Voluntary Participation Mediates the Relationship Between Multi-Membership in Online Communities and Life Satisfaction Among Chinese Populations: A Gendered Perspective
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Relationship Between Engagement in Online Communities and Life Satisfaction
2.2. A Gender-Specific Mediating Role of Voluntary Participation
2.2.1. A Synthesized Theoretical Model
2.2.2. Empirical Evidence on the Relationship Between Online Interaction, Voluntary Participation, and Life Satisfaction
3. Aims and Hypothesis
4. Methods
4.1. Data Sources and Respondents
4.2. Measures
4.3. Statistical Analyses
5. Results
6. Discussion
6.1. Strengths and Limitations
6.2. Theoretical Contribution and Practical Implications
7. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Papadopoulos, N.; Cleveland, M. An international and cross-cultural perspective on ‘the wired consumer’: The digital divide and device difference dilemmas. J. Bus. Res. 2023, 156, 113473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hopkins, J. The concept of affordances in digital media. In Handbuch Soziale Praktiken und Digitale Alltagswelten; Friese, H., Nolden, M., Rebane, G., Schreiter, M., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2020; pp. 47–54. [Google Scholar]
- Markham, A.N. Life Online: Researching Real Experience in Virtual Space; AltaMira Press: Walnut Creek, CA, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Wellman, B.; Salaff, J.; Dimitrova, D.; Garton, L.; Gulia, M.; Haythornthwaite, C. Computer networks as social networks: Collaborative work, telework, and virtual community. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 1996, 22, 213–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xia, Q.; Zhong, Y. Would network circles affect people’s life satisfaction? An analysis based on a national survey. Chin. J. Journal. Commun. 2021, 43, 84–110. [Google Scholar]
- Oksanen, A.; Celuch, M.; Oksa, R.; Savolainen, I. Online communities come with real-world consequences for individuals and societies. Commun. Psychol. 2024, 2, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wellman, B. Computer networks as social networks. Science 2001, 293, 2031–2034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fiesler, C.; Dym, B. Moving across lands: Online platform migration in fandom communities. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput 2020, 4, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frost, R.L.; Rickwood, D.J. A systematic review of the mental health outcomes associated with Facebook use. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2017, 76, 576–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andersen, L.M.B.; Rasmussen, A.N.; Reavley, N.J.; Reavley, N.J.; Bøggild, H.; Overgaard, C. The social route to mental health: A systematic review and synthesis of theories linking social relationships to mental health to inform interventions. SSM-Ment. Health 2021, 1, 100042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pavot, W.; Diener, E. Review of the satisfaction with life scale. In Assessing Well-Being; Social Indicators Research Series; Diener, E., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2009; Volume 39, pp. 101–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erdogan, B.; Bauer, T.N.; Truxillo, D.M.; Mansfield, L.R. Whistle while you work: A review of the life satisfaction literature. J. Manag. 2012, 38, 1038–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verduyn, P.; Ybarra, O.; Résibois, M.; Jonides, J.; Kross, E. Do social network sites enhance or undermine subjective well-being? A critical review. Soc. Issue Policy Rev. 2017, 11, 274–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pinquart, M.; Sörensen, S. Influences of socioeconomic status, social network, and competence on subjective well-being in later life: A meta-analysis. Psychol. Aging 2000, 15, 187–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Proctor, C.L.; Linley, P.A.; Maltby, J. Youth life satisfaction: A review of the literature. J. Happiness Stud. 2009, 10, 583–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Charles, S.J.; Stevenson, C.; Wakefield, J.R.H.; Fino, E. Diversity of group memberships predicts well-being: Cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2023, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Iyer, A.; Jetten, J.; Tsivrikos, D.; Postmes, T.; Haslam, S.A. The more (and the more compatible) the merrier: Multiple group memberships and identity compatibility as predictors of adjustment after life transitions. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 2009, 48, 707–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Repke, L.; Benet-Martínez, V. The interplay between the one and the others: Multiple cultural identifications and social networks. J. Soc. Issues 2019, 75, 436–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haslam, C.; Haslam, S.A.; Jetten, J.; Cruwys, T.; Steffens, N.K. Life change, social identity, and health. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2021, 72, 635–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fichman, P.; Sanfilippo, M.R. Online Trolling and Its Perpetrators: Under the Cyber Bridge; Rowman & Littlefield Publishers: Washington, DC, USA, 2016; pp. 6–9. [Google Scholar]
- Tate, P. The Use of Digital Technologies to Address Troublesome Knowledge Arising from Faiths Engagement in the Areas of Identity, Practice and Community. Master’s Thesis, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK, June 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Wilson, J. Volunteering. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 2000, 26, 215–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryan, V.D.; Agnitsch, K.A.; Zhao, L.; Mullick, R. Making sense of voluntary participation: A theoretical synthesis. Rural Sociol. 2005, 70, 287–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Behl, A.; Dutta, P. Engaging donors on crowdfunding platform in Disaster Relief Operations (DRO) using gamification: A Civic Voluntary Model (CVM) approach. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2020, 54, 102140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kusumarani, R.; Zo, H. Why people participate in online political crowdfunding: A civic voluntarism perspective. Telemat. Inform. 2019, 41, 168–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryan, R.M.; Deci, E.L. On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2001, 52, 141–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bos, A.L.; Greenlee, J.S.; Holman, M.R.; Oxley, Z.M.; Lay, J.C. This one’s for the boys: How gendered political socialization limits girls’ political ambition and interest. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 2021, 116, 484–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stockard, J. Gender socialization. In Handbook of the Sociology of Gender; Chafetz, J.S., Ed.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 2006; pp. 215–227. [Google Scholar]
- Wacker, J.G. A definition of theory: Research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. J. Oper. Manag. 1998, 16, 361–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burt, E.; Taylor, J.A. Information and communications technologies: Reshaping voluntary organizations. Nonprofit Manag. Leadersh. 2000, 11, 131–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ackermann, K.; Manatschal, A. Online volunteering as a means to overcome unequal participation? The profiles of online and offline volunteers compared. New Media Soc. 2018, 20, 4453–4472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The State of Volunteer Engagement: Insights from Nonprofit Leaders and Funders. Available online: https://dogood.umd.edu/research-impact/publications/state-volunteer-engagement-insights-nonprofit-leaders-and-funders (accessed on 27 September 2024).
- Piatak, J.; Dietz, N.; McKeever, B. Bridging or deepening the digital divide: Influence of household internet access on formal and informal volunteering. Nonprofit Volunt. Sect. Q. 2019, 48 (Suppl. S2), 123S–150S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Filsinger, M.; Ackermann, K.; Freitag, M. Surfing to help? An empirical analysis of Internet use and volunteering in 27 European societies. Eur. Soc. 2020, 22, 368–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boulianne, S. Standby ties that mobilize: Social media platforms and civic engagement. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 2022, 1, 1001–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hao, L. From intention to behavior: Does internet use encourage the volunteering participation of middle-aged groups? J. Northeast. Univ. Soc. Sci. 2022, 24, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ragnedda, M.; Ruiu, M.L.; Addeo, F. Measuring digital capital: An empirical investigation. New Media Soc. 2020, 22, 793–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Putnam, R.D. Bowling Alone. The Collapse and Revival of American Community; Simon and Schuster: New York, NY, USA, 2000; pp. 541–567. [Google Scholar]
- Filsinger, M.; Freitag, M. Internet use and volunteering: Relationships and differences across age and applications. Voluntas 2019, 30, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allen, J.A.; Mueller, S.L. The revolving door: A closer look at major factors in volunteers’ intention to quit. J. Community Psychol. 2013, 41, 139–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nichol, B.; Wilson, R.; Rodrigues, A.; Haighton, C. Exploring the effects of volunteering on the social, mental, and physical health and well-being of volunteers: An umbrella review. Voluntas 2024, 35, 97–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kahana, E.; Tirth, B.; Lovegreen, L.D.; Kahana, B.; Midlarsky, E. Altruism, helping, and volunteering: Pathways to well-being in late life. J. Aging Health 2013, 25, 159–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Santini, Z.I.; Jose, P.E.; Koyanagi, A.; Meilstrup, C.; Nielsen, L.; Madsen, K.R.; Koushede, V. Formal social participation protects physical health through enhanced mental health: A longitudinal mediation analysis using three consecutive waves of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). Soc. Sci. Med. 2020, 251, 112906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, L.H. Well-being and volunteering: Evidence from aging societies in Asia. Soc. Sci. Med. 2019, 229, 172–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gil-Lacruz, M.; Saz-Gil, M.I.; Gil-Lacruz, A.I. Benefits of older volunteering on wellbeing: An international comparison. Front. Psychol. 2019, 10, 2647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, J.; Hall, L.H.; Berzins, K.; Baker, J.; Melling, K.; Thompson, C. Mental healthcare staff well-being and burnout: A narrative review of trends, causes, implications, and recommendations for future interventions. Int. J. Ment. Health Nurs. 2018, 27, 20–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roche, A.; Ogden, J. Predictors of burnout and health status in Samaritans’ listening volunteers. Psychol. Health Med. 2017, 22, 1169–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Binder, M.; Freytag, A. Volunteering, subjective well-being and public policy. J. Econ. Psychol. 2013, 34, 97–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greenfield, E.A.; Marks, N.F. Formal volunteering as a protective factor for older adults’ psychological well-being. J. Gerontol. Ser. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 2004, 59, S258–S264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Paulin, M.; Ferguson, R.J.; Schattke, K.; Jost, N. Millennials, social media, prosocial emotions, and charitable causes: The paradox of gender differences. J. Nonprofit Public Sect. Market. 2014, 26, 335–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jost, J.T.; Krochik, M. Ideological differences in epistemic motivation: Implications for attitude structure, depth of information processing, susceptibility to persuasion, and stereotyping. Adv. Motiv. Sci. 2014, 1, 181–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderson, N.D.; Damianakis, T.; Kröger, E.; Wagner, L.M.; Dawson, D.R.; Binns, M.A.; Bernstein, S.; Caspi, E.; Cook, S.L. The benefits associated with volunteering among seniors: A critical review and recommendations for future research. Psychol. Bull. 2014, 140, 1505–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krause, N.; Rainville, G. Volunteering and psychological well-being: Assessing variations by gender and social context. Pastor. Psychol. 2018, 67, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, K.; Pei, J.; Wang, S.; Rokpelnis, K.; Yu, X. Life satisfaction in China, 2010–2018: Trends and unique determinants. Appl. Res. Qual. Life 2022, 17, 2311–2348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, M.; Zheng, S.; Zhou, L. Broadband Internet and enterprise innovation. China Econ. Rev. 2022, 74, 101802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Liu, F. Online-network-group use and political participation intention in China: The analysis based on CSS 2019 survey data. Behav. Sci. 2023, 13, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, P.; Zhu, D. Make efforts to develop an olive-shaped distribution pattern: An analysis based on data from the Chinese social survey for 2006–2013. Soc. Sci. China 2016, 37, 5–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baron, R.M.; Kenny, D.A. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1986, 51, 1173–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oh, H.J.; Ozkaya, E.; LaRose, R. How does online social networking enhance life satisfaction? The relationships among online supportive interaction, affect, perceived social support, sense of community, and life satisfaction. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2014, 30, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gray, A.L.; Moore, E.W. Understanding the relationship between sexual identity, life satisfaction, psychological well-being, and online community use. Mod. Psychol. Stud. 2018, 23, 4. [Google Scholar]
- Krause, M.W.; Montenegro, C.R. Community as a multifaceted concept. In Handbook of Community Psychology, Volume 1: Theoretical Foundations, Core Concepts, and Emerging Challenges; Bond, A.M., Serrano-García, I., Keys, B.C., Eds.; American Psychological Association Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2017; pp. 275–294. [Google Scholar]
- Jing, J.; Gao, C.; Niu, G. The effect of internet use on empathy. Adv. Psychol. Sci. 2017, 25, 652–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eagly, A.H.; Wood, W. Social role theory. In Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology; Van Lange, P.A.M., Kruglanski, A.W., Higgins, E.T., Eds.; Sage Publications Ltd.: London, UK, 2012; pp. 458–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papadakis, K.; Griffin, T.; Frater, J.L. Understanding volunteers? Motivations. In Proceedings of the 2004 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium, Newtown Square, PA, USA, 31 March–2 April 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Huizeren. China Volunteer Service Index Survey: Female Volunteers Survey Report. Available online: http://www.huizeren.org.cn/ (accessed on 6 May 2024).
Overall Sample (N = 2558) | Male (n = 1310) | Female (n = 1248) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N (Mean) | % (SD) | N (Mean) | % (SD) | N (Mean) | % (SD) | ||
Education level * | Less than lower secondary | 1058 | 41.36 | 382 | 30.13 | 679 | 54.33 |
Upper secondary or vocational | 574 | 22.44 | 294 | 22.44 | 280 | 22.44 | |
Tertiary | 923 | 36.08 | 634 | 48.40 | 289 | 23.16 | |
Residence | Urban | 1614 | 63.1 | 781 | 59.62 | 833 | 66.75 |
Rural | 944 | 36.9 | 529 | 40.38 | 415 | 33.25 | |
Marital Status * | Single | 737 | 28.81 | 454 | 34.66 | 283 | 22.68 |
Married | 1821 | 71.19 | 856 | 65.34 | 965 | 77.32 | |
Subjective SES * | Lower than ordinary level | 1172 | 45.82 | 607 | 46.84 | 565 | 45.27 |
Ordinary level | 1104 | 43.16 | 561 | 43.29 | 543 | 43.51 | |
Higher than ordinary level | 249 | 9.73 | 128 | 9.88 | 121 | 9.70 | |
Politics Status * | Communist | 871 | 34.05 | 494 | 37.71 | 377 | 30.21 |
Non-communist party member | 12 | 0.47 | 7 | 0.53 | 5 | 0.40 | |
None | 1675 | 65.48 | 809 | 61.76 | 866 | 69.39 | |
Multi-membership in Online Communities | 3.77 | 2.56 | 3.75 | 2.58 | 3.79 | 2.55 | |
Age * | 41.44 | 14.53 | 42.37 | 14.82 | 40.48 | 14.17 | |
Engaged in Voluntary Activities | Yes | 1288 | 50.35 | 633 | 48.32 | 637 | 51.04 |
No | 1270 | 49.65 | 677 | 51.68 | 611 | 48.96 | |
Life satisfaction | 7.43 | 2.03 | 7.46 | 2.04 | 7.39 | 2.02 |
Total Sample | Male | Female | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | SE | B | SE | B | SE | |
Multi-membership in Online Communities | 0.08 *** | 0.02 | 0.06 ** | 0.02 | 0.10 *** | 0.02 |
Engaged in Voluntary Activities (Ref: Uninvolved) | 0.26 *** | 0.08 | 0.21 | 0.11 | 0.31 ** | 0.11 |
Male | Female | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | SE | Z | B | SE | Z | |
Total effect | 0.061 | 0.022 | 2.81 ** | 0.103 | 0.022 | 4.62 *** |
Direct effect | 0.059 | 0.022 | 2.72 ** | 0.096 | 0.022 | 4.30 *** |
Indirect effect | 0.002 | 0.002 | 1.32 | 0.007 | 0.003 | 2.260 * |
X-M | 0.010 | 0.005 | 1.85 | 0.022 | 0.006 | 3.910 *** |
M-Y | 0.211 | 0.112 | 1.88 | 0.315 | 0.114 | 2.760 ** |
B | SE | Z | p > |Z| | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sobel | 0.007 | 0.003 | 2.254 | 0.024 |
Aroian | 0.007 | 0.003 | 2.206 | 0.027 |
Goodman | 0.007 | 0.003 | 2.305 | 0.021 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Huang, X.; Fu, M. Voluntary Participation Mediates the Relationship Between Multi-Membership in Online Communities and Life Satisfaction Among Chinese Populations: A Gendered Perspective. Behav. Sci. 2024, 14, 976. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14110976
Huang X, Fu M. Voluntary Participation Mediates the Relationship Between Multi-Membership in Online Communities and Life Satisfaction Among Chinese Populations: A Gendered Perspective. Behavioral Sciences. 2024; 14(11):976. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14110976
Chicago/Turabian StyleHuang, Xiaorui, and Mingqi Fu. 2024. "Voluntary Participation Mediates the Relationship Between Multi-Membership in Online Communities and Life Satisfaction Among Chinese Populations: A Gendered Perspective" Behavioral Sciences 14, no. 11: 976. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14110976
APA StyleHuang, X., & Fu, M. (2024). Voluntary Participation Mediates the Relationship Between Multi-Membership in Online Communities and Life Satisfaction Among Chinese Populations: A Gendered Perspective. Behavioral Sciences, 14(11), 976. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14110976