved when ammonium acetate was used as the nitrogen source with a DCW of 2.84 ± 0.02 g L−1 after 192 h.
Since biomass productivity was the primary goal of these cultivations, an increased nitrogen content of 0.16 g L−1 was selected, leading to a lipid content of 5 to 16% in R. erythropolis after 192 h. The lipid content for all distinct nitrogen sources, except for potassium nitrate, increased between 140 and 192 h (Figure 1c). The highest lipid yield was determined for cultures grown using the complex nitrogen sources yeast extract and tryptone/peptone, which registered 156.7 ± 23.0 mg g−1DCW and 132.3 ± 15.4 mg g−1DCW after 192 h, respectively. As TAG accumulation primarily occurs in the stationary phase [1] and cultures grown on complex nitrogen sources entered the stationary phase after 115 h, a sufficient time period for lipid accumulation was allowed. In contrast, R. erythropolis exhibited a longer lag phase when grown using the five defined inorganic nitrogen sources, having a lipid content of 5–5.5% (g g−1DCW) after 192 h. Cultures grown on potassium nitrate showed a higher lipid content after 140 h, i.e., 10.5% (g g−1DCW). Inefficient utilization of this compound could potentially induce nitrogen limitation in these cultures during the early cultivation phase, which could explain the elevated lipid yield after 140 h. Cultures grown using ammonium acetate showed the highest DCW, having a lipid content of 68.3 ± 5.0 mg g−1DCW after 192 h. In R. toruloides, organic nitrogen sources also led to increased lipid contents compared to inorganic nitrogen sources [35].
When R. opacus PD630 was grown using waste paper hydrolysate, the inorganic nitrogen sources ammonium chloride, followed by ammonium sulfate, gave the highest biomass and lipid yield, having a lipid content of around 25% after 120 h. When grown using the complex nitrogen sources urea, yeast extract, and peptone, biomass and lipid accumulation was lower. The lipid content of cultures grown using urea (15.24%) was reported to be three-fold higher than that of cultures grown using yeast extract (5.69%) and peptone (4.34%) [2]. These results are in contrast to the presented data in this study. One reason for this outcome could be the utilization of the complex carbon source waste paper hydrolysate, which offers a wide range of readily metabolizable ammonia acids, polypeptides, nucleotides, various vitamins, and trace elements. Therefore, the advantage of a complex nitrogen source, like yeast extract or tryptone/peptone, could be masked, as these substances are already available. Furthermore, R. opacus generally produces higher amounts of TAGS than R. erythropolis while cultivated using sugars, organic acids, and hydrocarbons [8].
The effect of different nitrogen and carbon sources on carotenoid accumulation in R. erythropolis has not previously been investigated. The carotenoid content of all cultures was assessed after 140 and 192 h (Figure 1d), with decreasing carotenoid contents recorded over this time period in all cultures. The highest carotenoid content was achieved when diammonium hydrogen phosphate (0.039 ± 0.006 Abs454nmmg−1DCW) was used as a nitrogen source, followed by ammonium sulfate. Cultures grown using ammonium chloride, potassium nitrate, ammonium nitrate, and ammonium acetate produced similar amounts of carotenoids after 140 h, having an absorbance of between 0.019 and 0.021 Abs454nmmg−1DCW. Temperature, pH, and carbon and nitrogen sources affect carotenoid production in micro-organisms [3,36,37]. Rhodotorula glutinis produced the highest amount of carotenoid using ammonium sulfate as nitrogen source, followed by yeast extract and peptone [34]. In contrast, for Rhodotorula sp. RY1801, the highest carotenoid production was achieved using yeast extract, followed by urea and ammonium sulfate. When ammonium nitrate was used as nitrogen source, the lowest carotenoid production was determined [36]. While the highest growth of the bacterium Sphingobium sp. was detected using diammonium hydrogen phosphate, complex nitrogen sources, like tryptone, soya peptone, and okara, were found to be the best options for the production of the carotenoid nostoxanthin [38]. The fungi Umbelopsis ramanniana produces, using diammonium hydrogen phosphate and the carbon source maltose, the highest amount of carotenoids compared to other nitrogen sources, while using the carbon source glucose, the lowest amount of carotenoids is produced [39]. Urea increased the production of total carotenoids and, in particular, β-carotene in Flavobacterium multivorum, likely by inhibiting hydroxylase activity, thereby decreasing the production of zeaxanthin [40]. While some studies indicated higher carotenoid yields using organic nitrogen sources, this finding could not be observed in Microbacterium paraoxydans or in the presented data in this study [38,41].

3.2. Effect of Different Carbon Sources on Biomass, Lipid, and Carotenoid Formation by R. erythropolis

For the evaluation of different carbon sources, ammonium acetate was selected as the nitrogen source due to the resulting highest achieved biomass accumulation and relatively high lipid yields. A defined nitrogen source offers the advantage of a controlled medium composition; therefore, possible fluctuations can be directly traced to the carbon source. Eight carbon sources were examined in this work, including glucose, galactose, and fructose, as monosaccharides/hexose. Lactose, sucrose, and maltose were included as disaccharides. Moreover, the sugar alcohol sorbitol and glycerol were examined (Figure 2). The latter element represents an interesting carbon source; as the main by-product of biodiesel production, it has a low cost and is readily available [16,42].
The cultivation proceeded for eight days under identical conditions of 16 g L−1 of carbon and 0.16 g L−1 of nitrogen in the form of ammonium acetate, resulting in a C:N of 100. No growth in R. erythropolis was detected for arabinose and xylose, which is congruent with other Rhodococcus strains. However, xylose, as well as arabinose utilization, was achieved via genetic engineering in R. opacus PD630 and R. jostii [43,44,45,46]. Xylose assimilation capabilities enable the efficient utilization of cellulose and hemicellulose degradation products [47], such as wheat bran hydrolysate [48] or corn stover hydrolysate [49]. Very low growth with final biomasses of under 0.5 g L−1 were determined for cultures with galactose, lactose, and maltose. The inability to grow on galactose and lactose was reported in other Rhodococcus strains, such as R. jostii, R. erythropolis, R. fascians, and R. equi [50]. The only strain capable of growth on these carbon sources was R. opacus [50], which is also reported to grow on maltose [51]. Further, R. erythropolis ZJB-09149 could grow using maltose, as well as lactose [52]. When fructose was used as a carbon source in this study, the fastest growth was measured for the first 48 h, after which point the stationary phase was entered. When grown using the two sugar alcohols sorbitol and glycerol, the strain entered the stationary phase two days later at around 94 h. For cultures grown using the disaccharide sucrose, the stationary phase also started after 94 h, with a final DCW of 2.47 ± 0.22 g L−1 noted after 192 h. The highest yield of biomass was achieved using glucose as a carbon source, with a DCW of 3.1 ± 0.14 g L−1 noted after 192 h. Interestingly, the stationary phase of cultures grown using glucose was not reached before 164 h, which was later than all other investigated carbon sources. When grown using different carbon sources, R. erythropolis strains MTCC1548, 2794, and 3951 showed distinct differences. While MTCC1548 grew best using glucose as carbon source, followed by glycerol, sucrose, and sorbitol, MTCC2794 and MTCC3951 showed the highest growth using sucrose, followed by sorbitol, glucose, and glycerol. Using glucose, MTCC2794 grew to around double the OD600 values of MTCC1548 and MTCC3951 [29]. When R. erythropolis LSSE8-1 was grown using different carbon sources, the highest OD600 was determined for glycerol, followed by sucrose and glucose, which is in reverse order to the growth investigated in this work [53]. The varying growth behaviors of R. erythropolis strains further emphasize the heterologous nature of these different strains.
The lowest lipid contents (≤3.6%) were measured for the cultures with galactose, lactose, and maltose, which also exhibited the lowest growth. Due to the low growth and, therefore, low consumption of nutrients, nitrogen limitation was presumably not reached. In comparison, fructose and glucose accumulated over double the amount of lipid. The highest lipid content was determined for the cultures grown using the sugar alcohols sorbitol and glycerol, which registered values of 93.8 ± 4.1 mg g−1DCW and 86.1 ± 13.4 mg g−1DCW after 192 h, respectively. Cortes et al. examined the effects of various carbon sources on the lipid accumulation in R. erythropolis DCL12 and R. opacus PWD14 cells. The experimental setup incorporated 0.01 g L−1 of nitrogen, and an excess of carbon (2 g L−1 of glucose) was used. R. erythropolis accumulated 78.71% (g g−1DCW) lipids in the stationary phase [54]. R. erythropolis IGTS8, when grown using 30 g L−1 of glycerol and 0.75 g L−1 of urea as carbon and nitrogen source, produced lipid content of 45.8% in 96 h [55].
Insufficient amounts of biomass were available to determine the carotenoid content of cultures grown using galactose and lactose. The highest carotenoid contents after 140 h were measured in cultures grown using maltose and glycerol, followed by fructose. The lowest carotenoid content was determined for cultures using glucose, with only around half of the carotenoids compared to the former. While R. mucilaginosa grew the fastest in the glucose medium, the highest carotenoid concentration was measured in the sucrose molasses-containing medium. The highest product yield was obtained using whey lactose as the carbon source [37]. This result is in agreement with those of Phaffia rhodozyma strains, which showed increased carotenoid production when using xylose, followed by sucrose, rather than glucose, as the carbon source [56]. In contrast, glucose was determined to be the most suitable carbon source for the production of carotenoids in Rhodotorula sp. RY1801, followed by fructose. Sucrose, lactose, and maltose showed comparable levels of carotenoid production [36]. Umbelopsis ramanniana produced the highest carotenoid amount with maltose used as the carbon source, followed by lactose and glucose [39].
In previous studies, it was demonstrated that Rhodococci can grow on various waste stream hydrolysates, ranging from sugar cane molasse, orange waste, and olive mill waste to cellulosic feedstocks [42], rendering them potent organisms for use in sustainable industrial processes. The data presented here regarding the bacterium’s behavior in a wide range of carbon and nitrogen sources offer a valuable resource for the identification of suitable and cost-effective growth media.

3.3. Effect of Nitrogen and Carbon Sources on the Fatty Acid Profile of R. erythropolis

The FA composition of R. erythropolis is heavily influenced by the cultivation conditions, including the carbon and nitrogen source, as well as the pH-value, temperature, and aeration [42]. FA represent an essential part of the phospholipid bilayer of the cellular membrane [57], which allows bacteria to adapt their lipid composition to maintain membrane fluidity and permeability in response to various stress conditions [58,59]. Bacteria of the actinomycetes group store large amounts of TAGs in lipid bodies. During lipid biosynthesis, an oleaginous layer is formed at the cytoplasm membrane, followed by the subsequent formation of lipid pre-bodies, which are finally released as mature lipid bodies in the cytoplasm [60].
The relative quantification of FAs is depicted as the percentage of total FAs (w/w) (Figure 3). Independent of the nitrogen or carbon source, the main components of the FA profile of R. erythropolis are palmitic acid (C16:0), 10-methyl octadecanoic acid (10-Me-18:0), myristic acid (C14:0), and oleic acid (C18:1). 10-Me-18:0 is a fully saturated and long-chain FA, which is characterized by a low melting temperature and high oxidative stability [61]. It occurs naturally in the membrane of a variety of actinobacteria [62]. In previous studies, 10-methyl octadecanoic acid was determined in R. erythropolis 3C-9 and DSM 43066 [63,64,65]. Tsitko et al. (1999) observed an increase of up to 34% of branched fatty acids (BFAs) of total FAs in R. opacus when cultivated using aromatic compounds. The role of 10-Me-18:0 in the protection of the membrane–cell wall structure against disruption was suggested [66].
The FA contents of all cultures grown using different nitrogen sources (Figure 1c), with the exception of cultures grown using potassium nitrate, increased between the samples taken after 6 (140 h) and 8 days (192 h). While the contents of palmitoleic acid (C16:1) decreased in all samples over time, the contents of palmitic acid (C16:0) increased in all samples, with exception of potassium nitrate, up to 34.1% in cultures grown using yeast extract and tryptone/peptone. Both nitrogen sources are associated with minimal differences between the two timepoints, i.e., 140 and 192 h. A distinct decrease in 10-methyl octadecanoic acid (10-Me-C18:0) was measured in samples grown using yeast extract (11.5%), tryptone/peptone (12.2%), and ammonium acetate (16.3%). In all other samples, contents of over 20% of this FA were determined. These three carbon sources also produced the highest contents of oleic acid (C18:1) and stearic acid (C18:0). Palmitic acid (C16:0) and oleic acid (C18:1) have been reported to be the main FAs in oleaginous Rhodococci, which produce high amounts of TAGs (50–75% glipid g−1DCW) [42].
The FA profile of cultures grown using distinct carbon sources were also compared (Figure 4). Distinct FA profiles were determined for cultures grown on lactose and maltose. Between 33 and 38% of the profile was identified as 10-methyl octadecanoic acid (10-Met-C18:0), more than double the amounts compared to the cultures using glucose, fructose or glycerol. Galactose, lactose, and maltose not only sustained reduced biomass, but also resulted in low levels of oleic acid (C18:1) (≤7.8%) and stearic acid (C18:0) (≤2.2%).
When comparing the FA profiles of cultures grown using glucose and glycerol as carbon sources, cultures cultivated using glycerol exhibited an increased amount of oleic acid (C18:1; 15.1 compared to 20.6%) and a decreased amount of 10-methyl octadecanoic acid (10-Me-C18:0; 15.7 compared to 11.9%). These findings are in line with those of Bhatia et al. (2019), who identified distinct FA profiles of three different Rhodococcus sp. species (YHY01, 1918, and 19938) grown using these carbon sources [13].
Odd-chain fatty acids (OCFA) are commercially important products due to their antifungal, anti-allergic, and anti-inflammatory properties [13,67,68]. Microbial oil typically comprises very low OCFA content [13,69], while Rhodococcus has the ability to accumulate high OCFA content, mainly pentadecanoic acid (C15:0) and heptadecanoic acid (C17:0). In Rhodococcus sp. YHY01, a maximum proportion of 85% w/w of all FA were identified as OCFA when cultivated using a mixture of glycerol, propionate, and ammonium chloride [13]. An increased amount of pentadecanoic acid (C15:0) could also be measured in cultures cultivated using sorbitol (2.4%) and glycerol (3.1%). Elevated amounts of heptadecenoic acid (C17:1) were determined in cultures cultivated using lactose (6.4%) and maltose (9.3%) compared to other carbon sources evaluated in this work.

3.4. RSM Model: Effect of Nitrogen and Carbon Concentrations on Biomass, Lipid and Carotenoid Formation of R. erythropolis

As a final step, the effects of a wide range of carbon and nitrogen concentrations on biomass accumulation, as well as lipid and carotenoids production, in R. erythropolis was assessed for the first time. To meet this goal, a full central composite design-based DOE (design of experiment) analysis was performed. For the CCD setup, glucose was selected as the carbon source, as the highest biomass was achieved with it (Figure 2). Good growth of Rhodococcus strains on glucose is well reported in the literature [70,71,72]. Ammonium acetate was used as the most promising nitrogen source. A C:N range of 12 to 160 was assessed, with a maximal C:N of 647 being part of the star points. The CCD design matrix, as well as the corresponding response on the dependent factors: biomass, lipid, and carotenoid contents, are illustrated in Table 3.
The fitted regression equations for the CCD model are represented below
Biomass-140 h (g L−1) = −0.145 + 0.076 C + 7.195 N
Biomass-192 h (g L−1) = 1.228 − 0.059 C + 5.207 N + 0.588 C × N
Lipid-140 h (mg g−1DCW) = 34.867 + 1.608 C − 99.460 N − 4.281 C × N + 192.195 N2
Lipid-192 h (mg g−1DCW) = 76.816 + 0.946 C − 300.836 N + 343.229 N2
Carotenoide-140 h (Abs454nm mg−1DCW) = 0.019 − 0.0002 C − 0.016 N + 0.001 C × N
Carotenoide-192 h (Abs454nm mg−1DCW) = 0.015 − 0.0002 C + 0.024 N − 0.025 N2
C and N represent carbon and nitrogen levels in g L−1, respectively. Table 4 showcases the ANOVA analysis of the reduced CCD models (insignificant factors excluded). The complete ANOVA analysis of the models after 192 h is listed in Table S8. The regression equations after 192 h translate into the 3D response surface plots depicted in Figure 5.
It can be deduced from the formulated regression Equations (2) and (3) that both of the independent factors, i.e., carbon and nitrogen, greatly affect biomass accumulation. After 192 h, a 2FI model was found to most accurately explain the interactions by exclusively considering significant terms. Carbon (linear) and nitrogen (linear), as well as the interactions between both concentrations, significantly affect the yield of biomass. With increased concentrations of carbon and nitrogen, increased biomass accumulation was determined (Figure 5a). The highest biomass was achieved with 11 g L−1 of carbon and 0.58 g L−1 of nitrogen, which corresponds to the highest tested nitrogen concentration, with 8.0 ± 0.3 g L−1 being recorded after 192 h.
For the lipid content, a reduced quadratic model with carbon (linear) and nitrogen (linear and quadratic) concentrations resulted in the best fitted model after 192 h. An inverse trend regarding biomass accumulation was observed. With decreasing carbon and nitrogen concentration, increasing lipid formation was observed. Nitrogen limitation can lead to high lipid production in oleaginous micro-organisms, but it simultaneously limits the biomass formation, as can be especially observed for Run 13 (Table 3). This observation was shown for a range of micro-organisms, including the oleaginous yeast Cutaneotrichosporon oleaginosus [27] and Rhodotorula glutinis [73]. Star points (Run 9 to 15) represent extreme low, as well as high, values for each factor of the design. These points are typically applied to estimate the curvature of the model. Run 13 represents minimal nitrogen content in the medium. Here, the lowest biomass (0.5 ± 0.05 g L−1), as well as the highest lipid content (100.5 ± 4.3 mg g−1DCW ), could be determined after 192 h. Due to a drastic decrease in the yield of biomass and increase in lipid formation in the culture compared to other tested media compositions, the model is unable to precisely predict this point, which could explain the significant lack of fit p-value for both lipid titer models (Table 4). Various C:N were tested for R. opacus PD630 grown using waste paper hydrolysate. While the biomass accumulation steadily decreased with an increase in C:N of 10 to 80, the lipid content steadily increased. A C:N of 60 yielded a lipid content of 41.6% [2].
The effects of carbon and nitrogen concentration on carotenoid production in Rhodococcus were investigated for the first time. When explaining the carotenoid content after 192 h, a reduced quadratic model with carbon (linear) and nitrogen (linear and quadratic) resulted in the best fit. Low carbon and high nitrogen content in the medium resulted in increased carotenoid production (Figure 5c), with a maximal carotenoid content of 0.020 ± 0.001 Abs454nmmg−1DCW (6 g L−1 of carbon and 0.5 g L−1 of nitrogen). Temperature and pH, as well as initial sugar and nitrogen contents, had effects on the carotenoid production by the yeast Rhodotorula mucilaginosa. Increased growth and carotenoid concentration could be observed at higher sugar concentrations [37]. In Rhodotorula glutinis CCY20-2-26, the highest pigment accumulation was determined at a C:N of 20, with the content decreasing at a higher C:N ratio [74]. In contrast, the carotenoid content of Rhodotorula glutinis increased with an increase in the C:N ratio. Additionally, both high and low concentrations of ammonium had negative effects on carotenoid production [73].
In RSM, low experiment numbers are sufficient to find the optimum parameters, as well as interpret effects among variables. However, this method also has drawbacks [24,29]. Applied quadratic non-linear correlations might not be sufficiently complex to explain non-linear dependencies in biological processes [29]. The CCD of different carbon and nitrogen concentrations presented in this study allows an estimation of the influence on the biomass, lipid, and carotenoid production of R. erythropolis. Furthermore, a suitable setup, enabling both biomass and lipid production, could be identified. One possibility is to achieve high-density biomass using high carbon and nitrogen concentrations supplied to the media, followed by nitrogen limitation for lipid accumulation.

4. Conclusions

In this study, a threefold media optimization method was performed for R. erythropolis using selected carbon and nitrogen sources. The data generated in this work, together with the CCD, provide a comprehensive source of information for the identification of suitable and cost-efficient feedstocks used in industrial processes. For the first time, the effects of carbon and nitrogen concentrations on the production of lipids and carotenoids in R. erythropolis have been assessed via a response surface model. Comparisons between fatty acid profiles when grown on different carbon and nitrogen sources revealed the enhanced production of oleic acid and stearic acid when grown on yeast extract and tryptone/peptone. Higher amounts of odd-chain fatty acids were detected when grown on lactose or maltose. Odd-chain fatty acids have unique pharmacological functions and are positively related to human health; they are, therefore, of high interest [75]. The optimal culture composition developed here could aid future studies that aim to understand de novo lipogenesis in R. erythropolis. Further, asymmetric carotenoids are of great industrial interest, as they are very difficult to chemically produce, but they can be produced by a lycopene β-cyclase identified in R. erythropolis AN12 [8,18].
Applying a C:N of 100, nine nitrogen and eight carbon sources were investigated. As all other parameters were held constant, new insights about the effects of a wide variety of carbon and nitrogen sources could be concluded. Maximum biomass acquisition was obtained using the nitrogen source ammonium acetate, whereas the complex nitrogen source yeast extract, followed by tryptone/peptone, achieved the highest lipid yield. With respect to different carbon sources, the highest biomasses could be observed using glucose, followed by sucrose. Notably, sugar alcohols, sorbitol and glycerol induced elevated lipid titers. While biomass production increased with the increase in carbon and nitrogen concentrations in the presented CCD, lipid production decreased.
The results of this study facilitate the identification of suitable waste stream substrates for R. erythropolis JCM3201T, as insights into the substrate flexibility and nutrient flow could serve as cultivation references for future studies of this promising organism. Future work could apply more sophisticated modeling solutions, such as machine learning algorithms, i.e. Bayesian optimization, for the optimization of this strain at a larger scale. To this end, additional factors, such as optimal pH, temperature, pO2, vitamins, and trace elements, could also be identified in a time- and cost-efficient manner. This current work could also feed into a big data acquisition model, where RSM and other methodologies could be extracted from various works to capture the non-linear behavior of a biological system.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms11092147/s1, Table S1: OD—Nitrogen Sources; Table S2: DCW, Lipid, and Carotenoid Titers of Nitrogen Sources; Table S3: OD—Carbon Sources; Table S4: DCW, Lipid, and Carotenoid Titers of Carbon Sources; Table S5: Onset of stationary phase-Nitrogen and carbon sources; Table S6: FAME profiles of Nitrogen Sources; Table S7: FAME profiles of Carbon Sources; Table S8: Complete ANOVA of central composite design (CCD) models after 192 h.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, all authors; methodology, S.E.-S.; validation, all authors; writing—original draft preparation, S.E.-S.; writing—review and editing, D.A., T.B. and N.M.; project administration, N.M.; funding acquisition, N.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), project OleoBuild, grant number: 031B0853A.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the valuable inputs of Nadim Ahmad, Nathanael Arnold, Manfred Ritz, and Felix Melcher.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alvarez, H.M.; Steinbuchel, A. Triacylglycerols in prokaryotic microorganisms. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2002, 60, 367–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nair, A.S.; Sivakumar, N. Biodiesel production by oleaginous bacteria Rhodococcus opacus PD630 using waste paper hydrolysate. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ram, S.; Mitra, M.; Shah, F.; Tirkey, S.R.; Mishra, S. Bacteria as an alternate biofactory for carotenoid production: A review of its applications, opportunities and challenges. J. Funct. Foods 2020, 67, 103867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Thanapimmetha, A.; Suwaleerat, T.; Saisriyoot, M.; Chisti, Y.; Srinophakun, P. Production of carotenoids and lipids by Rhodococcus opacus PD630 in batch and fed-batch culture. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2017, 40, 133–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Barreiro, C.; Barredo, J.L. Carotenoids Production: A Healthy and Profitable Industry. In Microbial Carotenoids; Methods in Molecular Biology; Barreiro, C., Barredo, J.L., Eds.; Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 2018; Volume 1852, pp. 45–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bell, K.S.; Philp, J.C.; Aw, D.W.; Christofi, N. The genus Rhodococcus. J. Appl. Microbiol. 1998, 85, 195–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. de Carvalho, C.C.C.R.; da Fonseca, M.M.R. The remarkable Rhodococcus erythropolis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005, 67, 715–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cappelletti, M.; Presentato, A.; Piacenza, E.; Firrincieli, A.; Turner, R.J.; Zannoni, D. Biotechnology of Rhodococcus for the production of valuable compounds. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 8567–8594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ochsenreither, K.; Glück, C.; Stressler, T.; Fischer, L.; Syldatk, C. Production Strategies and Applications of Microbial Single Cell Oils. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Tapiero, H.; Townsend, D.M.; Tew, K.D. The role of carotenoids in the prevention of human pathologies. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2004, 58, 100–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, L.; Song, J.; Li, Y.; Li, P.; Wang, H. Robust and cost-saving static solid cultivation method for lipid production using the chlamydospores of Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2019, 12, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pagels, F.; Vasconcelos, V.; Guedes, A.C. Carotenoids from Cyanobacteria: Biotechnological Potential and Optimization Strategies. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bhatia, S.K.; Gurav, R.; Choi, T.-R.; Han, Y.-H.; Park, Y.-L.; Jung, H.-R.; Yang, S.-Y.; Song, H.-S.; Yang, Y.-H. A clean and green approach for odd chain fatty acids production in Rhodococcus sp. YHY01 by medium engineering. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 286, 121383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sangal, V.; Goodfellow, M.; Jones, A.L.; Schwalbe, E.C.; Blom, J.; Hoskisson, P.A.; Sutcliffe, I.C. Next-generation systematics: An innovative approach to resolve the structure of complex prokaryotic taxa. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 38392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kitagawa, W.; Hata, M. Development of Efficient Genome-Reduction Tool Based on Cre/loxP System in Rhodococcus erythropolis. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Herrero, O.M.; Moncalián, G.; Alvarez, H.M. Physiological and genetic differences amongst Rhodococcus species for using glycerol as a source for growth and triacylglycerol production. Microbiology 2016, 162, 384–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Alvarez, H.M. Relationship between β-oxidation pathway and the hydrocarbon-degrading profile in actinomycetes bacteria. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2003, 52, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tao, L.; Picataggio, S.; Rouvière, P.E.; Cheng, Q. Asymmetrically acting lycopene β-cyclases (CrtLm) from non-photosynthetic bacteria. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2004, 271, 180–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tao, L.; Wagner, L.W.; Rouvière, P.E.; Cheng, Q. Metabolic engineering for synthesis of aryl carotenoids in Rhodococcus. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 70, 222–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Singh, V.; Haque, S.; Niwas, R.; Srivastava, A.; Pasupuleti, M.; Tripathi, C.K.M. Strategies for Fermentation Medium Optimization: An In-Depth Review. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 2087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bao, W.; Li, Z.; Wang, X.; Gao, R.; Zhou, X.; Cheng, S.; Men, Y.; Zheng, L. Approaches to improve the lipid synthesis of oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 149, 111386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Madani, M.; Enshaeieh, M.; Abdoli, A. Single cell oil and its application for biodiesel production. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2017, 111, 747–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Papanikolaou, S.; Aggelis, G. Lipids of oleaginous yeasts. Part I: Biochemistry of single cell oil production. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2011, 113, 1031–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sahu, R.; Meghavarnam, A.K.; Janakiraman, S. Response surface methodology: An effective optimization strategy for enhanced production of nitrile hydratase (NHase) by Rhodococcus rhodochrous (RS-6). Heliyon 2020, 6, e05111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Box, G.E.P.; Wilson, K.B. On the Experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.) 1951, 13, 1–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kong, Q.; Zhai, C.; Guan, B.; Li, C.; Shan, S.; Yu, J. Mathematic modeling for optimum conditions on aflatoxin B1 degradation by the aerobic bacterium Rhodococcus erythropolis. Toxins 2012, 4, 1181–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Awad, D.; Bohnen, F.; Mehlmer, N.; Brueck, T. Multi-Factorial-Guided Media Optimization for Enhanced Biomass and Lipid Formation by the Oleaginous Yeast Cutaneotrichosporon oleaginosus. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2019, 7, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Huang, L.; Ma, T.; Li, D.; Liang, F.-L.; Liu, R.-L.; Li, G.-Q. Optimization of nutrient component for diesel oil degradation by Rhodococcus erythropolis. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2008, 56, 1714–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mutalik, S.R.; Vaidya, B.K.; Joshi, R.M.; Desai, K.M.; Nene, S.N. Use of response surface optimization for the production of biosurfactant from Rhodococcus spp. MTCC 2574. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 7875–7880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Koblitz, J.; Halama, P.; Spring, S.; Thiel, V.; Baschien, C.; Hahnke, R.L.; Pester, M.; Overmann, J.; Reimer, L.C. MediaDive: The expert-curated cultivation media database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, D1531–D1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Engelhart-Straub, S.; Cavelius, P.; Hölzl, F.; Haack, M.; Awad, D.; Brueck, T.; Mehlmer, N. Effects of Light on Growth and Metabolism of Rhodococcus erythropolis. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Kolekar, P.D.; Phugare, S.S.; Jadhav, J.P. Biodegradation of atrazine by Rhodococcus sp. BCH2 to N-isopropylammelide with subsequent assessment of toxicity of biodegraded metabolites. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014, 21, 2334–2345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kövilein, A.; Zadravec, L.; Hohmann, S.; Umpfenbach, J.; Ochsenreither, K. Effect of process mode, nitrogen source and temperature on L-malic acid production with Aspergillus oryzae DSM 1863 using acetate as carbon source. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 1033777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Elfeky, N.; Elmahmoudy, M.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, J.; Bao, Y. Lipid and Carotenoid Production by Rhodotorula glutinis with a Combined Cultivation Mode of Nitrogen, Sulfur, and Aluminium Stress. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Evans, C.T.; Ratledge, C. Effect of Nitrogen Source on Lipid Accumulation in Oleaginous Yeasts. Microbiology 1984, 130, 1693–1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhao, Y.; Guo, L.; Xia, Y.; Zhuang, X.; Chu, W. Isolation, Identification of Carotenoid-Producing Rhodotorula sp. from Marine Environment and Optimization for Carotenoid Production. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Aksu, Z.; Eren, A.T. Carotenoids production by the yeast Rhodotorula mucilaginosa: Use of agricultural wastes as a carbon source. Process Biochem. 2005, 40, 2985–2991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, M.; Yang, Y.; Li, L.; Ma, Y.; Huang, J.; Ye, J. Engineering Sphingobium sp. to Accumulate Various Carotenoids Using Agro-Industrial Byproducts. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 784559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Kizilay, H.K.; Küçükçetin, A.; Demir, M. Optimization of carotenoid production by Umbelopsis ramanniana. Biotechnol. Prog. 2023, e3369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bhosale, P.; Bernstein, P.S. β-carotene production by Flavobacterium multivorum in the presence of inorganic salts and urea. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2004, 31, 565–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ojha, S.; Kapoor, S.; Mishra, S. Carotenoid Production by a Novel Isolate of Microbacterium paraoxydans. Indian J. Microbiol. 2018, 58, 118–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Alvarez, H.M.; Hernández, M.A.; Lanfranconi, M.P.; Silva, R.A.; Villalba, M.S. Rhodococcus as Biofactories for Microbial Oil Production. Molecules 2021, 26, 4871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kurosawa, K.; Plassmeier, J.; Kalinowski, J.; Rückert, C.; Sinskey, A.J. Engineering L-arabinose metabolism in triacylglycerol-producing Rhodococcus opacus for lignocellulosic fuel production. Metab. Eng. 2015, 30, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kurosawa, K.; Wewetzer, S.J.; Sinskey, A.J. Engineering xylose metabolism in triacylglycerol-producing Rhodococcus opacus for lignocellulosic fuel production. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2013, 6, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Xiong, X.; Wang, X.; Chen, S. Engineering of a xylose metabolic pathway in Rhodococcus strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 5483–5491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Xiong, X.; Wang, X.; Chen, S. Engineering of an L-arabinose metabolic pathway in Rhodococcus jostii RHA1 for biofuel production. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 43, 1017–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Donini, E.; Firrincieli, A.; Cappelletti, M. Systems biology and metabolic engineering of Rhodococcus for bioconversion and biosynthesis processes. Folia Microbiol. 2021, 66, 701–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Mischko, W.; Hirte, M.; Roehrer, S.; Engelhardt, H.; Mehlmer, N.; Minceva, M.; Brück, T. Modular biomanufacturing for a sustainable production of terpenoid-based insect deterrents. Green Chem. 2018, 20, 2637–2650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kurosawa, K.; Wewetzer, R.J.; Sinskey, A.J. Triacylglycerol Production from Corn Stover Using a Xylose-Fermenting Rhodococcus opacus Strain for Lignocellulosic Biofuels. J. Microb. Biochem. Technol. 2014, 6, 254–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Herrero, O.M.; Alvarez, H.M. Whey as a renewable source for lipid production by Rhodococcus strains: Physiology and genomics of lactose and galactose utilization. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2015, 118, 262–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hernández, M.A.; Alvarez, H.M. Glycogen formation by Rhodococcus species and the effect of inhibition of lipid biosynthesis on glycogen accumulation in Rhodococcus opacus PD630. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2010, 312, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Jin, L.-Q.; Li, Y.-F.; Liu, Z.-Q.; Zheng, Y.-G.; Shen, Y.-C. Characterization of a newly isolated strain Rhodococcus erythropolis ZJB-09149 transforming 2-chloro-3-cyanopyridine to 2-chloronicotinic acid. New Biotechnol. 2011, 28, 610–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Li, Y.; Xing, J.; Li, W.; Xiong, X.; Li, X.; Liu, H. Medium optimization of Rhodococcus erythropolis LSSE8-1 by Taguchi methodology for petroleum biodesulfurization. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2007, 24, 781–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Cortes, M.A.L.R.M.; de Carvalho, C.C.C.R. Effect of carbon sources on lipid accumulation in Rhodococcus cells. Biochem. Eng. J. 2015, 94, 100–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sriwongchai, S.; Pokethitiyook, P.; Pugkaew, W.; Kruatrachue, M.; Lee, H. Optimization of lipid production in the oleaginous bacterium Rhodococcus erythropolis growing on glycerol as the sole carbon source. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2012, 11, 14440–14447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Vázquez, M.; Santos, V.; Parajó, J.C. Effect of the carbon source on the carotenoid profiles of Phaffia rhodozyma strains. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1997, 19, 263–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sampath, H.; Ntambi, J.M. Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid Regulation of Genes of Lipid Metabolism. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2005, 25, 317–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Heipieper, H.J.; Weber, F.J.; Sikkema, J.; Keweloh, H.; de Bont, J.A.M. Mechanisms of Resistance of Whole Cells to Toxic Organic-Solvents. Trends Biotechnol. 1994, 12, 409–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Weber, F.J.; de Bont, J.A. Adaptation mechanisms of microorganisms to the toxic effects of organic solvents on membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1996, 1286, 225–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wältermann, M.; Hinz, A.; Robenek, H.; Troyer, D.; Reichelt, R.; Malkus, U.; Galla, H.J.; Kalscheuer, R.; Stöveken, T.; von Landenberg, P.; et al. Mechanism of lipid-body formation in prokaryotes: How bacteria fatten up. Mol. Microbiol. 2005, 55, 750–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Blitzblau, H.G.; Consiglio, A.L.; Teixeira, P.; Crabtree, D.V.; Chen, S.; Konzock, O.; Chifamba, G.; Su, A.; Kamineni, A.; MacEwen, K.; et al. Production of 10-methyl branched fatty acids in yeast. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2021, 14, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. McNabb, A.; Shuttleworth, R.; Behme, R.; Colby, W.D. Fatty acid characterization of rapidly growing pathogenic aerobic actinomycetes as a means of identification. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1997, 35, 1361–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Peng, F.; Liu, Z.; Wang, L.; Shao, Z. An oil-degrading bacterium: Rhodococcus erythropolis strain 3C-9 and its biosurfactants. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 102, 1603–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Machida, S.; Bakku, R.K.; Suzuki, I. Expression of Genes for a Flavin Adenine Dinucleotide-Binding Oxidoreductase and a Methyltransferase from Mycobacterium chlorophenolicum Is Necessary for Biosynthesis of 10-Methyl Stearic Acid from Oleic Acid in Escherichia coli. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Koch, C.; Klatte, S.; Schumann, P.; Burghardt, J.; Kroppenstedt, R.M.; Stackebrandt, E. Transfer of Arthrobacter picolinophilus Tate and Ensign 1974 to Rhodococcus erythropolis. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1995, 45, 576–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Tsitko, I.V.; Zaitsev, G.M.; Lobanok, A.G.; Salkinoja-Salonen, M.S. Effect of aromatic compounds on cellular fatty acid composition of Rhodococcus opacus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65, 853–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Avis, T.J.; Belanger, R.R. Specificity and mode of action of the antifungal fatty acid cis-9-heptadecenoic acid produced by Pseudozyma flocculosa. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67, 956–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. MubarakAli, D.; Praveenkumar, R.; Shenbagavalli, T.; Mari Nivetha, T.; Parveez Ahamed, A.; Al-Dhabi, N.A.; Thajuddin, N. New reports on anti-bacterial and anti-candidal activities of fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) obtained from Scenedesmus bijugatus var. bicellularis biomass. RSC Adv. 2012, 2, 11552–11556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Park, Y.-K.; Dulermo, T.; Ledesma-Amaro, R.; Nicaud, J.-M. Optimization of odd chain fatty acid production by Yarrowia lipolytica. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2018, 11, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kurosawa, K.; Boccazzi, P.; de Almeida, N.M.; Sinskey, A.J. High-cell-density batch fermentation of Rhodococcus opacus PD630 using a high glucose concentration for triacylglycerol production. J. Biotechnol. 2010, 147, 212–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Shields-Menard, S.A.; Amirsadeghi, M.; Sukhbaatar, B.; Revellame, E.; Hernandez, R.; Donaldson, J.R.; French, W.T. Lipid accumulation by Rhodococcus rhodochrous grown on glucose. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 42, 693–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kurane, R.; Toeda, K.; Takeda, K.; Suzuki, T. Culture Conditions for Production of Microbial Flocculant by Rhodococcus erythropolis. Agric. Biol. Chem. 2014, 50, 2309–2313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Braunwald, T.; Schwemmlein, L.; Graeff-Hönninger, S.; French, W.T.; Hernandez, R.; Holmes, W.E.; Claupein, W. Effect of different C/N ratios on carotenoid and lipid production by Rhodotorula glutinis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 6581–6588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Tkáčová, J.; Klempová, T.; Čertík, M. Kinetic study of growth, lipid and carotenoid formation in β-carotene producing Rhodotorula glutinis. Chem. Pap. 2017, 72, 1193–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zhang, L.-S.; Liang, S.; Zong, M.-H.; Yang, J.-G.; Lou, W.-Y. Microbial synthesis of functional odd-chain fatty acids: A review. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 36, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Effects of various nitrogen sources on growth curves, as well as biomass, lipid, and carotenoid accumulation of R. erythropolis after 140 and 192 h. Yield after 140 h is depicted in blue, and yield after 192 h is depicted in red. Samples were cultured using variable nitrogen sources at a nitrogen concentration of 0.16 g L−1 (C:N of 100, 16 g L−1 of carbon in the form of glucose), n = 3. (a) Cell growth measured as OD at 600 nm over 192 h. (b) Dry cell weight (DCW) at 140 and 192 h. (c) Lipid content (normalized to DCW) at 140 and 192 h. (d) Carotenoid accumulation (normalized to DCW) at 140 and 192 h.
Figure 1. Effects of various nitrogen sources on growth curves, as well as biomass, lipid, and carotenoid accumulation of R. erythropolis after 140 and 192 h. Yield after 140 h is depicted in blue, and yield after 192 h is depicted in red. Samples were cultured using variable nitrogen sources at a nitrogen concentration of 0.16 g L−1 (C:N of 100, 16 g L−1 of carbon in the form of glucose), n = 3. (a) Cell growth measured as OD at 600 nm over 192 h. (b) Dry cell weight (DCW) at 140 and 192 h. (c) Lipid content (normalized to DCW) at 140 and 192 h. (d) Carotenoid accumulation (normalized to DCW) at 140 and 192 h.
Microorganisms 11 02147 g001
Figure 2. Effect of various carbon sources on growth, lipid, and carotenoid accumulation of R. erythropolis after 140 and 192 h of being cultured in parallel with carbon concentration of 16 g L−1, holding all other conditions to be identical (C:N of 100, 0.16 g L−1 of nitrogen in the form of ammonium acetate), n = 3. Yield after 140 h is depicted in blue, and yield after 192 h is depicted in red. (a) Growth measured as OD at 600 nm over 192 h. (b) Dry cell weight (DCW) at 140 and 192 h. (c) Lipid content (normalized to DCW) at 140 and 192 h. (d) Carotenoid accumulation (normalized to DCW) at 140 and 192 h. No carotenoid extraction was performed for galactose and lactose due to a lack of sufficient biomass formation.
Figure 2. Effect of various carbon sources on growth, lipid, and carotenoid accumulation of R. erythropolis after 140 and 192 h of being cultured in parallel with carbon concentration of 16 g L−1, holding all other conditions to be identical (C:N of 100, 0.16 g L−1 of nitrogen in the form of ammonium acetate), n = 3. Yield after 140 h is depicted in blue, and yield after 192 h is depicted in red. (a) Growth measured as OD at 600 nm over 192 h. (b) Dry cell weight (DCW) at 140 and 192 h. (c) Lipid content (normalized to DCW) at 140 and 192 h. (d) Carotenoid accumulation (normalized to DCW) at 140 and 192 h. No carotenoid extraction was performed for galactose and lactose due to a lack of sufficient biomass formation.
Microorganisms 11 02147 g002
Figure 3. Fatty acid profiles of R. erythropolis grown using distinct nitrogen sources (n = 3). “Other” constitutes fatty acids with a total fatty acid content of representation below 3% (w/w) and includes C14:1, C15:0, C17:0, 14-Methyl-C16:0, C20:1, C20:3, C20:5, and C22:1. For each group, the two timepoints—140 h (left) and 192 h (right)—are depicted.
Figure 3. Fatty acid profiles of R. erythropolis grown using distinct nitrogen sources (n = 3). “Other” constitutes fatty acids with a total fatty acid content of representation below 3% (w/w) and includes C14:1, C15:0, C17:0, 14-Methyl-C16:0, C20:1, C20:3, C20:5, and C22:1. For each group, the two timepoints—140 h (left) and 192 h (right)—are depicted.
Microorganisms 11 02147 g003
Figure 4. Fatty acid profiles of R. erythropolis grown using distinct carbon sources (n = 3, except for Maltose after 192 h, where n = 2, as one sample was excluded as an outlier). “Other” constitutes fatty acids with a total fatty acid content representation of below 3% (w/w) and includes C14:1, C17:0, 14-Methyl-C16:0, C18:3, C20:1, C20:3, C20:5, and C22:1, among others. For each group, the two timepoints—140 h (left) and 192 h (right)—are depicted.
Figure 4. Fatty acid profiles of R. erythropolis grown using distinct carbon sources (n = 3, except for Maltose after 192 h, where n = 2, as one sample was excluded as an outlier). “Other” constitutes fatty acids with a total fatty acid content representation of below 3% (w/w) and includes C14:1, C17:0, 14-Methyl-C16:0, C18:3, C20:1, C20:3, C20:5, and C22:1, among others. For each group, the two timepoints—140 h (left) and 192 h (right)—are depicted.
Microorganisms 11 02147 g004
Figure 5. A 3D response surface plot of the combined effect of carbon and nitrogen levels on (a) biomass (g L−1), (b) lipid content (mg g−1DCW) and (c) carotenoid content (Abs454nmmg−1DCW) after 192 h. Red points mark the measured points on which the model was built, dark red points were measured above the depicted model surface and light red points were measured below the model surface.
Figure 5. A 3D response surface plot of the combined effect of carbon and nitrogen levels on (a) biomass (g L−1), (b) lipid content (mg g−1DCW) and (c) carotenoid content (Abs454nmmg−1DCW) after 192 h. Red points mark the measured points on which the model was built, dark red points were measured above the depicted model surface and light red points were measured below the model surface.
Microorganisms 11 02147 g005
Table 1. Matrix of tested nitrogen and carbon sources, as well as their chemical nature.
Table 1. Matrix of tested nitrogen and carbon sources, as well as their chemical nature.
NumberNitrogen SourceChemical NatureCarbon Source Chemical Nature
1Ammonium chlorideDefined inorganicGlucoseMonosaccharides
2Diammonium hydrogen phosphateGalactose
3Ammonium sulfateFructose
4Potassium nitrateLactoseDisaccharides
5Ammonium nitrateSucrose
6Yeast extractComplex organicMaltose
7Tryptone/peptoneSorbitolSugar alcohol
8UreaDefined organicGlycerol
9Ammonium acetate
Table 2. Range of values for central composite design.
Table 2. Range of values for central composite design.
VariableLevel
−1.414−10+1+1.414
Carbon (g L−1)3.9296111618.071
Nitrogen (g L−1)0.0170.10.30.50.583
Table 3. Full central composite design for the optimization of carbon and nitrogen concentrations in the cultivation media of R. erythropolis. C:N ratio, with C (carbon concentration) and N (nitrogen concentration), as well as the determined biomass, lipid, and carotenoid contents after 140 and 192 h, are listed. Each run was analyzed in two technical replicates. Due to technical complications, results of Run 13 represent one biological sample.
Table 3. Full central composite design for the optimization of carbon and nitrogen concentrations in the cultivation media of R. erythropolis. C:N ratio, with C (carbon concentration) and N (nitrogen concentration), as well as the determined biomass, lipid, and carotenoid contents after 140 and 192 h, are listed. Each run was analyzed in two technical replicates. Due to technical complications, results of Run 13 represent one biological sample.
RunC:NC
g L−1
N
g L−1
Biomass
g L−1
Lipid Content
mg g−1DCW
Carotenoid Content
Abs454nmmg−1DCW
Biomass
g L−1
Lipid Content
mg g−1DCW
Carotenoid Content
Abs454nmmg−1DCW
140 h192 h
160.006.0000.1001.4426.900.01921.7243.890.0159
260.006.0000.1001.2325.860.01751.7840.790.0148
3160.0016.0000.1001.7441.830.01561.9463.190.0156
4160.0016.0000.1001.7340.090.01462.1265.650.0133
512.006.0000.5003.2130.610.01244.8222.340.0206
612.006.0000.5003.4830.260.01464.6024.360.0207
732.0016.0000.5004.0228.180.01657.4328.090.0186
832.0016.0000.5005.1227.600.01567.2525.140.0183
913.103.9290.3002.4927.110.01343.6622.010.0186
1013.103.9290.3002.3326.760.01543.4521.340.0202
1160.2418.0710.3003.1928.530.02384.5329.710.0164
1260.2418.0710.3003.6126.630.02095.1331.300.0148
13647.0611.0000.0170.6365.720.01320.50100.530.0138
1418.8711.0000.5835.3730.130.01738.0422.600.0172
1518.8711.0000.5835.5027.770.01837.9625.680.0179
1636.6711.0000.3002.7326.960.01903.9628.790.0196
1736.6711.0000.3002.8327.420.01734.7629.520.0172
1836.6711.0000.3002.8026.180.01844.1232.760.0170
1936.6711.0000.3002.7125.230.01664.0531.790.0183
2036.6711.0000.3002.7726.800.01893.2033.160.0174
Table 4. ANOVA of full central composite design (CCD) models for the optimization of carbon and nitrogen concentrations in R. erythropolis cultivation media.
Table 4. ANOVA of full central composite design (CCD) models for the optimization of carbon and nitrogen concentrations in R. erythropolis cultivation media.
ResponseModelp-Value
Model
p-Value
Lack of Fit
R2Adjusted R2Predicted R2
Biomass 140 hLinear<0.00010.03180.93060.92240.8976
192 h2FI<0.00010.07220.96110.95380.9416
Lipid140 hReduced Quadratic0.0007<0.00010.70580.62730.2220
192 hReduced Quadratic<0.0001<0.00010.87250.84860.7262
Carotenoids 140 h2FI0.10850.00040.30800.1782−0.1744
192 hReduced Quadratic<0.00010.25250.79360.75490.6715
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Engelhart-Straub, S.; Haack, M.; Awad, D.; Brueck, T.; Mehlmer, N. Optimization of Rhodococcus erythropolis JCM3201T Nutrient Media to Improve Biomass, Lipid, and Carotenoid Yield Using Response Surface Methodology. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 2147. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11092147

AMA Style

Engelhart-Straub S, Haack M, Awad D, Brueck T, Mehlmer N. Optimization of Rhodococcus erythropolis JCM3201T Nutrient Media to Improve Biomass, Lipid, and Carotenoid Yield Using Response Surface Methodology. Microorganisms. 2023; 11(9):2147. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11092147

Chicago/Turabian Style

Engelhart-Straub, Selina, Martina Haack, Dania Awad, Thomas Brueck, and Norbert Mehlmer. 2023. "Optimization of Rhodococcus erythropolis JCM3201T Nutrient Media to Improve Biomass, Lipid, and Carotenoid Yield Using Response Surface Methodology" Microorganisms 11, no. 9: 2147. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11092147

APA Style

Engelhart-Straub, S., Haack, M., Awad, D., Brueck, T., & Mehlmer, N. (2023). Optimization of Rhodococcus erythropolis JCM3201T Nutrient Media to Improve Biomass, Lipid, and Carotenoid Yield Using Response Surface Methodology. Microorganisms, 11(9), 2147. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11092147

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop