Next Article in Journal
A Steering-Following Dynamic Model with Driver’s NMS Characteristic for Human-Vehicle Shared Control
Next Article in Special Issue
A Displacement Measuring Interferometer Based on a Frequency-Locked Laser Diode with High Modulation Frequency
Previous Article in Journal
An Evidence Basis for Future Equestrian Helmet Lateral Crush Certification Tests
Previous Article in Special Issue
Microscope 3D Point Spread Function Evaluation Method on a Confirmed Object Plane Perpendicular to the Optical Axis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Optical Design of a Miniaturized Airborne Push-Broom Spectrometer

1
School of Opto-Electronic Engineering, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Changchun 130022, China
2
Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130033, China
3
Research and development center, Zhejiang Sunyu Optics Co. Ltd., Yuyao 315400, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(7), 2627; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10072627
Submission received: 23 February 2020 / Revised: 1 April 2020 / Accepted: 7 April 2020 / Published: 10 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Collection Optical Design and Engineering)

Abstract

:
Combining the requirements of spectrometers for unmanned aerial vehicle platforms, a miniaturized airborne wide-angle push-broom imaging spectrometer with an Offner configuration is designed. The system comprises an objective lens and an Offner-type spectrometer with a spectral range of 400~1000 nm and a spectral resolution of 15 nm. The objective lens and Offner spectrometer are designed in isolation before integration. The front objective lens is an inverted telephoto with a focal length of 13 mm, a relative aperture of 1/4.5, and a field of view of 54°. The frequency of the convex grating in the Offner configuration is 102 LP/mm, and the dispersion width is 2.6 mm. The modulation transfer function of the integrated system is greater than 0.4 at the Nyquist frequency in all spectral bands. To estimate the volume and weight of the system, a preliminary optical–mechanical design scheme is given in this paper. The entire spectrometer has a volume of 130 × 80 × 120 mm and is less than 3 kg, which realizes the miniaturization design of the imaging spectrometer with a wide field of view for unmanned aerial vehicle platforms.

1. Introduction

The spectrometer appeared in the late 1970s and it is a breakthrough in the remote sensing field [1]. Since its birth, it has been favored for its wide application range, which includes military reconnaissance, surveys of agriculture, forestry monitoring, and mineral resource exploration [2,3,4,5]. With the rapid development of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and small satellite technology, the demand for miniaturized spectrometers has become increasingly intense [6,7,8,9,10]. We have investigated some typical small commercial spectrometers suitable for UAVs. For example, the AFX10 of Specim Spectral Imaging Ltd. for visible and near-infrared (VNIR) bands, which has a spectral resolution of 5.5 nm, a field of view (FOV) of 38°, a volume of 131 × 152 × 202 mm, and a weight of 2.5 kg. Hyspex’s VNIR-1800 has a spectral resolution of 3.26 nm, an FOV of 17°, a volume of 390 × 99 × 150 mm, and a weight of 5 kg. A spectrometer with a wide FOV has a larger imaging width, which could improve the efficiency of the push-broom. The spectral resolution of these commercial spectrometers is already very high, but the FOV and miniaturization design still need to be improved to meet different application needs.
The traditional spectrometer with grating or a prism has the disadvantage of spectral line curvature. The Offner spectrometers have been widely developed for their miniaturization with better image quality and spectral resolution, which consist of three spherical concentric elements (a convex grating and two concave mirrors) that simultaneously achieve aberration correction and spectral separation. The Offner spectrometer not only realizes a long slit length and a low f-number with a miniaturized structure, but also solves the problems of “smile” and “keystone” distortions [11,12,13,14,15,16,17].
According to the application requirements, combined with the development status of the airborne push-broom spectrometers, a miniaturized Offner-type spectrometer with a wide FOV, which can be integrated into a UAV platform or other aircraft, is designed in this paper. The objective lens and Offner spectrometer are designed in isolation before integration based on the calculation of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). A preliminary optical–mechanical design scheme is also discussed in this paper.

2. System Specification

2.1. Specifications of the Spectrometer

Our project uses the F-40 fixed-wing surveying and mapping UAV of Easy Fly Ltd. The maximum mission payload of the F-40 UAV is 6 kg, the maximum flight speed is 100 km/h, and the maximum flight altitude is 3.5 km. The positioning and orientation system uses PPOI-A28 from Leador Company, which adopts a customized integrated structure with a volume of 150 × 140 × 120 mm and a weight less than 2.5 kg. Based on the project requirements and the UAV platform, the specifications of the spectrometer were determined and are shown in Table 1. A wide FOV, a broad spectral range, and miniaturization should be achieved simultaneously.

2.2. Optical System Parameters

The optical system is an important part of the spectrometer, as it determines the performance and weight of the spectrometer. The main parameters of the optical system include focal length ( f ), FOV, relative aperture (1/F), and dispersion width of the slit image (d). The FOV angle of the optical system is calculated to be 53.2° according to the coverage width and flight altitude.

2.2.1. Sensor Selection and Frame Rate

The image sensor is the core component of an airborne spectrometer. After researching existing commercial products, we selected the GSENSE2011 CMOS of Gpixel. Its specific parameters are shown in Table 2.
According to the spectrometer’s instantaneous field of view (iFOV), flight speed (v), and flying altitude (H), the frame frequency of the sensor (fps) can be calculated, and its expression is as follows:
1 f p s = i F O V H v .
According to the spatial resolution (0.5 m@1 km) in Table 1, the iFOV is 0.5 mrad. When the aircraft’s altitude is 1 km and the speed is 100 km/h, the fps should be 56 frames, and the corresponding integration time is 0.018 s.

2.2.2. Focal Length

The focal length (f ′) of the optical system is related to the sensor’s pixel size (p), the Ground Sample Distance (GSD), and the flying altitude (H), as shown in Equation (2):
f = H p G S D .
After calculation, the focal length is 13 mm when the altitude is 1 km.

2.2.3. Relative Aperture

The relative aperture mainly affects the SNR of the spectrometer. The larger the relative aperture is, the higher the SNR of the image is, which is beneficial to obtain high-quality spectral data. However, the aberration is difficult to correct, and the volume and weight are also increased. A small relative aperture will result in a decreased energy in the image and a small SNR. Combining the existing spectrometer, the relative aperture of the front objective lens is determined to be 1/4.5 according to the SNR estimation and the optical design analysis.

2.2.4. Dispersion Width of the Slit

A wide dispersion width facilitates an increase in spectral resolution, but the dispersion of energy also reduces the SNR. Although a narrow dispersion width is advantageous for improving the SNR, the positioning accuracy of the secondary spectral filter is required to be much higher. Therefore, the dispersion width of the slit depends on the specifications of the sensor, spectral range, spectral resolution, and SNR.
From Table 1, the spectral resolution of the spectrometer is 15 nm, and the spectral range is 400~1000 nm, which could be divided into 40 channels. For spectral detection, one channel could be extended to 10 rows of pixels, that is, the slit image is expanded to 400 pixels. The dispersion width of the slit (d) could be calculated by:
d = N × c × p
where N is the number of spectral channels and c is the number of pixel rows in each channel. According to Table 2, d is 2.6 mm.

3. SNR Calculation

3.1. SNR

The SNR of the spectrometer directly affects the subsequent imaging effects. The SNR equation of an optical imaging remote sensor is as follows:
S N R = S e N e = S e S e + ( n σ R ) 2 + n D e
where S e is the number of signal electrons; σ R is the dark noise; D e is the dark current noise; and n is a coefficient, which is equal to 10 in this paper because 10 rows of pixels are combined in the output of the operating spectrometer.

3.2. Signal Electron Number

The number of signal electrons generated per unit wavelength can be calculated by:
S e ( λ ) = π λ A d L ( λ ) τ o ( λ ) D E t int η ( λ ) Δ λ 4 F 2 h c
where λ is the wavelength value; A d is the pixel area of the sensor; L ( λ ) is the spectral radiance of the entrance pupil; τ o ( λ ) is the transmittance of the optical system; DE is the diffraction efficiency of the grating; t int is the integral time, which is estimated to be 80% of the integral time calculated from Equation (1); η ( λ ) is the quantum efficiency (QE) of the sensor; Δ λ is the interval of spectral sampling; F is the f- number of the optical system; h is the Planck constant (6.626176 × 10−34 J⋅s); and c is the speed of light in a vacuum [18,19].
The spectral radiance of the entrance pupil was calculated by Modtran software, and the calculation conditions were:
  • Altitude: 1 km;
  • Solar zenith angle: 30°;
  • Ground albedo: 30% (a commonly used remote sensing condition);
  • Atmospheric model: Mid-latitude summer;
  • Boundary temperature (T): 300 K; and
  • Aerosol model: Rural aerosol, visibility 23 km.
The spectral radiance curve of the entrance pupil for 0.4~1.0 μm calculated by Modtran is shown in Figure 1.
The diffraction efficiency (DE) of the grating is shown in Figure 2, which is the measured data from grating manufacturers. The quantum efficiency (QE) of the sensor is shown in Figure 3.
The other values of Equation (5) are shown in Table 3.

3.3. Calculation Results

By substituting all parameters into Equation (4), the SNR of the full band can be obtained. As shown in Figure 4, the average SNR is 138, and the maximum SNR is 216 at 0.61 μm. This meets the SNR requirement of the spectrometer shown in Table 1.

4. Objective Lens Design

After analysis and calculation, the optical parameters of the objective lens are determined as shown in Table 4.
The front objective lens is a wide-angle, broad-spectrum optical system. A telecentric optical system should be used to achieve pupil matching with an Offner spectrometer [20]. The optional objective lenses include double Gauss objective, inverted telephoto objective, and fisheye lenses. The double Gauss objective lens is a large-aperture, wide FOV optical system, but it is difficult to achieve image telecentricity with it. Fisheye lenses can achieve very large FOVs, but the distortion is difficult to eliminate. The inverted telephoto objective lens has a certain ability to eliminate distortion. By complicating the front group of the inverted telephoto objective lens, the FOV can be enlarged, and the image telecentricity can be formed by using a field lens in front of the focus. Finally, an inverted telephoto is adopted with good corrections for aberrations, especially chromatic aberrations. The final design result of the front objective lens is shown in Figure 5, which consists of 10 spherical lenses. The total length and back focal length are 85 and 11.7 mm, respectively. Figure 6 shows the modulation transfer function (MTF) of the optimized front objective lens at 77 LP/mm, and the MTFs of all bands are greater than 0.32.
The field curvature and distortion of the system are shown in Figure 7, and the maximum relative distortion is less than 1.2%. The relative illumination is shown in Figure 8, and we can see that the illumination of the edge FOV is about 70% of the center FOV.

5. Design of the Offner Spectrometer

The Offner spectrometer is a concentric three-reflection optical system, which was developed from a reflective Offner relay optical system. The Offner spectrometer with convex spherical grating consists of three mirrors, and the second mirror is a convex spherical grating. It has a small volume and negligible spectral “smile” and “keystone” distortions. Therefore, this design adopts the Offner configuration with convex spherical grating. The specific parameters of the Offner spectrometer are shown in Table 5.
The designed Offner spectrometer is shown in Figure 9. The first mirror has the same radius of curvature as the third mirror, and the second mirror is a convex spherical grating, whose frequency is 102 LP/mm. Since the grating is used as the dispersive element, there is interference with the second-order diffracted light, and a cut-off filter should be used to avoid interference.
The MTFs of the Offner spectrometer at different wavelengths (400 nm, 600 nm, 800 nm, and 1000 nm) are shown in Figure 10. It can be seen that the MTFs in all spectral bands are greater than 0.45, which is close to the diffraction limit.
For spectrometers, the dispersion image of the slit will cause spectral “smile” and “keystone” distortions. The “smile” distortion (sometimes called spectral line curvature or slit curvature), which refers to a curvature of the monochromatic image of the slit in the spectral dimension, leads to the misregistration of the sensor pixels across the FOV of the spectrometer in the spectral dimension. On the other hand, the “keystone” distortion, which refers to variations in the slit magnification with the wavelength, leads to interband spatial misregistration in the spectral dimension [1]. After optimization, the maximum “keystone” distortion and spectral line curvature are 8 and 19 μm, respectively, which could be improved by spectral calibration.

6. Integrated System and Image Quality Evaluation

6.1. Integrated System

The front objective lens and the Offner spectrometer are combined as shown in Figure 11. The overall optical system has a volume of 120 × 50 × 90 mm.

6.2. Image Quality Evaluation

The MTFs of the combined system are shown in Figure 12. We can see that the MTFs at the Nyquist frequency are all greater than 0.4.

7. Optical–Mechanical Design

In order to adapt to the UAV platform, the spectrometer requires a compact structure, strong rigidity, and high thermal stability. From Table 1, the total weight of the spectrometer needs to be less than 3 kg, so we give a preliminary optical–mechanical design scheme in this paper. All the lenses in the objective are assembled into two lens barrels, and the Offner spectrometer is in a frame structure. To improve the environmental adaptability, all structural parts can be made of aluminum alloy, while the optical components of the spectrometer, such as mirrors and grating, are made of aluminum-based materials. This design takes this approach to the selection of the mechanical and optical materials.

7.1. Optical–Mechanical Design of the Objective Lens

The objective lens consists of 10 lenses, a plane mirror, and a slit. When designing the optical–mechanical structure, all components are installed in two lens barrels, as shown in Figure 13. Lens barrel 1 contains four lenses, lens barrel 2 contains six lenses, and the distance between the lenses is guaranteed by spacers.

7.2. Optical–Mechanical Design for the Combined System

The Offner spectrometer comprises a concave mirror, a convex grating, and a sensor. All of the elements are assembled in a frame structure that is connected to the objective lens with an L-shaped bent plate, as shown in Figure 14. The total weight of the system is approximately 2.9 kg with a volume smaller than 130 × 80 × 120 mm, which meets the technical requirements.

8. Conclusions

Based on the parameters of the UAV platform in Section 2.1 and the small commercial spectrometers in Section 1, a miniaturized wide-angle airborne imaging spectrometer was designed with a spectral range of 400~1000 nm and spectral resolution of 15 nm. The optical system parameters were calculated based on the spectrometer specifications, and the SNR of the system was also analyzed. The front inverted telephoto objective lens and Offner spectrometer of the airborne push-broom spectrometer were completed with good performance. The objective’s full FOV is 54° with a relative aperture of 1/4.5. The grating frequency in the Offner spectrometer is 102 LP/mm, the slit length is 13.5 mm, and the dispersion width is 2.6 mm. The MTF of the integrated system is greater than 0.4 at the Nyquist frequency in the spectral range, and the maximum “keystone” and spectral “smile” are 8 μm and 19 μm, respectively. To estimate the volume and weight of the spectrometer, a preliminary optical–mechanical design was also developed. The entire spectrometer has a volume of 130 × 80 × 120 mm, and the weight is less than 3 kg. The results show that the spectrometer is compact with a wide FOV, which meets the needs of UAV platforms for miniaturized spectrometers in our engineering project.

Author Contributions

Funding acquisition, Y.F.; Investigation, Y.W.; Methodology, Z.G.; Software, X.M.; Writing—original draft, Y.W.; Writing—review & editing, Y.W., Z.G., and L.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Excellent Young Talent Fund of the Department of Science and Technology of Jilin Province, grant number 20190103046JH.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Yuan, L.; Xie, J.; He, Z.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J. Optical design and evaluation of airborne prism-grating imaging spectrometer. Opt. Express 2019, 27, 17686–17700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Goetz, A.F. Three decades of hyperspectral remote sensing of the Earth: A personal view. Remote Sens. Environ. 2009, 113, S5–S16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mouroulis, P.Z.; Sellar, R.G.; Wilson, D.W.; Shea, J.J.; Green, R.O. Optical design of a compact imaging spectrometer for planetary mineralogy. Opt. Eng. 2007, 46, 063001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kumar, K.A.; Thapa, N.; Kuriakose, S.A. Advances in spaceborne hyperspectral imaging systems. Curr. Sci. 2015, 108, 826. [Google Scholar]
  5. Mouroulis, P.; Green, R.O. Review of high fidelity imaging spectrometer design for remote sensing. Opt. Eng. 2018, 57, 040901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Bender, H.A.; Mouroulis, P.Z.; Green, R.O.; Wilson, D.W. Optical design, performance, and tolerancing of next-generation airborne imaging spectrometers. Proc. SPIE 2010, 7812, 181–189. [Google Scholar]
  7. Warren, C.P.; Even, D.; Pfister, W.; Nakanishi, K.; Velasco, A.; Breitwieser, D.; Yee, S.; Naungayan, J. Miniaturized visible near-infrared hyperspectral imager for remote-sensing applications. Opt. Eng. 2012, 51, 111720–111721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Baohua, W.; Ningjuan, R.; Chongling, G.; Yuanyuan, W.; Xiaoming, Z. Optical System Design of Airborne Light and Compact High Resolution Imaging Spectrometer. Acta Opt. Sin. 2015, 35, 1022001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liyin, Y.; Jianan, X.; Jia, H.; Gang, L. Optical design of compact infrared imaging spectrometer. Infrared Laser Eng. 2018, 47, 418001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sigernes, F.; Fortuna, J.; Grøtte, M.E.; Syrjäsuo, M.; Storvold, R.; Johansen, T.A. Do it yourself hyperspectral imager for handheld to airborne operations. Opt. Express 2018, 26, 6021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Kwo, D.; Lawrence, G.; Chrisp, M. Design of A Grating Spectrometer From A 1:1 Offner Mirror System. Proc. SPIE 1987, 818, 275–281. [Google Scholar]
  12. Lobb, D.R. Theory of concentric designs for grating spectrometers. Appl. Opt. 1994, 33, 2648–2658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lobb, D.R. Imaging spectrometers using concentric optics. Proc. SPIE 1997, 3118, 339–347. [Google Scholar]
  14. Mouroulis, P.; Wilson, D.W.; Maker, P.D.; Muller, R.E. Convex grating types for concentric imaging spectrometers. Appl. Opt. 1998, 37, 7200–7208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Prietoblanco, X.; Monteroorille, C.; Couce, B.; La Fuente, R.D. Analytical design of an Offner imaging spectrometer. Opt. Express 2006, 14, 9156–9168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Kim, S.H.; Kong, H.J.; Lee, J.U.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, J.H. Design and construction of an Offner spectrometer based on geometrical analysis of ring fields. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2014, 85, 083108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Zhu, J.; Shen, W. Analytical design of athermal ultra-compact concentric catadioptric imaging spectrometer. Opt. Express 2019, 27, 31094–31109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Sellar, R.G.; Boreman, G.D.; Kirkland, L.E. Comparison of signal collection abilities of different classes of imaging spectrometers. Proc. SPIE 2002, 4816, 389–396. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sellar, R.G.; Boreman, G.D. Comparison of relative signal-to-noise ratios of different classes of imaging spectrometer. Appl. Optics 2005, 44, 1614–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Fisher, J.; Welch, W.C. Survey and analysis of fore-optics for hyperspectral imaging systems. Proc. SPIE 2006, 6206, 62062R. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The spectral radiance curve of the entrance pupil.
Figure 1. The spectral radiance curve of the entrance pupil.
Applsci 10 02627 g001
Figure 2. The diffraction efficiency of the grating.
Figure 2. The diffraction efficiency of the grating.
Applsci 10 02627 g002
Figure 3. The quantum efficiency of the CMOS.
Figure 3. The quantum efficiency of the CMOS.
Applsci 10 02627 g003
Figure 4. The SNR of the spectrometer in the spectral range of 0.4~1.0 μm.
Figure 4. The SNR of the spectrometer in the spectral range of 0.4~1.0 μm.
Applsci 10 02627 g004
Figure 5. The layout of the objective lens.
Figure 5. The layout of the objective lens.
Applsci 10 02627 g005
Figure 6. Modulation transfer function (MTF) of the front objective lens for (a) 400 nm, (b) 600 nm, (c) 800 nm, and (d) 1000 nm.
Figure 6. Modulation transfer function (MTF) of the front objective lens for (a) 400 nm, (b) 600 nm, (c) 800 nm, and (d) 1000 nm.
Applsci 10 02627 g006
Figure 7. The field curvature and distortion of the objective lens.
Figure 7. The field curvature and distortion of the objective lens.
Applsci 10 02627 g007
Figure 8. The relative illumination of the objective lens.
Figure 8. The relative illumination of the objective lens.
Applsci 10 02627 g008
Figure 9. Configuration of the Offner spectrometer.
Figure 9. Configuration of the Offner spectrometer.
Applsci 10 02627 g009
Figure 10. MTF of the Offner spectrometer (a) 400 nm; (b) 600 nm; (c) 800 nm; (d) 1000 nm.
Figure 10. MTF of the Offner spectrometer (a) 400 nm; (b) 600 nm; (c) 800 nm; (d) 1000 nm.
Applsci 10 02627 g010
Figure 11. Integrated configuration of the spectrometer.
Figure 11. Integrated configuration of the spectrometer.
Applsci 10 02627 g011
Figure 12. MTF of the integrated system (a) 400 nm; (b) 600 nm; (c) 800 nm; (d) 1000 nm.
Figure 12. MTF of the integrated system (a) 400 nm; (b) 600 nm; (c) 800 nm; (d) 1000 nm.
Applsci 10 02627 g012
Figure 13. Optical–mechanical structure of the objective lens.
Figure 13. Optical–mechanical structure of the objective lens.
Applsci 10 02627 g013
Figure 14. Integrated layout of the spectrometer.
Figure 14. Integrated layout of the spectrometer.
Applsci 10 02627 g014
Table 1. Specifications of the spectrometer. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is meaningful only at a given reference radiance, which is provided by the application.
Table 1. Specifications of the spectrometer. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is meaningful only at a given reference radiance, which is provided by the application.
Spectral RangeSpectral ResolutionSpatial ResolutionCoverage WidthTotal WeightSNR
0.4~1.0 μm15 nm0.5 m@1 km1 km@1 km<3 kg≥100
Table 2. The parameters of GSENSE2011 CMOS.
Table 2. The parameters of GSENSE2011 CMOS.
ParametersValue
Pixel number2048 × 1152
Pixel size (μm)6.5 × 6.5
Dark Noise ( e )<6
Dark Current ( e / p / s )<1
Maximum frame rate (fps)167
Table 3. Relative parameter values for Equation (5).
Table 3. Relative parameter values for Equation (5).
ParametersValue
A d 4.225 × 10−11 m2
τ o ( λ ) 0.85
t int 0.014 s
Δ λ 15 nm
F4.5
Table 4. Optical parameters of the objective.
Table 4. Optical parameters of the objective.
ParametersValue
Focal length13 mm
Relative aperture1/4.5
FOV54°
Spectral range400~1000 nm
Table 5. Offner spectrometer parameter index.
Table 5. Offner spectrometer parameter index.
ParametersValue
Working wavelength (nm)400~1000
Slit length (mm)13.5
Slit image dispersion width (mm)2.6
Object space NA0.11

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Gu, Z.; Meng, X.; Zhang, L.; Fu, Y. Optical Design of a Miniaturized Airborne Push-Broom Spectrometer. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 2627. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10072627

AMA Style

Wang Y, Gu Z, Meng X, Zhang L, Fu Y. Optical Design of a Miniaturized Airborne Push-Broom Spectrometer. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10(7):2627. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10072627

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yang, Zhiyuan Gu, Xiangyue Meng, Lei Zhang, and Yuegang Fu. 2020. "Optical Design of a Miniaturized Airborne Push-Broom Spectrometer" Applied Sciences 10, no. 7: 2627. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10072627

APA Style

Wang, Y., Gu, Z., Meng, X., Zhang, L., & Fu, Y. (2020). Optical Design of a Miniaturized Airborne Push-Broom Spectrometer. Applied Sciences, 10(7), 2627. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10072627

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop