Next Article in Journal
Microbiological and Molecular Investigation of Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Western Romanian Dairy Farms: An Epidemiological Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Overview of Bovine Mastitis: Application of Metabolomics in Screening Its Predictive and Diagnostic Biomarkers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

New Myzostomids (Annelida) in Symbiosis with Feather Stars in the Shallow Waters of the South China Sea (Hainan Island)

by
Alexander Isaychev
1,†,
Dimitry Schepetov
1,2,†,
Yutong Zhou
1,
Temir A. Britayev
3 and
Viatcheslav N. Ivanenko
1,2,*
1
Biological Faculty, Shenzhen MSU-BIT University, Shenzhen 518172, China
2
Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119992, Russia
3
A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 129164, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Animals 2024, 14(15), 2265; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14152265
Submission received: 18 December 2023 / Revised: 22 July 2024 / Accepted: 29 July 2024 / Published: 4 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Aquatic Animals)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Simple Summary: This research details the discovery of three new myzostomid worm species from feather stars near Sanya, Hainan Island. Additionally, we report the presence of Myzostoma polycyclus in the South China Sea for the first time. These findings, combined with an analysis of available molecular data, underscore significant gaps in our understanding of marine biodiversity of myzostomids.

Abstract

This research delves into the molecular and morphological characteristics of myzostomid worms associated with common shallow-water feather stars (Echinodermata: Crinoidea: Comatulidae) in the coastal waters near Sanya, Hainan Island. Through the examination of specimens collected at depths of up to 10 m using scuba diving techniques, we describe three new species (Myzostoma ordinatum sp. nov., M. scopus sp. nov., and M. solare sp. nov.) and report the first record of Myzostoma polycyclus Atkins, 1927 in the South China Sea. The absence of overlap with the seven previously documented Myzostomida species in the shallow waters of Hong Kong and Shenzhen reveals significant gaps in our understanding of marine biodiversity in the South China Sea. These findings, combined with an analysis of available molecular data, underscore the potential existence of unexplored and diverse symbiotic relationships among marine invertebrates within the region.

1. Introduction

The Myzostomida Graff, 1877, represents a distinctive group of diminutive and highly specialized symbiotic worms primarily associated with crinoids. They exhibit a unique body plan that markedly diverges from other Annelida taxa, with their specialized adaptations highlighted by Eeckhaut and Lanterbecq [1]. These worms are globally distributed, predominantly found in subtidal tropical zones, known as symbionts of diverse feather stars [2]. The morphological diversity within the Myzostomida group is linked to their symbiotic associations with echinoderm hosts, facilitating a multitude of body shapes. This morphological variance reflects their assorted ecological niches, ranging from free moving to cysticolous and gallicolous forms, in addition to those inhabiting the digestive systems of their hosts as endobionts [3].
Despite their apparent diversity, the taxonomic representation of Myzostomida remains underrepresented in the scientific literature, with a substantial number of undescribed species as emphasized by Summers, Al-Hakim, and Rouse [4]. Presently, approximately 180 species of Myzostomida, classified into seven families, are known, with 159 species attributed to the genus Myzostoma Leuckart 1836 [5,6,7]. The majority of myzostomids are ectocommensal on comatulids, although some inhabit the host’s body, forming cysts, galls, or residing within the digestive system [8]. Myzostomids are also found to be associated with Asteroidea, Ophiuroidea [9], and Antipatharia [10], and they are reported to inhabit diverse oceanic regions, from subtidal zones to depths exceeding 3000 m.
Hainan Island exhibits significant temporal and spatial variability in its shoreline and shallow-water community structures, resulting in marked fluctuations in species composition and population densities [11]. It is recognized as a biodiversity hotspot within the South China Sea, positioned at the interface between the China–Japan Subtropical Subregion and the Indo-Malaysian Tropical Subregion. Hainan Island represents the southernmost reach of the cold current’s surface flow along Guangdong province’s coastline [12]. Despite its ecological significance, there is a lack of documented records on Myzostomida diversity in this region.
This study is part of a broader survey investigating the symbiotic fauna of macroinvertebrates within tropical coral communities [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. It focuses on the integrative taxonomy of Myzostomida worms associated with common shallow-water feather stars of Hainan Island.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection and Processing

Symbionts (copepods, shrimps and worms) of two common shallow-water feather stars, Comanthus parvicirrus (Müller, 1841) and Comaster schlegelii (Carpenter, 1881) (Comatulidae, Comatulida), were collected using a local boat and scuba diving in the coastal waters near Sanya City, Hainan Island (N 18°12.279′ E 109°30.197′) (Figure 1).
The feather stars were collected at depths of 5 to 8 m and placed in resealable plastic bags underwater. Upon retrieval to the surface, a 10% ethanol solution was added to the bags. After 30 min of waiting and gentle shaking, the liquid was passed through a sieve with a 100-micrometer mesh diameter. The residue was preserved in 95% ethanol and stored at a temperature of −20 °C. The maps were generated using the ‘ggplot2’ package in R, version 2.1.1 [23].
This examination of six samples revealed 116 myzostomid specimens (see Table 1). The chosen preservation method was instrumental in maintaining the structural integrity of the specimens, facilitating their use in future morphological and molecular investigations after long storage.
All examined materials are in the collections of the Zoological Museum of Moscow State University, Russia (ZMMU), and the Faculty of Biology at MSU-BIT Shenzhen University, China. The museum specimen voucher numbers and NCBI GenBank Accession Numbers for our samples are in Table 2 and Table S1.

2.2. Morphological Analysis

For morphological observation, a dissecting stereomicroscope Cnoptec SZ650 (Chongqing, China) was used. Each collected specimen underwent a comprehensive external morphological examination, encompassing a thorough assessment of various attributes such as patterns of coloration, body morphology, surface texture, and appendage characteristics. This detailed examination and measurements were carried out under the scrutiny of a compound microscope Olympus BX43FC (Tokyo, Japan).
Species categorization and identification were executed with a reliance on the most up-to-date published descriptions of myzostomid species. From each of the identified species, a judicious selection process was undertaken to choose specimens with the most pristine and intact external morphological features. These selected specimens were subjected to a detailed photographic documentation process, utilizing a high-resolution imaging stereomicroscope. Additionally, images were captured using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) KYKY EM6200 (Beijing, China).
The SEM specimen preparation procedure involved a protocol that included the drying of specimens within a Labconco FreeZone 2.5 Liter -84C Benchtop Freeze Dryer (Kansas City, MO, USA) maintained at a temperature of −50 °C and a pressure of 0.03 mbar for a duration of four hours. Subsequently, a one-minute gold coating was applied to the specimens using a vacuum sputter.

2.3. Molecular Analysis

For brief molecular species identity analysis, we used a shortened most informative fragment of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene. DNA was extracted on magnetic beads using OMEGA Bio-Tek E.Z.N.A. Mag-Bind Blood & Tissue DNA HDQ 96 kit (Norcross, GA, USA), according to manufacturer’s protocol. Target COI fragment was amplified using Sauron-S878 [24] and jgHCO2198 [25] with 5′v M13 [26] sequencing adapters (M13F_Sauron-S878 tgtaaaacgacggccagtGGDRCWGGWTGAACWGTWTAYCCNCC; M13R_jgHCO2198 caggaaacagctatgacTAIACYTCIGGRTGICCRAARAAYCA) primer pair. Reactions were performed using Clontech TaKaRa cellartis Premium Taq PCR kit (Kyoto, Japan). Amplicones were sequenced in both directions with M13F(-21) (TGTAAAACGACGGCCAGT) and M13R(-27) (CAGGAAACAGCTATGAC) sequencing primers [26] at Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China).
Consensus sequences for each sample were assembled from raw reads in both directions and checked for ambiguities and low-quality base identifications in Geneious R10 [27]. Combined sequences were checked for putative contamination by using BLAST-n algorithm at GenBank nr/nt database [28]. Original data and publicly available sequences for genus Myzostoma were aligned with the MUSCLE [29] algorithm implemented in MEGA 7.0 [30]. Other Myzostomids were used as outgroups. Additionally, all sequences were translated into amino acids to verify reading frames and check for stop-codons and to avoid pseudo-gene sequence contamination. A total of 125 sequences were used, including outgroups; resulting alignment length was 622 bp (Table S1).
Bayesian phylogenetic reconstruction of phylogeny (BI) was performed in MrBayes 3.2 [31]. Markov chains were sampled at intervals of 500 generations. Analysis was initiated with random starting tree and ran for 5 × 107 generations. Maximum likelihood phylogeny inference (ML) was performed in the HPC-PTHREADS version of RaxML 8.2.12 [32], with 400 pseudo-replicates of fast bootstrap under the GTRCAT model of nucleotide evolution. Number of sufficient bootstrap pseudo-replicates was determined using AutoMRE approach [33]. Final phylogenetic tree images were rendered in FigTree 1.4.0 and further modified in Inkscape 1.1. Attribution to marine biogeographic realms followed borders from Costello et al. [34] and used ranges described in Summers et al. [4] and data from original species descriptions.

3. Results

The myzostomids associated with the three specimens of Comanthus parvicirrus comprised a single species, Myzostoma polycyclus Atkins, 1927. Among the myzostomid specimens collected from the four specimens of Comaster schlegeli (Carpenter, 1881), three new species were identified: Myzostoma ordinatum sp. nov., Myzostoma scopus sp. nov., and Myzostoma solare sp. nov.

3.1. Taxonomy

Myzostoma scopus sp. nov. Isaychev, Britayev, Ivanenko
Holotype: (ZMMU Pl-4886) One specimen in 96% ethanol. Sampling site is in the vicinity of Sanya city, Hainan Island (N 18°12.279′ E 109°30.197′), depth 5–8 m. Collected using scuba on 25 November 2009 by T.A. Britayev and V.N. Ivanenko.
Remaining specimens: Two specimens in 96% ethanol. Vicinity of Sanya city, Hainan Island (N 18°12,279′ E 109°30′197), depth 5–8 m. Collected on 25 November 2009 by T.A. Britayev and V.N. Ivanenko.
Hosts and distribution: Comaster schlegelii (Carpenter, 1881) depth 5–8 m, South China Sea, Hainan Is., Sanya.
Etymology: The name “scopus” is derived from the Latin word “scopus”, meaning “target”, and alludes to its distinctive pigmentation pattern, which resembles an archery target.
Description and diagnosis: The body of the holotype is circular, approximately 5 mm in diameter. The dorsal surface exhibits a smooth texture and is of ivory color, featuring a black laterally elongated rectangular spot at its center, surrounded by an interrupted ring of the same black color as the central spot (Figure 2A). The two other specimens from another host demonstrate similar color pattern, but without a central spot and less contrast than in the holotype (dark brownish-pink ring on light brownish-pink surface). The ventral surface is uniformly ivory in color in the holotype (Figure 2B,D) and uniformly light brown pinkish in the other two specimens. The centers of parapodial bases are positioned approximately 40% along the path from the center of the ventral side to the body margin. The parapodia are around 0.6–0.7 mm long and consist of two parts of roughly equal length: a stout conical base with a diameter of about 0.35 mm in its proximal part and a less massive cylindrical distal part with a rounded tip. Each parapodium is equipped with a hook. Parapodia are evenly distributed around the circular body. In our specimen, the parapodia bend toward the center, revealing the absence of median cirri. The outer side of the third parapodia carries a penis, measuring approximately 0.4 mm in length and exhibiting a similar shape to the distal part of the parapodium. Prominently visible large (approximately 0.3 mm) lateral organs, situated at about 30% along the path from the outer side of the parapodia to the body margin, alternate between the parapodia. The everted introvert (Figure 2C) is 3.5 times as long as it is wide and bears ten acute papillae. The cloaca is positioned at the same distance from the body center and margin as the lateral organs. The body margin is smooth, thin, and semitransparent, hosting 20 very short (0.15–0.18 mm) cirri of the same digitiform shape. The extreme edge of the body margin slightly curves on the ventral side, possibly due to ethanol fixation. The cirri are evenly distributed around the body margin.
Remarks: Myzostoma scopus sp. nov. displays several distinguishing characteristics, although there are a few myzostomid species that bear some resemblance to it, particularly in terms of having a circular body equipped with 20 small finger-like cirri around its margin. A detailed morphological comparison is provided below.
Myzostoma scopus sp. nov. is closely related morphologically and genetically to M. susanae Summers and Rouse in Summers, Al-Hakim, and Rouse, 2014, originally described from Comaster schlegelii (Carpenter, 1881) found at a depth of 6 m at Lizard Island Reef, Australia (Figure 2). However, unlike M. susanae, it exhibits a distinctive pigmentation pattern on its dorsal side and possesses more prominent cirri.
Another species that shares similarities is M. coriacium Graff, 1884, collected from Colobometra perspinosa (Carpenter, 1881) at depths of 7.5–10 m in Port Denison, Australia. According to Graff’s description, M. coriacium is not transparent and appears darkish brown in ethanol. It also bears lateral organs located halfway between the center and margin of the body. Graff’s illustration of M. coriacium’s cross-section depicts a body that is deeply ventrally concave and dorsally convex. In contrast, M. scopus sp. nov. can be distinguished by its color, a semitransparent body margin that is slightly bent ventrally, and lateral organs positioned closer to the body margin.
M. scopus sp. nov. shares a color pattern resembling that of M. horologium Graff, 1884, but differs by having a notably shorter parapodia, which do not extend beyond the body margin.
In comparison to M. brevipes, another species with a circular body, M. scopus sp. nov. can be distinguished by its smooth dorsal side, the absence of a dorsomedial ridge, and the absence of radial folds on the dorsal side.
When compared to M. seymourcollegiorum Rouse and Grygier, 2005, found on Cenolia trichoptera (Müller, 1846) and Cenolia glebosus Rowe, Hoggett, Birtles, and Vail, 1986 in southern Australia, M. scopus sp. nov. can be distinguished by the absence of parapodial cirri.
Differentiating from both M. pallidum Graff, 1877 (recorded from Comatula solaris and Comanthus parvicirrus) and M. triste Graff, 1877 (recorded from Comanthus parvicirrus), both from Bohol strait, M. scopus sp. nov. is characterized by its notably shorter parapodia, finger-like cirri with thin bases, and distinct coloration.
Myzostoma polycyclus Atkins, 1927
Studied material: 33 specimens from C. parvicirrus.
Type locality: Pacific: Torres Strait. Host of the type locality: Comanthus parvicirrus; depth unknown [35].
Other hosts and distribution: Comanthus suavius (Rowe, Hoggett, Birtles, and Vail, 1986), Capillaster multiradiatus (Linnaeus, 1758), Clarkcomanthus littoralis (Carpenter, 1888), Comanthus parvicirrus. North Sulawesi, Papua New Guinea, Fiji, Japan, South China Sea, Hainan Island, Sanya. Depth 2–9 m ([4], our data).
External morphology (Figure 3A): Examined material conforms to original [35] and consequent descriptions [36,37]. Specimens from various samples exhibited varying colors, which correlated with the coloration of their respective hosts (beige or dark blue). However, no morphological differences were observed among them, consistent with previous findings.
Remarks: The wide distribution and diversity of hosts, along with the molecular data obtained by us and deposited in GenBank, indicate on one hand the potential for widespread occurrence and diversity. However, they also highlight challenges in verification and potential inaccuracies in identifications.
Myzostoma solare sp. nov. Isaychev, Britayev, Ivanenko
Holotype: (ZMMU Pl-4887) One specimen in 96% ethanol. Sanya, Hainan Island (N 18°12.279′ E 109°30.197′), depth 5–8 m. Collected on 25 November 2009 by T.A. Britayev and V.N. Ivanenko.
Hosts and distribution: Comaster schlegeli (Carpenter, 1881), depth 5–8 m, South China Sea, Hainan Island, Sanya.
Etymology: The species name “solare” is derived from the Latin word “solare”, meaning “solar” in the neutral gender, in reference to its circular shape.
Studied material: Eight specimens from Comaster schlegeli (Carpenter, 1881).
External morphology: The body is circular (Figure 3B) and flat, measuring 1–1.2 mm in diameter. It exhibits a grayish-beige coloration with a darker region in the center of the dorsal side. The body is rounded evenly and is adorned with twenty prominent finger-like cirri, each measuring 0.08–0.1 mm in length. The dorsal surface displays a median ridge and radial folds (Figure 4A), while the ventral surface features scattered ciliary bundles. Parapodia are positioned at approximately 40% of the distance from the center of the body to the body margin, measuring 0.2 mm in length. Lateral organs are located roughly a quarter of the distance from the parapodial bases to the body margin and have a diameter of about 0.1 mm.
Remarks: Myzostoma solare sp. nov. exhibits close affinities with Myzostoma brevipes Graff, 1884, originally described from Crinometra brevipinna (Pourtalès, 1868) (formerly Antedon pourtalèsi Carpenter, 1888) in the Caribbean Sea at depths of 300 m. However, M. brevipes is distinguishable from the new species by its notably shorter parapodia. Moreover, Myzostoma solare sp. nov. also exhibits close affinities with M. pallidum Graff, 1877, described from Comatula solaris Lamarck, 1816, and Comanthus parvicirrus from shallow waters in the Philippines. Nonetheless, Myzostoma solare sp. nov. diverge from M. pallidum by possessing slender, finger-like marginal cirri, as opposed to the triangular cirri characteristic of M. pallidum. Despite their sister-group phylogenetic position, M. solare sp. nov. and M. polycyclus exhibit pronounced morphological differences. M. solare sp. nov. is characterized by about twenty small, uniform marginal cirri, whereas M. polycyclus features a body margin adorned with approximately fifty long, robust cirri of two distinct, alternating shapes.
Myzostoma ordinatum sp. nov. Isaychev, Britayev, Ivanenko
Holotype: (ZMMU Pl-4889) One specimen in 96% ethanol. Sampling site is in the vicinity of Sanya city, Hainan Island (N 18°12.279′ E 109°30.197′), depth 5–8 m. Collected using scuba on 25 November 2009 by T.A. Britayev and V.N. Ivanenko.
Hosts and distribution: Comaster schlegelii (Carpenter, 1881), depth 5–8 m, South China Sea, Hainan Island, Sanya.
Etymology: The name “ordinatum” is derived from the Latin adjective which means “regular” in neutral gender, due to the even situation of cirri around body margin.
Studied material: 28 specimens from 3 specimens of C. nobilis.
External morphology: The body is elongated (Figure 3C,D, Figure 4B,C and Figure 5A,B), measuring between 0.8 and 1.2 mm, and is oval, with a length approximately twice its width and expressed dorsal convexity and ventral concavity. The dorsal surface appears smooth and is colored yellowish gray, occasionally exhibiting a lighter dorsomedial stripe in certain specimens. SEM observation displays the existence of dispersed ciliary bundles on the dorsal side (Figure 4B,C). On the ventral side, parapodia emerge from cavities and can extend to the body margin, sometimes even surpassing the margin, making them visible from a dorsal view. The length of the parapodia is approximately one-third of the maximum body width. There are twenty finger-like cirri in total, with a broad base tapering distally, each measuring about one-fifth the length of the maximum body width, while the posterior-most pair of cirri on some specimens are about half the maximum body width long. Four pairs of lateral organs are situated on low mounds, positioned midway between the base of the parapodia and the body margin. These lateral organs and parapodia alternate in arrangement. The everted introvert is roughly half the body width in length and is adorned with four distal papillae (Figure S1). The oral opening is almost terminal and oriented toward the anterior body margin.
Remarks. The specimens of Myzostoma ordinatum sp. nov. display certain similarities with Myzostoma longitergum Eeckhaut, Grygier, Deheyn, 1998, known from Comaster schlegelii and Comaster audax in Papua New Guinea waters. However, they lack the characteristic cirri 2–9 grouped in doublets flanking lateral organs as described in the original species account. Moreover, the marginal cirri of M. ordinatum sp. nov. are evenly distributed around the body margin, contrasting with the anteriorly shifted arrangement in M. longitergum.
The morphological features of M. ordinatum sp. nov. resemble that of M. compressum Graff, 1884, described from Bathycrinus aldrichianus in the subantarctic Indian Ocean at a depth of 2.5 km. Nevertheless, our specimens were discovered in shallow tropical waters on a different host, lacking the distinctive mid-dorsal ridge of M. compressum and instead featuring a uniformly rounded dorsal surface. M. ordinatum sp. nov. close M. nasonovi Fedotov, 1938, documented from Hong Kong, but can be distinguished by twenty larger cirri compared to the small cirri of M. nasonovi.
Several specimens of Myzostoma ordinatum sp. nov. exhibit a convex dorsal side and concave ventral side, with body margins folded over the ventral surface to varying degrees (Figure 5C,D). In some cases, the folds were so pronounced that they completely obscured the ventral side, potentially influenced by preservation in alcohol. We assume that the specimens may demonstrate a natural ventral concavity and dorsal convexity, possibly facilitating a snug fit within the ambulacral groove of their host feather star.

3.2. Molecular Analysis

We sequenced fragments of the COI gene for four myzostomid species, including those described as new in this study. GenBank accession numbers for these new sequences are provided in Table 2. Phylogenetic analysis using both publicly available and newly generated data for myzostomid COI (Figure 6) reveals unresolved relationships using both reconstruction methods. Detailed phylogenetic trees, along with accession numbers, are provided in the supplementary figures (Figures S2 and S3).
The genus Myzostoma does not form a monophyletic group and instead clusters with samples of Hypomysostoma and Mesomyzostoma, showing moderate support in maximum likelihood reconstructions. This lack of monophyly within Myzostoma has been previously observed in studies dedicated to myzostomid phylogeny (e.g., [2]).
Myzostoma solare sp. nov. is consistently reconstructed as closely related to our samples of M. polycyclus (1PP/100%BS), with robust support in both phylogenetic approaches (1PP/93%BS). M. polycyclus (DQ238202) forms another distinct clade (1PP/100%BS) with M. toliarense (DQ238201), having nearly identical COI sequences. M. scopus sp. nov. is recovered as the sister to M. susanae, supported by high Bayesian inference (1PP/87%BS).
Our specimen of M. ordinatum sp. nov. forms a well-supported clade (1PP/99%BS) with a publicly available sequence of M. longitergum (KM014193). However, the sequences overlap with only 94.7% identical bases, indicating genetic divergence between the two species.

4. Discussion

Our study reveals the presence of four species in the northern part of the South China Sea, three of which are new scientific discoveries. Combined with the literature and molecular data available in GenBank, these findings underscore the limited understanding of this intriguing group of diminutive symbiotic invertebrates. In the coastal waters of China, only a small fraction of the global diversity of Myzostomida species (7 out of 180 known species) has been previously documented in the vicinity of Hong Kong and Shenzhen City [38]. These include Myzostoma attenuatum (Grygier, 1989), M. antennatum (Graff, 1884), M. bocki (Jägersten, 1937), M. dodecaphalcis (Grygier, 1992), M. nasonovi (Fedotov, 1938), M. cf. pallidum (Graff, 1877), and M. lobatum (Graff, 1877). This limited data documentation contrasts with the broader richness of feather stars in the South China sea, where at least 44 species have been reported [39], suggesting significant potential for discovering more myzostomid species.
Phylogenetic analyses conducted in our study have unveiled discrepancies between certain phylogenetic placements and molecular data. Specifically, the COI sequences of M. polycyclus (DQ238202) and M. toliarense (DQ238201) exhibit a striking similarity, suggesting a potential misattribution, as previously highlighted by Summers and Rouse [2]. Furthermore, despite morphological alignment with the diagnostic features of M. polycyclus, our sequences differ significantly from those attributed to DQ238202. Therefore, we propose that the sequence likely belongs to M. toliarense rather than M. polycyclus.
Our research enhances the genomic dataset for myzostomids, refining both inter- and intraspecific genetic boundaries and diagnostic criteria. Notably, we identified substantial genetic distinctions between M. scopus sp. nov. and its closest relative, M. susanae (Figure 6, Figures S2 and S3). Moreover, our analyses revealed significant divergence among specimens of M. ordinatum sp. nov., scarcely distinguishable from M. longitergum, suggesting a potential species complex. Conversely, microscopic and genomic analyses of specimens identified as M. ordinatum sp. nov. unexpectedly revealed significant morphological variability (Figure 5), highlighting the necessity of an integrative taxonomic approach to prevent premature species delineations.
The correction of the COI sequence attribution for M. polycyclus underscores the importance of rigorous genetic verification in species identification. This is particularly pertinent in taxonomic groups characterized by limited diversity sampling, where erroneous assignments can pose challenges detectable only through comprehensive comparisons across multiple reference datasets. Our study thus contributes valuable insights into myzostomid biodiversity and underscores the ongoing need for genetic and morphological analyses to refine species boundaries accurately.
As noted previously by Summers and Rouse [2], myzostomids typically exhibit host specificity, with closely related species often parasitizing crinoids from the same evolutionary clade. The newly described species M. scopus sp. nov. and M. ordinatum sp. nov. were both discovered on Comaster schlegelii, a host also inhabited by myzostomids from related clades such as M. susanae and M. longitergum, consistent with prior findings. This supports the hypothesis of co-evolution between crinoids as hosts and myzostomids as highly specialized symbionts.
In contrast, certain myzostomid species demonstrate a broader host range across different taxa. For example, M. polycyclus, found on C. parvicirrus in our study, is also known to parasitize other feather stars of diverse genera and species (e.g., Capillaster multiradiatus, Clarkcomanthus littoralis, Comanthus suavius), suggesting it may be less host specific.
Moreover, our analysis underscores the considerable gap in knowledge regarding myzostomid biology. This limited understanding currently hinders assessments of their phylogenetic relationships, host specificity, and biogeographical distribution patterns.

5. Conclusions

The findings of this study illuminate the hidden biodiversity within marine macroinvertebrates, emphasizing the pivotal role of documenting these and numerous other symbiotic relationships, especially given ongoing environmental challenges [21,40]. It is noteworthy that many of these microscopic invertebrate symbionts can take on parasitic or vector roles, particularly within key habitat-forming taxonomic groups such as echinoderms, corals, and marine sponges.
Our investigation underscores the urgent need for comprehensive, integrative research efforts that move beyond mere species enumeration. The complexity of marine ecosystems demands multidisciplinary approaches to untangle intricate relationships, providing crucial insights for informed decision-making in an increasingly dynamic global landscape.

Supplementary Materials

The supplementary data can be accessed at the following https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani14152265/s1. Table S1: Taxonomic names and GenBank accession numbers of partial COI sequences of Myzostomida used for molecular phylogenetic reconstruction. Figure S1: Ventral view of the anterior part of Myzostoma ordinatum sp. nov. with an everted introvert. Scale bar 200 µm (abbreviations: i—introvert, mc—marginal cirri, p—parapodia). Figure S2: Bayesian inference (BI) molecular phylogenetic tree of the genus Myzostoma, derived from partial COI sequences. Figure S3: Maximum likelihood (ML) molecular phylogenetic tree of the genus Myzostoma, derived from partial COI sequences. Figure S4: The distribution of myzostomids, as illustrated in Figure 6, spans across global marine biogeographical realms, following the framework established by Costello et al. [34] with modifications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.N.I., D.S., and T.A.B.; methodology, A.I., D.S., and V.N.I.; taxonomical expertise, A.I., T.A.B., and V.N.I.; software, D.S.; validation, A.I., D.S., Y.Z., T.A.B., and V.N.I.; formal analysis, A.I., D.S., and V.N.I.; investigation, A.I. and Y.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, A.I., D.S., and V.N.I.; writing—review and editing, A.I., D.S., Y.Z., T.A.B., and V.N.I.; visualization, D.S. and A.I.; supervision, T.A.B. and V.N.I.; project administration, V.N.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The project was supported by Shenzhen University Stability Support Program (Grant 210101006).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Genetic data obtained in this study are available by Accession Numbers provided in Table 2.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their sincere gratitude to Simei Ji and A.V. Kitashov (Shenzhen MSU-BIT University) for fostering a supportive and creative environment essential for the successful execution of this project. The authors also thank Xinzheng Li (Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao) and the staff of his laboratory for their help in organizing the field trip to Hainan Island as part of a collaborative project. The authors also extend their gratitude to E.S. Mekhova and G.D. Kolbasova for their insightful correspondence regarding myzostomids and their hosts.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Eeckhaut, I.; Lanterbecq, D. Myzostomida: A review of the phylogeny and ultrastructure. Hydrobiologia 2005, 535/536, 253–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Summers, M.M.; Rouse, G.W. Phylogeny of Myzostomida (Annelida) and their relationships with echinoderm hosts. BMC Evol. Biol. 2014, 14, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lanterbecq, D.; Rouse, G.W.; Eeckhaut, I. Bodyplan diversification in crinoid-associated myzostomes (Myzostomida, Protostomia). Invertebr. Biol. 2009, 128, 283–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Summers, M.M.; Al-Hakim, I.I.; Rouse, G.W. Turbo-taxonomy: 21 new species of Myzostomida (Annelida). Zootaxa 2014, 3873, 301–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. von Graff, L. Verzeichniss der von den United States Coast Survey steamers “Hassler” und “Blake” von 1867 bis 1879 gesammelten Myzostomiden. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 1883, 11, 125–133. [Google Scholar]
  6. von Graff, L. Report on the Myzostomida collected during the voyage of H. M. S. Challenger during the years 1873–76. Supplement. report on the scientific results of the Voyage of H. M. S. Challenger. Zoology 1887, 20, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  7. World Polychaeta Database. Myzostomida. Read, G.; Fauchald, K. (Eds.) 2024. Available online: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=233983 (accessed on 21 July 2024).
  8. Kolbasova, G.D.; Mekhova, E.S. Myzostoma khanhkhoaensis (Myzostomida), a new myzostomid species from the Nhatrang Bay, Vietnam. Zootaxa 2019, 4691, 235–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Lanterbecq, D.; Rouse, G.W.; Milinkovitch, M.C.; Eeckhaut, I. Molecular phylogenetic analyses indicate multiple independent emergences of parasitism in Myzostomida (Protostomia). Syst. Biol. 2006, 55, 208–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Terrana, L.; Eeckhaut, I. Taxonomic description and 3D modelling of a new species of myzostomid (Annelida, Myzostomida) associated with black corals from Madagascar. Zootaxa 2017, 4244, 277–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Xiao, Y.; Chen, S.B.; Zhang, L.; Yue, P.; Ouyang, Z.Y.; Liu, X.C. Designing nature reserve systems in Hainan Island based on ecosystem services. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2011, 31, 7357–7369. [Google Scholar]
  12. Liu, J.Y. Status of Marine Biodiversity of the China Seas. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e50719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Venmathi Maran, B.A.; Kim, I.H.; Bratova, O.A.; Ivanenko, V.N. Two new species of poecilostomatoid copepods symbiotic on the venomous echinoid Toxopneustes pileolus (Lamarck) (Echinodermata) from Vietnam. Syst. Parasitol. 2017, 94, 227–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ivanenko, V.N.; Hoeksema, B.W.; Mudrova, S.V.; Nikitin, M.A.; Martínez, A.; Rimskaya-Korsakova, N.N.; Berumen, M.L.; Fontaneto, D. Lack of host specificity of copepod crustaceans associated with mushroom corals in the Red Sea. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2018, 127, 770–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Shelyakin, P.V.; Garushyants, S.K.; Nikitin, M.A.; Mudrova, S.V.; Berumen, M.; Speksnijder, A.G.; Ivanenko, V.N. Microbiomes of gall-inducing copepod crustaceans from the corals Stylophora pistillata (Scleractinia) and Gorgonia ventalina (Alcyonacea). Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 11563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Korzhavina, O.A.; Hoeksema, B.W.; Ivanenko, V.N. A review of Caribbean Copepoda associated with reef-dwelling cnidarians, echinoderms, and sponges. Contrib. Zool. 2019, 88, 297–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Montano, S.; Reimer, J.D.; Ivanenko, V.N.; García-Hernández, J.E.; van Moorsel, G.W.N.M.; Galli, P.; Hoeksema, B.W. Widespread Occurrence of a Rarely Known Association between the Hydrocorals Stylaster roseus and Millepora alcicornis at Bonaire, Southern Caribbean. Diversity 2020, 12, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Korzhavina, O.A.; Reimer, J.D.; Ehrlich, H.; Ivanenko, V.N. Global diversity and distribution of Lamippidae copepods symbiotic on Octocorallia. Symbiosis 2021, 83, 265–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tchesunov, A.V.; Ivanenko, V.N. What is the difference between marine and limnetic-terrestrial associations of nematodes with invertebrates? Integr. Zoöl. 2021, 17, 481–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Korzhavina, O.A.; Grishina, D.Y.; Chen, X.; Fontaneto, D.; Ivanenko, V.N. Diving into diversity: Copepod crustaceans in octocoral associations. Diversity 2023, 15, 1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Korzhavina, O.A.; Gubareva, N.V.; Kitashov, A.V.; Britayev, T.A.; Ivanenko, V.N. From microscale interactions to macroscale patterns in copepod–crinoid symbiosis. Animals 2024, 14, 877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Korzhavina, O.A.; Nikitin, M.A.; Hoeksema, B.W.; Armenteros, M.; Reimer, J.D.; Ivanenko, V.N. Tracing geographic and molecular footprints of copepod crustaceans causing Multifocal Purple Spots Syndrome in the Caribbean sea fan Gorgonia ventalina. Diversity 2024, 16, 280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Vihtakari, M. ggOceanMaps: Plot Data on Oceanographic Maps Using ‘ggplot2’. R Package Version 2.1.1. 2023. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggOceanMaps (accessed on 19 November 2023).
  24. Rennstam, R.O.; Sint, D.; Horngacher, N.; Traugott, M. A broadly applicable COI primer pair and an efficient single-tube amplicon library preparation protocol for metabarcoding. Ecol. Evol. 2018, 8, 12335–12350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Geller, J.; Meyer, C.; Parker, M.; Hawk, H. Redesign of PCR primers for mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I for marine invertebrates and application in all-taxa biotic surveys. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2013, 13, 851–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Messing, J. New M13 vectors for cloning. In Methods in Enzymology; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1983; Volume 101, pp. 20–78. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kearse, M.; Moir, R.; Wilson, A.; Stones-Havas, S.; Cheung, M.; Sturrock, S.; Buxton, S.; Cooper, A.; Markowitz, S.; Duran, C.; et al. Geneious Basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 1647–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Altschul, S.F.; Gish, W.; Miller, W.; Myers, E.W.; Lipman, D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Edgar, R.C. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 1792–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Ronquist, F.; Huelsenbeck, J.P. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 2003, 19, 1572–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1312–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Pattengale, N.D.; Alipour, M.; Bininda-Emonds, O.R.; Moret, B.M.; Stamatakis, A. How many bootstrap replicates are necessary? In Research in Computational Molecular Biology: 13th Annual International Conference, RECOMB 2009, Tucson, AZ, USA, 18–21 May 2009; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; pp. 184–200. [Google Scholar]
  34. Costello, M.J.; Tsai, P.; Wong, P.S.; Kwok Lun Cheung, A.; Basher, Z.; Chaudhary, C. Marine biogeographic realms and species endemicity. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Atkins, D. Report on the Myzostomida collected by Mr. F.A. Potts in Torres Strait, with a description of a species obtained by Professor J. Stanley Gardiner from the Maldives. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 1927, 97, 339–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Eeckhaut, I.; Grygier, M.J.; Deheyn, D. Myzostomes from Papua New Guinea, with related Indo-West Pacific distribution records and description of five new species. Bull. Mar. Sci. 1998, 62, 841–886. [Google Scholar]
  37. Lanterbecq, D.; Eeckhaut, I. Myzostomida from Madagascar, with the description of two new species. Hydrobiologia 2003, 496, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sun, R.; Lei, Y.; Zhou, J. Phylum Annelida. In Checklist of Marine Biota of China Seas; Liu, R., Ed.; Science Press, Academia Sinica: Beijing, China, 2008; pp. 405–452. [Google Scholar]
  39. Liao, Y.; Xiao, N. Species composition and faunal characteristics of echinoderms in China Seas. Biodivers. Sci. 2011, 19, 729–736. [Google Scholar]
  40. Zeppilli, D.; Sarrazin, J.; Leduc, D.; Arbizu, P.M.; Fontaneto, D.; Fontanier, C.; Gooday, A.J.; Kristensen, R.M.; Ivanenko, V.N.; Sørensen, M.V.; et al. Is the meiofauna a good indicator for climate change and anthropogenic impacts? Mar. Biodiv. 2015, 45, 505–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Sampling locality and sampling site (red circle). (AD)—Regional view showcasing the geographic area around the sampling site. (B,C)—Detailed sampling site enhanced with bathymetric data, highlighting underwater topography and depth details.
Figure 1. Sampling locality and sampling site (red circle). (AD)—Regional view showcasing the geographic area around the sampling site. (B,C)—Detailed sampling site enhanced with bathymetric data, highlighting underwater topography and depth details.
Animals 14 02265 g001
Figure 2. Myzostoma scopus sp. nov., holotype. (A)—habitus, dorsal view, (B)—habitus, ventral view, (C)—introvert arrowed, ventral view, (D)—habitus, ventral side outline. Abbreviations: IN—introvert, NO—lateral organ, P—penis, C—cloaca.
Figure 2. Myzostoma scopus sp. nov., holotype. (A)—habitus, dorsal view, (B)—habitus, ventral view, (C)—introvert arrowed, ventral view, (D)—habitus, ventral side outline. Abbreviations: IN—introvert, NO—lateral organ, P—penis, C—cloaca.
Animals 14 02265 g002
Figure 3. (A) Myzostoma polycyclus, ventral view (SEM); (B) M. solare sp. nov., ventral view (SEM); (C) M. ordinatum sp. nov., ventral view; (D) M. ordinatum sp. nov., ventral view (SEM). Scale bar = 500 µm. Abbreviations: C—cloaca, LO—lateral organs, MC—marginal cirri, OO—oral opening, PP—parapodia.
Figure 3. (A) Myzostoma polycyclus, ventral view (SEM); (B) M. solare sp. nov., ventral view (SEM); (C) M. ordinatum sp. nov., ventral view; (D) M. ordinatum sp. nov., ventral view (SEM). Scale bar = 500 µm. Abbreviations: C—cloaca, LO—lateral organs, MC—marginal cirri, OO—oral opening, PP—parapodia.
Animals 14 02265 g003
Figure 4. (A)—Myzostoma solare sp. nov. Dorsal view, SEM. (B,C)—Myzostoma ordinatum sp. nov. dorsal view. Abbreviations: h—hook of parapodium, mc—marginal cirri, mdr—mid-dorsal ridge. Scale bar = 300 µm.
Figure 4. (A)—Myzostoma solare sp. nov. Dorsal view, SEM. (B,C)—Myzostoma ordinatum sp. nov. dorsal view. Abbreviations: h—hook of parapodium, mc—marginal cirri, mdr—mid-dorsal ridge. Scale bar = 300 µm.
Animals 14 02265 g004
Figure 5. Variability in the morphology of Myzostoma ordinatum sp. nov. (A,B)—Ventral view outlines depicting different shapes. (C,D)—Ventral view outlines and schematic cross-sections at the level of the third pair of parapodia showing diverse morphologies. Scale bar = 200 µm. Abbreviations: i—inversed introvert; lo—lateral organs; mc—marginal cirri; p—parapodia; tm—trunk margin.
Figure 5. Variability in the morphology of Myzostoma ordinatum sp. nov. (A,B)—Ventral view outlines depicting different shapes. (C,D)—Ventral view outlines and schematic cross-sections at the level of the third pair of parapodia showing diverse morphologies. Scale bar = 200 µm. Abbreviations: i—inversed introvert; lo—lateral organs; mc—marginal cirri; p—parapodia; tm—trunk margin.
Animals 14 02265 g005
Figure 6. Molecular phylogenetic reconstruction of the genus Myzostoma based on partial COI sequences, Bayesian inference. Species-level clades and outgroups are collapsed to a single branch. Numbers above branches indicate posterior probabilities (PP) from Bayesian inference, numbers below branches indicate bootstrap support from maximum likelihood (BS). Only PP > 0.9 and BS > 60 are shown. Geographical ranges (see according to Figure S4) indicated by colored circles and according to color scheme are annotated below the phylogenetic tree; species known from aphotic zone marked by blue star.
Figure 6. Molecular phylogenetic reconstruction of the genus Myzostoma based on partial COI sequences, Bayesian inference. Species-level clades and outgroups are collapsed to a single branch. Numbers above branches indicate posterior probabilities (PP) from Bayesian inference, numbers below branches indicate bootstrap support from maximum likelihood (BS). Only PP > 0.9 and BS > 60 are shown. Geographical ranges (see according to Figure S4) indicated by colored circles and according to color scheme are annotated below the phylogenetic tree; species known from aphotic zone marked by blue star.
Animals 14 02265 g006
Table 1. Hosts and number of Myzostoma specimens studied.
Table 1. Hosts and number of Myzostoma specimens studied.
HostMyzostoma polycyclusMyzostoma solare sp. nov. Myzostoma ordinatum sp. nov. Myzostoma scopus sp. nov.
Comanthus parvicirrus18
Comanthus parvicirrus10
Comanthus parvicirrus5
Comaster schlegelii 12
Comaster schlegelii 625
Comaster schlegelii 3342
Comaster schlegelii 91
Table 2. Material deposited in public collections.
Table 2. Material deposited in public collections.
SpeciesSampling LocalityDate of SamplingDepth, mHostVoucherGenBank Accession Number
Myzostoma scopus sp. nov.18.20465; 109.1699525 November 20095–8Comaster schlegeliiZMMU Pl-4886OR864678
Myzostoma solare sp. nov.18.20465; 109.1699525 November 20095–8Comaster schlegeliiZMMU Pl-4887OR864679
Myzostoma ordinatum sp. nov.18.20465; 109.1699525 November 20095–8Comaster schlegeliiZMMU Pl-4888
Myzostoma ordinatum sp. nov.18.20465; 109.1699525 November 20095–8Comaster schlegeliiZMMU Pl-4889OR864677
Myzostoma ordinatum sp. nov.18.20465; 109.1699525 November 20095–8Comaster schlegeliiZMMU Pl-4890
Myzostoma polycyclus18.20465; 109.1699524 November 20093–5Comanthus parvicirrusZMMU Pl-4891OR864681
Myzostoma polycyclus18.20465; 109.1699524 November 20093–5Comanthus parvicirrusZMMU Pl-4892
Myzostoma polycyclus18.20465; 109.1699524 November 20093–5Comanthus parvicirrusZMMU Pl-4893OR864680
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Isaychev, A.; Schepetov, D.; Zhou, Y.; Britayev, T.A.; Ivanenko, V.N. New Myzostomids (Annelida) in Symbiosis with Feather Stars in the Shallow Waters of the South China Sea (Hainan Island). Animals 2024, 14, 2265. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14152265

AMA Style

Isaychev A, Schepetov D, Zhou Y, Britayev TA, Ivanenko VN. New Myzostomids (Annelida) in Symbiosis with Feather Stars in the Shallow Waters of the South China Sea (Hainan Island). Animals. 2024; 14(15):2265. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14152265

Chicago/Turabian Style

Isaychev, Alexander, Dimitry Schepetov, Yutong Zhou, Temir A. Britayev, and Viatcheslav N. Ivanenko. 2024. "New Myzostomids (Annelida) in Symbiosis with Feather Stars in the Shallow Waters of the South China Sea (Hainan Island)" Animals 14, no. 15: 2265. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14152265

APA Style

Isaychev, A., Schepetov, D., Zhou, Y., Britayev, T. A., & Ivanenko, V. N. (2024). New Myzostomids (Annelida) in Symbiosis with Feather Stars in the Shallow Waters of the South China Sea (Hainan Island). Animals, 14(15), 2265. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14152265

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop