Next Article in Journal
Changes in Acute Phase Response Biomarkers in Racing Endurance Horses
Previous Article in Journal
Rumen Microbiome Reveals the Differential Response of CO2 and CH4 Emissions of Yaks to Feeding Regimes on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 12
Issue 21
10.3390/ani12212992
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Molecular Epidemiology of Blastocystis in Confined Slow Lorises, Macaques, and Gibbons

by
Qingyong Ni
1,2,*,†,
Shasha Dong
1,2,†,
Yumai Fan
3,
Wen Wan
3,
Ping Teng
3,
Shaobo Zhu
3,
Xiaobi Liang
3,
Huailiang Xu
4,
Yongfang Yao
4,
Mingwang Zhang
1,2 and
Meng Xie
4,*
1
Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611134, China
2
Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Multi-Omics, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611134, China
3
Dehong Wildlife Rescue Center, Forestry Bureau of Dehong Prefecture, Mangshi 678499, China
4
College of Life Science, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya’an 625099, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Animals 2022, 12(21), 2992; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12212992
Submission received: 18 September 2022 / Revised: 19 October 2022 / Accepted: 25 October 2022 / Published: 31 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Mammals)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Blastocystis sp. is one of the most frequently reported parasites and an intestinal anaerobic organism with high genetic diversity, which seriously threatens the health of non-human primates (NHPs). We conducted a comparative study based on small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) to assess the Blastocystis infection, its gene subtypes, and its zoonotic potential in confined macaques, gibbons, and slow lorises. The results indicated that the Blastocystis infections significantly differed between seasons and species. This is the first report on the prevalence and subtype distribution of Blastocystis sp. among captive slow lorises (Nycticebus spp.). The findings may contribute to formulating a feasible strategy for the improved confined management of NHPs and subsequent conservation practices, such as soft release.

Abstract

Blastocystis sp. is a common intestinal anaerobic parasite infecting non-human primates and many other animals. This taxon threatens the health of NHPs due to its high genetic diversity, impeding efforts to improve confined management and subsequent conservation practices. This study collected 100 and 154 fecal samples from captive macaques, gibbons, and slow lorises in the summer and winter, respectively. The Blastocystis infection, its gene subtypes, and its zoonotic potential based on small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) were analyzed. The prevalence of Blastocystis in the three primate genera was 57.79% (89/154) in the summer (2021) and 29.00% (29/100) in the winter (2020). Four zoonotic subtypes—ST1, ST2, ST3, and ST4—were identified. ST2 was the most prevalent subtype, suggesting that these animals may serve as reservoirs for pathogens of human Blastocystis infections. The macaques showed a more significant variation in Blastocystis infection between seasons than gibbons and slow lorises. The slow lorises in small cages and enclosure areas were potentially more infected by Blastocystis in the summer, indicating that inappropriate captive management may have detrimental effects on their health.

1. Introduction

Parasites are some of the most common exogenous pathogens in humans and non-human primates (NHPs) [1,2]. They may cause tissue damage or compression injuries to the host, depleting the host’s nutrients and thus propagating toxins or transmitting diseases [3]. Studies suggest that parasites affect the adaptability of the host and the survival and reproduction of infected individuals, posing a severe threat to the health of captive and wild primates [4]. Endoparasites, such as Capillaria sp. and Entamoeba sp., have been reported in NHPs and other animals [5,6,7]. In particular, primate taxa have been widely reported to be infected by the common luminal intestinal parasitic protist Blastocystis [1,5,8].
Blastocystis sp. is an intestinal protozoan with a broad host spectrum that mainly colonizes the ileocecal region of the host [2]. Blastocystis infections have been widely reported in humans and domestic, companion, and confined wild animals [9,10,11]. According to the survey data on Blastocystis infections in China, the prevalence in various populations is 0.007~48.6% [8]. The infected animals exhibit diarrhea, abdominal pain, nausea, and gastric distension [2,9,12,13]. Previous studies have shown that Blastocystis is related to irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in human and animals, while it interreacts with other parasites such as Giardia duodenalis [12,14,15]. The prevalence of Blastocystis sp. varies greatly in NHPs [5,16,17,18,19,20]. Studies postulate that zoonotic transmission from confined wild animals may cause human Blastocystis infections [21,22]. The infection can be self-limiting under normal immune function [23]. Studies have shown that iodoquinol, paromomycin, and nitazoxanide (IPN) have a strong therapeutic effect on Blastocystis hominis, but it the infection is usually treated with a single drug such as metronidazole [24,25]. A Blastocystis sp. infection is a foodborne zoonosis attributed to eating food contaminated with pathogenic microorganisms [26]. Recently, the prevalence, host range, and subtype distribution of Blastocystis in humans and domestic animals, and the factors related to the transmission of zoonoses, have been widely recorded [16,27,28,29].
To date, 32 subtypes of Blastocystis have been proposed based on SSU rRNA gene sequencing [30]. However, only 28 subtypes (ST1–ST17, ST21, and ST23–ST32) are accepted due to their unabridged sequence data and meeting the current criteria for unique subtype designations. ST1–ST4 are the predominant STs, suggesting zoonotic potential [31]. ST1–ST9 and ST12 often appear in human Blastocystis-like infection cases [32]. Other subtypes are only found in specific animals, indicating a certain degree of recessive host specificity [1,31]. For example, hoofed animals, such as pigs, are the natural hosts of ST5 [10]. ST4 is the most common subtype in rodents [32], while ST6 and ST7 are common in birds [33]. Previous studies suggest that the most common subtypes in NHPs are ST1, ST2, ST3, and, especially, ST2 [34,35] (Table 1).
Macaques, gibbons, and slow lorises are the main primate taxa distributed in China, and all their species are listed as protected animals [36]. Many individuals were confiscated or rescued by wildlife zoos and rescue centers, and most of them were finally released into the wild. However, a hard release without an investigation of parasite infections may pose a severe threat to the local wild populations and lead to an unsuccessful reintroduction. Previous studies showed that the prevalence of Blastocystis subtypes varied in some of these species (Table 1). For example, macaques are mostly infected with ST1, ST2, and ST3 [33,35], while gibbons are infected mainly by ST1, ST2, ST3, ST5, and ST8 [1,37,38]. However, there is still a data deficiency regarding strepsirrhines such as Nycticebus spp. [38]. We conducted a comparative study on the prevalence and phylogeny of Blastocystis in the three primate genera (Macaca, Hylobates, and Nycticebus). The confined animals may encounter health-threatening situations, such as incorrect diets, disease, disability, fear, pain, and feeding environments inconsistent with their natural survival [39]. This investigation into parasitic infections can provide a reference for these animals’ health statuses and contribute to designing appropriate captive management schemes and improving animal welfare.
Table
Table 1. The prevalence and subtypes of Blastocystis reported in macaques and gibbons.
Table 1. The prevalence and subtypes of Blastocystis reported in macaques and gibbons.
HostNumber of Positive/Total SamplesBlastocystis SubtypesReferences
ST1ST2ST3ST8ST19
Macaques
Macaca mulatta6/18 42 [13]
Macaca fascicularis3/13 21 [13]
Macaca fuscata6/33 24 [13]
Macaca mulatta28/291557 1[18]
Macaca mulatta149/3238575140 [20]
Macaca nemestrina36/9724936 [20]
Macaca fascicularis50/85392650 [20]
Macaca nigra1/71 [35]
Macaca nigra2/42 [21]
Macaca tonkeana2/22 [21]
Macaca mulatta12/3010 2 [40]
Gibbons
Hylobates spp.2/1811 [35]
Nomascus leucogenys1/41 [13]
Hylobates moloch2/42 [20]
Hylobates leucogenys2/42 [20]
Nomascus leucogenys2/22 [41]

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Ethics

Sample collection and experimental protocols were approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB13627), the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Sichuan Agricultural University, China, under permit number DKY-2020302166, and by the Administration for Wild Animal Protection in Yunnan Province, China. The protocols adhered to the American Society of Primatologists’ Principles for the Ethical Treatment of Non-Human Primates. Fecal samples were collected from NHPs per the Animal Ethics Procedures and Guidelines of the People’s Republic of China.

2.2. Sample Collection and Recording

The study was conducted at the Dehong Wildlife Rescue Center in Yunnan, China (24.38287° N, 98.45872° E), between November 2020 and July 2021. Most of the animals were rescued after confiscation due to illegal hunting and trade. Fecal samples were collected from the trays placed under the cages. We cleared the trays at 1 a.m. and collected the feces at 6 a.m. to ensure that all the samples were collected within 5 h after defecation. A total of 254 fecal samples from five non-human primate species (N. bengalensis, H. hoolock, M. leonina, M. arctoides, and M. mulatta) were collected in summer (n = 154) and winter (n = 100) (Table 2). The macaques were kept with 1–3 individuals in each cage (90 × 100 × 90 cm), while the gibbons were housed with one or two individuals in a large cell (1000 × 500 × 600 cm). The Bengal slow lorises were grouped into two confined enclosures (A and B) and individually housed in two types of iron cages: small (30 × 20 × 20 cm) and larger cages (40 × 30 × 30 cm). The animals that had been housed longer than 12 months were defined as group LC (long-term confinement), while those confiscated within 12 months were defined as group SC (short-term confinement) (Table 3). The collected fecal samples were maintained in dry ice, transferred to the laboratory within 12 h, and stored at −80 °C until used. We also obtained the individual records (sex, captivity duration, and bodyweight) from the rescue center. However, the documents were unavailable in the winter due to the absence of technicians during the long-term pandemic lockdown. Only the data collected in the summer were used in this study.

2.3. DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification, and Sequencing

DNA extraction was performed using Tiangen Tianamp stool DNA kit stool genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Catalog No. DP328, version No. DP201101x), following the manufacturer’s instructions. About 180–220 g of stool was placed into a 2 mL sterilized centrifuge tube using a sterilized toothpick and put on ice. The extracted DNA was stored at −20 °C until PCR amplification. The PCR mixture (25 μL) contained 12.5 μL of Taq PCR Master Mix (Tsingke Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), 1 μL of each primer (0.4 μM), 2 μL of genomic DNA, and nuclease-free water up to the desired volume. The PCR was started at 94 °C for 4 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C for 45 s, 49 °C for 45 s, and 72 °C for 50 s, with an extension at 72 °C for 5 min. Blastocystis sp. was screened and subtyped through PCR amplification of an approximately 600 bp region of the SSU rRNA gene using the forward primer RD5: (5′-GGAGGTAGTGACAATAAATC-3′) and reverse primer BhRDr: (5′-TGCTTTCGCACTTGTTCATC-3′) [42,43]. One μL of each PCR product was electrophoresed on 1.5% agarose gel. Amplicons were stained with 0.5μg/mL of ethidium bromide and visualized using a UV Transilluminator. All PCR products were sequenced using the sanger method on an ABI 3730 sequencer (Bioneer, Daejeon, South Korea).

2.4. Sequence and Phylogenetic Analysis

The nucleotide sequences generated in the current study were manually edited using SeqMan in DNASTAR v7.1 (https://www.dnastar.com/ accessed on 13 March 2022). All the sequences were aligned using SeqMan and reference sequences of known Blastocystis subtypes retrieved from NCBI GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ accessed on 8 March 2022). BLAST searches in the GenBank database (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi accessed on 1 October 2021.) were conducted for all the sequences (excluding vector and primer sites) to confirm they were Blastocystis sp. and check their subtype [44]. We used the ClustalW algorithm in the MegAlign module (DNASTAR Inc., Madison, WI, USA) to align the nucleotide sequences generated in this study with type sequences from GenBank, representing the ten subtypes currently recognized. The aligned sequences were manually edited to remove any artificial gaps. The calculated evolutionary distances were used to analyze phylogenetic relationships to support subtype grouping by both the neighbor-joining (NJ) and Maximum Likelihood (ML) methods using MEGA 6.06. A phylogram was reconstructed using the Kimura 2-parameter model with 1000 bootstrap replicates (http://www.Mega.software.net/ accessed on 9 June 2022). This study’s unique partial SSU rRNA genes were deposited in GenBank under accession numbers ON714609–ON714630.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 27.0. We analyzed the differences between seasons and species using the Chi-square and fisher’s exact tests. We calculated 95% confidence intervals (CI) and the odds ratios (ORs) to determine the variation in infectivity rates and the effects of captive management factors. ORs were calculated using a two-by-two table, and ORs greater than 1.0 indicated a positive association between infections and the related factors. The significance threshold was set at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Prevalence of Blastocystis sp. in NHPs

The prevalence of Blastocystis sp. in the three primate genera in the Dehong wildlife rescue center is shown in Table 2. The average prevalence in the winter was 29.00% (29/100). Macaca spp. had the highest prevalence (25/26; 96.15%), followed by Hylobates spp. (1/2; 50.00%), and Nycticebus spp. (3/72; 4.17%). The average prevalence in the summer was 57.79% (89/154). The macaques had a higher infection rate (54/56; 96.43%), followed by gibbons (7/13; 53.85%) and slow lorises (28/85; 32.94%). The two species of macaques, M. arctoide (n = 2) and M. leonine (n = 3), were all infected with Blastocystis.

3.2. Characterization of Blastocystis sp. Subtypes

Table 2 shows the infection prevalence and subtypes of Blastocystis in the five primate species. The gene subtypes of Blastocystis protozoa during the winter in Nycticebus spp. were ST1(1/3), ST3(1/3), and ST4(1/3). The macaques were mainly infected with ST2(18/25), while gibbons were infected with ST1(1/1). The prevalent gene subtypes of Blastocystis during the summer were ST2(25/28) and ST2(39/54) in Nycticebus spp. and Macaca spp., respectively. All positive Hylobates spp. were infected with ST2(7/7).

3.3. Blastocystis sp. Infection in Nycticebus spp.

The infection rates between species differed significantly during the summer (Chi-square test: x2 = 55.874; p < 0.05) and winter (Fisher’s exact test; p < 0.05). The infection rates showed a significant difference between the winter and summer in macaques (x2 = 20.367; p < 0.05), but no significant difference occurred in gibbons and slow lorises. The Chi-square test was also used to analyze the relationship between infected and uninfected groups of slow lorises and the correlations with confinement duration, sex, enclosure area, cage size, and bodyweight during the summer (Table 3). The results showed a significant difference in the infection rates among individuals housed in different enclosures and cage sizes. Based on the OR value, there was a positive correlation between the captivity duration and the infection rate of slow lorises. Long-term confinement may increase the infection rate of Blastocystis. The cage and enclosure size are also strongly correlated with the infection rate. The chi-square test and odds ratio results showed that sex and bodyweight had no significant effects on the infection rate of Blastocystis.

3.4. Phylogeny of Blastocystis sp.

A total of 22 representative sequences were selected from 118 positive Blastocystis sp. isolates and were used to construct a phylogenetic tree (Figure 1). The sequences obtained in this study showed identity with nine reference sequences of Blastocystis sp. published in GenBank. The newly acquired sequences belonged to ST1, ST2, ST3, and ST4. ST1–ST3 were found in the three primate taxa, and the sequences clustered together. ST4 was only detected in slow lorises and clustered with human-derived sequences (Figure 1).

4. Discussion

The difference in the prevalence of Blastocystis sp. in the summer and winter was significant in the three species, indicating that the extent of parasitic infection varied significantly between seasons. Previous studies have demonstrated that the prevalence of some dominant niches of protozoa varied in different hydrological periods [45]. For example, in the wet season, Giardia sp. was more often detected in free-ranging black howler monkeys (Alouatta pigra) than in the dry season [46]. The parasites may also have higher infection rates in the summer than in other seasons [47]. Higher temperatures and precipitation in the summer and rainy seasons may provide favorable conditions for endoparasites’ growth [47,48].
The slow lorises and gibbons displayed lower infection rates of Blastocystis than macaques in this study. The significant differences between the three primate taxa were potentially consistent with the susceptibility and recessive host specificity toward Blastocystis [9]. Some studies suggest that the venom of slow lorises has a specific defensive effect against ectoparasites [49,50], but there is no direct evidence for its function in defending against endoparasites. Human interference and the threat of illegal animal trade constitute an inevitable intersection between wildlife populations, livestock, and human beings, facilitating the cross-species transmission of potential pathogens [4]. Through the sharing of poor husbandry conditions without regular veterinary follow-ups, food or waterborne parasites could spread in humans and animals. In addition, survival stresses, such as a lack of food supply, water, and living space, increase the risk of parasitic infections in animals [51]. Compared with the macaques and slow lorises, which are housed together in tiny cages, the gibbons in the Dehong wildlife rescue center are kept alone or in pairs within large enclosures (300 m3), possibly leading to a lower infection rate of Blastocystis protozoa.
Macaques were the most susceptible to Blastocystis among the three taxa. This can be explained as a direct consequence of the fact that the macaques fed directly from the ground and drank water with the same ladle. Other studies postulate that macaques can be infected with various parasites [31,33,35]. The results may be due to the common confinement in groups since animals have a higher infection rate when mixed with others, especially at different ages [51,52]. Parasite transmission rates may scale positively with the host population’s density or the frequency of interactions [53]. Macaques have a larger body size, home range, and dietary width in the wild than the small-sized slow lorises [51]. Restricting their nutritional and habitat supply during confinement makes them susceptible to parasitic infections.
Blastocystis demonstrates extensive host adaptability and specificity at the gene subtype level [11]. The four subtypes (ST1, ST2, ST3, and ST4) detected in this study are all zoonotic subtypes [12,31], suggesting that zoonosis could have occurred in Dehong wildlife rescue center, which remains to be demonstrated. ST1, ST2, and ST3 were the prevalent subtypes in humans and NHPs. ST2 was the most pervasive subtype [2,34,35], while ST3 was the most virulent subtype among the 32 subtypes [43]. ST4 is not commonly found in NHPs [54]. Only the slow lorises were infected with ST4, possibly due to host specificity. Blastocystis ST4 may have beneficial effects on intestinal commensal bacteria in vitro and can inhibit the growth of pathogenic B. vulgatus [55].
Due to the absence of data in the winter, the effects of the confinement duration, sex, enclosure area, cage size, and body weight on the prevalence and subtype distribution of Blastocystis in N. bengalensis were only examined in the summer. More individuals in the SC group appeared to be infected by Blastocystis than those in the LC group. We speculate that the SC individuals, especially newly rescued ones, may still carry parasites from the wild. In addition, the SC individuals were housed in the enclosure close to the macaques, leading to a high risk of pathogenic transmission. Similarly, survival stresses, such as a lack of food supply and home range, make slow lorises more vulnerable to parasites and infectious diseases [4,51], especially with respect to those in small cages. It is highly recommended to provide large enclosures and separate feed boxes for the captive macaques and slow lorises and accelerate release progress for the confiscated individuals. We also recommend that sick individuals be provided with separate rooms and treatments. Individual characteristics, such as sex and body weight, have been reported to be correlated with parasitic infection. To be specific, sex affects the response of intestinal microorganisms to the host’s parasites, and weight loss may result from the reaction of the immune system to parasites [56,57]. We found that sex and body weight had no significant correlations with Blastocystis infection in slow lorises. However, the findings should be confirmed in further studies.

5. Conclusions

Four zoonotic subtypes infected five species in three primate genera, indicating the possible transmission between wild primates and humans in rescue centers. This study is the first systematic report on Blastocystis sp. infections in Nycticebus spp. The results suggest a higher host specificity towards ST4 in slow lorises than in macaques and gibbons. Captive management played a substantial role in affecting the Blastocystis infections of the confined NHPs. To alleviate detrimental effects, rescue centers or zoos are highly recommended to provide larger enclosures and cages for the slow lorises and macaques and house them separately. Given the absence of data in the winter, further research is needed to confirm the findings regarding seasonal variation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Q.N.; Data curation: S.D., Y.F., W.W., P.T., S.Z., X.L., H.X., Y.Y., M.Z. and M.X; Methodology: Q.N. and S.D.; Resource: Q.N., S.D., Y.F., W.W., P.T., S.Z. and X.L., Formal analysis: S.D., H.X., Y.Y., M.Z. and M.X.; Writing—original draft: S.D.; Writing—review & editing: Q.N., H.X., Y.Y., M.Z. and M.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO. 32070521).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Sample collection and experimental protocols were approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB13627), the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Sichuan Agricultural University, China, under permit number DKY-2020302166 on 8 October 2020, and the Administration for Wild Animal Protection in Yunnan Province, China. The protocols adhered to the American Society of Primatologists Principles for the Ethical Treatment of Non-Human Primates. Fecal samples were collected from NHPs per the Animal Ethics Procedures and Guidelines of the People’s Republic of China.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

This study’s unique partial SSU rRNA genes were deposited in GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/ accessed on 9 June 2022) under accession numbers ON714609-ON714630.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Dehong Wildlife Rescue Center for their full cooperation in the data and sample collection.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alfellani, M.A.; Jacob, A.S.; Perea, N.O.; Krecek, R.C.; Taner-Mulla, D.; Verweij, J.J.; Levecke, B.; Tannich, E.; Clark, C.G.; Stensvold, C.R. Diversity and distribution of Blastocystis sp. subtypes in non-human primates. Parasitology 2013, 140, 966–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Deng, L.; Chai, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Liu, H.; Zhong, Z.; Hu, Y.; Fu, H.; Yue, C.; Peng, G. Epidemiology of Blastocystis sp. infection in China: A systematic review. Parasite 2019, 26, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Wang, Y.H. Harm of parasites to animals. Shandong J. Anim. Sci. Vet. Med. 2017, 38, 46. [Google Scholar]
  4. Rode-Margono, E.J. Albers, M., Wirdateti, W.; Abinawanto, A.; Nekaris, K.A.I. Gastrointestinal parasites and ectoparasites in wild Javan slow loris (Nycticebus javanicus), and implications for captivity and animal rescue. J. Zoo Aquar. Res. 2015, 3, 80–86. [Google Scholar]
  5. Lv, X.H.; Chen, X.X.; Yuan, M.Q.; Cai, W.X.; Qiao, J.Y.; Wu, X.M. The intestinal parasitic infection and its morphology of Rhinopithecus roxellanaes and Macaca mulatta. J. Econ. Anim. 2010, 14, 92–95. [Google Scholar]
  6. Martin-Solano, S.; Carrillo-Bilbao, G.A.; Ramirez, W.; Celi-Erazo, M.; Huynen, M.-C.; Levecke, B.; Benitez-Ortiz, W.; Losson, B. Gastrointestinal parasites in captive and free-ranging Cebus albifrons in the Western Amazon, Ecuador. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2017, 6, 209–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ren, M.; Yang, F.; Gou, J.-M.; Wang, P.-X.; Zou, M.; Zhong, X.-H.; Lin, Q. First detection and molecular identification of Entamoeba in Yaks from China. Acta Parasitol. 2021, 66, 264–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ning, C.Q.; Qiao, A.L.; Hu, Z.H.; Chen, J.H.; Tian, L.G. Progress of researches on Blastocystis infections in humans and animals in China. Chin. J. Schistosomiasis Control. 2021, 33, 95–101. [Google Scholar]
  9. Vega, L.; Herrera, G.; Muñoz, M.; Patarroyo, M.A.; Maloney, J.G.; Santín, M.; Ramírez, J.D. Gut microbiota profiles in diarrheic patients with co-occurrence of Clostridioides difficile and Blastocystis. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0248185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rudzińska, M.; Kowalewska, B.; Szostakowska, B.; Grzybek, M.; Sikorska, K.; Świątalska, A. First report on the occurrence and subtypes of Blastocystis in pigs in Poland using sequence-tagged-site PCR and barcode region sequencing. Pathogens 2020, 9, 595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, L.K.; Wang, P.L.; Han, H.; Wang, R.J.; Guan, F.C. Current status of Blastocystis infection in China. Chin. J. Zoonoses 2021, 37, 548–555+562. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kumarasamy, V.; Anbazhagan, D.; Subramaniyan, V.; Vellasamy, S. Blastocystis sp., parasite associated with gastrointestinal disorders: An overview of its pathogenesis, immune modulation and therapeutic strategies. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2018, 24, 3172–3175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ma, L.; Qiao, H.; Wang, H.; Li, S.; Zhai, P.; Huang, J.; Guo, Y. Molecular prevalence and subtypes of Blastocystis sp. in primates in northern China. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2020, 67, 2789–2796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mirjalali, H.; Abbasi, M.R.; Naderi, N.; Hasani, Z.; Mirsamadi, E.S.; Stensvold, C.R.; Balaii, H.; Aghdaei, H.A.; Zali, M.R. Distribution and phylogenetic analysis of Blastocystis sp. subtypes isolated from IBD patients and healthy individuals in Iran. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2017, 36, 2335–2342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Abedi, S.H.; Fazlzadeh, A.; Mollalo, A.; Sartip, B.; Mahjour, S.; Sanaz, M.; Ali, T. The neglected role of Blastocystis sp. and Giardia lamblia in development of irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Microb. Pathog. 2021, 162, 105215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Cai, J.; Qiao, J.Y.; Zhang, X.; Jin, X.; Ren, J.; Ma, Q.; Wu, X. Observation on intestinal parasitic morphology and infection in captive rare wildlife in Shaanxi Province. Chin. J. Zool. 2009, 44, 63–69. [Google Scholar]
  17. Zanzani, S.A.; Gazzonis, A.L.; Epis, S.; Manfredi, M.T. Study of the gastrointestinal parasitic fauna of captive non-human primates (Macaca fascicularis). Parasitol. Res. 2016, 115, 307–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhao, G.H.; Hu, X.F.; Liu, T.L.; Hu, R.S.; Yu, Z.Q.; Yang, W.B.; Wu, Y.L.; Yu, S.K.; Song, J.K. Molecular characterization of Blastocystis sp. in captive wild animals in Qinling Mountains. Parasitol. Res. 2017, 116, 2327–2333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ma, L.; Wang, H.Q.; Li, S.; Zhang, N.N.; Guo, Y.H. Investigation and analysis of Blastocystis infection in primates and humans in Hebei Province. In The First Academic Forum for Young Scientists of Veterinary Parasitology Branch of Chinese Society of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine; Wuhan, China, 2019; Available online: https://cpfd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CPFDTOTAL-ZGXJ201911001044.htm (accessed on 18 September 2022).
  20. Li, T.C.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Y.L.; Chen, W.J.; Dong, X.L.; Yang, J.F.; Li, H.X.; Zou, F.C. Assessment of the subtypes and the zoonotic risk of Blastocystis sp. of experimental macaques in Yunnan province, southwestern China. Parasitol. Res. 2020, 119, 741–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Parkar, U.; Traub, R.J.; Vitali, S.; Elliot, A.; Levecke, B.; Robertson, I.; Geurden, T.; Steele, J.; Drakeh, B.; Thompson, R.C.A. Molecular characterization of Blastocystis isolates from zoo animals and their animal-keepers. Vet. Parasitol. 2010, 169, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Wang, W.; Owen, H.; Traub, R.J.; Cuttell, L.; Inpankaew, T.; Bielefeldt-Ohmann, H. Molecular epidemiology of Blastocystis in pigs and their in-contact humans in Southeast Queensland, Australia, and Cambodia. Vet. Parasitol. 2014, 203, 264–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Teng, X.J.; Chen, J.X.; Tian, L.G. Intestinal protozoa infection in HIV/AIDS patients. Chin. J. Parasitol. Parasit. Dis. 2017, 35, 607–614. [Google Scholar]
  24. Borody, T.J.; Grippi, D.; Le Busque, A.; Gadalla, S.; Dawson, V.; Jaworski, A. Improved eradication protocol for Blastocystis Hominis: 1363. Off. J. Am. Coll. Gastroenterol. ACG 2015, 110, S590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhong, Y.; Ye, J.H.; Xie, F.H.; Yan, X.M. Research progress of therapeutic drugs for Blastocystis infection. J. Gannan Med. Coll. 2021, 41, 409–414. [Google Scholar]
  26. Zhu, B.K.; Tian, B.; Xu, Y.H.; Lu, X.M. Research progress on pathogen detection methods of food-borne zoonoses. J. Food Saf. Qual. 2021, 12, 6743–6750. [Google Scholar]
  27. Yoshikawa, H.; Wu, Z.; Pandey, K.; Pandey, D.B.; Sherchand, J.B.; Yanagi, T.; Kanbara, H. Molecular characterization of Blastocystis isolates from children and rhesus monkeys in Kathmandu, Nepal. Vet. Parasitol. 2009, 160, 295–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Pokhrel, G.; Maharjan, M. Gastro-intestinal parasites of assamese macaque (Macaca assamensis Hodgson, 1840) in Shivapuri Nagarjun National Park, Kathmandu, Nepal. J. Inst. Sci. Technol. 2014, 19, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Li, J.; Karim, M.R.; Li, D.; Sumon, S.M.M.R.; Siddiki, S.H.M.F.; Rume, F.I.; Sun, R.Q.; Jia, Y.Q.; Zhang, L.X. Molecular characterization of Blastocystis sp. in captive wildlife in Bangladesh National Zoo: Non-human primates with high prevalence and zoonotic significance. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2019, 10, 314–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ni, F.; Yu, F.; Yang, X.; An, Z.X.; Ge, Y.M.; Liu, X.H.; Qi, M. Identification and genetic characterization of Blastocystis subtypes in Père David’s deer (Elaphurus davidianus) from Shishou, China. Vet. Res. Commun. 2022, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, X.; Ge, Y.; Wang, R.; Dong, H.; Yang, X.; Zhang, L. First report of Blastocystis infection in Pallas’s squirrels (Callosciurus erythraeus) in China. Vet. Res. Commun. 2021, 45, 441–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Stensvold, C.R.; Clark, C.G. Pre-empting Pandora’s box: Blastocystis subtypes revisited. Trends Parasitol. 2020, 36, 229–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Li, T.C.; Pu, L.H.; Li, H.X. Research progress of Blastocystis sp. in non-human primates. J. Wildl. 2019, 40, 1050–1054. [Google Scholar]
  34. Alfellani, M.A.; Taner-Mulla, D.; Jacob, A.S.; Imeede, C.A.; Yoshikawa, H.; Stensvold, C.R.; Clark, C.G. Genetic diversity of Blastocystis in livestock and zoo animals. Protist 2013, 164, 497–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Chen, L.; Chai, Y.; Yao, J.; Chen, S.; Zhou, Z.; Liu, H.; Zhong, Z.; Peng, G. Investigation and genotyping of Blastocystis in a wildlife park in Guiyang. J. Yunnan Agric. Univ. 2021, 36, 925–929. [Google Scholar]
  36. Nekaris, K.A.I.; Al-Razi, H.; Blair, M.; Das, J.; Ni, Q.Y.; Samun, E.; Streicher, U.; Jiang, X.L.; Long, Y.C. Nycticebus bengalensis. In The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species; 2020; p. e. T39758A17970536. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342946305_Bengal_slow_loris_Nycticebus_bengalensis_THE_IUCN_RED_LIST_OF_THREATENED_SPECIES (accessed on 18 September 2022).
  37. Stensvold, C.R.; Alfellani, M.A.; Nørskov-Lauritsen, S.; Katrine, P.; Emma, L.V.; Charlotte, M.; Henrik, V.N.; Graham, C. Subtype distribution of Blastocystis isolates from synanthropic and zoo animals and identification of a new subtype. Int. J. Parasitol. 2009, 39, 473–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Betts, E.L.; Gentekaki, E.; Tsaousis, A.D. Exploring micro-eukaryotic diversity in the gut: Co-occurrence of Blastocystis subtypes and other protists in zoo animals. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Nekaris, K.A.I.; Shepherd, C.R.; Starr, C.R.; Nijman, V. Exploring cultural drivers for wildlife trade via an ethnoprimatological approach: A case study of slender and slow lorises (Loris and Nycticebus) in South and Southeast Asia. Am. J. Primatol. 2010, 72, 877–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, Y.F.; Wang, Y.Q.; Chen, W.L.; Li, S.N.; Yang, J.F.; Zhou, F.C.; Yuan, F.Z. Molecular investigation of Blastocystis infection in wild monkeys in Xishuangbanna. Anim. Husb. Vet. Med. 2022, 54, 59–63. [Google Scholar]
  41. Deng, L.; Yao, J.; Chen, S.; He, T.M.; Chai, Y.J.; Zhou, Z.Y.; Shi, X.G.; Liu, H.F.; Zhong, Z.J.; Fu, H.L.; et al. First identification and molecular subtyping of Blastocystis sp. in zoo animals in southwestern China. Parasites Vectors 2021, 14, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Santín, M.; Gómez-Muñoz, M.T.; Solano-Aguilar, G.; Ronald, F. Development of a new PCR protocol to detect and subtype Blastocystis spp. from humans and animals. Parasitol. Res. 2011, 109, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Valenca-Barbosa, C.; do Bomfim, T.C.B.; Teixeira, B.R.; Rosana, G.; da Costa Neto, S.F.; Magalhães, B.S.N.; de Almeida Balthazar, D.; da Silva, F.A.; Biot, R.; d’Avila Levy, C.M.; et al. Molecular epidemiology of Blastocystis isolated from animals in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0210740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Stensvold, C.R.; Suresh, G.K.; Tan KS, W.; Thompson, R.A.; Traub, R.J.; Viscogliosi, E.; Yoshikawa, H.; Clark, C.G. Terminology for Blastocystis subtypes–a consensus. Trends Parasitol. 2007, 23, 93–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. An, R.Z.; Zhang, P.; Da, Z.; Qiao, N.Q.; Tang, Q.Y.; Ba, s. Niche and interspecific association of dominant species of protozoa in different hydrological periods of the Madidika Wetland in Tibet. For. Sci. 2021, 57, 126–138. [Google Scholar]
  46. Vitazkova, S.K.; Wade, S.E. Parasites of free-ranging black howler monkeys (Alouatta pigra) from Belize and Mexico. Am. J. Primatol. Off. J. Am. Soc. Primatol. 2006, 68, 1089–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Pilarczyk, B.; Tomza-Marciniak, A.; Pilarczyk, R.; Sadowska, N.; Udała, J.; Kuba, J. The effect of season and meteorological conditions on parasite infection in farm-maintained mouflons (Ovis aries Musimon). J. Parasitol. Res. 2022, 2022, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Lee, H.; Lee, S.H.; Seo, M.G.; Kim, H.Y.; Kim, J.W.; Lee, Y.R.; Kim, J.H.; Kwon, O.D.; Kwak, D. Occurrence and genetic diversity of Blastocystis in Korean cattle. Vet. Parasitol. 2018, 258, 70–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Nekaris, K.; Moore, R.S.; Rode, E.J.; Bryan, G.F. Mad, bad and dangerous to know: The biochemistry, ecology and evolution of slow loris venom. J. Venom. Anim. Toxins Incl. Trop. Dis. 2013, 19, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Gardiner, M.; Weldon, A.; Poindexter, S.A.; Nancy, G.; Nekaris, K.A.I. Survey of practitioners handling slow lorises (Primates: Nycticebus): An assessment of the harmful effects of slow loris bites. J. Venom Res. 2018, 9, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  51. Xie, X. A Survey of Intestinal Parasites Infection in Non-Human Captive Primates of Fujian Province. Master’s Thesis, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  52. He, J.G.; Zhong, G.J.; Zeng, Z.X. Research on the the infection of Blastocystis hominis in non-human primates in Guangzhou area. Chin. J. Zool. 1994, 1, 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  53. Patterson, J.E.H.; Ruckstuhl, K.E. Parasite infection and host group size: A meta-analytical review. Parasitology 2013, 140, 803–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hu, X.F. Study on the Infection and Population Structure of Blastocystis in Some Rare Wild Animals in Qinling Mountains. Master’s Thesis, Northwest University of Agriculture and Forestry, Xi’an, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  55. Deng, L.; Tan KS, W. Interactions between Blastocystis subtype ST4 and gut microbiota in vitro. Parasites Vectors 2022, 15, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Ling, F.; Steinel, N.; Weber, J.; Ma, L.; Chris, S.; Decio, C.; Zhu, B.; Daniel, B.; Wang, G.X. The gut microbiota response to helminth infection depends on host sex and genotype. ISME J. 2020, 14, 1141–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Calegar, D.A.; Bacelar, P.A.; Monteiro, K.J.L.; dos Santos, J.P.; Andressa, B.G.; Márcio, N.B.; Lauren, H.J.; Beatriz, C.N.; Filipe, A.C. A community-based, cross-sectional study to assess interactions between income, nutritional status and enteric parasitism in two Brazilian cities: Are we moving positively towards 2030? J. Health Popul. Nutr. 2021, 40, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Animals 12 02992 g001 550
Figure 1. Phylogenetic relationship of Blastocystis sp. based on the nucleotide sequences of the barcode regions of small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA). The neighbor-joining method was used to construct the trees using the Kimura-2-parameter model. The numbers on the branches are the percent bootstrap values from 1000 replicates. Each sequence was identified by its host, accession/association number, and subtype.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic relationship of Blastocystis sp. based on the nucleotide sequences of the barcode regions of small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA). The neighbor-joining method was used to construct the trees using the Kimura-2-parameter model. The numbers on the branches are the percent bootstrap values from 1000 replicates. Each sequence was identified by its host, accession/association number, and subtype.
Animals 12 02992 g001
Table
Table 2. Prevalence and subtype distribution of Blastocystis in NHPs.
Table 2. Prevalence and subtype distribution of Blastocystis in NHPs.
SpeciesPrevalence (95%CI)Subtypes (Number)
SummerWinterSummerWinter
Slow lorises
Nycticebus bengalensis28/85, 32.94%
(22.95~42.93%)		3/72, 4.17%
(0~8.78%)		ST2 (25), ST3 (2), ST4 (1)ST1 (1), ST3 (1), ST4 (1)
Macaques
Macaca mulatta51/53, 96.23%
(91.10~100%)		20/21, 95.24%
(86.13~100%)		ST1 (10), ST2 (38), ST3 (3)ST1 (3), ST2 (14), ST3 (3)
Macaca arctoides2/2, 100.00% (0~100%)2/2, 100.00% (0~100%)ST2 (1), ST3 (1)ST1 (1), ST2 (1)
Macaca leonina1/1, 100.00% (0~100%)3/3, 100.00% (0~100%)ST3 (1)ST2 (3)
Gibbons
Hylobates Hoolock7/13, 53.85%
(26.75~80.95%)		1/2, 50.00%
(0~100%)		ST2 (7)ST1 (1)
Table
Table 3. The Chi-square test and OR values showed the effects of confinement duration, sex, enclosure area, cage size, and bodyweight on the prevalence and subtype distribution of Blastocystis in N. bengalensis in summer.
Table 3. The Chi-square test and OR values showed the effects of confinement duration, sex, enclosure area, cage size, and bodyweight on the prevalence and subtype distribution of Blastocystis in N. bengalensis in summer.
Infected (n = 28)Uninfected (n = 57)OR (95%CI)x2p
Captive duration 2.976 (0.783~11.307)2.7380.098
LC2542
SC315
Sex 0.837 (0.837~2.071)0.1490.700
Male1329
Female1528
Enclosure area 0.376 (0.147~0.959)4.3080.038
A1034
B1823
Cage size 4.512 (1.709~11.918)9.8480.002
Small1612
Large1344
Bodyweight 1.026 (0.389~2.707)0.0030.958
I (≥1 kg)3918
II (<1 kg)199
LC—long-term confinement; SC—short-term confinement; OR—odds ratio.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ni, Q.; Dong, S.; Fan, Y.; Wan, W.; Teng, P.; Zhu, S.; Liang, X.; Xu, H.; Yao, Y.; Zhang, M.; et al. Molecular Epidemiology of Blastocystis in Confined Slow Lorises, Macaques, and Gibbons. Animals 2022, 12, 2992. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12212992

AMA Style

Ni Q, Dong S, Fan Y, Wan W, Teng P, Zhu S, Liang X, Xu H, Yao Y, Zhang M, et al. Molecular Epidemiology of Blastocystis in Confined Slow Lorises, Macaques, and Gibbons. Animals. 2022; 12(21):2992. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12212992

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ni, Qingyong, Shasha Dong, Yumai Fan, Wen Wan, Ping Teng, Shaobo Zhu, Xiaobi Liang, Huailiang Xu, Yongfang Yao, Mingwang Zhang, and et al. 2022. "Molecular Epidemiology of Blastocystis in Confined Slow Lorises, Macaques, and Gibbons" Animals 12, no. 21: 2992. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12212992

APA Style

Ni, Q., Dong, S., Fan, Y., Wan, W., Teng, P., Zhu, S., Liang, X., Xu, H., Yao, Y., Zhang, M., & Xie, M. (2022). Molecular Epidemiology of Blastocystis in Confined Slow Lorises, Macaques, and Gibbons. Animals, 12(21), 2992. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12212992

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop