Next Article in Journal
Worldwide Trends in Methods and Resources Promoting Geoconservation, Geotourism, and Geoheritage
Previous Article in Journal
The Status of Geoethical Thinking in the Educational System of Greece: An Overview
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hydrogeochemical Characteristics and Isotopic Tools Used to Identify the Mineralization Processes of Bottled Mineral Water in Morocco

1
Laboratory of Applied Chemistry and Environment, Team Solid Mineral Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Mohammed First University, Oujda, BP 717, Oujda 60000, Morocco
2
HydroSciences, Faculty of Pharmaceutical and Biological Sciences of Montpellier, IRD, CNRS, CEDEX 05, 34093 Montpellier, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Geosciences 2023, 13(2), 38; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13020038
Submission received: 28 November 2022 / Revised: 12 January 2023 / Accepted: 23 January 2023 / Published: 29 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Hydrogeology)

Abstract

:
Bottled waters are among the most important products in the human diet. In Morocco, eleven bottled mineral waters were analyzed (physicochemical composition and water stable isotopes) to identify their geologic origins and hydrochemical characteristics. The study of the ionic ratios shows that the mechanisms of water–rock interaction, such as the dissolution of carbonate and silicate minerals, influence the chemistry of these mineral waters, which are controlled by lithology and tectonics, sometimes with the influence of deep flux through fractures. The water from the Oulmes plateau shows a Na-HCO3 chemical facies in relationship with alkaline granite. Moreover, the carbonated waters (EMG and EMGL) are characterized by high concentrations of Si, Li, Rb, Sr, and Cs due to deep CO2 flux origin. The waters of Saiss, Middle Atlas, and Rif are of the Ca-HCO3 type linked mainly to carbonate formation. The stable isotope contents of water range from −7.74 to −5.35‰ for δ18O and −45.4 to −30.4‰ for δD. The recharge altitude of the aquifer was estimated to be between 250 and 1200 m, following a δ18O altitudinal gradient between 0.25 and 0.27‰ per 100 m. The industrial production process and the natural presence or artificial addition of CO2 can also influence the isotopic composition of water. These results can be a relevant guide to decision makers for better exploitation and assessment of the water quality.

1. Introduction

In recent years, with the change in lifestyle, people pay more and more attention to the quality of drinking water and its impact on health [1]. The Moroccan water law “36-15” [2], in particular, “Section 2: Water uses” and “Sub-section 3: Exploitation and sale of natural mineral waters, spring waters and table water”, define natural mineral water as water that comes from aquifers, and which has a naturally constant chemical composition and does not require any chemical treatment to make it drinkable. Spring water is a natural aquifer water that does not require any chemical treatment to be drinkable.
In many countries, there are regulations specifically governing the sale of bottled mineral water. In the European Community, Directives 1980/777/EEC [3], 1996/70/EC [4], and 2003/40/EC [5] stipulate that bottled water must be groundwater and clearly distinct from ordinary drinking water by its nature.
The quality of groundwater sold in large quantities in bottles is susceptible to the overexploitation of sources. Reasonable and sustainable exploitation is only possible with an in-depth knowledge of the complex dynamics that locally characterize the hydrological cycle [6]. Indeed, the chemistry of water is generally controlled by different factors, such as climatic conditions, interaction with atmospheric gases, hydrolysis, and dissolution of minerals present in dust, soils, and rocks, interactions between dissolved minerals and organic matter, rate of infiltration through the soil, residence time in the aquifer, mixing with other water, etc. [7,8,9].
Concentrations of major ions are used to identify the influence of water–rock interactions on the chemistry of the water and to identify the nature of the chemical reactions that take place [10,11].
Stable isotopes of the water molecule are widely used in such assessments [12], in particular for understanding the origins of groundwater from isotopes of precipitation as an input function, recharge zones, and surface–underground interactions [13]. Isotopic signals from rainwater (δ2H, δ18O) are transferred to groundwater during recharge. For much groundwater, the isotopic composition is equal to the composition of seasonal precipitation [14]. However, unlike in temperate regions, the isotopic composition of groundwater in arid regions can be significantly altered with respect to local precipitation [15]. The cause is the strong isotopic enrichment in heavy isotopes caused by evaporation during storage at the surface before infiltration into the aquifer [13]. In addition, in Morocco, the presence of a mountain system can modify the isotopic content of water which has infiltrated at higher elevations than at the altitudinal level of surface sources or wells with an apparent depletion effect [16].
Bottled waters, sold on the market, can be considered representative samples of their originating aquifers. This enables monitoring over time to show the stability of the chemistry of these waters and the possible impact on quality from human activity.
Over the past two decades, numerous studies worldwide have been carried out to characterize the composition and chemical origin of bottled water [17,18,19,20]. The main objective of this study is to consider bottled waters as reliable and chemically stable samples taken from several aquifers with different geological characteristics. This comparative study aims at understanding the origin and the processes that have contributed to the mineralization of bottled water in Morocco. In addition, the isotopic characterization of these waters makes it possible to determine the modes and altitudes of recharge of each aquifer used for the production of bottled water in Morocco.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Study Area

Morocco is a country located in northwest Africa, it is bordered by the Atlantic Ocean to the west and the Mediterranean Sea to the north, as well as by the country of Mauritania to the south and the country of Algeria to the east (Figure 1a).
The topography of the country is dominated by four mountain ranges; these divide the country into three distinct geographical regions, the mountainous interior, which contains fertile valleys and plateaus, the Rif mountain range in the north of the country which is parallel with the Mediterranean Sea coast, and the three Atlas mountain ranges south of the Rif Mountains (Figure 1c). In the case of the northern and northwestern parts, where the study area is located, the climates are characterized by humid Mediterranean and Atlantic climates (Figure 1b,d). The northwest of the country is the rainiest region with average annual precipitation exceeding 1000 mm, at the level of the High and Middle Atlas as well as in the north of the Rif, while precipitation does not exceed 200 mm in the majority of the other regions of the country (Figure 1e) [21].
This study focuses on seven still natural mineral waters (EM1 to EM7): a carbogazeous natural mineral water (EMG), an artificially carbonated natural mineral water (EMGF), a light carbogazeous natural mineral water (EMGL), and a spring water (ES) (Table 1).
Natural mineral waters and spring waters EM7 and ES are collected from the Rif region; EM1, EMGF, and EM3 are extracted from the South Rif or Pre-Rif corridor; EM2, EM4, EMG, and EMGL are produced from the Oulmes plateau; finally, EM5 and EM6 originate from the Middle Atlas (Figure 2) [22]. However, EMGL corresponds to the same water as EMG with a smaller quantity of gas obtained through partial decarbonation, and EMGF corresponds to the same source as EM1, to which CO2 has been artificially added.
From a geological point of view, the Oulmes plateau comprises two main types of geological formations, a granite formation surrounded by an andalusite and biotite schist zone. In the east of these schist formations, there is a quartzite formation outcrop with argillaceous shales containing limestone nodules, sandstones, and limestone [23]. The granitic facies of the Massif of Oulmes, can be classified into two large groups: medium-grained granites with two types of mica, and fine granites [24].
The plain of Sidi Harazem, which contains the aquifer of the EM3 sample, is formed by terrigenous fluvial type deposits of Plio-Quaternary age, present mainly in the northern part of the plain; this formation is reported under the name of “Conglomerates of Tghaytia” [25]. These conglomerates are unconformity deposits on the sandy marls of the Lower and Middle Pliocene. The formation is made up of a succession of beds of metric conglomerates interspersed by small passes of coarse sandstone marking a set of sequences separated by gully surfaces [26]. The constituent elements of the conglomerates are heterogeneous and polymeric of Liasic or Miocene origin and are fixed in a sandstone and sandstone–clay matrix [27].
The sources of mineral water, Ain Ifrane (EM5) and Ain Soultane (EM6), spring up in the chain of the Middle Atlas, which presents a resistant Jurassic carbonate formation (limestone and dolomite) in which levels of marl, clays, and sandstone are added [28]. These lands are deposited on a Triassic volcano-detrital series formed mainly of clays, sandstones, and alkaline basalts. The waters of the Middle Atlas generally exhibit a strongly calc-magnesian bicarbonate chemism in relation to the geological formations in place. The Triassic salt domes, which are widespread over a large area, outcrop locally (for example in Tissa, 47 km north of Fez), and are also present at different depths in the Pre-Rif Corridor [29].
The Chaouen water (EM7) is taken from the Ain Sahel Kharrouba source, which emerges at a break in the slope of an unconfined aquifer sitting in Villafranchian alluvium. The supply basin is made up of Quaternary alluvial formations fed by precipitation at the foot of the mountain of the dolomitic limestone ridge of the western Rif. The latter is highly fractured with Jurassic carbonates in which marl levels are interspersed [30]. The marls are of Cenomanian and Senonian age.
The Rif water (ES) is extracted from a shallow water table flowing in an alternating system of shale and sandstone. This water table is recharged at the level of the internal limestone ridge.

2.2. Sampling and Analytical Techniques

Bottled waters are considered chemically stable groundwater samples. In order to support this assumption, physicochemical analyses were carried out over several periods, for 3 years and for 3 different samples in terms of production date (Table S1) to verify the physicochemical stability of these waters. The analyses were carried out on 0.5 L and 1.5 L PET bottles, which were purchased in a supermarket.
The measurements of pH and EC were analyzed under the same temperature at the Laboratory of Applied Chemistry and Environment in the Faculty of Sciences, Oujda. The hydrogen potential (pH) and electrical conductivity (EC) were determined by using a HI9033 conductivity meter, and a HI98115 pH meter. The major ion analyses were carried out in accordance with the standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater by the American Public Health Association [31]. The bicarbonates (HCO3) and chlorides (Cl) were determined by assay method using hydrochloric acid and silver nitrate (0.1 N). Other elements such as nitrates (NO3), sulfates (SO42−), phosphates (PO43−), ammonium (NH4+), and nitrites (NO2) were determined by the colorimetric assay method using a UV-VIS spectrophotometer (Rayleigh UV—9200 (precision ±1 nm)). The analyses of cations and trace elements, 12 parameters in total (Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, K+, P, Si, B, Li, Ba, Rb, Sr, and Cs) were determined by using an ICP-MS model iCAP Q ThermoScientific at the Laboratory of Chemistry, Hydrosciences, Montpellier, France. The stable isotope analyses (δ18O and δ2H) were performed on an Elementar Isoprime IRMS at the LAMA Laboratory of HydroSciences, Montpellier. The analysis of δ18O was carried out by the dual inlet method with an AQUAPREP automaton using equilibration with CO2 (error ±0.05‰), and the analysis of δ2H by the continuous flow method using a Eurovector PYROH Elemental Analyzer, through pyrolysis of the water in the presence of chromium under a helium flow (error ±0.8‰).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Water Quality

The results of chemical analyses for the 11 types of bottled water studied are given in Table 2. However, Table S2 gives the standard deviation of the results. For the major elements, the results that we found are no different from those identified on the bottle labels. Label data for certain types of water show the chemical stability of water for decades.
The low pHs of EMG and EMGL are due to the dissolution of naturally occurring CO2 or artificially injected CO2 in EMGF waters. Based on the information on the label, CO2 was more likely to be artificially injected during the manufacturing process.
The EC of the samples showed great variability in the range of 175 to 2160 µS.cm−1. Some samples (EM3, EMG, and EMGL) showed extremely high EC (Table 2), which may be attributable to their thermal origin [34,35,36].
There are few details about the land use in the study zone. In the Moroccan ley, the catchments have a protective perimeter with a minimum distance of 35 m. All catchments are affected by agricultural activities more or less, but there are no urban activities. The Middle Atlas shows the greatest impact of intensive agriculture.
The concentration of nitrate is generally higher in the water withdrawn from the Middle Atlas where there are major agricultural activities. However, the concentration is higher for EM6 (22.5 mg/L) but remains below the guide value (50 mg/L). On the contrary, on the Oulmes plateau and in the Rif, agriculture activities are sparse and limited, allowing a limited impact. In the Rif (EM7 and ES), the catchments are located in the bottom of gullies, without agriculture activities for 3 km, providing a poor anthropic impact with very low nitrate contents.
The concentration of Ba (Table 2) is generally low because it is either adsorbed on clay minerals or precipitates with sulfate and carbonate in nature [37]. The solubility of Ba compounds increases with decreasing pH, and the highest Ba concentrations in bottled water are expected in low pH water derived from granite rocks for waters of Oulmes origin (EM2, EM4, EMG, and EMGL). Ba concentration depends not only on pH but also on the type of rocks, it can be found in igneous rocks such as granite, at high content levels [38]. Ba is also an alkaline earth metal, and probably has a higher content in the case of alkaline granite (EM2, EM4).
Higher concentrations of K, Si, Li, Rb, Sr, and Cs indicate that the water source is in granite rocks [39]. The increase in Li, Rb, and Cs content is associated with CO2 –Na waters [40]. The concentrations of K, Si, Li, Rb, Sr, and Cs for the waters of Oulmes origin (EM2, EM4, EMG, and EMGL) coming from granitic rocks are much higher than the water coming from other rocks type except EM3 in marls, which, like EMG and EMGL, are thermal waters marked with a higher EC. This condition can facilitate the solubility of minerals in the water. However, compared with EM2, Ba and Rb, two trace elements that are abundant in granitic rocks, show lower content and are probably lower in marls, limiting their presence in the water.
Table 3 shows the matrix of correlation coefficients between the different chemical parameters of the samples studied. This correlation shows that the mineralization of bottled waters in Morocco is mainly controlled by Cl, Na+, Ca2+, Mg2+, HCO3, and K+, suggesting that the mineralization is controlled by the dissolution/precipitation of rocks.
The hydrochemical facies of bottled water in Morocco were established using the Piper diagram [41] (Figure 3). The results obtained by the projection of the data show that the bottled waters from the Rif, Saiss, and Middle Atlas (EM1, EM5, EM6, EM7, EMGF, ES) show a Ca-HCO3 or Ca/Mg-HCO3 chemical facies, the bottled waters from Oulmes (EM2, EM4, and EMG-EMGL) show, respectively, a Ca/Na(Mg)-HCO3 and a Na(Ca-Mg)-HCO3 facies and the carbogazeous waters a Na(Ca)-HCO3(Cl) facies, and the bottled water from Sidi Hrazem (EM3) shows a Na(Ca-Mg)-Cl(HCO3) chemical facies. The original waters of the Oulmes plateau emerge successively in alkaline granites (granite and granite arena) [24], which explains their sodium bicarbonate facies. These waters show high concentrations of Na+ and K+, which may be related to the hydrolysis of feldspars such as albite and those contained in granite.
For EM1/EMGF, EM5, and EM6 mineral waters, the calc-magnesian bicarbonate facies are linked to the emergence of springs in the carbonate Jurassic formed by limestones and dolomites.
The EM3 mineral water exhibits a sodium chloride facies, which is related to the contact of the detrital Miocene marls of the Pre-Rif deposited on the Jurassic carbonates of the Atlas. However, the evaporate layers are found in the Miocene marl, which provides Na+ and Cl ions.
The mineralization of EM7 mineral water and ES spring water is mainly due to calcium bicarbonate, which may come from the limestone ridge of the Inner Rif region.

3.2. Water Mineralization Process

3.2.1. Water–Rock Interaction

Scatter plots, or binary correlation diagrams between ionic elements, make it possible to evaluate and understand the different processes involved in mineralization [42].
The correlation between Cl and Na+ (Figure 4a) shows the presence of three distinct groups. The first group is characterized by Na+/Cl ratios close to 1 (EM5, EM6, EM7, and ES), linked to the dissolution of halite. These waters belong to carbonate formation, this input of halite could be linked with the dissolution of soil salts (Na+ and Cl) that accumulate during the dry season and are removed during the wet season until the aquifer. The second group is characterized by Na+/Cl ratios >1 (EM2, EM4, EMG, and EMGL), and these waters are relatively rich in sodium, suggesting for this element an origin from the geological formation of the Oulmes plateau. Indeed, besides the contribution from rains and the dissolution of halite in soils during the wet seasons, these waters reside in alkaline granites, which constitute a second source of Na+ ions. Another possibility for the origin of Na+ ions is a cation exchange between the smectites or phyllosilicates resulting from the degradation of granite by circulating groundwater. The third group, with a Na+/Cl ratio <1 showing a sodium depletion with respect to chlorine, characterizes the waters extracted from Sidi Harazem (EM3), which pervade heterogeneous conglomerates fixed in a sandstone and sandstone–clay matrix.
The variations of geochemical mechanisms in the aquifer system can also be interpreted from different scatter plots. This allows hypotheses to be made on the origin of these cations, which normally pair up in the aqueous phase, generally in the bicarbonate or sulfated form.
The correlation between (Ca2++Mg2+) and (HCO3+SO42−) (Figure 4b), shows that most of the points are distributed on the line of slope 1, with the exception of the two samples EMG and EMGL, which are thermal waters and naturally carbonated which explains their excess in carbonates. Note that the sulfate contribution always remains very minor (Table 1), except for EM2, compared with bicarbonates, and this is the reason why Figure 4c shows a similar data distribution pattern. The still natural mineral waters (EM2 and EM4) and the carbogazeous natural mineral water (EMG and EMGL) from Oulmes are slightly above the equilibrium and richer in HCO3 ions. This can be related to the alkaline facies of granites where the hydrolysis process produces bicarbonate associated with high sodium concentrations. The relatively high concentration of sulfates in EM2 could be linked to the hydrolysis of the pyrite, which may be present in granitic fractures. Since these concentrations in EM4, EMG, and EMGL plot below the line, there may be a relationship to the dissolution of excess CO2 gas in the aquifer.
The relation between Ca2+ and Mg2+ shows that the groundwater extracted from the Rif (EM7 and ES) and Pre-Rif (EM3) highlights the relationship between the dissolution of calcite, or dolomite, and the geological structure of the aquifer (Figure 4d). Regarding our results, most of the points are close to the line (Ca2+/Mg2+ = 1) indicating the phenomenon of dissolution of the dominant dolomite, while the samples from the Rif (EM7 and ES), whose ratio is greater than 2, show dissolution of the dominant calcite. For EM7 water in carbonate formation, Mg2+ shows a lower content with respect to Ca2+. The first explanation is mainly an interaction with a calcic formation containing few Mg2+, and a part of the excess of Ca2+ could also be linked with sulfates (dissolution of gypsum) which are non-negligible in EM7. This is shown in Figure 4, which shows a good equilibrium between (Ca2++Mg2+) and (HCO3+SO42−). From the above, it can be argued that the origin of calcium in the groundwater from the Rif (EM7 and ES), Pre-Rif (EM3), and Middle Atlas (EM5 and EM6) is mainly linked to the dissolution of carbonate rocks.
EM2 and EM4 are also close to the line but with very low concentrations. This can be explained if the contribution of Ca2+ from the alkaline granite came from amphiboles and the calcium part of plagioclases with a sodium tendency.
The correlation diagram between the Na+ and (Ca2++Mg2+) (Figure 4e) shows a high concentration of sodium ions in the waters coming from the plateau of Oulmes and the thermal water of the Pre-Rif (EM3). This concentration is almost equal to the concentration of divalent cations. The Na+/HCO3 ratio of these waters is close to 1 (Figure 4f).
For the waters originating from the Oulmes plateau, the enrichment in sodium ion compared to chlorides and the predominance of bicarbonates in the salt load compared to divalent cations favor the process of alteration of alkaline-type granite silicates by hydrolysis as the origin of chemism [43]. In an alkaline context, the alteration of silicates enriches the water with sodium and bicarbonates [44].
Hydrothermal alteration, which is known to occur in EMG and EMGL, can also further enrich these waters in sodium ions [45]. For EM3, the Na+ ions can also come from the evaporate layers present in the Miocene detrital marls of the Pre-Rif, which explains its chlorinated and non-carbonated facies.

3.2.2. Ion Exchange Index

The cation exchange between water and clays is one of the important processes responsible for the evolution of groundwater during its transit through the reservoir. However, Ca2+ and Mg2+ can be exchanged mainly with the Na+ ion. In addition, the Garcia diagram showing the relationship between (Ca2++Mg2+)-(SO42−+HCO3) and (Na++K+-Cl) was also used to test for cation exchange. Cation exchange occurs in the aquifers if the ratio between (Ca2++Mg2+)-(SO42−+HCO3) and (Na++K+-Cl) is about −1 [46]. In the absence of this exchange, all analytical points should lie close to the origin [47] (Figure 5).
The results of the samples in the cation exchange diagram (Figure 5), show that most of the samples are influenced by the dissolution effect (the analytical points should lie close to the origin), except for carbogazeous natural mineral water from the Oulmes plateau (EMG and EMGL), which is out of the dissolution effect zone the, which could suggest that the chemical composition of these waters is controlled by the direct-ion exchange process in relation to enrichment in sodium ions by direct ion exchange with altered zones of granite rich in phyllosilicates or clays. However, the points could be on or close to the line characterized by a slope of −1, then possibly another process such as the hydrolysis of alkaline feldspars must be involved in the sodium excess found in these waters.
Another equation system, the chloro-alkaline ratios, CAI-1 and CAI-2, allows us to determine the exchange processes between water and rocks for (Na++K+) and (Ca2++Mg2+).
CAI- 1 = Cl   ( Na + + K + ) Cl
CAI- 2 = Cl     ( Na + + K + ) ( SO 4 2 + HCO 3 + CO 3 2 + NO 3 )
  • CAI close to 0: there is a balance between the chemical compositions of the water and the aquifer.
  • CAI < 0: the aquifer releases calcium and magnesium and fixes sodium and potassium, direct exchange.
  • CAI > 0: the aquifer releases sodium and potassium and fixes calcium and magnesium, indirect exchange.
Figure 6 presents the two ion exchange indices (CAI-1 and CAI-2) calculated for the different mineral and spring waters. We note that the sign and the value of the indices strongly depend on the origin of the waters.
The samples of water coming from the Middle Atlas and Rif present positive indexes, they underwent exchanges of the indirect base. For these waters, the HCO3 concentrations are higher than those of the alkaline earths, which indicates that these waters are softened by base exchange (Figure 6).
The waters coming from the Oulmes plateau have negative indexes, they are in chloro-alkaline imbalance. Samples of the original bottled waters from the Oulmes plateau (EM2, EM4, EMG, and EMGL) show a higher alkaline earth concentration than HCO3, which indicates that these waters have been hardened by the direct exchange.
However, the indexes are globally close to 0 or low, and the main process, as shown previously in Figure 5, is a chemical equilibrium process that dominates. Concerning EMG and EMGL, the ion exchange index is very low and confirms that the exchange process is not the main explanation to highlight the sodium excess, the hydrolysis of felspars seems more suitable.

3.2.3. Saturation Index

To confirm the dissolution/precipitation process of some main minerals, calcite, dolomite halite, and gypsum, the saturation index for all samples was calculated using Phreeqc V.3.7.3 software.
SI = log IAP/K
With IAP: ion activity product and K: mineral solubility constant.
SI = 0 determines an equilibrium state of the mineral in the water, SI < 0 is an undersaturated state, and SI > 0 is an oversaturated state.
Figure 7 shows the results of the saturation index obtained for all the samples studied. All the samples show a saturation index clearly below the equilibrium line (undersaturation) for halite and gypsum considering the weak concentration of the associated ions. The saturation index for dolomite and calcite show undersaturation or close to saturation, except for EM5 and EM6, which are oversaturated in calcite and dolomite and allow for a possible precipitation of these minerals. In fact, the range −0.5/0.5 represents an unstable condition and it is not so obvious to determine the real chemical conditions.

3.2.4. Gibbs Diagram

In order to confirm the results obtained previously concerning the origin of the mineralization of bottled waters in Morocco, we used the Gibbs diagram, which is widely used by researchers [48] and allows us to define the main trends which control the water mineralization origin.
The projection of the results on the Gibbs diagram (Figure 8) shows that all the waters studied are mainly influenced by the phenomenon of water–rock interaction. This implies that the water–rock interaction is the most important natural factor determining the chemistry of all-natural mineral water by recharge from surface water.

3.3. Isotopic Characterization

3.3.1. Relation between δ18O and δ2H in Rainwater and Water Sources

Two series of δ18O and δ2H isotope analyses were carried out in 2015 and 2018 on the water from the bottles studied (except ES1 measured in 2015 only). The oxygen-18 (δ18O in ‰ vs. V-SMOW) and deuterium (δ2H in ‰ vs. V-SMOW) contents of bottled water in Morocco are presented in Table 4.
The oxygen-18 and deuterium isotopic data in 2015 and 2018 were generally rather stable (Table S3), which shows that these aquifers are large enough to allow good mixing of successive annual recharges. The variability on the d-excess was slightly greater, from 2‰ to 3‰ in amplitude, partly explained by the fact that the analytical errors on the two isotopes are cumulative. The values in deuterium excess (d-excess), ranged from +8 to +16‰ for the waters analyzed in 2015 and from +11 to +20‰ for those of 2018.
Based on the 2015 results, the waters sampled in the Middle Atlas (EM1, EM3, EM6), those from the Oulmes plateau (EM4), and those from the Rif (EM7, ES) showed a mixed footprint in terms of origin, air masses with a mixture of rain from the Atlantic, where d-excess is close to 10, and Mediterranean origin, where d-excess >10 (Table 4). The depleted isotopic content of EM5 is to be linked with its elevation, which is the highest (Table 5), and the strong excess of deuterium is for its part also linked to the altitude. As for carbogazeous natural mineral water, the high values of d-excess may be the consequence of tectonic structures responsible for the ascent of deeper water [49]. For the waters of the Rif region located on the Mediterranean coast and more exposed to Mediterranean rains, the d-excess is greater than +12‰.
To better understand the cycles of the groundwater extracted to fill the bottles, we compared our isotopic analysis results to the analyses of rainwater at a monthly scale taken in the Pre-Rif (Fez-Saiss) between 1994 and 2018 by the Directorate of National Meteorology within the framework of the GNIP network of the IAEA, Rabat. The number of paired analyses for δ18O and δ2H in the database is 115, which was reduced to 91 after eliminating the rains whose d-excess showed an evaporation mark probably linked to sub-cloud evaporation of small amounts of rainfall. Figure 9 plots these results with a calculated linear equation δ2H = 7.73 δ18O + 11.9 (R2 = 0.945 and a weighted mean of −5.25‰ for oxygen-18 and −28.5‰ for deuterium (GNIP database, https://www-naweb.iaea.org/napc/ih/IHS_resources_isohis.html (accessed on 15 June 2022). This line is called the local meteoric water line (LMWL) and it is determined by the GNIP database. Between 1994 and 2015, it was slightly above the global meteoric water line (GMWL) (δ2H = 8 δ18O + 10), determined by Craig [50] for the first time, and confirmed by numerous studies including Cidu and Bahaj [28]. It is below the Mediterranean meteoric water line (MMWL) of equation δ2H = 8δ18O + 22‰ corresponding to the rainfall of eastern Mediterranean regions [51]. The Fez-Saiss line is between the global line and the west Mediterranean line defined by Celle-Jeanton et al. [52] in the south of France, which shows a d-excess of 13,7‰, and a d-excess of 13,9‰ in the north of Tunisia [53], showing a stronger imprint of the Atlantic rains in the study area.
Three distinct meteorological groups fall along the Fès-Saiss line [16] that are a result of (1) rains of Atlantic origin with a d-excess close to 10‰, (2) rains of Mediterranean origin marked by a d-excess greater than 12‰, and (3) rains that reach higher values of d-excess up to 25‰, which occurs when masses of humid Atlantic or Mediterranean air come up through the Sahara, drying up before precipitating on coastal areas. In Morocco, the rainwater d-excess shows well-defined seasonal variations with maxima during winter months, associated with depleted δ18O values. The d-excess minima (associated with enriched δ18O values) observed in the summer are due to weak and rare rainfall with high evaporation rates. In the region of Fez-Saiss, the rains are mainly of Mediterranean origin or come up from the Sahara (60% of d-excess> 12‰), and 40% are of Atlantic or mixed origin.
The line of equation (δ2H = 7.73δ18O + 11.9; R2 = 0.97) for the rains of Fez-Saiss in the Middle Atlas is different from the line relating to the rainwater in the Anti Atlas [54], (δ2H = 8δ18O + 14.5), in the High Atlas (δ2H = 8δ18O + 13.5) [55], and in central Morocco (δ2H = 8δ18O + 13.0) [56]. The data from the previous works come from short time series (2 years), which could be statistically biased with respect to the Fez-Saiss series.
In Figure 9 we have plotted the points that correspond to water from the Middle Atlas area (EM1, EMGF, and EM3). These points represent bottled groundwater and plot close to the heart of the rainfall point cluster. This result confirms the stability of the isotope footprint which has not changed over the timeframe investigated in stable and deep aquifers. Indeed, Figure 10 gives the positions of the different bottled waters in Morocco in the isotopic composition diagram (δ2H, δ18O). We note that the positioning of the different groups remained unchanged around the LMWL in 2015 and 2018, which indicates that the isotopic composition of the groundwater sampled was not significantly modified during the production process.
The waters are divided into five subgroups according to their altitude and their gaseous or flat nature (Figure 10). Subgroup 1 represents the lowest isotopic values, indicating that these waters have either infiltrated during a previous colder or rainier climatic regime or that this corresponds to the highest recharge zones (altitude >1500 m), which is more likely (Table 5). The oxygen and hydrogen isotope compositions of these water samples (EM5 and EM6) are significantly lower than those of other samples. They are bottled in the Middle Atlas (Ben Smim and Ain Soltane), which reaches altitudes of 1600 and 1400 m, respectively, with the highest depleting water in δ2H and δ18O caused by the altitude effect.
Subgroups 2 and 3 are mineral waters from Fez-Saiss and Oulmes, respectively. The position of these samples relative to the local meteoric water line (LMWL: δ2H = 7.73δ18O + 11.9) is close to group 5 (carbogazeous natural mineral waters).
Subgroup 4 represents waters from the Rif (EM7 and ES). These waters, taken from a low altitude in an area close to the Mediterranean coast, are the least loaded with heavy isotopes.
Subgroup 5 includes naturally carbonated or carbonated mineral waters EMG, EMGL, and EMGF. EMGF water, of the same geographical origin as EM1, is slightly offset from EM1 in 2015, showing that the gasification process could cause a slight isotopic fractionation., however, in 2018 they present the same values in oxygen-18 or deuterium. Oulmes thermal carbogazeous natural mineral waters (EMG and EMGL), from the same geographic region as EM2, exhibit an isotopic ratio shifted from the LMWL line, which may be due to the presence of CO2. For the carbonated waters of Lalla Haya of Oulmes (EMG), the presence of deep CO2, whose origin comes from magmatic degassing of the waters, could have caused a depletion of about 1‰ in δ18O and enrichment in deuterium [57].

3.3.2. Correlation between Altitude and δ18O

Determining the altitudes and recharge areas of sources is essential for the management of groundwater resources. Recharge altitudes can be estimated from stable isotope contents, the isotopic signal of the local recharge is generally being a function of the local annual atmospheric temperature at the surface [58].
We sought to determine the relationship that may exist between the isotope ratio of δ18O and the infiltration altitude of surface water. Table 5 and Figure 11 give the values of δ18O and the altitudes of the different groundwater production sites.
Figure 11 shows the correlation between δ18O values obtained in 2015 and in 2018, as a function of the altitude. The isotopic altitudinal gradient in Morocco has been estimated at −0.27‰ per 100 m of elevation [59] and −0.25‰ per 100 m in the Middle Atlas, the Rif, and the city of Fes [60]. For reference, we have drawn on the same graph the two lines, −0.27‰ and −0.25‰. We note that most still mineral waters are positioned along the two lines. However, the waters from the Pre-Rif area (EM1, EMGF, and EM3), located in the region of Fez at an altitude of 250 m, are well below the line. The production units are located in a zone situated between the Middle Atlas and the Rif, two reliefs of high elevation. The recharge of these sources is therefore probably done at a higher altitude in the Middle Atlas or the Rif, around a mean elevation of 1200 m according to the isotopic gradient.
The waters of the Rif, which are being extracted at the foot of the limestone ridge mountain, would appear to recharge at an altitude of around 700 m if the same gradient can be applied. The carbonated waters of Oulmes are below the regional altimeter lines consistently with the presence of CO2, which depletes the water in δ18O.

4. Conclusions

The physicochemical parameters and the stable isotope data of the 11 brands of mineral water bottled and marketed in Morocco have provided information on the origin and the mechanisms of the mineralization of these waters.
Geological formations are the main factors controlling the hydrochemical evolution of groundwater. While the original waters of Oulmes (granite and schist) show Na-HCO3 water types, the Middle Atlas and Rif waters are of the Ca-HCO3 type due to their interaction with carbonate and limestone rocks. The waters of the Middle Atlas are of the Ca-HCO3 type linked to the emergence of sources in the carbonaceous Jurassic, which is chiefly limestones and dolomites, and of the Na-Cl type for EM3 in relation to the detrital Miocene marls of the Pre-Rif deposited on the Jurassic carbonates of the Atlas. Regarding trace elements, the waters originating from the Oulmes plateau have very high levels of K, Si, Li, Rb, Sr, and Cs, in connection with their high concentration in granite rocks.
The local meteoric line of the region of Fez-Sais in the Middle Atlas is different from that of the regions further south of Morocco. In the Middle Atlas, there is a stronger imprint from the Atlantic rains. The stable isotope values (δ18O and δ2H) of the 11 samples lie along the local and global meteoric water lines and are unaffected by evaporation. The distribution of the isotopic composition of the waters subjected to a local recharge process is local (all waters except EM1, EMGF, and EM3), is consistent with the regional altitudinal isotopic gradient reported earlier, between −0.25‰/100 m and −0.27‰/100 m for oxygen-18. The waters from the Pre-Rif area (EM1, EMGF, and EM3), located in the region of Fez at an altitude of 250 m, are clearly below the line and show a recharge process at higher altitudes, around 1000 m. Mineral waters are divided into five subgroups according to their altitude and their gaseous or still nature. The combination of the use of groundwater chemistry and stable isotopes can improve our understanding of the geochemical acquisition processes of groundwater and help determine its recharge zone in mountainous areas.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/geosciences13020038/s1, Table S1. Date of production and analysis of the different types of water.

Author Contributions

M.G. wrote the main manuscript text, prepared figures, and performed the calculations; E.G. wrote the main manuscript text; J.-D.T. wrote the main manuscript text; M.B. wrote the main manuscript text; N.P. wrote the main manuscript text. All authors reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ochilova, N.R.; Muratova, G.S.; Karshieva, D.R. The Importance of Water Quality and Quantity in Strengthening the Health and Living Conditions of the Population. CAJMS 2021, 2, 399–402. [Google Scholar]
  2. Official Bulletin. n°6506 du 6 Octobre 2016 Dahir n°1-16-113 du 6 Kaada 1437 Portant Promulgation de la loi n°36-15 Relative à L'eau; Nabu Press: Charleston, South Carolina, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  3. EU Directive 1980/777/EEC. Council Directive 1980/778/EEC of 15 July 1980 on the Approximation of the Laws of the Member States Relating to the Exploitation and Marketing of Natural Mineral Water. Off. J. Eur. Communities 1980, L229, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  4. EU Directive 1996/70/EC. Directive 1996/70/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 October 1996 amending Council Directive 80/777/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the exploitation and marketing of natural mineral waters. Off. J. Eur. Communities 1996, L299, 26–28. [Google Scholar]
  5. EU Directive 2003/40/EC. Establishing the list, concentration limits and labelling requirements for the constituents of natural mineral waters and the conditions for using ozone-enriched air for the treatment of natural mineral waters and spring waters. Off. J. Eur. Communities L 2003, 126, 34–39. [Google Scholar]
  6. Grappein, B.; Lasagna, M.; Capodaglio, P.; Caselle, C.; Luca, D.A.D. Hydrochemical and Isotopic Applications in the Western Aosta Valley (Italy) for Sustainable Groundwater Management. Sustainability 2021, 13, 487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mushtaq, N.; Younas, A.; Mashiatullah, A.; Javed, T.; Ahmad, A.; Farooqi, A. Hydrogeochemical and isotopic evaluation of groundwater with elevated arsenic in alkaline aquifers in Eastern Punjab, Pakistan. Chemosphere 2018, 200, 576–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bouaissa, M.; Ghalit, M.; Taupin, J.D.; El Khattabi, J.; Gharibi, E. Assessment of groundwater quality in the Bokoya Massif (Central Rif, Northern Morocco) using several analytical techniques. Euro-Mediterr. J. Env. Integr. 2021, 6, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bouaissa, M.; Gharibi, E.; Ghalit, M.; Taupin, J.D.; El Khattabi, J. Identifying the origin of groundwater salinization in the Bokoya massif (central Rif, northern Morocco) using hydrogeochemical and isotopic tools. Groundw. Sustain. Dev. 2021, 14, 100646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fugedi, U.; Kuti, L.; Jordan, G.; Kerek, B. Investigation of the hydrogeochemistry of some bottled mineral waters in Hungary. J. Geochem. Explor. 2010, 107, 305–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bouaissa, M.; Ghalit, M.; Taupin, J.D.; Patris, N.; El Khattabi, J.; Gharibi, E. Assessment of medium mountain groundwater for consumption and irrigation using quality index method: Application to the Bokoya Massif (Central Rif, Northern Morocco). Arab. J. Geosci. 2021, 14, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Voica, C.; Cristea, G.; Feher, I. Multielement and Isotopic Characterization of Bottled Mineral Waters on the Romanian Market. In Bottled and Packaged Water vol. 4: The Sciences of Beverages; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2019; pp. 121–144. [Google Scholar]
  13. Clark, I.D.; Fritz, P. Environmental Isotopes in Hydrogeology; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  14. Qin, W.; Han, D.; Song, X.; Liu, S. Environmental isotopes (δ18O, δ2H, 222Rn) and hydrochemical evidence for understanding rainfall-surface water-groundwater transformations in a polluted karst area. J. Hydrol 2021, 592, 125748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, J.; Pang, Z.; Kong, Y.; Wang, S.; Bai, G.; Zhao, H.; Yang, Z. Groundwater isotopes biased toward heavy rainfall events and implications on the local meteoric water line. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos 2018, 123, 6259–6266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gourcy, L. Isotopic composition of precipitation in the Mediterranean basin in relation to air circulation patterns and climate. Iaea-Tecdoc 2005, 1453, 223. [Google Scholar]
  17. Felipe-Sotelo, M.; Henshall-Bell, E.R.; Evans, N.D.M.; Read, D. Comparison of the chemical composition of British and Continental European bottled waters by multivariate analysis. J. Food Compost. Anal. 2015, 39, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Peters, M.; Guo, Q.; Strauss, H.; Zhu, G. Geochemical and multiple stable isotope (N, O, S) investigation on tap and bottled water from Beijing, China. J. Geochem. Explor. 2015, 157, 36–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bertoldi, D.; Bontempo, L.; Larcher, R.; Nicolini, G.; Voerkelius, S.; Lorenz, G.D.; Brereton, P. Survey of the chemical composition of 571 European bottled mineral waters. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2011, 24, 376–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dinelli, E.; Lima, A.; De Vivo, B.; Albanese, S.; Cicchella, D.; Valera, P. Hydrogeochemical analysis on Italian bottled mineral waters: Effects of geology. J. Geochem. Explor. 2010, 107, 317–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hssaisoune, M.; Bouchaou, L.; Sifeddine, A.; Bouimetarhan, I.; Chehbouni, A. Moroccan Groundwater Resources and Evolution with Global Climate Changes. Geosciences 2020, 10, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Frizon de Lamotte, D.; Crespo-Blanc, A.; Saint-Bezar, B.; Comas, M.; Fernadez, M.; Zeyen, H.; Ayarza, H.; Robert-Charrue, C.; Chalouan, A.; Zizi, M.; et al. The Transmed Atlas—The Mediterranean Region from Crust to Mantle, Cavazza, W., Roure, F., Spakman, W., Stampfli, G., Ziegler, P., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  23. Elbatloussi, D.; Cheddadi, M.; Dadi, S.; Ruthy, I.; Orban, P.; Dassargues, A. Carte Hydrogéologique du Plateau d’Oulmès (Maroc); Notice Explicative, 2005. Available online: https://orbi.uliege.be/bitstream/2268/127371/2/NOTICEp_carte_hydro_oulmes.pdf (accessed on 15 May 2022).
  24. Heron, D.P.; Ghienne, J.F.; El Houicha, M.; Khoukhi, Y.; Rubino, J.L. Maximum extent of ice sheets in Morocco during the Late Ordovician glaciation. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol 2007, 245, 200–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cherai, B.; Idrissi, B.E.F.; Charroud, M.; El Hnot, H. Les mouvements de terrain dans le secteur urbain de la ville de Fès (Maroc): Facteurs de genèse et cartographie des zones à risques. AJIRAS 2017, 5, 405–414. [Google Scholar]
  26. Sabri, K.; Marrero-Diaz, R.; Ntarmouchant, A.; dos Santos, T.B.; Ribeiro, M.L.; Solá, A.R.; Jesus, A.P. Geology and hydrogeochemistry of the thermo-mineral waters of the South Rif Thrust (Northern Morocco). Geothermics 2019, 78, 28–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Charroud, M.; Cherai, B.; Benabdelhadi, M.; Falguères, C. Impact de la néotectonique quaternaire sur la dynamique sédimentaire du Saïs (Maroc): Du bassin d'avant fosse pliocène au plateau continental quaternaire. Quaternaire Revue de l'Association Française Pour l'étude du Quaternaire 2007, 18, 327–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Cidu, R.; Bahaj, S. Geochemistry of thermal waters from Morocco. Geothermics 2000, 29, 407–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Saadi, M.; Hilali, E.A.; Bensaıd, M.; Boudda, A.; Dahmani, M. Geological map of Morocco, scale 1: 1000000. Edition du Service Géologique du Maroc. Notes et Mémoires 1985, 8, 260. [Google Scholar]
  30. Chalouan, A.; Michard, A.; El Kadiri, K.; Negro, F.; de Lamotte, D.F.; Soto, J.I.; Saddiqi, O. The Rif Belt. In Continental Evolution: The Geology of Morocco; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; pp. 203–302. [Google Scholar]
  31. Baird, R.B.; Eaton, A.D.; Rice, E.W. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 23rd ed.; American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Federation: Washington, DC, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  32. WHO. Guidelines for drinking-water quality. WHO Chron. 2011, 38, 104–108. [Google Scholar]
  33. Official Bulletin n°6506 of October 6, 2016 Dahir n°1-16-113 of 6 Kaada 1437 Promulgating Law n°36-15 Relating to Water. 2016. Available online: http://www.auks.ma/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/loi%20eau.pdf(accessed on 27 November 2022).
  34. Mimi, A.L.; Dhia, H.B.; Bouri, S.; Lahrach, A.; Abidate, L.B.; Bouchareb-Haouchim, F.Z. Application of chemical geothermometers to thermal springs of the Maghreb, North Africa. Geothermics 1998, 27, 211–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zarhloule, Y.; Bouri, S.; Lahrach, A.; Boughriba, M.; El Mandour, A.; Ben Dhia, H. Hydrostratigraphical study, geochemistry of thermal springs, shallow and deep geothermal exploration in Morocco: Hydrogeothermal potentialities. In Proceedings of the World Geothermal Congress, Antalya, Turkey, 24–29 April 2005; pp. 24–29. [Google Scholar]
  36. Barkaoui, A.E.; Zarhloule, Y.; Rimi, A.; Verdoya, M.; Bouri, S. Hydrogeochemical investigations of thermal waters in the northeastern part of Morocco. Environ. Earth Sci. 2014, 71, 1767–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Reimann, C.; Birke, M. Geochemistry of European Bottled Water; Borntraeger Science Publishers: Stuttgart, Germany, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  38. Rossiter, A.G.; Gray, M.C. Barium contents of granites: Key to understanding crustal architecture in the southern Lachlan Fold Belt? Aust. J. Earth Sci. 2008, 55, 433–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shin, W.J.; Ryu, J.S.; Shin, H.S.; Jung, Y.Y.; Ko, K.S.; Lee, K.S. Major and Trace Element Geochemistry of Korean Bottled Waters. Water 2020, 12, 2585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Petrović, T.; Mandić, M.Z.; Veljković, N.; Papić, P.; Stojković, J. Geochemistry of Bottled Waters of Serbia. In Clean Soil and Safe Water; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 247–266. [Google Scholar]
  41. Piper, A.M. A graphic procedure in the geochemical interpretation of water-analyses. Eos Trans. AGU 1944, 25, 914–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Schoeller, H. Qualitative evaluation of groundwater resources. In Methods and Techniques of Groundwater Investigations and Development; UNESCO: Paris, France, 1967; pp. 44–52. [Google Scholar]
  43. Velde, B. Introduction to Clay Minerals: Chemistry, Origins, Uses and Environmental Significance; Chapman & Hall: London, UK, 1992; Volume 198. [Google Scholar]
  44. Elango, L.; Kannan, R. Rock–water interaction and its control on chemical composition of groundwater. Dev. Environ. Sci. 2007, 5, 229–243. [Google Scholar]
  45. Taillefer, A. Interactions Entre Tectonique et Hydrothermalisme: Rôle de la Faille Normale de la Têt sur la Circulation Hydrothermale et la Distribution des Sources Thermales des Pyrénées Orientales. Ph. D. Thesis, Université Montpellier, Montpellier, France, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  46. Garcia, G.M.; Hidalgo, M.D.V.; Blesa, M.A. Geochemistry of groundwater in the alluvial plain of Tucuman province, Argentina. Hydrogeol. J. 2001, 9, 597–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. McLean, W.; Jankowski, J.; Lavitt, N. Groundwater quality and sustainability in an alluvial aquifer, Australia. In Groundwater: Past Achievements and Future Challenges; A.A. Balkema: Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2000; pp. 567–573. [Google Scholar]
  48. Mohamed, A.; Asmoay, A.; Alshehri, F.; Abdelrady, A.; Othman, A. Hydro-geochemical applications and multivariate analysis to assess the water–rock interaction in arid environments. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 6340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Paternoster, M.; Liotta, M.; Favara, R. Stable isotope ratios in meteoric recharge and groundwater at Mt. Vulture volcano, southern Italy. J. Hydrol. 2008, 348, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Craig, H. Isotopic variations in meteoric waters. Science 1961, 133, 1702–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Nir, A. Development of isotope methods applied to groundwater hydrology. Isot. Tech. Hydrol. Cycle 1967, 11, 109–116. [Google Scholar]
  52. Celle-Jeanton, H.; Travi, Y.; Blavoux, B. Isotopic typology of the precipitation in the Western Mediterranean Region at three different time scales. Geophys. Res. Lett. Am. Geophys. Union 2001, 28, 1215–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ben Ammar, S.; Taupin, J.-D.; Ben Alaya, M.; Zouari, K.; Patris, N.; Khouatmia, M. Using isotopes and geochemistry tools to characterize groundwater in a coastal phreatic aquifer from the NE of Tunisia: Guenniche basin. J. Arid. Environ. 2020, 178, 104150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ettayfi, N.; Bouchaou, L.; Michelot, J.L.; Tagma, T.; Warner, N.; Boutaleb, S.; Vengosh, A. Geochemical and isotopic (oxygen, hydrogen, carbon, strontium) constraints for the origin, salinity, and residence time of groundwater from a carbonate aquifer in the Western Anti-Atlas Mountains, Morocco. J. Hydrol. 2012, 438, 97–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ait Lemkademe, A.; Michelot, J.L.; Benkaddour, A.; Hanich, L.; Maliki, A. Isotopic and hydrochemical approach to the functioning of an aquifer system in the region of Marrakech (Morocco). Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2011, 25, 2785–2792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ouda, B.; El Hamdaoui, A.; Ibn Majah, M. Isotopic composition of precipitation at three Moroccan stations influenced by oceanic and Mediterranean air masses. In Isotopic Composition of Precipitation in the Mediterranean Basin in Relation to Air Circulation Patterns and Climate; IAEA-Tecdoc 1453: Vienna, Austria, 2005; pp. 125–140. [Google Scholar]
  57. Olive, P.; Dassargues, A.; Griere, O.; Ruthy, I.; El Youbi, A. Caractérisation Isotopique des eaux du Granite et de l’auréole Métamorphique d’Oulmès (Maroc Central). In GIRE3D, Integrated Water Resources management and Challenges of the Sustainable Development. 2006. Available online: https://orbi.uliege.be/bitstream/2268/3459/1/publi135-2006.pdf (accessed on 15 May 2022).
  58. Gat, J.R. The isotopes of hydrogen and oxygen in precipitation. In Handbook of Environmental Isotope Geochemistry; IAEA: Vienna, Austria, 1980; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  59. Sefrioui, S.; Fassi Fihri, O.; El Ouali, A.; Marah, H.; Newman, B.; Essahlaoui, A. Utilisation des outils isotopiques pour la détermination de l’altitude de recharge des principales sources du bassin de Sebou-Maroc. J. Geomaghreb. 2010, 6. [Google Scholar]
  60. Winckel, A.; Marlin, C.; Dever, L.; Morel, J.L.; Morabiti, K.; Makhlouf, M.B.; Chalouan, A. Apport des isotopes stables dans l'estimation des altitudes de recharge de sources thermales du Maroc. C.R. Geosci. 2002, 334, 469–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Geographical location of Morocco; (b) major atmospheric systems and the Canary Current; (c) the regional topography; (d) distribution of bioclimatic zones; (e) distribution of annual precipitation [21].
Figure 1. (a) Geographical location of Morocco; (b) major atmospheric systems and the Canary Current; (c) the regional topography; (d) distribution of bioclimatic zones; (e) distribution of annual precipitation [21].
Geosciences 13 00038 g001
Figure 2. Geological map of the study area and the location of samples [22].
Figure 2. Geological map of the study area and the location of samples [22].
Geosciences 13 00038 g002
Figure 3. Piper diagram of bottled mineral water in Morocco.
Figure 3. Piper diagram of bottled mineral water in Morocco.
Geosciences 13 00038 g003
Figure 4. Binary correlation plots between different parameters. (a) Na vs. Cl; (b) (Ca + Mg) vs. (HCO3 + SO4); (c) Ca vs. HCO3; (d) Mg vs. Ca; (e) Na vs. (Ca + Mg); (f) Na vs. HCO
Figure 4. Binary correlation plots between different parameters. (a) Na vs. Cl; (b) (Ca + Mg) vs. (HCO3 + SO4); (c) Ca vs. HCO3; (d) Mg vs. Ca; (e) Na vs. (Ca + Mg); (f) Na vs. HCO
Geosciences 13 00038 g004
Figure 5. Scatter plot of ((Ca+Mg) − (HCO3+SO4)) versus ((Na+K) − Cl
Figure 5. Scatter plot of ((Ca+Mg) − (HCO3+SO4)) versus ((Na+K) − Cl
Geosciences 13 00038 g005
Figure 6. Ion exchange indices.
Figure 6. Ion exchange indices.
Geosciences 13 00038 g006
Figure 7. Saturation indices of the different minerals for each sample.
Figure 7. Saturation indices of the different minerals for each sample.
Geosciences 13 00038 g007
Figure 8. Gibbs diagram.
Figure 8. Gibbs diagram.
Geosciences 13 00038 g008aGeosciences 13 00038 g008b
Figure 9. Local meteoric water line corresponding to the Middle Atlas (Fez-Saiss).
Figure 9. Local meteoric water line corresponding to the Middle Atlas (Fez-Saiss).
Geosciences 13 00038 g009
Figure 10. Relationship between δ2H and δ18O in 2015 and 2018. MMWL: mediterranean meteoric water line; LMWL: local meteoric water line; GMWL: global meteoric water line.
Figure 10. Relationship between δ2H and δ18O in 2015 and 2018. MMWL: mediterranean meteoric water line; LMWL: local meteoric water line; GMWL: global meteoric water line.
Geosciences 13 00038 g010
Figure 11. Relationship between the altitude and water δ18O values. Blue line: the isotopic altitudinal gradient of Morocco; red line: the isotopic altitudinal gradient of the Middle Atlas.
Figure 11. Relationship between the altitude and water δ18O values. Blue line: the isotopic altitudinal gradient of Morocco; red line: the isotopic altitudinal gradient of the Middle Atlas.
Geosciences 13 00038 g011
Table 1. Types of bottled water studied.
Table 1. Types of bottled water studied.
Water TypeNameCityOriginDepths Below the Ground Surface (m)Geology
EM1Ain SaissFezMiddle Atlas750Jurassic carbonate formation (limestone and dolomite)
EM2Sidi AliOulmesOulmes Plateau13.8Granite
EM3Sidi HarazemFezMiddle Atlas90Miocene detrital marls of the Pre-Rif deposited on the Jurassic carbonates of the Atlas
EM4Ain AtlasOulmesOulmes Plateau-Granite
EM5Ain IfraneIfraneMiddle Atlas-Jurassic carbonate formation (limestone and dolomite)
EM6Ain SoultaneAin SoultaneMiddle Atlas-Jurassic carbonate formation (limestone and dolomite)
EM7ChaouenChefchaoenRif65Limestone ridge of the internal Riffian domain
EMGOulmesOulmesOulmes Plateau-Granite
EMGFAin Saiss FinelyFezMiddle Atlas750Jurassic carbonate formation (limestone and dolomite)
EMGLOulmes LightOulmesOulmes Plateau-Granite
ESRifChefchaoenRif35limestone ridge of the internal Riffian domain
Table 2. Average analytical results for bottled water in Morocco.
Table 2. Average analytical results for bottled water in Morocco.
Water TypepHECTDSNa+K+Mg2+Ca2+NH4+PClSO42−HCO3NO3NO2
µS/cmmg/L
EM17.5066338115.50.4736.463.20.0030.00742.65.14366.08.040.004
EM27.5529121321.21.928.8718.2<DL0.00816.032.191.500.050.002
EM37.441299750121.92.4736.872.4<DL0.003244.920.1341.64.500.025
EM47.7333527735.55.6810.118.2<DL0.08312.412.6158.68.340.003
EM57.555823582.540.7037.970.1<DL0.0238.886.57420.97.150.010
EM67.586954403.230.6344.475.20.0550.00810.610.0420.922.50.005
EM77.3251834510.90.3613.179.8<DL0.00419.527.0256.21.580.009
EMG6.0221601343230.723.439.7112.8<DL<DL289.39.68799.12.270.068
EMGF5.4565337614.90.4635.761.8<DL0.00947.94.66335.58.020.004
EMGL5.7121601318231.623.947.8126.60.0100.003292.910.3841.82.740.035
ES7.781751576.410.356.8529.9<DL0.00210.613.4109.80.78<DL
DL0.10.10.10.00020.0010.00010.00010.0010.00030.10.020.10.010.001
WHO6.5–8--------250250-503
MS6.5–8.52700-----0.5-750400-500.5
Water typeSiBLiBaRbSrCs
µg/L
EM128458.380.4612.10.3443.70.08
EM219,91116.174.829.56.85197.61.65
EM3524041.187.518.36.05499.92.17
EM417,82462.728.547.318.3314.00.10
EM584084.160.315.801.8672.80.01
EM625557.310.688.300.2636.10.02
EM7427531.41.3925.50.17257.00.00
EMG74,898545.53956.4260.5323.6641.6205.8
EMGF27078.480.5512.20.3141.00.08
EMGL75,674589.64339.9269.9327.2645.4211.3
ES407014.80.5913.70.24117.50.00
DL78.84560.10270.00340.00220.00480.00120.0002
WHO-500-700---
MS-300-700---
DL: detection limit; WHO: World Health Organization (WHO) guideline values for drinking water [32]; MS: Moroccan food water standards [33].
Table 3. Correlation coefficient matrix between the different chemical parameters of bottled water in Morocco. The bolded values ≥ 0.6 correspond to strong and representative relationship between 2 parameters.
Table 3. Correlation coefficient matrix between the different chemical parameters of bottled water in Morocco. The bolded values ≥ 0.6 correspond to strong and representative relationship between 2 parameters.
VariablesTDSNa+K+Mg2+Ca2+NH4+PO42−ClSO42−HCO3NO3
TDS1
Na+0.971
K+0.920.941
Mg2+0.650.480.411
Ca2+0.860.730.690.781
NH4+0.02−0.12−0.070.410.191
PO42−−0.31−0.23−0.10−0.35−0.49−0.111
Cl0.950.970.830.550.74−0.13−0.341
SO42−−0.22−0.10−0.18−0.61−0.32−0.18−0.11−0.101
HCO30.930.830.840.810.930.17−0.320.79−0.451
NO3−0.16−0.32−0.270.450.030.850.20−0.30−0.460.051
Table 4. Composition in δ18O and δ2H in 2015 and 2018.
Table 4. Composition in δ18O and δ2H in 2015 and 2018.
δ18O (‰)δ2H (‰)d-Excess (‰)δ18O (‰)δ2H (‰)d-Excess (‰)Origin
2015 2018
EM1−6.67−42.510.8−6.93−41.414.1Middle Atlas
EM2−6.30−37.612.8−6.61−37.915.0Oulmes
EM3−6.49−42.29.7−6.79−41.412.9Middle Atlas
EM4−5.98−36.910.9−6.30−37.712.7Oulmes
EM5−7.63−45.415.6−7.74−45.416.5Middle Atlas
EM6−6.92−45.210.2−7.27−45.013.2Middle Atlas
EM7−5.35−30.412.3−5.57−34.610.0Rif
EMG−6.89−38.916.3−7.20−38.319.3Oulmes
EMGF−6.93−42.612.9−6.93−41.414.1Middle Atlas
EMGL−6.87−38.116.9−7.09−36.620.1Oulmes
ES1−5.35−30.412.3 Rif
Table 5. Altitude and δ18O results of the samples.
Table 5. Altitude and δ18O results of the samples.
Water Typeδ18O (‰) (2015)δ18O (‰) (2018)Altitude (m asl)
EM1−6.67−6.93247
EM2−6.30−6.611108
EM3−6.49−6.79245
EM4−5.98−6.3934
EM5−7.63−7.741560
EM6−6.92−7.271360
EM7−5.35−5.57402
EMG−6.89−7.201050
EMGF−6.93−6.93247
EMGL−6.87−7.091050
ES−5.35 314
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ghalit, M.; Bouaissa, M.; Gharibi, E.; Taupin, J.-D.; Patris, N. Hydrogeochemical Characteristics and Isotopic Tools Used to Identify the Mineralization Processes of Bottled Mineral Water in Morocco. Geosciences 2023, 13, 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13020038

AMA Style

Ghalit M, Bouaissa M, Gharibi E, Taupin J-D, Patris N. Hydrogeochemical Characteristics and Isotopic Tools Used to Identify the Mineralization Processes of Bottled Mineral Water in Morocco. Geosciences. 2023; 13(2):38. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13020038

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ghalit, Mohammad, Mohamed Bouaissa, Elkhadir Gharibi, Jean-Denis Taupin, and Nicolas Patris. 2023. "Hydrogeochemical Characteristics and Isotopic Tools Used to Identify the Mineralization Processes of Bottled Mineral Water in Morocco" Geosciences 13, no. 2: 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13020038

APA Style

Ghalit, M., Bouaissa, M., Gharibi, E., Taupin, J. -D., & Patris, N. (2023). Hydrogeochemical Characteristics and Isotopic Tools Used to Identify the Mineralization Processes of Bottled Mineral Water in Morocco. Geosciences, 13(2), 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13020038

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop