The Impact of COVID-19 on Curriculum and Employability in Lebanon
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Background
2.1. Innovation Theory
- Ettlie et al. (1983) and Tushman and Anderson (2018) discuss incremental innovation. It brings about improvements in basic component quality. This kind of innovation is better characterized as remodelling.
- Contrarily, radical innovation intersects with other characteristics of innovation, including technical discontinuities, and is mentioned in a variety of sources, including Schumpeter (2017). A new meaning is introduced that may lead to a paradigm shift. The use of e-learning technologies in higher education comes with a firm promise that the learning process will have improved performance. At present, the field of e-learning is at the intersection of commercial, educational, and technological interests, trying to obtain a dominant position in higher education (Dospinescu and Dospinescu 2020).
2.2. Employability Theory
2.3. Constructs and Research Hypothesis
3. Methodology
3.1. Lebanese Context of the Study
3.2. Mixed Methodology
3.3. Questionnaire Set and Validation
- Do you regularly monitor how the market’s requirements for the competencies and abilities of recent graduates are changing, especially during COVID-19?
- How many times do you consider making changes in your curriculum? Is it a result of proposals from students or market demand or any other disruption such as COVID-19 crisis?
- What and how do you suggest stakeholders modify the curriculum?
- What kind of innovation have you implemented over the past three years at your university due to COVID-19?
- What are the roles in your company that demand innovation and changes all the time and you have noted during the sanitary crisis?
- What is the process you use to successfully match a candidate’s profile to a position or a job that is evolving or changing constantly?
- What criteria and procedures do you employ in your company to look for prospective job changes, work enrichment opportunities, or position expansion?
- Who makes changes to the job proposals, the corporation, or the employees in crisis times?
4. Findings
4.1. Site Survey
- In some majors, such as finance and audit, the percentages are in constant growth either for the demand of these master’s programs or in the enrolled for the academic years.
- In other majors, such as management and marketing, the percentages are more or less stable and are not subject to enormous variation.
- Throughout the four academic years, it is shown that male graduate students prefer finance related majors whereas the predominance of females is evident in the managerial and marketing concentrations.
- As for the accounting and auditing fields, a large majority of females are enrolled in this specialization.
- Entrepreneurship specialization suffered during COVID-19 crisis as noted in the non-existing/null percentage of enrolled graduate students in 2021–2022.
4.2. Results from the HR Interviews
- Human resources director for a major organization (distribution, dining…)
- Human resources manager for a holding (of services, goods, or automobiles).
- Director of human resources and talent for a big marketing and communications company
- A multinational holding’s human resources manager (service, distribution, industry).
- Human resources director for a major organization (retail).
4.3. Results from the Academics/Faculties
- P1:
- Business school dean
- P2:
- Business school dean
- P3:
- Rector/president of a university
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions and Limitations
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Abernathy, William J., and James M. Utterback. 1978. Patterns of industrial innovation. Technology Review 80: 40–47. [Google Scholar]
- Alsoud, Anas Ratib, and Ahmad Ali Harasis. 2021. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on student’s e-learning experience in Jordan. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 16: 1404–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aung, Than Nwe, and Soe Soe Khaing. 2016. Challenges of implementing e-learning in developing countries: A review. In Genetic and Evolutionary Computing: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computing, Yangon, Myanmar, 26–28 August 2015. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer International Publishing, Volume II 9, pp. 405–11. [Google Scholar]
- Baruch, Yehuda. 2001. Employability: A substitute for loyalty? Human Resource Development International 4: 543–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Basilaia, Giorgi, and David Kvavadze. 2020. Transition to online education in schools during a SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in Georgia. Pedagogical Research 5: em0060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blom, Victoria, Anne Richter, Lennart Hallsten, and Pia Svedberg. 2018. The associations between job insecurity, depressive symptoms and burnout: The role of performance-based self-esteem. Economic and Industrial Democracy 39: 48–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bos-Nehles, Anna, Maarten Renkema, and Maike Janssen. 2017. HRM and innovative work behaviour: A systematic literature review. Personnel Review 46: 1228–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boustani, Nada Mallah, May Merhej Sayegh, and Zaher Boustany. 2022. Attitude towards Online Shopping during Pandemics: Do Gender, Social Factors and Platform Quality Matter? Journal of Risk and Financial Management 15: 474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carnevale, Joel B., and Isabella Hatak. 2020. Employee adjustment and well-being in the era of COVID-19: Implications for human resource management. Journal of Business Research 116: 183–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crawford, Joseph, and Javier Cifuentes-Faura. 2022. Sustainability in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. Sustainability 14: 1879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Creswell, John. 2003. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Los Angeles: Sage. [Google Scholar]
- Crossan, Mary M., and Marina Apaydin. 2010. A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies 47: 1154–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, Hui, Wenbing Wu, Yihua Zhang, Xiaoyan Zhang, and Jing Ni. 2022. The Paradoxical Effects of COVID-19 Event Strength on Employee Turnover Intention. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19: 8434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dospinescu, Octavian, and Nicoleta Dospinescu. 2020. Perception over e-learning tools in higher education: Comparative study Romania and Moldova. Paper presented at the IE 2020 International Conference, Madrid, Spain, July 20–23; pp. 59–64. [Google Scholar]
- Doucet, Armand, Deborah Netolicky, Koen Timmers, and Francis Jim Tuscano. 2020. Thinking about Pedagogy in an Unfolding Pandemic: An Independent Report on Approaches to Distance Learning during COVID19 School Closures. Brussels: Education International. [Google Scholar]
- Duraku, Zamira Hyseni, and Linda Hoxha. 2020. The impact of COVID-19 on higher education: A study of interaction among Kosovar students’ mental health, attitudes toward online learning, study skills and changes in students’ life. In The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Education and Wellbeing. Edited by Zamira Hyseni Duraku. Pristina: University of Prishtina “Hasan Prishtina” Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Psychology. ISBN 978-9951-00-293-6. [Google Scholar]
- Ebersberger, Bernd, and Andreas Kuckertz. 2021. Hop to it! The impact of organization type on innovation response time to the COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Business Research 124: 126–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review 14: 532–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ettlie, John E., William P. Bridges, and Robert D. O’Keefe. 1983. Organizational strategy and structural differencesfor radical vs incremental innovation. Management Science 30: 682–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Finsterwalder, Jörg, and Volker G. Kuppelwieser. 2020. Equilibrating resources and challenges during crises: A framework for service ecosystem well-being. Journal of Service Management 31: 1107–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fredriksson, Magnus, and Øyvind Ihlen. 2018. Introduction: Public Relations and Social Theory 1. In Public Relations and Social Theory. London: Routledge, pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar]
- García-González, Marialuz Arántzazu, Fermín Torrano, and Guillermo García-González. 2020. Analysis of stress factors for female professors at online universities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17: 2958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harvey, Lee, Sue Moon, Vicki Geall, and Ray Bower. 1997. Graduates’ Work: Organisational Change and Students’ Attributes. Birmingham: Centre for Research into Quality. [Google Scholar]
- Henderson, Rebecca M., and Kim B. Clark. 1990. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 9–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knight, Peter T., and Mantz Yorke. 2002. Employability through the curriculum. Tertiary Education and Management 8: 261–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kohntopp, Thomas, and Jack McCann. 2020. Leadership in virtual organizations: Influence on workplace engagement. In The Palgrave Handbook of Workplace Well-Being. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 1–26. [Google Scholar]
- Little, Brenda. 2001. Reading between the lines of graduate employment. Quality in Higher Education 7: 121–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mallah Boustani, Nada, and May Merhej Sayegh. 2021. E-learning: Factors affecting students online learning during COVID-19 quarantine in a developing country. In Information and Knowledge Systems. Digital Technologies, Artificial Intelligence and Decision Making: 5th International Conference, ICIKS 2021, Virtual Event, 22–23 June 2021. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morley, Louise. 2001. Producing new workers: Quality, equality and employability in higher education. Quality in Higher Education 7: 131–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moustakas, Louis, and Denise Robrade. 2022. The challenges and realities of e-learning during COVID-19: The case of university sport and physical education. Challenges 13: 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nabi, Ghulam R., and David Bagley. 1998. Graduates’ perceptions of transferable personal skills and future career preparation in the UK. Career Development International 3: 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education (Great Britain). 1997. Higher Education in the Learning Society: Report of the National Committee; Wales: National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education.
- Onyema, Edeh Michael, Nwafor Chika Eucheria, Faith Ayobamidele Obafemi, Shuvro Sen, Fyneface Grace Atonye, Aabha Sharma, and Alhuseen Omar Alsayed. 2020. Impact of Coronavirus pandemic on education. Journal of Education and Practice 11: 108–21. [Google Scholar]
- Pacheco, Tyler, Simon Coulombe, Christine Khalil, Sophie Meunier, Marina Doucerain, Emilie Auger, and Emily Cox. 2020. Job security and the promotion of workers’ wellbeing in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic: A study with Canadian workers one to two weeks after the initiation of social distancing measures. International Journal of Wellbeing 10: 58–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piccoli, Beatrice, Antonino Callea, Flavio Urbini, Antonio Chirumbolo, Emanuela Ingusci, and Hans De Witte. 2017. Job insecurity and performance: The mediating role of organizational identification. Personnel Review 46: 1508–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piopiunik, Marc, Guido Schwerdt, Lisa Simon, and Ludger Woessmann. 2020. Skills, signals, and employability: An experimental investigation. European Economic Review 123: 103374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rogers, Everett. M. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed. New York: Free Press. [Google Scholar]
- Romelaer, Pierre. 2005. L’entretien de recherche. In Management des Ressources Humaines: Méthodes de Recherche en Sciences Humaines et Sociales. Edited by P. Roussel and F. Wacheux. Bruxelles: De Boeck, Chapter 4. pp. 101–34. [Google Scholar]
- Salas-Pilco, Sdenka Zobeida, Yuqin Yang, and Zhe Zhang. 2022. Student engagement in online learning in Latin American higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. British Journal of Educational Technology 53: 593–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanchez, Daniel Garrote, Nicolas Gomez Parra, Caglar Ozden, and Bob Rijkers. 2020. Which Jobs Are Most Vulnerable to COVID-19? What an Analysis of the European Union Reveals. What an Analysis of the European Union Reveals. World Bank Research and Policy Briefs. Washington: World Bank Group. [Google Scholar]
- Schumpeter, Joseph A. 2017. The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capita I, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Shahzad, Khuram, Sami Ullah Bajwa, Ronda B. Ansted, and Dawood Mamoon. 2016. Evaluating human resource management capacity for effective implementation of advanced metering infrastructure by electricity distribution companies in Pakistan. Utilities Policy 41: 107–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sintema, Edgar John. 2020. Effect of COVID-19 on the performance of grade 12 students: Implications for STEM education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 16: em1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Subedi, Suraksha, Suvash Nayaju, Sweta Subedi, Sanjeev Kumar Shah, and Jennifer Mathias Shah. 2020. Impact of E-learning during COVID-19 pandemic among nursing students and teachers of Nepal. International Journal of Science and Healthcare Research 5: 68–76. [Google Scholar]
- Suneson, Grant. 2020. Industries hit hardest by coronavirus in the US include retail, transportation, and travel. USA Today. March 20. Available online: https://eu.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/03/20/us-industries-being-devastated-by-the-coronavirus-travel-hotels-food/111431804/ (accessed on 20 September 2022).
- Tushman, Michael L., and Philip Anderson. 2018. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. In Organizational Innovation. London: Routledge, pp. 345–72. [Google Scholar]
- Tuzovic, Sven, and Sertan Kabadayi. 2021. The influence of social distancing on employee well-being: A conceptual framework and research agenda. Journal of Service Management 32: 145–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UNESCO. 2020. Global Education Meeting Extraordinary Session on Education Post-COVID-19 Background Document. Paris: UNESCO. [Google Scholar]
- United Nations. 2020. Policy Brief: Education during COVID-19 and beyond. New York: United Nations. Available online: https://www.un.org/development/desa/dspd/wp-content/uploads/sites/22/2020/08/sg_policy_brief_covid-19_and_education_august_2020.pdf (accessed on 20 September 2022).
- Waheed, Abdul, Xiaoming Miao, Salma Waheed, Naveed Ahmad, and Abdul Majeed. 2019. How new HRM practices, organizational innovation, and innovative climate affect the innovation performance in the IT industry: A moderated-mediation analysis. Sustainability 11: 621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Wen, Kim Mather, and Roger Seifert. 2020. Job insecurity, employee anxiety, and commitment: The moderating role of collective trust in management. In Multilevel Trust in Organizations. London: Routledge, pp. 84–101. [Google Scholar]
- Wiradendi Wolor, Christian, Solikhah Solikhah, Nadya Fadillah Fidhyallah, and Deniar Puji Lestari. 2020. Effectiveness of e-training, e-leadership, and work life balance on employee performance during COVID-19. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business 7: 443–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Wenxia, Zhen Pan, Qiuping Jin, and Yue Feng. 2022. Impact of self-perceived employability on sustainable career development in times of COVID-19: Two mediating paths. Sustainability 14: 3753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Year | Concentration | Number of Students Enrolled | F | M | % Female | % Male | % From Population | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2022–2023 | Accounting and audit | 24 | 14 | 11 | 58.33% | 45.83% | 22.64% | |
Entrepreneurship | 9 | 4 | 5 | 44.44% | 55.56% | 8.49% | 43.40% | |
Finance | 15 | 6 | 9 | 40.00% | 60.00% | 14.15% | 56.60% | |
Financial assets | 21 | 8 | 13 | 38.10% | 61.90% | 19.81% | ||
Management | 24 | 15 | 9 | 62.50% | 37.50% | 22.64% | ||
Marketing | 13 | 8 | 5 | 61.54% | 38.46% | 12.26% | ||
Total | 107 | 55 | 52 | 51.89% | 49.06% | 100.00% | ||
2021–2022 | Accounting and audit | 18 | 11 | 7 | 61.11% | 38.89% | 26.47% | |
Entrepreneurship | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | ||
Finance | 15 | 9 | 6 | 60.00% | 40.00% | 22.06% | 36.76% | |
Financial assets | 10 | 2 | 8 | 20.00% | 80.00% | 14.71% | 63.24% | |
Management | 13 | 8 | 5 | 61.54% | 38.46% | 19.12% | ||
Marketing | 12 | 8 | 4 | 66.67% | 33.33% | 17.65% | ||
Total | 68 | 38 | 30 | 55.88% | 44.12% | 100.00% | ||
2020–2021 | Accounting and audit | 20 | 15 | 5 | 75.00% | 25.00% | 23.81% | |
Entrepreneurship | 10 | 5 | 5 | 50.00% | 50.00% | 11.90% | 44.05% | |
Finance | 21 | 12 | 9 | 57.14% | 42.86% | 25.00% | 55.95% | |
Financial assets | 6 | 1 | 5 | 16.67% | 83.33% | 7.14% | ||
Management | 7 | 4 | 3 | 57.14% | 42.86% | 8.33% | ||
Marketing | 20 | 14 | 6 | 70.00% | 30.00% | 23.81% | ||
Total | 84 | 51 | 33 | 60.71% | 39.29% | 100.00% | ||
2019–2020 | Accounting and audit | 24 | 16 | 8 | 66.67% | 33.33% | 23.53% | |
Entrepreneurship | 11 | 4 | 7 | 36.36% | 63.64% | 10.78% | 50.98% | |
Finance | 23 | 11 | 12 | 47.83% | 52.17% | 22.55% | 49.02% | |
Financial assets | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.00% | 100.00% | 2.94% | ||
Management | 18 | 9 | 9 | 50.00% | 50.00% | 17.65% | ||
Marketing | 23 | 14 | 9 | 60.87% | 39.13% | 22.55% | ||
Total | 102 | 54 | 48 | 52.94% | 47.06% | 100.00% |
HR1 | HR2 | HR3 | HR4 | HR5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q 1 | Old School People have been in the same place for more than ten years, unable to change and advance with the times. | Following up on emerging trends and strategies in social media and marketing, as well as innovation in high technology departments like the IT and marketing ones. | Any positions within a department that have direct client or market interaction must constantly adapt to changes in the industry. | Due to outside circumstances like escalating competition, shifting market demands, shifting consumer behaviour, or because of corporate expansion. observe consumer behaviour, trends, and preferences. | All departmental jobs that directly interface with customers or the market must continuously adapt to changes in the sector. |
Q 2 | -Selection by interview -Personal and technical evaluation, as determined by performance review tools -An assessment of one’s capacity to adapt to change | upgrading the skill system through repeated seminars, on-the-job training, and outsourced trainings conducted by professionals and consultants. | Compare the profile to the standards established by the company’s culture, which states that “we recruit for attitude and train for skills.” Our Talents are trained, coached, and developed to be proactive about change. | There are other methodologies, including staying current on trends and innovations through being close to the market and going to conferences and seminars. | With frequent seminars, on-the-job training, and outside trainings led by consultants and specialists, the skill system is upgraded. |
Q 3 | -The company’s potential for development plus the business expansion signal Modernization of real-world commerce -Continuous research into and evaluation of the opposition. -Adopting new technologies, managing change, and evolving markets | When a new product was introduced, the concerned workers were given access to training and awareness-raising opportunities from upper-level employees of our organization and an outside company. | To be prepared for any impending changes in responsibilities, both locally and worldwide, trends progression and market analyses. | a number of methods, including conducting job analyses, shadowing workers to comprehend the task in issue and how the change will be implemented, creating updated job descriptions, etc. | should be ready for any upcoming changes in roles, both locally and globally, as well as for trends’ advancement and market evaluations. |
Q 4 | Both: From employee input and, when necessary to adjust to changes, from management proposals. | In light of the changes affecting the business, the organization suggests adjustments to the job. | Most of the time, the Agency works in tandem with the Talents. | On an organizational level as well as an individual personnel level, this occurs. | From suggestions made by employees and, as needed to adapt to changes, from management recommendations. |
Questions | Answers |
---|---|
Q1 P1 | We do. But not sufficient. However, we frequently receive alerts from our professional and social connections about the flaws in our programs and courses. |
Q1 P2 | I suppose that I, myself, have a longer-term perspective on changes; that is, when I arrange my courses, I pay more attention to long-term trends than to market demands. I frequently use research conducted by respectable professional companies like McKinsey, Deloitte, etc. to identify these patterns. |
Q1 P3 | Of course I (we) keep an eye on the shifting market demands, but this is more of a periodic process. |
Q2 P1 | Both in actuality, as well as our understanding of global evolution and tendencies We sometimes check over the main colleges’ websites. |
Q2 P2 | As these patterns alter and as we see demands during classroom lectures, we adjust our curriculum accordingly. |
Q2 P3 | In general, we update our curriculum every five years. Each speciality has a committee that is suggested by the dean. The required improvements are proposed by the committee. Not the recommendations of the pupils, but rather changes in the market. |
Q3 P1 | The BBA curriculum have changed, and top professors have been met to discuss the adjustments. We sent the updates to the other teachers through email. Together with the External Consultative Council, we discussed the revisions. |
Q3 P2 | A curriculum can be changed without a drawn-out procedure. |
Q3 P3 | Adding or removing courses is one way to make modifications, as is recommending (adding or removing) new chapters for a current course. To the Faculty Council, then to the University Council, as a suggestion from the scientific committee. |
Q4 P1 | -New elective courses; -New BBA curriculum; -EDBA -Began the accreditation procedure -New teaching regulations established by the university were introduced at the FGM level. Systematic research and worldwide publishing were also encouraged. |
Q4 P2 | Employing flipped classrooms, where students provide lectures on certain subjects, and heavily utilizing case studies across the courses |
Q4 P3 | Expanding the range of multimedia used in literacy lessons. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Boustani, N.M. The Impact of COVID-19 on Curriculum and Employability in Lebanon. Adm. Sci. 2023, 13, 128. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13050128
Boustani NM. The Impact of COVID-19 on Curriculum and Employability in Lebanon. Administrative Sciences. 2023; 13(5):128. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13050128
Chicago/Turabian StyleBoustani, Nada Mallah. 2023. "The Impact of COVID-19 on Curriculum and Employability in Lebanon" Administrative Sciences 13, no. 5: 128. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13050128
APA StyleBoustani, N. M. (2023). The Impact of COVID-19 on Curriculum and Employability in Lebanon. Administrative Sciences, 13(5), 128. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13050128