Next Article in Journal
Association between Fatty Acid Composition, Cryotolerance and Fertility Competence of Progressively Motile Bovine Spermatozoa
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Cyclic Thermal Stress at Later Age on Production Performance and Meat Quality of Fast-Growing, Medium-Growing and Thai Native Chickens
Previous Article in Journal
Spatial–Temporal Distribution of Megamouth Shark, Megachasma pelagios, Inferred from over 250 Individuals Recorded in the Three Oceans
Previous Article in Special Issue
RNA Profiles of the Korat Chicken Breast Muscle with Increased Carnosine Content Produced through Dietary Supplementation with β-Alanine or L-Histidine
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 11
Issue 10
10.3390/ani11102946
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparison of the Automatic and Manual Broiler Pre-Slaughter Chain Based on Trailer Microclimate during Transportation and Its Effect on m. pectoralis major

by
Filip Beňo
*,
Tereza Škorpilová
,
Václav Pohůnek
,
Josef Bauer
and
Rudolf Ševčík
Department of Food Preservation, Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology, University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2021, 11(10), 2946; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11102946
Submission received: 1 September 2021 / Revised: 4 October 2021 / Accepted: 11 October 2021 / Published: 12 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Poultry Production: Factors Affecting Meat Quality)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Improper pre-slaughter catching, loading/unloading, handling, and transport may cause negative effects on the welfare and meat quality of poultry. During the catch process, noisy, rough, or aggressive techniques can cause birds to panic, which can lead to injuries and lower meat quality. Fractures, joint dislocations, and bruises can be common and cause bird suffering, mortality, carcass degradation, and economic loss. Proper pre-slaughter processes can ensure the safety of poultry and workers. One way to prevent these problems is to use automatic catching machines (harvesters/chicken cat), handling machines (shuttles), and air-conditioned trucks (trailers) to collect and handle poultry. Microclimate in trailers is another important factor influencing welfare. Internal overheating may cause high mortality of the animals during transport and reduced meat quality. The use of modern air-conditioned trailers results in improved welfare conditions, reduced mortality and the incidence of injuries and fractures, and increased meat quality.

Abstract

This study aims to compare two broiler pre-slaughter chain methods: (i) the automatic pre-slaughter chain (APC) and (ii) manual pre-slaughter chain (MPC). The comparison is based on the evaluation of the trailer microclimate, number of injuries, and breast muscle (m. pectoralis major) quality. Transportation lasts 3.5 h, unloading 1 h. The selection of two hundred 39-day-old broilers (Ross 308 and Cobb 500 breeds) is random for each type of method. After slaughter, the pH value, electrical conductivity (EC), and color (lightness) of breast muscle tissues are determined at different post-mortem intervals. The MPC negatively affects the microclimate (p < 0.001), meat qualitative characteristics (p < 0.001), and places a greater strain on the body of chickens compared with APC. The average pH15min value of MPC broiler breast muscle tissue, generally used as the main meat quality parameter, is 5.97 ± 0.12, in contrast to 6.36 ± 0.16 for APC. Higher pH15min value of APC indicates better welfare and pre-slaughter handling. Values of EC and L* of breast tissues also confirms a difference between the methods of broiler handling (p < 0.001). No difference is found between the breed lines (p > 0.05).

1. Introduction

Considering the potential impact on the welfare and thus meat quality of poultry, pre-slaughter handling is considered a key point of poultry production [1]. Poultry is handled, transported, and slaughtered in higher numbers than any other livestock. In comparison to other farm animals, poultry has a shorter generation interval and a higher feed conversion ratio. Many operations in the broiler production chain are being criticized in terms of animal welfare as mass production can result in violations of animal welfare guidelines [2,3,4,5]. Pre-slaughter operations can result in bird fear, stress, pain, injury, and higher mortality [4,6,7]. In reality, poultry are subjected to a variety of stressors, including heat/cold stress and extended travel distances. Thermal stress, whether it is extreme heat or extreme cold, has a negative impact on poultry welfare during transportation [3]. The climatic conditions in crates and trailers are frequently overlooked while transporting poultry [8]. Poor welfare quality related to morbid conditions during transportation, caused by the thermal environment and pressure of transportation (air movement, low ambient temperature, and winter precipitation) and the decline in meat quality of slaughtered birds, cause big economic losses [9,10]. Stressful events (as well as interactions between animals and humans) trigger reactions in animals that translate into physical, physiological, and behavioral stress [10,11]. Although the genetic selection of broilers has greatly improved the growth rate and production efficiency, these advances may also be related to the reduced resistance to heat or cold stress and muscle pathology. The result of all these pressures may reduce the welfare and quality of poultry meat and may result in PSE (pale, soft, and exudative characteristics) meat conditions. Lower pH, higher EC, higher lightness, softer texture, lower water holding capacity, and higher yield loss are characteristic for PSE-like meat [11,12].
Broiler normal pH15min is about 6.2 to 6.5 and the final (pH24h) is about 5.8 post-mortem [13,14,15]. Most authors agree that the pH15min of PSE-like meat is pH < 5.8 [16,17,18]. The measurement of muscle tissue electrical conductivity (EC) can also be used to assess the quality of meat because EC values correlate with the muscle condition deviation similarly to PSE-like meat. In addition, there is a negative correlation between pH and EC. Due to high temperature and decreasing pH during the intensive glycolysis that takes place post-mortem, cell membranes and walls in the PSE-like muscles are disturbed; the intracellular fluid containing ions leaks out and the value of EC of muscle grows. After stunning, the pH value decreases while EC grows [19,20]. Flesh color is an important criterion that affects consumer choice and an important characteristic of meat quality.
The discoloration of broiler meat is closely related to the post-mortem decrease of muscle pH value. Lower pH15min (<5.8) and near to the isoelectric point leads to a discoloration of muscle tissue [13]. The criteria values of lightness (L*), determining meat quality and PSE-like meat presence, are based on studies where L*24h > 53 were classified as PSE and normal 46 < L*24h < 53 [21,22], or lightness with 50 ≤ L*1h ≤ 56 are classified as normal and L*1h > 56 as PSE-like meat [16].
The most likely causes of these problems are the poor design of transport crates and vehicles with not fully controllable temperature, relative humidity, and air-flow inside the cargo bay conditions [6,23]. Current manual pre-slaughter handling involves bird-catching, placing in crates, and then loading the crates into vehicles or trailers to transport the birds to the slaughterhouse [7,24]. To avoid causing extra discomfort and bad welfare conditions to the poultry, pre-slaughter methods must be developed and managed. One option is to use automatic handling of poultry during pre-slaughter processes [4,5].
Automatic pre-slaughter methods are already used in countries such as the Netherlands and Belgium [4,5]. In the Czech Republic, this method was first used in 2016, and is called the peer system. The technology of the peer system consists of automatic bird catching machines (harvesters), handling machines (shuttles), and trucks (trails) equipped with ventilation. Ventilation guarantees sufficient air circulation and an efficient air-conditioning system. The principal structure of the machine consists of a collecting head system operated by hydraulics and a conveyor belt used to place the broilers on one of the peer system shuttles. The peer system trailer consists of ten moving floors that gently bring the broilers in/out. One possible explanation for the reduction of stress is that the birds remain upright and do not stand upside down during mechanical capture.
In this study, two broiler pre-slaughter chains are compared: (i) the automatic pre-slaughter chain (APC) and (ii) manual pre-slaughter chain (MPC). To compare the two methods, the microclimate during transport, the incidence of broiler carcass injuries, and the quality of the pectoralis major muscle are assessed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Broiler Loading, Transport, and Unloading

The experiment took place in March 2020 and the average temperature of the month was 5.7 °C, with an average relative humidity of 54%. The average temperature of the experiment day was 3.0 °C, with an average relative humidity of 57%. The lowest temperature of the day was −5.0 °C and the highest was 10.4 °C, with no rainfall. Broiler loading occurred on the same day in one farm from 2 halls (South Bohemia, Czech Republic). There was a broiler genotype in each hall. Loading began at 2:45 a.m. and lasted 1.5 h until both types of trailers were filled. In each hall, the loading was done simultaneously, using both the automatic method and the manual method. In a conventional trailer, broiler genotypes were divided into right and left sides. The catching of the chickens has been set so that the density of birds in both type trailers is 32 kg/m2, which corresponds to about 14–16 birds/m2. For the peer system, genotypes were divided into odd and even floors. Broiler loading was followed by a 0.5 h rest. At 4:45 a.m., both trucks (APC and MPC) left for the slaughterhouse. The transport took a total of 3.5 h. This was followed by a further 0.5 h rest. After unloading the broilers, 100 of each genotype were randomly selected after stunning. Figure 1 shows the automatic pre-slaughter machines—“the peer system”.

2.2. Trailer Microclimate Measurement

To record the temperature and relative humidity in trailers, data loggers (Thermochron iButton DS1922L, MSL, San Jose, PA, USA) were used. Temperature was recorded in 10 min intervals. The QiTerm software was used for evaluation. There were 6 sensors placed in each truck trailer before the transport began; for the exact positions of the data loggers, see Figure 2A,B.

2.3. Samples

At 39-days-old, two hundred broilers from Cobb 500 (n = 100) and Ross 308 (n = 100) breeds, raised in an intensive system in the same microclimate and feeding conditions, were collected randomly from both pre-slaughter methods, the automatic pre-slaughter chain (APC) and manual pre-slaughter chain (MPC). In total, four groups were made (4 × n = 50): (i) Cobb from MPC, (ii) Ross from MPC, (iii) Cobb from APC, and (iv) Ross from APC. Broilers were stunned in an electric water bath. The stunning intensity of 120 mA with a frequency of 50 Hz for 4–6 s was used. The average slaughter weight of the broilers was 2.19 ± 0.43 kg. After stunning, killing by decapitation, bleeding, plucking, and gutting, carcasses were immediately stored in the refrigerator at 4 °C for 24 h.

2.4. pH Measurement

Breast muscle tissue pH value was measured by the direct probe method using a needle pH meter (Matthäus, Pöttmes, Germany). Values of pH (pH15min, pH4h, pH24h) were taken from the left and right breast muscle tissue post-mortem. The electrode was inserted approximately 5 cm deep into the breast tissue (pectoralis major muscle). Furthermore, the temperature was measured using a thermometer (Testo 110, Testo AG, Lenzkirch, Germany) with a temperature probe (Testo GmbH & Co., Testo AG, Lenzkirch, Germany) (range from −50 to 150 °C) before each pH measurement. The measured temperature was adjusted with a pH meter for correlation.

2.5. Electrical Conductivity Measurement

The tissue electrical conductivity was measured using the LF STAR (Matthäus, Pöttmes, Germany) with two parallel steel electrodes. It was measured at 1 h (EC1h), 4 h (EC4h), and 24 h (EC24h) post-mortem at both breast muscles about 3 cm deep in the tissue. The device was calibrated to 10 mS·cm−1.

2.6. Color Measurement

Broiler breast meat color was measured by reflectance of tissue with a spectrophotometer (Minolta CM–2600D, Tokyo, Japan) using CIE L* (lightness), CIE a* (redness), and CIE b* (yellowness). The device was calibrated to white (L* = 100) and black (L* = 0) colors. The parameters of the instrument are: mask–MAV (8 mm), gloss–SCE, UV–100% Full, observer–10°, illuminant D 65, color space–CIE L*a*b*. To prove PSE presence, only the CIE L* values were used.

2.7. Statistics

The data collected were used for statistical evaluation. The variables were muscle pH value, electrical conductivity, and color/lightness. The statistical significance between transport types and breed was statistically determined by the method PCA (Principal Component Analysis) created in the software STATISTICA 12.0 CZ (StatSoft, Prague, Czech Republic). Mixed-design ANOVA was applied to collected data. The pre-slaughter chain and breed line were considered to be a fixed effect, and pH value, EC, and L* were included in the model as a random effect (MIXED procedure). The differential analysis was performed using a t-test and the p-Value with 95% confidence interval.

3. Results

The transportation microclimate was recorded and post-mortem changes were controlled by measuring the qualitative characteristics of the breast muscle (pectoralis major). The variations of the pH value, electrical conductivity, and lightness of breast muscle tissue by transport and microclimate conditions of transport are given in Table 1. Pre-slaughter chain methods differed (p < 0.001) in every characteristic.
In Figure 3, the distribution of broiler carcasses after meat processing is shown by two grades, “A” and “B”. Grade “A” demands good body structure and meaty, with no bruises, no fractures, and a thin layer of fat under the skin. The carcasses with bruises, abrasions, fractures, etc. are classified as grade “B” (Figure 4).
For a comparison of the breed line (Cobb 500 and Ross 308) results, see Table 1. The difference was noted only for the measurement of electrical conductivity EC24h. The difference between pre-slaughter methods was also confirmed by the PCA analysis (Figure 5A). Breed × pre-slaughter method was not found to be significant (Figure 5B).

4. Discussion

Transport, poultry handling, and poultry slaughter technology alone have an impact on the quality of poultry meat produced. Any stress effects resulting in a reduction in the quality of the meat must be minimized. Poultry is most exposed to the stress of being caught on farms, transported, and then taken to the slaughterhouse and hooked before stunning [7,25]. The warm summer months are particularly problematic during transport, when high temperatures during transport can lead to overheating of poultry and subsequent death during transport or deterioration of meat quality. The aim of each meat-processing food business operator should be to improve the welfare of the animals and minimize the losses associated with the culling of poultry and the reduction in the quality of the meat produced. Increasing the level of welfare is possible by removing broilers from farms and transported to slaughterhouses using automatic pre-slaughter methods. Transportation in crates is used only on small farms where it is not possible to use the peer loading system because of inadequate farm space.
From the data from this study, it has been shown that the APC positively influences the welfare and quality of slaughtered broiler meat. Data presented by Nijdam et al. [26] show different results. In their study it was observed that automatic catching causes slightly higher mortality rates and for meat quality and stress, no differences were found between automatic and manual catching of broilers. In our study, the most important significant difference was observed in microclimate conditions (p < 0.001), as also shown by the high temperature and relative humidity standard deviations, and the maximum and minimum values (Table 1). The experiment in our study was carried out in March 2020. The average temperature of the day (time of day during the transportation) was 12.8 ± 2.3 °C and the average relative humidity was 57.1 ± 3.51 %. The temperature in the case of MPC fluctuated considerably. MPC might have had a negative impact on the meat quality and welfare of broilers. This fact is caused by fluctuating temperature, relative humidity, and lack of space and air during transport, causing stress to the poultry. Under optimal conditions, broilers should be exposed to a temperature in the so-called thermoneutral zone during transport. The results of our study do confirm previous research by Webster et al. [27], in which the optimal thermal zone is 8–18 °C. In contrast to the earlier findings of Meltzer [28], these results suggest an optimal thermal zone from 24 to 28.5 °C. Temperature fluctuations and relative humidity may be a particular problem causing higher mortality and frequent injuries of transported broilers [7,9,29,30,31].
From the data collected during the half-year period (November 2019 to April 2020), it was found that there was an increase in the prevalence of grade “A” broiler carcasses due to the new automated pre-slaughter chain (Figure 3). Automatic catching, loading, transporting, and unloading the broilers caused fewer injuries compared to the manual method. Similar results were obtained in the experiment by Knierim and Gocke [32]. The number of grade “A” carcasses has been determined using image analysis, which is placed in front of the cutting room. The representation of Grade “A” between the APC and MPC method is different across several months (p = 0.002). Average increase of grade “A” carcasses was about 5.3%.
The average pH values after 15 min, 4 h, and 24 h of the breast muscles were lower in the MPC broilers compared to APC broilers (p < 0.001), versus the values of electrical conductivity and lightness of MPC breast muscle were higher compared with APC after 1, 4, and 24 h post-mortem. Lower average pH15min value of MPC broiler breast muscles approaching the limit of 5.8 (according to literature reports) indicates a lower quality of the meat [16,17,18]. Contrary to what has been reported by Warris et al. [33] and Kannan et al. [15], our results indicate that APC and MPC influence pH value of broiler breast muscle. According to Ingr et al. [19], Saelin et al. [20], Byrne et al. [34], and Ovchynnikova et al. [35], negative correlations between pH and EC values of MPC (r = −0.81) and APC (r = −0.92) broiler breast muscle tissues were found. As mentioned by Saelin et al. [20], lower pH values lead to higher electrical conductivity values.
Referring to Ingr et al. [19], Šimek et al. [36], Byrne et al. [34], Thielke et al. [37], and our collected pH values, EC1h < 5 mS·cm−1 was classified as high-quality meat, 5 < EC1h < 9 mS·cm−1 as reduced quality meat, and EC1h > 9 mS·cm−1 correspond to PSE-like meat. Although the average EC1h value is not below the limit of 5 mS·cm−2, taking the standard deviation into account, the quality of the MPC meat is inclined to be of reduced quality, but not of PSE-like meat.
In the current study, the L* (1 and 24 h after slaughter) average value of the breast muscles of the APC broilers was higher compared with MPC broilers. Lightness is highly correlated with muscle tissue pH value and lower pH results in higher L* values [38,39]. The average L*1h value of MPC indicates PSE-like meat according to Petracci et al. [16] and L*24h values [21,22] also confirmed this fact. However, pH values did not confirm PSE meat conditions. Therefore, lightness is not an appropriate indicator for the determination of broiler breast meat quality muscle based on Molette et al. [40] and our data. The problem is also the character of broiler breast muscle, due to low myoglobin level and the presence of oxygen, causing pale meat color.
According to Table 1, there are no significance differences between breed lines (p > 0.05), except for values of electrical conductivity 24 h post-mortem (p < 0.05). As determined by Glamoclija et al. [41], pH values 15 min after the slaughter of 42-day-old different broiler breed lines were 6.44 for Cobb and 6.29 for Ross. In the current study, pH15min values for both breed lines were lower and similar for both breed lines, 6.14 for Cobb 500 and 6.18 for Ross 308. Values of pH taken 24 h (6.05 for Cobb 500 and 6.07 for Ross 308) after slaughter were similar just for Cobb breed lines, compared to Glamoclija et al. [41] (6.04 for Cobb 500 and 6.07 for Ross 308). Breed lines had no impact on the qualitative characteristics of pectoralis major of broilers.
The data obtained from the qualitative characterization of broiler breast muscles were subjected to principal component analysis (PCA), as shown in Figure 5. The first two components of the ordination explained 51.97% of the variation, with 39.51 and 12.44% for PC1 and PC2. The peer system clearly separated from conventional transport (Figure 5A). The peer system transport is closely correlated with pH values, versus conventional transport with EC and L* values. There was no important difference between the breed lines (Figure 5B).

5. Conclusions

Pre-slaughter chain influences broiler meat quality because broilers are subjected to the greatest stresses associated with environmental changes and may cause broiler meat condition defect (PSE), skin injuries, and limb fractures, thereby affecting the loss of raw materials. The results of our study indicate that MPC affected the m. pectoralis major and broiler welfare negatively. The trailer microclimate, temperature, and relative humidity is controlled during APC, leading to better well-being of transported broilers, with no overheating, overcooling, or gasping for breath. The introduction of the new peer system has also led to a reduction in the risk of injury and fractures (5–6%). MPC broiler resulted in lower pH values, higher electrical conductivity, and higher lightness of breast tissues. Breed lines had no impact on the qualitative characteristics of m. pectoralis major of the broilers.

Author Contributions

The author’s responsibilities were as follows: Conceptualization, F.B. and R.Š.; methodology, V.P.; software and statistics, T.Š.; validation, F.B., T.Š., and V.P.; formal analysis, F.B. and J.B.; data curation, F.B. and T.Š.; writing—original draft preparation, V.P. and R.Š.; writing—review and editing, T.Š. and J.B.; visualization, F.B.; supervision, F.B. and V.P.; project administration, F.B.; funding acquisition, R.Š. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development; registration number: 15/001/16220/231/000019.

Institutional Review Board Statement

No analyses on live animals were performed in this study. Selected analyses (physicochemical parameters) were determined after the broilers were slaughtered. All pre-slaughter operations were done on the basis of European regulations and in approved slaughterhouses. Therefore, it was not evaluated by an ethics committee prior to the field-work.

Data Availability Statement

Data available on request due to privacy restrictions. The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Velarde, A.; Rodriguez, P.; Dalmau, A.; Fuentes, C.; Llonch, P.; von Holleben, K.V.; Anil, M.H.; Lambooij, J.B.; Pleiter, H.; Yesildere, T.; et al. Religious slaughter: Evaluation of current practices in selected countries. Meat Sci. 2014, 96, 278–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bessei, W. Impact of animal welfare on worldwide poultry production. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 2019, 74, 211–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cavusoglu, E.; Petek, M. Effects of Season, Plumage Colour, and Transport Distance on Body Weight Loss, Dead-on-Arrival, and Reject Rate in Commercial End-of-Lay Hens. Animals 2021, 11, 1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. De Lima, V.A.; Ceballos, M.C.; Gregory, N.G.; Da Costa, M. Effect of different catching practices during manual upright handling on broiler welfare and behavior. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 4282–4289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Delezie, E.; Lips, D.; Lips, R.; Decuyepere, E. Is the mechanisation of catching broilers a welfare improvement? Anim. Welf. 2006, 15, 141–147. [Google Scholar]
  6. Jacobs, L.; Delezie, E.; Duchateau, L.; Goethals, K.; Tuyttens, F.A. Impact of the separate pre-slaughter stages on broiler chicken welfare. Poult. Sci. 2017, 96, 266–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kittelsen, K.E.; Granquist, E.G.; Kolbjornsen, O.; Nafstad, O.; Moe, R.O. A comparison of post-mortem findings in broilers dead-on-farm and broilers dead-on-arrival at the abattoir. Poult. Sci. 2015, 94, 2622–2629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Petracci, M.; Bianchi, M.; Cavani, C.; Gaspari, P.; Lavazza, A. Preslaughter mortality in broiler chickens, turkeys, and spent hens under commercial slaughtering. Poult. Sci. 2006, 85, 1660–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Aldridge, D.J.; Luthra, K.; Liang, Y.; Christensen, K.; Watkins, S.E.; Scanes, C.G. Thermal Micro-Environment during Poultry Transportation in South Central United States. Animals 2019, 9, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. García-Torres, S.; Cabeza de Vaca, M.; Tejerina, D.; Romero-Fernández, M.P.; Ortiz, A.; Franco, D.; Sentandreu, M.A.; Oliván, M. Assessment of Stress by Serum Biomarkers in Calves and Their Relationship to Ultimate pH as an Indicator of Meat Quality. Animals 2021, 11, 2291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Vecerek, V.; Grbalova, S.; Voslarova, E.; Janackova, B.; Malena, M. Effects of travel distance and the season of the year on death rates of broilers transported to poultry processing plants. Poult. Sci. 2006, 85, 1881–1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Barbut, S.; Zhang, L.; Marcone, M. Effects of pale, normal, and dark chicken breast meat on microstructure, extractable proteins, and cooking of marinated fillets. Poult. Sci. 2005, 84, 797–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Berri, C.; Debut, M.; Sante-Lhoutellier, V.; Arnould, C.; Boutten, B.; Sellier, N.; Baeza, E.; Jehl, N.; Jego, Y.; Duclos, M.J.; et al. Variations in chicken breast meat quality: Implications of struggle and muscle glycogen content at death. Br. Poult. Sci. 2005, 46, 572–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Desai, M.A.; Jackson, V.; Zhai, W.; Suman, S.P.; Nair, M.N.; Beach, C.M.; Schilling, M.W. Proteome basis of pale, soft, and exudative-like (PSE-like) broiler breast (Pectoralis major) meat. Poult. Sci. 2016, 95, 2696–2706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kannan, G.; Heath, J.L.; Wabeck, C.J.; Mench, J.A. Shackling of broilers: Effects on stress responses and breast meat quality. Br. Poult. Sci. 1997, 38, 323–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Petracci, M.; Betti, M.; Bianchi, M.; Cavani, C. Color variation and characterization of broiler breast meat during processing in Italy. Poult. Sci. 2004, 83, 2086–2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Taylor, R.D.; Jones, G.P. The incorporation of whole grain into pelleted broiler chicken diets. II. Gastrointestinal and digesta characteristics. Br. Poult. Sci. 2004, 45, 237–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, L.; Barbut, S. Rheological characteristics of fresh and frozen PSE, normal and DFD chicken breast meat. Br. Poult. Sci. 2005, 46, 687–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ingr, I.; Božek, R.; Jůzl, M. Myopathy of slaughter chickens. Acta Uni. Agri. Silvi. Mendel. Brun. 2014, 54, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Saelin, S.; Wattanachant, S.; Youravong, W. Evaluation of water holding capacity in broiler breast meat by electrical conductivity. Int. Food Res. J 2017, 24, 2593–2598. [Google Scholar]
  21. Li, K.; Zhao, Y.Y.; Kang, Z.L.; Wang, P.; Han, M.Y.; Xu, X.L.; Zhou, G.H. Reduced functionality of PSE-like chicken breast meat batter resulting from alterations in protein conformation. Poult. Sci. 2015, 94, 111–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ziober, I.L.; Paiao, F.G.; Marchi, D.F.; Coutinho, L.L.; Binneck, E.; Nepomuceno, A.L.; Shimokomaki, M. Heat and chemical stress modulate the expression of the alpha-RYR gene in broiler chickens. Genet. Mol. Res. 2010, 9, 1258–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dadgar, S.; Lee, E.S.; Leer, T.L.; Burlinguette, N.; Classen, H.L.; Crowe, T.G.; Shand, P.J. Effect of microclimate temperature during transportation of broiler chickens on quality of the pectoralis major muscle. Poult. Sci. 2010, 89, 1033–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Spurio, R.S.; Soares, A.L.; Carvalho, R.H.; Silveira Junior, V.; Grespan, M.; Oba, A.; Shimokomaki, M. Improving transport container design to reduce broiler chicken PSE (pale, soft, exudative) meat in Brazil. Anim. Sci. J. 2016, 87, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bravo, V.M.; Knowles, T.G.; Gallo, C. Transport, Associated Handling Procedures and Behaviour of Calves Marketed through Chilean Auction Markets. Animals 2020, 10, 2170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nijdam, E.; Delezie, E.; Lambooij, E.; Nabuurs, M.J.; Decuypere, E.; Stegeman, J.A. Comparison of bruises and mortality, stress parameters, and meat quality in manually and mechanically caught broilers. Poult. Sci. 2005, 84, 467–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Webster, A.J.; Tuddenham, A.; Saville, C.A.; Scott, G.B. Thermal stress on chickens in transit. Br. Poult. Sci. 1993, 34, 267–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Meltzer, A. Thermoneutral zone and resting metabolic rate of broilers. Br. Poult. Sci. 1983, 24, 471–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Chauvin, C.; Hillion, S.; Balaine, L.; Michel, V.; Peraste, J.; Petetin, I.; Lupo, C.; Le Bouquin, S. Factors associated with mortality of broilers during transport to slaughterhouse. Animals 2011, 5, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Monch, J.; Rauch, E.; Hartmannsgruber, S.; Erhard, M.; Wolff, I.; Schmidt, P.; Schug, A.R.; Louton, H. The welfare impacts of mechanical and manual broiler catching and of circumstances at loading under field conditions. Poult. Sci. 2020, 99, 5233–5251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cockram, M.S.; Dulal, K.J.; Stryhn, H.; Revie, C.W.; Miglior, F. Rearing and handling injuries in broiler chickens and risk factors for wing injuries during loading. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2020, 100, 402–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Knierim, U.; Gocke, A. Effect of catching broilers by hand or machine on rates of injuries and dead-on-arrivals. Anim. Welf. 2003, 12, 63–73. [Google Scholar]
  33. Warris, P.D.; Kestin, S.C.; Brown, S.N.; Knowles, T.G.; Wilkins, T.G.; Edwards, J.E.; Austin, S.D.; Nicol, C.J. The depletion of glycogen stores and indices of dehydration in transported broilers. Br. Vet. J. 1993, 149, 391–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Byrne, C.E.; Troy, D.J.; Buckley, D.J. Postmortem changes in muscle electrical properties of bovine M. longissimus dorsi and their relationship to meat quality attributes and pH fall. Meat Sci. 2000, 54, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ovchynnikova, O.; Grossova, L.; Snupukova, N.; Stastnik, O.; Juzl, M. Relationship between pH values and electrical conductivity, their usability in chicken breast meat evaluation as marker post mortal quality. In Proceedings of the MendelNet Conference, Brno, Czech Republic, 11 November 2020; pp. 359–364. [Google Scholar]
  36. Šimek, J.; Vorlová, L.; Steinhauser, L. Jakostní odchylky masa a jejich identifikace. Maso 2002, 12, 24–27. [Google Scholar]
  37. Thielke, S.; Lhafi, S.K.; Kuhne, M. Effects of aging prior to freezing on poultry meat tenderness. Poult. Sci. 2005, 84, 607–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Owens, C.M.; Sams, A.R. The influence of transportation on turkey meat quality. Poult. Sci. 2000, 79, 1204–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kim, J.H.; Hong, G.E.; Lim, K.W.; Park, W.; Lee, C.H. Influence of Citric Acid on the Pink Color and Characteristics of Sous Vide Processed Chicken Breasts During Chill Storage. Korean J. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2015, 35, 585–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Molette, C.; Remignon, H.; Babile, R. Modification of glycolyzing enzymes lowers meat quality of turkey. Poult. Sci. 2005, 84, 119–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Glamoclija, N.; Starcevic, M.; Janjic, J.; Ivanovic, J.; Boskovic, M.; Djordjevic, J.; Markovic, R.; Baltic, M.Z. The Effect of Breed Line and Age on Measurements of pH-value as Meat Quality Parameter in Breast Muscles (m. Pectoralis Major) of Broiler Chickens. Proc. Food Sci. 2015, 5, 89–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Animals 11 02946 g001 550
Figure 1. Automatic poultry pre-slaughter machines. (A) Trailer equipped with ventilation; (B) harvesters; (C) shuttles; (D) trailer floors; (E) automatic conveyor belt.
Figure 1. Automatic poultry pre-slaughter machines. (A) Trailer equipped with ventilation; (B) harvesters; (C) shuttles; (D) trailer floors; (E) automatic conveyor belt.
Animals 11 02946 g001
Animals 11 02946 g002 550
Figure 2. Trailer schemes (A–APC, B–MPC) with data logger locations. The data loggers were equally distributed in the top and bottom of each trail section (front, center, and rear).
Figure 2. Trailer schemes (A–APC, B–MPC) with data logger locations. The data loggers were equally distributed in the top and bottom of each trail section (front, center, and rear).
Animals 11 02946 g002
Animals 11 02946 g003 550
Figure 3. Grade A of carcass representation (n = 20,754 for APC; n = 19,345 for MPC).
Figure 3. Grade A of carcass representation (n = 20,754 for APC; n = 19,345 for MPC).
Animals 11 02946 g003
Animals 11 02946 g004 550
Figure 4. Grade B of broilers with bruises, skin injuries, and fractures.
Figure 4. Grade B of broilers with bruises, skin injuries, and fractures.
Animals 11 02946 g004
Animals 11 02946 g005 550
Figure 5. 2–D plots of principal component analysis (PCA) of the qualitative characteristics of transported broilers. Distribution of (A) pre-slaughter MPC and APC chain and (B) breed lines Cobb 500 and Ross 308.
Figure 5. 2–D plots of principal component analysis (PCA) of the qualitative characteristics of transported broilers. Distribution of (A) pre-slaughter MPC and APC chain and (B) breed lines Cobb 500 and Ross 308.
Animals 11 02946 g005
Table
Table 1. Qualitative characteristics of m. pectoralis major of broilers and the trailer microclimate conditions (mean ± SD).
Table 1. Qualitative characteristics of m. pectoralis major of broilers and the trailer microclimate conditions (mean ± SD).
Qualitative
Characteristics		nPre-Slaughter ChainBreed LineANOVA
MPCAPCp-ValueCobb 500Ross 308p-Valuep-Value
Pre-Slaughter Chain × Breed
pH15min1005.97 ± 0.126.36 ± 0.17<0.0016.14 ± 0.246.18 ± 0.23 0.6540.8358
pH4h5.83 ± 0.196.01 ± 0.14<0.0015.91 ± 0.195.93 ± 0.180.8740.0379
pH24h5.94 ± 0.166.16 ± 0.15 <0.0016.05 ± 0.196.07 ± 0.170.7940.2902
EC1h (mS·cm−1)1004.64 ± 0.813.49 ± 0.67<0.0013.99 ± 0.864.14 ± 1.010.2830.2880
EC4h (mS·cm−1)4.95 ± 0.873.86 ± 0.52<0.0014.46 ± 0.954.34 ± 0.830.3970.1195
EC24h (mS·cm−1)4.29 ± 0.933.66 ± 0.61<0.0014.11 ± 0.893.84 ± 0.78<0.05<0.0001
L*1h10056.65 ± 3.2552.20 ± 3.16<0.00154.19 ± 3.7054.66 ± 4.070.5950.6050
L*24h54.83 ± 2.6452.86 ± 2.37<0.00154.00 ± 2.6353.68 ± 2.750.6900.0283
Trailers microclimatenMinMaxØ MPC MinMaxØ APCp-Value
T (°C)62.625.812.9 ± 5.617.123.718.7 ± 1.8<0.001
RH (%)30.773.554.3 ± 20.138.464.251.1 ± 11.3<0.001
MPC = manual pre-slaughter chain; APC = automatic pre-slaughter chain; pH15min = pH 15 min after slaughter; pH4h = pH 4 h after slaughter; pH24h = pH 24 h after slaughter; EC1h = electrical conductivity 1 h after slaughter; EC4h = electrical conductivity 4 h after slaughter; EC24h = electrical conductivity 24 h after slaughter; L*1h = lightness 1 h after slaughter; L*24h = lightness 24 h after slaughter; Ø = average value; T = temperature; RH = relative humidity; n = number of samples/data loggers.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Beňo, F.; Škorpilová, T.; Pohůnek, V.; Bauer, J.; Ševčík, R. Comparison of the Automatic and Manual Broiler Pre-Slaughter Chain Based on Trailer Microclimate during Transportation and Its Effect on m. pectoralis major. Animals 2021, 11, 2946. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11102946

AMA Style

Beňo F, Škorpilová T, Pohůnek V, Bauer J, Ševčík R. Comparison of the Automatic and Manual Broiler Pre-Slaughter Chain Based on Trailer Microclimate during Transportation and Its Effect on m. pectoralis major. Animals. 2021; 11(10):2946. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11102946

Chicago/Turabian Style

Beňo, Filip, Tereza Škorpilová, Václav Pohůnek, Josef Bauer, and Rudolf Ševčík. 2021. "Comparison of the Automatic and Manual Broiler Pre-Slaughter Chain Based on Trailer Microclimate during Transportation and Its Effect on m. pectoralis major" Animals 11, no. 10: 2946. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11102946

APA Style

Beňo, F., Škorpilová, T., Pohůnek, V., Bauer, J., & Ševčík, R. (2021). Comparison of the Automatic and Manual Broiler Pre-Slaughter Chain Based on Trailer Microclimate during Transportation and Its Effect on m. pectoralis major. Animals, 11(10), 2946. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11102946

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop