4.1. Data Validation
Regression analysis during wave storm conditions reveals that values of the regression coefficient,
r2, for
Hm0 are quite good, both in the north and south points, although with slightly higher values in the north (0.66 for BGN) than in the south (0.62 for BTS).
Figure 4 shows three examples of the significant height evolution, both measured and modeled, during storm conditions. It can be observed that, even with significantly high values of
r2, models may overestimate (panel a,
r2 = 0.82) or underestimate (panel c,
r2 = 0.87) the experimental measures, although, often, the degree of correspondence is quite good or very good in some cases (panel b,
r2 = 0.92). In this sense, it is interesting to underline that although the general trend of the models is to underestimate experimental observations during extreme events (e.g., [
16,
17]), the results in this study include cases in which storms are underestimated, overestimated, as well as events considerably well reproduced, especially on the northern side of the islands. These results should not be surprising taking into account factors such as the altitude and complexity of the archipelago’s topography, the irregularity of the coastline, and the islands’ self and mutual shading effects, among others, which limit the ability of models to correctly reproduce wind and wave conditions in these areas.
Regarding the simultaneous evolution of wind and wave directions, the analysis of both parameters as obtained from the buoy and by the model, during storms shown in
Figure 4a,b, reveals that there is a fairly good correlation between the experimental measurements and the simulations. A quantitative measure of the correlation between two circular variables can be obtained by means of the circular correlation coefficient,
ρc [
29]. The value of this coefficient for wind measured and simulated directions observed at BTS during the storm of
Figure 4a is 0.29, while for the storm detected at BGN during the storm depicted in
Figure 4b is 0.78. On the other side, the circular correlation coefficients for wave measured and simulated directions in these two cases are 0.59 and 0.88. In other words, there is a better degree of correlation between wave direction measurements and simulations than between wind direction measurements and simulations. Moreover, the correlation coefficient between both circular variables is higher in the north than in the south. These results can be explained by the lower directional variability of waves than that of wind, as well as the superior ability of the models to simulate wind and wave conditions to the north than to the south of the islands, due to the complexity of their orography. Unfortunately, there is no directional information for the latter case (
Figure 4c) since it occurred prior to 2003, the date on which the directional sensors were incorporated into the buoys.
An overview of wind and wave directional variability, as well as their respective combined variability with wind speed, significant wave height, and peak period, can be qualitatively explored by means of wind and wave roses, as shown in
Figure 5, for both measured and simulated data at point IP3, south of Tenerife. Panels on the left and in the middle show overall good agreement between average measured and simulated wave direction, although the models slightly overestimate directional dispersion around the mean. Regarding wave height (panels a and d) and period (panels b and e), it can be observed that, in general, the wave model tends to slightly overestimate the significant wave height while weakly underestimating the peak period.
The aforementioned increment in directional dispersion is more noticeable in the case of wind (panels c and f), revealing some weaknesses of the atmospheric model for reproducing wind conditions south of the archipelago during stormy conditions. However, despite the above differences, mostly due to large orographic complexity, the average wind direction and wind intensity are reasonably well reproduced. It is important to note that these effects are much less important in the north of the islands, and are substantially attenuated, both north and south, when all data, not only those of stormy scenarios, are considered. In conclusion, even though the models exhibit some weaknesses, there is overall fairly good agreement between wave measurements and simulations, so that the model results may be used to explore the spatiotemporal variability of wave storms in the study area, although not without some caution.
4.2. Wave Storm Parameter Selection
As discussed above, the selection of the optimal threshold is an open issue. Consequently, there are several procedures for selecting an appropriate threshold value. Among these, one of the most widely used in practice is the percentile method, which, like the others, incorporates a certain degree of subjectivity but has the advantage of simplicity. Furthermore, some authors attribute a fairly good degree of robustness to this procedure, depending on the specific use (e.g., [
30,
31]).
In line with previous comments, the approach used to select the threshold,
Ht, has been conditioned by three main factors. The first is the specific interest of the study in storms capable of causing substantial damage on sandy beaches. The second is the knowledge of the prevailing wind and wave conditions in the archipelago, and the third is the observed general slight overestimation of significant wave height by the model, mainly during stormy conditions. Accordingly, after trying different quantiles (Q
95.0, Q
99.0, Q
99.5 and Q
99.9) to select a threshold considering these aspects, it has been observed that using percentiles lower than or equal to Q
99.5 led to the identification of a substantially high number of storms for an area with a rather moderate wave climate and subjected to strong sheltering effects against the most frequent storms, generally coming from the NW directional sector, as will be discussed in
Section 4.5. Finally, the quantile Q
99.9 has been identified as the most appropriate threshold for the objectives of the study.
Considering the importance of the occurrence of wave storms coinciding with high tide conditions, the minimum allowable temporal distance between storms,
ISDmin, was set at 48 h, which includes four low and high tide levels and is close to the average duration of atmospheric disturbances in the North Atlantic [
11,
17]. In the same vein, the minimum duration of the storm has been stated as the duration of a complete tidal cycle,
Dmin = 12 h.
4.3. Wave Storm Severity
The severity of wave storms has been evaluated by estimating the total wave power,
TWP, as in Equation (1), and storm energy,
E, as in Equation (2). Results obtained at the outer flanks of the Canary Islands for the period covered by the datasets are shown in
Figure 6a. Numbers next to each point indicate the number of identified storms, while values in brackets stand for the threshold used to select the events, corresponding in each case to the associated
Q99.9. It can be observed that the highest values of
E and
TWP are located on the western (EP6, EP7, EP8) and northern (EP8, EP1, EP2) flanks of the archipelago, since these are the sides most exposed to harsh wave fields reaching the islands from directional sectors with north and/or west components. On the contrary, the average energy and total wave power of wave storms detected south or east of the archipelago are substantially lower due to sheltering effects against the direct action of storms approaching from any directional sector, except for those travelling from the SW and S sectors. Points EP4 and EP3 are special cases. The first is located at the south but in the middle of the channel formed by Gran Canaria and Fuerteventura, through which waves coming from the NNW-NNE can propagate. Point EP3 is placed at the eastern side of the archipelago, so that wave directions at this point are restricted to NE-SW. It should be noted that proximity to Africa imposes significant fetch restrictions for wave propagation from the east.
It is worth mentioning that the thresholds established at each point to select the storms follow the same pattern as the average value of the storm energy. However, this is not the case for the number of wave storms, which is very similar for all the outer locations around the archipelago. Nevertheless, this result is totally consistent since wave storms are defined as a function of the threshold that changes from point to point.
Storminess conditions for inner points located at the southern coasts of Tenerife are shown in
Figure 6b, which indicates both the storm energy and total wave power, as well as the selected storm threshold at each point. Results reveal that the average storm energy and total wave power are larger in the southwestern and southern strips, exposed to relatively severe wave storms approaching from the southwest sector, as well as to storms travelling through the G-TF channel from the northwest. It must be stressed that, on this edge of the island, in the vicinity of points IP1 and IP2, are located the most famous beaches of the island. Wave conditions change substantially in the southeastern strips because these areas are protected against wave storms approaching the islands with northern, western, and even southern components. Energy reaching these points comes almost exclusively from the NNE-NE direction, coinciding with the predominant direction of the relatively weak trade winds.
4.4. Wave Storm Seasonality
The polar plot shown in
Figure 7 presents the date of occurrence for each storm at locations south of Tenerife, with the bubble size indicating storm energy,
E. It is easy to observe the existence of two distinct climatic seasons, one remarkably mild, from April to October, and other relatively stormy, which extends from November to April, although the period of occurrence for more energetic storms is restricted to a shorter time span, from December to March, approximately. This is the period when severe storms are detected in the southernmost places, while extreme storms reach the southwestern locations from November to April, and the southeastern coastal strip is influenced by less severe wave storms from mid-November to mid-April. An interesting, but rare, feature is the detection of two relatively moderate energy storms at location IP5 during summer. These storms are associated with intense trade wind events, generating moderately severe wave conditions and arriving at this location traveling from the NNE-NE, through the GC-T channel.
Generally speaking, extreme storms occur mainly during winter, between December and March, with a substantially lower probability of presentation during spring and autumn, becoming practically null in summer. Accordingly, Rayleigh and Kuiper tests clearly reject the hypothesis of uniformity at any level of significance. In other words, extreme storms are not randomly distributed around the circle (i.e., along the year) but concentrate during late autumn, winter, and early spring, with the more intense conditions observed during winter. Henceforth, the used tests allow us to accept the existence of a seasonal pattern in the timing of extreme wave storms on a statistical basis. It is interesting to note that the tests indicated above have been applied to be rigorous in the analysis, although, in this particular case, the simple observation of
Figure 7 provides qualitative confirmation of this fact.
4.5. Wave Storm Directionality
Wind and wave directionality in the external locations is shown in
Figure 8. The left panels depict the directionality of wind and wave conditions considering the whole datasets, while the right panels illustrate directionality during selected storm events. The upper panels reveal that the predominant wind conditions in the outer flanks of the archipelago are associated with the prevalence of trade winds, giving rise to relatively mild wind conditions blowing principally from the NNE sector (panel a). However, during severe wave storms, the prevailing wind conditions change significantly, except for the eastern strip (EP3), where the average direction remains from NNE, with a very small directional spread, but the intensity increases notably (panel b). Wind at locations in the northern and western flanks become dominated by intense winds blowing from the WNW-NNW sector. It is interesting to note that winds at locations north of Lanzarote (EP2) display mixed conditions, receiving the influence of the trade winds, intensified during the summer, and the arrival of strong winds from the NW during winter. At the southern location (EP5), wind conditions during wave storm situations become dominated by W-SW intense wind conditions, while point EP4, located in the channel between GC and F, receives the influence of winds with western, northern, and northeastern components.
With respect to the directionality of wave fields reaching the islands at the outer edges and their severity (middle panels), average directional conditions depict a similar pattern to that of the wind, with the predominance of low and moderate wave conditions travelling mainly from the N-NE directional sector, but rolling towards NW when shifting away from the African coast along the northern side and especially on the western coast (panel c). This effect becomes very clear during stormy wave conditions (panel d). In these situations, severe wave storms travel from the NW sector, affecting predominantly the western and northern sides of the archipelago. Due to self-sheltering effects, locations at the eastern side receive much less energy, with waves travelling from the NNE, while southern locations are affected by mild or moderate storms, following a similar pattern to that of the winds, including its propagation through the channels formed between islands.
Regarding the bivariate distribution of wave direction and period (lower panels), the situation is almost similar to that of wave height and directionality. Thus, during stormy conditions (panel f), waves approaching northern and western locations have notably long periods, revealing a swell structure. However, locations sheltered from these conditions (EP3 and EP5) receive smaller and shorter waves, indicating the frequent presence of wind-driven seas travelling from the NNE (EP3) and from WSW (EP5).
In brief, it is worth noting that most frequent and severe storms arrive from the N-NW sector and affect mainly the western and northern sides of the archipelago. The eastern flank is subjected to a strong sheltering effect against these events, so that it is almost exclusively exposed to wave fields generated by the trade winds (N-NNE). The presence of channels between islands allows the propagation of NW-NE wave fields towards the eastern and western edges of the central islands’ southern flanks. In the southern areas, during storm conditions, waves approaching from the S-SW sector predominate, although these are usually more moderate than on the rest of the flanks.
Even taking into account the above-mentioned uncertainty associated with the reproducibility of some parameters during extreme events with models, the differences are substantially large and consistent, showing meaningful and realistic changes between the characteristics of the wave fields under general conditions and during extreme episodes.
Results from the analysis of wind and wave directionality at the inner points, located along the southwest, south, and southeast areas of Tenerife, in terms of wind speed,
Hm0, and
Tp, are shown in
Figure 9. Variations in each pair of values are examined under two different types of situation: on the one hand, under average conditions, or average regime, extracted by using the whole dataset, and, on the other hand, during the extreme events selected in each location.
Figure 9a,d show that, in general, the dominant direction of the wind regime is NE. Wind speed reaches relatively low values very often (panel a). In contrast, wind speeds observed during wave storms are substantially higher and directionali-ty exhibit a more complex spatiotemporal pattern. In the southwest locations of the island (IP1), the dominant wind direction during wave storms (panel d) shows a considerable dispersion in the NW-NNW sector, although the intensity of the wind is notable only during periods when the wind flows from the NNW, passing through the G-T channel. At points located on the southern flank, the intensity is notably higher than the global average, but the direction in which the wind flows is the opposite, highlighting the presence of strong wind events from the SW. On the other hand, in the southeast locations (IP4, IP5), the predominant direction remains around the NW, but with strong winds blowing along the GC-T channel.
With regard to wave conditions south of Tenerife, it should be noted that, under global conditions (panel b), the southern coasts rarely experience wave conditions with Hm0 values above 2 m. The most western point (IP1) receives waves from the NNW, while waves reaching the southern (IP2, IP3, IP4) and eastern points (IP5) travel predominantly from the NE. Under severe conditions (panel e), the general pattern of wave directionality is practically the same as for wind in these conditions (panel d). However, note that at the westernmost point (IP1), the directional dispersion observed for the wind disappears, with waves travelling almost exclusively from the NNW, through the G-T channel.
The joint distribution of wave direction and peak period reflects an average behavior (panel c) very similar to that observed for wave direction and height. However, it is interesting to note that Tp values associated with storms observed at south and southeast areas (panel f) correspond mainly to locally wind-driven seas or young swell waves. In particular, waves reaching point IP5 and IP4 are associated with dominant trade winds and are funneled through the GC-T channel. Wave storms detected in the southwest points (IP1) are often due to wave fields reaching these coasts from distant storms located in the northwest area of the North Atlantic, through the channels between G-T, while those located in the southern border (IP2, IP3) show a much more complex pattern generated by the alternation of storms arriving through G-T and GC-T channels, as well as less frequently from the SSW-S directional sector.
4.6. Illustrative Wave Storm Event with Severe Impacts
With the aim of characterizing in more detail wind and wave conditions during storm events on the southern edge of Tenerife, the variability of wind and wave conditions during the selected extreme events has been examined considering the evolution of wind speed and direction, as well as wave height, period, and direction. Furthermore, mean water wave elevation data measured at the tidal gauge north of GC (TG) have been used to explore the contribution of this phenomenon to the impacts of selected extreme wave storms. Although the analysis was carried out for each of the storms identified south of Tenerife, the evolution of the parameters during one selected storm is briefly described below as an example. The selection of this storm has been made on the basis of several storm characteristics (storm energy, maximum value of Hm0 during the event, storm duration, wave direction during the storm) and the existence of evidence of its impact on tourist beaches extracted from the local press historical archives.
The selected storm occurred during late February and early March 2018, and it has been selected principally because of its significantly long duration (around 90 h). The maximum significant wave height during the storm was 4.1 m and the associated return period 12.3 years. This storm, named Emma, began to develop around 23 and 24 February to the NW of the Canary Islands, and progressively increased in intensity to reach its maximum between 26 February and 01 March, while it remained more or less stationary over the archipelago. Then, it continued its trajectory towards Northern Europe, progressively moving away from the islands. This low-pressure system resulted in strong winds blowing from the W-SW sector towards the islands and generating a wave storm that affected almost all the islands and, in particular, the southern and southwestern areas of Tenerife, with a large impact on the tourist beaches located on this coastal stretch.
Figure 10 shows the wave storm evolution as observed at point IP2.
Figure 10c shows that before 23 February, the wind direction presents a remarkable variability, until 23 February, when it was established in the S-SW sector, as with the wave direction. On the other hand,
Figure 10a reveals a rather positive relationship between the temporal evolutions of wind speed and wave height, indicating that it was a locally generated wave storm. This is also evidenced in
Figure 10b, in which it can be seen that both the average and peak periods adopt quite low values during the episode. Finally, in
Figure 10d, it can be seen that the storm’s peak coincided with a fairly large high tide, with a tidal range of around 2 m. Regarding the effect of tidal level on the wave storm impacts, the evaluation of tidal ranges coincident with the timing of storm occurrence, during the period when tidal information is available (1992–2020), reveals that the tidal range during the storms identified as damaging events was, in all cases, higher than the average value (1.5 m), pointing out the well-known significant contribution of this factor to the impact of wave storms on the coastline. In this particular example, the combination of both phenomena caused important negative impacts, including damage to coastal structures and buildings near the coastline, as well as erosion problems on the beaches of Arona (Southwestern Tenerife), which were reported by the local press, such as observed in
Figure 11, which shows the lack of sand and the severe damage caused on the promenade of Los Tarajeles beach, in Los Cristianos (Arona), which had to be closed during the period of their repair. Furthermore, the “Francisco Andrade Fumero” promenade, on Las Américas beach, was closed to public use due to flooding and damage. During the stormy period, the red flag was present on all the beaches of the highly tourism-dependent municipality of Arona.