Sea Caves and Other Landforms of the Coastal Scenery on Gozo Island (Malta): Inventory and New Data on Their Formation
by
, , , , and
Stefano Furlani
1,*
,
Fabrizio Antonioli
2, 
Emanuele Colica
3,4
,
Sebastiano D’Amico
4
,
Stefano Devoto
1
,
Pietro Grego
1 and
Timmy Gambin
5 1
Department of Mathematics and Geosciences, University of Trieste, Via Weiss 2, 34127 Trieste, Italy
2
CNR IGAG, Piazzale Aldo Moro 7, 00185 Rome, Italy
3
Research and Planning Unit, Public Works Department, Ministry for Public Works and Planning, Project House, Triq Francesco Buonamici, FRN 1700 Floriana, Malta
4
Department of Geosciences, University of Malta, MSD 2080 Msida, Malta
5
Department of Classics and Archeology, Faculty of Arts, University of Malta, MSD 2080 Msida, Malta
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Geosciences 2023, 13(6), 164; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13060164
Submission received: 20 April 2023
/
Revised: 29 May 2023
/
Accepted: 31 May 2023
/
Published: 2 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Relative Sea-Level Rise)
Abstract
:Sea caves are a type of cave formed primarily by the wave action of the sea. The coastal scenery of the Gozitan coast is very interesting in that sea caves and other coastal landforms, such as sea arches, develop at the sea level. We mapped seventy-nine semi-submerged sea caves opening at the sea level, five completely submerged sea caves, seven sea arches, one sea stack, and one shelter around the coast of Gozo, mainly in the Western and Eastern parts of the island, due to favorable lithological and topographical conditions. Additionally, we surveyed the topography of the emerged part of nine sea caves using the iPhone build-in LiDAR sensor, and eight sea caves in the submerged part using SCUBA equipment. This inventory represents the most detailed example of a database of coastal caves and related forms in the Mediterranean, mainly sourced from a swimming survey along the entire island. Thanks to the combination of outputs of the above-water emerged and submerged surveys, we defined three types of semi-submerged sea caves: (i) box caves, (ii) joint caves, and (iii) complex caves. Moreover, we added a cave-like landform above the sea level on calcarenites called shelter, or a little extended notch deeply carved into the cliff. The shape mainly depends on the structural and lithological setting of sea cliffs. In the Western sector of the island, we also discovered the only sea cave in Gozo, measuring 122 m in length and 10 m in width, with its floor developing above the mean sea level. This cave base is of interest due to rounded landforms related to marine erosion. In the innermost part of the cave, there is also a beach with rounded pebble at an elevation of about 7 m asl. Considering the tectonic stability of the island, it could be possibly related to the MIS 5.5 highstand.
1. Introduction
Sea caves are very common landforms in areas where there is a steep sea cliff. Wave action weakens the rock masses along joints and faults, enlarging them to form hollows and sea caves [1]. Sea caves occur along all the limestone coasts of the Mediterranean Sea, and as such, various aspects, including biological, geomorphological, and exploration, have been studied. Research results are mainly confined to local papers or proceedings of karst conferences. The volume [2] on Italian marine caves and [3] on Tyrrhenian sea caves discussed and took stock of the current state of knowledge regarding these types of caves. Cave deposits, such as speleothems and other cave deposits, have successfully been used as sea level markers, also in the Mediterranean Sea [4,5].
Sea caves, also known as littoral, coastal, or marine caves, include: (i) sea caves sensu stricto, if they are formed by marine processes, such as biogenic caves, flank margin caves [6,7], and abrasional caves; and (ii) caves that were formed before marine transgression, thus widened by processes such as karstic solution, eolian erosion, tectonic, and volcanic processes [8]. The formation of sea caves is mainly controlled by structural weaknesses, such as layers, cracks, and faults [9,10]. In particular, they begin to form when wave action enlarges a pre-existing weakness of the rock mass, causing selective erosion to produce a hollow [11]. The shape of sea caves depends on the dip of the bedding planes, and the attitude of joints and fault planes [12]. The prerequisites of sea cave formation are the presence of sea cliffs affected by the erosive action of waves and currents [13]. Sea cliffs must contain geological structures that allow selective erosion. The latter can favor the formation of sea caves, sea arches, and sea stacks as part of the coastal scenery [9]. The rock mass must be sufficiently resistant to prevent the formation of pocket beaches at its base and to allow for a sizeable cavity to form without the occurrence of rockfalls [13]. All the pre-requisites for the genesis and development of coastal caves are satisfied on the island of Gozo (Figure 1), where tens of sea caves occur [14,15].
In this study, we present an inventory of sea caves along the coastline of Gozo, we propose a classification, and, for the first time, we also describe a sea cave with clear evidences of marine landforms above the sea level possibly related to MIS 5.5.
2. Study Area
The Maltese Islands are a group of central Mediterranean islands located in the Sicily Channel (Figure 1), between Sicily (96 km Northward) and the African coasts (about 290 km Westward) [17]. Gozo (65.79 sq.km) is the second-largest island of the Maltese archipelago (Figure 1).
From a geological viewpoint, a sedimentary sequence mainly composed of carbonate rocks spanning in time from the Upper Oligocene to Upper Miocene crops out in Malta and Gozo. Along the coast, four rock types are present in descending order: Upper Coralline Limestone (UCL) Formation (up to 162 m), Blue Clay (BC) Formation (0–65 m), Globigerina Limestone (GLO) Formation (23–207 m), and Lower Coralline Limestone (LCL) Formation (up to 140 m) [17]. According to Schembri [18], GLO rock masses are prevalent in the island of Gozo (Figure 1c). Conversely, LCL rock masses are common along the W coasts of the island.
The island of Gozo has an easterly dip forming high LCL cliffs on the W coast, whilst the N and S coasts of Comino slope gently to the sea, and high cliffs are evident only on the NE coast. The topography of the islands is strongly controlled by an alternation of horsts and grabens developed during the Miocene and Plio-Quaternary extensional stages [16].
Regarding the recent tectonic movements of the Maltese Islands, Furlani et al. [19] investigated some archaeological remains on the mainland of Malta. The research provided an estimation of the relative sea level changes and vertical displacements of Malta since 3.3 ky BP. The submerged structures indicate that their elevations agree with the predicted sea level curve [20], implying relative stability for late Holocene.
2.1. Geomorphological Setting
The coastal geomorphology of the Maltese Islands was investigated by Paskoff and Sanlaville [21], Schembri [18], and Biolchi et al. [22]. The latter identified six morphotypes for the island of Malta: (i) plunging cliffs, (ii) screes coasts, (iii) sloping coasts, (iv) shore platforms, (v) pocket beaches, and (vi) artificial coasts. The coasts of Gozo resulted mainly dominated by plunging cliffs in the S and NW sectors [17], while scree coasts, locally called Rdum, are located in the NE part.
The high plunging cliffs found in the Maltese Islands are composed of LCL rock masses. These cliffs are resistant to weathering and erosion, which allows them to rise up to 90 m above sea level on the SW coast. These cliffs are interrupted by two large coves that correspond to oval sinkholes [23].
Scree-sloping coasts found in the Maltese Islands are characterized by the presence of thousands of UCL boulders. The latter are detached from the cliffs and moved towards the sea due to large slow-moving landslides. These deep-seated landslides and their mechanisms have been investigated in the N part of Malta island by various researchers [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. Recently, Prampolini et al. [34] produced a geomorphological map of the NE coast of Gozo at a scale of 1.15,000 and Rizzo et al. [35] investigated the coastal vulnerability of the above-mentioned sector of the Gozitan coast.
The island of Gozo is primarily characterized by plunging cliffs (46%), low sloping rock (31%), and scree-sloping coasts (20%), with only 3% of sandy deposits. On the other hand, the island of Comino is mainly composed of low sloping rock (60.6%) and cliffs or steep rock face (29.8%). Boulder screes are relatively less dominant compared to Gozo (7.8%) and sandy shores represent only 1.6% of the Comino coastline [18]. Both islands have various karst features, such as semicircular coves and drowned sinkholes [23]. Valleys on the islands are mostly rias that were previously formed by fluvial processes [16,21].
2.2. Climatic and Oceanographic Setting
The climate of the Maltese islands is typically Mediterranean, characterized by hot, dry long summers and mild rainy winters [36]. Weather and climate are strongly influenced by the sea and by the relatively flat morphology of the islands, which does not favor rainfall formation. On average, the island receives 530 mm of rainfall per year [18]. Mean temperatures range from 12 °C to 27 °C. Due to the central position of the Maltese Islands in the Mediterranean Sea, they are affected by long fetches mainly in the second and fourth quadrant [37]. Dominant winds come from NW [37]. The wave climate around the Maltese Islands is dominated by sea waves rather than swell waves: sea waves, generated by winds in the local area, are characterized by being steep and have relatively short-wave periods when compared to swell waves, which travel into the local area from elsewhere. Tidal oscillations, predominantly semi-diurnal, reach a maximum range of just 20.6 cm on average for spring tides and are reduced to 4.6 cm during neap tides [38].
3. Materials and Methods
The investigation of sea caves along the Gozitan coastline was carried out via swimming surveys in 2013 using the protocol of the Geoswim program [14,39,40]. Data collected were verified in a later campaign in May 2022. In particular, the first survey permitted the location of most of the sea caves presented in this study, while the second survey was aimed at the verification of the 2013 data as well as to perform underwater surveys in selected caves. Another additional survey in October 2022 was carried out in the cave named G32 (see Table 1) at Dimitri Point as sea level markers attributable to MIS 5.5 have been identified within the cave.
The minimum size of sea caves has not been precisely defined, but well-defined hollows at the sea level were mapped. Joints and fractures smaller than approximately 1 m in size were considered as discontinuities enlarged by marine processes.
3.1. Surveys of Sea Caves
Regarding the surveys of sea caves, we present data collected during the 2013 swim survey of the island of Gozo [39], as well as additional punctual surveys both of the submerged (Figure 2A,B) and emergent parts of sea caves (Figure 2C,D).
The 2013 survey followed the Geoswim protocol described by [14,15]. Geoswim consists of swim surveys of selected long sectors of rocky coast, mainly sloping coasts and plunging cliffs [22], with detailed observations of lateral changes in coastal landforms, ecological features of the coast, and mapping of prominent geo-objects.
Instruments, such as GPS, cameras, CTD sensors, echosounder, etc., were fixed onto the instrumental-supported raft (ISR, Figure 2). Two cameras were set in waterproof housings, above and below the ISR, and allowed the collection of ongoing videos and time-lapse images of the coastline being surveyed.
Regarding the DAQ (data acquisition) system, each device was autonomous with respect to the other. The synchronization of data collected during each surveying day was carried out with respect to the Coordinate Universal Time (UTC) and the comparison with GPS coordinates [14,15].
The surveys followed a predetermined route at approximately 1 m to 5 m from the coastline. Small changes in the original routes were caused by nuances in the local topography, and due to the orientation of some of the sea caves [14,15].
Observations were generally reported via radio to the support boat and written in the field booklet, which also includes other navigational information.
The survey covered semi-submerged sea caves, but some submerged caves, noticeable from the surface, were also reported and studied. SCUBA dives were conducted to collect data at eight sea caves using open-circuit dive equipment and underwater cameras.
3.2. Terrestrial Photogrammetry
We performed photographic acquisition to model the inner part of sea cave#G32, and to reconstruct its shape. This approach was also used to obtain the morphometric parameters of the entrances of most of the caves around the island. These high-resolution (HR) images were taken at various elevations roughly perpendicular to the cave walls using a GoPro Hero 7 Black camera. A total of 1522 images were acquired and processed separately in a specialized software used to produce the dense point cloud and 3D model of the cave, according to the DP technique. The first part of DP is known as the SfM technique, and involves the importation of images of each outcrop, and camera alignment.
Collected images were imported in Agisoft MetashapeTM (Agisoft LLC, St. Petersburg, Russia). The latter is a robust software package widely used for the DP technique. The above-cited software includes SfM algorithms that allow the user to align the images and calculate their relative position to each other during the camera alignment phase. The outcome of the camera alignment process was a sparse point cloud of the investigated cave. The second part of DP is known as MVS reconstruction, which involves dense point cloud production, mesh production, and the generation of a 3D textured model (Figure 4). The low-density point cloud is thickened by increasing the number of points, thus generating a dense point cloud. The final processing steps included the production of a 3D surface (mesh) and the generation of 3D textured models.
In a cave environment, global navigation satellite system (GNSS) signals are blocked, so it was not possible to measure the coordinates of the markers to scale the 3D model. Additionally, not having a total station available, it was decided to scale the 3D model within the photogrammetric software by inserting 50 cm scalebars on each side of each of the ten markers positioned along the cave. Moreover, multiple measurements in situ and further checks of the accuracy of the 3D model were made using the point cloud generated via mobile phone (MP) LiDAR as a reference [40].
3.3. iPhone LiDAR Survey
The MP survey aimed to build the 3D model of the innermost part of the G32 cave. We performed two MP surveys using an iPhone 12 Pro MaxTM (Apple Inc., Cupertino, CA, USA) in May and October 2022. These HR images were captured at various elevations roughly perpendicular to the sea cliff. The iPhone 12 Pro MaxTM weighs 0.226 kg, measuring 160.8 × 78.1 × 7.4 mm3, and it is equipped with three rear cameras, including a 12 MP wide-angle, f/1.6, 12 MP ultra-wide-angle, f/2.4, and 12 MP telephoto, f/2.0 with 2/2.5× optical and 10× digital zoom capacity. The 12 MP wide-angle camera was used to capture the images. Our acquisition was conducted within the overhead environment extant in caves, resulting in a very inaccurate GPS signal. The iPhone 12 Pro MaxTM uses a fast stabilization procedure that provides local coordinates within a few tens of seconds. Tavani et al. [41] and Corradetti et al. [42] observed that the accuracy of this model is lower than about 10 m. The acquisition was carried out in automatic mode.
In the cave#G32 (Table 1), we used the MP mounted on a 1.7 m-long selfie stick to extend the LiDAR scanning range that is limited to 5 m. Image acquisition was performed from an average distance of one meter from the cliff face. This distance was selected to guarantee a balance between image quality and the number of images taken. The camera orientation was varied to provide complete and uniform acquisition of the vertical joints that characterize the cliff. Since the cave has heights above 15 m, we integrated the MP LiDAR data with those obtained from the photogrammetric survey (made with the GoPro) to improve the accuracy of the final 3D model.
4. Field Data
Sea caves were mapped and measured as shown in Table 1 and described in detail in the Paragraph 4.1. A separate paragraph is dedicated to sea cave#G32 because it develops almost entirely above the mean sea level and exhibits rounded potholes and channels of possible marine origin.
4.1. Mapping of the Sea Caves and Sea Arches in Gozo
A total of 79 semi-submerged sea caves around the island of Gozo were mapped, 2 of which are tunnels, because they have exits in directions opposite to their entrances. In addition, seven sea arches and five submerged caves (Table 1, Figure 5) were also mapped. Sea cave#G26, also known as the Xlendi Tunnel, is almost totally submerged. We found 64 sea caves along the plunging cliffs of the W sector, between the ria of Mġarr ix-Xini and Reqqa Point in the N side of the island, and 15 sea caves were mapped along the E sector, between Daħlet Qorrot and Tac-Cawl rocks on the S side of the island.
Sea caves in the SW sector mainly develop in LCL rocks, except for the Xlendi tunnel, which opens onto a fault between LCL and GLO. In the Dwejra Bay area on the E side Azure Window, sea caves develop on GLO up to Wied il-Għasri, while at Reqqa Point, sea cave#G1 outcrops. In the E part of Gozo, LCL outcrops between Daleq Qorrot and Qala, the easternmost promontory of Gozo. From the latter site to Tac-Cawl rocks and Mgarr, GLO prevails, but some caves are carved on LCL rock masses (Figure 3).
We measured morphometric parameters in 12 caves in the field and confirmed them through DP-derived outputs, while 13 caves were measured solely via photogrammetry. The longest cave is #G32, which is located at Dimitri Point. Finally, we described the sea bottom in six of the caves.
4.2. Sea Cave#G32 with MIS5.5 Landforms and Deposit
Sea cave#G32 has a viable entrance with a height of 16 m (Figure 6), while the floor of the entrance is a few tens of centimeters above sea level (asl). The depth in front of the entrance rapidly increases and the area is partially rocky with sandy deposits. The total length of the cave is 122 m with a maximum width of 10 m. The height of the cave varies between 2.66 m in the innermost part and 15.5 m at the entrance (Figure 7). Here, a large limestone rock partially obstructs the entrance (Figure 8A) and forms a small terrace at about 15 m asl on the left side of the cave. Sea cave#G32 is a long sinuous tunnel roughly elongated in a NW/SE direction. The lower parts of the channels are occupied by seawater. The elevation of the floor increases from 0.5 m to 8.8 m asl in the innermost part. The floor of cave#G32 is generally made of well-rounded potholes as well as of rounded funnels and channels developing in the direction of the cave (Figure 8B,C). Roughly in the middle of the cave, a 30 m long sector of the floor is occupied by collapsed blocks up to 3 m in size. Beyond these blocks, the elevation of the floor increases rapidly. In the innermost sector of the cave, a sandy-to-pebble deposit occurs. The clasts are rounded or sub-rounded up to half a meter in diameter (Figure 8D,E). The deposit lies at an elevation of 8 m asl.
Living organisms occur up to about 40 m from the entrance, mainly on the floor, but also at the wall’s foot.
5. Discussion
In this section, we discuss the general characteristics of sea caves in Gozo (par. 5.1) and their statistical distribution around the island, the distribution vs. lithology, and the type of sea caves or other surveyed landforms (par 5.2). A separate paragraph (par. 5.3) is devoted to sea cave#G32, as it shows landforms that can be traced back to a paleo sea level.
5.1. Morphometric Characteristics of Sea Caves in Gozo
Sea caves are common landforms along rocky coasts. Their origin and development are due to several factors, such as wave action, karst processes, etc. [1,6,7,9] In Gozo, sea caves can be roughly divided into two main categories mainly according to the shape of the entrance (Table 1).
The first one is the box type, with a squared shape, mainly due to successive collapse of the limestone layers at the roof. The shape of the entrance can be both horizontally enlarged (Figure 9A) or vertically enlarged (Figure 9B).
The second one is the joint type, which develops along vertical or sub-vertical joints in the rock. Jointing can be perpendicular to the sea cliff (Figure 9C) or angled, up to almost parallel (Figure 9D). However, these types represent the end members of a complex mixing of shapes. In fact, many studied sea caves have both a box and joint component simultaneously. For example, they can develop through successive collapses of the roof along a joint (Figure 9E), or at the contact between two different geological formations (Figure 9F). The Xlendi Tunnel is a complex cave that develops on a tectonic contact between the LCL and GLO rock masses, creating a tube that is almost completely submerged and cuts a promontory from one side to the other.
Although submerged sea caves have been reported when visible from the water surface, we did not collect any morphometric parameters. Moreover, we also reported a sea cave in Marsalforn that is carved in the upper member of the GLO rock (#G75). It can be called a shelter, since it looks like a little extended notch carved into the cliff (Figure 9G).
Sea arches are remnant of sea cliff retreat, and possibly of paleo sea caves. We reported seven sea arches 08, but SA4, the famous Azure Window, collapsed during a severe winter storm in 2017 [43]. We also found a sea stack (SS1) near the Azure Window (#SA4) that was probably previously connected to the sea cliff (Figure 9H).
5.2. Sea-Cave Distribution and Lithology
The statistical analysis of the spatial distribution of sea caves along the coastline of Gozo, based on a total amount of 87 coastal landforms, or sea caves, sea arches, and sea stacks showed that 43 (51%) are located on NW part of the island, 16 (19%) on the SE, and 26 (30%) on the SW side. Due to a lack of data, five sea caves were not included in this quantification.
Below the Xwejni rock, there is a shelter carved in the GLO rock mass at Xwejni Bay. It was not considered in the statistical analysis since there is only one cave of this type. Most sea caves (n = 50) are box caves (63%), while there are 20 joint caves (26%), 8 complex sea caves (10%), and 1 shelter (1%), as shown in Figure 10B. There are five submerged caves, seven sea arches, and one sea stack. Most of the sea caves developed on LCL rock masses (n = 56, 71%), followed by GLO rocks (n = 15, 19%) and only a few in UCL rocks (n = 6, 8%), and finally at the contact between LCL and GLO (n = 2, 2%). Figure 10C shows the percentages for each formation.
The types of sea caves and lithology were compared for each zone of Gozo. In the NW side of Gozo (Figure 10A), most sea caves are located on LCL rocks and are mainly strata-type. In the SE side of Gozo, strata-type caves are also dominant but they are balanced between LCL and UCL (Figure 10B) and are mainly in GLO. In the SW side of Gozo, most of the sea caves are located on LCL, and only one sea cave (Xlendi tunnel) has developed on the contact between LCL and GLO rock masses (Figure 10C). No sea caves have been found on the NE side of the island, where large landslides are abundant [34].
In Gozo, most of the sea caves occur on its W side, spanning from the Northern to Southern sector, while the NE side has no sea caves due to landsliding and lithological factors. For instance, BC terrains outcrop from Marsalforn to Dahleq Qorrot Beach on the NE side of Gozo. Moreover, from Dahleq Qorrot to Hondoq, there are only six sea caves and one sea arch due to the topography of the island, which is mainly characterized by sloping coasts [22]. However, an increasing number of sea caves have developed along the remaining Southern sector towards Mgarr, comprising seven sea caves and two sea arches. No sea caves have been found between Mgarr and Mġarr ix-Xini.
Exposure appears to be the most critical factor, as most of the sea caves have developed along the NW side of the island, which is exposed to the dominant wind (Majjistral). The presence of freshwater at Dweira, as already reported by [44], and on the Southern side of the island, may have also contributed to the development of sea caves in the less-exposed sites.
5.3. Sea Cave#G32 and Relative Sea Level Change
Sea cave#G32 is the only cave on Gozo with a floor that has developed almost completely above the mean sea level. Despite this, seawater is still present on the floor, indicating that sea waves can enter the cave during storms up to a few dozen meters inside. Marine processes have significantly shaped the well-rounded channels and potholes, and the foot of the walls is also partially rounded. Moreover, the floor of the cave contains rounded-to-sub-rounded clasts up to the innermost part, where a sandy-to-pebbly deposit occurs. The clasts suggest that the deposit might be a Tyrrhenian beach deposit at an elevation of about 8 m, indicating the tectonic stability of Gozo over a long time, as well as in the Holocene, as reported by [44].
However, no datable fossil remains or even forms of rock biodegradation referable to lithodomes were found, which could be due to the low resistance of the limestones in which the cave is developed. This poor quality of rock masses suggest that these fossils were not preserved over a long time, as reported by [45,46]. The fact that rounded gravels are not cemented could raise doubts, related to the fact that the studied deposit is totally composed by uncemented clasts, and MIS5.5 deposits are usually cemented [44].
Otherwise, the altitude corrected for isostasy of the maximum transgression for MIS 5.5 at Gozo is 8.35 m, as reported by [45], and agrees to the altitude value of inner deposits.
6. Conclusions
A total of 84 sea caves and 8 retreat-related landforms have been investigated for the first time along the Gozitan coasts. These caves had never been inventorized and categorized for their shapes. Most of the caves were box caves (n = 50), followed by joint caves (n = 20), complex (n = 8), and shelter (n = 1) thanks to the combination of outputs of the above-water emerged and submerged surveys. All datasets were digitized and stored in a GIS, revealing that the majority of the sea caves studied developed on LCL rocks. This is likely due to the good quality of rock masses of the above-cited sedimentary rocks. Most of them (n = 41; 51%) are located on the most exposed sector (NW), indicating the significant contribution of waves and mechanical factors in their formation and shaping.
Additionally, marine landforms above the mean sea level have been reported in Gozo for the first time. Although dates and lithodomes on the cave walls are not available, the shapes suggest that the deposit found in the innermost part of the cave G32 (Table 1) may be a MIS 5.5 paleo-beach that has been preserved due to its inland location and potential protection from collapsed boulders in the central sector of the cave.
Author Contributions
All authors have contributed to this study. S.F. conceived the paper; S.F., F.A., P.G., E.C. and T.G. performed field surveys; P.G. digitized and stored datasets in GIS; E.C. computed DP; Original idea: S.F. and F.A.; Conceptualization: all authors; Writing—Original draft: all authors; Supervision: S.D. (Sebastiano D’Amico), S.D. (Stefano Devoto) and S.F.; Writing—Review and editing: S.D. (Sebastiano D’Amico), S.D. (Stefano Devoto), F.A. and T.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Data Availability Statement
The sea-cave dataset is available on request from the corresponding author.
Acknowledgments
We thank Linley Hastewell (University of Portsmouth) for his comments during the preparation of the manuscript. We are also grateful to three reviewers for their useful comments. This project was supported and funded by the University of Malta (Euro-Mediterranean Centre on Insular Dynamics, Institute of Earth Systems), Department of Mathematics and Geosciences, University of Trieste, and the Geoswim Programme, in addition to Heritage Malta’s Underwater Cultural Heritage Unit for providing the support needed for the 2022 survey.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest. Apple Inc. (Cupertino, California, US) and Agisoft MetashapeTM (Agisoft LLC, St. Petersburg, Russia) had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the paper; or in the decision to publish the results.
References
- Furlani, S.; Cucchi, F.; Biolchi, S. Late Holocene widening of karst voids by marine processes in partially submerged coastal caves (Northeastern Adriatic Sea). Geogr. Fis. Din. Quat. 2012, 35, 129–140. [Google Scholar]
- Alvisi, M.; Colantoni, P.; Forti, P. Grotte marine d’Italia. In Atti Del Convegno SPELEOMAR 91 E Successivi Contributi; Memorie dell’Istituto Italiano di Speleologia: Bologna, Italy, 1994; p. 254. [Google Scholar]
- Chelli, A.; Pappalardo, M.; Callegari, F. Rapporti fra livelli di carsificazione e paleo-linee di riva nelle isole del Golfo della Spezia (Liguria orientale). In Atti Della Società Toscana Di Scienze Naturali Residente in Pisa; Memorie, Serie A; Tuscan Society of Natural Sciences: Pisa, Italy, 2008; pp. 25–37. [Google Scholar]
- Antonioli, F.; Furlani, S.; Montagna, P.; Stocchi, P. The Use of Submerged Speleothems for Sea Level Studies in the Mediterranean Sea: A New Perspective Using Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA). Geosciences 2021, 11, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Antonioli, F.; Furlani, S.; Montagna, P.; Stocchi, P.; Calcagnile, L.; Quarta, G.; Cecchinel, J.; Lo Presti, V.; Morticelli, M.G.; Foresta Martin, F.; et al. Submerged Speleothems and Sea Level Reconstructions: A Global Overview and New Results from the Mediterranean Sea. Water 2021, 13, 1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mylroie, J.E.; Carew, J.L. The flank margin model for dissolution cave development in carbonate platforms. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 1990, 15, 413–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Antonioli, F.; Forti, P. Geologia e genesi delle grotte marine. In Grotte Marine: Cinquant’anni Di Ricerca in Italia; Cicogna, F., Bianchi, N.C., Ferrari, G., Forti, P., Eds.; CLEM, Ministero dell’Ambiente, Sezione Difesa Mare: Roma, Italy, 2003; p. 505. [Google Scholar]
- Bunnell, D. Littoral caves. In Encyclopedia of Karst Caves and Karst Sciences; Gunn, J., Ed.; Fitzroy Dearborn, Taylor and Francis Group: New York, NY, USA, 2004; pp. 491–492. [Google Scholar]
- Sunamura, T. Geomorphology of Rocky Coasts; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK, 1992. [Google Scholar]
- Zezza, F. Morfogenesi Litorale E Fenomeni D’instabilità Della Costa a Falesia Del Gargano Tra Vieste e Manfredonia; Geologia Applicata e Ingegneria, Università di Bari-Istituto di Geologia applicata all’Ingegneria: Bari, Italy, 1981; Volume 16, pp. 193–226. [Google Scholar]
- Waterstrat, W.J.; Mylroie, J.E.; Owen, A.M.; Mylroie, J.R. Coastal caves in Bahamian eolian calcarenites: Differentiating between sea caves and flank margin caves using quantitative morphology. J. Cave Karst Stud. 2010, 72, 61–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guilcher, A. Coastal and Submarine Morphology; Methuen: London, UK, 1958; p. 274. [Google Scholar]
- Moore, D.G. Origin and Development of Sea Caves; National Speleological Society Bulletin: Huntsville, AL, USA, 1954; pp. 71–76. [Google Scholar]
- Furlani, S. Integrating observational targets and instrumental data on rock coasts through snorkel surveys: A methodological approach. Mar. Geol. 2020, 425, 106191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Furlani, S.; Antonioli, F. The swim-survey archive of the Mediterranean rocky coasts: Potentials and future perspectives. Geomorphology 2023, 421, 108529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pedley, M.; Clarke, M.H. Limestone Isles in a Crystal Sea: The Geology of the Maltese Islands; Publishers Enterprises Group: San Gwann, Malta, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Said, G.; Schembri, J.A. Malta. In Encyclopedia of the World’s Coastal Landforms; Bird, E.C.F., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands; Heidelberg, Germany; New York, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 751–759. [Google Scholar]
- Schembri, J.A. Coastal Land Use in the Maltese Islands: A Description and Appraisal. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Durham, Durham, UK, 2003. Available online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/4417/ (accessed on 22 March 2023).
- Furlani, S.; Antonioli, F.; Biolchi, S.; Gambin, T.; Gauci, R.; Lo Presti, V.; Anzidei, M.; Devoto, S.; Palombo, M.; Sulli, A. Holocene sea level change in Malta. Quat. Int. 2013, 288, 146–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lambeck, K.; Antonioli, F.; Anzidei, M.; Ferranti, L.; Leoni, G.; Scicchitano, G.; Silenzi, S. Sea level change along the Italian coast during the Holocene and projections for the future. Quat. Int. 2011, 232, 250–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paskoff, R.; Sanlaville, P. Observations geomorphologiques sur les cotes del’archipel Maltais. Z. Fur Geomorphol. 1983, 22, 310–328. [Google Scholar]
- Biolchi, S.; Furlani, S.; Devoto, S.; Gauci, R.; Castaldini, D.; Soldati, M. Geomorphological identification, classification and spatial distribution of coastal landforms of Malta (Mediterranean Sea). J. Maps 2016, 12, 87–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Calleja, I.; Tonelli, C. Dwejra and Maqluba: Emblematic Sinkholes in the Maltese Islands. In Landscapes and Landforms of the Maltese Islands; Gauci, R., Schembri, J.A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 129–139. [Google Scholar]
- Devoto, S.; Biolchi, S.; Bruschi, V.M.; Furlani, S.; Mantovani, M.; Piacentini, D.; Pasuto, A.; Soldati, M. Geomorphological map of the NW Coast of the Island of Malta (Mediterranean Sea). J. Maps 2012, 8, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panzera, F.; D’Amico, S.; Lotteri, A.; Galea, P.; Lombardo, G. Seismic site response of unstable steep slope using noise measurements: The case study of Xemxija Bay area, Malta. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2012, 12, 3421–3431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mantovani, M.; Devoto, S.; Forte, E.; Mocnik, A.; Pasuto, A.; Piacentini, D.; Soldati, M. A multidisciplinary approach for rock spreading and block sliding investigation in the north-western coast of Malta. Landslides 2013, 10, 611–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soldati, M.; Barrows, T.T.; Prampolini, M.; Fifield, K.L. Cosmogenic exposure dating constraints for coastal landslide evolution on the Island of Malta (Mediterranean Sea). J. Coast. Conserv. 2018, 22, 831–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Soldati, M.; Devoto, S.; Prampolini, M.; Pasuto, A. The spectacular landslide-controlled Landscape of the Northwestern Coast of Malta. In Landscapes and Landforms of the Maltese Islands; Gauci, R., Schembri, J.A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 167–178. [Google Scholar]
- Devoto, S.; Macovaz, V.; Mantovani, M.; Soldati, M.; Furlani, S. Advantages of Using UAV Digital Photogrammetry in the Study of Slow-Moving Coastal Landslides. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 3566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Colica, E.; D’Amico, S.; Iannucci, R.; Martino, S.; Gauci, A.; Galone, L.; Galea, P.; Paciello, A. Using unmanned aerial vehicles photogrammetry for digital geological surveys: Case study of Selmun promontory, northern Malta. Environ. Earth Sci. 2021, 80, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Devoto, S.; Hastewell, L.J.; Prampolini, M.; Furlani, S. Dataset of Gravity-Induced Landforms and Sinkholes of the Northeast Coast of Malta (Central Mediterranean Sea). Data 2021, 6, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mantovani, M.; Bossi, G.; Dykes, A.P.; Pasuto, A.; Soldati, M.; Devoto, S. Coupling long-term GNSS monitoring and numerical modelling of lateral spreading for hazard assessment purposes. Eng. Geol. 2022, 296, 106466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Colica, E.; Galone, L.; D’Amico, S.; Gauci, A.; Iannucci, R.; Martino, S.; Pistillo, D.; Iregbeyen, P.; Valentino, G. Evaluating Characteristics of an Active Coastal Spreading Area Combining Geophysical Data with Satellite, Aerial, and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Images. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prampolini, M.; Gauci, C.; Micallef, A.S.; Selmi, L.; Vandelli, V.; Soldati, M. Geomorphology of the north-eastern coast of Gozo (Malta, Mediterranean Sea). J. Maps 2018, 14, 402–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rizzo, A.; Vandelli, V.; Buhagiar, G.; Micallef, A.S.; Soldati, M. Coastal Vulnerability Assessment along the North-Eastern Sector of Gozo Island (Malta, Mediterranean Sea). Water 2020, 12, 1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Groove, T.; Rackman, O. The Nature of Mediterranean Europe. An Ecological History; Yale University Press: New Haven, CT, USA, 2001; p. 384. [Google Scholar]
- Galdies, C. The Climate of Malta: Statistics, Trends and Analysis, 1951–2010; Valletta National Statistics Office: Valletta, Malta, 2011; p. 45. Available online: https://nso.gov.mt/en/publicatons/Publications_by_Unit/Documents/B3_Environment_Energy_Transport_Agriculture_Statistics/The_Climate_of_Malta.pdf (accessed on 18 April 2023).
- Drago, A. Sea level variability and the ‘Milghuba’ seiche oscillations in the northern coast of Malta, Central Mediterranean. Phys. Chem. Earth 2009, 34, 948–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Furlani, S.; Antonioli, F.; Gambin, T.; Gauci, R.; Ninfo, A.; Zavagno, E.; Micallef, A.; Cucchi, F. Marine notches in the Maltese Islands (central Mediterranean Sea). Quat. Int. 2017, 439, 158–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Luetzenburg, G.; Kroon, A.; Bjørk, A.A. Evaluation of the Apple iPhone 12 Pro LiDAR for an Application in Geosciences. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 22221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tavani, S.; Billi, A.; Corradetti, A.; Mercuri, M.; Bosman, A.; Cuffaro, M.; Seers, T.; Carminati, E. Smartphone assisted fieldwork: Towards the digital transition of geoscience fieldwork using LiDAR-equipped iPhones. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2022, 227, 103969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corradetti, A.; Seers, T.; Mercuri, M.; Calligaris, C.; Busetti, A.; Zini, L. Benchmarking Different SfM-MVS Photogrammetric and iOS LiDAR Acquisition Methods for the Digital Preservation of a Short-Lived Excavation: A Case Study from an Area of Sinkhole Related Subsidence. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 5187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caruana, J.; Wood, J.; Nocerino, E.; Menna, F.; Micallef, A.; Gambin, T. Reconstruction of the collapse of the ‘Azure Window’ natural arch via photogrammetry. Geomorphology 2022, 408, 108250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Furlani, S.; Antonioli, F.; Gambin, T.; Biolchi, S.; Formosa, S.; Lo Presti, V. Submerged speleothem in Malta indicates tectonic stability throughout the Holocene. Holocene 2018, 28, 1588–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Antonioli, F.; Ferranti, L.; Stocchi, P.; Deiana, G.; Lo Presti, V.; Furlani, S.; Marino, C.; Orrù, P.; Scicchitano, G.; Trainito, E.; et al. Morphometry and elevation of the last interglacial tidal notches in tectonically stable coasts of the Mediterranean Sea. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2018, 185, 600–623. [Google Scholar]
- Furlani, S.; Vaccher, V.; Antonioli, F.; Agate, M.; Biolchi, S.; Boccali, C.; Busetti, A.; Caldareri, F.; Canziani, F.; Chemello, R.; et al. Preservation of Modern and MIS 5.5 Erosional Landforms and Biological Structures as Sea Level Markers: A Matter of Luck? Water 2021, 13, 2127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1.
(A) Location of Maltese islands; (B) map of the Maltese islands; and (C) geological map of Gozo, modified from [16].
Figure 1.
(A) Location of Maltese islands; (B) map of the Maltese islands; and (C) geological map of Gozo, modified from [16].
Figure 2.
(A,B) SCUBA surveys during the May campaign; (C,D) the ISR used during the Geoswim surveys of the sea caves in Gozo.
Figure 2.
(A,B) SCUBA surveys during the May campaign; (C,D) the ISR used during the Geoswim surveys of the sea caves in Gozo.
Figure 3.
Example of 3D model of sea cave entrances. Sea caves at Gozo: (A) Sea cave#G74 developed along a joint parallel to the coastline; (B) sea cave#G43, developed from collapse of blocks from the roof; (C) sea cave#G33, developed on a joint but evolving for roof collapse. When available, the aforementioned models were used to measure the width and height of the cave entrances.
Figure 3.
Example of 3D model of sea cave entrances. Sea caves at Gozo: (A) Sea cave#G74 developed along a joint parallel to the coastline; (B) sea cave#G43, developed from collapse of blocks from the roof; (C) sea cave#G33, developed on a joint but evolving for roof collapse. When available, the aforementioned models were used to measure the width and height of the cave entrances.
Figure 4.
Screenshots of the 3D photogrammetric model of the inner part of sea cave#G32 in the NW sector of Gozo, with orthographic views of (A) S side; (B) N side; (C) top; and (D) bottom.
Figure 4.
Screenshots of the 3D photogrammetric model of the inner part of sea cave#G32 in the NW sector of Gozo, with orthographic views of (A) S side; (B) N side; (C) top; and (D) bottom.
Figure 5.
Spatial distribution of sea caves in Gozo. The colored lines represent the lithology outcropping at the sea level. (A) Zoom of the NW part of the island; (B) zoom of the Western sector of the island; (C) zoom of the SW sector of Gozo.
Figure 5.
Spatial distribution of sea caves in Gozo. The colored lines represent the lithology outcropping at the sea level. (A) Zoom of the NW part of the island; (B) zoom of the Western sector of the island; (C) zoom of the SW sector of Gozo.
Figure 6.
Map of elevation of sea cave#G32 obtained from photogrammetry. The beach in the innermost part of the sea cave lies at 7 m asl and could be remnants of a paleo beach active during MIS5.5.
Figure 6.
Map of elevation of sea cave#G32 obtained from photogrammetry. The beach in the innermost part of the sea cave lies at 7 m asl and could be remnants of a paleo beach active during MIS5.5.
Figure 7.
Top view of the 3D model of the sea cave from photogrammetry and 10 cross-sections from the entrance to the innermost part of them.
Figure 7.
Top view of the 3D model of the sea cave from photogrammetry and 10 cross-sections from the entrance to the innermost part of them.
Figure 8.
Details of sea cave#G32. (A) View of the entrance; (B) detail of the entrance; (C) the rounded landforms at the base near the entrance; (D) in the background are visible the collapsed blocks; (E) the beach at the innermost sector of the cave and LiDAR model. The beach is composed of rounded and sub-rounded pebbles that stand at about 7 m asl.
Figure 8.
Details of sea cave#G32. (A) View of the entrance; (B) detail of the entrance; (C) the rounded landforms at the base near the entrance; (D) in the background are visible the collapsed blocks; (E) the beach at the innermost sector of the cave and LiDAR model. The beach is composed of rounded and sub-rounded pebbles that stand at about 7 m asl.
Figure 9.
Examples of sea caves in Gozo. (A) Box cave#G16; (B) box cave developed in height; (C) joint cave#G20 and complex box cave#G21 at Dweira; (D) the entrance of sea cave#G32; (E) cave#G34; (F) box cave#G01; (G) the shelter cave#G75 at the base of the butte at Marsalforn; (H) the sea arch#SA3 called Wied Il-Mielaħ Window.
Figure 9.
Examples of sea caves in Gozo. (A) Box cave#G16; (B) box cave developed in height; (C) joint cave#G20 and complex box cave#G21 at Dweira; (D) the entrance of sea cave#G32; (E) cave#G34; (F) box cave#G01; (G) the shelter cave#G75 at the base of the butte at Marsalforn; (H) the sea arch#SA3 called Wied Il-Mielaħ Window.
Figure 10.
Comparison between sea caves and lithology for each zone of the island. The numbers in the diagrams indicate the sea cave population for different zones (A), types (B), and lithologies (C).
Figure 10.
Comparison between sea caves and lithology for each zone of the island. The numbers in the diagrams indicate the sea cave population for different zones (A), types (B), and lithologies (C).
Table 1.
List of the sea caves surveyed in Gozo (Malta). The names have been reported when available. The location name refers to the local place names of the sea cliffs. Morphometric parameters which were measured are the following: total length (L), depth at the entrance (D), height at the entrance (H), and width at the entrance (W). All the morphometric parameters are given in meters. The codes of sea caves are reported following the sequence of survey. The table also reports the location of sea arches and sea stacks as part of the coastal scenery.
Table 1.
List of the sea caves surveyed in Gozo (Malta). The names have been reported when available. The location name refers to the local place names of the sea cliffs. Morphometric parameters which were measured are the following: total length (L), depth at the entrance (D), height at the entrance (H), and width at the entrance (W). All the morphometric parameters are given in meters. The codes of sea caves are reported following the sequence of survey. The table also reports the location of sea arches and sea stacks as part of the coastal scenery.
| Cod [#] | Location | Lat | Long | Morphometric Parameters | Type | Lithology | Seafloor | Dive | Notes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L[m] | D[m] | H[m] | W[m] | |||||||||
| G00 | Mġarr ix-Xini | 14.272122 | 36.018691 | 5 | −5 | 3 | 5 | Joint | LCL | Sand | Y | Small enlarged joint |
| G01 | Mġarr ix-Xini | 14.270614 | 36.0156544 | Box | LCL | N | ||||||
| G02 | Mġarr ix-Xini | 14.269747 | 36.015165 | Complex | GLO | N | ||||||
| G03 | Ta’ Ċenċ Cliffs | 14.25591 | 36.0139207 | −18 | Joint | LCL | Bedrock | Y | Freshwater | |||
| G04 | Ta’ Ċenċ Cliffs | 14.2538125 | 36.0167085 | Joint | LCL | Y | ||||||
| GS1 | Ta’ Ċenċ Cliffs | 14.2531926 | 36.0177469 | 15 | −6.8 | Submerged | LCL | Bedrock | Y | |||
| G05 | Sannat Sunset | 14.2444318 | 36.0189859 | Box | LCL | N | Freshwater | |||||
| G06 | Sannat Sunset | 14.2416024 | 36.0191131 | Box | LCL | N | ||||||
| G07 | Sannat Sunset | 14.2409185 | 36.0192324 | Joint | LCL | N | ||||||
| G08 | Saguna Cliffs | 14.2361173 | 36.0196129 | Box | LCL | N | ||||||
| G09 | Saguna Cliffs | 14.2341385 | 36.0200416 | 7.5 | 25.5 | Joint | LCL | N | ||||
| G10 | Bardan cliff | 14.2284593 | 36.0217511 | Box | LCL | N | ||||||
| G11 | Sanap Cliffs | 14.2245791 | 36.0210436 | Joint | LCL | N | ||||||
| G12 | Dana Cliffs | 14.2207959 | 36.0211613 | −14 | 11.5 | 20 | Complex | LCL | N | The sea cave develops along a joint, but the main cave is strata type | ||
| G13 | Dana Cliffs | 14.2195611 | 36.0213733 | −7.3 | 12 | 17.7 | Complex | LCL | Sand | N | The sea cave develops along a joint, but the main cave is strata type | |
| SA1 | Xlendi | 14.2160544 | 36.0239584 | Sea arch | LCL | N | ||||||
| G14 | Xlendi | 14.2137018 | 36.0298459 | Complex | LCL | Mixed | Y | Xlendi Grotto Tunnel almost entirely submerged at the Xlendi Bay | ||||
| G76 | Xlendi | 14.216395 | 36.03038 | Box | LCL | N | Sea cave in the Xlendi harbor | |||||
| G77 | Xlendi | 14.215577 | 36.030131 | Box | LCL | Sand | N | Santa Katerina cave | ||||
| G15 | Xlendi | 14.2094692 | 36.0327362 | 80 | Complex | LCL | Y | |||||
| GS2 | San Raflu Pool | 14.2033501 | 36.0342364 | 15 | −15 | Submerged | LCL | N | ||||
| G16 | San Raflu Pool | 14.1986747 | 36.0334786 | −18 | Box | LCL | Bedrock | Y | ||||
| GS3 | Gebel Ben Gorg | 14.1942772 | 36.0329707 | 0.5 | −4 | Submerged | LCL | N | ||||
| G17 | Ras il-Wardija 1 | 14.1871697 | 36.0355697 | Box | LCL | N | Paleo-cave, freshwater | |||||
| G18 | Ras il-Wardija 2 | 14.1865132 | 36.0367578 | Box | LCL | N | ||||||
| G19 | Ras il-Wardija 3 | 14.1897463 | 36.0400363 | Joint | LCL | N | ||||||
| G20 | Dweira | 14.1932144 | 36.0457104 | Joint | LCL | N | Freshwater | |||||
| G21 | Dweira | 14.1933237 | 36.0462393 | Box | LCL | N | ||||||
| G22 | Dweira | 14.1931933 | 36.0468796 | Box | LCL | N | Freshwater | |||||
| SA4 | Dwejra | 14.189056 | 36.0541874 | 25 | −5 | 28 | 25 | Sea arch | GLO | Y | Azure window; it-Tieqa Żerqa. The sea arch collapsed during a storm in March 2017 | |
| SA7 | Dwejra | 14.188699 | 36.047228 | Sea arch | LCL | N | Sea arch at the Fungus rock (Il-Ġebla tal-Ġeneral) | |||||
| G23 | Inland sea | 14.189056 | 36.0541874 | Box | GLO | N | ||||||
| G24 | Inland sea | 14.1894875 | 36.0547943 | Joint | GLO | N | ||||||
| G25 | Inland sea | 14.1898915 | 36.0548658 | Box | GLO | N | ||||||
| G26 | Inland sea | 14.1904983 | 36.0550512 | −26 | 100 | Complex | GLO | Bedrock, pebbles | N | Tunnel to inland sea. The cave develops along a vertical joint | ||
| G27 | Dwejra | 14.1914257 | 36.055837 | Box | GLO | N | Well cave | |||||
| G28 | Dwejra | 14.1919628 | 36.0566865 | 48 | 26 | 38 | Box | GLO | N | |||
| SA2 | Dwejra | 14.1911471 | 36.0591243 | Sea arch | GLO | N | ||||||
| G29 | Dwejra | 14.1915367 | 36.0602678 | Box | GLO | N | ||||||
| G30 | Dimitri Point | 14.1891244 | 36.0639559 | 50 | −20 | Joint | LCL | N | ||||
| G31 | Dimitri Point | 14.1884944 | 36.0639492 | −20 | Box | LCL | N | |||||
| G32 | Dimitri Point | 14.1850655 | 36.0667122 | 122 | 20 | Box | LCL | Bedrock | Y | The sea cave develops almost completely above the m.s.l. In the innermost part of the cave, a pocket beach is present | ||
| G33 | Dimitri Point | 14.1842833 | 36.0685285 | Joint | LCL | N | ||||||
| G34 | Dimitri Point | 14.1840872 | 36.0713738 | Joint | LCL | N | ||||||
| G35 | Dimitri Point | 14.1840295 | 36.0720949 | Joint | LCL | N | ||||||
| G36 | Dimitri Point | 14.1878795 | 36.0741022 | Joint | LCL | N | ||||||
| G37 | Dimitri Point | 14.1900997 | 36.0742057 | Box | LCL | N | ||||||
| G38 | Dimitri Point | 14.1916748 | 36.0739835 | Box | LCL | N | ||||||
| G39 | Dimitri Point | 14.1936791 | 36.074132 | Box | LCL | N | Freshwater | |||||
| G40 | Dimitri Point | 14.194928 | 36.0746002 | −17.9 | Box | LCL | Bedrock | Y | ||||
| G41 | Garbo 1 | 14.1979927 | 36.0741818 | Box | LCL | N | ||||||
| G42 | Garbo 2 | 14.1991122 | 36.0746393 | 100 | 14 | 10 | Box | LCL | Bedrock | Y | Ta Cawla | |
| G43 | Garbo 2 | 14.1998981 | 36.0752509 | −15 | Box | LCL | N | |||||
| G44 | Ras il-Reqqa | 14.2013965 | 36.0764104 | Box | LCL | N | ||||||
| G45 | Ras il-Reqqa | 14.2029176 | 36.0781674 | Box | LCL | N | ||||||
| G46 | Ras il-Reqqa | 14.2057618 | 36.0786002 | Box | LCL | N | ||||||
| SA3 | Wied Il-Mielaħ | 14.2128364 | 36.0794835 | −12.8 | Sea arch | LCL | N | Wied Il-Mielaħ Window. Sea arch and cave | ||||
| G47 | Wied Il-Mielaħ | 14.2121964 | 36.0796957 | Box | LCL | N | ||||||
| G48 | Wied Il-Mielaħ | 14.2130906 | 36.0794797 | Box | LCL | N | ||||||
| G49 | Ponta tar-Reqqa | 14.2165452 | 36.0799805 | Box | LCL | N | ||||||
| G50 | Għasri | 14.2184774 | 36.0797239 | Box | LCL | N | ||||||
| G51 | Għasri | 14.2190333 | 36.0795673 | Box | LCL | N | ||||||
| G52 | Għasri | 14.2194306 | 36.0795876 | Box | LCL | N | ||||||
| G53 | Għar tal-Qrewis | 14.2209937 | 36.0796044 | Box | LCL | N | ||||||
| GS4 | Għar tal-Qrewis | 14.2217333 | 36.0797591 | Submerged | LCL | N | ||||||
| G54 | Wied il-Għasri | 14.222664 | 36.0801764 | 23.3 | 10.9 | Box | GL | N | Cathedral Cave | |||
| G55 | Naghar Il-Baħar | 14.2263839 | 36.0802423 | 25.3 | 19.7 | Complex | LCL | N | ||||
| G56 | Naghar Il-Baħar | 14.2270481 | 36.0803466 | 11.8 | 3 | Joint | LCL | N | ||||
| G57 | Naghar Il-Baħar | 14.2277495 | 36.0804173 | 16.9 | 13.5 | Box | LCL | N | ||||
| G58 | Naghar Il-Baħar | 14.2282471 | 36.0805395 | Box | UCL | N | ||||||
| G59 | Naghar Il-Baħar | 14.2312541 | 36.0819315 | Box | GLO | N | ||||||
| G60 | Reqqa Point | 14.2355514 | 36.0811692 | Box | LCL/GLO | N | Billinghurst Cave | |||||
| G61 | Daħlet Qorrot | 14.3225579 | 36.0476557 | Sea stack | GL | N | ||||||
| SA5 | Għar id-Dorf | 14.327939 | 36.042723 | Sea arch | LCL | N | ||||||
| G62 | Għar id-Dorf | 14.3298723 | 36.0408817 | Box | LCL | N | ||||||
| G63 | Għar id-Dorf | 14.3327781 | 36.0387429 | −7.4 | Box | LCL | N | |||||
| G64 | Ras il-Qala | 14.3357926 | 36.0321026 | Box | LCL | N | ||||||
| G65 | Gebel tal- Ħalfa | 14.3309904 | 36.029055 | Joint | UCL | N | ||||||
| G66 | Gebel tal-Ħalfa—Ħondoq | 14.3290582 | 36.0289611 | Joint | GLO | N | ||||||
| G67 | Gebel tal-Ħalfa—Ħondoq | 14.3253896 | 36.0282101 | Joint | LCL/GLO | N | Lithological contact | |||||
| G68 | Ħondoq Bay | 14.3216707 | 36.0265203 | Box | GLO | N | Sea cave with pebble beach inside | |||||
| SA6 | Ħondoq Bay | 14.318761 | 36.025764 | Sea arch | UCL | N | Barbaggan rocks | |||||
| G69 | Taċ-Ċawl Rock | 14.3164079 | 36.0260894 | Box | UCL | N | ||||||
| G70 | Taċ-Ċawl Rock | 14.3162483 | 36.0259872 | Box | UCL | N | ||||||
| G71 | Taċ-Ċawl Rock | 14.3157558 | 36.0258991 | Box | UCL | N | ||||||
| G72 | Taċ-Ċawl Rock | 14.3155613 | 36.0258795 | Box | UCL | N | ||||||
| G73 | Taċ-Ċawl Rock-Mgarr | 14.3134917 | 36.0267554 | Joint | GLO | N | ||||||
| GS5 | Taċ-Ċawl Rock-Mgarr | 14.313254 | 36.0267906 | Submerged | GLO | N | ||||||
| G74 | Taċ-Ċawl Rock-Mgarr | 14.309694 | 36.026575 | 6.5 | 12 | Box | GLO | N | ||||
| G75 | Xwejni | 14.249969 | 36.079987 | Shelter | GLO | N | ||||||
| G76 | Xlendi | 14.216395 | 36.03038 | Joint | LCL | N | ||||||
| G77 | Xlendi | 14.215577 | 36.030131 | Complex | LCL | N | ||||||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Furlani, S.; Antonioli, F.; Colica, E.; D’Amico, S.; Devoto, S.; Grego, P.; Gambin, T. Sea Caves and Other Landforms of the Coastal Scenery on Gozo Island (Malta): Inventory and New Data on Their Formation. Geosciences 2023, 13, 164. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13060164
AMA Style
Furlani S, Antonioli F, Colica E, D’Amico S, Devoto S, Grego P, Gambin T. Sea Caves and Other Landforms of the Coastal Scenery on Gozo Island (Malta): Inventory and New Data on Their Formation. Geosciences. 2023; 13(6):164. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13060164
Chicago/Turabian StyleFurlani, Stefano, Fabrizio Antonioli, Emanuele Colica, Sebastiano D’Amico, Stefano Devoto, Pietro Grego, and Timmy Gambin. 2023. "Sea Caves and Other Landforms of the Coastal Scenery on Gozo Island (Malta): Inventory and New Data on Their Formation" Geosciences 13, no. 6: 164. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13060164
APA StyleFurlani, S., Antonioli, F., Colica, E., D’Amico, S., Devoto, S., Grego, P., & Gambin, T. (2023). Sea Caves and Other Landforms of the Coastal Scenery on Gozo Island (Malta): Inventory and New Data on Their Formation. Geosciences, 13(6), 164. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13060164
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
