Life Cycle Engineering 4.0: A Proposal to Conceive Manufacturing Systems for Industry 4.0 Centred on the Human Factor (DfHFinI4.0)
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- First, the state of the art is analysed to identify the gap.
- The conceptual frameworks are then presented and analysed to value their usefulness in the resolution of the formulated gap.
- The proposed framework is designed while taking the inclusion of the previous conceptual frameworks into consideration.
- Finally, the method is applied to a case study.
2. Background of the Literature
2.1. Life Cycle Knowledge- and Technology-Intensive Industry (KTI) Manufacturing
2.2. Industry 4.0 Features
2.3. Application in Manufacturing
2.4. Smart and Learning Factories
2.5. Research Gap
3. Conceptual Frameworks
- For the division of the labour to be performed by the engineer and technicians as Operators 4.0, the formalisation and analysis of its elements is carried out by Vigotsky’s activity theory, as a tool that supports the elements of work, their variety, and the social fabric in which they are developed.
- The work to be carried out by engineers requires adaptation to their cognitive and affective characteristics, as well as to the particular characteristics of the task to be performed. Consequently, Ashby’s law of requisite variety is employed, which is articulated in different elements and relationships of the activity theory.
- The establishment of the network workflow in real time, as well as the training required depending on the type of situation requested, are carried out by applying the connectivist methodology, which provides the supports and strategies of online navigation.
- The potential of these conceptual frameworks is implemented under the DfHFinI4.0 framework with KETs.
3.1. Activity Theory
3.2. Law of Requisite Variety
3.3. Connectivist Paradigm
3.4. KETs
4. DfHFinI4.0 Framework
5. Case Study: DfHFinI4.0 in PERA 4.0
- The architecture of the information system.
- Human and organisational architecture.
- The architecture of the manufacturing team.
- The line related to automation the PERA diagram is limited, since many tasks and functions require human innovation.
- The line related to human factors is limited by human competencies.
- The extent of the automation line represents the actual degree of automation carried out, and defines the boundaries between the three elements.
- Level 0: Process. In this level, the real physical processes are defined by means of sensors, actuators, and other devices of the manufacturing process, and perform the functions of the automation and industrial control system for the measurement of the variables of the machines and the control of the process outputs. The devices communicate with each other, with the operator, and with top-level control devices.
- Level 1: Basic control. This level employs programmable automation controllers (PAC), which control and manipulate the manufacturing process, and act according to the feedback offered by the level-0 devices. The operator programs, configures, and manages these devices from the workstation through the human machine interface (HMI). In turn, the PACs (which for discrete manufacturing are called PLCs, and for process manufacturing are more specifically called DCSs) communicate with the specific information and control elements of levels 2 and 3, and also with other PACs.
- Level 2: Supervision control area. At this level, the supervision of the execution time and the operation of an area of the production facility are carried out using HMI, alert systems, batch-processing management systems, and the control of workstations. This level 2 communicates with PACs of level 1 and shares data with business systems and the applications of levels 4 and 5.
- Level 3: Manufacturing and control operations. This represents the highest level of the industrial automation and control system. This level includes the functions involved in managing workflows.
- Level 4: Business planning and site logistics. This level includes programming systems, material flow applications, manufacturing execution systems (MES), and information technology services (ITS).
- Level 5: Company. Residing at this level are the business resource management services, company-company through ERP and company-client through CRM for the PLM product, and BIM for the facility.
6. Discussion
7. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Trstenjak, M.; Cosic, P. Process Planning in Industry 4.0 Environment. Procedia Manuf. 2017, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bennett, N.; Lemoine, G.J. What a difference a word makes: Understanding threats to performance in a VUCA world. Bus. Horiz. 2014, 57, 311–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tao, F.; Cheng, Y.; Xu, L.D.; Zhang, L.; Li, B.H. CCIoT-CMfg: Cloud computing and internet of things-based cloud manufacturing service system. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2014, 10, 1435–1442. [Google Scholar]
- Pandit, D.; Joshi, M.P.; Sahay, A.; Gupta, R.K. Disruptive innovation and dynamic capabilities in emerging economies: Evidence from the Indian automotive sector. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2018, 129, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suárez Fernández-Miranda, S.; Marcos, M.; Peralta, M.E.; Aguayo, F. The challenge of integrating Industry 4.0 in the degree of Mechanical Engineering. Procedia Manuf. 2017, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, H.; Wan, J.; Zhang, C.; Tang, S.; Hua, Q.; Wang, Z. Industrial Big Data Analytics for Prediction of Remaining Useful Life Based on Deep Learning. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 17190–17197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plumanns, L.; Printz, S.; Vossen, R.; Jeschke, S. Strategic Management of Personnel Development in the Industry 4.0. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management & Organisational Learning: ICICKM 2017, Hong Kong, China, China, 7–8 December 2017; pp. 179–186. [Google Scholar]
- Tirabeni, L.; De Bernardi, P.; Forliano, C.; Franco, M. How Can Organisations and Business Models Lead to a More Sustainable Society? A Framework from a Systematic Review of the Industry 4.0. Sustainability 2019, 11, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tran, N.-H.; Park, H.-S.; Nguyen, Q.-V.; Hoang, T.-D. Development of a Smart Cyber-Physical Manufacturing System in the Industry 4.0 Context. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Vrchota, J.; Pech, M. Readiness of Enterprises in Czech Republic to Implement Industry 4.0: Index of Industry 4.0. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Romero, D.; Stahre, J.; Wuest, T.; Noran, O.; Bernus, P.; Fast-Berglund, Å.; Gorecky, D. Towards an Operator 4.0 Typology: A Human-Centric Perspective on the Fourth Industrial Revolution Technologies. In Proceedings of the 46th International Conference on Computers & Industrial Engineering, Tianjin, China, 29–31 October 2016; pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar]
- Romero, D.; Bernus, P.; Noran, O.; Stahre, J.; Berglund, Å.F. The operator 4.0: Human cyber-physical systems & adaptive automation towards human-automation symbiosis work systems. In Proceedings of the. IFIP International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems, Iguassu Falls, Brazil, 3–7 September 2016; Springer LLC: New York, NY, USA, 2016; Volume 488, pp. 677–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Taylor, M.P.; Boxall, P.; Chen, J.J.J.; Xu, X.; Liew, A.; Adenijib, A. Operator 4.0 or Maker 1.0? Exploring the implications of Industrie 4.0 for innovation, safety and quality of work in small economies and enterprises. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2020, 139, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Enke, J.; Glass, R.; Kreß, A.; Hambach, J.; Tisch, M.; Metternich, J. Industrie 4.0-Competencies for a modem production system A curriculum for Learning Factories. Procedia Manuf. 2018, 23, 267–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Emmanouilidis, C.; Pistofidis, P.; Bertoncelj, L.; Katsouros, V.; Fournaris, A.; Koulamas, C.; Ruiz-Carcel, C. Enabling the human in the loop: Linked data and knowledge in industrial cyber-physical systems. Annu. Rev. Control. 2019, 47, 249–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zakoldaev, D.A.; Gurjanov, A.V.; Shukalov, A.V.; Zharinov, I.O. Implementation of H2M technology and augmented reality for operation of cyber-physical production of the Industry 4.0. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2019, 1353, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Segura, A.; Diez, H.V.; Barandiaran, I.; Arbelaiz, A.; Álvarez, H.; Simões, B.; Posada, J.; García-Alonso, A.; Ugarte, R. Visual computing technologies to support the Operator 4.0. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2020, 139, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruppert, T.; Jaskó, S.; Holczinger, T.; Abonyi, A. Enabling Technologies for Operator 4.0: A Survey. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zolotová, I.; Papcun, P.; Kajáti, E.; Miškuf, M.; Mocnej, J. Smart and cognitive solutions for Operator 4.0: Laboratory H-CPPS case studies. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2020, 139, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fantini, P.; Pinzone, M.; Taisch, M. Placing the operator at the centre of Industry 4.0 design: Modelling and assessing human activities within cyber-physical systems. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2020, 139, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peruzzinia, M.; Fabio Grandia, M.P. Exploring the potential of Operator 4.0 interface and monitoring. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2020, 139, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Umeda, Y.; Takata, S.; Kimura, F.; Tomiyama, T.; Sutherland, J.W.; Kara, S.; Herrmann, C.; Duflou, J.R. Toward integrated product and process life cycle planning-An environmental perspective. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 2012, 61, 681–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, P.; Zhou, M.C. A life cycle engineering approach to development of flexible manufacturing systems. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom. 2003, 19, 465–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wanyama, W.; Ertas, A.; Zhang, H.C.; Ekwaro-Osire, S. Life-cycle engineering: Issues, tools and research. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2003, 16, 307–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Würtz, G.; Kölmel, B. Integrated Engineering—A SME-Suitable Model for Business and Information Systems Engineering (BISE) towards the Smart Factory. IFIP Adv. Inf. Commun. Technol. 2012, 380, 494–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mayer, P. Guidelines for writing a review article. Zurich-Basel Plant Sci. Cent. 2009, 82, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Coelho, D. A growing concept of ergonomics including pleasure. comfort and cognitive engineering: An engineering design perspective. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Galindo-Rueda, F.; Verger, F. OECD taxonomy of economic activities based on R&D intensity. OECD Publishing, Paris. OECD Sci. Technol. Ind. Work. Pap. 2016, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- National Science Board, N.S.F. Science and Engineering Indicators 2020: The State of U.S. Science and Engineering; NSB-2020-1; National Science Board, N.S.F.: Alexandria, VA, USA, 2020.
- Lee, J.; Bagheri, B.; Kao, H.A. A Cyber-Physical Systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manuf. Lett. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, J.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, B.; Zang, J. Human–Cyber–Physical Systems (HCPSs) in the Context of New-Generation Intelligent Manufacturing. Engineering 2019, 5, 624–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rødseth, H.; Eleftheriadis, R.; Lodgaard, E.; Fordal, J.M. Operator 4.0—Emerging job categories in manufacturing. Lect. Notes Electr. Eng. 2019, 484, 114–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krugh, M.; McGee, E.; McGee, S.; Mears, L.; Ivanco, A.; Podd, K.C.; Watkins, B. Measurement of Operator-machine Interaction on a Chaku-chaku Assembly Line. Procedia Manuf. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zamora, M.; Caldwell, E.; Garcia-Rodriguez, J.; Azorin-Lopez, J.; Cazorla, M. Machine Learning Improves Human-Robot Interaction in Productive Environments: A Review. In Proceedings of the International Work-Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, IWANN 2017, Cadiz, Spain, 14–16 June 2017; Proc. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes 812 Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics). Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2017; Volume 10306, pp. 283–293. [Google Scholar]
- Frynas, J.G.; Mol, M.J.; Mellahi, K. Management Innovation Made in China: Haier’s Rendanheyi. Calif. Manag. Rev. 2018, 61, 71–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shamim, S.; Cang, S.; Yu, H.; Li, Y. Management approaches for Industry 4.0: A human resource management perspective. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 24–29 July 2016; pp. 5309–5316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, Y.; Lin, D. Design an intelligent real-time operation planning system in distributed manufacturing network. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2017, 117, 742–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neuböck, T.; Schrefl, M. Modelling Knowledge about Data Analysis Processes in Manufacturing. In Proceedings of the IFAC Symposium on Information Control in Manufacturing Ottawa, ON, Canada, 11–13 May 2015; Volume 48, pp. 277–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanin, C.; Shafiq, I.; Waris, M.M.; Toro, C.; Szczerbicki, E. Manufacturing collective intelligence by the means of Decisional DNA and virtual engineering objects, process and factory. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2017, 32, 1585–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Lee, G.M.; Shu, L.; Crespi, N. Industrial Internet of Things-based collaborative sensing intelligence: Framework and research challenges. Sensors 2016, 16, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Synnes, E.L.; Welo, T. Enhancing Integrative Capabilities through Lean Product and Process Development. Procedia CIRP 2016, 54, 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Küsters, D.; Praß, N.; Gloy, Y.S. Textile Learning Factory 4.0-Preparing Germany’s Textile Industry for the Digital Future. Procedia Manuf. 2017, 9, 214–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehta, P.; Rao, P.; Wu, Z.D.; Jovanović, V.; Wodo, O.; Kuttolamadom, M. Smart manufacturing: State-of-The-Art reviewin context of conventional & modern manufacturing. In Proceedings of the ASME 2018 13th International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference, College Station, TX, USA, 18–22 June 2018; 2018; Volume 3, pp. 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Büth, L.; Juraschek, M.; Posselt, G.; Herrmann, C. Supporting SMEs towards adopting mixed reality A training concept to bring the reality-virtuality continuum into application. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 16th International Conference on Industrial Informatics, Porto, Portugal, 18–20 July 2018; pp. 544–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Govindarajan, U.H.; Trappey, A.J.C.; Trappey, C.V. Immersive Technology for Human-Centric Cyberphysical Systems in Complex ManufacturingProcesses: A Comprehensive Overview of the Global Patent Profile Using Collective Intelligence. Complexity 2018, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cimini, C.; Pinto, R.; Cavalieri, S. The business transformation towards smartmanufacturing: A literature overview about reference models and research agenda. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2017, 50, 14952–14957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stark, R.; Kind, S.; Neumeyer, S. Innovations in digital modelling for next generation manufacturing system design. CIRP Ann-Manuf. Technol. 2017, 66, 169–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, H.; Xue, L.; Wang, P.; Zeng, P.; Yu, H. Ontology-Based Web Service Integration for FlexibleManufacturing Systems. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 15th International Conference on Industrial Informatics, Emden, Germany, 24–26 July 2017; pp. 351–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klöber-Koch, J.; Pielmeier, J.; Grimm, S.; Brandt, M.M.; Schneider, M.; Reinhart, G. Knowledge-Based Decision Making in a Cyber-Physical Production Scenario. Procedia Manuf. 2017, 9, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, Q.; Tao, F. A Smart Manufacturing Service System Based on Edge Computing, Fog, Computing, and Cloud Computing. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 86769–86777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qu, S.; Wang, J.; Govil, S.; Leckie, J.O. Optimized Adaptive Scheduling of a Manufacturing Process System with Multi-Skill Workforce and Multiple Machine Types: An Ontology-Based, Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Approach. Procedia CIRP 2016, 57, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaensch, F.; Csiszar, A.; Scheifele, C.; Verl, A. Digital Twins of Manufacturing Systems as a Base for Machine Learning. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Mechatronics and Machine Vision in Practice (M2VIP), Stuttgart, Germany, 20–22 November 2018; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mortensen, S.T.; Madsen, O. A Virtual Commissioning Learning Platform. Procedia Manuf. 2018, 23, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaihara, T.; Katsumura, Y.; Suginishi, Y.; Kadar, B. Simulation model study for manufacturingeffectiveness evaluation in crowdsourcedmanufacturing. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 2017, 66, 445–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, P.; Leng, J. The Configuration of Social Manufacturing: A Social Intelligence Way Toward Service-Oriented. Int. J. Manuf. Res. 2016, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cachada, A.; Barbosa, J.; Leitão, P.; Gcraldcs, C.A.S.; Deusdado, L.; Costa, J.; Teixeira, J.; Moreira, A.H.J.; Miguel, P.; Romero, L.; et al. Maintenance 4.0: Intelligent and Predictive Maintenance System Architecture. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), Turin, Italy, 4–7 September 2018; pp. 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fisher, O.; Watson, N.; Porcu, L.; Baco, D.; Rigley, M.; Gomes, R.L. Cloud manufacturing as a sustainable process manufacturing route. J. Manuf. Syst. 2018, 47, 53–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Ren, S.; Liu, Y.; Si, S. A big data analytics architecture for cleaner manufacturing and maintenance processes of complex products. J. Clean. Prod. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Berg, L.P.; Vance, J.M. Industry use of virtual reality in product design and manufacturing: A survey. Virtual Real. 2017, 21, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pai, Y.S.; Yap, H.J.; Zawiah, S.; Dawal, S.Z.; Ramesh, S.; Phoon, S.Y. Virtual Planning, Control., and Machining for a Modular-Based Automated Factory Operation in an Augmented Reality Environment. Sci. Rep. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lawrence, K. Developing Leaders in a VUCA Environtment; UNC Kenan-Flagler Bussines School: Chapel Hill, NC, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Centea, D.; Elbestawi, M.; Singh, I.; Wanyama, T. SEPT Learning Factory Framework. In Smart Industry & Smart Education, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation, Duesseldorf, Germany, 21–23 March 2018; Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems; Auer, M., Langmann, R., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; Volume 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schallock, B.; Rybski, C.; Jochem, R.; Kohl, H. Learning Factory for Industry 4.0 to provide future skills beyond technical training. Procedia Manuf. 2018, 23, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baena, F.; Guarin, A.; Mora, J.; Sauza, J.; Retat, S. Learning Factory: The Path to Industry 4.0. Procedia Manuf. 2017, 9, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duin, H.; Gorldt, C.; Thoben, K.D.; Pawar, K. Learning In Ports With Serious Gaming. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), Funchal, Portugal, 27–29 June 2017; pp. 431–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papazoglou, M.P.; Andreou, A. Smart connected digital factories: Unleashing the power of industry 4.0 and the industrial internet. In Cloud Computing and Services Science; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2019; Volume 1073, pp. 77–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ashby, W.R. Requisite variety and its implications for the control of complex systems. In Facets of Systems Science; Part of the International Series in Systems Science and Systems Engineering; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1991; Volume 7, pp. 405–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Engeström, Y. Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Perspectives on Activity Theory; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1999; ISBN 0-521-43127-1. [Google Scholar]
- Foot, K.A. Cultural-Historical Activity Theory as Practical Theory: Illuminating the Development of a Conflict Monitoring Network. Publ. Commun. Theory 2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ashby, W.R. Variety, Constraint, and the Law of Requisite Variety; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017; ISBN 15327000. [Google Scholar]
- Clinton, G.; Lee, E.; Logan, R. Connectivism as a framework for creative productivity in instructional technology. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Athens, GA, USA, 6–8 July 2011; pp. 166–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodríguez, A.J.; Molero de Martins, D.M. Conectivismo como gestión del conocimiento. REDHECS Rev. Electrónica Humanidades, Educ. y Comun. Soc. 2009, 4, 73–85. [Google Scholar]
- Vitali, I.; Arquilla, V.; Tolino, U. A Design perspective for IoT products. A case study of the Design of a Smart Product and a Smart Company following a crowdfunding campaign. Des. J. 2017, 20, S2592–S2604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajnai, Z.; Kocsis, I. Labor Market Risks of Industry 4.0, Digitization, Robots and AI. In Proceedings of the IEEE 15th International Symposium on Intelligent Systems and Informatics (SISY), Subotica, Serbia, 14–16 September 2017; pp. 000343–000346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gualtieri, L.; Rojas, R.; Carabin, G.; Palomba, I.; Rauch, E.; Vidoni, R.; Matt, D.T. Advanced Automation for SMEs in the I4.0 Revolution: Engineering Education and Employees Training in the Smart Mini Factory Laboratory. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), Bangkok, Thailand, 16–19 December 2018; pp. 1111–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeganathan, L.; Khan, A.N.; Kannan Raju, J.; Narayanasamy, S. On a Frame Work of Curriculum for Engineering Education 4.0. In Proceedings of the 2018 World Engineering Education Forum-Global Engineering Deans Council (WEEF-GEDC), Albuquerque, NM, USA, 12–16 November 2018; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Tzafestas, S. Concerning human-automation symbiosis in the society and the nature. Int. J. Fact. Autom. Robot. Soft Comput. 2006, 1, 16–24. [Google Scholar]
- Norman, D.A. El Diseño de los Objetos del Futuro. La Interacción Entre el Hombre y la Máquina; Ediciones Paidós: Barcelona, Spain, 2010; ISBN 9788449323881. [Google Scholar]
- Engeström, Y. The future of activity theory. In Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2009; pp. 303–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Squires, J.E.; Estabrooks, C.A.; Gustavsson, P.; Wallin, L. Individual determinants of research utilization by nurses: A systematic review update. Implement. Sci. 2011, 6, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Allen, D.K.; Brown, A.; Karanasios, S.; Norman, A. How should technology-mediated organizational change be explained? A comparison of the contributions of critical realism and activity theory. MIS Quart. 2013, 37, 835–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hyysalo, S. Health Technology Development and Use: From Practice-Bound Imagination to Evolving Impacts; Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group: New York, NY, USA, 2010; ISBN 0-203-84915-9. [Google Scholar]
- Crawford, K.; Hasan, H. Demonstrations of the activity theory framework for research in information systems. Australas. J. Inf. Syst. 2006, 13, 49–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Engeström, Y. Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. J. Educ. Work 2001, 14, 133–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sannino, A.; Engestrom, Y. Cultural-historical activity theory: Founding insights and new challenges. Cult. Hist. Psychol. 2018, 14, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Henric-Coll, M. La Organización Fractal: El Futuro del Management; Fractal Teams: Navarra, Spain, 2014; ISBN 978-8461696628. [Google Scholar]
- Jarzabkowski, P. Strategic practices: An activity theory perspective on continuity and change. J. Manag. Stud. 2003, 40, 23–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuutti, K. Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1995; pp. 17–44. [Google Scholar]
- Wilson, T.D. Activity theory and information seeking. Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2009, 42, 119–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Issroff, K.; Scanlon, E. Using technology in higher education: An activity theory perspective. J. Comput. Assist. Learn 2002, 18, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benson, A.; Lawler, C.; Whitworth, A. Rules, roles and tools: Activity theory and the comparative study of e-learning. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 2008, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barab, S.; Schatz, S.; Scheckler, R. Using activity theory to conceptualize online community and using online community to conceptualize activity theory. Mind Cult. Act. 2004, 11, 25–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brine, J.; Franken, M. Students’ perceptions of a selected aspect of a computer mediated academic writing program: An activity theory analysis. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 2006, 22, 21–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Blin, F. CALL and the development of learner autonomy: Towards an activity-theoretical perspective. ReCALL Camb. Univ. 2004, 16, 377–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdullah, Z. Activity Theory as Analytical Tool: A Case Study of Developing Student Teachers’ Creativity in Design. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014, 131, 70–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hannah, J.; Hinson, L. Development of Propositions on Human Cognitive Abilities Matching Impacts on Accounting Job Performance. UF J. Undergrad. Res. 2019, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Beard-Gunter, A.; Ellis, D.G.; Found, P.A. TQM, games design and the implications of integration in industry 4.0 systems. Int. J. Qual. Serv. Sci. 2019, 11, 235–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodríguez, R.L. La Gestión del Tiempo Personal y Colectivo; Graó: Barcelona, Spain, 2010; ISBN 978-84-9980-406-4. [Google Scholar]
- Arenas, T.; Martínez, M.Á.; Honggang, X.; Morales, O.; Chávez, M. Integrating VSM and Network Analysis for Tourism Strategies–Case: Mexico and the Chinese Outbound Market. Syst. Pract. Action Res. 2019, 32, 315–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hancock, P.A.; Jagacinski, R.J.; Parasuraman, R.; Wickens, C.D.; Wilson, G.F.; Kaber, D.B. Human-automation interaction research: Past, present and future. Ergon. Des. Q. Hum. Factors Appl. 2013, 21, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sun, S.; Zheng, X.; Gong, B.; García, J.; Ordieres-Meré, J. Healthy Operator 4.0: A Human Cyber–Physical System Architecture for SmartWorkplaces. Sensors 2020, 20, 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Carrol, J. Human Cognitive Abilities: A Survey of Factor-Analytic Studies; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1993; ISBN 9780511571312. [Google Scholar]
- Jordan, P.W. Designing Pleasurable Products: An Introduction to the New Human Factors; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2000; ISBN 9780203305683. [Google Scholar]
- Saritas, M.T. The Emergent Technological and Theoretical Paradigsn in Education: The Interrelations of Cloud Computing (CC), Conectivism and Internet of things (IoT). Proc. Acta Polytech. Hungarica 2015, 12, 161–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Downes, S. Connectivism and Connective Knowledge: Essays on Meaning and Learning Networks; National Research Council Canada: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2012; ISBN 9781105778469.
- Salmon, G.; Siemens, G.; Ally, M. A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. Instr. Technol. Distance Educ. 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Menary, R. The Extended Mind. In A Bradford Book; The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2010; ISBN 978-0-262-01403-8. [Google Scholar]
- Patel, P.; Ali, M.I.; Sheth, A. From Raw Data to Smart Manufacturing: AI and Semantic Web of Things for Industry 4.0. IEEE Intell. Syst. 2018, 33, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, Y.-J.; Chen, M.-H.; Cheng, F.-C.; Cheng, Y.-C.; Lin, Y.-S.; Yang, C.-J. Developing a Decision Support System (DSS) for a Dental Manufacturing Production Line based on Data Mining. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Applied System Invention (ICASI), Tokyo, Japan, 13–17 April 2018; pp. 638–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, S.; Ouyang, J.; Li, D.; Liu, C. An Integrated Industrial Ethernet Solution for the Implementation of Smart Factory. IEEE Access 2017, 5, 25455–25462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cagnin, R.L.; Guilherme, I.R.; Queiroz, J.; Paulo, B.; Neto, M.F.O. A Multi-agent System Approach for Management of Industrial IoT Devices in Manufacturing Processes. In Proceedings of the INDIN 2018: IEEE 16th International Conference on Industrial Informatics, Porto, Portugal, 18–20 July 2018; pp. 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Madsen, O.; Møller, C. The AAU Smart Production Laboratory for Teaching and Research in Emerging Digital Manufacturing Technologies. Procedia Manuf. 2017, 9, 106–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lampón, J.F.; Cabanelas, P.; González-Benito, J. The impact of modular platforms on automobile manufacturing networks. Prod. Plan. Control. 2017, 28, 335–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Commission. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. In Defining Innovation. Report of the independent High. Level Group on Industrial Technologies; Directorate D–Industrial Technologies: Luxembourg, 2018; ISBN 978-92-79-85271-8. [Google Scholar]
- Ryu, K.; Jung, M. Agent-based fractal architecture and modeling for developing distributed manufacturing systems. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2003, 41, 4233–4255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.; Jin, C.; Bagheri, B. Cyber physical systems for predictive production systems. Prod. Eng. Res. Dev. 2017, 11, 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, D.; Ren, A.; Zhang, W.; Fan, F.; Liu, P.; Fu, X.; Terpenny, J. Cybersecurity for digital manufacturing. J. Manuf. Syst. 2018, 48, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suaily, S.; Zubaidah, S. Development of Product Service System Modelling in SMED: The Case of Inventory Control. J. Mod. Manuf. Syst. Technol. 2018, 1, 94–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shin, M.; Mun, J.; Jung, M. Self-evolution framework of manufacturing systems based on fractal organization. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiltshire, T.; Fiore, S.M. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience in Human-Machine Systems: A Roadmap for Improving Trainig, Human-Robot Interaction and Team Performance. IEEE Trans. Human Mach. Syst. 2014, 44, 779–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Warneke, H.-J. The Fractal Company: A Revolution in Corporate Culture; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1993; ISBN 978-3-642-78126-1. [Google Scholar]
- Ávila-Gutiérrez, M.J.; Aguayo-González, F.; Marcos-Bárcena, M.; Lama-Ruiz, J.R.P.-Á. Reference holonic architecture for sustainable manufacturing enterprises distributed. DYNA 2017, 84, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hübner, I. RAMI 4.0 und die Industrie-4.0-Komponente. Open Autom. 2015, 24–29. [Google Scholar]
- Yao, X.; Lin, Y. Emerging manufacturing paradigm shifts for the incoming industrial revolution. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johannessen, J.-A. Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning. In Knowledge Management as a Strategic Asset; Emerald Publishing: Bingley, UK, 2018; ISBN 978-1-4419-0007-4. [Google Scholar]
- Li, H.; Williams, T.J. Interface design for the Purdue enterprise reference architecture (PERA) and methodology in e-Work. Prod. Plan. Control. 2003, 14, 704–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, T. The Purdue Enterprise Reference Architecture and Methodology (PERA); Kluwer Academic: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1998; ISBN 412812509. [Google Scholar]
- Odewale, A. Implementing secure architecture for industrial control systems. In Proceedings of the 27th COREN Engineering Assembly, Abuja, Nigera, 6–8 August 2018; p. 17. [Google Scholar]
- Plósz, S.; Hegedűs, C.; Varga, P. Advanced security considerations in the arrowhead framework. In Proceedings of the Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Trondheim, Norway, 20–23 September 2016; Springer Science and Business Media LLC: Berlin, Germany; Volume 9923, pp. 234–245. [Google Scholar]
- Larrinaga, F.; Aldalur, I.; Illarramendi, M.; Iturbe, M.; Perez, T.; Unamuno, G.; Lazkanoiturburu, I. Analysis of technological architectures for the new paradigm of the Industry 4.0. Dyna 2019, 94, 267–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Adaptative Manufacturing | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D1 | D2 | D3 | D4 | D5 | D6 | |
[8] | ✘ | - | ✓ | ✘ | - | ✓ |
[9] | - | ✓ | - | ✘ | ✓ | ✘ |
[10] | ✘ | ✓ | - | ✘ | - | - |
[11] | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | - | - | - |
[12] | ✘ | - | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ✘ |
[13] | ✘ | ✓ | - | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ |
[14] | ✘ | - | - | ✘ | ✘ | ✓ |
[15] | ✘ | - | - | - | - | ✘ |
[16] | ✘ | - | ✘ | - | ✘ | ✘ |
[17] | ✘ | ✓ | - | ✓ | ✘ | ✘ |
[18] | ✘ | - | ✘ | ✓ | - | ✓ |
[19] | ✘ | - | ✘ | ✓ | - | ✘ |
[20] | ✘ | ✓ | - | ✘ | - | ✘ |
[21] | ✘ | - | ✘ | - | ✓ | ✘ |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Suarez-Fernandez de Miranda, S.; Aguayo-González, F.; Salguero-Gómez, J.; Ávila-Gutiérrez, M.J. Life Cycle Engineering 4.0: A Proposal to Conceive Manufacturing Systems for Industry 4.0 Centred on the Human Factor (DfHFinI4.0). Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 4442. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10134442
Suarez-Fernandez de Miranda S, Aguayo-González F, Salguero-Gómez J, Ávila-Gutiérrez MJ. Life Cycle Engineering 4.0: A Proposal to Conceive Manufacturing Systems for Industry 4.0 Centred on the Human Factor (DfHFinI4.0). Applied Sciences. 2020; 10(13):4442. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10134442
Chicago/Turabian StyleSuarez-Fernandez de Miranda, Susana, Francisco Aguayo-González, Jorge Salguero-Gómez, and María Jesús Ávila-Gutiérrez. 2020. "Life Cycle Engineering 4.0: A Proposal to Conceive Manufacturing Systems for Industry 4.0 Centred on the Human Factor (DfHFinI4.0)" Applied Sciences 10, no. 13: 4442. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10134442
APA StyleSuarez-Fernandez de Miranda, S., Aguayo-González, F., Salguero-Gómez, J., & Ávila-Gutiérrez, M. J. (2020). Life Cycle Engineering 4.0: A Proposal to Conceive Manufacturing Systems for Industry 4.0 Centred on the Human Factor (DfHFinI4.0). Applied Sciences, 10(13), 4442. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10134442