Next Article in Journal
Inquiring about Loss Aversion of Achievement Value
Next Article in Special Issue
Outcomes Associated with a Single Joystick-Operated Ride-on-Toy Navigation Training Incorporated into a Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Program: A Pilot Feasibility Study
Previous Article in Journal
Uncovering Resilience Disparities among Religious Groups in Israel’s Mass COVID-19 Vaccination Drive: Lessons Learned to the Post-COVID Era
Previous Article in Special Issue
Preoperative Biopsychosocial Assessment and Length of Stay in Orthopaedic Surgery Admissions of Youth with Cerebral Palsy
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Powered Mobility Device Use and Developmental Change of Young Children with Cerebral Palsy

Behav. Sci. 2023, 13(5), 399; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13050399
by Samuel W. Logan 1,*, Bethany M. Sloane 1, Lisa K. Kenyon 2 and Heather A. Feldner 3
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Behav. Sci. 2023, 13(5), 399; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13050399
Submission received: 7 April 2023 / Revised: 4 May 2023 / Accepted: 6 May 2023 / Published: 10 May 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Thank you for the opportunity to review this interesting paper. My comments and suggestions are listed in the attached document. Thank you.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf


Author Response

Please see attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

This study examines the use of powered mobility devices and developmental changes in young children with cerebral palsy.

 

The study is well presented, and the focus and outcomes are crystal obvious.

 

However, greater focus should be placed on the mechanics of cutting-edge gadgets and the one chosen to increase the credibility of the work by explaining the benefits and drawbacks of the chosen methodology. A basic section has been created, however it should be more detailed.

 

Using and mentioning these articles can help with this:

1.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09858-6_47

2. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11050561

Finally, additional photographs should be provided (e.g. device, etc.). To provide the reader with a better understanding.

Author Response

Please see attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

 I am satisfied that the authors have addressed all my comments and concerns on the manuscript. I have a single suggestion for the authors to correct a typo on Page 17, Line 542 where the authors should correct their included age range to "12-36 months" instead of "12-32 months"  

 

I would recommend the publication of the manuscript in your journal once the authors make this correction. 

Author Response

Thank you for the comment. We have updated "32" to "36". Thanks again! 

Back to TopTop