Next Article in Journal
Dietary Energy Levels Affect Rumen Bacterial Populations that Influence the Intramuscular Fat Fatty Acids of Fattening Yaks (Bos grunniens)
Next Article in Special Issue
Identifying Active Salmonella Infections in Swine Nurseries Using Serology and Bacterial Culture and Evaluating Associated Risk Factors
Previous Article in Journal
A Deletion Downstream of the CHCHD7 Gene Is Associated with Growth Traits in Sheep
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genomic Analysis of Staphylococcus aureus Strains Originating from Hungarian Rabbit Farms Reinforce the Clonal Origin of Various Virulence Types
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 10
Issue 9
10.3390/ani10091473
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Prevalence of Bovine Tuberculosis in Slaughtered Cattle in Sicily, Southern Italy

by
Jessica M. Abbate
1,
Francesca Arfuso
1,
Carmelo Iaria
2,*,
Giuseppe Arestia
3 and
Giovanni Lanteri
1
1
Department of Veterinary Science, University of Messina, Polo Universitario Annunziata, 98168 Messina, Italy
2
Department of Chemical, Biological, Pharmaceutical and Environmental Sciences, University of Messina, Polo Universitario Papardo, 98166 Messina, Italy
3
Veterinary Service of Hygiene of Farms and Zootechnical Productions, ASP 7, 97100 Ragusa, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2020, 10(9), 1473; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091473
Submission received: 16 July 2020 / Revised: 17 August 2020 / Accepted: 20 August 2020 / Published: 21 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Collection Veterinary Microbiology in Farm Animals)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Mycobacterium bovis is a Gram-positive, acid-fast bacterium responsible for disease in cattle and in several other domestic and wild animal species, also representing a prominent cause of morbidity and mortality in humans. In Italy, the incidence of bovine tuberculosis (bTB) in cattle has been progressively reduced throughout the years; however, the disease still remains widespread in Southern Italy, with the highest prevalence rates recorded in Sicily. Specific eradication programs have been established, with herd testing and post-mortem inspection at the slaughterhouse used as diagnostic procedures to obtain epidemiological data on bTB prevalence. The concomitant use of these procedures is essential in epidemiological surveillance programs, and although data on disease prevalence at herd level are systematically collected and used for epidemiological surveillance in Sicily, data from post-mortem inspection are scant. Therefore, the current survey aimed to investigate the prevalence of bTB in cattle in Sicily during two different three-year periods, using data from meat inspections and histopathological methods. Results obtained show that even though bTB occurrence in cattle was well reduced over the years, the disease still remains widespread in this region, posing severe implications for public health and a prominent economic impact on the livestock industry.

Abstract

Post-mortem inspection in slaughterhouses plays a key role in the epidemiological surveillance of infectious diseases, including bTB. This study assessed the prevalence of bTB in cattle in Sicily during two different three-year periods (2010–2012; 2017–2019), using data from meat inspections and histopathological methods. Out of 100,196 cattle, 5221 (5.21%) were diagnosed with tuberculous lesions. Higher prevalence of bTB was recorded during the triennium 2010–2012 (6.74%; n = 3692) compared to the triennium 2017–2019 (3.36%; n = 1529), with a decreasing trend in annual occurrence throughout the study period and a heterogenous proportion of infected cattle among the Sicilian provinces (p < 0.01). Lower rates of infection were recorded in animals aged <12 months and >84 months (p < 0.0001). Pearson’s chi square analysis revealed a higher localization of lesions in the thoracic cavity (p < 0.0001). Gathered findings show that even though bTB occurrence in cattle was greatly reduced over the years, the disease still remains widespread in Sicily, also posing severe implications for public health.

1. Introduction

Zoonotic tuberculosis (TB), caused by Mycobacterium bovis, is a prominent cause of morbidity and mortality in humans, and remains a cause of concern for livestock and wildlife worldwide [1,2,3]. Disease in humans has reemerged in several ecological scenarios, and in 2016, the World Health Organization (WHO) estimated 147,000 new human cases and 12,500 deaths due to the disease, globally [4]. Nevertheless, data for zoonotic tuberculosis do not accurately reflect the true incidence of the disease [1], as M. bovis is rarely supposed to cause disease in humans and the commonly used diagnostic techniques do not allow identification of the pathogen at species level [2,5,6].
Mycobacterium bovis is a Gram-positive, acid-fast bacterium belonging to the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTC) [7], responsible for disease in cattle, commonly known as bovine tuberculosis (bTB), also posing a risk for human infection and thus making the disease of public health concern [1,8]. While cattle are considered the main hosts of M. bovis, the pathogen has been increasingly detected in several other domestic and wild animal species, which are suspected to play a role in the maintenance and transmission of the infection in particular ecological settings [9,10,11,12,13]. The ingestion of unpasteurized milk from cows with mammary tuberculosis is the main route of transmission of infection to humans, resulting in the non-pulmonary form of the disease [8,14], while airborne transmission and contamination of skin wounds mainly occur in people working in close contact with diseased animals and/or contaminated animal products, including farmers, slaughterhouse workers, and veterinarians [8,14,15].
Considering the zoonotic potential of the disease and its economic impact on animal-related production, specific eradication programs have been established in many industrialized countries, aimed to control the infection in susceptible animal hosts, thus reducing the risk for human infection [16,17,18]. In European countries, a “test-and-slaughter” strategy has been adopted, which consists of systematic testing of cattle at herd level and slaughter of infected animals, with movement restrictions for the herd of origin until it is declared free from infection in consecutive whole-herd tests [16,17,18]. Intradermal tuberculin tests are commonly used for ante mortem diagnosis of M. bovis infection in cattle herds [19]. Tests evaluate a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction in sensitized animals after an intradermal injection of purified protein derivate (PPD) tuberculin from mycobacteria [19,20]. Additionally, an γ-interferon assay may be used in combination with skin tests to increase the overall sensitivity and specificity of herd testing [17,19]. Tuberculosis surveillance is completed at the slaughterhouse, and as all cattle are intended for human consumption, they are subjected to routine meat inspection. All animal carcasses are checked for typical gross lesions, consisting of well-circumscribed, often encapsulated foci of granulomatous inflammation with central necrosis or mineralization [21]. Tuberculous granulomas are frequently detected in the lymph nodes of the head and thorax (i.e., retro-pharyngeal, bronchial, and mediastinal), involving the lung parenchyma in 10–30% of cases, while generalized distribution of gross lesions is sporadically observed [21,22].
Herd testing and post-mortem inspection at the slaughterhouse are diagnostic procedures which are characterized by different values of sensitivity and specificity [19,23]; however, their concomitant use is essential to obtain reliable information on bTB prevalence in cattle in epidemiological surveillance programs [16,17,24,25]. In fact, the intra-vitam diagnostic test is characterized by high specificity (i.e., >99.9%) [26], but has a moderate sensitivity compared to the post-mortem examination (i.e., 75–95.5%) [19,27]. Additionally, several factors have been proven to influence the sensitivity of the diagnostic tests in field conditions. Accordingly, the concurrent presence of other diseases in the herd (e.g., Johne’s Disease and Bovine Viral Diarrhea (BVD) [28,29]), exposure to other non-pathogenic environmental mycobacteria [30], or co-infection with Fasciola hepatica [31,32], among others, may compromise sensitivity and specificity values, thus affecting the reliability of diagnostic tools. Additionally, M. bovis infection is not detectable in animals with a depressed cell-mediated immune response and macroscopic lesions are found only at post-mortem examination [21,31]. Therefore, post-mortem inspection at slaughterhouses allows the confirmation of bTB in herd test reactors, but also provides additional data concerning infected animals that have not reacted in field tests. Of note, epidemiological studies conducted in Northern Ireland demonstrated that 18–28% of the new bTB outbreaks are firstly detected during post-mortem examination at slaughterhouses [24].
In Italy, the incidence of bTB in cattle has been progressively reduced throughout the years, and currently several Italian regions have been declared officially disease free [33]. However, above all in Southern Italy, bTB is still widespread, with the highest prevalence rates recorded in Sicily in recent years [34]. Of note, the persistence of bTB in livestock in Sicily has been repeatedly rationalized with the existence of infected wild animal hosts, which play a crucial epidemiological role in the maintenance of bTB in particular ecological settings [11]. In Sicily, data on bTB prevalence at herd level are systematically collected and used for disease epidemiological surveillance, whereas data from post-mortem inspection at the slaughterhouse are scanty. Therefore, the purpose of the current survey was to investigate the prevalence of bTB in cattle in Sicily during two different three-year periods, using data from meat-inspections and histopathological methods. Gathered results will provide information on the prevalence, as well as changes in trends of the disease in this region, and will also assist in identifying risk factors which are useful in the streamlining interventions designed to eradicate tuberculosis in cattle.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The island of Sicily has an area of 25,711 km2 and is divided into 9 provinces and 390 municipalities. Livestock represents one of the most important resources for the Sicilian economy, involving more than 9000 farms with more than 380,000 heads of cattle, with the highest concentration in the provinces of Ragusa (22%), Palermo (21%), Messina (16%), and Enna (15%) [34]. The farms are registered in the National database (BDN) (Reg CE 1760/2000—BDN data) and their locations can be identified by geographic coordinates. Traditionally, the livestock system in Sicily consists of cattle reared in feral and semi-feral condition with extensive grazing methods that represent an ancient and traditional practice for using poor lands. Livestock farming differs between the production of farm animals for slaughter and the production of milk for the processing of dairy products.

2.2. Data Collection and Post-Mortem Examination

The study population included cattle slaughtered in a slaughterhouse located in the south-east of Sicily. The slaughterhouse was selected based on the high number of cattle slaughtered annually (mean 16,699 ± 2000) (ISTAT) and the wide geographical origin of the animals.
In detail, data on animals slaughtered from January 2010 to December 2012, and from January 2017 to December 2019 were included.
At the slaughterhouse, cattle were individually subjected to ante-mortem examinations, and data on animal geographical origin (i.e., municipality of the herd) and age were collected. According to age, cattle were categorized into five age classes: (1) <12 months, (2) 12–36 months, (3) 36–60 months, (4) 60–84 months, and (5) >84 months.
A routine post-mortem examination was then performed, and each animal carcass underwent systematic inspection of organs and respective draining lymph nodes, in accordance with EC Directive No 854/2004. Briefly, lungs, heart, liver, kidneys, mammary gland, and lymph nodes (mandibular, retropharyngeal, tracheobronchial, mediastinal, hepatic, mesenteric, and supramammary) were visually inspected, palpated, and incised to find visible lesions. All lesions consistent with well demarcated and encapsulated granulomas, with central caseous necrosis or mineralization were sampled for histopathological analyses. Anatomical localization of tuberculosis-like lesions was always recorded.
Ante mortem examination and post-mortem inspection were carried by the assigned veterinarians at the slaughterhouse.

2.3. Histopathological Examination

Tissues for histological analysis were stored in 10% buffered formalin and routinely processed. Paraffin-embedded tissue sections (5 μm) were stained with haematoxylin-eosin (H&E) for examination of morphological patterns, and Ziehl-Neelsen stain (ZN; 04-111802 Bioptica; Milano, Italy) to identify the specific etiological agent (i.e., acid-fast bacilli).
Only cases with tuberculous granulomas confirmed by histopathology were considered for this epidemiological study.
Laboratory analyses were carried out at the unit of Veterinary Pathology of the Department of Veterinary Science of the University of Messina (Sicily, Southern Italy).

2.4. Data Analysis

The prevalence of bTB in cattle during the two different triennia and the annual distribution of infectious cases, with regard to geographical origin of slaughtered cattle, animal age, and anatomical localization of gross lesions, were assessed. The normality assumption was tested using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov normality test, and when normal distribution was found (p > 0.05), two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to verify differences in the number of slaughtered animals and infection rates recorded among the different Sicilian provinces between the two considered three-year periods. When significant differences were found, Bonferroni’s post hoc comparison was applied. Pearson’s chi-square analysis was applied to evaluate statistically significant differences in the prevalence of infection related to animal age classes and organ-wise prevalence of granulomatous lesions. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using the software GraphPad Prism version 5.1 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

3. Results

A total of 100,196 cattle were slaughtered during the overall study period, including 54,751 animals during the triennium 2010–2012, and 45,445 during the three-year period of 2017–2019.
Overall, out of the 100,196 analyzed animal carcasses, 5221 (apparent prevalence of 5.21%) showed tuberculous gross lesions during all the study period. Interestingly, 1036 (19.84%) out of the 5221 positive cattle tested negative to the intradermal tuberculin test and bTB was first diagnosed during meat inspection at the slaughterhouse. A higher apparent prevalence of infection was recorded during the three-year period (2010–2012) (6.74%; n = 3692, mean 1230.66 ± 432.16), compared to the apparent prevalence rate recorded during the triennium (2017–2019) (3.36%; n = 1529, mean 509.66 ± 205.21). The annual distribution of bTB showed the highest apparent prevalence of infection in 2010 (9.51%) and the lowest prevalence in 2018 (2.17%), whereas apparent prevalence rates of 6.36%, 4.47%, 2.90%, and 5.15% were recorded during the years 2011, 2012, 2017, and 2019, respectively.
Bovine tuberculosis apparent prevalence rates based on geographical origins of infected slaughtered animals during the two investigated three-year periods are reported in Figure 1.
The proportion of infected cattle among the different Sicilian provinces was highly heterogeneous during the two different three-year periods. During the triennium 2010–2012, the proportion of infected cattle ranged from 18.37% reported in the province of Caltanissetta to 2.76% in the province of Syracuse, while it was from 20.67% to 1.48% in the provinces of Catania and Ragusa respectively, during the triennium 2017–2019. Additionally, a reduction in disease occurrence was observed for each province comparing the two different triennia, except for the provinces of Catania and Trapani, where an increased bTB prevalence was recorded.
Statistical analysis of data showed differences (p < 0.01) in the number of cattle and in bTB occurrence based on the geographical origin of cattle in and between the two considered triennia. In detail, a significantly higher bTB apparent prevalence was recorded in cattle sourced from the province of Catania compared to prevalence rates documented in cattle sourced from the provinces of Ragusa, Syracuse, Enna, Agrigento, Palermo, and Trapani during the three-year period 2017–2019 (p < 0.01). Instead, the apparent prevalence of infection observed during the triennium 2010–2012 was significantly higher in animals coming from the province of Caltanissetta compared to the provinces of Ragusa, Syracuse, Agrigento, and Palermo (p < 0.05) (Figure 2).
Pearson’s chi-square analysis revealed a significantly lower prevalence of infection in the youngest (<12 months) and oldest (>84 months) aged animals compared to animals aged 12–36 months and 36–60 months during both three-year periods (p < 0.0001). Specifically, during the triennium (2010–2012) gross lesions were mainly detected in animals aged 36–60 months (n = 1291; 34.97% ± 68.24), followed by animals aged 60–84 months (n = 1123; 30.42% ± 39.37), 12–36 months (n = 1040; 28.17% ± 41.54), >84 months (n = 233; 6.31% ± 9.28), and <12 months (n = 5; 0.13% ± 0.17). Conversely, between 2017 and 2019, the highest prevalence of bTB lesions was observed in animals aged 12–36 months (n = 1021; 66.77% ± 82.45), followed by cattle aged 36–60 months (n = 451; 29.50% ± 51.53), 60–84 months (n = 40; 2.62% ± 12.54), <12 months (n = 14; 0.91% ± 7.77), and >84 months (n = 3; 0.20% ± 1.26).
Regarding anatomical localization of the lesions, 5173 (99.08%) out of 5221 positive cattle showed gross lesions in the thoracic cavity (lungs and/or lymph nodes), while 0.77% (n = 40) and 0.15% (n = 8) of positive animals showed hepatic (liver and/or portal lymph nodes) and generalized distribution of lesions, respectively. Statistically significant differences in the prevalence of gross lesions among the anatomical sites and among age classes were found (Table 1).

4. Discussion

Our study assessed the apparent prevalence of bTB in cattle in Sicily during two different three-year periods, using data from post-mortem examinations at the slaughterhouse and histopathological assays, to acquire evidence on disease burden and changes in trends at a regional level.
Overall, out of the 100,196 inspected animal carcasses, 5221 (5.21%) showed tuberculous gross lesions confirmed by histopathology during the six-year study period, and surprisingly, 19.84% of the positive cattle tested negative to the intradermal tuberculin test. A twofold decrease in overall disease apparent prevalence was recorded during the three-year period of 2017–2019 compared to the prevalence rate recorded during the triennium of 2010–2012. Interestingly, a decreasing trend in annual bTB occurrence was observed throughout the study period, with the highest occurrence rate reported in 2010 (9.51%) and the lowest rate in 2018 (2.17%). Similarly, a decreasing trend in infection prevalence was documented in cattle in Sicily during the same years, based on data from systematic testing at herd level. In 2010, according to the Italian Ministry of Health annual report on bTB in cattle, approximately 200 new outbreaks were reported in Italy and 74% of these were recorded in Sicily [34]. Of note, the proportion of infected cattle herds was high in the provinces of Catania (8.58%) and Messina (5.36%) [11]. Between 2012 and 2016, the mean annual incidence in cattle herds was 2.73% (range: 1.81–3.65%), with a mean prevalence of infection of 3.35% (range: 2.71–4.19%) among all the Sicilian provinces [35]. Conclusively, according to the Italian Ministry of Health annual reports on bTB in cattle, prevalence rates in cattle herds were 2.10% and 1.25%, in 2018 and in 2019 respectively [34].
In the current study, the proportion of infected cattle among the different Sicilian provinces was highly heterogeneous during the two different three-year periods, and a reduction in disease occurrence was observed for each province comparing the two different triennia, except for the provinces of Catania and Trapani, where an increased prevalence was recorded. Several variables could influence heterogeneity in transmission of infection across animal populations and also the persistence of bTB in many areas, including the frequency of routine herd-testing; the inability of intra-vitam diagnostic tests to detect all infected animals, herd size, and type; and proximity to infected wildlife [9,17,19,36]. In particular, herd testing intervals vary between twice a year to once every two years, based on the prevalence of infection in the geographical area where the herd is located. As a consequence, some cattle are never tested during their lifetimes, especially in herds sited in low incidence areas [9]. Therefore, the persistence of undetected positive animals represents a constant reservoir of infection, and the risk of within-herd transmission is consistent especially in high-density herds [17]. Furthermore, the persistence of positive animals in herds may result from failure of intra vitam diagnostic tests to reveal all infected animals [19]. Of note, in the current study about 20% of the new bTB infection cases was firstly recorded during post-mortem inspection at the slaughterhouse, as animals with gross lesions tested negative to the intradermal tuberculin test. Regarding infected wildlife, M. bovis has been isolated in the free-ranging domestic pig in Sicily (Sicilian black pigs or Nebrodi pigs), suspected of acting as reservoirs of infection in particular ecological scenarios [11]. These animals live mostly in the woods of the Natural Parks of Nebrodi and Madonie, two rural nature reserves in northeastern Sicily, and are reared in free or semifree roaming conditions, frequently sharing pastures with cattle [11]. Moreover, wild boars could play an epidemiological role in the spread of M. bovis in sub-urban and rural areas in Sicily [37], and finally an outbreak of bTB was recently reported in a fallow deer (Dama dama) herd [38]. Sylvatic animals may act as spillover or reservoir hosts [10,13], thus playing a key role in the spread and transmission of M. bovis [9,11], as well as other pathogens with zoonotic potential in several ecological settings [39,40,41]. It should be noted that the livestock system in Sicily consists of cattle reared in feral and semi-feral conditions, with large opportunities of contact between livestock and wildlife. Thus, the different proportions of infected cattle among the different Sicilian provinces herein found could be explained with the distribution of potentially infected sylvatic animal populations at a regional level [10,38]. However, due to the data limitation in this work, future research should include a more detailed analysis of risk factors and variables that may considerably improve our current understanding of the distribution and persistence of bovine tuberculosis in this region.
According to age, a significantly lower prevalence of bTB lesions was observed in cattle aged <12 months and >84 months. Tuberculous lesions were mainly detected in cattle aged 36–60 months (34.97%) during the triennium 2010–2012, and in cattle aged 12–36 months (66.77%) during the three-year period 2017–2019. Generally, prevalence of bTB infection is positively correlated with animal age and the risk of infection increased in older cattle as a result of prolonged exposure to the pathogen in the environment [9,36,42]. In Great Britain, it has been demonstrated that bTB risk of infection increased with age up to the highest risk age group at 12 and 36 months old before risk declines [42]. However, this pattern emerged due to the detection and removal of infected animals, and survival of animals with lower infection rates [42]. Higher susceptibility of older cattle to M. bovis infection may result from prolonged exposure to the pathogen, but it may also correlate to the reactivation of latent infections in old stressed animals or be related to physiological decline of the immunity [42,43]. Certainly, a detailed understanding of age-dependent patterns will help to elucidate the true characteristics of bTB infection in cattle.
Furthermore, the anatomical distribution of gross lesions was correlated with cattle age in this study. In particular, hepatic lesions (liver and/or portal lymph nodes) were mainly observed in cattle aged <12 months, whereas lesions in the thoracic cavity were regularly recorded in older animals. Finally, only a minimal percentage of infected cattle showed the generalized form of the disease, and this finding agrees with other surveys [21,44]. The route of transmission of the M. bovis infection influences the spectrum of lesions in cattle [21]. Undoubtedly, the airborne transmission of infection appears to be the most common among cattle, as in 99.08% of infected animals granulomatous lesions were recorded in the thoracic cavity (lung and/or lymph nodes), whereas hepatic localization of the gross lesions supposed a transplacental transmission of the infection in cattle affected by endometrial tuberculosis [21].
Nevertheless, the probability that infected cattle show visible gross lesions at post-mortem examination is less than 50% [23]; therefore, an underestimation of bTB prevalence cannot be excluded in the current study. Experimental studies demonstrated that macroscopic lesions may be found in cattle 14 days post-infection [45], but in some instances, 6–8 weeks are required [46], and, especially in early infection, lesions are invisible to the naked eye. However, despite its low sensitivity and apparently low contribution in bTB surveillance system, post-mortem inspection at the slaughterhouse allows the detection of residual infection cases [21,24,25,47], also providing essential epidemiological data on zoonotic diseases [48,49] and allowing the documentation of several pathological findings [50,51].

5. Conclusions

The current study documents bovine tuberculosis occurrence in cattle in Sicily, using data from meat inspections at slaughterhouses and histopathological methods, over two different three-year study periods. Gathered findings show that, even though the national bTB surveillance program has considerably minimized the occurrence of the disease over the years, the disease is still widespread in Sicily. Because of the economic impact on the livestock industry and public health implications, there is a need to reevaluate the bTB eradication program, in view of the intrinsic constraints of the diagnostic tools and the environmental variables that certainly affect the success of control strategies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.M.A. and G.L.; methodology, F.A.; software, F.A.; validation, G.L.; formal analysis, G.A.; investigation, J.M.A.; resources, G.A.; data curation C.I.; writing—original draft preparation, J.M.A.; writing—review and editing, F.A., C.I., and G.L.; supervision, G.L.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Olea-Popelka, F.; Muwonge, A.; Perera, A.; Dean, A.S.; Mumford, E.; Erlacher-Vindel, E.; Forcella, S.; Silk, B.J.; Ditiu, L.; El Idrissi, A. Zoonotic tuberculosis in human beings caused by Mycobacterium bovis—A call for action. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, e21–e25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Pérez-Lago, L.; Navarro, Y.; García-de-Viedma, D. Current knowledge and pending challenges in zoonosis caused by Mycobacterium bovis: A review. Res. Vet. Sci. 2014, 97, S94–S100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Müller, B.; Dürr, S.; Alonso, S.; Hattendorf, J.; Laisse, C.J.M.; Parsons, S.D.C.; Van Helden, P.D.; Zinsstag, J. Zoonotic Mycobacterium bovis-induced tuberculosis in humans. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2013, 19, 899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. World Health Organization (WHO), Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO), World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), IUAT and International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union). Road map for zoonotic tuberculosis. In Proceedings of the 48th Union World Conference on Lung Health, Guadalajara, Mexico, 11–14 October 2017; pp. 11–14. [Google Scholar]
  5. Thoen, C.O.; LoBue, P.A.; de Kantor, I. Why has zoonotic tuberculosis not received much attention? Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2010, 14, 1073–1074. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Drobniewski, F.; Strutt, M.; Smith, G.; Magee, J.; Flanagan, P. Audit of scope and culture techniques applied to samples for the diagnosis of Mycobacterium bovis by hospital laboratories in England and Wales. Epidemiol. Infect. 2003, 130, 235–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Aranaz, A.; Cousins, D.; Mateos, A.; Domínguez, L. Elevation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis subsp. caprae Aranaz et al. 1999 to species rank as Mycobacterium caprae comb. nov., sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2003, 53, 1785–1789. [Google Scholar]
  8. Thoen, C.; LoBue, P.; De Kantor, I. The importance of Mycobacterium bovis as a zoonosis. Vet. Microbiol. 2006, 112, 339–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Milne, G.; Allen, A.; Graham, J.; Lahuerta-Marin, A.; McCormick, C.; Presho, E.; Reid, N.; Skuce, R.; Byrne, A.W. Bovine tuberculosis breakdown duration in cattle herds: An investigation of herd, host, pathogen and wildlife risk factors. PeerJ 2020, 8, e8319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Corner, L.A.; Gormley, E. Mycobacterial infections in multiple species: Implications for diagnosis and control. Vet. J. (London, Engl. 1997) 2012, 191, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Di Marco, V.; Mazzone, P.; Capucchio, M.T.; Boniotti, M.B.; Aronica, V.; Russo, M.; Fiasconaro, M.; Cifani, N.; Corneli, S.; Biasibetti, E. Epidemiological significance of the domestic black pig (Sus scrofa) in maintenance of bovine tuberculosis in Sicily. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2012, 50, 1209–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Balseiro, A.; Oleaga, A.; Orusa, R.; Robetto, S.; Domenis, L.; Zoppi, S.; Dondo, A.; Goria, M.; Gortázar, C.; Marín, J.F.G. Tuberculosis in roe deer from Spain and Italy. Vet. Rec. 2009, 164, 468–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Aranaz, A.; De Juan, L.; Montero, N.; Sánchez, C.; Galka, M.; Delso, C.; Alvarez, J.; Romero, B.; Bezos, J.; Vela, A.I. Bovine tuberculosis (Mycobacterium bovis) in wildlife in Spain. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004, 42, 2602–2608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Sa’idu, A.S.; Okolocha, E.C.; Dzikwi, A.A.; Gamawa, A.A.; Ibrahim, S.; Kwaga, J.K.P.; Usman, A.; Maigari, S.A. Public health implications and risk factors assessment of Mycobacterium bovis infections among abattoir personnel in Bauchi state, Nigeria. J. Vet. Med. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Torres-Gonzalez, P.; Soberanis-Ramos, O.; Martinez-Gamboa, A.; Chavez-Mazari, B.; Barrios-Herrera, M.T.; Torres-Rojas, M.; Cruz-Hervert, L.P.; Garcia-Garcia, L.; Singh, M.; Gonzalez-Aguirre, A. Prevalence of latent and active tuberculosis among dairy farm workers exposed to cattle infected by Mycobacterium bovis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2013, 7, e2177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Napp, S.; Ciaravino, G.; de Val, B.P.; Casal, J.; Saéz, J.L.; Alba, A. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the surveillance system for tuberculosis in cattle in Spain. Prev. Vet. Med. 2019, 173, 104805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Alvarez, J.; Perez, A.M.; Bezos, J.; Casal, C.; Romero, B.; Rodriguez-Campos, S.; Saez-Llorente, J.L.; Diaz, R.; Carpintero, J.; de Juan, L. Eradication of bovine tuberculosis at a herd-level in Madrid, Spain: Study of within-herd transmission dynamics over a 12 year period. BMC Vet. Res. 2012, 8, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Good, M.; Duignan, A. Perspectives on the history of bovine TB and the role of tuberculin in bovine TB eradication. Vet. Med. Int. 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. De la Rua-Domenech, R.; Goodchild, A.T.; Vordermeier, H.M.; Hewinson, R.G.; Christiansen, K.H.; Clifton-Hadley, R.S. Ante mortem diagnosis of tuberculosis in cattle: A review of the tuberculin tests, γ-interferon assay and other ancillary diagnostic techniques. Res. Vet. Sci. 2006, 81, 190–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Quinn, P.J.; Monaghan, M.L.; Doherty, M.L.; Collins, J.D.; Kazda, J.F. The tuberculin test. Vet. Microbiol. 1994, 40, 111–124. [Google Scholar]
  21. Domingo, M.; Vidal, E.; Marco, A. Pathology of bovine tuberculosis. Res. Vet. Sci. 2014, 97, S20–S29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Serrano, M.; Sevilla, I.A.; Fuertes, M.; Geijo, M.; Risalde, M.Á.; Ruiz-Fons, J.F.; Gortazar, C.; Juste, R.A.; Domínguez, L.; Elguezabal, N. Different lesion distribution in calves orally or intratracheally challenged with Mycobacterium bovis: Implications for diagnosis. Vet. Res. 2018, 49, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Garcia-Saenz, A.; Napp, S.; Lopez, S.; Casal, J.; Allepuz, A. Estimation of the individual slaughterhouse surveillance sensitivity for bovine tuberculosis in Catalonia (North-Eastern Spain). Prev. Vet. Med. 2015, 121, 332–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Pascual-Linaza, A.V.; Gordon, A.W.; Stringer, L.A.; Menzies, F.D. Efficiency of slaughterhouse surveillance for the detection of bovine tuberculosis in cattle in Northern Ireland. Epidemiol. Infect. 2017, 145, 995–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Probst, C.; Freuling, C.; Moser, I.; Geue, L.; Köhler, H.; Conraths, F.J.; Hotzel, H.; Liebler-Tenorio, E.M.; Kramer, M. Bovine tuberculosis: Making a case for effective surveillance. Epidemiol. Infect. 2011, 139, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Goodchild, A.V.; Downs, S.H.; Upton, P.; Wood, J.L.N.; De La Rua-Domenech, R. Specificity of the comparative skin test for bovine tuberculosis in Great Britain. Vet. Rec. 2015, 177, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Karolemeas, K.; de la Rua-Domenech, R.; Cooper, R.; Goodchild, A.V.; Clifton-Hadley, R.S.; Conlan, A.J.K.; Mitchell, A.P.; Hewinson, R.G.; Donnelly, C.A.; Wood, J.L.N. Estimation of the relative sensitivity of the comparative tuberculin skin test in tuberculous cattle herds subjected to depopulation. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e43217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Byrne, A.W.; Guelbenzu-Gonzalo, M.; Strain, S.A.J.; McBride, S.; Graham, J.; Lahuerta-Marin, A.; Harwood, R.; Graham, D.A.; McDowell, S. Assessment of concurrent infection with bovine viral diarrhoea virus (BVDV) and Mycobacterium bovis: A herd-level risk factor analysis from Northern Ireland. Prev. Vet. Med. 2017, 141, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Aranaz, A.; Bezos, J.; Álvarez, J.; Romero, B.; Lozano, F.; Paramio, J.L.; López-Sánchez, J.; Mateos, A.; Domínguez, L. Assessment of diagnostic tools for eradication of bovine tuberculosis in cattle co-infected with Mycobacterium bovis and M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis. Vet. Res. 2006, 37, 593–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Aagaard, C.; Govaerts, M.; Meikle, V.; Gutiérrez-Pabello, J.A.; McNair, J.; Andersen, P.; Suárez-Güemes, F.; Pollock, J.; Espitia, C.; Cataldi, A. Detection of bovine tuberculosis in herds with different disease prevalence and influence of paratuberculosis infection on PPDB and ESAT-6/CFP10 specificity. Prev. Vet. Med. 2010, 96, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Claridge, J.; Diggle, P.; McCann, C.M.; Mulcahy, G.; Flynn, R.; McNair, J.; Strain, S.; Welsh, M.; Baylis, M.; Williams, D.J.L. Fasciola hepatica is associated with the failure to detect bovine tuberculosis in dairy cattle. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Flynn, R.J.; Mulcahy, G.; Welsh, M.; Cassidy, J.P.; Corbett, D.; Milligan, C.; Andersen, P.; Strain, S.; McNair, J. Co-infection of cattle with Fasciola hepatica and Mycobacterium bovis—Immunological consequences. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2009, 56, 269–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lombardi, G.; Botti, I.; Pacciarini, M.L.; Boniotti, M.B.; Roncarati, G.; Dal Monte, P. Five-year surveillance of human tuberculosis caused by Mycobacterium bovis in Bologna, Italy: An underestimated problem. Epidemiol. Infect. 2017, 145, 3035–3039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Ministero della Salute. Cattle/Buffalo Tuberculosis—National Control Plans. Available online: http://www.salute.gov.it/relazioneAnnuale2018/dettaglioRA2018.jsp?cap=capitolo2&sez=ra18-2-sanimale&id=2061 (accessed on 20 July 2020).
  35. Istituto Zooprofilattico della Sicilia. Available online: http://www.izs.it/IZS/Engine/RAServeFile.php/f/Formazione_corsi_-_convegni/2016/Workshop_Indagini_Epidemiologiche_Roma/A._D_Orazi_Brucellosi_e_Tubercolosi_e_LEB_in_Sicilia_criticita_e_proposte.pdf (accessed on 20 July 2020).
  36. Dejene, S.W.; Heitkönig, I.M.A.; Prins, H.H.T.; Lemma, F.A.; Mekonnen, D.A.; Alemu, Z.E.; Kelkay, T.Z.; de Boer, W.F. Risk factors for bovine tuberculosis (bTB) in cattle in Ethiopia. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0159083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Amato, B.; Di Marco Lo Presti, V.; Gerace, E.; Capucchio, M.T.; Vitale, M.; Zanghì, P.; Pacciarini, M.L.; Marianelli, C.; Boniotti, M.B. Molecular epidemiology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains isolated from livestock and wild animals in Italy suggests the need for a different eradication strategy for bovine tuberculosis. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2018, 65, e416–e424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Amato, B.; Mignacca, S.A.; Pacciarini, M.L.; Vitale, M.; Antoci, S.; Cucinotta, S.; Puleio, R.; Biasibetti, E.; Fiasconaro, M.; Capucchio, M.T. An outbreak of bovine tuberculosis in a fallow deer herd (Dama dama) in Sicily. Res. Vet. Sci. 2016, 106, 116–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Abbate, J.M.; Arfuso, F.; Napoli, E.; Gaglio, G.; Giannetto, S.; Latrofa, M.S.; Otranto, D.; Brianti, E. Leishmania infantum in wild animals in endemic areas of southern Italy. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2019, 67, 101374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Iaria, C.; Migliore, S.; Macri, D.; Bivona, M.; Capparucci, F.; Gaglio, G.; Marino, F. Evidence of Centrocestus formosanus (Nishigori, 1924) in Zebrafish (Danio rerio). Zebrafish 2019, 16, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gaglio, G.; Reina, V.; Caffara, M.; Gjurcevic, E.; Iaria, C.; Marino, F. Risk of introduction of Clinostomum complanatum (Digenea: Clinostomidae) to Sicily through use of Cobitis bilineata (Canestrini, 1865) as live baits. Bull. Eur. Assoc. Fish Pathol. 2016, 36, 105–110. [Google Scholar]
  42. Brooks-Pollock, E.; Conlan, A.J.K.; Mitchell, A.P.; Blackwell, R.; McKinley, T.J.; Wood, J.L.N. Age-dependent patterns of bovine tuberculosis in cattle. Vet. Res. 2013, 44, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Demelash, B.; Inangolet, F.; Oloya, J.; Asseged, B.; Badaso, M.; Yilkal, A.; Skjerve, E. Prevalence of Bovine tuberculosis in Ethiopian slaughter cattle based on post-mortem examination. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2009, 41, 755–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jajere, S.M.; Atsanda, N.N.; Bitrus, A.A.; Hamisu, T.M.; Goni, M.D. A retrospective study of bovine tuberculosis at the municipal abattoir of Bauchi State, Northeastern Nigeria. Vet. World 2018, 11, 598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Cassidy, J.P.; Bryson, D.G.; Pollock, J.M.; Evans, R.T.; Forster, F.; Neill, S.D. Early lesion formation in cattle experimentally infected with Mycobacterium bovis. J. Comp. Pathol. 1998, 119, 27–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Palmer, M.V.; Whipple, D.L.; Rhyan, J.C.; Bolin, C.A.; Saari, D.A. Granuloma development in cattle after intratonsilar inoculation with Mycobacterium bovis. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1999, 60, 310. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  47. Abernethy, D.A.; Upton, P.; Higgins, I.M.; McGrath, G.; Goodchild, A.V.; Rolfe, S.J.; Broughan, J.M.; Downs, S.H.; Clifton-Hadley, R.; Menzies, F.D. Bovine tuberculosis trends in the UK and the Republic of Ireland, 1995–2010. Vet. Rec. 2013, 172, 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Wilson, C.S.; Jenkins, D.J.; Brookes, V.J.; Barnes, T.S. An eight-year retrospective study of hydatid disease (Echinococcus granulosus sensu stricto) in beef cattle slaughtered at an Australian abattoir. Prev. Vet. Med. 2019, 173, 104806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Brundu, D.; Aloi, D.; Rolesu, S.; Piseddu, T.; Masala, G. Cystic echinococcosis in slaughtered cattle in Sardinia: A retrospective epidemiological study and spatial analysis. Geospat. Health 2012, 6, 285–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Lanteri, G.; Abbate, J.M.; Iaria, C.; Macrì, D.; Ferrantelli, V.; Marino, F. Acorn-related acquired pseudomelanosis in Calabrian black pigs. BMC Vet. Res. 2019, 15, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Dupuy, C.; Morignat, E.; Maugey, X.; Vinard, J.-L.; Hendrikx, P.; Ducrot, C.; Calavas, D.; Gay, E. Defining syndromes using cattle meat inspection data for syndromic surveillance purposes: A statistical approach with the 2005–2010 data from ten French slaughterhouses. BMC Vet. Res. 2013, 9, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Animals 10 01473 g001 550
Figure 1. Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) prevalence rates recorded throughout the different provinces of Sicily, during the two investigated three-year periods (triennium 2010–2012 and triennium 2017–2019).
Figure 1. Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) prevalence rates recorded throughout the different provinces of Sicily, during the two investigated three-year periods (triennium 2010–2012 and triennium 2017–2019).
Animals 10 01473 g001
Animals 10 01473 g002 550
Figure 2. Number of slaughtered animals per province of Sicily (A) and prevalence of bovine tuberculosis (bTB) (B) during the triennia 2010–2012 and 2017–2019 with the related statistical significances found. Statistical significances: Δ vs. Triennium 2017–2019 (p < 0.01); * vs. all the other provinces (p < 0.001); ° vs. Enna (p < 0.01); □ vs. Catania and Messina (p < 0.01); a vs. Caltanissetta (Triennium 2010–2012, p < 0.05); b vs. Catania (Triennium 2017–2019, p < 0.01).
Figure 2. Number of slaughtered animals per province of Sicily (A) and prevalence of bovine tuberculosis (bTB) (B) during the triennia 2010–2012 and 2017–2019 with the related statistical significances found. Statistical significances: Δ vs. Triennium 2017–2019 (p < 0.01); * vs. all the other provinces (p < 0.001); ° vs. Enna (p < 0.01); □ vs. Catania and Messina (p < 0.01); a vs. Caltanissetta (Triennium 2010–2012, p < 0.05); b vs. Catania (Triennium 2017–2019, p < 0.01).
Animals 10 01473 g002
Table
Table 1. Prevalence of gross lesions (%), together with statistical significances, found among the anatomical sites studied in cattle of different age classes slaughtered during the overall study period (n = 54,751 animals during the triennium 2010–2012; n = 45,445 animals during the triennium 2017–2019).
Table 1. Prevalence of gross lesions (%), together with statistical significances, found among the anatomical sites studied in cattle of different age classes slaughtered during the overall study period (n = 54,751 animals during the triennium 2010–2012; n = 45,445 animals during the triennium 2017–2019).
Age ClassesAnatomical LocalizationPrevalence (%)
Triennium 2010–2012		Prevalence (%)
Triennium 2017–2019		p-Value
<12 MonthsThoracic07.1>0.05
Generalized2014.3>0.05
Hepatic80 ab78.6 ab<0.0001
12–36 MonthsThoracic97.4 cb99.7 cb<0.0001
Generalized0.40.1>0.05
Hepatic2.20.2>0.05
36–60 MonthsThoracic100 cd100 cd<0.0001
Generalized00-
Hepatic00-
60–84 MonthsThoracic100 cd100 cd<0.0001
Generalized00-
Hepatic00-
>84 MonthsThoracic100 cd100 cd<0.0001
Generalized00-
Hepatic00-
Statistical significances: a vs. thoracic and generalized anatomical sites; b vs. all the other age classes; c vs. generalized and hepatic anatomical sites; d vs. <12 months.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abbate, J.M.; Arfuso, F.; Iaria, C.; Arestia, G.; Lanteri, G. Prevalence of Bovine Tuberculosis in Slaughtered Cattle in Sicily, Southern Italy. Animals 2020, 10, 1473. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091473

AMA Style

Abbate JM, Arfuso F, Iaria C, Arestia G, Lanteri G. Prevalence of Bovine Tuberculosis in Slaughtered Cattle in Sicily, Southern Italy. Animals. 2020; 10(9):1473. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091473

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abbate, Jessica M., Francesca Arfuso, Carmelo Iaria, Giuseppe Arestia, and Giovanni Lanteri. 2020. "Prevalence of Bovine Tuberculosis in Slaughtered Cattle in Sicily, Southern Italy" Animals 10, no. 9: 1473. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091473

APA Style

Abbate, J. M., Arfuso, F., Iaria, C., Arestia, G., & Lanteri, G. (2020). Prevalence of Bovine Tuberculosis in Slaughtered Cattle in Sicily, Southern Italy. Animals, 10(9), 1473. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10091473

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop