Next Article in Journal
Growth Rate Distribution and Potential Non-Linear Relationship between Body Weight and Walking Ability in Turkeys
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Feeding Management System on Milk Production and Milk Quality from Sheep of the Turcana Breed
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Effect of Dietary Selenium on the Growth and Immune Systems of Fish

1
Wuxi Fisheries College, Nanjing Agricultural University, Wuxi 214081, China
2
Jiangsu Fishery Technology Promotion Center, Nanjing 210017, China
3
Key Laboratory of Integrated Rice-Fish Farming Ecology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Freshwater Fisheries Research Center, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Wuxi 214081, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2023, 13(18), 2978; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13182978
Submission received: 27 August 2023 / Revised: 8 September 2023 / Accepted: 18 September 2023 / Published: 20 September 2023

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

This paper addresses the various sources of Se in the aquatic environment as well as the positive and negative effects on fish. It emphasizes that optimal dietary Se levels are necessary for healthy biological processes in fish, such as growth, reproduction, and immunity. Since organic Se appears to be the most ideal for fish due to its low toxicity, environmental safety, and efficient fish culture, it explores the potential sources and forms of Se. Extreme doses could be toxic to fish, and higher levels could cause retarded growth, survival issues, abnormalities, and poor performance. However, adverse effects depend on the acceptance of the fish species. Additionally, there are a number of biological techniques that may be used to remove excess Se from the aquatic environment, with phytoremediation being the most effective. The production of Se-rich feeds and their benefits for fish immune systems, disease prevention, and growth development are discussed in this article. These factors contribute to the profitability of fish farmers and their confidence in the feed industry. In order to monitor and study Se’s effects on fish and their aquatic environment, the report highlights the significance of the feed industry and how it connects farmers with research institutions.

Abstract

Dietary selenium (Se) is an essential component that supports fish growth and the immune system. This review attempts to provide insight into the biological impacts of dietary Se, including immunological responses, infection defense, and fish species growth, and it also identifies the routes via which it enters the aquatic environment. Dietary Se is important in fish feed due to its additive, antioxidant, and enzyme properties, which aid in various biological processes. However, excessive intake of it may harm aquatic ecosystems and potentially disrupt the food chain. This review explores the diverse natures of dietary Se, their impact on fish species, and the biological methods for eliminating excesses in aquatic environments. Soil has a potential role in the distribution of Se through erosion from agricultural, industrial, and mine sites. The research on dietary Se’s effects on fish immune system and growth can provide knowledge regarding fish health, fish farming strategies, and the health of aquatic ecosystems, promoting the feed industry and sustainable aquaculture. This review provides data and references from various research studies on managing Se levels in aquatic ecosystems, promoting fish conservation, and utilizing Se in farmed fish diets.

1. Introduction

Dietary Se is vital for the growth and immune system of fish. Dietary Se is a micronutrient that functions as a component of important selenoproteins for both humans and animals [1,2]. These selenoproteins are involved in various biological processes, including antioxidant defense, thyroid hormone metabolism, and immune function [3]. Se as a nutritional element is obtained in the aquatic environment from two main sources: feed and fertilizer. In areas where waste and other activities from agriculture, industries, mining, and other natural events are carried out, Se concentrations might seem higher because of closer point sources. However, human activities can transfer Se into aquatic food webs through pathway concentrations in seleniferous environments [4,5,6]. Increases in dietary Se can, however, upset the aquatic food chain, and overexposure may cause disruption in fish tissues, which is harmful to human consumption both directly and indirectly.
Aquatic animals may be subjected to biotic and abiotic stresses during the farming season [7]. The most important factor that helps to counteract these stressors and promote high productivity and well-being is a nutritionally balanced aquatic diet [8]. Another important measure to ensure the nutritional value of aquafeeds is the addition of microelements such as Se [9]. Se aids many biological functions in the bodies of animals, including those of an antioxidant, a metabolic stimulator, and an immunostimulant [8]. In fact, Se serves as a precursor for a number of metabolites involved in biological processes in the body [10]. The immune and antioxidant systems benefit from the role of Se in the synthesis of selenoproteins [11]. Moreover, it helps regulate liver and kidney functions as crucial organs for the release of body toxins and nitrogen residues [12]. According to Swain et al. [13], Se is crucial for the biological functions of the fish’s body. Nutrition is one of several elements that influence the growth and development of fish in aquatic environments. Selenium is a crucial dietary component that has a tremendous impact on fish growth. Understanding the effects of dietary selenium on fish growth is critical for sustainable aquaculture practices and maintaining ecological balance in aquatic ecosystems. Additionally, several fish species have been found to have better overall growth when their diets contain adequate levels of selenium. According to Wang et al. [14], adequate selenium supplementation in feed has been associated with improved feed efficiency, weight gain, and growth rates.
Additionally, dietary Se enhances immune responses and increases the production of immune-related molecules, such as interleukin-10 (IL-10) and immunoglobulin A (IgA), which are critical for immune regulation and defense against infection. Zhai et al. [15] found that Se supplementation has a positive effect on the immune system and intestinal barrier, reducing permeability and pathogen entry. Se also affects the function of various immune cells in fish, such as macrophages and lymphocytes, as it enhances the phagocytic activity of macrophages so that they can effectively engulf and eliminate pathogens [16]. It also modulates the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), which are involved in the immune response against pathogens [17]. In addition, Se enhances lymphocyte proliferation and antibody production, promoting a robust immune response in fish. Se has been found to regulate the expression of immune-related genes in fish. For example, studies have shown that dietary Se supplementation promotes the expression of genes involved in the immune response, such as Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and cytokines [14]. These immune genes are needed for both the identification of pathogens and the start of immune reactions. Rainbow trout fed abundant organic Se (Se-Plex®) strengthened their immunity with 4 mg/kg of dietary Se which triggered a crucial response in the head kidney (HK) of rainbow trout and upregulated genes [18]. Rathore et al. [19] conducted a study on nano-Se supplementation in the diet of Nile tilapia, focusing on Se assimilation and the expression of immunoregulated selenoproteins, which showed enhanced Se absorption and utilization, while altered expression levels of immunoregulated selenoproteins were observed, suggesting possible effects on the immune system. In another study by Fontagné-Dicharry et al. [20], dietary Se was found to significantly affect the antioxidant status of rainbow trout fry and parameters related to oxidative stress. Generally, fish feed meal is a vital source of dietary Se in the aquatic environment that helps strengthen stress, inflammation, and infection response [21].
Se in fish feed should be used in the correct dosage, which should not exceed the levels recommended by the European Union. According to previous studies, the recommended Se dose in fish feed falls between 0.1 and 2.00 mg/kg; anything above this can have negative consequences [22]. Also, the European Union has enacted legislation stating that Se supplementation with organic Se should not exceed 0.5 mg/kg in feed [23,24,25].
Furthermore, the insight gained from knowledge about Se contents in fish feeds may ultimately lead to maximizing profitability for the feed industry by increasing fish farmers’ confidence and the demand for fish feed meal [26]. Adequate Se-rich feed from the feed industry supports the fish immune system, prevents disease, promotes fast growth, and ensures high meat quality [27,28]. By providing Se-enriched feeds, the feed industry can help prevent disease outbreaks and promote fish welfare. The feed industry can contribute to Se biofortification, i.e., increasing the Se concentrations in fish products for human consumption. Se-enriched feeds can help address Se deficiencies in regions where soils are naturally low in Se [29]. This ensures that fish farmers have access to Se-rich fish feed, which benefits their health and well-being. According to Wang et al. [26], Se can guarantee better fish health and secure food production, even though several countries have implemented limitations on the Se concentration of fish feed. The feed industry must adhere to Se contents based on fish species acceptability and standards to improve reputation, trust, and profitability. Se is essential for fish nutrition, health, disease prevention, biofortification, and regulatory compliance, enhancing the industry’s overall performance.
This study aims to explore the biological effects of extreme dietary Se on fish species, its implications for various dosage levels, and preventative methods for excess Se. It helps fill the gaps in the existing literature and provides a comprehensive insight into the effects of Se on fish growth and immune systems.

2. Sources of Se and Their Effects on the Aquatic Environment

Se is a naturally occurring element that interacts with fish’s environment through anthropogenic and natural means (see Figure 1). Thus, Se concentration in soil and aquatic environments depends on anthropogenic activities (industrial, mining, agriculture inputs, sewage sludge, oils, power plants, and mines) and natural occurrences (weathering rocks, volcanic eruptions, and atmospheric processes). There are ways in which Se can directly and indirectly get into the soil and aquatic environment, including erosion, runoff, and leaching that release coal ash into water bodies, particularly in Se-rich regions [4,30]. However, it also gets into the aquatic environment directly from mine discharges, agricultural fields, waste water, sewage disposals, and industrial discharges [6]. Khoshnood [31] highlighted the most frequent contaminants, such as heavy metals and pesticides, causing harm to fish in aquatic environments. According to Tan et al. [32], 40% of Se in the atmosphere and aquatic environment comes from industrial and mining activities. This percentage of Se was primarily influenced by human activities like burning coal and crude oil, which serves as an influencing factor [32]. In addition, these activities by humans have introduced high Se levels as micronutrient elements to the environment, causing imbalances in the food chain. The level of Se concentration in the aquatic environment in a particular area depends on a number of factors, such as the increase in demand for agriculture, industrial processes, mining power plants, chemical wastes deposited in the environment, from which Se comes from different sources, and the release of pollutants into the aquatic system [33,34]. Fish in the aquatic environment perform all metabolism processes, including Se intake, which may be carried out orally or assimilated into muscle and liver tissues.
Fish species make excellent models for detecting genotoxic chemicals in aquatic ecosystems [36,37] due to their abundance and specific habitats [38]. Most toxicity levels are based on uptake in the aquatic environment, which is substantially lower in natural populations than uptake through the food chain. Se concentrations in soils vary depending on the location, activities, type, and nature of the soils. Tan et al. [39] reported that Se content in various soil types varies from 1.07 to 6.69%. Thus, natural processes (physical and mechanical) occurring in the soil could lead to an uneven distribution of Se in the environment. In addition, the Se content in the soils of many countries varies. Studies have found Se levels of 0.4 mg/kg in most parts of the world’s soil, including North America, Ireland, Australia, and Israel, as well as in some Chinese provinces (72% of the area of China), New Zealand, and a considerable part of Europe [40,41] (Table 1).

3. Forms of Dietary Se Intake and Their Effects on Fish Species

Fish species absorb dietary Se in various forms, such as organic and inorganic [45,46,47]. These forms of dietary Se impact fish’s biological functions. The forms of dietary Se aid fish species in several ways depending on their health, size, species, feed composition, and experiment conditions [48]. The biological functions of fish in their aquatic environment may be supported by dietary Se use. However, the majority of dietary Se absorption by fish species is efficient due to their bulkiness or minute size [49].
As for Se in the diet of fish, there are a few different forms commonly used as inorganic, such as Na2SeO3 or sodium selenate (Na2SeO4) (Table 2). They differ in toxicity, with Na2SeO3 being slightly less toxic than Na2SeO4 [50]. Na2SeO3 is commonly used in fish feed and is also found in plant foods, meats, seafood, and dietary supplements that provide numerous health benefits, while Na2SeO4 is an insecticide used in agriculture to control insects and can be used as a fungicide [51]. Both forms are readily absorbed by fish and can meet their Se requirements. Na2SeO3 plays an important role in fish nutrition and tissues, as a study by Rathore et al. [19] showed that supplementing fish feed with inorganic Se positively affects Se content in Nile tilapia tissues.
Organic forms of dietary Se also include selenomethionine (SeMet) and selenocysteine (SeCyst). The two forms often come from natural sources such as yeast or plants. According to a study by Penglase et al. [52], fish feed enriched with Se provides fish with a higher proportion of essential nutrients and thus promotes their accumulation in their tissues. Additionally, dietary organic Se in fish feed has resulted in strengthened retention and increased Se levels in the fish. Since fish tissues accumulate both essential and non-essential trace elements [53], it is important to have an understanding of the various Se forms and their effects on fish.
SeMet is one of the essential amino acids. Fish can obtain SeMet from their diet, and it is known to play a crucial role in their overall health and biological functions such as growth and the immune system. A study by Liu et al. [54] demonstrated that SeMet supplementation in grass carp diets contributed to fostering growth performance, immune response, and antioxidant capacity.
SeCyst is an amino acid that incorporates Se into selenoproteins, thereby affecting reproduction, egg quality, and spawning performance in fish [26]. It is important for protecting fish from oxidative stress and maintaining cellular health, as shown by Kumar et al. [55]. In addition, SeCyst is an important component of antioxidant enzymes such as GPxs.
Table 2. Forms of dietary Se and their effects on some fish species.
Table 2. Forms of dietary Se and their effects on some fish species.
Forms of Dietary Se IntakeEffect Refs.
Na2SeO3Its supplementation in Mahseer fish shows better growth and biochemical health.[56]
It enhances African catfish growth.[57,58]
Na2SeO3, a Se dietary supplement, improves fish growth, antioxidant capacity, and immune response in fish, including Nile tilapia.[59]
It supports the growth and survival rates of rainbow trout.[60]
SeMetIt supports better absorption and more bioavailability in species such as rainbow trout, fathead minnows, channel catfish, and Atlantic salmon.[61]
It positively enhances innate immunity by improving serum lysozyme activity and GPxs activities in the liver and muscle tissues of Mahseer fish.
It causes better protective influences during stressful conditions with Medaka.[56]
Se content elevates the healthy growth of common carp.[26]
At 0.6 mg/kg, it supports the growth and immunity of goldfish.[57]
It stimulates the larval growth of rainbow trout fish.[62]
It promotes the growth potential of African catfish.[58]
Se Nanoparticles (nSe)It enhances growth and improves antioxidant enzyme activities in juvenile black sea bream.[14]
It increases the growth and immunity of goldfish at 0.6 mg/kg.[57]
It can alleviate hepatopancreas injury in high-fat diets and enhance the survival of grass carp.[63]
Na2SeO4It enhances the growth performance of African catfish.[58]

4. Se Characteristics in the Soil and Their Influences on the Aquatic Environment

Se is a chemical element that can naturally occur in soil. Soil serves as the primary source of Se, influencing its content in food, vegetables, and drinking water [39]. Hence, the amount of Se in the soil directly influences the amount of Se in fish. Soil parent material, physical and chemical properties, and other factors like soil type and land use could influence Se distribution in soil [64]. Se distribution in soil varies geographically and depends on factors such as parent material, climate, and land use practices. It can be found in varying concentrations worldwide (see Table 3), with higher levels typically found in regions with seleniferous deposits [64]. The bioavailability of Se in soil depends on its chemical form, as it can exist in different oxidation states (−2 to +6), with selenate (SeO4) and selenite (SeO3) being the most common forms. Na2SeO3 is more mobile and bioavailable, while SeO4 is prone to adsorption and immobilization in soil [65]. Soil contains various sources and forms of Se, including Se sulfides and Se ions. It is acidic, oily, and rich in organic matter. Se exists in various organic and inorganic forms, with selenopyrite or selenopyrite fixed to organic matter. According to Saha et al. [44], dietary Se exists in selenide (Se2−), SeO32−, and SeO42− forms, found in acidic, low redox soils, predominant in acidic, medium redox soils (0 to 200 mV), and dominant in alkaline, high redox soils (500 mV). Moreover, soil pH, organic matter content, and redox conditions significantly influence Se concentrations in soil. Acidic soils with low organic matter content can increase Se availability, while alkaline or high organic soils may reduce its mobility [66]. The interaction of Se in soil can have impacts on the aquatic environment, including fish populations. When Se-rich soils are eroded or irrigation water containing Se is used, Se can enter nearby water bodies through runoff or leaching. This can result in elevated Se concentrations in aquatic environments [67].
In the soil environment, the ideal Se levels, which support a variety of living organisms, including some fish species, particularly the African catfish in terms of extreme conditions, some crustaceans like crab, lobster, and prawns, as well as mollusks like snails and slugs, should exist. The soil environment serves in the capacity of producing food, transferring energy within food webs, releasing water, and regulating carbon [26,68]. Living organisms, including fish in the soil and aquatic environment, require adequate Se based on their acceptability for their survival and welfare. However, high Se concentration depends on soil types and characteristics such as sedimentary and organic matter, whereas magmatic rocks are poor in Se concentration and have a low Se content [69]. In areas where aquaculture structures are unmodernized, they allow external sources of Se to enter aquatic environments through runoff.
Moreover, authors have reported the global average Se concentration in soils at 0.1 and 2 mg/kg [70], 0.01–0.4 mg/kg [71], and 0.03–2.0 mg kg−1, with an average of 0.40 mg/kg [71,72]. The soil has multiple Se levels, and its characteristics are high, toxic, deficient, marginal, and moderate in levels of 0.40–1.00 mg/kg, 1.00–3.00 mg/kg, >3.00 mg/kg, <0.125 mg/kg, and 0.125–0.175 mg/kg [73], respectively, depending on type and characteristics. However, the average Se concentration level in soil globally falls within the range of 0.01–0.4 mg/kg [74,75]. The levels of Se in the soil vary based on the region or countries, as indicated in Table 3.
Table 3. Se concentration in soil environment and its characteristics.
Table 3. Se concentration in soil environment and its characteristics.
Countries Se Concentrations in Soils (mg/kg)Refs.
BelgiumIt has low Se content in agricultural soils, with an average of 0.30.[72,76]
ChinaIts average Se range falls within 0.01–2-Se and most top soils contain 0.06–9.13[65,77,78]
DenmarkA deficient soil Se level was found to be between 0.1 and 0.6.[67]
England<0.01–16[67]
Global Se levelsThe average Se range in the world falls between 0.01 and 2.00.[4,67]
Iran0.04–0.45[79]
JapanIt has an average Se range in the soil between 0.05 and 2.80.[71,72]
Netherlands Aqua regia has average Se contents of 0.12–1.9 for grassland soils and 0.20–1.20 for arable land soils.[72]
Qatar0.12–0.77[80]
Scotland It has a general average Se level in most soils between 0.12 and 0.88, and sandy soil contains 0.43.[67,81]
Sweden It has a low average Se content in agricultural soils of 0.30, the same as Belgium.[72,82]

5. Se Influences the Biological Functions of Various Diets of Fish Species

Many fish species’ biological processes are positively impacted by dietary Se, including thyroid regulation, growth promotion, improvement of fertility, immune system enhancement, and delay of aging [83,84,85], as well as antioxidant activity [86,87]. In contrast, Mechlaoui et al. [88] discovered that gilthead sea bream fed SeMet had better growth performance and higher antioxidant content than those fed sodium selenite (Na2SeO3). Ma et al. [89] demonstrated that dietary Se supplementation resulted in improved growth of grass carp. Abdel-Tawwab et al. [58] studied African catfish fed diets containing 0.2, 0.4, or 0.6 mg/kg Se and were also exposed to copper toxicity. They found that organic Se improved growth and reduced the negative effects of copper toxicity on physiology. Elia et al. [90] confirmed that fish fed Se-supplemented diets had higher growth rates and Se accumulation than the control group. Zhu et al. [91] investigated the effect of dietary Se on growth, body composition, and hepatic GPxs activity of largemouth bass; the researchers discovered that dietary Se supplementation improved growth and body composition and increased hepatic GPxs activity in largemouth bass, which may have a positive effect on their health. Han et al. [92] found that higher dietary Se content positively affected the overall growth performance of gibel carp compared to diets with lower Se content. Saffari et al. [93] confirmed that dietary Se is important to improve the growth and productivity of common carp and Ashouri et al. [94] reported that dietary Se concentrations of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 mg/kg improved the growth of common carp, muscle composition, and antioxidant status. Ibrahim et al. [8] confirmed that Nile tilapia fed nanoselenium (nanoSe) supplements had better growth rates and feed efficiency than those fed Se bulk supplements. Se is also important for biological functions like promoting fish growth, immune function, and health. It also boosts fish immunity, antioxidation, the stabilization of cell membranes [95,96], and the maintenance of normal metabolism in the body [30]. Fish feeding on regulated Se may support fish species performance by contributing to weight gain and specific growth rates in aquatic animals [64,93,94]. Studies on Wuchang bream have shown that Se increases growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I levels in serum and messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) transcription levels of growth hormone receptor 2 (ghr2) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (igf1) in the liver [97]. It effectively promotes growth in various fish species, including grass carp, gibel carp, and rainbow trout [92,98].

6. Excessive Se Exposure to Fish and the Types of Deformities or Abnormalities Experienced

Malformations or abnormalities are extreme conditions that no fish farmer likes to experience. Most problems that occur in fish farming are due to poor management and feed is a major factor. Deformities or abnormalities in fish can be caused by several factors. Dietary Se is required by organisms in sufficient amounts for proper biological and physiological functioning. However, increased dietary intake of Se may lead to adverse effects including malformations in fish. A study conducted by Lemly and Smith [99] examined the effects of dietary Se on fish deformities. They found that high dietary Se significantly increased the prevalence of dorsal deformities in fish, such as lateral curvature of the spine. The deformities have been observed in both juvenile and adult fish, demonstrating the importance of monitoring Se levels in aquatic ecosystems. In addition, a research article by Lemly [35] examined the relationship between Se concentration and deformities in fish populations (see Table 4 and Figure 2). The study found that elevated Se concentrations in fish tissues were associated with an increased incidence of skeletal deformities, including gill malformations and spinal anomalies. It should be noted that Se can enter aquatic ecosystems through natural sources, such as rocks and soils, as well as anthropogenic activities, such as mining and industrial effluents. Therefore, it is critical to carefully control Se levels in aquatic environments to avoid adverse effects on fish populations. Excessive dietary Se intake can interfere with the normal development of fish embryos and larvae. In a study by Johnson et al. [100], elevated Se exposure early in life was shown to increase the incidence of cranial deformities in fish. High dietary Se concentrations may also affect fish reproduction. Research by Lemly [35] has shown that Se accumulation in fish tissues can lead to reduced egg viability and offspring survival. In addition, Se-induced reproductive impairments can result in reduced population growth and overall reproductive success in fish. However, higher Se intake can disrupt immune functions, making fish more susceptible to infection and disease. Studies by Lin et al. [101] and He et al. [102] found that elevated Se concentrations in fish tissue resulted in impaired immune responses and increased mortality due to infectious diseases. Dietary Se may also affect fish behavior. Dhara et al. [103] showed that Se exposure alters the swimming behavior and activity patterns of fish, potentially affecting their ability to forage for food, evade predators, and interact socially within their ecosystem.
Dietary Se as a nutritional element and its toxic concentration levels have drawn increasing attention to Se toxicity [104]. Moreover, Se is considered the second most harmful trace element in fish after mercury [45,105]. For these reasons, Se should be present in fish feed in appropriate amounts. As can be seen in Table 4, abnormalities in early-life stage fish [46] exposed to Se have been associated with negative effects on fish populations. Although there is evidence of Se toxicity in fish [106,107], it is not yet known what level is required to protect fish populations [106].
Table 4. Deformities or abnormalities associated with Se toxicity in fish.
Table 4. Deformities or abnormalities associated with Se toxicity in fish.
Abnormalities of Higher Se EffectsRefs.
Renal calcinosisA high Se content of 10 mg/kg causes renal calcinosis disorder in rainbow trout.[108]
Metabolism disorder A diet containing Se at 13–15 mg/kg was observed to be highly toxic for rainbow trout and channel catfish.[108]
Oxidative stress and altered lipid metabolismA high content of dietary Se in the Atlantic salmon diet at 15 mg/kg causes oxidative stress and altered lipid metabolism.[109]
Loss of appetite and changes organs malfunctionsHigh dietary Se of 20.9 mg/kg in juvenile yellowtail kingfish causes reduced feed intake and liver and spleen changes.[110]
Vertebral and muscle deformitiesHigh Se concentrations cause spinal column abnormalities in fish, such as curvature or fusion of vertebrae, and hinder muscle growth.[110,111,112,113,114]
Survival abnormalities Razorback sucker larvae’s survival is reduced by Se concentrations above 4.6 mg/kg.[2]
Fin deformitiesSe toxicity affects fish fin development (short, frayed, or missing fins), causing deformities.[51]
Eye abnormalitiesHigh Se levels have been linked with fish eye deformities (reduced eye size or even complete eye loss) and cataracts.[51]
Gill deformitiesSe can affect the delicate structures of fish gills, potentially leading to abnormalities like fused or malformed gill arches, reduced gill surface area, or impaired respiration.[115]
Reproductive abnormalitiesSe can impact fish reproductive systems, causing deformities in gonads or reduced fertility. [52]
Abnormalities of liver, gill cells, and nerve conductionExtreme Se intake causes abnormalities in the liver and gill cells, nerve conduction disorders, and defects in the energy metabolism of zebrafish.[111]
Craniofacial deformitiesSe toxicity can affect the development of the skull and facial structures in fish, resulting in malformations such as asymmetrical jaws or abnormal eye placement. [109]
Skeletal deformitiesExtreme Se exposure may disrupt bone growth and mineralization in fish, leading to skeletal deformities such as bent or twisted fins, abnormal body shapes, or curved spines.[111]
Larval deformitiesSe accumulation can result in northern pike larvae deformities, including spinal curvature, craniofacial malformation, and impaired swimming ability.[113]
Figure 2. Increased Se impact on fish. The excess Se impact on fish was retrieved from Lemly [35], Wang et al. [26] Khan et al. [61].
Figure 2. Increased Se impact on fish. The excess Se impact on fish was retrieved from Lemly [35], Wang et al. [26] Khan et al. [61].
Animals 13 02978 g002

7. Dietary Se Deficiency in Fish Feed and Its Biological Effects

Dietary Se is a crucial component for the healthy growth and immune function of fish. It serves as a cofactor for crucial enzymes involved in immune system control, thyroid hormone metabolism, and antioxidant defense [89]. Dietary Se deficiency and the ensuing health issues may develop if fish do not consume sufficient Se in their diets. However, fish farmers may start experiencing impaired growth as one of the main effects of dietary Se deficiency in fish. According to studies [113], it has also been linked to reduced feed conversion, decreased protein synthesis, and poor tissue development. Aquaculture businesses may ultimately suffer from stunted growth and subpar performance as a result of this deficiency. Additionally, fish have reproductive capabilities, including gonad growth, maturation, and effective spawning [113,114,115].
Consequently, these processes can be disturbed by insufficient dietary Se in fish feed (see Table 5), which can also result in decreased fecundity and poor egg quality. Fish with low Se levels also have weakened immune systems and are more susceptible to illness and infection. By promoting the development of immune cells and controlling inflammatory processes, Se is known to enhance immunological responses [116]. These defenses are weakened by insufficient Se consumption, leaving fish more susceptible to infections and jeopardizing their general health. In addition to dietary Se deficiency in fish feed, the aquaculture feed industry should employ different approaches to address this problem. These approaches include adding Se-enriched feed ingredients like plants, animals, and yeast as organic dietary components [26]. These approaches may therefore be employed to correct dietary Se deficiency in order to enhance fish health, growth, and performance.

8. Biological Effects of Dietary Se on Fish Species

The presence of Se in the fish diet increases respiratory activity, lysozyme activity, acetylcholinesterase, and myeloperoxidase activities. In a recent report by Liu et al. [64], they discovered that Se increased the genes for fatty acid oxidation and triglyceride hydrolysis in the liver. The biological processes of aquatic animals are more influenced than negatively affected by the presence of Se in their diet. Se performs a variety of functions in the internal processes of aquatic animals, including immune system development, nutrition and nutritional conditions, enhancing reproduction, and increasing growth and performance in the aquatic environment.
The growth and performance of fish in aquatic environments depend on many factors, such as water quality, feed, and other genetically determined factors. Feed is one of the factors that should be balanced, with Se being an important nutrient for the biological activities of fish. Notwithstanding the effectiveness of Se in fish feed, serving as a vital nutrient requirement for fish growth, it has also been associated with improved feed digestibility, health, and growth in finfish. It has equally been associated with the stimulation of growth hormone production, leading to high growth [19], binding to the enzyme deiodinase necessary for thyroid hormone regulation [11], and an increase in growth hormone [10].
As reported by authors, Se is a vital requirement for certain fish species in improving their growth, feed utilization, and immune resistance to diseases of Mahseer [50,120], Asian seabass [120], Red seabream [121], Nile tilapia [122], Goldfish [57], Gilthead sea bream [120], Mahseer fish [61], European seabass [123], Rohu [13], and Caspian roach [124], as seen in Table 6.

9. Effects of Se Toxicity Intake on Immune Genes in Fish

Toxicity levels in fish feed vary based on species. Some fish species grow and survive above the European Commission’s recommended levels of Se and the optimum Se content range for aquatic animals of 0.2–1.8 mg/kg diet [129]. Every fish species has its own tolerance for dietary Se intake. However, one species’ acceptable level could be harmful to the other species’ biological effects, including growth performance and immune functions in the aquatic environment. For example, white sturgeon are less sensitive to Se toxicity, with a dietary Se toxicity level of 10 mg/kg [130], while other fish species are highly sensitive to it at these levels. Also, despite the beneficial effects of dietary Se on fish, it has been reported that excessive intake of Se can reduce antioxidant capacity and growth performance [6,131,132]. The severe Se intake in fish feed may be hazardous to certain fish species, thus causing biological abnormalities like reproductive impairments, egg and larval transfer, yolk sac absorption, reduced hatching, teratogenicity (deformities), and oedema in the early-life stages of fish and dying larvae [45,51]. Se is an essential element for upregulating and downregulating genes, but its deficiency can lead to the downregulation of antioxidant defenses and thyroid hormone metabolism, negatively affecting fish health [45,51]. Also, its excess may cause the upregulation of antioxidant system genes, which benefits fish by combating oxidative stress and maintaining cellular health [133].
However, dietary Se is essential for optimal growth, metabolic processes, performance, immunity, disease resistance, and reproduction in fish, but its deficiency poses a threat to their survival. Authors have reported that extreme Se levels have adverse effects on various fish species, with highly toxic effects at 13–15 mg/kg in rainbow trout [108,134], adverse health and survival effects at 6.6 mg/kg in juvenile split tail [135], reduced growth (20–30 mg/kg) in fathead minnow [59], and toxic levels at 10 mg/kg in white sturgeon [130]. Extreme Se levels in fish feed have been reported to cause locomotive neuron disorders in zebrafish. According to Zhao et al. [112], excess Se in zebrafish embryos can cause motor neuron dysfunction by inhibiting sl1 and insml1a expression, and also disrupting gamma aminobutyric acid (GABAergic) neuron function, excitability, and differentiation of dopaminergic neurons by downregulating glutamate decarboxylases (gad1b and gad2) expression, causing reduced spontaneous motor activity and affecting dopaminergic neuron differentiation [135,136]. Watanabe et al. [137] and Lemly [35] reported that higher Se can cause teratogenic abnormalities in many organs of fish, including the spine, head, mouth, and fins, as well as reduced feed efficiency, tissue breakdown, and reproductive failure. Also, Cotter et al. [138] reported that Se deficiency in fish diets leads to growth retardation and immunological instability in fish. Se acts as an antioxidant, protecting cells from oxidative damage and supporting immune cell function.

10. Biological Methods of Se in Controlling Aquatic Environments

Fish need Se to maintain their good health and biological processes; hence, it is necessary for Se to be present in aquatic environments. However, contaminants in the aquatic environment have been a concern, as man’s activities in securing a better life have also been detrimental to the environment. Many bacteria and plants have been used to treat or remove Se concentrations in the aquatic environment, and some of these methods and techniques are eco-friendly. However, researchers have found that microbial species can convert soluble Se (Na2SeO3 and Na2SeO4) to Se0 [139,140].
In aquaculture, several preventative or treatment techniques have the benefit of being toxic-residue-free pollution treatments that can be recycled and reused in the aquatic environment [141,142]. Trace metals are high-level pollutants in the aquatic environment, especially Se that can be prevented or treated using different techniques like bioremediation, adsorption, phytoremediation, constructed wetlands, nutrient management, etc. Toxic pollutants can also be removed using various biological techniques, or bioremediation, which uses plants and microorganisms. With regard to biological processes, including gene expression for the immune system and the growth performance of aquatic animals that are extremely sensitive to Se, this can be summarized in Table 7.
Regardless of the methods used to control excess Se concentrations in soils and waters, several factors must be considered, such as the specific environment, the severity of the contamination, and the desired outcome. However, one method that is generally considered effective is phytoremediation. It is considered efficient in removing Se from soil and water [143]. In this method, plants are used to remove or absorb Se. For example, hyperaccumulator plant species such as garlic and cabbage plants, such as cabbage, mustard, and broccoli, are able to accumulate high Se concentrations in their tissues, effectively lowering contamination levels [144]. It is also considered cost-effective compared to other methods such as constructed wetlands, phytovolatilization, bioremediation, etc. Once established, plants can take up and accumulate Se naturally, requiring minimal maintenance and avoiding the need for expensive infrastructure. It is also considered sustainable and environmentally friendly compared to other Se control methods [145]. It relies on natural processes and interactions between plants and microbes to remove Se and minimizes the use of chemicals or disruptive techniques [146]. In addition, once Se accumulates in plant tissues, it can be harvested and properly disposed of, preventing the re-release of the contaminant into the environment. This ensures long-term stability and reduces the risk of recontamination. Phytoremediation is the preferred method, but suitability depends on site-specific factors.
Table 7. Biological methods of Se prevention and its effects.
Table 7. Biological methods of Se prevention and its effects.
Biological Control Methods ApproachesRefs.
PhytoremediationPlants can accumulate Se in aquatic environments, potentially aiding in reducing Se in contaminated ecosystems.[147,148]
It has the ability to absorb contaminants through plants’ roots and breakdown pollutants, especially Se, through bioaccumulation.[149]
BioremediationThis technique uses microorganisms to break down and transform Se compounds, enabling bioremediation of Se-contaminated water through the use of bacteria, fungi, and algae.[144,149]
AdsorptionIt involves the applicable removal of Se in the aquatic environment as it has a low operating cost, high Se tolerance, and is effective in aquatic environments.[150,151]
Constructed wetlandsEngineered wetlands mimic natural wetlands by using plant species and microorganisms to remove pollutants, including Se, from contaminated water sources.[143]
BioaugmentationThis is the process of introducing Se-reducing microorganisms to aquatic environments for natural remediation, transforming toxic Se into less harmful forms.[149]
Nutrient managementEffective nutrient management in aquatic ecosystems can indirectly reduce Se toxicity by reducing agricultural runoff and wastewater discharge.[149]
PhytovolatilizationThis is an indirect method of removing contaminants or pollutants through absorption by plants’ roots in the soil and releasing them into volatile contaminant flux.[151]

11. The Relevance of the Feed Industry in Monitoring Dietary Se in Farmed Fish

The feed industry takes seriously its responsibility to monitor Se levels in aquaculture and aquatic habitats. It uses a variety of approaches and procedures to ensure the safety and health of fish and the environment. The industry regularly samples and examines fish tissue to monitor Se levels in farmed fish. For this purpose, Se content is usually measured in the liver or muscle tissue of the fish. In this way, the industry can ensure that the Se content of the fish remains within acceptable limits [43,44,45]. The feed industry monitors not only the Se content in the fish but also the water conditions in which the fish are raised. They conduct thorough water quality tests, which include the Se content of the water. This helps them assess the overall health of the environment and identify potential threats to the fish [35]. The feed industry often collaborates with regulatory agencies and academic institutions to ensure proper monitoring. This collaboration enables it to keep up with the most recent scientific advancements, recommendations, and legislation related to Se monitoring. In addition, the feed industry may take the necessary steps to maintain a safe and healthy fish habitat and limit any potential impact on the ecosystem by actively monitoring Se levels in both farmed fish and aquatic ecosystems.

12. Conclusions

Se is essential for numerous biological processes and at an acceptable dose, for the capacity of fish to survive, despite its harmful effects at high concentrations. Se is ingested by fish species through a variety of sources and processes. The dietary Se found in the aquatic environment is derived from runoff and leaching; it can also exist in a variety of forms, however, it is more vital for fish existence, growth, and gene and gene-related functions. Its toxicity depends on the dosage ingested and fish can absorb it through a variety of organs through the bioaccumulation process. Also, Se is necessary for the development, defense, procreation, and enzymatic functions of fish. Hence, excess intake can lead to deformities and other abnormalities, but it is important for their daily biological functions. Furthermore, Se intake by fish in aquaculture has an acceptable optimal range in which extremes are considered high or low concentrations. The environment plays an important role in the availability of Se due to natural and anthropogenic activities and several influencing factors. In the world, every country has its own Se range in the soil and this has a direct or indirect relationship with the aquatic environment. Dietary Se is vital for the growth and immunity of certain fish, with different dietary acceptability. It also plays an important role in the biological functions of fish, including increasing respiratory burst, lysozyme, acetylcholine esterase activity, and myeloperoxidase activities. However, excess Se in aquatic systems can be prevented by various biological methods or techniques.

Author Contributions

All authors named in this review article contributed to the development of this manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the “JBGS” Project of Seed Industry Revitalization in Jiangsu Province: JBGS [2021]123; the Central Public-Interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund (CAFS): NO.2022XT01; the Central Public-Interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund, Freshwater Fisheries Research Center, CAFS: 2021JBFM21; and the Central Public-Interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund (CAFS (2020TD36).

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to Prince T. Mabey for his relentless effort in assisting in editing the work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors report that they have no conflict of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

References

  1. Rayman, M.P. The importance of selenium to human health. Lancet 2000, 356, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hamilton, S.J. Review of selenium toxicity in the aquatic food chain. Sci. Total. Environ. 2004, 326, 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lu, J.; Holmgren, A. Selenoproteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 723–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ullah, H.; Liu, G.; Yousaf, B.; Ali, M.U.; Irshad, S.; Abbas, Q.; Ahmad, R. A comprehensive review on environmental transformation of selenium: Recent advances and research perspectives. J. Environ. Geochem. Health 2019, 41, 1003–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. USEPA-United States Environmental Protection Agency. Draft Aquatic Life and Aquatic-Dependent Wildlife Se Water Quality Criterion for Freshwaters of California; U.S. EPA, Office of Water, Office of Science and Technology: Washington, DC, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  6. Maier, K.J.; Knight, A.W. Ecotoxicology of Se in freshwater systems. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 1994, 134, 31–48. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Dawood, M.A.O.; El Basuini, M.F.; Zaineldin, A.I.; Yilmaz, S.; Hasan, M.T.; Ahmadifar, E.; El Asely, A.M.; Abdel-Latif, H.M.R.; Alagawany, M.; Abu-Elala, N.M.; et al. Antiparasitic and antibacterial functionality of essential oils: An alternative approach for sustainable aquaculture. Pathogens 2021, 10, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ibrahim, M.S.; El-gendy, G.M.; Ahmed, A.I.; Elharoun, E.R.; Hassaan, M.S. NanoSe versus bulk Se as a dietary supplement: Effects on growth, feed efficiency, intestinal histology, haemato-biochemical and oxidative stress biomarkers in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus Linnaeus, 1758) fingerlings. Aquac. Res. 2021, 52, 5642–5655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sarkar, B.; Bhattacharjee, S.; Daware, A.; Tribedi, P.; Krishnani, K.K.; Minhas, P.S. Se nanoparticles for stress-resilient fish and livestock. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2015, 10, 371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mehdi, Y.; Hornick, J.L.; Istasse, L.; Dufrasne, I. Se in the environment, metabolism and involvement in body functions. Molecules 2013, 18, 3292–3311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Holben, D.H.; Smith, A.M. The diverse role of Se within selenoproteins: A review. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1999, 99, 836–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, N.; Tan, H.-Y.; Li, S.; Xu, Y.; Guo, W.; Feng, Y. Supplementation of micronutrient Se in metabolic diseases: Its role as an antioxidant. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2017, 2017, 7478523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Swain, P.; Das, R.; Das, A.; Padhi, S.K.; Das, K.C.; Mishra, S.S. Effects of dietary zinc oxide and Se nanoparticles on growth performance, immune responses and enzyme activity in rohu, Labeo rohita (Hamilton). Aquac. Nutr. 2019, 25, 486–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Carlson, B.A.; Yoo, M.H.; Shrimali, R.K.; Irons, R.; Gladyshev, V.N.; Hatfield, D.L.; Park, J.M. Role of Se-containing proteins in T-cell and macrophage function. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2010, 69, 300–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhai, Q.; Cen, S.; Li, P.; Tian, F.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, H.; Chen, W. Effects of Dietary Selenium Supplementation on Intestinal Barrier and Immune Responses Associated with Its Modulation of Gut Microbiota. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2018, 5, 724–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Avery, J.; Hoffmann, P. Selenium, Selenoproteins, and Immunity. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Niu, R.; Yang, Q.; Dong, Y.; Hou, Y.; Liu, G. Selenium metabolism and regulation of immune cells in immune-associated diseases. J. Cell. Physiol. 2022, 237, 3449–3464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Pacitti, D.; Lawan, M.M.; Feldmann, J.; Sweetman, J.; Wang, T.; Martin, S.A.M.; Secombes, C.J. Impact of selenium supplementation on fish antiviral responses: A whole transcriptomic analysis in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fed supranutritional levels of Sel-Plex®. BMC Genom. 2016, 17, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rathore, S.S.; Murthy, H.S.; Mamun, M.A.-A.; Nasren, S.; Rakesh, K.; Kumar, B.T.N.; Abhiman, P.B.; Khandagale, A.S. Nano-Se supplementation to ameliorate nutrition physiology, immune response, antioxidant system and disease resistance against Aeromonas hydrophila in monosex Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2021, 199, 3073–3088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fontagné-Dicharry, S.; Godin, S.; Liu, H.; Prabhu, P.A.J.; Bouyssière, B.; Bueno, M.; Tacon, P.; Médale, F.; Kaushik, S.J. Influence of the forms and levels of dietary selenium on antioxidant status and oxidative stress-related parameters in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fry. Br. J. Nutr. 2015, 113, 1876–1887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hoffmann, P.R. The influence of selenium on immune responses. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2008, 52, 1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gatlin, D.M.; Wilson, R.P. Dietary Se requirement of fingerling channel catfish. J. Nutr. 1984, 114, 627–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. European Commission. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2015/489 of 23 March 2015 concerning the authorisation of selenomethionine produced by Saccharomyces cerevisiae NCYC R645 as a feed additive for all animal species (Text with EEA relevance). Off. J. Eur. Union 2015, 78, 5–8. [Google Scholar]
  24. European Commission. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 121/2014 of 7 February 2014 concerning the authorisation of L-selenomethionine as a feed additive for all animal species (Text with EEA relevance). Off. J. Eur. Union 2017, 39, 53–55. [Google Scholar]
  25. European Commission. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 847/2014 of 4 August 2014 concerning the authorisation of DL-selenomethionine as a feed additive for all animal species (Text with EEA relevance). Off. J. Eur. Union 2017, 232, 10–12. [Google Scholar]
  26. Wang, Y.F.; Chen, P.; Wang, F.H.; Han, W.X.; Qiao, M.; Dong, W.X.; Hu, C.S.; Zhu, D.; Chu, H.Y.; Zhu, Y.G. The ecological clusters of soil organisms drive the ecosystem multifunctionality under long-term fertilization. Environ. Int. 2022, 161, 107133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nip, T.H.M.; Ho, W.Y.; Wong, C.K. Feeding ecology of larval and juvenile black seabream (Acanthopagrus schlegeli) and Japanese seaperch (Lateolabrax japonicus) in Tolo Harbour, Hong Kong. Environ. Biol. Fishes 2003, 66, 197–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Barchielli, G.; Capperucci, A.; Tanini, D. The Role of Selenium in Pathologies: An Updated Review. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Rayman, M.P.; Winther, K.H.; Pastor-Barriuso, R.; Cold, F.; Thvilum, M.; Stranges, S.; Guallar, E.; Cold, S. Effect of long-term selenium supplementation on mortality: Results from a multiple-dose, randomised controlled trial. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2018, 127, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Otter, R.R.; Bailey, F.C.; Fortner, A.M.; Adams, S.M. Trophic status and metal bioaccumulation differences in multiple fish species exposed to coal ash-associated metals. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2012, 85, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Khoshnood, Z. Using Biomarkers in Ecotoxicology: What and Why? Focus Sci. 2016, 2, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tan, L.C.; Nancharaiah, Y.V.; van Hullebusch, E.D.; Lens, P.N.L. Selenium: Environmental significance, pollution, and biological treatment technologies. Biotechnol. Adv. 2016, 34, 886–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kaur, R.; Dua, A. Scales of freshwater fish Labeo rohita as bioindicators of water pollution in Tung Dhab Drain, Amritsar, Punjab, India. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part A 2015, 78, 388–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Byrne, S.; Miller, P.; Waghiyi, V.; Buck, C.L.; von Hippel, F.A.; Carpenter, D.O. Persistent organochlorine pesticide exposure related to a formerly used defence site on St. Lawrence Island, Alaska: Data from sentinel fish and human sera. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part A 2015, 78, 976–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lemly, A.D. Toxic effects of Se in fish. In Se Assessment in Aquatic Ecosystems: A Guide for Hazard Evaluation and Water Quality Criteria; Lemly, A.D., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2002; pp. 39–58. [Google Scholar]
  36. Aich, A.; Goswami, A.R.; Roy, U.S.; Mukhopadhyay, S.K. Ecotoxicological assessment of tannery effluent using guppy fish (Poecilia reticulata) as an experimental model: A biomarker study. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part A 2015, 78, 278–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Walia, G.K.; Handa, D.; Kaur, H.; Kalotra, R. Ecotoxicological studies on fish, Labeo rohita exposed to tannery industry effluent by using micronucleus test. Nucleus 2015, 58, 111–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ali, F.K.; El-Shehawi, A.M.; Seehy, M.A. Micronucleus test in fish genome: A sensitive monitor for aquatic pollution. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2008, 7, 606–612. [Google Scholar]
  39. Tan, J.; Zhu, W.; Wang, W.; Li, R.; Hou, S.; Wang, D.; Yang, L. Se in soil and endemic diseases in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2002, 284, 227–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhou, X.; Li, Y.; Lai, F. Effects of different water management on absorption and accumulation of Se in rice. Saudi. J. Biol. Sci. 2018, 25, 1178–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mayland, H.F.; James, L.F.; Panter, K.E.; Sonderegger, J.L. Se in seleniferous environments. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1989, 23, 15–50. [Google Scholar]
  42. Dixit, R.; Wasiullah; Malaviya, D.; Pandiyan, K.; Singh, U.B.; Sahu, A.; Shukla, R.; Singh, B.P.; Rai, J.P.; Sharma, P.K.; et al. Bioremediation of heavy metals from soil and aquatic environment: An overview of principles and criteria of fundamental processes. Sustainability 2015, 7, 2189–2212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, H.F.; McGrath, S.P.; Zhao, F.J. Se uptake, translocation and speciation in wheat supplied with selenate or selenite. N. Phytol 2008, 178, 92–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Saha, U.; Fayiga, A.; Sonon, L. Se in the Soil-Plant Environment: A Review. Int. J. Appl. Agric. Sci. 2017, 3, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  45. Janz, D.M.; DeForest, D.K.; Brooks, M.L.; Chapman, P.M.; Gilron, G.; Hoff, D.; Hopkins, W.A.; McIntyre, D.O.; Mebane, C.A.; Palace, V.P.; et al. Se toxicity to aquatic organisms. In Ecological Assessment of Se in the Aquatic Environment; Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC): Pensacola, FL, USA, 2010; pp. 139–230. [Google Scholar]
  46. Thomas, J.K.; Wiseman, S.; Giesy, J.P.; Janz, D.M. Effects of chronic dietary selenomethionine exposure on repeat swimming performance, aerobic metabolism and methionine catabolism in adult zebrafish (Danio rerio). Aquat. Toxicol. 2013, 130–131, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Albrecht, M.A.; Evans, C.W.; Raston, C.L. Green chemistry and the health implications of nanoparticles. Green Chem. 2006, 8, 417–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yu, Q.; Xia, C.; Han, F.; Xu, C.; Rombenso, A.; Qin, J.G.; Chen, L. Effect of Different Dietary Selenium Sources on Growth Performance, Antioxidant Capacity, Gut Microbiota, and Molecular Responses in Pacific White Shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquac. Nutr. 2022, 2022, 5738008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, J.S.; Wang, X.F.; Xu, T.W. Elemental Se at nano size (Nano-Se) as a potential chemo preventive agent with reduced risk of Se toxicity: Comparison with Se-methyl selenocysteine in mice. Toxicol. Sci. 2008, 101, 22–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Franke, K.W.; Moxon, A.L. A comparison of the minimum fatal doses of selenium, tellurium, arsenic, and vanadium. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1936, 58, 454–459. [Google Scholar]
  51. Lemly Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR, 1996) Toxicological Profile for Selenium (Update); ATSDR: Atlanta, GA, USA, 1996.
  52. Penglase, S.; Hamre, K.; Ellinngsen, S. Selenium and mercury have a synergistic negative effect on fish reproduction. Aquat. Toxicol. 2014, 149, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hussein, A.; Khaled, A. Determination of metals in tuna species and bivalves from Alexandria, Egypt. Egypt. J. Aquat. Res. 2014, 40, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Liu, L.; Liang, X.; Li, J.; Fang, J.; Alam, M. Effects of dietary selenium on growth performance and oxidative stress in juvenile grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus). Aquac. Nutr. 2018, 24, 1296–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kumar, N.; Krishnani, K.K.; Gupta, S.K.; Singh, N.P. Se nanoparticles enhanced thermal tolerance and maintain cellular stress protection of Pangasius hypophthalmus reared under lead and high temperature. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 2017, 246, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Raza, A. Effects of Graded Levels of Dietary Se Supplementation on the Growth of Juvenile Mahseer (Tor putitora). Master’s Thesis, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  57. Jahanbakhshi, A.; Pourmozaffar, S.; Adeshina, I.; Mahmoudi, R.; Erfanifar, E.; Ajdari, A. Se nanoparticle and selenomethionine as feed additives: Effects on growth performance, hepatic enzymes’ activity, mucosal immune parameters, liver histology, and appetite-related gene transcript in goldfish (Carassius auratus). Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 47, 639–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Abdel-Tawwab, M.; Mousa, M.A.A.; Abbass, F.E. Growth performance and physiological response of African catfish, Clarias gariepinus (B.) fed organic selenium prior to the exposure to environmental copper toxicity. Aquaculture 2007, 272, 335–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chen, H.; Li, J.; Yan, L.; Cao, J.; Li, D.; Huang, G.-Y.; Shi, W.-J.; Dong, W.; Zha, J.; Ying, G.-G.; et al. Subchronic effects of dietary selenium yeast and selenite on growth performance and the immune and antioxidant systems in Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus. Fish Shellfish. Immunol. 2020, 97, 283–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Kousha, M.; Yeganeh, S.; Amirkolaie, A.K. Synergistic effect of sodium selenite and Pediococcus acidilactici on growth, intestinal bacterial counts, selenium bioavailability, hepatic enzymes and non-specific immune response in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquac. Nutr. 2019, 26, 74–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Khan, K.U.; Zuberi, A.; Fernandes, J.B.K.; Ullah, I.; Sarwar, H. An overview of the ongoing insights in Se research and its role in fish nutrition and fish health. Physiol. Biochem. Fish 2017, 43, 1689–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Vidal, D.; Bay, S.M.; Schlenk, D. Effects of dietary selenomethionine on larval rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Arch Env. Contam Toxicol. 2005, 49, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Liu, G.; Yu, H.; Wang, C.; Li, P.; Liu, S.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, C.; Qi, M.; Ji, H. Nano-Se supplements in high-fat diets relieve hepatopancreas injury and improve survival of grass carp Ctenopharyngodon idella by reducing lipid deposition. Aquaculture 2021, 538, 736580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Pan, Z.; Feng, Y.; Wang, M.; Meng, W.; Chen, J. Geochemical characteristics of soil selenium and evaluation of selenium-rich land resources in Guiyang area. Front. Geochem. 2023, 1, 1094023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Arocha, M.A.; McCoy, B.J.; Jackman, A.P. VOC immobilization in soil by adsorption, absorption and encapsulation. J. Hazard. Mater. 1996, 51, 131–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zayed, A.M.; Terry, N. Chromium in the Environment: Factors Affecting Biological Remediation. Plant Soil 2003, 249, 139–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Fordyce, F.M. Selenium Deficiency and Toxicity in the Environment; Elseweir: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  68. Tolu, J.; Bouchet, S.; Helfenstein, J.; Hausheer, O.; Chékifi, S.; Frossard, E.; Tamburini, F.; Chadwick, O.A.; Winkel, L.H.E. Understanding soil Se accumulation and bioavailability through size resolved and elemental characterization of soil extracts. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 6974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. McNeal, J.M.; Balistrieri, L.S. Geochemistry and occurrence of Se: An overview. In Se in Agriculture and the Environment; Jacobs, L.W., Ed.; SSSA Special Publication: Canberra, Australia, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  70. Pezzarossa, B.; Petruzzeli, G. Selenium contamination in soil: Sorption and desorption processes. In Heavy Metals Release in Soils; Selim, H.M., Spark, D.L., Eds.; Lewis Publishers: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2001; pp. 191–206. [Google Scholar]
  71. Yamada, H.; Kamada, A.; Usuki, M.; Yanai, J. Total selenium content of agricultural soils in Japan. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2009, 55, 616–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Supriatin, S.; Weng, L.; Comans, R.N.J. Selenium speciation and extractability in Dutch agricultural soils. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 532, 368–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Kumar, N.; Krishnani, K.K.; Gupta, S.K.; Sharma, R.; Baitha, R.; Singh, D.K.; Singh, N.P. Immuno-protective role of biologically synthesized dietary Se nanoparticles against multiple stressors in Pangasinodon hypophthalmus. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2018, 78, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Feinberg, A.; Stenke, A.; Peter, T.; Hinckley, E.-L.S.; Driscoll, C.T.; Winkel, L.H.E. Reductions in the deposition of sulfur and Se to agricultural soils pose risk of future nutrient deficiencies. Commun. Earth Environ. 2021, 2, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Porcal, P.; Koprivnjak, J.-F.; Molot, L.A.; Dillon, P.J. Humic substances—Part 7: The biogeochemistry of dissolved organic carbon and its interactions with climate change. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2009, 16, 714–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. De Temmerman, L.; Waegeneers, N.; Thiry, C.; Laing, G.D.; Tack, F.; Ruttens, A. Selenium content of Belgian cultivated soils and its uptake by field crops and vegetables. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 468–469, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Dinh, Q.T.; Cui, Z.; Huang, J.; Tran, T.A.T.; Wang, D.; Yang, W.; Zhou, F.; Wang, M.; Yu, D.; Liang, D. Se distribution in the Chinese environment and its relationship with human health: A review. Environ. Int. 2018, 112, 294–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Dungan, R.S.; Frankenberger, W.T. Microbial transformations of Se and the bioremediation of seleniferous environments. Biorem. J. 1999, 3, 171–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kieliszek, M.; Bano, I.; Zare, H. A Comprehensive Review on Se and Its Effects on Human Health and Distribution in Middle Eastern Countries. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2022, 200, 971–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Shomar, B. Geochemistry of soil and groundwater in arid regions: Qatar as a case study. Groundw. Sustain. Dev. 2015, 1, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Shand, C.A.; Eriksson, J.; Dahlin, A.S.; Lumsdon, D.G. Selenium concentrations in national inventory soils from Scotland and Sweden and their relationship with geochemical factors. J. Geochem. Explor. 2012, 121, 4–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Johnsson, L. Selenium in Swedish Soils. Factors Influencing Soil Content and Plant Uptake; Department of Soil Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences: Uppsala, Sweden, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  83. Cai, Z.; Zhang, J.; Li, H. Selenium, aging and aging-related diseases. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2019, 31, 1035–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Liu, H.M.; Li, X.M.; Qin, F.; Huang, K. Se suppresses oxidative-stress-enhanced vascular smooth muscle cell calcification by inhibiting the activation of the PI3K/AKT and ERK signaling pathways and endoplasmic reticulum stress. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 19, 375–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Ahsan, U.; Kamran, Z.; Raza, I.; Ahmad, S.; Babar, W.; Riaz, M.; Iqbal, Z. Role of Se in male reproduction—A review. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2014, 146, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Wolonciej, M.; Milewska, E.; Roszkowska-Jakimiec, W. Trace elements as an activator of antioxidant enzymes. Postep. Hig. Med. 2016, 70, 1483–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Zhang, X.; Liu, C.; Guo, J.; Song, Y. Se status and cardiovascular diseases: Meta-analysis of prospective observational studies and randomized controlled trials. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016, 70, 162–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Mechlaoui, M.; Dominguez, D.; Robaina, L.; Geraert, P.-A.; Kaushik, S.; Saleh, R.; Briens, M.; Montero, D.; Izquierdo, M. Effects of different dietary selenium sources on growth performance, liver and muscle composition, antioxidant status, stress response and expression of related genes in gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata). Aquaculture 2019, 507, 251–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Ma, P.; Hu, Z.; Li, L.; Li, D.; Tang, R. Dietary selenium promotes the growth performance through growth hormone-insulin-like growth factor and hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axes in grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 47, 1313–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Elia, A.C.; Prearo, M.; Pacini, N.; Dorrr, A.J.M.; Abete, M.C. Effects of selenium diets on growth, accumulation and antioxidant response in juvenile carp. Ecotoxicol. Env. Saf. 2011, 74, 166–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Zhu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Liu, Y.; Yang, H.; Liang, G.; Tian, L. Effect of dietary selenium level on growth performance, body composition and hepatic glutathione peroxidase activities of largemouth bass Micropterus salmoide. Aquac. Res. 2011, 43, 1660–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Han, D.; Xie, S.; Liu, M.; Xiao, X.; Liu, H.; Zhu, X.; Yang, Y. The effects of dietary selenium on growth performances, oxidative stress and tissue selenium concentration of gibel carp (Carassius auratus gibelio). Aquac. Nutr. 2011, 17, e741–e749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Saffari, S.; Keyvanshokooh, S.; Zakeri, M.; Johari, S.A.; Pasha-Zanoosi, H. Effects of different dietary Se sources (sodium selenite, selenomethionine and nanoSe) on growth performance, muscle composition, blood enzymes and antioxidant status of common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Aquac. Nutr. 2016, 23, 611–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Ashouri, S.; Keyvanshokooh, S.; Salati, A.P.; Johari, S.A.; Pasha-Zanoosi, H. Effects of different levels of dietary Se nanoparticles on growth performance, muscle composition, blood biochemical profiles and antioxidant status of common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Aquaculture 2015, 446, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. DeForest, D.K.; Brix, K.V.; Elphick, J.R.; Rickwood, C.J.; deBruyn, A.M.H.; Tear, L.M.; Gilron, G.; Hughes, S.A.; Adams, W.J. Lentic, lotic, and sulfate-dependent waterborne Se screening guidelines for freshwater systems. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2017, 36, 2503–2513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Fernandes, I.O.; Oliveira, M.L.d.; Delabie, J.H.C. Description of two new species in the Neotropical Pachycondyla foetida complex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae) and taxonomic notes on the genus. Myrmecol. News 2014, 19, 133–163. [Google Scholar]
  97. Guo, H.; Lin, W.; Hou, J.; Wang, L.; Zhang, D.; Wu, X.; Li, L.; Li, D. The Protective Roles of Dietary Selenium Yeast and Tea Polyphenols on Growth Performance and Ammonia Tolerance of Juvenile Wuchang Bream (Megalobrama amblycephala). Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Zheng, L.; Feng, L.; Jiang, W.D.; Wu, P.; Tang, L.; Kuang, S.Y.; Zeng, Y.Y.; Zhou, X.Q.; Liu, Y. Selenium deficiency impaired immune function of the immune organs in young grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2018, 77, 53–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Lemly, A.D.; Smith, G.J. Aquatic Cycling of Selenium: Implications for Fish and Wildlife; Fish and Wildlife Leaflet 12; Fish and Wildlife Service: Washington, DC, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  100. Johnson, R.C. Lifetime Chronicles of Selenium Exposure Linked to Deformities in an Imperiled Migratory Fish. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 2892–2901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Lin, W.; Zhang, J.; Xu, J.; Pi, J. The Advancing of Selenium Nanoparticles against Infectious Diseases. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 682284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. He, Y.; Guo, C.; Lv, J.; Deng, Y.; Xu, J. Occurrence, sources, and ecological risks of three classes of insecticides in sediments of the Liaohe River basin, China. Env. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 62726–62735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Dhara, K.; Chukwuka, A.V.; Saha, S.; Saha, N.C.; Faggio, C. Effects of short-term selenium exposure on respiratory activity and proximate body composition of early-life stages of Catla catla, Labeo rohita and Cirrhinus mrigala. J. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2022, 90, 103805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Lin, Y.H.; Shiau, S.Y. Dietary selenium requirements of juvenile grouper, Epinephelus malabaricus. Aquaculture 2005, 250, 356–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Luoma, S.N.; Presser, T.S. Emerging Opportunities in Management of Selenium Contamination. ACS Publ. 2009, 43, 8483–8487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Muscatello, J.; Belknap, A.; Janz, D. Accumulation of selenium in aquatic systems downstream of a uranium mining operation in northern Saskatchewan, Canada. Environ. Pollut. 2008, 156, 387–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Miller, L.; Rasmussen, J.; Palace, V.; Hontela, A. The physiological stress response and oxidative stress biomarkers in rainbow trout and brook trout from selenium impacted streams in a coal mining region. J. Appl. Toxicol. Int. J. 2009, 29, 681–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Hodson, P.V.; Hilton, J.W. The nutritional requirements and toxicity to fish of dietary and waterborne selenium. Ecol. Bull. 1983, 35, 335–340. [Google Scholar]
  109. Hilton, J.W.; Hodson, P.V.; Slinger, S.J. The requirement and toxicity of selenium in rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri). J. Nutr. 1980, 110, 2527–2535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Berntssen, M.; Sundal, T.; Olsvik, P.; Amlund, H.; Rasinger, J.; Sele, V.; Hamre, K.; Hillestad, M.; Buttle, L.; Ørnsrud, R. Sensitivity and toxic mode of action of dietary organic and inorganic selenium in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Aquat. Toxicol. 2017, 192, 116–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Le, K.T.; Fotedar, R. Bioavailability of selenium from different dietary sources in yellowtail kingfish (Seriola lalandi). Aquaculture 2014, 420, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Zhao, G.; Hu, J.; Gao, M.; Zhu, Y.; Hong, Y. Excessive selenium affects neural development and locomotor behavior of zebrafish embryos. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2022, 238, 113611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Kupsco, A.; Schlenk, D. Molecular mechanisms of selenium-Induced spinal deformities in fish. Biol. Aquat. Toxicol. Southwest Fish. Sci. Cent. 2016, 179, 143–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Zhang, F.; Teng, Z.; Wang, L.; Wang, L.; Huang, T.; Zhang, X. Dietary Selenium Deficiency and Excess Accelerate Ubiquitin-Mediated Protein Degradation in the Muscle of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) via Akt/FoxO3a and NF-κB Signaling Pathways. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2022, 200, 1361–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Dasgupta, S. Nutritional Interventions During Gonad Development and Maturation Augments Quality Fish Seed Production; ICAR—Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Kolkata Centre: Kolkata, India, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Volkoff, H.; London, S. Nutrition and reproduction in fish. Encycl. Reprod. 2018, 6, 743–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Huang, Z.; Rose, A.H.; Hoffmann, P.R. The role of selenium in inflammation and immunity: From molecular mechanisms to therapeutic opportunities. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2012, 16, 705–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Mc Kenzie, R.C.; Arthur, J.R.; Beckett, G.J. Se and the regulation of cell signaling, growth, and survival: Molecular and mechanistic aspects. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2002, 4, 339–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Antony Jesu Prabhu, P.; Holen, E.; Espe, M.; Silva, M.S.; Holme, M.-H.; Hamre, K.; Waagbø, R. Dietary Se required to achieve body homeostasis and attenuate pro-inflammatory responses in Atlantic salmon post-smolt exceeds the present EU legal limit. Aquaculture 2020, 526, 735413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Longbaf Dezfouli, A.M.; Ghaedtaheri, A.; Keyvanshokooh, S.; Salati, A.P.; Mousavi, S.M.; Pasha-Zanoosi, H. Combined or individual effects of dietary magnesium and Se nanoparticles on growth performance, immunity, blood biochemistry and antioxidant status of Asian seabass (Lates calcarifer) reared in freshwater. Aquac. Nutr. 2019, 25, 1422–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Abu-Elala, N.M.; Shaalan, M.; Ali, S.E.; Younis, N.A. Immune responses and protective efficacy of diet supplementation with Se nanoparticles against cadmium toxicity in Oreochromis niloticus. Aquac. Res. 2021. [CrossRef]
  122. Dawood, M.A.; Zommara, M.; Eweedah, N.M.; Helal, A.I. Synergistic effects of Se nanoparticles and vitamin e on growth, immune-related gene expression, and regulation of antioxidant status of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2019, 195, 624–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Abd El-Kader, M.F.; Fath El-Bab, A.F.; Abd-Elghany, M.F.; Abdel-Warith, A.-W.A.; Younis, E.M.; Dawood, M.A.O. Se nanoparticles act potentially on the growth performance, hemato-biochemical indices, antioxidative, and immune-related genes of European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax). Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2021, 199, 3126–3134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Zahmatkesh, A.; Karimzadeh, K.; Faridnia, M. Effect of dietary Se nanoparticles and chitosan oligosaccharide on biochemical parameters of Caspian roach (Rutilus caspicus) under malathion stress. Casp. J. Environ. Sci. 2020, 18, 59–71. [Google Scholar]
  125. Izquierdo, M.S.; Socorro, J.; Arantzamendi, L.; Hernández-Cruz, C.M. Recent advances in lipid nutrition in fish larvae. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2000, 22, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Kohshahi, A.J.; Sourinejad, I.; Sarkheil, M.; Johari, S.A. Dietary cosupplementation with curcumin and different Se sources (nanoparticulate, organic, and inorganic Se): Influence on growth performance, body composition, immune responses, and GPxs activity of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 45, 793–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Seyedi, J.; Kalbassi, M.R.; Esmaeilbeigi, M.; Tayemeh, M.B.; Amiri Moghadam, J. Toxicity and deleterious impacts of Se nanoparticles at supranutritional and imbalance levels on male goldfish (Carassius auratus) sperm. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2021, 66, 12678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Karamzadeh, M.; Yahyavi, M.; Salarzadeh, A.; Nokhbe Zare, D. The effects of different concentrations of Se and zinc nanoparticles on growth performance, survival and chemical composition of whiteleg shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). Iran. Sci. Fish. J. 2021, 29, 43–51. [Google Scholar]
  129. Chen, Y.J.; Liu, Y.-J.; Tian, L.-X.; Niu, J.; Liang, G.-Y.; Yang, H.-J.; Yuan, Y.; Zhang, Y.-Q. Effect of dietary vitamin E and selenium supplementation on growth, body composition, and antioxidant defense mechanism in juvenile largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoide) fed oxidized fish oil. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 39, 593–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Tashjian, D.H.; The, S.J.; Sogomonyan, A.; Hung, S.S.O. Bioaccumulation and chronic toxicity of dietary l-selenomethionine in juvenile white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus). Aquat. Toxicol. 2006, 79, 401–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Jamil, Z. Effects of Inorganic and Nanoform of Selenium on Growth Performance and Biochemical Indices of Mahseer (Tor putitora). Ph.D. Thesis, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  132. Khan, K.U.; Zuberi, A.; Nazir, S.; Fernandes, J.B.K.; Jamil, Z.; Sarwar, H. Effects of dietary Se nanoparticles on physiological and biochemical aspects of juvenile Tor putitora. Turk. J. Zool. 2016, 40, 704–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Biller-Takahashi, J.D.; Takahashi, L.S.; Mingatto, F.E.; Urbinati, E.C. The immune system is limited by oxidative stress: Dietary selenium promotes optimal antioxidative status and greatest immune defense in pacu Piaractus mesopotamicus. Fish Shellfish. Immunol. 2015, 47, 360–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Teh, S.J.; Deng, X.; Deng, D.F.; Teh, F.C.; Hung, S.S.O.; Fan, T.W.M.; Liu, J.; Higashi, R.M. Chronic effects of dietary selenium on juvenile Sacramento splittail (Pogonichthys macrolepidotus). Environ. Sci Technol. 2004, 38, 6085–6093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Chen, Y.C.; Cheng, C.H.; Chen, G.D.; Hung, C.C.; Yang, C.H.; Hwang, S.P.; Kawakami, K.; Wu, B.K.; Huang, C.J. Recapitulation of zebrafish sncga expression pattern and labeling the habenular complex in transgenic zebrafish using green fluorescent protein reporter gene. Dev. Dyn. 2009, 238, 746–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Milanese, C.; Sager, J.J.; Bai, Q.; Farrell, T.C.; Cannon, J.R.; Greenamyre, J.T.; Burton, E.A. Hypokinesia and reduced dopamine levels in zebrafish lacking β-and γ1-synucleins. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 2971–2983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Watanabe, T.; Kiron, V.; Satoh, S. Trace minerals in fish nutrition. Aquaculture 1997, 151, 185–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Cotter, P.A.; Craig, S.R.; McLean, E. Hyper accumulation of Se in hybrid bass: A functional food for aquaculture? Aquac. Nutr. 2008, 14, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Lortie, L.; Gould, W.; Rajan, S.; McCready, R.; Cheng, K.-J. Reduction of selenate and selenite to elemental Se by a Pseudomonas stutzeri isolate. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1992, 58, 4042–4044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Oremland, R.S.; Blum, J.S.; Culbertson, C.W.; Visscher, P.T.; Miller, L.G.; Dowdle, P.; Strohmaier, F.E. Isolation, growth, and metabolism of an obligately anaerobic, selenate-respiring bacterium, strain SES−3. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1994, 60, 3011–3019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Lemly, A.D. Guidelines for evaluating Se data from aquatic monitoring and assessment studies. Environ. Monit. Assess. 1993, 28, 83–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Zhu, Y.-G.; Pilon-Smits, E.A.; Zhao, F.-J.; Williams, P.N.; Meharg, A.A. Se in higher plants: Understanding mechanisms for biofortification and phytoremediation. Trends Plant Sci. 2009, 14, 436–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Lichtfouse, E.; Morin-Crini, N.; Corina Bradu, C.; Boussouga, Y.-A.; Aliaskari, M.; Schäfer, A.I.; Das, S.; Wilson, L.D.; Ike, M.; Inoue, D.; et al. Technologies to Remove Selenium from Water and Wastewater; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  144. He, Y.; Xiang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Huang, H.; Shang, C.; Luo, L.; Gao, J.; Tang, L. Selenium contamination, consequences and remediation techniques in water and soils: A review. Environ. Res. 2018, 164, 288–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Bañuelos, G.S.; Lin, Z.Q.; Wu, L.; Terry, N. Phytoremediation of selenium-contaminated soils and waters: Fundamentals and future prospects. Rev. Environ. Health 2002, 17, 291–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Bañuelos, G.S. Phyto-products may be essential for sustainability and implementation of phytoremediation. J. Environ. Pollut. 2006, 144, 19–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Barillas, J.R.V.; Colin, F.; Quinn, C.F.; Pilon-Smits, E.A.H. Selenium accumulation in plants—Phytotechnological applications and ecological implications. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2011, 13 (Suppl. 1), 166–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Feng, R.; Wei, C.; Tu, S. The roles of Se in protecting plants against abiotic stresses. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2013, 87, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Li, T.; Xu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Hu, X.; Sun, Y.; Gu, X.; Luo, J.; Zhou, D.; Gao, B. Treatment technologies for selenium contaminated water: A critical review. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 299, 118858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. William, T.F.; Arshad, M. Bioremediation of selenium-contaminated sediments and water. BioFactors 2001, 14, 241–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Sophia, A.C.; Lima, E.C. Removal of emerging contaminants from the environment by adsorption. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 150, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The sources of Se and their influences in the aquatic environment with the fish. Se in the aquatic environment may be derived from artificial (industrial wastes, fossil fuel residues, and mines) and natural sources (plant and animal products, weathering of rocks, volcanic eruptions, and food products). The tissues responsible for Se intake include the gills, muscles, liver, and kidney [35]. The Se obtained in the aquatic environment could either influence their biological functions, such as growth and immunity, which have an inverse relationship wherein the impact on growth will influence immunity, or vice versa.
Figure 1. The sources of Se and their influences in the aquatic environment with the fish. Se in the aquatic environment may be derived from artificial (industrial wastes, fossil fuel residues, and mines) and natural sources (plant and animal products, weathering of rocks, volcanic eruptions, and food products). The tissues responsible for Se intake include the gills, muscles, liver, and kidney [35]. The Se obtained in the aquatic environment could either influence their biological functions, such as growth and immunity, which have an inverse relationship wherein the impact on growth will influence immunity, or vice versa.
Animals 13 02978 g001
Table 1. Summarizing the sources and effects of the dispensation of Se in the aquatic environment.
Table 1. Summarizing the sources and effects of the dispensation of Se in the aquatic environment.
Sources of SeDispensation of Se in the Aquatic EnvironmentEffects of ActionRefs.
AgricultureDerived from mining sites, fertilizer application, and sewage sludge (municipal).It enhances Se in the aquatic environment through surface runoff, infiltration, leaching, and percolation.[42,43]
Natural activities of parent rocksParents’ rocks weathering contributes to Se presence in environment.Rocks contain various metals, and Se is obtained from their weathering and gets into the surface soils and groundwater of the aquatic environment[42,43]
Industrial activitiesCrude oil, coal, fossil fuels, nuclear fuel, mining, and smelting processes elevate Se levels in the soil and aquatic environment.Several industries are located along aquatic environments for water and in most cases, dumping can easily occur.[41,44]
Table 5. Dietary Se deficiency and its body system effects on fish.
Table 5. Dietary Se deficiency and its body system effects on fish.
Se Deficiency in Feed EffectsRefs.
Growth and feed utilizationBiological functions, as well as the regulation of selenoproteins.[117]
Regular release of thyroid hormones, which stimulate growth hormone secretion from the pituitary gland of fish.[61]
Enhances antioxidant enzyme activities (e.g., catalase (CAT), Glutathione reductase, and GPx), reduces malondialdehyde (MDA) content, protects the liver from reactive oxygen species (ROS), maintains lipid metabolism, and protects the liver from ROS threats from nitrite exposure.[91,118]
Eliminates hydrogen peroxides and scavenges lipid peroxidation, especially as a selenoprotein GPxs active center.[61]
Enhances antioxidant enzyme activities (e.g., catalase (CAT), Glutathione reductase, and GPx), reduces malondialdehyde (MDA) content, protects the liver from reactive oxygen species (ROS), maintains lipid metabolism, and protects the liver from ROS threats from nitrite exposure.[91,118]
Innate immune response through selenoproteins under stress conditions.[118]
Help animals counteract oxidative stress to protect cellular membranes.[118]
Growth and immunePoor growth performance, lipid peroxidation, and decreased GPx enzymatic activity are observed in most fish due to Se deficiency in African catfish, Prussian carp and Japanese abalone.[61,118]
Inadequate supply of Se causes lower growth and a decreased GPxs activity in channel catfish.[119]
Disease invasionSalmon showed susceptibility to the Vibrio pathogen (Hitra disease).[22]
Nutritional imbalance of SeA decrease in plasma GPxs activity in rainbow trout occurs when fed a Se-deficient diet.[119]
Reduced GPxs activity in the rainbow trout liver.[22]
A decrease in GPxs activity in the liver and muscle tissues.[57]
Table 6. Dietary Se effect on growth, immune responses to diseases, and feed utilization of fish species.
Table 6. Dietary Se effect on growth, immune responses to diseases, and feed utilization of fish species.
Species EffectsRefs.
Gilthead seabream It helps in improving the growth of the species larvae and preventing skeleton anomalies.[125]
Asian seabassIt aids growth performance and immune response, and decreases alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) levels with no significant change in liver superoxide dismutase (SOD), GPx, or CAT.[119]
Red seabreamIt supports growth, feed efficiency, protease activity, hematocrit, antioxidant potential, and significantly decreases reactive oxygen metabolites, cholesterol, and triglycerides.[121]
It boosts the tolerance due to the stress caused by low salinity with a diet containing 2 mg/kg of Se.[121]
It increases growth, feed utilization, GPx, SOD, CAT, nitrotetrazolium blue (NTB).[121]
Nile tilapiaIt increases growth, feed utilization, GPx, SOD, CAT, NTB, lysozyme, liver, TNF-α, IL-1β, MDA, HSP70, lysozyme, respiratory burst activities, and antioxidant enzymes and also serves as resistance against Aeromonas sobria.[10,122]
When given dietary Se at a dose of 1–2 mg/kg, the species’ resistance to A. hydrophila and Aeromonas sobria infection is increased.[10,122]
European seabassIt encourages growth, feed efficiency, SOD, CAT, GH, IGF-1, IL-8, IL-1β, and lysozyme activities, as well as significantly reducing MDA and HSP70.[122]
Mahseer fishIt raises serum growth hormone levels, lysozyme activity, and hematocrit, and increases growth of the species.[61,126]
Sutchi catfishIt fosters growth, immunity, and resistance to Aeromonas veronii biovar sobriam.[73]
A 0.3 mg/kg dietary Se boosts resistance to an A. hydrophila infection.[55]
Rainbow troutIt raises GPx without having a major impact on body composition, growth, survival, or the use of feed.[124]
When dietary Se is given at a rate of 2 mg/kg, it also strengthens their resistance to sublethal ammonia stress.[124]
Caspian roachIt considerably promotes the ability to withstand malathion stress.[57,123]
It helps in relieving the impacts of malathion-induced stress with dietary Se of 1 mg/kg.[57,123]
Gibel carpIt also fosters weight gain, specific growth rates (SGR), immunity, mucosal immunity, ghrelin, and IGF-1 expression while decreasing the feed convection ratio (FCR).[127]
It improves the GPx and quality of male sperm.[127]
Common carpIt strengthens growth, liver GPx, SOD, and CAT activities, and also decreases MDA, AST, alanine transaminase, and lactate dehydrogenase.[94]
RohuIt lowers lactate dehydrogenase and alkaline phosphatase activities in Aeromonas hydrophila while enhancing growth and resistance.[13]
Whiteleg shrimpIt boosts growth and decreases FCR significantly.[128]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sumana, S.L.; Chen, H.; Shui, Y.; Zhang, C.; Yu, F.; Zhu, J.; Su, S. Effect of Dietary Selenium on the Growth and Immune Systems of Fish. Animals 2023, 13, 2978. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13182978

AMA Style

Sumana SL, Chen H, Shui Y, Zhang C, Yu F, Zhu J, Su S. Effect of Dietary Selenium on the Growth and Immune Systems of Fish. Animals. 2023; 13(18):2978. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13182978

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sumana, Sahr Lamin, Huangen Chen, Yan Shui, Chengfeng Zhang, Fan Yu, Jian Zhu, and Shengyan Su. 2023. "Effect of Dietary Selenium on the Growth and Immune Systems of Fish" Animals 13, no. 18: 2978. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13182978

APA Style

Sumana, S. L., Chen, H., Shui, Y., Zhang, C., Yu, F., Zhu, J., & Su, S. (2023). Effect of Dietary Selenium on the Growth and Immune Systems of Fish. Animals, 13(18), 2978. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13182978

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop